Correction: Genet Sel Evol (2020) 52: 63 10.1186/s12711-020-00584-0
In Durbin et al. [1], the correlation between partial and full breeding values, , was reported as a measure of prediction accuracy, which is not correct; the metric is the ratio between prediction accuracy in the partial dataset and prediction accuracy in the whole dataset. We have now calculated accuracy as follows:
where is the covariance and is the average inbreeding coefficient of the animals in the partial dataset. The equation for is adapted from [2].
Across the 10 cross-validation iterations, the average accuracy was = 0.547 (minimum = 0.539, maximum = 0.554).
Acknowledgements
We appreciate Daniela A.L. Lourenco and Ignacy Misztal for helping us identify and correct this error.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Durbin HJ, Lu D, Yampara-Iquise H, Miller SP, Decker JE. Development of a genetic evaluation for hair shedding in American Angus cattle to improve thermotolerance. Genet Sel Evol. 2020;52:63. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00584-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Macedo FL, Reverter A, Legarra A. Behavior of the linear regression method to estimate bias and accuracies with correct and incorrect genetic evaluation models. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:529–544. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
