Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Mar 18;10(11):e00073-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00073-21

Complete Genome Sequences of Three Uropathogenic Klebsiella quasipneumoniae Strains Isolated from Postmenopausal Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

Sundharamani Venkitapathi a,#, Belle M Sharon a,#, Tahira A Ratna a, Amanda P Arute a, Philippe E Zimmern b, Nicole J De Nisco a,
Editor: Catherine Putontic
PMCID: PMC7975875  PMID: 33737357

Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) poses a major health issue, especially among postmenopausal women. We report complete genome sequences of three Klebsiella quasipneumoniae strains isolated from the urine of postmenopausal women with rUTI. K. quasipneumoniae is a recently identified Klebsiella species with clinical and virulence characteristics distinct from K. pneumoniae.

ABSTRACT

Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) poses a major health issue, especially among postmenopausal women. We report complete genome sequences of three Klebsiella quasipneumoniae strains isolated from the urine of postmenopausal women with rUTI. K. quasipneumoniae is a recently identified Klebsiella species with clinical and virulence characteristics distinct from those of K. pneumoniae.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI), defined as two UTI episodes within 6 months or three within 12 months, poses a major health issue (1, 2). The genus Klebsiella is a leading cause of rUTI, accounting for 15% to 17% of cases (3). Klebsiella quasipneumoniae was originally associated with environmental niches; however, recent reports suggest a role in human infection (4). Lack of tests distinguishing K. quasipneumoniae from Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical settings has led to a likely underestimation of K. quasipneumoniae prevalence (5).

Complete genome assemblies of uropathogenic K. quasipneumoniae isolates allow investigation of virulence and metabolic traits specific to this species. We report the complete genome sequences of three K. quasipneumoniae strains (Table 1) isolated from the urine of postmenopausal women meeting the criteria for uncomplicated rUTI as part of an institutional review board-approved study (STU032016-006, MR17-120) (6).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics, assembly parameters, and accession numbers of three complete uropathogenic Klebsiella quasipneumoniae genome sequences

Strain BioSample accession no. SRA accession no.a No. of raw reads No. of trimmed reads Read N50 (bp) Read depth (×) MLSTb GenBank accession no. Type of contig (circular) Total length (bp) GC content (%) No. of CDSsc Plasmid replicon(s)
KqPF9 SAMN17016746 SRX9774966 (O) 150,239 148,741 11,189 153 UNd CP065841 Chromosome 5,272,842 58.1 5,137 NAe
SRX9779643 (I) 16,937,480 16,068,400 359 CP065842 Plasmid 399,394 48.3 435 IncFIB
CP065843 Plasmid 4,730 42.6 6 Col(pHAD28)
CP065844 Plasmid 4,096 55.5 5 Col440I
CP065845 Plasmid 4,000 46.3 4 Col440I
KqPF26 SAMN17016750 SRX9774961 (O) 26,486 26,344 13,446 39 3387 CP065838 Chromosome 5,242,686 58 5,039 NA
SRX9779644 (I) 12,077,320 11,492,042 271 CP065839 Plasmid 144,959 52.5 152 IncFIB(K), IncFII(K)
CP065840 Plasmid 3,478 45.7 6 UN
KqPF42 SAMN17016751 SRX9774962 (O) 125,656 124,662 11,819 147 1535 CP065846 Chromosome 5,278,208 58 5,092 NA
SRX9779645 (I) 18,822,828 17,989,506 420 CP065847 Plasmid 223,863 50.9 252 IncFIB(K)
a

O, ONT; I, Illumina.

b

MLST, multilocus sequence type.

c

CDSs, coding sequences.

d

UN, unknown.

e

NA, not applicable.

Clean-catch midstream urine was obtained from three postmenopausal women, plated onto CHROMagar Orientation medium (BD), and incubated overnight at 37°C. Isolated single colonies were chosen for genus identification by PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, followed by a MegaBLAST query (BLAST v2.10.0) (6, 7) against the nonredundant/nucleotide (nr/nt) database. Species identification was performed by PCR using primers specific for the K. quasipneumoniae beta-lactamase (bla) and deoxyribose regulator (deoR) genes (8). K. quasipneumoniae genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from overnight cultures grown at 37°C in Luria broth (LB) using the gDNA extraction kit (BioBasic), followed by quality assessment using a 260/280-nm absorbance ratio and agarose gel electrophoresis. gDNA was sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq 500 system and the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION platform. For Illumina sequencing, libraries were prepared using the Nextera DNA Flex library prep kit and sequenced to generate 2 × 150-bp paired-end reads. Illumina reads were quality assessed and trimmed using CLC Genomics Workbench v12.0.3 with cutoffs set at a minimum Phred score of 20 and a read length of 15 bp. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. ONT libraries were prepared using a ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK109) and barcode expansion kit 13-24 (EXP-NBD114) and sequenced on R9 FLO-MIN106 flow cells. ONT MinKNOW v3.6.16 was used for base calling, demultiplexing, and barcode trimming. ONT read quality was assessed with NanoStats v1.2.0 (9), and reads were trimmed with NanoFilt v2.6.0 (9). Reads with a Phred score of >7 and a length of >200 bp were retained (Table 1).

The Illumina and ONT reads were used to construct hybrid assemblies of each strain, and the circular genomic sequences were rotated to the starting base of dnaA or repA, if present, using Unicycler v0.4.8 (SPAdes v3.13.0, Racon v1.4.10, and Pilon v1.23) (1013). The quality of the hybrid assembly was evaluated using QUAST v5.0.2 (14), and the genome completeness was assessed with Bandage v0.8.1 (15) and BUSCO v1 (16) using the bacterial ortholog set on the gVolante server v1.2.1 (17). The NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v4.11 was used for genome annotation (18, 19). The GC content and coding sequences were evaluated using Geneious Prime v2020.0.5. The sequence type was determined using MLST v2.0 (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org/) with the K. pneumoniae configuration (20). The plasmid replicons were identified with PlasmidFinder v2.1 (21, 22), using the Enterobacteriaceae database and default cutoffs (Table 1).

Data availability.

The sequencing data were submitted to GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA683049. The BioSample and SRA accession numbers are reported in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Genome Center at the University of Texas at Dallas for their services in support of our research.

This work was funded by the Welch Foundation, award number AT-2030-20200401 to N.J.D.N., and by the Felecia and John Cain Chair in Women’s Health, held by P.E.Z.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Scholes D, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Stapleton AE, Gupta K, Stamm WE. 2000. Risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection in young women. J Infect Dis 182:1177–1182. doi: 10.1086/315827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Foxman B. 1990. Recurring urinary tract infection: incidence and risk factors. Am J Public Health 80:331–333. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.3.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cristea OM, Avrămescu CS, Bălășoiu M, Popescu FD, Popescu F, Amzoiu MO. 2017. Urinary tract infection with Klebsiella pneumoniae in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Health Sci J 43:137–148. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.43.02.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brisse S, Passet V, Grimont PAD. 2014. Description of Klebsiella quasipneumoniae sp. nov., isolated from human infections, with two subspecies, Klebsiella quasipneumoniae subsp. quasipneumoniae subsp. nov. and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae subsp. similipneumoniae subsp. nov., and demonstration that Klebsiella singaporensis is a junior heterotypic synonym of Klebsiella variicola. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3146–3152. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.062737-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rodrigues C, Passet V, Rakotondrasoa A, Brisse S. 2018. Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola and related phylogroups by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Front Microbiol 9:3000. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.De Nisco NJ, Neugent M, Mull J, Chen L, Kuprasertkul A, de Souza Santos M, Palmer KL, Zimmern P, Orth K. 2019. Direct detection of tissue-resident bacteria and chronic inflammation in the bladder wall of postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infection. J Mol Biol 431:4368–4379. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fonseca EL, Ramos NDV, Andrade BGN, Morais LLCS, Marin MFA, Vicente ACP. 2017. A one-step multiplex PCR to identify Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella variicola, and Klebsiella quasipneumoniae in the clinical routine. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 87:315–317. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Coster W, D'Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vaser R, Sovic I, Nagarajan N, Sikic M. 2017. Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res 27:737–746. doi: 10.1101/gr.214270.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simao FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nishimura O, Hara Y, Kuraku S. 2017. gVolante for standardizing completeness assessment of genome and transcriptome assemblies. Bioinformatics 33:3635–3637. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O'Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Carattoli A, Hasman H. 2020. PlasmidFinder and in silico pMLST: identification and typing of plasmid replicons in whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol Biol 2075:285–294. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9877-7_20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing data were submitted to GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA683049. The BioSample and SRA accession numbers are reported in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES