Abstract
In pancreatic islets, catabolism of tryptophan into serotonin and serotonin receptor 2B (HTR2B) activation is crucial for β-cell proliferation and maternal glucose regulation during pregnancy. Factors that reduce serotonin synthesis and perturb HTR2B signaling are associated with decreased β-cell number, impaired insulin secretion, and gestational glucose intolerance in mice. Albeit the tryptophan-serotonin pathway is dependent on vitamin B6 bioavailability, how vitamin B6 deficiency impacts β-cell proliferation during pregnancy has not been investigated. In this study, we created a vitamin B6 deficient mouse model and investigated how gestational deficiency influences maternal glucose tolerance. Our studies show that gestational vitamin B6 deficiency decreases serotonin levels in maternal pancreatic islets and reduces β-cell proliferation in an HTR2B-dependent manner. These changes were associated with glucose intolerance and insulin resistance, however insulin secretion remained intact. Our findings suggest that vitamin B6 deficiency-induced gestational glucose intolerance involves additional mechanisms that are complex and insulin independent.
Subject terms: Disease model, Mechanisms of disease
Fields et al. investigate the impact of vitamin B6 deficiency on islet β-cell proliferation during pregnancy, using vitamin B6-deficient mice. They find that gestational vitamin B6 deficiency decreases serotonin levels in pancreatic islets and reduces β-cell proliferation, showing that vitamin B6 deficiency regulates maternal glucose tolerance in a serotonin-dependent manner.
Introduction
Normal pregnancy is associated with increased maternal glucose production and decreased insulin sensitivity to accommodate the energy need of the fetus; as such, pregnancy is associated with a persistent state of maternal insulin resistance1,2. The metabolic adaptations during pregnancy call for an increased demand for maternal insulin, which places stress on the pancreatic β-cells. To secrete sufficient levels of insulin during pregnancy, β-cells proliferate and increase in mass to fulfill the expanding maternal insulin demand and to prevent hyperglycemia2–6. Failed β-cell proliferation has been linked to maternal insulin insufficiency and hyperglycemia, and subsequently to the development of gestational diabetes in mice7–9.
In 2010, German and coworkers reported that tryptophan-serotonin catabolism, a vitamin B6-dependent pathway, was highly upregulated in the pancreatic islets during pregnancy9–11. Dietary tryptophan restriction and genetic manipulation to this pathway reduced maternal islet serotonin levels and decreased maternal β-cell proliferation, ultimately leading to gestational diabetes in mice9. The role of vitamin B6 deficiency, however, has not been investigated. Although studies suggest that vitamin B6 deficiency in humans increases the risk for gestational glucose intolerance12–14 and that vitamin B6 supplementation improves glucose tolerance during pregnancy13,15, the causative link between vitamin B6 status during pregnancy and maternal glucose homeostasis, as well as the role of tryptophan-serotonin catabolism in vitamin B6 deficiency-associated state of glucose tolerance, has not been experimentally validated.
In this study, we hypothesized that maternal vitamin B6 deficiency perturbs the catabolism of tryptophan in the pancreatic islets and induces gestational diabetes. We investigated how gestational vitamin B6 deficiency influenced glucose homeostasis in pregnant mice and tested the impact of deficiency on serotonin levels in pancreatic islets. Results of this study provide new insights into the role of vitamin B6 on pancreatic islet physiology during pregnancy.
Results
Vitamin B6 deficiency induces glucose intolerance during pregnancy
To determine whether vitamin B6 deficiency alters maternal glucose homeostasis, we induced vitamin B6 deficiency during pregnancy by feeding C57BL6/J female mice control or vitamin B6-deficient diet 3 weeks prior to pregnancy, and during mating and pregnancy. Liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) analysis of maternal liver showed that pregnant mice from vitamin B6 deficiency group had decreased vitamin B6 level as measured by the increased ratio of kynurenine and kynurenic acid relative to controls at gestational day (GD) 12.5 and 16.5 (p = 0.05 and 0.0084, respectively; Supplemental Fig. 1a, b). Vitamin B6 deficiency did not significantly influence maternal body weight throughout gestation (Fig. 1a, Supplemental Table 1). In addition, we observed similar dietary intake between control and vitamin B6 deficiency dams throughout pregnancy (Supplemental Table 2).
To test whether vitamin B6 deficiency altered maternal glucose tolerance during pregnancy, we measured glucose levels after a 6 h fast and, subsequently, performed glucose tolerance testing (GTT) in pregnant mice at various gestational timepoints (i.e., GD 9.5, 12.5, and 16.5). At GD 9.5 fasting glucose levels were similar between treatment groups; at GD 12.5 and 16.5, however, maternal fasting glucose was elevated relative to controls (Fig. 1B). Analysis of glucose area under the curve (AUC) revealed that vitamin B6-deficient dams had higher total glucose levels compared to control at all gestational timepoints (i.e., GD 9.5, 12.5, and 16.5; Fig. 1F). Furthermore, glucose levels in vitamin B6-deficient dams were higher at T = 15 and 30 (GD 12.5; Fig. 1D) and T = 30 (GD 16.5; Fig. 1E) while we did not observe specific timepoints that drove the increased glucose AUC in GD 9.5 dams (Fig. 1C). Combined analysis of fasting glucose and glucose time graphs suggest that the glucose intolerance in our vitamin B6-deficient mice starts around mid-gestation and worsens at the latter timepoints.
Gestational diabetes is defined as the onset of transient diabetes during pregnancy, thus, it is a pregnancy-specific condition16. To determine if the effects of vitamin B6 deficiency on maternal fasting glucose levels and glucose tolerance were pregnancy-specific, we performed similar tests in mice prior to pregnancy (i.e., non-pregnant) and at 3 weeks after delivery (i.e., postpartum). We found that vitamin B6 deficiency did not impact fasting glucose (Fig. 1B) or glucose tolerance (Fig. 1F) in non-pregnant or postpartum mice, and the glucose time course graphs were similar between the control and vitamin B6-deficient groups (Supplemental Fig. 2a, b). In addition, we did not observe the effects of vitamin B6-deficient diet on body weight and food consumption (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, respectively) in non-pregnant mice. Our studies demonstrate that vitamin B6 deficiency-induced hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance are pregnancy-specific.
Vitamin B6 deficiency is associated with impaired insulin sensitivity
Glucose intolerance typically arises due to β-cell dysfunction17–19 or peripheral insulin resistance20. To uncover the underlying mechanism of vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance, we performed in vivo glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). Our data revealed that fasting insulin levels and insulin secretion were similar between control and vitamin B6-deficient dams at GD 12.5 (Fig. 2A) and 16.5 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that vitamin B6 deficiency did not impair insulin secretion. In fact, GD 12.5 dams had a significantly steeper slope (Fig. 2A), suggesting that more insulin was secreted over time relative to controls.
We next tested whether insulin resistance was the underpinning mechanism of vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance by performing insulin tolerance testing (ITT) in GD 12.5 and 16.5 dams. We observed that the insulin bolus was less effective at reducing glucose levels in vitamin B6-deficient dam compared to controls at GD 12.5 (p = 0.0459; Fig. 2B). At GD 16.5, however, vitamin B6-deficient dams had a normal, if not better, response, to the insulin challenge compared to controls at 30 and 120 min post insulin administration (p = 0.0145 and 0.0207, respectively; Fig. 2D). Overall, our results suggest that the vitamin B6-deficient dams are insulin resistant at GD 12.5, however, as pregnancy progresses, insulin sensitivity increases in vitamin B6-deficient dams.
Vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance is associated with reduced maternal serotonin levels
Michael German and colleagues demonstrated that reduced islet maternal serotonin during pregnancy is linked to gestational diabetes in mice9. Because vitamin B6 is a critical co-factor for serotonin synthesis (Supplemental Fig. 3), we asked whether its deficiency during pregnancy was linked to reduced islet-specific serotonin levels by using immunofluorescent co-staining of serotonin and insulin in GD 12.5 pancreases. Our studies revealed that serotonin co-localized with insulin, which defines pancreatic islets, but its staining was absent in the surrounding exocrine tissue; these results demonstrate that serotonin localization was specific to the islets (Fig. 3A). More importantly, serotonin immunostaining intensity in the pancreatic islets from vitamin B6-deficient dams was significantly reduced relative to controls (p = 0.035; Fig. 3B). To validate these observations, we used LC-HRMS to biochemically measure levels of metabolites in the tryptophan-serotonin catabolism pathway including serotonin, tryptophan, and pyridoxal 5′ phosphate (PLP) in pancreatic islets from control and vitamin B6-deficient GD 12.5 dams. Consistent with our immunostaining data, the LC-HRMS showed that vitamin B6-deficient dams had significantly decreased islet serotonin at GD 12.5 (p = 0.0461; Fig. 3C). In addition, tryptophan levels were significantly reduced in the pancreatic islets from vitamin B6-deficient dams (p = 0.0480; Supplemental Fig. 4a). Consistent with our expectation, islets from GD 12.5 vitamin B6-deficient dams had significantly lower levels of PLP relative to controls (p = 0.025; Supplemental Fig. 4b).
Because our mouse model is a systemic dietary restriction of vitamin B6, we also investigated if the diet produced global decrease in maternal serotonin. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis revealed that maternal serum serotonin levels were lower in vitamin B6-deficient dams relative to controls at GD 16.5 (p = 0.033; Fig. 3E), but not at 12.5 (Fig. 3D). These results suggest that islet-specific reduction of serotonin due to vitamin B6 deficiency occurs earlier than its systemic reduction in our mouse model.
Vitamin B6-deficient pregnant mice have reduced β-cell proliferation
Previous studies reveal that high levels of serotonin upregulate β-cell proliferation and increase β-cell mass during pregnancy9. To determine if reduced islet serotonin impaired β-cell proliferation and mass in our vitamin B6-deficient pregnant mice, we collected maternal pancreases at GD 12.5, which was the peak of β-cell proliferation during gestation9, and subsequently performed immunofluorescence using the insulin and MCM-2 antibodies that marked proliferating β-cells. Despite having similar pancreatic wet weight (Supplemental Fig. 5a), vitamin B6-deficient mice had significantly reduced proliferating β-cells compared to controls (4.831% ± 1.097 vs 10.93% ± 0.7744, respectively; p = 0.0017; VB6D + PBS vs Control + PBS panels in Fig. 4A and in the PBS group in Fig. 4B). Our results show that reduced islet serotonin in vitamin B6-deficient pregnant mice was linked to decreased maternal β-cell proliferation. Reduced β-cell proliferation in GD12.5 vitamin B6-deficient mice, however, was not associated with decreased β-cell mass as no significant difference was detected (Supplemental Fig. 5b), nor we observed changes in islet morphology (Supplemental Fig. 5c–e). As β-cell mass in mouse pregnancy reaches its highest ~4 days after the peak of proliferation5, we collected pancreases from GD 16.5 mice and compared β-cell mass in vitamin B6-deficient and control groups. At GD 16.5, there was a trend in decreased β-cell mass (p = 0.0726) in vitamin B6-deficient dams relative to controls (Supplemental Fig. 5f).
Vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance is serotonin receptor 2B (HTR2B) mediated
Because our vitamin B6-deficient dams had decreased islet serotonin levels and reduced β-cell proliferation, we hypothesized that the vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance was mediated through disrupted serotonin signaling. Activation of the HTR2B, a G-protein coupled receptor that utilizes serotonin as a ligand21,22, promotes β-cell proliferation during pregnancy9. Consistent with its function, Htr2b knock-out (KO) mice develop glucose intolerance only during pregnancy9. We hypothesized that the glucose intolerance in our vitamin B6-deficient mice was causatively associated with perturbed HTR2B signaling and that treatment with an HTR2B agonist would promote β-cell proliferation, ultimately improving glucose tolerance.
To determine whether treatment with an HTR2B agonist increases β-cell proliferation, we injected control and vitamin B6-deficient dams with BW-723C86 starting from GD 9.5 to 12.5, the critical window for HTR2B-dependent induction of β-cell proliferation9, and quantified β-cell proliferation at GD 12.5. As expected, vitamin B6-deficient mice treated with the HTR2B agonist had significantly increased β-cell proliferation compared to the PBS-treated dams (15.02% ± 0.3567 vs 4.831% ± 1.097, respectively, p = <0.0001, gray bars in Fig. 4B; VB6D + Agonist vs VB6D + PBS in Fig. 4A). Control dams treated with the agonist had a slight increase in β-cell proliferation compared to their respective PBS-treated controls (13.31% ± 0.4738 vs 10.93% ± 0.7744, respectively, p = 0.1771, black bars in Fig. 4B; Control + Agonist vs Control + PBS in Fig. 4A), however, this was not statistically significant.
We next investigated whether the increased β-cell proliferation in the HTR2B agonist-treated vitamin B6-deficient mice improved glucose tolerance. We injected control and vitamin B6-deficient dams with either PBS or BW-723C86 from GD 9.5 to 12.5 and performed GTT at GD 12.5 or 4 days later at 16.5. Our data revealed that the HTR2B agonist treatment did not influence GD 12.5 and 16.5 maternal weight (Supplemental Figs. 6a and 7a) or fasting glucose (Supplemental Figs. 6b and 7b) in control and vitamin B6-deficient dams compared to the PBS treatment groups. Consistent with our previous observation that vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance during pregnancy (Fig. 1F), in the PBS group, vitamin B6-deficient dams had significantly increased glucose AUC relative to controls at GD 12.5 (p = 0.0186; Supplemental Fig. 6d) and 16.5 (p = 0.0313; Fig. 4C). Upon HTR2B agonist treatment, GD12.5 vitamin B6-deficient dams remained glucose intolerant compared to agonist-treated controls dams (p = 0.0290; the agonist group in Supplemental Fig. 6d and triangle symbol in Supplemental Fig. 6c). In contrast, at GD 16.5, the HTR2B agonist treatment ameliorated the glucose-intolerant phenotype in vitamin B6-deficient mice compared to PBS-treated vitamin B6-deficient dams (p = 0.0185; gray bars in Fig. 4C and gray time graphs in Supplemental Fig. 7c). Collectively, our results demonstrate that vitamin B6 deficiency-induced glucose intolerance is mediated through HTR2B-dependent disruption of serotonin signaling, and intervention with an HTR2B agonist restores β-cell proliferation at GD 12.5, but the improvement in glucose tolerance is not observed until GD 16.5.
Discussion
The goal of the current study is to elucidate a previously unknown role of vitamin B6 in the tryptophan-serotonin catabolism pathway in the pancreatic islets, specifically during β-cell proliferation in pregnancy. Our laboratory is the first to experimentally demonstrate that vitamin B6 deficiency during pregnancy is associated with hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance. Although pregnancy itself induces a “physiological state of glucose intolerance”23,24, our studies show that vitamin B6 deficiency exacerbates gestational glucose intolerance. Mechanistically, these metabolic phenotypes are associated with reduced serotonin levels in maternal pancreatic islets and decreased β-cell proliferation. Interestingly, treating vitamin B6-deficient dams with an HTR2B agonist increased β-cell proliferation and improved gestational glucose intolerance, suggesting that vitamin B6-induced glucose intolerance is causatively linked to HTR2B activation. Previous work demonstrated a role for HTR2B-mediated serotonin signaling in regulating maternal glucose homeostasis in mice9. Although pharmacological inhibition of the HTR2B receptor has been previously shown to induce gestational diabetes in pregnant mice9, our study is the first to use an HTR2B agonist to increase β-cell proliferation and improve glucose tolerance during pregnancy. Furthermore, our results show that islet serotonin levels are decreased while the peripheral serotonin remains unaltered at GD 12.5 of pregnancy. Decreased islet serotonin was associated with reduced levels of PLP, the essential co-factor for its synthesis. Although we did not measure expression and activities of tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1), the first and rating-limiting enzyme in the tryptophan-serotonin catabolism pathway, our LC-HRMS metabolite analyses revealed that tryptophan was catabolized properly, if not higher, in the islets of the vitamin B6-deficient mice (Supplemental Fig. 4a), suggesting that the enzymatic activity of TPH1 was not impaired. An interpretation of these results is that the reduced islet serotonin originates downstream of the TPH1 activity, for example from alteration in the PLP-dependent conversion of 5-hydroxytryptophan into serotonin (Supplemental Fig. 3). In sum, our findings are consistent with previous studies showing that modulators of tryptophan-serotonin catabolism influence an individual’s risk of developing gestational diabetes1,25 and provides novel experimental evidence that vitamin B6 deficiency during pregnancy is a potential risk factor for gestational diabetes.
Glucose intolerance can arise from impaired β-cell insulin secretion17–19 or insulin resistance20. Our studies revealed that the vitamin B6-deficient dams had normal β-cell insulin secretion (Fig. 2A, C), suggesting that the residual β-cells secrete sufficient levels of insulin although it may be less effective in clearing glucose from the blood stream. At GD 12.5, we observed our vitamin B6-deficient mice were insulin resistant; interestingly, at GD 16.5, however, the dams had a heightened insulin-mediated glucose response when given a relatively low dose (0.5 U/kg*body weight) of insulin (Fig. 2D). These observations suggest that the glucose intolerance in our vitamin B6-deficient mice is truly complex and that both insulin resistance and other insulin-independent mechanisms contribute to the phenotype. Potential insulin-independent mechanisms include alterations in glucose uptake due to differences in activities of the glucose transporters GLUT426 and GLUT127, as well as impaired “glucose effectiveness” which refers to the ability of glucose to promote self-uptake and suppress its own production28–30. Furthermore, the increased insulin sensitivity in the GD16.5 vitamin B6-deficient mice may indicate an abnormal brain-related glucose counterregulatory mechanism that is necessary for restoring euglycemia31. Future studies should focus on these additional mechanisms through detailed investigations on glucose transporters, glucose effectiveness by utilizing advanced methods such as intravenous GTT32 and/or hyperglycemic clamp33, as well as various counterregulatory factors including glucagon, epinephrine, and cortisol34.
Our work established that vitamin B6 deficiency induces hyperglycemia during pregnancy at GD 12.5 and 16.5 (Fig. 1B). Although our control dams have higher fasting glucose values compared to other studies1,9,35,36, they are within the expected range reported after a 6 h fast in mice37. Factors that influence fasting glucose levels in mice include the measurement method (i.e., glucometer vs enzymatic assay38), type of glucometer (i.e., human vs animal38,39), fasting duration (i.e., 6 h vs overnight38,40), strain/substrain37,38, and repeated stress41,42. PBS injected GD 12.5 and 16.5 control dams in the agonist studies (Supplemental Figs. 6b and 7b) indeed had elevated fasting glucose relative to non-injected controls (Fig. 1B) which may reflect daily injection-induced stress.
As part of this study, we created a novel mouse model of gestational diabetes through the generation of mice that are vitamin B6-deficient through dietary restriction of pyridoxine HCl. Although we have not metabolically characterized the long term, post-pregnancy impact of vitamin B6 deficiency in our mice, our mouse model provides complementary insights into the various mechanisms underlying gestational diabetes in humans. The other mouse models of gestational diabetes include the streptopzocin (STZ)-treated43–46 and db−/+47–49 mice which have both strengths and limitations. The STZ-treatment induces glucose intolerance through chemical destruction of β-cells43–46 which represents a distinct mechanism compared to our mouse model. Another difference is that the STZ-induced glucose intolerance is not specific to pregnancy50. The db−/+ model of gestational diabetes, on the other hand, has similarities to our model including glucose intolerance that develops mid-gestation47–49, however, the phenotype is induced by genetic deletion of the leptin receptor, a different pathoetiology relative to our model. To our knowledge, our vitamin B6-deficient mouse model is one of the first nutritional mouse models of gestational diabetes that disrupts serotonin signaling needed for β-cell proliferation and leads to glucose intolerance in a partially HTR2B-dependent manner. As vitamin B6 deficiency is the leading nutrient deficiency in the United States, our mouse model provides a potentially useful tool to investigate novel mechanisms underlying gestational diabetes that are relevant to humans.
Although our vitamin B6 deficiency mice were generated with human-relevant levels in mind, it is important to note that the causes of vitamin B6 deficiency in developed countries such as the United States are unlikely to be solely dietary-derived, since most Westernized diets are enriched with vitamin B651,52. Genetic variants in the ALPL gene, for example, can highly influence vitamin B6 status53–55 as this enzyme converts vitamin B6 into a membrane soluble isoform, allowing this micronutrient to reach target tissues and cells55,56. Furthermore, levels of estrogens, derived from oral contraceptive57,58 as well as endogenous sex hormone59, could also influence vitamin B6 status suggesting that factors that modulate estrogen levels could play a role in impacting vitamin B6 status. The data presented in this current manuscript are proof of principle evidence showing that altered vitamin B6 status during pregnancy is causatively linked to gestational diabetes. Our work provides the rationale to further study how genetic and environmental factors that disrupt vitamin B6 bioavailability may impact maternal glucose homeostasis during pregnancy.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that adequate levels of vitamin B6 during pregnancy support a healthy state of maternal glucose metabolism. Future studies should focus on understanding how factors that can potentially perturb vitamin B6 bioavailability during pregnancy may modulate the tryptophan-serotonin pathway and impact maternal glucose homeostasis.
Methods
Mouse information
Six-to-eight-week-old virgin female C57BL/6J (JAX) mice were fed either a control (6 mg/kg pyridoxine hydrochloride or HCl; TD. 150561; Envigo, Madison) or vitamin B6-deficient (0.5 mg/kg pyridoxine HCl; TD. 160738; Envigo, Madison) diet, 3 weeks prior to mating, during mating, and throughout pregnancy. Vitamin B6 content in our control diet was comparable to standard laboratory mouse chows60. To minimize potential confounding effects from phytoestrogens, the control and vitamin B6-deficient diets were corn- instead of soy-based. In addition, to ensure no additional vitamin B6 is present, the diets used vitamin-free casein. The assigned dietary treatments continued until the experimental endpoints (i.e., GD 9.5, 12.5, or 16.5) as stated below. Details on diet composition are provided in Supplemental Table 3. Mice were housed in XJ microisolator cages (Allentown) with 1/8″ pelleted cellulose performance bedding (BioFresh) in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle room (i.e., lights on 6:00 am; lights off 6:00 pm) at 74 °F. All mouse work was carried out with the approval of the University Committee on Animal Resources of the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry.
Creation of the vitamin B6-deficient mouse model
We designed the vitamin B6-deficient diet based on a previous study that characterized the association between varying levels of pyridoxine HCl (a common dietary isoform of vitamin B6) in the diet and the circulating plasma levels of pyridoxal 5′ phosphate or PLP (the bioactive and most common isoform in blood) in non-pregnant mice61. We extrapolated these data to design a diet with a concentration of pyridoxine HCl (i.e., 0.5 mg/kg) that would result in plasma level of <20 nmol/L PLP (Supplemental Fig. 8), the threshold for vitamin B6 deficiency in humans62. The vitamin B6-deficient diet used in the current study is predicted to produce plasma PLP levels of 18.5 nmol/L.
Indirect measurement of vitamin B6 status
Kynurenine aminotransferase, the enzyme that converts kynurenine to kynurenic acid (Supplemental Fig. 3), is vitamin B6-dependent, as such the ratio of kynurenine to kynurenic acid has been used as an indirect measurement of vitamin B6 status63. To determine if dams fed the vitamin B6-deficient diet had low vitamin B6 status, we used LC-HRMS to compare the relative levels of kynurenine and kynurenic acid in GD 12.5 and 16.5 maternal livers from control and vitamin B6-deficient dams.
Frozen livers were cut on a tile kept on dry ice to 10–30 mg aliquots and weighed on an analytical balance. Tissues were then added to 0.2 mL 80% cold PBS spiked with 1 µg of each internal standard ([13C11]-tryptophan and [13C4]-kynurenine, 20 µL of 50 ng/µL in water, both from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories). Subsequently, all samples were homogenized using a Bullet Blender 24AU (Model BB24-AU) for 5 min at power 12 at 4 °C. Following homogenization, the samples were incubated on ice for 20 min to allow for metabolites extraction from tissues into the methanol solution. The tubes were hand vortexed for 5 s each, then spun down for 5 min at 13,500 rpm and the clear supernatants were moved to a clean Eppendorf tube. Supernatants were dried under nitrogen and resuspended in 100 µL of water then transferred to HPLC vials and 2 µL injections were made. Calibration curves were constructed for all of the analytes using authentic standards and the same amounts of internal standards.
Kynurenine and kynurenic acid were analyzed by LC-HRMS as reported in ref. 64 with the only modification that the LC was coupled to a Q Exactive-HF with a heated ESI source operating in negative ion mode alternation full scan and MS/MS modes. The [M-H]− ion of each analyte and its internal standard was quantified, with peak confirmation by MS/MS.
GTT
Non-pregnant, pregnant (GD 9.5, 12.5, and 16.5), and 3-week postpartum mice were fasted for 6 h (7:00 am to 1:00 pm) and subsequently injected with 2 g/kg body weight of glucose intraperitoneally40,65. Prior to injection (T = 0) and 15, 30, 60, and 120 min post injection (i.e., T = 15, 30, 60, and 120, respectively), blood was sampled from the tail vein using an ALPHATRAK2 glucometer (AlphaTrak). To measure total glucose concentration for each mouse, we calculated the AUC of the glucose time course graph. Differences in AUC among the treatment groups were compared using the statistical analysis described below.
GSIS
GD 12.5 and 16.5 pregnant mice were fasted for 6 h (7:00 am to 1:00 pm) and subsequently injected with 2 g/kg body weight of glucose intraperitoneally40,65. At T = 0, 15, and 30, tail vein blood was collected using a heparinized capillary tube (ThermoFisher). Blood samples were expelled from the capillary tube into a microcentrifuge tube and placed on ice until end of experiment. The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 rcf at 4 °C and the plasma was transferred to a new tube and stored at −80 °C until insulin levels were measured. Plasma insulin was analyzed using an ultra-sensitive mouse Insulin ELISA kit (Crystal Chem), according to manufacturer’s wide range protocol (0.1–12.8 ng/mL insulin) and the colorimetric endpoint was measured using the Epoch plate microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek) with Gen5 software (BioTek).
ITT
GD 12.5 and 16.5 pregnant mice were fasted for 6 h (7:00 am to 1:00 pm) and subsequently injected 0.5 U/kg body weight of Insulin (Humulin® U-100)40) intraperitoneally. At T = 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120, blood was sampled from the tail vein using an ALPHATRAK2 glucometer (AlphaTrak). At each timepoint, data were represented and analyzed as a percentage of fasting glucose. Comparisons between treatment groups were performed, using the statistical analysis described below.
HTR2B agonist injections
An HTR2B agonist, BW-723C86 (Sigma-Aldrich), was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a concentration of 0.25 mg/mL66. Pregnant dams were subcutaneously injected daily with either 100 µL of BW-723C86 (1 mg/kg bw dose) or PBS vehicle from GD 9.5 to 12.5 at the time when Htr2b mRNA expression peaks9.
Pancreas immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Pancreas extraction was performed using a published protocol67. Briefly, GD 12.5 and 16.5 pancreases were isolated, fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 h at 4 °C, paraffin-embedded, and cut into 5-µm sections. Slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated to distilled water using graded ethanol. We performed heat-induced epitope retrieval with sodium citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 6.0) in a 95 °C water bath for 20 min and slides were membrane permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. For IHC-immunofluorescence, slides were incubated in 0.1 M glycine for 60 min to quench autofluorescence due to the fixation process. Prior to immunostaining, sections were blocked with 5% normal donkey serum (IHC-immunofluorescence) or 5% bovine serum albumins or BSA (IHC-chromogenic) for 60 min. Primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-insulin (1:200, Abcam; ab18547), mouse anti-MCM-2 (1:750, ThermoFisher; MA5-15895), and rat anti-serotonin (1:200, Abcam; ab6336). Secondary antibodies used were 1:200 donkey anti-Rabbit-AlexaFluor® 488 (JacksonImmuno), 1:750 donkey anti-Mouse-AlexaFluor® 647 (JacksonImmuno), and 1:200 donkey anti-Rat-AlexaFluor® 647 (JacksonImmuno). Primary antibodies were diluted with 1% BSA and 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS, and slides incubated overnight at 4 °C. We washed the slides using Millipore water for 3 × 5 min and subsequently incubated the slides in secondary antibodies at room temperature in the dark for 2 h. Nuclei were stained with 300 nM DAPI (Invitrogen).
Serotonin detection and measurement
Serotonin was detected using immunofluorescence with the antibodies stated above. Multichannel images were acquired of Insulin (Alexa488), Serotonin (Alexa647), and DAPI using an Upright ECLIPSE Ni-E microscope (Nikon) at an ×20 objective. All images were captured with equal exposure times and laser intensities best determined for each channel. Using the insulin antibody, the pancreatic islets were located. The fluorescent serotonin staining intensity in each islet was evaluated by converting the images to gray scale in ImageJ (v1.48, NIH). Relative levels of serotonin immunostaining intensity were quantified using the corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) method68. Briefly, using measurement features in ImageJ, a region of interest was created by tracing the islets. Islet area and mean gray value were subsequently measured, and integrated density for the islet was calculated by multiplying area and mean gray value. In addition, background readings of three similar-sized areas, adjacent to the islet, were measured. Last, relative serotonin intensity was determined using the formula: CTCF = integrated density of traced islet − (area of traced islet × average of the mean gray value of background readings). An image representation can be found in the supplemental section (Supplemental Fig. 9).
LC-MS analysis of serum serotonin
On GD 12.5 and 16.5, control and vitamin B6-deficient pregnant dams were euthanized, blood serum collected via cardiac puncture, and stored at −80 °C until analyses. Twenty microliters of each serum sample were transferred into a new tube and [2H4]-serotonin (internal standard) was added to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL. Nine volumes (180 µL) of acetonitrile were added to each sample to precipitate the proteins. Tubes were vortexed and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected and placed in an autosampler vial.
For serotonin analysis, 5 µL of each sample was injected using an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC (Dionex) onto a 2.1 × 100 mm Accucore HILIC column, with 2.6 µm beads (ThermoFisher). Analytes were eluted using a mobile phase gradient and analyzed in positive mode on a TSQ Quantum Access Max triple quadrople mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher) with a heated electrospray ionization source. The spray voltage was set to 4.5 kV, the sheath gas flow rate was set to 65, and the auxiliary gas flow rate set to 5, while the capillary temperature was set to 400 °C. The mobile phases were A: 20 mM ammonium formate in 0.1% formic acid, and B: 20 mM ammonium formate in 90% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. The flow rate was set to 800 µL/min, and the column oven was set to 25 °C. The gradient began at 100% B and held for 0.75 min before ramping to 50% B in 0.5 min, where it was held for 0.5 min, and returned to 100% B in 0.25 min. The column was re-equilibrated at 100% B for 1 min prior to the next injection.
The precursor ion for serotonin was 177.1 m/z, with fragment ions of 115 and 160 m/z with collision energy of 28 and 11, respectively, at a tube lens voltage of 86 V. The precursor ion for serotonin d4 188.1 m/z, with fragment ions of 188.2 and 164.1 m/z with collision energies of 28 and 11 respective to a tube lens voltage of 65 V. Peak areas corresponding to levels of endogenous serotonin or the spiked internal serotonin standard were calculated using the LC Quan node of the XCalibur software (ThermoFisher). To determine the relative levels of serum serotonin, we calculated the ratio between endogenous serotonin and the internal serotonin standard.
Pancreatic islet isolation
Pancreatic islets were isolated using the histopaque gradient method69. Briefly, GD 12.5 control and vitamin B6-deficient dams were anesthetized using ketamine/xylazine mixture70. We digested the extracted pancreas in Hank’s buffer-saline solution (HBSS) with 2 mg/mL collagenase P for 15 min at 37 °C on an orbital shaker at 225 rpm. Immediately after digestion, the pancreatic tissues underwent a series of washes with ice-cold HBSS and, subsequently, was filtered through a 380 µm stainless steel mesh filter into 10 mL of ice-cold HBSS to remove pancreatic exocrine tissue. The pancreatic islets were isolated from the filtrate by histopaque 1100 gradient centrifugation at room temperature. The histopaque supernatant, containing the pancreatic islets, was decanted into ice-cold PBS and washed three times with PBS. Pancreatic islets were pelleted, the supernatant was subsequently discarded, and the islets were weighed to obtain wet weight, and immediately stored at −80 °C until further use.
LC-HRMS of metabolites in pancreatic islets
After islets were extracted from GD 12.5 control and vitamin B6-deficient dams, 50 µL of an internal standard mix ([2H4]-serotonin, [13C11]-tryptophan, and [13C4]-kynurenine) were added to each sample and blank tubes. One milliliter of 80% ice-cold methanol was added to each tube. Samples were pulse sonicated in ice and incubated for 10 min to allow for metabolites extraction from tissues into the methanol solution. The tubes were vortexed for 10 s and spun down for 5 min at 13,000 rpm at room temperature. The clear supernatants were moved to a clean Eppendorf tube, dried under nitrogen, and resuspended in 100 µL of 0.1% formic acid, and subsequently transferred to HPLC vials.
Two microliters of each sample were injected onto a Hypersil Gold column (2.1 × 150 mm, 1.9 µm). A 15-min gradient using two phases A (0.1% formic acid) and B (0.1% formic acid in methanol) was used for metabolites separation, starting from 100% A to 98% A at 6 min, 1% A at 10 min (held constant for 2 min), and at 12.1 min back to 100% A. The MS conditions were as described in ref. 71. Calibration curves were constructed for all of the analytes using authentic standards and the same amount of internal standards as used for the islet samples. The area ratio of analyte to internal standard was plotted versus the amount of analyte and a linear regression was used to calculate the amount of metabolite in the tube. The calculated amount was adjusted to the wet weight of the islets.
For islet serotonin quantification, a seven-point calibration curve was constructed using the internal standard. The linear equation of the curve is Y = 0.17*X + 0.28 (Supplemental Fig. 10a). For semi-quantitative analysis of islet PLP, we used the kynurenine internal standard due to its similar expected retention time as PLP (i.e., 3.9 min for kynurenine vs 4.2 min for PLP). The linear equation for the kynurenine calibration curve is Y = 0.878*X − 7.36 (Supplemental Fig. 10b).
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (Graphpad, San Diego, CA). Boxplots, Shapiro–Wilk’s test, and the Levene’s test were used to assess outliers, normality, and homogeneity of variances, respectively. An unpaired student’s t-test, two-sided was conducted on the following data sets: body weight measurements, fasting glucose, glucose AUC, islet morphology, and islet tryptophan. An unpaired student’s t-test, one-sided was conducted on the serum serotonin, and islet serotonin and PLP, and indirect vitamin B6 measurement data sets. Two-way, repeated measures, ANOVA with post hoc Holm–Sidak’s tests were conducted on glucose and insulin time graphs, and GSIS data sets. Two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s test was conducted on the β-cell proliferation and glucose AUC data from the PBS and HTR2B agonist-treated control and vitamin B6-deficient pregnant dams. All statistical tests were performed with an alpha = 0.05 and power = 0.80. P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data are represented as mean ± SEM throughout this manuscript except when stated otherwise.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the National Institute of Environment Health Sciences (RO1 ES029469-01A1 and P30 ES001247 to M.S.; T32 ES007026 to A.M.F.; P30ES013508 to C.M.) and an instrumentational grant from the National Institute of Health (S10 OD025242 to K.W.). We acknowledge Kavaljit H. Chhabra at University Rochester Medical Center for his technical support in our ITT and GSIS studies and helpful discussion on the manuscript.
Author contributions
A.M.F. contributed to the writing of the manuscript, performing the majority of the experiments, and analyzing the data. K.W. contributed to the writing, designing, and performing the method of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for serum serotonin. E.S.H. and C.M. contributed to the writing, designing, and performing the high-resolution mass spectrometry studies. M.S. conceived the original ideas, supervised the studies, interpreted data, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Data availability
Data that are reported in our manuscript will be maintained in the corresponding authors’ backup server. Data details will be released by a reasonable request to the corresponding author. Source data underlying plots shown in figures are provided in Supplementary Data 1.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-01900-0.
References
- 1.Banerjee RR, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus from inactivation of prolactin receptor and MafB in Islet beta-cells. Diabetes. 2016;65:2331–2341. doi: 10.2337/db15-1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sorenson RL, Brelje TC. Adaptation of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy: beta-cell growth, enhanced insulin secretion and the role of lactogenic hormones. Horm. Metab. Res. 1997;29:301–307. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-979040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parsons JA, Brelje TC, Sorenson RL. Adaptation of islets of Langerhans to pregnancy: increased islet cell proliferation and insulin secretion correlates with the onset of placental lactogen secretion. Endocrinology. 1992;130:1459–1466. doi: 10.1210/endo.130.3.1537300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kawai M, Kishi K. Adaptation of pancreatic islet B-cells during the last third of pregnancy: regulation of B-cell function and proliferation by lactogenic hormones in rats. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1999;141:419–425. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1410419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rieck S, Kaestner KH. Expansion of beta-cell mass in response to pregnancy. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;21:151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Banerjee RR. Piecing together the puzzle of pancreatic islet adaptation in pregnancy. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 2018;1411:120–139. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Karnik SK, et al. Menin controls growth of pancreatic beta-cells in pregnant mice and promotes gestational diabetes mellitus. Science. 2007;318:806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1146812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Devlieger R, Casteels K, Van Assche FA. Reduced adaptation of the pancreatic B cells during pregnancy is the major causal factor for gestational diabetes: current knowledge and metabolic effects on the offspring. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2008;87:1266–1270. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kim H, et al. Serotonin regulates pancreatic beta cell mass during pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2010;16:804–808. doi: 10.1038/nm.2173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schraenen A, et al. Placental lactogens induce serotonin biosynthesis in a subset of mouse beta cells during pregnancy. Diabetologia. 2010;53:2589–2599. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1913-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Iida H, et al. Expression mechanism of tryptophan hydroxylase 1 in mouse islets during pregnancy. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015;55:41–53. doi: 10.1530/JME-14-0299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bennink HJ, Schreurs WH. Improvement of oral glucose tolerance in gestational diabetes by pyridoxine. Br. Med. J. 1975;3:13–15. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5974.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Spellacy WN, Buhi WC, Birk SA. Vitamin B6 treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: studies of blood glucose and plasma insulin. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1977;127:599–602. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90356-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oxenkrug G. Insulin resistance and dysregulation of tryptophan-kynurenine and kynurenine-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide metabolic pathways. Mol. Neurobiol. 2013;48:294–301. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8497-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Susiarjo, M. et al. Bile acids and tryptophan metabolism are novel pathways involved in metabolic abnormalities in BPA-exposed pregnant mice and male offspring. Endocrinology158, 2533–2542 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Mack LR, Tomich PG. Gestational diabetes: diagnosis, classification, and clinical care. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2017;44:207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Florez JC. Newly identified loci highlight beta cell dysfunction as a key cause of type 2 diabetes: where are the insulin resistance genes? Diabetologia. 2008;51:1100–1110. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1025-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McCarthy MI. Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:2339–2350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0906948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Petrie JR, Pearson ER, Sutherland C. Implications of genome wide association studies for the understanding of type 2 diabetes pathophysiology. Biochem Pharm. 2011;81:471–477. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buchanan TA, Xiang AH. Gestational diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Invest. 2005;115:485–491. doi: 10.1172/JCI200524531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wouters MM, et al. Exogenous serotonin regulates proliferation of interstitial cells of Cajal in mouse jejunum through 5-HT2B receptors. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:897–906. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lesurtel M, et al. Platelet-derived serotonin mediates liver regeneration. Science. 2006;312:104–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1123842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Di Cianni G, et al. Intermediate metabolism in normal pregnancy and in gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2003;19:259–270. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Leturque A, et al. Glucose utilization rates and insulin sensitivity in vivo in tissues of virgin and pregnant rats. Diabetes. 1986;35:172–177. doi: 10.2337/diab.35.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leitner M, et al. Combined metabolomic analysis of plasma and urine reveals AHBA, tryptophan and serotonin metabolism as potential risk factors in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) Front Mol. Biosci. 2017;4:84. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leto D, Saltiel AR. Regulation of glucose transport by insulin: traffic control of GLUT4. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;13:383–396. doi: 10.1038/nrm3351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ebeling P, Koistinen HA, Koivisto VA. Insulin-independent glucose transport regulates insulin sensitivity. FEBS Lett. 1998;436:301–303. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Best JD, et al. Role of glucose effectiveness in the determination of glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:1018–1030. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.9.1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dube S, et al. The forgotten role of glucose effectiveness in the regulation of glucose tolerance. Curr. Diab Rep. 2015;15:605. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0605-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alford FP, et al. Glucose effectiveness is a critical pathogenic factor leading to glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes: An ignored hypothesis. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2018;34:e2989. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jacobson L, Ansari T, McGuinness OP. Counterregulatory deficits occur within 24 h of a single hypoglycemic episode in conscious, unrestrained, chronically cannulated mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006;290:E678–E684. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00383.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.McArthur MD, et al. Glucose effectiveness is the major determinant of intravenous glucose tolerance in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1999;276:E739–E746. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.4.E739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 1979;237:E214–E223. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.237.3.E214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Smith SM, Vale WW. The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2006;8:383–395. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/ssmith. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yamashita H, et al. Effect of spontaneous gestational diabetes on fetal and postnatal hepatic insulin resistance in Lepr(db/+) mice. Pediatr. Res. 2003;53:411–418. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000049667.58071.7D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yao L, et al. Resveratrol relieves gestational diabetes mellitus in mice through activating AMPK. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2015;13:118. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0114-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Benede-Ubieto R, et al. Guidelines and considerations for metabolic tolerance tests in mice. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2020;13:439–450. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S234665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ayala JE, et al. Standard operating procedures for describing and performing metabolic tests of glucose homeostasis in mice. Dis. Model Mech. 2010;3:525–534. doi: 10.1242/dmm.006239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mackay EM. The Distribution of glucose in human blood. J. Biol. Chem. 1932;97:685–689. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)76180-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bowe JE, et al. Metabolic phenotyping guidelines: assessing glucose homeostasis in rodent models. J. Endocrinol. 2014;222:G13–G25. doi: 10.1530/JOE-14-0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kuo T, et al. Regulation of glucose homeostasis by glucocorticoids. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015;872:99–126. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keller-Wood M, et al. Elevated maternal cortisol leads to relative maternal hyperglycemia and increased stillbirth in ovine pregnancy. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014;307:R405–R413. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00530.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Abdul Aziz SH, et al. Animal model of gestational diabetes mellitus with pathophysiological resemblance to the human condition induced by multiple factors (nutritional, pharmacological, and stress) in rats. BioMed. Res. Int. 2016;2016:9704607–9704607. doi: 10.1155/2016/9704607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aerts L, Van Assche FA. Ultrastructural evaluation of B-cell recruitment in virgin and pregnant offspring of diabetic mothers. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pr. 1998;41:9–14. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8227(98)00063-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Caluwaerts S, et al. Is low-dose streptozotocin in rats an adequate model for gestational diabetes mellitus? J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig. 2003;10:216–221. doi: 10.1016/S1071-5576(03)00044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Segar EM, et al. Programming of growth, insulin resistance and vascular dysfunction in offspring of late gestation diabetic rats. Clin. Sci. 2009;117:129–138. doi: 10.1042/CS20080550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kaufmann RC, et al. An animal model of gestational diabetes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981;141:479–482. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(15)33263-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lambin S, et al. Adipose tissue in offspring of Lepr(db/+) mice: early-life environment vs. genotype. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007;292:E262–E271. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00308.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Plows JF, et al. Absence of a gestational diabetes phenotype in the LepRdb/+ mouse is independent of control strain, diet, misty allele, or parity. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:45130. doi: 10.1038/srep45130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Deeds MC, et al. Single dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes: considerations for study design in islet transplantation models. Lab. Anim. 2011;45:131–140. doi: 10.1258/la.2010.010090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Medicine, I. O. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline, 592 (The National Academies Press, 1998). [PubMed]
- 52.Subar AF, et al. Dietary sources of nutrients among US adults, 1989 to 1991. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998;98:537–547. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00122-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Waymire KG, et al. Mice lacking tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase die from seizures due to defective metabolism of vitamin B-6. Nat. Genet. 1995;11:45–51. doi: 10.1038/ng0995-45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Narisawa S, Wennberg C, Millan JL. Abnormal vitamin B6 metabolism in alkaline phosphatase knock-out mice causes multiple abnormalities, but not the impaired bone mineralization. J. Pathol. 2001;193:125–133. doi: 10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH722>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Loohuis, L. M. et al. The alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) locus is associated with B6 vitamer levels in CSF and plasma. Genes10, 8 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Andreux PA, et al. Systems genetics of metabolism: the use of the BXD murine reference panel for multiscalar integration of traits. Cell. 2012;150:1287–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Leklem J, et al. Vitamin B6 requirements of women using oral contraceptives. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1975;28:535–541. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/28.5.535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Naz F, et al. Effect of oral contraceptive pills on the blood serum enzymes and dna damage in lymphocytes among users. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2016;31:294–301. doi: 10.1007/s12291-015-0533-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Rose DP. The interactions between vitamin B6 and hormones. Vitam. Horm. 1978;36:53–99. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(08)60982-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Council, N. R. Nutrient Requirements of Laboratory Animals: Fourth Revised Edition, 192 (The National Academies Press, 1995). [PubMed]
- 61.Furth-Walker D, Leibman D, Smolen A. Relationship between blood, liver and brain pyridoxal phosphate and pyridoxamine phosphate concentrations in mice. J. Nutr. 1990;120:1338–1343. doi: 10.1093/jn/120.11.1338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Prevention, U.S.C.f.D.C.a. Second National Report on Biochemical Indicators of Diet and Nutrition in the U.S. Populations (National Center for Environmental Health, 2012).
- 63.Ueland PM, et al. Direct and functional biomarkers of vitamin B6 status. Annu Rev. Nutr. 2015;35:33–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Guo L, et al. Diisopropylethylamine/hexafluoroisopropanol-mediated ion-pairing ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for phosphate and carboxylate metabolite analysis: utility for studying cellular metabolism. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2016;30:1835–1845. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vinué, Á. & González-Navarro, H. in Methods in Mouse Atherosclerosis (eds Andrés, V. & Dorado, B.) 247–254 (Springer, 2015).
- 66.Kennett GA, et al. Effects of the 5-HT2B receptor agonist, BW 723C86, on three rat models of anxiety. Br. J. Pharm. 1996;117:1443–1448. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15304.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Veite-Schmahl, M. J. et al. Dissection of the mouse pancreas for histological analysis and metabolic profiling. J. Vis. Exp. 10.3791/55647 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.McCloy RA, et al. Partial inhibition of Cdk1 in G 2 phase overrides the SAC and decouples mitotic events. Cell Cycle. 2014;13:1400–1412. doi: 10.4161/cc.28401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Carter JD, et al. A practical guide to rodent islet isolation and assessment. Biol. Proced. Online. 2009;11:3–31. doi: 10.1007/s12575-009-9021-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wellington D, Mikaelian I, Singer L. Comparison of ketamine-xylazine and ketamine-dexmedetomidine anesthesia and intraperitoneal tolerance in rats. J. Am. Assoc. Lab Anim. Sci. 2013;52:481–487. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Frederick DW, et al. Stable isotope labeling by essential nutrients in cell culture (SILEC) for accurate measurement of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide metabolism. Analyst. 2017;142:4431–4437. doi: 10.1039/C7AN01378G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data that are reported in our manuscript will be maintained in the corresponding authors’ backup server. Data details will be released by a reasonable request to the corresponding author. Source data underlying plots shown in figures are provided in Supplementary Data 1.