Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Feb 25;34(2):e14895. doi: 10.1111/dth.14895

Public interest in dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Insights from Google Trends

Kübra Esen‐Salman 1, Özlem Akın‐Çakıcı 2, Sinan Kardeş 3, Andaç Salman 2,
PMCID: PMC7995005  PMID: 33595849

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic had substantial effect both on daily life and medical practice. Internet data have been used to analyze the trends in public interest in various medical conditions and treatments. The aim of this study is to analyze the public interest in dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Google Trends was queried for a total of 120 dermatological search queries. Three periods of 2020 ([March 15‐May 9], [May 10‐July 4], and [July 5‐October 31]) were compared with the previous 4 years (2016‐2019). A significantly decreased interest in skin cancers and certain dermatologic conditions (eg, pityriasis rosea and scabies) was observed throughout the study period. Whereas a significant increase of interest in dry skin, hair shedding, oily hair, atopic dermatitis, and hand eczema was detected during the study. An initial decrease in interest was followed by a significant increase for acne, comedones, melasma, rosacea, botox, dermaroller, and peeling. The study demonstrated a significant impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the public interest in dermatology. The present results would help to create healthcare policies and information sources, which can meet the public demand. The reasons for the observed trends and their effect on patient outcomes might be of interest for future studies.

Keywords: COVID‐19, dermatology, Google, internet, public interest, skin disorders

1. INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), a novel infectious respiratory disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), first emerged in December 2019. The rapid and worldwide spread of the disease led to the declaration of a pandemic by WHO in March 2020. The number of confirmed cases has reached up to 60 million in 220 countries by 25th of November, 2020. 1 The global efforts to slow the spread of disease, including lockdown measures, have impacted the daily life, as well as the medical practice including dermatology. The main challenges encountered by the dermatologists and the patients during the pandemic include the reduction of face‐to‐face consultations, the uncertainties about the monitoring of the patients with ongoing biologic and immunosuppressive treatments, the lack of information about the effect of dermatologic conditions and treatments on the risk of COVID‐19, and the difficulties on the follow‐up of the patients with chronic diseases or skin cancer. 2

During recent years, internet data have been increasingly used to analyze the public behavior and interest in various medical conditions. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Google Trends is the most popular tool and has been used to explore the interest in dermatologic conditions before and during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 Previous studies in dermatology have investigated the public interest in common dermatological conditions (eg, acne, seborrheic dermatitis, and warts), cosmetic dermatology procedures, and COVID‐19‐related acral symptoms during the early phases of the outbreak. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 In the present study we aimed to analyze the public interest in a wide range of dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures using a very detailed set of search terms and a longer period of investigation for providing information on impact of different stages of pandemic on the public interest in dermatology. Therefore, the insights generated from this study would expand the knowledge produced in previous studies and increase our understanding in this new pandemic.

2. METHODS

Google Trends, a freely available tool, provides information on frequencies of queries that people search on Google search engine. It normalizes the frequency of a search query to all queries, and presents results as a relative search volume ranging from 0 to 100; with larger scores denote greater popularity for the search query.

We determined search queries representing a wide spectrum of dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures. Three different dermatologists (K.E.S., Ö.A.Ç., and A.S.) have discussed and decided the search terms through working on a shared online document. The terms were selected from the most frequent conditions, treatments and procedures using dermatology textbooks. The complete list of a total of 120 search queries is presented in Table 1. For each query, Google Trends was queried applying filters of “United States,” “01/01/2016‐11/17/2020,” and “All categories.” The Google Trends weekly data were exported for analysis.

TABLE 1.

Relative search volume (RSV) of dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments and procedures

March 15‐May 9 May 10‐July 4 July 5‐October 31
2020 2016‐2019 % Change P value 2020 2016‐2019 % Change P value 2020 2016–2019 % Change P value
Blistering 44.38 ± 2.02 46.91 ± 1.81 −5.39 .352 74.63 ± 3.22 65.72 ± 2.21 13.56 .023 55.88 ± 3.19 57.93 ± 1.98 −3.54 .585
Bruising 51 ± 1.98 70.09 ± 1.18 −27.24 <.001 75.38 ± 3.06 84 ± 1.48 −10.26 .011 76.06 ± 2.20 76.47 ± 1.12 −0.54 .867
Callus 51.0 ± 4.36 43.47 ± 0.96 17.32 .092 57.25 ± 1.38 48.13 ± 0.95 18.95 <.001 49.82 ± 1.22 46.04 ± 1.12 8.21 .022
Comedones 59.63 ± 3.82 53.38 ± 2.31 11.71 .162 73.25 ± 2.07 57.34 ± 2.52 27.75 <.001 75.53 ± 3.03 52.88 ± 1.70 42.83 <.001
Skin swelling 60.88 ± 2.85 64.25 ± 2.43 −5.25 .367 72.38 ± 5.74 60.88 ± 2.37 18.89 .064 71.59 ± 1.94 62.13 ± 1.69 15.23 <.001
Dandruff 86 ± 3.94 72.63 ± 1.54 18.41 .002 76.5 ± 2.26 61.78 ± 0.90 23.83 <.001 70.82 ± 1.26 62.79 ± 0.84 12.79 <.001
Dry skin 57.13 ± 2.13 52 ± 1.28 9.87 .039 53 ± 1.50 44.69 ± 0.69 18.59 <.001 48.82 ± 0.75 44.51 ± 0.67 9.68 <.001
Erythema 62.38 ± 1.77 77.97 ± 1.31 −19.99 <.001 67 ± 3.17 79.41 ± 1.20 −15.63 <.001 74.82 ± 1.2 79.5 ± 0.92 −5.89 .002
Hair loss 71.25 ± 3.29 70.28 ± 0.73 1.38 .774 85.25 ± 1.31 74.22 ± 0.90 14.86 <.001 92.06 ± 1.04 79.82 ± 0.51 15.33 <.001
Hair shedding 71.75 ± 5.89 48.78 ± 1.39 47.09 <.001 79.38 ± 2.17 55.06 ± 1.58 44.17 <.001 75.18 ± 1.28 59.63 ± 1.06 26.08 <.001
Hives 80.88 ± 0.98 83.56 ± 0.95 −3.21 .048 87.75 ± 1.99 90.34 ± 1.14 −2.87 .258 84.82 ± 2.08 86.31 ± 0.87 −1.73 .509
Sweating 61.63 ± 0.79 58.75 ± 1.01 4.90 .024 72.38 ± 2.87 72.84 ± 2.06 −0.63 .894 73 ± 2.73 72.29 ± 1.53 0.98 .821
Hyperpigmentation 75.63 ± 4.91 54.75 ± 1.99 38.14 <.001 93.25 ± 1.46 56.47 ± 1.72 65.13 <.001 79.53 ± 2.59 52.01 ± 1.33 52.91 <.001
Hypopigmentation 28.13 ± 3.87 37.44 ± 1.97 −24.87 .032 43.75 ± 3.45 42.16 ± 2.47 3.77 .707 46.71 ± 2.07 46.51 ± 1.59 0.43 .941
Skin irritation 58.63 ± 3.601 59.25 ± 1.1 −1.05 .868 72.25 ± 2.50 61.47 ± 1.47 17.54 <.001 65.76 ± 1.71 60.88 ± 1.20 8.02 .02
Itch 63.5 ± 1.58 59.03 ± 0.72 7.57 .01 82.13 ± 2.72 77.25 ± 1.82 6.32 .136 77.53 ± 2.56 73.49 ± 1.31 5.50 .159
Skin mole 57.5 ± 3.03 65.28 ± 1.34 −11.92 .019 83.5 ± 2.39 79.69 ± 1.74 4.78 .197 71.29 ± 1.96 67.43 ± 1.29 5.72 .099
Nail discoloration 37 ± 6.03 34.75 ± 2.25 6.47 .726 40.75 ± 4.19 35.61 ± 3.13 14.43 .326 41.35 ± 4.66 38.63 ± 2.18 7.04 .596
Nail thickening 38.86 ± 9.29 29.04 ± 4.04 33.82 .333 22.75 ± 2.41 31.88 ± 2.84 −28.64 .014 28.5 ± 2.60 26.91 ± 1.38 5.91 .589
Nevi 42.88 ± 3.90 61.63 ± 2.38 −30.42 <.001 53.88 ± 3.85 63.81 ± 2.40 −15.56 .029 59.82 ± 2.10 64.46 ± 1.36 −7.20 .064
Nevus 50.63 ± 4.20 78.09 ± 1.52 −35.16 <.001 66.13 ± 2.64 77.44 ± 1.49 −14.60 <.001 74.35 ± 1.70 76.94 ± 1.10 −3.37 .2
Oily skin 67.5 ± 2.63 71.66 ± 1.06 −5.81 .143 83.75 ± 3.56 76.16 ± 1.50 9.97 .049 77.71 ± 1.42 76.32 ± 1.16 1.82 .45
Oily hair 78.13 ± 2.92 64.56 ± 1.16 21.02 <.001 78.38 ± 1.93 58.97 ± 1.01 32.92 <.001 79.53 ± 2.23 64.12 ± 1.03 24.03 <.001
Onycholysis 46.38 ± 4.52 47 ± 2.51 −1.32 .904 59.5 ± 4.22 43.28 ± 2.28 37.48 .001 45.24 ± 3.70 49.07 ± 1.94 −7.81 .358
Pruritus 54 ± 1.81 61.31 ± 1.39 −11.92 .001 56.88 ± 1.56 57.28 ± 1.57 −0.70 .854 63.47 ± 1.37 64.59 ± 1.56 −1.73 .591
Purple skin 78.38 ± 3.62 62.53 ± 1.70 25.35 <.001 90.63 ± 1.31 71.66 ± 2.48 26.47 <.001 75.59 ± 2.12 63.41 ± 1.32 19.21 <.001
Rash 63.75 ± 2.41 64.47 ± 0.82 −1.12 .778 83.25 ± 1.18 81.88 ± 1.56 1.67 .482 68.82 ± 2.88 71.62 ± 1.31 −3.91 .377
Redness 73.38 ± 1.81 82.94 ± 1.36 −11.53 <.001 78.25 ± 1.23 79.84 ± 1.10 −1.99 .336 72.71 ± 1.14 75.1 ± 0.80 −3.18 .085
Skin scaling 33.88 ± 3.18 39.66 ± 3.13 −14.57 .195 39.63 ± 4.83 36.69 ± 3.20 8.01 .612 38.35 ± 3.45 41.51 ± 2.23 −7.61 .442
Skin discoloration 65.38 ± 3.55 64.25 ± 1.76 1.76 .777 80 ± 2.84 74.34 ± 1.80 7.61 .092 69.12 ± 1.63 66.9 ± 1.68 3.32 .342
Skin ulcer 57.25 ± 2.99 47.44 ± 2.73 20.68 .015 64.75 ± 3.18 48.13 ± 2.64 34.53 <.001 57.82 ± 2.43 53.87 ± 1.80 7.33 .190
Mouth ulcer 78.5 ± 2.81 70.44 ± 1.87 11.44 .017 76.63 ± 2.37 73.66 ± 1.74 4.03 .313 77.18 ± 2.22 72.99 ± 1.16 5.74 .094
Wheal 28.0 ± 1.49 30.91 ± 1.29 −9.41 .14 31.88 ± 2.21 30.22 ± 1.40 5.49 .527 31.06 ± 2.43 34.82 ± 1.41 −10.80 .179
Wound 77.38 ± 1.05 78.72 ± 1.05 −1.70 .364 87.50 ± 2.05 82.44 ± 1.4 6.14 .041 93.47 ± 0.89 83.71 ± 0.91 11.66 <.001
Acne 86.5 ± 3.22 87.44 ± 0.86 −1.08 .778 94.88 ± 1.40 86.5 ± 0.79 9.69 <.001 91.82 ± 0.93 86.76 ± 0.68 5.83 <.001
Actinic keratosis 47.88 ± 2.88 64.91 ± 2.04 −26.24 <.001 62.63 ± 2.75 69.0 ± 2.13 −9.23 .067 64.29 ± 1.81 64.84 ± 1.41 −0.85 .812
Angioedema 35.13 ± 1.67 46.44 ± 1.05 −24.35 <.001 38.88 ± 1.32 46.84 ± 1.09 −16.99 <.001 41.82 ± 1.20 50.38 ± 1.13 −16.99 <.001
Apthous stomatitis 32.0 ± 0.0 47.43 ± 5.23 −32.53 .003 33.0 ± 0.47 43.2 ± 0.51 −23.61 <.001 46.67 ± 9.54 46.93 ± 3.38 −0.55 .980
Atopic dermatitis 49.63 ± 7.29 32.28 ± 1.71 53.75 .020 42.0 ± 1.43 33.19 ± 1.85 26.54 <.001 39.18 ± 0.96 33.38 ± 1.17 17.38 <.001
Basal cell carcinoma 50.38 ± 2.22 77.19 ± 1.61 −34.73 <.001 65.13 ± 2.23 77.56 ± 1.87 −16.03 <.001 75.71 ± 1.86 80.13 ± 1.14 −5.52 .042
Skin candida 23.88 ± 3.32 38.28 ± 2.75 −37.62 .001 26.75 ± 2.41 35.0 ± 1.49 −23.57 .004 26.59 ± 1.68 32.87 ± 1.14 −19.11 .002
Chickenpox 47.38 ± 2.21 40.59 ± 3.17 16.73 .079 38.88 ± 1.92 37.47 ± 1.43 3.76 .557 44.18 ± 1.21 38.62 ± 0.95 14.40 <.001
Contact dermatitis 71.5 ± 1.75 64.78 ± 1.64 10.37 .005 78.13 ± 1.66 70.97 ± 1.72 10.09 .003 72.35 ± 1.70 70.44 ± 1.36 2.71 .381
Cosmetic allergy 25.5 ± 0.35 43.81 ± 4.60 −41.79 <.001 46.0 ± 4.95 43.0 ± 4.70 6.98 .660 46.83 ± 8.21 36.33 ± 1.18 28.90 .205
Demodex 21.88 ± 1.53 25.53 ± 0.75 −14.30 .031 22.5 ± 0.83 30.31 ± 2.15 −25.77 .001 23.12 ± 0.87 25.96 ± 0.38 −10.94 .003
Dermatitis 83.63 ± 3.46 77.59 ± 1.68 7.78 .116 90.88 ± 0.65 80.53 ± 1.79 12.85 <.001 86.12 ± 0.84 81.38 ± 1.29 5.82 .002
Diaper dermatitis 32.75 ± 4.93 44.16 ± 3.07 −25.84 .050 34.88 ± 3.62 34.86 ± 2.82 0.06 .998 38.24 ± 3.58 40.33 ± 2.53 −5.18 .633
Drug allergy 40.5 ± 2.59 44.31 ± 1.94 −8.60 .239 33.63 ± 1.49 40.13 ± 2.13 −16.20 .012 39.0 ± 2.57 36.54 ± 1.10 6.73 .379
Drug eruption 31.88 ± 6.31 40.23 ± 2.97 −20.76 .231 33.25 ± 3.38 40.9 ± 3.24 −18.70 .102 35.41 ± 3.36 39.49 ± 2.18 −10.33 .309
Erythema multiforme 37.63 ± 3.28 55.94 ± 2.23 −32.73 <.001 42.0 ± 2.09 51.72 ± 2.05 −18.79 .001 43.76 ± 1.79 54.93 ± 1.44 −20.33 <.001
Eczema 79.0 ± 2.63 80.06 ± 1.71 −1.32 .735 84.38 ± 1.37 79.0 ± 1.68 6.81 .013 73.94 ± 0.89 72.63 ± 1.08 1.80 .351
Fungal skin infection 46.25 ± 3.26 49.88 ± 1.90 −7.28 .337 57.88 ± 3.21 61.28 ± 2.44 −5.55 .398 56.24 ± 1.63 60.44 ± 1.78 −6.95 .081
Hand eczema 71.75 ± 4.25 46.5 ± 2.11 54.30 <.001 67.38 ± 4.20 49.88 ± 2.01 35.08 <.001 58.0 ± 2.60 47.37 ± 1.56 22.44 <.001
Herpes zoster 63.25 ± 2.55 70.59 ± 1.70 −10.40 .016 66.38 ± 2.54 69.19 ± 1.69 −4.06 .356 70.47 ± 1.81 71.71 ± 0.97 −1.73 .547
Hyperhidrosis 11.63 ± 0.75 14.38 ± 0.56 −19.12 .003 17.38 ± 0.75 19.03 ± 1.81 −8.67 .398 21.06 ± 4.82 17.85 ± 0.84 17.98 .512
Ichthyosis 17.25 ± 1.28 20.66 ± 1.21 −16.51 .054 14.0 ± 0.90 24.09 ± 2.90 −41.88 .001 16.06 ± 1.08 18.04 ± 0.78 −10.98 .136
Melanoma 41.63 ± 1.62 65.03 ± 1.79 −35.98 <.001 55.13 ± 1.47 68.06 ± 0.86 −19.0 <.001 54.71 ± 0.76 62.59 ± 0.76 −12.59 <.001
Melasma 47.75 ± 4.45 41.72 ± 1.27 14.45 .193 83.13 ± 4.70 55.47 ± 1.78 49.86 <.001 70.18 ± 3.61 49.03 ± 1.54 43.14 <.001
Miliaria 47.75 ± 7.51 39.91 ± 2.40 19.64 .320 58.5 ± 2.86 58.44 ± 3.08 0.10 .988 46.24 ± 4.10 50.84 ± 2.43 −9.05 .334
Milium 26.13 ± 2.19 25.97 ± 2.31 0.62 .960 32.38 ± 1.02 30.16 ± 2.33 7.36 .383 24.24 ± 2.10 33.18 ± 1.98 −26.94 .002
Molluscum 62.0 ± 2.33 77.38 ± 1.32 −19.88 <.001 81.0 ± 2.41 84.91 ± 1.34 −4.60 .157 71.53 ± 1.77 77.6 ± 1.21 −7.82 .005
Mycosis fungoides 18.63 ± 1.72 19.44 ± 1.04 −4.17 .687 19.75 ± 2.11 20.19 ± 0.88 −2.18 .848 19.94 ± 1.13 20.26 ± 0.74 −1.58 .811
Pediculosis 46.63 ± 4.30 56.09 ± 2.41 −16.87 .055 46.75 ± 4.87 43.97 ± 2.33 6.32 .607 51.71 ± 4.04 50.13 ± 2.26 3.15 .734
Pemphigoid 6.25 ± 0.42 9.47 ± 0.34 −34.0 <.001 9.38 ± 0.43 10.13 ± 0.50 −7.40 .254 10.53 ± 0.40 10.56 ± 0.31 −0.28 .954
Pemphigus 44.5 ± 3.61 48.22 ± 1.48 −7.71 .340 43.13 ± 1.97 50.34 ± 1.51 −14.32 .004 49.12 ± 1.65 53.31 ± 1.49 −7.86 .059
Pityriasis rosea 54.5 ± 2.28 77.5 ± 1.74 −29.68 <.001 66.75 ± 1.86 73.28 ± 1.98 −8.91 .016 56.29 ± 1.49 67.43 ± 1.15 −16.52 <.001
Psoriasis 71.0 ± 1.21 75.56 ± 1.48 −6.03 .017 75.0 ± 0.88 74.22 ± 1.37 1.05 .632 71.0 ± 1.08 71.5 ± 0.75 −0.70 .704
Rosacea 72.0 ± 2.91 82.13 ± 1.49 −12.33 .002 72.75 ± 1.68 67.5 ± 1.32 7.78 .014 63.24 ± 0.77 60.16 ± 0.81 5.12 .006
Scabies 37.0 ± 1.02 60.03 ± 1.69 −38.36 <.001 41.63 ± 0.98 63.81 ± 0.90 −34.76 <.001 41.06 ± 0.70 63.79 ± 0.87 −35.63 <.001
Seborrheic dermatitis 76.88 ± 3.12 75.28 ± 1.65 2.13 .652 79.5 ± 1.87 75.13 ± 1.73 5.82 .086 77.94 ± 1.76 73.96 ± 1.12 5.38 .056
Seborrheic keratosis 43.13 ± 1.90 62.03 ± 1.87 −30.47 <.001 63.25 ± 3.0 67.56 ± 1.70 −6.38 .211 69.65 ± 1.59 67.82 ± 1.60 2.70 .418
Skin cancer 55.88 ± 2.64 78.38 ± 1.39 −28.71 <.001 77.63 ± 2.05 87.56 ± 0.93 −11.34 <.001 70.41 ± 1.26 74.96 ± 1.20 −6.07 .009
Shingles 66.75 ± 1.93 73.69 ± 1.19 −9.42 .002 79.13 ± 1.29 75.91 ± 1.00 4.24 .049 91.94 ± 1.09 78.21 ± 0.81 17.56 <.001
Squamous cell carcinoma 29.25 ± 0.70 39.41 ± 1.72 −25.78 <.001 36.5 ± 1.38 38.28 ± 0.82 −4.65 .267 40.76 ± 1.31 40.53 ± 1.14 0.57 .892
Stevens Johnson syndrome 37.5 ± 3.27 40.53 ± 2.01 −7.48 .430 35.38 ± 1.95 42.5 ± 2.82 −16.75 .038 36.35 ± 2.02 43.65 ± 1.43 −16.72 .003
Syphilis 23.88 ± 0.12 26.34 ± 0.45 −9.34 <.001 24.75 ± 0.46 24.09 ± 0.36 2.74 .259 23.71 ± 0.33 24.24 ± 0.28 −2.19 .221
Tinea 51.25 ± 1.86 64.66 ± 1.18 −20.74 <.001 66.88 ± 2.13 73.69 ± 1.37 −9.24 .007 66.53 ± 1.37 74.12 ± 1.09 −10.24 <.001
Varicella 46.75 ± 1.92 61.63 ± 1.54 −24.14 <.001 52.75 ± 2.21 65.75 ± 1.43 −19.77 <.001 64.59 ± 1.50 68.01 ± 1.20 −5.03 .075
Vasculitis 29.5 ± 1.36 38.47 ± 0.66 −23.32 <.001 37.75 ± 0.98 40.69 ± 2.04 −7.23 .194 34.94 ± 0.88 38.69 ± 0.53 −9.69 <.001
Verruca 26.63 ± 3.66 27.63 ± 1.11 −3.62 .794 33.88 ± 2.92 29.78 ± 1.80 13.77 .232 37.18 ± 1.44 35.35 ± 1.65 5.18 .405
Vitiligo 40.13 ± 2.30 46.53 ± 1.27 −13.75 .015 57.0 ± 3.70 55.09 ± 1.46 3.47 .631 55.82 ± 1.53 56.91 ± 1.29 −1.92 .586
Urticaria 54.38 ± 2.62 56.09 ± 1.23 −3.05 .552 56.0 ± 1.34 55.13 ± 1.09 1.58 .612 55.53 ± 0.93 58.44 ± 1.22 −4.98 .059
Wart 68.88 ± 2.65 73.06 ± 0.76 −5.72 .129 83.13 ± 1.44 82.78 ± 1.03 0.42 .846 76.88 ± 1.56 78.81 ± 1.14 −2.45 .318
Zoster 63.25 ± 1.60 73.31 ± 1.61 −13.72 <.001 70.75 ± 3.03 76.44 ± 1.91 −7.44 .112 76.88 ± 1.83 76.32 ± 1.25 0.73 .801
Acitretin 34.5 ± 4.21 42.22 ± 2.84 −18.29 .128 32.5 ± 2.57 48.94 ± 2.89 −33.59 <.001 41.88 ± 2.62 45.93 ± 1.87 −8.82 .209
Soriatane 21.86 ± 3.76 31.8 ± 2.10 −31.26 .021 33.0 ± 5.67 34.08 ± 2.55 −3.17 .863 28.81 ± 3.39 29.61 ± 2.06 −2.70 .840
Dupilumab 17.63 ± 2.65 20.0 ± 1.69 −11.85 .449 22.63 ± 1.33 17.59 ± 1.34 28.65 .008 23.0 ± 2.05 20.97 ± 1.53 9.68 .428
Dupixent 62.0 ± 3.00 29.75 ± 3.65 108.40 <.001 65.25 ± 3.19 28.5 ± 3.00 128.95 <.001 75.06 ± 2.48 37.94 ± 2.70 97.84 <.001
Emollients 24.63 ± 2.44 23.88 ± 1.77 3.14 .804 25.43 ± 3.52 25.35 ± 3.08 0.32 .987 25.12 ± 1.83 23.61 ± 1.37 6.40 .510
Isotretinoin 57 ± 3.24 54.97 ± 2.3 3.69 .609 57.63 ± 2.34 51.38 ± 2.33 12.16 .058 57.18 ± 2.36 51 ± 1.46 12.12 .026
Accutane + Absorica + Amnesteem + Claravis + Myorisan 61.63 ± 1.25 66.63 ± 0.97 −7.50 .002 68.63 ± 1.59 65.16 ± 1.23 5.33 .085 68.65 ± 0.748 64.59 ± 0.89 6.29 <.001
Ivermectin 27.5 ± 10.49 5.88 ± 0.12 367.69 .039 10.88 ± 0.57 5.97 ± 0.13 82.24 <.001 12.18 ± 1.06 5.49 ± 0.10 121.86 <.001
Stromectol 28.38 ± 10.36 11.31 ± 1.08 150.93 .101 14.63 ± 1.39 10.81 ± 0.73 35.34 .015 12.44 ± 1.51 11.13 ± 0.67 11.77 .429
Sklice + Soolantra 41.63 ± 2.85 50.13 ± 2.50 −16.96 .025 37.88 ± 2.37 51.81 ± 1.71 −26.89 <.001 43.65 ± 2.77 50.56 ± 1.30 −13.67 .024
Omalizumab 31.13 ± 4.19 34.44 ± 2.24 −9.61 .486 32.38 ± 3.41 32.28 ± 2.13 0.31 .981 38.47 ± 3.79 34.62 ± 1.72 11.12 .355
Xolair 57.5 ± 2.46 65.44 ± 2.31 −12.13 .019 57.63 ± 2.0 66.0 ± 2.70 −12.68 .013 67.76 ± 2.32 66.62 ± 1.78 1.71 .695
Sunscreen 31.63 ± 4.44 39.66 ± 2.37 −20.25 .110 75.38 ± 4.29 71.13 ± 2.53 5.97 .393 37.29 ± 4.09 28.5 ± 1.97 30.84 .053
Sun protection 41.75 ± 4.7 48.78 ± 1.91 −14.41 .166 73.88 ± 3.80 73.13 ± 2.12 1.03 .863 41.06 ± 4.92 37.1 ± 2.19 10.67 .462
Corticosteroid cream 58.25 ± 6.21 45.63 ± 2.49 27.66 .059 75.75 ± 4.47 48.34 ± 3.07 56.70 <.001 60.88 ± 2.12 49.94 ± 2.07 21.91 <.001
Temovate + diprolene + dermovate + elocon + taclonex + calcitrene 44.75 ± 2.51 62.41 ± 2.31 −28.30 <.001 56.0 ± 2.77 62.5 ± 2.30 −10.40 .071 55.29 ± 2.95 62.51 ± 1.41 −11.55 .027
Tacrolimus ointment 55.0 ± 3.72 38.94 ± 3.08 41.24 .001 72.38 ± 3.59 47.16 ± 2.77 53.48 <.001 75.94 ± 2.95 46.93 ± 2.09 61.82 <.001
Protopic 38.88 ± 4.84 52.0 ± 3.08 −25.23 .022 49.25 ± 2.96 52.28 ± 2.57 −5.80 .440 49.24 ± 3.40 55.54 ± 1.71 −11.34 .098
Pimecrolimus cream 43.0 ± 4.71 22.38 ± 1.68 92.14 <.001 38.13 ± 5.02 26.27 ± 2.63 45.15 .036 53.47 ± 4.36 27.87 ± 1.79 91.86 <.001
Elidel 45.0 ± 2.78 71.84 ± 2.24 −37.36 <.001 51.63 ± 3.61 66.69 ± 2.40 −22.58 .001 51.35 ± 1.89 66.22 ± 1.63 −22.46 <.001
Botox 32.88 ± 2.17 51.94 ± 1.36 −36.70 <.001 58.13 ± 1.87 49.16 ± 1.10 18.25 <.001 63.41 ± 0.79 48.82 ± 0.96 29.89 <.001
Dermapen 36 ± 2.62 59.38 ± 2.47 −39.37 <.001 50.63 ± 2.44 55.31 ± 2.78 −8.46 .205 45.65 ± 2.76 53.84 ± 1.50 −15.21 .009
Dermaroller 55.5 ± 5.84 60.34 ± 1.69 −8.02 .426 64.5 ± 3.73 53.47 ± 1.66 20.63 .007 51.47 ± 3.46 51.34 ± 1.38 0.25 .972
Dermal filler 36.75 ± 5.64 44.69 ± 2.60 −17.77 .201 53.75 ± 6.86 46.78 ± 2.68 14.90 .344 64.35 ± 4.50 44.18 ± 1.75 45.65 <.001
Fractional Laser 16.13 ± 2.03 39.84 ± 2.57 −59.51 <.001 31.5 ± 3.47 31.97 ± 1.33 −1.47 .900 31.35 ± 1.81 35.57 ± 1.62 −11.86 .082
Laser epilation 30.88 ± 4.01 38.52 ± 2.73 −19.83 .115 32.5 ± 2.98 35.56 ± 2.64 −8.61 .442 36.36 ± 4.03 42.25 ± 2.52 −13.94 .215
Peeling 66 ± 4.19 58.56 ± 0.88 12.70 .083 89.38 ± 2.66 72 ± 1.56 24.14 <.001 73.06 ± 2.80 64.46 ± 1.46 13.34 .006
Patch testing 52.25 ± 6.97 46.69 ± 3.43 11.91 .474 52.75 ± 6.27 42.22 ± 2.31 24.94 .115 62.41 ± 4.40 44.1 ± 1.83 41.52 <.001
Skin Prick test 25.17 ± 5.72 32.83 ± 3.25 −23.33 .244 30.38 ± 6.26 27.3 ± 2.30 11.28 .644 29.38 ± 2.49 23.81 ± 1.20 23.39 .044
Skin allergy test 31.13 ± 1.95 51.78 ± 2.88 −39.88 <.001 43.25 ± 3.05 52.38 ± 2.7 −17.43 .025 48 ± 3.00 46.41 ± 1.67 3.43 .644
Phototherapy 61.13 ± 5.03 58.22 ± 1.81 5.0 .587 52.5 ± 3.55 51.81 ± 1.26 1.33 .855 57.88 ± 3.22 53.46 ± 1.35 8.27 .204
PRP 51.13 ± 1.60 68.97 ± 2.13 −25.87 <.001 69.63 ± 1.89 66.72 ± 1.82 4.36 .268 80.82 ± 1.40 68.81 ± 1.44 17.45 <.001
Mesotherapy 25 ± 2.40 50.5 ± 2.39 −50.5 <.001 50.88 ± 3.36 48.84 ± 2.84 4.18 .645 59.06 ± 3.92 46.1 ± 1.55 28.11 .002
Skin 84.38 ± 3.38 79.72 ± 0.72 5.85 .178 96.25 ± 0.93 83.47 ± 0.95 15.31 <.001 88.59 ± 1.23 79.03 ± 0.88 12.10 <.001
Skin care 83.63 ± 5.17 70.63 ± 0.84 18.41 .013 90.88 ± 2.06 68.31 ± 1.24 33.04 <.001 79.71 ± 1.30 66.32 ± 0.78 20.19 <.001
Dermatologist 43 ± 2.34 79.03 ± 0.94 −45.59 <.001 75.88 ± 2.91 83.25 ± 1.04 −8.85 .017 80.35 ± 0.68 80.94 ± 1.10 −0.73 .649

Notes: Plus‐minus values are means ± standard error (generalized estimating equations).

Abbreviation: PRP, platelet rich plasma.

Statistical analysis of data was carried out using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Three periods of 2020 ([March 15‐May 9], [May 10‐July 4], and [July 5‐October 31]) were compared with similar periods of the previous 4 years (2016‐2019) to assess public interest in different stages of COVID‐19 pandemic. Generalized estimating equations with gamma model were used in comparisons. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. RESULTS

The relative search volume for the dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures was statistically significantly decreased for 52, 28, and 19 search terms during the first (March 15‐May 9), second (May 10‐July 4), and third (July 5‐October 31) stages of the outbreak compared with similar periods in the preceding 4 years, respectively. On the contrary, there was a statistically significant increase in the relative search volume for 18, 36, and 36 search terms during these periods compared with the previous 4 years, respectively.

The relative search volume was statistically significantly decreased in all three periods for 14 search terms (erythema, angioedema, basal cell carcinoma, skin candida, Demodex, erythema multiforme, melanoma, pityriasis rosea, scabies, skin cancer, tinea, Sklice + Soolantra, temovate + diprolene + dermovate + elocon + taclonex + calcitrene, and elidel). The relative search volume was statistically significantly increased in all three periods for 13 search terms (dandruff, dry skin, hair shedding, hyperpigmentation, oily hair, purple skin, atopic dermatitis, hand eczema, dupixent, ivermectin, tacrolimus ointment, pimecrolimus cream, and skin care).

The relative search volume for 15 search terms (callus, comedones, hair loss, skin irritation, wound, acne, dermatitis, melasma, rosacea, shingles, corticosteroid cream, Botox, Dermaroller, peeling, and skin) was increased significantly during the second and third stage while it was statistically significantly decreased or remained unchanged during the first stage of the outbreak (March 15‐May 9).

Table 1 shows the changes in the relative search volume during three different periods (March 15‐May 9, May 10‐July 4, and July 5‐October 31) in detail.

4. DISCUSSION

The current study found that public interest in dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures has significantly changed during different periods of COVID‐19 pandemic when compared with the corresponding periods in the previous 4 years.

The interest in search terms including basal cell carcinoma, skin cancer, melanoma, erythema multiforme, scabies, pityriasis rosea, demodex, tinea, and skin candida has been decreased throughout the study period. Accordingly, a decreased interest in skin cancer during the COVID‐19 pandemic has also been reported in Italy, Turkey, and the United States. 11 , 14 This might be explained by the decrease in hospital/dermatology visits due to a fear to exposure to SARS‐COV‐2 and the resultant decrease in the diagnosis of these conditions or an increased concern for COVID‐19 rather than the dermatologic conditions. A prolonged diagnostic delay might result in more advanced disease, increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with skin cancers (eg, melanoma, non‐melanoma skin cancer [NMSC; ie, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma]). 16 In fact, a recent report from the United Kingdom has shown a decrease up to 47% in the number of non‐melanoma skin cancer treated and melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsies. 17 Moreover, studies from Italy showed a statistically significant increase in mean Breslow thickness during the post‐lockdown phase compared with the pre‐lockdown and decreased detection of melanoma during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 18 , 19 Another study from the United Kingdom has reported that the NMSCs excised in 2020 required significantly larger and more complex surgery than in 2019. 20 Altogether, these findings suggest an increased delay in the diagnosis of skin cancers, which in turn might result in more advanced disease requiring more complex surgical procedures. Implementation of teledermatology might help, at least partially to overcome these issues and effectively prioritize the patients in whom earlier treatment is needed. 21

Unlike our study suggesting a decreased interest in scabies and pruritus, recent studies have reported an outbreak of scabies in Spain and Turkey. 22 , 23 The increase of scabies was attributed to the increased transmission due to closer contact among family members and delay in diagnosis during the lockdown. This discrepancy could be attributed to the differences in the socioeconomic status of the study populations or merely to the lack of correlation between the incidence of scabies and public interest in these search terms. Considering the increased global burden of scabies, 24 , 25 the future studies investigating the changes in scabies epidemiology during COVID‐19 pandemic would be of benefit to prevent potential scabies outbreaks during the lockdowns in the future.

Another important finding of the present study was the increased interest in dry skin, atopic dermatitis, hand eczema, tacrolimus ointment, pimecrolimus cream, and skin care all through the study period. In line with our findings, a previous study from the United Kingdom has reported a similar trend for hand eczema during the COVID‐19 pandemic. 12 It seems possible that these results are due to more strict hygiene practices, that is, more frequent use of soaps and alcohol‐based hand sanitizers which might lead to the development of contact dermatitis. 26 Indeed, an increased incidence of dermatitis associated with the hygiene practices and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the pandemic has been reported. 27 , 28 Despite the efforts for the prevention of contact dermatitis associated with hygiene practices, 29 there still seems to be room for improvement in community education on safe and effective hygiene practices.

The current study found a continuous increase of interest in dandruff, oily hair, and hair shedding which are most commonly associated with seborrheic dermatitis and telogen effluvium. This result can be well‐expected considering that these conditions might exacerbate in response to elevated levels of psychological stress 30 which is a well‐characterized impact of COVID‐19. 31 The stable increase in the interest for the term “purple skin” is also of interest, despite being foreseeable. Among the various dermatologic manifestations of COVID‐19, pseudochilblain lesions involving acral areas (also described as COVID toes) and livedo‐like lesions might present as purplish discoloration of the skin. 32 Accordingly with our results, an increased public interest in acral lesions (ie, coronavirus toes, coronavirus fingers) has also been demonstrated in a prior study from France. 13

Another finding of this study was the initially decreased interest in “comedones, acne, melasma, rosacea, Botox, Dermaroller, peeling, and skin” followed by an increased interest. The initial decrease of interest may be anticipated as the public interest was more focused on COVID‐19 rather than the dermatologic conditions or cosmetic procedures. There are several possible explanations for the subsequent increase of interest in these terms. First of all, the extended duration of lockdown and stay‐at‐home policies might have caused visible and frequent facial lesions such as acne, rosacea, comedones, and melasma to draw greater attention. Accordingly, a recent report showed an increase in appearance‐focused behaviors (eg, mirror checking, appearance comparisons) in patients with higher dysmorphic concern during the COVID‐19 pandemic due to the closure of beauty services. 33 Moreover, another study reported an association between COVID‐19‐related stress negative body image in adults. 34 The subsequent increase of interest in cosmetic procedures such as botulinum toxin injections, dermaroller, and chemical peeling may also be explained by these findings. Another possible explanation is the exacerbation of acne and rosacea induced by the use of protective masks. 35 Previous studies have reported a similar trend for cosmetic procedures 11 , 12 , 14 but in the United Kingdom there was an increased interest in acne during the initial phases of the pandemic which was attributed to public desire for self‐treatment of acne. 12

Some limitations of the present study need to be acknowledged. First, the results should be interpreted cautiously before extrapolating to the general population because the source of data was confined to the population with access to the internet and Google searches. Nonetheless, the fact that Google's search engine market share of 88% 36 and the internet usage rate among US adults of 90%, 37 enables our study to cover a major segment of the general population. Another limitation is the lack of information on the reasons for the observed trends in the public interest. Future prospective studies are warranted to determine the reasons for the change in interest. Finally, although three experienced dermatologists have discussed and selected the search terms, some of the relevant dermatologic terms might not have been included in the analysis. The key strengths of this study are the analysis of a longer period comprising different stages of pandemic and comparison with the mean interest over the previous for years. Previous similar studies have compared either consecutive periods within a year 12 , 14 or a relatively shorter period during the pandemic with only the previous year. 11 Another strength of our study is the comprehensive list of search terms representing a wide range of dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures.

In conclusion, the study demonstrated a significant impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on the public interest in dermatology. The present results would help to create healthcare policies and information sources, which can meet the public demand. The reasons for the observed trends and their effect on patient outcomes might be of interest for future studies.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Esen‐Salman K, Akın‐Çakıcı Ö, Kardeş S, Salman A. Public interest in dermatologic symptoms, conditions, treatments, and procedures during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Insights from Google Trends. Dermatologic Therapy. 2021;34:e14895. 10.1111/dth.14895

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) Dashboard | WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) Dashboard [Internet]. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed November 26, 2020.
  • 2. Gisondi P, Piaserico S, Conti A, Naldi L. Dermatologists and SARS‐CoV‐2: the impact of the pandemic on daily practice. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:1196‐1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kardeş S, Kuzu AS, Raiker R, et al. Public interest in rheumatic diseases and rheumatologist in the United States during the COVID‐19 pandemic: evidence from Google Trends. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:329‐334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kardeş S, Kuzu AS, Pakhchanian H, et al. Population‐level interest in anti‐rheumatic drugs in the COVID‐19 era: insights from Google Trends. Clin Rheumatol. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Walker A, Hopkins C, Surda P. Use of Google Trends to investigate loss‐of‐smell–related searches during the COVID‐19 outbreak. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10:839‐847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bhambhvani HP, Tijerina JD, Parham MJ, Greenberg DR, Eisenberg ML. Public interest in elective urological procedures in the COVID‐19 pandemic: a Google Trends analysis. Urol Pract. 2020;7:496‐501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dhanda AK, Leverant E, Leshchuk K, Paskhover B. A Google trends analysis of facial plastic surgery interest during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44:1378‐1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Mavragani A, Ochoa G. Google trends in infodemiology and infoveillance: methodology framework. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:1‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Kluger N. Insights into worldwide interest in tattoos using Google Trends. Dermatology. 2019;235:240‐242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bloom R, Amber KT, Hu S, Kirsner R. Google search trends and skin cancer: evaluating the US population's interest in skin cancer and its association with melanoma outcomes. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:903‐905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kutlu Ö. Analysis of dermatologic conditions in Turkey and Italy by using Google trends analysis in the era of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:ee13949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Searle TN, Al‐Niaimi F, Ali FR. Dermatological insights from Google trends: what does the public think is important during COVID‐19 lockdown? Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45:898‐900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kluger N, Scrivener JN. The use of Google Trends for acral symptoms during COVID‐19 outbreak in France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e358‐e360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Guzman AK, Barbieri JS. Analysis of dermatology‐related search engine trends during the COVID‐19 pandemic: implications for patient demand for outpatient services and telehealth. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:963‐965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kluger N. Why are chilblains underreported in Nordic countries during the COVID‐19 pandemic? An analysis of Google trends. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:e100‐e101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gomolin T, Cline A, Handler MZ. The danger of neglecting melanoma during the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31:444‐445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Nolan GS, Dunne JA, Kiely AL, et al. The effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on skin cancer surgery in the United Kingdom: a national, multi‐Centre, prospective cohort study and survey of plastic surgeons. Br J Surg. 2020;107:e598‐e600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ricci F, Fania L, Paradisi A, et al. Delayed melanoma diagnosis in the COVID‐19 era: increased breslow thickness in primary melanomas seen after the COVID‐19 lockdown. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e778‐e779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Villani A, Fabbrocini G, Scalvenzi M. The reduction in the detection of melanoma during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic in a melanoma center of South Italy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Capitelli‐McMahon H, Hurley A, Pinder R, et al. Characterising non‐melanoma skin cancer undergoing surgical management during the COVID‐19 pandemic. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Elsner P. Teledermatology in the times of COVID‐19: a systematic review. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020;18:841‐845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Martínez‐Pallás I, Aldea‐Manrique B, Ramírez‐Lluch M, et al. Scabies outbreak during home confinement due to the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e781‐e783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kutlu Ö, Aktaş H. The explosion in scabies cases during COVID‐19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Karimkhani C, Colombara DV, Drucker AM, et al. The global burden of scabies: a cross‐sectional analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:1247‐1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Thomas C, Coates SJ, Engelman D, Chosidow O, Chang AY. Ectoparasites. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:533‐548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lampel HP, Powell HB. Occupational and hand dermatitis: a practical approach. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:60‐71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Simonsen AB, Ruge IF, Quaade AS, et al. Increased occurrence of hand eczema in young children following the Danish hand hygiene recommendations during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Contact Dermatitis. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Bhatia R, Sindhuja T, Bhatia S, et al. Iatrogenic dermatitis in times of COVID‐19: a pandemic within a pandemic. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:e563‐e566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rundle CW, Presley CL, Militello M, et al. Hand hygiene during COVID‐19: recommendations from the American contact dermatitis society. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1730‐1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Rodriguez‐Vallecillo E, Woodbury‐Fariña MA. Dermatological manifestations of stress in normal and psychiatric populations. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37:625‐651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Taylor S, Landry CA, Paluszek MM, Fergus TA, McKay D, Asmundson GJG. COVID stress syndrome: concept, structure, and correlates. Depress Anxiety. 2020;37:706‐714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Galván Casas C, Català A, Carretero Hernández G, et al. Classification of the cutaneous manifestations of COVID ‐19: a rapid prospective nationwide consensus study in Spain with 375 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183:71‐77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pikoos TD, Buzwell S, Sharp G, Rossell SL. The COVID ‐19 pandemic: psychological and behavioral responses to the shutdown of the beauty industry. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53:1993‐2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Swami V, Horne G, Furnham A. COVID‐19‐related stress and anxiety are associated with negative body image in adults from the United Kingdom. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;170:110426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Giacalone S, Minuti A, Spigariolo CB, et al. Facial dermatoses in the general population due to wearing of personal protective masks during the COVID‐19 pandemic: first observations after lockdown. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46:368‐369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Search Engine Market Share United States Of America | StatCounter Global Stats [Internet]. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share/all/united-states-of-america. Accessed 26 November, 2020
  • 37. Demographics of Internet and Home Broadband Usage in the United States | Pew Research Center [Internet]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/. Accessed 25 November, 2020

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Dermatologic Therapy are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES