Skip to main content
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids logoLink to Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
. 2021 Mar 1;24:274–283. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.02.033

AON-based degradation of c.151C>T mutant COCH transcripts associated with dominantly inherited hearing impairment DFNA9

Erik de Vrieze 1,2,, Jorge Cañas Martín 1, Jolien Peijnenborg 1, Aniek Martens 1, Jaap Oostrik 1,2, Simone van den Heuvel 3, Kornelia Neveling 3,4, Ronald Pennings 1,2, Hannie Kremer 1,2,3, Erwin van Wijk 1,2
PMCID: PMC7985667  PMID: 33815940

Abstract

The c.151C>T founder mutation in COCH is a frequent cause of late-onset, dominantly inherited hearing impairment and vestibular dysfunction (DFNA9) in the Dutch/Belgian population. The initial clinical symptoms only manifest between the 3rd and 5th decade of life, which leaves ample time for therapeutic intervention. The dominant inheritance pattern and established non-haploinsufficiency disease mechanism indicate that suppressing translation of mutant COCH transcripts has high therapeutic potential. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing resulted in the identification of 11 variants with a low population frequency (<10%) that are specific to the c.151C>T mutant COCH allele. Proof of concept was obtained that gapmer antisense oligonucleotides (AONs), directed against the c.151C>T mutation or mutant allele-specific intronic variants, are able to induce mutant COCH transcript degradation when delivered to transgenic cells expressing COCH minigenes. The most potent AON, directed against the c.151C>T mutation, was able to induce a 60% decrease in mutant COCH transcripts without affecting wild-type COCH transcript levels. Allele specificity decreased when increasing concentrations of AON were delivered to the cells. With the proven safety of AONs in humans, and rapid advancements in inner ear drug delivery, our in vitro studies indicate that AONs offer a promising treatment modality for DFNA9.

Keywords: antisense oligonucleotides, deafness, hearing loss, genetic therapy, DFNA9, COCH, gapmer, RNase H1

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


The c.151C>T founder mutation in COCH is a frequent cause of late-onset, dominantly inherited hearing impairment and vestibular dysfunction (DFNA9). We designed and in vitro validated gapmer AONs that are able to target the mutant COCH transcript for degradation. Our results describe the first step toward an AON-based treatment for DFNA9.

Introduction

DFNA9, caused by mutations in the COCH gene, is a relatively common form of dominantly inherited highly progressive hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction. It is characterized by adult-onset hearing loss, leading to complete deafness by the age of 50–70 years.1,2 With progression of the disease, speech perception and conversation become severely limited. DFNA9 patients furthermore suffer from balance problems, which severely hamper their daily activities. Overall, the problems associated with DFNA9 have a severe impact on the quality of life of patients and their relatives and friends.3

The COCH gene is located on chromosome 14, and encodes cochlin, a protein that consists of 550 amino acids. Cochlin is predicted to contain a signal peptide, an LCCL (limulus factor C, Cochlin, and late gestation lung protein Lgl1) domain, two short intervening domains, and two vWFA (von Willebrand factor A) domains. Cochlin is expressed in fibrocytes of the spiral ligament and spiral limbus, where it has been reported to assist in structural support and sound processing, and in the vestibular fibrocytes that are important in the maintenance of balance.4 Proteolytic cleavage of cochlin, between the LCCL domain and the more C-terminal vWFA domains, results in a 16-kDa LCCL domain-containing peptide that is secreted and has been shown to play a role in innate immunity in the cochlea.5 The vWFA domain-containing cochlin fragments are presumed to be extracellular matrix proteins, as cochlin vWFA2 was found to interact with collagens in vitro, and cochlin is a major component of the cochlear extracellular matrix.1,6

The c.151C>T (p.Pro51Ser) founder mutation, affecting the LCCL domain, appears to be the most prevalent mutation in COCH, as it underlies hearing loss in >1,000 Dutch and Belgian individuals.7,8 Histopathology of a temporal bone from a p.Pro51Ser DFNA9 patient revealed significant loss and degeneration of fibrocytes in the cochlea.1 Overexpression of murine cochlin containing the ortholog of the p.Pro51Ser variant in cultured cells previously revealed that this mutation results in the formation of cytotoxic cochlin dimers and oligomers that sequester wild-type cochlin.9 While the proteolytic cleavage of cochlin was shown to be reduced by the p.Pro51Ser variant and abolished by several other DFNA9-associated variants,9 the potential contribution of decreased proteolytic cleavage to DFNA9 pathology requires further investigation.

All available data indicate that DFNA9 results from a gain-of-function and/or a dominant-negative disease mechanism, rather than from haploinsufficiency. Downregulation of the mutant allele, thereby alleviating the inner ear from the burden caused by the formation of cytotoxic cochlin dimers, therefore has high therapeutic potential. The lack of auditory and vestibular phenotypes in mice carrying a heterozygous protein-truncating mutation in Coch,10 and in heterozygous family members of patients with early-onset hearing impairment due to homozygous protein-truncating mutations in COCH,11 illustrate that sufficient functional cochlin proteins can be produced from a single healthy COCH allele. We speculate that a timely intervention might even prevent hearing impairment altogether.

Antisense oligonucleotides (AONs) with DNA-like properties can be employed to target (pre-)mRNA molecules for degradation by the RNase H1 endonuclease.12,13 Chemical modifications can be introduced in the 5′ and 3′ flanking nucleotides to increase stability and nuclease resistance, while maintaining a central gap region of oligo-deoxynucleotides to bind to the target RNA and thereby activate RNase H1.12 These AONs are named gapmers, and their ability to specifically target mutant alleles for degradation has shown great promise in treatment strategies for non-haploinsufficiency disorders such as Huntington’s disease.14,15

For a successful application of AON therapy for non-haploinsufficiency disorders such as DFNA9, it is of major importance that the designed AONs only target the mutant (pre-)mRNA, and not the wild-type (pre-)mRNA, for degradation. As the options to design allele-discriminating AONs based on a single nucleotide difference are limited, we used single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing to identify additional allele-discriminating variants that can be exploited for AON design. This resulted in the identification of 11 variants with a low population frequency (<10%) that are specific to the c.151C>T mutant COCH haplotype. Our results show that both the c.151C>T mutation in COCH and low-frequency variants in cis with the DFNA9 mutation can be used to specifically target mutant COCH transcripts for degradation by RNase H1. Lead molecule c.151C>T AON-E appears to be the most promising molecule for further preclinical investigation. As this AON targets the DFNA9-causing mutation, future clinical application is not limited by the potential presence of the target on the patient’s wild-type allele.

Results

Identification of therapeutic targets

In order to develop a mutant-allele-specific therapy for DFNA9, reliable discrimination between the mutant and the wild-type allele is of vital importance. However, the single-nucleotide changes in COCH underlying most cases of DFNA9 restrict the design of allele-discriminating therapies. In search of additional variants that can be exploited to improve discrimination between the c.151C>T mutant and wild-type COCH allele, we subjected the genomic COCH sequence of three DFNA9 patients to long-read SMRT sequencing. We amplified the COCH gene in three fragments that contain overlapping single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (c.151C>T and c.734-304T>G) to aid haplotype assembly (Figure 1A). The identified variants are annotated on transcript NM_001135058.1, which does not contain the extended second coding exon. To identify targetable allele-specific variants that potentially allow for the treatment of the majority of the Dutch/Belgian DFNA9 patients, we filtered the variants in cis with the c.151C>T mutation for a population frequency below 20%. This resulted in the identification of 11 deep-intronic variants that are specific for the c.151C>T mutant COCH allele and have population frequencies between 5% and 10% (Figure 1B; Table 1). The identified variants provide additional targets for the development of a mutant allele-specific genetic therapy. The identified variants were validated using Sanger sequencing and confirmed to segregate with the c.151C>T mutation in COCH in two branches of Dutch DFNA9 families (Figure S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

COCH haplotype analysis

(A) Overview of the amplicons used to determine the haplotype-specific variants on the c.151C>T mutant COCH allele. Amplicon length is indicated in base pairs (bp) between brackets. (B) Variants with a low population frequency (<10%) on the c.151C>T mutant haplotype. The six identified variants in intron 7 are 1: c.629+1186T>C; 2: c.629+1779delC; 3: c.629+1807delA; 4: c.629+1809A>C; 5: c.629+1812A>T; 6: c.630-208A>C. Intron-exon structure of transcript NM_001135058.1 is depicted. The c.151C>T variant, causative for DFNA9, is indicated in bold.

Table 1.

Identified low-frequency variants on the c.151C>T COCH haplotype

Location SNP identifier Nucleotide change (HGVS) Amino acid change Frequency (percentage) gnomAD European non-Finnish
e4 rs28938175 c.151C>T Pro51Ser T: 0.0032
i4 rs143609554 c.240-239A>T T: 5.4
i6 rs7140538 c.436+185G>T T: 5.5
i6 rs10701465 c.436+368_436+369dupAG dupAG: 5.5
i8 rs186627205 c.629+1186T>C C: 5.4
i8 rs200080665 c.629+1779delC delC: 5.4
i8 rs368638521 c.629+1807delA delA: 5.9a
i8 rs554238963 c.629+1809A>C C: 9.9a
i8 rs184635675 c.629+1812A>T T: 5.4
i8 rs2295128 c.630-208A>C C: 5.3
i9 rs28362773 c.734-304T>G G: 7.2
i11 rs17097458 c.1477+9C>A A: 5.4

HGVS, Human Genome Variant Society.

a

No data in gnomAD; frequency data from dbSNP 153.

Design and in silico analysis of AONs

We selected the c.151C>T founder mutation and the intronic, mutant-allele-specific variant c.436+368_436+369dupAG as targets for AON-based therapy. In contrast with the identified single-nucleotide changes or deletions, the c.436+368_436+369dupAG variant is the only multi-nucleotide variant that is specific to the mutant allele. Based on this, we hypothesized that AONs directed against this variant can provide the highest allele specificity. To design AONs, we combined the criteria that are commonly used to design splice-switching AONs with the previously established notion that RNase H1-dependent AONs require a series of nucleotides with DNA-like properties in their central region.16, 17, 18 All possible AONs were investigated for thermodynamic properties in silico, with particular attention to the difference in binding affinity between the mutant and wild-type COCH mRNA. Targeting regions of all AONs used in this study are shown in Figure 2A. Note that the difference in binding affinity between the mutant and wild-type COCH mRNA was predicted to be larger for the AONs directed against the dupAG variant (c.436+368_436+369dupAG) compared to those directed against the single nucleotide substation (c.151C>T) (Table S1). The recognition of RNA/DNA duplexes by RNase H1 relates to the nature of the carbohydrate moiety in the AON backbone (2′-ribose versus 2′-deoxyribose).16 Therefore, AONs were either comprised completely of phosphorothioate (PS)-linked DNA bases, or of a central “gap” region of PS-DNA bases flanked by wings of 2′-O-methyl-RNA bases (gapmers). The gapmer design is particularly suitable for clinical application, as the nuclease-resistant 2′-modified ribonucleotides provide an increased binding affinity and half-life time.12,19,20

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Design and identification of candidate AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation and the in cis intronic variant c.436+368_436+369dupAG

(A) Graphical representation of AON-RNA binding positions on the c.151C>T mutant COCH transcript. Coding sequences are shown in capitals, intronic sequences in lower case. AON sequences are provided in Table S1. (B) Degradation of mutant COCH transcripts by AONs (250 nM end concentration in the medium), directed against the c.151C>T mutation, in mutant COCH-expressing transgenic cells. Six out of the seven AONs were able to lower the levels of mutant COCH transcripts at 24 h post transfection as compared to cells transfected with a scrambled control AON. (C) Degradation of mutant COCH transcripts by different AONs (250 nM end concentration in the medium), directed against the c.436+368_436+369dupAG variant on the mutant COCH transcript, in mutant COCH-expressing transgenic cells. Four out of the seven AONs showed an obvious decrease in mutant COCH transcript levels at 24 h post transfection as compared to cells transfected with a scrambled control AON. Uninduced and scrambled controls are displayed as the average of three biological replicates. Single transfections are used for the screening of on-target AONs. Data are displayed as the fold change compared to scrambled control AON-treated cells and normalized for the expression of RPS18.

Establishing stable transgenic cell lines expressing wild-type or c.151C>T COCH minigenes

The COCH expression levels in patient-derived primary fibroblast and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cells are too low to reliably determine the effect of RNase H1-dependent AONs. Therefore, we used the Flp-In system to generate two stable transgenic T-REx 293 cell lines, expressing either a mutant (including three deep-intronic allele-discriminating variants; Figure 1) or a wild-type COCH minigene construct under the control of a tetracycline-dependent promotor. The minigene constructs span the genomic COCH sequence between the transcription initiation site and the last complete nucleotide triplet of exon 7 (Figure S2A). For both alleles, several clones were expanded and investigated for inducible COCH expression (Figure S2B). Correct pre-mRNA splicing of both wild-type and mutant minigene COCH exons 1–7 was confirmed with RT-PCR (Figure S2C). In order to reliably quantify mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels, we used a custom TaqMan assay (Applied Biosystems), in which different fluorophores are coupled to probes specific for either the mutant or the wild-type transcript.

RNase H1-dependent AONs target mutant COCH transcripts for degradation

As the COCH gene is continuously expressed in the human cochlea, we opted for an experimental design in which COCH transcription remains active. To induce COCH transcription, seeded cells were treated overnight with tetracycline (0.25 μg/mL). Next morning, culture medium was replaced by fresh tetracycline-containing medium, and cells were transfected with the AONs. For the initial screening of AONs, we transfected AONs (n = 1) to a final concentration in the culture medium of 250 nM. This dose was selected based on the work of Naessens et al.,21 who showed a 50%–70% decrease in target transcripts in an overexpression-based cell model to identified candidate AONs for the future treatment of NR2E3-associated retinitis pigmentosa. Six (out of seven) AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation (Figure 2B) and four (out of seven) AONs directed against the dupAG variant (Figure 2C) were able to decrease the level of mutant COCH transcripts as compared to a scrambled control AON.

Three of the most effective AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation, and one AON directed against the dupAG variant, were analyzed in more detail using different concentrations of gapmer AONs and multiple technical replications (Figure 3). c.151C>T AON-A was able to induce a significant decrease in mutant COCH transcripts at a dose of 250 nM (p = 0.02, Tukey’s multiple comparison test), but not at 100 nM (Figure 3A). While AON-B showed a stronger effect in comparison to AON-A in the initial screening, the effect sizes of AON-A and -B were very similar in this replication experiment (Figure 3B). A significant decrease of mutant COCH transcripts was found at 100 nM and 250 nM (p < 0.0012, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). The third AON directed against the c.151C>T mutation that was investigated in more detail, AON-E, did show a typical dose-dependent decrease in mutant COCH transcript levels. At 100 nM, the level of mutant COCH transcripts was approximately half of the number of transcripts detected in cells treated with a scrambled control AON (p < 0.0002, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Mutant COCH transcript levels were even further decreased in cells transfected with 250 nM of AON-E (p < 0.0001, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). While on average the AONs directed against the dupAG variants appeared slightly less effective in the initial AON screen, transfection of mutant COCH-minigene-expressing cells with dupAG AON-B resulted in a significant decrease in mutant COCH transcripts at the three concentrations tested (Figure 3D; p < 0.0009, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). The highest effect size appears already to be achieved at 25 nM. The maximum effect size of dupAG AON-B was similar to the effect observed for c.151C>T AON-A and -B, but it was much less when compared to c.151C>T AON-E.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Identified candidate AONs induce a significant decrease in mutant COCH transcript levels

(A–D) To confirm the effect of previously identified candidate AONs, c.151C>T AON-A (A), c.151C>T AON-B (B), c151C>T AON-E (C), and c.436+368_436+369dupAG AON-B (D) were investigated at two different doses. (A) c.151C>T AON-A results in significant decrease in mutant COCH transcripts at 250 nM, but not at 100 nM. (B) c.151C>T AON-B was able to induce a significant decrease in mutant COCH transcripts at both 100 nM and 250 nM, but no differences between the two doses were observed. (C) c.151C>T AON-E decreased the level of mutant COCH transcripts in a statistically significant and dose-dependent manner. At a concentration of 250 nM, the number of COCH transcripts was reduced to 20% of those in cells treated with a scrambled control AON. (D) Transfection of c.436+368_436+369dupAG AON-B resulted in a significant decrease of mutant COCH transcripts, without statistically relevant differences between the two concentrations. All four AONs had a gapmer design with wings of 2′-O-methyl-RNA bases flanking the central PS-DNA core. AONs were transfected at a dose leading to the indicated concentration in the well and investigated for their effect on transcript levels 24 h after transfection. Data are expressed as mean ± SD of 3 replicate transfections, normalized to the expression of RPS18 and displayed as the fold change compared to scrambled control AON-treated cells. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test.

We next investigated the ability of these four AONs in discriminating between mutant and wild-type COCH transcripts (Figure 4). We chose to compare the AONs at a concentration of 100 nM, as three out of the four AONs were able to significantly reduce mutant COCH transcript levels at this concentration. As observed previously, transfection of mutant COCH minigene cells with c.151C>T AON-B, c.151C>T AON-E, and dupAG AON-B significantly decreased mutant COCH transcript levels as compared to a scrambled control AON (Figure 4A). None of the four AONs induced a significant decrease of wild-type COCH transcripts when transfected in wild-type COCH-expressing transgenic cells, although we did observe a marked decrease in both mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels resulting from the transfection of c.151C>T AON-A (Figure 4B). Likely, the correction for multiple comparisons explains the lack of a significant difference between c.151C>T AON-A-treated and scrambled AON-treated wild-type COCH minigene cells.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Comparison of AON efficiency in mutant and wild-type COCH-minigene-expressing cells

(A and B) AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation or the c.436+368_436+369dupAG (dupAG) variant were transfected in stable transgenic cell lines expressing (A) a mutant COCH minigene, and (B) a wild-type COCH minigene. AONs were transfected at a dose that results in a final concentration of 100 nM in the culture medium, and their effect on COCH transcript levels was investigated 24 h post transfection. (A) As shown previously, c.151C>T AON-B and AON-E, and dupAG AON-B, were able to induce a significant decrease in the mutant COCH transcript level. (B) None of the AONs resulted in a significant decrease in wild-type COCH transcript levels in transgenic cells expressing the wild-type COCH minigene. While c.151C>T AON-A results in a decrease in wild-type COCH transcript levels, the observed decrease is not statistically significant (p = 0.14, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). All AONs used here consisted of a gapmer composition. Mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels are normalized for the expression of RPS18 and plotted as mean ± SD of 3 replicates. The left axis shows the fold change compared to scrambled AON-transfected cells; the right axis shows the RPS18 normalized transcript levels. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test.

While both cell lines display the same tetracycline-induced 18-fold increase in COCH minigene expression (Figure 4, left y axis), the expression levels relative to housekeeping gene RPS18 differ between clones (Figure 4, right y axis). The higher normalized expression of wild-type COCH minigene transcripts as compared to mutant COCH minigene transcripts may lead to an overestimation of allele specificity of the AONs. Furthermore, the lack of mutant COCH transcripts in these cells poorly resembles the situation in patients. To better determine allele specificity, we searched for a mutant COCH minigene clone with similar expression levels of tetracycline-induced mutant COCH minigene and endogenous (wild-type) COCH. Subjecting these cells to three different AON concentrations revealed that c.151C>T AON-E can induce a significant and allele-specific reduction in mutant COCH transcript level at 25 nM (Figure 5A) (p < 0.0001, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). At 100 nM and 250 nM, c.151C>T AON-E induces a concomitant decrease in endogenous wild-type COCH levels. Nevertheless, the 4- to 6-fold lower levels of mutant COCH transcripts as compared to wild-type COCH transcripts indicate that c.151C>T AON-E has a stronger affinity for the mutant transcript. In the same cell model, transfection of 25 nM of dupAG AON-B did not result in significant differences in mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels (Figure 5B). A scrambled control AON was included in this experiment to confirm that the observed effect is specific to the AON sequence. Transfection of the cells with the scrambled AON mildly increases endogenous wild-type COCH expression but not the expression of the tetracycline-induced mutant COCH minigene. Although compared to the delivery of scrambled AON, c.151C>T AON-E does reduce the levels of wild-type COCH transcripts with 30% (p = 0.14, Tukey’s multiple comparison test), the comparison with untransfected cells expressing both mutant and wild-type COCH transcripts is most relevant from a therapeutic point of view.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Investigation of allele-specificity in cells with equal levels of mutant and wild-type COCH transcription

Mutant COCH-minigene-expressing cells from a clone with comparable expression levels of endogenous wild-type COCH were transfected with AONs. (A) Transfection of cells with c.151C>T AON-E results in a dose-depended decrease in mutant COCH transcript levels. Allele-specific reduction of mutant COCH transcript levels was observed at 25 nM but not at 100 and 250 nM. (B) Mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels in cells treated with 25 nM c.151C>T AON-E, dupAG AON-B, or scrambled control AON. Mutant and wild-type COCH transcript levels are normalized for the expression of RPS18 plotted as mean ± SD or 3 replicates. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison post-test conducted for possible comparisons. Outcome for relevant comparisons is shown; asterisks indicate the p value compared to tetracycline-treated cells.

Discussion

The c.151C>T founder mutation in COCH is estimated to be one of the most prevalent causes of dominantly inherited, adult-onset hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction in Northwest Europe, affecting >1,000 individuals in the Dutch/Belgian population. In this work, we present 11 intronic variants in cis with the c.151C>T mutation and show that these variants can be exploited for the development of a mutant-allele-specific therapy using RNase H1-dependent AONs. We identified a highly effective AON, directed against the c.151C>T mutation, as the most promising candidate for further preclinical development.

The ability of AONs to specifically target mutant transcripts for degradation is of key importance for the development of an AON-based therapy for dominantly inherited disorders with a dominant-negative or gain-of-function disease mechanism such as DFNA9. The therapeutic strategy must be potent enough to prevent the synthesis of proteins from the mutant allele but allow sufficient protein synthesis from the wild-type allele for normal inner ear function. For any antisense-based approach, discrimination between alleles based on a single-nucleotide difference presents as a potential pitfall in terms of concomitant downregulation of the wild-type allele.22, 23, 24 Recently published AONs directed against a mutation in NR2E3, causative for dominantly inherited retinitis pigmentosa, also significantly reduced the wild-type transcript and protein levels.21 In contrast, for Huntington’s disease (HTT gene), also resulting from a non-haploinsufficiency disease mechanism, the use of gapmer AONs to target a SNP specific to the mutant allele emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy in vitro and in vivo.15 As nearly all cases of DFNA9 are caused by single-nucleotide changes,25 we explored the presence of mutant-allele-specific variants that can serve as additional targets to develop a therapeutic strategy for the most frequently occurring DFNA9 mutation, c.151C>T. Here, we employed SMRT sequencing26 to sequence the complete mutant COCH haplotype using three overlapping PCR amplicons. With average polymerase read lengths of up to 30 kb, the SMRT sequencing platform presents a powerful tool to identify genetic variants on the mutant allele and offers a major advantage over the manual genotyping of family trios, as done for example to identify the target SNPs in the HTT gene.27

The c.151C>T COCH allele contains a remarkably high number of SNPs with a relatively low allele frequency (∼5%) in the non-Finnish European population according to the gnomAD database (v.2.1.1).28 As the c.151C>T founder mutation arose on a relatively uncommon haplotype, we estimate that less than 5% of DFNA9 patients are homozygous for these SNPs. Therefore, approximately 95% of DFNA9 patients with the c.151C>T mutation can theoretically be treated with AONs directed against one of these mutant-allele-specific variants. In comparison, it was reported that targeting one of three relatively frequent SNPs can provide a treatment for approximately 85% of patients suffering from Huntington’s disease.27 In contrast to the identified mutant-allele-specific SNPs in HTT, all of the identified variants in COCH map to the introns. As such, the identified mutant-allele-specific variants in COCH are only amenable to AON-mediated pre-mRNA degradation by the RNase H1 enzyme and not to mRNA interference (RNAi).29, 30, 31

We designed AONs to specifically target mutant COCH transcripts for RNase H1 degradation. In addition to targeting the DFNA9-associated mutation c.151C>T, we opted to target the 2 bp duplication c.436+368_436+369dupAG in cis with the DFNA9 mutation. In silico analysis of thermodynamic AON properties indicated that AONs directed against the dupAG variant possess a larger difference in binding affinity between the mutant and the wild-type transcript as compared to AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation (Table S1). The on-target efficacy of AONs was investigated in stable transgenic cells that express a mutant COCH minigene under control of a tetracycline-dependent promotor. A similar cell model was previously used to investigate the kinetics of RNase H1-dependent antisense oligonucleotide induced degradation13 and offers a suitable alternative to the patient-specific fibroblast and lymphoblastoid cell lines that hardly express COCH. We opted to investigate the effect of AONs under continuous activation of COCH transcription, which best resembles the situation in the cochlea, where constant COCH expression amounts to synthesis of one of the most abundant proteins in the entire organ.1,6 The gapmer configuration of c.151C>T AON-E was the most effective of all the designed AON molecules and at the highest dose resulted in a decrease of mutant COCH transcripts to <15% of the number of transcripts in cells treated with a scrambled control AON. The effects of AONs directed against the c.436+368_436+369dupAG (dupAG) variant were overall lower as compared to the c.151C>T AONs. This could result from small differences in biochemical properties. The target region of the dupAG variant is more AT rich as compared to the sequence surrounding the c.151C>T variant. The calculated free energy of on-target AON binding was indeed lower for AONs directed against the dupAG variant as compared to AONs directed against the c.151C>T mutation. The fact that these AONs are directed against an intronic variant, which is only present in unspliced nuclear pre-mRNA, could also contribute to the lower on-target efficiency.

In terms of specificity for the mutant COCH allele, we anticipated an advantage for AONs directed against the dupAG variant. When transfected in wild-type COCH minigene-expressing cells, both c.151C>T AON-E and dupAG AON-B did not reduce the levels of wild-type COCH. In view of the higher expression of wild-type COCH as compared to mutant COCH, we concluded that this approach could possibly overestimate the allele specificity. We searched for a mutant COCH minigene clone with similar (tetracycline induced) mutant COCH expression as endogenous wild-type COCH expression. Transfection of c.151C>T AON-E in these cells revealed that allele specificity strongly depends on the amount of AON that is delivered to the cells. At 25 nM, the levels of mutant COCH transcripts were decreased to 40% of the levels of mutant COCH in control cells, without reducing the number of wild-type COCH transcripts. Upon increasing the concentration, c.151C>T AON-E also reduced the number of wild-type transcripts, albeit less compared to the reduction in mutant transcript levels. While dupAG AON-B also did not reduce wild-type COCH levels at 25 nM, the effect on mutant COCH transcripts was mild and therefore currently of little relevance for future clinical applications, especially since transfections with increasing doses did not further decrease the levels of mutant COCH transcripts in the initial dose-response study. While the on-target efficiency of AONs directed against the dupAG variant can be improved by, for example, increasing the length of the AON or introducing chemically modified nucleotides that enhance binding affinity, we see little reason for this. With higher efficiency and allele specificity at 25 nM, c.151C>T AON-E is a better candidate for clinical applications, especially since the use of AONs directed against the pathogenic mutations, unlike those directed against allele-specific variant, is not constrained by a small percentage of individuals who are homozygous for the target variant.

While c.151C>T AON-E could also benefit in terms of allele specificity from chemical modifications, decreasing AON length and or shortening the gap region, these alternations are likely to decrease cleavage efficiency as well. This raises the question of how much reduction in mutant COCH transcripts is required to achieve a clinically meaningful effect. Lacking an animal model to perform these experiments, we can currently only discuss the different factors that will determine the therapeutic effect. First of all, our data suggest that allele specificity strongly depends on the expression levels of mutant and wild-type COCH. Therefore, the AON dose is best titrated in vivo. In addition, we should realize that the levels of mutant and wild-type COCH are not necessarily identical, as allelic variation in gene expression is quite common in the human genome.32 Second, we do not know yet how much knockdown of mutant COCH is required to alleviate the patient’s phenotype. The age of onset of symptoms in DFNA9, usually between the 3rd and 5th decade of life for the c.151C>T mutation,2,33,34 indicates that the cochlea can cope with the burden of mutant cochlin proteins for many decades. It has furthermore been shown that otic fibrocytes, the main cell type producing cochlin, display some capacity for self-renewal.35 In the most optimal situation, AONs might be able to remove the burden of mutant cochlin proteins to an extent that allows for fibrocyte renewal and thereby possibly improved auditory and vestibular function. We speculate that a >50% reduction of mutant transcript levels, such as achieved upon the transfection of 25 nM of c.151C>T AON-E, could already be sufficient to halt or delay the disease progression when treatments are started at an early stage. The third factor is the extent to which a reduction in wild-type COCH transcripts is tolerated. We know from animal models and carriers of loss-of-function mutations that the number of wild-type transcripts from a single allele is sufficient for normal inner ear function. While difficult to put a number on the minimal number of transcripts needed, studies on splice modulation therapy for USH1C-associated hearing loss indicate that 20% of functional USH1C transcripts is sufficient for inner ear function.36 Along these lines, the 80% reduction of mutant transcripts and 50% reduction of wild-type transcripts that we observe upon the transfection of 100 nM c.151C>T AON-E could potentially yield good therapeutic outcomes.

The transient effect of AONs is both an advantage and a potential limitation for future clinical applications. It lowers the risk of sustained adverse or off-target effects that could accompany genome-editing techniques, but it also implies that a repeated delivery is likely to be required to achieve maximum efficacy. AON-based splice-modulation therapy for hearing impairment in Usher syndrome type 1c is extensively investigated in the fetal and post-natal cochlea.36,37 In contrast to USH1C-associated hearing impairment, the adult age of onset of DFNA9 leaves ample opportunity for therapeutic intervention in adults before the onset of the initial symptoms. Delprat et al.38 previously reported the use of phosphorothioate oligonucleotide-mediated knockdown in the adult rodent cochlea to investigate the role of the otospiralin protein in the inner ear protein. In this study, they placed pieces of gel foam loaded with AONs on the round window membrane (RWM) of rats and observed the effects of otospiralin knockdown already 2 days later.38 Otospiralin and cochlin are both expressed by the otic fibrocytes, which indicates that cellular uptake of AONs is unlikely to be a limiting factor for future AON-based DFNA9 therapy. Although many advancements in cochlear drug delivery have been made since,39, 40, 41 a huge gap in knowledge remains in terms of safety, stability, and biodistribution of gapmer AONs in the (adult) human cochlea. Further investigation into the feasibly of RWM diffusion as a potential delivery method for AON-based therapy in patients is also warranted, as the gapmer composition of AONs may affect diffusion properties, and the thickness of the human RWM and larger size of the cochlea are likely to affect the biodistribution.

In conclusion, this study shows that AONs can be engineered to target the c.151C>T mutant COCH transcript for degradation. The identified intronic, mutant-allele-specific variants present interesting alternative targets to design allele-specific AONs. However, the AONs directed against the intronic variant in COCH that were investigated here require further optimization of knockdown efficiency and specificity before continued preclinical development is warranted. The best-performing AON directed against the pathogenic mutation is able to reduce mutant COCH transcripts by 60% without affecting levels of wild-type transcripts. While increasing AON concentration further increased the reduction in mutant COCH transcripts, the levels of wild-type transcripts no longer remain unaffected. Further pre-clinical studies in animal models of DFNA9 are needed to assess the clinically relevant reduction in mutant COCH transcript levels and to what extent a decrease in wild-type transcripts is tolerated. The rapidly evolving procedures for repeated drug delivery to the cochlea render the application of AONs for the treatment of inherited hearing impairment an increasingly feasible strategy.

Materials and methods

SMRT sequencing of COCH haplotypes

This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands and was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Experiments were conducted at the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. DNA samples of three seemingly unrelated DFNA9 patients carrying the c.151C>T mutation in COCH were selected for SMRT sequencing (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) to identify shared variants on the mutant allele. The COCH gene was amplified in three overlapping amplicons (Figure 1), in which known haplotype-specific variants were anticipated to be present to aid assembly. Fragments were amplified with primers 5′-GAAGTTCGGTTCTCAGGCC-3′ and 5′-TGCCATCGTCATACAAAAGG-3′ (fragment 1), 5′-CAAAATCTGGAATGGTATGGAAG-3′ and 5′-GATCAAATGCAGACCTAGCC-3′ (fragment 2), and 5′-TCCCCTGCAGTACTTTTTGTC-3′ and 5′-GTAAGCCAGCTTACAATAACTC-3′ (fragment 3), using Q5 polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Amplicons were pooled per sample, and library preparation was done according to protocol Procedure and Checklist—Preparing SMRTbell Libraries using PacBio Barcoded Adapters for Multiplex SMRT Sequencing (Pacific Biosciences, #100-538-700-02). Generation of polymerase-bound SMRTbell complexes was performed using the Sample Setup option in SMRTLink 6.0 (Pacific Biosciences), and sequencing was performed on a Sequel I systems (Pacific Biosciences). Following the run, generation of circular consensus reads (CCS) and mapping of these reads was performed using SMRTLink 6.0. Bam files were loaded into the Sequence Pilot software (JSI Medical Systems) to perform variant calling. The variants were subsequently filtered to excluded homopolymers and homozygous variants. The identified variants with a low population frequency (<10%) were considered as potential therapeutic targets and validated using targeted Sanger sequencing. Segregation analysis in two branches of large Dutch DNFA9 families (W02-006 and W00-330) was used to confirm the presence of the identified variants on the mutant haplotype. Primers used in the segregation analyses are listed in Table S2.

AONs

AONs were designed using previously published criteria for splice-modulating AONs.17,18 In summary, the sequences surrounding the c.151C>T and c.436+368_436+369dupAG variants on the mutant COCH allele were analyzed in silico for AON accessibility. The thermodynamic properties of every possible 20-mer antisense oligonucleotide were analyzed in silico for AON-AON duplex formation, the formation of AON-target mRNA duplexes, and the formation of AON-wild-type mRNA duplexes using the RNAstructure webserver.42 The uniqueness of the AON target sequences was determined by BLAST analysis. The seven most optimal AONs were purchased from Eurogentec (Liège, Belgium) and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before use. As a non-binding control, an AON with a scrambled nucleotide sequence was also acquired. Sequences and AON chemistry are presented in Table S1.

Generation of transgenic COCH minigene cell lines

The genomic region of wild-type and c.151C>T mutant COCH exons 1 to 7 (transcript variant 1; NM_001135058.1), including the haplotype-specific variants, was amplified from the translation initiation site to the splice donor site of exon 7 using primers 5′-ATGTCCGCAGCCTGGATC-3′ and 5′-GGCTTGAACAAGGCCCACA-3′. The mutant and wild-type amplicons were subsequently cloned into the pgLAP1 vector (Addgene plasmid #19702) using Gateway cloning technology (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Upon sequence validation, COCH-containing pgLAP1 vectors were co-transfected with pOGG44 (#V600520, Invitrogen), encoding Flp-Recombinase, in FLp-in T-REx 293 cells (#R78007, Invitrogen) using polyethylenimine. Cells in which the COCH sequence was stably integrated were selected for using DMEM-AQ medium (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate, 10 μg/mL blasticidin, and 100 μg/mL hygromycin. Individual hygromycin-resistant clones were expanded and subsequently tested for the induction of COCH transcription by tetracycline using an allele-specific TaqMan assay. Correct splicing of the COCH minigenes was assessed using a forward primer on exon 1 (5′-TCCGCAGCCTGGATCCCGG-3′) and reverse primer on exon 7 (5′-GGCTTGAACAAGGCCCACA-3′).

Delivery of RNase H1-dependent AONs

Wild-type and mutant COCH-expressing FLp-in T-REx 293 cells were cultured in DMEM-AQ medium (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate, 10 μg/mL blasticidin, and 100 μg/mL hygromycin. For AON treatments, cells were seeded in 12-well or 24-well plates at ∼50% confluency. Next day, COCH transcription was activated through the administration of 0.25 μg/mL tetracycline (#T7660, Sigma Aldrich). Twenty hours after induction, cells were transfected with AONs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions, using a 1:2 ratio of AON (in μg) and lipofectamine reagent (in μL). AON doses are calculated as final concentration in the culture medium. Cells were collected for transcript analysis 24 h after AON delivery.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from cells using the Nucleospin RNA mini kit (#740955, Machery-Nagel) according to manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was generated using iScript cDNA synthesis reagents (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a fixed amount of RNA input (250 ng) in a 10 μL reaction volume. The obtained cDNA was diluted four times and used for transcript analysis.

Analysis of COCH transcript levels

Diluted cDNA (4 μL) was used as input in an allele-specific TaqMan assay using primers 5′-GGACATCAGGAAAGAGAAAGCAGAT-3′ and 5′-CCCATACACAGAGAATTCCTCAAGAG-3′, a wild-type allele-specific VIC-labeled probe 5′-CCCCCTGGGCAGAG-3′ and a mutant allele-specific FAM-labeled probe 5′-CCCCCTGAGCAGAG-3′. Expression of RPS18 was analyzed with GoTaq (#A6002, Promega), using primers 5′-ATACAGCCAGGTCCTAGCCA-3′ and 5′-AAGTGACGCAGCCCTCTATG-3′. Abundance of mutant and wild-type COCH transcripts was calculated relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene RPS18.

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO ZonMw Offroad grant 40-08125-98-16065 to E.d.V.); the Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation for Neurosciences (to E.d.V. and E.v.W.); the Foundation Fighting Blindness USA (grant PPA-0517-0717-RAD to E.v.W.); the Gelderse Blinden Stichting; Stichting Ushersyndroom; and Stichting Klavertje2. SMRT sequencing was done at the Radboudumc Genome Technology Center.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, E.d.V. and E.v.W.; methodology, E.d.V. and J.P.; formal analysis, E.d.V.; investigation, E.d.V., J.P., J.C.M., A.M., J.O., and S.v.d.H.; resources, E.d.V., K.N., R.P., and E.v.W.; writing – original draft, E.d.V.; writing – review & editing, R.P., H.K., and E.W.; supervision, E.d.V., E.v.W., and H.K.

Declaration of interests

A patent has been filed for the AONs described in this manuscript under number PCT/EP2020/080429. E.d.V. and E.v.W. report being employed by Radboudumc and inventor on this patent.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2021.02.033.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (802KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Robertson N.G., Cremers C.W.R.J., Huygen P.L.M., Ikezono T., Krastins B., Kremer H., Kuo S.F., Liberman M.C., Merchant S.N., Miller C.E. Cochlin immunostaining of inner ear pathologic deposits and proteomic analysis in DFNA9 deafness and vestibular dysfunction. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:1071–1085. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bom S.J.H., Kemperman M.H., Huygen P.L.M., Luijendijk M.W.J., Cremers C.W.R.J. Cross-sectional analysis of hearing threshold in relation to age in a large family with cochleovestibular impairment thoroughly genotyped for DFNA9/COCH. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2003;112:280–286. doi: 10.1177/000348940311200316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Belder J., Matthysen S., Claes A.J., Mertens G., Van de Heyning P., Van Rompaey V. Does Otovestibular Loss in the Autosomal Dominant Disorder DFNA9 Have an Impact of on Cognition? A Systematic Review. Front. Neurosci. 2018;11:735. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gallant E., Francey L., Fetting H., Kaur M., Hakonarson H., Clark D., Devoto M., Krantz I.D. Novel COCH mutation in a family with autosomal dominant late onset sensorineural hearing impairment and tinnitus. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2013;34:230–235. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jung J., Yoo J.E., Choe Y.H., Park S.C., Lee H.J., Lee H.J., Noh B., Kim S.H., Kang G.Y., Lee K.M. Cleaved Cochlin Sequesters Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Activates Innate Immunity in the Inner Ear. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:513–525.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nagy I., Trexler M., Patthy L. The second von Willebrand type A domain of cochlin has high affinity for type I, type II and type IV collagens. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:4003–4007. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Kok Y.J., Bom S.J., Brunt T.M., Kemperman M.H., van Beusekom E., van der Velde-Visser S.D., Robertson N.G., Morton C.C., Huygen P.L.M., Verhagen W.I.M. A Pro51Ser mutation in the COCH gene is associated with late onset autosomal dominant progressive sensorineural hearing loss with vestibular defects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999;8:361–366. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.2.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fransen E., Verstreken M., Bom S.J., Lemaire F., Kemperman M.H., De Kok Y.J., Wuyts F.L., Verhagen W.I.M., Huygen P.L.M., McGuirt W.T. A common ancestor for COCH related cochleovestibular (DFNA9) patients in Belgium and The Netherlands bearing the P51S mutation. J. Med. Genet. 2001;38:61–65. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yao J., Py B.F., Zhu H., Bao J., Yuan J. Role of protein misfolding in DFNA9 hearing loss. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:14909–14919. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.106724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jones S.M., Robertson N.G., Given S., Giersch A.B.S., Liberman M.C., Morton C.C. Hearing and vestibular deficits in the Coch(-/-) null mouse model: comparison to the Coch(G88E/G88E) mouse and to DFNA9 hearing and balance disorder. Hear. Res. 2011;272:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.JanssensdeVarebeke S.P.F., Van Camp G., Peeters N., Elinck E., Widdershoven J., Cox T., Deben K., Ketelslagers K., Crins T., Wuyts W. Bi-allelic inactivating variants in the COCH gene cause autosomal recessive prelingual hearing impairment. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2018;26:587–591. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0066-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Crooke S.T. Molecular mechanisms of action of antisense drugs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1489:31–44. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4781(99)00148-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vickers T.A., Crooke S.T. The rates of the major steps in the molecular mechanism of RNase H1-dependent antisense oligonucleotide induced degradation of RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:8955–8963. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vickers T.A., Crooke S.T. Antisense oligonucleotides capable of promoting specific target mRNA reduction via competing RNase H1-dependent and independent mechanisms. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e108625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Southwell A.L., Kordasiewicz H.B., Langbehn D., Skotte N.H., Parsons M.P., Villanueva E.B., Caron N.S., Østergaard M.E., Anderson L.M., Xie Y. Huntingtin suppression restores cognitive function in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10:eaar3959. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar3959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pallan P.S., Egli M. Insights into RNA/DNA hybrid recognition and processing by RNase H from the crystal structure of a non-specific enzyme-dsDNA complex. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:2562–2569. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.16.6461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aartsma-Rus A., van Vliet L., Hirschi M., Janson A.A.M., Heemskerk H., de Winter C.L., de Kimpe S., van Deutekom J.C.T., ’t Hoen P.A.C., van Ommen G.J. Guidelines for antisense oligonucleotide design and insight into splice-modulating mechanisms. Mol. Ther. 2009;17:548–553. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Slijkerman R., Kremer H., van Wijk E. Antisense Oligonucleotide Design and Evaluation of Splice-Modulating Properties Using Cell-Based Assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1828:519–530. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8651-4_34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lima W.F., Crooke S.T. Binding affinity and specificity of Escherichia coli RNase H1: impact on the kinetics of catalysis of antisense oligonucleotide-RNA hybrids. Biochemistry. 1997;36:390–398. doi: 10.1021/bi962230p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bennett C.F., Swayze E.E. RNA targeting therapeutics: molecular mechanisms of antisense oligonucleotides as a therapeutic platform. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010;50:259–293. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.010909.105654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Naessens S., Ruysschaert L., Lefever S., Coppieters F., De Baere E. Antisense Oligonucleotide-Based Downregulation of the G56R Pathogenic Variant Causing NR2E3-Associated Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa. Genes (Basel) 2019;10:363. doi: 10.3390/genes10050363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zaleta-Rivera K., Dainis A., Ribeiro A.J.S., Cordero P., Rubio G., Shang C., Liu J., Finsterbach T., Parikh V.N., Sutton S. Allele-Specific Silencing Ameliorates Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Attributable to a Human Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Mutation. Circulation. 2019;140:765–778. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jiang J., Wakimoto H., Seidman J.G., Seidman C.E. Allele-specific silencing of mutant Myh6 transcripts in mice suppresses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Science. 2013;342:111–114. doi: 10.1126/science.1236921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Southwell A.L., Skotte N.H., Kordasiewicz H.B., Østergaard M.E., Watt A.T., Carroll J.B., Doty C.N., Villanueva E.B., Petoukhov E., Vaid K. In vivo evaluation of candidate allele-specific mutant huntingtin gene silencing antisense oligonucleotides. Mol. Ther. 2014;22:2093–2106. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bae S.-H., Robertson N.G., Cho H.-J., Morton C.C., Jung D.J., Baek J.-I., Choi S.-Y., Lee J., Lee K.-Y., Kim U.-K. Identification of pathogenic mechanisms of COCH mutations, abolished cochlin secretion, and intracellular aggregate formation: genotype-phenotype correlations in DFNA9 deafness and vestibular disorder. Hum. Mutat. 2014;35:1506–1513. doi: 10.1002/humu.22701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eid J., Fehr A., Gray J., Luong K., Lyle J., Otto G., Peluso P., Rank D., Baybayan P., Bettman B. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science. 2009;323:133–138. doi: 10.1126/science.1162986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carroll J.B., Warby S.C., Southwell A.L., Doty C.N., Greenlee S., Skotte N., Hung G., Bennett C.F., Freier S.M., Hayden M.R. Potent and selective antisense oligonucleotides targeting single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the Huntington disease gene / allele-specific silencing of mutant huntingtin. Mol. Ther. 2011;19:2178–2185. doi: 10.1038/mt.2011.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karczewski K.J., Francioli L.C., Tiao G., Cummings B.B., Alföldi J., Wang Q., Collins R.L., Laricchia K.M., Ganna A., Birnbaum D.P. Variation across 141,456 human exomes and genomes reveals the spectrum of loss-of-function intolerance across human protein-coding genes. bioRxiv. 2019;42:531210. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vickers T.A., Koo S., Bennett C.F., Crooke S.T., Dean N.M., Baker B.F. Efficient reduction of target RNAs by small interfering RNA and RNase H-dependent antisense agents. A comparative analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:7108–7118. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210326200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Østergaard M.E., Kumar P., Nichols J., Watt A., Sharma P.K., Nielsen P., Seth P.P. Allele-Selective Inhibition of Mutant Huntingtin with 2-Thio- and C5- Triazolylphenyl-Deoxythymidine-Modified Antisense Oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2015;25:266–274. doi: 10.1089/nat.2015.0547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Smith C.I.E., Zain R. Therapeutic Oligonucleotides: State of the Art. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2019;59:605–630. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lo H.S., Wang Z., Hu Y., Yang H.H., Gere S., Buetow K.H., Lee M.P. Allelic variation in gene expression is common in the human genome. Genome Res. 2003;13:1855–1862. doi: 10.1101/gr.1006603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.JanssensdeVarebeke S., Topsakal V., Van Camp G., Van Rompaey V. A systematic review of hearing and vestibular function in carriers of the Pro51Ser mutation in the COCH gene. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276:1251–1262. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05322-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bischoff A.M.L.C., Huygen P.L.M., Kemperman M.H., Pennings R.J.E., Bom S.J.H., Verhagen W.I.M., Admiraal R.J.C., Kremer H., Cremers C.W.R.J. Vestibular deterioration precedes hearing deterioration in the P51S COCH mutation (DFNA9): an analysis in 74 mutation carriers. Otol. Neurotol. 2005;26:918–925. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185048.84641.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bohnenpoll T., Trowe M.-O., Wojahn I., Taketo M.M., Petry M., Kispert A. Canonical Wnt signaling regulates the proliferative expansion and differentiation of fibrocytes in the murine inner ear. Dev. Biol. 2014;391:54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lentz J.J., Jodelka F.M., Hinrich A.J., McCaffrey K.E., Farris H.E., Spalitta M.J., Bazan N.G., Duelli D.M., Rigo F., Hastings M.L. Rescue of hearing and vestibular function by antisense oligonucleotides in a mouse model of human deafness. Nat. Med. 2013;19:345–350. doi: 10.1038/nm.3106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hastings M.L., Brigande J.V. Fetal gene therapy and pharmacotherapy to treat congenital hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction. Hear. Res. 2020;394:107931. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Delprat B., Boulanger A., Wang J., Beaudoin V., Guitton M.J., Ventéo S., Dechesne C.J., Pujol R., Lavigne-Rebillard M., Puel J.L., Hamel C.P. Downregulation of otospiralin, a novel inner ear protein, causes hair cell degeneration and deafness. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:1718–1725. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01718.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Plontke S.K., Salt A.N. Local drug delivery to the inner ear: Principles, practice, and future challenges. Hear. Res. 2018;368:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chin O.Y., Diaz R.C. State-of-the-art methods in clinical intracochlear drug delivery. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019;27:381–386. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hao J., Li S.K. Inner ear drug delivery: Recent advances, challenges, and perspective. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2019;126:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reuter J.S., Mathews D.H. RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (802KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Articles from Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy

RESOURCES