Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a severe and rapidly evolving epidemic. Now, although a few drugs and vaccines have been proved for its treatment and prevention, little systematic comments are made to explain its susceptibility to humans. A few scattered studies used bioinformatics methods to explore the role of microRNA (miRNA) in COVID-19 infection. Combining these timely reports and previous studies about virus and miRNA, we comb through the available clues and seemingly make the perspective reasonable that the COVID-19 cleverly exploits the interplay between the small miRNA and other biomolecules to avoid being effectively recognized and attacked from host immune protection as well to deactivate functional genes that are crucial for immune system. In detail, SARS-CoV-2 can be regarded as a sponge to adsorb host immune-related miRNA, which forces host fall into dysfunction status of immune system. Besides, SARS-CoV-2 encodes its own miRNAs, which can enter host cell and are not perceived by the host’s immune system, subsequently targeting host function genes to cause illnesses. Therefore, this article presents a reasonable viewpoint that the miRNA-based interplays between the host and SARS-CoV-2 may be the primary cause that SARS-CoV-2 accesses and attacks the host cells.
Keywords: miRNA, COVID-19, immune system, virus
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents an emerging, rapidly evolving trend and has resulted in over 71 million cases and 1.6 million deaths around 220 countries up to December 2020, and remains an increasing situation [1]. And the experts declared that the outbreak was extremely serious and would not be quelled soon. Scientists have confirmed that COVID-19 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a single-stranded RNA virus with high similarity in its genome and symptoms with SARS-CoV epidemic in 2002–04 [2]. During the early stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the viruses enter and kill the T lymphocyte cells, with profound lymphopenia that first occurred in the patients [3]. Meanwhile, the virus-activated inflammatory response including the innate and the adaptive immune response also attacks lymphocyte and promotes its apoptosis [3]. In the later phase of infection, with the number of virus particles accumulating, some symptoms are following, which include destructed endothelial barrier, loss of oxygen diffusion capacity and weakened alveolar-capillary oxygen transmission [3]. In severe COVID-19 individuals, the increase of systemic inflammation induced by a series of cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-2 and IL-7, damages distant organs and results in multiorgan failure even death [4].
MicroRNA (miRNA) is a powerful regulator of gene expression and participates in almost all types of gene regulation [5–7], which cover conventional coding RNA (transcription factor [8], enzyme [9], etc.), non-coding RNA (ncRNA) [10] and mitochondrial transcripts [11]. Generally, miRNA controls gene expression through targeting the 3′-untranslational region (UTR) [12], 5′-UTR [13] and coding region [14] of specific mRNA or embedding in the specific gene [15, 16]. When the cells perceive changes of surrounding circumstances, they can take the necessary action to respond to these external changes by triggering a series of signaling events. In most cases, almost all the emerging signaling events are dominated by some core proteins in the current pathways, and these proteins are always controlled by their specific miRNAs. Thus, the intracellular and extracellular environments under morbid or abnormal physiologic conditions may cause deregulation of miRNAs, and some of these will ultimately contribute to the process and some will impede or delay it.
Bioinformatic methods have facilitated progresses in the field of protein functional annotation, omics studies and feature selection [17–20], and also contribute to a series of studies that indicated physiological mechanism of COVID-19. When the virus invades the host, the body may fall into a violent struggle against the virus. First, the immune system can perceive the allothigene and initiates the immune response for self-defense via activating lines of signaling pathways. However, if the virus breaks the immune barrier or eludes immunological recognition, cells will be attacked by inducing destructive cellular processes. Core proteins in these two processes are controlled by some miRNAs. In some cases, miR-130a can initiate the innate immune response via upregulating immune factors including type I interferon (IFN-α/IFN-β), interferon-stimulated genes 15, ubiquitin-specific protease 18 and myxovirus resistance protein A during hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [21]. MiR-146 can induce cell apoptosis by targeting son of sevenless homolog 1 in enterovirus-71 infected cells [22]. Moreover, host miRNA can also target the viral genome. MiR-122 directly binds 5′-UTR of HCV RNA thus enhancing viral replication [23–25]. Additionally, virus also produces miRNA, which, in one facet, targets human genes to induce some signaling pathways and, in another facet, targets viral genome to regulate the virus-related physiological process. For example, white spot syndrome virus (WSSV)-encoded miRNA (WSSV-miR-22) can target host signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) to promote the virus infection [26]. HBV-miR-3, a Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) encoded miRNA, can bind to HBV transcripts to inhibit its replication [27]. Thus, miRNAs play indispensable roles during virus infection. Bioinformatics methods have facilitated progress in the field of protein functional annotation, omics studies and feature selection [17–20], and also contribute to a series of studies to explore physiological mechanism of COVID-19. Moreover, increasing evidence employing bioinformatics methods has discussed miRNA’s role in SARS-COV-2 infection and indicated that the interplay between miRNA and its targeted biomolecules was crucial for the SARS-COV-2 development. SARS-CoV-2 can encode its miRNA, which can be transported into the host cells and be not recognized by the host’s immune system as an allothigene due to its enough small size. Some of SARS-CoV-2 generated miRNAs enter the host cell, which target and inhibit immune-related genes thus triggering off paralysis of the immune system. Further, the viral miRNAs that bind to functional regions in its genomic RNA also contribute to viral infection and replication. Even worse, the vulnerable body has the incapacity to restrain the viral unscrupulous replication, leading to more severe symptoms. Besides, the cunning SARS-CoV-2 releases its RNA genome as a sponge to adsorb host functional miRNA and disturb immune system, which also provides a suitable opportunity for that SARS-COV-2 destroys host cells. In this perspective, our review summarized both host and virus miRNAs’ roles during SARS-COV-2 infection.
miRNA: small but powerful gene regulator
Most of non-coding RNAs, which include miRNA, long-noncoding RNA (lncRNA) and circular RNA (circRNA), are not directly involved in cell physiological process but severed as regulators to control gene expression. Different from other non-coding RNAs, miRNA, only containing approximately 22 nucleotides, usually regulates gene expression by directly targeting specific mRNA [12]. Some of miRNA regulatory modes have been well understood, which include (i) targeting 3′-UTR of mRNA, (ii) targeting 5′-UTR of mRNA, (iii) targeting coding region of mRNA and (iv) embedding in a specific gene. And many lncRNAs and circRNAs are indirectly involved in gene regulation via sponging miRNAs [28–30]. Thus, miRNA is a powerful and direct manipulator of gene expression. MiRNA regulates almost all protein-coding genes therefore indirectly participating in a set of signaling pathways in various pathological and physiological conditions. Knockout of miRNA in mice may lead to various degrees of phenotypes including defects in adaptive immunity, splenomegaly, postnatal death and so on [31, 32].
The available evidence suggests that miRNAs perform a crucial role in virus infection. Some miRNAs can activate immune-related signaling proteins to defend the virus. In human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected macrophages, miR-221 and miR-222 are upregulated and reduce CD4 expression, which limits HIV-1 propagation and production [33]. A series of studies indicate that deletion of miRNAs in mice mode has a great impact on the process of viral infection and phenotypes in mice (Table 1). Besides, there are many miRNA-based interactions between host and virus (discussed in more detail below), which affect the process of viral infection in host and host’s health.
Table 1.
miRNA | Virus | Phenotypes | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
miR-155 | WNV | Increased morbidity and mortality after infection with a lethal strain. 100% mortality after infection with a non-lethal strain; Sharp reduction of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-12, IL-6, IL-15 and GM-CSF abundance during WNV infection | [107] |
HSV-1 | Enhanced resistance to herpetic stromal keratitis; Remarkable reduction of T helper cells type 1 and 17 in number in the ocular lesions and the lymphoid organs during HSV-1 infection; Decreased stromal keratitis lesion severity | [108] | |
HSV-1 | Increased susceptibility to ocular infection with HSV-1; Higher mortality after infection with HSV-1 | [109] | |
NV | No obvious phenotype | [110] | |
JHMV | Increased morbidity and mortality during JHMV infection; Loss of the ability of T cell responses during JHMV infection | [111] | |
MHV-68 | Reduced efficient MHV-68 reactivation | [112] | |
Flu | Faster recovery capability from influenza infection; Low level of inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress in lung during influenza infection | [113] | |
CVB3 | Decreased mortality and alleviative viral myocarditis; Reduced abundance of IFN-γ and increased expression IL-4 and IL-13 in heart; Decreased inflammation and CD45(+) leukocytes in heart | [114] | |
miR-17-92 | LMCV | Impaired humoral response during LMCV infection; Reduced virus-specific TFH and Th1 cells during LMCV infection | [115] |
miR-150 | LMCV | Enhanced recall response in memory CD8+ T cells; Accelerated differentiation of memory cells | [116] |
miR-21-5p | HCV | Reduced steatosis during HCV infection | [117] |
miR-22 | LMCV | Maintained platelet in number during LMCV infection; Sharply decreased red blood cells and hemoglobin | [118] |
miR-34a | HIV | Enhanced resistance to HIV; Reduced antiretroviral agents and HIV-Tat protein-induced senescence during HIV infection | [119] |
WNV, West Nile virus; HSV-1, Herpes simplex virus 1; NV, norovirus; JHMV, neurotropic JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus; MHV-68, murine gammaherpesvirus; Flu, influenza; LMCV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus.
Dysregulation of host miRNA in COVID-19
As mentioned above, miRNA plays a crucial role in maintaining normal physiological function. Disorder in the internal environment of the organism is usually accompanied by abnormal synthesis or secretion of a miRNA in cell or blood. Thus, a lot of miRNAs have become recognized indicators in some diseases including cancers [34, 35], diabetes [36], cardiovascular diseases [37, 38] and virus-infected diseases [39].
The available evidence suggests that deregulation of some miRNAs emerges in SARS-CoV-2 infectious patients. A miRNA’s high-throughput sequencing analysis in peripheral blood of 10 COVID-19 patients and 4 control donors indicated 35 upregulated and 38 downregulated miRNAs, in which changes of miR-16-2-3p and miR-183-5p are most remarkable in the upregulated and downregulated list, respectively [40]. And further enrichment analysis using targets of these miRNAs identified that Ras GTPase binding and protein kinases were captured [40]. Another study performed transcriptome sequencing of both whole blood noncoding RNAs and mRNAs for six moderate and six severe COVID-19 patients as well as and four healthy donors, in which (i) miR-146a-5p, miR-21-5p and miR-142-3p were consistently downregulated, (ii) miR-3605-3p was consistently upregulated, (iii) miR-15b-5p, miR-486-3p and miR-486-5p were upregulated only in severe COVID-19 patients compared with the healthy donors and (iv) miR-181a-2-3p, miR-31-5p and miR-99a-5p were downregulated only in severe COVID-19 cases [41]. The data supported that these miRNAs would be a potential indicator to recognize COVID-19 or severe COVID-19 patients [41]. Besides, functional enrichment analysis for predicted targets of miRNAs signifies that processes including virus binding, virus process and defense response to the virus may require the involvement of these miRNAs [41]. Thus, changes of these circular miRNAs may sever as indicators to recognize whether a person suffers from COVID-19 and the symptom is moderate or severe.
The role of host miRNA in COVID-19
Dysregulation of miRNA has been presented in COVID-19 patients, which would lead to the change of the genes that are regulated by the miRNAs. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a receptor in the cell membrane, can receive viral structural spike(S) protein and facilitate SARS-CoV-2 cell entry by coordinating transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) [3]. The close connection between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease is already indisputable, because of that some cases reported COVID-19 patients also suffered from cardiac disease [42–44]. Research showed that miR-200c was essential for SARS-CoV-2 entry to the receptor ACE2 in cardiomyocytes [45]. The overexpression of miR-200c can reduce mRNA and protein expressions of ACE2, and the specific mechanism indicated that miR-200c could target 3′-UTR of its mRNA [45]. And another study identified that miR-98-5p can inhibit TMPRSS2 expression via binding its 3′-UTR in human endothelial cells [46]. Besides, Nersisyan et al. [47] used bioinformatic analysis to uncover that lysine-specific demethylase 5B (JARID1B) can regulate ACE2 and TMPRSS2 via transcriptional repression of let-7e/ miR-125a and miR-141/miR-200, which directly target 3′-UTR of these two receptors, and the expression of JARID1B was necessary for these two receptors. Thus, these miRNAs are crucial for the function of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptors. Our established therapeutic target database (TTD) provides drugs for treating COVID-19 in clinical trials and corresponding targets [48–50]. We consider that miRNA regulation for gene expression is ubiquitous and nonselective. In the current study, available miRNAs that regulate drug targets for treating COVID-19 in clinical trials are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Target | miRNA | Description | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
DHODH | miR-502 | MiR-502 directly regulates DHODH through binding to the position 245 to 251 in 3′-UTR of its mRNA in colon cancer cells. | [120] |
VCP | miR-129-5p | MiR-129-5p downregulates the expression of VCP by binding to two sites located at its 3′-UTR in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. | [121] |
AGTR1 | miR-410 | MiR-410 suppresses the expression level of AGTR1 by two binding sites in the 3′-UTR of AGTR1 mRNA in pancreatic cancer. | [122] |
TMEM97 | miR-152-3p | MiR-152-3p downregulates TMEM97 through interacting with 3′-UTR of TMEM97 mRNA in prostate cancer. | [123] |
OPRS1 | miR-297 | MiR-297 regulates Sig-1R expression via directly targeting its 3′-UTR during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. | [124] |
MRC1 | miR-27a-3p | MiR-27a can mediate the process of phagocytosis by regulating CD206 expression on monocytes. | [125] |
mTOR | miR-99a | MiR-99 inhibits the expression of mTOR by targeting its 3′-UTR in a post-transcriptional manner in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. | [126] |
JAK-2 | miR-124 | MiR-124 reduces the expression of JAK2 via binding to its UTR in non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. | [127] |
IMPDH2 | miR-34a-5p | MiR-34a can target and downregulate IMPDH2 by binding to its exon 7 of IMPDH2. | [128] |
IMPDH1 | miR-19a-3p | MiR-19a could reduce gene expression of IMPDH1 through targeting its 3′-UTR in breast cancer. | [129] |
CSK2 | miR-1228-3p | MiR-1228* can target 3′-UTR of CK2A2 and inhibit its expression in gastric cancer. | [130] |
BRD2 | miR-143-3p | MiR-143-3p directly targets BRD2 by binding to its 3′-UTR in gastric cancer. | [131] |
BAR | miR-19a-3p | MiR-19a suppresses ADRB1 expression by directly interacting with its 3′-UTR. | [132] |
JAK-1 | miR-299-3p | MiR-299-3p targets 3′-UTR of JAK1 mRNA and inhibits its expression. | [133] |
IL6R | miR-451a | MiR-451can negatively regulate IL6R by interacting with 3′-UTR in IL6R mRNA in umbilical vein endothelial cells. | [134] |
IL1R1 | miR-21 | MiR-21 negatively regulates the IL1R1 at the level of translation through binding to 3′-UTR of L1R1. | [135] |
IL6 | miR-665 | MiR-665 interacts and downregulates IL6 by targeting its 3′-UTR in adipose-derived stem cells. | [136] |
GAK | miR-206 | MiR-206 downregulates GAK via target 3′-UTR of its mRNA in renal cell cancer. | [137] |
VEGF | miR-125 | MiR-125 inhibits the expression of VEGF through interacting with 3′-UTR of VEGF mRNA in the colorectal cancer cells. | [138] |
IFNG | miR-16-5p | MiR-15b regulates IFNG through binding to the sites at IFNG’s 3′-UTR in natural killer cells. | [139] |
TLR6 | miR-494-3p | MiR-494-3p remarkably downregulates the level of TLR6 through targeting its 3′-UTR. | [140] |
TLR2 | miR-344b-1-3p | MiR-344b-1-3p targets and downregulates TLR2 by interaction with the site of TLR2 3′-UTR. | [141] |
PIK3CG | miR-1976 | MiR-1976 interacts with PIK3CG and reduces PIK3CG expression through binding the site at PIK3CG 3′-UTR in triple-negative breast cancer. | [142] |
PIK3CD | miR-30a | MiR-30a downregulates the expression of PIK3CD via directly binding to the 3′-UTR of PIK3CD mRNA in colorectal carcinoma. | [143] |
IL8 | miR-203 | MiR-203 can directly target 3′-UTR of IL8 and reduce the expression of IL8 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. | [144] |
CCR5 | miR-455-5p | MiR-455-5p negatively regulates CCR5 by binding to the 3′-UTR of CCR5 mRNA in the prostate cancer cells. | [145] |
CAPN2/CAPNS1 | miR-223 | MiR-223 targets CAPN2 by binding to the 3′-UTR of CAPN2. | [146] |
CAPN1/CAPNS1 | miR-124-3p | MiR-124-3p inhibits the expression of CAPN1 in the human neural cell line. | [147] |
BTK | miR-346 | Mir-346 inhibits BKT by targeting binding to its 3′-UTR. | [148] |
ACE2 | Let-7b | Let-7b downregulates ACE2 through directly targeting the coding sequence of ACE2. | [149] |
ANG-2 | miR-125b-5p | MiR-125b reduces the expression level of ANGP2 through binding to the 3′-UTR of Angpt2 mRNA. | [150] |
TLR3 | miR-146a | MiR-146a negatively regulates TLR3 via binding to its 3′-UTR during coxsackievirus B infection. | [151] |
BSG | miR-22-3p | MiR-22 represses the level of BASI through directly targeting its 3′-UTR in breast cancer. | [152] |
TNF | miR-17-5p | MiR-17 can decrease TNFA expression via binding to TNFA 3′-UTR in the leukemia cells. | [153] |
RIPK1 | miR-24-3p | MiR24-3p suppresses RIPK1 expression through binding to its 3′-UTR during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. | [154] |
PTGES2 | miR-146a | MiR-146a negatively regulates PTGES-2 via binding to its 3′-UTR in bone marrow stem cells. | [155] |
TBK1 | miR-199a | MiR-199a suppresses the expression level of TBK1 by targeting 3′-UTR of TBK1 in Mycobacterium bovis infected cell. | [156] |
ABCC1 | miR-7-5p | MiR-7-5p downregulates ABCC1 expression by binding to its 3′-UTR in hepatocellular carcinoma. | [157] |
MARK2 | miR-190a-5p | MiR-190a targets PAR-1 and reduce its expression through binding to its 3′-UTR in breast cancer. | [158] |
LOX | miR-200b-3p | MiR-200 suppresses LOX expression by binding to 3′-UTR of LOX mRNA in breast cancer. | [159] |
LH2 | miR-26b-5p | MiR-26b-5p downregulates PLOD2 through binding to 3′-UTR of PLOD2 in bladder cancer. | [160] |
LDH | miR-200c | MiR-200c directly binds to 3′-UTR of LDHA and inhibits LDHA expression in non-small cell lung cancer. | [161] |
LARP1 | miR-374a | MiR-374a negatively regulates LARP1 by the binding site in the 3′-UTR of LARP1 mRNA in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. | [162] |
IL10 | miR-106a-5p | MiR-106a directly binds 3′-UTR of IL-10 mRNA and downregulates its expression. | [163] |
IL1B | miR-21-5p | MiR-21-5p inhibits IL1B expression by binding the 3′-UTR of IL1B in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma cell. | [164] |
HDAC2 | miR-500a-5p | MiR-500a-5p directly regulates the expression of HDAC2 by binding to HDAC2 3′-UTR in colorectal cancer. | [165] |
DNMT1 | miR-152 | MiR-152 can decrease the expression of DNMT1 by binding to the 3′-UTR of its transcript in the bladder cancer cells. | [166] |
CUL2 | miR-154-5p | MiR-154-5p targets and inhibit CUL2 by binding to the 3′-UTR of CUL2 in cervical cancer. | [167] |
CSNK2A2 | miR-1228-3p | MiR-1228* directly binds to 3′-UTR of CK2A2 mRNA and inhibits its expression in gastric cancer cell. | [130] |
BRD4 | miR-200a | MiR-200a negatively regulates BRD4 expression by binding to the BRD4 3′-UTR in the prostate cancer cells. | [168] |
DHODH, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase; VCP, valosin-containing protein p97; AGTR1, type-1 angiotensin II receptor; TMEM97, sigma intracellular receptor 2; OPRS1, opioid receptor sigma 1; MRC1, mannose receptor; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; JAK-2, janus kinase 2; IMPDH2, inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase 2; IMPDH1, inosine-5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase 1; CSK2, casein kinase II; BRD2, bromodomain-containing protein 2; BAR, beta adrenergic receptor; JAK-1, janus kinase 1; IL6R, interleukin 6; GAK, cyclin G-associated kinase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; IFNG, interferon gamma; TLR6, toll-like receptor 6; TLR2, toll-like receptor 2; PIK3CG, PI3-kinase gamma; PIK3CD, PI3-kinase delta; IL8, interleukin 8; CAPN2/CAPNS1, calpain-2/calpain small subunit 1 dimer; CAPN1/CAPNS1, calpain-1/calpain small subunit 1 dimer; BTK, bruton tyrosine kinase; ANG-2, angiopoietin-2; TLR3, toll-like receptor 3; BSG, basigin; RIPK1, receptor-interacting protein 1; PTGES2, prostaglandin E synthase 2; TBK1, NF-kappa-B-activating kinase; ABCC1, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1; MARK2, microtubule affinity regulating kinase 2; LOX, lysyl oxidase; LH2, lysyl hydroxylase 2; LDH, L-lactate dehydrogenase; LARP1, La-related protein 1; IL10, interleukin-10; IL1B, interleukin-1 beta; HDAC2, histone deacetylase 2; DNMT1, DNA [cytosine-5]-methyltransferase 1; CUL2, cullin-2; CSNK2A2, casein kinase II alpha prime; BRD4, bromodomain-containing protein 4.
In addition to binding to host genes, host miRNAs also interact with the genome of SARS-CoV-2. In one facet, host miRNAs bind to the viral genome to affect viral replication or infection. In turn, the viral genome can be a magnet to adsorb host functional miRNAs thus interfering host’s normal physiological function.
For a canonical case, miR-122, a liver-specific miRNA, interacts with 5′-UTR of the HCV RNA genome, enhancing viral replication [24]. A set of reports performed the prediction of interaction between human miRNA and SARS-CoV-2 genome. Research predicted miRNAs that can target functional RNAs of SARS-CoV-2 including S (Spike) protein, E (Envelope) protein, M (Membrane) protein, N (nucleocapsid) protein, ORF1ab, ORF3a, ORF8, ORF7a, ORF10 and ORF6 [51]. For example, 67 miRNAs including miR-447b are predicted to bind to RNA of S protein, which interacted with ACE2 for viral entry to host cell [52]; miR-3672 binds to RNA of E protein, which was integral membrane protein and forms cation-selective ion channels for viral morphogenesis and assembly [53]; 10 miRNAs including miR-325 bind to RNA of M protein, which played crucial roles for virus assembly through interaction with itself, S protein and N protein [54]. Conclusively, each of the viral 10 genes was predicted to bind to a series of miRNAs, which probably affect the function of these genes [51]. In addition to these translational regions, another study identified that host miRNAs also interact with 3′-UTR and 5′-UTR in the SAS-CoV-2 genome by bioinformatics approach [55]. Further, the researchers used 67 SARS-CoV-2 isolates from 24 different countries and found that 24 host miRNAs can bind differentially across these isolates [55]. A total of 18 miRNAs consistently were presented to interact with the genome of these isolates [55]. Pathway enrichment analysis of host miRNAs can capture some immune-related signaling pathways, which provided new insight that the virus adsorbed host immune-related miRNA and participated in the maladjustment of host’s immune systems, thus affecting viral infection [55]. In this perspective, Bartoszewski et al. [56] also validated the hypothesis by bioinformatics approach and reckoned that SAS-CoV-2 acts as a sponge or magnet through adsorbing host functional miRNAs that were crucial for the host’s immune system.
The responsibility of miRNA for viral infection is more than as discussed above. When the body is attacked by viruses, some miRNAs will be called upon and initiate the immune response through targeting and regulating immune-related genes. miR-221 and miR-222 can target the CD4 viral receptor and reduce its expression, thus activating host response and restraining HIV-1 entry to macrophage [57]. Inducing of miR-103 and 107 by interleukin-1β-mediated p53 reduced C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) expression and HIV-1 infection of macrophages [58]. Oppositely, some deregulating miRNAs also exacerbate the process of viral infection and then destroy vulnerable host cells. In HBV-infected liver cells, increased miR-328-3p targets the forkhead box protein O4 gene, an endogenous inhibitor of the nuclear factor-κB, and leads to hepatocyte injury by inducing cellular inflammatory response [59]. In enterovirus 71 infected human epidermoid carcinoma cells, reduced miR-30a can mediate the abundance of Beclin-1, a key autophagy-promoting gene, thus enhancing host cellular autophagy activity and viral replication [60].
The role of viral miRNA in COVID-19
Viruses also encode their own miRNAs [61], which have high similarities in structure and function with human miRNAs. Virus-produced miRNAs execute their function generally via two manners.
The first is to interact with specific regions of their own genome or transcript. The interaction in the functional gene or gene’s regulatory region can result in changed gene expression, usually downregulation, to affect viral replication and infection. MiR-N367, a miRNA produced by HIV-1 infected T cells, can target the viral nef gene, which is important for HIV-1 replication, and block its stability and translation [62]. Besides, DNA viruses also synthesize miRNAs. WSSV, a DNA virus, produces WSSV-miR-66 and WSSV-miR-68, which can target and inhibit wsv094 and wsv177 genes as well as wsv248 and wsv309 via binding to their 3′-UTR [63]. The four genes play suppressive roles in WSSV infection, so the increase of both WSSV-miR-66 and WSSV-miR-68 will enhance the process of the virus infection [63]. A study identified 27 SARS-CoV-2-encoded miRNAs that can bind to the genomic region of the virus [64]. Most of target sites were located at ORF1ab gene and some sites were at 5′-UTR of the virus genome and the S gene [64]. Moreover, the virus-encoded miRNA binding to the region of genome could affect virus replication and entry to the host [64].
The second is that viral miRNAs can be transported to host cells and bind to host miRNAs and genes during virus infection, which generally represses the expression of these functional miRNAs or genes and triggers intracellular signaling pathways. Viruses could not produce too many kinds of miRNA due to limited genome in size [65], and the Rhesus lymphocryptovirus encodes the largest miRNAs in number, 68 miRNAs [66]. The release of viral miRNAs in host cells is more beneficial for the viral infection rather than proteins, because the smaller miRNA molecules are easier to be ignored or not recognized by the host’s immune system [65]. Therefore, interactions between viral miRNAs and host genes may be crucial approaches by which virus infects host. Interleukin-1 receptor 1 (IL1R1), a cytokine receptor that binds interleukin 1 (IL-1), can recruit immune-related protein activating the signaling of host immune response during viral infection [67]. MiR-BHRF1-2-5p, a miRNA encoded by Epstein–Barr Virus, can target 3′-UTR of the host’s IL1R1 gene and reduce its mRNA and protein expression, which disrupts the triggering of IL-1 signaling events and following pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling [68]. In fact, miRNA has no marked preference for sequences that it binds to. Complementary base pairing, generally 10–20 bases, is the only basis for maintaining this interaction. MiRNA can target all types of RNA, including CDS or UTR of mRNA, even miRNA, circRNA and lncRNA, whereas, in addition to UTR of mRNA and miRNA, miRNA binding to these RNAs could not degrade them or affect their functions. A research used miRNAFold software and predicted six SARS-CoV-2 miRNAs that can target human miRNAs, and further used miRbase database and identified target genes of these human miRNAs [69]. Enrichment analysis of target genes found some immune-related genes, which may indicate that viral miRNAs interact with human miRNAs targeting immune genes and result in cytokine storm [69]. Cytokine storm is a physiological phenomenon that innate immune system is uncontrolled and hyper-activated and presents excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines [70]. The disorder of the immune system can lead to organ damage and death [70]. A study of Merino et al. [71] also discovered the SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs by using deep learning. Target genes of these miRNAs were closely related to respiratory diseases and viral infection, particularly, some of which have been reported to be surely morbigenous genes that induced SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 [71]. Besides, another study further explored the function of SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs in detail [64]. And Liu and colleagues used a computational approach and identified the function of a series of viral miRNAs [64]. Lines of facts indicated that SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs may regulate host’s immune system and inflammatory response during virus infection, which including MR385-3p binding to 5′-UTR of TGFBR3 (a key receptor of immune system), MR147-5p binding to the enhancer of CXCL16 and ARRB2 (two inflammation-related proteins), MR66-3p binding to the enhancer of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (an important cytokine in the cytokine storm), MR147-3p binding to the enhancer of TMPRSS2 (a receptor collaborating ACE2 responsible for virus entry to host), MR198-3p act on the enhancer of ADAR (a IFN system response-related gene), and MR359-5p and MR328-5p relative to MYH9 and RARA (two viral infection-related proteins), respectively [64]. MD2-5p and MR147-3p targeted apoptosis-related proteins CHAC1 and RAD9A, respectively, which were probably involved in the apoptosis process caused by virus infection-induced afflictions of host cells [64].
The patients with COVID-19 were fell into the status under dysregulated physiological function, which included the emergence of excessive inflammatory response [43], impairment of lymphopoiesis [3], increase of lymphocyte apoptosis [3] and disruption of endothelial barrier [3]. Mechanistically, the cooperation or crosslink of signaling pathways induced by COVID-19, for typical cases, release of proinflammatory factors such as IL-6 [72], hyperactivation of JAK/STAT pathway [73] and enhance of Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling [74] contributes to the emergence of these symptoms. SARS-CoV-2-produced miRNAs attached the criss-crossed pathway network as interactors to control the key protein expression, which are responsible for turning up or down flux of these pathways to modulate the process of virus infections. Therefore, the interactome between the viral miRNAs and host pathway network is a crucial approach in which SARS-CoV-2 infects the host and results in multiple clinical symptoms during COVID-19 infections [75, 76].
Tools and databases for analyzing or predicting human miRNAs adsorbed by SARS-CoV-2
Bioinformatics-based methods have benefited the fields of omics study [19, 77–80] and drug design [81–85]. As discussed above, the RNA genome of SARS-CoV-2 can adsorb human functional miRNAs as a sponge, which can force the host into a susceptible state. Therefore, the acquisition of these miRNAs plays a decisive role in the understanding of the process of virus infection. Human miRNAs interacted with the genome of SARS-CoV-2 can be captured or obtained from current available bioinformatics tools or platforms. And some timely studies that focus on miRNA’s role in COVID-19 have used these databases, servers and algorithms to acquire these interacted miRNAs. These tools mainly provide analyzing or predicting interaction between the miRNAs and targeted RNA sequences (Table 3).
Table 3.
Studies | Contents | Tools | URL | Description of the tool | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Khan’s study [55] | RNA–RNA interactions for viral miRNA-host mRNA and the host miRNA-viral genome | IntaRNA 2.0 | http://rna.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/IntaRNA | An algorithm for prediction of RNA–RNA interaction | [169] |
microRNA.org | http://www.microrna.org | A database containing knowledge of miRNA target prediction | [170] | ||
psRNATarget | http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/ | A server for analysis of miRNA target | [171] | ||
Identification of host miRNA targets | Funrich | http://www.funrich.org/forum | A software for functional enrichment analysis (containing information of experimentally validated targets of host miRNAs) | [172] | |
miRTarBase | http://miRTarBase.cuhk.edu.cn/ | A database containing experimentally validated microRNA-target interaction | [173] | ||
Fulzele’s study [174] | Identification of human miRNAs targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome | miRDB | http://mirdb.org | A database for prediction of miRNA targets | [175] |
Bartoszewski’s study [56] | Prediction of interaction between host miRNA and coronaviruses | RNA22 v2 | https://cm.jefferson.edu/rna22/Interactive/ | A method for miRNA binding sites and their corresponding microRNA/mRNA complexes | [176] |
Tang’s study [41] | Identification of host miRNA-mRNA interaction | multimiR | http://multimir.ucdenver.edu | A R package for miRNA-target interaction | [177] |
Satyam’s study [69] | Prediction of viral miRNA targeted host gene | miRanda v3.3 | http://www.microrna.org | An algorithm for prediction of miRNA target genes | [178] |
Sardar’s study [179] | Resource of antiviral host miRNAs (experimentally verified) and their targets | VIRmiRNA | http://crdd.osdd.net/servers/virmirna | A database containing experimentally validated viral miRNAs and their targets | [180] |
Prediction of host miRNA targeting virus genome | miRanda v3.3 | http://www.microrna.org | An algorithm for prediction of miRNA target genes | [178] | |
psRNATarget | http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/ | A server for analysis of miRNA target | [171] |
Conclusion and future remark
MiRNA is a type of direct and powerful manipulator of gene expression. MiRNA controls gene expression by binding any regions suitable for the interaction that can be located in DNA and RNA even proteins. MiRNA-based regulation (i) spreads over almost all categories of genes, which cover conventional coding RNA (transcription factor [8], enzyme [9], etc.), nuclear ncRNA [10], mitochondrial transcripts [11], via interactions with mRNA (3′-UTR, 5′-UTR and coding sequence), ncRNA [10], promoter DNA [86–88], non-Ago protein [89] and embedding in specific gene [15]; (ii) frequently participates in a variety of biological processes, including cell differentiation [90], proliferation [91], cell death [92], innate immunity [93] and migration [94] and (iii) governs the development of a number of diseases, such as cancer [34], diabetes [36], cardiovascular disease [37] and virus-infected disease [39]. The interplay between miRNA and other biomolecules is responsible for the homeostasis of a living organism. Either deprivation or forcing of the interplay may lead to disorder of physical function or the occurrence of disease. The absence of some miRNAs may result in severe symptoms even death in mice models.
Now COVID-19 has been affecting us for nearly 1 year and remains the trend of worsening in many countries. Attention to miRNA has increased the understanding of the pathogenesis and mechanism of SARS-COV-2 infection. Bioinformatics-based studies including omics-based analyses [95–97], establishment of databases [98–100] and web servers [101–105] have provided a tremendous assistance for a series of diseases research. Considering the risk and infectivity of the coronavirus, bioinformatics serves for the study of COVID-19 as a fast and effective tool and contributes to a number of emerging researches that focus on the connection between the ncRNAs and the virus infection. Based on these online RNA–RNA interaction tools, there are emerging studies that explored the role of RNA molecules interplays between virus and host in COVID-19.
Although many types of ncRNAs including miRNA, lncRNA and circRNA are involved in intracellular physiological processes and cellular signal pathways in various diseases, miRNA received more attention to the field of COVID-19 than other ncRNAs when the virus disease is developing. For one aspect, most of miRNA regulation to gene expression is direct, which may indicate that miRNA can regulate cellular signal pathways more directly and efficiently. For another, miRNA is the smallest RNA among these ncRNAs, which makes virus-releasing miRNAs unperceived by host’s immune system and might facilitate the process of virus entering to host.
An interesting hypothesis is that SARS-CoV-2 genome adsorbing host functional miRNAs leading to the host’s immune system in dysfunction has been verified by computational approach. A few timely studies have predicted and analyzed human miRNAs that interacted with the genome RNA of SARS-CoV-2 and target genes of these miRNAs were related to immune system, inflammatory response and cytokine storm in virus infection. According to the experience of previous knowledge in virus infection, the thought is reasonable that virus particles of SARS-CoV-2 may elude immunological recognition through depriving the host immune related miRNAs. In turn, host miRNAs targeting some function region of SARS-CoV-2 could result in an accelerated process of virus infection. Most of the therapeutic targets of COVID-19 in clinical are regulated miRNAs, which may provide the thought that the virus controls entry to cell and damaged processes by manipulating these functional miRNAs. SARS-CoV-2 also produces its own miRNAs. Available evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs also can target host genes that are related to immune system, inflammatory response and cytokine storm. Most of the findings above are based on bioinformatics techniques despite lack of experimental verification, however, which reasonably explains the cause why the SARS-COV-2 infection was not recognized by host’s immune system and the fact how SARS-CoV-2 destroyed the cell through control functional genes. During SARS-COV-2 infection, host-generated and virus-generated miRNAs are involved in the process of escaping immunological recognition, triggering the inflammatory response and mediating cytokine storm via interaction with related genes. Some altered miRNA expressions also can be acted as indicators of SARS-COV-2 infection in different phages.
Conclusively, the interplay of miRNA and other molecules during SARS-COV-2 infection may be a crucial manner to permit virus entry to the host. In one facet, due to the low molecular mass of miRNA, the function miRNA released by SARS-CoV-2 is not recognized by the host’s immune system and interacted with human genes, which provides a suitable opportunity for SARS-COV-2 infection. In another facet, adsorption of SARS-CoV-2’s RNA genome for human function miRNAs also traps the host in weakened immune protection status. Thereby, interactions between miRNA and other molecules may be a feasible strategy for the prevention and cure of COVID-19.
Although plenty of researches have reported that understanding the role of SARS-CoV-2- and host-generated miRNA presented the guiding role in the pathological causes and development of COVID-19, the contributions are not enough to provide substantial and direct assistance for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 due to that they are still in the theoretical stage. Because COVID-19 is developing and found for just around 1 year, little experiment-based mechanistic studies are made to further explain how miRNAs regulate gene expression to affect the processes of the virus infection and replication.
However, the studies about the miRNA in other viruses may be worthy references to apply to SARS-CoV-2 that knocking down of some virus- or host-produced miRNAs resulted in the decreased copies of the viruses [27, 63, 106]. It may mean that inhibition of miRNA can effectively block RNA–RNA interaction between host and virus to suppress virus infection and replication. Considering that the property of host miRNAs with multiple targets could lead to unanticipated disorder of physiological function in host cells, these clues may indicate that SARS-CoV-2 produced miRNAs might be potential targets of the COVID-19’s prevention and treatment. Therefore, the further exploring of SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs is urgently needed to investigate their targetability for COVID-19.
Key Points
Bioinformatics technology contributes to a number of timely and significant studies for understanding miRNA’s role in SARS-COV-2 infection.
Genomic RNA of SARS-CoV-2 adsorbs host immune-related miRNAs to disturb immune system, which provides a suitable opportunity for SARS-CoV-2 entry and infection to host.
SARS-CoV-2 produces and releases its own miRNAs in the host, which target host functional genes and affect subsequent signaling pathways including immune protection, inflammatory response and so on.
Host generated miRNAs target functional genes in the SARS-CoV-2 genome further leading to the severe progression of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Song Zhang is a PhD student in College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. He is interested in bioinformatics and molecular biology.
Kuerbannisha Amahong is a PhD student of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. She is interested in bioinformatics.
Xiuna Sun is a PhD student of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. She is interested in bioinformatics and molecular biology.
Xichen Lian is a PhD student of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. She is interested in bioinformatics and molecular biology.
Jin Liu is a PhD student of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. She is interested in bioinformatics and molecular biology.
Huaicheng Sun is a MD student of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. He is interested in bioinformatics.
Yan Lou is a professor of State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Clinical Research and Evaluation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. She is interested in the area of precision medicine, diagnosis and treatment of liver disease and system biology.
Feng Zhu is a professor of College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China. His research laboratory (https://idrblab.org/) has been working in the fields of bioinformatics, OMIC-based drug discovery, system biology and medicinal chemistry.
Yunqing Qiu is a professor of State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Clinical Research and Evaluation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China. He is interested in the area of precision medicine, diagnosis and treatment of liver disease and system biology.
Contributor Information
Song Zhang, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Kuerbannisha Amahong, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Xiuna Sun, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Xichen Lian, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Jin Liu, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Huaicheng Sun, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Yan Lou, Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Clinical Research and Evaluation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Feng Zhu, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Zhejiang University, China.
Yunqing Qiu, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Drug Clinical Research and Evaluation, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China.
Author contributions
Song Zhang: conceptualized, searched and reviewed literature, created the tables and drafted the manuscript. Kuerbannisha Amahong, Xiuna Sun, Xichen Lian, Jin Liu, Huaicheng Sun and Yan Lou: searched literature. Feng Zhu and Yunqing Qiu: conceptualized and critically reviewed the paper.
Funding
Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872798 and U1909208); Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR21H300001); National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0910500); Leading Talent of the ‘Ten Thousand Plan’—National High-Level Talents Special Support Plan of China; Fundamental Research Fund for Central Universities (2018QNA7023); Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (2020C03010). Supported by Information Technology Center, Zhejiang University.
Data availability statement
All data in the manuscript are collected and available in PubMed database and Therapeutic Target Database.
References
- 1. World Health Organization . Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (16 December 2020, date last accessed).
- 2. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020;579:270–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, et al. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 2020;324:782–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Romagnoli S, Peris A, De Gaudio AR, et al. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: from the bench to the bedside. Physiol Rev 2020;100:1455–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yang J, Song H, Cao K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of helicobacter pylori infection-associated diseases based on miRNA-mRNA interaction network. Brief Bioinform 2019;20:1492–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhang S, Zhou Y, Wang Y, et al. The mechanistic, diagnostic and therapeutic novel nucleic acids for hepatocellular carcinoma emerging in past score years. Brief Bioinform 2020. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Faiza M, Tanveer K, Fatihi S, et al. Comprehensive overview and assessment of microRNA target prediction tools in Homo sapiens and Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Bioinform 2019;14:432–45. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, et al. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev 2008;22:894–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, et al. C-Myc suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature 2009;458:762–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tang R, Li L, Zhu D, et al. Mouse miRNA-709 directly regulates miRNA-15a/16-1 biogenesis at the posttranscriptional level in the nucleus: evidence for a microRNA hierarchy system. Cell Res 2012;22:504–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zhuang X, Chen Y, Wu Z, et al. Mitochondrial miR-181a-5p promotes glucose metabolism reprogramming in liver cancer by regulating the electron transport chain. Carcinogenesis 2020;41:972–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lai EC. Micro RNAs are complementary to 3' UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet 2002;30:363–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Orom UA, Nielsen FC, Lund AH. MicroRNA-10a binds the 5'UTR of ribosomal protein mRNAs and enhances their translation. Mol Cell 2008;30:460–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Ito Y, Inoue A, Seers T, et al. Identification of targets of tumor suppressor microRNA-34a using a reporter library system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017;114:3927–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhou Y, Do DC, Ishmael FT, et al. Mannose receptor modulates macrophage polarization and allergic inflammation through miR-511-3p. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018;141:350–64 e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Heinsbroek SE, Squadrito ML, Schilderink R, et al. miR-511-3p, embedded in the macrophage mannose receptor gene, contributes to intestinal inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2016;9:960–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hong J, Luo Y, Zhang Y, et al. Protein functional annotation of simultaneously improved stability, accuracy and false discovery rate achieved by a sequence-based deep learning. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:1437–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hong J, Luo Y, Mou M, et al. Convolutional neural network-based annotation of bacterial type IV secretion system effectors with enhanced accuracy and reduced false discovery. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:1825–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Fu J, Tang J, Wang Y, et al. Discovery of the consistently well-performed analysis chain for SWATH-MS based pharmacoproteomic quantification. Front Pharmacol 2018;9:681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chen J, Zhang Y, Wei Y, et al. Discrimination of the contextual features of top performers in scientific literacy using a machine learning approach. Res Sci Educ 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9835-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Li S, Duan X, Li Y, et al. MicroRNA-130a inhibits HCV replication by restoring the innate immune response. J Viral Hepat 2014;21:121–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Chang YL, Ho BC, Sher S, et al. miR-146a and miR-370 coordinate enterovirus 71-induced cell apoptosis through targeting SOS1 and GADD45beta. Cell Microbiol 2015;17:802–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Pedersen IM, Cheng G, Wieland S, et al. Interferon modulation of cellular microRNAs as an antiviral mechanism. Nature 2007;449:919–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jopling CL, Schutz S, Sarnow P. Position-dependent function for a tandem microRNA miR-122-binding site located in the hepatitis C virus RNA genome. Cell Host Microbe 2008;4:77–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Khan F, Ahmad A, Ali A, et al. Conformational hotspots of dengue virus NS5 RdRp. Curr Bioinform 2018;13:310–8. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ren Q, Huang Y, He Y, et al. A white spot syndrome virus microRNA promotes the virus infection by targeting the host STAT. Sci Rep 2015;5:18384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Yang X, Li H, Sun H, et al. Hepatitis B virus-encoded MicroRNA controls viral replication. J Virol 2017;91:e01919–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang J, Liu X, Wu H, et al. CREB up-regulates long non-coding RNA, HULC expression through interaction with microRNA-372 in liver cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:5366–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature 2013;495:384–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Chowdhury MR, Basak J, Bahadur RP. Elucidating the functional role of predicted miRNAs in post-transcriptional gene regulation along with Symbiosis in Medicago truncatula. Curr Bioinform 2020;15:108–20. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Park CY, Choi YS, McManus MT. Analysis of microRNA knockouts in mice. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19:R169–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yang Q, Wu J, Zhao J, et al. The expression profiles of lncRNAs and their regulatory network during Smek1/2 knockout mouse neural stem cells differentiation. Curr Bioinform 2020;15:77–88. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Lodge R, Ferreira Barbosa JA, Lombard-Vadnais F, et al. Host MicroRNAs-221 and -222 inhibit HIV-1 entry in macrophages by targeting the CD4 viral receptor. Cell Rep 2017;21:141–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2017;16:203–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liao Z, Li D, Wang X, et al. Cancer diagnosis through IsomiR expression with machine learning method. Curr Bioinform 2018;13:57–63. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Regazzi R. MicroRNAs as therapeutic targets for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2018;22:153–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhou SS, Jin JP, Wang JQ, et al. miRNAS in cardiovascular diseases: potential biomarkers, therapeutic targets and challenges. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2018;39:1073–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Narang P, Dangi M, Sharma D, et al. An integrated chikungunya virus database to facilitate therapeutic analysis: ChkVDb. Curr Bioinform 2019;14:323–32. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Sarkar N, Chakravarty R, Hepatitis B. Virus infection, MicroRNAs and liver disease. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:17746–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Li C, Hu X, Li L, et al. Differential microRNA expression in the peripheral blood from human patients with COVID-19. J Clin Lab Anal 2020;34:e23590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tang H, Gao Y, Li Z, et al. The noncoding and coding transcriptional landscape of the peripheral immune response in patients with COVID-19. Clin Transl Med 2020;10:e200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Inciardi RM, Lupi L, Zaccone G, et al. Cardiac involvement in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020;5:819–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Zheng YY, Ma YT, Zhang JY, et al. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17:259–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Lu D, Chatterjee S, Xiao K, et al. MicroRNAs targeting the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor ACE2 in cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2020;148:46–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Matarese A, Gambardella J, Sardu C, et al. miR-98 regulates TMPRSS2 expression in human endothelial cells: key implications for COVID-19. Biomedicine 2020;8:462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Nersisyan S, Shkurnikov M, Turchinovich A, et al. Integrative analysis of miRNA and mRNA sequencing data reveals potential regulatory mechanisms of ACE2 and TMPRSS2. PLoS One 2020;15:e0235987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Wang Y, Zhang S, Li F, et al. Therapeutic target database 2020: enriched resource for facilitating research and early development of targeted therapeutics. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:D1031–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Li YH, Yu CY, Li XX, et al. Therapeutic target database update 2018: enriched resource for facilitating bench-to-clinic research of targeted therapeutics. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D1121–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wang Y, Li F, Zhang Y, et al. Databases for the targeted COVID-19 therapeutics. Br J Pharmacol 2020;177:4999–5001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sacar Demirci MD, Adan A. Computational analysis of microRNA-mediated interactions in SARS-CoV-2 infection. PeerJ 2020;8:e9369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Gallagher TM, Buchmeier MJ. Coronavirus spike proteins in viral entry and pathogenesis. Virology 2001;279:371–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wilson L, McKinlay C, Gage P, et al. SARS coronavirus E protein forms cation-selective ion channels. Virology 2004;330:322–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Masters PS. The molecular biology of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res 2006;66:193–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Khan MA, Sany MRU, Islam MS, et al. Epigenetic regulator miRNA pattern differences among SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2, and SARS-CoV-2 world-wide isolates delineated the mystery behind the epic pathogenicity and distinct clinical characteristics of pandemic COVID-19. Front Genet 2020;11:765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Bartoszewski R, Dabrowski M, Jakiela B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 may regulate cellular responses through depletion of specific host miRNAs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2020;319:L444–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Lodge R, Gilmore JC, Ferreira Barbosa JA, et al. Regulation of CD4 receptor and HIV-1 entry by MicroRNAs-221 and -222 during differentiation of THP-1 cells. Viruses 2017;10:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Lodge R, Bellini N, Laporte M, et al. Interleukin-1beta triggers p53-mediated downmodulation of CCR5 and HIV-1 entry in macrophages through microRNAs 103 and 107. MBio 2020;11:e02314–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Fu X, Ouyang Y, Mo J, et al. Upregulation of microRNA-328-3p by hepatitis B virus contributes to THLE-2 cell injury by downregulating FOXO4. J Transl Med 2020;18:143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Fu Y, Xu W, Chen D, et al. Enterovirus 71 induces autophagy by regulating has-miR-30a expression to promote viral replication. Antiviral Res 2015;124:43–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pfeffer S, Zavolan M, Grasser FA, et al. Identification of virus-encoded microRNAs. Science 2004;304:734–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Omoto S, Ito M, Tsutsumi Y, et al. HIV-1 nef suppression by virally encoded microRNA. Retrovirology 2004;1:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. He Y, Yang K, Zhang X. Viral microRNAs targeting virus genes promote virus infection in shrimp in vivo. J Virol 2014;88:1104–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Liu Z, Wang J, Xu Y et al. Implications of the virus-encoded miRNA and host miRNA in the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2. arXiv 2020;2004:04874v1. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Tycowski KT, Guo YE, Lee N, et al. Viral noncoding RNAs: more surprises. Genes Dev 2015;29:567–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Riley KJ, Rabinowitz GS, Steitz JA. Comprehensive analysis of rhesus lymphocryptovirus microRNA expression. J Virol 2010;84:5148–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Muzio M, Ni J, Feng P, et al. Pillars article: IRAK (Pelle) family member IRAK-2 and MyD88 as proximal mediators of IL-1 signaling. Science 1997;278:1612–5 J Immunol 2013;190:16–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Skinner CM, Ivanov NS, Barr SA, et al. An Epstein-Barr virus microRNA blocks interleukin-1 (IL-1) signaling by targeting IL-1 receptor 1. J Virol 2017;91:e00530–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Satyam R, Bhardwaj T, Goel S, et al. miRNAs in SARS-CoV 2: a spoke in the wheel of pathogenesis. Curr Pharm Des 2021;27:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Turnquist C, Ryan BM, Horikawa I, et al. Cytokine storms in cancer and COVID-19. Cancer Cell 2020;38:598–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Merino GA, Raad J, Bugnon LA, et al. Novel SARS-CoV-2 encoded small RNAs in the passage to humans. Bioinformatics 2020. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell 2020;181:1036–45 e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Luo W, Li YX, Jiang LJ, et al. Targeting JAK-STAT signaling to control cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2020;41:531–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Appelberg S, Gupta S, Svensson Akusjarvi S, et al. Dysregulation in Akt/mTOR/HIF-1 signaling identified by proteo-transcriptomics of SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020;9:1748–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Guzzi PH, Mercatelli D, Ceraolo C, et al. Master regulator analysis of the SARS-CoV-2/human interactome. J Clin Med 2020;9:982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Gysi DM, Do Valle I, Zitnik M, et al. Network Medicine Framework for Identifying Drug Repurposing Opportunities for COVID-19. arXiv, 2020;2004:07229v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Li B, Tang J, Yang Q, et al. Performance evaluation and online realization of data-driven normalization methods used in LC/MS based untargeted metabolomics analysis. Sci Rep 2016;6:38881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Tang J, Wang Y, Fu J, et al. A critical assessment of the feature selection methods used for biomarker discovery in current metaproteomics studies. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:1378–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tang J, Fu J, Wang Y, et al. Simultaneous improvement in the precision, accuracy, and robustness of label-free proteome quantification by optimizing data manipulation chains. Mol Cell Proteomics 2019;18:1683–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Yang QX, Wang YX, Li FC, et al. Identification of the gene signature reflecting schizophrenia's etiology by constructing artificial intelligence-based method of enhanced reproducibility. CNS Neurosci Ther 2019;25:1054–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Xue W, Yang F, Wang P, et al. What contributes to serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake Inhibitors' dual-targeting mechanism? The key role of transmembrane domain 6 in human serotonin and norepinephrine transporters revealed by molecular dynamics simulation. ACS Chem Nerosci 2018;9:1128–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Zhang Y, Ying JB, Hong JJ, et al. How does chirality determine the selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 6? A lesson from trichostatin A enantiomers based on molecular dynamics. ACS Chem Nerosci 2019;10:2467–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Fu T, Zheng G, Tu G, et al. Exploring the binding mechanism of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative allosteric modulators in clinical trials by molecular dynamics simulations. ACS Chem Nerosci 2018;9:1492–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Wang P, Zhang X, Fu T, et al. Differentiating physicochemical properties between addictive and nonaddictive ADHD drugs revealed by molecular dynamics simulation studies. ACS Chem Nerosci 2017;8:1416–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Zheng G, Xue W, Yang F, et al. Revealing vilazodone's binding mechanism underlying its partial agonism to the 5-HT1A receptor in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2017;19:28885–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Place RF, Li LC, Pookot D, et al. MicroRNA-373 induces expression of genes with complementary promoter sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:1608–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Chaluvally-Raghavan P, Jeong KJ, Pradeep S, et al. Direct upregulation of STAT3 by MicroRNA-551b-3p deregulates growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer. Cell Rep 2016;15:1493–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Jin S, Wang Z, Lin J, et al. The complexity of promoter regions based on a vector topological entropy. Curr Bioinform 2017;12:471–4. [Google Scholar]
- 89. Eiring AM, Harb JG, Neviani P, et al. miR-328 functions as an RNA decoy to modulate hnRNP E2 regulation of mRNA translation in leukemic blasts. Cell 2010;140:652–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Jeker LT, Bluestone JA. MicroRNA regulation of T-cell differentiation and function. Immunol Rev 2013;253:65–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Wang D, Atanasov AG. The microRNAs regulating vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: a Minireview. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Shirjang S, Mansoori B, Asghari S, et al. MicroRNAs in cancer cell death pathways: apoptosis and necroptosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2019;139:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Yuan X, Berg N, Lee JW, et al. MicroRNA miR-223 as regulator of innate immunity. J Leukoc Biol 2018;104:515–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Aghdam SG, Ebrazeh M, Hemmatzadeh M, et al. The role of microRNAs in prostate cancer migration, invasion, and metastasis. J Cell Physiol 2019;234:9927–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Yang Q, Li B, Tang J, et al. Consistent gene signature of schizophrenia identified by a novel feature selection strategy from comprehensive sets of transcriptomic data. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:1058–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Li YH, Li XX, Hong JJ, et al. Clinical trials, progression-speed differentiating features and swiftness rule of the innovative targets of first-in-class drugs. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:649–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Yang Q, Hong J, Li Y, et al. A novel bioinformatics approach to identify the consistently well-performing normalization strategy for current metabolomic studies. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:2142–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Yin J, Li F, Zhou Y, et al. INTEDE: interactome of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49:D1233–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Tang J, Wu X, Mou M, et al. GIMICA: host genetic and immune factors shaping human microbiota. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;49:D715–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Yin J, Sun W, Li F, et al. VARIDT 1.0: variability of drug transporter database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:D1042–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Yang Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. NOREVA: enhanced normalization and evaluation of time-course and multi-class metabolomic data. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:W436–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Li B, Tang J, Yang Q, et al. NOREVA: normalization and evaluation of MS-based metabolomics data. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:W162–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Tang J, Fu J, Wang Y, et al. ANPELA: analysis and performance assessment of the label-free quantification workflow for metaproteomic studies. Brief Bioinform 2020;21:621–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Yang Q, Li B, Chen S, et al. MMEASE: online meta-analysis of metabolomic data by enhanced metabolite annotation, marker selection and enrichment analysis. J Proteomics 2021;232:104023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Li F, Zhou Y, Zhang X, et al. SSizer: determining the sample sufficiency for comparative biological study. J Mol Biol 2020;432:3411–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Wang H, Gao H, Duan S, et al. Inhibition of microRNA-199a-5p reduces the replication of HCV via regulating the pro-survival pathway. Virus Res 2015;208:7–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Natekar JP, Rothan HA, Arora K, et al. Cellular microRNA-155 regulates virus-induced inflammatory response and protects against lethal West Nile virus infection. Viruses 2019;12:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Bhela S, Mulik S, Gimenez F, et al. Role of miR-155 in the pathogenesis of herpetic stromal keratitis. Am J Pathol 2015;185:1073–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Bhela S, Mulik S, Reddy PB, et al. Critical role of microRNA-155 in herpes simplex encephalitis. J Immunol 2014;192:2734–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Thorne L, Lu J, Chaudhry Y, et al. miR-155 induction is a marker of murine norovirus infection but does not contribute to control of replication in vivo. Wellcome Open Res 2018;3:42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Dickey LL, Worne CL, Glover JL, et al. MicroRNA-155 enhances T cell trafficking and antiviral effector function in a model of coronavirus-induced neurologic disease. J Neuroinflammation 2016;13:240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Crepeau RL, Zhang P, Usherwood EJ. MicroRNA miR-155 is necessary for efficient gammaherpesvirus reactivation from latency, but not for establishment of latency. J Virol 2016;90:7811–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Pociask DA, Robinson KM, Chen K, et al. Epigenetic and transcriptomic regulation of lung repair during recovery from influenza infection. Am J Pathol 2017;187:851–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Zhang Y, Zhang M, Li X, et al. Silencing MicroRNA-155 attenuates cardiac injury and dysfunction in viral myocarditis via promotion of M2 phenotype polarization of macrophages. Sci Rep 2016;6:22613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Wu T, Wieland A, Lee J, et al. Cutting edge: miR-17-92 is required for both CD4 Th1 and T follicular helper cell responses during viral infection. J Immunol 2015;195:2515–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Ban YH, Oh SC, Seo SH, et al. miR-150-mediated Foxo1 regulation programs CD8(+) T cell differentiation. Cell Rep 2017;20:2598–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Clement S, Sobolewski C, Gomes D, et al. Activation of the oncogenic miR-21-5p promotes HCV replication and steatosis induced by the viral core 3a protein. Liver Int 2019;39:1226–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Kadmon CS, Landers CT, Li HS, et al. MicroRNA-22 controls interferon alpha production and erythroid maturation in response to infectious stress in mice. Exp Hematol 2017;56:7–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Zhan J, Qin S, Lu L, et al. miR-34a is a common link in both HIV- and antiretroviral therapy-induced vascular aging. Aging (Albany NY) 2016;8:3298–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Zhai H, Song B, Xu X, et al. Inhibition of autophagy and tumor growth in colon cancer by miR-502. Oncogene 2013;32:1570–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Liu Y, Hei Y, Shu Q, et al. VCP/p97, down-regulated by microRNA-129-5p, could regulate the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One 2012;7:e35800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Guo R, Gu J, Zhang Z, et al. MicroRNA-410 functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptor in pancreatic cancer. IUBMB Life 2015;67:42–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Ramalho-Carvalho J, Goncalves CS, Graca I, et al. A multiplatform approach identifies miR-152-3p as a common epigenetically regulated onco-suppressor in prostate cancer targeting TMEM97. Clin Epigenetics 2018;10:40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Bao Q, Zhao M, Chen L, et al. MicroRNA-297 promotes cardiomyocyte hypertrophy via targeting sigma-1 receptor. Life Sci 2017;175:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Saha B, Momen-Heravi F, Kodys K, et al. MicroRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from alcohol-exposed monocytes signals naive monocytes to differentiate into M2 macrophages. J Biol Chem 2016;291:149–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Sun J, Chen Z, Tan X, et al. MicroRNA-99a/100 promotes apoptosis by targeting mTOR in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oncol 2013;30:411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Wang P, Lv HY, Zhou DM, et al. miR-204 suppresses non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) invasion and migration by targeting JAK2. Genet Mol Res 2016;15:gmr6415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Kim HR, Roe JS, Lee JE, et al. A p53-inducible microRNA-34a downregulates Ras signaling by targeting IMPDH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012;418:682–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Ouchida M, Kanzaki H, Ito S, et al. Novel direct targets of miR-19a identified in breast cancer cells by a quantitative proteomic approach. PLoS One 2012;7:e44095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Jia L, Wu J, Zhang L, et al. Restoration of miR-1228* expression suppresses epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. PLoS One 2013;8:e58637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Chen Z, Li Z, Soutto M, et al. Integrated analysis of mouse and human gastric neoplasms identifies conserved microRNA networks in gastric carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 2019;156:1127–39 e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Miao Y, Chen H, Li M. MiR-19a overexpression contributes to heart failure through targeting ADRB1. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:642–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Servais FA, Kirchmeyer M, Hamdorf M, et al. Modulation of the IL-6-Signaling pathway in liver cells by miRNAs targeting gp130, JAK1, and/or STAT3. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2019;16:419–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Liu D, Liu C, Wang X, et al. MicroRNA-451 suppresses tumor cell growth by down-regulating IL6R gene expression. Cancer Epidemiol 2014;38:85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Zhang L, Chu Q, Liu X, et al. microRNA-21 negatively regulates NF-kappaB signaling pathway via targeting IL1R1 in miiuy croaker. Dev Comp Immunol 2020;105:103578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Wu R, Ruan J, Sun Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA HIF1A-AS2 facilitates adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) osteogenic differentiation through miR-665/IL6 axis via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018;9:348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 137. Wei C, Wang S, Ye ZQ, et al. miR-206 inhibits renal cell cancer growth by targeting GAK. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2016;36:852–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Wu QB, Chen J, Zhu JW, et al. MicroRNA125 inhibits RKO colorectal cancer cell growth by targeting VEGF. Int J Mol Med 2018;42:665–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Sullivan RP, Leong JW, Schneider SE, et al. MicroRNA-deficient NK cells exhibit decreased survival but enhanced function. J Immunol 2012;188:3019–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Wang HF, Li Y, Wang YQ, et al. MicroRNA-494-3p alleviates inflammatory response in sepsis by targeting TLR6. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019;23:2971–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Xu H, Wu Y, Li L, et al. MiR-344b-1-3p targets TLR2 and negatively regulates TLR2 signaling pathway. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017;12:627–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Wang J, Li M, Han X, et al. MiR-1976 knockdown promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell properties inducing triple-negative breast cancer metastasis. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Zhong M, Bian Z, Wu Z. miR-30a suppresses cell migration and invasion through downregulation of PIK3CD in colorectal carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem 2013;31:209–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Qu JQ, Yi HM, Ye X, et al. MiRNA-203 reduces nasopharyngeal carcinoma radioresistance by targeting IL8/AKT Signaling. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14:2653–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Xing Q, Xie H, Zhu B, et al. MiR-455-5p suppresses the progression of prostate cancer by targeting CCR5. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:6394784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Siuda D, Randriamboavonjy V, Fleming I. Regulation of calpain 2 expression by miR-223 and miR-145. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 2019;1862:194438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Zhou Y, Deng J, Chu X, et al. Role of post-transcriptional control of calpain by miR-124-3p in the development of Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2019;67:571–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Alsaleh G, Suffert G, Semaan N, et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase is involved in miR-346-related regulation of IL-18 release by lipopolysaccharide-activated rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. J Immunol 2009;182:5088–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Zhang R, Su H, Ma X, et al. MiRNA let-7b promotes the development of hypoxic pulmonary hypertension by targeting ACE2. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2019;316:L547–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Zhou HC, Fang JH, Shang LR, et al. MicroRNAs miR-125b and miR-100 suppress metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by disrupting the formation of vessels that encapsulate tumour clusters. J Pathol 2016;240:450–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Fei Y, Chaulagain A, Wang T, et al. MiR-146a down-regulates inflammatory response by targeting TLR3 and TRAF6 in coxsackievirus B infection. RNA 2020;26:91–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Kong LM, Liao CG, Zhang Y, et al. A regulatory loop involving miR-22, Sp1, and c-Myc modulates CD147 expression in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res 2014;74:3764–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Li Y, Shi Y, McCaw L, et al. Microenvironmental interleukin-6 suppresses toll-like receptor signaling in human leukemia cells through miR-17/19A. Blood 2015;126:766–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Tan H, Qi J, Fan BY, et al. MicroRNA-24-3p attenuates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by suppressing RIPK1 expression in mice. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018;51:46–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Matysiak M, Fortak-Michalska M, Szymanska B, et al. MicroRNA-146a negatively regulates the immunoregulatory activity of bone marrow stem cells by targeting prostaglandin E2 synthase-2. J Immunol 2013;190:5102–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Wang J, Hussain T, Yue R, et al. MicroRNA-199a inhibits cellular autophagy and downregulates IFN-beta expression by targeting TBK1 in Mycobacterium bovis infected cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2018;8:238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Hu H, Yang L, Li L, et al. Long non-coding RNA KCNQ1OT1 modulates oxaliplatin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma through miR-7-5p/ABCC1 axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018;503:2400–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Chu HW, Cheng CW, Chou WC, et al. A novel estrogen receptor-microRNA 190a-PAR-1-pathway regulates breast cancer progression, a finding initially suggested by genome-wide analysis of loci associated with lymph-node metastasis. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23:355–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Sun M, Gomes S, Chen P, et al. RKIP and HMGA2 regulate breast tumor survival and metastasis through lysyl oxidase and syndecan-2. Oncogene 2014;33:3528–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Miyamoto K, Seki N, Matsushita R, et al. Tumour-suppressive miRNA-26a-5p and miR-26b-5p inhibit cell aggressiveness by regulating PLOD2 in bladder cancer. Br J Cancer 2016;115:354–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Lei W, Kang W, Nan Y, et al. The downregulation of miR-200c promotes lactate dehydrogenase a expression and non-small cell lung cancer progression. Oncol Res 2018;26:1015–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Xu Z, Xu J, Lu H, et al. LARP1 is regulated by the XIST/miR-374a axis and functions as an oncogene in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncol Rep 2017;38:3659–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Sharma A, Kumar M, Aich J, et al. Posttranscriptional regulation of interleukin-10 expression by hsa-miR-106a. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:5761–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Terao M, Fratelli M, Kurosaki M, et al. Induction of miR-21 by retinoic acid in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma cells: biological correlates and molecular targets. J Biol Chem 2011;286:4027–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Tang W, Zhou W, Xiang L, et al. The p300/YY1/miR-500a-5p/HDAC2 signalling axis regulates cell proliferation in human colorectal cancer. Nat Commun 2019;10:663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Zhao M, Li YP, Geng XR, et al. Expression level of MiRNA-126 in serum exosomes of allergic asthma patients and lung tissues of asthmatic mice. Curr Drug Metab 2019;20:799–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Zhao W, Liu Y, Zhang L, et al. MicroRNA-154-5p regulates the HPV16 E7-pRb pathway in cervical carcinogenesis by targeting CUL2. J Cancer 2020;11:5379–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Guan H, You Z, Wang C, et al. MicroRNA-200a suppresses prostate cancer progression through BRD4/AR signaling pathway. Cancer Med 2019;8:1474–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Mann M, Wright PR, Backofen R. IntaRNA 2.0: enhanced and customizable prediction of RNA-RNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:W435–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, et al. The microRNA.Org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D149–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Dai X, Zhao PX. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:W155–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Pathan M, Keerthikumar S, Chisanga D, et al. A novel community driven software for functional enrichment analysis of extracellular vesicles data. J Extracell Vesicles 2017;6:1321455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Huang HY, Lin YC, Li J, et al. miRTarBase 2020: updates to the experimentally validated microRNA-target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:D148–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Fulzele S, Sahay B, Yusufu I, et al. COVID-19 virulence in aged patients might be impacted by the host cellular MicroRNAs abundance/profile. Aging Dis 2020;11:509–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Chen Y, Wang X. miRDB: an online database for prediction of functional microRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res 2020;48:D127–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Miranda KC, Huynh T, Tay Y, et al. A pattern-based method for the identification of MicroRNA binding sites and their corresponding heteroduplexes. Cell 2006;126:1203–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Ru Y, Kechris KJ, Tabakoff B, et al. The multiMiR R package and database: integration of microRNA-target interactions along with their disease and drug associations. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:e133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Enright AJ, John B, Gaul U, et al. MicroRNA targets in drosophila. Genome Biol 2003;5:R1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Sardar R, Satish D, Birla S, et al. Comparative analyses of SARS-CoV2 genomes from different geographical locations and other coronavirus family genomes reveals unique features potentially consequential to host-virus interaction and pathogenesis. bioRxiv, 2020. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.21.001586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 180. Qureshi A, Thakur N, Monga I, et al. VIRmiRNA: a comprehensive resource for experimentally validated viral miRNAs and their targets. Database (Oxford) 2014;2014:bau103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data in the manuscript are collected and available in PubMed database and Therapeutic Target Database.