Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2020 Feb 28;528(13):2174–2194. doi: 10.1002/cne.24883

Characterization of Drosophila octopamine receptor neuronal expression using MiMIC-converted Gal4 lines

Hannah M McKinney 1, Lewis M Sherer 2, Jessica L Williams 1,3, Sarah J Certel 2,4, R Steven Stowers 1
PMCID: PMC7998515  NIHMSID: NIHMS1560698  PMID: 32060912

Abstract

Octopamine, the invertebrate analog of norepinephrine, is known to modulate a large variety of behaviors in Drosophila including feeding initiation, locomotion, aggression, and courtship, among many others. Significantly less is known about the identity of the neurons that receive octopamine input and how they mediate octopamine-regulated behaviors. Here, we characterize adult neuronal expression of MiMIC-converted Trojan-Gal4 lines for each of the five Drosophila octopamine receptors. Broad neuronal expression was observed for all five octopamine receptors, yet distinct differences among them were also apparent. Use of immunostaining for the octopamine neurotransmitter synthesis enzyme Tdc2, along with a novel genome-edited conditional Tdc2-LexA driver, revealed all five octopamine receptors express in Tdc2/octopamine neurons to varying degrees. This suggests autoreception may be an important circuit mechanism by which octopamine modulates behavior.

Keywords: autoreception, Drosophila, octopamine, octopamine receptor, RRID:AB_221568, RRID:AB_2340686, RRID:AB_2340850, RRID:AB_2536611, RRID:AB_2633280, RRID:AB_2814891, RRID:BDSC_27392, RRID:BDSC_42119, RRID:BDSC_43050, RRID: BDSC_57940, RRID:BDSC_59133, RRID:BDSC_60312, RRID:BDSC_60313, RRID: BDSC_67636, RRID:BDSC_68264

1 |. INTRODUCTION

The vertebrate adrenergic system is integral to countless behavioral and physiological processes, including stress response (Snyder & Silberman, 2019), metabolic maintenance (Ciccarelli, Sorriento, Coscioni, Iaccarino, & Santulli, 2016), and neuropsychiatric diseases (Langer, 2015; Sallee, Connor, & Newcorn, 2013). Adrenergic signaling occurs via the release of adrenaline (epinephrine) and noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Both adrenaline and noradrenaline exert their various effects by binding to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). These receptors are classified as either α-adrenergic or β-adrenergic and trigger numerous downstream signaling events, including the activation of protein kinases and increased gene transcription, through the second messengers cyclic AMP (cAMP) and calcium (Ca2+) (Ciccarelli et al., 2016; Cole & Sood, 2012; Santulli & Iaccarino, 2013; Vaniotis et al., 2011). In addition to the complexity of downstream signaling, the location of adrenergic receptors is multifaceted with receptors located presynaptically as well as postsynaptically (Langer & Angel, 1991). While many studies in recent decades have examined the role of postsynaptic adrenergic receptors, the impact of presynaptic receptors, or autoreceptors, on circuits that regulate behavior and as targets for drug discovery remains poorly examined.

Drosophila melanogaster offers several advantages to investigating adrenergic receptor localization and function including a sophisticated genetic toolbox, a simpler nervous system, and a reduced number of neurotransmitter receptors as compared to vertebrates. In Drosophila, octopamine (Oct), the structural analogue of norepinephrine, is synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine via the action of tyrosine decarboxylase (Tdc) and tyramine-ß-hydroxylase (Roeder, 1999). Oct exerts its effects by binding to Oct receptors (OctRs), including five adrenergic-like receptors in Drosophila: two α-adrenergic-like GPCRs (OAMB and Octα2R) and three β-adrenergic-like GPCRs (Octβ1R, Octβ2R, and Octβ3R) (Balfanz, Strunker, Frings, & Baumann, 2005; El-Kholy et al., 2015; Evans & Maqueira, 2005; Han, Millar, & Davis, 1998; Maqueira, Chatwin, & Evans, 2005; Qi et al., 2017).

Presynaptic autoreceptors provide a retrograde transfer of information mediated by the released transmitter of the presynaptic neuron and can perform autoregulatory functions in neurotransmission. For example, at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ), activation of Octβ2R autoreceptors is required for the growth of Oct arbors during development and in response to starvation, while the inhibition of this synaptic growth depends on the autoreceptor function of Octβ1R (Koon et al., 2011; Koon & Budnik, 2012). Autoreception may also provide a critical component in regulating the activity of neurons that release more than one neurotransmitter, neuropeptide or neuromodulator, such as neurons expressing dopamine and the vesicular glutamate transporter (Aguilar et al., 2017). Most recently, it has been shown that the majority of octopaminergic neurons also express glutamate (Sherer et al., in press). As dual neurotransmitter usage is now recognized to occur throughout the nervous system of invertebrates and vertebrates (Hoopfer, 2016; Nassel, 2018; Seal & Edwards, 2006; Vaaga, Borisovska, & Westbrook, 2014), elucidating the role of the corresponding neurotransmitter receptors, including as autoreceptors, is important for understanding of the functionality of dual transmitter neurons.

As a precursor to addressing the functional impact of OctR presynaptic and postsynaptic signaling on Oct transmission, we first sought to determine the neuronal expression patterns of Drosophila OctRs. Our approach was to generate Trojan-Gal4 lines for OAMB, Octβ1R, Octβ2R, and Octβ3R through MiMIC conversion (Diao et al., 2015). MiMIC converted Gal4 drivers faithfully recapitulate the cellular expression of their corresponding genes (Diao et al., 2015) as they are located at the endogenous chromosomal locus of their respective genes and thus the complete regulatory region of each gene directs their expression. Here, we characterized the adult central nervous system expression patterns of each new OctR-Gal4 line along with the Octα2R Trojan-Gal4 from the Gene Disruption Project (Li-Kroeger et al., 2018), and examined OctR autoreception expression in Tdc2 neurons. To further refine our autoreceptor analysis, we generated new intersectional genetic tools for Tdc2 and the Drosophila non-NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptor DmGluR1A (Ultsch et al., 1992) to provide a genetic means of identifying co-expression with OctRs. Each OctR exhibited unique autoreceptor expression patterns using both antibody staining and genetic approaches. We also identified a number of neurons co-expressing OctRs and GluRIA, thus indicating the potential convergence of dual Oct-glutamate signals to the same downstream target neurons. Our new tools provide novel intersectional methods to use in further identifying and understanding the complexities of adrenergic receptor signaling and localization.

2 |. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid construction

The pCFD4-Tdc2 and pCFD4-GluRIA double guide RNA plasmids were generated as previously described (Port, Chen, Lee, & Bullock, 2014). Targeting sequences included in pCFD4-Tdc2 guide RNAs are CATAATAAAGCTCACCGT and AAATCTTTTATAGGACGA. Targeting sequences included in pCFD4-GluRIA guide RNAs are GGCGAGCC CAGGCGAATT and GCCATGGCTCGTTGGGGA. Donor plasmids were constructed with NEBuilder HiFi (New England Biolabs) in the vector pHSG298 (Takara Biosciences). The complete sequences of all donor plasmids are shown in Supplemental Information.

The 20XUAS-DSCP-KD, 20XUAS-B3, 10XQUAS-DSCP-His2B-mCherry, and 10XUAS-DSCP-His2A-GFP expression clones were assembled using Gateway MultiSite cloning as previously described (Petersen & Stowers, 2011). The L1-10XQUAS-DSCP-L5 entry clone was generated using the L1-10XQUAS-L4 entry clone (Petersen & Stowers, 2011) as template such that the hsp70 minimal promoter was replaced with the Drosophila synthetic core promoter (DSCP) (Pfeiffer et al., 2008). The table below includes fly lines created for publication in this article.

Genome-edited Fly Strains
B3RT-Tdc2-LexA
KDRT-GluRIA-QF2
Transgenic Fly Strains Landing Site
LexAop2-6XmCherry JMK66B
UAS-His2A-GFP VK18 (53B), VK5 (75A)
LexAop2-His2B-mCherry JMK66B
UAS-KD VK18 (53B)
UAS-B3 VK31 (62E)
QUAS-His2B-mCherry VK2 (28E)

Genome editing

The pCFD4-Tdc2 guide RNA plasmid was co-injected with the B3RT-TDC2-LexA donor plasmid into embryos of strain nos-Cas9 TH_attP2 (Ren et al., 2013) by Bestgene, Inc. The surviving adults that were injected as embryos were crossed to yw; UAS-B3; n-syb-GAL4, LexAop2-6XmCherry and genome-edited B3RT-TDC2-LexA chromosomes were identified by fluorescence. The observation that the B3RT-Tdc2 female is homozygous sterile suggests the function of the Tdc2 gene is likely disrupted prior to excision as this is the phenotype of the octopamine null mutant (Monastirioti, 2003). Nevertheless, B3RT-Tdc2 remains a reliable and valid tool for identifying Tdc2 neurons. The pCFD4-GluRIA guide RNA plasmid was co-injected with the KDRT-GluRIA-QF2 donor plasmid into embryos of strain nos-Cas9 TH_attP40 (Ren et al., 2013) by Bestgene, Inc. The surviving adults that were injected as embryos were crossed to yw; N-syb-GAL4; UAS-B3, LexAop2-6XmCherry and genome-edited KDRT-GluRIA-QF2 chromosomes were identified by fluorescence.

Germline excisions and inversions

Germline excisions were generated by crossing B3RT-Tdc2-LexA to yw; nos-GAL4; UAS-DSCP-B3 and KDRT-GluRIA-QF2 to yw; nos-GAL4; 20XUAS-DSCP-KD. Progeny males of the appropriate genotype were crossed to a second chromosome balancer stock to generate individual flies with potential germline excisions. Germline excisions were identified by taking individual males from the first balancer cross and crossing them to a 13XLexAop2-6XmCherry-HA or 10XQUAS-6XmCherry-HA fluorescent reporter and screening directly for fluorescence. Balanced fly stocks containing the desired germline excised or inverted chromosomes were established from progeny of positive single male crosses.

Fly strains/MiMIC lines

A table of original fly lines used in this paper can be found in the Supplemental Information. Flies were raised on standard cornmeal, yeast and agar food at 25°C and occasionally kept at 18°C after sorting and prior to dissection. MiMIC lines OAMB (BDSC #57940); Octβ1R (BDSC #42119); Octβ2R (BDSC #59133); Octβ3R BDSC #43050) were converted to Trojan-Gal4 lines following recombinase-mediated cassette exchange as described in Diao et al. (2015). Octα2R-Gal4 (BDSC #67636), vGlut-Gal4 (BDSC #60312) Tdc2-Gal4-AD (BDSC #68264) and vGlut-Gal4-DBD (BDSC # 60313), and UAS-CD8-mCherry (F. Schnorrer, BDSC# 27392) were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center.

2.1 |. Immunostaining

Immunostaining was performed as previously described (Certel & Thor, 2004). Primary antibodies and dilution factors: The SYN (3C11) mAb 1:50 developed by Buchner (Klagges et al., 1996), anti-bruchpilot (nc82) mAb 1:30 developed by Buchner were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, created by the NICHD of the NIH and maintained at The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242; rabbit Abfinity anti-GFP (Thermo-Fisher) 1:400, mouse anti-GFP 3E6 (Thermo-Fisher) 1:200, rat anti-mCherry 16D7 (Thermo-Fisher) 1:400, rabbit anti-mCherry (Abcam ab213511) 1:500, mouse anti-mCherry 1:400 (Biorbyt orb256058); rat anti-GFP 8H12 (Kerafast) 1:200; rabbit anti-Tdc2 (pab0822-P, Covalab) 1:400 and 1:200). Secondary antibodies and dilution factors: donkey anti-mouse Alexa 488 (Jackson Immunoresearch 715-546-151) 1:400; goat anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (Thermo-Fisher A32731) 1:400; donkey anti-rat Alexa 488 (Jackson 712-546-153) 1:400; goat anti-rabbit JF549 (Novus NBP1-72732JF549) 1:200; donkey anti-mouse JF549 (Novus NBP1-75119JF549) 1:200; goat anti-rat JF549 (Novus NBP1-75398JF549) 1:200; goat anti-rabbit JF646 (NBP1-72732JF646) 1:200; donkey anti-mouse JF646 (Novus NBP1-75119JF646) 1:200, and goat anti-rat JF646 (Novus NBP1-75398JF646) 1:200.

3 |. RESULTS

Earlier generation OctR-Gal4 drivers utilized only one to three kilobases of OctR promoter regions (El-Kholy et al., 2015), even though each of the OctR genes span tens of kilobases in the Drosophila genome. As such, the respective regulatory regions are likely more extensive, making it probable that existing OctR-Gal4 lines provide incomplete OctR expression patterns. Additionally, as with all transgenes, the existing OctR-Gal4 lines are potentially subject to position effects associated with transgenic insertion sites. To more accurately recapitulate the complete neuronal expression pattern of Drosophila OctRs as a precursor to functional studies, we generated Trojan-Gal4 lines for OAMB, Octβ1R, Octβ2R, and Octβ3R using the previously described cross scheme (Diao et al., 2015) and examined their expression patterns using both nuclear (UAS-His2A-GFP; Figure 1a1a5) and plasma membrane (UAS-CD-mCherry; Figure 1c1c5) markers. These drivers likely are complete and accurate reporters of the transcriptional expression of their respective OctR genes since the Trojan-GAL4 lines are located at the endogenous genomic location of each OctR gene within coding introns common to all isoforms (Figure 1b1b5). As such, they represent the “gold standard” for reporting on the complete expression pattern of a gene (Diao et al., 2015). It is worth noting, however, that translational regulation of OctR protein expression cannot be ruled out and thus could differ from the patterns reported here using fluorescent reporters. Additional advantages of these lines include the absence of position effects and the detection of OctR gene expression with higher sensitivity and higher fidelity.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Expression patterns of MiMIC OctR-Gal4 lines. Nuclear expression patterns in male adult brains for (a1) OAMB > His2A-GFP, (a2) Octα2R > His2A-GFP, (a3) Octβ1R > His2A-GFP, (a4) Octβ2R > His2A-GFP, (a5) Octβ3R > His2A-GFP; genomic locations of MiMIC insertions retrieved from flybase.org for (b1) OAMB-Gal4, (b2) Octα2R, (b3) Octβ1R, (b4) Octβ2R, (b5) Octβ3R; expression patterns using a plasma membrane reporter (c1) OAMB > CD8-mCherry, (c2) Octα2R > CD8-mCherry, (c3) Octβ1R > CD8-mCherry, (c4) Octβ2R > CD8-mCherry, (c5) Octβ3R > CD8-mCherry. Scale bar = 75 μm. Antibodies used: anti-mCherry (green) and anti-SYN (blue)

3.1 |. Tdc2 and OctR co-expression

To assess the possibility of OctR autoreception in the central brain, we mapped OctR expression in octopaminergic neurons using two approaches. First, we expressed a UAS-driven nuclear GFP reporter via the individual OctR-Gal4 lines and analyzed Oct/tyramine co-expression with an antibody against Tdc2. As Oct is synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine via the action of Tdc2 and Tβh in invertebrates (Cole et al., 2005), the Tdc2 antibody (Meiselman, Kingan, & Adams, 2018; Pauls, Blechschmidt, Frantzmann, El Jundi, & Selcho, 2018; Pech, Pooryasin, Birman, & Fiala, 2013) recognizes neurons that express Oct and/or tyramine (hereafter “Tdc2+ neurons” for simplicity).

Second, we utilized a novel intersectional genetic method to label Tdc2-expressing neurons and determine co-expression with each OctR-Gal4 driven reporter. For each OctR-Gal4, at least 25 adult brains were examined per genotype and the representative nuclear expression pattern in anterior and posterior sections is shown. Results from both methods revealed significant coexpression of Tdc2 and OctR’s, suggesting putative locations for autoreception.

3.2 |. Oct α-adrenergic receptors: OAMB and Octα2R

Oct neurons in the adult Drosophila brain are located in discernible clusters (Busch et al., 2009) throughout anterior and posterior sections (Figure 2a1a3). Our newly generated OAMB-Gal4 line drives nuclear GFP expression as expected in the mushroom body Kenyon cells (El-Kholy et al., 2015; Han et al., 1998) as well as broadly throughout the rest of the brain (see Figure 2bg3) and VNC (Figure 2h1i3). In anterior sections of the brain, Tdc2 and His2A-GFP nuclear expression driven by OAMB-Gal4 (henceforth OAMB > His2A-GFP) are co-expressed within the ASM cluster of Tdc2+ neurons (Figure 2c1c3, closed arrows), which is located superior to the antennal lobes (AL) (Figure 2a2). Within this cluster, OAMB > His2A-GFP was not found in two pairs of Tdc2+ neurons (Figure 2c1-c3, open arrows). Tdc2 and OAMB > His2A-GFP were co-expressed in the VL neurons, located between the AL and the ventrolateral protocerebrum (Figure 2a2, see Figure 7). Co-expression was not detected in the anterior or posterior subesophageal ganglion (SEZ; Figure 2d1d3, f1f3, open arrows) or in the PB1 cluster of Tdc2+ neurons in the posterior superior medial protocerebrum (PSMP; Figure 2g1g3, open arrows).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

OAMB is expressed in a subset of Oct neurons. (a1) Tdc2 expression (red) in a control UAS-His2A-GFP/+ brain. Scale bar = 50 μm (a2) Anterior optical sections of (a1) outlining Tdc2+ neuronal clusters (uppercase): ASM cluster in the ASMP (anterior superior medial protocerebrum), AL (antennal lobe) clusters AL1 and AL2, VL (ventrolateral), SEZ (subesophageal ganglion) (a3) Posterior sections of (a1): PSM and PB1 clusters in posterior superior medial protocerebrum (PSMP), PB2 cluster in pb (protocerebral bridge), oes (esophagus), SEZ (b) Anterior sections (46–76) of OAMB > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (c1–c3) Solid white rectangle from b showing co-expression of Tdc2 (red) and OAMB (green) in the ASM cluster of Tdc2 neurons (closed arrows) and neurons with no co-expression (open arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d1–d3) Dashed rectangle from (b) showing no co-expressing neurons in the SEZ (open arrows) Scale bar = 10 μm. (e) Posterior sections (1–37) of OAMB > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (f1–f3) Solid white rectangle from (e) showing no discernible co-expression in the SEZ (open arrows). (g) Dashed rectangle from (e) showing no co-expression seen in the PSMP region of the brain (open arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm. Antibodies used: anti-Tdc2 (red), anti-GFP (green), and anti-SYN (blue). (h1–h3) Nuclear GFP (h1, green) expression pattern in adult VNC with Tdc2 (h2, red) co-expression (h3, closed white arrow). Scale bar =30 μm. (i1–i3) Solid rectangle from (h1) showing neurons co-expressing with Tdc2 (closed white arrow) and neurons without Tdc2 co-expression (open white arrow) in the VNC. Scale bar = 30 μm. Antibodies used (h1–i3): anti-brp (blue), anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red)

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Examination of sex differences among OctR-Gal4 lines. Full z-stacks of anterior and posterior sections of male and female brains with overlapping Tdc2 stain. (a1–b2) OAMB-Gal4 > His2A-GFP, (c1–d2) Octα2R-Gal4 > His2A-GFP, (e1–f2) Octβ1R-Gal4 > His2A-GFP, (g1–h2) Octβ2R-Gal4 > His2A-GFP, and (i1–j2) Octβ3R-Gal4 > His2A-GFP. Scale bars = 50 μm. Antibodies used: anti-SYN (blue), anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red)

Similar to OAMB, we found Octα2R-Gal4 driven His2A-GFP (Octα2R > His2A-GFP) expression widespread throughout the brain (Figure 3a,b) and VNC (Figure 3e1f3). Octα2R > His2A-GFP/Tdc2 co-expression was seen within the majority of ASM Tdc2+ neurons, and in the SEZ and AL2 neurons (Figure 3c1c3, closed white arrows). Examination of single confocal sections of the VNC revealed a number of neurons showing co-expression with Tdc2 (Figure 3f1f3, closed white arrows) and a number of Tdc2+ neurons lacking His2A-GFP expression (Figure 3f1f3, closed white arrow). In contrast to the absence of OAMB/Tdc2 co-expression in the SEZ, Octα2R > His2A-GFP is co-expressed in the majority of Tdc2+ neurons in the SEZ (Figure 3c1d3, closed arrows) with the exception of one pair in the posterior SEZ (Figure 3d1d3, open arrows). Co-expression was also detected in the PSM and VL clusters (see Figure 7). The identification of distinct clusters of alpha-adrenergic autoreceptor expression indicates potential key areas of functional differences.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Octα2R is expressed in a subset of Oct neurons. (a) Anterior optical sections (58–79) of Octα2R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm.(b) Posterior sections (3–37) of Octα2R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (c1–c3) Solid white rectangle from (a) showing co-expression of nuclear GFP (green) in Tdc2-stained somata (red) of the SEZ (closed arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d1–d3) Solid white rectangle from (b) showing co-expression (closed arrows) of Tdc2 and nuclear GFP in posterior SEZ neurons. Open arrows indicate a single pair of SEZ neurons with no co-expression. Scale bar = 10 μm. Antibodies used: anti-GFP (green), anti-SYN (blue), anti-Tdc2 (red). (e1–e3) Nuclear GFP (e1, green) expression pattern in adult VNC with Tdc2 (e2, red) co-expression (e3, closed white arrows). Scale bar = 30 μm. (f1–f3) Solid rectangle from (e1) showing co-expression (closed white arrows) and at least one neuron with no co-expression (open arrow) in the VNC. Scale bar = 30 μm. Antibodies used (e1–f3): anti-brp (blue), anti-GFP (green), and anti-Tdc2 (red)

3.3 |. Oct β-adrenergic receptors: Octβ1R, Octβ2R, and Octβ3R

His2A-GFP expression driven by Octβ1R-Gal4 (Octβ1R > His2A-GFP) was widespread throughout the central brain, including the Kenyon cells (Figure 4a,b), and the VNC (Figure 4f1g3). In contrast to OAMB, Tdc2 and Octβ1R > His2A-GFP were co-expressed in the AL1, PB1 and VM clusters of Tdc2+ neurons (Figure 4c1d3). Within the AL clusters, there were a number of co-expressing neurons (Figure 4c1c3, closed arrows) and at least one neuron with no co-expression (Figure 4cc2, open arrow). In the posterior and anterior sections of the SEZ, Octβ1R > His2A-GFP exhibited co-expression with Tdc2 (Figure 4ee2). At least one neuron in the VNC of Octβ1R > His2A-GFP co-expressed with Tdc2 (Figure 4f1f3, closed white arrow) while the majority of neurons in the VNC did not co-express with Tdc2 (Figure 4g1g3, open white arrow).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Octβ1R is expressed in a subset of Oct neurons. (a) Anterior sections (26–33) of Octβ1R > His2A-GFP showing broad GFP expression. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Posterior sections (6–14) of Octβ1R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (c–c2) Solid white rectangle from (a) showing co-expression of Octβ1R > His2A-GFP (green) in the AL2 cluster Tdc2+ neurons (red). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d–d2) Dashed rectangle from (b) showing Octβ1R co-expression in the Tdc2+ (red) PB1 cluster (closed arrows). Neurons negative for co-expression are illustrated with open arrows. Scale bar = 10 μm. (e1–e3) Solid white rectangle from (b) showing co-expression of Octβ1R > His2A-GFP (green) in Tdc2+ neurons (red) in posterior SEZ (closed arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm. Antibodies used: anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red), anti-SYN (blue). (f1–f3) Nuclear GFP (f1, green) expression pattern in adult VNC with Tdc2 (f2, red) co-expression (f3, closed white arrow). Scale bar = 30 μm. (g1–g3) Solid rectangle from (f1) showing a neuron without co-expression with Tdc2 (open arrow). Scale bar =30 μm. Antibodies used (f1–g3): anti-brp (blue), anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red)

Octβ2R-Gal4 driven His2A-GFP expression (Octβ2R > His2A-GFP; Figure 5ac) was detected with Tdc2 in all Tdc2+ neuron clusters in the adult brain (Figure 5dh2) and only one neuron in the VNC (Figure 5i1j3, closed white arrow). Several pairs of Tdc2+ neurons in the ASM cluster co-expressed Tdc2 and Octβ2R > His2A-GFP, with at least one pair negative for co-expression (Figure 5d1d3). A significant amount of co-expression was observed in the AL2 cluster of the AL (Figure 5e1e3, closed white arrows), however Octβ2R > His2A-GFP was not detected in AL1 neurons (Figure 5e1e3, open arrows). At least two VM neurons in the SEZ co-expressed Octβ2R > His2A-GFP and Tdc2 (Figure 5g1g3), with co-expression also seen in PB1 cluster of the PSMP region (Figure 5h1h3, closed white arrow).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Octβ2R expresses in a subset of Oct neurons. (a) Anterior sections (70–93) of Octβ2R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Middle sections (36–65) of Octβ2R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (c) Posterior sections (15–31) of Octβ2R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar 50 μm. (d1–d3) Solid white rectangle from (a) showing co-expression of Tdc2 (red) and Octβ2R > His2A-GFP(green) in the ASM cluster (closed arrows) with at least one pair of Tdc2 neurons showing no co-expression (open arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm (e1–e3) Dashed rectangle from (a) indicating co-expression of Tdc2 (red) and Octβ2R > His2A-GFP (green) in AL2 cluster (closed white arrows). A pair of AL1 neurons (open white arrows) did not exhibit co-expression. Scale bar = 10 μm. (f1–f3) Dotted rectangle from (a) showing co-expression in the anterior section of the SEZ (closed arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm (g1–g3) Solid white rectangle from (b) showing co-expression in the SEZ. Scale bar = 10 μm. (h1–h3) Some co-expression of Tdc2 and Octβ2R > His2A-GFP (closed arrows) and neurons not showing co-expression (open arrows) in the PB1 cluster of the PSMP region. Scale bar = 10 μm. Antibodies used: anti-Tdc2 (red), anti-GFP (green) and anti-SYN (blue). (i1–i3) Nuclear GFP (i1, green) expression pattern in adult VNC with Tdc2 (i2, red) co-expression in one neuron (i3). Scale bar = 30 μm. (j1–j3) Solid rectangle from (i1) with only one neuron showing co-expression with Tdc2 (closed white arrow). Scale bar = 30 μm. Antibodies used (f1–g3): anti-brp (blue), anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red)

Figure 6 illustrates the widespread neuronal expression of His2A-GFP driven by the Octβ3R-Gal4 (Octβ3R > His2A-GFP; Figure 6a,b). Octβ3R > His2A-GFP co-expression with Tdc2 was detected in several Tdc2+ neuronal clusters, including both the anterior and PSMP of adult brains (Figure 6c1d3, closed white arrows) and in at least one neuron in the VNC (Figure 6f1f3, closed white arrow). Lack of co-expression was also seen in the PSMP (Figure 6d1d3, open white arrows) and in the VNC (Figure 6f1f3, open white arrows).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Octβ3R is expressed in a subset of Oct neurons. (a) Anterior sections (32–42) of Octβ3R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Posterior sections (0–26) of Octβ3R > His2A-GFP. Scale bar = 50 μm. (c1-c3) White rectangle from (a) showing co-expression in the ASM cluster of Tdc2 neurons (closed arrows). Scale bar = 10 μm. (d1–d3) White rectangle from (b) showing some co-expression in PSMP cluster of Tdc2 neurons (closed arrows) and some neurons negative for co-expression (open arrows). Scale bar 10 μm. Antibodies used: anti-Tdc2 (red), anti-GFP (green) and anti-SYN (blue). (e1–e3) Nuclear GFP (e1, green) expression pattern in adult VNC with Tdc2 (e2, red) co-expression (e3). Scale bar = 30 μm. (f1–f3) Solid rectangle from (e1) showing co-expression with Tdc2 (closed white arrow) and neurons showing no co-expression (open arrow). Scale bar = 30 μm. Antibodies used: anti-brp (blue), anti-GFP (green), anti-Tdc2 (red)

3.4 |. Sex differences in OctR-Gal4 expression

Levels of Octα2R mRNA in particular have been reported to be higher in males than females (Qi et al., 2017). This difference could reflect a greater number of Octα2R-expressing neurons in males or sex-specific differences in gene expression. We thus decided to examine differences between males and females in every OctR-Gal4 line and also observe any differences in their co-expression with the Tdc2 antibody (Figure 7). While neuron count was not quantified, no gross differences in Gal4 > His2A-GFP expression patterns were seen between males and females (Figure 7a1j2). However, we did determine Octα2R > His2A-GFP expression in females co-localized with Tdc2 in the posterior SEZ (Figure 7d2, closed white arrow) while in males Octα2R > His2A-GFP expression was not detectable in this pair of Tdc2+ VM neurons (Figure 7c2, open white arrow). These results indicate potential sex-specific differences in α-adrenergic autoreceptor expression and suggest an area for further study. In summary, we have generated new OctR-Gal4 lines and determined each OctR has the potential to serve an autoregulatory function due to co-expression within distinct Tdc2+ clusters.

3.5 |. B3RT-Tdc2-LexA intersectional genetics confirms potential autoreceptor locations

As shown above with the MiMIC OctR-Gal4s, distinct presynaptic receptor expression was observed for each OctR. To independently assess the overlap of OctR expression with Tdc2+ neurons, a variant of Tdc2, B3RT-Tdc2-LexA (hereafter B3RT-Tdc2), was developed via CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing (see Section 2). B3RT-Tdc2 incorporates one B3 recombinase target site, B3RT, (Nern, Pfeiffer, Svoboda, & Rubin, 2011) into the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the Tdc2 genomic locus, and a second B3RT adjacent to the coding sequence of the LexA transcription factor in an intron between the first two coding exons (Figure 8a). Prior to excision of the DNA between the B3RTs, LexA is not expressed, but after excision, a Tdc2-LexA driver results. Thus, intersectional expression between any Gal4 driver and Tdc2 neurons can be revealed using B3RT-Tdc2 in combination with a UAS-B3 recombinase transgene and a LexAop reporter. Since B3RT excisions are effectively permanent, any neurons experiencing excisions during development will retain those excisions in the adult, even if Gal4 expression is not maintained. LexAop reporter expression that does not also show UAS expression may thus be observed with some Gal4 drivers as a result of excisions that occurred during development. No LexAop2 reporter expression was detected in the absence of a Gal4 driver (Figure 8b), thus indicating neither the UAS-B3 recombinase nor LexAop2–6XmCherry reporter exhibits leaky expression.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

B3RT-Tdc2 expression in α-adrenergic-like receptors. (a) Schematic of B3RT-Tdc2-LexA. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was used to insert same orientation B3 recombinase target sites (B3RTs) into the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the Tdc2 gene and into the intron between the first two Tdc2 coding exons. The coding sequence of the LexA transcription factor was also inserted immediately adjacent to the downstream B3RT. The B3 recombinase mediates excision between the B3RT’s in all neurons that express the B3 recombinase using a Gal4 driver and UAS-B3. After the excision, a Tdc2-LexA driver is created and is expressed only in the subset of Gal4-expressing neurons that also express Tdc2 and not in Gal4-expressing neurons that do not express Tdc2. Black rectangles are untranslated exons, white rectangles are coding exons, red rectangles are B3RTs, and yellow rectangles are coding LexA sequence. (b) Control B3RT-Tdc2 with no Gal4 driver, anti-mCherry (red), anti-SYN (blue), anti-GFP (green). (c) Germline excision of B3RT-Tdc2 (see Section 2), where Tdc2-LexA is expressed in all Tdc2 neurons, anti-syn (blue), anti-mCherry (red), anti-Tdc2 (green). (d1–d3) Nuclear expression of n-syb-Gal4 (d3, anti-GFP, green) and subset of nsyb-Gal4 neurons that express Tdc2 (d2, anti-mCherry, red), anti-SYN (blue) yw; B3RT-Tdc2, nsyb-Gal4; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP. (e1–e3) OAMB > His2A-GFP (e3, anti-GFP, green) and the subset of OAMB-Gal4 neurons which express Tdc2 (e2, anti-mCherry, red), anti-SYN (blue): yw; B3RT-Tdc2; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP/OAMB-Gal4. (f1–f3) Octα2R > His2A-GFP (f3, anti-GFP, green) and subset of Octα2-Gal4 neurons which express Tdc2 (f2, anti-mCherry, red), anti-SYN (blue): yw; B3RT-Tdc2; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP/Oct2R-Gal4. All scale bars 50 μm

To assess whether the B3RT-Tdc2 recapitulates endogenous expression of Tdc2, a germline excision of B3RT-Tdc2 was generated and the resulting LexAop2–6XmCherry reporter expression was compared to endogenous Tdc2 protein expression. Neuronal expression of the 6XmCherry reporter recapitulates Tdc2 expression (Figure 8c1c3), as expected for genome editing at the endogenous chromosomal locus of Tdc2 with its complete regulatory region. A similar Tdc2 neuronal expression pattern was also observed upon panneuronal excision using the n-syb-Gal4 driver and the LexAop2-His2Bm-Cherry reporter (Figure 8d1d3), thus indicating B3 recombinase-mediated excision occurs with a high level of efficiency.

After verifying that both the germline excision and pan-neuronal excision of B3RT-Tdc2 closely recapitulated endogenous Tdc2 expression, we utilized this method to further assess overlapping expression of Tdc2 and OctRs. To visualize Tdc2 and OctR co-expression, we utilized the same UAS-His2A-GFP nuclear reporter for all OctR-Gal4s and the LexAop2-His2BCherry nuclear reporter to reveal conditional B3RT-Tdc2 expression (Figure 6e1f3, Figure 7). B3RT-Tdc2 > His2B-mCherry labeled a similar pattern of neurons in the intersection of the OAMB-Gal4 and B3RT-Tdc2 as was seen with the Tdc2 antibody (Figure 8e1e3, compare to Figure 2bg3), including the VL neurons and those within the ASM cluster. Likewise, driving B3 recombinase with Octα2R-Gal4 resulted in co-expression of His2B-mCherry and His2A-GFP in both pairs of VL neurons, as well as neurons within the AL, the ASMP and PSMP clusters, and the SEZ (Figure 8f1f3).

B3RT-Tdc2 also corroborated the overlapping expression of Tdc2 with each OctβR-Gal4 (Figure 9a1c3), demonstrating co-expression in the PSMP, ASMP, AL (with Octβ3R exhibiting the least on average, of the OctβR-Gal4s; see Figure 9b), and VM clusters of Tdc2+ neurons, closely recapitulating results seen with the Tdc2 antibody and OctR co-expression in Figures 47. Using the nuclear reporters with the B3RT-Tdc2 method also allowed us to manually count co-expressing OctR-Tdc2 neurons with greater ease than with antibody staining (Figure 10). In the ASMP, Octα2R-Gal4 had the lowest average of co-expressing neurons (Figure 10a), though Octα2R-Gal4 showed the highest average of co-expression in the antennal lobe, followed by Octβ1R-Gal4 (Figure 10b). In the SEZ, OAMB-Gal4 had the lowest average of co-expressing neurons with B3RT-Tdc2, with Octα2R-Gal4 again having the highest average, followed by Octβ2R-Gal4. All OctR-Gal4s co-expressed neurons in low numbers in the PSMP, with OAMB-Gal4 co-expressing the least on average (Figure 10d). However, within the lateral clusters of the Tdc2+ neurons, Octβ2R-Gal4 co-expressed the least (Figure 10e). In summary, B3RT-Tdc2 independently confirms the co-expression observed using the Tdc2 immunostaining approach and also demonstrates its utility for identifying Tdc2 neurons whose expression overlaps that of a Gal4 driver of interest.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

B3RT-Tdc2 expression in OctβR-Gal4s. (a1–a3) yw; B3RT-Tdc2; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP/Octβ1R-Gal4 showing subset of Octβ1R-Gal4 neurons which also express Tdc2 (a2, red), only the Gal4 pattern (a3, green) and merged (a1). (b1–b3) yw; B3RT-Tdc2; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP/Octβ2R-Gal4 showing subset of Octβ2R-Gal4 neurons that also express Tdc2 (b2, red), only the Gal4 pattern (b3, green) and merged (b1). (c1–c3) yw; B3RT-Tdc2; LexAop2-His2B-mCherry, UAS-His2A-GFP/Octβ3R-Gal4 showing subset of Octβ3R-Gal4 neurons that also express Tdc2 (c2, red), only the Gal4 pattern (c3, green) and merged (c1). Antibodies used: anti-GFP (green), anti-mCherry (red), and anti-SYN (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10

Average number of co-expressing OctR-Gal4/B3RT-Tdc2 neurons. Co-expressing Gal4 > His2A-GFP/Tdc2-LexA > His2B-mCherry neurons were manually counted in brain regions (a) anterior superior medial protocerebrum (ASMP), (b) antennal lobe (AL), (c) suboesophageal ganglion (SEZ), (d) posterior superior medial protocerebrum (PSMP), and (e) anterior- and posterior-lateral regions. OAMB-Gal4 (n = 12), Octα2R-Gal4 (n = 6), Octβ1R-Gal4 (n = 10), Octβ2R-Gal4 (n = 10), Octβ3R-Gal4 (n = 9), N-syb-Gal4 (n = 8)

3.6 |. Intersectional genetics reveals co-expression of two types of receptors

We recently demonstrated that Oct neurons in the adult brain co-express the Drosophila vesicular glutamate transporter (dVGlut) (Sherer et al., in press) (Figure 11a). In addition, single-cell transcriptomics data demonstrate a high percentage of mid-brain Oct-expressing neurons also express markers for dVGlut (Croset, Treiber, & Waddell, 2018). The functional capabilities of such dual neurotransmission neurons are complex. For example, the postsynaptic response to Oct and glutamate may be determined by neurons expressing receptors for one or both neurotransmitters. In an initial attempt to determine whether glutamate and octopamine receptors are expressed in the same neurons, co-expression between OctRs and the Drosophila non-NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptor, GluRIA (Ultsch et al., 1992) was investigated.

FIGURE 11.

FIGURE 11

KDRT-GluRIA expression in α-adrenergic-like receptors. (a) vGlut-Gal4; UAS-dsRed (red) and anti-Tdc2 (green) showing distinct co-localization, indicative of dual transmitting neurons (white arrows). Scale bar 30 μm. (b) Schematic of KDRT-GluRIA-QF2 construct. The first KD recombination target site (KDRT) was CRISPR’d upstream of the endogenous locus of the GluRIA translation start site within the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) while the second KDRT was placed in an intron downstream of the translation start site, directly preceding a QF2 driver sequence. Prior to the excision of the DNA the two KDRTs flank, no QF2 expression occurs. After the excision mediated by the KD recombinase, a null mutation in the GluRIA gene is formed, along with a GluRIA-QF2 driver, which can drive the expression of our QUAS reporter of interest. (c1–c3) Pan-neuronal Gal4 driving expression of the KD recombinase in the subset of n-syb-Gal4 neurons that express GluRIA (c2, red). yw;n-syb-Gal4; KDRT-GluRIA, UAS-KD, UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry. (d) Germline excision of KDRT-GluRIA driving expression of QUAS-His2B-mCherry in all GluRIA-expressing neurons (red). (e1–e3) OAMB-His2A-GFP pattern (e3, green), subset of OAMB-Gal4 neurons expressing GluRIA (e2, red), and merged channels (e1) yw; UAS-KD, UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry; KDRT-GluRIA, OAMB-Gal4. Closed white arrow indicating four PENP neurons co-expressing OAMB and GluRIA. (f1–f3) Octα2R > His2A-GFP pattern (f3, green) and subset of Octα2R-Gal4 neurons expressing GluRIA (f2, red), with broad expression seen in optic lobes. Merged channels (f1) yw; UAS-KD, UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry; KDRT-GluRIA, Octα2R-Gal4. Closed white arrow indicating four PENP neurons co-expressing Octα2R and GluRIA. Antibodies used: anti-GFP (green), anti-mCherry (red), and anti-SYN (blue). All scale bars = 50 μm unless otherwise specified

As the intersectional genetic approach provides a powerful means to assess co-expression, we used CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate a conditional GluRIA allele, KDRT-GluR1A-QF2 (hereafter KDRT-GluR1A) at the endogenous GluR1A chromosomal locus. KDRT-GluR1A is analogous to B3RT-Tdc2 described above except it uses KD recombinase target sites (KDRTs) (Nern et al., 2011) and the QF2 transcription factor (Riabinina & Potter, 2016). KDRT-GluR1A contains one KDRT in the 5′ UTR and a second KDRT with adjacent QF2 coding sequences in the intron between the first two coding exons of GluR1A. Prior to excision, the QF2 driver is not expressed (Figure 11b). However, after pan-neuronal KD recombinase-mediated excision using the n-syb-Gal4, a GluR1A-QF2 driver is created that expresses broadly in the optic lobes and sparsely in the central brain (Figure 11c1,c2). This pattern is highly similar to the pattern observed in a KDRT-GluR1A germline excision (Figure 11d), indicating KD recombinase-mediated excisions occur with high efficiency. KDRT-GluRIA can thus be used to reveal intersectional expression of any Gal4 driver with GluRIA neurons. Additionally, KDRT-GluR1A can be used to remove GluR1A receptor function in individual neurons.

Images demonstrating the intersection of the expression of OctR > His2A-GFP and KDRT-GluRIA > His2B-mCherry in anterior sections of the brains are shown in Figures 11 and 12. The OAMB receptor and KDRT-GluRIA are co-expressed in neurons surrounding the SEZ, a region that contains many Oct neurons and receives chemosensory information, as well as two neurons in the superior medial protocerebrum (SMP) and four neurons within the periesophageal neuropils (PENP) (Figure 11e1e3, closed white arrow). Octα2R > His2A-GFP neurons that co-express KDRT-GluRIA > His2B-mCherry are also found in the central brain within the medial area of the SEZ as well as SMP and PENP neurons (Figure 11f1f3, closed white arrow).

FIGURE 12.

FIGURE 12

KDRT-GluRIA expression in OctβR-Gal4s. (a1–a3) yw; UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry; KDRT-GluRIA, UAS-KD/Octβ1R-Gal4 showing subset of Octβ1R-Gal4 neurons in the anterior sections (a3, green) that also express GluRIA (a2, red), and merged channels (a1) with closed white arrow indicating at least one neuron co-expressing Octβ1R and GluRIA in the anterior SEZ. Very little co-expression was seen in the central brain, with the majority seen in the optic lobes. (b1–b3) yw; UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry; KDRT-GluRIA, UAS-KD/Octβ2R-Gal4 labeling the subset of Octβ2R-Gal4 neurons in the anterior sections (b3, green) also expressing GluRIA (b2, red), and merged channels (b1) with closed white arrow indicating at least one neuron co-expressing Octβ2R and GluRIA in the anterior SEZ. (c1–d3) yw; UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry; KDRT-GluRIA, UAS-KD/Octβ3R anterior (c) and posterior (d) sections showing the subset of Octβ3R-Gal4 neurons (c3, d3, green) also expressing GluRIA (c2, d2, red) and merged channels (c1,d1). Closed white arrows indicate co-expressing neurons in anterior and posterior superior medial protocerebrum. (e1–e3) yw; UAS-His2A-GFP, QUAS-His2B-mCherry/Tdc2-Gal4-AD, vGlut-Gal4-DBD; KDRT-GluRIA, UAS-KD labeling GluRIA-expressing neurons (e2) within the subset of neurons labeled by the Tdc2/vGlut split Gal4 (e3) and merged channels (e1). Closed white arrows indicate co-expressing neurons in the SEZ. Stained with anti-GFP (green), anti-mCherry (red), and anti-SYN (blue). Scale bars = 50 μm

The co-expression of OctβR’s and KDRT-GluRIA ranges from a small number of neurons to widespread co-expression (e.g., Octβ3R-Gal4), suggesting the possibility of key differences in neurons that have the potential to respond to both octopamine and glutamate signaling (Figure 9). KDRT-GluRIA and Octβ1R or KDRT-GluRIA and Octβ2R were co-expressed in neurons located in the SEZ and ventro-medial to the AL (Figure 12a1b3, closed white arrows). Octβ3R and KDRT-GluRIA are broadly co-expressed in the central brain and optic lobes (Figure 12c1d3, closed white arrows). Co-expression was observed in the SMP, the superior lateral protocerebrum, the PENP, and posterior lateral protocerebrum (Figure 12d1d3). The Octβ3R-Gal4 was the only OctR that showed substantial co-expression with KDRT-GluRIA in the posterior sections of the brain (Figure 12dd2). These results indicate widespread differences in the co-expression of OctRs and GluRIA.

As these results indicate substantial evidence for Oct autoreceptor usage, we decided to also investigate GluRIA potential autoreception within Oct-Glut dual transmitting neurons seen in Figure 11a. Although less common, glutamate receptors have also been known to function as autoreceptors (Pittaluga, 2016). A Tdc2−/vGlut- split Gal4 line, which labels all neurons expressing both Tdc2 and vGlut (Figure 9e3), crossed to our KDRT-GluRIA labeled an average of 11.5 dual transmitting neurons in the SEZ that also express GluRIA (Figure 12e1e3, closed white arrows, n = 6). This result indicates these dual transmission SEZ neurons may use presynaptic glutamate receptors as autoreceptors. The schematic in Figure 10 offers plausible scenarios for both pre- and postsynaptic signaling from dual transmission neurons. On the presynaptic side (Figure 13ac), synaptic vesicles of dual transmitting neurons may release neurotransmitters from the same (Figure 13a) or separate (Figure 13b,c) synaptic vesicles and this release may also be spatially segregated (Hnasko & Edwards, 2012). Our results demonstrate Oct presynaptic receptor localization, which is likely utilized for autoreceptor presynaptic signal regulation as seen in Figure 13a,c. Our data also suggest the possibility of a presynaptic glutamate autoreceptor (Figure 13a). Downstream from dual Oct-Glut neurons, postsynaptic neurons may express receptors for Oct or Glut (Figure 13b,c) or as our results also indicate, downstream neurons can express both an OctR and a GluR, (Figure 13a). Using the new intersectional genetic tools described here, further studies will be able to address the function of presynaptic and postsynaptic receptor localization on octopamine signaling.

FIGURE 13.

FIGURE 13

Dual transmission and postsynaptic receptor scenarios. In dual transmitting neurons, neurotransmitters are either packaged in synaptic vesicles together (a, presynaptic) or separately (b,c, presynaptic) and may be released at the same synapse (a, presynaptic) or separate ones (b,c, postsynaptic). From our experiments here, we show OctR expression in Tdc2+ neurons, which are indicate autoreception properties as shown in (a) and (c). Additional data indicates potential GluRIA autoreception as seen in (a) and (b). Postsynaptically, receptors may be expressed together (a, postsynaptic) or on different neurons (b,c, postsynaptic). Our data indicate a number of neurons express OctR and a GluRIA, as in (a)

4 |. DISCUSSION

In this study, we used MiMIC Trojan-Gal4 lines for each of the five OctRs to characterize OctR expression in Drosophila. Broad expression of each OctR receptor was observed throughout the adult brain and VNC, including in Tdc2/Oct neurons. These results were independently substantiated using the conditional Tdc2-LexA driver B3RT-Tdc2 that allows assessment of intersectional expression between any Gal4 driver and Tdc2 neurons. While it is possible that OctR distribution in Oct neurons is not presynaptic, results from vertebrates suggest autoreceptor modulation is likely (Cragg & Greenfield, 1997; Starke, 2001; Trendelenburg et al., 2003), even in dual neurotransmitter neurons (Takacs et al., 2018).

In the case of autoreception, the released neurotransmitter may activate the autoreceptor to regulate secretion of that same transmitter by either inhibiting or facilitating its release. Thus, autoreception brings a key regulatory aspect to neurotransmitter signaling that significantly impacts synaptic transmission, circuit output, and behavior (Choi et al., 2012; Koon et al., 2011; Koon & Budnik, 2012; Langer, 2015). In Drosophila, receptors for the neuropeptide peptide dispersing factor (PDF) are expressed in and required by PDF-expressing lateral ventral pacemaker neurons (LNv’s) to shift the balance of activity from evening to morning (Choi et al., 2012). Serotonin regulates neurite outgrowth in an autocrine manner in Helisoma (Diefenbach, Sloley, & Goldberg, 1995) and in the ventral nerve cord of Drosophila larvae (Sykes & Condron, 2005). At the Drosophila NMJ, the growth of Oct arbors during development and in response to starvation requires the activation of Octβ2R autoreceptors, while the inhibition of synaptic growth depends on Octβ1R on presynaptic motorneurons (Koon et al., 2011; Koon & Budnik, 2012).

As Oct functions in such diverse capacities in invertebrates, the capability of an Oct neuron to presynaptically modulate its own release could have significant impacts on downstream circuit targets. For example, Tdc2+ neurons are required to promote aggression (Zhou, Rao, & Rao, 2008) and inhibit inter-male courtship (Andrews et al., 2014; Certel et al., 2010). Oct autoreceptors on these neurons may function to provide negative feedback to inhibit either aggression or courtship, depending on the social situation. While we investigated OctR expression in Oct neurons, the presence of other neurotransmitter receptors on Tdc2+ neurons may additionally affect computational output from these neurons, affecting a variety of systems in the fly. Our novel B3RT-Tdc2 intersectional genetic tool allows future studies of other neurotransmitters or neurotransmitter receptors inputs in Tdc2+ neurons as it can be used in conjunction with any available Gal4 driver.

In such an investigation of Tdc2 expression with other neurotransmitters, we recently identified a subset of Tdc2+ neurons that also utilize glutamate (Sherer et al., in press). Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter at the Drosophila NMJ and glutamatergic neurons are found in all regions of the adult central brain (Daniels, Gelfand, Collins, & DiAntonio, 2008; Jan & Jan, 1976). In vertebrates, glutamate is co-released with dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and GABA (Danik et al., 2005; Fattorini, Antonucci, Menna, Matteoli, & Conti, 2015; Ottem, Godwin, Krishnan, & Petersen, 2004; Wang et al., 2019). In Drosophila, glutamate enhances the efficiency of dopamine loading into synaptic vesicles (Aguilar et al., 2017).

Given recent results demonstrating Oct-glut co-expression (Sherer et al., in press), we investigated potential Oct and Glut postsynaptic receptor expression using the new Trojan-Gal4’s. Similar to the conditional Tdc2 driver created here, a conditional glutamate receptor driver, KDRT-GluRIA, was developed and used to reveal that GluRIA is co-expressed to a different degree with each OctR-Gal4. These results indicate these co-expressing neurons as putative postsynaptic targets of upstream dual Oct-Glut transmitting neurons (see Figure 13). While we investigated GluRIA and Tdc2 co-expression with OctRs, other neurotransmitters and neurotransmitter receptors are likely also co-expressed with Tdc2 (Croset et al., 2018), and future studies utilizing these new conditionally expressible genetic tools can expand our knowledge of octopaminergic dual transmitting signaling mechanisms.

Supplementary Material

supinfo

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Bloomington Stock Center for fly lines and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for antibodies. NIH R01 GM115510 grant to S.J.C. and R.S.S. supported this work.

Funding information

NIH Center for Scientific Review, Grant/Award Number: R01 GM115510

Footnotes

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Complete sequences of donor plasmids are shown in Supplemental Information. Fly strains original to this publication will be deposited at the Bloomington Drosophila stock center or will be made available upon request. Donor plasmids will be deposited at Addgene or will be made available upon request.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article.

REFERENCES

  1. Aguilar JI, Dunn M, Mingote S, Karam CS, Farino ZJ, Sonders MS, … Freyberg Z. (2017). Neuronal depolarization drives increased dopamine synaptic vesicle loading via VGLUT. Neuron, 95(5), 1074–1088 e1077. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews JC, Fernandez MP, Yu Q, Leary GP, Leung AK, Kavanaugh MP, … Certel SJ (2014). Octopamine neuromodulation regulates Gr32a-linked aggression and courtship pathways in drosophila males. PLoS Genetics, 10(5), e1004356. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balfanz S, Strunker T, Frings S, & Baumann A. (2005). A family of octopamine [corrected] receptors that specifically induce cyclic AMP production or Ca2+ release in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Neurochemistry, 93(2), 440–451. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03034.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Busch S, Selcho M, Ito K, & Tanimoto H. (2009). A map of octopaminergic neurons in the Drosophila brain. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 513(6), 643–667. 10.1002/cne.21966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Certel SJ, Leung A, Lin CY, Perez P, Chiang AS, & Kravitz EA (2010). Octopamine neuromodulatory effects on a social behavior decision-making network in drosophila males. PLoS One, 5(10), e13248. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Certel SJ, & Thor S. (2004). Specification of drosophila motoneuron identity by the combinatorial action of POU and LIM-HD factors. Development, 131(21), 5429–5439. 10.1242/dev.01418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi C, Cao G, Tanenhaus AK, McCarthy EV, Jung M, Schleyer W, … Nitabach MN (2012). Autoreceptor control of peptide/neurotransmitter corelease from PDF neurons determines allocation of circadian activity in drosophila. Cell Reports, 2(2), 332–344. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ciccarelli M, Sorriento D, Coscioni E, Iaccarino G, & Santulli G. (2016). Adrenergic receptors. In Endocrinology of the heart in health and disease (pp. 285–315). Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cole SH, Carney GE, McClung CA, Willard SS, Taylor BJ, & Hirsh J. (2005). Two functional but noncomplementing drosophila tyrosine decarboxylase genes: Distinct roles for neural tyramine and octopamine in female fertility. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280 (15), 14948–14955. 10.1074/jbc.M414197200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole SW, & Sood AK (2012). Molecular pathways: Beta-adrenergic signaling in cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 18(5), 1201–1206. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cragg SJ, & Greenfield SA (1997). Differential autoreceptor control of somatodendritic and axon terminal dopamine release in substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and striatum. Journal of Neuroscience, 17 (15), 5738–5746 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9221772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Croset V, Treiber CD, & Waddell S. (2018). Cellular diversity in the drosophila midbrain revealed by single-cell transcriptomics. Elife, 7, e34550. 10.7554/eLife.34550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Daniels RW, Gelfand MV, Collins CA, & DiAntonio A. (2008). Visualizing glutamatergic cell bodies and synapses in drosophila larval and adult CNS. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 508(1), 131–152. 10.1002/cne.21670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Danik M, Cassoly E, Manseau F, Sotty F, Mouginot D, & Williams S. (2005). Frequent coexpression of the vesicular glutamate transporter 1 and 2 genes, as well as coexpression with genes for choline acetyltransferase or glutamic acid decarboxylase in neurons of rat brain. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 81(4), 506–521. 10.1002/jnr.20500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Diao F, Ironfield H, Luan H, Diao F, Shropshire WC, Ewer J, … White BH (2015). Plug-and-play genetic access to drosophila cell types using exchangeable exon cassettes. Cell Reports, 10(8), 1410–1421. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Diefenbach TJ, Sloley BD, & Goldberg JI (1995). Neurite branch development of an identified serotonergic neuron from embryonic Helisoma: Evidence for autoregulation by serotonin. Developmental Biology, 167(1), 282–293. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. El-Kholy S, Stephano F, Li Y, Bhandari A, Fink C, & Roeder T. (2015). Expression analysis of octopamine and tyramine receptors in drosophila. Cell and Tissue Research, 361(3), 669–684. 10.1007/s00441-015-2137-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Evans PD, & Maqueira B. (2005). Insect octopamine receptors: A new classification scheme based on studies of cloned drosophila G-protein coupled receptors. Invertebrate Neuroscience, 5(3–4), 111–118. 10.1007/s10158-005-0001-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fattorini G, Antonucci F, Menna E, Matteoli M, & Conti F. (2015). Co-expression of VGLUT1 and VGAT sustains glutamate and GABA co-release and is regulated by activity in cortical neurons. Journal of Cell Science, 128(9), 1669–1673. 10.1242/jcs.164210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Han KA, Millar NS, & Davis RL (1998). A novel octopamine receptor with preferential expression in drosophila mushroom bodies. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(10), 3650–3658 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9570796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hnasko TS, & Edwards RH (2012). Neurotransmitter corelease: Mechanism and physiological role. Annual Review of Physiology, 74, 225–243. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoopfer ED (2016). Neural control of aggression in drosophila. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 38, 109–118. 10.1016/j.conb.2016.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jan LY, & Jan YN (1976). L-glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. The Journal of Physiology, 262(1), 215–236. 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Klagges BR, Heimbeck G, Godenschwege TA, Hofbauer A, Pflugfelder GO, Reifegerste R, … Buchner E. (1996). Invertebrate synapsins: A single gene codes for several isoforms in drosophila. Journal of Neuroscience, 16(10), 3154–3165 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8627354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Koon AC, Ashley J, Barria R, DasGupta S, Brain R, Waddell S, … Budnik V. (2011). Autoregulatory and paracrine control of synaptic and behavioral plasticity by octopaminergic signaling. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 190–199. 10.1038/nn.2716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koon AC, & Budnik V. (2012). Inhibitory control of synaptic and behavioral plasticity by octopaminergic signaling. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(18), 6312–6322. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6517-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Langer SZ (2015). alpha2-Adrenoceptors in the treatment of major neuropsychiatric disorders. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 36(4), 196–202. 10.1016/j.tips.2015.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Langer SZ, & Angel I. (1991). Pre- and postsynaptic alpha-2 adrenoceptors as target for drug discovery. Journal of Neural Transmission. Supplementum, 34, 171–177. 10.1007/978-3-7091-9175-0_22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li-Kroeger D, Kanca O, Lee PT, Cowan S, Lee MT, Jaiswal M, … Bellen HJ (2018). An expanded toolkit for gene tagging based on MiMIC and scarless CRISPR tagging in drosophila. Elife, 7, e38709. 10.7554/eLife.38709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maqueira B, Chatwin H, & Evans PD (2005). Identification and characterization of a novel family of Drosophila beta-adrenergic-like octopamine G-protein coupled receptors. Journal of Neurochemistry, 94(2), 547–560. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03251.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Meiselman MR, Kingan TG, & Adams ME (2018). Stress-induced reproductive arrest in drosophila occurs through ETH deficiency-mediated suppression of oogenesis and ovulation. BMC Biology, 16(1), 18. 10.1186/s12915-018-0484-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Monastirioti M. (2003). Distinct octopamine cell population residing in the CNS abdominal ganglion controls ovulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental Biology, 264(1), 38–49. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nassel DR (2018). Substrates for neuronal Cotransmission with neuropeptides and small molecule neurotransmitters in drosophila. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 12, 83. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nern A, Pfeiffer BD, Svoboda K, & Rubin GM (2011). Multiple new site-specific recombinases for use in manipulating animal genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(34), 14198–14203. 10.1073/pnas.1111704108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ottem EN, Godwin JG, Krishnan S, & Petersen SL (2004). Dualphenotype GABA/glutamate neurons in adult preoptic area: Sexual dimorphism and function. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(37), 8097–8105. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2267-04.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pauls D, Blechschmidt C, Frantzmann F, El Jundi B, & Selcho M. (2018). A comprehensive anatomical map of the peripheral octopaminergic/tyraminergic system of Drosophila melanogaster. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 15314. 10.1038/s41598-018-33686-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pech U, Pooryasin A, Birman S, & Fiala A. (2013). Localization of the contacts between Kenyon cells and aminergic neurons in the Drosophila melanogaster brain using SplitGFP reconstitution. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 521(17), 3992–4026. 10.1002/cne.23388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Petersen LK, & Stowers RS (2011). A gateway MultiSite recombination cloning toolkit. PLoS One, 6(9), e24531. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pfeiffer BD, Jenett A, Hammonds AS, Ngo TT, Misra S, Murphy C, … Rubin GM (2008). Tools for neuroanatomy and neurogenetics in drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(28), 9715–9720. 10.1073/pnas.0803697105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pittaluga A. (2016). Presynaptic release-regulating mGlu1 receptors in central nervous system. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 7, 295. 10.3389/fphar.2016.00295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Port F, Chen HM, Lee T, & Bullock SL (2014). Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(29), E2967–E2976. 10.1073/pnas.1405500111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Qi YX, Xu G, Gu GX, Mao F, Ye GY, Liu W, & Huang J. (2017). A new drosophila octopamine receptor responds to serotonin. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 90, 61–70. 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ren X, Sun J, Housden BE, Hu Y, Roesel C, Lin S, … Ni JQ (2013). Optimized gene editing technology for Drosophila melanogaster using germ line-specific Cas9. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(47), 19012–19017. 10.1073/pnas.1318481110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Riabinina O, & Potter CJ (2016). The Q-system: A versatile expression system for drosophila. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1478, 53–78. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6371-3_3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Roeder T. (1999). Octopamine in invertebrates. Progress in Neurobiology, 59(5), 533–561 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10515667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sallee F, Connor DF, & Newcorn JH (2013). A review of the rationale and clinical utilization of alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity and related disorders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 23(5), 308–319. 10.1089/cap.2013.0028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Santulli G, & Iaccarino G. (2013). Pinpointing beta adrenergic receptor in ageing pathophysiology: Victim or executioner? Evidence from crime scenes. Immunity & Ageing, 10(1), 10. 10.1186/17424933-10-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Seal RP, & Edwards RH (2006). Functional implications of neurotransmitter co-release: Glutamate and GABA share the load. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 6(1), 114–119. 10.1016/j.coph.2005.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sherer LM, Catudio-Garrett E, Morgan HR, Sirrs LA, Shearin HK, Williams JL, … Certel SJ (2020). Octopamine-dependent aggression requires dVGLUT from dual-transmitting neurons. PLoS Genetics, [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Snyder A, & Silberman Y. (2019). Stress engages novel beta-adrenergic receptor and CRF1 receptor mediated glutamatergic signaling in the ventral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. The FASEB Journal, 33 (1_Suppl), 850.816. 10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.850.16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Starke K. (2001). Presynaptic autoreceptors in the third decade: Focus on alpha2-adrenoceptors. Journal of Neurochemistry, 78(4), 685–693. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00484.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sykes PA, & Condron BG (2005). Development and sensitivity to serotonin of drosophila serotonergic varicosities in the central nervous system. Developmental Biology, 286(1), 207–216. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.07.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Takacs VT, Cserep C, Schlingloff D, Posfai B, Szonyi A, Sos KE, … Nyiri G. (2018). Co-transmission of acetylcholine and GABA regulates hippocampal states. Nature Communications, 9(1), 2848. 10.1038/s41467-018-05136-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Trendelenburg AU, Philipp M, Meyer A, Klebroff W, Hein L, & Starke K. (2003). All three alpha2-adrenoceptor types serve as autoreceptors in postganglionic sympathetic neurons. NaunynSchmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology, 368(6), 504–512. 10.1007/s00210-003-0829-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ultsch A, Schuster CM, Laube B, Schloss P, Schmitt B, & Betz H. (1992). Glutamate receptors of Drosophila melanogaster: Cloning of a kainate-selective subunit expressed in the central nervous system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89(21), 10484–10488. 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10484 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Vaaga CE, Borisovska M, & Westbrook GL (2014). Dual-transmitter neurons: Functional implications of co-release and co-transmission. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 29, 25–32. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vaniotis G, Del Duca D, Trieu P, Rohlicek CV, Hebert TE, & Allen BG (2011). Nuclear beta-adrenergic receptors modulate gene expression in adult rat heart. Cellular Signalling, 23(1), 89–98. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang HL, Zhang S, Qi J, Wang H, Cachope R, Mejias-Aponte CA, … Morales M. (2019). Dorsal raphe dual serotonin-glutamate neurons drive reward by establishing excitatory synapses on VTA mesoaccumbens dopamine neurons. Cell Reports, 26(5), 1128–1142 e1127. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhou C, Rao Y, & Rao Y. (2008). A subset of octopaminergic neurons are important for drosophila aggression. Nature Neuroscience, 11(9), 1059–1067. 10.1038/nn.2164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supinfo

RESOURCES