Abstract
Background
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is one of the most frequent and severe genetic diseases leading to premature death or severe motor disability. New therapies have been developed in recent years that change the natural history of the disease. The aim of this study is to describe patients included in the Polish Registry of SMA, with a focus on the course of type 3 SMA (SMA3) before the availability of disease-modifying treatments.
Results
790 patients with SMA were included in the registry (173 with type 1 [SMA1], 218 with type 2 [SMA2], 393 with SMA3, and six with type 4 SMA [SMA4]), most (52%) of whom were adults. Data on SMN2 gene copy number were available for 672 (85%) patients. The mean age of onset was 5 months for SMA1, 11.5 months for SMA2, and 4.5 years for SMA3. In patients with SMA3, the first symptoms occurred earlier in those with three copies of SMN2 than in those with four copies of SMN2 (3.2 years vs. 6.7 years). The age of onset of SMA3 was younger in girls than in boys (3.1 years vs. 5.7 years), with no new cases observed in women older than 16 years. Male patients outnumbered female patients, especially among patients with SMA3b (49 female vs. 85 male patients) and among patients with SMA3 with four copies of SMN2 (30 female vs. 69 male patients). 44% of patients with SMA3 were still able to walk; in those who were not still able to walk, the mean age of immobilization was 14.0 years. Patients with SMA3a (age of onset < 3 years) and three copies of SMN2 had significantly worse prognosis for remaining ambulant than patients with SMA3b (age of onset ≥ 3 years) and four copies of SMN2.
Conclusions
The Registry of SMA is an effective tool for assessing the disease course in the real world setting. SMN2 copy number is an important prognostic factor for the age of onset and ambulation in SMA3. Sex and age of disease onset also strongly affect the course of SMA. Data supplied by this study can aid treatment decisions.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-021-01771-y.
Keywords: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Neuromuscular disease, Registry, TREAT-NMD, SMN2 copy number, Type 3 SMA
Background
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by symmetrical progressive muscle weakness and atrophy due to degeneration of motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord, with an incidence of approximately 1 in 8000 live births [1–3]. The phenotype of SMA extends from a severe presentation in childhood, with hypotonia and generalized weakness at birth, to an adult-onset disease with mild symptoms. Historically, based on the age of onset and the best motor function achieved, five types of SMA (SMA0, SMA1, SMA2, SMA3, and SMA4) have been distinguished [4]. Type 3 SMA (SMA3) is divided into SMA3a (first symptoms appear before 3 years of age) and SMA3b (onset after 3 years of age) [5, 6].
SMA is caused by homozygous deletion of exon 7 in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene [7] or—less frequently—by SMN1 point mutations on one allele occurring in a compound heterozygous state with deletion on the other allele [8, 9]. An increased SMN2 copy number alleviates the clinical course of SMA [10]. Patients with SMA1 usually have two copies of SMN2, those with SMA2 usually have three copies, and those with SMA3 or SMA4 have three or more copies [10–13].
Registries of patients with rare disorders, such as neuromuscular diseases (NMDs), have an important role in monitoring the course of the disease, defining trial or treatment-ready population. In 2007, the Translational Research in Europe and Treatment of Neuromuscular Diseases (TREAT-NMD) project (http://www.treat-nmd.eu) was initiated as a European Committee-funded Network of Excellence to support translational research in the field of NMDs. An important tool to achieve the aims of the TREAT-NMD project was the creation of a global database of patients in national registries. The structure of the registry and the cross-sectional results of this international collaboration have been reported previously [14]. The Polish Registry of SMA was created in 2010 following TREAT-NMD guidelines within a research project funded by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (641/N-TREAT/09/2010/0). Since then, data have been collected, curated, and updated at a single neuromuscular referral center.
The aim of this study is to describe the patients included in the Polish Registry of SMA and to analyze the clinical course of SMA3 before disease-modifying treatment became available in Poland.
Methods
Data collection and entry method
Data were collected by paper or electronic questionnaires, completed by doctors or patients after signed informed consent was obtained (Ethics Committee approval BK/180/2008). The questionnaire included mandatory and highly recommended items, as proposed by TREAT-NMD in 2007 and extended in 2018. Data comprise information on basic motor functions, spirometry, ventilation status, scoliosis, feeding, participation in clinical trials and other registries, and other detailed data. Genetic confirmation of SMA was mandatory and assessment of SMN2 copy number was highly recommended. The genetic tests were carried out in several laboratories in Poland. If necessary, patients or genetic laboratories were contacted for data clarification. Patients were encouraged to update their data once per year. The accuracy of the data obtained in the questionnaires and compatibility with diagnosis were verified by curators (neurologists), and data were then entered manually onto a Linux-operated server within the Medical University of Warsaw (MYSQL Database) with an option to transfer to Excel for analysis when needed. The database allows the transmission of encoded pseudonymized data to the TREAT-NMD Global Registry.
Statistical methods
Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC 27513-2414, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as mean (+/− SD) or median (95% CI). Discrete variables are presented as numbers or letters and categorical variables are marked accordingly. Statistical analyses describing interrelationships between examined variables and comparisons between groups of patients were carried out using a Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-squared test (χ2), ANOVA Kruskal–Wallis, or Wilcoxon test. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to demonstrate the interdependence of examined traits. Kaplan–Meier models were estimated to assess the risk of immobilization depending on selected parameters.
A multidimensional logistic regression analysis was also carried out to identify independent factors that influence the risk of immobilization. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patient characteristics
In total, 790 patients were included in the registry on 31st October 2019. Enrollment was highest after the registration of nusinersen in Europe and its reimbursement in Poland (January 2019). The registry included 173 patients with SMA1, 218 with SMA2, 393 with SMA3, and six with SMA4. 372 patients were female (female:male = 0.89). The mean age was 8.8 years (SD 11.0) for patients with SMA1, 17.5 years (SD 14.1) for those with SMA2, 28.0 years (SD 16.3) for those with SMA3, and 44.0 years (SD 9.4) for those with SMA4; 52.4% of enrolled patients were adults. The age distribution of all enrolled patients by SMA type is shown in Fig. 1.
For patients with SMA1 and SMA2 the ratio of female to male patients was similar. There was significant male predominance among patients with SMA3b compared with SMA3a (female:male = 0.58 for SMA3b vs. 1.03 for SMA3b; χ2 6.74, p < 0.001). All six patients with SMA4 were male.
At the time of data cutoff 11 enrolled patients had died (eight with SMA1, two with SMA2, and one with SMA3).
Genetic data
In all patients, diagnosis of SMA was confirmed by a genetic test. 98.5% of enrolled patients had homozygous deletion of exon 7 of SMN1, and 1.5% had a heterozygous point mutation of the SMN1 gene coexisting with a deletion. All of these mutations have been previously described elsewhere [8]. Data on SMN2 copy number were available for 672 (85%) patients. The distribution of SMN2 copy number by SMA type is presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Number of SMN2 copies | SMA1 n = 140 (% of SMA1 patients) |
SMA2 n = 182 (% of SMA2 patients) |
SMA3 n = 344 (% of SMA3 patients) |
SMA4 n = 6 (% of SMA4 patients) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 (1.4%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0 | 0 |
2 | 53 (38%) | 14 (7.7%) | 21 (6%) | 0 |
3 | 80 (57%) | 149 (82%) | 185 (54%) | 1 (17%) |
4 | 5 (3.6%) | 18 (10%) | 138 (40%) | 5 (83%) |
Data available for 672 patients
Age of first symptoms
The mean age of first symptoms (age of onset) was 0.44 years (5 months) for SMA1, 0.96 years (11.5 months) for SMA2, and 4.54 years for SMA3.
The age of onset in female patients was significantly lower than in male patients for those with SMA1 (3.5 months [SD 2.28] vs. 6.4 months[SD 10.68], p = 0.04) or SMA3 (3.11 years [SD 3.11] vs. 5.67 years [SD 5.64]; p < 0.001). Cumulative data on the age of onset showed that the first symptoms occurred by the age of 7 years in 90% of female patients, and by 14 years in 90% of male patients. No new diagnoses were observed in women older than 16 years, whereas the age of onset extended to over 20 years in men (Fig. 2).
59 (15%) of 393 patients with SMA3 had an age of onset under 18 months, with symptom onset occurring between 12 and 17 months in 75% of these patients. The most common first symptoms were walking difficulties (waddling gait) from the beginning. Additionally six other patients with SMA3 reported an age of onset between 1 and 6 months (floppy baby since birth in three cases and “weaker than older sibling or children at the same age” in three cases).
Influence of SMN2 copy number on the age of onset of SMA3
Among 250 patients with SMA3 (in the multifactorial analysis), 86 (64%) patients with SMA3a had three copies of SMN2 and only 38 (28%) had four copies, whereas 47 (40%) patients with SMA3b had three copies of SMN2 and 61 (52%) had four copies. Only 7% of patients with SMA3 had two copies of SMN2.
In patients with SMA3, the first symptoms occurred more than 3 years earlier in patients with three copies of SMN2 than in those with four copies (mean age 3.01 years vs. 6.71 years; χ2 4.88, p < 0.0001) (Table 2).
Table 2.
SMA3 | Number of patients with three copies of SMN2 | Mean age of onset in patients with three copies of SMN2 | Number of patients with four copies of SMN2 | Mean age of onset in patients with four copies of SMN2 | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 133 |
3.01 years (SD 3.3; 1 month–18 years) |
99 |
6.71 years (SD 5.86; 1 month–20 years) |
< 0.0001 |
Female | 72 |
2.35 years (SD 1.9; 1 month–12 years) |
30 |
5.13 years (SD 4.46; 1 month–16 years) |
< 0.0001 |
Male | 61 |
3.78 years (SD 4.3; 0.5–18 years) |
69 |
7.1 years (SD 5.85 years; 1 month–20 years) |
< 0.0001 |
Data available for 232 patients. Values are expressed as mean (SD; range)
Of the 59 patients with SMA3 with symptom onset before 18 months of age, four (7%) had two copies of SMN2, 35 (64%) had three copies, and 16 (27%) had four copies; the SMN2 copy number was not provided for four patients.
There were significantly fewer female than male patients with four copies of SMN2 (30 female vs. 69 male patients, female:male = 0.4).
Ambulation in patients with SMA3
Only nusinersen-naive patients with SMA3 were included in the analysis for ambulation. 172 (44%) of 389 patients with SMA3 were still able to walk. The mean age of loss of ambulation was 14.0 years (SD 11). Female patients lost ambulation earlier than male patients (11.9 years [SD 10.2] vs. 15.7 years [SD 11.4]; p = 0.022).
Data obtained from a Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the probability of preserved ambulation for patients with SMA3 was 80% after a disease duration of 10 years, 68% after 20 years, and 61% after 30 years (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Patients with SMA3a had a significantly worse prognosis for remaining ambulant than those with SMA3b. For patients with SMA3a, the probability of remaining ambulant was 58% at 10 years, 37% at 20 years, and 33% at 30 years compared with 89% at 10 years, 78% at 20 years, and 69% at 30 years for patients with SMA3b (χ2 2.5, p = 0.001). This observation was also confirmed when female and male patients were analyzed separately (Additional file 1: Table S1).
SMN2 copy number was a significant prognostic factor for remaining ambulant. In patients with four copies of SMN2, 91% could still walk after 10 years, 82% after 20 years, and 73% after 30 years of the disease, whereas in patients with three copies of the SMN2 gene, the corresponding percentages were 70%, 60%, and 55% (χ2 4.09, p < 0.0001) (Additional file 2: Table S2).
There was a significant difference in the probability of remaining ambulant between patients with SMA3a and those with SMA3b for those with three as well as those with four copies of SMN2 (p < 0.05) in all relationships except SMA3a with four copies versus SMA3b with three copies (χ2 0.44, p = 0.66). The best prognosis for maintaining the ability to walk was in patients with SMA3b with four copies of SMN2 (Fig. 3 and Additional file 2: Table S2; duration of disease is the time between onset and immobilization; data available for 232 patients).
The Kaplan–Meier statistics did not show a significant difference between female and male patients in terms of the prognosis for remaining ambulant regardless of the age of onset or SMN2 copy number.
A multifactorial logistic analysis with step-wise factor selection was carried out on the 250 patients with SMA3, the results of which are presented in Table 3.
Table 3.
Model fit χ2 53.59, p < 0.0001 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Estimate | Wald Chi-square | Pr > χ2 | Odds ratio | 95% Wald confidence limits | ||
Intercept | − 1.37 | 22.85 | < 0.0001 | ||||
SMN2 copies (≤ 3 vs. 4) | 1 | 0.69 | 5.31 | 0.021 | 2.00 | 0.64 | 6.74 |
Sex (male vs. female) | 2 | 0.70 | 6.25 | 0.012 | 2.02 | 1.16 | 3.49 |
Disease duration* | 3 | 0.08 | 47.69 | < 0.0001 | 1.1 | 1.06 | 1.20 |
*Disease duration = the interval between the onset and the last follow-up
Discussion
The Polish Registry of SMA was set up under TREAT-NMD initiative in 2010. The main purpose of TREAT-NMD was to improve trial-readiness, advance patient diagnosis and care, and accelerate the search for therapies for patients with NMDs. During the last few decades, the number of SMA registries and registered patients has been growing quickly worldwide. In October 2019, the cut-off date for our analysis, the Polish Registry of SMA included 790 patients, which makes our registry one of the largest national databases of patients with SMA [14, 15]. The most dynamic increase in the number of enrolled patients was directly related to the approval of nusinersen in 2016 in the USA and a reimbursement decision in Poland in December 2018. The first Polish patients began nusinersen treatment in the National Health Program in April 2019. Only 33 patients treated with nusinersen were included in our study (19 with SMA1, ten with SMA2, and four with SMA3) at data cut-off. The four patients with SMA3 were excluded from the analysis on ambulation, so our study was able to characterize Polish patients with SMA3 prior to the era of widely available treatment that changes the natural history of SMA.
Half of our 790 patients had SMA3. SMA1 constituted 22% and SMA2 28% of the population in the registry. The proportion of SMA types in the Polish registry reflects the real-world prevalence of SMA types, although previous data on the incidence of SMA indicate that SMA1 accounts for about 50% of all SMA patients [2]. The predominance of SMA3 has also been observed in other registries [14]. In the Global TREAT-NMD Registry (more than 5000 patients), the proportion of SMA1 patients was even smaller. This situation is probably caused by the severe disease course and high mortality of SMA1 before the era of pharmacotherapy.
Contrary to data in the TREAT-NMD Global Registry or Cure SMA Registry most of our patients (52%) are adults and 37% of them are in the age range 18–39 years [14, 16]. Our observations could therefore provide new insights into the later stages of all SMA types. Additionally, this should raise awareness of the spectrum of issues associated with SMA in adult life, such as education, professional activities, parenthood, or coexisting age-related diseases.
In all 790 patients, the diagnosis of SMA5q was confirmed by genetic testing, which has been widely available in Poland since 2000. In the past decade the SMN2 copy number has also been assessed routinely at diagnosis. Additionally, many patients who were diagnosed with SMA earlier were referred to genetic laboratories for evaluation of their SMN2 copy number.
Data on SMN2 copy number were available in 672 patients in the registry. SMN2 copy number is known to be an important modifier of the disease, but it is not sufficient to predict phenotype [12, 13]. Nevertheless, three copies of SMN2 are usually attributed to the SMA2 phenotype [10, 12, 17]. This fact was also confirmed in our study as 82% of patients with SMA2 had three copies of SMN2. Interestingly, the percentage of patients with three copies of SMN2 in our cohort is also high among patients with SMA1 (57%) and SMA3 (54%). In a study of the Spanish population, 86% of patients with SMA1 had two copies of SMN2 and only 6% had three copies [10]. By contrast, in a Dutch study 21 of 23 patients with a milder course of SMA1 had three copies of SMN2 [18]. Additionally, in a previous study in the Polish population, 41% of 204 patients with SMA1 had three copies of SMN2 [13].
Our results are probably related to the structure of the analyzed group, which included a high percentage of patients with SMA1 with a long survival time. This overrepresentation of a milder form of SMA1 in our registry could be explained by the burden on the parents of children with a severe SMA1 phenotype precluding enrollment of acute cases in the registry.
We observed 21 (6%) patients with SMA3 and two copies of SMN2. A similar proportion was reported in several studies. Calucho et al. [10] reported that about 5% of patients with SMA3 had two copies of SMN2 in a combined large cohort of patients. Similarly, in a recently published multicenter study on clinical variability in SMA3, 5% of 182 patients had two copies of SMN2. Interestingly, in a group of ambulant patients with SMA3b, this percentage reached 13% [19]. Among German patients with SMA3a, nearly 12% had two copies of SMN2 [11].
The milder course of the disease in patients with two copies of SMN2 could be explained by the presence of additional modifying factors, such as the polymorphism c.859G > C in exon 7 or A-44G transition in intron 6 of the SMN2 gene [20, 21]. We did not test this hypothesis in our cohort. It is recognized that other factors modify the phenotype. In some cases of SMA3 with two copies of SMN2 or SMA3b with three copies of SMN2 the polymorphism c.859G > C in exon 7 of the SMN2 gene was excluded [10, 22].
In our cohort, we observed five patients with SMA1 and four copies of SMN2. Single patients with such a discrepancy between genotype and expected phenotype have been reported previously [10, 18]. We are aware that, if in doubt, the SMN2 copy number should be validated by an expert laboratory with good quality control. This is of utmost importance in pre-symptomatic patients, as it may determine the treatment strategy [23].
44% of patients with SMA3 in our registry were still able to walk. The mean age of immobilization of patients with SMA3 was 14.0 years. In the TREAT-NMD Global Registry, some country-specific differences in the age of immobilization were observed. For example, the mean age of loss of ambulation in Ukraine was 9 years, compared with 19 years in the UK [14]. In a prospective, multicenter study of 28 patients with SMA3 from France, Belgium, and Germany as well as in a study based on the International SMA Registry, the mean age of loss of ambulation was 12 years [17, 19]. Besides being based on a smaller number of patients, both studies included only young adults, compared to the wide age range in our registry.
The Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the prognosis for being ambulant was significantly worse for patients with SMA3a than for those with SMA3b. 58% of patients with SMA3a were still able to walk after a disease duration of 10 years, 37% after 20 years, and 33% after 30 years, whereas the prognosis was much better in patients with SMA3b and the corresponding numbers were 89%, 78%, and 69%. A similar analysis was presented in a collaborative study on German and Polish patient data collected from the 1960s to the 1990s. In that study, the probability of being ambulatory was 70% after 10 years, 33% after 20 years, and 22% after 30 years for patients with SMA3a, and the corresponding numbers for SMA3b were 96%, 84%, and 70% [5]. Our data confirm the observation that earlier symptom onset leads to a more severe phenotype [5, 22]. This further supports the need for early diagnosis and pharmacotherapy [23].
We also analyzed the influence of SMN2 copy number on the age of onset and walking functions in patients with SMA3. The age of first symptoms in patients with three copies of SMN2 was more than two times earlier than in those with four copies (3.01 years vs. 6.71 years). Additionally, patients with SMA3a more frequently had three than four copies of SMN2 (64% vs. 28%), in contrast to SMA3b (40% vs. 52%). The empirical subdivision of patients with SMA3 into SMA3a and SMA3b was first supported by genetic testing by Wirth in 2006 [10, 11, 13, 18, 22].
Although, by definition, SMA3 should be diagnosed in children with symptom onset after 18 months of age [4–6], 59 patients with SMA3 in our cohort had their first symptoms earlier. Our observations show that the age of onset in SMA3 overlaps with that of SMA2, illustrating the continuum of clinical severity. Classification based on age of onset with a cut-off of 18 months to separate SMA2 and SMA3 can result in about 15% of patients not fitting any traditionally defined type of SMA. An age of onset below 18 months was also reported in patients with SMA3 in previous studies [22, 24].
We also confirmed that SMN2 copy number plays a substantial role in the prognosis for ambulation in SMA3. Patients with four copies of SMN2 had a significantly higher chance of walking independently after a certain disease duration than patients with three copies of SMN2. Additionally, patients with SMA3b with three or four copies of SMN2 had a substantially better prognosis for ambulation. The largest differences in the probability of preserving the ability to walk were noted between patients with SMA3b with four copies of SMN2 and patients with SMA3a with three copies of SMN2. Multifactorial analysis showed that patients with three or fewer copies of SMN2 have a two times higher risk of immobilization than those with four copies. Although the number of copies of SMN2 plays an important role in the disease course, there are certainly other SMA-modifying factors [25]. Better prognosis for ambulation in patients with SMA3 with four copies of SMN2, regardless of the age of onset, was also reported in other studies [18, 22, 26].
Interestingly, a recent multicenter study on the natural history of SMA3 in a large cohort reported that age, SMA type, and ambulatory status were significantly associated with changes in mean Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) score, but that sex and SMN2 copy number were not [19].
Our study revealed the influence of sex on some aspects of SMA. There was a significant male predominance among patients with SMA3b (female:male = 0.58, p < 0.001) as well as in patients with SMA3 with four copies of SMN2 (female:male = 0.43). In SMA4, all six patients were male. In SMA1 and SMA3, the age of onset was significantly earlier in female patients.
The influence of sex was observed in some previous studies, which reported a low proportion of female patients with symptom onset after 8 years of age [27, 28]. Male predominance in the chronic form of SMA was also described previously in a Spanish cohort and in the International SMA Registry (female:male = 0.7) [19, 29]. In another study on patients with Spanish origin, a significant predominance of male patients was found among those with SMA2 and SMA3 [22].
The small number of female patients with SMA3 and four copies of SMN2 in our cohort corresponds with the small number of female patients with SMA3b. In our registry, a significantly smaller number of female patients with four copies of SMN2 may support the view that a higher proportion of female individuals are asymptomatic carriers of biallelic SMN1 deletions [28, 30, 31].
In our study, Kaplan–Meier statistics did not show statistically significant differences in the prognosis for ambulation between female and male patients with SMA3 or in subgroups with SMA3a or SMA3b. However, in a multifactorial analysis that took into account sex, SMN2 copy number, and disease duration, the risk of loss of ambulation for a female patient was two times lower than for a male patient. All these observations indicate a possible relationship between sex and the course of SMA, as reported in other studies [13, 19, 22, 27–31].
Limitations of the study
We are aware of some limitations of our study. The retrospective data collection and the type of registry (in most cases the questionnaires were completed by patients and verified by a neurologist curator) might influence data accuracy. As most of the patients are adults and present the full spectrum of SMA types, data from the early phase of the disease might not be precise. However, care was taken to verify information with available medical documentation. The relatively high proportion of adult patients in the registry could be because the registry was created at a neuromuscular center for adults and older children. Data on SMN2 copy number were available from the patients’ routine genetic test results, but genetic analysis for known modifying factors such as polymorphism c.859G > C in exon 7 or A-44G transition in SMN2 was not performed.
Conclusions
Our registry-based study allowed us to characterize a large population of patients with SMA and describe the clinical course of SMA3 before the availability of pharmacotherapy. We confirmed that SMN2 copy number is an important prognostic factor for the age of onset and ambulation in SMA3. Our analysis indicated that SMN2 copy number, age of disease onset, and sex independently affect the disease course, suggesting the existence of other phenotype modifiers. After 10 years of experience, we conclude that this registry can be a true and effective tool for assessing the clinical course of SMA in the real-world setting.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Barbara Ryniewicz, Dr. Biruta Kierdaszuk, Dr. Anna Potulska-Chromik, Dr. Anna Fraczek, and Karolina Aragon-Gawinska for the everyday care patients with SMA. The Department of Neurology at the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland, is a member of the European Reference Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases (EURO-NMD).
Abbreviations
- CI
Confidence interval
- HFMSE
Hammersmith functional motor scale expanded
- NMD
Neuromuscular disease
- SD
Standard deviation
- SMA
Spinal muscular atrophy
- SMN1
Survival motor neuron 1
- TREAT-NMD
Translational research in Europe and treatment of neuromuscular diseases
Authors' contributions
AL: conception of the study, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and writing and editing the manuscript. MJ: conception of the study, data collection and interpretation, and critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. AK: conception of the study. KJ: data collection. PG: data collection and editing the manuscript. JZ: data collection. JS: statistical analysis and preparing the figures. AKP: conception and supervision of the study, data interpretation, and critical revision of manuscript for important intellectual content. The authors thank Proper Medical Writing, Warsaw, Poland for providing linguistic support, which was funded by Biogen Poland, Warsaw, Poland. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a Grant from Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (641/N-TREAT/09/2010/0), and partially supported by a Biogen Grant (1WC/5BIOGEN/17).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and Consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical University of Warsaw (BK/180/2008). Written informed consent was obtained from patients, or the parents or legal guardians of patients.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Anna Lusakowska is a sub-investigator in clinical trials for patients with SMA (funded by Roche) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (funded by PTC), receives institutional Grant support from Biogen, and is a lecturer on neuromuscular diseases supported by Biogen and Roche. Maria Jedrzejowska reports participation in scientific advisory boards for Biogen and Avexis/Novartis, receives honoraria for lectures from Biogen and travel support from Biogen and Roche, and acts as a sub-investigator in Roche trials of olesoxime and risdiplam for SMA. Anna Kaminska declares no conflicts of interest. Katarzyna Janiszewska declares no conflicts of interest. Przemysław Grochowski declares no conflicts of interest. Janusz Zimowski declares no conflicts of interest. Janusz Sierdzinski declares no conflicts of interest. Anna Kostera Pruszczyk reports lecture honoraria and travel support from Biogen, Roche, PTC, Avexis, and Novartis, institutional Grant support from Biogen, and advisory board honoraria from Biogen, Roche, Avexis, and Novartis, and is a principal investigator for Roche SMA studies.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Vill K, Kölbel H, Schwartz O, Blaschek A, Olgemöller B, Harms E, et al. One year of newborn screening for SMA—results of a German pilot project. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2019;6(4):503–515. doi: 10.3233/JND-190428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Verhaart IE, Robertson A, Leary R, McMacken G, König K, Kirschner J, et al. A multi-source approach to determine SMA incidence and research ready population. J Neurol. 2017;264(7):1465–1473. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8549-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jędrzejowska M, Milewski M, Zimowski J, Zagożdżon P, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Borkowska J, et al. Incidence of spinal muscular atrophy in Poland - more frequent than predicted? Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34(3):152–157. doi: 10.1159/000275492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Farrar MA, Park SB, Vucic S, Carey KA, Turner BJ, Gillingwater TH, et al. Emerging therapies and challenges in spinal muscular atrophy. Ann Neurol. 2017;81:355–368. doi: 10.1002/ana.24864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Forrest E, Lusakowska A, Borkowska J, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. A collaborative study on the natural history of childhood and juvenile onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy (type II and III): 569 patients. J Neurol Sci. 1997;146(1):67–72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(96)00284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zerres K, Rudnik-Schöneborn S. Natural history in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Clinical analysis of 445 patients and suggestions for a modification of existing classifications. Arch Neurol. 1995;52:518–523. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1995.00540290108025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lefebvre S, Burglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell. 1995;80:155. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90460-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wirth B. An update of the mutation spectrum of the survival motor neuron gene (SMN1) in autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) Hum Mutat. 2000;15(3):228–237. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200003)15:3<228::AID-HUMU3>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jędrzejowska M, Gos M, Zimowski JG, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Ryniewicz B, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. Novel point mutations in survival motor neuron 1 gene expand the spectrum of phenotypes observed in spinal muscular atrophy patients. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24(7):617–623. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calucho M, Bernal S, Alías L, March F, Venceslá A, Rodríguez-Álvarez FJ, et al. Correlation between SMA type and SMN2 copy number revisited: an analysis of 625 unrelated Spanish patients and a compilation of 2,834 reported cases. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018;28(3):208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wirth B, Wirth ĆL, Brichta ĆB, Schrank ĆH, Lochmüller S, Blick ĆA, et al. Mildly affected patients with spinal muscular atrophy are partially protected by an increased SMN2 copy number. Hum Genet. 2006;119:422–428. doi: 10.1007/s00439-006-0156-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Feldkötter M, Schwarzer V, Wirth R, Wienker TF, Wirth B. Quantitative analyses of SMN1 and SMN2 based on real-time light cycler PCR: fast and highly reliable carrier testing and prediction of severity of spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:358–368. doi: 10.1086/338627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jędrzejowska M, Milewski M, Zimowski J, Borkowska J, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Sielska D, et al. Phenotype modifiers of spinal muscular atrophy: the number of SMN2 gene copies, deletion in the NAIP gene and probably gender influence the course of the disease. Acta Biochim Pol. 2009;56(1):103–108. doi: 10.18388/abp.2009_2521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bladen CL, Thompson R, Jackson JM, Garland C, Wegel C, Ambrosini A, et al. Mapping the differences in care for 5000 spinal muscular atrophy patients, a survey of 24 national registries in North America Australasia and Europe. J Neurol. 2014;261(1):152–163. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-7154-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ambrosini A, Calabrese D, Avato FM, Catania F, Cavaletti G, Pera MC, et al. The Italian neuromuscular registry: a coordinated platform where patient organizations and clinicians collaborate for data collection and multiple usage. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13:176. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0918-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Belter L, Cook SF, Crawford TO, Jarecki J, Jones CC, Kissel JT, et al. An overview of the Cure SMA membership database: highlights of key demographic and clinical characteristics of SMA members. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5(2):167–176. doi: 10.3233/JND-170292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chabanon A, Seferian AM, Daron A, Péréon Y, Cances C, Vuillerot C, et al. Prospective and longitudinal natural history study of patients with type 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy: baseline data NatHis-SMA study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0201004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wadman R, Stam M, Gijzen M, Lemmink H, Snoeck I, Wijngaarde C, et al. Association of motor milestones, SMN2 copy and outcome in spinal muscular atrophy types 0–4. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017;88:365–367. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coratti G, Messina S, Lucibello S, Carmela Pera MC, Montes J, Pasternak A, et al. Clinical variability in spinal muscular atrophy type III. Ann Neurol. 2020;88:1109–1117. doi: 10.1002/ana.25900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bernal S, Alías L, Barceló MJ, Also-Rallo E, Martínez-Hernández R, Gámez J, et al. The c.859G>C variant in the SMN2 gene is associated with types II and III SMA and originates from a common ancestor. J Med Genet. 2010;47(9):640–642. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.079004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu X, Wang SH, Sun J, Krainer AR, Hua Y, Prior TW. A-44G transition in SMN2 intron 6 protects patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(14):2768–2780. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Medrano S, Monges S, Gravina LP, Alıas L, Mozzoni J, Araoz HV, et al. Genotype phenotype correlation of SMN locus genes in spinal muscular atrophy children from Argentina. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20(6):910–917. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dangouloff T, Burghes A, Tizzano EF, Servais L. 244th ENMC international workshop: newborn screening in spinal muscular atrophy May 10–12, 2019, Hoofdorp, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2020;30(1):93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I, Borkowska J, Zerres K. The predictive value of achieved motor milestones assessed in 441 patients with infantile spinal muscular atrophy types II and III. Eur Neurol. 2001;45:174–181. doi: 10.1159/000052118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wirth B, Mendoza-Ferreira N, Torres-Benito L. Spinal muscular atrophy disease modifiers. In: Sumner CJ, Paushkin S, Ko C-P, editors. Spinal muscular atrophy: disease mechanism and therapy. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2017. pp. 191–210. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Swoboda K, Prior TW, Scott CB, McNaught T, Wride MC, Reyna SP, et al. Natural history of denervation in SMA: relation to age, SMN2 copy number, and function. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:704–712. doi: 10.1002/ana.20473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I, Zaremba J, Borkowska J, Szirkowiec W. Chronic proximal spinal muscular atrophy of childhood and adolescence: sex influence. J Med Genet. 1984;21(6):447–450. doi: 10.1136/jmg.21.6.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jędrzejowska M, Borkowska J, Zimowski J, Kostera-Pruszczyk A, Milewski M, Jurek M, et al. Unaffected patients with a homozygous absence of the SMN1 gene. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(8):930–934. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alías L, Bernal S, Fuentes-Prior P, Barceló MJ, Also E, Martínez-Hernández R, et al. Mutation update of spinal muscular atrophy in Spain: molecular characterization of 745 unrelated patients and identification of four novel mutations in the SMN1 gene. Hum Genet. 2009;125:29–39. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0598-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cuscó I, Barceló MJ, Rojas-García R, Illa I, Gámez J, Cervera C, et al. SMN2 copy number predicts acute or chronic spinal muscular atrophy but does not account for intrafamilial variability in siblings. J Neurol. 2006;253:21–25. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0912-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Oprea GE, Kröber S, McWhorter ML, Rossoll W, Müller S, Krawczak M, et al. Plastin 3 is a protective modifier of autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy. Science. 2008;320(5875):524–527. doi: 10.1126/science.1155085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.