Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis is clinically more severe, more difficult to treat, and carry a higher risk of vision loss, evisceration, or enucleation. This study is to investigate the clinical settings, antibiotic susceptibility, and visual outcomes of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis was diagnosed in 38 eyes of 38 patients. The main clinical features were postcataract endophthalmitis (n = 13, 34%) and endophthalmitis associated with corneal ulcer (n = 12, 32%), trauma (n = 6, 16%), endogenous etiology (n = 4, 11%), trabeculectomy (n = 2, 5%), and pterygium excision-related scleral ulcer (n = 1, 3%). Presenting visual acuity ranged from counting fingers to no light perception. Pars plana vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics was performed in 17 eyes (39%) in primary or secondary treatments. S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (38/38, 100%), penicillin (37/38, 97%), ceftriaxone (37/38, 97%), cefuroxime (12/15, 80%), levofloxacin (13/15 ,87%), and moxifloxacin (15/17, 88%). Final visual acuity was better than 20/400 in 3 of 38 eyes (8%), 5/200 to hand motions in 3 eyes (8%), and light perception to no light perception in 32 eyes (84%). Ten eyes (26%) underwent evisceration or enucleation. Although S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis had a very poor visual prognosis.
Subject terms: Outcomes research, Epidemiology
Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is a Gram-positive, spherical bacteria. They are usually found in pairs and are nonsporing and nonmotile. S. pneumoniae resides asymptomatically in healthy carriers, and they typically colonize the respiratory tract, sinuses, and nasal cavity. However, in individuals with compromised immune systems, such as elderly adults and young children, the bacterium may become pathogenic and spread to other locations to cause disease. S. pneumoniae has various virulence factors, including polysaccharide capsules, pneumolysin, neuraminidases, and zinc metalloproteinases. All these factors contribute to the severity of ocular infections1,2.
S. pneumoniae is still a main cause of ocular infectious diseases, such as conjunctivitis, keratitis, and endophthalmitis1,2. Although the endophthalmitis incidence is lower than that of conjunctivitis and keratitis, endophthalmitis is clinically more severe and more difficult to treat.
S. pneumoniae infection is a key cause of exogenous and endogenous endophthalmitis, and such infections have the worst visual sequelae among all organisms of endophthalmitis3. Of the 420 patients enrolled in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study, 291 had a positive culture, with a total of 323 growth isolates confirmed4. Of five patients, only two patients had visual acuity (VA) of 5/200 or better, and no patient had vision of 20/100 or better3.
In other studies of streptococcal endophthalmitis, S. pneumoniae led to the worst visual outcomes out of the culture-proved organisms examined3,5–8.
These outcomes include a lack of light perception and loss of eye globe despite antibiotic treatment and pars plana vitrectomy5,6,9,10. In other studies, the most common causes of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis were surgery and trauma5,9–12. Furthermore, most cultured S. pneumoniae isolates cultured were susceptible to vancomycin3,5–7,9,12–14. This study investigated the clinical details, antibiotic susceptibility, and visual outcomes of patients with culture-proven endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae infection at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan.
Results
Thirty-eight eyes of 38 patients with culture-proven endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae infection were identified. Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the demographics, systemic illnesses, clinical features, management details, and visual outcomes of patients with S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis. In terms of sex, 25 of the patients (66%) were male and 13 patients (34%) were female. The median age was 61.3 ± 26.7 years (range, 2 to 92 years). The systemic illnesses of interest included diabetes mellitus (in nine patients) and primary hypertension (in nine patients). The median follow-up interval was 21 months (range, 1 to 85 months).
Table 1.
Demographics, clinical settings and features, managements, and outcomes of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis. ACI anterior chamber irrigation; TAPtap and injection.
| Demographics | No. (%) | Clinical features | No. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient number | 38 | Presenting visual acuity | |
| Eye affected | 38 | Counting fingers | 4 (11%) |
| OD | 22 (58%) | Hand motions | 14 (37%) |
| OS | 16 (42%) | Light perception | 12 (32%) |
| Mean age, years | 61.3 ± 26.7 | No light perception | 7 (18%) |
| Gender | Not available | 1 (3%) | |
| Male | 25 (66%) | Hypopyon | 34 (89%) |
| Female | 13 (34%) | Fundus: invisible | 38 (100%) |
| Systemic illness | Management | ||
| Diabetes | 9 (24%) | Primary | |
| Hypertension | 9 (24%) | Vitrectomy | 15 (39%) |
| Cancer | 2 (5%) | Tap | 15 (39%) |
| Coronary arterial disease | 2 (5%) | Evisceration | 6 (16%) |
| Tuberculosis | 1 (3%) | ACI + TAP | 2 (5%) |
| Aortic aneurysm | 1 (3%) | Additional | |
| Ebstein's abnormality | 1 (3%) | Tap | 19 (50%) |
| Pneumonia | 1 (3%) | Vitrectomy | 5 (13%) |
| Infective endocarditis | 1 (3%) | Evisceration/enucleation | 4 (11%) |
| Unknown heart disease | 1 (3%) | ACI + TAP | 2 (5%) |
| Clinical settings | Final visual acuity | ||
| Cataract | 13 (34%) | ≧ 10/20 | 1 (3%) |
| Corneal ulcer | 12 (32%) | 20/50–20/200 | 1 (3%) |
| Trauma | 6 (16%) | 19/200–20/400 | 1 (3%) |
| Endogenous | 4 (11%) | 4/200- Counting fingers | 2 (5%) |
| Trabeculectomy | 2 (5%) | Hand motions | 1 (3%) |
| Pterygium excision-scleral ulcer | 1 (3%) | Light perception | 2 (5%) |
| No light perception | 30 (79%) |
Table 2.
Management and visual outcomes in Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis.
| No | Sex | Age | Eye | Cause (interval between diagnosis and event, days) | Medical records | Initial VA | Primary treatment | Additional treatment | Final VA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 84 | OD | Cataract (3) | Gastric cancer | CF | PPV | TAP | NLP |
| 2 | F | 75 | OS | Cataract (1) | HTN | CF | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 3 | F | 83 | OD | Cataract (2) | DM | HM | PPV | TAP | NLP |
| 4 | F | 83 | OD | Cataract (5) | DM, HTN, CAD | LP | PPV | PPV | CF |
| 5 | M | 69 | OS | Cataract (1) | HTN | LP | PPV | PPV | LP |
| 6 | M | 84 | OS | Cataract (3) | HTN, CAD | LP | PPV | TAP | NLP |
| 7 | F | 60 | OD | Cataract (2) | HTN | NLP | TAP | Evisceration | NLP |
| 8 | F | 75 | OD | Cataract (2) | DM, HTN | NLP | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 9 | M | 11 | OD | Cataract (5) | RP, Ebstein's abnormality | LP | PPV | TAP | NLP |
| 10 | F | 49 | OS | Cataract (8) | HTN, heart disease | LP | TAP | Evisceration | NLP |
| 11 | M | 75 | OS | Cataract (3) | HM | PPV | 20/50 | ||
| 12 | M | 79 | OD | Cataract (3) | HTN, Aortic aneurysm | HM | PPV | TAP | 20/400 |
| 13 | M | 71 | OD | Cataract (2) | TB | HM | PPV | ACI + TAP | NLP |
| 14 | M | 2 | OD | PK- related CU ( 45) | Dermoid cyst | – | Evisceration | NLP | |
| 15 | M | 63 | OS | PK- related CU ( 3 years) | HM | TAP | TAP | NLP | |
| 16 | F | 73 | OS | PK- related CU ( 8 years) | HM | Evisceration | NLP | ||
| 17 | M | 72 | OD | PK- related CU (60) | LP | TAP | TAP | NLP | |
| 18 | M | 63 | OS | PK- related CU (6 years) | DM | NLP | PPV | Evisceration | NLP |
| 19 | F | 80 | OD | PK- related CU (25) | DM, cancer | LP | PPV | TAP | NLP |
| 20 | M | 63 | OS | PK- related CU ( 5 years) | LP | Evisceration | NLP | ||
| 21 | F | 41 | OD | PK- related CU ( 5 years) | HM | TAP | TAP | NLP | |
| 22 | F | 69 | OD | PK- related CU (7) | Lung cancer | LP | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 23 | M | 63 | OS | Corneal ulcer | HM | TAP | TAP | NLP | |
| 24 | M | 80 | OD | Corneal ulcer*1 | NLP | Evisceration | NLP | ||
| 25 | M | 69 | OD | Corneal ulcer*2 | HM | TAP | TAP | NLP | |
| 26 | M | 22 | OS | Trauma/penetrating (3) | HM | PPV | HM | ||
| 27 | M | 53 | OD | Trauma/penetrating (2) | DM | LP | Evisceration | NLP | |
| 28 | M | 11 | OD | Trauma/penetrating (4) | HM | PPV | TAP | CF | |
| 29 | M | 40 | OD | Trauma/IOFB (1) | HM | PPV | TAP | NLP | |
| 30 | M | 35 | OS | Trauma/IOFB (2) | HM | ACI + TAP | ACI + TAP | 20/20 | |
| 31 | M | 38 | OS | Trauma/IOFB (1) | HM | TAP | PPV | NLP | |
| 32 | M | 78 | OS | Endogenous | DM | LP | Evisceration | NLP | |
| 33 | F | 46 | OS | Endogenous | DM | NLP | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 34 | M | 92 | OD | Endogenous | DM, HTN, pneumonia | NLP | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 35 | M | 72 | OD | Endogenous | IE | NLP | TAP | TAP | NLP |
| 36 | M | 25 | OD | Trabeculectomy (2 years) | CF | PPV | PPV | NLP | |
| 37 | M | 35 | OD | Trabeculectomy (4 years) | LP | ACI + TAP | PPV | LP | |
| 38 | F | 74 | OS | Scleral ulcer*3 | Pterygium excision | CF | TAP | Enucleation | NLP |
ACI anterior chamber irrigation; CAD coronary arterial disease; CF counting fingers; CU corneal ulcer; DM diabetes mellitus; HM hand motions; HTN hypertension; IE infective endocarditis; IOFB intraocular foreign body; LP light perception; NLP no light perception; PK penetrating keratoplasty; PPV pars plana vitrectomy; TAP tap and injection.
*Associated organisms: Proteus mirabilis1, Serratia marcescens2, and Klebsiella oxytoca3.
Patient clinical settings and features
The main clinical features were postcataract endophthalmitis (n = 13, 34%) and endophthalmitis associated with corneal ulcer (n = 12, 32%), trauma (n = 6, 16%), endogenous etiology (n = 4, 11%), trabeculectomy (n = 2, 5%), and pterygium excision-related scleral ulcer (n = 1, 3%). Among 12 eyes with corneal ulcer–related endophthalmitis, nine (75%) of them had been subjected to penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Penetrating trauma caused endophthalmitis in three eyes, and an intraocular foreign body (IOFB) caused endophthalmitis in the remaining three eyes.
In the endogenous etiology group, endogenous causes included infective endocarditis and pneumonia, and two patients had unidentified primary sources of infection. One patient with scleral ulcer–related endophthalmitis underwent a complicated pterygium excision with subsequent scleral grafts. All patients with postcataract endophthalmitis developed acute-onset endophthalmitis (median, 3 days; range, 1 to 8 days). The two patients with trabeculectomy–associated etiologies developed endophthalmitis 2 years and 4 years posttrabeculectomy, respectively. The mean interval between trauma and diagnosis of endophthalmitis was 2 days (range, 1 to 4 days).
Severe blurring of vision and pain were symptoms observed for all 38 eyes (100%) and 35 of 38 eyes (92%), with mean durations of 2.2 and 2.0 days, respectively. Visual acuity (VA) test results were as follows: hand motions (HM; n = 14/38, 37%), light perception (LP; n = 12/38, 32%), no light perception (NLP; n = 7/38, 18%), counting fingers (4/38, 11%), and undetermined VA in one 2-year-old patient. Hypopyon was documented in 34 of 38 eyes (89%). Visualization in the posterior segment view was poor in all eyes due to severe anterior chamber inflammation and severe vitritis. The lacrimal sac findings did not indicate dacrocystitis in our series. Additionally, in the postcataract endophthalmitis subgroup, hypopyon was documented in 12 of 13 eyes (92%), and increased intraocular pressure (IOP > 21 mm Hg) was found in 8 of 13 eyes (62%). Presenting symptoms of pain and decreased VA were identified in 11 of 13 eyes (96%) and in 13 of 13 eyes (100%) and had mean durations of 1.9 and 2.1 days, respectively.
Microbiology, antibiotic susceptibility testing, and minimal inhibitory concentration
S. pneumoniae infections were identified from vitreous samples from 35 (95%) of 37 patients and from anterior chamber taps in 19 patients (78%). Cultures from 35 eyes (92%) yielded a single microorganism. In three patients with polymicrobial endophthalmitis, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Serratia marcescens were identified. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of antibiotics are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with endophthalmitis.
| Number (%) | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vancomycin | 38/38 (100%) | ||
| Penicillin | 37/38 (97%) | 1/38 (3%) | |
| Cefuroxime | 12/15 (80%) | 3/15 (20%) | |
| Ceftriaxone | 37/38 (97%) | 1/38 (3%) | |
| Levofloxacin | 13/15 (87%) | 2/15 (13%) | |
| Moxifloxacin | 15/17 (88%) | 2/17 (12%) |
Table 4.
Minimal inhibitory concentration of Streptococcus pneumoniae in patients with endophthalmitis. MIC minimal inhibitory concentration.
| MIC (μg/ml) | 0.125 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penicillin (n = 15) | 1 | 4 | 5† | 3 | 1* | 1 |
| Ceftriaxone (n = 16) | 1 | 3 | 7† | 4* | 1 | |
| Cefuroxime (n = 6) | 1 | 1 | 2† | 1 | 1* | |
| Vancomycin (n = 6) | 5† | 1* |
*Indicates MIC90 values.
†Indicates MIC50 values.
Management
Primary treatment consisted of a combination of vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotics in 15 (39%) of 38 patients and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravitreal antibiotics in another 15 patients (39%). Follow-up treatments with vitreous tap and intravitreal antibiotics (TAP) were performed within 2 weeks of primary treatment in 19 (50%) of the 38 patients owing to clinically worsening inflammation and infection. One patient with traumatic endophthalmitis due to IOFB underwent removal of an anterior chamber IOFB and anterior chamber irrigation, and they were given antibiotics intravitreally. This patient was treated with a second course of anterior chamber irrigation with intravitreal antibiotics and eventually achieved 20/20 vision. Primary evisceration was performed on six eyes, and secondary evisceration or enucleation was performed on four eyes. In addition, intravitreal dexamethasone was administered to eight eyes (21%) during primary treatment.
Final visual outcomes
Of the 38 eyes, final VA was 20/400 or better in three eyes (8%), 5/200 to HM in three eyes (8%), and LP to NLP in 32 eyes (84%). Of the three patients whose affected eyes achieved VA of 20/400 or better, one patient underwent removal of an anterior chamber IOFB (VA of 20/20), and patients had postcataract endophthalmitis (final VA, 20/50 and 20/400). Evisceration or enucleation was performed on 10 (26%) eyes.
Statistical analysis
No significant difference in visual outcomes was observed between PPV and TAP groups (P = 0.99, Fischer’s exact test). Because of the relatively small number of eyes and the nonrandomized nature of this retrospective study, statistical conclusions concerning the differences between the clinical settings encountered and the treatment administered in this series cannot be drawn.
Discussion
A comparison of previous and current studies is presented in Table 5 and includes clinical settings, the vancomycin sensitivity pattern, and final visual outcomes. The most common etiology in the current series was postoperative endophthalmitis; this finding is similar to those in studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Australia, and Thailand5–10. However, the most common cause in an Indian study was keratitis, followed by trauma and surgery13. In postoperative settings, the most common causes were cataract, trabeculectomy, and PK-related corneal ulcer. Because of the increasing trend toward the intravitreal administration of antivascular endothelial growth factor agents, streptococcus species such as viridans streptococci have become more common than S. pneumoniae as the causative organisms of intravitreal injection–related endophthalmitis5.
Table 5.
Comparison in patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae in literature and present study.
| Study no | Nationality | Year | No. of eyes | Etiology | No. of eyes | Vancomycin susceptibility no | Final VA ≧20/400 no. (%) | Evisceration/Enucleation no. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Mao et al.7 | US | 1977–1990 | 6 | NA | 6/6 (100%) | 2/6 (33%) | NA | |
| 2. Miller et al.9 | US | 1989–2003 | 27 | All | 27 | 27/27 (100%) | 8/27 (30%) | 2/27 (7%) |
| Ocular surgery1 | 14 | 3 (21%) | ||||||
| Corneal stitch abscess | 5 | 3 (60%) | ||||||
| Corneal ulcer | 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Trauma | 3 | 2 (67%) | ||||||
| Endogenous | 2 | 0 | ||||||
| 3. EVS3 | US | 1990–1994 | 5 | Cataract | 5 | 5/5 (100%) | 2/5 (40%)2 | NA |
| 4. Soriano et al.10 | Spain | 1986–2004 | 36 | All | 36 | Not tested | NA | 17/36 (47%) |
| Cataract | 18 | |||||||
| Trauma | 5 | |||||||
| Glaucoma surgery | 4 | |||||||
| Radiotherapy | 3 | |||||||
| PK | 3 | |||||||
| Endogenous | 2 | |||||||
| Corneal abscess | 1 | |||||||
| 5. Kurniawan et al.6 | Australia | 1997–2012 | 23 | NA | 23/23 (100%) | 4/20(20%)3 | 9/20(45%) | |
| 6. Kuriyan et al.5 | US | 2000–2011 | 13 | All | 13 | 13/13(100%) | 5/13 (38%) | NA |
| Cataract | 4 | |||||||
| Bleb | 4 | |||||||
| GDD | 2 | |||||||
| PK | 1 | |||||||
| IVI | 1 | |||||||
| Corneal ulcer | 1 | |||||||
| 7. Dave et al.11 | India | 2004–2017 | 68 | NA | 68 | 51/52 (98%) | 0 | 68/68 (100%) |
| 8. Jindal et al.13 | India | 2006–2013 | 105 | Trauma | 105 | > 98% | NA | NA |
| 9. Dave et al.12 | India | 2006–2018 | 36 | Endogenous | 36 | > 98% | NA | NA |
| 10. Yospaiboon et al.8 | Thailand | 2012–2016 | 20 | All | 20 | NA | NA | NA |
| Postoperative | 11 | |||||||
| Trauma | 4 | |||||||
| Keratitis | 2 | |||||||
| Undetermined | 3 | |||||||
| 11. Chen et al. (current study) | Taiwan | 2000–2019 | 38 | All | 38 | 38/38 (100%) | 3/37 (8%) | 10/38 (26%) |
| Cataract | 13 | 2/13 (15%) | ||||||
| PK- related ulcer | 9 | 0 | ||||||
| Corneal ulcer | 3 | 0 | ||||||
| Trauma | 6 | 1/6 (17%) | ||||||
| Endogenous | 4 | 0 | ||||||
| Trabeculectomy | 2 | 0 | ||||||
| Scleral ulcer | 1 | 0 |
GDD glaucoma drainage device; IVI intravitreal injection; NA not available; PK penetrating keratoplasty.
1Ocular surgery: Cataract extraction (5), bleb-associated (4), lensectomy/anterior vitrectomy (1), bleb needling (1), suture removal (1), penetrating keratoplasty (1), glaucoma drainage device (1).
2Final VA ≧5/200.
3Final VA > 20/200.
S. pneumoniae is generally sensitive to vancomycin, penicillin, ceftriaxone, and fluoroquinolone. In Western countries, most related case series reported that it had susceptibility to vancomycin (100%)4,5,7,9,10. However, in India, some S. pneumoniae isolates showed resistance to vancomycin12–14. In this study and studies from Australia and Thailand, all S. pneumoniae isolates were sensitive to vancomycin (100%)6,8. Although fluoroquinolones, such as levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, are widely used in the treatment or prophylaxis of endophthalmitis, some S. pneumoniae isolates have been reported to still be resistant to these treatments9,12. In our study, some S. pneumoniae isolates were partially resistant to moxifloxacin or levofloxacin. Our study demonstrated that the MIC90 of vancomycin for S. pneumoniae was 0.5 μg/mL. We propose that vancomycin be continued as the first-line intravitreal antibiotic in the treatment of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis.
Studies on endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae infection showed a higher rate of poor visual and anatomical outcomes in those with the disease. US case series3,5,7,9 have found better visual outcomes than in Asian, European, and Austrian studies6,8,10,12–14. In the present study, only three eyes (3 out of 38, 8%) achieved vision of 20/400 or better. Patients with endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae or P. aeruginosa infection have a higher risk of requiring evisceration or enucleation13,15. Miller et al., in their study on S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis, reported that 3 out of 27 (11%) eyes required evisceration9. In Spanish and Indian studies, higher rates of evisceration of eyes affected by S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis were identified10,13. Soriano et al.10 reported an evisceration rate of 47% in 36 cases of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis. However, our study demonstrated an evisceration or enucleation rate of 26% in 38 cases of S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis.
Early detection and treatment are the best approaches to improving final visual outcomes in patients with endophthalmitis. Although some case series have shown no statistical difference between vitrectomy and TAP, early PPV still offers a higher likelihood of achieving a more favorable visual prognosis6,9,10. The need for a higher number of intravitreal injections was significantly associated with a poor final VA7. The rate of evisceration or enucleation in patients with endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae did not decrease in recent studies5,6,8,13,14. Chen et al.16 demonstrated that prevention of evisceration or enucleation in patients with endogenous bacterial panophthalmitis, no light perception, and scleral abscess can be achieved through multiple intravitreal and periocular injections of antibiotics and dexamethasone. No eye required evisceration or enucleation. Multiple intravitreal and periocular injections of antibiotics and dexamethasone could be an alternative to evisceration or enucleation in such cases.
This study has several limitations. First, the study was retrospective. Second, a few subgroups, such as those with traumatic, trabeculectomy-related, and endogenous S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis, had a relatively small number of patients. This made statistical analysis difficult to perform. Third, only a few antibiotics and samples were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. However, vancomycin is regularly tested by the laboratory department of our hospital. Because vancomycin is a routine antimicrobial agent used in treating Gram-positive bacterial endophthalmitis, our results still offer useful information. Despite these limitations, this study provided data on antibiotic susceptibility patterns and visual outcomes of endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae.
In conclusion, the most common cause in S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis infection was postcataract status. Although all S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, patients with S. pneumoniae endophthalmitis typically have a very poor visual prognosis. Further studies are necessary to ensure better prevention and management of endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae; this could include preventing he emergence of endophthalmitis and examining the effectiveness of prompt, aggressive medical and surgical interventions for the management of endophthalmitis.
Methods
The Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taoyuan, Taiwan approved this retrospective study protocol and waived the need for written informed consent from the study patients. All clinical procedures were conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The medical records of all patients treated for endophthalmitis caused by S. pneumoniae infection were reviewed at a tertiary referral center between April 2019 and January 2000. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Positive S. pneumoniae cultures from intraocular fluid (aqueous humor and vitreous) were identified in patients with exogenous endophthalmitis, including after surgery and trauma; (2) For patients with endogenous endophthalmitis, their bodily fluids were cultured with growths of S. pneumoniae. (3) The patients received follow-ups for at least 3 months unless, based on their final best-corrected VA, they had NLP. Data collected and reviewed included demographic information, medical history, presenting signs and symptoms, duration of symptoms before diagnosis of endophthalmitis, intervals between event and diagnosis of endophthalmitis, culture sites, antibiotic sensitivities and resistance patterns, management administered, and final VA.
Intraocular fluids were collected and plated on blood agar (5% sheep), chocolate agar, fungus culture media, and thioglycolate broth. All microbiologic testing was performed at the Microbiology Department of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Bacterial culture isolates were identified through conventional microbiological methods (2000–2013) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF–MS; 2014–2019). Conventional microbiological methods included Gram staining and biochemical tests. Gram staining revealed Gram-positive, lancet-shaped cocci. Positive reactions included optochin, bile solubility, inulin and alfa hemolysis, and negative reactions included catalase and oxidase. When the isolates were identified through MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Germany), the microbial film was overlaid with 1 μL of 70% formic acid. After the sample had dried, the film was overlaid with 1 μL of the matrix solution (50% acetonitrile containing 1% a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and 2.5% trifluoroacetic acid). After the sample had dried again, microorganism identification and data analysis were performed, for which the Bruker LT Microflex MALDI-TOF MS and Bruker Biotyper 3.0 system software programs were used. All analyses were performed using standard methods. An identification was considered successful at the species level when the score exceeded 2.0. The isolates were tested for susceptibility to various antibiotics using the Kirby–Bauer Disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton blood agar. The MIC breakpoints were determined based on the 0.5 McFarland standards by using a microdilution broth and the E-test method. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Wayne, PA) standards were used for interpretation and quality control for each corresponding year17. Because of the limitations inherent in a retrospective study, the antibiotic susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae isolates was performed in some selected antibiotics, including vancomycin, penicillin, ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. Some S. pneumoniae isolates were tested to determine the relevant MIC of antibiotics such as penicillin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, and vancomycin.
The treatment strategies were determined by the individual treating physicians and did not follow a standardized protocol. Before S. pneumoniae was cultured, intravitreal antibiotics included vancomycin with either ceftazidime or amikacin. After positive cultures of S. pneumoniae isolates and antibiotic susceptibility testing results were obtained, intravitreal vancomycin was administered. The doses of intravitreal agents were as follows: vancomycin, 1 mg/0.1 mL; amikacin, 0.25–0.4 mg/0.1 mL; ceftazidime, 2.25 mg/0.1 mL; and dexamethasone, 0.4 mg/0.1 mL. Tap with intravitreal antibiotics was treated as follows: (1) Corneal clarity was not suitable for PPV. (2) Patients with poor systemic condition were not suitable for PPV. (3) Patients refused PPV because of poor visual prognosis . Pars plana vitrectomy was performed as follows: (1) corneal clarity possible for PPV, and (2) poor response to initial tap treatment. Enucleation or evisceration was performed when the globe was not salvageable due to corneal or scleral necrotic laceration. Poor visual outcomes were defined by VA worse than 20/400, whereas favorable prognoses were defined by VA of 20/400 or better. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows version 23 (SPSS Science, Chicago, IL, USA).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 106-2314-B-182A-041, and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital CMRPG3F1243.
Author contributions
K.-J.C. designed the study, performed statistical analysis, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript for publication; Y-J. C. collected and analyzed the data; H.-C. C.,C.-C. L., M.-H. S., Y.-P. C., N.-K. W., Y.-S. H., A.-N. C., W.-C. W., L. Y., C.-C. S., L. L., Y.-H. C. and H.-D. C. all provided patients’ data and assisted in data collection. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Jedrzejas MJ. Pneumococcal virulence factors: Structure and function. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2001;65:187–207. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.187-207.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benton AH, Marquart ME. The role of pneumococcal virulence factors in ocular infectious diseases. Interdiscip. Perspect. Infect. Dis. 2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/2525173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Microbiologic factors and visual outcome in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study. Am. J. Ophthalmol.122, 830–46 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 4.Han DP, et al. Spectrum and susceptibilities of microbiologic isolates in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1996;122:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)71959-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kuriyan AE, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by streptococcal species: clinical settings, microbiology, management, and outcomes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014;157:774–780.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kurniawan ED, Rocke JR, Sandhu SS, Allen PJ. Predictors of visual outcome and the role of early vitrectomy in streptococcal endophthalmitis. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018;46:424–431. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mao LK, Flynn HW, Jr, Miller D, Pflugfelder SC. Endophthalmitis caused by streptococcal species. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1992;110:798–801. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180070030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yospaiboon Y, et al. Factors affecting visual outcomes after treatment of infectious endophthalmitis in northeastern Thailand. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2018;12:765–772. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S160758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miller JJ, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2004;138:231–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Soriano F, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis: a study of 36 cases with special reference to antibiotic resistance and treatment options. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006;12:519–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dave TV, et al. Infectious endophthalmitis leading to evisceration: spectrum of bacterial and fungal pathogens and antibacterial susceptibility profile. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 2019;9:9. doi: 10.1186/s12348-019-0174-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dave VP, et al. Clinical presentations, microbiology and management outcomes of culture-proven endogenous endophthalmitis in India. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2020;68:834–839. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1091_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jindal A, et al. Endophthalmitis after open globe injuries: Changes in microbiological spectrum and isolate susceptibility patterns over 14 years. J. Ophthalmic Inflamm. Infect. 2014;4:5. doi: 10.1186/1869-5760-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen KJ, et al. Endophthalmitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Taiwan. Retina. 2011;31:1193–1198. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181fbce5c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pappuru RR, et al. Endophthalmitis progressing to panophthalmitis: clinical features, demographic profile, and factors predicting outcome. Semin. Ophthalmol. 2018;33:671–674. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1416411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen KJ, et al. Prevention of evisceration or enucleation in endogenous bacterial panophthalmitis with no light perception and scleral abscess. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; eighteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S18. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008).