Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Dec 24;67(3):539–545. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15726

The IOU Consensus Recommendations for Empirical Therapy of Cystitis in Nursing Home Residents

Joseph T Hanlon a,b,c,d, Subashan Perera a,e, Paul J Drinka f, Christopher J Crnich g,h, Steven J Schweon i, Michele Klein-Fedyshin j, Charles B Wessel j, Stacey Saracco a, Gulsum Anderson a, Mary Mulligan k, David A Nace a
PMCID: PMC7980083  NIHMSID: NIHMS1677636  PMID: 30584657

Abstract

Objectives:

To establish consensus guidelines for empiric treatment of uncomplicated cystitis with anti-infectives in non-catheterized older nursing home residents.

Design:

Two-round modified Delphi Survey.

Participants:

Expert panel of 19 clinical pharmacists.

Measurements:

Comprehensive literature search, and development/review/edit of draft survey by the investigative group (i.e., 1 geriatric clinical pharmacist, 2 physicians from geriatric and 1 from infectious disease internal medicine). The expert panel rated their agreement with each of 31 recommendations for drugs of choice, dosing medications at various levels of renal function, drug-drug interactions to avoid, and duration of therapy by gender on a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). Consensus agreement was defined as a lower 95% confidence limit of ≥4.0 for the recommendation–specific mean score.

Results:

The response rate was 95% for the first round and 3 recommendations achieved consensus (i.e., dosing for nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in those without chronic kidney disease, and drug-drug interaction between trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and warfarin). In the second round, 90% responded and reached consensus on an additional 8 recommendations (2 for nitrofurantoin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as initial drugs of choice, 3 for dosing ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole at various levels of chronic kidney disease, and 3 drug-drug interactions to avoid: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole with phenytoin and ciprofloxacin with theophylline, or tizanidine)

Conclusion:

An expert panel of clinical pharmacists was largely able to reach consensus agreement on a number of recommendations for the optimal empiric treatment of cystitis with oral anti-infective medications in older nursing home residents. The recommendations were incorporated into a treatment algorithm for uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized nursing home residents and used in educational materials for health professionals in an ongoing controlled intervention study.

Keywords: aged, nursing homes, cystitis, urinary tract infection, anti-bacterial agents

INTRODUCTION

Suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common reason that antibiotics are prescribed to older nursing home residents.1-3 While UTI may include a number of clinical entities, uncomplicated cystitis accounts for most cases of UTI.4-7 Patients with cystitis are typically not severely ill and present with lower urinary symptoms such as dysuria, urinary urgency / frequency, or suprapubic pain.8 Warning signs or symptoms such as fever, rigor, flank pain, hypotension, or prostatic pain suggest more complicated upper tract disease or prostatitis.8

The appropriateness of antibiotics is important as they can have considerable unintended consequences such as adverse drug events and promoting development of antibiotic resistant organisms.1,9 Moreover, antibiotic resistant urinary tract organisms are associated with increased transfers to acute care facilities, and mortality.1,10 In addition, suboptimal antibiotic use is the leading cause of Clostridium difficile infections which can result in serious and life threatening complications.1,11

Unfortunately, much of the antibiotic use for cystitis among nursing home residents is potentially suboptimal. For example, Rotjanapan and colleagues conducted a six-month study in two Rhode Island nursing homes (total of 270 beds) and found that 72% of residents with cystitis did not receive a drug of choice.12 In addition, 46% of antibiotics given had a suboptimal dosage and nearly 70% were given an antibiotic for an excessive duration. Another study by Miller and colleagues reported on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for 282 residents aged 65 and older who received an antibiotic for cystitis in 18 U.S. nursing homes over a 12-month period.13 Overall, 40% of antibiotics were deemed to be potentially suboptimal. The most common problem was excessive doses of primarily renally cleared antibiotics in 19% of residents. Other problems seen included the use of higher cost antibiotics, therapeutic duplication, impractical directions, prolonged duration and drug-interactions.13

While there are clinical practice guidelines for defining, evaluating and monitoring infections in nursing home residents, they are not specific to optimal use of antibiotics in treating cystitis.14-18 Given this background, the study objective was to establish consensus guidelines for the optimal prescribing of empiric anti-infectives for uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized older nursing home residents via a modified Delphi survey of an expert panel of clinical pharmacists.19,20

METHODS

To develop the modified Delphi survey, the investigative team worked with two medical librarians at the University of Pittsburgh to conduct a comprehensive literature review restricted to English language articles in PubMed and Embase using a combination of terms including urinary tract infections, cystitis, antibacterial agents, nursing homes, and aged. Abstracts of these articles were reviewed. Studies deemed relevant underwent full article review. In addition, reference lists from review and retrieved articles were scanned for any additional relevant studies.

Using the identified literature and considering four important aspects of medication appropriateness (i.e., drugs of choice, dosing medications at various levels of renal function, drug-drug interactions to avoid, and duration of therapy by gender), a clinical pharmacist researcher developed the initial draft of the Delphi survey.19,20 This draft survey was further refined by three internal medicine physician investigators (2 from geriatric medicine and 1 from infectious disease). The final survey included 31 recommendations and supporting references to be considered by an expert panel. The expert panel consisted of 19 clinical pharmacists (see Acknowledgment section for details) and they were sent the modified Delphi survey via email and were blinded to the identity of other panel members. They were asked to rate their agreement with each of 31 recommendations on a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). After receipt of the completed surveys, means and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each recommendation. Consensus on agreeing to a recommendation was achieved when the lower 95% confidence limit calculated from participant responses was greater than or equal to 4.0. Consensus on disagreeing to a recommendation was achieved when the upper 95% confidence limit calculated from participant responses was less than or equal to 3.0, and the remainder was treated as failure to reach consensus.

Recommendations that did not achieve consensus in the first round were included in a second round during which the same expert panel was asked to further consider the recommendation after providing the group rating mean for each item from the first round, and additional targeted or suggested items from the expert panel to better glean consensus. This approach is consistent with previous published work.21,22 For all statistical analyses, SAS® version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) was used. The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board approved the study as exempt. The results were summarized into simple treatment recommendations to facilitate clinical use.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 253 treatment studies in PubMed and 332 in Embase for a total of 462 unique articles, of which 53 were deemed relevant after abstract review. No additional studies were identified from reference lists. Three quarters (75%) of expert panel members were female. Additionally, 68% were board certified geriatric pharmacists, whereas an additional 26% were board certified in another speciality.

The first-round response rate was 95%. After the first round of the survey, consensus was reached for 3 recommendations (using nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160/800mg twice daily in those without chronic kidney disease, and avoiding a drug-drug interaction between trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and warfarin (Table 1). The panel also reached consensus against considering fosfomycin as a drug of choice, avoiding nitrofurantoin in those with a creatinine clearance<60 ml/min, avoiding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in those with a creatinine clearance<30 ml/min, avoiding ciprofloxacin in patients concurrently receiving glipizide/glyburide, 5 days as the minimum treatment duration for men, and fosfomycin as the cheapest alternative (Table 1).

Table 1.

Clinical Pharmacist Expert Panel Round 1 Survey Responses for Antibiotic Treatment of Cystitis in Older Nursing Home Residents

Appropriateness
Domain
Recommendations Mean (95% CI)
Drugs of Choice for Empiric Treatment With adequate renal function or sulfonamide allergy, nitrofurantoin 4.22 (3.86-4.59)
With adequate renal function but without sulfonamide allergy, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 4.28 (3.90-4.65)
Fosfomycin is always the first choiceb 1.61 (1.26-1.96)
Renal Dosing When CrClr<60, avoid nitrofurantoin b 1.89 (1.65-2.12)
When CrClr<40, avoid nitrofurantoin 3.17 (2.50-3.83)
When CrClr<30, avoid nitrofurantoin 4.44 (3.96-4.83)
When CrClr<30, avoid trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleb 2.22 (1.75-2.69)
When CrClr<15, avoid trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 4.33 (3.91-4.75)
With adequate renal function, nitrofurantoin 100mg twice dailya 4.56 (4.30-4.81)
With adequate renal function, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800mg twice daily a 4.61 (4.36-4.86)
With reduced renal function but not to the level it should be avoided, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800mg daily 4.00 (3.58-4.42)
When CrCl<30, ciprofloxacin 250mg daily 3.56 (3.04-4.07)
With adequate renal function, ciprofloxacin 250mg twice daily 4.17 (3.68-4.66)
Regardless of renal function, fosfomycin 3 gm single dose 4.17 (3.71-4.63)
Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions Ciprofloxacin and theophylline 4.28 (3.90-4.65)
Ciprofloxacin and corticosteroids 3.22 (2.79-3.66)
Ciprofloxacin and warfarin 4.06 (3.69-4.42)
Ciprofloxacin and glipizide/glyburide b 2.33 (1.77-2.90)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and procainamide 3.83 (3.31-4.35)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and phenytoin 4.33 (3.95-4.71)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and warfarin a 4.89 (4.73-5.05)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and methotrexate 3.94 (3.45-4.44)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors 3.72 (3.35-4.10)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and angiotensin receptor blockers 3.72 (3.35-4.10)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and sulfonylureas 3.50 (3.11-3.89)
Minimum Duration of Anti-Infective Treatment In women, 3 days 3.83 (3.34-4.32)
In women, 5 days 2.89 (2.35-3.43)
In men, 5 days b 2.06 (1.69-2.42)
In men, 7 days 4.11 (3.73-4.49)
In men, 10 days 2.67 (2.15-3.18)
Cost of Treatment Fosfomycin is the least expensive choice b 1.50 (1.15-1.85)
a

Consensus agreement

b

Consensus disagreement

Abbreviations: CI =confidence interval; CrClr= creatinine clearance in milliliters per minute; gm=gram; mg=milligram

The second-round response rate was 90%. Four new recommendations were added. The panel reached consensus agreement on: nitrofurantoin as the drug of choice for empiric treatment of cystitis among individuals with adequate renal function and a sulfonamide allergy; trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as the drug of choice in those with adequate renal function and without a sulfonamide allergy; avoiding nitrofurantoin in those with a creatinine clearance<30 ml/min; avoiding trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in those with a creatinine clearance<15ml/min; for those with adequate renal function, 250mg twice daily as the appropriate dose of ciprofloxacin; significance of the drug-drug interaction between ciprofloxacin and theophylline, between ciprofloxacin and tizanidine, and that between trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and phenytoin (Table 2). The panel disagreed that ciprofloxacin and sulfonylureas constitute a significant drug-drug interaction, and men should be treated for a minimum of 10 days (Table 2). Consensus was not reached for the remaining items (Table 2). Figure 1 operationally summarizes the survey results as treatment guidelines.

Table 2.

Clinical Pharmacist Expert Panel Round 2 Survey Responses for Antibiotic Treatment of Cystitis in Older Nursing Home Residents

Appropriateness
Domain
Recommendations Mean (95% CI)
Drugs of Choice for Empiric Treatment With adequate renal function or sulfonamide allergy, nitrofurantoin a 4.41 (4.15-4.67)
With adequate renal function but without sulfonamide allergy, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole a 4.35 (4.04-4.66)
Renal Dosing When CrClr<60, avoid nitrofurantoin 3.35 (2.72-3.98)
When CrClr<30, avoid nitrofurantoin a 4.82 (4.62-5.03)
When CrClr<15, avoid trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole a 4.41 (4.00-4.82)
With reduced renal function but not to the level it should be avoided, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 160/800mg daily 4.12 (3.72-4.52)
When CrCl<30, ciprofloxacin 250mg daily 3.76 (3.34-4.19)
When CrCl<30, ciprofloxacin 500mg daily c 3.06 (2.44-3.67)
With adequate renal function, ciprofloxacin 250mg twice dailya 4.47 (4.21-4.74)
With adequate renal function, ciprofloxacin 500mg twice daily c 2.53 (1.90-3.16)
Regardless of renal function, fosfomycin 3 gm single dose 4.24 (3.74-4.73)
Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions Ciprofloxacin and theophylline a 4.41 (4.09-4.73)
Ciprofloxacin and corticosteroids 3.06 (2.72-3.40)
Ciprofloxacin and warfarin 4.06 (3.72-4.40)
Ciprofloxacin and glipizide/glyburide b 2.35 (1.91-2.80)
Ciprofloxacin and tizanidine a,c 4.41 (4.05-4.78)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and procainamide 4.06 (3.72-4.40)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and phenytoin a 4.41 (4.15-4.67)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and methotrexate 4.06 (3.67-4.44)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors 3.71 (3.31-4.10)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and angiotensin receptor blockers (or potassium supplements) c 3.71 (3.31-4.10)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and sulfonylureas 3.59 (3.22-3.95)
Minimum Duration of Anti-Infective Treatment In women, 3 days 4.00 (3.69-4.31)
In women, 5 days 2.71 (2.27-3.14)
In men, 7 days 4.00 (3.64-4.36)
In men, 10 days b 2.47 (2.06-2.88)
a

Consensus agreement

b

Consensus disagreement

c

New recommendation added in round 2

Abbreviations: CI =confidence interval; CrClr=estimated creatinine clearance in milliliters per minute; gm=gram; mg=milligram

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Empiric Treatment of Uncomplicated Bladder Infection (Cystitis) In Nursing Home Residents ≥ 65 Years Without a Urinary Catheter

DISCUSSION

This study found that an expert panel of clinical pharmacists could achieve consensus agreement on the optimal prescribing of empiric oral anti-infectives in uncomplicated cystitis in older nursing home residents. Regarding drugs of choice, the panel reached agreement that preferred drugs were nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. This is consistent with recent guidelines and reviews and also is clinically sensible as they are capable of successfully treating the three most common cystitis organisms, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella spp. and Proteus spp. for uncomplicated cystitis in older nursing home.17,23-30 In addition, nitrofurantoin may also be effective in treating Enterococcus that maybe resistant to other choices and is also a good choice in those with a sulfa allergy.23 Where resistance to E. coli is less than 20%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole may be a reasonable alternative as its average wholesale price is less than nitrofurantoin and allows one to avoid the small risk of pulmonary reactions that can be seen with nitrofurantoin.23-24, 29,31-32

The expert panel agreement also provides guidance regarding the renal dosing recommendations for several anti-infectives consistent with a previous Delphi Survey.22 Although controversial, nitrofurantoin should not be used in residents with estimated creatinine clearance <30ml/min because urinary concentrations may be insufficient for it to be effective.33 In those whose creatinine clearance is >15ml/min, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is an acceptable alternative. Below this level of renal function, the risk of hyperkalemia with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is greater and alternatives such as ciprofloxacin or fosfomycin should be considered.24,31,34

The panel also identified four clinically important drug-drug interactions, three of which involved narrow therapeutic range drugs (i.e., phenytoin, theophylline, and warfarin). A case control study from Canada found that trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in combination with warfarin increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage by nearly 4-fold (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]= 3.84).35 This finding was confirmed by another case-control study from the U.S. in which trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole increased the risk of bleeding with warfarin by nearly 3-fold (aOR=2.70).36 This same anti-infective was found in another case-control study to be the culprit interacting with phenytoin in which the risk of toxicity requiring hospitalization was increased more than two-fold (aOR=2.11).37 In addition, ciprofloxacin increases the risk of theophylline toxicity by nearly two-fold (aOR=1.86).38

This study had several potential limitations. First, though the panel agreed that anti-infective treatment in men more than 5 days but less than 10 days in duration was acceptable for uncomplicated cystitis, we were unable to reach consensus regarding optimal duration of treatment. For women, most sources are clear that the duration of use for anti-infectives for cystitis should range between 3-7 days.23-24,28-29 Therefore, we operationalized the duration of use as 7 days for men and 3 days for women in the final recommendations (Figure 1). Second, we had used a convenience sample of clinical pharmacists for this modified Delphi survey. However, these individuals came from 10 states and included clinical pharmacists from academia, community base care and managed care. Third, face-to-face meetings of the panelists were not held due to the prohibitive cost and other practical considerations. However, non-face-to-face participation is felt to be advantageous in maintaining blinding and limits confounding arising from dominant personalities.39 Finally, as new research contributes additional information about emerging resistance patterns, and safe and effective medication use in the elderly, the list of anti-infective drugs and associated prescribing information will likely need to be updated.

Like with all treatment guidelines, clinical judgment is important. It is important to note that active patient monitoring without empiric antibiotic use may also be acceptable while awaiting culture results. These guidelines are meant for empiric treatment pending culture results. Clinicians should reassess a patient’s clinical progress along with antibiotic appropriateness once culture results return. Referred to as an antibiotic time out, this reassessment offers the clinician an opportunity to refine antibiotic prescribing by narrowing the antimicrobial spectrum, reducing treatment duration, and potential discontinuing unnecessary additional treatment. When using this treatment guideline, clinicians should also be mindful of local resistance patterns in their facility as well as disease severity, recent antibiotic use, and/or prior history of antimicrobial resistance in an individual patient as these factors may influence the choice of empiric antimicrobial selected.

In conclusion, an expert panel of clinical pharmacists was largely able to reach consensus agreement on a number of recommendations for the optimal empiric treatment of cystitis with oral anti-infective medications in older nursing home residents. These recommendations were incorporated into a treatment algorithm for uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized older nursing home residents and used in educational materials for health professionals in an ongoing controlled intervention study (AHRQ R18 HS023779).

Impact Statement:

We certify that this work is NOVEL clinical research. While clinical practice guidelines exist for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in nursing home residents, there are no clinical practice guidelines focusing specifically on the optimal use of antibiotics for the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in non-catheterized nursing home residents.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the following individuals who were members of the Expert Panel: Sherrie Aspinall, PharmD, MS, BCPS, VA Center for Medication Safety, Hines, IL; and School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Judith Beizer, PharmD, BCGP, AGSF, School of Pharmacy, St. Johns University, New York, NY; Nicole Brandt, PharmD, MBA, BCPP, BCGP, School of Pharmacy University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; Shelly Gray, PharmD, MS, AGSF School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Emily Hajjar, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, Jefferson School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA; Sean M. Jeffery, PharmD, BCGP, AGSF, School of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT; Michael Koronkowski, PharmD, BCGP, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago IL; Sunny Linnebur, PharmD, BCPS, BCGP, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; Robert Maher, PharmD, BCGP, Klingensmith's Drugstores and Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA; Zachary Marcum, PharmD, PhD, BCPS, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Jennifer Naples, PharmD, BCPS, BCGP, Pharmacovigilance Center, Army Office of the Surgeon General, Falls Church, VA; Christine O'Neil, PharmD BCPS, BCGP, Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA; Emily Peron, PharmD, MS, BCPS, BCGP, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Christine Ruby-Scelsi, PharmD, BCPS, BCGP, School of Pharmacy, University Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Heather Sakely, PharmD, BCPS, BCGP , UPMC St. Margaret Family Medicine Residency, Pittsburgh, PA; Mollie Scott, PharmD, BCACP, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC and School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Todd Semla, PharmD, MS, BCGP, AGSF, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Pharmacy Benefits Management Services and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Patricia Slattum, PharmD, PhD, BCGP, School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; Catherine Starner, PharmD, BCPS, Prime Therapeutics PBM, Eagan, MN and School of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Funding Sources: This study was supported in part by grants from the Agency for Health Research and Quality (R18-HS023779), National Institutes on Aging (P30-AG02482711), VA Health Services Research (IIR 14-297, IIR 14-306, IIR 15-115, and The Donoghue Foundation).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Checklist:
Elements of
Financial/
Personal
Conflicts
Author 1
Hanlon
Author 2
Perera
Author 3
Drinka
Author 4
Crinch
Author 5
Schweon
Author 6
Klein-Fedyshin
Author 7
Wessel
Author 8
Saracco
Author 9
Anderson
Author 10
Mulligan
Author 11
Nace
Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes* No Yes No
Employment or Affiliation x X x x x x x x
 
Grants/Funds x X x x x x X x x X X
 
Honoraria x X X x x x X X x x X
 
Speaker Forum x X x x X x X x x X X
 
Consultant x X X x x x X X x x X
 
Stocks x X x x X x X x x X X
 
Royalties x X X x x x X X x x X
 
Expert Testimony x X x x X x X x x X X
 
Board Member x X X x x x X X x x X
 
Patents x X x x X x X x x X X
 
Personal Relationship x X X x x x x x x x X
x x X

SJS provides consulting services to the following companies: Crothall Healthcare, TouchPoint, Morrison, APIC Consulting, Qualidigm, and Fortis Management Group.

Sponsors Role:

The sponsor had no role in the design, methods, data collection, analysis and preparation of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1).Nace DA, Drinka PJ, Crnich CJ. Clinical uncertainties in the approach to long-term care residents with possible urinary tract infection. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014;15:133–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Dwyer LL, Harris-Kojetin LD, Valverde RH, et al. Infections in long-term care populations in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61: 341–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Benoit SR, Nsa W, Richards, CL, et al. Factors associated with antimicrobial use in nursing homes: a multilevel model. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:2039–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Johansen TE, Botto H, Cek M, et al. Critical review of current definitions of urinary tract infections and proposal of an EAU/ESIU classification system. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2011;38(suppl):64–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Anger JT, Saigal C, Wang MM, Yano EM, Urological Diseases Project in America Project. Urologic disease burden in the United States: Veteran users of Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare. Urology 2008;72:37–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Foxman B Urinary tract infection syndromes: Occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Willems CS, van den Broek D’Obrenan J, Numans ME, Verheij TJ, van der Velden AW. Cystitis: Antibiotic prescribing, consultation, attitudes and opinions. Fam Pract 2014;31:149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Nace DA, Perera SK, Hanlon JT, et al. The Improving Outcomes of UTI Management in Long-Term Care Project (IOU) consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of uncomplicated cystitis in nursing home residents. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018. Doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.05.030 [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Handler SM, Wright RM, Ruby CM, Hanlon JT. The epidemiology of medication-related adverse events in nursing homes. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2006:4:264–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Friedman ND, Temkin E, Carmeli Y. The negative impact of antibiotic resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016;22:416–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Hunter JC, Mu Y, Dumyati GK, et al. Burden of nursing home-onset Clostridium difficile infection in the United States: estimates of incidence and patient outcomes. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016. January 18;3(1):ofv196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12).Rotjanapan P, Dosa D, Thomas KS. Potentially inappropriate treatment of urinary tract infections in two Rhode Island nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:438–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Miller SW, Warnock R, Marshall LL. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections in long-term care facilities. Consult Pharm 1999;14:157–177. [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Stone ND, Ashraf MS; Calder J, et al. Surveillance definitions of infections in long-term care facilities: revisiting the McGeer Criteria. Inf Contr Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:965– 977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Loeb M, Bentley DW, Bradley S, et al. Development of minimum criteria for the initiation of antibiotics in residents of long-term care facilities: results of a consensus conference. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:120–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).High KP, Bradley SF, Gravenstein S, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation of fever and infection in older adult residents of long-term care facilities: 2008 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009;48:149–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Zarowitz BJ, Allen C, Tangalos E, Ouslander JG. Algorithms promoting antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016. ;17:173–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Crnich CJ, Drinka P. Improving the management of urinary tract infections in nursing homes: It’s time to stop the tail from wagging the dog. Ann Long Term Care 2014:43–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:376–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Campbell SM, Cantrill JA. Consensus methods in prescribing research. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001;26:5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).Fouts MM, Hanlon JT, Pieper CF, Perfetto EM, Feinberg JL. Identification of elderly nursing facility residents at high risk for drug-related problems. Consult Pharm 1997;12:1103–1111. [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Hanlon JT, Aspinall S, Semla T, et al. Consensus guidelines for oral dosing of primarily renally cleared medications in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:335–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).Rowe TA, Juthani-Mehta M. Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in older adults. Inf Dis Clin N Am 2014;28:75–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG et al. International Clinical Practice Guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e103–e120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25).Mckinnell JA, Stollenwerk NS, Jung CW, et al. Nitrofurantoin compares favorably to recommended agents as empirical treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections in a decision and cost analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011; 86:480–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26).Pedela RL, Shihadeh KC, Knepper BC, Haas MK, Burman WJ, Jenkins TC. Preferential use of nitrofurantoin over fluoroquinolones for acute uncomplicated cystitis and outpatient Escherichia coli resistance in an integrated health care system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:461–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27).Kistler CE, Zimmerman S, Scales K, et al. The antibiotic prescribing pathway for presumed urinary tract infections in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:1719–1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28).Cortes-Penfield NW, Trautner BW, Jump RLP. Urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria in older adults. Infect Dis Clin N Am 2017;3: 673–688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29).Mody L, Juthani-Mehta M. Urinary tract infections in older women: a clinical review. JAMA 2014; 311:844–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30).Schaeffer AJ, Nicolle LE, Urinary tract infections in older men. N Engl J Med 2016;374:562–571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31).Anonymous. Alternatives to fluoroquinolones. Med Lett Drugs Ther 2016;58(1496):75–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32).Claussen K, Stocks E, Bhat D, Fish J, Rubin CD. How common are pulmonary and hepatic adverse effects in older adults prescribed nitrofuantoin? J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:1316–1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33).The American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. AGS Updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63:2227–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34).Falagas ME, Vouloumanou EK, Togias AG, et al. Fosfomycin versus other antibiotics for the treatment of cystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrobial Chemother 2010;65:1862–1877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35).Fischer HD, Juurlink DN, Mamdani MM, et al. Hemorrhage during warfarin therapy associated with cotrimoxazole and other urinary tract anti–infective agents: a population–based study. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:617–621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36).Baillargeon J, Holmes HM, Lin YL, Raji MA, Sharma G, Kuo YF. Concurrent use of warfarin and antibiotics and the risk of bleeding in older adults. Am J Med 2012;125:183–188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37).Antoniou T, Gomes T, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN. Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole–induced phenytoin toxicity in the elderly: a population–based study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011;71:544–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38).Antoniou T, Gomes T, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN. Ciprofloxacin–induced theophylline toxicity: a population–based study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2011;67:521–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39).Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 2007;12(10): 1–8. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES