Abstract
Tropical peat swamp forest is a global store of carbon in a water-saturated, anoxic and acidic environment. This ecosystem holds diverse prokaryotic communities that play a major role in nutrient cycling. A study was conducted in which a total of 24 peat soil samples were collected in three forest types in a tropical peat dome in Sarawak, Malaysia namely, Mixed Peat Swamp (MPS), Alan Batu (ABt), and Alan Bunga (ABg) forests to profile the soil prokaryotic communities through meta 16S amplicon analysis using Illumina Miseq. Results showed these ecosystems were dominated by anaerobes and fermenters such as Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes that cover 80–90% of the total prokaryotic abundance. Overall, the microbial community composition was different amongst forest types and depths. Additionally, this study highlighted the prokaryotic communities’ composition in MPS was driven by higher humification level and lower pH whereas in ABt and ABg, the less acidic condition and higher organic matter content were the main factors. It was also observed that prokaryotic diversity and abundance were higher in the more oligotrophic ABt and ABg forest despite the constantly waterlogged condition. In MPS, the methanotroph Methylovirgula ligni was found to be the major species in this forest type that utilize methane (CH4), which could potentially be the contributing factor to the low CH4 gas emissions. Aquitalea magnusonii and Paraburkholderia oxyphila, which can degrade aromatic compounds, were the major species in ABt and ABg forests respectively. This information can be advantageous for future study in understanding the underlying mechanisms of environmental-driven alterations in soil microbial communities and its potential implications on biogeochemical processes in relation to peatland management.
Subject terms: Metagenomics, Microbial ecology
Introduction
Soil microorganisms play central roles in nutrient transformations in mediating soil organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in the forest ecosystems1. These microorganisms have dual roles in the soil, as an agent for the decomposition of plant residues and are a labile pool of nutrients2. The primary drivers in determining the microbial community composition in soil are pH, temperature, soil moisture, organic matter content, nutrient availability and biotic interactions, with increased microbial activity and abundance in hotspots such as litter, deadwood and rhizospheres3. These plant biomasses provide the most important C sources for forest soil microbes. Although fungi are widely-studied and are considered as the main decomposers in forest soils of many forest types due to their ability to produce a wide-range of extracellular enzymes that enables them to effectively degrade recalcitrant component of plant biomass4, recent findings have indicated that bacteria also commonly possess genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes5. In fact, bacteria incorporated relatively more cellulose-derived C than that incorporated by fungi6. Therefore, bacterial involvement in decomposition appears to be a relatively common trait.
Tropical peatland is a globally significant carbon reservoir, where peat is accumulated from organic matter mostly of plant materials due to a higher rate of deposition and a lower rate of decomposition because of waterlogged anaerobic condition7–9. Aside from thick leaf litters, peat in the tropics are largely composed of coarse woody material from fallen trees, branches and thick dead root mats10. The decomposition rate of coarse woody materials is slower due to high lignin content and low surface-area-to-volume ratio that limits even anaerobic decomposition11. Lignin and other unsaturated acid-insoluble material such as tannins and humic substances are known as aromatics that are more recalcitrant, whereas acid-hydrolysable polysaccharides are carbohydrates that are labile12. In addition, aromatics are known to inhibit anaerobic decomposition13.
Malaysia’s tropical peatlands cover about 2.7 × 104 km2 of the total land area, in which most of these areas are located in Sarawak and Sabah with an area of approximately 1.7 × 104 km2 14. In Sarawak, a distinct transition in the structure of the forest vegetation can be observed from the edge to the center of a peat dome. It is characterized by an uneven-canopied high forest from the edge of the swamp to zones of lower tree height, decreased tree girth, thicker leaves and lower tree species richness towards the centre of the swamp. The characterization based on this phasic community zonation has classified six forest types namely Mixed Peat Swamp, Alan Batu, Alan Bunga, Padang Alan, Padang Selunsor and Padang Keruntum15–17. However, the three main forest types are Mixed Peat Swamp (MPS), Alan Batu (ABt) and Alan Bunga (ABg) forests18. On a tropical peat dome, MPS forests are predominantly located at the edge of the dome and adjacent to the main river. Due to the fact that it lies at a lower elevation, it receives nutrients carried by the water flowing downslope. Consequently, MPS is of higher soil fertility and humification level, which is indicated by richer tree species composition. The structure and physiognomy of MPS are highly similar to a mineral soil lowland dipterocarp rain forest with abundance of epiphytes and climbers. ABt forests are generally located at the slope of a tropical peat dome with the highest water flow through the area. The hydrological movement creates an austere environment and makes it unique as trees experience physiological adaptation by having bigger buttresses and extensive root system. ABg forests are located towards the tip of the peat dome and trees are also found to have extensive roots18,19. All these environmental conditions along with other factors such as aboveground vegetation20, the quality and quantity of the litter21 and soil depth22,23 play important role in shaping soil microbial communities. In a previous study on these three peat forest types, the highest decomposability rate based on soil C flux, is in the order ABg > ABt > MPS19. Soil C flux is a method commonly used to measure decomposition of peat19. However, fertility of peat soil in terms of humification level and availability of nutrients to plants is in the reversed order MPS > ABt > ABg. A study conducted by Millard and Singh24, suggested that the quality and composition of organic matter play a huge impact on the microbial diversity especially bacteria. Therefore, it is important to understand the effects of forest types and soil depth on soil microbial community composition as it could provide insight regarding the community structure and function relationship and relative contributions of various microbial groups to SOM transformation for better peatland management.
Advancement in molecular methods has allowed higher resolution assessment of microbial compositions in complex tropical peatland ecosystem. There are only a few studies conducted using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to look into bacterial community composition in tropical peatlands. Such studies have been conducted in tropical peat swamp forest in Thailand25, Indonesia26, Brunei27, and Peninsular Malaysia28. Their results demonstrated that Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria are the two most dominant phyla in the tropical peat swamp forests. Interestingly, Tripathi et al.27, confirmed that geologically distinct environments such as the tropical peat swamp forests and heath forest are about as microbiologically diverse or more than tropical mixed dipterocarp forests, whilst Too et al.28 reported that depth but not tree species influences microbial community structure in a tropical peat swamp forest in Peninsular Malaysia.
The study by Sangok et al.19,29 has characterized SOM decomposability and the accumulation rate of tropical peat soils from the different forest types in Maludam National Park, Sarawak. It is hypothesized that the microbial community composition is reflected by the peat soil decomposition level of each forest type. Thus, the objective of this study is to profile the prokaryotic community variation in the three common forest types across a peat dome using the high-throughput sequencing to relate to the carbon biogeochemical cycling in a tropical peat dome.
Materials and methods
Study site and soil sampling
The Maludam National Park (1°31′ N, 111°08′ E) located at Betong Division, Sarawak is the largest single patch of peat swamp forest in Sarawak, covering an area of 430 km2 and was gazetted in May 200018. Prior to the designation as the Maludam National Park, the forest has undergone selective logging, where trees with DBH of more than 45 cm have been harvested. The selective logging activity was only stopped in the 1990s30. The area has mean annual precipitation of 3182 mm and mean annual temperature of 27.2 °C during 2017–2018. Generally, a distinct shift in the structure of forest vegetation can be observed from the edge to the center of the peat dome. Across a peat dome, the peat swamp forest can be characterized into six phasic community types and we studied the three most common forest types: phasic community 1 (Mixed Peat Swamp forest) is a Gonystylus-Dactylocladus-Neoscortechinia association, phasic community 2 (Alan Batu forest) is a Shorea albida-Gonystylus-Stenonurus association and phasic community 3 (Alan Bunga forest) is a S. albida consociation15.
Field sampling was carried out in April, October, December 2017 and February 2018. Peat soil samples were collected using a peat auger (Eijkelkamp, The Netherlands) from three forest types namely Mixed Peat Swamp forest (MPS), Alan Batu forest (ABt), and Alan Bunga forest (ABg) (Fig. 1). Samples were taken at two depths; 0–20 cm (T) and 30–50 cm (B) from the soil column. Mid-section (20–30 cm) of the soil was excluded from the analysis to clearly distinguish between the top and bottom layers. Composite soil samples (2.0 kg) were collected randomly at each forest type. Soil samples were placed in polyethylene zipper bags and the air inside the bags were eliminated as much as possible. For transportation to the laboratory, soil samples were stored in cooler box (with ice packs) and kept away from direct sunlight. A total of 24 peat soil samples were collected from the three forest types. Soil samples were stored at − 20 °C and 4 °C prior to DNA extraction and soil chemical analyses, respectively.
Water table measurement
Water table (WT) measurement was taken by measuring the water level in the perforated PVC pipes, which were installed previously at each forest type. Water table is calculated as WT (cm) = H1 – H2, where H1 is the height from the top of the pipe until the water surface inside the pipe and H2 is the height from the top of the pipe until ground surface outside the pipe. The measurements were taken from three different sides of the pipe circumference to obtain an average reading at each sampling site.
Soil chemical analyses
Soil pH was determined by weighing 5.0 g of fresh peat soil sample into a 50 ml Falcon tube which was then added with 12.5 ml of ultrapure water (UPW) based on the 2:5 (w/v) soil to water ratio. The solution was placed on an orbital shaker SSL1 (Stuart, UK) at 300 rpm for 1 h and left overnight to allow the suspension to settle down and formed an aqueous layer. The pH reading was taken using a pH meter Metrohm 827 (Metrohm, Switzerland). Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by weighing approximately 2.0 g of the peat soil sample and analyzed using thermo gravimetric analyzer TGA 701 (Leco, USA). LOI analysis is used to determine the organic matter content in soil by measuring weight loss after burning31. Total nitrogen (N) and total carbon (C) was determined by using a TruMac CN analyzer (Leco, USA) and from those values, the C/N ratio was calculated. The C/N ratio is a method to determine the state of organic matter decomposition32 as there is a correlation between C/N ratios and humification degree. As for the pyrophosphate solubility index (PSI), 0.5 g of peat soil samples were added with 50 ml of 0.025 M of sodium pyrophosphate (NA4P2O7.10H2O) and mixed-well using a shaker for 18 h before filtering the mixture using Whatman Filter Paper No. 5 (Whatman, UK). The filtered solution was then diluted with distilled water and measured using an ultraviolet visible spectrometer UV/VIS Lambda 25 (Perkin Elmer, USA). This method is a colorimetric estimation of the degree of humification of organic soil by measuring the color intensity of an extract obtained by treating the peat sample with sodium pyrophosphate solution which is able to extract the dark colored substance quantitatively33.
Total DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene amplification
Total DNA was extracted from approximately 2.0 g of fresh peat soil sample using the protocols in Lau34. The quality of DNA was examined on 1% agarose gel and the concentration was measured with NanoPhotometer P-360 (IMPLEN, Germany). The DNA samples concentration was ensured to be more than 10 ng/µl (Supplementary Table S1). A PCR amplification was carried out using universal primers 341F-GC (5′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 907R (5′-CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT-3′)35, targeting the V4 hypervariable region in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Amplification was done in 30 µl reaction volumes containing 2.25 U of Amplitaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, USA), 0.2 mM dNTPs mixture (Vivantis Technologies, Malaysia), 2.0 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA), 3 µl of 10X AmpliTaq buffer (Applied Biosystems, USA), 0.5 mM of each primer and 1.15–6.39 ng of soil DNA. The PCR procedure was conducted using a MasterCycler Nexus G2 (Eppendorf, Germany) under the following protocols; 94 °C for 3 min (initial denaturation), 25 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C (denaturation), 1 min at 54 °C (annealing of primers) and 2 min at 72 °C (extension), and at 72 °C for 10 min (final extension). PCR products were run on the 2.0% (w/v) gel and viewed using the Molecular Imager Gel Doc XR system (BioRad, USA).
Illumina sequencing and sequence processing
Samples were purified using a gel extraction kit NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey–Nagel, Germany) according to the manufacturer instruction prior to sequencing. All 24 purified samples were sent to Seibutsu Giken (Japan) for sequencing. Initially, a library was prepared from the purified samples using a 2-step tailed PCR method and the concentration of the prepared library was measured using Synergy H1 and QuantiFluor dsDNA System while its quality was confirmed using Fragment Analyzer and ds DNA 915 Reagent Kit (Advanced Analytical Technologies, Inc.). After that, the sequencing analysis was performed using Illumina Miseq under the condition of 2 × 300 bp. Using Fastq_barcode_splitter of Fastx toolkit, only sequences that matched exactly with the primer were extracted and sequences with low quality score (< 20) were removed leaving a final base pair length of 150 or less. Pre-processed sequences were then analyzed in Quantitative Insights into Microbiology Ecology (QIIME)36 and clustered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) using Greengenes database at 97% similarity. The alpha diversity indices such as Shannon-index, Chao1, Observed species, and Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) whole tree were also determined using QIIME script. Observed species, Shannon-index and Chao1 were generated based on OTU counts, while PD whole tree quantified the branch diversity of the phylogenetic tree37–39. The Shannon-index is an estimator of species richness and species evenness with more weight on species richness40,41 whereas, Chao1 is also an estimator for species richness but more weight is given to the low abundance species37. Subsequently, the rarefaction curves were plotted using the data from Observed species.
Statistical analysis
The microbial OTUs were compiled and grouped into different taxonomic levels while OTUs belonging to chloroplast, mitochondria and unassigned were excluded from the analysis28. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.5.1 and all data were tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. For the normally distributed data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significant differences based on forest types and depths and followed by post hoc Tukey HSD test using the ‘aov’ and ‘TukeyHSD’ functions respectively while for the non-normally distributed data the Friedman test was utilized along with pairwise Wilcox test in case of significant results using the ‘friedman.test’ and ‘pairwise.wilcox.test’ functions.
Further, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) with 999 permutations was performed using the ‘metaMDS’ function based on Bray–Curtis distant matrices. In order to determine the correlation between the peat soil chemical properties and environmental variable with the microbial community, the ‘envfit’ function was used with 999 random permutations. Lastly, permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PerMANOVA) was utilized to assess the statistical significance of microbial data in the different forest types, soil depth and months using the ‘adonis’ function. The relationship between forest types and the major prokaryotic taxa was visualized using principle component analysis (PCA).
Data accessibility
Sequencing data were submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under the Bioproject number PRJNA588113.
Results
Differences in water table and soil chemical properties
During this study the Maludam National Park has a mean annual precipitation of 3182 mm and mean annual temperature of 27.2 °C from 2017 to 2018. The water tables were significantly different (p < 0.05) only for ABg as the water level is constantly above ground surface (Supplementary Table S2). As for MPS and ABt, the water tables fluctuated in the top 0–20 cm soil layer throughout the sampling period, keeping the 30–50 cm soil layer constantly submerged under water. Submerged soil layers (30–50 cm) were observed to be more acidic than soil layers that was not submerged (0–20 cm) at MPS and ABt. Peat chemical properties that showed significant differences (P < 0.05) were pH and PSI. Higher pH (above pH 4.1) and lower PSI (below PSI 4.9) were observed for ABt and ABg. Higher PSI values in MPS (Table 1) indicated that it has higher degree of humification, whereas lower PSI values in ABt and ABg (Table 1) showed lower degree of humification. The LOI analysis showed that the organic matter contents in the soil samples were more than 98%, which were of normal range for organic soil. However, there were no significant differences observed for total C, total N and C/N ratio. The humification level of the soil from the three peat forest types were in this case, unable to be differentiated based on the C/N ratios except that it gave useful information on the carbon and nitrogen contents. Therefore, PSI may be a more reflective parameter for humification level at the three sites for this study.
Table 1.
Properties | MPS | ABt | ABg | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0–20 cm | 30–50 cm | 0–20 cm | 30–50 cm | 0–20 cm | 30–50 cm | |
WT (cm) | − 3.8 ± 3.6a | − 8.1 ± 4.7a | 18.3 ± 3.8b | |||
pH | 3.9 ± 0.0 | 3.8 ± 0.0 | 4.2 ± 0.0 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.0 | 4.1 ± 0.0 |
LOI (%) | 98.5 ± 0.2a | 99.3 ± 0.1b | 99.4 ± 0.1b | 99.5 ± 0.1b | 99.4 ± 0.1b | 99.6 ± 0.0b |
PSI | 21.5 ± 1.9a | 13.5 ± 0.8b | 2.5 ± 0.1c | 4.9 ± 0.6c | 1.9 ± 0.2c | 1.9 ± 0.1c |
TC (%) | 53.9 ± 0.7a | 53.9 ± 0.7a | 54.1 ± 1.1a | 54.1 ± 0.9a | 54.0 ± 1.0a | 54.5 ± 0.6a |
TN (%) | 1.5 ± 0.1a | 1.7 ± 0.2a | 1.7 ± 0.1a | 1.7 ± 0.0a | 1.5 ± 0.1a | 1.5 ± 0.1a |
C/N ratio | 36.1 ± 3.0a | 33.4 ± 3.6a | 32.3 ± 2.6a | 32.6 ± 0.8a | 35.4 ± 1.9a | 36.5 ± 2.3a |
Values are mean ± standard error. Different letters in the same row indicate significant difference at the level of P < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test.
WT water table with (−) values indicating depths below soil surface, LOI loss-on-ignition, PSI pyrophosphate solubility index, TC total carbon, TN total nitrogen.
Variations in alpha diversity
The average number of high-quality reads obtained from all 24 samples was 31,138 (Supplementary Table S1). A total of 50,245 operational taxonomic units (OTU) at 97% similarity were obtained. The rarefaction curves of the Observed species across all 24 samples were tabulated (Supplementary Figure S1). The microbial alpha diversity was evaluated by the Shannon diversity index, Chao1, Observed species and PD whole tree (Table 2, Supplementary Figure S2). Statistical analyses were conducted and showed that alpha diversity indices differ significantly among forest types (p < 0.05) as shown primarily by the Observed species and PD whole tree. At the top layer of 0–20 cm, microbial species diversity (Observed species and PD whole tree), evenness (Shannon index) and abundance (Chao1) were highest in the following order ABt > ABg > MPS and as for the bottom layer of 30–50 cm, it was in the following order ABg > ABt > MPS except for evenness.
Table 2.
Depth and forest types | Shannon Index2 | Chao11 | Observed Species1 | PD Whole Tree1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0–20 cm | ||||
MPS | 8.29 ± 0.11a | 10,918.79 ± 276.90a | 3385.8 ± 62.8a | 143.50 ± 2.08a |
ABt | 9.01 ± 0.04b | 12,042.47 ± 3 12.75b | 3958.3 ± 51.2b | 170.39 ± 2.00b |
ABg | 8.92 ± 0.01b | 11,030.92 ± 159.09a | 3717.2 ± 13.5c | 161.98 ± 0.71c |
30–50 cm | ||||
MPS | 8.26 ± 0.08ab | 9234.13 ± 369.47a | 3207.5 ± 90.7a | 141.89 ± 2.87a |
ABt | 8.00 ± 0.09a | 10,123.32 ± 339.99a | 3221.1 ± 78.3a | 147.08 ± 2.95a |
ABg | 8.59 ± 0.07b | 11,867.66 ± 358.93b | 3662.1 ± 81.5b | 162.30 ± 3.03b |
Values are mean ± standard error. Rarefied samples (22,738 sequences) were used for the analyses. Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference at the level of P < 0.05 based on Tukey’s HSD test (1) or pairwise Wilcox test (2).
Differences in dominant taxonomic groups
The average relative abundance of bacteria was 88.5% (84.4–94.3%) and the remaining percentage represented archaea (Fig. 2). There were 45 prokaryotic microbiota phyla identified in the Maludam tropical peat swamp forests with 13 dominant phyla (relative abundance higher than 1%). The most abundant phyla in all forest type are Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria taking up a combined total of an average of more than 70% of the whole prokaryotic population (Fig. 2). Sequences that were less than 1% in both forest types and depths were clustered together forming the minority phyla comprising of Parvachaeota, Armatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, Elusimicrobia, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Gemmatimonadeles, Lentispharae, Synergiseles, Tenericutes, AD3, BH180-139, BRC1, FBP, FCP0426, GNO2, NC10, NKB19, ODI, OP11, OP3, SAR406, SRB1093, SPI, TM6, TM7, TPD-58, WS4 and WWE1.
The relative abundance of the phylum Acidobacteria was the highest in the top layer of MPS (29%) and was significantly different to the percentage in ABt forest which had the lowest value especially in the bottom layer (17.3%) (Supplementary Table S3). Alphaproteobacteria, one of the classes of Proteobacteria, showed significantly higher abundance in MPS than the other two forests especially in the bottom soil layer with a percentage of 27.1%. It was observed that ABt forest possessed the highest percentage of the class Betaproteobacteria (top: 10.6%, bottom: 19.7%) followed by ABg and MPS respectively. The Gammaproteobacteria group showed no significant difference throughout the three forests. As for Deltaproteobacteria, the relative abundance of this group at the top layer was highest in ABt (7.2%) while at the bottom layer it was highest in MPS forest (8.9%). For Actinobacteria, a significant difference in percentage was observed only at the top soil layer with the highest in ABg, followed by ABt and MPS. The phylum Firmicutes has higher percentage in ABt and ABg forests especially in the deeper soil layers although there was no significant difference observed at P < 0.05. The phylum Planctomycetes exhibited high relative abundance in ABg forest specifically in the top layer and was significantly different from the other two forest types. The relative abundance of the phylum Verrucomicrobia was the lowest in MPS forest, intermediated in ABt forest and highest in ABg forest in both depths. Other microbial groups detected were Nitrospirae, Cyanobacteria, Spirochaetes, WPS-2 and GAL15. Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota were the two dominant phyla from the archaea domain. Crenarchaeota was observed to be highest in ABt forest, whereas Euryarchaeota was observed to be significantly greater in abundance at the top layer of MPS forest.
A PCA (Fig. 4) was conducted based on the relative abundance of the major bacterial and archaeal phyla. The first two axis of the PCA explained about 58.3% of the total variance, with PC1 and PC2 explained 37.5 and 20.8% of the total variance, respectively. The PCA analysis showed a pattern of distribution for prokaryotic microbiota communities from different forest types and soil depths. There were four major groups observed in the clustering of prokaryotic microbiota; (a) MPS(T), (b) MPS(B), (c) ABg(T) and (d) ABg(B), ABt(T), ABt(B). The MPS(T) soil is correlated with the relative OTU abundance of Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Euryarchaeota taxa whereas, MPS(B) was highly correlated to Deltaproteobacteria and Nitrospirae taxa. As for ABg(T), the relative abundance of the phyla Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Cyanobacteria showed correlation. The remaining three ABt(T), ABt(B) and ABg(B) clusters were observed to be overlapped and was highly correlated to the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria, Firmicutes and Spirochaetes.
Association between soil and environmental parameters with prokaryotic community composition
The PerMANOVA analyses indicated that forest types and soil depths significantly influenced the microbial community composition in this study (P < 0.01) while no significant effect of different months was detected (P < 0.127). Forest types explained about 24% whereas depth explained 19% of the compositional variation in the communities. Based on the NMDS ordination plot, prokaryotic community compositions were segregated by forest types and depths (Fig. 3). The plot displayed a clear separation of MPS prokaryotic community composition from that of ABt and ABg forests, with both ABt and ABg forests showed an indication of overlap. In particular, the overlap occurred between prokaryotic community from the topsoil samples of ABg with the top and bottom samples of ABt forest. In order to further investigate the relationship of the soil parameters and environmental variable on the prokaryotic community composition, vectors were fitted onto the ordination space using ‘envfit’ function. Among the six soil chemical properties and one environmental variable analyzed, four were found to be significantly correlated with the microbial community compositions (P < 0.05). PSI showed the highest correlation (r2 = 0.8674), followed by pH (r2 = 0.7149), LOI (r2 = 0.6179) and WT (r2 = 0.2515).
Discussion
This study provides insights of prokaryotic community composition differences in soils from three forest types with different oligotrophic environment on a tropical peat dome in Maludam National Park, Sarawak, Malaysia: MPS (least oligotrophic), ABt (moderately oligotrophic) and ABg (most oligotrophic) forests. The oligotrophic level of the three forests types were also described by Monda et al.30, where trees were observed to develop higher wood strength, stem thickness but hollow stem in moderately oligotrophic conditions of ABt forest, while trees invest more in stem thickness than wood strength in the severely oligotrophic ABg forest. Previous work conducted using next-generation sequencing in the tropical peat swamp forest of Thailand25, Brunei27 and Peninsular Malaysia28 generalize tropical peat swamp forest to only one type. However, the pioneering work by Anderson15 previously described that there are six different forest types of the tropical peat swamp forest based on the forest vegetation in Borneo. The distinct chrono sequence of forest types across a tropical peat dome reflects the evident difference in characteristics of the underlying peat soils. It is documented that peat decomposability rate for the three forest types is in the order of ABg > ABt > MPS19 and peat accumulation rate also corresponds in the same order29, which translates into the decomposition level from highest to lowest in the reverse order of MPS > ABt > ABg. It was hypothesized that microbial community composition will be reflected in concordance with the peat soil decomposition level. However, the abundance and diversity of the prokaryotic microbiota were found to be in the order of ABt > ABg > MPS in the 0–20 cm soil layer and the order ABg > ABt > MPS in the 30–50 cm soil layer.
Soil chemical properties affect composition of prokaryotic microbiota
This study found that the soil chemical properties of soil had significant influence on the composition of prokaryotic microbiota in the different peat forests type. The prokaryotic community compositions in ABt and ABg were influenced by the less acidic condition and higher organic matter content (Table 1, Fig. 2). This is in accordance with the bigger soil aggregates in ABt and ABg, containing more fresh organic materials. The organic matter from plant origin consists of varying amounts of organic compounds, which are differentiated according to molecular size, solubility and primary constituents. These organic compounds in the normal course of decomposition will undergo a sequential decay process and this may be related to the plant fiber structure as microorganisms may have access to those that are located on the more available outer structure42. In the initial stage of organic matter decomposition, materials particularly sugars, low-molecular-weight phenolics and some nutrients are readily lost through dissolution and leaching. In addition to that, opportunistic microorganisms will be rapidly growing and feeding on the remaining simpler materials43. In principle, the next targeted organic compound is the hemicelluloses particularly arabinan based and followed by galactans, mannans and xylans successively. The onset of cellulose degradation is expected to be the same as mannans and lignin degradation comes last due to the slow growing lignin-degrading microorganisms mainly the white-rot, soft-rot, brown-rot fungi44 and the more recent reports of lignin-degrading bacteria such as Actinomycetes, Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria45,46. However, there are findings reporting that there is also a possibility of the onset of lignin degradation immediately after litter fall47. In the complex forest ecosystem, individual processes may be dominating but all processes may occur continually throughout the decay continuum. These processes are dominated by decomposer microorganisms through the production of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes that are either bound onto the outside of the cell or released to its surrounding environment43. Therefore, the higher content of organic matter in ABt and ABg could be the main reason for the higher prokaryotic microbiota abundance as it attracts decomposer microorganisms especially those that degrade hemicellulose and cellulose.
As organic matter decomposes, organic carbon and nutrients are either absorbed by plants or transferred to the soil organic matter (SOM), which can be categorized into three major pools; dissolved organic matter (DOM), particulate organic matter (POM) and humus. For the DOM and POM pools, they will be continually being decomposed by microorganisms whereas humus is in the most decomposed form, is more resistant to further microbial decomposition48. The stable humus contains the insoluble fraction known as humin and the soluble fraction consisting of humic and fulvic acid. It is generally characterized as dark brown to black pigments found in soil and is rich in oxygen-containing functional groups, notably carboxyl, phenolic, enolic, alcoholic and carbonyl of quinones2. It is observed that the humification level at MPS was higher as reflected in the ten-fold PSI value in comparison to the lowest level in ABg (Table 1). Thus the lower pH reading in this study could be due to the higher humus component. Therefore, the prokaryotic community abundance in MPS was distinctly different from ABt and ABg (Fig. 2) and driven by these two factors; higher humification level and lower pH. Higher humification level at MPS could be due to localized source or washed-down from the upstream ABt and ABg forests. This information could be used to better understand the biogeochemical mechanisms that regulate soil microbial community composition and maintaining its functionality is crucial for the improvement of peatland management.
Higher prokaryotic diversity and abundance in the more oligotrophic forests
The results of this study indicated higher prokaryotic microbiota diversity and abundance in the more oligotrophic peat swamp forest in ABt(T) and ABg(B). Despite the fact that ABg(B) soil layer was constantly submerged in water under anoxic condition (Supplementary Table S2), a higher prokaryotic diversity and abundance was observed. One common understanding is that the soil microbial activities in tropical peatlands are inhibited due to the acidic waterlogged condition caused by the fluctuating groundwater that divides the soil into two distinct layers; the oxic-acrotelm layer and the permanently water saturated anoxic-catotelm layer49. However, it could be that tropical peatland ecosystems are dominated by anaerobes and fermenters such as Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes that covers 80–90% of the total prokaryotic abundance. Members of the phyla Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria have been associated to anaerobic respiration in peat50. In bottom layer of soil located below the water table and is constantly anoxic, is usually dominated by anaerobic degradation that takes place at lower decomposition rate than aerobic degradation. Under the anaerobic conditions, organic matter is degraded to methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) as the end products51.
The more oligotrophic forests ABt and ABg have higher abundance and diversity in prokaryotic microbiota and this could be due to bigger soil aggregates observed in the two forest types. The soil macroaggregates contain more fresh organic materials of plant deposits in the form of leaf litter, wood residue and root mass that are more susceptible to microbial decomposition. With time, these macroaggregates will be broken down to form microaggregates. Microaggregates are formed from primary particles from plant and microbial debris bound together by humic materials and polysaccharide polymers that protects soil organic matter (SOM) against decomposition. The aggregate structure has an important role in the accessibility of SOM for microbial decomposition52, which is also reflected by higher CO2 emission rate from peat macroaggregate in an incubation study53. The other reason for the higher abundance of prokaryotic microbiota in ABt and ABg forests could be that the aromatics by-products from the breakdown of fresh organic materials especially labile carbohydrates are washed-off due to the higher water flow through the area. These aromatic by-products that are known to actively inhibit anaerobic decomposition13 are not accumulated and therefore allow higher activity of anaerobic decomposition in ABt and ABg forests. This is supported by the higher CH4 flux from ABt and ABg forests in comparison to MPS from the preliminary soil respiration chamber experiment (unpublished) (Supplementary Figure S3). Another rationale for the lower aromatic by-product inhibition in ABt and ABg is the existence of microbes that can catabolize aromatic compounds in these two forest types. In this study, it was found out that Burkholderia oxyphila from the class of Betaproteobacteria was higher in abundance in ABt and ABg forests than in MPS which reinforced this fact. Burkholderia oxyphila has been reported to be able to catabolize various aromatic compounds such as catechin, vanilic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic and trans-pcoumaric acid in a forest soil in Japan54 (Table 3). In 2014, all Bukholderia genus which are primarily environmental samples were transferred to a new proposed genus; Parakburkholderia gen. nov. Thus, the name of Burkholderia oxyphila was amended to Paraburkholderia oxyphila55. Additionally, ABt forest was found to be abundant with Aquitalea magnusonii which has been reported to degrade aromatic compounds as well56. There are possibilities of other microbes that has the same ability that was not captured in the data of this study. These may explain the low activity of anaerobic decomposition in MPS even though considerable percentage of methanogens mainly from the phylum Euryarchaeota resided in this forest as the aromatic by-products impeded the anaerobic decomposition process thus less CH4 gas. Moreover, Methylovirgula ligni was found to be abundant in MPS which is from the methanotroph family of Beijerinckiaceae that consume CH4 contributing to the low CH4 gas emissions in MPS forest57.
Table 3.
Phylum/class | Family | OTU | Associated species | Accession no. | Function/role |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acidobacteria | Koribacteraceae | 23,592 | Uncultured bacterium | MH532163.1 | ND |
38,977 | Uncultured bacterium | FJ166836.1 | ND | ||
Alphaproteobacteria | Beijerinckiaceae | 30,093 | Methylovirgula ligni | CP025086.1 |
(a) Utilize reduced carbon substrates with no carbon–carbon bonds as sole source of carbon and energy (b) Major carbon source is methanol, which is produced from decomposition of fallen woody materials and plant debris (c) Capable of atmospheric nitrogen fixation (Lidstrom91, Vorob’ev et al.92) |
Hyphomicrobiaceae | 3769 | Rhodoplanes oryzae | NR_134156.2 | (a) Can undergo photoorganoheterotrophy or chemoorganoheterotrophy (Srinivas et al.93) | |
Rhodospirillaceae | 17,532 | Uncultured bacterium | MF439272.1 |
(a) Can undergo photoorganoheterotrophy or chemoorganoheterotrophy (b) Photoassimilate simple organic compounds under anaerobic conditions (Biebl and Pfennig63, Baldani et al.62) |
|
23,729 | Uncultured bacterium | HQ629097.1 | |||
14,249 | Uncultured bacterium | JQ384202.2 | |||
Caulobacteraceae | (a) Ability in degrading hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin (Wilhelm et al.64) | ||||
Betaproteobacteria | Burkholderiaceae | 18,034 | Paraburkholderia metalliresistens | MN661271.1 |
(a) Assimilates 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), which indirectly promotes plant growth (b) Resistant to metals and has phosphate-solubilizing ability (Guo et al.94) |
28,966 |
Paraburkholderia oxyphila (Burkholderia oxyphila) |
NR_112887.1 |
(a) Able to transforms catechin, a component of tannins into taxifolin through a two-step oxidation process under the acidic conditions of a forest soil in Japan (b) Catabolizes various aromatic compounds such as catechin, vanilic acid, protocatechuic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic and trans-pcoumaric acid |
||
40,794 | Burkholderia arboris | NR_042634.1 |
(a)Assimilates L-arabinose, D-mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose, caprate and phenylacetate (b)Produces pyocelin, a bacterial siderophore with bioactivities from generation of reactive oxygen species. These pyocelin damage plant tissues and is linked to pine wilt disease |
||
Neisseriaceae | 21,128 | Aquitalea pelogenes | MN42817.1 |
(a)Most active cellulose degrader involved in rapid plant litter degradation (b) Produces glycoside hydrolases that are involved in the complete enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose (c) Have significantly higher β-d-glucosidase and cellobiohydrolase activity (Woo et al.68, Sedláček et al.97) |
|
37,359 | Aquitalea magnusonii | MN709239.1 |
(a) Possesses genes for metabolisms of various organic acids, protein amino acids, carbohydrates and aromatic compounds (b)Plant growth-promoting characteristic with the genes for auxin biosynthesis and phosphorus supply (Lau et al.98, Ishikawa et al.56) |
||
29,610 | Neisseriaceae bacterium | KM187040.1 | ND | ||
Deltaproteobacteria | Syntrophobacteraceae | 47,345 | Uncultured bacterium | AB364730.1 | ND |
18,121 | Uncultured bacterium | AB364730.1 | ND | ||
47,874 | Uncultured bacterium | LK024886.2 | ND | ||
Planctomycetes | Isosphaeraceae | 53,553 | Uncultured bacterium | MH528390.1 | ND |
3315 | Uncultured bacterium | KX823823.1 | ND | ||
Actinobacteria | Actinomycetales | 23,507 | Uncultured bacterium | LR589816.1 | ND |
55,000 | Micrococcus sp. | LC484762.1 |
(a) Produces cellulase and xylanase for lignocellulose degradation (b) Plant growth promoting ability (Dastager et al.99, Mmango-Kaseke et al.100) |
||
Acidimicrobiales | 47,380 | Uncultured bacterium | HG324890.1 | ND | |
Firmicutes | Bacillaceae | 7818 | Bacillus aerius | NR_118439.1 | (a) Produces endoglucanase that are important for the initiation of cellulose hydrolysis (Oke et al.101) |
Paenibacillaceae | 46,383 | Paenibacillus tyrfis | MN428219.1 | (a) Produces active antimicrobial metabolites, plant growth promoting hormones and insecticides (Aw et al.102, Haruna et al.103) | |
Nitrospirae | Thermodesulfovibrionaceae | 46,238 | Uncultured bacterium | AB364847.1 | ND |
12,777 | Uncultured bacterium | JQ801065.1 | ND | ||
12,230 | Uncultured bacterium | KC161617.1 | ND | ||
Crenarchaeota | MBGA | 27,465 | Uncultured soil archaeon | HQ614127.1 | ND |
6922 | Uncultured bacterium | MH532224.1 | ND | ||
25,348 | Uncultured bacterium | MH532218.1 | ND | ||
MCG | 55,141 | Uncultured soil archaeon | MK527582.1 | ND | |
50,789 | Uncultured soil archaeon | KF640358.1 | ND | ||
23,899 | Uncultured soil archaeon | AB600448.1 | ND | ||
Euryarchaeota | Methanomassillicoccaceae | 15,675 | Uncultured soil archaeon | AB364937.1 |
(a) Available in pure culture. Uses H2 as electron donor but is not able to reduce CO2 to CH4 (b) Ability to reduce methanol to CH4 and also contain complete sets of genes for the degradation of methylamines to CH4 and NH3 (Iino et al.104, Borrel et al.90, Nobu et al.105) |
Tropical peat swamp forests although characterized as waterlogged, nutrient-poor, anaerobic and highly acidic in nature, these ecosystems could still support complex microbial communities as any other terrestrial ecosystem. Tripathi et al.27 also reported that tropical peat swamp forest could be as microbiologically diverse as a tropical mixed dipterocarp forest. However, dominant microbes may be novel or inadequately characterized due to limitation in isolating pure cultures. One of such examples is the comparatively new Acidobacteria phylum found in this study as they are dominated by Koribacteraceae, Solibacteres and Ellin6513. Koribacteraceae and Solibacteres are previously grouped as the bacterium Ellin and have only been recently characterized58. Acidobacteria capsulatum was the first described member of Acidobacteria only in the 1990’s59. Therefore, the unknown and the uncultured microbes could possibly be the dominant group that is greatly under-estimated in their diversity and abundance in tropical peatland ecosystems.
Major prokaryotic taxa and their functions in carbon cycling
As has been shown in this study that the microbial communities in tropical peat swamp forests could be as diverse and abundant as any other tropical forests, except that these ecosystems are dominated by mostly the lesser known microbes. Their functional roles especially in relation to C cycling is important for the understanding of tropical peatland ecosystems as terrestrial carbon stores. The basis to understand these specific roles is, all microbes transfer carbon between environmental compartments to achieve one fundamental goal, that is to survive through reproduction. They live by using different organic and inorganic forms of carbon as carbon and energy sources60. Therefore, it is essential to elucidate the C utilization preference by the major prokaryotic taxa found in the tropical peat swamp forests.
Acidobacteria is a relatively new phylum found to be abundant and diverse across various ecosystems especially in soil. However, due to the difficulty in cultivation, relatively little information is available to describe the ecological functions of the members of this phylum58. In this study, Acidobacteria covers 20–30% of the total relative abundance of prokaryotic microbiota in each soil. The major members of this phylum were found to be Koribacteraceae, Solibacteres and Ellin6513. However, Koribacter versatilis and Solibacter usitatus, previously known as Ellin6513 and Ellin6076 respectively, were the only two isolates representatives of Koribacteriaceae and Solibacteres. They are not fully characterized and do not possess valid taxonomical name to date58. Nevertheless, the abundant presence of this phylum in soils may suggest that these microbes play an important role in biogeochemical processes61, specifically in plant cell wall degradation since it has been demonstrated to degrade xylan58.
The relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria was found to be correlated to MPS forests (Figs. 4 and 5). The three major families in the Alphaproteobacteria class found were Rhodospirillaceae, Caulobacteraceae and Hyphomicrobiaceae (Fig. 2). Rhodospirillaceae is known as the purple non-sulphur bacteria and can grow photoheterotrophically under anoxic conditions in the light and chemoheterotrophically in the dark62. They are known to be able to photo assimilate simple organic compounds under anaerobic conditions63. Caulobacteraceae is reported to have the ability in degrading hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin in coniferous forest soil64. Hyphomicrobiaceae thrives only in the presence of low concentrations of suitable carbon sources and unable to grow in rich media. The aerobic Hyphomicrobiaceae are chemoheterotrophs whereas anaerobic Hyphomicrobiaceae grow by denitrification or mixed acid fermentation65.
In this study, the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria was found to be significantly correlated to the bottom soil layers (30–50 cm) of both ABt and ABg forests (Figs. 4 and 5). The two major family of Betaproteobacteria found in this study were Burkholderiaceae and Neisseriaceae. Genus Burkholderia are known for their ability to degrade recalcitrant carbohydrates (mannitol, cellobiose, xylose and N-acetyl-d-glucosamine) and aromatic compounds such as L-phenylalanine66,67. Thus, genus Burkholderia could contribute to the turnover of plant derived organic carbon. As for Neisseriaceae, the genus Aquitalea is known to have the ability to produce hydrolytic enzymes that degrade cellulose68.
As for Gammaproteobacteria, the two major families are the Enterobacteriaceae and Solimonadaceae (previously named Sinobacteraceae). Many species under the Enterobacteriaceae family can exist as free-living in diverse ecological niches from terrestrial to aquatic environments, while some are only associated to animals, plants and insects69. They are known to be involved in decomposition of monosaccharides in aerated forest70. As for Solimonadaceae family, it is widely described to have the ability to decompose chemical pollutants such as atrazine, chlorinated hydrocarbons and hexane71.
In this study, class Deltaproteobacteria was found to be associated to the bottom soil layers (30–50 cm) at all three forest types (Fig. 5). The major family found for the class Deltaproteobacteria was Syntrophobacteraceae. Syntrophobacteraceae (Syntrophobacter spp. and unclassified Syntrophobacteraceae) are known to oxidize organic matter incompletely and produce acetate as the end-product. Acetate is known to be the most abundant intermediate during anaerobic decomposition of organic matter and is the most important substrate for methanogens for production of CH4 in anoxic environments72. The major family in the Nitrospirae phylum found at this soil layer is the Thermodesulfovibrionaceae, which is reported to contribute to the degradation of organic compounds and indirectly to the production of methane in anaerobic digesters73.
Actinobacteria was found to be significantly linked to the top soil layers (0–20 cm) in both ABt and ABg forests (Figs. 4 and 5). Actinobacteria are known to produce a range of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes to degrade plant and animal polymers including lignin, cellulose, chitin and other organic compounds74. In peatlands, they are reported to decompose lignocellulose by producing various enzymes such as phenol oxidase and they are also known to release dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in the form of soluble polyphenolics as end-products75.
Family Bacillaceae of the phylum Firmicutes is reported to be responsible for the degradation of plant polysaccharides and cellulose76,77. Clostridiaceae is another family under the phylum Firmicutes which is known for their fermentation capacity in acidic peat and are prominent cellobiose consumer78. In another report, they are known to depolymerize starch, xylan and cellulose79.
Planctomycetes was observed to be correlated to the top soil layer (0–20 cm) in ABg forest (Fig. 4). Planctomycetes are anaerobic autotrophs and possess genes encoding enzymes that are found only in methane-generating archaea and methane-oxidizing group of Proteobacteria. Another distinct feature of Planctomycetes is it can oxidize ammonia to dinitrogen without oxygen80. The major group observed in this study was Isosphaeraceae. They are known to be slow-acting decomposers of plant-derived organic matter81.
The Crenarchaeota phylum is said to be highly prevalent in many marine and soil systems and are more predominant over Euryarchaeota in pasture soils82. The result of this study also corresponds to the same finding. Crenarchaeota are known to be light-independent carbon autotrophs or simply known as the ability for carbon fixation by using CO2 from the atmosphere as carbon source83,84. The ability of using CO2 is different from photosynthesis as no archaea is known to carry out photosynthesis. Aside being a predominant disease-causing agent, the phylum Spirochaetes has been reported in various environments including soil but it is unclear whether they involve in C cycle process85,86.
In the case of Euryarchaeota, this study found that the relative abundance is highly associated to MPS(T) (Figs. 4 and 5) and this archaeal phylum is known to consist of many methanogens restricted to mostly anoxic environments87. Euryarchaeota facilitate anaerobic conversion of hydrogen, formate, acetate, methyl compounds and simple alcohols to CH4 and CO2 in many anaerobic ecosystems88. Methanomassiliicoccales is a Euryarchaeota previously known as Methanoplasmatales, which has now been validated by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes and generally accepted89. Methanomassiliicoccales was differentiated from the other methanogens due to its ability to grow on hydrogen (H2) + methyl-compounds, and therefore they are H2-dependent in metabolizing methyl into CH490.
Conclusion
Our result shows the microbial community composition was different between forest types and soil depths. Factors such as high humification level and low pH contributed to the difference in microbial community diversity and abundance in MPS forest while the more oligotrophic ABt and ABg forests were due to the less decomposed form of organic material. The comparatively fresher organic materials are more susceptible to microbial decomposition particularly anaerobic decomposition. The aromatic by-products from any decomposition processes at ABt and ABg could be lower because they are being washed-down to MPS located at a lower elevation. Also, bacteria such as Aquitalea magnusonii and Paraburkholderia oxyphilla that can catabolize aromatics compounds were found to be higher in abundance at ABt and ABg thus contributing to the low amounts of aromatic compounds. In MPS, Methylovirgula ligni was abundant in this forest type that could explain the low emission of CH4 gas since they consume methane gas. Therefore, anaerobic degradation is less inhibited at ABt and ABg compared to MPS forest as reflected in the higher CH4 fluxes from these forest types. Overall, the findings of this study uncover insight into the factors that influences the microbial community composition of these tropical peat swamp soil and could lay out the foundation for future study in regards to the underlying mechanisms of environmental-driven alterations in soil microbial communities and its potential implications on biogeochemical processes.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the staffs of Sarawak Tropical Peat Research Institute, who assisted in the laborious field work and laboratory analysis.
Author contributions
L.M. M.I. and N.M. acquired research funding. L.M., S.Y.L.L., M.I. and S.R. designed the study. S.Y.L.L. and S.P.D. wrote the manuscript. S.P.D., S.Y.L.L. and M.I. performed formal analysis. M.I., S.R., F.M., M.L.Y., M.C., M.S.J. and M.L.L. improved and reviewed the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-81865-6.
References
- 1.van der Heijden MGA, et al. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008;11:296–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stevenson, F. J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. 95–97 (2nd edn.). (Wiley, New York, 1994).
- 3.Lladó S, López-Mondéjar R, Baldrian P. Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017;81:1. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00063-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eichlerová I, et al. Enzymatic systems involved in decomposition reflects the ecology and taxonomy of saprotrophic fungi. Fungal Ecol. 2015;13:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Berlemont R, Martiny AC. Genomic potential for polysaccharides deconstruction in bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:1513–1519. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03718-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Štursová M, Žifcˇáková L, Leigh MB, Burgess R, Baldrian P. Cellulose utilization in forest litter and soil: Identification of bacterial and fungal decomposers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2012;80:735–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01343.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Andriesse JP. Nature and management of tropical peat soils. FAO Soils Bull. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome) 1988;59:240. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chimmer RA, Ewel KC. A tropical freshwater weland: II. Production, decomposition, and peat formation. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 2005;13:671–684. doi: 10.1007/s11273-005-0965-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zinck JA. Tropical and subtropical peats: An overview. Peatlands of the western Guayana Highlands, Venezuala. Ecol. Stud. 2011;217:5–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20138-7_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dommain R, et al. Forest dynamics and tip-up pools drive pulses of high carbon accumulation rates in a tropical peat dome in Borneo (Southeast Asia) J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2015;120:617–640. doi: 10.1002/2014JG002796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dommain R, Couwenberg J, Joosten H. Development and carbon sequestration of tropical peat dome s in Southeast Asia: Links to post- glacial sea-level changes and Holocene climatic variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011;30:999–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2011.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hodgkins SB, et al. Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):3640. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06050-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Minderlein S, Blodau C. Humic-rich peat extracts inhibit sulfate reduction, methanogenesis, and anaerobic respiration but not acetogenesis in peat soils of a temperate bog. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010;42:2078–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Posa MRC, Wijedasa LS, Corlett RT. Biodiversity and conservation of tropical peat swamp forests. Bioscience. 2011;61:49–57. doi: 10.1525/bio.2011.61.1.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Anderson JAR. The Ecology and Forest Types of the Peat Swamp Forests of Sarawak and Brunei in Relation to Their Silviculture. PhD Diss.: University of Edinburgh; 1961. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Anderson JAR. The flora of the peat swamp forests of Sarawak and Brunei, including a catalogue of all recorded species of flowering plants, ferns and fern allies. Garden’s Bull Singap. 1963;29:131–228. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Anderson JAR. The structure and development of the peat swamps of Sarawak and Brunei. J. Trop. Geogr. 1964;18:7–16. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Melling L. Peatland in Malaysia. In: Osaki M, Tsuji N, editors. Tropical Peatland Ecosystems. Japan: Springer; 2016. pp. 59–73. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sangok, F. E., Maie, N., Melling, L. & Watanabe, A. Evaluation on the decomposability of tropical forest peat soils after conversion to an oil palm plantation. Sci. Total Environ. 381–388 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Jangid K, et al. Land-use history has a stronger impact on soil microbial community composition than aboveground vegetation and soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011;43:2184–2193. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.06.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zheng HF, et al. Litter quality drives the differentiation of microbial communities in the litter horizon across an alpine treeline ecotone in the eastern Tibetan Plateau. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28150-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Eilers KG, Debenport S, Anderson S, Fierer N. Digging deeper to find unique microbial communities: The strong effect of depth on the structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012;50:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tsitko I, et al. The variation of microbial communities in a depth profile of an acidic, nutrient-poor boreal bog in Southwestern Finland. Open J. Ecol. 2014;4:832. doi: 10.4236/oje.2014.413071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Millard P, Singh BK. Does grassland vegetation drive soil microbial diversity? Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2010;88:147–158. doi: 10.1007/s10705-009-9314-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kanokratana P, et al. Insights into the phylogeny and metabolic potential of a primary tropical peat swamp forest microbial community by metagenomic analysis. Microb. Ecol. 2011;61(3):518–528. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9766-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kwon MJ, Haraguchi A, Kang H. Long-term water regime differentiates changes in decomposition and microbial properties in tropical peat soils exposed to the short-term drought. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013;60:33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tripathi BM, et al. Distinctive tropical forest variants have unique soil microbial communities, but not always low microbial diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Too CC, Keller A, Sickel W, Lee SM, Yule CM. Microbial community structure in a Malaysian tropical peat swamp forest: The influence of tree species and depth. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2859. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sangok FE, et al. Variations in the rate of accumulation and chemical structure of soil organic matter in a coastal peatland in Sarawak, Malaysia. CATENA. 2020;184:104244. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Monda Y, Kiyono Y, Chaddy A, Damian C, Melling L. Association of growth and hollow stem development in Shorea albida trees in a tropical peat swamp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. Trees. 2018;32:1357–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00468-018-1717-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Karam A. Chemical properties of organic soils. In: Carter MR, editor. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers Canadian Society of Soil Science; 1993. pp. 459–476. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Heathwaite AL, Göttlich K. Mires Process, Exploitation and Conservation. London: Wiley; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Karl A. Determination of the degree of humification in peat samples. J. Sci. Agric. Soc. Finland. 1956;28:18–35. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lau, S. Y. L. Study on the diversity and vertical distributions of soil microorganisms in tropical peatlands of Sarawak, Malaysia, and characterization of nitrous oxide (N2O) emitters and quenchers from the tropical peat soils. (PhD Diss., Japan: Graduate School of Agriculture Hokkaido University, 2015).
- 35.Ikenaga M, Tabuchi M, Oyama T, Akagi I, Sakai M. Development of LNA oligonucleotide-PCR clamping technique in investigating the community structures of plant-associated bacteria. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2015;79(9):1556–1566. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2015.1038213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Caporaso JG, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods. 2010;7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chao A. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 1984;11:265–270. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chao A, Chiu C, Jost L. Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010;365(1558):3599–3609. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim BR, et al. Deciphering diversity indices for a better understanding of microbial communities. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;27:2089–2093. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1709.09027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lemos LN, Fulthorpe RR, Triplett EW, Roesch LF. Rethinking microbial diversity analysis in the high throughput sequencing era. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2011;86:42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Magurran A. Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford: Blackwell; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Eriksson KE, Blanchette RA, Ander P. Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Wood and Wood Components. New York: Springer; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Berg B, McClaugherty C. Plant Litter: Decomposition, Humus Formation, Carbon Sequestration. 2. Berlin: Springer; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Berg B, Hannus K, Popoff T, Theander O. Changes in organic-chemical components during decomposition: Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest I. Can. J. Bot. 1982;60:1310–1319. doi: 10.1139/b82-167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bugg TD, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Singh R. The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bioproduct. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011;22:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang XF, et al. Isolation and characterization of lignin-degrading bacteria from rainforest soils. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013;110:1616–1626. doi: 10.1002/bit.24833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Krishna MP, Mohan M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: A review. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2017;2:236249. [Google Scholar]
- 48.McCauley, A., Jones, C. & Jacobsen, J. Soil pH and organic matter in nutrient management module No. 8, Montana State University Extension, Bozeman, Montana, USA (2017).
- 49.Clymo RS. The limits to peat bog growth. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 1984;303:605–654. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tveit A, Schwacke R, Svenning MM, Urich T. Organic carbon transformations in high-Artic peat soils: Key functions and microorganisms. ISME J. 2013;7:299–311. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Genero MM. Microbial Communities in Boreal Peatlands: Responses to Climate Change and Nitrogen and Sulfur Depositions. Sweden: Linkoing University; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jastrow JD, Amnonette JE, Balley VL. Mechanisms controlling soil carbon turnover and their potential application for enhancing carbon sequestration. Clim. Change. 2007;80:5–23. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9178-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kimura SD, Melling L, Goh KJ. Influence of soil aggregate size on greenhouse gas emission and uptake rate from tropical peat soil in forest and different oil palm development years. Geoderma. 2012;185–186:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Otsuka, Y. et al. Burkholderia oxyphila sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from acidic forest soil that catabolizes (+)-catechin and its putative aromatic derivatives. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 249–254 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 55.Sawana, A., Adeolu, M. & Gupta, R. S. Molecular signatures and phylogenomic analysis of the genus Burkholderia: proposal for division of this genus into the amended genus Bukholderia containing pathogenic organisms and a new genus Parabukholderia gen. nov. harboring environmental species. Front. Genet. 5, 429 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Ishizawa H, Kuroda M, Ike M. Draft genome sequence of Aquitalea magnusonii strain H3, a plant growth-promoting bacterium of duckweed (Lemna minor) Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2017;5:33. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00812-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tamas I, Smirnova AV, He Z, Dunfield PF. The (d)evolution of methanotrophy in the Beijerinckiaceae-a comparative genomic analysis. ISME J. 2014;8:369–382. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kielak AM, Barreto CC, Kowalchuk GA, Van Veen JA, Kuramae EE. The ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond genes and genomes. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:744. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kishimoto, N., Kosako, Y. & Tano, T. Acidobacterium capsulatum gen. nov., sp. nov.: an acidophilic chemoorganotrophic bacterium containing menaquinone from acidic mineral environment. Curr. Microbiol. 22, 1–7 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 60.Gougoulias C, Clark JM, Shaw LJ. The role of soil microbes in the global carbon cycle: Tracking the below-ground microbial processing of plant-derived carbon for manipulating carbon dynamics in agricultural systems. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014;94:2362–2371. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Catao ECP, et al. Soil Acidobacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences reveal subgroup level differences between Savanna-like Cerrado and Atlantic forest Brazilian biomes. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014;2014:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2014/156341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Baldani, J. I. et al. The Family Rhodospirillaceae, in The Prokaryotes (eds. Rosenberg, E., DeLong E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson F.) (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- 63.Biebl, H. & Pfennig, N. Isolation of members of the family Rhodospirillaceae. in The Prokaryotes (eds. Starr M. P., Stolp, H., Trüper H. G., Balows, A. & Schlegel H.G.) (Springer, Berlin, 1981).
- 64.Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME. 2019;13:413–429. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0279-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oren, A. & Xu, X. W. The family Hyphomicrobiaceae. in The Prokaryotes (eds. Rosenberg, E., DeLong E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson F.) (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- 66.Suarez-Moreno RZ, et al. Common features of environmental and potentially beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia. Microb. Ecol. 2012;63:249–266. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9929-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Klann J, McHenry A, Montelongo C, Goffedi SK. Decomposition of plant-sourced carbon compounds by heterotrophics betaproteobacteria isolated from a tropical Costa Rican bromeliad. Microbiol. Open. 2016;5(3):479–489. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Woo HL, Hazen TC, Simmons BA, De Angelis KM. Enzyme activities of aerobic lignocellulolytic bacteria isolated from wet tropical peat forest soils. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2014;37:60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Octavia S. & Lan, R. The family Enterobacteriaceae. in The Prokaryotes (eds. Rosenberg, E., DeLong E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt E., Thompson, F.) (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- 70.Degelmann DM, Kolb S, Dumont M, Murrell JC, Drake HL. Enterobacteriaceae facilitate the anaerobic of glucose by a forest soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009;68:312–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhou, Y., Lai, R. & Li, W. J. The family Solimonadaceae. in The Prokaryotes (eds. Rosenberg, E., DeLong E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E., Thompson, F.) (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- 72.Liu P, Pommerenke B, Conrad R. Identification of Syntrophobacteraceae as major acetate-degrading sulfate reducing bacteria in Italian paddy soil. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;20:337. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Daims, H. The family Nitrospiraceae. in The Prokaryotes Rosenberg (eds. E., DeLong E. F., Lory, S., Stackebrandt, E. & Thompson, F.) (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- 74.Eisenlord SD, Zak DR. Simulated atmospheric nitrogen deposition alters actinobacterial community composition in forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010;74:1157–1166. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kang H, et al. Biologically driven DOC release from peatlands during recovery from acidification. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06259-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wu S, et al. Composition, diversity, and origin of the bacterial community in grass carp intestine. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Aislabie, J. & Deslippe, J. R. Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. in Ecosystem Services in New Zealand (eds. Dyemond, J. R.) (2013).
- 78.Juottonen H, et al. Distinct anaerobic bacterial consumers of cellobiose-derived carbon in boreal fens with different CO2/CH4 production ratios. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83(4):e02533–e2616. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02533-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wiegel, J., Tanner, R. A. L. P. H. & Rainey, F. A. An introduction to the family Clostridiaceae. in The Prokaryotes (eds. Dworkin, M. et al.) 654–678 (Springer, New York, 2006).
- 80.Fuerst JA, Sagulenko E. Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;9:403–413. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ivanova AA, Naumoff DG, Miroshnikov KK, Liesack W, Dedysh SN. Comparative genomics of four Isosphaeraceae planctomycetes: A common pool of plasmids and glycoside hydrolase genes shared by Paludisphaera borealis PX4T, Isosphaera pallida IS1BT, Singulisphaera acidiphila DSM 18658T, and Strain SH-PL62. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:412. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Nicol GW, Glover LA, Prosser JI. Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaeal communities in managed and natural upland pasture soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2003;9:1451–1457. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00673.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Herndl GJ, et al. Contribution of Archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:2303–2309. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2303-2309.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hallam SJ, et al. Pathways of carbon assimilation and ammonia oxidation suggested by environmental genomic analyses of marine Crenarchaeota. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Seshadri R, et al. Comparison of the genome of the oral pathogen Treponema denticola with other spirochete genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:5646–5651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307639101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Paster, B. J. Phylum XV. Spirochaetes Garrity and Holt (2001). in Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (eds. Brenner, D. J., Krieg, N. R., Garrit y, G. M., & Staley, J.T.) Vol. 471 (Springer, New York, 2011).
- 87.Yuan CL, et al. Distributions and environmental drivers of archaea and bacteria in paddy soils”. J. Soils Sediments. 2018;1:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nobu MK, et al. Microbial dark matter ecogenomics reveals complex synergistic networks in a methanogenic bioreactor. ISME J. 2015;9:1710–1722. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly published. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2013;63(11):3931–3934. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.058222-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Borrel G, et al. Comparative genomics highlights the unique biology of Methanomassiliicoccales, a Thermoplasmatales-related seventh order of methanogenic archaea that encodes pyrrolysine. BMC Genom. 2014;15:679. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lidstrom, M. E. Aerobic methylotrophic prokaryotes. in The Prokaryotes, 3rd edn, Vol. 2, 618–634 (eds. M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K. H. Schleifer & E. Stackebrandt). (Springer, New York, 2006).
- 92.Vorob’ev AV, et al. Methylovirgula ligni gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately acidophilic, facultatively methylotrophic bacterium with a highly divergent mxaf gene. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009;59:2538–2545. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.010074-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Srinivas A, Sasikala C, Ramana C. Rhodoplanes oryzae sp. nov., a phototrophic alphaproteobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere soil of paddy. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014;64:2198–2203. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.063347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Guo JK, et al. Burkholderia metalliresistens sp. nov., a multiple metal-resistant and phosphate-solubilising species isolated from heavy metal-polluted soil in Southeast China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;107:1591–1598. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0453-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Vanlaere E, et al. Burkholderia latens sp. nov., Burkholderia diffusa sp. nov., Burkholderia arboris sp. nov., Burkholderia seminalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia metallica sp. nov., novel species within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2008;58:1580–1590. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65634-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Mannaa M, Park I, Seo YS. Genomic features and insights into the taxonomy, virulence, and benevolence of plant-associated Burkholderia species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:121. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Sedláček I, et al. Aquitalea pelogenes sp. nov., isolated from mineral peloid. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016;66:962–967. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Lau HT, Faryna J, Triplett EW. Aquitalea magnusonii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Gram-negative bacterium isolated from a humic lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006;56:867–871. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64089-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dastager SG, Deepa CK, Pandey A. Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010;48:987–992. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Mmango-Kaseke Z, Okaiyeto K, Nwodo U, Mabinya L, Okoh A. Optimization of cellulase and xylanase production by Micrococcus species under submerged fermentation. Sustainability. 2016;8(11):1168. doi: 10.3390/su8111168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Oke MA, Annuar K, Simarani K. Mixed feedstock approach to lignocellulosic ethanol production prospects and limitations. Bioenerg. Res. 2016;9(4):1189–1203. doi: 10.1007/s12155-016-9765-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Aw YK, et al. Newly isolated Paenibacillus tyrfis sp. nov., from Malaysian tropical peat swamp soil with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:219. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Haruna E, Zin NM, Adams JM. Draft genome sequence of an endophytic bacterium, Paenibacillus tyrfis strain SUK123 from Santiria apiculata stem. Genomics Data. 2017;14:44–46. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2017.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Iino T, et al. Candidatus Methanogranum caenicola: A novel methanogen from the anaerobic digested sludge, and proposal of Methanomassiliicoccaceae fam. Nov. and Methanomassiliicoccales ord. nov., for a methanogenic lineage of the class Thermoplasmata. Microbes Environ. 2013;28:244–250. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Nobu MK, Narihiro T, Kuroda K, Mei R, Liu WT. Chasing the elusive Euryarchaeota class WSA2: Genomes reveal a uniquely fastidious methyl-reducing methanogen. ISME J. 2016;10:2478–2487. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing data were submitted to NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under the Bioproject number PRJNA588113.