Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Mar 18;397(10281):1261–1262. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00467-0

Free licensing of vaccines to end the COVID-19 crisis

Kayvan Bozorgmehr a,b, Rosa Jahn b, David Stuckler c, Martin McKee d
PMCID: PMC7972308  PMID: 33743843

The pace of COVID-19 vaccine development, authorisation, and production is unprecedented. Yet all three approved vaccines by Pfizer–BioNTech, Moderna, and AstraZeneca are already facing manufacturing delays. These delays are creating chaos for many national vaccination programmes, leading to calls for coordinated efforts by governments and manufacturers to increase production.1

These pharmaceutical companies have benefited greatly from huge sums of public funding for research and development and advance purchase commitments, amounting to between US$2·2 billion and $4·1 billion (by Feb 1, 2021) from Germany, the UK, and North America combined (appendix). Yet unfortunately, these governments did not make their support conditional on measures that would enable more vaccine to be produced through, for example, patent pools (eg, the COVID-19 Technology Access Pool) or non-exclusive licensing, which would allow pharmaceutical companies with spare manufacturing capacity to increase supply. So far, most effort has gone into increasing production capacity in the vaccine developers' own facilities or through subcontracts and licensing arrangements with other developers, such as AstraZeneca's agreement with the Serum Institute of India, or Sanofi's support in filling and packing bottles of Pfizer–BioNTech's vaccine.

It is not, however, too late to take bold measures to increase production. Ideally, an agreement could be reached with the patent holders to make the relevant intellectual property available. However, if this agreement is not possible, compulsory licensing is possible (ie, when a government grants permission to someone else to produce a patented product).2 Compulsory licensing is permitted in exceptional circumstances: public health emergencies,3 such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Together, thirteen EU member states account for more than 60% of the world's major facilities for vaccine production and 90% of global vaccine production.4 Of course, changes would be needed to refocus production to COVID-19 vaccines, but this approach could boost production in the immediate future. It would also enable vaccine manufacturers in low-income regions to start producing immediately,5 especially benefiting those countries that are far down the list to receive vaccines. Delays in vaccine production and deployment will lead to avoidable morbidity, mortality, and repeated lockdowns with detrimental health, social, and economic consequences that are related to COVID-19. Effective and coordinated roll-out plans are urgently required to speed up deployment of existing vaccines. The EU should also use all instruments that are available, including compulsory licensing, to overcome the delays in vaccine production and to protect public health in this unprecedented crisis.

Throughout the pandemic, things that were once considered to be impossible, such as lockdowns and other severe restrictions on personal and economic liberty, have become accepted. There is no reason why our approach to vaccine development and manufacture should be any different.

Acknowledgments

We declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (126.8KB, pdf)

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (126.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Lancet (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES