Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2019 Nov 1;76(1):119–130. doi: 10.1111/biom.13106

Table 4.

Type I error rate (a) and power (b) for testing the null hypothesis Ho: δ = 0 based on 10000 simulations with characteristics similar to the WA EPT study. Binomial observations for 22 clusters in 5 times intervals are simulated from a linear model with μ = 0.09, a linearly decreasing time effect (−0.005 per time period), a random cluster effect (τ = 0.015) and random treatment effect (η = 0, 0.002, 0.008). Number of individuals per cluster per time period (n) is either constant (n = 305) or variable between clusters according to a lognormal distribution with mean log(171) and standard deviation 1.06 (giving a mean cluster size of 305).

(a) Type I error rate (nominal level = 0.05)
Vδ=01(δ^) NN1Vδ=δ^1(δ^) V2(δ^)
Treatment standard deviation (η)
n 0 0.002 0.008 0 0.002 0.008 0 0.002 0.008
constant 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.08
variable 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07
(b) Power (for the alternative Ha : δ = −0. 01)
Vδ=01(δ^) NN1Vδ=δ^1(δ^) V2(δ^)
Treatment standard deviation (η)
n 0 0.002 0.008 0 0.002 0.008 0 0.002 0.008
constant 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.33 0.32 0.30
variable 0.18 0.17 0.08 0.20 0.18 0.09 0.22 0.20 0.12