Abstract
Objectives To describe the diagnostic and management features of optic nerve gliomas.
Design Literature review.
Results Optic nerve gliomas are generally benign in the pediatric age group although they are usually malignant and aggressive in adults. As such, the mechanisms by which these lesions are diagnosed, the systemic implications, the goals of intervention, and the nature of therapeutic management all differ between these tumors.
Conclusions This article addresses these lesions and discusses the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms by which they may be approached.
Keywords: glioma, optic nerve glioma, malignant optic nerve glioma
Introduction
Gliomas of the optic nerve and visual pathways occur in two distinct forms. In the pediatric population, these neoplasms are generally benign, and may be definitively detected on orbital imaging. Although they may not require intervention at all, medical management remains the standard of care; except in rare circumstances. Surgery is generally not indicated, and recent refinements in the comprehension of the cellular biology of these tumors have resulted in novel therapeutic interventions. Furthermore, well-designed trials have identified meaningful treatment strategies to address pediatric optic nerve gliomas. When these tumors recur, fail to respond, or progress despite appropriate management, emerging treatment protocols offer the promise of enhanced outcomes.
Alternatively, in adults, optic nerve gliomas carry a very poor prognosis. These lesions are rapidly progressive, and survival rates are poor. Surgical intervention is generally required to confirm the diagnosis in this age group. However, well-designed therapeutic protocols have not been developed for this disease, likely due to its rarity. Nonetheless, emerging evidence suggests that the nature of our treatments may have an impact on the duration of survival.
This review intends to carefully define the nature of these tumors and to discuss therapeutic options to address them.
Optic Pathway Gliomas: Pediatric Population
Optic nerve gliomas represent 2 to 5% of central nervous system neoplasms among children. 1 2 3 4 5 Furthermore, these lesions comprise 1% of all intracranial tumors 6 and 7% of all gliomas. 6 7 Seventy percent of optic nerve gliomas are detected within the first decade of life and 90% are identified by the second decade. 7
These tumors may be associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) or may be sporadic. NF-1-related tumors are generally detected at a younger age (mean of 4.5 years) and may be either bilateral or unilateral. 2 In NF-1, reported rates of glioma development have ranged considerably, with incidences ranging from 20% overall to bilateral disease in 35%. 7 8 9 10 11
Alternatively, sporadic optic nerve gliomas are generally detected at a slightly older age, although, when present, they are generally noted in the first decade of life. 2 These lesions carry a greater risk of vision loss. 12 13 14 Specifically, at least 50% of NF-1-associated gliomas are not associated with decreased vision, whereas 66 to 74% of sporadic tumors result in loss of vision and 74% progress radiographically. 7
Histologically, pediatric optic nerve gliomas generally represent low-grade pilocytic astrocytomas, although fibrillary astrocytomas have been reported. 15 Furthermore, proliferation marker analysis indicates that sporadic gliomas demonstrate more aggressive histopathologic features. 16 17
Recent scientific findings have shed light on the cellular biology of optic pathway gliomas. In NF-1, a tumor-suppressor gene that controls cellular proliferation, survival, and differentiation is inactivated. This control mechanism acts through the mitogen-activated kinase (MEK) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. 18 The product of the NF-1 gene (neurofibromin) normally binds to RAS, thereby inactivating it and controlling cellular division; consequently, inactivity of the NF-1 gene results in constitutive activation of RAS and unchecked cellular proliferation. 19 Alternatively, sporadic cases of optic nerve gliomas demonstrate a rearrangement of the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF gene. 7 18 19 20 21 22
At presentation, the majority of optic nerve gliomas are asymptomatic and are thus detected either during screening evaluations or incidentally during imaging that is performed for other purposes. 3 10 23 Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits with and without gadolinium represents the preferred radiographic modality. Optic nerve gliomas are classically tubular or fusiform in nature and appear as isointense on T1 and iso- or hyperintense on T2 images. 2 In the light of the high risk of vision loss associated with biopsy, 24 surgical confirmation is rarely indicated, and the diagnosis may be made on radiographic features alone. 25
The clinical course of optic nerve gliomas is highly variable; many of these tumors may be indolent for several years, whereas other are associated with marked, rapid growth. Ultimately, vision loss is the most critical determinant of the need to treat gliomas. 10 25 26 27 Perimetry may detect progression of vision loss more rapidly and with greater accuracy than simple acuity testing, although this evaluation may be difficult in children.
As such, optical coherence tomography (OCT) represents a powerful modality to assess the health of the optic nerve. Specifically, loss of the retinal nerve fiber layer is directly associated with loss of visual acuity and visual field and growth of the tumor. 28 29 Similarly, stability of the nerve fiber layer thickness on OCT correlates with the absence of vision loss in these patients. 30
Recommendations for screening and repeat imaging are based on a given patient's specific features. Children with a known history of NF-1 and a documented history of an optic nerve glioma should be tested for visual acuity every 3 months for the first year after diagnosis. Assuming stable examinations, these children are advised to then undergo testing every 6 months until the age of 8 years, followed by annual examinations until the age of 18 years. Imaging is recommended every 3 months for the first year, every 6 months for 2 years, and annually for 3 to 5 years. Cases of NF-1 without a history of a glioma should receive an annual examination until the age of 8 years, and should then be assessed every other year until the age of 18 years. 2
Several features correlate with increased tumor aggressiveness and worse visual outcomes. Younger age at diagnosis, sporadic tumors, and optic nerve pallor all represent clinical findings associated with worse prognoses. 26 31 32 33 34 Radiologically, greater degrees of enhancement and tumor extension beyond the chiasm suggest more aggressive oncologic behavior. 7
Visual acuity and loss of vision remain the key features in determining whether or not optic nerve gliomas necessitate treatment. Clinically significant vision loss is conventionally defined as a decrease of 0.2 logMAR in acuity. 10 27 With progressive disease, chemotherapy has solidly emerged as the first-line therapy. Combination therapy consisting of vincristine and carboplatin results in 3- and 5-year rates of progression-free survival of 77 and 69%, respectively. 35 Although this regimen has not been associated with treatment-related mortality, 36 hypersensitivity reactions are quite common. 37 38
Additionally, previous investigations revealed that therapy with thioguanine, procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine (TPCV) yielded outcomes that were similar to those seen with vincristine and carboplastin. 36 However, CCNU and procarbazine are associated with a risk of leukemia, and patients with NF-1 already carry a risk of this malignancy. As such, this regimen may be useful in sporadic cases of gliomas, but should be avoided with NF-1. 25 Cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy yielded a 78% rate of progression-free survival in one study, but this combination carries risks of ototoxicity and secondary leukemia. 39 In cases of refractory and recalcitrant disease, monotherapy regimens that employ temozolomide, vinblastine, and vinorelbine have all demonstrated some evidence of success. 40 41 42 43
Several caveats should be considered in the chemotherapeutic management of optic nerve gliomas. Specifically, clinicians should be aware that the correlation between radiographic appearance and visual function is imperfect. 44 45 46 Additionally, the impact of this intervention on visual acuity may not be profound. In a large-scale investigation, the acuities of 24% of patients with NF-1 improved after chemotherapy, whereas 35% experienced stability and 41% worsened. Among sporadic gliomas, 18% improved, 43% achieved stability, and 39% worsened. 47
Improved comprehension of the cellular features of gliomas and a broader arsenal of chemotherapeutic agents have resulted in new options to treat this disease. Given the role of MEK in the pathogenesis of these tumors, selumetinib, refametinib, trametinib, and cobimetinib have been employed in progressive and recurrent disease, and these agents resulted in 69% progression-free survival. 48
Similarly, agents that target vascular endothelial growth factor may play an important role in the management of gliomas. Improved visual symptoms and a clinical response after bevacizumab treatment has been reported in 86% of patients. 49 A case series of four patients with initial treatment failures documented visual improvement after bevacizumab monotherapy in four patients, 50 and combination therapy of bevacizumab and irinotecan yielded a 47.8% rate of 2-year progression-free survival in patients with recurrent disease. 51
Historically, radiation therapy carried high 10-year rates of progression-free survival, ranging from 90 to 100%. 52 53 54 55 56 Nonetheless, the complications associated with this modality are substantial, and include neurodevelopmental, visual, endocrinologic, neurovascular, and oncologic concerns. 25 As such, radiation is currently reserved for salvage therapy in older patients.
Finally, surgical intervention continues to play a role in the management of optic nerve gliomas. However, the risk of vision loss is substantial with surgical manipulation of the optic nerve. Furthermore, several authors contend that these lesions are unlikely to extend to the chiasm. 25 57 Given the multiple chemotherapeutic options for tumor control, surgery is generally not entertained to limit the growth of these neoplasms or to restore vision. Instead, debulking efforts are attempted to reduce disfiguring proptosis or heal significant exposure keratopathy. As such, these lesions may be approached through a standard lateral orbitotomy.
Malignant Optic Nerve Gliomas: Adult Population
Unlike the relatively less aggressive gliomas that occur in the pediatric population, these neoplasms represent a more nefarious disease. Classically, these tumors arise in middle-aged males who present with rapidly progressive vision loss. The visual deterioration tends to occur over several weeks, and tumor-related death typically occurs within several months of onset. 58
Although pediatric gliomas are associated with a more bland histologic appearance, malignant optic nerve gliomas represent anaplastic astrocytomas (WHO grade III) or glioblastoma multiforme (WHO grade IV). Radiologically, these tumors appear quite similar to their pediatric counterparts, although the amount of contrast enhancement is generally more profound. 59 60 61 Conventionally, biopsy is recommended to rule out other causes of vision loss.
Despite the rarity of this disorder, a recent review analyzed the outcomes among 44 patients. The median age at diagnosis was 62.5 years. The median overall survivals for WHO grades III and IV were 11 and 10 months, respectively, and this difference was not statistically significant. Regardless of intervention, the outcomes were generally poor, although the nature of the treatment impacted the duration of survival. Without therapy, the median survival was 2 months, whereas chemotherapy resulted in a median survival of 4 months, and combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy yielded a median survival of 11 months. Due to the rarity of malignant optic nerve gliomas, well-designed prospective studies and treatment protocols have not been designed. 58
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Note
This study specifically focused upon sporadic OPG outlining their clinical characteristics, visual prognosis, and considerations for follow-up and treatment.
Pearls and Tips.
Whereas biopsy is generally not required in cases of suspected pediatric optic nerve gliomas and the diagnosis may be made on imaging features, surgical confirmation should take place in adult-onset malignant optic nerve gliomas.
In pediatric patients with vision loss from optic nerve gliomas, chemotherapy is the standard of care. Newer agents and regimens offer hope in cases of recalcitrant or recurrent disease.
Surgical debulking is generally reserved for disfiguring proptosis, severe pain, or progressive keratopathy in pediatric cases of optic nerve glioma.
Combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy appear to extend the duration of survival in cases of malignant optic nerve glioma, although outcomes are generally poor.
References
- 1.Avery R A, Fisher M J, Liu G T. Optic pathway gliomas. J Neuroophthalmol. 2011;31(03):269–278. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e31822aef82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beres S J, Avery R A. Optic pathway gliomas secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017;24(02):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beres S J, Avery R A. Optic pathway gliomas secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017;24(02):92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2017.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Czyzyk E, Jóźwiak S, Roszkowski M, Schwartz R A. Optic pathway gliomas in children with and without neurofibromatosis 1. J Child Neurol. 2003;18(07):471–478. doi: 10.1177/08830738030180070401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dolecek T A, Propp J M, Stroup N E, Kruchko C. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. Neuro-oncol. 2012;14 05:v1–v49. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dutton J J. Gliomas of the anterior visual pathway. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;38(05):427–452. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(94)90173-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rasool N, Odel J G, Kazim M. Optic pathway glioma of childhood. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017;28(03):289–295. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.NF France network . Blanchard G, Lafforgue M P, Lion-François L. Systematic MRI in NF1 children under six years of age for the diagnosis of optic pathway gliomas. Study and outcome of a French cohort. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20(02):275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blazo M A, Lewis R A, Chintagumpala M M, Frazier M, McCluggage C, Plon S E. Outcomes of systematic screening for optic pathway tumors in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Am J Med Genet A. 2004;127A(03):224–229. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Listernick R, Charrow J, Greenwald M, Mets M. Natural history of optic pathway tumors in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: a longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 1994;125(01):63–66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(94)70122-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Prada C E, Hufnagel R B, Hummel T R. The use of magnetic resonance imaging screening for optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 2015;167(04):851–8560. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Astrup J. Natural history and clinical management of optic pathway glioma. Br J Neurosurg. 2003;17(04):327–335. doi: 10.1080/02688690310001601216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chateil J F, Soussotte C, Pédespan J M, Brun M, Le Manh C, Diard F. MRI and clinical differences between optic pathway tumours in children with and without neurofibromatosis. Br J Radiol. 2001;74(877):24–31. doi: 10.1259/bjr.74.877.740024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kornreich L, Blaser S, Schwarz M. Optic pathway glioma: correlation of imaging findings with the presence of neurofibromatosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(10):1963–1969. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hoffman H J, Soloniuk D S, Humphreys R P. Management and outcome of low-grade astrocytomas of the midline in children: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(06):964–971. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199312000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bowers D C, Gargan L, Kapur P. Study of the MIB-1 labeling index as a predictor of tumor progression in pilocytic astrocytomas in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(15):2968–2973. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cummings T J, Provenzale J M, Hunter S B. Gliomas of the optic nerve: histological, immunohistochemical (MIB-1 and p53), and MRI analysis. Acta Neuropathol. 2000;99(05):563–570. doi: 10.1007/s004010051161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gutmann D H, Donahoe J, Brown T, James C D, Perry A. Loss of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) gene expression in NF1-associated pilocytic astrocytomas. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2000;26(04):361–367. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lau N, Feldkamp M M, Roncari L. Loss of neurofibromin is associated with activation of RAS/MAPK and PI3-K/AKT signaling in a neurofibromatosis 1 astrocytoma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000;59(09):759–767. doi: 10.1093/jnen/59.9.759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dasgupta B, Yi Y, Chen D Y, Weber J D, Gutmann D H. Proteomic analysis reveals hyperactivation of the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway in neurofibromatosis 1-associated human and mouse brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(07):2755–2760. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jones D T, Kocialkowski S, Liu L. Tandem duplication producing a novel oncogenic BRAF fusion gene defines the majority of pilocytic astrocytomas. Cancer Res. 2008;68(21):8673–8677. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jones D T, Kocialkowski S, Liu L, Pearson D M, Ichimura K, Collins V P. Oncogenic RAF1 rearrangement and a novel BRAF mutation as alternatives to KIAA1549:BRAF fusion in activating the MAPK pathway in pilocytic astrocytoma. Oncogene. 2009;28(20):2119–2123. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Friedman J M, Birch P. An association between optic glioma and other tumours of the central nervous system in neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropediatrics. 1997;28(02):131–132. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Revere K E, Katowitz W R, Katowitz J A, Rorke-Adams L, Fisher M J, Liu G T.Childhood optic nerve glioma: vision loss due to biopsy Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 201733(3S, Suppl 1):S107–S109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Farazdaghi M K, Katowitz W R, Avery R A. Current treatment of optic nerve gliomas. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(05):356–363. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fisher M J, Loguidice M, Gutmann D H. Visual outcomes in children with neurofibromatosis type 1-associated optic pathway glioma following chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Neuro-oncol. 2012;14(06):790–797. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.REiNS International Collaboration Fisher M J, Avery R A, Allen J C.Functional outcome measures for NF1-associated optic pathway glioma clinical trials Neurology 201381(21, Suppl 1):S15–S24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Avery R A, Liu G T, Fisher M J. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(03):542–900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fard M A, Fakhree S, Eshraghi B. Correlation of optical coherence tomography parameters with clinical and radiological progression in patients with symptomatic optic pathway gliomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(10):2429–2436. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2394-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Avery R A, Cnaan A, Schuman J S. Longitudinal change of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in children with optic pathway gliomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(05):944–9520. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Balcer L J, Liu G T, Heller G. Visual loss in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: relation to tumor location by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(04):442–445. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00852-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thiagalingam S, Flaherty M, Billson F, North K. Neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: follow-up of 54 patients. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(03):568–577. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wan M J, Ullrich N J, Manley P E, Kieran M W, Goumnerova L C, Heidary G. Long-term visual outcomes of optic pathway gliomas in pediatric patients without neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neurooncol. 2016;129(01):173–178. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2163-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Segal L, Darvish-Zargar M, Dilenge M E, Ortenberg J, Polomeno R C. Optic pathway gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: follow-up of 44 patients. J AAPOS. 2010;14(02):155–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Packer R J, Ater J, Allen J. Carboplatin and vincristine chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed progressive low-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(05):747–754. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.5.0747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ater J, Holmes E, Zhou T. Abstracts from the thirteenth international symposium on pediatric neuro-oncology: results of COG protocol A9952—a randomized phase 3 study of two chemotherapy regimens for incompletely resected low-grade glioma in young children. Neuro-oncol. 2008;10:451–452. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lafay-Cousin L, Sung L, Carret A S. Carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction in pediatric patients with low-grade glioma: a Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium experience. Cancer. 2008;112(04):892–899. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yu D Y, Dahl G V, Shames R S, Fisher P G. Weekly dosing of carboplatin increases risk of allergy in children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23(06):349–352. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200108000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Massimino M, Spreafico F, Cefalo G. High response rate to cisplatin/etoposide regimen in childhood low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(20):4209–4216. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.08.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gururangan S, Fisher M J, Allen J C. Temozolomide in children with progressive low-grade glioma. Neuro-oncol. 2007;9(02):161–168. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2006-030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bouffet E, Jakacki R, Goldman S. Phase II study of weekly vinblastine in recurrent or refractory pediatric low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1358–1363. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.5843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lassaletta A, Scheinemann K, Zelcer S M. Phase II weekly vinblastine for chemotherapy-naive children with progressive low-grade glioma: a Canadian pediatric brain tumor consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(29):3537–3543. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cappellano A M, Petrilli A S, da Silva N S. Single agent vinorelbine in pediatric patients with progressive optic pathway glioma. J Neurooncol. 2015;121(02):405–412. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1652-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fisher M, Balcer L, Gutmann D . New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2010. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Optic Glioma Visual Outcomes Following Chemotherapy: An International Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fletcher W A, Imes R K, Hoyt W F. Chiasmal gliomas: appearance and long-term changes demonstrated by computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1986;65(02):154–159. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.65.2.0154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moreno L, Bautista F, Ashley S, Duncan C, Zacharoulis S. Does chemotherapy affect the visual outcome in children with optic pathway glioma? A systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(12):2253–2259. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Falzon K, Drimtzias E, Picton S, Simmons I. Visual outcomes after chemotherapy for optic pathway glioma in children with and without neurofibromatosis type 1: results of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Low-Grade Glioma 2004 trial UK cohort. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102(10):1367–1371. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Banerjee A, Jakacki R I, Onar-Thomas A. A phase I trial of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory low-grade glioma: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium (PBTC) study. Neuro-oncol. 2017;19(08):1135–1144. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hwang E I, Jakacki R I, Fisher M J. Long-term efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab-based therapy in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(05):776–782. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Avery R A, Hwang E I, Jakacki R I, Packer R J. Marked recovery of vision in children with optic pathway gliomas treated with bevacizumab. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(01):111–114. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gururangan S, Fangusaro J, Poussaint T Y. Efficacy of bevacizumab plus irinotecan in children with recurrent low-grade gliomas: a Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium study. Neuro-oncol. 2014;16(02):310–317. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/not154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bataini J P, Delanian S, Ponvert D. Chiasmal gliomas: results of irradiation management in 57 patients and review of literature. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(03):615–623. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90678-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cappelli C, Grill J, Raquin M. Long-term follow up of 69 patients treated for optic pathway tumours before the chemotherapy era. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79(04):334–338. doi: 10.1136/adc.79.4.334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Grabenbauer G G, Schuchardt U, Buchfelder M. Radiation therapy of optico-hypothalamic gliomas (OHG): radiographic response, vision and late toxicity. Radiother Oncol. 2000;54(03):239–245. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(00)00149-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Horwich A, Bloom H J. Optic gliomas: radiation therapy and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985;11(06):1067–1079. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jenkin D, Angyalfi S, Becker L. Optic glioma in children: surveillance, resection, or irradiation? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25(02):215–225. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90342-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zeid J L, Charrow J, Sandu M, Goldman S, Listernick R. Orbital optic nerve gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J AAPOS. 2006;10(06):534–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Alireza M, Amelot A, Chauvet D, Terrier L M, Lot G, Bekaert O. Poor prognosis and challenging treatment of optic nerve malignant gliomas: literature review and case report series. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:7510–7.51E8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hoyt W F, Meshel L G, Lessell S, Schatz N J, Suckling R D. Malignant optic glioma of adulthood. Brain. 1973;96(01):121–132. doi: 10.1093/brain/96.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Traber G L, Pangalu A, Neumann M. Malignant optic glioma: the spectrum of disease in a case series. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253(07):1187–1194. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3045-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Miller N R. Primary tumours of the optic nerve and its sheath. Eye (Lond) 2004;18(11):1026–1037. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]