Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2021 Feb 15;143(7):2676–2681. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c13203

Electronic Relaxation Pathways in Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers Absorbing Near-Infrared Radiation and Exhibiting High Yields of Singlet Oxygen Generation

Luis A Ortiz-Rodríguez 1, Sean J Hoehn 2, Axel Loredo 3, Lushun Wang 4, Han Xiao 5, Carlos E Crespo-Hernández 6,*
PMCID: PMC7985834  NIHMSID: NIHMS1678768  PMID: 33587618

Abstract

Heavy-atom-free photosensitizers (HAF-PSs) based on thionation of carbonyl groups of readily accessible organic compounds are rapidly emerging as a versatile class of molecules. However, their photochemical properties and electronic relaxation mechanisms are currently unknown. Investigating the excited-state dynamics is essential to understand their benefits and limitations and to develop photosensitizers with improved photochemical properties. Herein, the photochemical and electronic-structure properties of two of the most promising HAF-PSs developed to date are revealed. It is shown that excitation of thio-4-(dimethylamino)naphthalamide and thionated Nile Red with near-infrared radiation leads to the efficient population of the triplet manifold through multiple relaxation pathways in hundreds of femtoseconds. The strong singlet–triplet couplings in this family of photosensitizers should enable a broad range of applications, including in photodynamic therapy, photocatalysis, photovoltaics, organic LEDs, and photon up-conversion.


Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved, noninvasive therapy for cancer treatment that relies on the administration of a photosensitizer (PS) and light to the affected area.1-5 Photoactivation of the PS promotes intersystem crossing (ISC) to the triplet state, which can transfer energy to molecular oxygen, generating singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are toxic to the targeted cancer cells and tissues. PDT is more attractive than conventional therapies such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, because it is minimally invasive, has exceptional spatiotemporal selectivity and diminished side effects, and has an overall simplicity among other important considerations.4,6-8 Notwithstanding the significant benefits over traditional therapies, PDT has yet to reach its full potential primarily because optimal PSs, applicable to a wide range of cancers and biological tissues, are difficult to develop. An ideal PS should be easy to synthesize and store,9 has a high molar absorption in the therapeutic window (ca. 600–800 nm),10 high triplet (ΦT) and singlet oxygen (ΦΔ) quantum yields, and low cytotoxicity in the dark, and be cost-effective.5,9,11

One prevalent approach is to incorporate heavy atoms into organic molecules to enhance their ISC efficiency, yet these compounds are often difficult to synthesize, costly, and suffer from increased dark cytotoxicity.12-14 Another approach that is swiftly gaining increased attention is to thionate carbonyl groups of existing organic molecules to red shift and increase their absorption coefficients and increase their ΦT and ΦΔ.5,15-18 Many of these heavy-atom-free PSs (HAF-PSs), offer good biocompatibility, biodegradability, minimal dark cytotoxicity, and structural stability.5,16,18-20 Two highly promising HAF-PSs are thio-4-(dimethylamino)naphthalamide (SDMNP) and thionated Nile Red (SNR).18,21 These HAF-PSs exhibit high near-infrared (NIR) cross sections, high ΦΔ, and good PDT efficacy against monolayer cancer (HeLa) cells and 3D multicellular tumor spheroids.18 However, their photochemical properties are currently unknown, particularly, their electronic relaxation mechanisms upon NIR excitation. Elucidating the relaxation mechanisms of these HAF-PSs is essential for diagnosing their benefits and limitations, and to refine this chemistry.

Figure 1 shows the absorption spectra of SDMNP and SNR in DMSO and MeCN. The spectrum of SDMNP extends to 725 and 750 nm in MeCN and DMSO, respectively, while it extends to 750 and 795 nm for SNR. Both molecules exhibit negligible fluorescence quantum yields (<0.001) and generate high yields of singlet oxygen (81% and 36% for SDMNP and SNR, respectively).18,21

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Absorption spectra of (a) SDMNP and (b) SNR in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and acetonitrile (MeCN). Vertical lines correspond to the calculated electronic transitions and corresponding oscillator strengths at the TD-PBE0/IEFPCM/6-31+G(d,p)//B3LYP/IEFPCM/6-31+G(d,p) in each solvent. Inset: molecular structure of SDMNP and SNR.

Vertical excitation energies (VEEs) were calculated to characterize the accessible electronic transitions for ISC to reactive triplet states upon NIR excitation (see Figure 1 and Tables S1 and S2 for SDMNP and SNR, respectively). The S1 state has nπ* character and negligible oscillator strength in both molecules, which rationalizes their negligible fluorescence yields instead of photoinduced electron transfer,18,21 while the S2 state has ππ* character and is directly populated upon NIR excitation. There are four and three triplet states lower in energy than the S2(ππ*) state in SDMNP and SNR, respectively. Hence, the population reaching the S2(ππ*) state could relax from the Franck–Condon (FC) region through at least five electronic states in SDMNP or through four in SNR. Furthermore, within the expected accuracy of the calculations (±0.3 eV), the S2(ππ*) state is isoenergetic with the S1(nπ*) and the T4(nπ*) states in SDMNP, while the S1(nπ*) state is isoenergetic with the T3(ππ*) state in SNR, suggesting that these states are strongly coupled in the FC region, possibly giving rise to efficient ISC to the triplet manifold.

The spin–orbit coupling constants (SOCs) between the two lowest-energy excited singlet states and the four/three triplet states of SDMNP/SNR were also calculated at three key regions of their potential energy surfaces (PESs): the FC, the S1 minimum, and the S2 minimum (Tables S3 and S4). On the basis of the SOCs and El Sayed’s rules,22,23 S2 → T3 and S1 → T1 are predicted to occur more efficiently in SDMNP, with S2 → T4 playing a smaller role, while S2 → T2, S1 → T1, and S1 → T3 are predicted to occur more efficiently in SNR. The efficiency of these pathways in both molecules is independent of the regions of the PESs or solvent used. The multitude of ISC pathways predicted to play a role is remarkable, confirming the increased density of states upon thionation,24 which can give rise to efficient and near-unity ΦT.

Femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy (fs-TAS) was used to investigate if ISC occurs efficiently and independent of solvent. Figure 2 presents the TAS for SDMNP following 610 nm excitation. Two positive- and two negative-amplitude bands are observed within the pump–probe cross-correlation (Figure 2a,d). The negative-amplitude bands are assigned to S0 depopulation, in agreement with the absorption spectra (Figure 1a). The positive-amplitude bands are assigned to excited-state absorption (ESA) by transient species. One of the bands exhibits a maximum around 340 nm, while the other has a maximum around 460 nm. Both bands reach their maximum intensity around 240 and 350 fs in DMSO and MeCN, respectively. A blue shift of the 460 nm band is observed (Figure 2b,e), while a new absorption band appears simultaneously with a maximum around 680 nm. The positive-amplitude absorption bands decay monotonically during ca. 11 ps to 3 ns in DMSO, or ca. 30 ps to 3 ns in MeCN, while S0 repopulation is simultaneously observed. Representative decay traces, lifetimes, and corresponding evolution-associated difference spectra (EADS) are reported in Figure 3a,b, Table S5, and Figure S1, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

fs-TAS for SDMNP (λexc = 610 nm) in (a)–(c) DMSO and (d)–(f) MeCN solutions. Solvent-stimulated Raman emission bands are observed within the pump–probe cross-correlation around 510 and 520 nm for DMSO and MeCN, respectively. The breaks are covering the scattering of the pump reaching the detectors.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Representative decay traces for SDMNP in (a) DMSO and (b) MeCN and for SNR in (c) DMSO and (d) MeCN. The solid lines are the fittings obtained a kinetic analysis of the transient absorption data (see Methods in the Supporting Information for details).

To assist in the assignment of SDMNP’s transient species, the S2(ππ*), S1(nπ*), and T1(ππ*) states were optimized and their ESAs were calculated (Figure S2). Attempts to optimize the T3(nπ*) state were unsuccessful. The ESA demonstrates that the absorption spectra of both singlet states and the T1(ππ*) state overlap significantly, while the ESA from the singlet excited states are largely blue-shifted relative to that of the T1(ππ*) state. Hence, we assign the 460 nm absorption band to the vibrationally excited T1(ππ*) and/or T3(nπ*) states, with some overlap with the S2(ππ*) and S1(nπ*) states. The 339 nm band has significant overlap from both S1(nπ*) and S2(ππ*) states. A comparison of decay traces at 339 and 460 nm support this assignment (Figure 3a,b). The band between 400 and 525 nm red shifts and grows within the pump–probe cross-correlation (Figures 2a,d and 3). The red shift is assigned to the population of the S2(ππ*) state and ultrafast internal conversion (IC) to the S1(nπ*) state, competing with ISC to the triplet manifold from both singlet states. Indeed, considering El Sayed’s rules, the large SOCs, and the dynamics observed in the TAS, it becomes evident that population of the triplet manifold occurs through two competitive pathways: (1) a direct S2(ππ*) → T3(nπ*) pathway, with subsequent IC to the T1(ππ*) state, and (2) an indirect S2(ππ*) → S1(nπ*) → T1(ππ*) ISC pathway. Remarkably, both pathways are occurring within 580 and 210 fs (τ1) in DMSO and MeCN, respectively. The ultrafast lifetime suggests that the triplet state of SDMNP is populated in high yield, as observed for a wide-range of thiobase derivatives15,16,24-33 and other thionated compounds.34-36

The blue shift observed in Figure 2b,e is assigned to a combination of vibrational cooling (VC) and solvent relaxation (SR) dynamics in the triplet manifold, occurring within 5 ps in DMSO and 50 ps in MeCN. The large ΔE(S1–T1) and ΔE(T3–T1) energy gaps (Table S1) and the observation that τ2 changes significantly with solvent (Table S5) support this assignment. The optimized structures suggest that blue shifting is not due to major conformational changes in the excited states (Figure S3).

The population reaching the triplet state of SDMNP decays within 3 ns in DMSO and 60% slower in MeCN (Figure 2c,f). ISC back to S0 occurs rapidly, suggesting that there is significant SOC between the T1 and S0 states. Triplet decay is not due to triplet self-quenching in the concentration from 75 to 779 μM (Figure S4), suggesting that it is due to an intrinsic process. Fast, hundreds of picoseconds ISC back to S0 has been observed previously for a selenium-substituted DNA base.37 Scheme 1a depicts the proposed relaxation mechanism.

Scheme 1. Proposed Deactivation Mechanism for SDMNP (a) and SNR (b) in DMSO and MeCNa.

Scheme 1.

aThickness of the arrow represents qualitatively the probability of a given pathway (the thicker the arrow, the higher the probability).

Figure 4 presents the TAS for SNR following 674 nm excitation. Positive- and negative-amplitude bands are observed within the pump–probe cross-correlation (Figure 4a,b). The negative-amplitude bands are assigned to S0 depopulation, in agreement with the absorption spectra (Figure 1b). Three positive-amplitude absorption bands are observed with maxima around 405, 450, and 550 nm. A minor absorption band is observed around 330 nm in both solvents, but it strongly overlaps with the S0-depopulation signal. The 550 nm band starts to decay during the initial hundreds of femtoseconds in DMSO (Figure 3b), while the other bands stay relatively unchanged. In MeCN, all bands start to decay during the initial hundreds of femtoseconds (Figure 4f). As the 550 nm band continues to decay and shifts to 570 nm (Figure 4c), the other two bands start to decay as well (Figure 4f,g). Additionally, the 448 nm band blue shifts (Figure 4c, inset). Figure 4d,g shows that the residual transient signal decays monotonically, but not fully within 3 ns. Representative decay traces, lifetimes, and corresponding EADS are reported in Figure 3c,d, Table S5, and Figure S5, respectively.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

fs-TAS for SNR (λexc = 674 nm) in (a)–(d) DMSO and (e)–(g) MeCN solutions. The solvent-stimulated Raman emission band is observed at 555 nm. The breaks are covering the scattering of the pump reaching the detectors.

To assist in the assignment of the SNR’s transient species, the S2(ππ*), S1(nπ*), and T1(ππ*) states were optimized and their ESA spectra calculated. Attempts to optimize the T2(nπ*) and T3(ππ) states were unsuccessful. On the basis of the energy gaps (Table S2), SOCs (Table S5), and calculated ESA spectra (Figure S6), the absorption bands at 330 and 448 nm in Figure 4a,e are assigned to a combination of the S1(nπ*) and S2(ππ*) states, while the bands at 405 and 550–570 nm are assigned to a triplet state (i.e., T2 and/or T3), the vibrationally excited T1(ππ*) state, or a combination of them. This is evident in Figure 3c,d, where the kinetic traces at 448 nm rapidly decay at an early time, following a decay behavior similar to that of the species absorbing at 405 nm. Hence, the complex dynamics observed during the first few picoseconds in Figure 4 correspond to a competition between ultrafast S2(ππ*) → S1(nπ*) IC and ISC from both singlet states to the triplet manifold (i.e., T3, T2, and/or T1). This combination of processes occurs within 500 fs (τ1), independent of solvent. As for SDMNP, VC and SR in the triplet manifold occur within τ2, which is supported by the change of τ2 with solvent (Table S5). The dynamics in Figure 4d,g correspond to the partial decay of the T1(ππ*) state together with S0 repopulation. Scheme 1b depicts the proposed relaxation mechanism.

In this study, the deactivation mechanisms of two promising HAF-PSs18 were elucidated and the primary doorway states leading to ultrafast ISC dynamics were identified. Thionation of carbonyl groups is key to enable the photochemical properties exhibited by these HAF-PSs. VEEs and SOCs for dimethylaminonaphtalamide and Nile Red are reported in Tables S6-S9, which provide full support and strengthen the notion that thionation is a convenient and general strategy to red shift the absorption spectrum, increase the density of states, and the singlet–triplet SOCs of organic compounds, enabling ultrafast ISC, and high ΦT and ΦΔ.5,16,24,32 Besides PDT, HAF-PSs are anticipated to find wide-ranging applications in photocatalysis, photovoltaics, organic LEDs, and photon up-conversion.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

L.A.O.-R., S.J.H., and C.E.C.-H. acknowledge the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CHE-1800052). L.A.O.-R. also acknowledges the NSF-AGEP and the NOA-AGEP program for support. This work made use of the High Performance Computing Resource in the Core Facility for Advanced Research Computing at CWRU. A.L., L.W., and H.X. acknowledge the Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT RR170014), IH (R35-GM133706), the Robert A. Welch Foundation (C-1970), the John S. Dunn Foundation Collaborative Research Award, and the Hamill Innovation Award. H.X. is a Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Scholar in Cancer Research.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/doi/. The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c13203.

Experimental and computational methods; tables and figures with vertical excitation energies and oscillator strengths, spin–orbit coupling constants, EADS and EAS, optimized excited-state geometries, normalized decay curves, lifetimes, and Cartesian coordinates, and discussion of supporting results (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Luis A. Ortiz-Rodríguez, Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States

Sean J. Hoehn, Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.

Axel Loredo, Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.

Lushun Wang, Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.

Han Xiao, Department of Chemistry, Department of Biosciences, and Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States.

Carlos E. Crespo-Hernández, Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Dougherty TJ; Gomer CJ; Henderson BW; Jori G; Kessel D; Korbelik M; Moan J; Peng Q Photodynamics Therapy. J. Natl. Cancer Inst 1998, 90, 889–905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Macdonald IJ; Dougherty TJ Basic principles of photodynamic therapy. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2001, 5, 105–129. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Castano AP; Demidova TN; Hamblin MR Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part one–photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther 2004, 1 (4), 279–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Castano AP; Mroz P; Hamblin MR Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumor immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6 (7), 535–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Ortiz-Rodríguez LA; Crespo-Hernández CE Thionated organic compounds as emerging heavy-atom-free photodynamic therapy agents. Chem. Sic 2020, 11, 11113–11123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Dolmans DEJGJ; Fukumura D; Jain RK Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 380–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Brown SB; Brown EA; Walker I The present and future role of photodynamic therapy in cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5 (8), 497–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Fan W; Huang P; Chen X Overcoming the Achilles’ heel of photodynamic therapy. Chem. Soc. Rev 2016, 45, 6488–6519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Abrahamse H; Hamblin; Michael R New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J 2016, 473 (4), 347–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Agostinis P; Berg K; Cengel KA; Foster TH; Girotti AW; Gollnick SO; Hahn SM; Hamblin MR; Juzeniene A; Kessel D; Korbelik M; Moan J; Mroz P; Nowis D; Piette J; Wilson BC; Golab J Photodynamics therapy of cancer: an update. Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 2011, 61, 250–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Allison RR; Sibata CH Oncologic photodynamic therapy photosensitizers: a clinical review. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther 2010, 7 (2), 61–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Bruijnincx PCA; Sadler PJ Controlling platinum, ruthenium, and osmium reactivity for anticancer drug design. Adv. Inorg. Chem 2009, 61, 1–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Smith NA; Sadler PJ Photoactivatable metal complexes: from theory to applications in biotechnology and medicine. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A 2013, 371, 20120519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Monro S; Colón KL; Yin H; Roque J III; Konda P; Gujar S; Thummel RP; Lilge L; Cameron CG; McFarland SA Transition metal complexes and photodynamic therapy from a tumor-centered approach: challenges, opportunities, and highlights from the development of TLD1433. Chem. Rev 2019, 119 (2), 797–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Pollum M; Jockusch S; Crespo-Hernández CE 2, 4-Dithiothymine as a potent UVA chemotherapeutic agent. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136 (52), 17930–17933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Ashwood B; Pollum M; Crespo-Hernández CE Photochemical and photodynamical properties of sulfUr-substituted nucleic acid bases. Photochem. Photobiol 2019, 95 (1), 33–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Nguyen V-N; Qi S; Kim S; Kwon N; Kim G; Yim Y; Park S; Yoon J An emerging molecular design approach to heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for enhanced photodynamic therapy under hypoxia. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 16243–16248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Tang J; Wang L; Loredo A; Cole C; Xiao H Single-atom replacement as a general approach towards visible-light/near-infrared heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Sci 2020, 11, 6701–6708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Pollum M; Guan L; Ahsanuddin S; Baron E; Lam M; Crespo-Hernández C Photoactivation of sulfur-modified DNA and RNA analogs induces cytotoxicity in epidermoid carcinoma cells. J. Invest. Dermatol 2016, 136, S105. [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Pollum M; Minh L; Jockusch S; Crespo-Hernández CE Dithionated nucleobases as effective photodynamic agent against human epidermoid carcinoma cells. ChemMedChem 2018, 13, 1044–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Tang J; Robichaux MA; Wu K-L; Pei J; Nguyen V-N; Zhou Y; Wensel TG; Xiao H Single-atom fluorescence switch: a general approach toward visible-light-activated dyes for biological imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 14699–14706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Lower SK; El-Sayed MA The triplet state and molecular electronic processes in organic molecules. Chem. Rev 1966, 66, 199–241. [Google Scholar]
  • (23).El-Sayed MA Triplet state. Its radiative and nonradiative properties. Acc. Chem. Res 1968, 1, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Mai S; Pollum M; Martínez-Fernández L; Dunn N; Marquetand P; Corral I; Crespo-Hernández CE; González L The origin of efficient triplet state population in sulfur-substituted nucleobases. Nat. Commun 2016, 7, 13077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Reichardt C; Crespo-Hernández CE Room-temperature phosphorescence of the DNA monomer analogue 4-thiothymidine in aqueous solutions after UVA excitation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2010, 1 (15), 2239–2243. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Reichardt C; Guo C; Crespo-Hernández CE Excited-state dynamics in 6-thioguanosine from the femtosecond to microsecond time scale. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (12), 3263–3270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Pollum M; Martínez-Fernández L; Crespo-Hernández CE, Photochemistry of nucleic acid bases and their thio-and aza-analogues in solution. In Photoinduced Phenomena in Nucleic Acids I; Barbatti M; Borin AC; Ullrich S, Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Vol. 355, pp 245–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Pollum M; Jockusch S; Crespo-Hernández CE Increase in the photoreactivity of uracil derivatives by doubling thionation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2015, 17 (41), 27851–27861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Martínez-Fernández L; Granucci G; Pollum M; Crespo-Hernández C; Persico M; Corral I Decoding the molecular basis for the population mechanism of the triplet phototoxic precursors in UVA light-activated pyrimidine anticancer drugs. Chem. - Eur. J 2017, 23, 2619–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Borrego-Varillas R; Teles-Ferreira DC; Nenov A; Conti I; Ganzer L; Manzoni C; Garavelli M; de Paula AM; Cerullo G Observation of the sub-100 fs population of a dark state in a thiobase mediating intersystem crossing. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 16087–16093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Teles-Ferreira D; Conti I; Borrego-Varillas R; Nenov A; van Stokkum IHM; Ganzer L; Manzoni C; de Paula AM; Cerullo G; Garavelli M A unified experimental/theoretical description of the ultrafast photophysics of single and double thionated uracils. Chem. - Eur. J 2020, 26, 336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Ortiz-Rodríguez LA; Reichardt C; Hoehn SJ; Jockusch S; Crespo-Hernández CE Detection of the thietane precursor in the UVA formation of the DNA 6–4 photoadduct. Nat. Commun 2020, 11, 3599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Ashwood B; Ortiz-Rodríguez LA; Crespo-Hernández CE Photochemical relaxation pathways of S6-methylthioinosine and O6-methylguanosine in solution. Faraday Discuss. 2018, 207, 351–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Tilley AJ; Pensack RD; Lee TS; Djukic B; Scholes GD; Seferos DS Ultrafast triplet formation in thionated perylene diimides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 9996–10004. [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Pollum M; Ashwood B; Jockusch S; Lam M; Crespo-Hernández CE Unintended consequences of expanding the genetic alphabet. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138 (36), 11457–11460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Ashwood B; Jockusch S; Crespo-Hernández CE Photo-reactivity of dTPT3: An unnatural nucleoside for developing semisynthetic organisms. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 2017, 8, 2387–2392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Farrell KM; Brister MM; Pittelkow M; Sølling TI; Crespo-Hernández CE Heavy-atom-substituted nucleobases in photodynamic applications: substitution of sulfur with selenium in 6-thioguanine induces a remarkable increase in the rate of triplet decay in 6-selenoguanine. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 11214–11218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES