Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Feb 20;13(2):e13456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13456

Retroperitoneal Schwannoma: Two Rare Case Reports

Marouane Harhar 1,, Abdelbassir Ramdani 1, Tariq Bouhout 1, Badr Serji 1, Tijani El Harroudi 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7984941  PMID: 33777545

Abstract

Schwannomas are neuroectodermal tumors that rarely occur in the retroperitoneal space. We report two cases of patients who presented with abdominal pain. Radiological findings revealed a retroperitoneal mass in both cases. Both patients underwent complete surgical excision with an uneventful postoperative course. The histopathological study confirmed the nature of schwannoma. Complete surgical excision remains the gold standard for the management of these tumors. The preoperative diagnosis is usually difficult; however, the definitive diagnosis is made upon histopathological examination.

Keywords: schwannoma, retroperitoneal tumor

Introduction

Schwannomas are neuroectodermal tumors that usually affect nerves in the head, neck, and extremities. The retroperitoneal location is rare and accounts for approximately 3% of all schwannoma [1]. Retroperitoneal schwannomas (RSS) represent 4% of all retroperitoneal tumors [2]. They are essentially benign tumors, however, malignant forms have been reported in up to 60% of patients with Von Recklinghausen’s disease [3]. Generally, these tumors are clinically silent and discovered incidentally, and the symptoms are vague and nonspecific [4]. Sometimes, the preoperative diagnosis is hard to define. Histologically, schwannomas are typically characterized by the presence of areas of high cellularity (Antoni A tissue), and low cellularity (Antoni B tissue) [5]. The therapeutic approach depends on the pre-operative evaluation, the size and location of the mass, and the surgeon’s preference [6]. Herein we present the clinical, biological, and radiological features of two patients with schwannoma and describe the therapeutic management conducted in both cases. Written consent was obtained by all participants in this study.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 70-year-old female patient, with a history of diabetes, presented with chronic right flank abdominal pain. Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography scan (CT) revealed a heterogenous right retroperitoneal mass, localized in the lateral and retrocaval area and medial to the right kidney, measuring 10 x 5 cm (Figures 1, 2).

Figure 1. Axial abdominal CT scan showing a right retroperitoneal mass (blue arrow).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Coronal abdominal CT scan showing a retroperitoneal mass (blue arrow) located in the lateral and retrocaval area with intimate contact with the inferior vena cava (blue star).

Figure 2

Laboratory tests including tumor markers and urine catecholamine were normal. The patient underwent a laparotomy surgery, showing a bilobed mass connected to the intervertebral foramina, and making us suspect the possibility of schwannoma. Thus, a complete resection of the tumor was performed (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Image showing the resected mass.

Figure 3

The postoperative course was uneventful. Microscopic findings revealed the presence of spindle-shaped cells with a typical palisading pattern, arranged in short bundles of interlacing fascicles. The final pathologic diagnosis was a benign schwannoma. The patient experienced no recurrence over six months of follow-up

Case 2

A 29-year-old male patient, with no noticeable medical or surgical history, presented with a one-year history of chronic diffuse abdominal pain, physical examination was unremarkable. Abdominopelvic CT scan and abdominal MRI showed a well-circumscribed, heterogenous retroperitoneal mass developed in the right lateral aortic area measuring 14 x 7 cm (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Abdominal MRI: Axial sections in T2 sequence (A), T2 with fat saturation (B), T2 coronal sections (C), and axial T1 sections with fat saturation and gadolinium contrast (D) showing a large retroperitoneal mass (arrows), well-circumscribed, hyperintense in T2 sequence, heterogeneous with cystic areas not enhanced by contrast.

Figure 4

The patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperatively, the mass was located in the lateral aortic area and connected to the intervertebral foramina. We decided to perform a complete resection of the mass.

Pathological examinations revealed a benign schwannoma. The patient made an uneventful recovery, he remained asymptomatic, with no recurrence at a one-year follow-up.

Discussion

Schwannomas are neurogenic tumors deriving from the Schwann cells of nerve sheaths, affecting predominantly females and mostly found in patients aged 20 to 60 years [7]. The retroperitoneal location accounts for approximately 3% of all schwannoma. Schwannomas are usually benign tumors, and scarcely undergo malignant transformation unless they are associated with von Recklinghausen's disease that accounts for 5% to 18% of all RSs [1].

Considering the flexible feature of the retroperitoneum, the RSs are usually clinically “silent” and need to reach a significant size to be responsible for compressive symptoms, ranging from vague abdominal pain to abdominal mass and urinary difficulties. In our cases, abdominal pain was the predominant symptom.

Radiologic examination plays a major role in the diagnostic approach. CT scan with contrast shows classically a well-defined tumor with slightly low density compared with soft tissue due to the high presence of myelin and fat [8]. MRI is superior to CT in defining the margins and identifying the nerve origin [9]. Schwannomas are commonly hypointense on T1 and hyperintense on T2-weighted MR images [8]. The target sign (a hypointense center with a hyperintense periphery) and fascicular sign (bundles) are two well-known characteristic features of neurogenic tumors on MRI; however, they are not seen frequently in RSs [10]. Malignant schwannomas have irregular contours, exhibit mixed intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images, and tend to invade other structures; however, they are extremely rare in patients without a history of neurofibromatosis [9,11].

The differential diagnoses with schwannomas include neurogenic tumors such as paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma; tumors such as fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma, and ganglioneuroma have similar findings on CT and MRI scans making preoperative diagnosis unlikely [11,12].

Percutaneous biopsy is a matter of debate. Some physicians skipped it due to the possibility of biopsy-related complications (bleeding, infection, tumor seeding) while other physicians managed patients conservatively due to benign biopsy results [6,13,14]. In our two cases, we took into consideration the possible complications of biopsy as well as the existence of symptoms related to the size of the tumor that needed to be excised to improve the symptoms.

The final diagnosis is solely based on histopathologic examination of the specimens. RS is histologically characterized by alternating Antoni A and Antoni B areas [5]. In Antoni A tissue, the cells are arranged in an organized compact pattern, while in Antoni B tissue, the cells are scattered loosely in an edematous matrix [5,13,15]. Immunohistology complement shows strong and diffuse staining of S-100 protein in schwannomas cells cytoplasm which confirms the diagnosis of schwannoma [11].

Surgical management consists of total resection. These tumors are usually solitary, well-circumscribed, and noninvasive, so complete surgical excision provides good results [16]. The surgical difficulties are essentially related to the risk of injuring surrounding neurovascular structures and devascularization of the ureter during tumor dissection. In our case, the surgical exploration found a connection between the tumor and the intervertebral foramen suggesting the diagnosis of schwannoma intraoperatively. The laparoscopic approach is feasible and only a few cases are reported in the English literature [7]. It exhibits a promising future in the treatment but the choice of surgical management may largely rely on the size and location of tumors [7].

Recurrence of benign schwannoma is rare, it follows usually incomplete resection, which was reported in 5%-10% of cases [17]. In case of recurrence, surgical excision is recommended. Adjuvant therapy is not recommended due to the lack of sensitivity of this tumor to chemotherapy and radiotherapy [18].

Conclusions

Retroperitoneal schwannomas are rare tumors. They are mostly benign, but can rarely be malignant, especially when associated with neurofibromatosis. The final diagnosis is based on histological and immunohistochemical findings of the specimens. Complete surgical resection remains the gold standard for the management of RSs. Despite the rare location of schwannoma in the retroperitoneum, they should be considered in cases of retroperitoneal abdominal masses.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Benign retroperitoneal schwannoma: a case series and review of the literature. Daneshmand S, Youssefzadeh D, Chamie K, et al. Urology. 2003;62:993–997. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00792-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tumors of the retroperitoneum. Felix EL, Wood DK, Das Gupta TK. Curr Prob Cancer. 1981;6:1–47. doi: 10.1016/s0147-0272(81)80011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the uterine corpus presenting as a huge abdominal neoplasm. Sengar Hajari AR, Tilve AG, Kulkarni JN, Bharat R. J Can Res Ther. 2015;11:1023. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.147694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Retroperitoneal schwannoma. Goh BK, Tan YM, Chung YF, Chow PK, Ooi LL, Wong WK. Am J Surg. 2006;192:14–18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Imaging of peripheral nerve sheath tumors with pathologic correlation: pictorial review. Pilavaki M, Chourmouzi D, Kiziridou A, Skordalaki A, Zarampouzas T, Dervelengas A. Eur J Radiol. 2004;52:229–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Giant retroperitoneal schwannoma: a case treated with 3D laparoscopic resection. Chiang HC, Yan MY, Chen CA, Chen PH. Biomed Sci & Tech Res . 2018;8 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Laparoscopic excision of retroperitoneal schwannoma. Rajkumar JS, Ganesh D, Anirudh JR, Akbar S, Kishore CM. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:0. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13792.6762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Intranasal computed schwannoma: magnetic resonance and computed tomography appearance. Dublin AB, Dedo HH, Bridger WH. Am J Otolaryngol. 1995;16:251–254. doi: 10.1016/0196-0709(95)90152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Management of retroperitoneal schwannoma reports and review of the literature. Fernandez RB, Villamil LR, Montes SF, et al. World J Nephrol Urol. 2016;5:58–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Imaging features of retroperitoneal and pelvic schwannomas. Hughes MJ, Thomas JM, Fisher C, Moskovic EC. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:886–893. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2005.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Surgical management of retroperitoneal schwannoma complicated with severe hydronephrosis: a case report. Zhang L, Gao M, Zhang T, Chong T, Wang Z, Liu W, Li H. Medicine. 2018;97:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Retroperitoneal schwannoma: a rare case. Kalaycı M, Akyüz U, Demirağ A, Gürses B, Ozkan F, Gökçe O. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2011;2011:465062. doi: 10.1155/2011/465062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Giant retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma: is preoperative biopsy always mandatory? Al Skaini MS, Haroon H, Sardar A, et al. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;6:233–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Management of benign retroperitoneal schwannomas: a single-center experience. Strauss DC, Qureshi YA, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Am J Surg. 2011;202:194–198. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Walter JB, Talbot IC. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1965. General pathology; pp. 435–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Diagnostic dilemma of a rare, giant retroperitoneal schwannoma: a case report and review of literature. Singh M, Kumar L, Chejara R, Prasad OP, Kolhe Y, Saxena A. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2014;2014:628538. doi: 10.1155/2014/628538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Retroperitoneal schwannoma mimicking hepatic tumor. Gu L, Liu W, Xu Q, Wu ZY. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19024112/ Chin Med J. 2008;121:1751–1752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Demographics, management and treatment outcomes of benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumors in Japan. Fujimoto N, Kubo T, Hisaoka M, et al. Int J Urol. 2018;25:61–67. doi: 10.1111/iju.13469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES