Abstract
Several studies have shown the importance of oxidative stress (OS) in respiratory disease pathogenesis. It has been reported that the nasal epithelium may act as a surrogate for the bronchial epithelium in several respiratory diseases involving OS. However, the sample yields obtained from nasal biopsies are modest, limiting the number of parameters that can be determined. Flow cytometry has been widely used to evaluate cellular OS profiles. It has the advantage that analyses can be performed using a small amount of sample. Therefore, we aimed to set up a new method based on flow cytometry to assess the oxidative profile of human nasal epithelial cells which could be used in research on respiratory diseases. Levels of total nitric oxide, superoxide anion, peroxynitrite, and intracellular peroxides were measured. Reduced thiol levels, such as antioxidant-reduced glutathione and oxidative damaged lipids and proteins, were also analysed. The intracellular calcium levels, plasma membrane potential, apoptosis, and percentage of live cells were also studied. Finally, a strategy to evaluate the mitochondrial function, including mitochondrial hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion, mitochondrial mass, and membrane potential, was set up. Using small amounts of sample and a non-invasive sampling technique, the described method enables the measurement of a comprehensive set of OS parameters in nasal epithelial cells, which could be useful in research on respiratory diseases.
Keywords: flow cytometry, rare respiratory diseases, nasal epithelium, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species
1. Introduction
Free radicals are molecules with at least one unpaired electron in their outer layer. The need to acquire an electron to achieve electrochemical stability drives reactions of free radicals with other biomolecules. Free radicals react with DNA, lipids, and proteins, producing oxidation and a loss of activity in these biomolecules [1]. As a by-product of cellular aerobic metabolism, various reactive species are generated, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide (O2−) or hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), such as nitric oxide (NO) or peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [2,3]. The primary intracellular sources of ROS and RNS are mitochondria, lysosomes, peroxisomes, nuclear and cytoplasmic membranes, and the endoplasmic reticulum [4]. ROS and RNS are also generated by external factors, such as tobacco or environmental pollution [5]. Eukaryotic cells possess defence mechanisms to avoid biomolecular oxidative damage, with vitamin C, vitamin E, and glutathione all relevant examples of simple defence mechanisms [6]. Cells also have complex enzymatic systems, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR), which evolved to reduce ROS levels [7,8]. Under physiological conditions, basal ROS and RNS levels are necessary for cells’ function by acting as regulatory and signalling molecules. Thus, cells need these species to maintain the cellular reduction-oxidation (REDOX) balance [9].
Oxidative stress (OS) is produced when there is an imbalance toward pro-oxidation between pro-oxidant and antioxidant systems. When defensive mechanisms cannot prevent ROS and RNS accumulation, signalling pathways are activated and gene expression and protein synthesis changes occur [9]. In response to DNA oxidative damage, cells react by repairing the damage, activating different cell cycle checkpoints, or inducing apoptosis [10]. These conditions are linked to numerous pathological processes, such as cancer, chronic inflammation, ageing, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disease, and asthma, among others [11,12].
Nasal epithelial cells represent the first line of defence against various environmental factors. These cells clean, humidify, and warm inhaled air and produce mucus, which attaches to particles transported by cilia present on some cells to the digestive tract, where they are eliminated. Nasal epithelial cells are not only a physical barrier but were also shown to respond by producing inflammatory mediators that can affect the local immune response [13]. These cells are suitable in vitro models for the study of novel defence mechanisms [14]. Thus, the nasal epithelium may act as a surrogate for the bronchial epithelium in asthma studies [15].
On the other hand, numerous studies have shown the importance of OS as a factor involved in the pathogenesis of several diseases of the respiratory system, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [16], asthma [17], alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) [18,19,20,21] and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) [22]. Therefore, it is essential to know the underlying mechanisms by which OS directs pathogenesis in these diseases to develop more effective therapies. There are currently no methods based on flow cytometry that allow the analysis of different OS parameters in nasal epithelial cells. Therefore, given the importance of these cells in different respiratory pathologies and the important role of OS in their development, we present a new method based on flow cytometry to assess the oxidative profile of human nasal epithelial cells, which could be very useful in the future research of several respiratory diseases.
2. Experimental Section
2.1. Biological Samples
Nasal epithelial cells were obtained from six healthy donors (3 males and 3 females; ages (mean ± Standard Deviation) 27 ± 1.5 and 28 ± 2.3, respectively) at the Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (HCUV) and Hospital General Universitario de Valencia (HGUV) (Valencia, Spain). A cytology brush (Covaca SA CE2005, Madrid, Spain) was inserted into the patient’s nostril, and the nasal epithelium of the middle meatus was gently brushed, yielding strips of ciliated nasal epithelium. Samples were transported using Medium199 supplemented with Hanks’ salts, l-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Before labelling, samples were filtered using 50 µm CellTrics® filters (Sysmex; Sant Just Desvern; Barcelona, Spain) (25004-0042-2317 Sysmex) to isolate cells from cell debris and aggregates. Participants were healthy, non-smoking individuals without respiratory bronchial disease, local or systemic disease, allergies, rhinosinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection for at least one month before sampling. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of the HCUV and HGUV and followed the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki [23]. All the participating individuals gave their written informed consent. Samples were analysed in the Cytometry Service of the Unidad Central de Investigación Medicina (UCIM) of Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria INCLIVA.
2.2. Reagents
The probes used in this study are detailed, including global distributors, in the Supplementary Materials (Reagents). Flow cytometry methods, including reagent concentrations; storage temperature; species studied; incubation protocols in basal tubes; and positive controls, cytometers, and lasers used for each measurement are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Additionally, a step-by-step protocol is available in the Supplementary Materials section.
Table 1.
Reactive Species | Measurement | Stock Concentration | Storage Temperature | Final Concentration | Flow Cytometer | Excitation Laser | Detector | Cell Number | Total Volume | Incubation Time | Incubation Temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBAC | Plasma membrane potential | 100 µM | −20 °C | 1.2 µM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
FLUO-4 | Intracellular Ca2+ | 50 µM | −20 °C | 0.5 µM | LSR Fortessa X-20 | Blue (488 nm) |
530/30505LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
CMFDA | Reduced thiols (GSH) | 10 µM | −20 °C | 25 nM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
DAF-FMDA | NO | 1.25 mM | −20 °C | 1 µM | LSR Fortessa X-20 | Blue (488 nm) |
530/30505LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
DCF | Intracellular peroxides | 1 mg/mL | −20 °C | 2.5 µg/mL | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
MitoSOX | Motochondrial O2− | 0.5 mM | −20 °C | 640 nM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
700/54665LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
Mitotracker Green | Mitochondrial mass | 10 µM | −20 °C | 78 nM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
BODIPY 665/676 | Oxidized/reduced lipid ratio | 1 mM | −20 °C | 800 nM | FACS Aria III | Blue (488 nm) Red (635 nm) |
586/42556LP and 780/60735LP | 12.000 | 250 µL | 30 min | 37 °C |
TMRM | Mitochondrial Ψm | 240 µM | −20 °C | 600 nM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
586/42560LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
DHR 123 | ONOO− | 5 mM | −20 °C | 100 µM | LSR Fortessa X-20 | Blue (488 nm) |
530/30505LP | 12.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
HE | O2− | 1 mg/mL | −20 °C | 2.5 µg/mL | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
700/54665LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
FTC | Protein carbonylation | 1 mM | −20 °C | 800 nM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
MitoPY | Mitochondrial H2O2 | 1 mM | −20 °C | 4 µM | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
DAPI | Cell death | 1 mg/mL | −20 °C | 800 ng/mL | FACS Verse | Violet (405 nm) |
448/45 | 8.000 | 250 µL | 20 min | 37 °C |
PI | Cell death | 1 mg/mL | 4 °C | 8 µg/mL | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
586/42560LP | 12.000 | 100 µL | 15 min | RT |
Annexin V | Apoptosis | - | 4 °C | - | FACS Verse | Blue (488 nm) |
527/32507 LP | 12.000 | 100 µL | 15 min | RT |
Table 2.
Reactive Species | Measurement | Inductor | Stock Concentration | Final Concentration | Storage Temperature | Inductor Incubation Time | Inductor Incubation Temperature | Reactive Incubation Time | Reactive Incubation Temperature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBAC | Plasmatic membrane potential | t-BHP | 7.7 mM | 100 μM | 4 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
FLUO-4 | Intracellular Ca2+ | Ionomycin | 1.338 mM | 50 μM | −20 °C | Kynetics | Kynetics | ||
CMFDA | Reduced thiols | DEM | - | 20 mM | −20 °C | 90 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
DAF-FM DA | NO | NOR-1 | 1 mg/mL | 16 μg/mL | −20 °C | Kynetics | Kynetics | ||
DCF | Intracellular peroxides | t-BHP | 7.7 mM | 100 μM | 4 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
MitoSOX | Mitochondrial O2− | PB | 2.8 mg/mL | 2.24 μg/mL | −20 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
BODIPY 665/676 | Oxidized/reduced lipids ratio | t-BHP | 7.7 mM | 100 μM | 4 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
TMRM | Mitochondrial Ψm | FCCP | 10 mM | 52 μM | −20 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
DHR 123 | ONOO- | NOR-1 and PB | 1 mg/mL and 2.8 mg/mL | 16 μg/mL and 2.24 μg/mL | −20 °C | Kynetics | Kynetics | ||
HE | O2− | PB | 2.8 mg/mL | 2.24 μg/mL | −20 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
FTC | Protein carbonylation | Menadione | 10 mg/mL | 1 mM | −20 °C | 60 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
MitoPY | Mitochondrial H2O2 | t-BHP | 7.7 mM | 100 μM | 4 °C | 15 min | 37 °C | 30 min | 37 °C |
2.3. Determination of Dead and Live Cells
Dead cells may compromise flow cytometric data analysis, especially when studying physiological conditions, such as OS. As cellular viability is usually determined by measuring cells’ capacity to exclude vital dyes, we excluded dead cells from our analysis by adding a DNA-binding dye. 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) was added into tubes with dihydroethidium (HE), 2’-7’dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH), Dihydrorhodamine 123 (DHR1,2,3), Diaminofluorescein-FM diacetate (DAF-FM DA), 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMFDA), Tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester (TMRM), MitoTracker Green, MitoSOX, MitoPY 1, FLUO-4, BODIPY 665 (B665), and FTC, whereas propidium iodide (PI) was used with Bis(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid)trimethine oxonol (DIBAC). PI is widely used with Annexin V to determine if cells are viable, apoptotic, or necrotic through differences in plasma membrane integrity and permeability. PI does not stain live or early apoptotic cells due to the presence of an intact plasma membrane, but in late apoptotic and necrotic cells the integrity of the plasma and nuclear membranes decreases, allowing PI to cross the cell membrane, intercalate into nucleic acids, and display red fluorescence [24,25].
2.4. Reactive Oxygen Species and Reactive Nitrogen Species Assessment
Superoxide anion (O2−) is detected by HE, a fluorescent probe selectively oxidised and hydroxylated by O2− to 2-OH-ethidium, emitting fluorescence when bound to DNA [26,27]. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) detection was based on DCFH oxidation, which generally exhibits a low basal fluorescence, but is converted to highly fluorescent DCF when oxidised by H2O2 in the presence of peroxidase [27,28]. Peroxynitrite (ONOO−) production was assessed using DHR1,2,3, an uncharged, nonfluorescent ROS indicator that passively diffuses across membranes where it is oxidised to cationic rhodamine 123, exhibiting green fluorescence [29,30]. Nitric oxide (NO) production was assessed using DAF-FM DA, an otherwise nonfluorescent probe that forms a fluorescent benzotriazole when it reacts with NO, thereby acting as a specific NO detector [31,32]. Intracellular thiol-reduced status, including reduced glutathione (GSH), was measured using CMFDA [33,34]. For each measurement, cells were incubated with the appropriate probe in individual tubes—i.e., HE (2.5 ug/mL), DCFH (2.5 μg/mL), DHR1,2,3 (100 μM), DAF-FM DA (1 μM), or CMFDA (25 nM)—for 20 min at 37 °C. Fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.5. Plasmatic Membrane Potential Assessment
Plasma membrane potential was evaluated using DIBAC, a potential-sensitive fluorescent probe that can enter depolarised cells and bind to intracellular proteins or membranes. Increased depolarisation results in an additional influx in the anionic dye and increases fluorescence. Conversely, hyperpolarisation results in a decrease in fluorescence. DIBAC dyes are excluded from mitochondria because of their negative charge, making them suitable for measuring plasma membrane potentials [35,36]. Cells were incubated with DIBAC (1.2 μM) for 20 min at 37 °C, and fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.6. Mitochondrial Assessment
Mitochondrial membrane potential (Ψm) was analysed using TMRM, a fluorescent probe that accumulates inside mitochondria directly proportional to their membrane potential [37,38]. Mitochondrial mass was determined using MitoTracker Green, a fluorescent dye that locates mitochondria independently to Ψm [39,40]. Mitochondrial O2− (mtO2−) was measured using MitoSOX, which enters live cells, specifically the mitochondria, where it is rapidly oxidised by O2− [30,41]. Mitochondrial H2O2 (mtH2O2) was measured using mitoPY 1, a cell-permeable fluorescent probe that selectively tracks the mitochondria of living cells by selectively binding to mtH2O2 [30,42]. For each measurement, cells were incubated with the appropriate probe in individual tubes—i.e., TMRM (600 nM), MitoTracker Green (78 nM), MitoSOX (640 nM), or MitoPY 1 (4 μM)—for 20 min at 37 °C. Fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.7. Intracellular Calcium Assessment
Intracellular calcium (Ca2+) was measured using FLUO-4, a fluorogenic probe that detects intracellular Ca2+ [43,44]. Cells were incubated with FLUO-4 (0.5 μM) for 20 min at 37 °C, and fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.8. Oxidative Damage to Biomolecules
Lipid peroxidation was detected using the lipophilic probe BODIPY 665/676 dye, which exhibits a change in fluorescence emission after interaction with peroxyl radicals [45,46]. Cells were incubated with B665 (800 nM) for 30 min at 37 °C, and fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
Protein oxidation (carbonylation) levels were measured using FTC, a molecule that emits green fluorescence when it interacts with carbonyl groups of proteins [26,47]. Cells were incubated with FTC (800 nM) for 20 min at 37 °C, and fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.9. Apoptosis Assay
Apoptosis status was determined using Annexin V, a 35–36 kDa Ca2+-dependent phospholipid-binding protein with a high affinity for phosphatidylserine (PS), which binds to PS on exposed apoptotic cell surfaces [48]. Cells were incubated in the dark for 15 min at room temperature with Annexin V, PI, and Annexin V-binding buffer (previously diluted to 1/10 in PBS). After incubation, 300 μL of the 1/10 Annexin V-binding buffer was added to the dilution. Samples were analysed by flow cytometry with the appropriate settings.
2.10. Positive Control Incubations
As controls, appropriate fluorochromes were added to each tube after previous incubation with their respective inducers. An H2O2 generator, t-BHP (100 μM) [49,50], was used for the B665, DCFH, MitoPY 1, and DIBAC tubes. PB (2.24 μg/mL), an O2− generator [50,51], was used for HE and MitoSOX tubes. DEM (20 mM), which produces GSH depletion [33,50], was used for CMFDA. Menadione (1 mM) was used for FTC to increase the carbonylated protein levels [50,52], and FCCP (52 μM), a mitochondrial uncoupler that decreases Ψm [50,53], was used for TMRM. Each tube was incubated in the dark for 15 min (except menadione, which was incubated for an hour, and DEM, which was incubated for 90 min) at 37 °C with their respective inducers. Next, each tube was incubated in the dark for 30 min at 37 °C. Samples were run on the flow cytometer with the appropriate settings.
A kinetic strategy was designed for the real-time follow-up of intracellular NO, ONOO−, and Ca2+ generation. Cells were previously incubated with their respective fluorochromes—i.e., DAF (1 μM), DHR1,2,3 (100 μM), or FLUO-4 (0.5 μM), and DAPI. Each tube was incubated in the dark for 20 min at 37 °C. Afterwards, the acquisition process was paused to add the inducers. In the NO-positive control, two doses of NOR-1 (16 μg/mL), a nitric oxide generator [35], were added, and the acquisition process was continued until 300 s. In the ONOO−-positive control, PB (2.24 μg/mL) and NOR-1 (16 μg/mL) were added, and the acquisition was continued until 200 s. In the Ca2+-positive control, the ionophore ionomycin (50 μM) was added to stimulate Ca2+ influx, and acquisition was continued until 600 s.
2.11. Cytometer Settings and Data Analysis
All flow cytometry assays were carried out using the FACSVerse cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), except the lipid oxidised/lipid reduced ratio, which was carried out using the FacsAria III cytometer (BD Biosciences), and kinetic analyses of NO, ONOO, and Ca2+ generation, which were carried out using the LSR Fortessa X-20 (BD Biosciences) (Table 1).
Blue (488 nm), violet (405 nm), and red (635 nm) lasers were used. The fluorescence results of DCFH, CMFDA, FTC, Mitotracker Green, Annexin, DIBAC, and MitoPY 1 were collected using a 527/32 507LP filter. Fluorescence results of MitoSOX and HE were collected using a 700/54 665LP filter, and TMRM and PI fluorescence results were collected using a 586/42 560LP filter. The fluorescence of DAPI was collected using a 448/45 filter. The fluorescence of B665 was detected using 586/42 556LP and 780/60 735LP filters. The DAF-FM DA, DHR1,2,3, and FLUO-4 fluorescence were gathered using a 530/30 505LP filter.
BD FACSSuite software was used for data acquisition with the FACSVerse cytometer, and the FACSDiva 4.0 software was used for FACSAriaIII and LSR Fortessa X-20 cytometer data acquisition. Offline data analysis was performed using the FLOWJO V.10.1 software (FlowJo™ Software Version 10.1. Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2019; Ashland, OR, USA).
3. Results
Due to the lack of previous research regarding the OS profile of the human nasal epithelial cells, a complex experimental design was needed. Besides cell quantity adjustment, reactive concentration, and voltage, positive controls were used to ensure that each parameter was correctly determined, as explained below. Basal labelling, the positive control and the corresponding graphics for each parameter from the six healthy individuals included in the study are shown in the Supplementary Materials section.
3.1. Gating Strategy
Figure 1 shows the population gating strategy used for each parameter. Nasal epithelial cells were selected by morphology, as measured by forward scatter (FSC), a cell size indicator, and side scatter (SSC), which estimates the internal complexity of the cells (1A). After this, individual cells were selected from all nasal epithelial cells through height confrontation (high-FSC) in front of the FSC area (area-FSC), disregarding doublets (1B). Dead cells were excluded using DAPI or PI (1C).
3.2. ROS and RNS Generation
Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 show an example of intracellular peroxides and total O2− levels detected after incubating the nasal epithelial cells with the respective fluorescent probes and inductors in positive controls. The gating strategy shown in Figure 1 was used, and dead cells were discarded using DAPI.
A kinetic strategy was designed for the real-time follow-up of intracellular NO (Supplementary Table S3) and ONOO− generation (Supplementary Table S4). Single human nasal epithelial cells were selected based on morphology and DAPI exclusion. The strategies for the sequential gating of NO and ONOO− generation are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively.
3.3. GSH Detection
Supplementary Table S5 shows an example of total GSH levels after incubating the nasal epithelial cells with CMF and DEM as a positive control. The gating strategy shown in Figure 1 was used, and DAPI was used to identify dead cells.
3.4. Intracellular Ca2+ and Plasma Membrane Potential Detection
A kinetic strategy was designed for the real-time follow-up of intracellular Ca2+ generation. Human nasal epithelial cells were selected based on morphology. After that, single cells were selected, and dead cells were discarded using DAPI. Gating percentages and fluorescence values for FLUO-4 are shown in Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S6.
Plasmatic membrane potential levels detected after incubating the nasal epithelial cells with DIBAC and t-BHP (positive controls) are shown in Supplementary Table S7. The gating strategy shown in Figure 1 was used, with PI used to identify any dead cells.
3.5. Mitochondrial Function
Supplementary Tables S8–S11 show the levels of mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial mass, and mitochondrial H2O2 and O2– detected after incubating the nasal epithelial cells with their respective fluorochromes and inductors for positive controls. The gating strategy in Figure 1 was used, and DAPI was used to identify dead cells.
3.6. Oxidative Damage in Lipids and Proteins Analysis
Supplementary Table S12 shows the carbonylated protein levels after incubating the nasal epithelial cells with FTC and menadione in the positive controls. The gating strategy in Figure 1 was used, and DAPI was used to identify dead cells.
Figure 5 shows the detection and gating strategy and the corresponding fluorescence values of the lipidic peroxidation levels in the human nasal epithelial cells after incubation with BODIPY665. Nasal epithelial cells were selected based on morphology after eliminating doublets, and fluorescence levels were determined for BODIPY665. Supplementary Table S13 shows the basal sample results and the control, which were previously incubated with t-BHP and then with BODIPY665.
3.7. Apoptosis and Cell Death Detection
Figure 6 shows the levels of apoptosis and cell death of human nasal epithelial cells after Annexin V and PI staining. Nasal epithelial cells were selected based on morphology after eliminating doublets. Gating for Annexin V−/PI− (live), Annexin V+/PI− (early apoptosis), Annexin V−/PI+ (necrosis), and Annexin V+/PI+ (late apoptosis) populations are demonstrated.
4. Discussion
Numerous studies have shown the importance of OS in the physiopathology of diseases. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the association between OS and pathogenesis could be used to deepen the understanding of the disease’s pathophysiology and the discovery of new therapeutic targets that will allow the development of new drugs with clinical utility. Three approaches are used to measure OS: (i) the direct determination of ROS/RNS; (ii) the determination of oxidative damage to biomolecules (lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids); and (iii) the determination of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems [54]. Whichever method is used, OS is difficult to measure for several reasons. Firstly, sampling itself is a source of OS and must be carried out carefully to avoid OS artificial generation that could oxidise the biomolecules, giving rise to false results. The addition of a control group whose samples are manipulated in the same way as those of the patients would partially solve this problem, since the differences between groups could be attributed to changes related to the disease’s physiopathology. Secondly, many of the techniques used have a low sensitivity, which implies that a large number of cells must be used to obtain reliable results. This is a significant problem, mainly when often limited clinical samples are used. Thirdly, ROS/RNS have a very short half-life and it is therefore difficult to determine them accurately and precisely. To solve this problem, the indirect measurement of ROS/RNS was used by assessing the oxidative damage that these radicals cause in biomolecules [55,56].
Although many analytical techniques have been developed to measure OS over the years, there is still no gold standard. Methods such as electron spin resonance or nuclear magnetic resonance lack sensitivity and are unfeasible due to the short half-life of some ROS/RNS. Other methods, such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or high-performance liquid chromatography, require highly trained personnel. Recently, techniques based on spectrophotometry and enzyme assays have been developed. These methods have several advantages, such as being easy to perform, quantitative, and high-throughput and having a high sensitivity and the ability to be used with a wide variety of biological samples (serum, plasma, saliva, etc.). However, when analysing heterogeneous populations (e.g., blood), all these methods can lead to biased results as they are not able to separate the different cell populations, and therefore only overall results are obtained [55,56,57,58].
Flow cytometry has several advantages over previous methods in determining OS. It can measure OS in a large number of individual cells quickly and identify subpopulations within heterogeneous samples, providing qualitative results from a high number of individual cells from a particular subpopulation, instead of measuring the average of the total population. It also allows the analysis of multiple parameters from the same biological sample in a single experiment. Besides, sorting of subpopulations is possible, allowing further analysis by other methods of these sorted subpopulations. Our group aims to characterise the role of OS in rare respiratory diseases, such as PCD, to study its potential implication in disease pathophysiology. As sample yield obtained from biopsies is often a limiting factor when studying the affected tissue in respiratory diseases, we developed a novel method based on flow cytometry to determine fourteen parameters related to cell metabolism using a small amount of sample. To our knowledge, this is the first use of flow cytometry to assess OS levels in human nasal epithelial cells and could represent a new procedure for the study of respiratory diseases in which nasal epithelial cells are the affected tissue.
It has been described that mitochondria, which are the main cellular organelles involved in the production of ROS/RNS, are affected in some respiratory diseases [59]. Therefore, a new protocol to study the mitochondrial mass, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial production of H2O2 and O2− in human nasal epithelial cell samples was set up. Moreover, a method to measure the general oxidative status of these cells and their ROS and RNS production, including intracellular peroxides, O2−, and ONOO−, was developed. As some respiratory diseases are related to inflammation, which is also related to OS, this methodology allowing us to study reactive species production in affected tissues could be advantageous [1,11]. In addition, the study of intracellular Ca2+ and plasma membrane potential provides investigators with necessary information regarding cell metabolism, which could provide insight into various diseases. In our study, Fluo-4 has been used to measure intracellular Ca2+ levels. Single-wavelength dyes, such as Fluo-4, cannot provide quantitative data as the variability of dye concentration and/or photobleaching influence the emission intensities. Consequently, using Fluo-4 only the presence/absence of intracellular Ca2+ can be determined, and the use of dual-wavelength dyes, such as Fura-2 AM, that allows for accurate quantification of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, is only limited by the C2+ response of Fura-2 [60]. Finally, mitochondrial GSH, one of the most important non-enzymatic defences against OS, can be studied relatively quickly and cheaply using this protocol [9].
Additionally, this work allows the study of OS damage in biomolecules, such as proteins and lipids [1] [10]. Combined with the study of apoptosis and cellular death, this provides a complete profile of the effect of oxidative stress on human nasal epithelial cells, which make up part of the affected tissues in some respiratory diseases, such as PCD [61]. Finally, a great advantage of this method is that a comprehensive set of OS parameters regarding different respiratory diseases could be studied in future research using tiny samples and non-invasive sampling techniques.
5. Limitations
This article was written to show a laboratory protocol to measure OS parameters in nasal epithelial cells. The study was performed using samples from a small number of healthy individuals, so it is not intended to draw conclusions on OS status, which should be done in future research. As an example, the fluorescence values obtained in the samples (Supplementary Tables S1–S13) are shown.
6. Conclusions
We have established a method based on flow cytometry to study a comprehensive set of OS parameters in nasal epithelial cells that could be useful in research on respiratory diseases. This method has the additional advantage of using small amounts of sample and a non-invasive sampling technique.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Spanish association of patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency for donations of research funds to our research group on rare respiratory diseases at IIS INCLIVA/UVEG.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/6/1172/s1, Table S1: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for intracellular H2O2 from six healthy individuals; Table S2: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for O2− from six healthy individuals; Table S3: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for nitric oxide (NO) from six healthy individuals; Table S4: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for peroxynitrite (ONOO−) from six healthy individuals; Table S5: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for GSH from six healthy individuals; Table S6: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for intracellular Calcium (iCa2+) from six healthy individuals; Table S7: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for plasmatic membrane potential (PMP) from six healthy individuals; Table S8: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for mitochondrial membrane potential (∆ψm) from six healthy individuals; Table S9: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for mitochondrial H2O2 (mt H2O2) from six healthy individual; Table S10: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for mitochondrial O2− (mtO2−) from six healthy individuals; Table S11: Labeling for mitochondrial mass from six healthy individuals; Table S12: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for carbonylated proteins from six healthy individuals; Table S13: Basal labeling and the corresponding positive control for the oxidized/reduced lipid ratio (ox/red lipid) from six healthy individuals.
Author Contributions
Conceptualisation, A.R., D.P., S.C., M.M., M.A., G.A., J.E.O., L.B., M.M.N.-G., A.E. and F.D.; methodology, A.R., G.H.; formal analysis, A.R.; investigation, A.R.; resources, S.C., M.A., F.D.; data curation, A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.; writing—review and editing, M.M.N.-G.; visualisation, M.M.N.-G.; supervision, F.D.; project administration, F.D.; funding acquisition, A.E. and F.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The present work was funded by grants from the Spanish Paediatric Pneumology Society 2014, and Valencia Pneumology Society 2015. Some equipment employed in this work was funded by Generalitat Valenciana and co-financed with European Regional Development funds (OP ERDF of Comunitat Valenciana 2014–2020). L.B. is funded by GVA grant number ACIF/2019/231.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia (date of approval: 29 January 2015) and the Hospital General Universitario de Valencia (date of approval: 10 March 2015).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Finkel T., Holbrook N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000;408:239–247. doi: 10.1038/35041687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Le Bras M., Clément M.-V., Pervaiz S., Brenner C. Reactive oxygen species and the mitochondrial signaling pathway of cell death. Histol. Histopathol. 2005;20:205–219. doi: 10.14670/HH-20.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weidinger A., Kozlov A.V. Biological activities of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: Oxidative stress versus signal transduction. Biomolecules. 2015;5:472–484. doi: 10.3390/biom5020472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Figueira T.R., Barros M.H., Camargo A.A., Castilho R.F., Ferreira J.C., Kowaltowski A.J., Sluse F.E., Souza-Pinto N.C., Vercesi A.E. Mitochondria as a source of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: From molecular mechanisms to human health. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013;18:2029–2074. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schroder P., Krutmann J. Environmental oxidative stress—Environmental sources of ROS. Handb. Environ. Chem. 2005;2:19–31. doi: 10.1007/b101144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gupta R.K., Patel A.K., Shah N., Choudhary A.K., Jha U.K., Yadav U.C., Gupta P.K., Pakuwal U. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in disease and cancer: A review. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15:4405–4409. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.11.4405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sies H., Berndt C., Jones D.P. Oxidative stress. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:715–748. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pamplona R., Costantini D. Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011;301:R843–R863. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00034.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alfadda A.A., Sallam R.M. Reactive oxygen species in health and disease. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:936486. doi: 10.1155/2012/936486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Evans M.D., Cooke M.S. Factors contributing to the outcome of oxidative damage to nucleic acids. BioEssays. 2004;26:533–542. doi: 10.1002/bies.20027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rahman T., Hosen I., Islam M.M.T., Shekhar H.U. Oxidative stress and human health. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2012;3:997–1019. doi: 10.4236/abb.2012.327123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guerra J.I.E. Oxidative stress, diseases and antioxidant treatment. An. Med. Interna. 2001;18:326–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Günther J., Seyfert H.-M. The first line of defence: Insights into mechanisms and relevance of phagocytosis in epithelial cells. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018;40:555–565. doi: 10.1007/s00281-018-0701-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Müller L., Brighton L.E., Carson J.L., Ii W.A.F., Jaspers I. Culturing of human nasal epithelial cells at the air liquid interface. J. Vis. Exp. 2013:e50646. doi: 10.3791/50646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thavagnanam S., Parker J.C., McBrien M.E., Skibinski G., Shields M.D., Heaney L.G. Nasal epithelial cells can act as a physiological surrogate for paediatric asthma studies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Domej W., Oetll K., Renner W. Oxidative stress and free radicals in COPD—Implications and relevance for treatment. Int. J. Chronic Obs. Pulm. Dis. 2014;9:1207–1224. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S51226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mishra V., Banga J., Silveyra P. Oxidative stress and cellular pathways of asthma and inflammation: Therapeutic strategies and pharmacological targets. Pharm. Ther. 2017;181:169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Escribano A., Pastor S., Reula A., Castillo S., Vicente S., Sanz F., Casas F., Torres M., Fernández-Fabrellas E., Codoñer-Franch P., et al. Accelerated telomere attrition in children and teenagers with α1-antitrypsin deficiency. Eur. Respir. J. 2016;48:350–358. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00176-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torres-Durán M., Lopez-Campos J.L., Barrecheguren M., Miravitlles M., Martinez-Delgado B., Castillo S., Escribano A., Baloira A., Navarro-Garcia M.M., Pellicer D., et al. Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: Outstanding questions and future directions. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018;13:114. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0856-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Escribano A., Amor M., Pastor S., Castillo S., Sanz F., Codoñer-Franch P., Dasí F. Decreased glutathione and low catalase activity contribute to oxidative stress in children with α-1 antitrypsin deficiency: Table 1. Thorax. 2014;70:82–83. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Magallón M., Navarro-García M.M., Dasí F. Oxidative Stress in COPD. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1953. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zihlif N., Paraskakis E., Tripoli C., Lex C., Bush A. Markers of airway inflammation in primary ciliary dyskinesia studied using exhaled breath condensate. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2006;41:509–514. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rickham P.P. Human experimentation: Code of ethics of W.M.A. BMJ. 1964;2:177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wallberg F., Tenev T., Meier P. Analysis of apoptosis and necroptosis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016;2016:087387. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot087387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang G., Gurtu V., Kain S.R., Yan G. Early detection of apoptosis using a fluorescent conjugate of annexin V. Biotechniques. 1997;23:525–531. doi: 10.2144/97233pf01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kalyanaraman B. Oxidative chemistry of fluorescent dyes: Implications in the detection of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011;39:1221–1225. doi: 10.1042/BST0391221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalyanaraman B., Hardy M., Podsiadly R., Cheng G., Zielonka J. Recent developments in detection of superoxide radical anion and hydrogen peroxide: Opportunities, challenges, and implications in redox signaling. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2017;617:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eruslanov E., Kusmartsev S. Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010;594:57–72. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crow J.P. Dichlorodihydrofluorescein and Dihydrorhodamine 123 are sensitive indicators of Peroxynitritein Vitro: Implications for intracellular measurement of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species. Nitric Oxide. 1997;1:145–157. doi: 10.1006/niox.1996.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dikalov S.I., Harrison D.G. Methods for detection of mitochondrial and cellular reactive oxygen species. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014;20:372–382. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Díez I., Calatayud S., Hernandez C., Quintana E., O’Connor J., Esplugues J., Barrachina M.D. Nitric oxide, derived from inducible nitric oxide synthase, decreases hypoxia inducible factor-1α in macrophages during aspirin-induced mesenteric inflammation. Br. J. Pharm. 2010;159:1636–1645. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00654.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Namin S.M., Nofallah S., Joshi M.S., Kavallieratos K., Tsoukias N.M. Kinetic analysis of DAF-FM activation by NO: Toward calibration of a NO-sensitive fluorescent dye. Nitric Oxide. 2013;28:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2012.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hedley D.W., Chow S. Evaluation of methods for measuring cellular glutathione content using flow cytometry. Cytometry. 1994;15:349–358. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990150411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sebastià J., Cristòfol R., Martin M., Rodríguez-Farré E., Sanfeliu C. Evaluation of fluorescent dyes for measuring intracellular glutathione content in primary cultures of human neurons and neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y. Cytom. Part A. 2002;51:16–25. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Evans J.A., Darlington D.N., Gann D.S. A circulating factor(s) mediates cell depolarization in hemorrhagic shock. Ann. Surg. 1991;213:549–557. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199106000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Perry S.W., Norman J.P., Barbieri J., Brown E.B., Gelbard H.A. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: A practical usage guide. Biotechnique. 2011;50:98–115. doi: 10.2144/000113610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Petrat F., Pindiur S., Kirsch M., De Groot H. “Mitochondrial” photochemical drugs do not release toxic amounts of 1O2 within the mitochondrial matrix space. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003;412:207–215. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9861(03)00063-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Scaduto R.C., Grotyohann L.W. Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential using fluorescent rhodamine derivatives. Biophys. J. 1999;76:469–477. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77214-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Presley A.D., Fuller K.M., Arriaga E.A. MitoTracker Green labeling of mitochondrial proteins and their subsequent analysis by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B. 2003;793:141–150. doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00371-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Doherty E., Perl A. Measurement of mitochondrial mass by flow cytometry during oxidative stress. React. Oxyg. Species. 2017;4:275–283. doi: 10.20455/ros.2017.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mukhopadhyay P., Rajesh M., Yoshihiro K., Haskó G., Pacher P. Simple quantitative detection of mitochondrial superoxide production in live cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007;358:203–208. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dickinson B.C., Lin V.S., Chang C.J. Preparation and use of MitoPY1 for imaging hydrogen peroxide in mitochondria of live cells. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8:1249–1259. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gee K., Brown K., Chen W.-N., Bishop-Stewart J., Gray D., Johnson I. Chemical and physiological characterization of fluo-4 Ca2+-indicator dyes. Cell Calcium. 2000;27:97–106. doi: 10.1054/ceca.1999.0095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wesseling M.C., Wagner-Britz L., Boukhdoud F., Asanidze S., Nguyen D.B., Kaestner L., Bernhardt I. Measurements of intracellular Ca2+ content and phosphatidylserine exposure in human red blood cells: Methodological issues. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016;38:2414–2425. doi: 10.1159/000445593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Naguib Y.M.A. Antioxidant Activities of Astaxanthin and Related Carotenoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000;48:1150–1154. doi: 10.1021/jf991106k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Raudsepp P., Brüggemann D.A., Andersen M.L. Detection of radicals in single droplets of oil-in-water emulsions with the lipophilic fluorescent probe BODIPY665/676 and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014;70:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chaudhuri A.R., De Waal E.M., Pierce A., Van Remmen H., Ward W.F., Richardson A. Detection of protein carbonyls in aging liver tissue: A fluorescence-based proteomic approach. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006;127:849–861. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Perumalsamy H., Sankarapandian K., Kandaswamy N., Balusamy S.R., Periyathambi D., Raveendiran N. Cellular effect of styrene substituted biscoumarin caused cellular apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017;92:104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2017.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Akasaki Y., Alvarez-Garcia O., Saito M., Caramés B., Iwamoto Y., Lotz M.K. FoxO transcription factors support oxidative stress resistance in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:3349–3358. doi: 10.1002/art.38868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Beltrán B., Nos P., Dasí F., Iborra M., Bastida G., Martínez M., Oʼconnor J.-E., Sáez G., Moret I., Ponce J. Mitochondrial dysfunction, persistent oxidative damage, and catalase inhibition in immune cells of naïve and treated Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010;16:76–86. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Herrera G., Martínez A., O’Cornor J., Blanco M. Functional assays of oxidative stress using genetically engineered Escherichia coli Strains. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 2003;24:11–16. doi: 10.1002/0471142956.cy1116s24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Thor H., Smith M.T., Hartzell P., Bellomo G., Jewell S.A., Orrenius S. The metabolism of menadione (2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) by isolated hepatocytes. A study of the implications of oxidative stress in intact cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1982;257:12419–12425. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33730-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khailova L.S., Rokitskaya T.I., Kotova E.A., Antonenko Y.N. Effect of cyanide on mitochondrial membrane depolarization induced by uncouplers. Biochemistry. 2017;82:1140–1146. doi: 10.1134/S0006297917100066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Katerji M., Filippova M., Duerksen-Hughes P. Approaches and methods to measure oxidative stress in clinical samples: Research applications in the cancer field. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019;2019:1279250. doi: 10.1155/2019/1279250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Palmieri B., Sblendorio V. Oxidative stress tests: Overview on reliability and use. Part II. Eur. Rev. Med Pharm. Sci. 2008;11:383–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Palmieri B., Sblendorio V. Oxidative stress tests: Overview on reliability and use. Part I. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2007;11:309–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Palmieri B., Sblendorio V. Current status of measuring oxidative stress. Methods Mol. Biol. 2009;594:3–17. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rahman I., Biswas S.K. Non-invasive biomarkers of oxidative stress: Reproducibility and methodological issues. Redox Rep. 2004;9:125–143. doi: 10.1179/135100004225005219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bhatti J.S., Bhatti G.K., Reddy P.H. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in metabolic disorders—A step towards mitochondria based therapeutic strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Basis Dis. 2017;1863:1066–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tinning P.W., Franssen A.J.P.M., Hridi S.U., Bushell T.J., McConnell G. A 340/380 Nm Light Emitting Diode Illuminator for Fura-2 AM Ratiometric Ca2+ imaging of live cells with better than 5 NM Precision. J Microsc. 2018;269:212–220. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Reula A., Lucas J.S., Moreno-Galdó A., Romero T., Milara X., Carda C., Mata-Roig M., Escribano A., Dasi F., Armengot-Carceller M. New insights in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs. 2017;5:537–548. doi: 10.1080/21678707.2017.1324780. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical restrictions.