Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2021 Mar 5;12:613105. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.613105

Effects of Interleukin-1β in Glycinergic Transmission at the Central Amygdala

Jocelyn Solorza 1,2,†, Carolina A Oliva 3,†, Karen Castillo 4,†, Gabriela Amestica 1, María Constanza Maldifassi 4, Xaviera A López-Cortés 5, Rafael Barra 6, Jimmy Stehberg 7, Matthias Piesche 8,9, Patricio Sáez-Briones 10, Wendy González 2,11, Mauricio Arenas-Salinas 2, Trinidad A Mariqueo 1,*
PMCID: PMC7973117  PMID: 33746753

Abstract

Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) is an important cytokine that modulates peripheral and central pain sensitization at the spinal level. Among its effects, it increases spinal cord excitability by reducing inhibitory Glycinergic and GABAergic neurotransmission. In the brain, IL-1β is released by glial cells in regions associated with pain processing during neuropathic pain. It also has important roles in neuroinflammation and in regulating NMDA receptor activity required for learning and memory. The modulation of glycine-mediated inhibitory activity via IL-1β may play a critical role in the perception of different levels of pain. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) participates in receiving and processing pain information. Interestingly, this nucleus is enriched in the regulatory auxiliary glycine receptor (GlyR) β subunit (βGlyR); however, no studies have evaluated the effect of IL-1β on glycinergic neurotransmission in the brain. Hence, we hypothesized that IL-1β may modulate GlyR-mediated inhibitory activity via interactions with the βGlyR subunit. Our results show that the application of IL-1β (10 ng/ml) to CeA brain slices has a biphasic effect; transiently increases and then reduces sIPSC amplitude of CeA glycinergic currents. Additionally, we performed molecular docking, site-directed mutagenesis, and whole-cell voltage-clamp electrophysiological experiments in HEK cells transfected with GlyRs containing different GlyR subunits. These data indicate that IL-1β modulates GlyR activity by establishing hydrogen bonds with at least one key amino acid residue located in the back of the loop C at the ECD domain of the βGlyR subunit. The present results suggest that IL-1β in the CeA controls glycinergic neurotransmission, possibly via interactions with the βGlyR subunit. This effect could be relevant for understanding how IL-1β released by glia modulates central processing of pain, learning and memory, and is involved in neuroinflammation.

Keywords: interleukin-1β, auxiliary subunit, glycine receptors, beta subunit, central amygdala (CeA), neuroimmune communication

Introduction

The Central Nervous System (CNS) performs an orchestrated innate immune response to painful injury (Watkins and Maier, 2002; Xu et al., 2020). During chronic pain development, several inflammatory mediators participate in the loss of spinal and supra-spinal inhibition, leading to hyperexcitability of pain-associated circuits (Ji et al., 2018; Maydych, 2019; Mariqueo and Zúñiga-Hernández, 2020). Proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, participate actively in pain sensitization (Ferreira et al., 1988; Sommer and Kress, 2004), inducing hyperalgesia and allodynia (Tadano et al., 1999; Wei et al., 2012). These effects are mediated via spinal modulation of GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory synaptic transmission (Kawasaki et al., 2008; Chirila et al., 2014; Patrizio et al., 2017), by decreasing glycine receptor activity in lamina II postsynaptic interneurons (Chirila et al., 2014), and hence, reducing glycinergic inhibitory control of spinal excitability.

While the role of spinal IL-1β in pain processing has been widely studied, information on the effects of IL-1β at the supra-spinal level is rather precarious. In the brain, IL-1β is released by astrocytes and microglia in response to various proinflammatory stimuli (Sugama et al., 2011; González et al., 2014). Increased IL-1β in brain regions relevant for pain processing such as the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and amygdala have been reported during neuropathic pain establishment (del Rey et al., 2011; Al-Amin et al., 2011; Gui et al., 2016).

No study to date has evaluated the effects of IL-1β on glycinergic activity at supra-spinal regions. Together with GABAA receptors, GlyRs regulate neuronal excitability in the CNS, including regions that are critical for central nociceptive processing, such as the spinal cord (Gradwell et al., 2017), thalamus (Molchanova et al., 2018), prefrontal cortex (Liu et al., 2015), nucleus accumbens (Muñoz et al., 2018), hippocampus (Aroeira et al., 2011), periaqueductal gray (PAG) (Choi et al., 2013) and amygdala (Delaney et al., 2010).

Glycine receptors are pentameric ligand-gated chloride channels that control synaptic inhibition in the CNS (Thompson et al., 2010; Burgos et al., 2016). GlyRs can be assembled as homopentamers of four types of α subunits (α(1–4)GlyR subunits), or heteropentamers forming complexes with the auxiliary β subunit (βGlyR), in a proposed 3α2β or 2α3β conformation (Grudzinska et al., 2005). The auxiliary βGlyR subunit is unable to form functional channels without αGlyR subunits (Galaz et al., 2015). However, βGlyR affects the establishment of inhibitory synapses by an intracellular interaction with the scaffolding protein Gephyrin (Maric et al., 2011) and modulates the pharmacological profile of glycinergic currents (Bormann et al., 1993). Both αGlyR and βGlyR subunits share common structural characteristics, including a N-terminal extracellular domain (ECD), four transmembrane domains (TMD), and a large intracellular loop (ICD) between TM3 and TM4 (Lynch, 2004).

The role of spinal GlyRs in chronic pain sensitization has been broadly investigated. Using Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as a pro-inflammatory mediator to induce peripheral and central inflammatory pain sensitization, it was reported that PGE2 stimulates the intracellular phosphorylation of α3GlyR subunits to reduce glycinergic inhibitory neurotransmission control (Moraga-Cid et al., 2020). The role of α3GlyR subunits in PGE2-induced pain sensitization is further supported by a study showing that PGE2-induced pain sensitization was reduced in mice lacking α3GlyR subunits (Glra3−/− Knockout mice) (Harvey et al., 2004). Interestingly, it has been proposed that the auxiliary βGlyR subunit blocks α3GlyR subunit phosphorylation by steric hindrance, as the βGlyR ICD loop is larger than that of α3GlyR subunits (Acuña et al., 2016). The βGlyR subunit shows widespread expression in the CeA nucleus (Delaney et al., 2010), which is involved in the cognitive and emotional integration of peripheral nociceptive pain (Cai et al., 2018). CeA neural circuits integrate cortical inputs to assign valence to peripheral nociceptive stimuli (Pessoa and Adolphs, 2010), and increased excitability in CeA circuits has been associated to reduced inhibitory control during the establishment of neuropathic pain (Ikeda et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2014). The role of GlyRs at the CeA level has not been explored to date. Given that IL-1β induces hyperalgesia by reducing glycinergic activity in the spinal cord, here we studied whether IL-1β can modulate GlyR activity in the CeA. Furthermore, we evaluated the possibility that IL-1β modulates GlyR activity via interactions with the βGlyR auxiliary subunit.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats (250–350 g) were obtained from the Animal Facility of University of Chile. Animal care and experimental protocols for this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Use Committee of University of Chile (N°17027-MED-UCH) and followed the guidelines for ethical protocols and animal care established by the National Institute of Health, MD, United States and the International Association for the Study of Pain in conscious animals. Every effort was made to minimize animal suffering.

Animals were bred and housed in controlled laboratory conditions, received standard rat chow diet and water ad libitum and were housed on a 12-h light/dark cycle at a constant room temperature of 23°C.

Homology Modeling and Molecular Simulations

We constructed a three-dimensional (3D) molecular model of the heteropentameric GlyR (2α1:3β) based on the X ray crystal structure of α1GlyR subunits from zebrafish (Du et al., 2015a) (Protein Data Bank ID code: 3JAE; Resolution: 3.9 Å). The software MODELLER version 9.18 was used to build the homology models for all sets of receptors (Šali and Blundell, 1993). The GlyR was oriented towards the z axis and embedded in a membrane composed by POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) lipids. The system was solvated in a water periodic box (162 × 160 × 123 Å) of TIP3 water molecules and ionized at 0.15 mM NaCl. The initial conformations of each system were subjected to cycles of energy minimization of 10,000 steps and further equilibrated by molecular dynamics of 20 ns with α carbons restrained, in order to relax the conformation of the lateral chains and avoid conformation tension generated during the construction of the model. The calculations were performed using NAMD software and the CHARMM36 united-atom force field for membrane lipids and the CHARMM27 force field with the CMAP correction for proteins (Phillips et al., 2005). All analyses were performed using the VMD software (Humphrey et al., 1996). To study the interaction of IL-1β with the GlyR, the crystal structure of the IL-1β Receptor complex bound to IL-1β (ID code: 3O4O; Resolution: 3.3 Å; RValue: 0.29) was used to build the IL-1β homology model. All models were validated using PROCHEK (Laskowski et al., 1993).

Docking Simulations

Protein-protein interactions between GlyR with IL-1β were explored. The system was named 2α1:3β-IL-1β (heteropentameric α1βGlyR conformation bound to IL-1β). In order to study the putative interactions between IL-1β and the 2α1:3β GlyR the ClusPro2.0 server was used (https://cluspro.org). ClusPro2.0 is based on three key computational stages. First, an extensive sampling of conformations on a rigid-body docking was performed. Then, resulting conformations were grouped by RMSD according to those with the lowest energy, and finally, a refinement of the structures was performed by energy minimizations. Clusters were classified using electrostatic and Van der Waals interactions. Clusters with sizes greater than the sum of their average plus twice their standard deviation were considered representative, as previously reported (Bottegoni et al., 2006).

Site Directed Mutagenesis

Point mutations in the βGlyR subunit were made using a QuikChange kit from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, United States), following the manufacturer’s instructions, and checked by sequencing (Macrogen), using the following primers GlyRY240A: Forward: tga​tat​taa​aaa​gga​gga​tat​cga​agc​tgg​caa​ctg​tac​aaa​at and Reverse: att​ttg​tac​agt​tgc​cag​ctt​cga​tat​cct​cct​ttt​taa​tat​ca.

Cell Culture and Expression of Recombinant GlyRs

Human embryonic kidney 293 cells (HEK293T) were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with L-glutamine DMEM-GlutaMAX (Gibco) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Lonza Basel, Switzerland) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Once the cells reached 60–70% confluence, they were transfected with a pcDNA3.1 plasmid containing either the rat αGlyR subunit, rat βGlyR subunit (NovoPro Biosciences) or site mutated rat Y240AβGlyR subunits, using the Effectene transfection kit (Qiagen). GlyR subunits were co-transfected with CD-8 as reporter, and labeled using Dynabeads coupled with anti-CD8 antibody (Invitrogen). Cells were transfected with 0.3 μg total DNA at a co-transfection ratio 1:2:0.1 or 1:0.1 for heteropentameric α1GlyR:βGly:CD8 or homopentameric α1GlyR:CD8, respectively. Cell cultures were incubated for 24 h with the Effectene-DNA complexes, followed by trypsinization and seeding in poly-l coated 12 mm coverslips at a density of 300,000 cells/µl. Electrophysiology experiments were performed 48 h after transfection, in 12-mm glass coverslips coated with poly-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich).

Patch Clamp Recordings in Cultured Cells

Patch Clamp recordings in whole cell configuration where used to measure evoked current amplitudes on transiently transfected HEK293T cells at −60 mV holding potential. Patch electrodes (3.0–5.0 MΩ) were pulled from borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, INC 1B150F-4) in a Sutter P97 puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, United States) and filled with an internal solution buffer composed of (in mM): 140 CsCl, 10 BAPTA, 10 HEPES, 4 MgCl2, 2 ATP, 0.5 GTP. The external solution buffer was composed of (in mM): 140 NaCl, 3 KCl, 10 HEPES, 1.3 Mg2Cl and 2.4 CaCl2 and 10 glucose. Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, United States) in conjunction with an I/O board NI 6221 PCI (National Instruments) and the Strathclyde electrophysiology software WinWCP (University of Strathclyde, UK) were used for data acquisition. EC50 and nHill values were obtained experimentally from a normalized dose response curve using data points from the evoked currents in response to 30, 50, 100, 300 and 1,000 µM of glycine, using a nonlinear algorithm in the GraphPad Prism 6 software. The dose-response curves were fitted to Hill’s equation:

Iglycine=Imax∗[glycine]EC50nHill+[glycine]nHill

The current evoked at a determined concentration (I glycine), the maximal current obtained at saturating concentrations of glycine (I max), the concentration of glycine to reach the half maximal current response (EC50) and the Hill coefficient (nHill), which indicates cooperativity in the binding of glycine to GlyR (Hussein et al., 2019), were estimated from the dose response curves. Perfusion experiments were performed by evoking currents with 50 µM glycine pulses. Then IL-1β (10 ng/ml) was perfused for 60 s, followed by intermittent 50 µM glycine pulses in 10 s intervals until sensitivity was restored. All experiments were performed at room temperature (20°–21°C). These currents were analyzed by fitting a single exponential function to adjust the decay time constant.

Patch Clamp Recordings in Central Amygdala Slices: Rat Brain Slice Preparation and Electrophysiological Measurements

Four male SD rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and then decapitated. Their brains were rapidly removed and placed in a beaker with cold artificial cerebrospinal solution (ACSF) composed of (in mM): 85 NaCl, 75 sucrose, 3 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 10 dextrose, 3.5 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 3 sodium pyruvate, 0.5 sodium L-ascorbate and 3 myo-inositol (305 mOsm, pH 7.4 with 95% O2/5% CO2). Two coronal slices of 300 µm from each hemisphere were obtained from each animal using a vibratome and left for 1 h at 36°C in the ACSF solution. Then the ACSF solution was replaced with a “recording solution,” composed of (in mM): 126 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 10 dextrose, 1 MgSO4, 2 CaCl2, 3 sodium pyruvate, 0.5 sodium L-ascorbate and 3 myo-inositol (305 mOsm, pH 7.4 with 95% O2/5% CO2) at room temperature (22°C). Slices were recorded in a submerged-style chamber solution with recording solution at 30–32°C, under an upright infrared-differential interference contrast (IR-DIC) fluorescence microscope (Eclipse FNI, Nikon) equipped with a 40× water objective. Voltage-clamp whole cell recordings were performed in the soma of visually identified neurons in the CeA. We used a borosilicate glass electrode (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, United States) pulled on a P-97 Flaming/Brown Micropipette Puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, United States). The glass pipette, ranging from 3.5 to 4.2 MΩ, was filled with intracellular solution containing the following (in mM): 130 Cs-gluconate, 3.5 CsCl, 4 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, 10 Na-phosphocreatine, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES and 0.4% Biocytin (286 mOsm, pH 7.4 adjusted with CsOH). After seal formation and successful transition to whole-cell configuration, access resistance usually between 4 and 15 MΩ, was continuously monitored; series resistance was monitored and compensated between 75 and 80%. Glycine-mediated currents were isolated in the presence of synaptic blockers CNQX (10 µM), APV (50 µM), and picrotoxin (50 µM) to block AMPAR, NMDAR and GABAA receptors, respectively. The spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs) obtained as outward currents were recorded at a holding potential of +20 mV. The remaining sIPSCs obtained after further application of bicuculline (10 µM) was considered glycine-based sIPSC. At the end of the recordings, strychnine was applied to block glycinergic currents and thus confirm that the observed currents were glycinergic. We used PClamp detection events to choose single events of about 3–10 pA that were greater than peak to peak noise, to analyze their amplitude, area, and decay constant. Spontaneous synaptic events were detected over 100 s of continuous recording, and two different times following IL-1β application were analyzed (10 ng/ml, at 5 and 15 min). For these experiments, 16 slices out of 4 animals were recorded, and 13 cells were selected for the calculations (the criterium was the recording with stable input resistance (Rin) along the experiment). Voltage-clamp signals were acquired using a MultiClamp 700B amplifier (Axon CNS, Molecular Devices LLC), low-pass filtered at 10 kHz, digitally sampled at 30 kHz and recorded through a Digidata-1440A interface (Axon CNS, Molecular Devices) and PClamp 10.3 software.

Statistical Analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). We used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the effects of IL-1β treatment, followed by a Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism software (GraphPad, United States).

Results

IL-1β Modulated Glycinergic Currents in Central Amygdala Slices

To determine whether IL-1β can modulate GlyR activity in the CeA, we performed whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings in CeA neurons from brain slices. Representative traces of isolated spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic glycinergic currents (sIPSCs), before (Control) and during the application of IL-1β, are presented in Figure 1A. We generated an amplitude distribution plot of the events recorded in all the slices/cells. We observed that the application of IL-1β induced a significant change in the amplitude distribution of sIPSCs, from the beginning of IL-1β perfusion (5 min), and up to 15 min afterward (Figure 1B). GlyR currents transiently shifted toward events of higher amplitude after 5 min of IL-1β perfusion, and reduced the events in all the amplitudes after 15 min (See the table with summarized values). The cumulative probability distribution of the amplitudes showed that the half-probability is transiently shifted to the right at the beginning of IL-1β perfusion. At 15 min, the half-probability is similar to the control. However, the curve is accelerated by the effects of IL-1β (Figure 1C).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Glycinergic sIPSCs are modulated by IL-1β in CeA neurons of rat. (A) Representative synaptic sIPSC glycinergic currents in the presence of CNQX (10 μM), APV (50 μM), picrotoxin (50 µM), bicuculline (10 μM), clamped at +20 mV, 5 and 15 min after incubation with IL-1β. (B) Upper: Event distribution histograms of sIPSCs amplitudes before (black bars) and after IL-1β application (gray bars). Below: table with summarized analysis and statistics of distribution histograms (C) Cumulative probability histogram of amplitude in CeA neurons before (black line), 5 min (gray line) and 15 min (discontinuous line) after incubation with IL-1β. (D) Graphical representation of the mean ± SEM (n = 4 rats, 13 cells) of glycinergic sIPSC currents parameters: amplitude (pA), frequency (Hz) and decay time (ms). One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (*p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001).

The analysis of the mean current amplitude, frequency, and decay constant (tau) is summarized in Figure 1D. We compared the control average with the 5 and 15 min time points after IL-1β perfusion. The data showed that IL-1β transiently and significantly modulated spontaneous glycine current amplitudes (control: 20.4 ± 0.22 pA; IL-1β 5 min: 23.7 ± 0.18 pA; IL-1β 15 min: 19.5 ± 0.23 pA; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001; Figure 1D, left). Instead, IL-1β did not significantly change the frequency of spontaneous glycinergic activity (control: 0.15 ± 0.01 Hz; IL-1β 5 min: 0.18 ± 0.02 Hz; IL-1β 15 min: 0.15 ± 0.02 Hz; Figure 1D, middle). However, the presence of IL-1β did transiently increase the decay time constant of the current (control: 7.2 ± 0.72 ms; IL-1β 5min: 18.4 ± 0.5 ms; IL-1β 15min: 8.6 ± 0.9 ms; ***p < 0.001). These analyses suggest that IL-1β can dynamically modulate the amplitude and decay time constant of spontaneous isolated glycinergic currents, suggesting a modulatory effect on GlyR subunits in the CeA.

The Effects of IL-1β on GlyRs is Mediated by an Interaction with the Auxiliary βGlyR Subunit

Previous studies demonstrated that auxiliary βGlyR subunit is broadly expressed in the CeA (Delaney et al., 2010). To determine if βGlyR subunit could be involved in the effects of IL-1β, we constructed a three-dimensional (3D) molecular model of the heteropentameric GlyR (2α1:3β) and IL-1β based on the most complete X-ray crystal structure of α1GlyR available, which was obtained from zebrafish (PDBid: 3JAE) and the IL-1β (PDBid:3o4o). Several three-dimensional reconstructions of αGlyR structure are available, but they are only partial (Du et al., 2015b; Huang et al., 2017; Moraga-Cid et al., 2015). We modeled the ECD and TMD of the βGlyR subunit since there is no available crystallographic structure of the ICD. The sequence identity between both proteins is nearly 50%, which is acceptable for this type of procedure (Burgos et al., 2016). We carried out protein-protein coupling experiments to predict the binding modes of IL-1β on the heteromeric GlyR. The system 2α1:3β-IL-1β showed a representative cluster (See Supplementary Appendix S1). Finally, the result was enhanced on Rosie (Rosseta Online Server, https://rosie.graylab.jhu.edu/docking2). The relevant site identified in the interaction with the IL-1β, corresponded to the back of the loop C of β-subunit in the system 2α1:3β. Molecular Docking suggested that the residues Tyrosine 240, Lysine 235 and Aspartate 237 in the back of loop C of the ECD domain of the βGlyR subunit could have a predominant role in the modulation of IL-1β, mostly interacting through hydrogen bonds (Figure 2A). These residues were identified as hot spots for interactions with IL-1β (Wang et al., 2010). Besides, three important putative interactions between β-subunit and IL-1β through hydrogen bonds were described. These interactions correspond to the hydrogen bonds that were established between residues Gln48 (IL-1β)-Tyr240 (βGlyR), Glu51 (IL-1 β)-Lys235 (βGlyR) and Lys93 (IL-1β)-Asp237 (βGlyR), and showed as red dotted lines in Figure 2B. These results suggested that IL-1β may modulate GlyRs currents by interacting with the βGlyR auxiliary subunit, however to prove it we performed site-directed mutations.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Molecular model of heteropentameric 2α1:3β GlyRs and identification of the residues which putatively interact with IL-1β. αGlyR, βGlyR subunits and IL-1β are represented in green, yellow and grey, respectively.

The Modulation of Glycinergic Currents by IL-1β Is Impaired by Site-Directed Mutation in the Auxiliary βGlyR Subunit

We performed an alignment of human ECD domains of αGlyR and βGlyR subunits focusing on the domain that contains the amino acids proposed to interact with IL-1β (Figure 3). The Tyrosine 240 residue that was divergent in βGlyR was selected to perform a site directed mutagenesis. Then, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiological recordings were performed on HEK293T cells transfected with α1 alone, α1β wild type (α1βWT) or α1β mutated (α1βY240A), and perfused with glycine (50 μM) and IL-1β (10 ng/ml) as already described (Kawasaki et al., 2008) (Figure 4). The heteropentameric α1βWT exhibited greater current decay time constant when compared to the mutated α1βY240A GlyR (Figure 4A; τ = 35,420 ± 2,671 ms and τ = 3,367 ± 1,684 ms, respectively (n = 3 cells from three different cultures; one-way ANOVA, ****p < 0.0001). The plotted current decay time constants of glycine-activated currents in homo- and heteropentameric GlyRs after the application of glycine or glycine + IL-1β are shown in Figure 4B. The effect of IL-1β significantly increases the decay time of the chloride currents in the presence of a βGlyR subunit in heteropentameric GlyRs; whereas, when the βGlyR was mutated (βY240A) the effect of IL-1β was abolished. This data shows that this subunit is important for the cytokine-induced effect in the GlyRs kinetics. Remarkably, it also suggests that the Tyrosine 240 residue from the βGlyR subunit is critical for IL-1β effects on GlyRs (Figure 4B). On the other hand, the EC50 for glycine was not affected by the mutated subunit (comparing EC50 of α1βWT with α1βY240A; Figure 4C and table), showing that the mutation affects the modulation of GlyRs by IL-1β without altering the pharmacological properties of the channel. Altogether these results suggest that IL-1β modulates GlyR activity through an interaction with the βGlyR subunit.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Sequence Alignment of complete Human ECD domains of α(1–3) and βGlyR subunits. Red arrow indicates the location of the residue (Y240) that was mutated in the βGlyR subunit.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

The effects of IL-1β are mediated by interaction with auxiliary βGlyR. (A) Representative glycine-activated currents of α1β wild type and α1βY240Α after the perfusion of glycine (black line) + IL-1β (red line). (B): Graphical representation of effects of glycine or glycine + IL-1β in homo and heteropentameric GlyRs. (C) Graphical representation of dose-response curve. Glycine activated currents at different glycine concentrations (10–1,000 μM) were normalized to a percentage of the maximal response to the application of glycine 1,000 μM in HEK293T cells transfected with different subunits of GlyRs. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Discussion

Here, we showed that IL-1β modulates glycinergic transmission in the CeA, which is in line with previous studies showing that IL-1β decreases spinal glycinergic inhibitory neurotransmission by reducing the number and amplitude of sIPSCs events (Kawasaki et al., 2008; Chirila et al., 2014; Patrizio et al., 2017). We recorded spontaneous currents (sIPSC), this is, spontaneous postsynaptic currents generated in the absence of experimental stimulation, but by action-potential-dependent and the spontaneous release of neurotransmitter. Changes in current frequency are related to vesicular release from presynaptic sites, whereas changes in current amplitude are dependent upon activation of the postsynaptic receptors. Our results show a transient effect of IL-1β in CeA neurons lasting for minutes, suggesting that the modulation of glycinergic transmission induced by IL-1β could be modulatory and dynamic, affecting channel kinetic parameters at postsynaptic sites. Thus, in our analysis, we observed a transient increase in the amplitude of sIPSCs, probably due to increased activation of postsynaptic GlyRs, with a later reduction (after 15 min) due to a reduced activation, or inhibition, of postsynaptic GlyR. No changes related to frequency were observed, suggesting that presynaptic release of glycine was not affected by IL-1β.

Previous evidence demonstrated that clustering of GlyR is dynamically regulated depending on the subunit composition, and its mobility along the synapse is strongly dependent on the presence of α1 and β subunits (Patrizio et al., 2017). Moreover, in that report, the authors showed that IL-1β affects GlyR currents when α1β, but no other α subunits (α2,3) are present, suggesting that the effect of IL-1β is dependent on subunit-specific tissue expression. In the amygdala, the presence of α1GlyR and βGlyR is relevant, specifically in CeA, where the expression of βGlyR subunit is particularly high (Delaney et al., 2010). Our data indicate that in this region, GlyR currents are dynamically modulated by IL-1β, and this effect is specifically dependent on the presence of βGlyR. The amplitude distribution histograms were built two times after IL-1β, where we observed a shift toward the higher events. We suggest that this is part of the dynamic effect of IL-1β in the particular tissue as the amygdala. The unusual high expression of βGlyR subunit in the CeA induces the clustering of GlyRs, transiently increasing the postsynaptic currents. Later, the inhibition caused by IL-1β exerts its effect reducing significantly the currents, disaggregating the clusters. The clustering of GlyRs found in synapses is a process regulated by the auxiliary βGlyR subunit via an intracellular interaction with the scaffolding protein Gephyrin (Maric et al., 2011). The exact mechanism by which IL-1β modulates the GlyRs is unknown; however, we propose that IL-1β exerts a conformational change at the extracellular protein domain that causes changes both in channel opening and receptor clustering. Based on previous studies and our present results, it is possible to propose that IL-1β reduces glycinergic inhibitory control in CeA neurons by disaggregation of glycinergic clusters.

We performed in silico docking experiments using the α1βGlyR 3D structure because α1β is the predominant GlyR conformation in the mature central nervous system (Aguayo et al., 2004). Our molecular docking results show that IL-1β may interact with the loop C at the ECD of βGlyR subunits. This structure has been implicated in the conformational rearrangement necessary for the closing of the channel (Huang et al., 2017). Accordingly, our data in transfected HEK cells show that application of IL-1β slows down the recovery of glycine activated currents in the α1βWT. A similar effect was observed in CeA slices, a region with elevated levels of βGlyR, where the decay constant was significantly increased in response to IL-1β. The effect of IL-1β on the glycine current recovery was abolished in channels formed by the βGlyR containing the Y240A mutation. This result supports the idea that IL-1β is interacting with the GlyR in a β subunit dependent binding.

Given that the release of IL-1β is increased in brain regions associated to pain processing including the amygdala in different models of chronic pain (del Rey et al., 2011; Al-Amin et al., 2011; Gui et al., 2016), it is probable that the modulation of glycinergic currents induced by IL-1β may be relevant for pain processing in the CeA. Further studies will be required to assess the role of inhibitory glycinergic currents in the processing of pain at the CeA.

However, the relevance of the present report is not limited to pain processing. The expression of IL-1β has also been reported to increase after LTP induction in the hippocampus (Schneider et al., 1998); while its blockade has been shown to facilitate hippocampus-dependent memory (Yirmiya, 2002; Avital et al., 2003; Depino et al., 2004). The expression of IL-1β in brain regions associated to pain processing, mood, and memory (such as the hippocampus and amygdala) can be associated with chronic pain perception, but also with learning deficits and depression triggered by chronic pain. How the modulation of glycinergic currents by IL-1β in the CeA and other brain regions contributes to learning impairments and mood disorders is a matter of further investigation.

In conclusion, GlyRs activity is modulated by IL-1β in the CeA, possibly via interactions with the βGlyRs auxiliary subunit. This subunit may play a critical role in central pain sensitization. Elucidation of the binding mode between IL-1β and the βGlyR subunit may offer novel possibilities for the development of new pharmacological agents with potential analgesic activity to treat chronic pain and its associated pathologies.

Highlights

  • 1 IL-1β modulates inhibitory synaptic transmission in the Central Amygdala

  • 2 The effect of IL-1β is mediated by the auxiliary βGlyR subunit

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Use Committee of the University of Chile (N17027-MED-UCH).

Author Contributions

JS, KC, GA, MM, XL-C, RB, MP, PS-B, WG, and MA-S designed or performed experiments, discussed the results, reviewed the final manuscript. CO, JS, and TM designed and performed experiments, discussed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by PIEI QUIMBIO University of Talca (TM), FONDECYT grant No. 3170690 (TM). CONICYT Doctoral Program Scholarship Grant No.21201001 (JS). FONDECYT Grant No.1180999 (KC). The Centro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaiso is a Millennium Institute supported by the Millennium Scientific Initiative of the Chilean Ministry of Economy, Development, and Tourism (P029-022-F) (KC). FONDECYT grant 1200452 (JS), FONDECYT grant No.1191133 (WG), Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channels-Associated Diseases (MiNICAD) and FONDEQUIP (WG).

Conflict of Interest

The authors hui declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2021.613105/full#supplementary-material.

Click here for additional data file. (19.2KB, pdf)

References

  1. Acuña M. A., Yévenes G. E., Ralvenius W. T., Benke D., Di Lio A., Lara C. O., et al. (2016). Phosphorylation state-dependent modulation of spinal glycine receptors alleviates inflammatory pain. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 2547–2560. 10.1172/JCI83817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguayo L. G., van Zundert B., Tapia J. C., Carrasco M. A., Alvarez F. J. (2004). Changes on the properties of glycine receptors during neuronal development. Brain Res. Rev. 47, 33–45. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Amin H., Sarkis R., Atweh S., Jabbur S., Saadé N. (2011). Chronic dizocilpine or apomorphine and development of neuropathy in two animal models II: effects on brain cytokines and neurotrophins. Exp. Neurol. 228, 30–40. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aroeira R. I., Ribeiro J. A., Sebastião A. M., Valente C. A. (2011). Age-related changes of glycine receptor at the rat hippocampus: from the embryo to the adult. J. Neurochem. 118, 339–353. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07197.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Avital A., Goshen I., Kamsler A., Segal M., Iverfeldt K., Richter-Levin G., et al. (2003). Impaired interleukin-1 signaling is associated with deficits in hippocampal memory processes and neural plasticity. Hippocampus 13, 826–834. 10.1002/hipo.10135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bormann J., Rundström N., Betz H., Langosch D. (1993). Residues within transmembrane segment M2 determine chloride conductance of glycine receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers. EMBO J. 12, 3729–3737. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8404844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bottegoni G., Cavalli A., Recanatini M. (2006). A comparative study on the application of hierarchical-agglomerative clustering approaches to organize outputs of reiterated docking runs. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 46, 852–862. 10.1021/ci050141q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgos C. F., Yévenes G. E., Aguayo L. G. (2016). Structure and pharmacologic modulation of inhibitory glycine receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 90, 318–325. 10.1124/mol.116.105726 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai Y. Q., Wang W., Paulucci-Holthauzen A., Pan Z. Z. (2018). Brain circuits mediating opposing effects on emotion and pain. J. Neurosci. 38, 6340–6349. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2780-17.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chirila A. M., Brown T. E., Bishop R. A., Bellono N. W., Pucci F. G., Kauer J. A. (2014). Long-term potentiation of glycinergic synapses triggered by interleukin 1β. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8263–8268. 10.1073/pnas.1401013111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi K.-H., Nakamura M., Jang I.-S. (2013). Presynaptic Glycine receptors increase GABAergic neurotransmission in rat periaqueductal gray neurons. Neural Plast. 2013, 954302. 10.1155/2013/954302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. del Rey A., Yau H.-J., Randolf A., Centeno M. V., Wildmann J., Martina M., et al. (2011). Chronic neuropathic pain-like behavior correlates with IL-1β expression and disrupts cytokine interactions in the hippocampus. Pain 152, 2827–2835. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Delaney A. J., Esmaeili A., Sedlak P. L., Lynch J. W., Sah P. (2010). Differential expression of glycine receptor subunits in the rat basolateral and central amygdala. Neurosci. Lett. 469, 237–242. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Depino A. M., Alonso M., Ferrari C., del Rey A., Anthony D., Besedovsky H., et al. (2004). Learning modulation by endogenous hippocampal IL-1: blockade of endogenous IL-1 facilitates memory formation. Hippocampus 14, 526–535. 10.1002/hipo.10164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Du J., Lü W., Wu S., Cheng Y., Gouaux E. (2015a). Glycine receptor mechanism elucidated by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 526, 224–229. 10.1038/nature14853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Du J., Lü W., Wu S., Cheng Y., Gouaux E. (2015b). Glycine receptor mechanism elucidated by electron cryo-microscopy. Nature 526, 224–229. 10.1038/nature14853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira S. H., Lorenzetti B. B., Bristow A. F., Poole S. (1988). Interleukin-1 beta as a potent hyperalgesic agent antagonized by a tripeptide analogue. Nature 334, 698–700. 10.1038/334698a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Galaz P., Barra R., Figueroa H., Mariqueo T. (2015). Advances in the pharmacology of lGICs auxiliary subunits. Pharmacol. Res. 101, 65–73. 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.07.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. González H., Elgueta D., Montoya A., Pacheco R. (2014). Neuroimmune regulation of microglial activity involved in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuroimmunol. 274, 1–13. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gradwell M. A., Boyle K. A., Callister R. J., Hughes D. I., Graham B. A. (2017). Heteromeric α/β glycine receptors regulate excitability in parvalbumin-expressing dorsal horn neurons through phasic and tonic glycinergic inhibition. J. Physiol. 595, 7185–7202. 10.1113/JP274926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grudzinska J., Schemm R., Haeger S., Nicke A., Schmalzing G., Betz H., et al. (2005). The beta subunit determines the ligand binding properties of synaptic glycine receptors. Neuron 45, 727–739. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gui W.-S., Wei X., Mai C.-L., Murugan M., Wu L.-J., Xin W.-J., et al. (2016). Interleukin-1β overproduction is a common cause for neuropathic pain, memory deficit, and depression following peripheral nerve injury in rodents. Mol. Pain 12, 174480691664678. 10.1177/1744806916646784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harvey R. J., Depner U. B., Wässle H., Ahmadi S., Heindl C., Reinold H., et al. (2004). GlyR alpha3: an essential target for spinal PGE2-mediated inflammatory pain sensitization. Science 304, 884–887. 10.1126/science.1094925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang X., Shaffer P. L., Ayube S., Bregman H., Chen H., Lehto S. G., et al. (2017). Crystal structures of human glycine receptor α3 bound to a novel class of analgesic potentiators. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 108–113. 10.1038/nsmb.3329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. (1996). VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hussein R. A., Ahmed M., Breitinger H.-G., Breitinger U. (2019). Modulation of glycine receptor-mediated pain signaling in vitro and in vivo by glucose. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 12, 280. 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ikeda R., Takahashi Y., Inoue K., Kato F. (2007). NMDA receptor-independent synaptic plasticity in the central amygdala in the rat model of neuropathic pain. Pain 127, 161–172. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ji R.-R., Nackley A., Huh Y., Terrando N., Maixner W. (2018). Neuroinflammation and central sensitization in chronic and widespread pain. Anesthesiology 129, 343–366. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiang H., Fang D., Kong L.-Y., Jin Z.-R., Cai J., Kang X.-J., et al. (2014). Sensitization of neurons in the central nucleus of the amygdala via the decreased GABAergic inhibition contributes to the development of neuropathic pain-related anxiety-like behaviors in rats. Mol. Brain 7, 72. 10.1186/s13041-014-0072-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kawasaki Y., Zhang L., Cheng J.-K., Ji R.-R. (2008). Cytokine mechanisms of central sensitization: distinct and overlapping role of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in regulating synaptic and neuronal activity in the superficial spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 28, 5189–5194. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3338-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. (1993). PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291. 10.1107/S0021889892009944 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu Y., Huang D., Wen R., Chen X., Yi H. (2015). Glycine receptor-mediated inhibition of medial prefrontal cortical pyramidal cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 456, 666–669. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lynch J. W. (2004). Molecular structure and function of the glycine receptor chloride channel. Physiol. Rev. 84, 1051–1095. 10.1152/physrev.00042.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maric H.-M., Mukherjee J., Tretter V., Moss S. J., Schindelin H. (2011). Gephyrin-mediated γ-aminobutyric acid type A and glycine receptor clustering relies on a common binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 42105–421114. 10.1074/jbc.M111.303412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mariqueo T., Zúñiga-Hernández J. (2020). Omega-3 derivatives, specialized pro-resolving mediators: promising therapeutic tools for the treatment of pain in chronic liver disease. Prostaglandins, Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 158, 102095. 10.1016/j.plefa.2020.102095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Maydych V. (2019). The interplay between stress, inflammation, and emotional attention: relevance for depression. Front. Neurosci. 13, 384. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Molchanova S. M., Comhair J., Karadurmus D., Piccart E., Harvey R. J., Rigo J.-M., et al. (2017). Tonically active α2 subunit-containing Glycine receptors regulate the excitability of striatal medium spiny neurons. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 10, 442. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moraga-Cid G., San Martín V. P., Lara C. O., Muñoz B., Marileo A. M., Sazo A., et al. (2020). Modulation of glycine receptor single-channel conductance by intracellular phosphorylation. Sci. Rep. 10, 4804. 10.1038/s41598-020-61677-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moraga-Cid G., Sauguet L., Huon C., Malherbe L., Girard-Blanc C., Petres S., et al. (2015). Allosteric and hyperekplexic mutant phenotypes investigated on an α1 glycine receptor transmembrane structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 2865–2870. 10.1073/pnas.1417864112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Muñoz B., Yevenes G. E., Förstera B., Lovinger D. M., Aguayo L. G. (2018). Presence of inhibitory glycinergic transmission in medium spiny neurons in the nucleus accumbens. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 228. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Patrizio A., Renner M., Pizzarelli R., Triller A., Specht C. G. (2017). Alpha subunit-dependent glycine receptor clustering and regulation of synaptic receptor numbers. Sci. Rep. 7, 10899. 10.1038/s41598-017-11264-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pessoa L., Adolphs R. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 773–782. 10.1038/nrn2920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Phillips J. C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., et al. (2005). Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802. 10.1002/jcc.20289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Šali A., Blundell T. L. (1993). Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schneider H., Pitossi F., Balschun D., Wagner A., del Rey A., Besedovsky H. O. (1998). A neuromodulatory role of interleukin-1beta in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 95, 7778–7783. 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sommer C., Kress M. (2004). Recent findings on how proinflammatory cytokines cause pain: peripheral mechanisms in inflammatory and neuropathic hyperalgesia. Neurosci. Lett. 361, 184–187. 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sugama S., Takenouchi T., Sekiyama K., Kitani H., Hashimoto M. (2011). Immunological responses of astroglia in the rat brain under acute stress: interleukin 1 beta co-localized in astroglia. Neuroscience 192, 429–437. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tadano T., Namioka M., Nakagawasai O., Tan-No K., Matsushima K., Endo Y., et al. (1999). Induction of nociceptive responses by intrathecal injection of interleukin-1 in mice. Life Sci . 65, 255–261. 10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00244-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson A. J., Lester H. A., Lummis S. C. R. (2010). The structural basis of function in Cys-loop receptors. Q. Rev. Biophys. 43, 449–499. 10.1017/S0033583510000168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang D., Zhang S., Li L., Liu X., Mei K., Wang X. (2010). Structural insights into the assembly and activation of IL-1β with its receptors. Nat. Immunol. 11, 905–911. 10.1038/ni.1925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Watkins L. R., Maier S. F. (2002). Beyond neurons: evidence that immune and glial cells contribute to pathological pain States. Physiol. Rev. 82, 981–1011. 10.1152/physrev.00011.2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wei X.-H., Yang T., Wu Q., Xin W.-J., Wu J.-L., Wang Y. Q., et al. (2012). Peri-sciatic administration of recombinant rat IL-1β induces mechanical allodynia by activation of src-family kinases in spinal microglia in rats. Exp. Neurol. 234, 389–397. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu M., Bennett D. L. H., Querol L. A., Wu L.-J., Irani S. R., Watson J. C., et al. (2020). Pain and the immune system: emerging concepts of IgG-mediated autoimmune pain and immunotherapies. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 91, 177–188. 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yirmiya R. (2002). Brain interleukin-1 is involved in spatial memory and passive avoidance conditioning. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 78, 379–389. 10.1006/nlme.2002.4072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (19.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES