Abstract
Coxiella burnetii is the bacterial causative agent of the zoonosis Q fever. The current human Q fever vaccine, Q-VAX®, is a fixed, whole cell vaccine (WCV) licensed solely for use in Australia. C. burnetii WCV administration is associated with a dermal hypersensitivity reaction in people with pre-existing immunity to C. burnetii, limiting wider use. Consequently, a less reactogenic vaccine is needed. Here, we investigated contributions of the C. burnetii Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system (T4BSS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in protection and reactogenicity of fixed WCVs. A 32.5 kb region containing 23 dot/icm genes was deleted in the virulent Nine Mile phase I (NMI) strain and the resulting mutant was evaluated in guinea pig models of C. burnetii infection, vaccination-challenge, and post-vaccination hypersensitivity. The NMI ∆dot/icm strain was avirulent, protective as a WCV against a robust C. burnetii challenge, and displayed potentially altered reactogenicity compared to NMI. Nine Mile phase II (NMII) strains of C. burnetii that produce rough LPS, were similarly tested. NMI was significantly more protective than NMII as a WCV; however, both vaccines exhibited similar reactogenicity. Collectively, our results indicate that, like phase I LPS, the T4BSS is required for full virulence by C. burnetii. Conversely, unlike phase I LPS, the T4BSS is not required for vaccine-induced protection. LPS length does not appear to contribute to reactogenicity while the T4BSS may contribute to this response. NMI ∆dot/icm represents an avirulent phase I strain with full vaccine efficacy, illustrating the potential of genetically modified C. burnetii as improved WCVs.
Subject terms: Bacteria, Bacterial genetics, Bacterial host response, Bacterial secretion, Bacterial techniques and applications
Introduction
Coxiella burnetii is a gram-negative, intracellular bacterium with near worldwide dissemination. This bacterium is the causative agent of the zoonosis Q fever. Human infection typically occurs following inhalation of infectious aerosols generated by domestic livestock reservoirs such as dairy cows, goats, and sheep. Human Q fever generally presents as an acute influenza-like illness although many individuals remain asymptomatic throughout infection1. Full recovery is common following acute illness, particularly after antibiotic treatment; however, some patients may develop persistent infections2 such as endocarditis, hepatitis, lymphadenitis, myocarditis, osteomyelitis, and/or vasculitis1,3 Because Q fever is potentially a debilitating disease and C. burnetii is environmentally stable and highly infectious by the aerosol route, the pathogen is considered a potential biological weapon and a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Select Agents and Toxins (DSAT) select agent4,5.
A single subcutaneous dose of whole cell, inactivated C. burnetii has long been known as highly efficacious in human vaccination against Q fever6,7. Q-VAX® is a whole cell vaccine (WCV) comprised of formalin-inactivated C. burnetii (Henzerling strain) that is licensed for use in Australia8,9. Here, it is administered primarily to at-risk populations, such as abattoir workers, and exhibits near 100% protective efficacy10. A potentially severe post-vaccination delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin response can occur at the inoculation site in individuals with pre-existing immunity due to previous symptomatic or asymptomatic infection11. This response necessitates extensive pre-screening of potential vaccinees by serologic and skin testing11,12. Accordingly, vaccine reactogenicity is a deterrent to the widespread use of C. burnetii WCVs in humans. A WCV derived from the Nine Mile strain, Coxevac®, has been approved for veterinary use in the European Union since 2015 and has been reported to cause injection site swelling in ruminants following repeated vaccination13.
Two surface exposed structures of C. burnetii that mediate host cell interactions and immune responses are the Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system (T4BSS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The T4BSS delivers proteins with effector functions directly into the host cytosol, which mediates successful host cell infection14. C. burnetii contains two dot/icm loci; a major loci encoding 23 proteins and a minor loci encoding 2 proteins. Together these proteins form the surface exposed secretion apparatus15. Extensive structural modeling of the homologous Dot/Icm system of Legionella pneumophila reveals a macromolecular complex that includes several outer membrane lipoproteins16,17. Over 100 T4BSS substrates have been identified for C. burnetii, but only a few are functionally defined18. Most dot/icm mutants are incapable of replication within cultured cells19–21 and a dotA mutant exhibits attenuated virulence in Galleria mellonella larva22 and SCID mice23. The virulence potential of dot/icm mutants in an immunocompetent mammalian model is untested as is the relevance of the apparatus in vaccine-mediated immunity and hypersensitivity reactions.
Cumulative evidence suggests C. burnetii LPS enables pathogen avoidance of host immune detection by shielding the bacterial cell surface from binding by complement and antibodies and from recognition of toll-like receptor ligands, such as lipoproteins24–26. LPS has also been proposed to modulate intracellular trafficking of C. burnetii in macrophage host cells27. All natural C. burnetii isolates express full-length (phase I) LPS which is necessary for full virulence28. In fact, phase I LPS is currently the only virulence factor of C. burnetii defined in an immunocompetent animal model29. Serial in vitro passage of phase I C. burnetii in cultured cells, embryonated eggs, or synthetic medium results in LPS truncation. This process is known as phase variation and culminates in avirulent phase II organisms that synthesize LPS without O-antigen and several core sugars29–34. Shortly after the description of the phase variation phenomenon, Ormsbee et al.35 demonstrated in a guinea pig model that phase I organisms are significantly more potent as WCVs than phase II organisms, results repeated more recently in goat36 and mouse37 models. Thus, phase I LPS O-antigen is clearly a critical protective immunogen in vaccine-mediated immunity. Indeed, extracted phase I, but not phase II LPS, is protective in murine models37,38 with a caveat being the unknown degree of purity of these preparations. Similarly, an LPS peptide mimic vaccine elicits a protective antibody response in mice39. The role of LPS in vaccine reactogenicity has not been evaluated.
An improved Q fever vaccine should exhibit the potency of Q-VAX® without the risk of a deleterious post-vaccination DTH response. Current and historic experimental vaccine platforms aimed at providing an efficacious, non-reactogenic Q fever vaccine include residue remaining after chloroform-methanol extraction of C. burnetii40, RNA-produced peptides containing predicted T-cell epitopes41, and protein subunit-adjuvant conjugates42. To the best of our knowledge, none of these strategies have yielded a vaccine with comparable efficacy to Q-VAX®. To achieve this goal, improved knowledge of both protective and DTH antigens, and the host immune response to these molecules, is needed. In the current study, we used guinea pig models to examine the roles of C. burnetii LPS and the T4BSS in virulence, vaccine-induced immunity, and the post-vaccination DTH response. This was achieved using isogenic C. burnetii strains, which express different LPS chemotypes28, and a mutant strain lacking the entire dot/icm apparatus.
Results
C. burnetii strain characterization
The C. burnetii strains Nine Mile RSA493 phase I (NMI), Nine Mile Crazy RSA514 (NMC), and Nine Mile RSA439 phase II, clone 4 (NMII) were utilized in these studies due to their historic experimental use, known virulence, and shared genetic background29,30,43. These isogenic strains are genetically similar with the exception of large genomic deletions of LPS biosynthesis genes in NMC and NMII44. NMI, NMC, and NMII strains are characterized by their production of full-length (phase I), intermediate length, and truncated (phase II) LPS, respectively30. A NMI RSA493 ∆dot/icm mutant was constructed using Cre-lox-mediated recombination to delete a 32.5 kb region containg 23 genes (cbu1622-cbu1652) encoding Dot/Icm apparatus proteins (Fig. 1a, b).
Three studies were conducted using guinea pig models to examine the influence of LPS length and the T4BSS in C. burnetii virulence, vaccine efficacy, and post-vaccination hypersensitivity. The experimental designs are outlined in Table 1. As LPS length is an important determinant of virulence and vaccine efficacy29, the LPS content of all C. burnetii stocks used for infections or as WCVs were characterized by silver stain (Fig. 2a–c) and immunoblot using antibodies specific for phase I, intermediate, and phase II LPS30 (Supplementary Fig. 1). NMI and NMII stocks used for infections in experiment 1 (virulence) displayed prototypical LPS molecules. Specifically, NMI expressed intermediate (~11 kDa; lipid A, inner and outer core sugars, and one repeating O-antigen unit lacking virenose) and full-length phase I LPS (>12 kDa; lipid A, all core sugars, and repeating O-antigen subunits) and NMII expressed only phase II LPS (~3 kDa; lipid A and inner core sugars) (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1a–c)30. A low amount of phase II LPS was also produced by NMI which is reflective of low in vitro passage. Repeated in vitro passage in synthetic medium is required to generate clonal C. burnetii mutants. Consequently, the engineered NMI ∆dot/icm mutant appeared to express more phase II LPS than the NMI parent strain (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1 a–c). In experiments 2 (vaccine efficacy) and 3 (post-vaccination hypersensitivity), both fixed and live C. burnetii strains were utilized. The live NMI stock used for infection displayed slightly more phase II LPS then the NMI used in experiment 1 (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figs. 1d–f). For WCV stocks, NMI and NMC were passaged in vitro prior to fixation to promote the formation of phase II LPS equivalent to NMI ∆dot/icm (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 1i). NMC WCV expressed prototypical intermediate (~11 kDa) LPS molecules (Fig. 2c).
Table 1.
Experiment 1—Virulence | ||
Infection > 14 Days > Euthanasia | ||
Infection strain | Sample size | |
Saline | 4 | |
aNMI | 4 | |
bNMII | 4 | |
cNMI Δdot/icm | 4 | |
Experiment 2 – Vaccine Efficacy | ||
Vaccination > 28 Days > Infection > 14 Days > Euthanasia | ||
Vaccine strain | Infection strain | Sample size |
Saline | Saline | 3 |
Saline | NMI | 4 |
NMI | NMI | 4 |
Q-VAX® | NMI | 4 |
NMII | NMI | 4 |
NMI Δdot/icm | NMI | 4 |
Experiment 3—Post-vaccination hypersensitivity | ||
Infection > 42 Days > Skin Test > 21 Days > Euthanasia | ||
Infection strain | Skin test strain | Sample size |
Saline | Saline | 4 |
Saline | NMI | 4 |
NMI | Saline | 4 |
NMI | NMI | 4 |
NMI | dNMC | 4 |
NMI | NMII | 4 |
NMI | NMI ?dot/icm | 4 |
aNMI: Nine Mile I RSA493
bNMII: Nine Mile II RSA439
cNMI ∆dot/icm: Nine Mile I RSA493 with dot/icm deletion
dNMC: Nine Mile Crazy RSA514
NMI ∆dot/icm is avirulent in a guinea pig model of Q fever
We first evaluated the virulence of NMI ∆dot/icm in guinea pigs (Table 1, experiment 1). Animals were intraperitoneally infected with 106 genome equivalents (GE) of C. burnetii (NMII, NMI, or NMI ∆dot/icm) or saline (Fig. 3a). Body temperatures were recorded daily for 14 days following infection (Fig. 3b). As expected, saline-treated negative control animals remained afebrile (body temperature of ≤39.5 °C) and maintained a consistent body temperature throughout the duration of each study. Conversely, animals from the NMII and NMI-infected groups developed fever of varied duration and magnitude (Fig. 3c). Two of the NMII-infected animals developed fever, one for a single day and the other for two days. All NMI-infected animals developed fever which lasted for 6–9 days. In contrast, NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals remained afebrile throughout the duration of the study. On average, NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals experienced significantly lower maximum body temperatures than NMI-infected animals (Fig. 3d).
Body weight measurements over 14 days mirrored body temperatures both in magnitude and timing (Figs. 3b and 4a). The expected growth trajectory in the absence of intervention was estimated by linear regression fit via generalized estimating equations to body weight measurements taken on animals in the saline group. Body weight alterations relative to the expected weight were analyzed two days after the day of maximum body temperature for each animal as this was found to coincide with the day of maximum weight loss. NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals exhibited similar body weight alteration kinetics to the saline mock-infection group (Fig. 4a). These two groups did not experience any statistically significant mean differences in weight relative to their baseline trajectory at two days post maximum temperature (Fig. 4b). In contrast, NMI and NMII-infected animals lost body weight during the study, beginning around day 3 post-infection. Both groups exhibited statistically significant decreases in average body weight relative to their baseline trajectory at two days post maximum body temperature compared to NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals (Fig. 4b).
Splenomegaly, another endpoint related to C. burnetii-induced disease progression in guinea pigs45, was measured following euthanasia. As a percentage of body weight, geometric mean spleen weights were comparable in saline, NMII, and NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals (Fig. 4c). In contrast, geometric mean spleen weights were significantly increased in the NMI-infected animals compared to NMI ∆dot/icm-infected animals (Fig. 4c).
NMI ∆dot/icm WCV protects against C. burnetii challenge in a guinea pig model of Q fever
Next, we evaluated the efficacy of NMI ∆dot/icm as a WCV (Table 1, experiment 2). Guinea pigs were subcutaneously vaccinated with 25 μg of paraformaldehyde fixed NMI, NMII, or NMI ∆dot/icm. Q-VAX® (25 μg) and saline were used as positive and negative vaccination controls, respectively. Over a 28-day rest period, no alterations in body temperature or weight were observed as a result of vaccination (data not shown). Animals were then intraperitoneally challenged with 106 genomic equivalents (GE) of C. burnetii NMI, or mock challenged with saline (Fig. 5a). Body temperatures were recorded daily for 14 days following infection and are presented in Fig. 5b. Mock vaccinated and mock challenged controls (Saline:Saline) did not exhibit fever or significant changes in body temperature for the duration of the monitoring period. All saline-mock vaccinated and NMI-challenged animals (Saline:NMI) developed sustained fevers (4–9 days in duration) by day 3 post-infection (Fig. 5b, c). Guinea pigs in NMI:NMI and Q-VAX®:NMI (vaccination:challenge) groups exhibited similar body temperature responses with low grade fevers occurring at 2 to 4 days post-infection for several animals. All NMII:NMI animals experienced fever, with an average duration of 2 days. Notably, most NMI ∆dot/icm:NMI animals did not experience fever, the exception being a single animal with a minimal fever at 4 days post-infection (temp = 39.8 °C). NMI ∆dot/icm was the only vaccination treatment that resulted in significantly decreased maximum body temperature compared to unvaccinated, NMI-challenged control animals (Fig. 5d).
Body weight measurements over 14 days mirrored body temperatures both in magnitude and timing (Figs. 5b and 6a). Saline:Saline animals exhibited stable body weight kinetics and we used measurements from this group to estimate the expected weight trajectory in the absence of intervention. All NMI-challenged animals lost body weight beginning at day 3 post-infection, regardless of vaccination status. Saline:NMI animals lost the most body weight relative to their baseline trajectory at two days post maximum temperature compared to all other vaccinated and challenged groups, with an average loss of 73.9 g (Fig. 6b). Among vaccinated and challenged groups, NMII:NMI lost the most body weight two days post maximum body temperature, with an average loss of 57.7 g. NMI ∆dot/icm vaccine efficacy was further illustrated by NMI ∆dot/icm:NMI animals demonstrating significantly less splenomegaly than Saline:NMI and NMII:NMI groups at 14 days post-infection (Fig. 6c). Lower overall estimated splenic bacterial burdens were observed in all vaccinated animals compared to that of Saline:NMI unvaccinated controls (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Two mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN) were excised, counted (Supplementary Fig. 3a), and analyzed for lymphocyte marker expression (Supplementary Fig. 3b–d) at 14 days post challenge. mLN counts were significantly decreased in NMI ∆dot/icm:NMI animals compared to Saline:NMI animals. Additionally, CD8+ T-cell median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was significantly decreased in NMI ∆dot/icm:NMI animals compared to Saline:NMI animals.
WCV skin testing reveals contributions of the T4BSS of C. burnetii to the post-vaccination hypersensitivity response
Skin testing (Table 1, Experiment 3) was initiated by intraperitoneally infecting guinea pigs with 106 NMI to allow for immune sensitization. All NMI-infected animals displayed fever and weight loss at similar levels for 14 days following infection, confirming successful infection (Supplementary Fig. 4). At 42 days post-infection, animals were intradermally injected with 25, 2.5, and 0.25 μg of fixed C. burnetii or saline at three sites in each animal’s flank for hypersensitivity skin testing (Fig. 7a, b). For 21 days following skin testing no changes were observed in body temperature or weight (Supplementary Fig. 5) and no changes were observed in mesenteric lymph node (mLN) size at euthanasia (Supplementary Fig. 6a) among experimental animals. At 21 days post-skin testing, splenomegaly was observed in NMI-infected and skin tested groups but not the uninfected, NMI-skin tested group (Supplementary Fig. 6b).
Erythema and induration were measured for 21 days following skin testing and are reported as erythema area (Fig. 7c and Supplementary Fig. 7) and induration severity (Fig. 7d and Supplementary Fig. 8) at the injection site. A visual representation of erythema outcomes is presented in Fig. 7e. As expected, neither Saline:Saline nor NMI:Saline animals exhibited measurable erythema or induration throughout the monitoring period. Half of the non-sensitized, NMI-skin tested control animals (Saline:NMI) exhibited measurable erythema at the 25 μg skin testing site beginning at day 14 or 21. Minimal induration was observed in all of the animals in this group at the 25 μg skin testing site. All sensitized and C. burnetii skin tested groups exhibited more severe responses than non-sensitized groups. NMI:NMI, NMI:NMC, and NMI:NMII groups exhibited similar kinetics and magnitude of response, beginning with measurable erythema at day 7 at the 25 μg site for animals from all three groups and at the 2.5 μg site for NMI:NMI and NMI:NMII animals. NMI:NMI and NMI:NMC groups exhibited statistically significant increases in maximum erythema at any given skin testing site compared to the Saline:Saline group. Induration at the 25 μg site was initially detected at day 2 in half of the NMI:NMC animals and at day 4 in 3/4 of NMI:NMI animals and half of NMI:NMII animals. Induration was sustained for the remainder of the 21 day post-skin test period and was observed at additional skin testing sites (2.5 and 0.25 μg) in animals from NMI:NMI, NMI:NMC, and NMI:NMII groups. Average induration at the 25 μg skin testing site was significantly increased for these groups compared to Saline:Saline negative controls and for NMI:NMI and NMI:NMC groups compared to unsensitized Saline:NMI controls. Erythema and induration were observed at 0.25 μg sites for animals in both NMI:NMI and NMI:NMII groups, emphasizing the relative intensity of these responses. In contrast, NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm animals demonstrated erythema at the 25 and 2.5 μg sites, but not at the 0.25 μg site, and only experienced induration at the 0.25 μg site transiently. Maximum erythema was similar among all sensitized and C. burnetii skin tested groups, with half of the NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm animals displaying values comparable to all other Nine Mile strain skin tested groups. The remaining two NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm animals did not display measurable erythema at any skin testing site. Maximum erythema and average induration were not significantly increased in the NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm group compared to negative and unsensitized controls.
Skin biopsies obtained at 21 days post-skin test were fixed, processed, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin prior to histopathologic evaluation. Skin sections and scoring criteria are described in Fig. 8a. Inflammatory infiltrate was characterized by macrophages (dominant at lower scores) and heterophils (dominant at higher scores). Histological scoring largely corresponded with erythema and induration scores, with all WCV skin tested groups displaying some degree of reactogenicity, regardless of sensitization status (Fig. 8b). All Nine Mile strains yielded similar skin test responses in NMI sensitized animals, with a higher degree of variation among individual responses in the NMI: NMII and NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm groups.
Discussion
Chemically fixed, whole cell C. burnetii is a highly efficacious vaccine for the prevention of Q fever in humans46 (Q-VAX®) and coxiellosis in livestock47 (Coxevac®). Indeed, Q-VAX® has been an unmitigated success in lowering Q fever cases among at-risk populations in Australia48. Despite its remarkable efficacy, several factors limit greater deployment of Q-VAX®. First and foremost, vaccination requires careful pre-vaccination serology and skin testing to identify individuals with pre-existing immunity in order to avoid a potentially severe DTH response following vaccination. These pre-immune cohorts can be substantial as exhibited in a past vaccination program at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories49 (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health). Among 384 employees who underwent skin testing, 79 were positive, yielding an approximate reactivity rate of 21% among this population of laboratory workers. Cryptic, pre-existing immunity likely reflects a high percentage of asymptomatic/subclinical C. burnetii infections which are thought to account for nearly 60% of human exposures1. In a nationwide survey of 4437 United States adults, national Q fever seroprevalence was found to be 3.1%50. Studies among French51 and Japanese52 populations yielded similar seroprevalence among the general population. In groups where Q fever is considered an occupational hazard, such as veterinarians, seroprevalence reports range from 13.5%52 to 19%53. Thus, pre-existing immunity prior to vaccination is a highly relevant consideration. Q-VAX® skin testing takes 7 days to complete, further complicating vaccine administration. Second, licensed C. burnetii WCVs are made from virulent, phase I strains that are heavily regulated and require biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) laboratory conditions for handling. To address these shortcomings, we explored the contribution of major C. burnetii surface structures (i.e., LPS and the T4BSS) in vaccine protection and reactogenicity, and the applicability of a genetically engineered avirulent phase I strain as a WCV.
The C. burnetii component(s) responsible for post-vaccination hypersensitivity are unknown. In agreement with previous animal studies37, we demonstrate that NMI is more potent than NMII as a WCV; however, both strains, along with NMC, show similar reactogenicity in our guinea pig model. In pre-sensitized animals, the reactogenic response occurs with similar kinetics and magnitude regardless of Nine Mile LPS variant utilized in the skin test. Indeed, the original description of the intradermal skin test in humans mentioned that fixed phase II organisms were satisfactory as skin test antigen54. Given isogenic NMI and NMII differ only in production of smooth and rough LPS, respectively44,55,56, our data indicate LPS O-antigen contributes substantially to C. burnetii WCV potency while having little influence on the post-vaccination hypersensitivity response.
Consistent with our results, protein(s) or lipid-protein complex(es) have been implicated in the reactogenic response57. Soon after development of a hypersensitivity skin test in animals, researchers tested chemical fractions of C. burnetii for both vaccine-mediated protection and reactogenicity. Particular insight was provided by examination of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) extracts which were shown to contain the phase I antigen58. Extracts displayed 10% and 1% the potency of whole cells as vaccine and skin test antigens in rabbits, respectively59. The quantitative differences in protection and reactivity suggested the activities were mediated by distinct antigens and/or immunologic processes. Subsequent removal of protein from TCA extract by phenol treatment eliminated the remaining reactogenicity exhibited by the original extract57. Ultimately, it was shown that the phase I antigen extracted by TCA is LPS58,60. Indeed, TCA extract was tested as an experimental human “chemovaccine”61,62 and a lack of infections among the study cohort suggested efficacy49.
Collectively, our data demonstrate that the T4BSS is required for C. burnetii pathogenesis, dispensable for vaccine-induced immunity, and may be involved in the post-vaccination hypersensitivity response in guinea pigs. In contrast to highly virulent NMI, NMI ∆dot/icm did not cause fever, body weight loss, or splenomegaly in a guinea pig infection model, all indicators of productive infection. Indeed, the NMI ∆dot/icm strain appeared to be completely avirulent with no statistical deviation from the saline-treated animals in any of the clinically relevant endpoints we tested. The avirulence of the NMI ∆dot/icm mutant was not unexpected as studies have shown that strains with individual dot/icm mutations exhibit pronounced intracellular growth defects in vitro19,20, in Galleria mellonella larvae22, and in an immunodeficient SCID mouse model23. In our guinea pig infection model, NMI ∆dot/icm appears more attenuated than NMII which caused high but transient fever in a single animal and mean weight loss across the experimental group. Greater attenuation of NMI ∆dot/icm versus NMII may reflect the fact that NMI ∆dot/icm cannot produce a vacuole that supports intracellular growth20 while NMII can because of the presence of a functional T4BSS. Thus, more rounds of NMII replication might be expected before the organism is cleared by the host immune system.
On a per microgram level, the NMI ∆dot/icm mutant has the same vaccine potency as Q-VAX® or NMI in terms of fever response, body weight change, and splenomegaly following challenge. Additionally, outgrowth of C. burnetii following inoculation of axenic media with spleen homogenate indicates WCV-vaccinated animals generally lack viable bacteria in the spleen following challenge, in stark contrast to Saline:NMI unvaccinated control animals. Thus, by 14 days post-infection, bacterial clearance occurs in our guinea pig model of Q fever vaccination.
The vaccine potency of NMI ∆dot/icm is notable for several reasons. First, it shows the T4BSS, a macromolecular cell envelope complex, is dispensable for vaccine-induced protection in a guinea pig model of vaccination and challenge. Second, it illustrates that avirulent phase I strains can be genetically engineered and confer protection equivalent to virulent, naturally occurring phase I strains as tested in a guinea pig model. Current methodology used to generate C. burnetii mutants requires several passages under positive selection to derive a clonal mutant. Starting with homogeneous phase I NMI, generation of NMI ∆dot/icm resulted in a subpopulation of organisms producing phase II LPS as detected by silver staining, a phenomenon we have previously described30. However, despite the presence of some phase II bacteria in the NMI and NMI ∆dot/icm WCV stocks used in this study, both vaccines performed as well as Q-VAX®. These results are in contrast to the weak protection conferred by NMII WCV, which was also reported to be less protective than NMI WCV in a murine vaccination-challenge model37. We are currently evaluating several methods to eliminate phase II bacteria generated by serial passage.
NMI ∆dot/icm-skin tested animals appeared to experience less severe reactogenic response trends than animals skin tested with wild-type NMI. For example, erythema was not observed at 0.25 μg skin test sites, overall induration was less severe throughout the post-skin testing monitoring period, and histology scores were generally lower. Moreover, 2/4 NMI ∆dot/icm skin tested animals showed no measurable erythema at the 25 μg site while all NMI tested animals exhibited measurable erythema. NMI:NMI and NMI:NMC groups exhibited statistically significant increases in maximum erythema compared to Saline:Saline controls and in average induration at 25 μg sites compared to Saline:NMI controls. NMI:NMI, NMI:NMC, and NMI:NMII groups exhibited statistically significant increases in average induration at 25 μg sites compared to Saline:Saline controls. These metrics were not differentiated statically in NMI:NMI ∆dot/icm animals, emphasizing the divergent responses in this group compared to other Nine Mile skin tested groups. Consistent with potentially reduced reactivity, the C. burnetii T4BSS apparatus has several predicted outer membrane lipoproteins (e.g., DotC, DotD, and IcmN)17,63,64, and bacterial lipoproteins are known to modulate DTH responses65. Animals that were not sensitized but skin tested with C. burnetii (Saline:NMI) displayed relatively low reactivity following skin testing. Due to the absence of prior sensitization, these responses may be considered more irritant or innate in nature66. This “baseline” irritant response, particularly evidenced at the 25 μg skin test sites, should be considered in the evaluation of the response of all skin tested animals. Additional considerations regarding this model are the depth of skin test injections as variation may influence characteristics of the response and the unblinded nature of induration measurements. Importantly, variation between animals of the same group and among endpoints in this model indicates a complex biological response possibly related to the use of outbread animals.
Although skin testing with any given dose of NMI WCV did not induce any gross systemic alterations or signs of toxicity, prolonged splenomegaly was observed in several experimental groups. Infected animals displayed significant splenomegaly at euthanasia (63 days post initial inoculation) compared to uninfected animals, and the magnitude of this response did not appear to be influenced by skin testing. Prolonged splenomegaly in a guinea pig Q fever model may be suggestive of continuous host immune system activity and/or bacterial persistence.
Another intriguing observation is the significant decrease in mLN cellularity in NMI ∆dot/icm-vaccinated, NMI-challenged animals compared to Saline-mock vaccinated, NMI-challenged animals at 14 days post-challenge This trend was observed for all vaccinated and challenged groups, although not statistically significant. This observation may be related to a difference in the kinetics and/or nature of the immune response during primary infection compared to challenge of vaccinated animals67. Although the peak functional T-cell response was likely completed by this time point, along with the decrease in mLN cellularity, NMI ∆dot/icm-vaccinated, NMI-challenged animals displayed significantly decreased mLN CD8+ T-cell mean flouresence intensity (MFI) compared to Saline-mock infected, NMI-challenged animals. Again, this suggests possible heterogeneity in primary and secondary immune responses. Trends in mLN CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell frequency indicate potential alterations in these cell populations following both primary infection and vaccination and challenge. The CD8+ population appears to be decreased while the CD4+ population appears to be increased following infection in vaccinated, challenged animals compared to that of unvaccinated, challenged animals. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are known to be required for primary clearance of C. burnetii in a murine model68 and [MHC-II restricted] CD4+ T cells are known to be imperative for the secondary protective response in a murine model69. These data suggest a potential divergent, temporally-specific role for each cell type in both primary and secondary responses. Generally, vaccination appeared to yield a distinct cellular population profile compared to primary infection. With the expansion of immune analysis into additional tissues and more comprehensive understanding of relevant responses, correlates of protective immunity following WCV vaccination may be identified in this model.
In summary, our data confirm that the T4BSS is essential for C. burnetii virulence in an immunocompetent mammal. However, unlike LPS, the T4BSS is dispensable for vaccine-mediated protection and may be involved in the post-vaccination hypersensitivity response. Based on attenuated virulence in guinea pigs, NMII is exempt in the U.S. from regulation as a select agent by CDC-DSAT (https://www.selectagents.gov/exclusions-hhs.html). It is suitable for work at BSL-2 and is considered non-revertible to full virulence due to deletion of numerous LPS biosynthesis genes. Here, we show that non-revertible NMI ∆dot/icm displays virulence attenuation similar to NMII, leading to the possibility that this strain could also be exempted from regulation by DSAT. Exemption and BSL-2 use would make NMI ∆dot/icm more widely available to the scientific community to explore its application as an alternative WCV and to examine the role of LPS in C. burnetii-host cell interactions. Indeed, innate immune signaling and cellular trafficking are both proposed as LPS-mediated events that differ between phase I and phase II bacteria27,70,71. NMI ∆dot/icm could also be used as a source of phase I LPS for O-antigen-carrier protein conjugate vaccine studies as proposed by Anacker and colleagues in 196357. These studies provide proof of principle that targeted gene deletion can be used to generate alternative WCVs for protection against Q fever and to identify, and potentially eliminate, deleterious DTH antigens.
Methods
Coxiella burnetii strains
All C. burnetii strains were grown in acidified citrate cysteine medium-2 or -D (ACCM-2 or ACCM-D)72 at 37 °C, 2.5% O2, and 5% CO2 and were subsequently stored at −80 °C in cell freezing medium (DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide). Stocks for vaccination and skin testing (WCVs) were cultured in the same manner as infection stocks, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 h, washed twice in sterile PBS, resuspended in USP-grade saline, and stored at −80 °C until vaccination or skin testing. All manipulations of phase I C. burnetii stocks and infected animal tissue were performed in a BSL-3 laboratory in accordance with standard operating procedures approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Institutional Biosafety Committee.
Construction of NMI ∆dot/icm
The entire 32.5 kb dot/icm locus of the C. burnetii NMI strain was deleted using Cre-lox. Specifically, the 5′ flanking region of icmX (cbu1652) was amplified from gDNA by PCR with DotIcm5′-pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB-F and DotIcm5’-pUC19-Kan-LoxP-sacB-R oligonucleotides. The resulting PCR product was cloned into AvaI digested pUC19-Kan-LoxP-sacB by In-Fusion to create pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB::DotIcm5′flank. The 3′ flanking region from icmB (cbu1622) was amplified from gDNA by PCR with DotIcm3′-pJC-CAT-loxP-F and DotIcm3′-pJC-CAT-loxP-R oligonucleotides. The resulting PCR product was cloned into BamHI/SalI digested pJC-CAT-LoxP by In-Fusion to create pJC-CAT-LoxP::DotIcm3′flank. Three successive transformations were carried out with pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB::DotIcm5′flank, pJC-CAT-LoxP::DotIcm3′flank, and pUC19::1169P-cre, using kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and sucrose selection, respectively. The dot/icm deletion was confirmed by PCR30.
Due to the presence of background wild-type NMI, a lysCA selection cassette was inserted into the LoxP site of uncloned NMI ∆dot/icm by Cre-lox recombination. Briefly, LoxP-P1169-lysCA-LoxP was amplified from pJC-CAT::1169P-lysCA by PCR using LysCAcass-F and LysCAcass-R. The LoxP-P1169-lysCA-LoxP PCR was co-transformed into the uncloned NMI ∆dot/icm with pUC19::1169P-cre. Selection of transformants was carried out using ACCM-D minus lysine. Clonal NMI ∆dot/icm was obtained by plating on ACCM-D minus lysine agarose plates incubated at 37 °C, 2.5% O2, and 5% CO2. The presence of cloned NMI ∆dot/icm was confirmed by PCR as previously described30. The strain was cultivated and stored as described above. Oligonucleotide primers and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Strain or plasmid | Genotype and/or phenotype | Source |
---|---|---|
Strains | ||
E. coli Stellar cells | F–, endA1, supE44, thi-1, recA1, relA1, gyrA96, phoA, Φ80∆ lacZΔ M15, Δ (lacZYA - argF) U169, Δ(mrr - hsdRMS - mcrBC), ΔmcrA, λ– | Clontech |
C. burnetii Nine Mile I | NMI, RSA493, phase I, clone 7 | Davis et al.82 and Seshadri, et al.83 |
C. burnetii Nine Mile II | NMII, RSA439, phase II, clone 4 | Millar et al.56 |
C. burnetii Nine Mile Crazy | NMC, RSA514 | Hackstadt et al.28 |
C. burnetii NMI ∆dot/icm | NMI containing a 32.5 kb dot/icm (cbu1622-1652) deletion | This study |
Plasmids | ||
pJC-CAT-loxP | pJB2581 containing cat driven by 1169 P; Cmr | Beare et al.84 |
pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB | pUC19 containing a 1169P-Kan-loxP-sacB cassette; Kanr | Beare et al.84 |
pJC-CAT::1169P-lysCA | 1169P-lysCA cassette cloned into pJC-CAT; Cmr | Beare et al.30 |
pUC19::1169P-cre | pUC19 containing cre driven by 1169 P; Ampr | Beare et al.84 |
pJC-CAT-loxP::DotIcm3′flank | 3′ flanking DNA from CBU1622 cloned into pJC-CAT-loxP; Cmr | This study |
pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB::DotIcm5′flank | 5′ flanking DNA from CBU1652 cloned into pJC-CAT-loxP; Kanr | This study |
Visualization of C. burnetii LPS and bacterial enumeration
C. burnetii LPS was extracted by modified hot phenol extraction and visualized by silver stain and immunoblot30,43. All samples utilized in silver stains and immunoblots were derived from the indicated experiments and were run in parallel. Uncropped gel and blot images are presented in Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10, respectively. The BioRad Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard was utilized as a molecular weight marker in these experiments. C. burnetii stocks used for infection were quantified using qPCR to enumerate genome equivalents (GE)43. Fixed C. burnetii used in WCVs were enumerated using a direct bacterial count as modified from Ormsbee et al.73. Bacteria were stained with Hoechst dye for 20 min, washed in PBS, then sonicated for 5 min in a bath sonicator (60 sonics/min) to eliminate clumping. Dilutions of bacterial suspensions were imaged on glass slides in triplicate using a Nikkon Eclipse T2 microscope. Bacteria were delinated in micrographs using Cell Profiler™ software and enumerated based on the following conversion factors: average particle count per field × 1705 (# of fields per view) × dilution factor. For WCV dose approximation, bacterial numbers were converted to mg dosages using the purified dry weight calculations of Ormsbee et al.73 (3.78 × 1010 C. burnetii per mg).
Guinea pigs
Table 3 Hartley guinea pigs were obtained from Charles River (strain code 051) at 4 to 6 weeks of age. Animals were acclimated for at least a week prior to experimental manipulation. In light of historical Q fever virulence studies29,74, and to minimize potentially confounding sex-associated factors (e.g., behavior, body weight, hormonal effects), female guinea pigs were utilized in these studies. Animals were housed in individually ventilated plastic cages (Allentown; two animals per cage) with hardwood Sani-chip bedding (PJ Murphy). A high fiber guinea pig diet (Envigo global high fiber guinea pig diet; Teklad, cat n. 2041) and chlorinated, reverse osmosis filtered tap water were administered ad libitum. A 12-h light–dark cycle was maintained in animal housing facilities which were kept at 68–72 °F and 40–60% relative humidity with a 50% set point. For all experiments, group numbers equaled 4 animals with the exception of the Saline:Saline group in experiment 2 which only had 3 animals. All animals were housed in approved animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL-3) facilities and manipulated under ABSL-3 standard operating procedures approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Institutional Biosafety Committee and an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol (ASP 2018-002-E). Animal experiments and procedures were performed in an Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited National Institutes of Health-National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases animal facility.
Table 3.
Primer | Sequence (5’ to 3’) |
---|---|
Primers used to create NMI ∆dot/icm | |
DotIcm5′-pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB-F | ACGTTTGCGGCCGCCTGCAGCATCGGCTCAACGACCATCC |
DotIcm5′-pUC19-Kan-loxP-sacB-R | AGGCCTTGCAGGCCCTGCAGGTTGACCGATATAATCATCGGACATC |
DotIcm3′-pJC-CAT-loxP-F | ACGAAGTTATGTCGACGGTCAGGGATAGTCCCGCTTC |
DotIcm3′-pJC-CAT-loxP-R | CGGTACCCGGGGATCCGATACCGATCAGGTGCTCGGG |
LysCAcass-F | GCTCGCGTCGACCGGTGAGCTCGGTACCCGGGGATCC |
LysCAcass-R | CATGCGCACCACCGGTGATTAATTAGAGAACCTGTTTGTCGAC |
Primers used for analysis of NMI ∆dot/icm | |
CBU1628-F | ATTCGAAAAATTTTCCTAACTC |
CBU1628-R | CAACCCTTCAATCATCAACTTAAC |
Dot/Icm-KO-F | TTGCCCAGTGGCATAATAAGCG |
Dot/Icm-KO-R | CTTCTTAACTAGAATATTTATCGCCCATG |
PCRcontrol-3′-F | CAATAAAAACTAACCCAGAAAGTAATTC |
PCRcontrol-3′-R | GCTGCTGCATCCGATTCATC |
C. burnetii infection
On the day of infection, animals were sedated by isoflurane inhalation using an anesthetic vaporizer with activated charcoal adsorption filters (VetEquip Inc, cat. n. 901801 and 931401) and an IPTT-300 transponder (BioMedic Data Systems) was implanted subcutaneously above the shoulder of each animal in a longitudinal orientation using a large bore needle. Four guinea pigs per group were infected with 106 GE of C. burnetii in USP-grade saline via intraperitoneal injection. Negative control animals were mock infected with USP-grade saline for each experiment. Body weights, body temperatures, and any behavioral/clinical changes were recorded daily following infections. Body temperatures were collected using a DAS-8007-P reader (BioMedic Data Systems) at a consistent daily time and a temperature of ≥39.5 °C was defined as fever74–76.
Vaccination challenge
On the day of vaccination, animals were sedated by isoflurane inhalation and IPTT-300 transponders were implanted as described above. Four guinea pigs per group were vaccinated with 25 μg of Q-VAX® or 4% paraformaldehyde fixed C. burnetii in USP-grade saline via subcutaneous upper back injection. Negative control animals were mock vaccinated with USP-grade saline for each experiment. Body weights, body temperatures, and behavioral/clinical changes were recorded daily following vaccination. At 28 days post-vaccination, animals were infected with 106 GE C. burnetii as described above.
Post-infection hypersensitivity skin testing
The guinea pig post-vaccination hypersensitivity model was performed as described by Baeten et al.77 with modifications. Four guinea pigs per group were infected with 106 GE of NMI or mock infected with saline as described above. At 42 days following infection, animals were sedated by isoflurane inhalation and skin tested with 25, 2.5, and 0.25 μg of C. burnetii WCV in USP-grade saline via intradermal injection at three separate sites on each animal’s back. Negative control animals were mock skin tested with USP-grade saline. Body weights, body temperatures, behavioral/clinical changes, were recorded daily after skin testing. Skin testing sites were shaved one day prior to intradermal inoculation (“skin testing”) and weekly one day prior to skin metric measurement. Erythema diameter was measured on days 7, 14, and 21 post-skin testing using a Mitutoyo digimatic caliper 550-311-20. Induration was measured every two days by visual assessment and palpation and scored in a manner similar to that described by T. Fredriksson and U. Petterson78. Animals were euthanized 21 days following skin testing.
Euthanasia, tissue collection, and processing
For all experiments, guinea pigs were euthanized by intraperitoneal ketamine injection followed by exsanguination via cardiac puncture and induction of pneumothorax. Blood was collected by cardiac puncture using Vacutainer® blood collection tubes and needles (BD). Following euthanasia, two mesenteric lymph nodes (Experiments 2 and 3) and the spleen (all experiments) were excised and placed into tubes containing sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, pH: 7.4, cat. n. 10010023). For experiment 3, 10 mm skin biopsies were collected from each skin testing site and placed into 5 mL 10% formalin for a 48 h fixation. Lymph nodes were manually dissociated using the frosted ends of two microscope slides. Spleens were dissociated using disposable 15 mL tissue grinders (VWR International, cat. n. 47732-446). Lymph node and spleen cellularity were determined using a Scepter automated cell counter (Millipore, cat. n. PHCC20060) with size exclusion parameters (6 to 36 μm). Spleen suspensions were stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis. For bacterial outgrowth quantification from spleen tissues (experiment 2), spleens were homogenized as described above and homogenates were used to inoculate ACCM-2 media as described by Omsland, et al.79 with the following modifications. Briefly, 5 uL of spleen homogenate was added to 5 mL of ACCM-2 in T25 flasks. After 7 days of growth, C.burnetii DNA was extracted from bacteria contained in 1.4 mL of each ACCM-2 culture using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit. Quantification of genome equivalents (GE) in extracted DNA was conducted by qPCR using primers specific for C. burnetii groel43. The estimated bacterial burden per mg of spleen tissue was calculated based on dilution factors and published data showing C. burnetii averages approximately 4 logs of growth in ACCM-2 media over a 7 day incubation period79. Ct values over 35 were considered background amplification in this assay.
Flow cytometry
For experiments 2 and 3, single-cell suspensions from mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens were aliquoted into 96-well U-bottom plates at a minimum density of 106 cells per well. Cells were washed in staining buffer (PBS + 1% bovine serum albumin) and in a cocktail of antibodies specific for guinea pig cell surface antigens, including B cells (clone: MsGp10, fluorophore: unconjugated, BioRad, cat. N. MCA567) with secondary antibody (anti-mouse IgG1, clone: RMG1-1, fluorophore: AF700, BioLegend, cat. N. 406632), CD4 (clone: CT7, fluorophore: RPE, BioRad, cat. n. MCA749PE), and CD8 (clone: CT6, fluorophore: FITC, BioRad, cat. n. MCA752F). Following surface staining, cells were washed in staining buffer and fixed overnight at 4 °C using Cytofix (BD, cat. n. 554655). Following fixation, cells were washed in staining buffer and analyzed on a BD LSR II or FACSymphony flow cytometer using FacsDiva software (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed with FlowJo 10.0 software (TreeStar Inc., Ashland, Oregon). A minimum of 20,000 events were captured for each sample. Single-stained compensation controls and fluorescence minus one staining controls were included to help set gating boundaries.
Histology
Skin biopsies were fixed in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin for a minimum of 7 days, placed in tissue cassettes and processed with a Sakura VIP-6 Tissue Tek on a 12 h automated schedule using a graded series of ethanol, xylene, and PureAffin. Embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 μm, mounted and dried overnight at 42° C prior to staining with hematoxylin and eosin using established methods. Biopsy specimens were evaluated using an Olympus BX53 microscope.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and R version 3.6.380. Statistical evidence for differences in group means or geometric means (for splenomegaly and immunological variables) were assessed using two-sample Welch t tests, allowing for unequal variances between groups. For each comparison, we computed Wald-type 95% confidence intervals and describe statistical significance with two-sided p-values, where we represent p-values in equal to or below 0.05 with a single asterisk (*) and p-values equal to or below 0.01 with a double asterisk (**). No adjustment was made for multiple comparisons due to the small sample sizes involved. For splenic bacterial outgrowth data, we utilized the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test after transforming all samples above our qPCR amplification threshold (Ct > 35) to the minimum threshold value. For each comparison, we describe statistical significance with two-sided p-values, where we represent p-values at equal to or below 0.05 with a single asterisk (*), p-values equal to or below 0.01 with a double asterisk (**), and p-values equal to or below 0.001 with a triple asterisk (***). We used weight measurements of animals in the saline mock-infection control groups in experiments 1 and 2 to estimate separate baseline weight trajectories in the absence of intervention for treated animals in each of those experiments. We fit a linear regression model adjusted for baseline (i.e., pre-treatment) weight using generalized estimating equations with first-order autoregressive working correlation matrix clustering on animal ID utilizing the “geepack” package in R81. The counterfactual no-intervention weight trajectory for each treated animal was predicted by incorporating individual baseline weight into the fitted regression model.
Reporting summary
Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Rocky Mountain Veterinary Branch staff for animal caretaking and histology work and Charlie Larson for assistance with bacterial enumeration. This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (ZIAAI001331).
Author contributions
C.M.L. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. P.A.B. designed and performed experiments and analyzed data. D.C.C. assisted with experiments. J.F. analyzed data. M.T. assisted with experiments. C.I.S. assisted with experiments and analyzed data. R.A.H. oversaw study design and data analysis. All authors discussed results and assisted in editing the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Data availability
The authors confirm that all relevant data are included in the manuscript and Supplementary Information.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41541-021-00296-6.
References
- 1.Eldin C, et al. From Q fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: a paradigm change. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2017;30:115–190. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00045-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Million M, Raoult D. No such thing as chronic Q fever. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017;23:856–857. doi: 10.3201/eid2305.151159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vogiatzis I, Dimoglou G, Sachpekidis V. Q Fever myocarditis. Hippokratia. 2008;12:46–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Madariaga MG, Rezai K, Trenholme GM, Weinstein RA. Q fever: a biological weapon in your backyard. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003;3:709–721. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00804-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Samuel JE, Hendrix LR. Laboratory maintenance of Coxiella burnetii. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2009;Chapter 6:Unit 6C.1. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc06c01s15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smadel JE, Snyder MJ, Robbins FC. Vaccination against Q fever. Am. J. Hyg. 1948;47:71–81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a119187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meiklejohn G, Lennette EH. Q fever in California. I. Observations on vaccination of human beings. Am. J. Hyg. 1950;52:54–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marmion B, et al. Q Fever Research Group (QRG), Adelaide: Activities-Exit Summary 1980–2004. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005;1063:181–186. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marmion B. Q fever: the long journey to control by vaccination. Med J. Aust. 2007;186:164–166. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gefenaite G, Munster JM, van Houdt R, Hak E. Effectiveness of the Q fever vaccine: A meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2011;29:395–398. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kermode M, Yong K, Hurley S, Marmion B. An economic evaluation of increased uptake in Q fever vaccination among meat and agricultural industry workers following implementation of the National Q Fever Management Program. Aust. N.Z. J. Public Health. 2003;27:390–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2003.tb00415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ruiz S, Wolfe DN. Vaccination against Q fever for biodefense and public health indications. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:726–726. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schulze LSC, Borchardt S, Ouellet V, Heuwieser W. Effect of a phase I Coxiella burnetii inactivated vaccine on body temperature and milk yield in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2016;99:541–550. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-9628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Voth DE, Heinzen RA. Coxiella type IV secretion and cellular microbiology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2009;12:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Segal G, Feldman M, Zusman T. The Icm/Dot type-IV secretion systems of Legionella pneumophila and Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005;29:65–81. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ghosal D, et al. Molecular architecture, polar targeting and biogenesis of the Legionella Dot/Icm T4SS. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1173–1182. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0427-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chetrit D, Hu B, Christie PJ, Roy CR, Liu J. A unique cytoplasmic ATPase complex defines the Legionella pneumophila type IV secretion channel. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:678–686. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0165-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Larson CL, et al. Right on Q: genetics begin to unravel Coxiella burnetii host cell interactions. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:919–939. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2016-0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carey KL, Newton HJ, Luhrmann A, Roy CR. The Coxiella burnetii Dot/Icm system delivers a unique repertoire of type IV effectors into host cells and is required for intracellular replication. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beare PA, et al. Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system requirements for Coxiella burnetii growth in human macrophages. mBio. 2011;2:e00175–00111. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00175-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martinez E, Cantet F, Fava L, Norville I, Bonazzi M. Identification of OmpA, a Coxiella burnetii protein involved in host cell invasion, by multi-phenotypic high-content screening. PLOS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004013. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Norville IH, et al. Galleria mellonella as an alternative model of Coxiella burnetii infection. Microbiol. (Read., Engl.) 2014;160:1175–1181. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.077230-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Schaik EJ, Case ED, Martinez E, Bonazzi M, Samuel JE. The SCID mouse model for identifying virulence determinants in Coxiella burnetii. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:25–25. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shannon JG, Howe D, Heinzen RA. Virulent Coxiella burnetii does not activate human dendritic cells: role of lipopolysaccharide as a shielding molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:8722–8727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501863102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hackstadt T. Steric hindrance of antibody binding to surface proteins of Coxiella burnetti by phase I lipopolysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 1988;56:802. doi: 10.1128/IAI.56.4.802-807.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vishwanath S, Hackstadt T. Lipopolysaccharide phase variation determines the complement-mediated serum susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii. Infect. Immun. 1988;56:40. doi: 10.1128/IAI.56.1.40-44.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Barry AO, et al. Impaired stimulation of p38alpha-MAPK/Vps41-HOPS by LPS from pathogenic Coxiella burnetii prevents trafficking to microbicidal phagolysosomes. Cell host microbe. 2012;12:751–763. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hackstadt T, Peacock MG, Hitchcock PJ, Cole RL. Lipopolysaccharide variation in Coxiella burnetti: intrastrain heterogeneity in structure and antigenicity. Infect. Immun. 1985;48:359–365. doi: 10.1128/IAI.48.2.359-365.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Moos A, Hackstadt T. Comparative virulence of intra- and interstrain lipopolysaccharide variants of Coxiella burnetii in the guinea pig model. Infect. Immun. 1987;55:1144–1150. doi: 10.1128/IAI.55.5.1144-1150.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Beare PA, Jeffrey BM, Long CM, Martens CM, Heinzen RA. Genetic mechanisms of Coxiella burnetii lipopolysaccharide phase variation. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1006922. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stoker MG, Fiset P. Phase variation of the Nine Mile and other strains of Rickettsia burneti. Can. J. Microbiol. 1956;2:310–321. doi: 10.1139/m56-036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ftacek P, Skultety L, Toman R. Phase variation of Coxiella burnetii strain Priscilla: influence of this phenomenon on biochemical features of its lipopolysaccharide. J. endotoxin Res. 2000;6:369–376. doi: 10.1177/09680519000060050701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kersh GJ, Oliver LD, Self JS, Fitzpatrick KA, Massung RF. Virulence of pathogenic Coxiella burnetii strains after growth in the absence of host cells. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011;11:1433–1438. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hotta A, et al. Phase variation analysis of Coxiella burnetii during serial passage in cell culture by use of monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:4747–4749. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4747-4749.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ormsbee RA, Bell EJ, Lackman DB, Tallent G. The influence of phase on the protective potency of Q fever vaccine. J. Immunol. (Baltim., Md.: 1950) 1964;92:404–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arricau-Bouvery N, et al. Effect of vaccination with phase I and phase II Coxiella burnetii vaccines in pregnant goats. Vaccine. 2005;23:4392–4402. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang G, et al. Mechanisms of vaccine-induced protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii infection in BALB/c mice. J. Immunol. (Baltim., Md.: 1950) 2007;179:8372–8380. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Williams JC, et al. Antigenic structure of Coxiella burnetii. A comparison of lipopolysaccharide and protein antigens as vaccines against Q fever. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1990;590:370–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb42243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peng Y, Zhang Y, Mitchell WJ, Zhang G. Development of a lipopolysaccharide-targeted peptide mimic vaccine against Q fever. J. Immunol. (Baltim., Md.: 1950) 2012;189:4909–4920. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Williams JC, Damrow TA, Waag DM, Amano K. Characterization of a phase I Coxiella burnetii chloroform-methanol residue vaccine that induces active immunity against Q fever in C57BL/10 ScN mice. Infect. Immun. 1986;51:851–858. doi: 10.1128/IAI.51.3.851-858.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Reeves PM, Paul SR, Sluder AE, Brauns TA, Poznansky MC. Q-vaxcelerate: A distributed development approach for a new Coxiella burnetii vaccine. Hum. Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13:2977–2981. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1371377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gilkes, A. P. et al. Tuning subunit vaccines with novel TLR triagonist adjuvants to generate protective immune responses against Coxiella burnetii. The Journal of Immunology, ji1900991, 10.4049/jimmunol.1900991 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 43.Long CM, Beare PA, Cockrell DC, Larson CL, Heinzen RA. Comparative virulence of diverse Coxiella burnetii strains. Virulence. 2019;10:133–150. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1575715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoover TA, Culp DW, Vodkin MH, Williams JC, Thompson HA. Chromosomal DNA deletions explain phenotypic characteristics of two antigenic variants, phase II and RSA 514 (crazy), of the Coxiella burnetii nine mile strain. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:6726–6733. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6726-2733.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Russell-Lodrigue, K. E., Zhang, G. Q., McMurray, D. N. & Samuel, J. E. Clinical and pathologic changes in a guinea pig aerosol challenge model of acute Q fever. Infect Immun74, 10.1128/iai.00763-06 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Marmion BP, et al. Vaccine prophylaxis of abattoir-associated Q fever: eight years’ experience in Australian abattoirs. Epidemiol. Infect. 1990;104:275–287. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800059458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.de Cremoux R, et al. Assessment of vaccination by a phase I Coxiella burnetii-inactivated vaccine in goat herds in clinical Q fever situation. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012;64:104–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ackland JR, Worswick DA, Marmion BP. Vaccine prophylaxis of Q fever. A follow-up study of the efficacy of Q-Vax (CSL) 1985-1990. Med J. Aust. 1994;160:704–708. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1994.tb125909.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ormsbee, R. & Marmion, B. P. in Q Fever, Vol. I: The Disease Vol. I (ed Thomas J Marrie) Ch. 12, 225-244 (CRC Press, 1990).
- 50.Anderson, A. D. et al. Seroprevalence of Q fever in the United States, 2003–2004. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.81, 10.4269/ajtmh.2009.09-0168 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 51.Tissot Dupont H, et al. Epidemiologic features and clinical presentation of acute Q fever in hospitalized patients: 323 French cases. Am. J. Med. 1992;93:427–434. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90173-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Abe T, et al. A seroepidemiological study of the risks of Q fever infection in Japanese veterinarians. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2001;17:1029–1032. doi: 10.1023/A:1020018907452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sellens E, et al. Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence in unvaccinated veterinary workers in Australia: Evidence to support Q fever vaccination. Zoonoses Public Health. 2020;67:79–88. doi: 10.1111/zph.12658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lackman DB, Bell EJ, Bell JF, Pickens EG. Intradermal sensitivity testing in man with a purified vaccine for Q fever. Am. J. Public Health Nations Health. 1962;52:87–93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.52.1.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Beare PA, et al. Comparative genomics reveal extensive transposon-mediated genomic plasticity and diversity among potential effector proteins within the genus Coxiella. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:642–656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01141-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Millar JA, et al. Whole-genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii Nine Mile RSA439 (Phase II, Clone 4), a Laboratory Workhorse Strain. Genome Announcements. 2017;5:e00471–00417. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00471-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anacker RL, Haskins WT, Lackman DB, Ribi E, Pickens EG. Conversion of the Phase I antigen of Coxiella Burnetii to Hapten by phenol treatment. J. Bacteriol. 1963;85:1165–1170. doi: 10.1128/JB.85.5.1165-1170.1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brezina R, Urvolgyi J. Study of the antigenic structure of Coxiella burnetii. I. Extraction of Phase I antigenic component by means of trichloroacetic acid. Acta Virol. 1962;6:4. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Anacker RL, Lackman DB, Pickens EG, Ribi E. Antigenic and skin-reactive properties of fractions of Coxiella burnetii. J. Immunol. 1962;89:145. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schramek S, Brezina R. Characterization of an endotoxic lipopolysaccharide from Coxiella burnetii. Acta Virol. 1976;20:152–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kazar J, Brezina R, Palanova A, Tvrda B, Schramek S. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a Q fever chemovaccine in persons professionally exposed to Q fever in Czechoslovakia. Bull. World Health Organ. 1982;60:389–394. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brezina, R., Schramek, S., Kazar, J. & Urvolgyi, J. Q fever chemovaccine for human use. Acta Virol.18, 269 (1974).
- 63.Nagai H, Kubori T. Type IVB secretion systems of Legionella and other Gram-negative bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:136–136. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yerushalmi G, Zusman T, Segal G. Additive effect on intracellular growth by Legionella pneumophila Icm/Dot proteins containing a lipobox motif. Infect. Immun. 2005;73:7578. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7578-7587.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Whelan AO, et al. Modulation of the bovine delayed-type hypersensitivity responses to defined mycobacterial antigens by a synthetic bacterial lipopeptide. Infect. Immun. 2003;71:6420. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6420-6425.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vermeer BJ. Skin irritation and sensitization. J. Controlled Release. 1991;15:261–265. doi: 10.1016/0168-3659(91)90117-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Shannon JG, Heinzen RA. Adaptive immunity to the obligate intracellular pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Immunol. Res. 2009;43:138–148. doi: 10.1007/s12026-008-8059-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Read AJ, Erickson S, Harmsen AG. Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in clearance of primary pulmonary infection with Coxiella burnetii. Infect. Immun. 2010;78:3019–3026. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00101-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ledbetter L, et al. Major histocompatibility complex class II-Restricted, CD4+ T cell-dependent and -independent mechanisms are required for vaccine-induced protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii. Infect. Immun. 2020;88:e00824–00819. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00824-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shannon JG, Howe D, Heinzen RA. Virulent Coxiella burnetii does not activate human dendritic cells: Role of lipopolysaccharide as a shielding molecule. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:8722–8727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501863102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Honstettre A, et al. Lipopolysaccharide from Coxiella burnetii is involved in bacterial phagocytosis, filamentous actin reorganization, and inflammatory responses through Toll-Like Receptor 4. J. Immunol. 2004;172:3695. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sandoz KM, Beare PA, Cockrell DC, Heinzen RA. Complementation of arginine auxotrophy for genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii by use of a defined axenic medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:3042–3051. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00261-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ormsbee R, Peacock M, Gerloff R, Tallent G, Wike D. Limits of rickettsial infectivity. Infect. Immun. 1978;19:239–245. doi: 10.1128/IAI.19.1.239-245.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Russell-Lodrigue KE, et al. Coxiella burnetii isolates cause genogroup-specific virulence in mouse and guinea pig models of acute Q fever. Infect. Immun. 2009;77:5640–5650. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00851-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kocianova E, Kovacova EI, Literak I. Comparison of virulence of Coxiella burnetii isolates from bovine milk and from ticks. Folia parasitologica. 2001;48:235–239. doi: 10.14411/fp.2001.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Yun NE, et al. Pathogenesis of XJ and Romero strains of junin virus in two strains of guinea pigs. Am. J. Tropical Med. Hyg. 2008;79:275–282. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Baeten LA, et al. Standardized guinea pig model for Q fever vaccine reactogenicity. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fredriksson T, Pettersson U. Severe psoriasis-oral therapy with a new retinoid. Dermatologica. 1978;157:238–244. doi: 10.1159/000250839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Omsland A, et al. Isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii are facilitated by an improved axenic growth medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011;77:3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02826-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Team, R. C. R.:A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org (2019).
- 81.Højsgaard S, Halekoh U, Yan J. The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J. Statistical Softw. 2005;15:11. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Davis GE, Cox HR, Parker RR, Dyer RE. A filter-passing infectious agent isolated from ticks. Public Health Rep. (1896-1970) 1938;53:2259–2282. doi: 10.2307/4582746. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Seshadri R, et al. Complete genome sequence of the Q-fever pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:5455–5460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931379100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Beare PA, Larson CL, Gilk SD, Heinzen RA. Two systems for targeted gene deletion in Coxiella burnetii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:4580–4589. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00881-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all relevant data are included in the manuscript and Supplementary Information.