Abstract
Venom research is a highly multidisciplinary field that involves multiple subfields of biology, informatics, pharmacology, medicine, and other areas. These different research facets are often technologically challenging and pursued by different teams lacking connection with each other. This lack of coordination hampers the full development of venom investigation and applications. The COST Action CA19144–European Venom Network was recently launched to promote synergistic interactions among different stakeholders and foster venom research at the European level.
Keywords: COST, venom, toxins, networking, interdisciplinarity
Background
Venomous species represent ∼15% of the global estimated animal biodiversity, are omnipresent in aquatic and terrestrial habitats, and evolved independently in all metazoan lineages in >100 instances [1]. Venoms are complex mixtures of bioactive compounds, mostly peptides and proteins, that evolved through millions of years of natural selection predominantly for predation and defense. Venom toxins are adaptive and highly convergent traits, extremely useful to understand the evolutionary mechanisms that link genotype, phenotype, and protein function.
In addition, toxins are streamlined to act fast at very low concentrations, being highly specific with key physiological targets of prey and/or predators (ion channels, enzymes, and cellular membrane components) [2]. Many toxins target the neuromuscular system, while others possess anticoagulant, cytolytic, anesthetic, and hypotensive activities [3]. These characteristics make them ideal candidates for biotechnological applications. To date, 10 animal-derived drugs have been approved and several others are in various stages of clinical trials to treat a wide array of diseases including cancer, hypertension, acute coronary syndromes, and chronic pain [4]. Besides medicine, venom toxins have great potential in other biotechnological fields: spider toxins to develop eco-friendly insecticides and other agrochemicals [4], ion channel blockers from cone snails and bees for cosmeceutical applications [5], and pore-forming toxins for sequencing and sensing technologies [6].
Venomics as a multidisciplinary playground
Venom investigation involves many scientific disciplines that in recent years have undergone great technological improvements (Fig. 1). These fast-evolving technologies foster venomics research but also bring new challenges, necessitating considerable integrative expertise.
High-throughput techniques have facilitated the characterization of complex venoms even in non-model organisms [7]. Transcriptomic data obtained by the latest RNA-sequencing technologies are often integrated with bottom-up proteomics, in which high-performance liquid chromatography is coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. This proteo-transcriptomics approach allows the detection of low-copy transcripts and post-translational modifications, and a precise relative quantification of expressed proteins. Integration of genomic data is still uncommon, despite its promise for elucidating evolutionary and regulatory patterns of venom compounds.
Bioinformatics pipelines are used for similarity-based screening and identification of promising candidates. Afterwards, the peptide and protein toxins are synthesized via solid-phase peptide synthesis and regioselective folding, or by a variety of different recombinant expression systems to obtain a realistic folding pattern. When separation and isolation of each compound is not achievable owing to the low quantity of raw venom, these procedures can yield amounts of proteins suitable for subsequent activity testing, although they require extensive optimization for each component.
Activity screening mostly relies on electrophysiology that is applied on multiple neuroreceptors, ligand-gated and voltage-gated ion channels involved in neurodegenerative and drug dependency disorders, in immune system regulation, anesthesia, and neuropathic pain. Electrophysiology also includes ex vivo assays and bi-dimensional array assays on tissue preparations for neurological disorders and trauma. Other activity screening tests target hormonal pathways, cancer, cardiovascular or inflammatory disorders, diabetes and obesity, and infectious diseases. Bioactivity-driven identification of novel compounds is further tested by in vivo phenotypic screens [8].
In addition, biophysical approaches such as X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and micro-computer tomography have become key components of drug discovery platforms and venom systems identification. In silico approaches, such as molecular modeling, have also become widely used for studying venom components, providing structural information and theoretical understanding of the molecular mechanisms of toxin action [9].
The COST Action EUVEN: from fragmentation to integration
The different facets of venomics are typically pursued by different research groups, whose level of collaboration in the EU is not adequate to face the increasing challenges in venomics research, as reflected by the decreased relative contributions of EU scientists to global venom research in the past 20 years (Fig. 2).
The European Venom Network COST Action CA19144 (EUVEN) [10] was launched in October 2020 to promote an efficient exchange of ideas, knowledge, and benchmarks and to involve all relevant stakeholders to foster European venom research. The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Association has operated since 1971 funding bottom-up networks that run for 4 years to boost research, innovation, and careers through a series of collaborative activities including workshops, conferences, working group (WG) meetings, training schools, short-term scientific missions, dissemination, and outreach.
In bringing together experts from all relevant fields, EUVEN develops protocols on best practices in venomics and identifies the most promising novel technological tools, animal models, and untapped physiological targets to be integrated into current venom research. Stronger collaborations with non-academic stakeholders, especially with small and medium enterprises (SMEs), are enforced as a prerequisite for promoting biomedical, diagnostic, agrochemical, cosmeceutical, or nanobiotechnological applications of venom compounds. EUVEN also aims to involve non-professional societies to foster biodiversity-based research with the support of natural history museums. Our major research and capacity-building objectives will be tackled through the engagement of participants (currently from 31 countries) in 5 WGs.
WG1: Novel targets in venom research—In this WG, novel targets are established and validated to expand and diversify the current main focus of the research community on just a few model organisms, diseases, and molecular targets.
WG2: Best practices and innovative tools—The aim of this WG is to validate and develop best research practices to minimize variation and gather reproducible and comparable results in all experimental and analytical steps contributing to venom investigation. Additionally, the integration of innovative tools in venom research will be evaluated.
WG3: Interaction with industry—The focus of WG3 is the interplay between academic researchers and industrial partners to transform researchers' discoveries and knowledge into innovations for society. EUVEN supports different initiatives to encourage participation of SMEs in meetings and discussions and to increase the appeal of venom research for industries.
WG4: Web resources—Available web resources for venom research currently lack a streamlined synergism. WG4 aims at integrating databases in a single repository that will also implement the most useful computational analytical tools for the detection of relevant features, including folds/activities of potential applicative interest.
WG5: Training—Given the multidisciplinary nature of venom research, EUVEN plans to offer extensive training opportunities in all relevant venom research disciplines.
Conclusion
The new COST Action EUVEN provides a flexible platform for scientists to overcome the lack of coordination, tools, and resources, through the development of a fully synergistic network. To guarantee the coverage of the diverse topics of interest in EUVEN and build an effective network across Europe and beyond, it is fundamental to engage the broadest participation possible from all COST participating countries. Near-neighbor and international partner countries can also request to join EUVEN and participate in networking activities.
We believe that building an effective network that is able to bridge different scientific disciplines and sectors constitutes a fundamental prerequisite to fully develop the extraordinarily transformative potential of venom research.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
COST: European Cooperation in Science and Technology; EUVEN: European Venom Network COST Action CA19144; SME: small and medium enterprise; WG: working group.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
The authors acknowledge support from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) through the Action CA19144 EUVEN. AV was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (grant 841576). GZ was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program through a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (grant 845674).
Authors' Contributions
Conceptualization, M.V.M., A.A., G.A., S.D., B.M.v.R., and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.V.M.; figures preparation, B.M.v.R., A.T.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; project administration, M.V.M, G.A., A.T. Except for the first, authors are listed alphabetically with respect to last name. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Parts of this paper are derived from the Memorandum of Understanding for the implementation of the COST Action “European Venom Network” (EUVEN) CA19144.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Maria Vittoria Modica, Department of Biology and Evolution of Marine Organisms, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy.
Rafi Ahmad, Department of Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Holsetgata 22, 2318 Hamar, Norway.
Stuart Ainsworth, Department of Tropical Disease Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, L3 5QA, Liverpool, UK.
Gregor Anderluh, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Agostinho Antunes, CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Av. General Norton de Matos, 4450–208 Porto, Portugal; Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal.
Dimitris Beis, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Ephessiou St., 115 27 Athens, Greece.
Figen Caliskan, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Science and Letters, Department of Biology, TR-26040 Eskisehir, Turkey.
Mauro Dalla Serra, Istituto di Biofisica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via De Marini 6 - Torre di Francia, 16149 Genova, Italy.
Sebastien Dutertre, IBMM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Place Eugene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier, France.
Yehu Moran, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus - Givat Ram 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel.
Ayse Nalbantsoy, Ege University, Bioengineering Department, 180 Bornova, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.
Naoual Oukkache, Institut Pasteur of Morocco, 1 Place Louis Pasteur, 20100 Casablanca, Morocco.
Stano Pekar, Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlarska 2, 61137 Brno, Czechia.
Maido Remm, Department of Bioinformatics, University of Tartu, IMCB, Riia 23, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
Bjoern Marcus von Reumont, Department of Insect Biotechnology, Justus Liebig University, Winchester Str. 2, 35394 Giessen, Germany; LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Senckenberganlage 25 D-60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Yiannis Sarigiannis, Department of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, CY-2417 Nicosia, Cyprus.
Andrea Tarallo, Department of Research infrastructures for Marine Biological Resources, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121 Naples, Italy.
Jan Tytgat, Department of of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eivind Andreas Baste Undheim, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis,Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway.
Yuri Utkin, Laboratory of Molecular Toxinology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya, 16/10, 117997 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Aida Verdes, Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Calle de José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain; Department of Life Science, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Aude Violette, Alphabiotoxine Laboratory, B-7911 Montroeul-au-Bois, Belgium.
Giulia Zancolli, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, UNIL Sorge Le Biophore, CH - 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
References
- 1. Schendel V, Rash LD, Jenner RA, et al. . The diversity of venom: the importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding its ecology and evolution. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(11):666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Casewell NR, Wüster W, Vonk FJ, et al. . Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28(4):219–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Fry BG, Roelants K, Champagne DE, et al. . The toxicogenomic multiverse: convergent recruitment of proteins into animal venoms. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2009;10:483–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Holford M, Daly M, King GF, et al. . Venoms to the rescue. Science. 2018;361(6405):842–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim H, Park SY, Lee G. Potential therapeutic applications of bee venom on skin disease and its mechanisms: A literature review. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11:374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Morante K, Bellomio A, Viguera AR, et al. . The isolation of new pore-forming toxins from the sea anemone Actinia fragacea provides insights into the mechanisms of actinoporin evolution. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11:401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Drukewitz SH, von Reumont BM. The significance of comparative genomics in modern evolutionary venomics. Front Ecol Evol. 2019;7:163. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Vargas RA, Sarmiento K, Vásquez IC. Zebrafish (Danio rerio): A potential model for toxinological studies. Zebrafish. 2015;12:320–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Leffler AE, Kuryatov A, Zebroski HA, et al. . Discovery of peptide ligands through docking and virtual screening at nicotinic acetylcholine receptor homology models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E8100–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.European Venom Network (EUVEN). https://euven-network.eu.Accessed 1 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.