Abstract
Evaluation and management of subglottic stenosis in pregnancy is challenging. It often is not only a multidisciplinary approach between obstetricians, otolaryngologists (ENT surgeons) and anesthesiologists, but also requires a thorough understanding of possible foreseen complications by the patient as well. Hence, whenever we are presented with a challenging case requiring multidisciplinary approach involving team of physicians from different specialties, it is routine practice to huddle regarding the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management and care. We present a case of a 37-year-old woman with a known history of idiopathic subglottic stenosis, 16 weeks’ pregnant, G4P1, with a surgical history significant for two previous subglottic dilations in the past and who now presented with an audible stridor and shortness of breath on activity. We highlighted the unique challenges encountered and the corresponding management adopted. This is a case of successful management of symptomatic worsening of subglottic stenosis managed during pregnancy.
Keywords: anaesthesia, ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology, pregnancy
Background
Subglottic stenosis is defined as the narrowing of the airway in the region below the vocal folds1 and may be congenital or secondary to systemic conditions including Wegener’s granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), prolonged intubation or prior tracheostomy. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (ISS), a diagnosis of exclusion,2 is rarely encountered during pregnancy and therefore little guidance is available to those managing parturient with this condition as most of the existing literature is based on a few case reports. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this case.
Case presentation
We report the successful management of a 37 year-old gravida 4 para 1 woman at 16 weeks’ gestation with a known medical history of ISS presenting with gradual worsening of audible stridor and shortness of breath on exertion. Obstetric history was remarkable for one prior caesarean delivery and two miscarriages.
She was evaluated by a rheumatologist as the subglottic stenosis was initially considered to be autoimmune and was on methylprednisolone with mild improvement in symptoms initially. However, the diagnosis of idiopathic aetiology was established over the course of years due to multiple negative workups to rule out auto immune pathology. She underwent subglottic dilations twice over the course of 2 years with temporary improvement that lasted for 4–5 months. Other significant surgical history was gastric fundoplication for severe GORD, which was now well controlled.
Flexible nasopharyngoscopy performed, as an outpatient, had revealed subglottic stenosis of 2.5 mm in diameter. Airway examination revealed a Mallampati Score of 3, mouth opening of 4 cm, thyromental distance of 4 cm and full cervical range of motion. An audible tracheal bruit was auscultated as well as an inspiratory stridor was present, though the patient was able to lie flat without significant distress. Her otolaryngologist considered it a life-threatening state that needed urgent surgery due to her worsening symptoms and precious pregnancy. After discussion with patient’s obstetrician, decision was made to proceed with surgery during second trimester of pregnancy.
Treatment
The patient was offered various surgical options such as cryotherapy, endoscopic radial laser incisions and balloon dilations along with an awake temporary tracheostomy for airway protection. Detailed risks of aspiration especially with a history of reflux disease increased during pregnancy along with difficult airway was explained when the patient refused an awake tracheostomy as a backup.
Given the success of previous two balloon dilation procedures and the less invasiveness nature compared with others, the decision was made to proceed with balloon dilation for symptomatic relief keeping in mind the high-risk nature during the precious pregnancy.
Following administration of aspiration prophylaxis which included 30 mL of sodium citrate, standard American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) monitoring was initiated as well as continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. The patient was preoxygenated in the left lateral position followed by induction of anaesthesia with 2 mg midazolam, 150 mcg fentanyl and 150 mg of propofol, 50 mg of rocuronium was given after successful mask ventilation. Propofol and remifentanil infusions were then started at 120 mcg/kg/min and 0.15 mcg/kg/min, respectively. Laryngotracheal administration of 160 mg of lidocaine 4% preceded transtracheal jet ventilation with a 14 gauge needle.
Suspension laryngoscopy revealed significant scarring of the subglottic region with narrowing estimated to be 2.5 mm (figure 1) and a diagnostic bronchoscope could not be passed through the lumen. A surgical incision was made using micro laryngeal scissors at the 12‘o clock and 15‘o clock in the trachea. Successive Jackson laryngeal dilators were passed (20–38 Fr) followed by 12 mm and 15 mm balloons sequentially deployed in the subglottis and inflated for 1 min. Following dilation, a 7.0 endotracheal tube (ETT) could easily be inserted into the trachea without complication. The improvement to Myer-Cotton grade 1 from pre procedure grade 3 is the highlight of the case.
Figure 1.
Intraoperative laryngoscopy view of subglottic region before (A) during (B) balloon dilation and after (C) balloon dilation.
Following this, muscle relaxant was reversed with administration of glycopyrrolate 0.8 mg and neostigmine 5 mg, the patient was successfully extubated in the operating room. She was then transferred to post anaesthesia care unit in stable condition. She was evaluated by the obstetrician with a bedside ultrasound which revealed a single fetus with good fetal movements and normal fetal heart rate (table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of intraoperative challenges and corresponding management
| Challenges | Management |
| High aspiration risk during pregnancy | Sodium citrate was given in addition to standard antiemetic regimen |
| Anticipated difficult airway, surgical manipulation and chance of bleeding due to increased vascularity | |
| Preoperative consent for tracheostomy in case of an emergency | |
| Changes in cardiopulmonary physiology during pregnancy | Preoxygenation in left lateral position |
| Risk of laryngospasm in the setting of increased bleeding secondary to increased vascularity and mucosal congestion | Laryngotracheal topicalisation with 4% lidocaine |
| Airway manipulation—preference of anesthetic– oxygenation–ventilation technique to avoid interference with surgical field | Total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol infusion Intermittent jet ventilation |
| Increased fire risk in the setting of airway manipulation | Use laryngeal scissors and balloon dilators instead of lasers and electrocautery |
| Significant scarring of the subglottic region with very narrow lumen (2.5 mm) | Surgical incision first made using micro laryngeal scissors followed by successive Jackson laryngeal dilators followed by sequential balloon dilations |
| Assure fetal well-being during the high-risk surgical procedure in parturient | Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in addition to standard ASA monitoring Bedside fetal ultrasound in PACU after the procedure by obstetrics team |
ASA, American Society of Anesthesiology; PACU, post anaesthesia care unit.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient tolerated the procedure well. She reported immediate improvement in her breathing after recovery from anaesthesia in the operating room. She was discharged after 24 hours of observation with mild hoarseness. The rest of her pregnancy was uncomplicated. She delivered a baby girl full term via repeat c-section. She had persistent symptom relief for about 6 months, after which she developed progressive dyspnoea that required repeat subglottic balloon dilation during her postpartum period.
Discussion
ISS is a rare disorder. While the pathophysiology is not well understood, inflammation and scarring is usually present. It is almost exclusively in Caucasian women between the third and fifth decades of life.3 Hormonal factors such as the paucity of oestrogen receptors in the stenotic areas leading to increased release of fibroblast growth factor have been postulated as it occurs exclusively in women.3 4
It may present with exertional dyspnoea, cough, difficulty with throat clearing, dysphonia or stridor. Though no universally accepted algorithm for its management exists, treatment options include observation, medical management, endoscopic intervention and open tracheal resection with reanastomosis.5 It is generally recommended that endoscopic therapy (which include radial incisions, rigid or balloon dilation, cryotherapy, topical steroid and mitomycin C application) be pursued initially before attempting open procedures.6–8
Because ISS affects women predominantly, often at childbearing age, it is important to learn how to manage the disease in pregnant patients. Pregnancy results in a variety of respiratory changes that can lead to increased vascularity, mucosal congestion and bleeding. Recent study showed that there were worsening symptoms from ISS during pregnancy; however, there was no increase in operative or clinic interventions.9 Parturients are also at a significantly greater risk of aspiration of gastric contents especially with worsening of reflux during pregnancy. Hence, the airway management in such patient population can be extremely challenging.
Unfortunately, given the epidemiology of the disease, guidance for the management of ISS in pregnancy from the literature has been limited to small number of case reports and case series among which various treatment strategies have been considered in individual circumstances. Surgical options mentioned above maybe performed under local anaesthesia with or without intravenous sedation, general inhalational anaesthesia with intubation and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with jet or high-flow nasal cannula ventilation (table 2).1 10–19 There is no consensus regarding optimal management of these patients. We chose to administer TIVA with muscle relaxation with supraglottic jet ventilation to facilitate suspension laryngoscopy and balloon dilation despite risk of difficult airway and aspiration risk in pregnancy along with pneumothorax, bleeding and chances of miscarriage. Due to significant subglottic narrowing, the decision was made not to intubate the airway as even a small calibre endotracheal tube would cause an interference in the surgical field and affect surgical outcomes. The lack of any maternal and fetal complications and successful resolution in symptoms with an ability to carry the pregnancy to full term makes this a unique case.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics, surgical and anaesthetic management and outcomes from previous reports
| Literature | Age | Gestational age | Presenting symptoms | Preoperative Cotton-Myer grading | Operative technique | Anaesthetic technique | Ventilation technique | Outcomes |
| Rumbak et al11 | 20 | 27 | Difficulty breathing and stridor | Unknown | Cautery-assisted balloon dilation | Local, sedation | Unknown | NSVD |
| Rumbak et al11 | 21 | 32 | Dyspnoea, cough, ‘tight’ throat | Unknown | Cautery-assisted balloon dilation | General, volatile anaesthetic | Endotracheal tube | NSVD |
| Engel et al12 | 29 | 37 | None | Unknown | None | N/A | N/A | NSVD |
| Karippacheril et al13 | 28 | 40 | None | Unknown | None | N/A | N/A | C-section, tracheostomy after delivery, followed by decannulation |
| Nash et al15 | 30 | 24 | Stridor, hoarse voice | Unknown | Non-surgical management | N/A | N/A | NSVD |
| Carness and Berman1 | 31 | 28 | Dyspnoea on exertion | Unknown | Laser-assisted balloon dilation | Local, sedation | Blow-by oxygen | NSVD |
| Hamersley et al16 | 31 | Unknown | Unknown | Grade 3 | Balloon dilation | Local, sedation | Unknown | Unknown |
| Damrose et al17 | 40 | 28 | Unknown | Grade 3 | Balloon dilation | General, TIVA | Jet ventilation | NSVD |
| Damrose et al17 | 30 | 31 | Unknown | Grade 3 | Balloon dilation | General, TIVA | Jet ventilation | NSVD |
| Damrose et al17 | 33 | 17 | Unknown | Grade 3 | Balloon dilation | General, TIVA | Jet ventilation | NSVD |
| Damrose et al17 | 42 | 30 | Unknown | Grade 3 | Balloon dilation | General, TIVA | High flow nasal cannula | NSVD |
| Walsh and Shostak18 | 37 | 33 | Progressive stridor | Unknown | Balloon dilation | General, volatile anaesthetic | LMA, jet ventilation, tracheostomy until delivery | Unknown |
| Bourn et al19 | 29 | 21 | Stridor | Grade 2 | Balloon dilation | General, TIVA | Transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange | C-section |
LMA, Laryngeal mask airway; N/A, Not applicable; NSVD, normal spontaneous vaginal delivery; TIVA, total intravenous anaesthesia.
Maternal and fetal safety in the case of airway compromise requires a multidisciplinary approach including obstetricians, otolaryngologists and anesthesiologists in addition to a thorough understanding of the possible complications that can be encountered in pregnant patients experiencing this condition.
Learning points.
This is a case of successful management of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (ISS) in pregnancy which is rarely encountered with limited treatment options available.
The management of ISS becomes more challenging in the setting of pregnancy which results in increased airway vascularity and mucosal congestion leading to bleeding in the setting of a high aspiration risk. A thorough understanding of possible foreseen complications is critical.
A multidisciplinary approach among obstetricians, otolaryngologists and anesthesiologists is required to achieve appropriate management of both maternal and fetal safety.
Footnotes
Contributors: Both authors helped with the case, manuscript preparation and proof reading.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient consent for publication: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Carness JM, Berman JL. Awake microlaryngoscopy and serial balloon dilation in a third trimester multigravida with subglottic tracheal stenosis: anesthetic implications. A A Case Rep 2014;3:166–8. 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harries PG, Mason PS, Ramsay AD, et al. Idiopathic tracheal stenoses. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110:973–5. 10.1017/S0022215100135480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aravena C, Almeida FA, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: a review. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:1100–11. 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tapias LF, Rogan TJ, Wright CD. Pregnancy-Associated idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis: presentation, management and results of surgical treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Scholz A, Srinivas K, Stacey MRW, et al. Subglottic stenosis in pregnancy. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:385–8. 10.1093/bja/aem391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Giudice M, Piazza C, Foccoli P, et al. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis: management by endoscopic and open-neck surgery in a series of 30 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003;260:235–8. 10.1007/s00405-002-0554-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krimsky WS, Rodrigues MP, Malayaman N, et al. Spray cryotherapy for the treatment of glottic and subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope 2010;120:473–7. 10.1002/lary.20794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roediger FC, Orloff LA, Courey MS. Adult subglottic stenosis: management with laser incisions and mitomycin-C. Laryngoscope 2008;118:1542–6. 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318179247a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McCrary H, Torrecillas V, Conley M, et al. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis during pregnancy: a support group survey. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2021;130:188–94. 10.1177/0003489420947780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kuczkowski KM. Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: what are the risks of anesthesia? Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004;59:52–6. 10.1097/01.OGX.0000103191.73078.5F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rumbak M, Dryer J, Padhya T, et al. Successful management of subglottic stenosis during the third trimester of pregnancy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2010;17:342–4. 10.1097/LBR.0b013e3181f42da1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Engel NMAA, Gramke HF, Peeters L, et al. Combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for a woman with Wegener's granulomatosis with subglottic stenosis. Int J Obstet Anesth 2011;20:94–5. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Karippacheril JG, Goneppanavar U, Prabhu M, et al. Idiopathic subglottic stenosis in pregnancy: a deceptive laryngoscopic view. Indian J Anaesth 2011;55:521. 10.4103/0019-5049.89894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nanjegowda N, Srinivasan NM. Undiagnosed tracheal stenosis complicating airway management in pregnancy. Sri Lankan J Anaesthesiol 2011;19:86–8. 10.4038/slja.v19i2.1973 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nash Z, Krishna A, Darwish M, et al. Conservative management of subglottic stenosis in pregnancy resulting in vaginal birth. BMJ Case Rep 2014;2014:bcr2013202137. 10.1136/bcr-2013-202137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hamersley ER, Perez AJ, Morrison MP. Surgical treatment of symptomatic subglottic stenosis during the third trimester of pregnancy. Ear Nose Throat J 2018;97:E10–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Damrose EJ, Manson L, Nekhendzy V, et al. Management of subglottic stenosis in pregnancy using advanced apnoeic ventilatory techniques. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2019;133:399–403. 10.1017/S0022215119000690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Walsh KJ, Shostak E. Supraglottic jet ventilation in a parturient with subglottic stenosis. J Clin Anesth 2019;58:98–9. 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.05.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bourn S, Milligan P, McNarry AF. Use of transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange (thrive) to facilitate the management of subglottic stenosis in pregnancy. Int J Obstet Anesth 2020;41:108–13. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

