Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Mar 24;25(5):27. doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00943-6

Reducing New Persistent Opioid Use After Surgery: A Review of Interventions

Stacey Burns 1,, Richard Urman 1,2, Rachel Pian 3, Oscar Jim Michael Coppes 4
PMCID: PMC7990836  PMID: 33760983

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review aims to summarize interventions used in the perioperative period to reduce the development of new persistent postoperative opioid use in opioid-naïve patients.

Recent Findings

The development of new persistent opioid use after surgery has recently been identified as a common postoperative complication. The existing literature suggests that interventions across the continuum of care have been shown to decrease the incidence of new persistent postoperative opioid use. Specific preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative interventions will be reviewed, as well as the use of clinical pathways and protocols that span throughout the perioperative period. Common to many of these interventions include the use of multimodal analgesia throughout the perioperative period and an emphasis on a patient-centered, evidence-based approach to the perioperative pain management plan.

Summary

While the incidence of new persistent postoperative opioid use appears to be high, the literature suggests that there are both small- and large-scale interventions that can be used to reduce this. Technological advances including prescription monitoring systems and mobile applications have enabled studies to monitor opioid consumption after discharge. Interventions that occur preoperatively, such as patient education and expectation setting regarding postoperative pain management, and interventions that occur postoperatively, such as the implementation of procedure-specific, evidence-based prescribing guidelines and protocols, have been shown to reduce post-discharge opioid consumption. The use of multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing adjuncts throughout the perioperative period is central to many of these interventions and has essentially become standard of care for management of perioperative pain.

Keywords: Persistent postoperative opioid use, Postsurgical opioids, Multimodal analgesia, Multidisciplinary pain management, Perioperative opioid reduction

Introduction

It is well known that the USA is facing an ongoing opioid crisis, with the number of opioid overdoses and deaths on the rise. Between 1999 and 2008 opioid prescribing in the USA quadrupled, with a parallel increase in reported overdoses [1]. Approximately 40% of opioid overdose deaths involve a prescription opioid, with the combined economic burden of prescription opioid-related overdose, abuse, and dependence exceeding $78.5 billion annually [2]. Given this grave reality alongside the multitude of well-documented adverse effects of opioids, interventions have been implemented across all levels of the healthcare system with the aim of limiting opioid prescriptions.

Surgical patients are particularly vulnerable during the perioperative period, as the majority of them are exposed to opioids at some point during this time. Up to 14.7% of patients who are opioid-naïve may develop persistent postoperative opioid use [3], and studies show that opioids prescribed during and after surgery can increase the risk of chronic use in all patients [47]. Additionally, the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain can be as high as 85% depending on the type of surgery [7]. New persistent opioid use after surgery, most commonly defined as continued opioid prescription use between 90 and 180 days after the surgical procedure in a previously opioid-naïve patient, has recently been identified as one of the most common postoperative complications [3, 8]. Therefore, this population has become an increasingly important focus in the literature.

The incidence of new persistent opioid use after surgery is multifactorial, related to patient-specific risk factors, the type of surgery, and prescribing behaviors during the perioperative period. While there have been various interventions designed to decrease opioid use in the immediate perioperative period, lack of long-term longitudinal follow-up precludes an accurate assessment of the impact on new postoperative opioid use. This article will discuss risk factors associated with persistent opioid use after surgery and provide an up-to-date review of interventions designed to prevent new persistent opioid use after surgery. Interventions under discussion will include perioperative protocols/clinical pathways and programs, as well as preoperative-, intraoperative-, and postoperative-specific interventions.

Risk Factors for the Development of New Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use

Risk factors associated with the development of persistent postoperative opioid use in previously opioid-naïve patients include patient-related risk factors, surgical factors, and the perioperative pain management plan. Multiple patient-specific variables have been identified as potentially contributing to new persistent opioid use, including substance use disorders, mood disorders, and preexisting chronic pain [6, 9••]. Specific surgical procedures that have been linked to an increased risk of persistent postoperative opioid use include total knee arthroplasty, simple mastectomy, open cholecystectomy, open appendectomy, cesarean delivery, and cardiothoracic surgery [6, 10]. Additionally, many studies have shown that the amount and duration of opioids prescribed at discharge contribute to the development of new persistent postoperative opioid use [4, 5, 10, 11••]. Knowledge of these risk factors can aid in the early identification of patients at high risk, which may significantly alter a patient’s trajectory of care.

Perioperative Protocols/Clinical Pathways

The implementation of multidisciplinary perioperative protocols which focus on the use of opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia modalities throughout the continuum of care, like Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols, have consistently shown to be associated with decreased perioperative opioid consumption. While the majority of studies examining the effects of ERAS protocols on perioperative opioid use terminate at patient discharge, tracking post-discharge opioid use has enabled more recent studies to examine the impact of ERAS protocols on both discharge and post-discharge opioid prescriptions. Liu et al. (2019) implemented an ERAS protocol targeting two patient populations (2468 elective colorectal and 3885 emergent hip fracture patients) with specific multimodal non-opioid adjuncts and followed patients for up to 1 year after surgery. Using pharmacy dispensing records it was reported that implementation of the ERAS protocol was associated with more than a 20% reduction in opioid refills 3 months to 1 year after surgery [12]. Razi et al. (2020) investigated an Enhanced Recovery after Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for patients undergoing thoracotomies and robotic thoracoscopies which focused on a multimodal pain management strategy including the use of opioid-sparing analgesics and regional anesthesia. Implementation of the ERATS protocol resulted in a drastic reduction of new persistent opioid use without adversely affecting outcomes [13]. Similar longitudinal results have been reported in liver surgery [14], indicating potentially unrealized benefits of ERAS protocols that extend beyond discharge.

Technological advances have enabled the incorporation of novel mobile applications into ERAS protocols, which can aid in tracking postoperative opioid use. Pickens et al. (2019) found that the implementation of a mobile application for real-time collection of patient-reported outcomes for 30 days after hepatopancreatobiliary surgery within an ERAS pathway resulted in decreased opioid consumption and pain scores, increased compliance with ambulation and breathing exercises, and prevention of emergency room visits [15]. Future adoption and scaling of such mobile applications may prove to be beneficial in the management and tracking of postsurgical pain and opioid use.

Another example of a multidisciplinary, integrative approach to the prevention of new persistent postoperative opioid use is Toronto General Hospital’s Transitional Pain Service, which is designed to identify patients at risk for chronic postsurgical pain and opioid use and offer coordinated and comprehensive care throughout the perioperative period. Patients are seen preoperatively, postoperatively in the hospital, and after discharge in an outpatient setting for up to 6 months after surgery [16]. Clarke et al. (2018) found that participation in the Transitional Pain Service significantly improved pain scores and simultaneously reduced the incidence of persistent opioid use within the first 6 months after surgery [17].

Preoperative Interventions

The preoperative period is a critical stage where patients with risk factors for the development of new persistent opioid use can be identified early on, which can prompt the early involvement of programs like Toronto General Hospital’s Transitional Pain Service. In these patients, it is important to obtain baseline pain levels prior to surgery, as this information can help to prevent overzealous treatment of postoperative pain [8]. Studies across various surgical subspecialties have highlighted the importance of preoperative-specific interventions on reducing new persistent opioid use after surgery. Overall, interventions emphasizing patient education, expectation setting, shared decision making, and early identification of high-risk patients are associated with a decrease in the incidence of new persistent postoperative opioid use [1822]. A recent systematic review of institutional strategies aimed at reducing opioids after orthopedic surgery reported that formal preoperative patient education programs were the most effective intervention in reducing persistent postoperative opioid use [18]. In patients undergoing hysterectomies, those who participated in a preoperative patient education program consumed significantly fewer oral morphine equivalents at the time of discharge with no significant change in patient satisfaction or number of refills. This education program included a discussion of pain expectations and information regarding the mean number of opioids used by a similar cohort, and patients were then able to choose the number of opioids prescribed at discharge [19]. Similarly, a recently published randomized controlled trial examining the effect of opioid-related preoperative patient education on post-discharge opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair reported that preoperative patient education significantly decreased the number of opioid pills consumed at 3 months after surgery. Furthermore, it led to earlier cessation of opioids in both opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients [23].

Intraoperative and Immediate Perioperative Interventions

Over the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of perioperative pain, with an evolving focus on the use of multimodal analgesia in the immediate perioperative period to reduce unnecessary opioid exposure. Multimodal analgesia, referred to above, is defined as two or more interventions with varying mechanisms of action for postoperative pain relief [24]. It has been suggested that by increasing the number of non-opioid pain management modalities, more effective pain control is achieved with decreased opioid use [25]. Examples of opioid-sparing multimodal interventions include pharmacological adjuncts like ketamine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, gabapentinoids, intravenous lidocaine infusions, regional and neuraxial techniques, and non-pharmacologic techniques such as TENS, acupuncture, and music therapy [26]. Liposomal bupivacaine is newly being considered, although data is still developing. The use of multimodal adjuncts in the immediate perioperative period has been studied extensively [10, 26, 27••], and while many of these adjuncts have been shown to be associated with reduced opioid consumption and pain scores in the immediate postoperative period, most studies do not continue to track opioid use after discharge.

Postoperative Interventions

Given the lack of large-scale data on post-discharge pain trajectories and opioid usage, lack of guidance regarding optimal postoperative pain management, and the resulting widespread variability in prescribing practices, multiple studies have focused on postoperative-specific interventions to decrease opioid consumption after discharge [24]. Many surgical specialties are now implementing evidence-based, procedure-specific postoperative pain management protocols to help guide opioid prescribing practices, resulting in decreased variability and decreased unnecessary opioid prescriptions [20, 2830].

Provider education and implementing procedure-specific prescribing guidelines for discharge have consistently been shown to reduce new persistent opioid use [18, 3134]. In a study by Kaafarni et al. (2019), persistent postoperative opioid use was decreased after implementation of a multidisciplinary intervention including opioid guidelines for procedures from 11 different specialties, provider-focused posters displayed in all surgical units, patient opioid/pain brochures setting expectations, and educational seminars to residents, advanced practice providers, and nurses [35]. Similarly, a 2020 study by Patel et al. found that implementing an opioid reduction intervention consisting of an informational sheet for patients at discharge, education by nurses at discharge, and an evidence-based prescribing guideline resulted in decreased opioid usage in the first 30 days after surgery [36]. Interestingly, Howard et al. (2018) found that after implementing evidence-based opioid prescribing recommendations for a single surgical procedure (laparoscopic cholecystectomy), discharge opioid prescriptions decreased for four other unrelated surgical procedures without significantly affecting refill rates, described as the “spillover effect” [37]. In addition to procedure-specific protocols, recent studies suggest that patient-specific prescribing and tapering protocols based on a review of the patient’s personal opioid consumption prior to discharge leads to decreased persistent opioid use after discharge [38, 39]. Other simple yet effective interventions include lowering discharge opioid prescription defaults in the electronic health system [40] and the creation of evidence-based procedure-specific discharge ordering sets [41]. Involvement of a transitional pain service can help to bridge the potential gap in care after discharge.

Lastly, a review of a novel electronic health modality aimed at optimizing pain management while decreasing unnecessary opioid consumption was recently published, in which the authors designed and implemented a mobile application guiding patients in pain management and opiate use in the first 2 weeks after discharge from a total knee replacement. They reported that use of the application resulted in decreased opioid consumption, and more frequent use was associated with a more pronounced result [42••]. While this study is limited in the duration of follow-up, further technological advances will continue to pave the way for closer monitoring of patients after surgical discharge, enabling more tailored, collaborative patient-centered care.

Conclusions

With growing evidence that new persistent opioid use after major and minor surgery is relatively common, there has been an increased interest in longitudinal follow-up of postoperative opioid use. Efforts are being made across the continuum of care to limit unnecessary exposure to opioids. Current literature suggests that interventions can be performed throughout the perioperative period to successfully decrease the risk of patients developing new persistent postoperative opioid use. Early identification of patients at risk can help to tailor interventions within the context of a multidisciplinary perioperative pain management plan. The use of multimodal anesthesia and analgesia, enhanced recovery pathways, and additional opioid-sparing techniques have become the standard of care in the management of perioperative pain. While many studies examining single interventions in isolation have shown to consistently decrease opioid requirements in the immediate perioperative period, few studies report the impact on opioid consumption after discharge and the same is true for many of the ERAS studies. Future studies are needed to determine if the observed decrease in in-hospital opioid use translates into decreased post-discharge opioid use and the development of new persistent use. Fortunately, technological advances including prescription monitoring and centralized electronic medical record systems are making post-discharge tracking more feasible, which will enable future studies the ability to follow patients in the longer term. Additionally, the use of mobile electronic applications as a way to decrease post-discharge opioid consumption appears to be a promising new development, enabling closer follow-up, monitoring, and patient-centered prescription guidance.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

Stacey Burns, MD, MBA, Rachel Pian, BA, and Oscar Jim Michael Coppes, MD, have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Richard Urman, MD reports grants and personal fees from Merck, grants and personal fees from Medtronic, grants from AcelRx, personal fees from Takeda, personal fees from Heron, personal fees from Acacia, and grants from NIH/AHRQ/NSF, outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Acute Pain Medicine

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  • 1.Leonard PJ, Jones CM, Mack KA, Rudd RA. Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers --- United States, 1999--2008. In: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6043a4.htm?s_cid=mm6043a4_w. Accessed 6 Sept 2020.
  • 2.Florence CS, Zhou C, Luo F, Xu L. The economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and dependence in the United States, 2013. Med Care. 2016;54:901–906. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jivraj N, Raghavji F, Bethell J, Wijeysundera D, Ladha K, Bateman B, et al. Persistent postoperative opioid use. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:1528–1539. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Calcaterra S, Yamashita T, Min S, Keniston A, Frank J, Binswanger I. Opioid prescribing at hospital discharge contributes to chronic opioid use. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;31:478–485. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3539-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alam A. Long-term analgesic use after low-risk surgery. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:425–430. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kent M, Hurley R, Oderda G, Gordon D, Sun E, Mythen M, et al. American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative-4 Joint Consensus Statement on Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:543–552. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Searle R, Simpson K. Chronic post-surgical pain. continuing education in anaesthesia. Crit Care Pain. 2009;10:12–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Karamchandani K, Srinivas P, Bryan W, Pepin M, Lehman E, Krishnamoorthy V, et al. New persistent opioid use after surgery. ASA Newslett. 2020;84:8–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brummett C, Waljee J, Goesling J, Moser S, Lin P, Englesbe M, et al. New persistent opioid use after minor and major surgical procedures in US adults. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:e170504. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hah J, Bateman B, Ratliff J, Curtin C, Sun E. Chronic opioid use after surgery. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1733–1740. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Brown C, Chen Z, Khurshan F, Groeneveld P, Desai N. Development of persistent opioid use after cardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:889. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu V, Eaton A, Lee D, Reyes V, Paulson S, Campbell C, et al. Postoperative opioid use before and after enhanced recovery after surgery program implementation. Ann Surg. 2019;270:e69–e71. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Razi S, Stephens-McDonnough J, Haq S, Fabbro M, Sanchez A, Epstein R, et al. Significant reduction of postoperative pain and opioid analgesics requirement with an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery protocol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.137. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Lillemoe H, Marcus R, Day R, Kim B, Narula N, Davis C, et al. Enhanced recovery in liver surgery decreases postoperative outpatient use of opioids. Surgery. 2019;166:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pickens R, Cochran A, Tezber K, Berry R, Bhattacharya E, Koo D, et al. Using a mobile application for real-time collection of patient reported outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery within an ERAS® pathway. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2019;31:111–112. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.03.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Katz J, Weinrib A, Fashler S, Katznelson R, Shah B, Ladak S, et al. The Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service: development and implementation of a multidisciplinary program to prevent chronic postsurgical pain. J Pain Res. 2015;8:695–702. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S91924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Clarke H, Azargive S, Montbriand J, Nicholls J, Sutherland A, Valeeva L, Boulis S, McMillan K, Ladak SSJ, Ladha K, Katznelson R, McRae K, Tamir D, Lyn S, Huang A, Weinrib A, Katz J. Opioid weaning and pain management in postsurgical patients at the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service. Can J Pain. 2018;2:236–247. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1501669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lovecchio F, Premkumar A, Stepan J, Albert T. Fighting back: institutional strategies to combat the opioid epidemic: a systematic review. HSS J. 2019;15:66–71. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-09662-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vilkins A, Sahara M, Till S, Ceci C, Howard R, Griffith K, et al. Effects of shared decision making on opioid prescribing after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020;75:21–22. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000617220.49982.c6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prabhu M, Dubois H, James K, Leffert L, Riley L, Bateman B, et al. Implementation of a quality improvement initiative to decrease opioid prescribing after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:631–636. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sugai D, Deptula P, Parsa A, Fereydoun D. The importance of communication in the management of postoperative pain. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72:180–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O’Donnell K. Preoperative pain management education: a quality improvement project. J PeriAnesth Nurs. 2015;30:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2015.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Syed U, Aleem A, Wowkanech C, Weekes D, Freedman M, Tjoumakaris F, et al. Neer Award 2018: the effect of preoperative education on opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018;27:962–967. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Soffin E, Lee B, Kumar K, Wu C. The prescription opioid crisis: role of the anaesthesiologist in reducing opioid use and misuse. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:e198–e208. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Memtsoudis S, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Cozowicz C, Mörwald E, Mariano E, et al. Association of multimodal pain management strategies with perioperative outcomes and resource utilization. Anesthesiology. 2018;128:891–902. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar K, Kirksey M, Duong S, Wu C. A review of opioid-sparing modalities in perioperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1749–1760. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Creighton D, Kumar A, Grant S. perioperative multimodal pain management: an evidence-based update. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2019;9:295–307. doi: 10.1007/s40140-019-00340-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee B, Schug S, Joshi G, Kehlet H, Beloeil H, Bonnet F, et al. Procedure-Specific Pain Management (PROSPECT) – an update. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2018;32:101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2018.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Patel H, Srivastava A, Patel N, Faisal F, Ludwig W, Joice G, et al. A prospective cohort study of postdischarge opioid practices after radical prostatectomy: the ORIOLES initiative. Eur Urol. 2019;75:215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang D, Sussman J, Dossa F, Jivraj N, Ladha K, Brar S, et al. A systematic review of behavioral interventions to decrease opioid prescribing after surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271:266–278. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Howard R, Waljee J, Brummett C, Englesbe M, Lee J. Reduction in opioid prescribing through evidence-based prescribing guidelines. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:285–287. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hill M, Stucke R, McMahon M, Beeman J, Barth R. An educational intervention decreases opioid prescribing after general surgical operations. Ann Surg. 2018;267:468–472. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fleischman A, Tarabichi M, Foltz C, Makar G, Hozack W, Austin M, et al. Cluster-randomized trial of opiate-sparing analgesia after discharge from elective hip surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;229:335–345.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wyles C, Hevesi M, Trousdale E, Ubl D, Gazelka H, Habermann E, et al. The 2018 Chitranjan S. Ranawat, MD Award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477:104–113. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kaafarani H, Eid A, Antonelli D, Chang D, Elsharkawy A, Elahad J, et al. Description and impact of a comprehensive multispecialty multidisciplinary intervention to decrease opioid prescribing in surgery. Ann Surg. 2019;270:452–462. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Patel H, Faisal F, Patel N, Pavlovich C, Allaf M, Han M, et al. Effect of a prospective opioid reduction intervention on opioid prescribing and use after radical prostatectomy: results of the Opioid Reduction Intervention for Open, Laparoscopic, and Endoscopic Surgery (ORIOLES) Initiative. BJU Int. 2019;125:426–432. doi: 10.1111/bju.14932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Howard R, Alameddine M, Klueh M, Englesbe M, Brummett C, Waljee J, Lee J. Spillover effect of evidence-based postoperative opioid prescribing. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;227:374–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tamboli M, Mariano E, Gustafson K, Riones B, Hunter O, Wang R, et al. A multidisciplinary patient-specific opioid prescribing and tapering protocol is associated with a decrease in total opioid dose prescribed for six weeks after total hip arthroplasty. Pain Med. 2019;21:1474–1481. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen E, Betancourt L, Li L, Trucks E, Marcantonio A, Tornetta P. Standardized, patient-specific, postoperative opioid prescribing after inpatient orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020;28:e304–e318. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chiu A, Jean R, Hoag J, Freedman-Weiss M, Healy J, Pei K. Association of lowering default pill counts in electronic medical record systems with postoperative opioid prescribing. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:1012–1019. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stanek J, Renslow M, Kalliainen L. The effect of an educational program on opioid prescription patterns in hand surgery: a quality improvement program. J Hand Surg. 2015;40:341–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pronk Y, Peters M, Sheombar A, Brinkman J. Effectiveness of a mobile eHealth app in guiding patients in pain control and opiate use after total knee replacement: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2020;8:e16415. doi: 10.2196/16415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Pain and Headache Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES