Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;27(11):3694–3699. doi: 10.1002/chem.202005391

Table 1.

Reaction optimization.[a]

graphic file with name CHEM-27-3694-g005.jpg

Entry

Deviations from above

Yield[b] (3 a) [%]

1

55

2

1 equiv. 1 a, 3 equiv. 2 a

40

3

Pd source: PdCl2/Pd(TFA)2/Pd2(dba)3

trace/24/16

4

K2CO3 instead of Cs2CO3

trace

5

THF instead of PhH solvent

62

6

10 mol % RuPhos instead of Xantphos

3 a: n.d.

4: 63 %

7

10 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 20 mol % Xantphos, THF solvent

83 (81)[c]

8

cyclohexyl bromide instead of 2 a

trace

9

reaction in the dark

no reaction

[a] Reaction conditions: 0.6 mmol 1 a (3 equiv.), 0.2 mmol 2 a (1 equiv.), 0.4 mmol (2 equiv.) Cs2CO3, 5 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % Xantphos were dissolved in 1 mL benzene under argon atmosphere, irradiated with 3 W blue led (470 nm) at room temperature overnight. [b] The yield was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy of the crude reaction. The internal standard was CHBr3. [c] Isolated yield.