Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;40(2):177–182. doi: 10.14366/usg.20085

Table 2.

Summary of studies applying deep learning to focal liver disease

Study Task Data used for deep learning US system Total no. of images No. of validation set images Ground truth Method
Liu et al. (2020) [17] TACE response prediction CEUS Three 130 CEUS datasets 41 CEUS cine sets mRECIST on CT/MRI 3D-CNN
Pan et al. (2019) [15] Classification CEUS N/A 4,420 images from 242 tumors 10-Fold cross-validation N/A 3D-CNN
Guo et al. (2018) [13] Classification CEUS One 93 CEUS datasets 5-Fold cross-validation Pathology, CT, MRI DCCA-MKL
Schmauch et al. (2019) [16] Detection and classification B-mode N/A 544 images 3-Fold cross-validation 177 Images for external validation N/A ResNet50
Hassan et al. (2017) [14] Detection and classification B-mode N/A 110 images 10-Fold cross-validation Unsupervised learning SSAE+SVM

US, ultrasonography; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; CEUS, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; mRECIST, modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; 3D, three-dimensional; CNN, convolutional neural network; N/A, not available; DCCA-MKL, deep canonical correlation analysis-multiple kernel learning; SSAE, stacked sparse auto-encoders; SVM, support vector machine.