Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine. 2020 Jun 20;29:102248. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102248

64Cu-labeled melanin nanoparticles for PET/CT and radionuclide therapy of tumor

Huijun Zhou a,b, Qing Zhang b,c, Yan Cheng b, Lili Xiang d, Guohua Shen a, Xiaoai Wu a, Huawei Cai a, Daifeng Li b,e, Hua Zhu f, Ruiping Zhang g,*, Lin Li a,*, Zhen Cheng b,**
PMCID: PMC7986290  NIHMSID: NIHMS1678551  PMID: 32574686

Abstract

Melanin is a group of natural pigments found in living organism. It can be used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging due to its inherent chelating ability to radioactive cupric ion. This study was to prepare 64Cu-labeled PEGylated melanin nanoparticles (64Cu-PEG-MNPs), and to further take advantage of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of radiolabeled nanoparticles to realize the integration of tumor diagnosis and treatment. We successfully synthesized PEG-MNPs. Saline and serum stability experiments demonstrated good stability. PET/CT showed high tumor aggregation. Moreover, 64Cu-PEG-MNPs resulted in a therapeutic effect on the A431 tumor-bearing mice in the treatment group. The pathological results further confirmed that the therapeutic doses of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs cause pathological changes of tumor tissues while showing minimal toxicity to normal tissues. Our data successfully demonstrate the good imaging performance of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs on A431 tumors and further proved its therapeutic effect, highlighting a great potential in targeted radionuclide therapy.

Keywords: Melanin nanoparticles, 64Cu, PET/CT, Imaging agent, Radionuclide therapy


With high morbidity and mortality, cancer has become a major cause of death and public health problem in China. According to “Cancer Statistics, 2019”, there exist approximately 1,762,450 new cancer cases and 606,880 cancer deaths in the United States in 2019.1 So far, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are still the primary methods of cancer treatment. The goal of cancer therapies is to minimize damage to normal cells while killing tumor cells efficiently. However, traditional chemoradiotherapy damages normal tissues during the process of killing cancer cells.2,3 Therefore, the development of a new type of targeted radiopharmaceutical and treatment method with small dosage, long-term effects, accurate positioning and less side effects, which enables the radiopharmaceutical to be concentrated to the tumor or even inside the tumor cells, has attracted tremendous attention in the field of cancer radionuclide therapy recently.47

The use of radionuclide-labeled compounds for the treatment of tumor, i.e. radionuclide-targeted anti-tumor therapy, has become an attractive treatment and has been actively explored in pre-clinical research and clinical practice. Compared to external irradiation treatment and chemotherapy, targeted radionuclide therapy can specifically deliver radiation dosages to tumor cells with minimum damage to normal tissues and organs. Radioisotopes that emit Auger electrons, α-particles, and β-particles can be used for radionuclide therapy.8,9 Some β particle-emitting radioisotopes such as 90Y, 177Lu, 188Re, 131I, and 64Cu have been studied for tumor-targeted radiotherapy. It has been widely recognized that high-energy β-particle-emitting radioisotopes such as 188Re and 90Y are suitable for treating larger tumors, while medium-low energy emission particles, such as 64Cu, 153Sm, and 177Lu, are more suitable for treating small or metastatic tumors.8,1014

The half-life of 64Cu is 12.7 h, and it emits β+ (0.653 MeV [17.8%]) and β (0.579 MeV [38.4%]) electrons. 64Cu is considered to be suitable for both positron emission tomography (PET) and tumor radionuclide therapy.15,16 It can be easily coordinated with numerous chelators and thus used for radiolabeling various peptides and other biologically related small molecules, monoclonal antibodies, proteins and nanoparticles.1720 The moderate half-life of 64Cu renders it feasible for multiple time point imaging study and also makes it suitable for in vivo studies of small molecules as well as larger, slower-removing proteins and nanoparticles. Based on the above advantages, there have been reports on PET and tumor radionuclide therapy using various types of 64Cu-based molecules in the past two decades. For example, studies have shown that 64CuCl2 PET has a good imaging performance and therapeutic effect on tumors, highlighting the strong potential of 64Cu in the treatment of some tumor types.17

Melanin is a natural pigment widely found in living organisms. It is produced by the oxidation of tyrosine and is often used as a biomarker for the imaging of melanoma.21,22 In our previous research, a type of small size (11 nm), water-soluble melanin nanoparticles (MNPs) was prepared and displayed tumor accumulation property through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect.23,24 It retains many characteristics of melanin and can directly complex with various metal ions without traditional surface modification of chelating agents, which significantly simplifies the preparation process and reduces the heterogeneity of the nanoparticles. MNP has been demonstrated to be used for tumor multimodality imaging, such as photoacoustic imaging (PAI), PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, MNP is an organic and biodegradable material and exhibits good performance in tumor imaging.24 All these properties make MNPs great potential for clinical transformation. The purpose of the current study was to prepare 64Cu-labeled MNPs for PET/CT of tumor and further evaluate its tumor radionuclide therapy effect in the nude mice bearing human epidermoid carcinoma (A431) models.

Methods

Reagents and chemicals

Melanin, amine-PEG5000-amine, sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, and NH4OH solution were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Gibco. The A431 cell line was obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection. 64CuCl2 was purchased from the Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin at Madison. The synthesis of polyethylene glycol modified MNPs (PEG-MNPs) was performed according to previous work.24

64Cu2+ radiolabeling of PEG-MNPs

Briefly, the 1 mg mL−1 polyethylene glycol modified MNPs (PEG-MNPs) in solution as prepared in our previous study24 was radiolabeled with 64Cu2+ by addition of 555 MBq (15 mCi) 64CuCl2 in NaOAc (0.1 N, pH 5.5) buffer followed by a 1 h incubation at 40 °C. The reaction was then terminated by adding 15 μL of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and the radiolabeled nanoparticles, 64Cu-PEG-MNPs, were purified using a PD-10 column.

In vitro radiostability assays

64Cu-PEG-MNPs (200 μCi, 7.4MBq) were mixed with 500 μl FBS and placed at 37 °C, or mixed with 500 μl of saline and incubated at room temperature. Samples were taken at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h. Then the radiochemical purity was determined by radio-thin layer chromatography (TLC) to evaluate its in vitro radiostability with acetone as developing agent for TLC.

In vitro cell assays

A431 cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells/well and grown overnight. Subsequently, 64Cu-PEG-MNPs (~2 μCi [74 kBq]/well) were added and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. Three replicate wells per group and two plates were used. Thereafter, the incubated cells were washed three times with cold PBS solution, and then cells and lysates were collected by the method of trypsinization. The radioactivity of the cells was measured using a gamma counter. The cell uptake value of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs was expressed as percentage of radioactivity bound to the cells divided by the total radioactivity added. All cell binding experiments were repeated three times.

The cellular retention of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs (~2 μCi [74 kBq]/well) was determined by incubating A431 cells in binding media for 2 h. After that, the incubation medium was removed and the cells were gently washed with cold PBS three times. Then to each well culture medium was added and incubated for 4 h. Three replicate wells per group were used. Then at each time point, the incubation PBS was taken, and the cells were collected by trypsinization. The radioactivity of the cells was measured by a gamma counter.

Small-animal PET and biodistribution studies

All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Research Animals as established by the Stanford University Animal Studies Committee. Small animal PET/CT scans were performed on A431 tumor-bearing mice (n = 4) using a Siemens Inveon microPET/CT scanner. Each nude mouse was injected with 11.1 MBq (300 μCi) of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs via tail vein. Inhaled anesthesia was performed on each nude mouse with 2% isoflurane–oxygen gas mixture. Thirty minute static scans were performed at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after the injection. All images were reconstructed by a two-dimensional ordered subsets expectation maximum (OSEM) algorithm with attenuation and scatter correction.

For biodistribution study, A431 tumor-bearing mice were divided into 4 groups and each mouse was injected with 11.1 MBq (300 μCi) of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs. After 2, 4, 8 and 24 h of injection, the nude mice were sacrificed and dissected. Blood, tumor and other major organs (heart, lung, spleen, liver, stomach, kidney, intestine, bone and muscle tissue) were collected and weighed; the radioactivity was measured by the γ counter. The percentage of the injected radioactive dose per gram of tissue (% ID/g) value was calculated and expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Dosimetry studies

The biodistribution of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs was assessed at 2, 4, 8, and 24 h in A431 tumor-bearing mice to evaluate radiation-absorbed doses from 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in tumor and normal organs and tissues according to the literature.25 When estimating the tumor absorbed does, it was assumed that once the radiopharmaceutical is inside the tumor, there is no biological elimination.26 Organ dosimetry was estimated using the OLINDA/EXM software (version 2.0; Hermes Medical Solutions AB).

Radionuclide therapy

A431 tumor-bearing nude mice were used to determine the therapeutic effect of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs. Nude mice with tumor diameters of 5–8 mm were randomly divided into treatment group and control groups. The treatment group (n=6) was injected with ~55.5 MBq (1.21±0.14 mCi) 64Cu-PEG-MNPs through tail vein to observe treatment effect. The other two groups (n=5 per group) were injected with the same amount (0.3 ml) of PBS and PEG-MNP respectively through the tail vein as controls, and the mice body weight and tumor size were measured every two days. Tumor size was calculated by the following formula: volume = short diameter2 × long diameter/2. Nude mice were sacrificed when the tumor diameter exceeded 1.75 cm, or the tumor weight was greater than 10% of body weight, or the tumor was ulcerated, or the animal was dying.

After euthanasia, the liver, kidney and tumor were collected and fixed in 10% formalin. Then the organs of A431 tumor-bearing nude mice were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The liver, kidney and tumor of the mice in the treatment group were observed for pathological differences. Section images were taken using an Olympus IX71 microscope.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism 5.0 software was used. The measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and multiple sets of data were compared. One-way analysis of variance was used.

Results

64Cu radiolabeling and in vitro stability

The radiolabeling process was completed in 1 h. The final product 64Cu-PEG-MNPs were purified by PD-10 column to remove free 64Cu2+, and its radiochemical purity was assessed by radio-TLC, which showed that the radiochemical purity of the labeled nanoparticles was greater than 95% (Figure 1, A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Radiochemical purity of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs was measured by radio-TLC. (B) In vitro radiostability of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in saline at room temperature and FBS at 37 °C for 2, 4, 8 and 24 h.

Radiostability assay showed that 64Cu-PEG-MNPs were stable in saline (the purity was greater than 95.0% at 24 h measured). And its stability was slightly reduced in FBS but there were still about 90.0% labeled nanoparticles at 24 h incubation at 37 °C (Figure 1, B).

Cell uptake and efflux study

Uptake of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs by A431 cells at 0.25 h to 4 h is shown in Figure 2. The maximum uptake value was reached during the 4-h incubation period. The uptake value was 2.72% ± 0.2% for 1 h, 4.91% ± 0.27% for 2 h and 5.78% ± 0.12% for 4 h. 64Cu-PEG-MNPs showed good retention in A431 cells. Even after four hours incubation in PBS, only 4.49% of radioactivity release from the A431 cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Time-dependent cell uptake (A) and efflux (B) of 64Cu-PEG-MNP in A431 cells.

PET and biodistribution

Static PET/CT images of A431 tumor-bearing mice were collected at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after tail vein injection of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs (n = 4). The coronal and transverse images of the delayed acquisition are shown in Figure 3. Tumors were clearly visible at all time points. Also, the imaging study showed high accumulation of 64Cu -PEG-MNPs in the liver, indicating that the main clearance pathway of 64Cu -PEG-MNPs is through the hepatobiliary system.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Representative images of decay corrected coronal (top) and transaxial (bottom) small animal PET/CT images of nude mice bearing A431 tumor at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after tail vein injection of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs (11.1MBq).

In vivo biodistribution study of A431 tumor-bearing mice that injected with 64Cu-PEG-MNPs for 2, 4, 8 and 24 h confirmed the PET results (Table 1, Figure 4). The tumor uptake value of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs was 7.45 ± 0.50, 11.75 ± 0.49, 13.59±0.69 and 5.62 ± 0.52 % ID/g at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after injection, respectively. The liver and spleen had relatively high uptake values (liver’s uptake values were all greater than 10% ID/g at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h and 24 h). In addition, in vivo biodistribution results at 24 h post-injection showed tumor/blood and tumor/muscle ratio of 3.60 ± 0.17 and 15.12 ± 0.62, respectively.

Table 1.

Biodistribution of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in A431 tumor-bearing mice (%ID/g, mean ± SD, n = 4).

Organ 2 h 4 h 8 h 24 h
Blood 18.07±0.05 16.77±0.02 19.65±0.58 2.07±0.04
Tumor 7.45±0.50 11.75±0.49 13.59±0.69 5.62±0.52
Lung 2.64±0.36 3.21±0.31 4.52±0.66 1.61±0.35
Spleen 24.30±0.46 23.01±0.24 25.84±0.01 7.34±0.47
Kidney 19.48±0.40 21.68±0.37 22.36±0.59 5.34±0.32
Heart 9.23±0.61 8.51±0.55 10.55±0.92 3.45±0.61
Stomach 6.64±0.47 9.62±0.47 9.69±0.85 0.53±0.46
Liver 30.97±0.53 33.86±0.34 36.10±0.25 16.24±0.64
Muscle 2.09±0.08 1.28±0.02 1.75±0.68 0.49±0.01
Intestine 12.30±0.40 18.63±0.52 20.38±0.56 3.13±0.28
Bone 5.44±0.05 4.84±0.10 6.08±0.61 1.76±0.09
Tumor/blood 0.31±0.03 0.70±0.03 0.69±0.05 3.60±0.17
Tumor/muscle 2.69±0.14 9.17±0.54 7.77±1.85 15.12±0.62

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Decay-corrected biodistribution of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs at 2, 4, 8 and 24 h post-injection in A431 tumor bearing mice (mean ± SD, n = 4).

Tumor and major organs dosimetry

The primary and secondary critical normal organs were liver and spleen, with absorbed doses of 0.136 mGy/MBq and 0.0358 mGy/MBq, respectively. The data for other target organs are shown in Table 2. The effective dose is 0.0258 mGy/MBq. For the 2 g tumor a spherical model was used (OLINDA/EXM software) and the absorbed dose was 57.5 mGy/MBq.

Table 2.

Radiation absorbed doses from 64Cu-PEG-MNPs.

Organ mSv/MBq
Adrenals 2.81E-02
Brain 2.27E-02
Breasts 2.07E-02
Gallbladder wall 3.33E-02
LLI wall 2.39E-02
Small intestine 2.98E-02
Stomach wall 2.72E-02
ULI wall 2.63E-02
Heart wall 2.87E-02
Kidneys 6.22E-02
Liver 1.36E-01
Lungs 1.59E-02
Muscle 9.33E-03
Ovaries 2.44E-02
Pancreas 2.81E-02
Red marrow 2.91E-02
Osteogenic cells 6.72E-02
Skin 1.88E-02
Spleen 3.58E-02
Thymus 2.18E-02
Thyroid 2.15E-02
Urinary bladder wall 2.35E-02
Uterus 2.47E-02
Total body 2.63E-02
Effective dose(mSv/MBq) 2.58E-02

Extrapolated radiation dose for a 70 kg female model.

Radionuclide therapy

The tumor size and body weight changes curves are shown in Figure 5. The A431 tumor growth rate of the 64Cu-PEG-MNPs treatment group was significantly slower than that of the two control groups (Figures 5, 6). Nude mice initially showed a downward trend in weight and then returned to their original body weight levels after a few days. The H&E staining results of A431 tumor-bearing nude mice showed that there was no significant difference in livers and kidneys between 64Cu-PEG-MNPs treatment group and PBS control group. In addition, pathological change in tumor tissue was found for the 64Cu-PEG-MNPs treatment group (Figure 7). Tumor necrosis cells in the drug administration group were scattered, nuclei disappeared, and chromatin was loose and fuzzy, suggesting tumor necrosis caused by radiation damage.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Tumor growth (A) and weight variation curves (B) of the 64Cu-PEG-MNPs radionuclide therapy group, the PBS treated group, and PEG-MNPs treated group as controls in A431 tumor models.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Color image of tumor samples obtained from different groups (PBS and PEG-MNPs treated control groups and 64Cu-PEG-MNPs treated group at 1 week post-injection)

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

H&E staining of kidneys, livers, tumors from the radionuclide therapy group and the control group.

Discussion

Over the past decades, along with the development of molecular imaging probes, melanin has been used as an effective molecular targeting probe and a primary contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging with its superior light absorption capacity.2729 In addition, melanin has a natural property of chelating various metal ions (including Cu2+)23,3032; therefore, it can be used for chelating radionuclides for imaging. Traditional biomolecular-based nanoplatforms generally require complex chelating functions to incorporate radiometals. MNPs are a bioinspired nanoplatform and easily complex metal ions without surface modification or introduction of chelating groups, making them highly attractive in biomedical applications. In this study, 64Cu was successfully loaded on MNPs without any chelating ligands. And to improve the biocompatibility and the water solubility, and efficiently prevent the formation of metal ion-induced precipitation, polyethylene glycol (PEG) chains were introduced to the MNPs. Moreover, the obtained 64Cu-PEG-MNPs exhibited good radiostability in fetal bovine serum at 37 °C at 4 h. At 8 h and 24 h, 90.3% ± 1.27% and 90.05% ± 1.34% of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs remained intact, respectively, suggesting good in vitro stability of the radiolabeled nanoparticles. However, the stability of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs may not be as high as commercially available macrocyclic Cu complexes, such as Cu-NOTA, Cu-DOTA and Cu-TETA, etc., which are kinetically more inert.33 At present, they are widely used for 64Cu marker imaging. However, due to the limitations of in vivo stability and biosafety of these drugs, these copper chelates have not been used in clinical practice for the time being yet.3436 The 64Cu-PEG-MNPs also exhibited good biocompatibility and exhibited rapid and high tumor uptake, extended tumor retention, and high organ ratios of tumor to normal organ, which are all the preconditions for being radiolabeled therapeutic agents and indicate the MNP therapeutic nanoparticles can accumulate in solid tumors through EPR effect.3739 64Cu-PEG-MNPs exhibited rapid tumor uptake of 7.45±0.50 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g) at 2 h after injection in A431 tumor-bearing nude mice and the tumor was clearly visualized by PET which lasted until 8 h. Although the tumor uptake value of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs dropped to 5.62 ± 0.52%ID/g at 24 h, it still accumulated relatively high enough in tumor. The long-term retention of PEG-MNPs provides a better choice for dynamic observation and radiotherapy for tumor. However, relying solely on the EPR effect cannot slow down the metabolic rate of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs. Active targeting of nanoparticles can further increase accumulation in tumor. The simultaneous use of active and passive targeting will greatly increase the tumor-targeting effect of nanoprobes and provide ideas for further research.

For dosimetry calculation, the OLINDA/MXM was used for specific human models of different weights. Inputting extrapolated data from mice can provide acceptable data for humans. The estimated absorbed dose for a 2 g tumor was 0.057 Gy/MBq with a 55.5 MBq dose injected in the mice and the mean calculated effective dose for the female model was 0.0258 mSv/MBq. Thus the absorbed and effective dose of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in human body can be effectively estimated, and the effective dose is lower than the upper limit of the allowable range.

In addition, we observed high accumulation of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in liver and spleen from PET and in vivo biodistribution results. Since kidney uptake was also seen, it can be concluded that the radiolabeled melanin nanoparticles are cleared through both the hepatobiliary system and kidney-urinary system. This is consistent with the in vivo metabolic distribution characteristics of nanoparticles. Besides, studies have shown that most of the nanoparticles will be deposited in the liver and spleen when the nano-diameter is greater than 6 nm.4042

This study also demonstrated that 64Cu-PEG-MNPs produced therapeutic effects on A431 tumor-bearing nude mice. Treatment with a single dosage of ~55.5 MBq of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs resulted in substantial tumor growth inhibition over the time period of the therapy study. Mice treated with 64Cu-PEG-MNPs developed obvious reaction, such as weight loss during the first week after start of treatment. After a few days, however, the mice returned to normal weight and maintained normal growth patterns. For the control group, most of the tumor diameter reached 1.75 cm, the tumor weight was greater than 10% of body weight, or the tumors were ulcerated on the seventh day, then the monitoring was stopped and the mice were sacrificed. But for treatment group, above-mentioned condition didn’t occur until the thirteenth day. Besides, the potential radiation toxicity caused by 64Cu-PEG-MNPs needs to be considered. It should be pointed out that the high energy Auger electrons emitted by 64Cu may cause damage at the chromosomal and cellular levels, thereby facilitating its application for radionuclide therapy.43,44 The treatment efficacy of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs demonstrated here may be partially caused by this physical property of 64Cu as well. Moreover, radioactive cytotoxicity to normal tissues was not observed based on the H&E staining results of the liver and kidney of the nude mice of the treatment group and the control group. Taken together, these results indicate that the use of a therapeutic dose of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs does not result in significant systemic toxicity in the short term.

Our results suggest that the 64Cu-PEG-MNP is expected to be a promising radiolabeled nanomaterial for tumor theranostics. However, the findings still have some limitations. Optimal administration timing and therapeutic dose of 64Cu-PEG-MNPs were not examined. These issues should be taken into account in future preclinical and clinical studies to achieve a more effective outcome of this therapy. In addition, we chose single human epidermoid carcinoma (A431) tumor-bearing mice model; then the efficacy of the 64Cu-PEG-MNPs in the other types of cancer would be warranted by further studies.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0008397), and NCI of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence Grant CCNE-TR U54 CA119367, CA151459.

Abbreviations:

PET

positron emission tomography

EPR

enhanced permeability and retention

MNPs

melanin nanoparticles

PEG

polyethylene glycol

PBS

phosphate buffered saline

FBS

fetal bovine serum

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

PAI

photoacoustic imaging

DMEM

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin 2019;69(1):7–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Seiwert TY, Salama JK, Vokes EE. The concurrent chemoradiation paradigm—general principles [J]. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007;4(2):86–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wan GY, Liu Y, Chen BW, et al. Recent advances of sonodynamic therapy in cancer treatment [J]. Cancer Biol Med 2016;13(3):325–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mikaeili A, Erfani M, Shafiei M, et al. Development of a (99m)Tc-Labeled CXCR4 antagonist derivative as a new tumor radiotracer [J]. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2018;33(1):17–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kiess AP, Minn I, Vaidyanathan G, et al. (2S)-2-(3-(1-Carboxy-5-(4–211At-astatobenzamido)pentyl)ureido)-pentanedioic acid for PSMA-targeted alpha-particle radiopharmaceutical therapy [J]. J Nucl Med 2016;57(10):1569–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mier W, Kratochwil C, Hassel JC, et al. Radiopharmaceutical therapy of patients with metastasized melanoma with the melanin-binding benzamide 131I-BA52 [J]. J Nucl Med 2014;55(1):9–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Schuchardt C, et al. PSMA-based radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the Bad Berka experience since 2013 [J]. J Nucl Med 2016;57(Suppl 3):97s–104s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miao Y, Owen NK, Fisher DR, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of a 188Re-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide analog in murine and human melanoma-bearing mouse models [J]. J Nucl Med 2005;46 (1):121–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Volkert WA, Goeckeler WF, Ehrhardt GJ, et al. Therapeutic radionuclides: production and decay property considerations [J]. J Nucl Med 1991;32(1):174–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yoshii Y, Matsumoto H, Yoshimoto M, et al. (64)Cu-intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy: a novel approach for adjuvant treatment in a clinically relevant preclinical model of pancreatic cancer [J]. J Nucl Med 2019;60(10):1437–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang J, Kulkarni HR, Singh A, et al. (177)Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with a single functioning kidney [J]. J Nucl Med 2019;60(11):1579–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bandara N, Stott Reynolds TJ, Schehr R, et al. Matched-pair, (86)Y/(90) Y-labeled, bivalent RGD/bombesin antagonist, [RGD-Glu-[DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2], as a potential theranostic agent for prostate cancer [J]. Nucl Med Biol, 2018, 62–63(71–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alavi M, Khajeh-Rahimi F, Yousefnia H, et al. (177)Lu/(153)Smethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonic acid cocktail: a novel palliative treatment for patients with bone metastases [J]. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2019;34(5):280–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pryma DA, Chin BB, Noto RB, et al. Efficacy and safety of high-specific-activity (131)I-MIBG therapy in patients with advanced pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma [J]. J Nucl Med 2019;60 (5):623–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anderson CJ, Ferdani R. Copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging of cancer: advances in preclinical and clinical research [J]. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2009;24(4):379–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bryan JN, Jia F, Mohsin H, et al. Monoclonal antibodies for copper-64 PET dosimetry and radioimmunotherapy [J]. Cancer Biol Ther 2011;11 (12):1001–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Qin C, Liu H, Chen K, et al. Theranostics of malignant melanoma with 64CuCl2 [J]. J Nucl Med 2014;55(5):812–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cheng Z, De Jesus OP, Kramer DJ, et al. 64Cu-labeled affibody molecules for imaging of HER2 expressing tumors [J]. Mol Imaging Bio 2010;12(3):316–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang Q, Zhou H, Chen H, et al. Hierarchically nanostructured hybrid platform for tumor delineation and image-guided surgery via NIR-II fluorescence and PET bimodal imaging [J]. Small 2019;15(45): e1903382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ren Q, Mohri K, Warashina S, et al. Improved immuno-PET imaging of HER2-positive tumors in mice: urokinase injection-triggered clearance enhancement of (64)Cu-trastuzumab [J]. Mol Pharm 2019;16 (3):1065–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Meredith P, Sarna T. The physical and chemical properties of eumelanin [J]. Pigment Cell Res 2006;19(6):572–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bose A, Petsko GA, Eliezer D. Parkinson’s disease and melanoma: co-occurrence and mechanisms [J]. J Park Dis 2018;8(3):385–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hong SH, Sun Y, Tang C, et al. Chelator-free and biocompatible melanin nanoplatform with facile-loading gadolinium and copper-64 for bioimaging [J]. Bioconjug Chem 2017;28(7):1925–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fan Q, Cheng K, Hu X, et al. Transferring biomarker into molecular probe: melanin nanoparticle as a naturally active platform for multimodality imaging [J]. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136(43):15185–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cho SY, Gage KL, Mease RC, et al. Biodistribution, tumor detection, and radiation dosimetry of 18F-DCFBC, a low-molecular-weight inhibitor of prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer [J]. J Nucl Med : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 2012;53(12):1883–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Molina-Trinidad EM, de Murphy CA, Ferro-Flores G, et al. Radio-pharmacokinetic and dosimetric parameters of 188Re-lanreotide in athymic mice with induced human cancer tumors [J]. Int J Pharm 2006;310(1–2):125–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Y, Maslov K, Zhang Y, et al. Fiber-laser-based photoacoustic microscopy and melanoma cell detection [J]. J Biomed Opt 2011;16(1) 011014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Oh JT, Li ML, Zhang HF, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of skin melanoma in vivo by dual-wavelength photoacoustic microscopy [J]. J Biomed Opt 2006;11(3):34032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu JW, Wang YM, Xu L, et al. Melanin-like nanoquencher on graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for tyrosinase activity and inhibitor assay [J]. Anal Chem 2016;88(17):8355–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hong L, Simon JD. Current understanding of the binding sites, capacity, affinity, and biological significance of metals in melanin [J]. J Phys Chem B 2007;111(28):7938–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Samokhvalov A, Liu Y, Simon JD. Characterization of the Fe(III)-binding site in Sepia eumelanin by resonance Raman confocal microspectroscopy [J]. Photochem Photobiol 2004;80:84–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Y, Hong L, Kempf VR, et al. Ion-exchange and adsorption of Fe(III) by Sepia melanin [J]. Pigment Cell Res 2004;17(3):262–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.De Silva RA, Jain S, Lears KA, et al. Copper-64 radiolabeling and biological evaluation of bifunctional chelators for radiopharmaceutical development [J]. Nucl Med Biol 2012;39(8):1099–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu N, Kang CS, Sin I, et al. Promising bifunctional chelators for copper 64-PET imaging: practical (64)Cu radiolabeling and high in vitro and in vivo complex stability [J]. J Biol Inorg Chem 2016;21(2):177–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou Y, Li J, Xu X, et al. (64)Cu-based radiopharmaceuticals in molecular imaging [J]. Technology Cancer Res Treat 2019;181533033819830758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Szymanski P, Fraczek T, Markowicz M, et al. Development of copper based drugs, radiopharmaceuticals and medical materials [J]. Biometals 2012;25(6):1089–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liang XJ, Chen C, Zhao Y, et al. Circumventing tumor resistance to chemotherapy by nanotechnology [J]. Methods Mol Biol 2010;596:467–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Waite CL, Roth CM. Nanoscale drug delivery systems for enhanced drug penetration into solid tumors: current progress and opportunities [J]. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2012;40(1):21–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ngoune R, Peters A, von Elverfeldt D, et al. Accumulating nanoparticles by EPR: a route of no return [J]. J Control Release 2016;238:58–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang YN, Poon W, Tavares AJ, et al. Nanoparticle-liver interactions: cellular uptake and hepatobiliary elimination [J]. J Control Release 2016;240:332–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Seo HJ, Nam SH, Im HJ, et al. Rapid hepatobiliary excretion of micelle-encapsulated/radiolabeled upconverting nanoparticles as an integrated form [J]. Sci Rep 2015;5:15685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Samuelsson E, Shen H, Blanco E, et al. Contribution of Kupffer cells to liposome accumulation in the liver [J]. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 2017;158:356–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gutfilen B, Souza SA, Valentini G. Copper-64: a real theranostic agent [J]. Drug Des Dev Ther 2018;12:3235–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Righi S, Ugolini M, Bottoni G, et al. Biokinetic and dosimetric aspects of (64)CuCl2 in human prostate cancer: possible theranostic implications [J]. EJNMMI Res 2018;8(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES