Skip to main content
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica logoLink to Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
. 2000 Mar 1;41(1):63–77. doi: 10.1186/BF03549656

Factors Prior to Dry Period Associated with High and Low Levels of Cow Milk Somatic Cell Counts in Next Lactation

Faktorer for tørrperioden assosiert med høyt eller lavt nivå av kucelletall i påfølgende laktasjon.

O Østerås 1,, V L Edge 2
PMCID: PMC7996417  PMID: 10920477

Abstract

Østerås O, and Edge VL: Factors prior to dry period associated with high and low levels of cow milk somatic cell counts in next lactation. Acta vet. scand. 2000, 41, 63–77. – Data from a randomized controlled field study of selective dry cow therapy were used in which 686 cows had been allocated to 2 control groups (sampling only or placebo) or 2 therapy groups. Possible factors from previous lactation were assessed in determining their association with the probability of ‘failure’, designated as a cow milk somatic cell count (CMSCC) of greater than 399000 per ml in geometric mean of several measurements during subsequent lactation. Success cows were those with a CMSCC of less than 200000 per ml. For our analyses, this targeted 187 success cows and 186 failure cows. Therapy was given as a total dose of 400000 IU penicillin and 100 mg neomycin per infected quarter as dry cow preparation once, or as a lactation formula with a total dose of 1.2 million IU penicillin and 1200 mg dihydrostreptomycin per infected quarter during a 1-week period. Significant factors in the predictive model for success included therapy, low level of CMSCC (geometric mean of the 3 last tests) in previous lactation, low level of CMSCC (weighted by daily milk yield mean) in the herd, young cows, and not having had a case of treatment for chronic clinical mastitis. Additional information on the probability of failure in treated and untreated cows can be predicted by number of quarters infected with Staphylococcus aureus approximately 1.5 months before drying off. The models derived are considered for use as tools in selective treatment and culling decisions.

key word: Mastitis, SCC, Staphylococcus aureus, culling decision, selective dry cow therapy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

References

  1. Cascals JB: Diagnostic tablets and MIC Agar Diffusion, 1st ed. A/S Rosco, Denmark.
  2. De Europœiske Fællesskabers Tidende, 1992: Rådets direktiv 92/46/EØF) af 16. Juni 1992 om sunnhedsbestemmelser for produktion og afsætning af rå mælk, varmebehandlet mælk og mælkebaserede produkter. 1993.
  3. Dohoo IR, Leslie KE. Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intra mammary infections. Prev. Vet. Med. 1991;10:225–237. [Google Scholar]
  4. International Dairy Federation: Recommendation for presentation of mastitis related data. Part I: Somatic cell count, Part II: Records of clinical mastitis. No 321. IDF, Square Vergote 41, Brussels. 1997.
  5. Klastrup O, Madsen PS. Nordic recommendations in mastitis investigations of quarter samples. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1974;26:197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Landbruksdepartementet: Forskrifter om bedømmelse og betaling av leverandørmelk etter kvalitet. Landbruksdepartmentet forskrift av 16.oktober 1996.
  7. Østerås O, Sandvik L, Aursjø J, Gjul GG, Jørstad A. Assessment of strategy in selective dry cow therapy for mastitis control. J. Vet. Med. B. 1991;38:513–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1991.tb00905.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Østerås O, Sandvik L, Aursjø J, Gjul GG, Jørstad A. Effect of dry cow therapy on subclinical mastitis - an evaluation of long-acting and short-acting injectors. J. Vet. Med. B. 1994;41:529–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1994.tb00260.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Østerås O, Sandvik L. Effects of selective dry cow therapy on culling rate, clinical mastitis, milk yield and cow somatic cell count. A randomized clinical field study in cows. J. Vet. Med. B. 1996;43:555–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1996.tb00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Østerås O, Martin SW, Edge VL. Determinants of success or failure in the elimination of major mastitis pathogens in selective dry cow therapy. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:1221–1231. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75345-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Østerås O, Edge VL, Martin SW. Possible risk factors associated with penicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine subclinical mastitis in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:927–938. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75311-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. SAS Institute Inc.: SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers, Version 6 edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 1987.
  13. SAS Institute Inc.: Changes and Enhancements for Version 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 1991.
  14. Schalm OW, Caroll EJ, Jain NC: Bovine mastitis. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia. 1971, 360 pp.
  15. Sol J, Sampimon OC, Snoep JJ, Schukken YH. Factors associated with bacteriological cure after dry cow treatment of subclinical Staphylococcal mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1994;77:75–79. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76930-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Solbu H. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle. I: Disease incidences and non-genetic effects on mastitis, ketosis and milk fever. Z. Tierrzuchtg. Zuchtsbiol. 1983;100:139–157. [Google Scholar]
  17. Walter S. Coding ordinal independent variables in multiple regression analyses. Am. J. Epidem. 1987;125:319–323. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES