Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248396

Experience of gender-based violence and its effect on depressive symptoms among Indian adolescent girls: Evidence from UDAYA survey

Ratna Patel 1, Samriddhi S Gupte 2, Shobhit Srivastava 3, Pradeep Kumar 3, Shekhar Chauhan 4,*, Mani Deep Govindu 5, Preeti Dhillon 6
Editor: Kannan Navaneetham7
PMCID: PMC7993765  PMID: 33765009

Abstract

Background

Violence against women has been one of the most prominent issue and a major public health concern. It is a principle violation of basic human rights and has both physical and mental effect on the victim. This study focuses on married and unmarried girls aged 15 to 19 years, belonging to Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, India. This study attempts to examine depression level among married and unmarried girls who have faced violence against them. With the unprecedented growth in social networking, online digital platform and its accessibility, the study also brings out the pertinent aspect of internet based violence and its psychological outcome on adolescent girls. Hence, the study can be seen as an important and needed value addition to the existing pool of knowledge on the subject.

Methods

The study uses Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) project data for Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Depressive symptoms among adolescent girl is the outcome variable of the study. Descriptive statistic and bivariate analysis has been used to get to preliminary results. Chi-squared test is used to test the significant of variables. Further, multi-variate analysis (logistic regression) was used.

Results

Almost 29, 23 and 26 percent of married adolescent girls had faced emotional, physical and sexual violence respectively. It was found that about five per cent of unmarried and eight per cent of married girls had high depressive symptoms. It was found that unmarried adolescent girls who had witnessed their father beating mother were 71 percent more likely to suffer from higher depressive symptoms [OR: 1.71, 1.09–2.69]. Adolescents who faced perpetrated bullying had 90 per cent [OR: 1.90, 1.32–2.72] and 86 per cent [OR: 1.86, 0.98–3.52] higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms.

Conclusion

The study goes beyond intimate partner violence and includes various covariates to explain the association between violence and depressive symptoms among married and unmarried adolescents. Hence, more inclusive policies are needed to address the issue of violence against women as the spectrum of the violence is expanding with time.

Introduction

World Health Organization defines violence as “The intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual that results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, mal-development or deprivation.” The inclusion of word “power” broadens “the conventional understanding of violence include those acts that result from a power relationship, including threats and intimidation” [1]. Violence against women has long been a prominent and widespread area of concern in public health. It is also a principle violation of basic human rights, which impairs, particularly, women’s right to life, right to freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishments, and to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health [24].

Violence against women take various forms ranging from emotional to sexual. Global studies show women all over the world face violence in various forms at hands of various people [5,14,15]. The most common forms of violence that a woman faces are domestic violence, abuse and sexual violence [5]. Worldwide 35 percent of the women have experienced intimate partner or non-partner sexual violence [6]. The 2013–2014 Crime Survey of England showed that around 2.2 percent (approximately 355000) of women aged 16 to 59 have suffered some kind of sexual assault along with 8.5 percent women (1.5 million) had experienced domestic abuse in the past year [7]. In United States, more than 10 million adults experience domestic violence annually [8]. Also, the number of intimate partner victims has seen an increase by 42 percent from 2016 to 2018 in U.S [9]. In India, 30 percent of women have experienced physical violence since the age of 15 years and around 4 percent of ever pregnant women have experienced physical violence during pregnancy. According to National Family Health Survey, 2015–16, of the total ever married women, 33 percent have experienced spousal violence in various forms such as physical, sexual or emotional. Of this, the most common form of violence is physical violence, followed by emotional violence [10]. In India, the problem of gender based violence has taken a grave turn. With a number of policies and acts to strengthen position of women within the society, the crimes against women are still seeing new peaks. However, there does exist a regional disparity [11]. According to NCRB Crime in India 2018 statistic, highest number of dowry related deaths occurred in Uttar Pradesh, followed by Bihar (252.1 and 111.1 deaths per million female population, respectively) [12]. Uttar Pradesh and Bihar have also reported the highest number of cases of kidnapping or abduction of girls below 18 years to compel her marriage (444.9, 294.2 women per million women respectively), whereas, Assam, West Bengal and Rajasthan have reported the highest number of cases in the section of cruelty by husband or relatives (crime rate of 66.7 percent, 35.0 percent, 33.0 percent respectively) [12].

Given the diversity and disparity that exists in India, it becomes imperative to look into the factors that affect violence against women. Broadly these factors can be clustered as those falling under Extrinsic factors and those under Intrinsic factors [13]. However, the underlying cause of violence of any kind remains to be the power imbalance [14]. In many cultures, including India, males dominate and control the power hierarchies and thus, uses several forms of violence over women to keep their supremacy intact [15]. Using domestic violence against women is a stereotypical notion by man to maintain or regain his masculinity [16]. Intrinsic factors are the factors pertaining to individual or personal characteristics such as age, education, income etc. Some factors that do influence the acceptance of violence are also witnessing violence as a child or having faced violence at a young age [17]. Age is also seen as a critical factor, 15 to 19, that is adolescence, is seen to be the most vulnerable age where almost all women face or witness some form of violence [18].

Witnessing or facing violence has long term effect on the mental health of women. Literature asserts that domestic violence and abuse increases the likeliness of depressive disorder [19]. Not just, physical violence but psychological domestic violence and abuse has also shown to have similar detrimental effect as physical violence with respect to depressive disorder, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and psychological stress [2022]. However, there is dearth of work on association between violence and depressive symptoms among married and unmarried adolescents in India. Although, adolescents have been identified as at risk age group, yet almost no study delves into their psychological response to having witnessed or experienced violence.

The current study attempts to bridge the gap that exists in the literature on the association between violence witnessed/experienced by adolescents and depressive symptoms among them. The study focuses on married and unmarried girls aged 15 to 19, belonging to Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, India. With the unprecedented growth in social networking, online digital platform and its accessibility, the study also brings out the pertinent aspect of internet based violence and its psychological outcome on adolescent girls. Hence, the study can be seen as an important and needed value addition to the existing pool of knowledge on the subject. This study hypothesize that adolescents experiencing violence would show higher depressive symptoms.

Methods

Data

The present study carried out data from Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) project survey, which was conducted in two Indian states Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, in 2016 by Population Council under the guidance of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. With the use of a multi-stage sampling procedure, the survey gathered information on family, media, community environment, and quality of transitions to young adulthood indicators, and provide the estimates for states as a whole as well as rural and urban of both states. The sample size for Uttar Pradesh and Bihar was 10,161 and 10,433 adolescents aged 10–19 years, respectively. For this study, a total sample of 12,972 adolescent girls aged 15–19 years was considered. Among them, 7,766 respondents were unmarried, 313 were married, but no Gauna was performed and 4,893 were currently married at the time of the survey. We dropped the 313 married, but no Gauna performed cases as the data did not have information about these respondents for physical violence by a parent during the last 12 months. In some parts of India, girls participate in a marriage ceremony at a very young age, but they do not begin a sexual relationship or cohabitate with their husbands until a ceremony known as gauna has taken place [23]. Gauna is most common in North India where parents may wait several years between the marriage and gauna until the girl attains puberty or is deemed mature enough to begin living with her husband [23]. The effective sample size for this study was 12,599 adolescent girls aged 15–19 years after adjusting for missing data from some married and unmarried adolescent girls. The sample was representative for Uttar Pradesh and Bihar to make the estimates representative and to account for the multi stage systematic sampling design, we used survey weights across the analysis [24,25]. Informed consent was sought from each individual to be interviewed, among unmarried adolescents in ages 10–17, consent was also sought from a parent or guardian. Additionally, names were never recorded in the computer form in which data were collected. In order to preserve the confidentiality of the respondent or the parent/guardian, signing the consent form was optional; however, the interviewer was required to sign a statement that she or he had explained the content of the consent form to the respondent or parent.

This study uses data which is secondary in nature and therefore does not require any ethical approval from any institutional review board. The data collection for UDAYA survey was approved by Population Council, New Delhi and ethical review board of Population Council, New Delhi approved the questionnaire that was used in the field work.

Outcome variable

Depressive symptom among adolescent girls was the outcome variable of this study. The respondent was asked about the symptoms for past two weeks only. The questions included, a. had trouble falling asleep or sleeping too much, b. feeling tired or having little energy, c. poor appetite or eating too much, d. trouble concentrating on things, e. had little interest or pleasure in doing things f. feeling down, depressed or hopeless, g. feeling bad about yourself, h. been moving or speaking slowly, i. had thoughts that respondent would be better off dead. All the above questions were asked on a scale of four i.e., 0 “not at all”, 1 “less than once a week”, 2 “one week or more” and 3 “nearly every day”. The scale of 27 points was then generated using egen command in STATA 14. The variable was treated as count variable for the analytical purpose (Cronbach alpha: 0.86). A score of 0–9 was considered as mild/minimal depressive symptoms whereas the score of 10–27 was considered as moderate to severe category [2427]. The variable was recoded as a binary variable for analytical purpose i.e. 0 as low which include mild/minimal symptoms and 1 as high which include moderate to severe symptoms.

Exposure variables

The variables included gender based violence among unmarried and married adolescent girls. The following categorization was done for the analytical purpose.

Gender based violence among unmarried adolescent girls

  1. Parental violence was coded as 1 means ‘Yes’ depicting if the respondent witnessed father ever beating mother in the last 12 months and 0 means ‘No,’ otherwise.

  2. Physical violence was recorded as 1 ‘Yes’ if the respondent experienced physical violence by a parent during the last 12 months and 0 ‘No’; otherwise. This question was asked to unmarried girls only.

  3. Sexual violence was coded as ‘Yes’ Ever experienced forced sex (attempted or forced) and ‘No’; otherwise.

Intimate partner violence among married adolescent girls

  1. Separate questions were asked to married girls only regarding emotional, physical, and sexual violence. Emotional violence was defined as if the husband humiliate respondent in front of others coded as 1 ‘Yes’ and 0 ‘No,’ otherwise.

  2. Physical violence was recorded as 1 ‘Yes’ if the husband ever slapped, twisted or pulled hair, pushed/shook or throe something, kicked dragged beaten, burnt on purpose, attacked with a knife to the respondent and 0 ‘No,’ otherwise.

  3. Sexual violence was defined as ‘Yes’ if the husband ever forced the respondent to have sex in the last 12 months and ‘No’; otherwise.

Justification over wife-beating was recoded from the question ‘is it right for a husband to beat his wife’ coded ‘Justified and ‘not justified.’ Perpetrated bullying in the last 12 months (ever teased/beaten a girl/boy/weaker for any reason in the last 12 months) were coded as ‘Yes’ and ‘No.’ Perpetrated bullying means that they were carrying out bullying. If the respondent experienced mobile or internet-based harassment, it was recorded as ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ if the respondent did not experience this kind of harassment.

Age of the adolescent girls grouped into two categories: early adolescent (15–17 years) and late adolescent (18–19 years). Education was categorized as: no education, 1–7 years of schooling, 8–9 years of schooling, and 10 & above years of schooling. Place of residence was given in the survey as rural and urban. Caste was grouped as Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) and Other Backward Class and Others. The Scheduled Caste include “untouchables”; a group of population which is socially segregated and financially/economically by their low status as per Hindu caste hierarchy. The Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) are among the most disadvantaged socio-economic groups in India. The OBC are the group of people who were identified as “educationally, economically and socially backward”. The OBC’s are considered low in traditional caste hierarchy but are not considered as untouchables. The “other” caste category are identified of having higher social status [28].

Religion was categorized into two groups: Hindu and non-Hindu. The survey measured household economic status, using a wealth index composed of household asset data on ownership of selected durable goods, including means of transportation, as well as data on access to a number of amenities. The wealth index was constructed by allocating the following scores to a households reported assets or amenities. Index scores had ranged from 0 to 57. Households were ranked according to the index score (divided into five groups) based on five quintiles using xtile function in STATA 14. The wealth quintile was coded as poorest, poorer, middle, richer and richest. Access to the mobile phone was coded as ‘Yes’ if the respondent had their mobile phone or have access to a family member’s mobile phone and ‘No’ otherwise. Similarly, access to the internet was coded as ‘Yes’ if the respondent had access to the internet on mobile or computer and ‘No’; otherwise. Exposure to mass media was coded as “Yes” if the respondent had daily or weekly exposure to television, film, radio, or media, and “No” otherwise. The data was available for two states Uttar Pradesh and Bihar.

Statistical analysis

The bivariate and multivariate analysis adopted to fulfil the study objective. First, univariate (sample distribution) analysis was done to observe the frequency distribution of adolescent girls. Second, bivariate analysis was used to find the association between outcome and independent variables. A chi-square test used to test the level of significance between variables. Finally, logistic regression was used to estimates the effect of different exposure variables on high depressive symptoms among adolescent girls. The results were presented in the form of odds and 95% confidence interval (CI).

ln(p1p)=α+β1X1+β2X2+β3X3.βnXn

Where β0,…..,βM are regression coefficient indicating the relative effect of a particular explanatory variable on the outcome. These coefficients change as per the context in the analysis in the study.

Results

Exposure to gender-based Violence and characteristics of adolescent girls

Table 1 depicts the socio-demographic characteristics of adolescent girls aged 15–19 years and their exposure to gender-based violence (GBV). It was found that about five per cent of unmarried and eight percent of married girls had high depressive symptoms. Nearly eight percent of unmarried adolescents witnessed their father beat their mother. Around nine percent of unmarried girls experienced physical violence by their parents, and two percent had experienced sexual violence. About 29 percent, 23 percent and 26 percent of married adolescent girls experienced emotional, physical and sexual violence, respectively.

Table 1. Characteristics of adolescent girls aged 15–19 years and their exposure to GBV.

Background Characteristics Unmarried Married
Percentage N Percentage N
Depressive symptoms
Low 95.1 7,383 92.1 4,452
High 4.9 383 7.9 380
Witnessed father ever beating mother
No 92.4 7,174 --
Yes 7.6 592
Experienced physical violence by a parent
No 90.7 7,042 --
Yes 9.3 724
Experienced Sexual Violence
No 97.6 7,582 --
Yes 2.4 184
Experienced Emotional Violence
No 71.4 3,451
Yes 28.6 1,382
Experienced Physical Violence
No 77.1 3,724
Yes 22.9 1,109
Experienced Sexual Violence
No 73.9 3,572
Yes 26.1 1,261
Justification over wife-beating
Justified 19.8 1,539 26.7 1,290
Not justified 80.2 6,227 73.3 3,543
Experienced mobile phone/internet-based harassment
No 95.5 7,414 93 4,493
Yes 4.5 352 7.0 340
Perpetrated bullying
No 85.1 6,610 97.2 4,697
Yes 14.9 1,156 2.8 136
Age groups (in years)
15–17 71.9 5,580 26.6 1,285
18–19 28.2 2,186 73.4 3,547
Education level (in years)
No education 7.6 593 27.3 1,318
1–7 18.8 1,459 23.5 1,135
8–9 33.3 2,585 25.0 1,210
10 & above 40.3 3,130 24.2 1,170
Place of residence
Urban 17.3 1,344 14.8 713
Rural 82.7 6,422 85.2 4,120
Caste
SC/ST 22.1 1,715 28.6 1,384
OBC 57.2 4,444 60.7 2,935
Others 20.7 1,607 10.6 514
Religion
Hindu 77.5 6,019 84.1 4,065
Non-Hindu 22.5 1,747 15.9 768
Wealth quintile
Poorest 11.9 923 13.6 656
Poorer 17.1 1,327 19.6 947
Middle 20.9 1,626 23.4 1,133
Richer 25.2 1,955 25.5 1,233
Richest 24.9 1,934 17.9 865
Mobile access
No mobile 12.1 941 4.9 235
Own Mobile 8.4 650 35.6 1,719
Family member’s 79.5 6,175 59.6 2,879
Internet access
No 91.4 7,094 96.2 4,648
Yes 8.7 672 3.8 185
Mass media exposure
No 38.4 2,984 52.4 2,534
Yes 61.6 4,782 47.6 2,298
State
Uttar Pradesh 55.9 4,338 35.5 1,713
Bihar 44.1 3,428 64.6 3,120
Total  100.0 7,766 100.0 4,833

SC/ST: Scheduled caste/scheduled tribe; GBV: Gender-based violence; OBC: Other backward Class; Violence among married women come under intimate partner violence; depressive symptoms (low include scores from 0–9 and high include scores 10–27).

About 20 percent of unmarried and 27 percent of married girls justified wife beating by husband. Moreover, around five percent of unmarried and seven percent of married girls had experienced mobile phone/internet-based harassment. Perpetrated bullying was more common among unmarried adolescent girls (15%) than married girls (3%). Only eight percent of unmarried and 36 percent of married girls had access over their own mobile phones. However, only nine percent of unmarried and 4 percent of married girls had internet access.

Prevalence of high depressive symptoms among adolescents by exposure to GBV and their characteristics

Percentage of adolescent girls who reported high depressive symptoms by gender-based violence and other background characteristics, according to their marital status is presented in Table 2. The prevalence of high depressive symptoms was higher among unmarried girls who witnessed mother beaten by their father (9%). Moreover, unmarried adolescent girls who faced physical violence by their parents (8%) and if ever experienced sexual violence (11%) had higher prevalence of depressive symptoms. Moreover, the prevalence of depressive symptoms was higher among married girls who experienced emotional violence (13%), physical violence (14%), and sexual violence (11%). Adolescent girls who experienced harassment over mobile phone/internet had higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (unmarried-10% and married-13%). Interestingly, depressive symptoms was higher among adolescent girls who perpetrated bullying (unmarried-8% and married-15%) i.e. If the respondent bullied someone, she had higher depressive symptoms. Similarly, depressive symptoms was more prevalent among adolescent girls who had own mobile phone access (unmarried-8% and married-10%). Married adolescent girls who had internet access had significantly higher prevalence of depressive symptoms (14%).

Table 2. Percentage of adolescent girls who reported high depressive symptoms by gender-based violence and other background characteristics, according to their marital status.

Background Characteristics Unmarried Married
High depressive symptoms p-value High depressive symptoms p-value
Witnessed father ever beating mother ***
No 4.6
Yes 8.9
Experienced physical violence by a parent ***
No 4.6
Yes 8.4
Experienced Sexual Violence ***
No 4.8
Yes 11.1
Experienced Emotional Violence ***
No 5.7
Yes 13.4
Experienced Physical Violence ***
No 6.2
Yes 13.5
Experienced Sexual Violence ***
No 6.9
Yes 10.7
Justification over wife-beating *
Justified 5.5 6.2
Not justified 4.8 8.5
Experienced mobile phone/internet-based harassment *** **
No 4.7 7.5
Yes 10.2 12.6
Perpetrated bullying *** **
No 4.3 7.7
Yes 8.3 14.8
Age groups (In years) ***
15–17 4.3 7.9
18–19 6.6 7.9
Education level (In years) *
No education 6.7 7.8
1–7 4.0 7.3
8–9 5.7 9.3
10 & above 4.4 7.1
Place of residence *
Urban 6 8.8
Rural 4.7 7.7
Caste **
SC/ST 6.4 7.9
OBC 4.2 7.9
Others 5.3 7.9
Religion ***
Hindu 4.7 7.3
Non-Hindu 5.7 10.9
Wealth quintile *
Poorest 5.3 7.1
Poorer 4.1 8.9
Middle 3.5 8.6
Richer 6.0 6.7
Richest 5.4 8.1
Mobile access ** **
No mobile 4.7 5.3
Own 7.8 9.5
Family member’s 4.7 7.1
Internet access **
No 4.8 7.6
Yes 5.9 14.3
Mass media exposure *
No 4.1 7.9
Yes 5.4 7.9
State *
Uttar Pradesh 4.9 9.3
Bihar 5.0 7.1

***p<0.001

**p<0.05

*p<0.10

SC/ST: Scheduled caste/scheduled tribe; OBC: Other Backward Class; Violence among married women come under intimate partner violence; depressive symptoms (low include scores from 0–9 and high include scores 10–27).

Association between exposure to GBV and depressive symptoms among adolescent girls

Table 3 provides the estimates from binary logistic regression analysis for high depressive symptoms among adolescent girls by background characteristics. It was found that unmarried adolescents who witnessed their father ever beating their mother had 71 percent higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms than their counterpart [OR: 1.71, 1.09–2.69]. Similarly, unmarried adolescents who experienced physical violence by parents had 62 per cent higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms than who did not experience [OR: 1.62, 1.16–2.25]. Unmarried girls who experienced sexual violence had 98 percent higher odds to suffer from higher depressive symptoms compared to those who did not experience [OR: 1.98, 0.94–4.19].

Table 3. Estimates from binary logistic regression analysis for high depressive symptoms among adolescent girls by background characteristics.

Background Characteristics Unmarried Married
OR [95% CI] OR [95% CI]
Witnessed father ever beating mother
No (Ref)
Yes 1.71 [1.09–2.69]**
Experienced physical violence by a parent
No (Ref)
Yes 1.62 [1.16–2.25]***
Experienced Sexual Violence
No (Ref)
Yes 1.98 [0.94–4.19]*
Experienced Emotional Violence
No (Ref)
Yes 2.10 [1.42–3.11]***
Experienced Physical Violence
No (Ref)
Yes 1.63 [1.13–2.35]***
Experienced Sexual Violence
No (Ref)
Yes 1.11 [0.81–1.53]
Justification over wife beating
Justified (Ref)
Not justified 0.89 [0.59–1.34] 1.59 [1.09–2.33]**
Experienced mobile phone/internet based harassment
No (Ref)
Yes 1.78 [1.02–3.11]** 1.37 [0.8–2.37]
Perpetrated bullying
No (Ref)
Yes 1.90 [1.32–2.72]*** 1.86 [0.98–3.52]*
Age groups (In years)
15–17 (Ref)
18–19 1.81 [1.34–2.46]*** 0.94 [0.71–1.26]
Education Level (In years)
No education (Ref)
1–7 0.57 [0.32–1.02]* 0.89 [0.6–1.33]
8–9 0.94 [0.52–1.7] 1.25 [0.82–1.89]
10 & above 0.59 [0.33–1.06]* 0.99 [0.62–1.6]
Place of Residence
Urban (Ref)
Rural 0.90 [0.66–1.22] 0.97 [0.69–1.37]
Caste
SC/ST (Ref)
OBC 0.59 [0.4–0.86]*** 0.95 [0.7–1.28]
Others 0.68 [0.44–1.04]* 0.92 [0.52–1.63]
Religion
Hindu (Ref)
Non-Hindu 1.41 [1–1.98]** 1.67 [1.08–2.58]**
Wealth quintile
Poorest (Ref)
Poorer 0.85 [0.49–1.48] 1.14 [0.73–1.79]
Middle 0.77 [0.43–1.39] 1.04 [0.69–1.58]
Richer 1.38 [0.8–2.38] 0.81 [0.52–1.29]
Richest 1.37 [0.73–2.58] 0.97 [0.54–1.72]
Mobile Access
No Mobile (Ref)
Own Mobile 1.46 [0.81–2.63] 2.25 [1.18–4.27]**
Family member’s 1.00 [0.60–1.65] 1.71 [0.88–3.3]
Internet Access
No (Ref)
Yes 0.93 [0.57–1.52] 1.95 [1.06–3.62]**
Mass Media Exposure
No (Ref)
Yes 1.95 [1.30–0.87–1.96] 0.95 [0.70–1.29]
State
Bihar (Ref)
Uttar Pradesh 1.08 [0.8–1.45] 1.54 [1.12–2.14]***

***p<0.01

**p<0.05

*p<0.10

Ref: Reference category; CI: Confidence interval; SC/ST: Scheduled caste/scheduled tribe; OBC: Other Backward Class; OR: Odds ratio; Violence among married women come under intimate partner violence; depressive symptoms (low include scores from 0–9 and high include scores 10–27).

Married girls who experienced emotional violence were 2.1 times more likely to have higher depressive symptoms than who do not face emotional violence [OR: 2.10, 1.42–3.11]. Moreover, married girls who had experienced physical violence had 63 per cent higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms than their counterparts [OR: 1.63, 1.13–2.35]. Similarly, the likelihood of higher depressive symptoms was higher among adolescent girls who experienced sexual violence, though the results were not significant [OR: 1.11, 0.81–1.53].

Married girls who justified wife beating, had 59 per cent higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms than those who did not justify [OR: 1.59, 1.09–2.33]. Unmarried girls who experienced harassment over mobile phone/internet had 78 per cent higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms than who did not experience [OR: 1.78, 1.02–3.11]. Similarly, adolescents who perpetrated bullying had 90 per cent [OR: 1.90, 1.32–2.72] and 86 per cent [OR: 1.86, 0.98–3.52] higher likelihood to suffer from higher depressive symptoms among unmarried and married adolescents respectively compared to their counterparts. Married adolescents who had own mobile phone and internet access were 2.25 times [OR: 2.25, 1.18–4.27] and 1.95 times [OR: 1.95, 1.06–3.62] higher odds to suffer from higher depressive symptoms respectively than who did not have mobile phone access and no internet access.

Fig 1 displays result for interaction for depressive symptoms in married girls. The results present a scenario where the prevalence of depressive symptoms was categorized by experiencing and not experiencing violence along with justifying wife beating. About 15 percent of married girls who experienced physical violence and did not justify wife beating had high depressive symptoms. Moreover, ten percent of married girls who experienced physical violence and justify wife beating had high depressive symptoms. The result clearly highlights that experiencing physical violence and not justifying wife beating were linked to higher depression among married adolescents.

Fig 1. Percentage of high depressive symptoms for physical violence and justification over wife beating among married adolescent girls.

Fig 1

Similarly, Fig 2 displays result for interaction for depressive symptoms in unmarried girls. The results present a scenario where the prevalence of depressive symptoms was categorized by witnessed and not witnessed violence against mother perpetuated by father along with justifying wife beating. Results found a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms for unmarried girls who witnessed father ever beating mother and did not justify wife beating. Moreover, six percent of unmarried girls who witnessed father ever beating mother and also justified wife beating had high depressive symptoms.

Fig 2. Percentage of high depressive symptoms for unmarried adolescent girls who witnessed father ever beating mother and justification over wife beating.

Fig 2

Discussion

Previously, various studies have examined violence against women [29,30]; however, studies related to violence against married and unmarried adolescents are minimal across various settings [3133]. Furthermore, minimal research is available examining the relationship between violence against adolescent girls and their mental health status [2,34]. By carrying out this study, we intended to fill the gap in the extant literature through exploring an association between violence against married and unmarried adolescents and depressive symptoms among them. Results noted that those who experience violence were more likely to face depressive symptoms. Previous studies also acknowledged that violence against women leads to mental health issues among them [3538]. When in an abusive relationship, where women suffer violence against them, women lose self-confidence and therefore is more likely to face mental health issues [39].

Furthermore, women who suffer violence do not disclose this onslaught to anyone due to cultural secrecy and keep enduring the pain of violence until it becomes a mental trauma for them [40]. Results further found that adolescent girls who witness that their father beat mother were more likely to report depressive symptoms. It could also be important to understand in the context of this study that unmarried girls who witness IPV against mothers may also end up experiencing violence against them after marriage. The above notion has been confirmed through a few studies where evidence indicated that exposure to intimate partner violence against mother was one of the most common factors associated with male perpetration and female experiencing violence in later life [41,42].

Another important finding revealed that unmarried adolescent girls who experience internet based harassment were more likely to suffer from depressive symptoms. Studies have explicitly noticed that a subsequent number of adolescent girls face cyberbullying and online harassment [43,44]. Furthermore, studies also noticed mental health problems among adolescent girls who face cyberbullying and internet-based harassment [45,46]. The promotion of social networking sites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat has led to technology-facilitated harassment for girls [47,48]. Experiencing internet-based harassment may be an onset point for substance use, which may further perpetuate mental health issues among girls [49]. Perception over wife-beating is another crucial variable in the context of this study. This variable captures information about wife justifying violence against them. The study noticed that married adolescent girls who did not justify violence against them were more likely to show depressive symptoms. Previously studies have noted that women justify violence against them [50,51]. Deviating from the finding of this study, a study noticed that women who believe that intimate partner violence is acceptable were found to be having long-term mental health problems [52]. However, the reverse finding from this study could be attributed to the fact that married adolescent girls who do not justify violence against them may be experiencing severe violence from their husbands which may be aggravating mental trauma among them leading to higher depressive symptoms.

Several background characteristics also explain the onset of depressive symptoms as a result of violence against adolescents. Education has been observed as a protective factor against depressive symptoms among unmarried adolescent girls who have faced violence being perpetrated. Previously, various studies have noted the importance of education in lowering the onset of violence [5355]; however, studies examining the importance of education in lowering the violence and subsequently mental health issues among adolescent girls are minimal [56]. Increasing education levels among women improve their chances of personal skills and employability, which further decreases their risk of being exposed to violence [57]. Furthermore, parental education could also averse the violence against women [58]. Caste is another important variable in the context of this study. Results noted that unmarried girls from the General caste category were less likely to show depressive symptoms than their counterparts. Population from the General caste category belong to the well-off socio-economic group as compared to the population in other remaining caste categories such as Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, and Other Backward Castes; therefore, women in marginalized caste experience higher intimate partner violence [59]. Furthermore, women in Scheduled caste experience higher violence as they belong to the economically weaker section and are less likely to be employed [60]. The higher rates of violence among the marginalized group could be attributed to their worsened mental health and subsequently higher depressive symptons.

The study has several limitations. There is a high possibility of under-reporting of information on violence. Previous studies have also noted that it is not easy to extract information on violence against women due to various socio-cultural issues [61,62]. Furthermore, information on depressive symptoms was self-reported and not clinically diagnosed. Also, cross-sectional nature of data limits our understanding of causal inference. At last, the study was based on two states of India, namely, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, and therefore study findings shall not be generalized to the national population. Despite the above limitations, the study provides first-hand information on the relationship between violence and depressive symptoms among unmarried and married adolescent girls.

Conclusion

We believe that our study is among the first of its kind in examining the association between violence and depressive symptoms among married and unmarried adolescent girls in two backward states in India. The strength of the study is its finding extend beyond intimate partner violence upon married women and included various covariates that explained violence and depressive symptoms among unmarried adolescent girls. We identified several significant findings from this study. Married and unmarried adolescents who faced any form of violence were more likely to experience depressive symptoms. Furthermore, internet-based harassment and, subsequently, depressive symptoms were also noticed among the study population. The findings from this study call out the need to implement policies that explore to recognize and battle depression or its onset among adolescents and also bring the issue of violence against women to the forefront. It is recommended that the state governments of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar shall oblige to prevent violence against women, and further state-governments should provide funding for research and services that uptake the violence against women to the core issue. It is important to protect the health and well-being of women, and therefore, it is recommended that state governments shall ensure that victims of any form of violence must have access to health-care services.

Acknowledgments

Ethical statement

Informed consent was sought from each individual to be interviewed, among unmarried adolescents in ages 10–17, consent was also sought from a parent or guardian. Additionally, names were never recorded in the computer form in which data were collected. In order to preserve the confidentiality of the respondent or the parent/guardian, signing the consent form was optional; however, the interviewer was required to sign a statement that she or he had explained the content of the consent form to the respondent or parent.

Data Availability

https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/RRXQNT.

Funding Statement

This paper was written using data collected as part of Population Council’s UDAYA study, which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. No additional funds were received for the preparation of the paper.

References

  • 1.García-Moreno C, Stöckl H. Protection of sexual and reproductive health rights: addressing violence against women. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2009. August 1;106(2):144–7. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oram S, Khalifeh H, Howard LM. Violence against women and mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017. February 1;4(2):159–70. 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30261-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Assembly UG. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Retrieved April. 1979. December 18;20:2006. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/ text/econvention.htm (accessed Oct 5, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.du Vall M. The Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence in the light of the Polish legal regulations and statistical values. IN POLISH MEDIA DISCOURSE as exemplified in the debate.:47. ISBN 978-92-871-7990-6, 2014. http://www.refworld.org/docid/548165c94.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stöckl H, Devries K, Rotstein A, Abrahams N, Campbell J, Watts C, et al. The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2013. September 7;382(9895):859–65. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence Geneva: World Health Organization, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Office for National Statistics. Focus on: violent crime and sexual offences, 2013/14. London: Office for National Statistics; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Basile KC, Black MC, Breiding MJ, Chen J, Merrick MT, Smith SG, et al. National intimate partner and sexual violence survey; 2010 summary report. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/nisvs_report2010-a.pdf.
  • 9.Morgan RE, Kena G. Criminal victimization, 2016. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2018. December;845. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) & ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. Mumbai: IIPS. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jejeebhoy SJ, Santhya KG. Preventing violence against women and girls in Bihar: challenges for implementation and evaluation. Reproductive health matters. 2018. January 1;26(52):92–108. 10.1080/09688080.2018.1470430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.National Crime Records Bureau (Ministry of Home Affairs). 2018. Crimes in India 2018 Statistic. Volume I. Government of India. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flood M, Pease B. Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, violence, & abuse. 2009. April;10(2):125–42. 10.1177/1524838009334131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Packota VJ. Emotional abuse of women by their intimate partners: A literature review. Education Wife Assault, Toronto. 2000. Available from: http://www.springtideresources.org/resource/emotional-abuse-women-their-intimatepartners-literature-review. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Niaz U. Violence against women in South Asian countries. Archives of women’s mental health. 2003. August 1;6(3):173–84. 10.1007/s00737-003-0171-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marium S. Women’s level of education and its effect on domestic violence in rural Bangladesh. IOSR J Hum Soc Sci. 2014;19:40–5. Available from: http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol19-issue5/Version-3/H019534045.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ali PA, Gavino MI. Violence against women in Pakistan: A framework for analysis. Journal-Pakistan Medical Association. 2008. April 1;58(4):198. Available from: http://legalpoint.pk/download/Violence%20against%20Women%20in%20Pakistan%20A%20Framework%20for%20Analysis.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.WHO. Violence against Women The Health Sector Responds. 2013. [Online]. http://www.esteri.it/mae/doc/cug/whoviolenzacontrodonne.pdf.
  • 19.Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013. May 7;10(5):e1001439. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones L, Hughes M, Unterstaller U. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in victims of domestic violence: A review of the research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2001. April;2(2):99–119. 10.1177/1524838001002002001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, Desai S, Sanderson M, Brandt HM, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American journal of preventive medicine. 2002. November 1;23(4):260–8. 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00514-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romito P, Turan JM, De Marchi M. The impact of current and past interpersonal violence on women’s mental health. Social science & medicine. 2005. April 1;60(8):1717–27. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Joshi A, Dhapola M, Kurian E, Pelto PJ. Experiences and perceptions of marital sexual relationships among rural women in Gujarat, India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal. 2001. March 31;16(2):177–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Santhya KG, Acharya R, Pandey N, Singh SK, Rampal S, Zavier AJ, et al. Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Bihar, India. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-BiharReport.pdf.
  • 25.Santhya KG, Acharya R, Pandey N, Gupta A, Rampal S, Singh S, et al. Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Uttar Pradesh, India. New Delhi. 2017. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-UPreport.pdf.
  • 26.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ‐9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine. 2001. September;16(9):606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chauhan S, Srivastava S, Kumar P, Patel R, Dhillon P. Interaction of substance use with physical activity and its effect on depressive symptoms among adolescents. Journal of Substance Use. 2020. December 3:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Subramanian SV, Nandy S, Irving M, Gordon D, Smith GD. Role of socioeconomic markers and state prohibition policy in predicting alcohol consumption among men and women in India: a multilevel statistical analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:829–36. doi: /S0042-96862005001100012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jeyaseelan L, Kumar S, Neelakantan N, Peedicayil A, Pillai R, Duvvury N. Physical spousal violence against women in India: some risk factors. Journal of biosocial science. 2007. September 1;39(5):657. 10.1017/S0021932007001836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kalokhe A, del Rio C, Dunkle K, Stephenson R, Metheny N, Paranjape A, et al. Domestic violence against women in India: A systematic review of a decade of quantitative studies. Global public health. 2017. April 3;12(4):498–513. 10.1080/17441692.2015.1119293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Muthengi E, Gitau T, Austrian K. Is working risky or protective for married adolescent girls in urban slums in Kenya? Understanding the association between working status, Savings and Intimate-Partner Violence. PLoS one. 2016. May 27;11(5):e0155988. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155988 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thupayagale-Tshweneagae GB, Phuthi K, Ibitoye OF. Patterns and dynamics of sexual violence among married adolescents in Zimbabwe. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2019. December 1;21(2):1–3. 10.25159/2520-5293/6455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Silverman JG, Challa S, Boyce SC, Averbach S, Raj A. Associations of reproductive coercion and intimate partner violence with overt and covert family planning use among married adolescent girls in Niger. EClinicalMedicine. 2020. May 1;22:100359. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Deb S, Ray M, Bhattacharyya B, Sun J. Violence against the adolescents of Kolkata: A study in relation to the socio-economic background and mental health. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2016. February 1;19:4–13. 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Heise L., & Garcia-Moreno C. Violence by intimate partners. In: Krug EG et al., eds. World report on violence and health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1, 87–121. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Houry D, Kemball R, Rhodes KV, Kaslow NJ. Intimate partner violence and mental health symptoms in African American female ED patients. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2006. July 1;24(4):444–50. 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.12.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Varma D, Chandra PS, Thomas T, Carey MP. Intimate partner violence and sexual coercion among pregnant women in India: relationship with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of affective disorders. 2007. September 1;102(1–3):227–35. 10.1016/j.jad.2006.09.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rai R, Rai AK. Sexual violence and poor mental health of women: An exploratory study of Uttar Pradesh, India. Clinical epidemiology and global health. 2020. March 1;8(1):194–8. 10.1016/j.cegh.2019.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ahmed SM. Intimate partner violence against women: Experiences from a woman-focused development programme in Matlab, Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition. 2005. March 1:95–101. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23499189.pdf. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zainab N, Jadoon A, Nawaz M. The Culture of silence and secrets: Repressions and psychological disorders among Pakistani housewives in fiction. Global Language Review. 2017;2(1):114–29. 10.31703/glr.2017(II-I).09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kishor S, Johnson K. Profiling domestic violence: a multi-country study. Studies in Family Planning. 2005. September 1;36(3):259–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC public health. 2011. December 1;11(1):109. 10.1186/1471-2458-11-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Asgola S, Kaur S. Experiences of sexual harassment among rural school going adolescent girls: Location of occurrence and emotional reactions. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing. 2017. April 1;8(4):272. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Salmon S, Turner S, Taillieu T, Fortier J, Afifi TO. Bullying victimization experiences among middle and high school adolescents: Traditional bullying, discriminatory harassment, and cybervictimization. Journal of Adolescence. 2018. February 1;63:29–40. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zetterström Dahlqvist H, Gillander Gådin K. Online sexual victimization in youth: predictors and cross-sectional associations with depressive symptoms. European journal of public health. 2018. December 1;28(6):1018–23. 10.1093/eurpub/cky102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Reed E, Salazar M, Behar AI, Agah N, Silverman JG, Minnis AM, et al. Cyber sexual harassment: prevalence and association with substance use, poor mental health, and STI history among sexually active adolescent girls. Journal of adolescence. 2019. August 1;75:53–62. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Englander E. Coerced sexting and revenge porn among teens. Bullying, teen aggression & social media. 2015. March;1(2):19–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Powell A, Henry N. Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2019. September;34(17):3637–65. 10.1177/0886260516672055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bucchianeri MM, Eisenberg ME, Wall MM, Piran N, Neumark-Sztainer D. Multiple types of harassment: associations with emotional well-being and unhealthy behaviors in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2014. June 1;54(6):724–9. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tran TD, Nguyen H, Fisher J. Attitudes towards intimate partner violence against women among women and men in 39 low-and middle-income countries. PloS one. 2016. November 28;11(11):e0167438. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tanimu TS, Yohanna S, Omeiza SY. The pattern and correlates of intimate partner violence among women in Kano, Nigeria. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 2016;8(1). 10.4102/phcfm.v8i1.1209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Neville HA, Oh E, Spanierman LB, Heppner MJ, Clark M. General and culturally specific factors influencing Black and White rape survivors’ self-esteem. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2004. March;28(1):83–94. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00125.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hossain N, Khan S. Domestic abuse and the duties of physicians: a case report. Indian J Med Ethics. 2015. October;12(4):248–50. 10.20529/IJME.2015.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sasani L, Tahrekhani M, Naji S, Salehi S. Iranian Women’s Experiences of Spousal Abuse. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. May 13;185:208–13. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sen S, Bolsoy N. Violence against women: prevalence and risk factors in Turkish sample. BMC women’s health. 2017. December 1;17(1):100. 10.1186/s12905-017-0454-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bacchus LJ, Ranganathan M, Watts C, Devries K. Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ open. 2018. July 1;8(7):e019995. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Boyle MH, Georgiades K, Cullen J, Racine Y. Community influences on intimate partner violence in India: Women’s education, attitudes towards mistreatment and standards of living. Social science & medicine. 2009. September 1;69(5):691–7. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yakubovich AR, Stöckl H, Murray J, Melendez-Torres GJ, Steinert JI, Glavin CE, et al. Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective–longitudinal studies. American journal of public health. 2018. July;108(7):e1–1. 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ahmad J, Khan N, Mozumdar A. Spousal Violence Against Women in India: A Social–Ecological Analysis Using Data From the National Family Health Survey 2015 to 2016. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2019. October 23:0886260519881530. 10.1177/0886260519881530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Menon SV, Allen NE. The formal systems response to violence against women in India: A cultural lens. American journal of community psychology. 2018. September;62(1–2):51–61. 10.1002/ajcp.12249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Visaria L. Violence against women in India: Is empowerment a protective factor?. Economic and Political Weekly. 2008. November 29:60–6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40278238. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kaur R, Garg S. Addressing domestic violence against women: An unfinished agenda. Indian Journal of Community Medicine: Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2008. April;33(2):73. 10.4103/0970-0218.40871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Kannan Navaneetham

30 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-32760

Experience of Gender-based Violence and its effect on the mental health status of Indian adolescent girls: Evidence from UDAYA survey

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chauhan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 13 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kannan Navaneetham, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have reported significance probabilities of 0 in places. Since p=0 is not strictly possible, please correct this to a more appropriate limit, eg 'p<0.0001'.

Furthermore, within the Methods section, please provide further clarification regarding how the wealth quintile was stratified for analysis.

3. Please ensure you have also stated whether consent was obtained from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study, and how this was documented. Or whether the research ethics committee or IRB specifically waived the need for their consent.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This paper tackles an important subject the mental health consequences of exposure to violence in adolescent girls and women in India.

Abstract, Conclusion: This is not the first study worldwide to associate violence and mental health in adolescent girls. Please modify this statement. Is it the first study in India?

Page 3, line 4: ‘understanding of violence of include’ You don’t need the second ‘of’ here.

Page 4, line 2: I don’t understand this phrase ‘per lakh’.

Page 4, line 8: Can you clarify this ‘Given the diversity and disparity that exists’.

Page 4, line 4 up: This is not true. There are studies of violence and its mental health consequences in terms of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and PTSD in the published literature.

Page 5, first paragraph: Can you please state your hypotheses here.

Page 5, line 15: How was the sample analysed in this study derived from the population of 20,000 participants in the original study? Was it a representative sample?

Page 5, line 16: What is a ‘Gauna’? Please add an explanation for those readers not familiar with Indian culture.

Page 6, Outcome variable: Was this measure of depressive symptoms a standard scale – if so, please reference it? If it was not a standard scale where was it derived from? How did you decide on the threshold for depressive symptoms?

Page 7, line 7: Did you measure whether they were a victim of bullying as well as carrying out bullying?

Page 8, Results: I wonder if it would be better if you began your results with more general findings, rather than the interactions i.e. Table 1. This would help to set the context for the interaction results. It is not clear why you stratify your results by whether it is justifiable for husbands to beat their wives?

Table 1: What does ‘OBC Other backward Class’ mean? A more detailed explanation would help readers not familiar with Indian Government Surveys.

Page 17, line 3: There are more studies of violence and mental health in adolescents than you report. It would be worth you doing further literature searches. This is not to undermine the importance of your findings.

Page 18, paragraph 2: Could the protective effect of education against violence in unmarried girls be a reflection of the protective effect of parental education levels?

In 'Limitations' you could also mention that as this is a cross sectional study there are limits to how much you can justify causal statements in the paper.

In general the English grammar in the paper could be improved before resubmission.

Reviewer #2: Dear Autors,

Your manuscript seems to be very interesting. You expose the problem with experiencing violence by young girls in India, which is rare. The manuscript requires many changes in the content or should be submitted to a different journal.

Abstract: it should specify in more detail the aim of the study. In my opinion, there is some discrepancy between the abstract and the main body of the manuscript in terms of aim of the study.

Some sentences cited information require bibliographic confirmation (eg, on p. 3, “Global studies show women all over the world face violence in various forms at hands of various people.”).

The authors do not specify the outcome variable. It first appears as an outcome variable, mental health, and then depressive symptoms. It is not clear what the depressive symptoms mean. It is not known what the definition of an outcome variable is and how this variable is described. The authors do not refer to the universal DSM 5 classification system or even any other.

Detailed information on how the statistics are calculated should not appear in the manuscript, as shown on p. 14.

The study aimed to test the impact of violence on the mental health of adolescents' victims. Unfortunately, the statistics do not allow to measure the value of impact or rather the prediction the odds of being a case based on the values of the independent variables (predictors).

According to Guidelines for reviewers, your manuscript should be revisted.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Stephen Stansfeld

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0248396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248396.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


21 Jan 2021

Editor’s Comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: The manuscript has been prepared as per the journal’s guidelines.

2. We note that you have reported significance probabilities of 0 in places. Since p=0 is not strictly possible, please correct this to a more appropriate limit, eg 'p<0.0001'.

Furthermore, within the Methods section, please provide further clarification regarding how the wealth quintile was stratified for analysis.

Response: ***p<0.001, **p<0.05, *p<0.10 is now used in the manuscript. Also, clarification regarding how the wealth quintile was created is also added.

3. Please ensure you have also stated whether consent was obtained from parents or guardians of the minors included in the study, and how this was documented. Or whether the research ethics committee or IRB specifically waived the need for their consent.

Response: The data used is secondary data and therefore authors did not require any ethical consent. However, the agencies that collected the data undertook followed all the required ethical guidelines. Please refer to the following references for the same.

1. Santhya KG, Acharya R, Pandey N, Gupta A, Rampal S, Singh S, Zavier AF. Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Uttar Pradesh, India. New Delhi. 2017. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-UPreport.pdf

2. Santhya KG, Acharya R, Pandey N, Singh SK, Rampal S, Zavier AJ, Gupta AK. Understanding the lives of adolescents and young adults (UDAYA) in Bihar, India. https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2017PGY_UDAYA-BiharReport.pdf

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer #1:

This paper tackles an important subject the mental health consequences of exposure to violence in adolescent girls and women in India.

1. Abstract, Conclusion: This is not the first study worldwide to associate violence and mental health in adolescent girls. Please modify this statement. Is it the first study in India?

Response: We have modified the statement as suggested.

2. Page 3, line 4: ‘understanding of violence of include’ You don’t need the second ‘of’ here.

Response: Authors are thankful to the reviewer for pointing out the mistake. Accordingly changes have been made.

3. Page 4, line 2: I don’t understand this phrase ‘per lakh’.

Response: Lakh is the one-tenth part of the ‘million.’ One million equals to 10 lakhs. However for the general understanding, we have changed it to million in the text.

4. Page 4, line 8: Can you clarify this ‘Given the diversity and disparity that exists’.

Response: It means that India is a country with wide diversity and disparity. India has around 29 states. States have their own language and culture varying from each other.

5. Page 4, line 4 up: This is not true. There are studies of violence and its mental health consequences in terms of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and PTSD in the published literature.

Response: Changes have been made as suggested.

6. Page 5, first paragraph: Can you please state your hypotheses here.

Response: Authors have stated hypothesis as suggested by the reviewer.

7. Page 5, line 15: How was the sample analysed in this study derived from the population of 20,000 participants in the original study? Was it a representative sample?

Response: Yes, the sample was representative. Additionally, only sample from married and unmarried adolescent girls were taken for the analysis. The girls whose ‘gauna’ was not performed were not added in the analysis. The term ‘gauna’ has been defined in the manuscript.

8. Page 5, line 16: What is a ‘Gauna’? Please add an explanation for those readers not familiar with Indian culture.

Response: Authors have defined the term ‘gauna’ in the revised manuscript.

9. Page 6, Outcome variable: Was this measure of depressive symptoms a standard scale – if so, please reference it? If it was not a standard scale where was it derived from? How did you decide on the threshold for depressive symptoms?

Response: Yes, the scale was a standard scale. The reference is now added as per given suggestion.

10. Page 7, line 7: Did you measure whether they were a victim of bullying as well as carrying out bullying?

Response: The respondents were carrying out bullying. The change is incorporated in the manuscript.

11. Page 8, Results: I wonder if it would be better if you began your results with more general findings, rather than the interactions i.e. Table 1. This would help to set the context for the interaction results. It is not clear why you stratify your results by whether it is justifiable for husbands to beat their wives?

Response: Authors are thankful to the reviewer for pointing out the mistakes. Accordingly, changes have been made as suggested by the reviewer. We stratified our results by whether it is justifiable for husbands to beat their wives because it is expected that those women who justify wife beating may find it normal and therefore may not report depressive symptoms due to violence. The explanation has been given the manuscript.

12. Table 1: What does ‘OBC Other backward Class’ mean? A more detailed explanation would help readers not familiar with Indian Government Surveys.

Response: Details are now added as per suggestion. The information regarding OBC and other caste group has been added to exposure variable section.

13. Page 17, line 3: There are more studies of violence and mental health in adolescents than you report. It would be worth you doing further literature searches. This is not to undermine the importance of your findings.

Response: As per given suggestion, authors have included other relevant studies to their manuscript.

14. Page 18, paragraph 2: Could the protective effect of education against violence in unmarried girls be a reflection of the protective effect of parental education levels?

Response: Indeed parental education acts as a safety net. Previous research also outlined the protective effect of parental education in reducing the likelihood of violence (Yakubovich, A. R., Stöckl, H., Murray, J., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Steinert, J. I., Glavin, C. E., & Humphreys, D. K. (2018). Risk and protective factors for intimate partner violence against women: Systematic review and meta-analyses of prospective–longitudinal studies. American journal of public health, 108(7), e1-e11.).

15. In 'Limitations' you could also mention that as this is a cross sectional study there are limits to how much you can justify causal statements in the paper.

Response: The authors are thankful to the reviewer for pointing out the genuine limitation. Accordingly, we have included the limitation as suggested.

16. In general the English grammar in the paper could be improved before resubmission.

Response: The authors have taken help from one independent native English speaker to improve the English grammar of the paper.

Reviewer #2:

1. Your manuscript seems to be very interesting. You expose the problem with experiencing violence by young girls in India, which is rare. The manuscript requires many changes in the content or should be submitted to a different journal.

Response: Authors are thankful to the reviewer for acknowledging the importance of this study. Also, authors have modified the manuscript as suggested by two independent reviewers.

2. Abstract: it should specify in more detail the aim of the study. In my opinion, there is some discrepancy between the abstract and the main body of the manuscript in terms of aim of the study.

Response: the abstract has been modified as suggested by the reviewer. The background of the study has been modified and now the aim is clear as discussed in the manuscript.

3. Some sentences cited information require bibliographic confirmation (eg, on p. 3, “Global studies show women all over the world face violence in various forms at hands of various people.”).

Response: Authors have provided the citation at the required place in the text as suggested by the reviewer.

4. The authors do not specify the outcome variable. It first appears as an outcome variable, mental health, and then depressive symptoms. It is not clear what the depressive symptoms mean. It is not known what the definition of an outcome variable is and how this variable is described.

Response: The outcome variable was depressive symptoms coded as low and high. The reference is added. Outcome variable is generally known as dependent variable. Outcome variables are observed and measured by changing independent variables. These variables determine the effect of the cause (independent) variables when changed for different values.

5. The authors do not refer to the universal DSM 5 classification system or even any other.

Response: Authors did not refer to DSM 5 as this study referred PHQ-9 to measure depressive symptoms. Proper citation has also been provide for the same.

6. Detailed information on how the statistics are calculated should not appear in the manuscript, as shown on p. 14.

Response: Comment incorporated.

7. The study aimed to test the impact of violence on the mental health of adolescents' victims. Unfortunately, the statistics do not allow to measure the value of impact or rather the prediction the odds of being a case based on the values of the independent variables (predictors).

Response: Authors are thankful to the reviewer for pointing out the mistake. Actually, authors did not intend to test the impact. It was an error while writing the manuscript. Authors intend to examine the association between violence and depressive symptoms among married and unmarried adolescents. Accordingly, we have replaced the word ‘impact’ with the word ‘association’ throughout the manuscript.

8. According to Guidelines for reviewers, your manuscript should be revisited.

Response: Authors have modified the manuscript as per given suggestions. Authors have strictly followed the guidelines while preparing the revised version of the manuscript.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Kannan Navaneetham

26 Feb 2021

Experience of Gender-based Violence and its effect on depressive symptoms among Indian adolescent girls: Evidence from UDAYA survey

PONE-D-20-32760R1

Dear Dr. Chauhan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kannan Navaneetham, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: As I mentioned in the first review, the research issue is very interesting and important. You made changes according to my comments. The theoretical background seems to be improved.

The most important concern of your manuscript is showing the phenomenon of violence taking into account the cultural context.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Stephen Stansfeld

Reviewer #2: Yes: Magdalena Rode

Acceptance letter

Kannan Navaneetham

16 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-32760R1

Experience of Gender-based Violence and its effect on depressive symptoms among Indian adolescent girls: Evidence from UDAYA survey 

Dear Dr. Chauhan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Kannan Navaneetham

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES