Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Mar 23;11:6661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86177-3

Characterization of the bacterial microbiome of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus collected from Pecari tajacu “Sajino” Madre de Dios, Peru

Jesús Rojas-Jaimes 1,, David Lindo-Seminario 2, Germán Correa-Núñez 3, Benoit Diringer 4
PMCID: PMC7988070  PMID: 33758359

Abstract

Ticks are arthropods that can host and transmit pathogens to wild animals, domestic animals, and even humans. The bacterial microbiome of adult (males and females) and nymph Rhipicephalus microplus ticks collected from a collared peccary, Pecari tajacu, captured in the rural area of Botijón Village in the Amazon region of Madre de Dios, Peru, was evaluated using metagenomics. The Chao1 and Shannon–Weaver analyses indicated greater bacterial richness and diversity in female ticks (GARH; 375–4.15) and nymph ticks (GARN; 332–4.75) compared to that in male ticks (GARM; 215–3.20). Taxonomic analyses identified 185 operational taxonomic units representing 147 bacterial genera. Of the 25 most prevalent genera, Salmonella (17.5%) and Vibrio (15.0%) showed the highest relative abundance followed by several other potentially pathogenic genera, such as Paracoccus (7.8%), Staphylococcus (6.8%), Pseudomonas (6.6%), Corynebacterium (5.0%), Cloacibacterium (3.6%), and Acinetobacter (2.5%). In total, 19.7% of the detected genera are shared by GARH, GARM, and GARN, and they can be considered as the core microbiome of R. microplus. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to characterize the microbiome of ticks collected from P. tajacu and to report the presence of Salmonella and Vibrio in R. microplus. The pathogenic potential and the role of these bacteria in the physiology of R. microplus should be further investigated due to the possible implications for public health and animal health in populations neighboring the habitat of P. tajacu.

Subject terms: Animal migration, Biodiversity, Ecological epidemiology, Ecosystem ecology, Microbial ecology, Molecular ecology

Introduction

Ticks are arthropods that can host a range of pathogens of other organisms and are one of the main vectors for vector-borne diseases1. Babesia sp. and Rickettsia sp. are pathogens frequently transmitted by ticks, whose detection and identification have been facilitated by molecular methods, particularly by the emergence of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques2,3. NGS techniques allow for (i) the precise characterization of the composition of complex microbiomes independent of the traditional culture techniques, (ii) the identification of pathogens, opportunists, probiotics, or commensals for the arthropod and/or host, and (iii) the calculation and comparison of the diversity and richness of microbiomes4. Although commensal and symbiotic bacteria have been identified by metagenomic studies in ticks4,5, these studies have focused on the microbiome with pathogenic potential from the veterinary and human perspective6. The microbiome biology in ticks still remains generally unexplored and neglected, and whether the microbiome has a neutral, harmful, or beneficial effect on the arthropod with regard to nutritional processes, adaptation, development, reproduction, or defense in adverse environments needs to be determined6. Furthermore, previous studies on Ixodes pavlovskyi have described Rickettsia, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and Borrelia burgdorferi as well as their impact on the vector and susceptible hosts6,7. Another study on Dermacentor occidentalis has identified an emerging pathogenic bacterium in humans called Rickettsia philipii as well as two new bunyaviruses8. The microbiome of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus has been characterized in cattle by pyrosequencing techniques9, while the pathogens Anaplasma, Bartonella, Borrelia, Ehrlichia, Francisella, and Rickettsia have been identified in ticks of the genera Amblyomma sp., Ixodes sp., and Haemaphysalis sp.10. Metagenomics has also been used to identify other infectious agents in Rhipicephalus sp., such as viruses, particularly nairoviruses that cause important diseases in humans11.

This study aims to analyze the bacterial microbiome in R. microplus collected from wild Pecari tajacu using metagenomics.

Results

Ticks collected from P. tajacu

Taxonomic identification indicated that all the collected ticks in Madre de Dios (Fig. 1) belong to R. microplus12.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Botijón Village where samples were collected, and San Lorenzo town where cattle farming is practiced. This map was created with the Geoservidor https://geoservidor.minam.gob.pe/ edited with ArcGis 10.3.1 version 2015.

Statistical values and diversity in the R. microplus microbiome

Microbiome analysis using the 16s-515F/16s-806R primers and amplicon sequencing on Ion Torrent PGM (Ion Personal Genome Machine System, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC) generated a total of 117,192 raw reads (39,604 average) from the three analyzed samples1315 (Table 1). After rigorous data curation, 55,805 high-quality sequences were retained with an average of 20,462 sequences per sample and an average length of 150 bp16,17. The maximum number of filtered sequences (26,549) was obtained from the female tick sample, which exceeded those found in male and nymph samples by 164.7% and 204.8%, respectively18. These sequences were assigned to 1075 total unique sequences corresponding to 185 abundant (< 0.005%) OTUs based on a > 97% identity cutoff for bacterial 16S rRNA genes18. At the individual sample level, the microbiome from nymphs surpassed that from females and males (221, 195, and 148 OTUs, respectively). Those OTUs were mainly identified as prokaryotes (99.89%) and to a lesser extent as unknown sequences (0.11%). At the taxonomic level, a total of 147 genera distributed in 99 families, 59 orders, 30 classes, and 12 phyla were detected.

Table 1.

Statistical summary of the microbiota from Rhipicephalus microplus.

Sample size GARH GARM GARN
Number of total sequences 56,059 32,524 28,609
Number of filtered sequences 29,084 18,103 14,200
Number of sequences assigned to OTUs 26,549 14,045 14,145
Number of OTUs 221 148 195
Phylum 10 6 9
Class 19 15 15
Order 43 29 34
Family 62 41 55
Genus 87 57 82
Richness and diversity indexes
Chao1 375* 215* 332*
Shannon–Weaver 4.15* 3.20* 4.75*

*Significant differences (P < 0.01).

The SW index reflects the specific diversity of each sample, whose value increases as the number of different OTUs increases. In this study, the microbiome obtained from nymph tick samples showed a higher SW index than the female and male microbiomes. On the other hand, Chao1, the index that evaluates specific richness, showed that the number of expected OTUs decreased from 375 in GARH to 332 in GARN and 215 in GARM after the standardization of the sample size to 14,000 sequences. Statistical analyses of variance of the SW and Chao1 indexes in the GARH, GARM, and GARN samples showed significant differences (P < 0.01)1921.

Composition of the core and shared and individual microbiome from R. microplus

The comparative analysis of the composition of the microbiota from GARH, GARM, and GARN revealed that 19.7% out of the 147 genera found in R. microplus were common to the three groups. This shared community is considered as the core microbiota (Table 2). The percentages showed a decreasing proportionality in GARH, GARN, and GARM in relation to the non-shared bacterial genera. A higher percentage of shared microbiota was observed between GARH and GARN (9.5%) compared to that between GARM and GARH (3.4%) and between GARM and GARN (1.4%).

Table 2.

Composition of the core microbiome according to R. microplus sex and stage.

Codes Total Genera
GARH GARM GARN 29 (19.7%) Streptococcus Brevundimonas Micrococcus Pseudomonas Corynebacterium Acinetobacter Staphylococcus Brachybacterium Ornithinimicrobium Lysobacter Brevibacillus Stenotrophomonas Other Bacillus Citrobacter Pluralibacter Janibacter Sphingomonas Salmonella Rothia Tepidimonas uncultured bacterium Nocardioides Paracoccus Aeromonas Vibrio Enterobacter Cloacibacterium Anoxybacillus
GARH GARM 5 (3.4%) Trabulsiella Schlegelella Anaerococcus Actinomyces Neisseria
GARH GARN 14 (9.5%) Blastococcus Sphingobacterium uncultured Comamonas Halomonas Dietzia Cupriavidus Tetrasphaera Granulicatella Thermus Deinococcus Kocuria Unassigned Rheinheimera
GARM GARN 2 (1.4%) Brachymonas Lactococcus
GARH 39 (26.5%) Phreatobacter Lawsonella Ruegeria Alteromonas Saccharopolyspora Bergeyella Enhydrobacter Prevotella Pseudorhodoferax Solobacterium Hydrogenobacter Morganella Gibbsiella Salinimicrobium Haematobacter Chryseobacterium uncultured Gemmatimonadetes bacterium Paenibacillus Gemella Cellvibrio Aquabacterium Abiotrophia Thiopseudomonas Craurococcus Peptoniphilus Myroides Bacteroides Shewanella Chroococcidiopsis Macrococcus Ensifer Gordonia Plesiomonas Salinicoccus Alishewanella Porphyromonas Fructobacillus Pantoea Lactobacillus
GARM 21 (14.3%) Vulcaniibacterium Roseomonas Eikenella Enteractinococcus Mycobacterium Enterococcus Ilumatobacter Propioniciclava Hydrogenophilus Rubrobacter Peredibacter Georgenia Veillonella Thauera Chryseomicrobium Gemmatimonas Propionibacterium Diaphorobacter Cnuella Asticcacaulis Domibacillus
GARN 37 (25.2%) Ochrobactrum Atopostipes Marinilactibacillus Alkalibacterium Paramesorhizobium Psychrobacter Ralstonia Sphingorhabdus Quadrisphaera Sphingobium Ottowia Exiguobacterium Brevibacterium Haemophilus Aerococcus Bradyrhizobium Luteimonas Flavobacterium Nannocystis Ruminococcus Novosphingobium Aeromicrobium Rubellimicrobium Acidovorax Pleomorphomonas Erythrobacter Sandaracinus Bordetella Serinicoccus Weissella Gardnerella Candidatus Alysiosphaera Klebsiella Leptotrichia Actinobacillus Isoptericola Atopococcus

Microbiota according to R. microplus sex and stage

Regarding the abundance of bacterial genera in R. microplus, Salmonella was the most abundant genus in GARM, while Vibrio was the most abundant genus in GARH and GARN, and Paracoccus was the second most abundant genus in GARH. On average, these were the most abundant genera in R. microplus, 17.5%, 15%, and 7.8%, respectively (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microbiome abundance according to R. microplus stage and sex. (Rstudio version 3.2.3. https://cran.rstudio.com/bin/windows/base/old/3.2.3/).

Discussion

The richness and diversity indexes revealed that the microbiota present in GARH and GARN exhibit greater bacterial genera diversity and richness than the microbiota in GARM. This is in agreement with previous studies on R. microplus that were collected from cattle9. Previous studies in male and female ticks of Ixodes ovatus, I. persulcatus, and Amblyomma variegatum have shown differentiated microbiome profiles both at the taxonomic and functional levels between sexes of the same tick species22.

A metagenomic study showed that the microbiome profile in ticks is related to metabolic processes and that their resilience and adaptability to the environment is related to their sex22. In addition, geographical location, temperature, humidity, species, sex, anatomical location, and type of diet have been shown to affect the microbiome of ticks2328. In our study, although ticks were of the same species and were collected from the same host, significant differences were found in bacterial diversity and richness related to the sex and developmental stage of ticks.

Among the 147 different genera identified, the core microbiome that included the majority of the most prevalent genera stood out. Several of the identified genera within the core microbiome are known to be human pathogens (i.e., Salmonella, Vibrio, Paracoccus, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Corynebacterium, Cloacibacterium, and Acinetobacter). In addition, a greater bacterial microbiome was shared between nymph and female ticks [14 (9.5%)] compared to that shared between male and female ticks [5 (3.4%)]. We suggest that these differences have a behavioral origin. Thus, female and nymph ticks are more prone to remain on the same host, whose microbiota impact on the tick gut microbiome, while male ticks frequently change hosts22. This hypothesis is supported by studies on other genera that reported higher relative abundance and alpha diversity in female ticks than in male ticks22. Additionally, it is necessary to consider that the role of nuclei bacterial genera and the species included in these may present different roles as pathogens or symbionts depending on whether they are found in the arthropod or in the vertebrate that hosts the arthropod.

The most prevalent genus among the three groups of ticks was identified as Salmonella, whose members cause gastrointestinal tract infection and dysentery and can lead to serious clinical conditions, especially in children29. The genus Vibrio, the second in abundance (15.6%), represents a finding of great interest as, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study showing its presence in R. microplus. The genus Vibrio is a common commensal of aquatic arthropods and has a remarkable capacity for adaptation to the environment30,31. Its presence evinces the adaptation of this genus to the gastrointestinal system of R. microplus, which inhabits a jungle ecosystem. Many Vibrio are opportunistic pathogens of both arthropods and humans. Therefore, studying the virulence of the identified species is essential3032. Paracoccus, the third most abundant genus (6.97%), is a coccobacillary bacterium that is typically present in a wide range of ecosystems33. Staphylococcus, with a prevalence of 6.63%, is mainly related to infections in soft tissues and has been previously reported in the gut of R. microplus and with a high prevalence in female Amblyomma variegatum9,22. Pseudomonas showed an abundance of 5.87% in R. microplus. In previous studies, the presence of this bacterial genus in R. microplus and in male Amblyomma variegatum with a high prevalence has been reported9,22. Pseudomonas has been suggested to be involved in the infection of soft tissues, including the tissues of the respiratory system34,35. The presence of Corynebacterium, with an abundance of 5.87%, is important because some Corynebacterium species produce the diphtheria toxin or can cause osteomyelitis36. In addition, this genus has been previously identified in eggs and male adults of R. microplus9. Cloacibacterium, with a prevalence of 2.93% in R. microplus, are gram-negative bacteria that proliferate in aqueous environments with high content of organic matter37. Acinetobacter, with an abundance of 2.53%, has been reported in a metagenomic study in I. persulcatus, I. pavlovskyi, and Dermacentor reticulatus38. Sphingomonas, the ninth most abundant genus (2.47%), includes non-fermenting and strictly aerobic gram-negative bacteria. Some species, such as S. paucimobilis and S. wittichii, can cause infections in immunocompromised patients39,40.

In contrast to the bacterial microbiome relevant to human health identified in our study, a previous study on bacterial diversity in R. microplus collected from cattle identified Ehrlichia sp., Coxiella sp., and Bartonella sp.41. This indicates that the bacterial microbiome would also depend on the host parasitized by the ticks. Some bacteria, such as Leptospira interrogans, Mycobacterium, Salmonella, Clostridium, and Pasteurella, and tick genera, such as Haemaphysalis, Dermacentor, and Amblyoma, have been identified in the genus Pecari4244. In our case, R. microplus, a tick that mainly parasitizes cattle45, was found in P. tajacu (sajino). P. tajacu was possibly tick infected due to the proximity of Botijón Village, where livestock farming is practiced. This highlights that ticks can infect cattle, P. tajacu, and humans, with the potential risks of pathogen transmission that this implies.

Regarding the role of bacteria in ticks, note that nonpathogenic microorganisms present in ticks could cause infections in humans and other animals. For example, ecological studies have shown that Rickettsia, Francisella, and Coxiella, which are considered vertebrate pathogens, can change their pathogenic role and have a mutualistic and symbiotic relationship with ticks1. Therefore, studying the interaction between the bacterial microbiota and ticks is of utmost importance for the control of pathogens and the development of the arthropod1. Coxiella sp. infects at least two-third of the ticks and is important for the survival of Amblyomma americanum and Rhipicephalus sp.46,47. Nonetheless, it has not been found in our study. Coxiella sp. and Francisella sp. are linked to the synthesis of vitamins necessary for the survival of ticks4850. Likewise, other symbiotic bacteria, such as Francisella, Rickettsia, and Rickettsiella, have been reported46, with Rickettsia sp. and Coxiella sp. having become strict endosymbionts1. According to previous studies, the endosymbiont bacteria of a species of tick vary depending on the ecology and the number of ticks studied, for example, although in the case of Coxiella it was previously described R. microplus collected from cattle, previous studies that have demonstrated that the infection rates by Coxiella in R. microplus ticks are highly variable. A 2016 study evaluated R. microplus from Brazil, and found that only approximately 37% of the samples contained Coxiella 51. In 2015 a study evaluated Coxiella in many species of ticks without finding the bacteria, one of the species of ticks evaluated was 3 R. microplus samples from Benin (west Africa) and did not find any Coxiella 52. Therefore, the importance of our study is the finding of the new microbiome of R. microplus collected from Pecari tajacu.

The small number of ticks was justified by the fact that R. microplus ticks are not very common on the wild host Pecari tajacu; therefore, we could not collect a larger sample of ticks. On the other hand, we found interesting to test these ticks because We wanted to search for the microbiota of an exotic tick (R. microplus) infesting a mammal species native to the Amazonia (Pecari tajacu). Again, even though our sample was small, we have to highlight the interesting results We have found from these ticks.

Among the limitations of our study is the bacterial microbiome found in 5 females, 5 males and 2 nymphs of ticks collected from P. tajacu, which implies a bacterial microbiome representative of a specific circumstance and ecology. Therefore, studies with a greater number of samples could show a greater diversity of species and different percentages of bacterial abundance.

Conclusion

In this study, we found a high bacterial diversity in female, male, and nymph R. microplus collected from P. tajacu. The greatest bacterial diversity and richness was found in females and nymph ticks compared to male ticks. The most frequent bacterial genera were Salmonella, Vibrio, and Paracoccus. This is the first bacterial metagenomic study performed in R. microplus collected from P. tajacu in the Peruvian jungle, and the presence of Vibrio is highlighted. This study lays the foundations for future studies on the importance of the role of the identified bacteria on arthropods and animal and human health.

Material and methods

Ethical aspects

This study was approved by the Oficina de Salud Pública y Medio Ambiente del Consejo Regional de Madre de Dios (Office of Public Health and Environment of the Regional Council Madre de Dios), Peru. Laboratory procedures for bacterial identification were conducted in accordance with the international guidelines for the use of animals in research and the standards of the Comité de Cuidado y Uso de Animales del Área de Investigación en Salud de la Junta del Consejo Regional de Madre de Dios (Animal Care and Use Committee of the Health Research Area of the Madre de Dios Regional Council Board). The study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

Geographic location

The study was conducted in the outskirts of Botijón Village (12° 07ʹ 12.95ʺ S, 69° 04ʹ 31.47ʺ W; WGS 84, 267 m.a.s.l.), Tambopata province, Madre de Dios region, Peru (Fig. 1). The collection site corresponds to a forest area where hunting of wild animals is allowed. The average annual rainfall in the study area is 1600 mm3, and the average annual temperature is 25 °C. The area is in the tropical wet forest zone. During sample collection, the weather was hot and humid.

Sample collection

A wild male of P. tajacu (sajino) was captured in Botijón Village in June 2012. The ticks from its abdominal region were collected 3 h after its sacrifice using forceps and were individually placed in 2 ml cryovials containing 96% ethyl alcohol. Cryovials were labeled with an identification code for the sampling site and the animal from which the sample was collected. Five male ticks, five female ticks, and two nymph ticks were identified. On sterile plates ticks were washed for 15 min in a solution 0.9% isotonic sterile sodium chloride saline followed by 15 min in a solution of 96% ethanol to remove surface contaminants. Excess solution was absorbed and ticks were air-dried prior to manipulation under sterile conditions. Each tick was individually cut in half lengthwise using sterile scalpels number 15.

Taxonomic classification

Ticks were identified using taxonomic keys12 at the Laboratorio de Entomología del Instituto Nacional de Salud del Perú en Lima (Entomology Laboratory of the National Institute of Health of Peru in Lima).

DNA extraction

Total DNA extraction from ticks was performed using Gentra Puregene Tissue kits (QIAGEN, Halden-Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions13 from pools for each tick sex and stage, i.e., GARH (females), GARM (males), and GARN (nymphs) pools.

Metagenomics

To study the bacterial diversity and richness in the microbiota from Rhipicephalus microplus, the presence and quality of the extracted DNA was verified by PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene14 using the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTAGTCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) that generate a product of about 1500 base pairs (bp). All reactions were performed in 25 μl (total volume) mixtures containing 2.5 μl 10× buffer, 2.5 μl 25 mM MgCl2, 0.6 μl 10 mM dNTPs, and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (THERMO SCIENTIFIC). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, hybridization at 55 °C for 45 s, elongation at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were visualized by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel.

Total DNA extractions were analyzed by spectrophotometry (NANODROP EPPENDORF), and the samples with sufficient quality and quantity were shipped to MR DNA (Shallowater, TX, USA) and sequenced on the PGMplatform (Ion Personal Genome Machine System, THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC). Metagenomic analysis was performed on the PCR amplification products of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene using the 515F/806R primers15.

Analysis and processing of metagenomic data

The sequences generated by Ion Torrent were analyzed with QIIME v1.9.115, where the initial sequences were processed based on filtering of barcodes ≤ 6 bp, Q25 quality scores, 150 bp sequence length, and chimera detection using usearch6116,17. High-quality sequences were assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with a 97% identity cutoff for bacteria. The final OTUs were classified taxonomically using the High Quality Ribosomal RNA Databases “SILVA” v132 database (https://www.arb-silva.de/). Likewise, unrepresentative OTUs ≤ 0.005% were filtered during analysis18.

Lastly, the final OTUs were processed to analyze the Shannon–Weaver (SW) alpha diversity index, Chao1 richness index, beta diversity (venn and heatmap), and taxonomic abundance (barplot) of the microbial communities using the phyloseq and ampvis packages with the statistical program RStudio version 3.2.3.16,19,20. Sequences shorter than 250 bp were removed. The obtained OTUs were then taxonomically classified using BLASTn and compared with a curated database derived from Greengenes, RPDII, and NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov21, http://rdp.cme.msu.edu15). The sequences were registered in Metagenomics Analysis Server “MG-RAST” ID: mgp95793; available at https://www.mg-rast.org/linkin.cgi?project=mgp95793.

Acknowledgements

Marcelo B. Labruna of the Departamento de Medicina Veterinaria Preventiva y Salud Animal Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia of the Universidad de São Paulo for his advice and review of this article; Dr. Eric MiaIhe for funding the molecular studies; Cesar Chanta for his support in the laboratory procedures in Incabiotec SAC.

Abbreviations

GARH

Female tick

GARM

Male tick

GARN

Nymph tick

m.a.s.l.

Meters above sea level

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

SW

Shannon–Weaver

OTU

Operational taxonomic units

PGM

Ion personal genome machine system

NGS

Next-generation sequencing

RNA

Ribosomal RNA

WGS

World geodetic system

SW

Shannon–Weaver

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

pb

Base pairs

Author contributions

J.R.J. designed, performed the field work, and wrote and approved the final version of the article. G.C.N. performed the field work and wrote and approved the final version of the article. D.L.S. performed the analysis and bioinformatics study and approved the final version of the article. B.D. designed the molecular study and wrote and approved the final version of the article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bonnet SI, Binetruy F, Hernández-Jarguín AM, Duron O. The tick microbiome: Why non-pathogenic microorganisms matter in tick biology and pathogen transmission. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:236. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burgdorfer W, Hayes S, Mavros A. Non-pathogenic rickettsiae in Dermacentor andersoni: A limiting factor for the distribution of Rickettsia rickettsii. In: Burgdorfer AA, Anacker RL, editors. Rickettsia and Rickettsial Disease. Academic; 1981. pp. 585–594. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chauvin A, Moreau E, Bonnet S, Plantard O, Malandrin L. Babesia and its hosts: Adaptation to long-lasting interactions as a way to achieve efficient transmission. Vet. Res. 2009;40:37. doi: 10.1051/vetres/2009020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ravi A, et al. Metagenomic profiling of ticks: Identification of novel rickettsial genomes and detection of tick-borne canine parvovirus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13(1):1–19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Greay TL, Gofton AW, Paparini A, Ryan UM, Oskam CL, Irwin PJ. Recent insights into the tick microbiome gained through next-generation sequencing. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2573-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rar V, et al. Detection and genetic characterization of a wide range of infectious agents in Ixodes pavlovskyi ticks in Western Siberia, Russia. Parasites Vectors. 2017;10(1):1–24. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2186-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Filippova NA. Ixodid Ticks of the Subfamily Ixodinae. Publishing House Nauka; 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bouquet J, Melgar M, Swei A, Delwart E, Lane RS, Chiu CY. Metagenomic-based surveillance of pacific coast tick dermacentor occidentalis identifies two novel bunyaviruses and an emerging human Ricksettsial pathogen. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12047-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Andreotti R, De León AAP, Dowd SE, Guerrero FD, Bendele KG, Scoles GA. Assessment of bacterial diversity in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus through tag-encoded pyrosequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(6):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nakao R, et al. A novel approach, based on BLSOMs (batch learning self-organizing maps), to the microbiome analysis of ticks. ISME J. 2013;7(5):1003–1015. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xia H, et al. Metagenomic profile of the viral communities in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks from Yunnan, China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barros-Battesti D, Arzua M, Bechara H. Carrapato de Importância Medico-Veterinaria da Região Neotropical: Um Guia Ilustrado para Identificação de Espécies (Ticks of Medical-Veterinary Importance in the Neotropical Region: An Illustrated Guide for Species Identification). 10ma edição. Butantan Publicação; 2006. p. 223. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.QIAGEN. Gentra, Puregene (QIAGEN GROUP), 2007–2010 (accessed 9 June 2017); https://www.qiagen.com/us/shop/sample-technologies/dna/genomic-dna/gentra-puregene-tissue-kit/#orderinginformation.
  • 14.Sperling JL, et al. Comparison of bacterial 16S rRNA variable regions for microbiome surveys of ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8:453–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caporaso JG, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108(Supplement 1):4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16):2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Glassing A, Dowd SE, Galandiuk S, Davis B, Jorden JR, Chiodini RJ. Changes in 16S RNA gene microbial community profiling by concentration of prokaryotic DNA. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2015;119:239242. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, Knight R, Caporaso JG. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods. 2013;10(1):57–59. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Andersen KS, Kirkegaard RH, Karst SM, Albertsen M. ampvis2: An R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data. BioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1101/299537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.DeSantis TZ, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Obregón D, Bard E, Abrial D, Estrada-Peña A, Cabezas-Cruz A. Sex-specific linkages between taxonomic and functional profiles of tick gut microbiomes. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:298. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qiu Y, Nakao R, Ohnuma A, Kawamori F, Sugimoto C. Microbial population analysis of the salivary glands of ticks; a possible strategy for the surveillance of bacterial pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e103961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Treuren W, et al. Variation in the microbiota of Ixodes ticks with regard to geography, species, and sex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:6200–6209. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01562-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carpi G, et al. Metagenomic profile of the bacterial communities associated with Ixodes ricinus ticks. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e25604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang X-C, Yang Z-N, Lu B, Ma X-F, Zhang C-X. The composition and transmission of microbiome in hard tick, Ixodes persulcatus, during blood meal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014;5:864–870. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Menchaca AC, et al. Preliminary assessment of microbiome changes following blood-feeding and survivorship in the Amblyomma americanum nymph-to-adult transition using semiconductor sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Clayton KA, Gall CA, Mason KL, Scoles GA, Brayton KA. The characterization and manipulation of the bacterial microbiome of the Rocky Mountain wood tick, Dermacentor andersoni. Parasites Vectors. 2018;8:1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1245-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015;1:901–937. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jesser KJ, Noble RT. Vibrio ecology in the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, characterized by next-generation amplicon sequencing of the gene encoding heat shock protein 60 (hsp60) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018;84:1–21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00333-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Payne SM, Mey AR, Wyckoff EE. Vibrio iron transport: Evolutionary adaptation to life in multiple environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016;80:69–90. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00046-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boyd EF, et al. Post genomic analysis of the evolutionary history and innovations of the family Vibrionaceae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015;3(5):1–43. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.VE-0009-2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maj A, et al. Plasmids of carotenoid-producing Paracoccus spp. (Alphaproteobacteria)—Structure, diversity and evolution. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):1–27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patro LPP, Rathinavelan T. Targeting the sugary armor of Klebsiella species. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019;9:1–23. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Folkesson A, Jelsbak L, Yang L, Johansen HK, Ciofu O, Hoiby N, Molin S. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;10:841–851. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wong JSJ, et al. Corynebacterium accolens-associated pelvic osteomyelitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010;48(2):654–655. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00818-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gay NR, Fleming E, Oh J. Draft genome sequence of Cloacibacterium normanense NRS-1 isolated from municipal wastewater. Genome Announc. 2016;4(6):1–2. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01397-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kurilshikov A, et al. Comparative metagenomic profiling of symbiotic bacterial communities associated with ixodes persulcatus, ixodes pavlovskyi and dermacentor reticulatus ticks. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martínez MA. Retrato microbiológico. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2011;44(1):289–295. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moreno-Forero SK, Van-Der-Meer JR. Genome-wide analysis of Sphingomonas wittichii RW1 behaviour during inoculation and growth in contaminated sand. ISME J. 2015;9(1):150–165. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Giron, S. Diversidad bacteriana de la garrapata Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus en el ganado bovino del estado de Tamaulipas (Bacterial diversity of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus tick in cattle of the state of Tamaulipas). (2015). [Thesis]. Thesis to obtain the title of Master of Science in Genomic Biotechnology viable (accessed 14 October 2019); https://tesis.ipn.mx/handle/123456789/24552.
  • 42.Jimemez M, Gasper M, Carmona M, Terio K. Suidae and Tayassuidae. Pathol. Wildl. Zoo Anim. 2018;1:207–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sutherland-Smith M. Suidae and Tayassuidae (Wild Pigs, Peccaries) Fowler's Zoo Wild Anim. Med. 2015;1(8):568–584. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-4557-7397-8.00058-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bermúdez S, Meyer N, Moreno R, Artavia A. NOTAS SOBRE Pecari tajacu (L., Y Tayassu peccari (LINK, 1795) (ARTIODACTYLA: TAYASSUIDAE) COMO HOSPEDEROS DE GARRAPATAS DURAS (ACARI: IXODIDAE) EN PANAMÁ. Tecnociencia. 2008;20(1):61–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodríguez-Vivas RI, Quiñones AF, Fragoso SH. Epidemiología y control de la garrapata Boophilus en México (Epidemiology and control of Boophilus tick in Mexico) In: Rodríguez-Vivas RI, editor. Enfermedades de Importancia Económica en Producción Animal (Diseases of Economic Importance in Animal Production) McGraw-Hill-UADY; 2005. pp. 571–592. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Duron O, et al. Evolutionary changes in symbiont community structure in ticks. Mol. Ecol. 2017;26:2905–2921. doi: 10.1111/mec.14094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhong J, Jasinskas A, Barbour AG. Antibiotic treatment of the tick vector Amblyomma americanum reduced reproductive fitness. PLoS ONE. 2017;2:1–7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gottlieb Y, Lalzar I, Klasson L. Distinctive genome reduction rates revealed by genomic analyses of two Coxiella-like endosymbionts in ticks. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015;7:1779–1796. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gerhart JG, Moses AS, Raghavan RA. Francisella-like endosymbiont in the Gulf Coast tick evolved from a mammalian pathogen. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1–6. doi: 10.1038/srep33670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sjodin A, et al. Genome characterisation of the genus Francisella reveals insight into similar evolutionary paths in pathogens of mammals and fish. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Machado-Ferreira E, Vizzoni VF, Balsemão-Pires E, Moerbeck L, Gazeta GS, Piesman J, Voloch CM, Soares CA. Coxiella symbionts are widespread into hard ticks. Parasitol. Res. 2016;115(12):4691–4699. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5230-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Duron O. The IS1111 insertion sequence used for detection of Coxiella burnetii is widespread in Coxiella-like endosymbionts of ticks. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015;362(17):1–8. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES