Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248719

Potential of organizing unmarried adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for a better transition to adulthood: Findings from a cross-sectional study in India

Jaleel Ahmad 1,*,#, Avishek Hazra 1,#, Kumudha Aruldas 2, Arima Singh 3, Niranjan Saggurti 1
Editor: Joseph Telfair4
PMCID: PMC7971707  PMID: 33735288

Abstract

It is essential to equip adolescents with the right information and appropriate skills for a quality transition to their adulthood. This study examines the individual agency of unmarried adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) who were organized into self-help groups (SHG) as compared to those who were not in groups. The paper uses data from a cross-sectional survey conducted with 872 unmarried AGYW aged 15–21 years from 80 villages across two districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. The dependent variables were AGYW’s financial independence, collective action, decisionmaking, mobility, self-expression, generalized perceived self-efficacy, gender norms attitudes, and attitudes toward violence. The primary independent variables were group membership and the duration of the membership. Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between group membership and various components of individual agency. More than half of the respondents, with an average age of 18 years were enrolled in school or college and one-third had 12 or more years of education. The group members, compared to non-members, were significantly more likely to be financially independent (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, p<0.01), to take collective action for entitlements (OR = 3.80, p<0.01), and to have progressive attitudes toward gender roles and norms (OR = 1.43, p<0.05). A longer duration of group membership increases the likelihood of financial independence, collective action, and decisionmaking ability. The study highlights the need for further investment in adolescent girls’ programming and highlights the potential of organizing AGYW into SHG and using the ‘platform’ to bring change in their lives and consequential individual agency.

Introduction

Globally, millions of adolescents are transitioning to adulthood every year and among them about half are females. The young population can be an asset to any nation. They can drive productivity if they are provided a quality transition to adulthood, i.e. equipped with proper information and skills [1]. There is a growing recognition that achieving sustainable development goals (SDG) by 2030 requires a deliberate investment in adolescents, particularly girls [2–6]. Evidence shows that in poor settings adolescent girls often face psychosocial challenges such as mobility restrictions, lower self-efficacy, and lesser decisionmaking power, and hardly exercise their choice in personal matters [7]. They have limited opportunities for education, skill acquisition, and personal development [8]. Further, they must confront gender inequalities and gender role expectations [3, 5, 7, 9–13]. Adolescents often do not have a safe environment to socialize, and lack the opportunity to learn life skills or to get essential and correct information on health and other issues that concern their lives [5, 14, 15] and many are neither equipped nor supported to make a healthy transition to adulthood.

The vast majority of adolescents live in developing countries and more than half of the world’s adolescents live in Asia with the highest number in India [16]. One-fourth of India’s population consists of adolescents [11]. Uttar Pradesh (UP), the most populous state of India, contributes more than 40 million adolescents and young girls between 15–21 years of age to the country’s total population [17]. The Government of India and the State government have launched several schemes and programs for adolescent girls to provide opportunities to improve their health and well-being [18]. Many services have not reached the target group adequately for many reasons including lack of (correct) information among adolescents and /or their parents about schemes, absence of proper guidance to access schemes, challenges in accessing the services due to poor implementation, and insufficient services from the system [9].

A non-governmental organization in rural UP has mobilized unmarried adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in the age group of 13–21 years and organized them into Young Women Self-Help Groups (YWSHG) with the objective of making generational change through the girls’ psychosocial development. The organization mainly targeted girls who had dropped out of school and were from families that already had at least one ever-married woman as a member of another self-help group (SHG) of ever-married women formed by the organization. A YWSHG consists of 10–12 AGYW as its members. The AGYW recieved trainings on basic financial literacy, menstrual health and hygiene, vocational training for income generation, leadership skills, rights, and accessing entitlements to social schemes and services. These trainings were meant to increase girls’ decisionmaking power, self-efficacy, mobility, and collective action for their entitlements which are the key elements of empowerment. The YWSHG were also assumed to provide a safe space to AGYW where they could discuss their life challenges, learn life skills, and support each other in their needs.

There is growing evidence that suggests that developing girls’ and women’s skills, providing opportunities and access to resources, and offering vocational training can improve their health and social outcomes. Girl-centered programs in Bangladesh, Egypt, and Uganda demonstrated the transformations of girls’ lives through vocational and life-skill training and engaging them to improve their confidence, self-efficacy, and mobility, by targeting gender norms [19–21]. The work with AGYW using the YWSHG is a unique program that included multiple activities mentioned in the previous paragraph with a focus on building the capacity to improve self-efficacy to mobilize AGYW to take collective action for their rights and entitlements. There is a lack of evidence on whether organizing AGYW into YWSHG at a large scale makes any difference in their empowerment status. This study aimed to explore whether organizing AGYW into YWSHG, exposed them to various training on life skills can make any difference in their ability to make decisions, financial independence, mobility, collective action, self-expression, self-efficacy to deal with difficult situations, attitude towards gender norms and access to resources in comparison with AGYW who were not members of YWSHG.

Methods

Ethics statement

The study participants were contacted and interviewed at their homes by trained female research assistants. Along with the oral informed consent of the girls, the guardian’s written informed consent was obtained to interview girls below the age of 18 years. Further, the interviews were conducted maintaining the privacy and used the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing technique. Semi-structured questionnaires, in the local language Hindi, which included various psychometric tools tested with age groups in Indian settings, were used in the survey. The study protocol and tools were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Population Council, the research institution that conducted this study. The protocol approval number is 740 and was approved on May 18, 2016.

Data

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2016 among unmarried AGYW aged 15–21 years who were members of YWSHG with a comparison group who were not members. Two districts of UP, Amethi, and Sultanpur, with the highest number of YWSHG, were selected purposively for the study. All the Gram Panchayats (GPs), the lowest administrative units, with three or more YWSHG were listed for the sampling purpose. Twenty GPs from each of these two districts were selected following systematic random sampling. The 40 GPs from these two districts had 127 YWSHG and three to four of AGYW from each of these YWSHG were randomly selected for the interview from the list of members provided by the leaders of each group. To select AGYW who were not members of YWSHG, an equal number of 40 GPs without the presence of YWSHG were randomly selected from the same two districts from where the GPs with YWSHG were selected. The YWSHG and non-YWSHG GPs were matched in terms of the GP-wise proportion of Scheduled Caste (SC)/Scheduled Tribe (ST) population to the total population. Historically, the SCs and STs have been socially and economically marginalized segments in Indian society and the proportion of such a population within a geographic location influences many developmental parameters. For identifying respondents from non-YWSHG households, all unmarried AGYW aged 15–21 years were listed from 100 households of the randomly selected segments of the selected GPs. The eligible respondents were selected randomly from the list obtained through the house listing. In total, 872 AGYW—471 YWSHG members and 401 non-members were interviewed.

A rigorous quality-assurance process was followed in data collection. The data-entry package used in the interview was developed in CSPro software version 6.3 and had built-in logic and checks to reduce non-sampling errors. Further, one quality-assurance person was assigned to each survey team of 4–5 members to assess the data quality through spot checks and back checks, and supportive supervision. The field supervisors sent data daily to the study coordinator who analyzed data on an ongoing basis and discussed any data-related queries with the field teams.

Measures

The primary measure of the study includes the individual agency of AGYW. The individual agency has several connotations in the literature and is defined as per its use [22]. In this study, the individual agency has been defined as the ability of AGYW to make decisions and have financial independence, mobility, collective action, self-expression, belief in their ability to deal with difficult situations, egalitarian gender norms, and access to resources. Each of these indicator consist of several questions or variables. Composite indices were created to summarize information for each indicator and were used as dependent variables in multiple logistic regressions. Each variable considered under a composite index was dichotomized and assigned a score of either 0 or 1. The mean score for an index was calculated and considered as a cut-off to divide the scores into low and high. Scores above the mean were categorized as high and the rest as low.

Dependent variables

A description of each of the dependent variable used in this paper is presented here. The questions on financial independence, collective action, decisionmaking, mobility, self-expression, and attitudes towards violence were adopted from tools that explored these issues at scale and are available in the public domain [23]. Tested scales were used for measuring the variables on generalized perceived self-efficacy [24]and gender norm attitudes [25].

Financial independence

The girls were considered financially independent if they had saved money, had a saving goal, calculated the number of days to achieve their saving goal, had a bank account in their name, were operating their bank account on their own and were aware of basic banking services such as depositing money, loans and keeping valuables in the bank.

Collective action

Collective action was defined as action taken by AGYW in a group, or along with other girls, to demand their entitlements from health workers, Panchayat members, or bank officials in the past six months of the study.

Decisionmaking

The girls were considered empowered in decisionmaking if they perceived that they can make decisions entirely on their own in matters that concern their education, health care, taking a job, spending their earned money, and decisions about marriage.

Mobility

Freedom of movement or physical mobility was measured if girls were allowed to visit their neighborhood shop or market, community program within the village, or places outside the village or neighborhood including a friend or relative’s house, a place of entertainment like a theatre, or any program outside the village and a health facility without any escort.

Self-expression

Self-expression was measured by the ability of girls to express their opinion to their elders about the issues that concern them, to confront a person if he or she says or does something wrong, to express their feelings to their parents, and to tell their parents about their marriage decisions and autonomy to choose their life partner.

Generalized perceived self-efficacy

Generalized perceived self-efficacy was measured through a generalized self-efficacy scale developed and adapted in India. The scale was designed to assess personal agency i.e. confidence in dealing with difficult situations and circumstances, such as being able to find means and ways to get what she wants, dealing efficiently with unexpected events, knowing how to handle unforeseen situations, and ability to usually find several solutions if confronted with a problem [24].

Gender norms attitudes

Gender roles and attitudes were assessed using the Gender Equitable Attitude and Gender Equitable Norm Scales developed by C-Change [25]. The key variables include girls’ views on the importance of their education compared to boys, the decision on when to marry, the boy’s participation in domestic work and care of children by husband, freedom to do things, and decision on how to spend money.

Attitudes toward violence

Attitude toward wife-beating was measured to gauge the extent to which girls thought wife-beating by the husband was justified if (a) he finds her unfaithful, (b) she goes out without telling him, (c) she disagrees with the opinion of her husband, (d) she makes a mistake, (e) she does not care of her children to his satisfaction, (f) she gives birth only to girls, and (g) she refuses to have sexual relation with him.

Independent variables

The independent variables were YWSHG group membership and the duration of the membership. The duration of YWSHG membership was categorized into 1–5, 6–11, 12–23, and 24 or more months to examine its association with individual agency. The non-members were assigned ‘0’ for the duration of the membership. Socio-demographic characteristics of adolescents were obtained based on single questions asked in the survey. Age was categorized into 15–19 and 20 or more years; caste into SC/ST, Other Backward Classes, and General; education into four categories–up to class 5, class 6–8, class 9–11, and class 12 or more. The variables of SHG membership of family members, receipt of vocational training, and exposure to mass media (either reads a newspaper or listen to the radio or watches television) were dichotomized into “Yes” and “No”. A proxy variable of the standard of living index (SLI) was computed to denote a household’s economic condition and was used in the analysis. The SLI computation was based on an additive index using four variables available in the dataset–the main source of drinking water, the main source of lighting for the household, the main fuel used for cooking in the household, and the type of house.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between AGYWs’ agency indicators and YWSHG membership or duration of the membership. The socio-demographic characteristics of AGYW were taken as controlled variables in the regression models.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of adolescent girls and young women

The average age of the respondents was 18 years. The socio-demographic characteristics of AGYW were similar among the YWSHG members and non-members, except for two factors–education and family member’s SHG membership (Table 1). More than half of the AGYWs (57 percent) were currently in school or college at the time of the interview and about one-third had completed class 12 or more. A significantly higher proportion of non-members (39 percent) than YWSHG members (35 percent) had completed class 12 or more (OR = 1.5, p<0.05). Among AGYW, who were currently in school, more than two-thirds wanted to continue their education till graduation, and among those who dropped out of school or college, about 40 percent wanted to be a graduate or even postgraduate. A higher proportion of YWSHG members were from SHG families (60 percent) compared to non-members (18 percent).

Table 1. Percent distribution of AGYW by select socio-demographic characteristics.

Characteristics Categories Total Non-YWSHG YWSHG Adjusted OR
N = 872 N = 401 N = 471 (CI, 95%)
Age (in years) 15-19R 84.7 85.0 84.5 --
20–25 15.3 15.0 15.5 0.96 (0.61–1.52)
Education (years of schooling) Up to class 5R 8.3 10.7 6.2 --
Class 6 to 8 21.3 17.5 24.6 1.03 (0.56–1.19)
Class 9 to 11 33.8 33.2 34.4 2.27 (1.45–3.57)**
Class 12 or more 36.6 38.7 34.8 1.48 (1.01–2.17)*
Castea GeneralR 23.9 19.5 27.6 --
SC/ST 31.7 38.4 25.9 0.60 (0.38–0.92)
Other Backward Classes 44.5 42.1 46.5 0.98 (0.66–1.45)
Standard of living index LowR 31.1 32.4 29.9 -
Middle 53.0 54.6 51.6 0.92 (0.65–1.29)
High 15.9 13.0 18.5 1.45(0.89–2.37)
Currently in school/college NoR 43.0 44.4 41.8 --
Yes 57.0 55.6 58.2 0.87 (0.62–1.22)
From SHG familya NoR 59.7 82.5 40.3 --
Yes 40.3 17.5 59.7 7.0 (5.04–9.72)**

Note:

a = chi-square test, p<0.001; CI = confidence interval; R = Reference category; OR = odds ratio

*p<0.05

**p<0.01; In regression model group membership was taken as the dependent variable in the regression model.

# = The study aimed to interview girls of age 15–21 years, but the data contained information of 28 unmarried girls of age 22 to 25 years.

Association between YWSHG membership and individual agency

Table 2 shows that a significantly higher proportion of YWSHG members as compared to non-members scored high for financial independence (46 percent vs 28 percent), collective action (26 percent vs 6 percent), decisionmaking (27 percent vs 21 percent), and mobility (26 percent vs 21 percent). Also, a significantly higher proportion of AGYW from YWSHG justified wife-beating by the husbands (52 percent) compared to non-members (44 percent). There was no statistical difference between the two groups of participants around gender norm attitudes, self-expression, and generalized self-efficacy.

Table 2. Association between AGYWs’ individual agency related indicators and YWSHG membership.

NON-YWSHG (N = 401)
%
YWSHG (N = 471) % Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Financial independence (High)a 28.2 46.3 2.29 (1.62–3.25)**
Collective action (High)a 6.2 25.7 3.82 (2.32–6.31)**
Decisionmaking (High)a 20.9 27.2 1.34 (0.94–1.93)
Mobility (High)a 20.7 25.7 1.09 (0.75–1.60)
Self-expression (High) 45.4 48.4 1.01 (0.74–1.36)
Generalized self-efficacy (High) 50.9 45.0 0.72 (0.53–0.98)*
Attitude toward gender norms—Egalitarian 45.4 48.0 1.43 (1.04–1.95)*
Attitude toward domestic violence (justified)a 43.9 52.0 1.63 (1.19–2.22)**

Note: CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; Each of the dependent variables–financial independence, collective action, decisionmaking, mobility, self-expression, and generalized self-efficacy were dichotomized as low (0) and high (1), attitude toward gender norms as non-egalitarian (0) and egalitarian (1), and attitude toward gender norms as not justified (0) and justified (1). The key independent variable is YWSHG membership (non-member is the reference category). Each of the regression models was adjusted for AGYW’s age, education, school enrolment, vocational training, exposure to mass media, caste, SHG membership of family members, and household’s standard of living index.

a. z-test, p<0.05

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

The logistic regression analyses showed that even after controlling for respondent’s age, education, school enrolment, vocational training, exposure to mass media, caste, SHG membership of family members, household’s SLI, YWSHG members, as compared to non-members, were twice more likely to have financial independence (OR = 2.29, p<0.01), four times more likely to take collective action (OR = 3.8, p<0.01), one-and-half times more likely to have an egalitarian attitude toward gender roles and norms (OR = 1.43, p<0.05) (Table 2).

Findings further show that the duration of YWSHG membership of AGYW was significantly associated with higher financial independence, collective action, decisionmaking, and mobility (p<0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. Percentage distribution of AGYW who scored high in individual agency indicators by the duration of YWSHG membership.

Duration of membership in months
  Not member (N = 401) 1–5 (N = 64) 6–11 (N = 89) 12–23 (N = 229) 24 or more (N = 89)
Financial independence (High)a, % 28.2 34.4 44.9 47.6 52.8
Collective action (High)a, % 6.2 31.3 21.3 22.7 33.7
Decisionmaking (High)a, % 20.9 21.9 23.6 26.2 37.1
Mobility (High)a, % 20.7 15.6 16.9 30.6 29.2
Self-expression (High), % 45.4 42.2 51.7 48 50.6
Generalized self-efficacy (High), % 50.9 54.7 43.8 44.1 41.6
Attitude toward gender norms–Egalitarian (High), % 45.4 53.1 52.8 45.4 46.1
Attitude toward domestic violence (justified), % 43.9 54.7 53.9 49.8 53.9

Note:

aChi-square test, p<0.05

The logistic regression analysis indicated that AGYW who were members of YWSHG for 24 or more months, as compared to the non-members, were two and half times more likely to have financial independence (OR = 2.5, p<0.01), five times more likely to take collective action for their entitlements (OR = 5.3, p<0.01) and twice more likely to have decision ability on matters that concerns them (OR = 2.0, p<0.01) (Table 4). Duration of YWSHG membership did not have any significant relationship with self-expression and an egalitarian attitude toward gender norms.

Table 4. Influence of duration of YWSHG membership on AGYW individual agency related indicators.

  Duration of membership in months
Odds ratios (95% CI)
  1–5 months 6–11 months 12–23 months 24 or more months
Financial independence (High) 1.68 (0.89–3.17) 2.08 (1.21–3.56)** 2.49 (1.65–3.74)** 2.51 (1.47–4.23)**
Collective action (High) 5.09 (2.45–10.56)** 3.23 (1.61–6.47)** 3.16 (1.80–5.53)** 5.34 (2.80–10.18)**
Decisionmaking (High) 1.08 (0.55–2.13) 1.18 (0.66–2.09) 1.23 (0.81–1.89) 2.01 (1.18–3.41)**
Mobility (High) 0.73 (0.33–1.60) 0.61 (0.31–1.19) 1.43 (0.92–2.22) 1.12 (0.63–1.99)
Self-expression (High) 0.79 (0.45–1.39) 1.16 (0.72–1.88) 0.98 (0.68–1.40) 1.10 (0.68–1.79)
Generalized self-efficacy (High) 0.79 (0.45–1.39) 1.16 (0.72–1.88) 0.98 (0.68–1.40)* 1.10 (0.68–1.79)*
Attitude toward gender norms–(Egalitarian) 1.62 (0.91–2.90) 1.60 (0.97–2.64) 1.33 (0.92–1.94) 1.38 (0.83–2.29)
Attitude toward domestic violence (Justified) 1.65 (0.94–2.93) 1.65 (1.01–2.69)* 1.51 (1.05–2.19)* 1.10 (1.15–3.14)*

Note: Each of the dependent variables–financial independence, collective action, decisionmaking, mobility, self-expression, and generalized self-efficacy was dichotomized as low (0) and high (1), attitude towards gender norms as non-egalitarian (0) and egalitarian (1), and attitude towards gender norms as not justified (0) and justified (1). The key independent variable is YWSHG membership duration (non-member is the reference category). Each of the regression models was adjusted for AGYW’s age, education, school enrolment, vocational training, exposure to mass media, caste, SHG membership of family members, and household’s standard of living index.

*p<0.05

**p<0.01

Discussion

Adolescents and young women’s membership in SHGs have a positive association with financial independence, collective action, and decisionmaking–the three critical individual level elements for the quality transition to adulthood. Further, AGYW with longer association with YWSHG had higher financial independence, were more likely to have decisionmaking power, and were more likely to participate in collective action. These could be the result of increased solidarity among the members with a longer duration of association in the group. Evidence suggests that adolescence is the formative age for developing basic financial-management skills like regular saving habits with saving goals which can help them to mitigate their future economic vulnerabilities as a consequence of poverty [1, 4]. Furthermore, economic empowerment and access to money are important for girls to mitigate financial emergencies, particularly for education and medical emergencies [4]. The SHGs are generally based on the micro-finance model that encourages savings and builds collective efficacy to address the marginalization of SHG members. The findings of this study indicate the potential of YWSHG that allow space for AGYW to take collective action to avail themselves of entitlements such as demand for services from health workers or local administration or bank officials. Such capacities reduce their dependency on others to achieve a better life in the future. Interventions to build the capacity of girls in Uganda show similar results [21]. Empowering girls with skills and knowledge can improve their life outcomes [26]. Given this, YWSHG can play a critical role in building adolescents’ capacities, skills, and choices in their lives.

Although financial independence and the ability to take collective action was higher among the members of YWSHG, but membership did not make much difference on other aspects such as mobility, self-expression, and attitude towards gender norms. Restricted mobility and limited agency among unmarried AGYW were also reported in the “Youth in India” study that was conducted in six states of India to assess the situation and needs of the adolescent and young population [12].

The study shows that YWSHG membership as well as the duration of membership did not affect attitude towards domestic violence. A significantly higher proportion of AGYW justified wife-beating. Further investigation is required to explore the reasons but the validation of the Gender Equitable Men (GEM) scale by Lung Vu showed that 70 percent girls of aged 10–24 years reported substantial support for inequitable gender norms, and women expected to tolerate violence to keep their family together [27]. As gender norms are followed generationally and reinforced by the family and community, it is harder to change adolescents’ mindset through interventions of short duration.

YWSHG provides a platform for adolescent girls and young women to come together and voice their opinions. This strategy can also be used to make girls aware of health issues such as anemia which is a major health concern among girls in their second decade of life. A randomized control trial in Uganda showed that “combined” interventions have more effectiveness than a “single” intervention for the empowerment of adolescents to health behaviors [19].

Most of the YWSHG members are girls who drop out of school and uniting them in a platform can be a good strategy to engage them in life skill activities that can delay their chances of early marriage and childbearing. Studies have demonstrated that engaging young girls through a multiple economic empowerment approach combined with health education and skill development at the community level helps in delaying the age of marriage and improving health and social outcomes [20, 28].

The study had certain limitations. First, the study findings are based on a cross-sectional survey that cautions against establishing any cause-effect relationship. Longitudinal studies are better suited to examine the ways YWSHG membership changes the lives of adolescents. However, the results from the adjusted regression analysis showed a direction in the relationship between YWSHG membership and AGYWs’ agency. Second, the study was done in a geographic location that had a high concentration of YWSHG. This might have had an indirect influence on girls’ empowerment as the higher number of YWSHG might have a better chance of taking collective action. Third, the selection bias of AGYW to be YWSHG members cannot be ruled out. AGYW, whose mothers were SHG members, may have higher levels of empowerment and would therefore be more likely to join groups. The analysis controlled for this potential selection bias by including AGYWs’ socio-demographic characteristics as well as SHG membership of family members as confounding factors in the multivariate regression models.

Conclusion

Adolescent girls and young women are the critical segments of the population on which future development depends. The Women Deliver Conference in 2013 made a strong call to invest in adolescents and young people, particularly girls, to improve their health and wellbeing, skills, and capacities to address various social and economic problems of the current and future generations [29]. The Women Deliver Conference in 2016 reiterated that when an investment is made in girls and women, everybody wins [30]. Investment in adolescents and youth can open a window of opportunity for a demographic dividend [26]. To achieve sustainable development goals, adolescents and young women require the right information, skills, and access to services.

The study noted that AGYW aspired for higher education–both those who were currently in school or college and those who had dropped out of school. Education is critical for the overall development of an individual. The schools and colleges provide space and opportunities for AGYW to achieve their educational aspirations. Therefore, programs addressing AGYW lives must address the issues around drop out of girls from school and colleges. This study found that YWSHG members compared to non-members had greater individual agency, thus demonstrating that YWSHGs are safe spaces for AGYW in rural settings to channel their potential and energies. Such groups provide them space to interact and a safety net for taking collective action. The finding that AGYW members were twice more likely to make decisions on matters that concern them indicates that YWSHG help in transform gender attitudes and norms which are critical for girls’ future lives. The findings thus demonstrate that YWSHG have the potential to empower young women to be agents to change and transform future generations. Therefore, it is important to continue the mobilization of AGYW particularly in rural settings in India. Under the National Rural Livelihood Mission, the Government of India is making a deliberate attempt to improve the livelihood opportunities and empower women through SHGs, it may be equally important to invest and support in developing and designing or replicating such models of organizing AGYW into YWSHG, to implement interventions that improve the skills and lives of adolescents and young women.

Acknowledgments

We are extremely grateful to all the adolescent girls and young women who participated in this study, their parents and guardians for their consent to allow their daughters to be part of this study, the organization that mobilized and united these girls under YWSHG, their field staff for extending support during data collection, and the research investigators who conducted interviews. Special thanks to Diana Nolan for copyediting the article.

Data Availability

The data, study tools and a readme file explaining about the data are available on the Harvard data verse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM).

Funding Statement

The Population Council was funded for this study by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant OPP1141832). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [JA, AH, KA], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘Author Contributions’ section. At the time of conduct of the study and manuscript development, AS was employed by the organization that was working with YWSHGs. Currently, AS is employed by a commercial organization that did not have any role in this study.

References

  • 1.Catino J. The health of vulnerable adolescent girls: A strategic investment for double return.
  • 2.Desa UN. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development.
  • 3.Igras SM, Macieira M, Murphy E, Lundgren R. Investing in very young adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health. Global public health. 2014. May 28;9(5):555–69. 10.1080/17441692.2014.908230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McCarthy K, Brady M, Hallman K. Investing when it counts: Reviewing the evidence and charting a course of research and action for very young adolescents.
  • 5.Chandra-Mouli V, Greifinger R, Nwosu A, Hainsworth G, Sundaram L, Hadi S, et al. Invest in adolescents and young people: it pays. Reproductive health. 2013. December;10(1):1–5. 10.1186/1742-4755-10-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sawyer SM, Afifi RA, Bearinger LH, Blakemore SJ, Dick B, Ezeh AC, et al. Adolescence: a foundation for future health. The lancet. 2012. April 28;379(9826):1630–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60072-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Santhya KG, Jejeebhoy SJ, Saeed I, Sarkar A. Growing up in rural India: An exploration into the lives of younger and older adolescents in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh.
  • 8.Erulkar AS, Muthengi E. Evaluation of Berhane Hewan: a program to delay child marriage in rural Ethiopia. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health. 2009. March 1:6–14. 10.1363/ifpp.35.006.09 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sivagurunathan C, Umadevi R, Rama R, Gopalakrishnan S. Adolescent health: present status and its related programmes in India. Are we in the right direction? Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015. March;9(3): LE01. 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11199.5649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hallman KK, Kenworthy NJ, Diers J, Swan N, Devnarain B. The shrinking world of girls at puberty: Violence and gender-divergent access to the public sphere among adolescents in South Africa. Global public health. 2015. March 16;10(3):279–95. 10.1080/17441692.2014.964746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kalyanwala S, Sharma V, Sarna A. Adolescents in India: A desk review of existing evidence and behaviours, programmes and policies. New Delhi: Population Council & UNICEF. 2013. 10.1017/S0021932012000533 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ram U, Mohanty SK, Singh A, Ram F, Jejeebhoy SJ, Santhya KG, et al. Youth in India: Situation and Needs 2006–2007. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Population Council. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nanda P, Das P, Singh A, Negi R. Addressing comprehensive needs of adolescent girls in India: a potential for creating livelihoods. New Delhi: International Centre for Research on Women. 2013. March 22. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gay J. High-Impact Practices in Family Planning (HIPs),“. Adolescent-Friendly Contraceptive Services: Mainstreaming Adolescent-Friendly Elements Into Existing Contraceptive Services. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Raj A, Saggurti N, Winter M, Labonte A, Decker MR, Balaiah D, et al. The effect of maternal child marriage on morbidity and mortality of children under 5 in India: cross sectional study of a nationally representative sample. Bmj. 2010. January 22;340. 10.1136/bmj.b4258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.World Health Organization. Health for the world’s adolescents: a second chance in the second decade: summary. World Health Organization; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.UNICEF. 2017 [Accessed on 02.062017]; Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/adolescents/adolescent-demographics.
  • 18.INDIA P. Census of India 2011 Provisional Population Totals. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Handbook S. Rashtriya Kishor Swasthya Karyakram. Adolescent Health Division Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India. 2014. January. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bandiera O, Buehren N, Burgess R, Goldstein M, Gulesci S, Rasul I, et al. Empowering adolescent girls: evidence from a randomized control trial in Uganda. World Bank; 2012. December. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amin S, Ahmed J, Saha J, Hossain M, Haque E. Delaying child marriage through community-based skills-development programs for girls: Results from a randomized controlled study in rural Bangladesh.
  • 22.Selim M, Abdel-Tawab NG, El Sayed K, Elbadawy A, El Kalaawy H. The Ishraq Program for out-of-school girls: From pilot to scale-up.
  • 23.Malhotra A, Schuler SR, Boender C. Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In background paper prepared for the World Bank Workshop on Poverty and Gender: New Perspectives 2002 Jun 28 (Vol. 28).
  • 24.Nanda G. Compendium of gender scales. Washington, DC: FHI. 2011;360. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Scholz U, Doña BG, Sud S, Schwarzer R. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European journal of psychological assessment. 2002;18(3):242. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gay E. Investing in Adolescents’ and Young People’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights is Key to Harnessing the Demographic Dividend in Africa. In2017 International Population Conference 2017 Nov 3. IUSSP.
  • 27.Vu L, Pulerwitz J, Burnett-Zieman B, Banura C, Okal J, Yam E. Inequitable gender norms from early adolescence to young adulthood in Uganda: Tool validation and differences across age groups. Journal of adolescent health. 2017. February 1;60(2):S15–21. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sandøy IF, Mudenda M, Zulu J, Munsaka E, Blystad A, Makasa MC, et al. Effectiveness of a girls’ empowerment programme on early childbearing, marriage and school dropout among adolescent girls in rural Zambia: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2016. December 1;17(1):588. 10.1186/s13063-016-1682-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Temmerman M, Khosla R, Say L. Sexual and reproductive health and rights: a global development, health, and human rights priority. The Lancet. 2014. August 2;384(9941):e30–1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Women Deliver Conference, 4th Global conference. 2016 [cited 2017 25.6.2017]; Available from: http://wd2016.org/.

Decision Letter 0

Joseph Telfair

4 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-29446

Potential of organizing adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for an inter-generational change: Learnings from a cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ahmad,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

  • The academic Editor served as the second reviewer on this manuscript. The editor agreed with the first reviewer. The authors also need to add a clear set of actionable recommendations linked to the key findings. 

  • The authors are strongly encouraged to specifically address the comments from the reviews if they wish to revise and resubmit, to be seriously considered for publication.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 19 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Joseph Telfair, DrPH, MSW, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

The academic Editor served as the second reviewer on this manuscript. The editor agreed with the first reviewer. The authors also need to add a clear set of actionable recommendations linked to the key findings.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"The authors have declared that no competing interests exist"

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: name of commercial company.

2.1. Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

2.2. Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.  

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and  there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

3. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: - The title is vague since the focus is not evident until you read the abstract that the authors assess transition to adulthood. I would strongly recommend adding transition to adulthood to title to let focus be known.

-Copyediting and proofreading the entire manuscript is strongly recommended

-Authors state that “The Government of India and the State government have launched several schemes and programs for adolescents girls to provide opportunities to improve their health and well-being [19]. But the services have not reached the target group adequately for many reasons including insufficient awareness and lack of knowledge among adolescents.” Not sure how insufficient awareness and lack of knowledge among adolescents are different reasons. What are the other “many reasons?”

- Need to explicitly state measures and scales used for other researchers to replicate. Would strongly advise to add data collection instruments to appendix to understand context of scales and measures to see why variables were measured the way they were (e.g. standard of living, exposure to mass media, etc.).

- Information regarding the caste system would be helpful to provide context for readers.

- Would suggest in the discussion when authors state “These findings were similar to the findings of the youth survey [12],” authors should give context about the youth survey referenced since it currently reads as a youth survey that was part of the authors' study even though that is not the case.

- Great job to the authors for combining multiple programmatic approaches to promote individual agency to incorporate nutrition, menstrual health and hygiene.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248719.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Jan 2021

Editor’s comments

Comment: The academic Editor served as the second reviewer on this manuscript. The editor agreed with the first reviewer. The authors also need to add a clear set of actionable recommendations linked to the key findings.

Response: We have reviewed the manuscript and added a set of actionable recommendations in the last para of the discussion (line number 347-365) as;

“The study noted that AGWYs aspired for higher education – both those who were currently in school or college and those who had dropped out of school. Education is critical for the overall development of an individual. The schools and colleges provide space and opportunities for AGYWs to achieve their educational aspirations. Therefore, programs addressing AGYWs lives must address the issues around drop out of girls from school and colleges. This study found that YWSHG members compared to non-members had greater individual agency, thus demonstrating that YWSHGs are safe spaces for AGYWs in rural settings to channel their potential and energies. Such groups provide them space to interact and a safety net for taking collective action. The finding that AGYWs members were twice more likely to make decisions on matters that concern them indicate that YWSHGs help in transform gender attitudes and norms which are critical for girls’ future lives. The findings thus demonstrate that YWSHGs have the potential to empower young women to be agents to change and transform future generations. Therefore, it is important to continue the mobilization of AGYWs particularly in rural settings in India. Now that under the National Rural Livelihood Mission, the Government of India is making a deliberate attempt to improve the livelihood opportunities and empower women through SHGs, it may be equally important to invest and support in developing and designing or replicating such models of organizing AGYWs into YWSHGs, to implement interventions that improve the skills and lives of adolescents and young women.”

Comment 1: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: We have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript and ensured formatting according to PLOS ONE’s style requirements

Comment 2: Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"The authors have declared that no competing interests exist"

We note that one or more of the authors are employed by a commercial company: name of commercial company.

Response: One of the authors (Arima Singh) was involved with the study and manuscript writing while she was associated with the organization that was working with YWSHGs. Currently, she is employed by IPE Global Pvt. Ltd., an international development consulting company that did not have any role either in conduct of the study or writing of the manuscript.

We have revised the ‘funding statement’ and ‘competing interests’ statement’ to reflect this (please see response in point number 2.1 and 2.2).

Comment 2.1: Please provide an amended Funding Statement declaring this commercial affiliation, as well as a statement regarding the Role of Funders in your study. If the funding organization did not play a role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript and only provided financial support in the form of authors' salaries and/or research materials, please review your statements relating to the author contributions, and ensure you have specifically and accurately indicated the role(s) that these authors had in your study. You can update author roles in the Author Contributions section of the online submission form.

Please also include the following statement within your amended Funding Statement.

“The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [insert relevant initials], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”

If your commercial affiliation did play a role in your study, please state and explain this role within your updated Funding Statement.

Response: We have revised the funding statement and included

“The Population Council was funded for this study by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant OPP1141832). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [JA, AH, KA], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. At the time of conduct of the study and manuscript development, AS was employed by the organization that was working with YWSHGs. Currently, AS is employed by a commercial organization that did not have any role in this study.”

Comment 2.2: Please also provide an updated Competing Interests Statement declaring this commercial affiliation along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products, etc.

Within your Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this commercial affiliation does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests) . If this adherence statement is not accurate and there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Response: Thank you for raising the concern. We carefully reviewed the details on competing interests through the link you provided (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). We have revised the Competing Interests Statement as below:

“The authors declare no individual or organizational competing interest exist. Commercial affiliation of one author (AS) does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.”

Based on your advice, we have included both an updated Funding Statement and Competing Interests Statement in the revised cover letter.

Comment 3: We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Response: Please find below the data repository information (DOIs) to access the data and tools.

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM

Reviewer’s Comments

Comment 1: Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Response: Thank you for your appreciation

Comment 2: Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Response: We have applied appropriate statistical techniques to examine the study objectives.

Comment 3: Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Response: Please find below the data repository information (DOIs) to access the data and tools.

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM

Comment 4: Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Response: We have revised the manuscript and done copyediting to avoid any typographical or grammatical errors.

Comment 5: Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

5.1 Reviewer #1: - The title is vague since the focus is not evident until you read the abstract that the authors assess transition to adulthood. I would strongly recommend adding transition to adulthood to title to let focus be known.

Response: We have reassessed the title. In light of the outcome measures we have used in the paper, we have revised the title of the manuscript as “Potential of organizing unmarried adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for a better transition to adulthood: Findings from a cross-sectional study in India.

5.2 -Copyediting and proofreading the entire manuscript is strongly recommended

Response: We have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript and did the copyediting to avoid spelling and grammatical errors.

5.3 -Authors state that “The Government of India and the State government have launched several schemes and programs for adolescents girls to provide opportunities to improve their health and well-being [19]. But the services have not reached the target group adequately for many reasons including insufficient awareness and lack of knowledge among adolescents.” Not sure how insufficient awareness and lack of knowledge among adolescents are different reasons. What are the other “many reasons?”

Response: We have revised the statement and expanded “many reasons”. The revised text in the manuscript (line number 61-67) is as follows:

“The Government of India and the State government have launched several schemes and programs for adolescents’ girls to provide opportunities to improve their health and well-being [18]. But many services have not reached the target group adequately for many reasons including lack of (correct) information among adolescents and /or their parents about schemes, absence of proper guidance to access schemes, challenges in accessing the services due to poor implementation and insufficient services from system [9]”.

5.4 - Need to explicitly state measures and scales used for other researchers to replicate. Would strongly advise to add data collection instruments to appendix to understand context of scales and measures to see why variables were measured the way they were (e.g. standard of living, exposure to mass media, etc.).

Response: We have elaborated the measures about the scales used in the paper and given proper citation to refer to the original sources from where we adopted the questions/scales. The instrument used for the present study is available at

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM

We have explained the construction of standard of living index (Line no. 198-202) and exposure to mass media (Line no.197). The revised text is as below

SLI: “A proxy variable of standard of living index (SLI) was computed to denote a household’s economic condition and was used in the analysis. The SLI computation was based on an additive index using four variables available in the dataset – main source of drinking water, main source of lighting for the household, main fuel used for cooking in the household and type of house.”

Mass media exposure: “either reads newspaper or listen to radio or watches television”.

5.5 - Information regarding the caste system would be helpful to provide context for readers.

Response: We have added information on caste system. The text is added in Line no. 111-113 appears as:

“Historically, the SCs and STs have been socially and economically marginalized segments in Indian society and the proportion of such a population within a geographic location influences many developmental parameters.”

5.6 - Would suggest in the discussion when authors state “These findings were similar to the findings of the youth survey [12],” authors should give context about the youth survey referenced since it currently reads as a youth survey that was part of the authors' study even though that is not the case.

Response: The context has been added to the reference of the youth survey. The revised text in Line no. 300-303 appears as:

“Restricted mobility, and limited agency among unmarried AGYW was also reported in “Youth in India” study that was conducted in six states of India to assess the situation and needs of the adolescent and young population [12]”.

5.7 - Great job to the authors for combining multiple programmatic approaches to promote individual agency to incorporate nutrition, menstrual health and hygiene.

Response: Thank you for the appreciation.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Joseph Telfair

4 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-29446R1

Potential of organizing unmarried adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for a better transition to adulthood: Findings from a cross-sectional study in India

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ahmad,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

In light of the challenge is finding competent reviewers, the editor served as the second reviewer. There remains concerns about editing (inconsistent places) that need to be addressed for any last publication considerations. See below for what needs to be specifically addressed. 

 Strongly recommend another round of copyediting (e.g. AGYW is mentioned in some parts of the paper while AGWY is used in other parts of the paper). The link to the data repository led to data files that can be downloaded. However, data is unable to be downloaded because the data use form requires identifiable information.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 21 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Joseph Telfair, DrPH, MSW, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed the reviewers' comments in the previous round of review. Strongly recommend another round of copyediting (e.g. AGYW is mentioned in some parts of the paper while AGWY is used in other parts of the paper). The link to the data repository led to data files that can be downloaded. However, data is unable to be downloaded because the data use form requires identifiable information.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248719.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


1 Mar 2021

Comment: Strongly recommend another round of copyediting (e.g. AGYW is mentioned in some parts of the paper while AGWY is used in other parts of the paper). The link to the data repository led to data files that can be downloaded. However, data is unable to be downloaded because the data use form requires identifiable information.

Response: We have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript including copyediting. We have removed the restriction from the data repository but as an institution policy only few identifiable information such as name, email ID and institution are required to download the data. The data can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Joseph Telfair

4 Mar 2021

Potential of organizing unmarried adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for a better transition to adulthood: Findings from a cross-sectional study in India

PONE-D-20-29446R2

Dear Dr. Ahmad,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Joseph Telfair, DrPH, MSW, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Joseph Telfair

8 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-29446R2

Potential of organizing unmarried adolescent girls and young women into self-help groups for a better transition to adulthood: Findings from a cross-sectional study in India.

Dear Dr. Ahmad:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Joseph Telfair

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The data, study tools and a readme file explaining about the data are available on the Harvard data verse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NQYBPM).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES