Abstract
Background:
The present study was conducted in Jul 2019 and Jan 2020 in two wildlife parks of the Nowshera district, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan, where the endangered Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) is successfully bred in captivity. We determined diversity of internal and external parasites that take advantage of the situation of congestion, resulting in massive mortalities of wild animals in captivity.
Methods:
Internal parasites of living urial were determined by direct wet smear and flotation methods, while dead urial was necropsied for any pertaining observation.
Results:
All examined fecal samples were found infected with gastrointestinal parasites, which had significant difference in the total abundance in winter and summer. S. papillosus and H.contortus, and a single protozoan, Eimeria spp. were the dominant parasites in fecal samples. Ticks collected from urial enclosures and dead animals were of single species H. anatolicum. Theileria spp. was observed in blood, while hydatid cysts were found in lungs and liver of necropsied urial.
Conclusion:
The study indicates that internal parasites such as Haemonchus contortus and Strongyloides papillosus, while external parasites as Hyalomma anatolicum ticks played major role in the population decline. Strict veterinary control of infectious diseases, provision of hygienic and supplementary diet, and proper maintenance of urial population are necessary measures for the control of mortalities.
Keywords: Punjab urial, Nematodes, Ticks, Hydatid cyst
Introduction
Zoos and wildlife parks serve different purposes to wildlife, the first being provision of shelter to handicapped animals that cannot survive in nature on their own. Zoos also provide shelter to exotic confiscated animals that cannot be released in local environment due to the probability of competition with or biological invasion on the local fauna. Many zoos around the world provide study workplace to scientists in reproductive biology for the reintroduction of animals, especially of that facing extinction threat (1, 2). Human activity affects natural habitats and wildlife behavior; hence, for the education and awareness of public, raising wild animals in captivity has become both a social and scientific necessity. However, zoos face an undeniable problem of infectious diseases, due to too much congestion of different types of wild animals in such limited space. Parasites could be host-specific for infecting a single host type or could be generalists for infecting a wide variety of hosts (3).
Urial is a species of wild sheep inhabiting India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, eastern Iran, and Central Asian countries. Urial (Ovis vignei) and Asiatic mouflon (Ovis orientalis) are distinct species, because urial has 58 chromosomes, while Asiatic mouflon, which inhabits western Iran and Turkey, has 54 chromosomes (4). Urial of Pakistan are single species, and have less genetic difference (5). Three subspecies are generally recognized to occur in Pakistan, viz Ladakh urial (Ovis vignei vignei), Afghan urial (Ovis vignei blanfordi) and the Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) (6, 7). The validity of these subspecies still warrants the need of enormous research. Nonetheless, the Punjab urial (O. v. punjabiensis) occupies parts of central Pakistan, declared endangered (8).
In Pakistan, research on diseases of captive wild sheep and goats is in deficit. At present, most of the old yet important biological publications on fauna of the country have not been digitized and remained mostly inaccessible to readers. However, case reports on urial parasites could be found. However, Awan et al.’s (9) suggestions largely set the trend of research on parasites of urial at the population level. Later, blood parasites (10) and other causes of mortality (11) were studied in Punjab urial. Punjab urial of Kalabagh and Afghan urial of Torghar have many parasites common with domestic sheep and goats (12, 13).
The present study was conducted to investigate ecto and endoparasites as well causes of mortalities in captive Punjab urial at two wildlife parks of Khyber Pakhtunkwa Province, Pakistan.
Materials and Methods
Study areas and animals
The current study was conducted in Jul 2019 and Jan 2020 at two wildlife parks in Nowshera district of Pakistan. Both these parks are currently serving as promising breeding facilities for Punjab urial (1). Cherat Wildlife Park (CWP) covers an area of 26.97 km 2 established in 2006. Manglot Wildlife Park (MWP) covers an area of 7.12 km 2 established in 1990. The animals were occasionally drenched with anthelmintics. However, so far have never been vaccinated against viral or bacterial diseases. Urial is maintained in vast enclosures of the park. The enclosures were made near human settlement especially in CWP, without considering effect of human disturbance or transmissible diseases of livestock on the caged wildlife. Human, domestic animals and stray dogs pass outside, yet very close to the enclosures. So far these urial have not been reintroduced anywhere.
Ectoparasite sampling
During the current study physical capture or restrain the animals was not allowed. For sampling ticks from ground, we used two methods, the visual searching method and the dragging method (9, 14). In each enclosure five, 60 meter long transects were designed. The visual searching method was based on searching the ground and tips of leaves along the transect, especially the grasses and shrubs. In the dragging method, we used a cotton sheet (2x1m), dragged it slowly and carefully over the transect, and checked it for ticks after every 10 m. Specimens were carefully collected to avoid damaging body parts and were preserved in glass bottles containing 70% ethanol. All the samples were identified under a stereo microscope up to species level by consulting the given descriptions (15).
Fecal analyses
Overall, 68 fecal samples were collected from living urial of both study sites, in summer and winter. Samples were collected in polythene bags and taken to Veterinary Research Institute, Peshawar. Fecal samples were left at room temperature for a few days for the emergence of third-stage larvae (L3) from nematode eggs. All the samples were processed and examined by flotation in saturated salt solution. Eggs and larvae were identified consulting different diagnostic literature (15, 16). Eggs/larvae/oocysts per gram of feces (E.P.G., L.P.G., O.P.G.) were determined by McMaster technique.
Postmortem reports
Based on postmortem reports, we retrospectively analyzed mortality causes of captive Punjab urial at CWP (Dec 2008–Jan 2020) and at MWP (Dec 2012–Jan 2020). Overall, 52 urial died at CWP, and 7 at MWP. The animals were classified into three age groups, i.e., lambs (<1 yr old), yearlings (≥1.5 yr old) and adults (≥ 2 yr old) (17). Death causes were determined based on autopsy examinations. Some of the tissue samples, adult helminths and cysts were preserved in 70% ethanol. To study hemoprotozoa, blood was obtained from the heart, smeared thinly on slides, fixed in absolute ethanol and treated with Giemsa staining.
Statistical analysis
Data sets were analyzed using the SPSS ver. 20 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics was used for investigating number of infected organisms and percentages. The Pearson’s chi-square test was used to analyse the prevalence of all infected groups with total parasitic infestation. Variables were significant at P<0.05.
Results
Gastrointestinal Parasites
All the studied fecal samples in both seasons were infected with one or more gastrointestinal parasites. Overall, eight nematodes species were identified, i.e., Strongyloides papillosus, Haemonchus contortus, Marshallagia marshalli, Chabertia ovina, Ostertagia spp., Trichostrongylus spp., Trichuris spp. and Nematodirus spp. Protozoa belonging to Eimeria genus were observed (Table 1). At both study sites, the gastrointestinal helminths were more common than the protozoa. S. papillosus (19.89%), H. contortus (19.3%), Trichostrongylus spp. (14.6%) and Trichuris spp. (7.6%) were the dominant parasites.
Table 1:
Percentage prevalence and mean intensity of parasites in Punjab urial of CWP and MWP
| Variable | Summer | Overall Summer Prevalence (%) | Winter | Overall Winter Prevalence (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWP (n=23) | MWP (n=11) | CWP (n=23) | MWP (n=11) | |||||||
| Prevalence (%) | Intensity | Prevalence (%) | Intensity | Prevalence (%) | Intensity | Prevalence (%) | Intensity | |||
| Overall helminthosis | 100 | - | 100 | - | 100 | 100 | - | 100 | - | 100 |
| Strongyloides papillosus | 100 | 858.70 ± 45.6 | 100 | 1000 ± 108.7 | 100 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Haemonchus contortus | 30.4 | 326.1 ± 83.7 | - | - | 20.6 | 73.9 | 294.4 ± 28.3 | 63.6 | 521.4 ± 30.6 | 70.6 |
| Chabertia ovina | 13 | 287.5 ± 42.7 | - | - | 8.8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Ostertagia spp. | 17.4 | 480.0 ± 107.9 | - | - | 11.8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Trichostrongylus spp. | 26.1 | 930.0 ± 78.4 | 27.3 | 516.7 ± 72.6 | 26.5 | 30.4 | 207.1 ± 35.2 | 72.7 | 443.8 ± 62.3 | 44.1 |
| Trichuris spp. | 21.7 | 440.0 ± 87.2 | 36.4 | 662.5 ± 110.6 | 26.5 | 21.7 | 120 ± 30.0 | - | - | 14.7 |
| Marshallagia marshalli | - | - | 45.5 | 340.0 ± 64.0 | 14.7 | - | - | 27.3 | 200.0 ± 28.9 | 8.8 |
| Nematodirus spp. | - | - | 36.4 | 412.5 ± 108.7 | 11.8 | - | - | 27.3 | 137.5 ± 12.5 | 8.8 |
| Eimeria spp. | 82.6 | 1260.5 ± 91.6 | 9.1 | 1500 ± 0.0 | 58.8 | 100 | 750 ± 42.6 | - | - | 67.6 |
Seasons had significant influence on overall abundance of parasite E.P.G., L.P.G., and O.P.G. at both sites. S. papillosus had significantly high mean value of the total seasonal abundance of of E.P.G. and L.P.G. at both sites (P=0.0001). H. contortus had no significant difference on abundance of infection (P>0.05) in both seasons. Whereas, Eimeria spp. had significant difference between two seasons in only CWP (P=0.016).
Ectoparasites
Overall, 78 unfed ticks specimens were collected in both seasons from CWP, whereas no specimen was collected from MWP. All these specimens belonged to H. anatolicum. Female ticks were more abundant (n=53) than male ticks (n=25).
Postmortem changes
The postmortem results showed a significant difference between mortalities in different age groups in both sites. Lambs were the most susceptible age group showed high rates of mortalities (61%). We categorized postmortem findings under two heads, parasite-related and physiology-related observations with a highly significant difference (χ2 =58.9; P=0.003) (Table 2). Four types of parasites were found in dead animals, i.e., tick infestation with H. anatolicum (22%), hydatid cysts in both lungs (3.45%) and liver (10.16%), Theileria spp. (6.8%), and H. contortus stomach (3.4%). The physiological anomalies noted were weak musculature (18.6%), gastrointestinal infections (8.5%), haemorrhagic diarrhea (8.5%) and cardiac arrest (3.4%). Overall mortalities and parasites infections were higher in females than males (Fig. 1). Miscellaneous causes of mortality constituted 5.1% in males, and 10.2% in females. It included heat stroke, predation, stillbirth, snakebite, and deaths occurring due to land sliding, or during physical capturing of animal for drenching, and natural age-related causes.
Table 2:
| Postmortem observations | CWP (%) | MWP (%) | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamb | Yearling | Adult | Lamb | Yearling | Adult | ||
| Parasitological observations: | |||||||
| Ticks infestation | 6 (10.2) | 2 (3.4) | 5 (8.5) | - | - | - | 13 (22) |
| Hydatid cyst infection | 6 (10.2) | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.7) | - | - | - | 8 (13.6) |
| Theileria infection | 4 (6.8) | - | - | - | - | - | 4 (6.8) |
| Haemonchus infection | 2 (3.4) | - | - | - | - | - | 2 (3.4) |
| Physiological observations | |||||||
| Weak musculature | 8 (13.6) | - | - | 3 (5.1) | - | - | 11 (18.6) |
| Gastrointestinal infections | 2 (3.4) | 1 (1.7) | 2 (3.4) | - | - | - | 5 (8.5) |
| Haemorrhagic diarrhea | 2 (3.4) | 1 (1.7) | - | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.7) | - | 5 (8.5) |
| Cardiac arrest | - | - | 2 (3.4) | - | - | - | 2 (3.4) |
| Miscellaneous | 2 (3.4) | 1 (1.7) | 4 (6.8) | - | - | 2 (3.4) | 9 (15.3) |
| Total | 32 (54.2) | 6 (10.2) | 14 (23.7) | 4 (6.8) | 1 (1.7) | 2 (3.4) | 59 (100) |
| χ2 = 37.8 (P=0.036) | χ2 = 22 (P=0.005) | χ2 = 58.9 (P=0.003) | |||||
Fig. 1:
Collective sex-wise data of urial mortalities in CWP and MWP. (A) Parasitological and physical anomalies were noted during postmortem. (B) Overall mortality percentage and miscellaneous causes of death
Discussion
The parasitic fauna recorded during the present study remarkably resembled other reports from nearby Peshawar city (18). Hence, the common parasites of small ruminants of this region in Pakistan are species of Fasciola, Haemonchus, Trichuris, Trichostrongylus, Strongyloides, Ostertagiaand Marshallagia, which depend on moisture for their existence. The present study was a thorough investigation of infection with parasites and causes of mortality in captive Punjab urial. Nowshera district through winter and summer, where the two wildlife parks of our study are located, is a humid (0.017–0.069 mm) and riverine region (19). Necropsy of dead animals is necessary, as it shows parasites that cannot be otherwise observed in coprological studies. The present study is the first to report hydatid cysts in urial of Pakistan. This canine-borne metacestode of Echinococcus granulosus tapeworm is widely prevalent in domestic sheep and goats of Pakistan (20), and also reported in Himalayan ibex (Capra ibex sibirica) of India and Asiatic mouflon (Ovis orientalis) of Iran and Turkey (13).
During present research, Eimeria spp. was recorded. Species of Eimeria are commonly seen associated with captive and free-living wild sheep of Iran (21–23). In Pakistan, seven species of Eimeria were found in Afghan urial, with prevalence of E. ovinoidalis, E. bakuensis and E. parva to be comparatively higher than others were (13). Eimeria is host-specific, which means sheep Eimeria cannot infect goats or other animals (24). Yet, urial, mouflon and domestic sheep belong to the same genus and are closely related to each other. Hence, they share many parasites, including Eimeria.
During the present research, Theileria spp. and its vector Hyalomma anatolicum ticks were recorded in Punjab urial, both being more prevalent in females, than in male urial. Both these parasites are widely prevalent in small ruminants of Pakistan, especially in the areas near Nowshera district (25–28). Anatolian wild sheep of Turkey were found infected with Rhipicephalus turanicus, R. bursa and Hy. excavatum (29, 30), the latter two ticks also found associated with Theileria ovis (30). In Iran, 16 species of ixodid ticks were reported from wild sheep (mouflon, urial and their hybrids) and wild goats (bezoar), including Hy. anatolicum excavatum from Trans-Caspian urial (31). The earliest study in Pakistan regarding ticks of wild animals led to collection of Ha. sulcata, but not Hy. anatolicum from Punjab urial in Jhelum district (32). Recently, PCR studies documented presence of T. ovis in Punjab urial (10). Small ruminants of Pakistan are parasitized by many more blood protozoa and ticks genera than discussed in this work (25–28), and all of them have strong potential to infect urial.
Mortality in captive wild mammals is always associated with overcrowding of animals in limited space (1, 2, 11). Parasites proliferate so well, especially when host animals are available at little distance. Mortality is sure when the parasite has a dramatic effect on body condition. In our study, we suspect four parasites to have caused mortalities in urial, i.e., S. papillosus, H. contortus, Hy. anatolicum and Theileria spp., though other parasites are not exempted. The nematode S. papillosus causes dramatic weight loss (33), and in heavy infections, it leads to cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death (34, 35). The other nematode H. contortus causes blood loss, yet we did not perform blood count of animals. Heavy ticks’ infestation cause paralysis of limbs in the early stage and mortality in a later stage. Tick paralysis and respiratory failures contributed to the 46% mortalities of captive Anatolian wild sheep (30). In Punjab urial of Lahore zoo, tick infestation, tick paralysis and theileriosis were seen in 20% of the mortalities cases (11). We strongly hold ticks to be the forerunner in causing mortalities in urial here, because 78 ticks were collected from CWP where 53 urial had died, while in MWP only 7 urial had died, with no ticks infestation. Besides parasitological causes, deficiency in the nutritional values also contributes to weak musculature (11). In addition, the captive populations are more prone to inbreeding depression, resulting in weak progeny and ultimately higher mortalities. No shifting of breeding animals from both the facilities in the current study was one of the many limiting factors (1, 2).
Conclusion
Clumping of animals in limited space increases mortality, as was the case with captive Punjab urial in our study. The animals were infected with two protozoa, eight nematodes, one metacestode and one arthropod parasite. Together, these parasites, especially Haemonchus, Strongyloides, Hyalomma and Theileria contributed particularly in driving the urial population to a dramatic fall. While free-living urial may live well with these parasites, the captive animals succumb due to genetic, nutritional, and behavioral stresses associated with captivity. The links of communicable disease between wildlife and domestic animals need to be disconnected by eliminating wildlife-livestock interaction, by provision of veterinary care, and by treating and vaccinating for other potential diseases. Translocation of breeding pairs, release of surplus animals in their natural habitat or other enclosures, and recruiting adults from wild habitats are necessary for preserving genetic diversity of the endangered wildlife in captivity.
Acknowledgements
This paper is part of the first author’s Ph.D. thesis. It was supported financially by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (31870512), and the fundamental research funds for the central universities (2572014CA03). This study also got financial support from Heilongjiang Touyan innovation team program for forest ecology and conservation, Ningxia Helan Mountains National Nature Reserve. The authors express sincere thanks to the Wildlife Department Khyber Pakhtunkhwa for allowing us to conduct this study.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Khattak RH, Liu Z, Teng L. Development and implementation of baseline welfare assessment protocol for captive breeding of wild ungulate—Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis, Lydekker 1913). Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12):1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khattak RH, Liu Z, Teng L, et al. Determining optimal stock density of Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) in captivity for breeding, population growth and reintroduction potential. Pak J Biol Sci. 2020; 23(9):1227–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walker JG, Morgan ER. Generalists at the interface: nematode transmission between wild and domestic ungulates. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2014; 3(3):242–250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nadler CF, Korobitsina KV, Hoffmann RS, et al. Cytogenetic differentiation, geographic distribution, and domestication in Palearctic sheep (Ovis). Z Säugetierkd. 1973; 38:109–125. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rezaei HR, Naderi S, Chintauan-Marquier IC, et al. Evolution and taxonomy of the wild species of the genus Ovis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010; 54(2):315–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hess R, Bollmann K, Ghulam-Rasool, et al. Indo-Himalayan region: Pakistan. In: Shackleton DM, editor. Wild sheep and goats and their rrelatives. Status survey and conservation action plan for Caprinae. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK; 1997. p. 239–260. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roberts TJ. The mammals of Pakistan. Revised ed. Oxford University Press, UK; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sheikh KM, Molur S. Status and red list of Pakistan’s mammals. Based on the conservation assessment and management plan. IUCN, Pakistan; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Awan GA, Ahmad T, Festa-Bianchet M. Disease spectrum and mortality of Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) in Kalabagh Game Reserve. Pak J Zool. 2005; 37:175–179. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shahzad S, Tipu MY, Aslam A, et al. Comparative hemato-biochemical study on theileriosis in naturally infected Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) and domestic sheep (Ovis aries) in Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci. 2015; 25(3):472–476. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nemat A, Ali Z, Ahmad S, et al. Study of disease records of zoo animals in Lahore zoo, Pakistan. J Anim Plant Sci. 2015; 25(3):483–492. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bajwa AA, Cuff JP, Imran M, et al. Assessment of nematodes in Punjab urial (Ovis vignei punjabiensis) population in Kalabagh Game Reserve: development of a DNA barcode approach. European J Wildl Res. 2019; 65(4). DOI: 10.1007/s10344-019-1298-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ahmed S. Parasites of markhor, urial and Chiltan wild goat in Pakistan. Ann Parasitol. 2020; 66(1):3–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ramos VN, Osava CF, Piovezan U, et al. Complementary data on four methods for sampling free-living ticks in the Brazilian Pantanal. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2014; 23(4):516–521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Van Wyk JA, Mayhew E. Morphological identification of parasitic nematode infective larvae of small ruminants and cattle: a practical lab guide. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2013; 80(1):539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Geist V. On delayed social and physical maturation in Mountain Sheep. Can J Zool. 1968; 46(5):899–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sohail M, Nauman-ul-Islam M, Shah SSA, et al. Incidence of gastrointestinal parasites in Beetal goats at district Peshawar, Pakistan. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2017; 5(5):205–207. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Government of Pakistan . Regional metrological center Peshawar, Pakistan. 2019. http://www.rmckpk.pmd.gov.pk/
- 20.Ahmed S, Nawaz M, Gul R, et al. Some epidemiological aspects of hydatidosis of lungs and livers of sheep and goats in Quetta, Pakistan. Pak J Zool. 2006; 38(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tavassoli M, Khoshvaghti H. Helminths and coccidia infection of wild sheep (Ovis ammon orientalis) in Kabodan Island of National Park of Urmia Lake, Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2010; 1:26–29. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nasiri V, Jameie F. Intestinal parasitic infection in wild animals of a zoological garden in Alborz, Iran. J Istanbul Vet Sci. 2019; 3:37–42. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nasiri V, Jameie F, Paykari H, et al. Survey of gastrointestinal parasitic infection in captive wild animals of a central zoological garden in Iran. J Vet Sci Res. 2019; 1:78–91. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chartier C, Paraud C. Coccidiosis due to Eimeria in sheep and goats, a review. Small Rumin Res. 2012; 103(1):84–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ghosh S, Bansal GC, Gupta SC, et al. Status of tick distribution in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Parasitol Res. 2007; 101 Suppl 2:S207–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shah SSA, Khan MI, Hanif-ur-Rehman. Epidemiological and hematological investigations of tick-borne diseases in small ruminants in Peshawar and Khyber Agency, Pakistan. J Adv Parasitol. 2017; 4:15–22. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anwar K. Epidemiology of tick-borne infection in ruminants in Peshawar. J Adv Parasitol. 2018; 5:6–10. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khan A, Nasreen N, Niaz S, et al. Tick burden and tick species prevalence in small ruminants of different agencies of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), Pakistan. Int J Acarol. 2019; 45:374–380. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sevinc F, Guclu F, Uslu U. The parasites detected in the Anatolian wild sheep (Ovis orientalis anatolica). J Faculty Vet Med Erciyes University. 2004; 1:87–89. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Orkun Ö, Emir H, Karaer Z. Ticks threatening lineage of Anatolian wild sheep (Ovis gmelinii anatolica) and determination of their tick-borne pathogens. Vet Parasitol. 2016; 228:77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoogstraal H, Valdez R. Ticks (Ixodoidea) from wild sheep and goats in Iran and medical and veterinary implications. Fieldiana Zool. 1980; 6:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 32.McCarthy VC. Ixodid ticks (Acarina, Ixodidae) of West Pakistan. Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, USA; 1967. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pienaar JG, Basson PA, Du Plessis JL, et al. Experimental studies with Strongyloides papillosus in goats. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1999; 66(3):191–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nakanishi N, Nakamura Y, Ura S, et al. Sudden death of calves by experimental infection with Strongyloides papillosus. III. Hematological, biochemical and histological examinations. Vet Parasitol. 1993; 47(1–2):67–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nakamura Y, Ooba C, Hirose H. Recovery from arrhythmias in lambs infected with Strongyloides papillosus following worm elimination. J Helminthol. 1998; 72(1):43–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

