Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249232

Frequency of relapse for severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under five children admitted to health facilities in Hadiya Zone, South Ethiopia

Abera Lambebo 1,*, Deselegn Temiru 2, Tefera Belachew 2
Editor: Claudia Marotta3
PMCID: PMC7993841  PMID: 33765081

Abstract

Background

Severe acute malnutrition is a common cause of morbidity and mortality among under five children in Ethiopia. A child may experience more than one episode of SAM depending on the improvement of the underlying factors. However, there is no study that determined the frequency of relapse of SAM cases after discharge in Ethiopia.

Objective

To identify the frequency of relapse and associated factors among children discharged after undergoing treatment for SAM in Hadiya Zone, South, Ethiopia.

Methods

An institution based retrospective cohort study was done among children admitted to health posts for treatment of SAM from 2014/2015-2019/2020 under-five children’s after discharge in health post for severe acute malnutrition in the last five years in Hadiya zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. Both first admission data and relapse data were abstracted from the records of the SAM children from Aguste 1–30 /2020 Using a data collection format. Data were coded and edited manually, then doubly entered into Epi-Data statistical software version 3.1 and then exported to SPSS for windows version 26. After checking all the assumptions finally Negative binomial regression for poison has been used. All tests were two sided and P values <0.05 were used to declare statistical significance.

Results

In the last five year there were the proportion of relapsed cases were 9.6%, 95% CI: (7.7%, 11.7%) On multivariable negative binomial regression model, after adjusting for background variables relapse of severe acute undernutrition was significantly associated with having edema during admission with (IRR = 2.21, 95% CI:1.303–3.732), being in the age group of 6–11 months (IRR = 4.74,95% CI:1.79–12.53), discharge MUAC for the first admission (P = 0.001, IRR = 0.37, 95% CI:0.270–0.50) increase the risk of incidence rate ratio(IRR) relapse case of severe acute under nutrition.

Conclusion

Frequency of SAM relapse was positively associated with age, having edema during admission, while it was negatively associated with discharge MUAC. The results imply the need for reviewing the discharge criteria taking into account the recovery of MUAC as a marker for lean tissue accretion, especially in edematous children and those in the younger age.

Introduction

Background

Malnutrition referring to deficiencies, excesses, or imbalances in a person’s intake of energy and/or nutrients and it affects every country in the world by one or more forms [1]. Severe acute malnutrition(Wasting) is characterized by low weight-for length/ height and or bilateral pitting edema [2]. Severe acute malnutrition [3] has several immediate, underlying and basic causes. Once a child develops SAM, he/she often suffers from chronic and lifelong consequences throughout life continuing the miserable legacy from generation to generation [4].

Nearly half of all deaths in children under 5 are attributable to undernutrition which puts them at greater risk of dying from common infections and delays recovery from them [5]. Large proportion of childhood malnutrition occur mainly among under five children living in low-income and middle-income countries [6]. In Africa there are large burden of risk factors related to childhood health and development, most of which are of an infective or social origin [7].

It is manifests by either marasmus, Kwashiorkor, marasmic kwashiorkor or non-edematous malnutrition is form of severe under nutrition, the child is severely wasted and has the appearance of “skin and bones” due to loss of muscle and fatty tissue. The child’s face looks like an old man’s following forfeiture of facial subcutaneous fat, but the eyes may be watchful and the ribs are visible. There might be folds of skin on the buttocks and thighs that make it look as if the child is wearing “baggy pants Children with severe acute under nutrition has very low weight for their height and severe muscle wasting and they may also have nutritional edema–characterized by swollen feet, face and limbs [8, 9].

Although relapse of SAM is one of the problems encountered in the management of children with severe acute malnutrition, its magnitude and associated factors are not documented so far.

Study in rural Malawi among children 6 to 59 months old with MAM shows that mid-upper arm circumference and WHZ at the end of supplementary feeding were the most important factors in predicting which children remained well-nourished [10].

In Ethiopia, children with SAM are admitted to health posts using MUAC < 11.5cm and get treated with ready to use therapeutic food and other treatments indicated in the protocol for a period of 8 weeks (Refer to the national SAM Guideline). Children with the lowest MUAC at admission showed a significant gain in MUAC but not weight, and children with the lowest weight-for-height/length (WHZ) showed a significant gain in weight but not MUAC and response to treatment was largest for children with the lowest anthropometric status at admission in either measurement modality by WHZ or MUAC [11].

However, they are discharged from the program based on percent of weight gained or weight for height > 70%. During discharge recovery based on MUAC is not used. We suspected whether discharge before full recovery MUAC could lead to increased frequency of relapse of SAM.

There is one case control study conducted in Ethiopia to identify the determinant factors for relapse [12] however, this study was limited to factor identification and fail to identify frequency of relapse for this mater this study considers case count of relapse cases in selected area and time. So, this study is aimed to identify the number of relapse cases and associated factors.

Methods

An institution retrospective cohort study was conducted among the cohort of 2014/2015-2019/2020 under-five children’s who are admitted and discharged for SAM case in 20 selected health posts in Hadiya zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia from Aguste 1–30 /2020.

According to a May 24, 2004 World Bank memorandum, 6% of the inhabitants of Hadiya have access to electricity, this zone has a road density of 104.1 kilometers per 1000 square kilometers compared to the national average of 30 kilometers) [13], the average rural household has 0.6 hectare of land compared to the national average of 1.01 hectare [14] the equivalent of 0.6 heads of livestock. 22.8% of the population is in non-farm related jobs, compared to the national average of 25% and a Regional average of 32%. 74% of all eligible children are enrolled in primary school, and 21% in secondary schools. 43% of the zone is exposed to malaria and the memorandum gave this zone a drought risk [15]. This zone is characterized by a predominant commitment to agricultural activities, especially the enset-growing, which is often combined with that of grain, barley and maize, as well as the breeding of domestic animals [16].

In Hadiya Zone there were 280 Health Posts (HPs), 60 rural Health Centers, one University teaching Hospital and 3 primary level Hospitals. Hadiya zone is divided into 11 districts for administrative purposes. The vast majority of the population are Hadiya in ethnic group and they earn their living through rain fed agriculture and it has 12 woradas and 2 administrates towns. The woredas were; East Bedewacho, Siraro Bedewacho, West Bedewacho and Shone town administration separated from the rest of the zone by Kembeta Tambaro and the administrative center of Hadiya is Hosanna [17]. Of which this was study conducted in two woradas and one town administration among 20 health posts with highest number of cases East Bedawacho (Tikere kokere,Tikare Anbesa,Mahal,Jariso,Amburse Anjulo,2nd Chafa,Eddo,Lenda,Jerso Kutube and Bente Wosen).

Siraro Bedewacho (Abuka,Langano,Dongaro Bonkoya,Wera Bonkoya,sheriko Gafarso,Kumudo,Beshilo,Mahal Korga and Woldia) and Shone town administration (Wera Gere and Shone City Adimin). And health posts were selected based on number of SAM cases.

Study population

Documents of all under five children that were admitted for severe acute undernutrition in selected health posts in the last five year.

Inclusion

All documents that full registered about the admission and discharge status were included for this study.

Exclusion criteria

Documents that double registered or registration after transfer for other facilities were excluded.

Sample size calculation

Sample size for this study is all cases with in selected area at fixed time that means number of relapse cases among admitted children for severe acute malnutrition in health posts of two woradas and one town administration in the last five years.

Sampling technique

For this study all severe acute malnutrition cases those admitted in selected woradas and health posts were included and woradas and health posts were selected conveniently based on their case load.

Data collection methods

For collecting data from the registration book of under-five children with SAM, structured list of questioners was used during the survey for relapsed cases of SAM in the last five years. And the questionaries were adopted from previous study that was conducted in Malawi for similar topics [7]. To ensure data quality, a three days training was given for data collectors and supervisors on the data collection tool, the data collection procedure and questionnaire was pretested on children with SAM in Halaba, which is not part of the study area.

Operational definition

Relapse rate/repeated relapse episodes; The proportion of children who re-enrolled after they recovery and discharged [18].

Wasting is defined; as low weight-for-height. It often indicates recent and severe weight loss, although it can also persist for a long time [1].

Severe acute malnutrition; It is diagnosed by weight for- height below -3 SD of the WHO standards, by a MUAC < 11.5 cm and by Clinical sign having bilateral edema [8, 19, 20].

Kwashiorkor or edematous malnutrition; is also form of severe under nutrition, the child’s muscles were wasted, but wasting may not be apparent due to generalized edema or swelling from excess fluid in the tissues [8, 9].

Criteria for discharging children from treatment; weight-for-height/length is ≥–2 Z-scores and they have had no oedema for at least 2 weeks [21].

Data processing and analysis

The data were doubly entered by two data clerks into Epi-Data version 3.1 to avoid clerical errors using side by side comparison. and the data were then exported to SPSS for windows version 26 statistical software for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive analysis such as simple frequencies, measures of central tendency, and measures of variability was used to describe age and sex distribution as well as discharge status of the under-five children for severe acute malnutrition treatment.

Before poison regression the assumptions were checked, as the variable is relapse case count it meets the first assumption for poison regression. Then One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test was done to check significance test for non-significant value and as result reveals 0.978 so this data full fills the second assumptions again when we see the distribution of the data for third assumptions; mean = 0.1178 and variance = 0.149 these values indicate the overdispersion of data, for as we looking for poison regression another assumption of poison regression is equi-dispersion of data. However, for this data it fails to meet the last assumption of poison regression. As the last assumption fails, we have conducted negative binomial regression for poison. A negative binomial regression selection of variables for multiple negative binomial regression is based on P-value <0.25 and final significance for Incidence Risk Ratio (IRR) was declined at a P-value of < 0.05.

Ethical considerations

Before starting the data collection process, ethical clearance was be secured by Jimma University Health Research Ethics Review Committee (IHRERC). An official letter was written from Jimma University to the Hadiya Zone health office.

Informed written consent was obtained from all health extension workers of selected health posts and woreda health office, confidentiality of the study documents was’ information was also ensured according to the Helsinki declaration of ethical code for human subjects.

Results

In this study, the relapse case count has been conducted for severe acute malnutrition in two woredas and one town administrative in 20 health posts among 900 children with severe acute malnutrition in the last five years before the survey. From the total case counts from the records 465(51.7%) were females and 435(48.3%) were males. The mean (±sd) age of the children in this study was 26.1±0.496 months. Regarding the types of admissions, from 900 children with SAM, 814(90.1%) were new admissions (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio demographic characteristic of under five children who are admitted for severe acute under nutrition in Hadiya Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia in the las five years from 2014/2015-2019/2020 (n = 900).

Variable Frequency Percent
Sex
Male 435 48.3
Female 465 51.7
Age, Months
6–11 206 22.9
12–23 171 19
24–35 161 17.9
36–47 226 25.1
48–60 136 15.1
Residential worada
Siraro Bedewacho 507 56.3
East Bedewacho 307 34.1
Shone City administration 86 9.6
Types of admission
New admission 814 90.4
Re admission 86 9.6

From the total admissions for SAM, 575 (63.9%) were non-edematous diagnosed as marasmic cases, while and 325(36.1%) were edematous diagnosed as kwashiorkor and the rest were diagnosed as marasmic kwashiorkor. The mean (± SD) days of stay on treatment after admission was 46 days (±12.98) days. Regarding the treatment outcome of admitted children, 838(93.1%) were cured, 6 (0.7%) died while 20(2.2%), 16(1.8%),14(1.6%), and 6(0.7%) were Defaulter, Unknown, Non-response, and medical transfer cases, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. Nutritional status of the children during admission among severe acute under nourished under five children in Hadiya Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia in the las five years from 2014/2015-2019/2020 (n = 900).

Nutritional status and diagnosis Number Percent
Presence of edema
    Yes 325 36.1
    No 575 63.9
Diagnosis during admission
    Marasmus 575 63.9
    Kwashiorkor 319 35.4
    Marasmic kwashiorkor 6 -
Treatment out comes
Cured 838 93.1
Dead 6 -
Defaulter 20 2.2
Unknown 14 1.6
Transfer out 16 1.8
Non response 6 -
MUAC of the children when termination treatment(cm)
<11.5 270 30
11.5 <-12.5 396 44
>12.5 175 19.4
Not recorded 59 6.6

Of the total case treated in the20 health posts, 86 (9.6%), 95% CI: (7.7%, 11.7%) of SAM cases were readmitted with similar cases in the last five year out of which 66 children were readmitted once and the rest 20 cases were readmitted twice (Fig 1).

Fig 1. The number of relapsed cases of severe acute under nourished under five children in Hadiya Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia from 2014/2015-2019/2020 (n = 900).

Fig 1

From the total of 86(9.6%,) 95% CI: (7.7%, 11.7%) relapsed cases 44 (4.9%) were males and the rest 42(4.7%) were females. The outcome for the first admission showed that 48(5.3%) were cured and discharged for the first admission 20(2.2%) were defaulters for the first admission 10(1.1%) was with unknown status and the rest 8 were transferred out for a medical reason. Regarding the age of relapsed cases 34(39.5%) were at the age of 6–11 months followed by those in the age group of 36-47(23.3%) and 12–23 months (15.1%) (Table 3).

Table 3. Relapsed cases with other variables severe acute under nourished under five children in Hadiya Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia from 2014/2015-2019/2020 (n = 900).

Variable Relapse of SAM cases among under five children
Yes No
n (% n (%
Sex
Male 44 (4.9) 391(43.4)
Female 42(4.7) 423(47)
Admission edema
Yes 32(3.6) 293(32.6)
No 54(6) 521(57.9)
Outcome for the first admission
Cured 48(5.3) 790(87.8)
Defaulter 20(2.2) 0
Non responses 0 6
Transfer out 8 8
Unknown status 10(1.1) 4
Age, months
6–11 34(3.8) 172(25)
12–23 13(1.4) 158(17.6)
24–35 14(1.6) 147(16.3)
36–47 20(2.2) 206(22.9)
48–60 5 131(14.6)
Discharge MUAC (cm)
<11.5 53(5.9) 217(24.1)
11.5–12.5 23(2.6) 373(41.4)
>12.5 6 169(18.8)
Not recorded 4 55(6.1)

On multivariable Negative binomial regression, after adjusting for background variables including sex of the child, admission edema, child age, discharge weight for age ratio Z score [8], discharge mid-upper arm circumference (MAUC) and a number of days in treatment having edema at admission, age of the child, MUAC at discharge, and having edema on the first admission were independent predictors of relapse.

Having nutritional edema during the first admission increased incidence rate ratio of relapse for SAM by 2.205 times (IRR = 2.21, 95% CI:1.303–3.732). Similarly, being in the age groups of 6–11 months increased the incidence rate ratio of relapse for SAM by 4.7 times compared to the age group of 48–60 months (IRR = 4.74,95% CI:1.79–12.53). Likewise, having edema during the first admission increased the incidence rate ratio of relapse by 2.2 times ((P = 0.003, IRR = 2.2, 95% CI:1.30–3.73).

Conversely, there was a negative relation between discharge MUAC for the first admission and relapse of SAM. For 1cm increase in the discharge MUAC of the first admission, the incidence rate ration of relapse of SAM decreased by 63% (P = 0.001, IRR = 0.37, 95% CI:0.270–0.50) (Table 4).

Table 4. Negative binomial regression model for factors associated with incidence rate ratio (IRR) of relapse of SAM case in Hadiya Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia.

2014/2015-2019/2020 (n = 900).

Variable β P IRR (95% CI)
sex
Male 148 0.52 1.16 (0.74–1.82)
Female . 1.00
Edema during admission
Yes 0.79 0.003* 2.20(1.30–3.73)
No 1.00
Age, months
6–11 1.56 0.002* 4.74(1.79–12.53)
12–23 0.93 0.093 2.53(0.86–7.50)
24–35 0.71 0.160 2.04 (0.76–5.51)
36–47 0.68 0.148 1.984 (0.78–5.02)
- 1.00
Discharge MUAC for the first admission -1.001 0.001* .368 (.27-.50)
Number of days in treatment for the first admission 0.006 0.48 1.006 (.990–1.02)

IRR: Incidence rate ratio.

P<0.01.

CI: Confidence interval.

Discussion

We found out that the proportion of relapse was 9.6%, 95% CI: (7.7%, 11.7%) which is in line with study conducted in rural Malawi reveals that children treated for SAM and discharged in 8 weeks 7% relapse after treatment [10]. Similarly, Another Prospective cohort studies in Bangladesh, among severely malnourished children’s reveal that from those who treated for severe malnutrition and discharged by weight for height but not for MUAC; 7% required re admission to the nutrition program because of [22]. From this we may conclude that the problem of relapse among severe acute malnourished children is common. However, there is no tracer system after discharge from the programs in health system and this may lead to repeated admission of children for similar problem.

On other hand, it was observed that MUAC at discharge of the first admission was associated with incidence rate ratio of relapse. For 1cm increase in the MUAC at the discharge of the first admission from the existing one or 11.5cm it will decrease the incidence rate ratio of relapse by 63%. This finding is in line with the study done in rural Jharkhand and Odisha, eastern India, and in Burkina Faso which showed that as anthropometric indicators were hazardous for MAM and for SAM as MUAC at 11.5 cm [9, 10]. As MUAC is a measure fat free mass, which is mostly lean tissue, it is an indicator of recovery in terms of fat free masa accretion [23]. The findings imply that early discharge of children with SAM before return of MUAC will result in a relapse of severe acute malnutrition as there is still a need for more time before discharge for restoration of the wasted lean tissue. This implies the need for revising the existing cutoff point of MUAC for discharge as anthropometric cure may not guarantee the risk of relapse in SAM cases.

Similarly, having edema during admission increased the incidence rate ratio of relapse by 2.2 times compared to non-edematous children during admission. This may be related to the fact that edematous children lose significant amount of lean body mass and have marginal protein status that precipitated the edema, requiring more time for recovery [24]. Experimental studies on the edema showed that dietary treatment improved edema even before the albumin concentration rose. Among edematous children, there was low plasma zinc concentration and which was strongly associated with nutritional edema and there were significant relationships between plasma zinc concentrations and stunting, skin ulceration, and wasting [11].

However, as earlier weight losses there among severe acute malnourished children after treatment there may be early discharge before cure for some micronutrients like Zink and this may result in recurrence of SAM cases among under five children. When we come to discharge criteria of edematous severe acute malnourished children as loss of edema but not weight gain; however, no cut-off points for weight for the weight after edema.

Another variable that is linked with incidence rat ratio of relapse was age. Being in the age group between 6–11 months increased the incidence of relapse for SAM by 4.74 times compared to those in the age 48–60 months. This may be related to that the target group for screening for the nutritional problem is mainly focusing to the under five-year children and after treatment for severe acute undernutrition there is no follow up at home level if the age is above 60 months as this reason there may relapsed case in this age group but due to age cutoff point for screening will exclude them for admission and diagnosis. This could be related to the fact that age group 6–11 months is the time when complementary feeding is initiated, exposing children to different nutritional and health problems increasing the risk of relapse compared to older ages where children can have different options including family meal.

Practical implication

In this study as we have seen above Severe acute malnourished children who have edema and early discharge for MUAC results in increasing risk of incidence of relapse. Based on this result we may suggest that existing MUAC for SAM discharge needs rehearsal and it is better to develop discharge additional criteria for SAM children with edema rather than using weight loss as sole criteria.

Strength

In this study as much as possible we have tried to cover number of health posts with highest number of cases for the last five year with limited number of resources and we have used negative binomial poison regression for this study, to overcome some of the problems of the normal model as for count data poison model has a minimum value of 0 and it will not predict negative values. This makes it ideal for a distribution in which the mean or the most typical value is close to 0.

Limitation

As this study is retrospective cohort and study design itself bring some limitation and it is better to support this study with prospective cohort to know the sequential order of factors and to identify which factors precedes as cause of relapse. And in this study some important factors were not included due to lack of appropriate or complete registration (e.g., antibiotics, vitamin A, vaccination status, access to health services, standard of living, food security, and access to clean water that may affect relapse to SAM.

Conclusion

Based on this finding we may conclude that the relapse cases for severe acute undernutrition among under-five children were higher in Ethiopia comparing to the other countries. There were also some factors that increase the incidence of relapse cases; early discharge of MUAC, edema during admission, and age of the child were the linked factors with the Incidence Risk Ratio (IRR) with relapse of SAM cases.

Recommendation

As there is the highest relapse rate for severe acute malnutrition it is better to have a tracer system for SAM children after discharge from the outpatient treatment program (OTP). And it is better to differ the discharge cut-off point for the weight for age for edematous SAM children and non-edematous SAM children.

In addition to that as the existing discharge point of MUAC is another contributing factor for the incidence of relapse it is an indication for looking a new cutoff point for the discharge of MUAC for SAM under-five children may result in better outcomes after discharge for SAM.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(ZIP)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

For this study material and finical support is got from Jimma University post graduate school as PhD student research support fund. The role the funders took in the study, Funders had no role in this study as I am PhD candidate in the above-mentioned university funders has no role except giving support for their students on the time of research. And no authors mentioned in this study had received any salary for this particular study as the last two authors were from Jimma University, and they are employee of Jimma university. In this study including myself all authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.WHO. Organization. Wh, editor: WHO. 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malnutritio.
  • 2.Fabiansen Kevin, Phelan Bernardette Cichon, Charles W Yaméogo, et al. Short Malnourished Children and Fat Accumulation With Food Supplementation PEDIATRICS 2018;142(3). 10.1542/peds.2018-0679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Harshal T., Samir A. Various Anthropometric Methods of Assessment of Nutritional Status in Under Five Children. Indian Medical Gazette. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bank World. Combating Malnutrition in Ethiopia An Evidence-Based Approach for Sustained Results. Washington DC 20433: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UNICEF. The State of the World’s Children. 2019.
  • 6.Zulfiqar A., Bhutta, James A., Berkley, Robert H., Bandsma, et al. Severe childhood malnutrition. Macmillan PublishersLimited,part of Springer Natur. 2017;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stobaugh HC, Bollinger LB, Adams SE, Crocker AH, Grise JB, Kennedy JA, et al. Effect of a package of health and nutrition services on sustained recovery in children after moderate acute malnutrition and factors related to sustaining recovery: a cluster-randomized trial. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;106(2):657–66. 10.3945/ajcn.116.149799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.UNICEF. UNICEF Strategic Plan 2014–2017 contact:Director, Division of Policy and Strategy. In: Plaza U, editor. New York, NY 100172014.
  • 9.WHO. WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. 2009. [PubMed]
  • 10.Trehan I, Banerjee S, Murray E, Ryan KN, Thakwalakwa C, Maleta KM, et al. Extending supplementary feeding for children younger than 5 years with moderate acute malnutrition leads to lower relapse rates. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. 2015;60(4):544–9. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tadesse AW, Tadesse E, Berhane Y, Ekström E- C. Choosing Anthropometric Indicators to Monitor the Response to Treatment for Severe Acute Malnutrition in Rural Southern Ethiopia—Empirical Evidence. 2017;9(12):1339. 10.3390/nu9121339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abitew DB, Yalew AW, Bezabih AM, Bazzano AN. Predictors of relapse of acute malnutrition following exit from community-based management program in Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: An unmatched case-control study. PloS one. 2020;15(4):e0231524. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.World Bank. 2003. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5985.
  • 14.al. KDe. Comparative national and regional figures comes from the World Bank publication, "Tenure Security and Land Related Investment", WP-2991 Archived at the Wayback Machine. 2007.
  • 15.World Bank. 2006. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTETHIOPIA/Resources/PREM/FourEthiopiasrev6.7.5.May24.pdf.
  • 16.VALENTINA PEVERI. NUTRITION AND IDENTITY IN HADIYA ZONE (SOUTH-CENTRAL ETHIOPIA). University of Bologna, Department of Historical, Anthropological and Geographical Sciences,1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wikipedia. Ethiopia. the free encyclopedia2019.
  • 18.Akparibo R, CK Lee A, Booth A, Harris J, Woods HB, Blank L. Relationships between recovery and relapse, and default and repeated episodes of default in the management of acute malnutrition in children in humanitarian emergencies. 2015.
  • 19.UNICEF. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women. 2019.
  • 20.WHO, UNICEF. WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; 2009.
  • 21.WHO WHO. Guideline: Updates on the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 7913264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: bookorders@who.int). WHO Press; 2013. [PubMed]
  • 22.Ali E, Zachariah R, Shams Z, Vernaeve L, Alders P, Salio F, et al. Is mid-upper arm circumference alone sufficient for deciding admission to a nutritional programme for childhood severe acute malnutrition in Bangladesh? Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2013;107(5):319–23. 10.1093/trstmh/trt018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Briend A, Mwangome MK, Berkley JA. Using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference to Detect High-Risk Malnourished Patients in Need of Treatment. In: Preedy VR, Patel VB, editors. Handbook of Famine, Starvation, and Nutrient Deprivation: From Biology to Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 705–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Di Giovanni V, Bourdon C, Wang DX. Metabolomic Changes in Serum of Children with Different Clinical Diagnoses of Malnutrition. J Nutr. 2016;146(12):2436–44. 10.3945/jn.116.239145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Claudia Marotta

22 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-40116

Relapse of severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under five children admitted to health facilities in Hadiya zone, Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lambebo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 20 February. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide the names of the 20 selected health posts in Hadiya zone.

3. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed the survey or questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information. If the questionnaire is published, please provide a citation to the (1) questionnaire and/or (2) original publication associated with the questionnaire.

4. Thank you for stating in the text of your manuscript "ethical clearance was be secured by Jimma University Health Research Ethics Review Committee (IHRERC). An official letter was written from Jimma University to the Hadiya Zone health office. Informed written consent was obtained from all health extension workers of selected health posts and woreda health office, Confidentiality of the study documents [were] also ensured according to the declaration of Helsinki ethical code for human subjects." Please also add this information to your ethics statement in the online submission form.

5.In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

6.Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

 "no"

At this time, please address the following queries:

  1. Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

  2. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

  3. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

  4. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

7. Please amend either the title on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the title in the manuscript so that they are identical.

8. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

Additional Editor Comments:

dear authors follow reviewer suggestion to improve your paper

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors Wrote an interesting paper on important topic and relevant setting. The article is good but need some improvement also for the reference

Introduction:Africa has a large burden of overall risk factors related to childhood health and development, most of which are of an infective or social origin. Children with malnutrition are "children at risk" to worst health and social outcome (see and citeThe At Risk Child Clinic (ARCC): 3 Years of Health Activities in Support of the Most Vulnerable Children in Beira, Mozambique. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jun 27;15(7):1350. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071350. PMID: 29954117; PMCID: PMC6069480.)

Methods and results: are clear

Discussion: add some risk factors of malnutrition: es HIV, low socio economic level, malaria etc

Reviewer #2: This retrospective study investigated the prevalence of relapse to severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and its associated factors in children under five admitted to health facilities in Hadiya zone (Ethiopia). SAM is an important health problem, particularly in developing countries, and relapse to SAM is one of the important outcomes. Identifying the burden of relapse to SAM in different contexts, its potential risk factors, and consequences are crucial for developing appropriate solutions to this problem. However, the current paper has some serious limitations.

• There have been several publications addressing relapse to SAM in recent years, some of which are from African countries as well as Ethiopia (see references below). Therefore, authors have to provide a convincing rationale for conducting this study.

• The methodology section has many limitations: authors should provide specific definitions for SAM and relapse, briefly illustrate the used treatment protocol, clarify discharge criteria (% of weight gain?), whether there was a system for follow-up/community-based management (CMAM)?, How the 20 health posts in Hadiya zone were selected (not random selection?), authors should briefly describe the collected data.

• Several important factors were not included in the study that may affect relapse to SAM, such as length of time between discharge and relapse, treatment (e.g., antibiotics, vitamin A, ready to use therapeutic food), vaccination status, access to health services, standard of living, food security, and access to clean water.

• The used data from 2004 may not reflect the current sociodemographic situation.

• The discussion is not adequate and does not include data from recent studies, some of which are from Ethiopia (see references below).

• Authors are encouraged to merge the first 3 tables into 1 large table, reporting the frequency for total cases, relapse cases, and no relapse cases for each variable as well as using appropriate statistical tests for comparison.

• The paper is poorly written with poor structure and a lot of language errors.

Stobaugh HC, Mayberry A, McGrath M, Bahwere P, Zagre NM, Manary MJ, Black R, Lelijveld N. Relapse after severe acute malnutrition: A systematic literature review and secondary data analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Apr;15(2):e12702. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12702.

Abitew DB, Yalew AW, Bezabih AM, Bazzano AN. Predictors of relapse of acute malnutrition following exit from community-based management program in Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: An unmatched case-control study. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231524.

Mengesha MM, Deyessa N, Tegegne BS, Dessie Y. Treatment outcome and factors affecting time to recovery in children with severe acute malnutrition treated at outpatient therapeutic care program. Glob Health Action. 2016 Jul 8;9:30704. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.30704.

Tadesse E, Worku A, Berhane Y, Ekström EC. An integrated community-based outpatient therapeutic feeding programme for severe acute malnutrition in rural Southern Ethiopia: Recovery, fatality, and nutritional status after discharge. Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Apr;14(2):e12519. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12519.

Kabalo MY, Seifu CN. Treatment outcomes of severe acute malnutrition in children treated within Outpatient Therapeutic Program (OTP) at Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: retrospective cross-sectional study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2017;36(1):7. Published 2017 Mar 9. doi:10.1186/s41043-017-0083-3

Reviewer #3: A good study, adding to the continuum of studies about relapse of malnutrition in developing countries

However your study should have highlighted the predictors of relapse or at least the recent papers discussing such issue, in the discussion section such as:

Relapse after severe acute malnutrition: A systematic literature review and secondary data analysis

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6587999/

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231524

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Elsayed Abdelkreem

Reviewer #3: Yes: Antoine AbdelMassih

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Claudia Marotta

8 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-40116R1

Frequency of Relapse of Severe Acute Malnutrition and Associated Factors Among Under Five Children Admitted to Health Facilities in Hadiya Zone, South Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Abera

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 12 March. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear Authors, only some minor suggestion to improve your already good paper

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: authors wrote an interesting paper and I suggest to accept the paper

Reviewer #2: The authors successfully addressed some reviewers’ comments, but some issues remain.

• In the last paragraph of introduction “Even though; there were some studies on SAM post discharge status there is limitation in addressing relapse case because of methodological and analytical drawbacks”. Authors should provide references to these "some studies" and explain the "methodological and analytical drawbacks" (in introduction or discussion).

• In operational definitions: “Severe acute malnutrition; It is diagnosed by weight for- height below -3 SD of the WHO standards, by a MUAC 11.5 cm and by Clinical sign”. Please, revise to “….MUAC less than 11.5 cm..”, and specify what is the “clinical sign”? bilateral edema?

• In the introduction, authors state that recovery based on MUAC is not used for dischareg “However, they are discharged from the program based on percent of weight gained or weight for height > 70%. During discharge recovery based on MUAC is not used”. However, in operational definitions, they state that MUAC ≥125 mm is one of the discharge criteria “Criteria for discharging children from treatment; weight-for-height/length is ≥–2 Z-scores and they have had no oedema for at least 2 weeks, or mid-upper-arm circumference is ≥125 mm and they have had no oedema for at least 2 weeks”.

• Several important factors were not included in the study and multivariate regression analysis that may affect relapse to SAM, such as length of time between discharge and relapse, treatment (e.g., antibiotics, vitamin A, ready to use therapeutic food), vaccination status, access to health services, standard of living, food security, and access to clean water. The authors should acknowledge this in the study limitations.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Elsayed Abdelkreem

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 25;16(3):e0249232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249232.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


9 Mar 2021

all comments from the editors and reviewers were amended and corrected. each parts of comments were attached as separate latter response to reviewers

Attachment

Submitted filename: rebuttal letter -3.docx

Decision Letter 2

Claudia Marotta

15 Mar 2021

Frequency of Relapse for Severe Acute Malnutrition and Associated Factors Among Under Five Children Admitted to Health Facilities in Hadiya Zone, South Ethiopia

PONE-D-20-40116R2

Dear Dr. Abera,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

dear authors congratulations

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: no recommendations. the paper can be accept

Authors wrote an interesting paper from interesting setting

Reviewer #2: The authors successfully addressed almost all reviewers' comments. Only a minor comment remains. In operational definitions: “Severe acute malnutrition; It is diagnosed by weight for- height below -3 SD of the WHO standards, by a MUAC 11.5 cm....”. Please, revise to “….MUAC < 11.5 cm..”.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Elsayed Abdelkreem

Acceptance letter

Claudia Marotta

17 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-40116R2

Frequency of Relapse for Severe Acute Malnutrition and Associated Factors Among Under Five Children Admitted to Health Facilities in Hadiya Zone, South Ethiopia.

Dear Dr. Lambebo:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Claudia Marotta

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: rebuttal letter .docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: rebuttal letter -3.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES