Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Mar 22;11:6552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85880-5

Puerarin enhances intestinal function in piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

Mengjun Wu 1,3,#, Dan Yi 1,#, Qian Zhang 1,#, Tao Wu 1, Kui Yu 1, Meng Peng 1, Lei Wang 1, Di Zhao 1, Yongqing Hou 1,, Guoyao Wu 2
PMCID: PMC7985190  PMID: 33753826

Abstract

Puerarin has been reported to be an excellent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial agent, but the potential effect of puerarin on porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether puerarin could alleviate intestinal injury in piglets infected with PEDV. A PEDV (Yunnan province strain) infection model was applied to 7-day-old piglets at 104.5 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose). Piglets were orally administered with puerarin at the dosage of 0.5 mg/kg body weight from day 5 to day 9. On day 9 of the trial, piglets were inoculated orally with PEDV. Three days later, jugular vein blood and intestinal samples were collected. Results showed puerarin reduced morbidity of piglets infected with PEDV. In addition, puerarin reduced the activities of aspartate aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase, the ratio of serum aspartate aminotransferase to serum alanine aminotransferase, the number of white blood cells and neutrophils, and the plasma concentrations of interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α, as well as protein abundances of heat shock protein-70 in PEDV-infected piglets. Moreover, puerarin increased D-xylose concentration but decreased intestinal fatty acid-binding protein concentration and diamine oxidase activity in the plasma of piglets infected with PEDV. Puerarin increased the activities of total superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase, while decreasing the activities of myeloperoxidase and concentration of hydrogen peroxide in both the intestine and plasma of PEDV-infected piglets. Puerarin decreased mRNA levels of glutathione S-transferase omega 2 but increased the levels of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2. Furthermore, puerarin increased the abundance of total eubacteria (16S rRNA), Enterococcus genus, Lactobacillus genus and Enterobacteriaceae family in the intestine, but reduced the abundance of Clostridium coccoides in the caecum. These data indicate puerarin improved intestinal function in piglets infected by PEDV and may be a promising supplement for the prevention of PEDV infection.

Subject terms: Drug discovery, Microbiology, Molecular biology

Introduction

Some isoflavonoids are considered to be beneficial to human health partially due to their antioxidant properties1. Puerarin (PR), an isoflavone extracted from kudzu root, possesses neuroprotective and antioxidant properties. PR was reported to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) and intracellular ROS production induced by lipopolysaccharide in N9 microglial cells2 and to decrease the activities of caspase-3 and caspase-9 in PC12 cells, thereby protecting cells from oxidative injury3. It has been reported that PR has anti-inflammatory activity in an inflammatory cell model4. PR can partly attenuate the detrimental inflammation induced by cerebral ischemia/reperfusion by activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway5. In addition, PR may be used as an antimicrobial agent6 since PR could protect porcine intestinal epithelial cells (IPEC-J2) against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection through inhibiting bacterial adhesion and inflammatory responses7. The latest research found that PR could suppress the rise of mRNA levels of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) N and M genes in intestines of PEDV-infected piglets8.

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED), caused by PEDV, is an intestinal infectious disease characterized by vomiting, anorexia, watery diarrhea, and dehydration9, which leads to dramatic mortality in neonatal piglets and is, therefore, an overwhelming threat to the swine industry worldwide10. The latest research, as provided evidence for airborne transmission of PEDV11, demonstrated greater transmission potential of PEDV than that of other seasonal diarrhea viruses12. The small intestine, especially the jejunum and ileum, is the target of PEDV13. An intact intestinal barrier plays a vital role in preventing the virus, bacteria and dietary allergens from entering the mucosa14,15. In the gut, the microbiota is an important biological barrier that prevents invaders from entering the body16. Specifically, the composition of the small intestinal microbiota is markedly altered in sucking piglets infected with PEDV17. After PEDV infection, the most predominant changes are the reduced expression of proteins related to oxidative stress, and the enhanced expression of proteins involved in inflammatory responses9. Notably, among the PEDV strains, virulent strain such as CH/YNKM-8/2013 can strongly activate the NF-κB pathway and caused much more intensive inflammatory cascades than attenuated vaccine CV77718.

As a traditional Chinese herb, PR shows excellent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. Results of our previous study indicated that PR attenuated the reduction of cell proliferation in vitro, and inhibited PEDV replication and the expression of several cytokines8. Considering the good antioxidant property of PR and the special role of intestinal bacteria, we hypothesized that PR could alleviate PEDV-induced intestinal oxidative stress and inflammation, and modulate the intestinal flora in piglets. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. We are not aware of publications that report the roles of PR in alleviating intestinal injury and modulating intestinal microbes in PEDV-challenged piglets. The findings of this study will provide new perspectives for PR in preventing or mitigating PEDV in swine.

Results

Clinical observations and body weight in PEDV-infected piglets

PEDV infection significantly reduced the body weight and increased morbidity of piglets as compared with the control (P < 0.05), while PR administration reduced the morbidity of PEDV- infected piglets (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on body weight and morbidity of piglets after PEDV infection. (a) body weight. (b) morbidity. Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

Plasma biochemical parameters and blood cell counts

Data on plasma biochemical parameters and blood cell counts are summarized in Table 1. Compared with non-infected pigs, PEDV-infected pigs had higher activities of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total cholesterol (CHOL) level, and AST/ALT ratio, but lower alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity and levels of total bilirubin (TBIL), triglyceride (TG), and urea in the plasma (P < 0.05). However, PR-administered piglets exhibited lower activities of AST and ALP and lower concentrations of CHOL in plasma, but higher activity of ALT and higher concentrations of TBIL, TG and urea in plasma, compared with PEDV-infected pigs without receiving PR (P < 0.05). PEDV increased the numbers of white blood cells (WBC), neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM) and red blood cells (RBC), while decreasing the numbers of monocytes (MONO), monocyte ratio (MONOR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width ratio (PDWR) in the blood (P < 0.05). In addition, PR administration reduced the numbers of WBC, NEU and RBC, but elevated the numbers of MONO, MONOR, MPV and PDWR (P < 0.05) in comparison with PEDV-infected pigs.

Table 1.

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on plasma biochemical parameters and immune cell numbers in piglets infected with PEDV.

Items Control PEDV PEDV + PR
Plasma biochemical parameters
ALT (U/L) 75.6 ± 4.35b 63.5 ± 5.66a 75.2 ± 8.84b
AST (U/L) 43.3 ± 8.35a 55.6 ± 8.77b 46.3 ± 3.56a
AST/ALT 0.63 ± 0.14a 0.79 ± 0.16b 0.67 ± 0.19ab
Total bilirubin (μmol/L) 11.1 ± 4.22b 6.62 ± 0.84a 12.3 ± 6.86b
Total protein (g/L) 54.2 ± 3.45 52.2 ± 1.98 51.7 ± 3.02
Albumin (g/L) 29.6 ± 2.22 28.0 ± 1.25 28.6 ± 2.58
Cholesterol (mmol/L) 2.22 ± 0.42a 2.95 ± 0.23b 2.42 ± 0.30a
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 0.72 ± 0.14b 0.50 ± 0.12a 0.72 ± 0.21b
Urea nitrogen(mmol/L) 4.11 ± 1.56b 1.13 ± 0.15a 3.41 ± 1.58b
ALP (U/L) 356 ± 91.2a 439 ± 78.6b 345 ± 74.6a
Creatinine (µmol/L) 73.8 ± 8.05 75.8 ± 9.27 77.5 ± 5.30
Glucose (mmol/L) 5.01 ± 0.57 5.28 ± 0.39 5.00 ± 0.85
GGT (mmol/L) 43.3 ± 8.27 41.4 ± 9.52 41.6 ± 12.8
Blood cell counts
White blood cells (109/L) 8.85 ± 2.04a 12.9 ± 1.99b 9.97 ± 3.40a
Neutrophils (109/L) 3.45 ± 1.02a 5.56 ± 0.18b 3.45 ± 1.09a
Lymphocytes (109/L) 4.86 ± 1.17a 6.96 ± 1.10b 5.91 ± 2.29ab
Monocytes (109/L) 0.34 ± 0.08b 0.21 ± 0.07a 0.36 ± 0.16b
Monocyte ratio (%) 3.37 ± 1.07b 2.03 ± 0.71a 3.09 ± 0.91b
Red blood cells (1012/L) 5.95 ± 0.49a 6.53 ± 0.42b 6.11 ± 0.23a
MPV (fL) 9.24 ± 0.72b 8.09 ± 0.86a 8.99 ± 0.49b
PDWR (%) 68.6 ± 4.06b 61.8 ± 4.91a 67.6 ± 4.68b

Values are mean and SD, n = 8.

a,bWithin a row, means with different superscripts differ (< 0.05).

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; MPV, mean platelet volume; PDWR, Platelet distribution width ratio.

DAO activity, D-xylose and I-FABP concentrations in plasma

Data on blood DAO activity, D-xylose and I-FABP concentrations are summarized in Fig. 2. PEDV infection decreased D-xylose concentration in plasma, but increased I-FABP concentration and DAO activity in plasma, when compared with the control (P < 0.05). On the contrary, PR administration to PEDV-infected piglets increased D-xylose concentration in plasma, but decreased I-FABP concentration (P < 0.05).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on blood DAO activity and D-xylose, I-FABP concentrations of piglets after PEDV infection. Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

Anti-oxidative enzymes and oxidation-relevant products in plasma and intestinal mucosae

Data on activities of T-SOD, GSH-PX, CAT and MPO, as well as the concentrations of MDA and H2O2 are summarized in Fig. 3. Compared with the control, PEDV infection reduced the activities of CAT in the plasma, duodenum and colon, T-SOD in the colon, and GSH-Px in the duodenum, jejunum and colon, but increased the activities of MPO in the plasma and colon, and the concentrations of MDA in the ileum and of H2O2 in the plasma and ileum (P < 0.05). However, compared with the PEDV group, the PEDV + PR group had higher activities of T-SOD in the duodenum and colon, GSH-Px in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, and CAT in the plasma and colon, but lower levels of MPO in the plasma, duodenum and colon, as well as lower levels of H2O2 in the plasma and ileum (P < 0.05). Additionally, as shown in Fig. 3, compared with the control, PEDV infection increased the mRNA levels of GSTO2, but reduced the mRNA levels of nuclear factor carotenoid 2 related factor 2 (Nrf2). In contrast, PR administration decreased the mRNA levels of GSTO2, but increased the mRNA levels of Nrf2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on the redox status of piglets after PEDV infection. (a) T-SOD, total superoxide dismutase, (b) GSH-PX, glutathione peroxidase, (c) CAT catalase, (d) MPO myeloperoxidase, (e) H2O2, hydrogen peroxide, (f) MDA malondialdehyde, (g) GSTO2, Glutathione S-transferase omega 2; Nrf2, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 . Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

Concentration of cytokines in plasma

PEDV infection increased the concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in plasma, as compared with the control (P < 0.05). However, PR intervention reduced the concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in the plasma of the PEDV-infected piglets (P < 0.05). The results are shown in Fig. 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on cytokines in the plasma of piglets after PEDV infection. Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

HSP70 and villin protein abundances

PEDV infection significantly increased the abundance of the HSP70 protein, but decreased the abundance of the villin protein, compared to the control (P < 0.05). However, PR administration decreased the abundance of the HSP70 protein (P < 0.05) in comparison with the PEDV group (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on relative expression of HSP70 and Villin in ileum tissue of piglets after PEDV infection. Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

Abundance of selected intestinal bacteria

Compared with the control, PEDV infection reduced the number of Enterococcus genus, but increased the number of Lactobacillus genus in the jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon. Moreover, PEDV infection reduced the abundances of total eubacteria in the jejunum and ileum, Clostridium coccoides and Enterobacteriaceae family in the jejunum, while increasing the abundances of total bacteria in the caecum and colon, Clostridium coccoides in caecum and Enterobacteriaceae family in the caecum and colon (P < 0.05). Compared with the PEDV group, PR administration increased the abundances of Enterococcus genus in the jejunum and caecum, Lactobacillus genus in the jejunum, ileum and caecum, total bacteria in the jejunum and ileum, Enterobacteriaceae family in the caecum, but reduced the abundance of Lactobacillus genus and total eubacteria in the colon, and Clostridium coccoides in the caecum (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of puerarin (PR) administration on selected bacteria of piglets after PEDV infection, (a) Total eubacteria (16S rRNA), (b) Enterococcus genus, (c) Enterobacteriaceae family, (d) Clostridium coccoides, (e) Lactobacillus genus Values are mean and SD, n = 8. a, b, c, Values within a column not sharing a common superscript letter indicate significant difference at P < 0.05.

Discussion

PEDV infection is a significant challenge to swine production worldwide911. Its clinical symptoms include diarrhea and vomiting, as well as reductions in body weight. Results of our study indicated that PR intervention reduced morbidity in infected piglets, as compared with the PEDV group without PR administration. As an antioxidant phytochemical, PR could be used as herbal medicine to inhibit intestinal inflammation and improve intestinal function. This can be translated into sustaining global pig production.

The immune system status of animals could be evaluated by the numbers of white blood cells, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes19,20. These cells play a key role in the process of inflammation and tissue damage. Recruitment or extravasation of leukocytes is their migration toward an area of inflammation, injury, or infection21. There are pieces of evidence that blood lymphocytes are significantly elevated after PEDV infection or vaccination22,23. Infiltration of lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils and other mononuclear cells were found in the lamina propria of the small intestine after PEDV infection24. In good agreement with these studies, our results demonstrated that the numbers of blood WBC, NEU and LYM significantly increased in piglets after PEDV infection. Monocytes are a subset of circulating white blood cells that can further differentiate into tissue macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs)25. Recruitment of monocytes is essential for mediating the host antimicrobial defense and is also implicated in many inflammatory diseases26. PEDV infection of neonatal piglets triggered a strong and rapid induction in type I interferon27. DC is known to secret cytokines such as type I interferon, IL-12, IL-10, and chemokine to regulate the subsequent immune responses28. In the present study, the decrease of blood monocytes in piglets after acute PEDV infection may be that monocytes are rapidly recruited to the intestinal injury site and differentiated into dendritic cells to participate in the immune response. More studies are needed to test this hypothesis. One study has shown the upregulation of genes for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α in IPEC-J2 cells infected with PEDV29. Consistently, we previously reported that the mRNA levels of related inflammatory factors in Vero cells and the levels of inflammatory factors in the ileal tissue are elevated in PEDV-challenged piglets8. However, blood circulation is vital in the development of systemic inflammation. In the current study, the concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, were increased in the plasma of PEDV-infected pigs. Taken it together, these findings indicated that PEDV infection induced systemic inflammation in piglets. Notably, we found that PR administration significantly decreased the numbers of immune cells and the concentrations of blood pro-inflammatory cytokines in PEDV-infected piglets, thereby potentially mitigating inflammation and tissue injury in the animals. Our results are consistent with those that PR exerted protective effects against neutrophil infiltration in rats30, decreased neutrophil adhesion in cultured endothelial cells31, and prevented LPS-induced acute injury in mice32 and rats33. Therefore, PR may attenuate systemic inflammation by suppressing the production of pro-inflammatory mediators.

Another indicator of tissue damage is the levels of enzymes in plasma. For example, abnormal hepatic biochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are associated with increased activities of AST, ALT and ALP in plasma34. In the present study, the decreases in plasma AST and ALP levels after PR intervention provided further evidence for the anti-inflammatory effect of PR. Additionally, AST, ALT, AST/ALT ratio, and ALP in plasma are good indicators of liver function3537. Furthermore, one study found that PEDV-induced up-regulated proteins were involved in 22 diseases and disorders, such as hepatic diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, and inflammatory responses9. It appears that PR could attenuate the PEDV-induced liver dysfunction because PR administration attenuated the rise in plasma AST, AST/ALT ratio and ALP in PEDV-infected piglets. The underlying mechanisms are largely unknown and warrant to be elucidated. PEDV damage the pig intestinal epithelium, leading to reduced integrity and function of the mucosal barrier38. Intestinal mucosal barrier function can be commonly assessed by several indicators, including D-xylose concentration and DAO activity in plasma39,40. DAO is a highly active intracellular enzyme produced by the intestinal epithelial cells and only presents in the intestinal mucosa and ciliated cells41. In the case of malabsorption, the entry of D-xylose from the intestinal cavity to the portal vein is destructed, thereby reducing the concentration of D-xylose in the blood. Therefore, plasma D-xylose level and DAO activity can be used as indicators of intestinal absorption function and integrity42. Additionally, among the FABP family proteins, I-FABP is particularly abundant in epithelial cells of the small intestinal mucosa and it is rapidly released into the circulation when the small intestinal mucosa is impaired. Therefore, I-FABP could be used as a tissue-specific injury marker43,44. In our previous study, histologic lesions were present in the jejunum and ileum of PEDV-infected piglets, including severe villous atrophy8. In the present study, PEDV decreased plasma D-xylose and I-FABP concentrations, while increasing DAO activity in the plasma, indicating that PEDV induced intestinal dysfunction. Importantly, PR administration enhanced intestinal function, as indicated by an increase in the plasma concentrations of D-xylose and I-FABP and a decrease in plasma DAO activity. Previous studies also reported that PR could improve intestinal mucosal barrier function in mice45,46. Furthermore, we found that PR administration attenuated the PEDV-induced decrease in the expression of villin, a marker of villus cell differentiation in ileal mucosae47,48. Based on molecular level, detection indicators, the current results further support our previous conclusion. Taken together, these data indicated that PR could alleviate intestinal injury and improve intestinal function in PEDV-infected piglets.

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in the intestinal mucosa and plasma are important indicators of oxidative stress49. Neutrophil myeloperoxidase (MPO) is a rich granule enzyme that catalyzes the production of potent ROS, the latter serves as a biomarker for oxidative damage and is raised in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)50. Glutathione S-transferase is also an important biomarker for inflammation and oxidative stress51. GSTO2 plays a protective role in counteracting oxidative stress52. In the present study, the levels of MDA, H2O2, MPO and GSTO2 were elevated but CAT, T-SOD and GSH-Px activities in the plasma and intestine were decreased in PEDV-infected pigs. These results were consistent with our previous report that supplementation with N-acetylcysteine (an antioxidant) alleviated intestinal injury in piglets infected by PEDV53. In addition, the expression of HSP70, one of the most important cellular defense mechanisms, is induced under stressful conditions such as infection54. Interestingly, HSP70, GSH-Px and total antioxidant capacity are significantly up-regulated in pigs and rats after PEDV infection5557. A study found that Nrf2 may increase the expression of antioxidant related genes by acting on the antioxidant response element (ARE) in the gene promoter, therefore control abnormal oxidative stress58. In the present study, PR increased the mRNA levels of Nrf2 under PEDV infection. The result was similar to previous studies demonstrating that Nrf2 is a key regulator on puerarin preventing oxidative stress damage in rodents5961. Collectively, our results indicated that PR could effectively improve the redox status and alleviate oxidative damage in piglets infected with PEDV.

The intestinal microbiota is important for gastrointestinal function and health. Dynamic changes in the gut microbiota of piglets may contribute to decreases in morbidity and mortality in the older PEDV-infected piglets62. In the current study, although Enterobacteriaceae family and Clostridium coccoides were reduced in the jejunum, they were increased in the caecum and colon after PEDV infection. Enterobacteriaceae family is commonly present in the gastrointestinal tract and represents a group of potentially pathogenic microflora63. One study observed a statistically significant predominance of Clostridium_Sensu_Stricto_1 in 2-week-old piglets after PEDV infection64. Enterococcus genus, which has been studied as a probiotic65, was reduced in the jejunum, ileum and cecum after PEDV infection. Lactobacillus genus is commonly investigated as a probiotic agent66. L. johnsonii, one of the lactobacilli, has been shown to enhance the resistance of cells to E. coli challenge and can be used as a probiotic to handle the problem of piglet diarrhea67,68. However, another study found Lactobacillus was elevated in children diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome69. It is still unclear whether the increase of Lactobacillus in the intestine could protect animals against PEDV. Another study found that total bacteria in the small intestine was reduced after transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) infection in swine70, which was consistent with our results. However, the increase of total eubacteria in the large intestine may be attributed to the increase of Lactobacillus genus, Enterobacteriaceae family, and Clostridium coccoides. Consistent with this notion, PR can be used as a preventive treatment for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a mouse model71. A lower abundance of Clostridium coccoides was detected in the caecum, while a higher abundance of the Enterococcus genus in the jejunum and caecum after PR intervention. Intriguingly, there is a significant increase in the number of Lactobacillus genus in the PEDV + PR group as compared with the PEDV group and, even to a greater extent with the control group. Collectively, PR intervention could maintain the balance of intestinal microflora and increase the number of beneficial bacteria. Considering the reduced morbidity, the improvements of intestinal mucosal barrier function indicators and anti-oxidative function, we believe that the changes in the abundance of selected microorganisms in the gut in response to PR intervention are beneficial for intestinal health in PEDV-infected piglets. Because the digestion, absorption and metabolism of nutrients are crucial for animal growth and survival72, regulating the intestinal bacteria may be an alternative measure to prevent or treat PED. Further researches are necessary to identify specific changes in the intestinal flora at the species level, especially the Lactobacillus genus. This is the first time to report the effect of PR on anti-oxidation and some specific bacteria in the intestine of PEDV-infected piglets.

Conclusion

Oral administration with PR reduced morbidity in piglets infected with PEDV. The beneficial effects of PR on intestinal function were associated with the following: (1) enhanced anti-inflammatory functions (indicated by the decreases in AST, ALP, immune cell numbers and cytokines levels); (2) improved anti-oxidative capacity (indicated by improving redox status and attenuating oxidative damage); (3) possibly enhanced intestinal mucosal barrier; and (4) increased the abundance of intestinal beneficial bacteria. These results provide important insights into the development of effective prevention against PEDV infection and other enteric diseases.

Materials and methods

PEDV and puerarin

PEDV (Yunnan province strain, GenBank accession No. KT021228) was kindly provided by State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China). PR (purity ≥ 98%) was purchased from Macklin (Macklin Inc., Shanghai, China).

Animals and treatments

Twenty-four crossbred (Duroc × Landrace × Large White) 7-day-old healthy piglets, half male and half female with similar body weight (3.17 ± 0.51 kg), were randomly divided into one of three groups (Control, PEDV, and PEDV + PR) with 8 replicates per group. All pigs were purchased from a PEDV-free farm. These piglets were not vaccinated with a PEDV vaccine. The experiment lasted for 12 days. During day 5 to day 9 of the trial, piglets in the PEDV + PR group were orally administered with PR at the dosage of 0.5 mg/kg body weight (dissolved in a liquid milk replacer), whereas the other two groups were given the same volume of liquid milk replacer. The dose of PR was chosen according to our preliminary study that PR (0.5 mg/kg BW) could exert antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects in piglets infected with PEDV8. On day 9 of the trial, piglets in the PEDV and PEDV + PR groups were orally inoculated with 3.3 mL of PEDV solution at 104.5 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infectious dose) per pig, while those in the control group were orally inoculated with an equal volume of sterile saline. D-xylose (0.1 g / kg body weight) was orally administered to all pigs on day 12 of the trial. One hour later, blood samples were obtained from the jugular vein, and thereafter all piglets were weighed and sacrificed by injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg Body weight) to collect intestinal tissues and chyme as described previously53,73. Briefly, the intestine was dissected free of the mesentery tissue, and segments were obtained from the distal duodenum, mid-jejunum, mid-ileum, mid-caecum, and mid-colon, respectively. Intestinal contents were collected carefully and then intestine was flushed with ice-cold PBS. The mucosa was collected through scraping using a sterile glass microscope slide. All the sampling procedures were conducted at a chilled glass plate. All samples were stored at -80 ℃ until further analysis. The experimental basic feed (liquid milk substitute) formulated to meet all the nutrients required by suckling pigs was purchased from Wuhan Anyou Feed Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Piglets were housed in clean pens with the strict prevention of cross-infection. The control group was quarantined from the infection groups and in different rooms. Piglets were observed daily and weighed to analyze the health status (body weight, morbidity). For the assessment of morbidity, clinical signs were recorded in all piglets, including diarrhea (defined as any loose or soft stool observed during defecation or seen on the piglets), dehydration (defined as sunken eyes and the appearance of wrinkled skin), and vomiting74. The specific evaluator was blind to the experimental design and objectively registered the signs. The animal use protocol for the present study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Wuhan Polytechnic University (Index number: 011043145–029-2013–000,009).

Plasma biochemical parameters and blood cell counts

The method was presented in the previous study53. In short, one hour after oral administration of D-xylose on day 12 of the experiment, blood samples were collected from the anterior vena cava into heparinized vacuum tubes (Becton–Dickinson Vacutainer System, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA) and then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min at 4 ℃ to obtain plasma. Plasma biochemical parameters were measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions by a Hitachi 7060 Automatic Biochemical Analyzer (Hitachi, Japan)75. Blood cell counts were performed on the Siemens ADVIA 2120i Hematology Analyzer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, Illinois, USA).

Determination of D-xylose and diamine oxidase (DAO) in plasma

The kit for detecting D-xylose in plasma was purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China), and operated following the procedure described previously76. 50 μL of the plasma was added to 5 mL of the phloroglucinol color reagent solution (Sigma Chemical Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA), then heated at 100 ℃ for 4 min in a water bath. After the samples were cooled to room temperature, the absorbance of the mixed solution at 554 nm was measured using a SpectraMax i3x Multi-Mode Detection Platform (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The standard solution of 0 mmol/L D-xylose was considered as the blank. In addition, DAO activities in plasma were determined by using spectrophotometry according to the manufacturer’s instructions77. The assay kit was purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China).

Activities of anti-oxidant enzymes and levels of oxidation-relevant products in plasma and intestinal mucosae

The activities of catalase (CAT), myeloperoxidase (MPO), total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined by using commercially available kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Assays were performed in triplicate.

Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) and cytokine determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Concentrations of I-FABP and cytokines (IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α) in the plasma were measured by using commercial ELISA kit (R&D Systems, CA, USA), which were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot analysis

Western blot was performed according to the previous method78. In brief, proteins were extracted from intestinal mucosae and the concentrations were determined by using the bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Scientific, USA). Equivalent quantities of proteins from the independent biological replicates were denatured in 5 × sample loading buffer by heating at 100 ℃ for 5 min and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were then electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane and blocked with 5% w/v skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween 20 (TBST) for 1.5 h at room temperature. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 ℃ overnight: heat shock protein 70 (HSP70, Enzo, 1: 1000), villin (Santa, 1: 1000). After washed three times with TBST, membranes were incubated with the anti-rabbit (mouse) immunoglobulin G horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody (Beijing ZhongShan Golden Bridge Biological Technology Co. Ltd, Beijing, China; 1:5000 dilution). After being washed with TBST, blots were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting kit (ECL-plus, Amersham Biosciences, Sweden). β-actin (Invitrogen, 1:4000) was determined as an internal reference.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and droplet digital PCR (dd PCR)

The total RNA in ileum tissue was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Takara, Dalian, China) to ensure the purity (a 28 S/18 S rRNA ratio of > 1.8 and an OD260/OD280 ratio of approximately 2.0). The cDNA was synthesized by RT-PCR using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qPCR was carried out by using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Dalian, China) on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Foster City, CA). The relative expression level of each gene was calculated with the 2−ΔΔCT method79. Ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4) was used as the reference gene in the ileum.

Genomic DNA was extracted from chyme by using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). The ddPCR was conducted in a QX200 Droplet Digital PCR system (Bio-Rad) as described previously80. In short, the final volume of each assay mixture was 20 μL, which contained 10 μL of 2x ddPCR supermix,100 nM primers and 4 μL of extracted DNA. Then the QX200 Droplet Generator (Bio-Rad) was used to generate the droplets according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification was performed using the following conditions: 1 cycle of 95 ˚C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 94 ˚C for 30 s, 55 ˚C for 1 min, and 98 ˚C for 10 min. The droplets were quantified by QX200 Droplet Reader (Bio-Rad). Since no standard curve was required for the ddPCR81, therefore, the fluorescent signal events above the threshold line were analyzed by QuantaSoft Software (Bio-Rad). According to preliminary experiments, the threshold of 10,000 was selected to separate positive and negative droplets. The universal primers were used to analyze total eubacteria. Specific 16S rRNA genes were targeted for these selected bacteria (Enterococcus genus, Enterobacteriaceae family, Clostridium coccoides and Lactobacillus genus). The relative abundance levels of genes in the treatment groups were normalized to the control group to determine the differences among the groups, as we described previously73. Primers used in the present study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

The sequences of primers used in the present study.

Gene name Sequence References
RPL4 F:5′-GGAAACCGTCGCGAGA-3' 8
R:5′-GCCCCAGAGACAGTT-3'
GSTO2 F:5′-GCCTTGAGATGTGGGAGAGAA-3' 82
R:5′-AAGATGGTGTTCTGATAGCCAAGA-3'
Nrf2 F:5′-ATCACCTCTTCTGCACCGAA-3' Present study
R:5′-GCTTTCTCCCGCTCTTTCTG-3'
Enterobacteriaceae family F:5′-CATTGACGTTACCCGCAGAAGAAGC-3' 73
R:5′-CTCTACGAGACTCAAGCTTGC-3
Enterococcus genus F:5′- CCCTTATTGTTAGTTGCCATCATT-3' 73
R:5′-ACTCGTTGTACTTCCCATTGT-3'
Clostridium coccoides F:5′-AATGACGGTACCTGACTAA-3' 73
R:5′- CTTTGAGTTTCATTCTTGCGAA-3'
Lactobacillus genus F:5′-AGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA-3' 73
R:5′-CACCGCTACACATGGAG-3'
Total eubacteria (16S rRNA) F:5′-CGGTCCAGACTCCTACGGG-3' 73
R:5′-TTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC-3'

RPL4 ribosomal protein L4.

GSTO2 glutathione S-transferase omega 2.

Nrf2 nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2.

Statistical analysis

Data were reported as means with SD and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA in the SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA). The data of the morbidity was analyzed by χ2 analysis and expressed as a percentage. Following the 2−ΔΔCt method, the mean value of the ileal gene expression of piglets in the control group was set to 1.00. The mean value of the relative abundance of bacteria in the control group was also set to 1.00. Multiple comparisons of means by the Duncan test was performed when the difference is significant. P-values ≤ 0.05 were taken to indicate statistical significance.

Ethics statement

All animal works were conducted according to the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Wuhan Polytechnic University (Index No.: 011043145-029-2013-000009) and the ARRIVE guidelines.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (371.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank members of Hou Lab, especially Dr. Dan Yi and Dr. Qian Zhang, for their technical help and discussion. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0501210), the Program of National Agricultural Research Outstanding Talents of China (2015), Hubei Provincial Key R&D Program (2019ABA083) and Texas A&M AgriLife Research (H-8200), the Open Project of Hubei Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (Grant No. 201805). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CAT

Catalase

DAO

Diamine oxidase

GSH-Px

Glutathione peroxidase

H2O2

Hydrogen peroxide

I-FABP

Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein

IL-6

Interleukin-6

IL-8

Interleukin-8

MDA

Malondialdehyde

MPO

Myeloperoxidase

PEDV

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus

SD

Standard deviation

TCID50

50% Tissue culture infectious dose

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor-α

T-SOD

Total superoxide dismutase

Author contributions

Y.H. and G.W. conceived and designed the experiment, and revised the manuscript. M.W., K.Y. and M.P. carried out the nursing of the piglets, viral challenge and index detection. T.W., L.W. and D.Z. performed data analysis and proposed figures. M.W., D.Y. and Q.Z. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Data availability

We declare that we support data availability, which allows unlimited access to our published materials, data and associated protocols promptly available to readers.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Mengjun Wu, Dan Yi and Qian Zhang.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-85880-5.

References

  • 1.Andersen ØM, Markham KR. Flavonoids: Chemistry, biochemistry and applications (CRC Press, 2005).
  • 2.Zheng GM, Yu C, Yang Z. Puerarin suppresses production of nitric oxide and inducible nitric oxide synthase in lipopolysaccharide-induced N9 microglial cells through regulating MAPK phosphorylation, O-GlcNAcylation and NF-κB translocation. Int. J. Oncol. 2012;40:1610–1618. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheng Y, Leng W, Zhang J. Protective effect of puerarin against oxidative stress injury of neural cells and related mechanisms. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016;22:1244–1249. doi: 10.12659/MSM.896058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang X, Hu W, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Sun L. Puerarin inhibits c-reactive protein expression via suppression of nuclear factor κb activation in lipopolysaccharide-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with stable angina pectoris. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010;107:637–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00548.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liu XJ, Mei ZG, Qian JP, Zeng YB, Wang MZ. Puerarin partly counteracts the inflammatory response after cerebral ischemia/reperfusion via activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Neural Regen. Res. 2013;34:3203–3215. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.34.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shin B, Park W. Zoonotic diseases and phytochemical medicines for microbial infections in veterinary science: current state and future perspective. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:1–9. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu X, et al. Effect of puerarin, baicalin and berberine hydrochloride on the regulation of IPEC-J2 cells infected with enterotoxigenic escherichia coli. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019 doi: 10.1155/2019/7438593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu M, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals antiviral and anti-inflammatory effects of puerarin in piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Front. Immunol. 2020;1:169. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ye Y, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals changes in vero cells in response to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. J. Proteome Res. 2019;18:1623–1633. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song D, Park B. Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: a comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines. Virus Genes. 2012;44:167–175. doi: 10.1007/s11262-012-0713-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li Y, et al. An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06056-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee C. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus: an emerging and re-emerging epizootic swine virus. Virol. J. 2015;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0421-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim O, Chae C. In situ hybridization for the detection and localization of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the intestinal tissues from naturally infected piglets. Vet. Pathol. 2000;37:62–67. doi: 10.1354/vp.37-1-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu Y, et al. Fish oil enhances intestinal integrity and inhibits TLR4 and NOD2 signaling pathways in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. J. Nutr. 2012;142:2017–2024. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.164947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martín-Venegas R, Roig-Pérez S, Ferrer R, Moreno JJ. Arachidonic acid cascade and epithelial barrier function during Caco-2 cell differentiation. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:1416–1423. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500564-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salzman NH, Underwood MA, Bevins CL. Paneth cells, defensins, and the commensal microbiota: a hypothesis on intimate interplay at the intestinal mucosa. Semin. Immunol. 2007;19:83. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang MZ, et al. Differences in the intestinal microbiota between uninfected piglets and piglets infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guo X, et al. iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic analysis of Vero cells infected with virulent and CV777 vaccine strain-like strains of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. J. Proteomics. 2015;130:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rowbottom DG, Green KJ. Acute exercise effects on the immune system. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000;32(Suppl 7):S396–S405. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200007001-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Altendorf, E., Zebert, D., Holl, M. & Yager, P. Differential blood cell counts obtained using a microchannel based flow cytometer. In International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators, Proceedings. 10.1109/sensor.1997.613704 (1997).
  • 21.Shirazi LF, Bissett J, Romeo F, Mehta JL. Role of inflammation in heart failure. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2017;19:27. doi: 10.1007/s11883-017-0660-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hou X, et al. Oral immunization against PEDV with recombinant Lactobacillus casei expressing dendritic cell-targeting peptide fusing COE protein of PEDV in piglets. Viruses. 2018;10:106. doi: 10.3390/v10030106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Arriba ML, Carvajal A, Pozo J, Rubio P. Lymphoproliferative responses and protection in conventional piglets inoculated orally with virulent or attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus. J. Virol. Methods. 2002;105:37–47. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(02)00063-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jung K, Saif LJ. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection: Etiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis and immunoprophylaxis. Vet. J. 2015;204:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissmann F. Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009;27:669–692. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shi C, Pamer EG. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011;11:762–774. doi: 10.1038/nri3070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Annamalai T, Saif LJ, Lu Z, Jung K. Age-dependent variation in innate immune responses to porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection in suckling versus weaned pigs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2015;168:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang X, Ohnstad M, Nelsen A, Nelson E. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus does not replicate in porcine monocyte-derived dendritic cells, but activates the transcription of type I interferon and chemokine. Vet. Microbiol. 2017;208:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lin H, et al. Differential protein analysis of IPEC-J2 cells infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus pandemic and classical strains elucidates the pathogenesis of infection. J. Proteome Res. 2017;16:2113–2120. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Z, et al. Protective effects of edaravone combined puerarin on inhalation lung injury induced by black gunpowder smog. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2015;26:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2015.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deng HF, et al. Puerarin prevents vascular endothelial injury through suppression of NF-κB activation in LPS-challenged human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;104:261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang X, et al. Puerarin prevents LPS-induced acute lung injury via inhibiting inflammatory response. Microb. Pathog. 2018;118:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ullah MZ, et al. Attenuation of inflammatory pain by puerarin in animal model of inflammation through inhibition of pro-inflammatory mediators. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018;61:306–316. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mendes FD, et al. Abnormal hepatic biochemistries in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007;102:344–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Parvez MK, Al-Dosari MS, Arbab AH, Niyazi S. The in vitro and in vivo anti-hepatotoxic, anti-hepatitis B virus and hepatic CYP450 modulating potential of Cyperus rotundus. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019;27:558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Casadio LVB, et al. Lipase and factor V (But not viral load) are prognostic factors for the evolution of severe yellow fever cases. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2019;114:e190033. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760190033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lu Q, et al. Puerarin attenuates calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2014;42:337–347. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X14500220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Curry SM, Schwartz KJ, Yoon KJ, Gabler NK, Burrough ER. Effects of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection on nursery pig intestinal function and barrier integrity. Vet. Microbiol. 2017;211:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zonta S, et al. Elemental enteral nutrition preserves the mucosal barrier and improves the trophism of the villi after small bowel transplantation in piglets. Transplant. Proc. 2007;39:2024–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang L, et al. Dietary leonurine hydrochloride supplementation attenuates lipopolysaccharide challenge-induced intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction by inhibiting the NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathway in broilers. J. Anim. Sci. 2019;97:1679–1692. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen JL, et al. Benzoic acid beneficially affects growth performance of weaned pigs which was associated with changes in gut bacterial populations, morphology indices and growth factor gene expression. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl) 2017;101:1137–1146. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yi D, et al. N-Acetylcysteine improves intestinal function in lipopolysaccharides-challenged piglets through multiple signaling pathways. Amino Acids. 2017;49:1915–1929. doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2389-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Funaoka H, Kanda T, Fujii H. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) as a new biomarker for intestinal diseases. Rinsho byori. Jpn. J. Clin. Pathol. 2010;58:162–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cheng S, Yu J, Zhou M, Tu Y, Lu Q. Serologic intestinal-fatty acid binding protein in necrotizing enterocolitis diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015 doi: 10.1155/2015/156704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang L, et al. Puerarin prevents high-fat diet-induced obesity by enriching Akkermansia muciniphila in the gut microbiota of mice. PLoS ONE. 2019 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu Y, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine Gegen Qinlian decoction ameliorates irinotecan chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity in mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;109:2252–2261. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.West AB, et al. Localization of villin, a cytoskeletal protein specific to microvilli, in human ileum and colon and in colonic neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:343–352. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90421-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Moll R, Robine S, Dudouet B, Louvard D. Villin: a cytoskeletal protein and a differentiation marker expressed in some human adenocarcinomas. Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol. Incl. Mol. Pathol. 1987;54:155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF02899208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cao S, et al. Resveratrol improves intestinal barrier function, alleviates mitochondrial dysfunction and induces mitophagy in diquat challenged piglets 1. Food Funct. 2019;10:344–354. doi: 10.1039/c8fo02091d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chami B, Martin NJJ, Dennis JM, Witting PK. Myeloperoxidase in the inflamed colon: a novel target for treating inflammatory bowel disease. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2018;645:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Piacentini S, Monaci PM, Polimanti R, Manfellotto D, Fuciarelli M. GSTO2*N142D gene polymorphism associated with hypothyroidism in Italian patients. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013;40:1967–1971. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2253-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Y, et al. A novel Omega-class glutathione S-transferase gene in Apis cerana cerana: molecular characterisation of GSTO2 and its protective effects in oxidative stress. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2013;18:503–516. doi: 10.1007/s12192-013-0406-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang L, et al. N-Acetylcysteine supplementation alleviates intestinal injury in piglets infected by porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Amino Acids. 2017;49:1931–1943. doi: 10.1007/s00726-017-2397-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.de Toda IM, De la Fuente M. The role of Hsp70 in oxi-inflamm-aging and its use as a potential biomarker of lifespan. Biogerontology. 2015;16:709–721. doi: 10.1007/s10522-015-9607-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Li Z, et al. Comparative proteome analysis of porcine jejunum tissues in response to a virulent strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and its attenuated strain. Viruses. 2016 doi: 10.3390/v8120323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Han RM, et al. Comparison of flavonoids and isoflavonoids as antioxidantsz. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:3780–3785. doi: 10.1021/jf803850p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Xiao C, et al. Anti-oxidative and TNF-α suppressive activities of puerarin derivative (4AC) in RAW264.7 cells and collagen-induced arthritic rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011;666:242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.05.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ko K, Wahyudi LD, Kwon YS, Kim JH, Yang H. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activating triterpenoid saponins from camellia japonica roots. J. Nat. Prod. 2018;81:2399–2409. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cai SA, et al. Nrf2 is a key regulator on puerarin preventing cardiac fibrosis and upregulating metabolic enzymes UGT1A1 in rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:540. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ma JQ, Ding J, Xiao ZH, Liu CM. Puerarin ameliorates carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative DNA damage and inflammation in mouse kidney through ERK/Nrf2/ARE pathway. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014;71:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zou Y, et al. Protective effect of puerarin against beta-amyloid-induced oxidative stress in neuronal cultures from rat hippocampus: Involvement of the GSK-3β/Nrf2 signaling pathway. Free Radic. Res. 2013;47:55–63. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2012.742518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alonso C, et al. Evidence of infectivity of airborne porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and detection of airborne viral RNA at long distances from infected herds. Vet. Res. 2014;45:73. doi: 10.1186/s13567-014-0073-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jonach B, Boye M, Stockmarr A, Jensen TK. Fluorescence in situ hybridization investigation of potentially pathogenic bacteria involved in neonatal porcine diarrhea. BMC Vet. Res. 2014;10:68. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Huang A, et al. Dynamic change of gut microbiota during porcine epidemic Diarrhea virus infection in suckling piglets. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Alshammari E, Patel M, Sachidanandan M, Kumar P, Adnan M. Potential evaluation and health fostering intrinsic traits of novel probiotic strain enterococcus durans f3 isolated from the gut of fresh water fish catla catla. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2019;39:844–861. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2019.e57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Niederwerder MC. Role of the microbiome in swine respiratory disease. Vet. Microbiol. 2017;209:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu HY, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus johnsonii and Lactobacillus reuteri on gut barrier function and heat shock proteins in intestinal porcine epithelial cells. Physiol. Rep. 2015 doi: 10.14814/phy2.12355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xin J, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance, intestinal immunity, and gut microbiota in piglets. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins. 2020;12:184–1931. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9511-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rigsbee L, et al. Quantitative profiling of gut microbiota of children with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1740–1751. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Xia L, Yang Y, Wang J, Jing Y, Yang Q. Impact of TGEV infection on the pig small intestine. Virol. J. 2018;15:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1012-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ya-Nan G, et al. Traditional chinese medicine QPYF as preventive treatment for Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea in a mouse model. Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016 doi: 10.1155/2016/3759819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wu G. Principles of animal nutrition. CRC Press; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yi D, et al. Dietary supplementation with oleum cinnamomi improves intestinal functions in piglets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018 doi: 10.3390/ijms19051284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Goede D, et al. Previous infection of sows with a “ mild ” strain of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus confers protection against infection with a “ severe ” strain. Vet. Microbiol. 2015;176:161–164. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang L, et al. Dietary supplementation with α-ketoglutarate activates mTOR signaling and enhances energy status in skeletal muscle of lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. J. Nutr. 2016;146:1514–1520. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.236000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hou Y, et al. Dietary α-ketoglutarate supplementation ameliorates intestinal injury in lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. Amino Acids. 2010;39:555–564. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0473-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hosoda N, et al. Structural and functional alterations in the gut of parenterally or enterally fed rats. J. Surg. Res. 1989;47:133. doi: 10.1016/0022-4804(89)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hou Y, et al. Protective effects of N-acetylcysteine on intestinal functions of piglets challenged with lipopolysaccharide. Amino Acids. 2012;43:1233–1242. doi: 10.1007/s00726-011-1191-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Song T, et al. Construction of a cDNA library for miniature pig mandibular deciduous molars. BMC Dev. Biol. 2014;14:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-14-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cheng X, et al. Development and evaluation of a droplet digital PCR assay for the diagnosis of paucibacillary leprosy in skin biopsy specimens. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;13:e0007284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sze MA, Abbasi M, Hogg JC, Sin DD. A comparison between droplet digital and quantitative PCR in the analysis of bacterial 16S load in lung tissue samples from control and COPD GOLD 2. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e110351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wu T, et al. Trilactic glyceride regulates lipid metabolism and improves gut function in piglets. Front. Biosci. Landmark. 2020 doi: 10.2741/4858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (371.3KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

We declare that we support data availability, which allows unlimited access to our published materials, data and associated protocols promptly available to readers.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES