Abstract
Breast cancer metastasizes mainly to organs such as bone, lung, and liver, whereas metastases to the peritoneum and urinary tract are rare. Metastasis to the peritoneum or urinary tract may result in renal dysfunction, infection, and painful hydronephrosis. In our hospital, 1,409 breast cancer surgeries were performed between January 2004 and December 2015, and 7 cases of hydronephrosis associated with recurrence were observed. The median age of patients was 69 years (57–79 years). The median time from surgery to diagnosis of hydronephrosis was 47 months (20–70 months). Histology was invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 6 cases and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in 1 case. There were 6 bilateral cases and 1 unilateral case of hydronephrosis. The causes were retroperitoneal metastasis in 5 cases and lymph node metastasis in 2 cases. The hydronephrosis was untreated in 2 cases, and treated with a ureteral stent in 2 cases, nephrostomy in 1 case, and nephrostomy due to ureteral stent failure in 2 cases. The median survival from the onset of hydronephrosis was 12 months (3–57 months). Although the probability of hydronephrosis in breast cancer recurrence was not high, care must be taken to avoid renal dysfunction, infection, or pain, which may require treatment.
Keywords: Hydronephrosis, Breast cancer, Metastasis
Introduction
There were an estimated 2 million cases of breast cancer worldwide in 2017, and the number is increasing every year. There were also an estimated 600,000 female deaths, making it the number one cause of cancer death in women [1]. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, the number of deaths has yet to decrease.
Metastasis of breast cancer has been studied in various autopsy and diagnostic imaging studies. Metastasis to the peritoneum or urinary tract may result in renal dysfunction, infection, and painful hydronephrosis. A PubMed search did not identify any papers focusing on hydronephrosis, although there have been case reports of metastasis to rare sites such as the bladder. In the present study, hydronephrosis associated with breast cancer metastasis was investigated.
Materials and Methods
Cases treated at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Medical Hospital between January 2004 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 1,409 breast cancer surgeries in that period, of which 122 were metastatic recurrences, with 7 cases of hydronephrosis.
Results
An overview of the cases is shown in Table 1. All were female, and the median age was 69 years (57–79 years). The median time from surgery to diagnosis of hydronephrosis was 47 months (20–70 months). The histological type was IDC in 6 (of 1,252 patients with IDC), ILC in 1 (of 52 patients with ILC), and special type in 0 (of 94 patients with special type). The subtypes were luminal type in 3 cases and triple-negative (TN) in 4 cases.
Table 1.
Overview of metastatic breast cancer with hydronephrosis in our hospital
| Case | Age | Primary cancer |
Metastasis |
Hydronephrosis |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| histology | subtype | time from op. to onset, months | sites | medication | time from op. to onset, months | localization | causes | local treatment | Creatinine (mg/dL) before and after local treatment | medication | prognosis after the onset, months | ||
| 1 | 79 | IDC | TN | 20 | Pleura Lymph nodes | 20 | Bilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | None | Paclitaxel EC | 12 | ||
| 2 | 60 | ILC | TN | 70 | Pleura | 70 | Unilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | Ureteral stents | before: 0.96 after: 0.84 | Paclitaxel Capecitabine S-1+irinotecan Gemcitabine | 14 | |
| 3 | 57 | IDC | Luminal | 17 | Bone Skin | Exemestane | 27 | Bilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | None | Capecitabine Eribulin Vinorelbine |
57 | |
| 4 | 61 | IDC | Luminal | 60 | Lymph nodes Liver |
60 | Bilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | Nephrostomy | before: 7.68 after: 1.26 | Docetaxel Anastrozole S-1+irinotecan Gemcitabine | 34 | |
| 5 | 71 | IDC | TN | 17 | Lymph nodes Liver Bone | Eribulin Capecitabine Paclitaxel + bevacizumab | 34 | Bilateral | Lymph node metastasis | Ureteral stents Nephrostomy |
before: 7.33 after: 1.11 | Gemcitabine Irinotecan | 4 |
| 6 | 69 | IDC | Luminal | 16 | Bone | Exemestane Fulvestrant Capecitabine Toremifene | 67 | Bilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | Ureteral stents Nephrostomy |
before: 2.73 after: 4.39 | 3 | |
| 7 | 72 | IDC | TN | 25 | Liver | Capecitabine | 47 | Bilateral | Lymph node metastasis | Ureteral stents | before: 1.25 after: 0.78 | Eribulin S-1 | 8 |
There were 6 bilateral cases and 1 unilateral case of hydronephrosis. The causes of hydronephrosis were retroperitoneal metastasis in 5 cases and lymph node metastasis in 2 cases. The hydronephrosis was untreated in 2 cases and treated in 2 cases with ureteral stents, 1 case with nephrostomy, and 2 cases with nephrostomy due to ineffective ureteral stents. The indications for the 5 intervening cases were renal dysfunction in 4 cases and back pain in 1 case. Other metastatic sites were bone metastasis in 3 cases, liver metastasis in 3 cases, lymph node metastasis in 3 cases, pleural metastasis in 2 cases, and skin metastasis in 1 case. In 2 untreated patients, chemotherapy eliminated the hydronephrosis. Renal dysfunction and pain improved in the 5 patients with intervention.
After hydronephrosis, the breast cancer was treated in 6 cases and untreated in 1 case. Finally, the median survival from hydronephrosis was 12 months (3–57 months).
A case in which the patient's hydronephrosis improved with chemotherapy alone and a case in which a ureteral stent was inserted but was ineffective and a nephrostomy was added are presented.
Presentation of Cases
Case 3 in Table 1 showed improvement in hydronephrosis with chemotherapy alone. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (12 courses of weekly paclitaxel, 4 courses of FEC-100 [5-FU + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide]) and surgery for left breast cancer. The pathology was ypT3N1M0, ER(+), PgR(+), HER2:0. Postoperative radiotherapy and letrozole were started. At 18 months postoperatively, bone metastases appeared, so the treatment was changed to exemestane. When CT was performed because of the appearance of back pain in the 27th month, retroperitoneal thickening, bilateral hydronephrosis (Fig. 1a), and lung metastases were found. The patient's renal function was well preserved, and no local treatment for hydronephrosis was given. The patient was started on capecitabine, and 4 months later the bilateral hydronephrosis improved (Fig. 1b). The patient was treated with capecitabine for 33 months, followed by eribulin and vinorelbine, but the patient died 57 months after surgery.
Fig. 1.
a Appearance of bilateral hydronephrosis. b Four months after the start of treatment, bilateral hydronephrosis has improved.
Case 5 in Table 1 was a case in which a nephrostomy was added due to inadequate response to the insertion of a ureteral stent. The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4 courses of FEC-100 [5-FU + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide] and 4 courses of docetaxel) and surgery for right breast cancer. The pathology was ypT2N1M0, ER(−), PgR(−), HER2:0. The patient underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Seventeen months after surgery, liver metastasis, lymph node metastasis, and bone metastasis were observed.
The patient was treated with eribulin, capecitabine, paclitaxel + bevacizumab, but 34 months after surgery, CT showed hydronephrosis (Fig. 2a), and ureteral stents were placed bilaterally (Fig. 2b). The patient was treated with gemcitabine and irinotecan, but 3 months after stenting, renal failure occurred, and a nephrostomy was performed. The patient's renal function improved, but the primary disease progressed, and the patient died 38 months after surgery.
Fig. 2.
a Appearance of bilateral hydronephrosis. b Temporary improvement in hydronephrosis after placement of ureteral stents.
Discussion
Hydronephrosis in breast cancer is mainly caused by metastases to the retroperitoneum, para-aortic lymph nodes, ureters, and bladder. Abrams et al. [2] reported the frequency of these metastases in 167 cases, with 74 (44.3%) in peritoneal lymph nodes, 41 (24.6%) peritoneal, 13 (7.8%) ureters, and 4 (2.4%) bladder.
A PubMed search for the keywords “breast cancer” and “hydronephrosis” identified 10 cases of postoperative recurrence, as shown in Table 2 [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The median time from surgery to diagnosis of hydronephrosis was 76.5 months (18–360 months), and the histological type was IDC in 4 cases, ILC in 5 cases, and unknown in 1 case. Compared to the present cases, the histological type was more often lobular carcinoma, and lobular carcinoma is generally known to have a high incidence of specific metastases.
Table 2.
Overview of metastatic breast cancer cases with hydronephrosis in the reference literature
| [Ref.] | Age | Primary cancer |
Metastasis |
Hydronephrosis |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| histology | subtype | time from op. to onset, months | sites | medication | time from op. to onset, months | localization | causes | local treatment | medication | prognosis after the onset, months | ||
| [3] | 77 | Unknown | Luminal | 334 | Bone | Capecitabine | 360 | Bilateral | Bladder metastasis | Ureteric stents | Paclitaxel | Unknown |
| [4] | 68 | IDC | Luminal HER2 | 72 | Bone | Toremifene | 180 | Unilateral | Bladder metastasis | Nehrostomy | Eribulin | Unknown |
| [5] | 54 | IDC | TN | 24 | Lymph nodes | 24 | Unilateral | Lymph node metastasis | Ureteric stents | Paclitaxel | Unknown | |
| [6] | 62 | IDC | Luminal | 27 | Lymph nodes | Fulvestrant | 45 | Bilateral | Bladder metastasis | None | Palbociclib +fulvestrant | Unknown |
| [7] | 58 | IDC | Luminal HER2 | 20 | Bone Appendix | 20 | Bilateral | Lymph node metastasis | Nephrostomy | Fulvestrant Pertuzumab +trastuzumab +docetaxel | Unknown | |
| [8] | 59 | ILC | Luminal | 108 | Pleura Bone Lymph nodes |
108 | Bilateral | Bladder metastasis | Ureteric stents | Unknown | Unknown | |
| [9] | 53 | ILC | Luminal | 60 | Lymph nodes Bone | Letrozole Capecitabine Vinorelbine |
98 | Bilateral | Bladder metastasis | Ureteric stents Nephrostomy | Taxanes | Unknown |
| [10] | 91 | ILC | Luminal HER2 | 55 | None | 55 | Bilateral | Bladder metastasis | Surgery | Tamoxifen | 12 | |
| [11] | 61 | ILC | Luminal | 120 | Lymph nodes Bone | Fulvestrant Capecitabine | 156 | Unilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | Ureteric stents | Eribulin | 8 |
| [12] | 59 | ILC | Luminal | 18 | Duodenum Lymph nodes | 18 | Unilateral | Retroperitoneal metastasis | None | Capecitabine +tamoxifen | 5 | |
Borst et al. [13] reported that peritoneal and retroperitoneal metastases occurred in 0.6% of ductal carcinoma and 3.1% of lobular carcinoma cases. The subtypes were luminal type in 6 cases, TN in 1 case, and luminal HER2 in 3 cases. There were 6 patients with bilateral and 4 patients with unilateral hydronephrosis. The causes of hydronephrosis were retroperitoneal metastasis in 2 cases, lymph node metastasis in 2 cases, and bladder metastasis in 6 cases. The treatment for hydronephrosis was untreated in 2 cases, ureteral stents in 4 cases, nephrostomy in 2 cases, ureteral stents plus nephrostomy in 1 case, and surgery in 1 case. The time between surgery and diagnosis of hydronephrosis was a median of 47 months in the present cases and 76.5 months in the references. In the present cases and in the references, about half of the cases with hydronephrosis were found at the time of recurrence. However, there were few recurrences of hydronephrosis alone, and most of them were accompanied by bone and lymph node metastases. The median time to metastasis at other sites was reported to be 24 months for bone metastasis, 38 months for lung metastasis, and 11 months for liver metastasis [14]. Since the time to onset of hydronephrosis tends to be longer than that of other metastatic sites, the number of patients who develop hydronephrosis may increase in the future as more patients survive long after recurrence.
Treatment is indicated when hydronephrosis causes or is strongly expected to cause renal dysfunction, infection, or pain. Ureteral stents are often the 1st choice in cases of renal dysfunction. Nephrostomy is indicated in cases where ureteral stent insertion is difficult or where ureteral stent is not effective due to extensive peritoneal metastasis. There are also cases of nephrostomy due to stent ineffectiveness, as in case 5. The cause may be extrinsic ureteral compression, increased bladder pressure, or inadequate peristalsis of the ureter, which can cause ureteral stents to fail [15]. Plastic stents are usually the most commonly used material for ureteral stents, but there have been reports of good ureteral patency with recently developed metallic stents [15].
Hormonal therapy and chemotherapy are used in the treatment of breast cancer after diagnosis of hydronephrosis. However, in cases of prolonged renal dysfunction, it may be better to reduce the dose of drugs or use drugs that are less sensitive to renal dysfunction, such as taxanes.
The prognosis is considered to be near the end stage of the disease, as the disease has spread throughout the body with hematogenous and lymphatic metastases, but there are few reports on prognosis. Further accumulation of data is needed to determine the prognosis of such patients.
Conclusions
Hydronephrosis associated with breast cancer metastasis was investigated. At our institution, the rate of hydronephrosis in breast cancer recurrence was not high, about 0.5%. Hydronephrosis does not require treatment in the absence of renal dysfunction. If renal dysfunction appears or is likely to appear, procedures such as stents or nephrostomy could be used to continue treatment of the breast cancer.
Statement of Ethics
All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Patient anonymity and all confidential information have been preserved.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). All patients gave informed consent for the publication of this case report.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Sources
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Contributions
Study conception and design: Hitoshi Sugimoto, Goshi Oda, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, and Hiroyuki Uetake. Collected data: Hitoshi Sugimoto, Kumiko Hayashi, Maho Yoshino, Ayumi Ogawa and Tokuko Hosoya. Drafting of the manuscript: Hitoshi Sugimoto. Modification of the manuscript: Goshi Oda and Minato Yokoyama. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdel-Rahman O, et al. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5((12)):1749–68. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abrams HL, Spiro R, Goldstein N. Metastasis in carcinoma: analysis of 1000 autopsied cases. Cancer. 1950;3:74–85. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<74::aid-cncr2820030111>3.0.co;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jordan LA, Green L. Late breast cancer metastasis to the urinary bladder presenting with bilateral hydronephrosis. Radiol Case Rep. 2018;13((6)):1238–41. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2018.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoneyama K, Nakagawa M, Hara A. Bladder metastasis from primary breast cancer: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2018;4((1)):73. doi: 10.1186/s40792-018-0484-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chahin M, Chhatrala H, Krishnan N, Brow D, Zuberi L. Triple-negative lobular breast cancer causing hydronephrosis. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2020;8:1–3. doi: 10.1177/2324709620905954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.De Rose AF, Balzarini F, Mantica G, Toncini C, Terrone C. Late urinary bladder metastasis from breast cancer. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019;91((1)):60–2. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mori R, Futamura M, Morimitsu K, Yoshida K. Appendicitis caused by the metastasis of HER2-positive breast cancer. Surg Case Rep. 2016;2((1)):104. doi: 10.1186/s40792-016-0235-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ibraheemi A. Case report of metastatic invasive breast lobular carcinoma to the urinary bladder. Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2016;10((1)):51. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cormio L, Sanguedolce F, Di Fino G, Massenio P, Liuzzi G, Ruocco N, et al. Asymptomatic bladder metastasis from breast cancer. Case Rep Urol. 2014;2014:672591. doi: 10.1155/2014/672591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nieder C, Pawinski A. A case of recurrent breast cancer with solitary metastasis to the urinary bladder. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2014;2014:931546. doi: 10.1155/2014/931546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jibiki N, Shimizu Y, Hashimoto K, Hamano T, Nishino T. Case of retroperitoneal metastasis of breast cancer with effective insertion of plural stents. Jpn J Cancer Chemother. 2018;45((13)):2220–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nihon-yanagi Y, Park Y, Ooshiro M, Aoki H, Suzuki Y, Hiruta N, et al. A case of recurrent invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast found as metastasis to the duodenum. Breast Cancer. 2009;16((1)):83–7. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borst MJ, Ingold JA. Metastatic patterns of invasive lobular versus invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Surgery. 1993;114((4)):637–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Patanaphan V, Salazar OM, Risco R. Breast cancer: metastatic patterns and their prognosis. South Med J. 1988;81((9)):1109–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kouba E, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Management of ureteral obstruction due to advanced malignancy: optimizing therapeutic and palliative outcomes. J Urol. 2008;180((2)):444–50. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


