Abstract
Nanoparticle-based nucleic acid conjugates (NP-NACs) hold great promise for theragnostic (diagnostic and therapeutic) applications. However, several limitations have hindered the realization of their full potential in the clinical treatment of cancer and other diseases. In diagnosis, NP-NACs, combined with conventional optical sensing systems, have been applied for cancer detection in vitro, but low signal-to-noise ratios limit their broad in vivo applications. Meanwhile, the efficiency of NP-NAC-mediated cancer therapies has been limited through the adaptation of alternative pro-survival pathways in cancer cells. The recent emergence of personalized and precision medicine has outlined the importance of both accurate diagnosis and efficient therapeutics in a single platform. As such, we report the controlled assembly of hybrid graphene oxide/gold nanoparticle-based cancer-specific NACs (Au@GO NP-NACs) for multimodal imaging and combined therapeutics. Our developed Au@GO NP-NACs shows excellent surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-mediated live-cell cancer detection and multimodal synergistic cancer therapy through the use of photothermal, genetic, and chemotherapeutic strategies. Synergistic and selective killing of cancer cells were then demonstrated by using in vitro microfluidic models and nine different cancer cell lines by further incorporating near-infrared photothermal hyperthermia, a Topoisomerase II anti-cancer drug, and cancer targeting peptides. Moreover, with distinctive advantages of the Au@GO NP-NACs for cancer theragnostics, we further demonstrated precision cancer treatment through the detection of cancer cells in vivo using SERS followed by efficient ablation of the tumor. Therefore, our Au@GO NP-NACs could pave a new road for the advanced theragnostics of cancer as well as many other diseases.
Keywords: Graphene hybrid nanomaterials, Nanoparticle-based nucleic acid conjugates, Multimodal cancer theragnostics, Nanomedicine, Personalized medicine
Graphical Abtract
TABLE OF CONTENTS: The effective modulation of tumor microenvironment requires both efficient delivery of anti-cancer therapeutics and robust detection modalities. By incorporating SERS monitoring functions and photothermal-gene therapies, graphene/gold nanoparticle-based nucleic acid conjugates (Au@GO-NAC) were developed by self-assembly, which suppressed growth of 9 cancer cell lines in vitro and efficiently ablated metastatic tumors in vivo, thereby supporting the excellent potential of Au@GO-NACs for next-generation cancer nanomedicine.
INTRODUCTION:
Cancer is considered one of the most complex and aggressive diseases that is dynamically controlled by the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) as well as a multitude of genetic/epigenetic alternations leading to abnormal cell behaviors.[1, 2] Conventional cancer therapeutic approaches have shown limited success against various cancers due to the heterogeneity of the TME and complex oncogenic signaling pathways in cancer.[1, 3] Regarding the current challenges and opportunities in cancer research, nanotheragnostics have been demonstrated as advanced approaches for early cancer diagnosis, accurate cancer prognosis, and effective cancer treatment.[4, 5, 6] Typically, these nanotheragnostic systems are multifunctional nanosystems that can integrate cancer-specificity, imaging, and treatment modalities into nanomaterials for effectively combined cancer therapeutics.[7] For example, the recent development of nanomaterial-based nucleic acid conjugates (NACs) has demonstrated excellent potential as an innovative theragnostic tool for advanced cancer research.[8, 9, 10] Given that the primary goal of personalized medicine is to target the disease-related genetic information about patients, NACs have a clear advantage by having the ability to sense endogenous biomarkers.[11, 12] However, remaining issues include enzymatic degradation and inefficient cellular uptake of NAC therapeutics, which need to be addressed before the full realization of NAC-based cancer therapeutics is achieved.[8, 13, 14] The integration of NACs into multifunctional nanomaterials can overcome the above hurdles.
Among various nanomaterials for constructing nanomaterial-NACs, carbon- (e.g., graphene and carbon nanotube) and noble metal (e.g., gold)-based plasmonic nanomaterials have shown promising results for cancer applications due to their unique physicochemical properties at the nanoscale.[15–17] Graphene oxide (GO) and its derivatives, with amphiphilic surfaces and high surface areas, have been proven as excellent multifunctional delivery platforms for small molecule drugs and nucleic acids.[12, 18, 19] Moreover, efficient binding of single-stranded oligonucleotides onto GO surfaces and their reversible detachment in the presence of complementary DNA/mRNA have enabled selective and sensitive detection of crucial oncogenes in live cancer cells.[19] Meanwhile, plasmonic nanomaterials have been widely utilized for constructing ultrasensitive biosensors as well as developing advanced phototherapies, owing to their unique ability to amplify optical fields non-linearly through localized surface plasmonic resonance (LSPR).[16, 20] Furthermore, some recent studies have reported synergistic therapeutic results between the two (carbon-based and plasmonic) groups of nanomaterials for a variety of biomedical applications.[10, 21, 22] We hypothesized that the combination of unique biological properties from NACs with the excellent physicochemical properties of hybrid graphene oxide (GO)/plasmonic gold (Au) nanoparticles would enable scientists to develop advanced cancer-specific multimodal imaging and combined therapeutics. This task necessitates the innovative design and synthesis of hybrid plasmonic-graphene nanomaterial-based NACs for in vitro and in vivo nanotheragnostic applications.
Herein, we describe a novel strategy for the design, synthesis, and application of multifunctional hybrid graphene oxide/plasmonic gold-based nucleic acid conjugates (Au@GO NP-NACs) for the advancement of precision cancer medicine. Remarkably, we demonstrate the controlled assembly of different graphene/gold hybrid nanostructures and identified Au@GO NP as an ideal platform for constructing the theragnostic NACs. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrated its potential applications for overcoming critical hurdles in precision cancer therapy, such as the identification of effective multimodal therapeutics, site-specific drug/gene delivery, and non-invasive imaging [FIGURE 1a]. Our typical Au@GO NP-NACs has i) a core-shell structure with high colloidal stability and efficient cellular uptake; ii) excellent dark-field cell imaging (DFI) modality; iii) distinctive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) properties for probing oncogenes in a non-destructive manner, and iv) a dual cancer therapeutic platform [photothermal (PT) and chemotherapies] [FIGURE 1b]. Further, cancer imaging and detection are achieved by conjugating Raman dye (Cy5)-labeled nucleic acid [e.g., AntiSense OligoNucleotide (ASON)] that specifically targets oncogenes (BCL2) onto Au@GO NP via π-π stacking (Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC for short). While our system is highly modular and a variety of different oncogenes can be targeted, we focused on BCL2 as a proof-of-concept, as the upregulated pro-survival BCL2 gene has been identified as a cancer hallmark and proven to be a suitable target for cancer diagnosis.
To construct the cancer nanotheragnostic platform based on Au@GO NP-NAC, we further demonstrated the accurate detection of tumor markers followed by the effective suppression of tumor growth, which could address the critical issue of tumor heterogeneity. Using Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC, we can successfully differentiate cancer cells from control cells using SERS [FIGURE 1b]. More specifically, the delivery of an Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC conjugated with Cy5 Raman dye (Au@GO NP-Cy5-BCL2-NAC) into cancer cells resulted in selective binding between ASON and the over-expressed BCL2 mRNAs, leading to the disruption of π-π stacking via duplex formation and the subsequent release of Raman dye (Cy5) molecules as indicated by the reduced SERS signal [FIGURE 1b]. Meanwhile, the targeted oncogene (BCL2) expression was reduced simultaneously. By combining the delivery of clinically approved anti-cancer drugs (e.g., doxorubicin), repression of the drug-resistance gene (BCL2) expression through antisense ASON, and phototherapies in a single platform, a near-complete removal of cancer cells was achieved in vitro and in vivo [FIGURE 1c]. Moreover, a multi cancer cell line (9 different lines with distinctive cancer origins) assay was performed to testify the general applications of our therapeutic platform. Taken together, the successful development of our Au@GO NP-NACs platform could significantly advance cancer theragnostics by providing distinctive cancer detection modalities and effective combinatorial therapies.
Design and synthesis of hybrid graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles (Au@GO NPs) for the specific and efficient delivery of therapeutic modalities to cancer cells
Plasmonic metal-graphene hybrid nanomaterials have shown a wide spectrum of attractive properties for cancer theragnostics, but colloidal instability or bulkiness limits some of them.[23, 24] Also, the physical and biological properties of plasmonic metal-graphene hybrid nanomaterials are highly sensitive to their hybrid structures, requiring a versatile method for precisely controlling the assembly between metal nanoparticles and GO.[17] To this end, we first established an electrostatic self-assembly method to create different plasmonic metal-GO hybrid nanomaterials in a controllable manner, which include core-shell structured GO-encapsulated gold nanoparticles (Au@GO NPs, experimental condition), reduced GO-encapsulated gold nanoparticles (Au@rGO NPs), GO-encapsulated gold nanorods (Au@GO NRs), as well as gold nanoparticle-decorated GO (Au NP-GO assembly) [FIGURE 2a–b, S1-S2]. Specifically, the core-shell hybrid nanostructures were synthesized by the slow addition of positively charged, diluted solution (<100 μg/mL) of gold nanoparticles (+33 mV, ~40 nm, for Au@GO NP and Au@rGO NP) or gold nanorods (+11 mV, 10 nm width and 40 nm length, for Au@GO NR) into concentrated solutions (>3.0 mg/mL) negatively charged GO (−54 mV, 110 nm) with (for Au@rGO NP) or without (for Au@GO NP) reduction by ascorbic acid [FIGURE 2a, S1–S2]. Meanwhile, the Au NP-GO assembly is synthesized by simply reversing the order of reaction by adding diluted GO solution into a concentrated solution of Au NPs [FIGURE 2a]. All these structures show excellent enhancement effect on the electromagnetic field, according to our finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation, which is desired for our following applications in cancer imaging and PT therapies [FIGURE 2a, S2]. However, although rGO, Au NR, and Au NP assemblies have been reported to show stronger photothermal properties than GO and Au NP alone, we found that the Au@rGO NPs and Au NP-GO assembly show poor colloidal stability, likely due to their hydrophobic surfaces and bulkiness, respectively [FIGURE 2c, S3]. Au@GO NRs showed improved colloidal stability, but they were slightly cytotoxic at higher concentrations (100 μg/mL), which could originate from the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) ligands based on previous literature [FIGURE 2d].[25] Considering that our following applications would require several steps of surface modifications, and a mild photothermal effect is sufficient for our purpose of sensitizing cancer cells, we focused on the Au@GO NPs that have excellent colloidal stability, biocompatibility, as well as a proper size range for cellular uptake for the current study.[17, 23]
Moreover, we hypothesized that our synthesized Au@GO NP could incorporate high-contrast imaging of cancer cells with a robust plasmonic effect and achieve high cellular uptake efficiency with a proper size and shape range for endocytosis [FIGURE 3a]. We confirmed our hypothesis by first investigating the plasmonic effect using FDTD simulation, which shows a clearly enhanced light field intensities in the proximity of Au NPs [FIGURE 3b]. The GO encapsulating the Au NP could readily absorb the enhanced light, which is evidenced by the over 3-fold higher absorption at the NIR range of light in the UV-Vis spectrum of Au@GO NP as compared to Au NP or GO alone [FIGURE 3c]. As a result, we observed an exponentially increased D and G band peak intensities of GO in the Raman spectra of Au@GO NP compared to GO alone, an effect known as surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), which is desired for our SERS-based cancer biosensing and imaging applications [FIGURE 3d].[10] Additionally, a high contrast DFI imaging modality was also enabled by the plasmonic core in the Au@GO NP [FIGURE 3e]. Although many fluorescence-based cancer imaging methods have been widely applied for nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems, graphene and GO can quench the fluorescence of conjugated dyes via Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), leading to poor quality of fluorescence imaging.[26, 27] In this regard, Au@GO NP could address this challenge as both DFI and SERS signals are typically sharp and not affected by GO. Utilizing the DFI and SERS, we successfully confirmed the high delivery efficiency of Au@GO NP into cancer cells that are crucial for our therapeutic platform (DFI, FIGURE 3e). Specifically, cancer cells that uptake Au@GO NPs show extremely high contrast and low noise levels, further supporting Au@GO NP as an excellent reagent for non-invasive cancer imaging in vitro, as DFI is compatible with live cell detection. As a control, cells cultured with GO alone did not yield any noticeable DFI signals, thereby supporting the LSPR origin of Au@GO NP-enhanced DFI [FIGURE 3e]. Taken together, our Au@GO NPs exhibited excellent cellular uptake by cancer cells, high biocompatibility with somatic cells, and have distinctive imaging modalities, all of which are desired for cancer theragnostic applications.
Mild photothermal hyperthermia induced by Au@GO NPs for sensitizing cancer cells
Another critical criteria for constructing our cancer therapeutic platform is the capability of Au@GO NP to enhance photothermal (PT) hyperthermia, which has been proven as a robust strategy to improve the outcome of gene therapy and chemotherapy by activating the heat shock protein (HSP) pathway and sensitizing cancer cells towards a pro-apoptotic status in a spatiotemporally controlled manner.[28–30] Specifically, our cancer therapeutic approach is based on the delivery of BCL2 antisense oligonucleotide (BCL2-ASON) and a Topoisomerase II anti-cancer drug (doxorubicin) to synergize with the activation of HSP by mild hyperthermia for suppression of DNA repair mechanisms, as well as activating caspase pathways [FIGURE 1c]. In this regard, we hypothesized that our core-shell Au@GO NP with GO adjacent to plasmonic nanoparticles could be advantageous through amplifying the local light field and enhancing photothermal effects, which has been supported by the FDTD simulation as well as UV-Vis absorption spectrum experiment [FIGURE 3a–c].[22] To directly validate our hypothesis on the enhanced PT hyperthermia from Au@GO NPs, we then performed additional characterization on the NIR laser-induced temperature increase from Au@GO NP compared to its two individual components (Au NP alone and GO alone) [FIGURE 3f]. As shown in FIGURE 3f, at identical concentrations and low NIR laser intensity (1.2 W/cm2), water alone resulted in a negligible temperature increase (ΔT<2 °C), suggesting minimal non-specific heating from the laser. In contrast, the temperature of Au NP and GO solutions increased by 5 °C and 7 °C, respectively, which is consistent with literature reports as both Au NP and graphene nanomaterials are widely used photothermal reagents.[17, 22] However, the Au@GO NP solution showed the highest temperature increase of 15 °C. Therefore, we can conclude that a synergy exists between Au NP and GO for PT hyperthermia induction. Although only mild temperature increase is typically required to sensitize cancer cells, the increased PT effects in Au@GO NP can ensure a better tumor tissue penetration depth for in vivo applications. As such, we validated that Au@GO NP displays synergistically enhanced NIR PT hyperthermia for cancer therapeutic applications.
Next, we sought to investigate whether the Au@GO NP-based NIR PT hyperthermia could sensitize cancer cells by analyzing HSP and caspase gene expression through a quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). First, we verified the capability of NIR PT hyperthermia for cancer sensitization based on a significantly enhanced expression of the HSP gene family found in the NIR exposed group compared to the control (without NIR exposure) group after treating cancer cells with an identical concentration of Au@GO NPs [FIGURE 3g]. Indeed, the upregulated HSP genes have been widely associated with reduced DNA repair in cancer cells and utilized for sensitizing cancer cells towards DNA-intercalating drugs such as doxorubicin.[29, 30] Therefore, Au@GO NPs could potentially lead to in vivo modulation of HSP genes in vivo by simply controlling laser intensities. Additionally, the Caspase 3 gene, a master cancer apoptotic gene, also dramatically (>4-fold) increased in the experimental Au@GO NP combined with NIR condition. Notably, unlike conventional PT-based anti-cancer therapy, our Au@GO NP-based mild PT hyperthermia effectively upregulated Caspase pathways without sacrificing cell viability [FIGURE S4]. However, when higher efficiency of cancer necrosis is needed, Au@GO NP can also induce cancer necrosis at over 90% efficiency by increasing laser intensity or nanoparticle concentration [FIGURE S4]. Considering the efficient PT induction of HSP and Caspase 3 at low laser intensities, Au@GO NP can effectively sensitize cancer cells towards gene and chemotherapies without potential photo-toxicities. Moreover, the spatiotemporally controlled gene regulation by PT hyperthermia can be desired for precise cancer therapy as well.
Sensitive detection and effective suppression of cancer pro-survival gene using Au@GO NP-NACs
The upregulated expression of the pro-survival BCL2 gene has been proven to be a cancer hallmark and suitable target for cancer diagnosis. As such, the unique physical properties (e.g., LSPR) and surface chemistry (e.g., reversible attachment and detachment of ASON) of Au@GO NP make it an excellent bifunctional platform for the monitoring and knockdown of BCL2 [FIGURE 4a].[31, 32, 33] We demonstrated this by taking advantage of a reversible binding phenomenon between the GO and ASON interface. First, we loaded a Raman dye (Cy5)- labeled ASON (Cy5-ASON) onto Au@GO NP (Au@GO NP-Cy5-BCL2-NAC) based on the π-π interactions between ASON and graphene.[10] When in the proximity of the Au NP core, the SERS signal from the dye is strong, due to the LSPR effect. When the target complementary DNA or mRNA (e.g., BCL2 mRNA) is present in a double helix form, and the Cy5-ASON detaches from the surface of Au@GO NP. This leads to a Raman signal reduction [FIGURE 4a]. Accompanying this process, the fluorescence of Cy5 is quenched in the proximity of Au@GO NP due to FRET and recovered when bound to the complementary DNA/mRNA sequence.[19, 26] Based on this mechanism, we first validated the detachment of the dye- conjugated ASON in the presence of complementary DNA/mRNA in a FRET assay [FIGURE 4b].
Next, we sought to investigate the possibility of mRNA detection via SERS by first using a solution-based assay followed by live-cell detection. From our results, as hypothesized, we found that when the dye- conjugated ASON was loaded onto the Au@GO NP, multiple distinctive Cy5 Raman peaks appeared [FIGURE 4c]. As soon as we incubated the Au@GO NP-ASON conjugates with complementary DNA sequences in a buffered solution, all characteristic peaks (e.g., 1120 cm−1, aliphatic C-C vibration mode) of Cy5 diminished, suggesting the feasibility of SERS-based gene detection [FIGURE 4c]. Meanwhile, considering the cellular uptake mechanism could vary among different cell types, we can also use an internal reference peak from GO (G band at 1650 cm−1) to normalize different Au@GO NP-NACs uptake efficiency of various cells, thereby improving the reliability of the Au@GO NP-NAC-based sensing system.
Moreover, we demonstrated SERS-based non-destructive monitoring of cancer cells through a similar mechanism based on a reversible binding of ASON on the surface of Au@GO NP [FIGURE 4d–e]. Specifically, transfecting a cancer cell known to express higher BCL2 mRNAs and a control non-cancerous cell line with the Au@GO NP-Cy5-BCL2-NAC resulted in significantly different SERS spectrums. SERS peaks (1120 cm−1) characteristics of the dye were 3–5 times lower in cancer cells compared to the control cells, suggesting a higher expression level of BCL2 [FIGURE 4d–e]. Conventional gene analysis methods such as qRT-PCR validated the higher BCL2 mRNA expression in cancer cells with similar fold change, suggesting the potential of our Au@GO NP-NAC-based SERS platform for quantitative gene detection.[34] However, quite interestingly, our approach does not require the lysis of cells for analysis, thereby providing live-cell detection. Additionally, since we used a NIR laser during SERS detection, our detection method could also be translated into in vivo systems. Considering the difficulties of non-destructively monitoring gene expression levels in live cells through a non-destructive manner and the significant difference in BCL2 mRNA levels between cancer and non-cancerous cells, our Au@GO NP-NAC-based platform holds great promise in imaging and detecting cancer cells.
Next, we confirmed the suppression of BCL2 mRNAs by Au@GO NP-NAC. Suppression of the overexpressed pro-survival BCL2 gene has been established as a promising treatment for cancer.43 However, many of BCL2 gene therapies have failed clinical trials, which are partially attributed to the inconsistent therapeutic outcome due to poor cellular uptake and enzymatic cleavage of genetic materials (e.g., ASON and siRNA).[31, 33, 35] In this regard, both Au NP and GO have shown the potential to prevent enzymatic cleavage of antisense or siRNAs. Here, our Au@GO NP, with excellent cell transfection efficiency, could provide a unique platform for ASON delivery [FIGURE 4f].[19, 36] We first tested the efficacy of Au@GO NP-NACs for gene regulation based on a GFP knockdown assay using EGFP-labeled cancer cells [FIGURE 4f–g]. We specifically designed the 21mer ASON sequence to bind with EGFP mRNAs and then loaded them onto Au@GO NP (Au@GO NP-GFP-NAC). By quantifying GFP fluorescence levels 48 hours after treatment, we found gene suppression (around 30%) in our experimental group (Au@GO NP-GFP-NAC) compared to the non-treated control. Further, to show the capability for cancer treatment, we delivered Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC into cancer cells and monitored the gene expression using qRT-PCR [FIGURE 4h]. Consistent with the GFP knockdown assay, we reduced BCL2 mRNA by 40% in our experimental (Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC) condition compared to the control (no treatment). Therefore, using protein and gene expression assays, we successfully validated the enhanced delivery of ASONs and the suppression of a pro-survival (BCL2) gene in cancer cells via gene expression and protein assays.
Multi-cancer cell line validation of a target-specific synergistic therapeutic platform
An ideal cancer theragnostic system would allow the detection of cancer cells, followed by the effective suppression of tumors.[5, 6, 37] Considering that gene therapy usually only targets specific pathways, recent evidence has suggested combinatorial treatment can significantly facilitate cancer gene therapy.[13, 33] In this regard, recent reports from our group, as well as many others, have shown synergy between hyperthermia and BCL2 gene downregulation for sensitizing cancer cells towards chemotherapy.[28, 29, 32, 33] Our Au@GO NP-based theragnostic platform is unique, as it not only can provide hyperthermia, BCL2 suppression, and anti-cancer drug delivery in a spatiotemporally controlled manner, but also allows for imaging of cancer cells and monitoring of gene delivery [FIGURE 5]. More specifically, our Au@GO NP was employed to deliver doxorubicin (Au@GO NP-DOX), a topoisomerase II inhibitor anti-cancer drug, in an effort to initiate apoptotic pathways. In response to the doxorubicin, DNA repair mechanisms and anti-apoptotic mechanisms in cancer take action to prevent cell death.[38] To this end, Au@GO NP inhibits this process through overcoming two cancer therapeutic resistance mechanisms by i) inducing NIR-based PT hyperthermia, which stimulates HSP and reduces DNA repair, and ii) inhibiting the overexpressed BCL2 gene and shifting cancer cells towards pro-apoptotic status.[32, 33] Therefore, synergistic induction of cancer apoptosis can be realized in a single platform [FIGURE 5a–b].
First, we verified their synergistic therapeutic effects using a cell apoptosis assay [FIGURE 5c]. Consistent with our previous results, the Au@GO NP-based NIR hyperthermia alone does not induce noticeable cell death, suggesting minimum toxicity from our controlled mild hyperthermia. However, the NIR hyperthermia significantly increased the toxicity of doxorubicin, indicating a robust synergistic effect between anti-cancer drugs and mild hyperthermia. Similarly, the delivery of Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC sensitized cancer cells towards doxorubicin in a concentration-dependent manner. However, most importantly, Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC combined with NIR hyperthermia promoted a significantly higher percentage of cell death compared to the control groups of the ASON alone (Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC-DOX, by around 31%) and NIR hyperthermia alone (Au@GO NP-DOX, by around 17%) at the DOX loading concentration of 10 μg/mL. The result from our optimized condition may originate from the simultaneous suppression of pro-survival BCL2 mRNAs (by ASON delivery) and an increase of pro-apoptotic mRNAs (e.g., Caspase, by NIR hyperthermia), which simultaneously enhance the potency of the delivered anti-cancer drug [FIGURE 5a].
Moreover, considering the high potency of the Au@GO NP-based platform, target-specific delivery would be essential to avoid any side-effect on surrounding non-tumor tissues. For this purpose, iRGD-conjugated lipid ligands were conjugated (iRGD-Au@GO NP) via hydrophobic interactions between a long carbon chain in the lipid and GO surfaces. Many cancer cells overexpress surface integrins, such as αvβ3 and iRGD, which has been established as a useful ligand for selective binding towards these integrins as well as enhancing tumor penetration in vivo.[39] We confirmed the selective delivery of iRGD-Au@GO NP into αvβ3 overexpressing malignant cells (MDA-MB-231) based on higher intracellular DFI signals comparing to a control cell line (MCF7) that does not overexpress the αvβ3 integrin [FIGURE 6a1–a2]. Most importantly, the selective delivery of the iRGD-Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC-DOX combined with PT hyperthermia further resulted in an increased percentage of apoptotic malignant cells [FIGURE 6a3]. Furthermore, not only for the breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231), our iRGD-Au@GO-based therapeutic platform was further tested to be effective across nine different cancer cell lines with distinct origins (liver, pancreas, lung, mammary gland, skin, and brain) in a combinatorial multi-cancer test [FIGURE S5-S6]. Taken together, we established Au@GO NP-based synergistic cancer therapeutic platform for efficient and generalized cancer-killing without introducing significant toxicity in non-tumor tissues, which are of utmost interest in clinical anti-cancer applications.
Additionally, we validated the effects of the Au@GO NP-based therapeutic platform for targeted cancer treatment in a microfluidic model. In the past few decades, many therapeutic strategies that killed cancer cells in vitro have failed in clinical trials due to heterogeneous cancer populations and complex tumor microenvironments in cancer patients.[40] To this end, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of the iRGD-Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC- DOX using a co-culture microfluidic model [FIGURE 6b, FIGURE S7]. More specifically, two cell pairs of high clinical relevance are carefully selected to validate the therapeutic effects of our platform: i) a control cell line (MCF-7) with low-integrin expression and a malignant/metastatic cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) with high integrin expression, and ii) non-cancerous astrocyte cell line and cancerous glioblastoma cell line. Compared to conventional in vitro cancer apoptosis assays, our microfluidic model may better represent the tumor microenvironment by providing: i) a center microchannel composed of photo-crosslinked gelatin-methacrylate hydrogels that mimic tumor vascularization; ii) a proper fluid flow rate that mimics the elution of nanoparticles and drugs in vivo; and iii) spatial patterning of heterogeneous cell populations that represent the heterogeneous structure of tumor tissues. Interestingly, we observed a robust migration of cancer cells through the micro-channels one-week after the establishment of the microfluidic model, indicating potential relevance to cancer invasion and metastasis [FIGURE 5b2, FIGURE S7]. We mimicked intravenous and intratumoral injection of anti-cancer therapeutics by flowing drug-loaded Au@GO NP through the central channel and from the side channels, respectively. Two days after nanoparticle treatment using an intravenous injection model followed by NIR treatment, we quantified cell apoptosis at each channel and found a higher (over 60%) reduction of cell viability and full ablation of migrating cells (MDA-MB-231) in the metastatic cancer cell channel [FIGURE 5b3]. A similar trend was identified in the astrocyte-glioblastoma microfluidic model. In addition, the intratumoral injection model resulted in near 100% ablation of cancer cells (MCF7 and glioblastoma) without significantly reducing the survival of control cells [FIGURE S7]. These phenomena further confirmed the robust therapeutic effect from the Au@GO NP-based platform.
Au@GO NP-NACs for Advanced In Vivo Cancer Cell Imaging and Combined Therapeutics
With distinctive properties of Au@GO NP-NACs demonstrated in vitro, we then further performed an in vivo tumor growth assay to evaluate their theragnostic performance [FIGURE 7a]. Considering the critical challenge of tumor heterogeneity, next-generation precision cancer medicine would require the treatment of cancer to start with detection, followed by the effective killing of cancer cells. While there have been quite a few nanoparticle-based NACs that effectively reduced tumor growth, there is still limited development of single-platform gene detection methods for probing cancer cells in vivo. In this regard, our Au@GO NP-NAC, which can target nucleic acids (e.g., BCL2 mRNA) in cancer and show significant changes in Raman signal, may provide a promising solution. To this end, we performed in vivo SERS on tumor and normal tissues one-day after nanoparticle injection. Consistent with our in vitro experimental results as well as in vivo gene analysis, we found lower SERS signals at tumor sites compared to surrounding tissues, indicating a higher expression of BCL2 in vivo by cancer cells after the injection of Au@GO NP-Cy5-BCL2-NAC [FIGURE 7b–c]. Similar trends were confirmed by Raman mapping as well [FIGURE 7b]. While more detailed analysis would be required to evaluate the reliability of Au@GO NP-based SERS cancer gene detection, our results indicate the feasibility of Au@GO NP-NACs for monitoring cancer cells in vivo. Next, we sought to investigate the anti-cancer therapeutic effects from the iRGD-Au@GO NP-BCL2-NAC-DOX. Consistent with our in vitro anti-cancer assays, our experimental group, which combines PT hyperthermia with gene and chemotherapies in a single platform, almost completely removed the tumor at the end of the in vivo assay (3 weeks) [FIGURE 7d–e]. In contrast, all three control groups showed significantly lower tumor suppression, as quantified by the time-dependent tumor growth volumes. As such, we successfully validated the robust effect of our multifunctional Au@GO NP-based platform.
Additionally, gene analysis of the tumor tissues further revealed consistent mechanisms for cancer-killing, with a significant increase in the expression of apoptotic genes such as BID, BAX, Cyto-C, and Caspase 3 in our experimental group [FIGURE S8]. Also, no signs of toxicity from the conjugates were detected in normal tissues [FIGURE S8]. Taken together, we can conclude that the Au@GO NP-NAC-based treatment has an outstanding performance in tumor ablation with minimal toxic effects on non-cancerous cells both in vitro and in vivo, which are all desired for precision cancer therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
In the past two decades, nanoparticle-based NACs have shown great potential for theragnostic applications towards the treatment of cancer as well as many other diseases, but several limitations hindered their clinical applications. To this end, we developed a novel core-shell Au@GO NP-NACs with distinctive physical (e.g., NIR PT hyperthermia, DFI, SERS, and LSPR), chemical (e.g., reversible binding towards ASON) and biological properties (drug/gene delivery). In the Au@GO NP-NAC, a high contrast DFI modality enables cancer imaging in vitro, and selective detection of an over-expressed cancer gene was successfully achieved by SERS sensing. The suppression of a pro-survival gene, combined with phototherapy and chemotherapy mediated by Au@GO NP-NAC, led to the synergistic induction of cancer apoptosis. The establishment of a cancer co-culture microfluidic model validated the target-specificity of Au@GO NP-NAC, and in vivo tumor growth assays supported its clinical promise of combinatorial treatment of cancer. While many nanoparticles and NACs have been studied for cancer theragnostics, our approach based on Au@GO NP-NACs allows the practical identification and robust killing of 9 different types of cancer cells with distinctive tissue origins in a single platform, which is desired for next-generation precision cancer therapy.
Non-destructive diagnosis and selective modulation of genes have been utilized to facilitate the development of many biomedical fields. Combining gene therapy with phototherapies (e.g., PT hyperthermia) has also shown promise for cancer treatment, regenerative medicine, and neurodegenerative diseases.[5, 41] For this purpose, our Au@GO NP-NAC, as a modular theragnostic platform, holds great potential for a variety of advanced applications. For example, the detection and silencing of miRNAs that regulate cancer metastasis can lead to new devices that facilitate cancer therapies. Similarly, both photothermal treatment and nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery have been considered promising approaches for modulating tumor microenvironments. Also, further enhancement of the distinctive physical properties of Au@GO NP-NAC, such as the LSPR, could improve its overall therapeutic effects. These could be achieved by modulating the shape and components of the plasmonic core nanoparticles. Additionally, developing biodegradable or bio-cleavable versions of Au@GO NP by controlling its composition may also speed up its clinical translation significantly. Moving forward, we expect to establish quantitative and multiplex gene detection for a better understanding of complex diseases.
Taken together, the successful further development of multifunctional Au@GO NP-NAC-based nanotheragnostic platform would pave new roads for next-generation precision medicine, not only for the treatment of but also to accurately diagnose and effectively prognose cancer and other diseases that are complicated by a multitude of genetic/epigenetic alternations.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work is partially supported by NSF (CHE-1429062), the New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord (CSCR17IRG010; CSCR16ERG019), NIH R21 (R21AR071101), and NIH R01 (1R01DC016612, 3R01DC016612-01S1, and 5R01DC016612-02S1).
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from the author.
Contributor Information
Hyeon-Yeol Cho, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 123 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea.
Jeffrey Luo, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 123 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Jong-Min Lee, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea.
Bong Geun Chung, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Woo Choi, Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Sogang University, 35 Baekbeom-ro, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04107, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Bum Lee, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 123 Bevier Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
REFERENCES
- [1].Vishwakarma M, Piddini E, Nature Reviews Cancer 2020, 20, 187; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Hausser J, Alon U, Nature Reviews Cancer 2020, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Jackson HW, Fischer JR, Zanotelli VRT, Ali HR, Mechera R, Soysal SD, Moch H, Muenst S, Varga Z, Weber WP, Bodenmiller B, Nature, 25; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Fox NS, Haider S, Harris AL, Boutros PC, Nat. Commun 2019, 10, 13; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Miao ZH, Huang DD, Wang YC, Li WJ, Fan LN, Wang JG, Ma Y, Zhao QL, Zha ZB, Adv. Funct. Mater, 13; [Google Scholar]; Wang YB, Wu WB, Mao D, Teh C, Wang B, Liu B, Adv. Funct. Mater 2020, 30, 11. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Quintanal-Villalonga Á, Chan JM, Helena AY, Pe’er D, Sawyers CL, Triparna S, Rudin CM, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2020, 1. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Jin Q, Deng YY, Chen XH, Ji J, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 954; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Mu J, Lin J, Huang P, Chen X, Chemical Society Reviews 2018, 47, 5554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC, Nature Reviews Cancer 2017, 17, 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Chan WC, Khademhosseini A, Parak W, Weiss PS, ACS Publications, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Lee D-E, Koo H, Sun I-C, Ryu JH, Kim K, Kwon IC, Chemical Society Reviews 2012, 41, 2656; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Sun Y, Wang YJ, Niu CC, Strohm EM, Zheng YY, Ran HT, Huang RZ, Zhou D, Gong YP, Wang ZG, Wang D, Kolios MC, Adv. Funct. Mater 2020, 30, 1. [Google Scholar]
- [8].Kundu A, Nandi S, Nandi AK, Progress in Materials Science 2017, 88, 136; [Google Scholar]; Thi EP, Mire CE, Lee ACH, Geisbert JB, Zhou JZ, Agans KN, Snead NM, Deer DJ, Barnard TR, Fenton KA, MacLachlan I, Geisbert TW, Nature 2015, 521, 362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Cutler JI, Auyeung E, Mirkin CA, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 1376; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Rabie H, Zhang YX, Pasquale N, Lagos MJ, Batson PE, Lee KB, Adv. Mater 2019, 31, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Yang L, Lee J-H, Rathnam C, Hou Y, Choi J-W, Lee K-B, Nano letters 2019, 19, 8138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Zeggini E, Gloyn AL, Barton AC, Wain LV, Science 2019, 365, 1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Tang LH, Chang HX, Liu Y, Li JH, Adv. Funct. Mater 2012, 22, 3083. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G, Doss CGP, Lee S-S, Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids 2017, 8, 132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Chen G, Wang Y, Xie R, Gong S, Journal of Controlled Release 2017, 259, 105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Panwar N, Soehartono AM, Chan KK, Zeng SW, Xu GX, Qu JL, Coquet P, Yong KT, Chen XY, Chem. Rev 2019, 119, 9559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Giannini V, Fernandez-Dominguez AI, Heck SC, Maier SA, Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 3888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Yin PT, Shah S, Chhowalla M, Lee KB, Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 2483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Yang K, Feng L, Shi X, Liu Z, Chem Soc Rev 2013, 42, 530; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Paul A, Hasan A, Al Kindi H, Gaharwar AK, Rao VTS, Nikkhah M, Shin SR, Krafft D, Dokmeci MR, Shum-Tim D, Khademhosseini A, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 8050; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Hung AH, Holbrook RJ, Rotz MW, Glasscock CJ, Mansukhani ND, MacRenaris KW, Manus LM, Duch MC, Dam KT, Hersam MC, Meade TJ, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10168; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Tu ZX, Donskyi EG, Qiao HS, Zhu ZL, Unger WES, Hackenberger CPR, Chen W, Adeli M, Haag R, Adv. Funct. Mater, 10. [Google Scholar]
- [19].Tang LH, Wang Y, Li JH, Chemical Society Reviews 2015, 44, 6954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Laing S, Jamieson LE, Faulds K, Graham D, Nature Reviews Chemistry 2017, 1, 0060. [Google Scholar]
- [21].Mao S, Lu GH, Yu KH, Bo Z, Chen JH, Adv. Mater 2010, 22, 3521; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Lee JH, Choi HK, Yang L, Chueng STD, Choi JW, Lee KB, Adv. Mater 2018, 30, 8; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Doerr A, Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 578; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Xiong L, Forsythe C, Jung M, McLeod AS, Sunku SS, Shao YM, Ni GX, Sternbach AJ, Liu S, Edgar JH, Mele EJ, Fogler MM, Shvets G, Dean CR, Basov DN, Nat. Commun 2019, 10, 6; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Yin HJ, Tang HJ, Wang D, Gao Y, Tang ZY, ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Lim DK, Barhoumi A, Wylie RG, Reznor G, Langer RS, Kohane DS, Nano Letters 2013, 13, 4075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WC, Annual review of biomedical engineering 2012, 14, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WC, Nano Lett 2006, 6, 662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Huang X, Neretina S, El‐Sayed MA, Adv. Mater 2009, 21, 4880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Lu CH, Yang HH, Zhu CL, Chen X, Chen GN, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2009, 48, 4785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Zhang C, Yuan Y, Zhang S, Wang Y, Liu Z, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2011, 50, 6851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Setroikromo R, Wierenga P, Van Waarde M, Brunsting J, Vellenga E, Kampinga H, Cell stress & chaperones 2007, 12, 320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Yin PT, Shah BP, Lee KB, Small 2014, 10, 4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Wust P, Hildebrandt B, Sreenivasa G, Rau B, Gellermann J, Riess H, Felix R, Schlag PM, Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3, 487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Sun WT, Chen XY, Xie C, Wang Y, Lin LT, Zhu KS, Shuai XT, Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 2248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Thomadaki H, Scorilas A, Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci 2006, 43, 1; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Chen AM, Zhang M, Wei DG, Stueber D, Taratula O, Minko T, He HX, Small 2009, 5, 2673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Jansen B, Wacheck V, Heere-Ress E, Schlagbauer-Wadl H, Hoeller C, Lucas T, Hoermann M, Hollenstein U, Wolff K, Pehamberger H, Lancet 2000, 356, 1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Jansen B, Wacheck V, Heere-Ress E, Schlagbauer-Wadl H, Hoeller C, Lucas T, Hoermann M, Hollenstein U, Wolff K, Pehamberger H, The Lancet 2000, 356, 1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Frenzel A, Grespi F, Chmelewskij W, Villunger A, Apoptosis 2009, 14, 584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Pan W, Liu B, Gao X, Yu Z, Liu X, Li N, Tang B, Nanoscale 2018, 10, 14264; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Lu C-H, Zhu C-L, Li J, Liu J-J, Chen X, Yang H-H, Chemical Communications 2010, 46, 3116; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Lin L-S, Cong Z-X, Cao J-B, Ke K-M, Peng Q-L, Gao J, Yang H-H, Liu G, Chen X, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Chen C, Zhou S, Cai Y, Tang F, npj Precision Oncology 2017, 1, 37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Abdullah LN, Chow EK-H, Clinical and translational medicine 2013, 2, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Greenwald DR, Ruoslahti E, Science 2010, 328, 1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Sung KE, Beebe DJ, Advanced drug delivery reviews 2014, 79, 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Li M, Yang X, Ren J, Qu K, Qu X, Adv. Mater 2012, 24, 1722; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Donde A, Wong PC, Chen LL, Current gene therapy 2017, 17, 187; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Smith RA, Miller TM, Yamanaka K, Monia BP, Condon TP, Hung G, Lobsiger CS, Ward CM, McAlonis-Downes M, Wei H, The Journal of clinical investigation 2006, 116, 2290; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Srikanth M, Kessler JA, Nature Reviews Neurology 2012, 8, 307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.