Abstract
The genus Monarda (family Lamiaceae) contains 22 species of which three are native to southern Alabama, M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata. Several species of Monarda have been used in traditional medicines of Native Americans, and this present study is part of an ongoing project to add to our understanding of Native American pharmacopeia. Plant material from M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata was collected in south Alabama and the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation. The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatographic techniques to determine the chemical compositions as well as enantiomeric distributions. The compounds thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, and their derivatives were the primary terpenoid components found in the essential oils. The known biological activities of these compounds are consistent with the traditional uses of Monarda species to treat wounds, skin infections, colds, and fevers.
Keywords: Monarda citriodora, Monarda fistulosa, Monarda punctata, essential oil, thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene
1. Introduction
The Plant List [1] shows 22 different Monarda L. (Lamiaceae) species, 18 of which occur in the United States [2]. There are three Monarda species native to south Alabama, namely Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag., Monarda fistulosa L., and Monarda punctata L. (see Figure 1) [2].
Several Monarda species have been used by Native Americans as medicinal plants [3]. For example, M. fistulosa was used by the Blackfoot, Navajo, Lakota, and Winnebago people to treat boils, cuts and wounds; the Cherokee, Chippewa, Flathead, Ojibwa, and Tewa used the plant to treat colds, fever, and influenza; the Crow, Lakota, Menominee, and Ojibwa used the plant for coughs, catarrh, and other respiratory problems. Monarda punctata was used by the Delaware, Mohegan Nanticoke, and Navajo tribes to treat colds, fever coughs, and catarrh.
Both M. citriodora and M. fistulosa are popular ornamentals and have been introduced to temperate locations around the world [4,5,6]. Geographical location likely plays an important role in the phytochemistry of Monarda species. To our knowledge, however, there have been no previous examinations of M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, or M. punctata growing in their native range of south Alabama. In this work, we have examined the chemical compositions and enantiomeric distributions of essential oils of the three Monarda species from south Alabama.
2. Results
2.1. Monarda Citriodora
The M. citriodora essential oils were obtained as clear orange oils. The essential oil yields for M. citriodora aerial parts essential oil were 1.59% and 1.79% for samples #1 and #2, respectively, while the root essential oil was obtained in 0.879% yield. The chemical compositions of the essential oils from the aerial parts and the roots of M. citriodora cultivated in south Alabama are summarized in Table 1. The essential oils were dominated by the phenolic monoterpenoids thymol (RIdb = 1289) and carvacrol (RIdb = 1296). The other major components were p-cymene (RIdb = 1024) and thymol methyl ether (RIdb = 1239).
Table 1.
Aerial Parts Essential Oil | Root Essential Oil | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIcalc | RIdb | Compound | #1, % | ED, (+):(−) | #2, % | ED, (+):(−) | #2, % | ED, (+):(−) |
923 | 925 | α-Thujene | 1.0 | 69.0:31.0 | 0.8 | 66.6:33.4 | 0.5 | 64.2:35.8 |
930 | 932 | α-Pinene | 0.3 | 84.2:15.8 | 0.3 | 62.8:37.2 | 0.2 | 74.5:25.5 |
947 | 950 | Camphene | tr | tr | tr | |||
970 | 971 | Sabinene | tr | tr | --- | |||
975 | 978 | β-Pinene | 0.1 | 64.5:35.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
976 | 974 | 1-Octen-3-ol | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | |||
983 | 984 | 3-Octanone | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||
987 | 989 | Myrcene | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | |||
995 | 996 | 3-Octanol | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||
1002 | 1004 | Octanal | tr | tr | --- | |||
1003 | 1004 | p-Mentha-1(7),8-diene | tr | --- | --- | |||
1005 | 1006 | α-Phellandrene | 0.1 | 95.1:4.9 | 0.1 | 100:0 | tr | 100:0 |
1007 | 1008 | δ-3-Carene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 |
1015 | 1017 | α-Terpinene | 1.8 | 100:0 | 1.1 | 100:0 | 0.7 | 100:0 |
1016 | 1022 | m-Cymene | tr | tr | --- | |||
1023 | 1024 | p-Cymene | 7.8 | 6.4 | 7.2 | |||
1027 | 1030 | Limonene | 0.5 | 26.7:73.3 | 0.4 | 63.3:36.7 | 0.3 | 57.3:42.7 |
1028 | 1029 | β-Phellandrene | 0.2 | 0:100 | 0.1 | 0:100 | 0.1 | 0:100 |
1030 | 1033 | Benzyl alcohol | --- | --- | 0.4 | |||
1030 | 1030 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |||
1055 | 1057 | γ-Terpinene | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | |||
1067 | 1069 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 0.8 | 95.3:4.7 | 1.0 | 89.5:10.5 | 0.9 | 90.7:9.3 |
1083 | 1086 | Terpinolene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1084 | 1086 | trans-Linalool oxide (furanoid) | --- | tr | 0.1 | |||
1087 | 1093 | p-Cymenene | --- | --- | tr | |||
1098 | 1099 | Linalool | 0.1 | 71.9:28.1 | 0.1 | 49.7:50.3 | 0.3 | 50.1:49.9 |
1099 | 1099 | trans-Sabinene hydrate | tr | 76.5:23.5 | 0.3 | 71.1:28.9 | 0.3 | 66.8:33.2 |
1165 | 1167 | exo-Acetoxycamphene | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1169 | 1170 | Borneol | 0.1 | 0:100 | 0.1 | 0:100 | 0.3 | 0:100 |
1178 | 1180 | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.4 | 60.2:39.8 | 0.4 | 58.5:41.5 | 1.9 | 20.9:79.1 |
1183 | 1186 | p-Cymen-8-ol | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1187 | 1190 | Methyl salicylate | tr | --- | --- | |||
1195 | 1195 | α-Terpineol | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.2 | 100:0 |
1196 | 1197 | Methyl chavicol (= Estragole) | --- | 1.5 | --- | |||
1236 | 1239 | Thymol methyl ether | 4.4 | 5.6 | 11.3 | |||
1252 | 1252 | Thymoquinone | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.3 | |||
1253 | 1246 | Carvone | tr | 39.9:60.1 | --- | --- | ||
1290 | 1289 | Thymol | 38.2 | 37.0 | 29.0 | |||
1297 | 1296 | Carvacrol | 38.3 | 39.9 | 38.3 | |||
1305 | 1309 | 4-Vinylguaiacol | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1306 | 1306 | iso-Ascaridole | tr | tr | --- | |||
1342 | 1345 | Thymyl acetate | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |||
1347 | 1356 | Eugenol | tr | --- | 0.3 | |||
1361 | 1365 | Carvacryl acetate | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.0 | |||
1372 | 1375 | α-Copaene | tr | 100:0 | tr | 0.1 | 100:0 | |
1380 | 1382 | β-Bourbonene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1389 | 1392 | (Z)-Jasmone | tr | tr | tr | |||
1398 | 1398 | Cyperene | --- | --- | 0.2 | |||
1404 | 1408 | Decyl acetate | tr | --- | --- | |||
1415 | 1417 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 0.3 | 100:0 | 0.4 | 100:0 | 0.5 | 100:0 |
1426 | 1430 | β-Copaene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1451 | 1453 | α-Humulene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1457 | 1457 | Rotundene | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1471 | 1475 | γ-Muurolene | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1473 | 1481 | (E)-β-Ionone | --- | --- | tr | |||
1477 | 1480 | Germacrene D | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | |
1481 | 1485 | γ-Thujaplicin | tr | --- | 0.1 | |||
1483 | 1489 | β-Selinene | tr | --- | --- | |||
1487 | 1490 | γ-Amorphene | tr | --- | --- | |||
1491 | 1497 | α-Selinene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1494 | 1497 | α-Muurolene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1509 | 1512 | γ-Cadinene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1514 | 1518 | δ-Cadinene | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0:100 | ||
1548 | 1549 | Thymohydroquinone | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1577 | 1577 | Caryophyllene oxide | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1649 | 1655 | α-Cadinol | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1689 | 1691 | Cyperotundone | --- | --- | 0.2 | |||
1835 | 1841 | Phytone | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 14.3 | 10.2 | 9.6 | |||||
Oxygenated monoterpenoids | 84.0 | 86.3 | 86.0 | |||||
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.4 | |||||
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids | tr | 0.1 | 0.4 | |||||
Benzenoid aromatics | tr | 1.5 | 0.8 | |||||
Others | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | |||||
Total identified | 99.8 | 99.8 | 99.3 |
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (< 0.05%).
Chiral gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the M. citriodora essential oils revealed the (+)-enantiomers to be the major stereoisomers for α-thujene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, α-terpinene, cis-sabinene hydrate, trans-sabinene hydrate, α-terpineol, α-copaene, (E)-β-caryophyllene, and germacrene D. On the other hand, the (−)-enantiomer was dominant for β-phellandrene, borneol, carvone, and δ-cadinene. Limonene showed variation in the enantiomeric distributions with (+)-limonene in 26.7%, 63.3%, and 57.3% for aerial parts #1, #2, and roots essential oils, respectively. Likewise, linalool also showed variation with (+)-linalool of 71.9%, 49.7%, and 50.1%. (+)-Terpinen-4-ol was the predominant enantiomer in the aerial parts essential oils (60.2% and 58.5%), but (−)-terpinen-4-ol (79.1%) was dominant in the root essential oil.
2.2. Monarda Fistulosa
Monarda fistulosa essential oils were obtained in 2.66–4.83% yields as bright orange oils. The chemical compositions of the essential oils from the aerial parts of M. fistulosa are summarized in Table 2. In samples #1 and #2, thymol (RIdb = 1289) dominated the compositions (54.3% and 62.2%, respectively) with lesser quantities of p-cymene (RIdb = 1024, 12.1% and 10.2%), limonene (RIdb = 1030, 6.1% and 3.7%), carvacrol (RIdb = 1296, 5.9% and 6.6%), and thymoquinone (RIdb = 1252, 8.4% and 2.3%). Curiously, sample #3, although qualitatively similar, had a very different quantitative composition with thymoquinone as the most abundant constituent (41.3%) followed by p-cymene (21.9%), but with lower concentrations of thymol (8.9%) and carvacrol (1.6%).
Table 2.
Aerial Parts Essential Oil | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIcalc | RIdb | Compound | #1, % | ED, (+):(−) | #2, % | ED, (+):(−) | #3, % | ED, (+):(−) |
923 | 925 | α-Thujene | 1.2 | 72.5:27.5 | 0.8 | 72.8:27.2 | 0.9 | 71.2:28.8 |
930 | 932 | α-Pinene | 0.5 | 59.2:40.8 | 0.3 | 63.8:36.2 | 0.5 | 61.0:39.0 |
947 | 950 | Camphene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.2 | 100:0 |
971 | 971 | Sabinene | 0.2 | 58.4:41.6 | tr | 0.2 | 59.0:41.0 | |
973 | 973 | 1-Octen-3-one | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
975 | 978 | β-Pinene | 0.2 | 57.3:42.7 | --- | 0.2 | 57.9:42.1 | |
978 | 978 | 1-Octen-3-ol | 3.0 | 3.3 | 3.3 | |||
982 | 984 | 3-Octanone | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
987 | 989 | Myrcene | tr | 0.3 | 0.1 | |||
995 | 996 | 3-Octanol | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1004 | 1004 | p-Mentha-1(7),8-diene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1006 | 1006 | α-Phellandrene | 0.1 | 95.5:4.5 | 0.2 | 95.4:4.6 | 0.1 | 93.4:6.6 |
1008 | 1008 | δ-3-Carene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 |
1016 | 1017 | α-Terpinene | 2.1 | 100:0 | 2.3 | 100:0 | 0.8 | 100:0 |
1019 | 1022 | m-Cymene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1024 | 1024 | p-Cymene | 12.1 | 10.2 | 21.9 | |||
1025 | 1026 | 2-Acetyl-3-methylfuran | --- | --- | 0.5 | |||
1029 | 1030 | Limonene | 6.1 | 0.5:99.5 | 3.7 | 2.6:97.4 | 6.3 | 1.2:98.8 |
1030 | 1031 | β-Phellandrene | 0.2 | 0:100 | 0.2 | 0:100 | 0.2 | 0:100 |
1031 | 1030 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1056 | 1057 | γ-Terpinene | tr | 0.1 | tr | |||
1069 | 1069 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 1.2 | 95.8:4.2 | 1.3 | 96.3:3.7 | 2.4 | 96.5:3.5 |
1078 | 1079 | 1-Nonen-3-ol | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1084 | 1086 | Terpinolene | tr | 0.1 | tr | |||
1089 | 1091 | p-Cymenene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1098 | 1099 | Linalool | tr | 37.8:62.2 | tr | 37.5:62.5 | tr | 37.9:62.1 |
1099 | 1099 | trans-Sabinene hydrate | 0.2 | 75.9:24.1 | 0.3 | 75.0:25.0 | 0.5 | 75.3:24.7 |
1103 | 1107 | Nonanal | tr | --- | tr | |||
1115 | 1112 | (E)-2,4-Dimethylhepta-2,4-dienal | --- | --- | 0.2 | |||
1121 | 1121 | trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | tr | tr | 0.3 | |||
1123 | 1124 | cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | tr | tr | tr | |||
1130 | 1132 | cis-Limonene oxide | tr | --- | 0.1 | |||
1133 | 1135 | 2-Vinylanisole | 0.1 | tr | tr | |||
1134 | 1137 | cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | --- | --- | 0.3 | |||
1135 | 1138 | trans-Limonene oxide | tr | --- | --- | |||
1137 | 1138 | trans-Sabinol | --- | --- | tr | |||
1138 | 1140 | trans-Pinocarveol | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1139 | 1141 | cis-Verbenol | --- | --- | tr | |||
1143 | 1145 | trans-Verbenol | --- | --- | 0.3 | |||
1144 | 1145 | Camphor | --- | --- | tr | |||
1160 | 1164 | Pinocarvone | --- | --- | tr | |||
1161 | 1162 | (Z)-iso-Citral | --- | --- | tr | |||
1167 | 1168 | trans-Phellandrene epoxide | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1170 | 1170 | Borneol | 0.5 | 0:100 | 0.2 | 0:100 | 0.7 | 0:100 |
1179 | 1180 | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.4 | 63.3:36.7 | 0.5 | 63.2:36.8 | 0.5 | |
1186 | 1186 | p-Cymen-8-ol | 0.1 | tr | 0.6 | |||
1195 | 1195 | α-Terpineol | 0.3 | 100:0 | 0.2 | 100:0 | 0.3 | |
1197 | 1198 | Methylchavicol (= Estragole) | --- | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1197 | 1198 | cis-Piperitol | --- | --- | 0.2 | |||
1217 | 1218 | trans-Carveol | --- | --- | 0.2 | |||
1231 | 1232 | cis-Carveol | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1240 | 1242 | Cuminaldehyde | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1241 | 1242 | Carvone | --- | --- | 0.3 | |||
1250 | 1241 | Pulegone | --- | 0.2 | --- | |||
1252 | 1252 | Thymoquinone | 8.4 | 2.3 | 41.3 | |||
1281 | 1282 | Bornyl acetate | --- | --- | 0.1 | |||
1284 | 1286 | Cogeijerene | 0.1 | --- | --- | |||
1291 | 1291 | p-Cymen-7-ol | tr | --- | 0.2 | |||
1295 | 1293 | Thymol | 54.3 | 62.2 | 8.9 | |||
1300 | 1300 | Carvacrol | 5.9 | 6.6 | 1.6 | |||
1307 | 1306 | iso-Ascaridole | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1345 | 1346 | α-Cubebene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1351 | 1356 | Eugenol | tr | tr | --- | |||
1373 | 1375 | α-Copaene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 100:0 |
1382 | 1382 | β-Bourbonene | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1387 | 1387 | trans-β-Elemene | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1418 | 1419 | β-Ylangene | tr | 0.1 | ||||
1419 | 1417 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 0.3 | 100:0 | 0.3 | 100:0 | 0.2 | 100:0 |
1427 | 1430 | β-Copaene | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1452 | 1453 | α-Humulene | tr | tr | tr | |||
1473 | 1475 | γ-Muurolene | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |||
1479 | 1479 | α-Amorphene | --- | tr | --- | |||
1480 | 1483 | trans-β-Bergamotene | 0.1 | --- | 0.1 | |||
1481 | 1480 | Germacrene D | 0.7 | 100:0 | 0.6 | 100:0 | 0.6 | 100:0 |
1484 | 1485 | γ-Thujaplicin | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.3 | |||
1488 | 1490 | γ-Amorphene | tr | --- | --- | |||
1491 | 1492 | β-Selinene | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||
1493 | 1492 | trans-Muurola-4(14),5-diene | --- | 0.1 | --- | |||
1496 | 1497 | epi-Cubebol | --- | tr | --- | |||
1497 | 1497 | α-Selinene | --- | 0.1 | --- | |||
1498 | 1497 | α-Muurolene | tr | 0.1 | tr | |||
1510 | 1512 | γ-Cadinene | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |||
1511 | 1515 | Cubebol | tr | --- | --- | |||
1517 | 1518 | δ-Cadinene | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | |||
1518 | 1519 | trans-Calamenene | tr | tr | --- | |||
1520 | 1523 | β-Sesquiphellandrene | tr | --- | --- | |||
1537 | 1538 | α-Cadinene | tr | tr | --- | |||
1542 | 1541 | α-Calacorene | tr | tr | --- | |||
1543 | 1546 | α-Elemol | tr | --- | --- | |||
1548 | 1554 | Thymohydroquinone | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | |||
1558 | 1565 | Eugenyl acetate | tr | tr | tr | |||
1559 | 1557 | Germacrene B | tr | --- | --- | |||
1580 | 1577 | Caryophyllene oxide | tr | tr | 0.1 | |||
1638 | 1639 | cis-Guaia-3,9-dien-11-ol | 0.1 | 0.1 | --- | |||
1651 | 1655 | α-Cadinol | tr | 0.1 | tr | |||
Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 22.8 | 18.3 | 31.4 | |||||
Oxygenated monoterpenoids | 72.2 | 75.7 | 61.2 | |||||
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 | |||||
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
Benzenoid aromatics | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
Others | 3.1 | 3.6 | 4.3 | |||||
Total identified | 100.0 | 100.0 | 98.7 |
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. #3 = Plant sample #3. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (<0.05%).
As was observed in M. citriodora essential oils, in M. fistulosa essential oils, the (+)-enantiomer was the major for α-thujene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, α-terpinene, cis-sabinene hydrate, trans-sabinene hydrate, α-terpineol, α-copaene, (E)-β-caryophyllene, and germacrene D, while the (−)-enantiomer was predominant for β-phellandrene and borneol. (−)-Limonene (97.4–99.5%) and (−)-linalool (62.1–62.5%) dominated in all three M. fistulosa samples. (+)-Camphene (100%), (+)-sabinene (58.4–59.0%), and (+)-terpinen-4-ol (63.2–63.3%) were also dominant.
2.3. Monarda Punctata
Hydrodistillation of two samples of wild-growing M. punctata aerial parts gave bright orange essential oils in 0.781% and 0.658% yield. The most abundant components in the essential oils were thymol (RIdb = 1289, 61.8% and 47.9%), p-cymene (RIdb = 1024, 15.3% and 19.8%), γ-terpinene (RIdb = 1057, 2.7% and 9.7%), and carvacrol (RIdb = 1296, 4.5% and 4.1%) (see Table 3).
Table 3.
Aerial Parts Essential Oil | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIcalc | RIdb | Compound | #1, % | ED, (+):(−) | #2, % | ED, (+):(−) |
923 | 925 | α-Thujene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.7 | 68.5:31.5 |
930 | 932 | α-Pinene | tr | 0.2 | 83.8:16.2 | |
945 | 950 | Camphene | --- | 0.1 | 100:0 | |
957 | 959 | Benzaldehyde | --- | tr | ||
970 | 971 | Sabinene | tr | tr | ||
974 | 978 | β-Pinene | tr | 0.1 | 62.7:37.3 | |
975 | 974 | 1-Octen-3-ol | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||
980 | 983 | 3-Octanone | --- | tr | ||
986 | 989 | Myrcene | 0.3 | 1.1 | ||
995 | 996 | 3-Octanol | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
1001 | 1004 | p-Mentha-1(7),8-diene | --- | tr | ||
1004 | 1006 | α-Phellandrene | 0.1 | 100:0 | 0.2 | 94.6:5.4 |
1006 | 1008 | δ-3-Carene | tr | 0.1 | 100:0 | |
1014 | 1017 | α-Terpinene | 1.3 | 100:0 | 3.0 | 100:0 |
1016 | 1022 | m-Cymene | --- | tr | ||
1024 | 1024 | p-Cymene | 15.3 | 19.8 | ||
1025 | 1026 | 2-Acetyl-3-methylfuran | --- | tr | ||
1026 | 1030 | Limonene | 0.4 | 50.2:49.8 | 0.5 | 0:100 |
1027 | 1029 | β-Phellandrene | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0:100 | |
1028 | 1030 | 1,8-Cineole | 0.4 | 0.1 | ||
1039 | 1043 | Phenylacetaldehyde | --- | tr | ||
1055 | 1057 | γ-Terpinene | 2.0 | 9.7 | ||
1066 | 1069 | cis-Sabinene hydrate | 0.6 | 100:0 | 0.7 | 97.9:2.1 |
1076 | 1079 | 1-Nonen-3-ol | --- | tr | ||
1082 | 1086 | Terpinolene | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
1087 | 1091 | p-Cymenene | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||
1095 | 1099 | Linalool | --- | tr | 70.1:29.9 | |
1098 | 1101 | trans-Sabinene hydrate | 0.2 | 100:0 | 0.1 | 83.2:16.8 |
1100 | 1104 | Nonanal | --- | 0.1 | ||
1104 | 1107 | 1-Octen-3-yl acetate | 0.2 | 0.4 | ||
1145 | 1145 | trans-Verbenol | --- | tr | ||
1161 | 1158 | Menthone | 0.3 | --- | ||
1168 | 1170 | Borneol | 0.1 | 0:100 | tr | 0:100 |
1177 | 1180 | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.8 | 58.7:41.3 | 0.6 | 66.1:33.9 |
1182 | 1183 | m-Cymen-8-ol | --- | 0.1 | ||
1184 | 1186 | p-Cymen-8-ol | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
1191 | 1197 | Methyl chavicol (= Estragole) | 0.8 | --- | ||
1193 | 1195 | α-Terpineol | --- | 0.1 | 100:0 | |
1202 | 1206 | Decanal | --- | 0.1 | ||
1224 | 1224 | Thymol methyl ether | --- | tr | ||
1235 | 1238 | Carvacrol methyl ether | 1.1 | 1.0 | ||
1239 | 1242 | Cumin aldehyde | --- | 0.1 | ||
1247 | 1250 | Thymoquinone | 2.0 | 0.2 | ||
1289 | 1289 | Thymol | 61.8 | 47.9 | ||
1293 | 1291 | p-Cymen-7-ol | --- | 0.2 | ||
1296 | 1296 | Carvacrol | 4.5 | 4.1 | ||
1306 | 1309 | 4-Vinylguaicol | --- | tr | ||
1347 | 1356 | Eugenol | 0.7 | 0.3 | ||
1370 | 1375 | α-Copaene | --- | tr | ||
1378 | 1382 | β-Bourbonene | --- | tr | ||
1384 | 1390 | trans-β-Elemene | --- | tr | ||
1415 | 1417 | (E)-β-Caryophyllene | 1.6 | 100:0 | 1.2 | 100:0 |
1424 | 1430 | β-Copaene | --- | tr | ||
1427 | 1430 | trans-α-Bergamotene | 1.2 | 0.7 | ||
1449 | 1453 | α-Humulene | --- | tr | ||
1469 | 1475 | γ-Muurolene | --- | 0.1 | ||
1476 | 1480 | Germacrene D | 0.7 | 100:0 | 0.4 | 100:0 |
1479 | 1483 | trans-β-Bergamotene | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||
1480 | 1485 | γ-Thujaplicin | --- | 0.1 | ||
1482 | 1489 | β-Selinene | --- | tr | ||
1489 | 1492 | α-Selinene | --- | tr | ||
1492 | 1497 | α-Muurolene | --- | tr | ||
1506 | 1512 | γ-Cadinene | --- | tr | ||
1512 | 1518 | δ-Cadinene | --- | 0.1 | ||
1517 | 1523 | β-Sesquiphellandrene | --- | 0.1 | ||
1546 | 1549 | Thymohydroquinone | 0.3 | 2.5 | ||
1576 | 1577 | Caryophyllene oxide | 0.2 | 0.2 | ||
1633 | 1639 | cis-Guaia-3,9-dien-11-ol | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||
1648 | 1655 | α-Cadinol | --- | tr | ||
1834 | 1841 | Phytone | --- | tr | ||
Monoterpene hydrocarbons | 19.9 | 35.7 | ||||
Oxygenated monoterpenoids | 72.5 | 58.3 | ||||
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | 3.7 | 2.7 | ||||
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||||
Benzenoid aromatics | 1.5 | 0.3 | ||||
Others | 2.1 | 2.4 | ||||
Total identified | 100.0 | 99.8 |
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (<0.05%).
The enantiomeric distributions of terpenoids in M. punctata essential oils were analogous to those observed for M. citriodora and M. fistulosa oils with the exception of limonene, which was virtually racemic in sample #1, but 100% (−)-limonene in sample #2.
3. Discussion
Monarda citriodora and M. fistulosa have been introduced throughout temperate regions of the world as popular herbal medicines as well as ornamentals [4,5,6]. The volatile phytochemistry has shown wide variation depending on geographical location (Table 4). The essential oils of M. citriodora in the present study were rich in both thymol and carvacrol, whereas essential oils from Europe and Asia were dominated by thymol with much lower concentrations of carvacrol. Monarda fistulosa, in particular, showed wide variation with at least three different chemotypes (carvacrol-rich, thymol-rich, and geraniol-rich, see Table 4). The essential oils of M. fistulosa (samples #1 and #2) in this study fit into the thymol-rich chemotype. Interestingly, there was a high concentration of thymoquinone in M. fistulosa sample #3, with concomitant lower concentrations of thymol and carvacrol. Thymol was reported as the major component of M. punctata in two old reports [11,12]. Consistent with these reports, a floral essential oil of M. punctata from China was rich in thymol (75.2%), which is in agreement with the aerial parts essential oils from Alabama.
Table 4.
Monarda spp. | Plant Tissue | Collection Site | Composition (Major Components) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
M. citriodora | Aerial parts | Jammu, India (cultivated) | Thymol (82.3%), carvacrol (4.8%) | [13] |
M. citriodora | Aerial parts | Imola (BO) Italy (cultivated) | Thymol (19.6%), p-cymene (15.6%), γ-terpinene (13.5%), carvacrol (9.3%), α-terpinene (9.2%), myrcene (5.7%) | [14] |
M. citriodora | Not reported | Commercial (India) | (E)-β-Caryophyllene (19.2%), citral a (13.3%), limonene (11.8%), cis-verbenol (11.4%), geraniol (7.6%), citronellal (5.6%) | [15] |
M. citriodora var. citriodora | Leaves | Liverpool, UK (cultivated) | Thymol (50.7%), p-cymene (22.8%), carvacrol (3.6%) | [16] |
M. citriodora var. citriodora | Flowers | Liverpool, UK (cultivated) | Thymol (61.8%), γ-terpinene (13.3%), p-cymene (4.2%), carvacrol (3.8%) | [16] |
M. citriodora var. citriodora | Aerial parts | Liverpool, UK (cultivated) | Thymol (56.9%), p-cymene (13.0%), α-terpinene (10.0%), carvacrol (4.3%) | [17] |
M. citriodora var. citriodora | Aerial parts | Commercial (unknown) | Thymol (70.6%), p-cymene (10.6%), carvacrol (6.1%) | [18] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Krasnodarsk Krai, Russia (introduced, wild) | p-Cymene (32.5%), carvacrol (23.9%), thymol (12.6%), carvacrol methyl ether (5.5%), unidentified aliphatic aldehyde (6.3%) | [19] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Casola Valsenio, Italy (cultivated) | Thymol (26.5%), β-phellandrene (17.0%), α-phellandrene (13.7%), p-cymene (13.5%), myrcene (8.1%) | [20] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada (cultivated) | Geraniol (61.8%), geranyl formate (16.6%), geranial (10.6%), neral (6.6%) | [21] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Poplarville, MS, USA (cultivated) | Carvacrol (39.1%), p-cymene (35.4%), (−)-1-octen-3-ol | [22] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Imola (BO) Italy (cultivated) | Thymol (31.6%), β-phellandrene (18.1%), α-phellandrene (14.2%), p-cymene (13.1%), myrcene (8.8%) | [23] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Imola (BO) Italy (cultivated) | Thymol (28.4%), β-phellandrene (16.9%), α-phellandrene (13.7%), p-cymene (13.3%), myrcene (8.7%) | [24] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Imola (BO) Italy (cultivated) | Thymol (33.4%), β-phellandrene (18.0%), α-phellandrene (14.0%), p-cymene (13.2%), myrcene (8.6%) | [24] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Ravenna, Italy (cultivated) | γ-Terpinene (25.2%), carvacrol (24.3%), p-cymene (11.0%; reported as o-cymene), thymol (8.4%), α-terpinene (5.0%), thymol methyl ether (4.7%) | [25] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Chişinău, Republic of Moldova (cultivated) | Carvacrol (54.8%), p-cymene (23.2%), carvacrol methyl ether (5.9%) | [26] |
M. fistulosa | Flowers | Gallatin Valley, MT, USA (wild) | Carvacrol (45.7%), p-cymene (25.6%), γ-terpinen (6.8%), thymol (3.1%) | [27] |
M. fistulosa | Leaves | Gallatin Valley, MT, USA (wild) | Carvacrol (71.5%), p-cymene (13.1%), γ-terpinen (2.5%), thymol (3.3%) | [27] |
M. fistulosa | Aerial parts | Moscow, Russia (cultivated) | α-Terpineol (37.7%), 1-octen-3-ol (10.5%), geraniol (10.4%), thymol (9.3%), p-cymene (4.9%) | [28] |
M. fistulosa cv. Fortuna | Aerial parts | Kherson, Ukraine (cultivated) | Thymol (77.3%), carvacrol methyl ether (4.9%), carvacrol (3.8%) | [6] |
M. fistulosa cv. Premiera | Aerial parts | Kherson, Ukraine (cultivated) | Thymol (78.3%), carvacrol methyl ether (4.8%), carvacrol (3.6%) | [6] |
M. fistulosa var. menthifolia | Aerial parts | Morden, Manitoba, Canada (cultivated) | Geraniol (86.8%) | [29] |
M. punctata | Flowers | Xi’an, China (cultivated?) | Thymol (75.2%), p-cymene (6.7%), limonene (5.4%), carvacrol (3.5%) | [30] |
a Isomer not indicated.
The high concentrations of thymol, carvacrol, and p-cymene are consistent with the traditional uses of Monarda spp. to treat skin infections, wounds, fevers, and respiratory problems. Thymol [31], carvacrol [32], and p-cymene [33] have demonstrated antibacterial and antifungal activities [34,35], as well as wound-healing activity [36]. Thymol [37] and carvacrol [38], in addition to thymoquinone [39], have shown antitussive effects. Thymoquinone has also shown wound-healing properties [40]. Furthermore, both thymol [41] and carvacrol [32] have shown analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities [42].
As far as we are aware, this work presents the first chiral analysis of terpenoid constituents of Monarda species. Several investigations on the enantiomeric distributions in other members of the Lamiaceae have been reported in the literature, however. There seems to be much variation in the enantiomeric distribution of monoterpenoids across the family. Consistent with what was observed in Monarda essential oils, (+)-α-pinene was the major enantiomer found in Coridothymus capitatus [43], Rosmarinus officinalis [44], Lepechinia heteromorpha [45], Ocimum canum, and Ocimum kilimandscharicum [46]. Likewise, (+)-β-pinene predominates over (−)-β-pinene in C. capitatus [43] as well as the Monarda essential oils. On the other hand, (−)-β-pinene dominates in R. officinalis [44] and Lepechinia mutica [47]. The essential oils of peppermint (Mentha × piperita) and spearmint (Mentha spicata) have shown nearly racemic mixtures of α- and β-pinenes [48]. (+)-α-Phellandrene and (−)-β-phellandrene were the dominant enantiomers in the Monarda essential oils. In marked contrast, however, (−)-α-phellandrene and (+)-β-phellandrene predominated in L. mutica essential oil [47]. (−)-Limonene predominates in M. fistulosa essential oil, peppermint (M. piperita) and spearmint (M. spicata) essential oils [48] whereas (+)-limonene is the major enantiomer in C. capitatus [43], O. canum, and O. kilimandscharicum [46], and a nearly racemic mixture was found in rosemary (R. officinalis) essential oil [44]. (+)-Linalool was the predominant enantiomer in C. capitatus [43], Salvia schimperi [49], Pycnanthemum incanum [50], O. canum, and O. kilimandscharicum [46], whereas (−)-linalool was the major stereoisomer in Lavandula angustifolia [51] and R. officinalis [44].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Material
Monarda citriodora was cultivated in Kirkland Gardens, Newville, AL, USA (31°26′27″ N, 85°21′31″ W) from seeds (Outsidepride Seed Source, Independence, OR, USA). The cultivated Monarda spp. were grown in loamy clayey-sand and fertilized with chicken manure, kelp meal, and bone meal at planting in full sun. The aerial parts of M. citriodora were collected from separate plants on separate occasions (plant #1, collected on 20 June 2020; plant #2 collected on 1 August 2020). The roots of M. citriodora were obtained from plant #2.
Monarda fistulosa was cultivated in Kirkland Gardens, Newville, AL, USA (31°26′27″ N, 85°21′31″ W) from seedlings (Home Depot, Dothan, AL, USA) as above. The aerial parts of three different plant samples were collected on 25 June 2020.
Monarda punctata was collected from wild-growing plants near Newville, AL, USA (31°27′23″ N, 85°22′17″ W); the edge of a planted pine forest, disturbed grassland, full/partial sun, sandy-clay soil that had been intentionally burned (prescribed burn) 1.5 years before collection. The aerial parts of two different plants were collected on 1 June 2020.
Plants were identified by S.K. Lawson and a voucher specimen of each plant was deposited in the University of Alabama in Huntsville Herbarium (HALA); voucher numbers for M. citriodora (SKL61820), M. fistulosa (SKL72020), and M. punctata (SKL9620). The Monarda plant materials were allowed to dry in the shade for several days, the air-dried plant materials were pulverized and subjected to hydrodistillation using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus with continuous extraction with dichloromethane (Table 5).
Table 5.
Monarda spp. | Mass Plant Material | Yield Essential Oil (EO) |
---|---|---|
Monarda citriodora #1 | 25.57 g dried aerial parts | 406.2 mg orange EO |
Monarda citriodora #2 | 37.81 g dried aerial parts | 675.6 mg orange EO |
Monarda citriodora #2 | 17.47 g dried roots | 153.6 mg yellow EO |
Monarda fistulosa #1 | 9.60 g dried aerial parts | 364.0 mg bright orange EO |
Monarda fistulosa #2 | 7.58 g dried aerial parts | 366.2 mg bright orange EO |
Monarda fistulosa #3 | 8.98 g dried aerial parts | 238.9 mg bright orange EO |
Monarda punctata #1 | 39.09 g dried aerial parts | 305.6 mg bright orange EO |
Monarda punctata #2 | 62.62 g dried aerial parts | 411.9 mg bright orange EO |
4.2. Gas Chromatographic Analysis
The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID), and chiral GC-MS as previously reported [52].
4.2.1. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 Ultra, ZB-5ms GC column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–260 °C (2 °C/min), 1-μL injection of 5% solution of EO in dichloromethane (split mode, 30:1). Retention indices (RIs) were determined with reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes. Compounds identified by comparison of the MS fragmentation and retention indices with those in the databases [7,8,9,10].
4.2.2. Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detection
Shimadzu GC 2010, FID detector, ZB-5 GC column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–260 °C (2.0 °C/min). The percent compositions were determined from raw peak areas without standardization.
4.2.3. Chiral Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry
Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010S, Restek B-Dex 325 column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–120 °C (1.5 °C/min) then 120 °C–200 °C (2.0 °C/min), 0.1 μL injection of 5% solution of EO in dichloromethane (split mode, 45:1). The enantiomeric distributions were determined by comparison of retention times with authentic samples obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Relative enantiomer percentages were calculated from peak areas.
5. Conclusions
This study presents, for the first time, analyses of the essential oils of three species of Monarda growing in south Alabama. In addition, the enantiomeric distribution of terpenoids was also carried out. This work illustrates the wide variation in essential oil compositions based on geographical location as well as variations in enantiomeric distribution. It would be interesting to compare enantiomeric distributions for Monarda essential oils from other geographical locations and for other Monarda species. Nevertheless, the phenolic monoterpenoids thymol and/or carvacrol were found to dominate the compositions of M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata and support the traditional medicinal uses of these plants.
Acknowledgments
P.S. and W.N.S. participated in this work as part of the activities of the Aromatic Plant Research Center (APRC, https://aromaticplant.org/, accessed on 9 February 2021).
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.K.L. and W.N.S.; methodology, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S.; software, P.S.; validation, W.N.S., formal analysis, P.S. and W.N.S.; investigation, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S.; data curation, W.N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.N.S.; writing—review and editing, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Royal Botanic Gardens K. The Plant List. [(accessed on 1 February 2021)]; Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=Monarda.
- 2.Kartesz J.T. BONAP’s North American Plant Atlas. [(accessed on 1 February 2021)]; Available online: http://bonap.net/Napa/TaxonMaps/Genus/County/Monarda.
- 3.Moerman D.E. Native American Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Inc.; Portland, OR, USA: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davidson C.G. Monarda, Bee-balm. In: Anderson N.O., editor. Flower Breeding and Genetics. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2007. pp. 756–779. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ciuruşniuc A.-M., Robu T. Study of the behaviour of cultivated species of the genus Monarda L. in Vaslui County, to introduce them in cultivation as medicinal, aromatic and decorative plants. Lucr. Științifice Ser. Agron. 2012;55:309–312. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dudchenko V.V., Svydenko L.V., Markovska O.Y., Sydiakina O.V. Morphobiological and biochemical characteristics of Monarda L. varieties under conditions of the southern steppe of Ukraine. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020;21:99–107. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Adams R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. 4th ed. Allured Publishing; Carol Stream, IL, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mondello L. FFNSC 3. Shimadzu Scientific Instruments; Columbia, MD, USA: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 9.NIST . NIST17. National Institute of Standards and Technology; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Satyal P. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Alabama in Huntsville; Huntsville, AL, USA: 2015. Development of GC-MS Database of Essential Oil Components by the Analysis of Natural Essential Oils and Synthetic Compounds and Discovery of Biologically Active Novel Chemotypes in Essential Oils. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schroeter H.J. Analysis of the volatile oil of Monarda punctata, Linne. Am. J. Pharm. 1888;1888:113. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schumann W.R., Kremers E. On the chemical composition of the oil from Monarda punctata, L. Am. J. Pharm. 1896;1896:469. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pathania A.S., Guru S.K., Verma M.K., Sharma C., Abdullah S.T., Malik F., Chandra S., Katoch M., Bhushan S. Disruption of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade and induction of apoptosis in HL-60 cells by an essential oil from Monarda citriodora. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013;62:246–254. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Di Vito M., Bellardi M.G., Mondello F., Modesto M., Michelozzi M., Bugli F., Sanguinetti M., Sclocchi M.C., Sebastiani M.L., Biffi S., et al. Monarda citriodora hydrolate vs. essential oil comparison in several anti-microbial applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019;128:206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deepika, Singh A., Chaudhari A.K., Das S., Dubey N.K. Nanoencapsulated Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag. essential oil as potential antifungal and antiaflatoxigenic agent against deterioration of stored functional foods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020;57:2863–2876. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04318-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collins J.E., Bishop C.D., Deans S.G., Svoboda K.P. Composition of the essential oil from the leaves and flowers of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora grown in the United Kingdom. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1994;6:27–29. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1994.9698320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bishop C.D., Thornton I.B. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of the essential oils of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora and Melaleuca alternifolia on post-harvest pathogens. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997;9:77–82. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1997.9700718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dorman H.J.D., Deans S.G. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and in vitro antioxidant properties of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora, Myristica fragrans, Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum, Pelargonium sp. and Thymus zygis oils. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004;16:145–150. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2004.9698679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zamureenko V.A., Klyuev N.A., Bocharov B.V., Kabanov V.S., Zacharov A.M. An investigation of the component composition of the essential oil of Monarda fistulosa. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1989;25:549–551. doi: 10.1007/BF00598073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Contaldo N., Bellardi M.G., Cavicchi L., Epifano F., Genovese S., Curini M., Bertaccini A. Phytochemical effects of phytoplasma infections on essential oil of Monarda fistulosa L. Bull. Insectology. 2011;64:S177–S178. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Adebayo O., Bélanger A., Khanizadeh S. Variable inhibitory activities of essential oils of three Monarda species on the growth of Botrytis cinerea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013;93:987–995. doi: 10.4141/cjps2013-044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tabanca N., Bernier U.R., Ali A., Wang M., Demirci B., Blythe E.K., Khan S.I., Baser K.H.C., Khan I.A. Bioassay-guided investigation of two Monarda essential oils as repellents of yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013;61:8573–8580. doi: 10.1021/jf402182h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Francati S., Gualandi G. Side effects of essential oils of Monarda fistulosa L. and M. didyma L. on the tachinid parasitoid Exorista larvarum (L.): A preliminary study. Tachinid Times. 2017;30:4–8. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mattarelli P., Epifano F., Minardi P., Di Vito M., Modesto M., Barbanti L., Bellardi M.G. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aerial parts of Monarda didyma and Monarda fistulosa cultivated in Italy. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants. 2017;20:76–86. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2016.1278184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laquale S., Avato P., Argentieri M.P., Bellardi M.G., D’Addabbo T. Nematotoxic activity of essential oils from Monarda species. J. Pest Sci. 2018;91:1115–1125. doi: 10.1007/s10340-018-0957-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Colţun M.B., Bogdan A.A. Aspects of the biology and the cultivation of Monarda fistulosa L. as aromatic species in the Republic Of Moldova. Оснoвні, малoпoширені і нетрадиційні види рoслин–від вивчення дo oсвoєння (сільськoгoспoдарські і біoлoгічні науки) 2020;2020:103–109. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghosh M., Schepetkin I.A., Özek G., Özek T., Khlebnikov A.I., Damron D.S., Quinn M.T. Essential oils from Monarda fistulosa: Chemical composition and activation of transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) channels. Molecules. 2020;25:4873. doi: 10.3390/molecules25214873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Malankina E.L., Kuzmenko A.N., Zaitchik B.T., Ruzhitskiy A.O., Evgrafov A.A., Kozlovskaya L.N. Content and composition of wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa L.) essential oil at different phenological phases. Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 2020;75:391–394. doi: 10.3103/S0027131420060140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mazza G., Chubey B.B., Kiehn F. Essential oil of Monarda fistulosa L. var. menthaefolia, a potential source of geraniol. Flavour Fragr. J. 1987;2:129–132. doi: 10.1002/ffj.2730020310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li H., Yang T., Li F.-Y., Yao Y., Sun Z.-M. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of Monarda punctata essential oil and its main components against common bacterial pathogens in respiratory tract. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014;7:7389–7398. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marchese A., Orhan I.E., Daglia M., Barbieri R., Di Lorenzo A., Nabavi S.F., Gortzi O., Izadi M., Nabavi S.M. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: A brief review of the literature. Food Chem. 2016;210:402–414. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sharifi-Rad M., Varoni E.M., Iriti M., Martorell M., Setzer W.N., del Mar Contreras M., Salehi B., Soltani-Nejad A., Rajabi S., Tajbakhsh M., et al. Carvacrol and human health: A comprehensive review. Phyther. Res. 2018;32:1675–1687. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marchese A., Arciola C.R., Barbieri R., Silva A.S., Nabavi S.F., Sokeng A.J.T., Izadi M., Jafari N.J., Suntar I., Daglia M., et al. Update on monoterpenes as antimicrobial agents: A particular focus on p-cymene. Materials. 2017;10:947. doi: 10.3390/ma10080947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Memar M.Y., Raei P., Alizadeh N., Aghdam M.A., Kafil H.S. Carvacrol and thymol: Strong antimicrobial agents against resistant isolates. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 2017;28:63–68. doi: 10.1097/MRM.0000000000000100. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Aljaafari M.N., AlAli A.O., Baqais L., Alqubaisy M., AlAli M., Aidin M., Ong-Abdullah J., Abushelaibi A., Lai K.-S., Lim S.-H.E. An overview of the potential therapeutic applications of essential oils. Molecules. 2021;26:628. doi: 10.3390/molecules26030628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Costa M.F., Durço A.O., Rabelo T.K., Barreto R.d.S.S., Guimarães A.G. Effects of carvacrol, thymol and essential oils containing such monoterpenes on wound healing: A systematic review. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019;71:141–155. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gavliakova S., Biringerova Z., Buday T., Brozmanova M., Calkovsky V., Poliacek I., Plevkova J. Antitussive effects of nasal thymol challenges in healthy volunteers. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2013;187:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Boskabady M.H., Jandaghi P., Kiani S., Hasanzadeh L. Antitussive effect of Carum copticum in guinea pigs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97:79–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hosseinzadeh H., Eskandari M., Ziaee T. Antitussive effect of thymoquinone, a constituent of Nigella sativa seeds, in Guinea pigs. Pharmacologyonline. 2008;2:480–484. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Selçuk C.T., Durgun M., Tekin R., Yolbas L., Bozkurt M., Akçay C., Alabalk U., Basarali M.K. Evaluation of the effect of thymoquinone treatment on wound healing in a rat burn model. J. Burn Care Res. 2013;34:274–281. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31827a2be1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Jyoti D.D., Singh D., Kumar G., Karnatak M., Chandra S., Verma V.P., Shankar R. Thymol chemistry: A medicinal toolbox. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2018;15:454–474. doi: 10.2174/1573407214666180503120222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fachini-Queiroz F.C., Kummer R., Estevão-Silva C.F., Carvalho M.D.D.B., Cunha J.M., Grespan R., Bersani-Amado C.A., Cuman R.K.N. Effects of thymol and carvacrol, constituents of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil, on the inflammatory response. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012;2012:657026. doi: 10.1155/2012/657026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tateo F., Mariotti M., Bononi M. Essential oil composition and enantiomeric distribution of some monoterpenoid components of Coridothymus capitatus (L.) Rchb. grown on the island of Kos (Greece) J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998;10:241–244. doi: 10.1080/10412905.1998.9700895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Satyal P., Jones T.H., Lopez E.M., McFeeters R.L., Ali N.A.A., Mansi I., Al-Kaf A.G., Setzer W.N. Chemotypic characterization and biological activity of Rosmarinus officinalis. Foods. 2017;6:20. doi: 10.3390/foods6030020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gilardoni G., Ramírez J., Montalván M., Quinche W., León J., Benítez L., Morocho V., Cumbicus N., Bicchi C. Phytochemistry of three Ecuadorian Lamiaceae: Lepechinia heteromorpha (Briq.) Epling, Lepechinia radula (Benth.) Epling and Lepechinia paniculata (Kunth) Epling. Plants. 2019;8:1. doi: 10.3390/plants8010001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pragadheesh V.S., Saroj A., Yadav A., Samad A., Chanotiya C.S. Compositions, enantiomer characterization and antifungal activity of two Ocimum essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013;50:333–337. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ramírez J., Gilardoni G., Ramón E., Tosi S., Picco A.M., Bicchi C., Vidari G. Phytochemical study of the Ecuadorian species Lepechinia mutica (Benth.) Epling and high antifungal activity of carnosol against Pyricularia oryzae. Pharmaceuticals. 2018;11:33. doi: 10.3390/ph11020033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Coleman W.M., Lawrence B.M. Examination of the enantiomeric distribution of certain monoterpene hydrocarbons in selected essential oils by automated solid-phase microextraction-chiral gas chromatography-mass selective detection. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2000;38:95–99. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/38.3.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Endeshaw M.M., Gautun O.R., Asfaw N., Aasen A.J. Volatile oil constituents of the Ethiopian plant Salvia schimperi Benth. Flavour Fragr. J. 2000;15:27–30. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1026(200001/02)15:1<27::AID-FFJ868>3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dein M., Munafo J.P. Characterization of key odorants in hoary mountain mint, Pycnanthemum incanum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019;67:2589–2597. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b06803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Satyal P., Pappas R.S. Antique lavender essential oil from 1945, its chemical composition and enantiomeric distribution. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils. 2016;3:20–25. [Google Scholar]
- 52.DeCarlo A., Johnson S., Okeke-Agulu K.I., Dosoky N.S., Wax S.J., Owolabi M.S., Setzer W.N. Compositional analysis of the essential oil of Boswellia dalzielii frankincense from West Africa reveals two major chemotypes. Phytochemistry. 2019;164:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2019.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the article.