Congenital Hypothyroidism: A 2020–2021 Consensus Guidelines Update—An ENDO-European Reference Network Initiative Endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology

Paul van Trotsenburg; Athanasia Stoupa; Juliane Léger; Tilman Rohrer; Catherine Peters; Laura Fugazzola; Alessandra Cassio; Claudine Heinrichs; Veronique Beauloye; Joachim Pohlenz; Patrice Rodien; Regis Coutant; Gabor Szinnai; Philip Murray; Beate Bartés; Dominique Luton; Mariacarolina Salerno; Luisa de Sanctis; Mariacristina Vigone; Heiko Krude; Luca Persani; Michel Polak

doi:10.1089/thy.2020.0333

. 2021 Mar 12;31(3):387–419. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0333

Congenital Hypothyroidism: A 2020–2021 Consensus Guidelines Update—An ENDO-European Reference Network Initiative Endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology

Paul van Trotsenburg ^1,^*, Athanasia Stoupa ^2,^3,^4,^5,^*, Juliane Léger ^6,⁷, Tilman Rohrer ⁸, Catherine Peters ⁹, Laura Fugazzola ^10,¹¹, Alessandra Cassio ¹², Claudine Heinrichs ¹³, Veronique Beauloye ¹⁴, Joachim Pohlenz ¹⁵, Patrice Rodien ¹⁶, Regis Coutant ¹⁷, Gabor Szinnai ¹⁸, Philip Murray ^19,²⁰, Beate Bartés ²¹, Dominique Luton ^22,²³, Mariacarolina Salerno ²⁴, Luisa de Sanctis ²⁵, Mariacristina Vigone ²⁶, Heiko Krude ²⁷, Luca Persani ^28,²⁹, Michel Polak ^2,^3,^4,^5,^30,^31,^32,^✉

^¹Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

^²Pediatric Endocrinology, Gynecology and Diabetology Department, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France.

^³Université de Paris, Paris, France.

^⁴INSERM U1163, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France.

^⁵INSERM U1016, Cochin Institute, Paris, France.

^⁶Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Reference Center for Growth and Development Endocrine Diseases, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France.

^⁷Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMR 1141, Paris, France.

^⁸Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, University Children's Hospital, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

^⁹Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.

^¹⁰Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

^¹¹Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

^¹²Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Unit of Pediatrics, Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna Italy.

^¹³Pediatric Endocrinology Unit, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

^¹⁴Unité d'Endocrinologie Pédiatrique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

^¹⁵Department of Pediatrics, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical School, Mainz, Germany.

^¹⁶Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de la Thyroïde et des Récepteurs Hormonaux, Service EDN, CHU d'Angers, Institut MITOVASC, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

^¹⁷Unité d' Endocrinologie Diabetologie Pédiatrique and Centre des Maladies Rares de la Réceptivité Hormonale, CHU-Angers, Angers, France.

^¹⁸Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

^¹⁹European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology.

^²⁰Department of Paediatric Endocrinology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.

^²¹Thyroid Group, European Patient Advocacy Group Patient Representative (ePAG), Association Vivre sans Thyroide, Léguevin, France.

^²²Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Paris Nord Val de Seine (HUPNVS), Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.

^²³Department Risks and Pregnancy (DHU), Université de Paris, Inserm U1141, Paris, France.

^²⁴Pediatric Endocrine Unit, Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

^²⁵Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Turin, Italy.

^²⁶Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

^²⁷Institut für Experimentelle Pädiatrische Endokrinologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

^²⁸Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

^²⁹Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

^³⁰Paris Regional Newborn Screening Program, Centre régional de dépistage néonatal, Paris, France.

^³¹Centre de Référence Maladies Endocriniennes de la Croissance et du Développement, INSERM U1016, IMAGINE Institute, Paris, France.

^³²ENDO-European Reference Network, Main Thematic Group 8, Paris, France.

^{^*}

These authors contributed equally to this work.

^✉

Address correspondence to: Michel Polak, MD, PhD, Pediatric Endocrinology Gynecology and Diabetology Department, Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, 149 Rue de Sèvres, Paris 75015, France michel.polak@aphp.fr

PMCID: PMC8001676 PMID: 33272083

Abstract

Background: An ENDO-European Reference Network (ERN) initiative was launched that was endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology with 22 participants from the ENDO-ERN and the two societies. The aim was to update the practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of congenital hypothyroidism (CH). A systematic literature search was conducted to identify key articles on neonatal screening, diagnosis, and management of primary and central CH. The evidence-based guidelines were graded with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, describing both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. In the absence of sufficient evidence, conclusions were based on expert opinion.

Summary: The recommendations include the various neonatal screening approaches for CH as well as the etiology (also genetics), diagnostics, treatment, and prognosis of both primary and central CH. When CH is diagnosed, the expert panel recommends the immediate start of correctly dosed levothyroxine treatment and frequent follow-up including laboratory testing to keep thyroid hormone levels in their target ranges, timely assessment of the need to continue treatment, attention for neurodevelopment and neurosensory functions, and, if necessary, consulting other health professionals, and education of the child and family about CH. Harmonization of diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up will optimize patient outcomes. Lastly, all individuals with CH are entitled to a well-planned transition of care from pediatrics to adult medicine.

Conclusions: This consensus guidelines update should be used to further optimize detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of children with all forms of CH in the light of the most recent evidence. It should be helpful in convincing health authorities of the benefits of neonatal screening for CH. Further epidemiological and experimental studies are needed to understand the increased incidence of this condition.

Keywords: congenital hypothyroidism, guidelines, thyroid dysgenesis, dyshormonogenesis, central hypothyroidism, neonatal screening

Introduction

Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) can be defined as (variable) dysfunction of the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid (HPT) axis present at birth, resulting in insufficient thyroid hormone (TH) production and, with that, severe-to-mild TH deficiency. CH may be caused by abnormal development or function of the thyroid gland, or of the hypothalamus and pituitary, but also to impaired TH action.

In 2014, an international consensus guideline on CH was published that encompassed the scientific literature up to 2013 (1). An ENDO-European Reference Network (ERN) initiative was launched, which was endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology, with the aim to update the practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CH.

Methods

Twenty-two participants from the ENDO-ERN network, Main Thematic Group 8—thyroid, including an ENDO-ERN patient association representative, and from the two scientific societies, the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology participated. Preparation for the consensus took ∼24 months, starting late 2017 including email exchanges and two preparatory face-to-face meetings organized in 2019. All coauthors performed a comprehensive literature research using PudMed including articles published from January 1, 2013 to present (late 2020) concerning the five different subthemes presented in the consensus. Publications before 2013 have already been considered in the previous CH consensus published in 2014. Only publications in English were considered.

A comprehensive review of all selected articles formed the basis of discussion and writing for the five working groups (WGs): WG1: neonatal screening, WG2: diagnosis and criteria for treatment, WG3: treatment and monitoring, WG4: outcomes of neonatal screening and early treatment, and WG5: genetics of CH and antenatal management. A preliminary document summarizing the questions addressed in the preparatory meetings was prepared by each WG and shared for review with all the experts before the final meeting. At the final consensus meeting, propositions and recommendations were reconsidered by participants and discussed in plenary sessions, enabling any reformulation of the recommendations. Recommendations were based on best available research evidence. Best practice statements were considered when necessary and, if evidence is mixed, based on expert opinion.

A detailed description of the grading scheme Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) has been published elsewhere (2). Factors that influence the strength of the recommendation (strong vs. weak) include the quality of evidence, the balance between benefits and risks, the burden of interventions, and the cost.

For each point, recommendations and evidence are described, with a modification in the grading evidence, as follows: 1 = strong recommendation (applies to most patients in most circumstances, benefits clearly outweigh the risk); 2 = weak recommendation (suggested by us or should be considered; the best action may depend on circumstances or patient values, benefits, and risks closely balanced or uncertain). Quality of evidence is indicated as follows: +00: low (case series or nonsystematic clinical observations, inconsistent and unprecise estimates, or with indirect evidence); ++0: moderate (studies with methodological flaws, inconsistent or indirect evidence); +++: high quality (low risk bias).

Summary of the CH consensus guidelines update

1. Neonatal screening

1.1. The benefits of CH screening

Early detection and treatment of CH through neonatal screening prevent irreversible neurodevelopmental delay and optimize its developmental outcome (1/+++).
Screening for CH should be introduced worldwide (1/+++).

1.2. Analytical methodology and effectiveness of CH screening strategies

The incidence of CH partly depends on the screening strategy; based on data from a number of screening programs, the incidence of primary CH lies between 1 in 3000 and 1 in 2000; the highest reported incidence of central CH is ∼1 in 16,000 (1/+++).
The initial priority of neonatal screening for CH should be the detection of all forms of primary CH—mild, moderate, and severe; the most sensitive test for detecting primary CH is measurement of thyrotropin (TSH) (1/+++).
When financial resources are available, we recommend adding measurement of total or free thyroxine (fT4) to TSH, to screen for central CH (2/++0).

1.3. Postscreening strategies in special categories of neonates at risk of CH

Some groups of children may have a false-negative neonatal screening result or have a high risk of mild CH not detected by neonatal screening, for instance premature, low birthweight, and sick babies; for these groups a postscreening strategy including collection of a second specimen ∼10 to 14 days of age may be considered (1/+00).
In patients with Down's syndrome, we recommend measuring TSH at the end of the neonatal period (1/++0).
The initial screening in an affected twin may be normal; a second screening in same sex twins should be considered. The nonaffected sibling of twins should be followed up for possible TSH elevation later in life (2/+00).
Clinical suspicion of hypothyroidism, despite normal TSH in TSH-based screening programs, should prompt further evaluation for primary (rare cases of false-negative neonatal screening results) and central CH, particularly in children with a family history of central CH (2/+00).

2. Diagnostics and criteria for treatment

2.1. Biochemical criteria used in the decision to start treatment for CH

A newborn with an abnormal neonatal screening result should be referred to an expert center (1/++0).
An abnormal screening result should be followed by confirmatory testing consisting of measurement of serum fT4 and TSH (1/++0).
If the serum fT4 concentration is below and TSH clearly above the age-specific reference interval, then levothyroxine (LT4) treatment should be started immediately (1/+++).
If the serum TSH concentration is >20 mU/L at confirmatory testing (approximately in the second week of life), treatment should be started, even if fT4 is normal (arbitrary threshold, expert opinion) (2/+00).
If the serum TSH concentration is 6–20 mU/L beyond the age of 21 days in a healthy neonate with an fT4 concentration within the age-specific reference interval, we suggest to either start LT4 treatment immediately and retest, off-treatment, at a later stage, or to withhold treatment but retest 1 to 2 weeks later and to re-evaluate the need for treatment (lack of evidence in favor or against treatment, this is an area of further investigation) (2/++0).
In countries or regions where thyroid function tests are not readily available, LT4 treatment should be started if filter paper TSH concentration is >40 mU/L (at the moment of neonatal screening; arbitrary threshold, expert opinion) (2/+00).
If the serum fT4 is low, and TSH is low, normal or slightly elevated, the diagnosis central CH should be considered (1/++0).
In neonates with central CH, we recommend to start LT4 treatment only after evidence of intact adrenal function; if coexistent central adrenal insufficiency cannot be ruled out, LT4 treatment must be preceded by glucocorticoid treatment to prevent possible induction of an adrenal crisis (2/+00).

2.2. Communication of abnormal screening and confirmatory results

An abnormal neonatal screening result should be communicated by an experienced professional (e.g., member of pediatric endocrine team, pediatrician, or general physician) either by telephone or face to face, and supplemented with written information for the family (2/+00).

2.3. Imaging techniques in CH

In patients with a recent CH diagnosis, we strongly recommend starting LT4 treatment before conducting thyroid gland imaging studies (1/++0).
We recommend imaging of the thyroid gland using either radioisotope scanning (scintigraphy) with or without the perchlorate discharge test, or ultrasonography (US), or both (1/++0).
Knee X-ray may be performed to assess the severity of intrauterine hypothyroidism (2/+00).

2.4. Associated malformations and syndromes

All neonates with a high TSH concentration should be examined carefully for dysmorphic features suggestive for syndromic CH, and for congenital malformations (particularly cardiac) (1/+++).

3. Treatment and monitoring of CH

3.1. Starting treatment for primary CH

LT4 alone is recommended as the medication of choice for the treatment of CH (1/++0).
LT4 treatment should be started as soon as possible, not later than 2 weeks after birth or immediately after confirmatory (serum) thyroid function testing in neonates in whom CH is detected by a second routine screening test (1/++0).
The LT4 starting dose should be up to 15 μg/kg per day, taking into account the whole spectrum of CH, ranging from mild to severe (1/++0).
Infants with severe CH, defined by a very low pretreatment serum fT4 (<5 pmol/L) or total T4 concentration in combination with elevated TSH (above the normal range based on time since birth and gestational age (GA), should be treated with the highest starting dose (10–15 μg/kg per day) (1/++0).
Infants with mild CH (fT4 > 10 pmol/L in combination with elevated TSH) should be treated with the lowest initial dose (∼10 μg/kg per day); in infants with pretreatment fT4 concentrations within the age-specific reference interval an even lower starting dose may be considered (from 5 to 10 μg/kg) (1/++0).
LT4 should be administered orally, once a day (1/++0).
The evidence favoring brand versus generic LT4 is mixed but based on personal experience/expert opinion we recommend brand rather than generic (2/++0).

3.2. Monitoring treatment in primary CH

We recommend measurement of serum fT4 and TSH concentrations before or at least 4 hours after the last (daily) LT4 administration (1/++0).
We recommend evaluation of fT4 and TSH according to age-specific reference intervals (1/++0).
The first treatment goal in neonates with primary CH is to rapidly increase the circulating amount of TH, reflected by normalization of serum TSH; therafter, TSH should be kept within the reference interval.
If TSH is in the age-specific reference interval, fT4 concentrations above the upper limit of the reference interval can be accepted and recommend maintaining the same LT4 dose (1/++0).
Any reduction of the LT4 dose should not be based on a single higher than normal fT4 concentration, unless TSH is suppressed (i.e., below the lower limit of the reference interval) or there are signs of overtreatment (e.g., jitteriness or tachycardia) (1/++0).
The first clinical and biochemical follow-up evaluation should take place 1 to 2 weeks after the start of LT4 treatment (1 week at the latest in case of a starting dose of 50 μg per day or an even higher dose) (1/+00).
Subsequent (clinical and biochemical) evaluation should take place every 2 weeks until complete normalization of serum TSH is achieved; therafter, the evaluation frequency can be lowered to once every 1 to 3 months until the age of 12 months (1/+00).
Between the ages of 12 months and 3 years, the evaluation frequency can be lowered to every 2 to 4 months; thereafter, evaluations should be carried out every 3 to 6 months until growth is completed (1/+00).
If abnormal fT4 or TSH values are found, or if compliance is questioned, the evaluation frequency should be increased (2/+00).
After a change of LT4 dose or formulation, an extra evaluation should be carried out after 4 to 6 weeks (2/+00).
We recommend physicians to avoid long-term under- or overtreatment during childhood (1/++0).
In contrast to adults, in neonates, infants, and children, LT4 can be administered together with food (but with avoidance of soy protein and vegetable fiber); more important, LT4 should be administered at the same time every day, also in relation to food intake; while this approach can improve compliance, it ensures as constant as possible LT4 absorption and, with that, as good as possible LT4 dose titration (2/+00).
In case of an unexpected need for LT4 dose increase, reduced absorption, or increased metabolization of thyroxine (T4) by other disease (e.g., gastrointestinal), food or medication should be considered (2/+00); incompliance may be the most frequent cause, especially in teenagers and adolescents.

3.3. Treatment and monitoring of central CH

In severe forms of central CH (fT4 < 5 pmol/L), we also recommend to start LT4 treatment as soon as possible after birth at doses like in primary CH (10–15 μg/kg per day, see section 3.1), to bring fT4 rapidly within the normal range (1/++0).
In milder forms of central CH, we suggest starting treatment at a lower LT4 dose (5–10 μg/kg per day), to avoid the risk of overtreatment (1/++0).
In newborns with central CH, we recommend monitoring treatment by measuring fT4 and TSH according to the same schedule as for primary CH; serum fT4 should be kept above the mean/median value of the age-specific reference interval; if TSH is low before treatment, subsequent TSH determinations can be omitted (1/+00).
When under- or overtreatment is suspected in a patient with central CH, then TSH, or free triiodothyronine (fT3) or total triiodothyronine (T3) can be measured (1/+00).
When fT4 is around the lower limit of the reference interval, then undertreatment should be considered, particularly if TSH >1.0 mU/L (1/+00).
When serum fT4 is around or above the upper limit of the reference interval, then overtreatment should be considered (assuming that LT4 has not been administered just before blood withdrawal), particularly if associated with clinical signs of thyrotoxicosis, or a high fT3 concentration (1/+00).

3.4. Diagnostic re-evaluation of thyroid function beyond the first 6 months of life

When no definitive diagnosis of permanent CH was made in the first weeks or months of life, then re-evaluation of the HPT axis after the age of 2 to 3 years is indicated, particularly in children with a gland in situ (GIS), and in those with presumed isolated central CH (1/++0).
For a precise diagnosis, LT4 treatment should be phased out over a 4 to 6 weeks period or just stopped, and full re-evaluation should be carried out after 4 weeks, consisting of (at least) fT4 and TSH measurement.
If primary hypothyroidism is confirmed (TSH ≥10 mU/L), consider thyroid imaging and, if possible, genetic testing; if central CH is likely (fT4 below the lower limit of the reference interval in combination with a low normal of only mildly elevated TSH), consider evaluating the other anterior pituitary functions and genetic testing.
If TSH is above the upper limit of the reference interval but <10 mU/L (primary CH) or fT4 just above the lower limit of the reference interval (central CH), then continue withdrawal and retest in another 3 to 4 weeks (1/++0).
If a child with no permanent CH diagnosis and a GIS requires a LT4 dose less than 3 μg/kg per day at the age of 6 months, then re-evaluation can be done already at that time (1/++0).
We recommend avoiding iodine as an antiseptic during peri- and neonatal period, as it can cause transient CH (1/++0).

3.5. Treatment and monitoring of pregnant women with CH

In women with CH who are planning pregnancy, we strongly recommend optimization of LT4 treatment; in addition, these women should be counseled regarding the higher need for LT4 during pregnancy (1/++0).
fT4 (or total T4) and TSH levels should be monitored every 4 to 6 weeks during pregnancy, aiming at TSH concentrations in accordance with current guidelines on treatment of hypothyroidism during pregnancy, that is, <2.5 mU/L throughout gestation in patients treated with LT4 (1/+00).
In pregnant women with central CH, the LT4 doses should be increased aiming at an fT4 concentration above the mean/median value of the trimester specific reference interval (1/+00).
After delivery, we recommend lowering LT4 dose to preconception dose; additional thyroid function testing should be performed at ∼6 weeks postpartum (1/++0).
All pregnant women should ingest ∼250 μg iodine per day (1/++0).

4. Outcomes of neonatal screening and early treatment

4.1. Neurodevelopmental outcomes

Psychomotor development and school progression should be periodically evaluated in all children with CH; speech delay, attention, and memory problems, and behavioral problems are reasons for additional evaluation (1/++0).
In the small proportion of children with CH who do display significant psychomotor developmental delay and syndromic CH with brain abnormalities, it is crucial to rule out other causes of intellectual impairment than CH (1/+00).
Not just neonatal, but also repeated hearing tests should be carried out before school age and, if required, during further follow-up (2/++0).

4.2. Development of goiter in thyroid dyshormonogenesis

Children and adolescents with primary CH due to dyshomonogenesis may develop goiter and nodules; in these cases, serum TSH should be carefully targeted in the lower part of normal range and periodical ultrasound investigation is recommended to monitor thyroid volume (2/++0).
Since a few cases of thyroid cancer have been reported, fine needle aspiration biopsy for cytology should be performed in case of suspicious nodules on ultrasound investigation (1/+00).

4.3. Growth, puberty, and fertility

Adequately treated children with nonsyndromic CH have normal growth and puberty, and their fertility does not differ from individuals who do not have CH (1/+++).

4.4. Bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health

Adequately treated children with nonsyndromic CH also have normal bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health (1/++0).

4.5. Patient and professional education, and health-related quality of life

Medical education about CH should be improved at all levels, with regular updates (1/+++).
Education of parents, starting at the time of diagnosis, and later on of the patient is essential; not only throughout childhood, but also during transition to adult care and in women during pregnancy (1/+++).
Since adherence to treatment may influence the outcomes, it should be promoted throughout life (1/++0).

4.6. Transition to adult care

When patients are transferred from pediatric to adult care, the main aims are continuity of care and, with that, optimal clinical outcomes and quality of life, and to increase understanding of CH and promote self-management (1/+++).

5. Genetics of CH, genetic counseling, and antenatal management

5.1. Criteria for genetic counseling

Genetic counseling should be targeted rather than general (to all CH patients) and done by an experienced professional (2/++0).
Counseling should include explaining inheritance and the risk of recurrence of the patient's primary or central form of CH, based on the CH subtype, the family history, and, if known, the (genetic) cause (1/++0).
Parents with a child, or families with a member with CH should have access to information about the two major forms of primary CH—thyroid dysgenesis (TD) and dyshormonogenesis—and, if included in the neonatal screening, about central CH (1/+++).

5.2. Genetics of CH

If genetic testing is performed, its aim should be improving diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis (1/++0).
Before doing so, possibilities and limits of genetic testing should be discussed with parents or families (1/++0).
When available, genetic testing should be performed by means of new techniques, such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) array, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of gene panels (targeted NGS), or whole exome sequencing (WES) (1/++0).
Preferably, genetic testing or studies should be preceded by careful phenotypic description of the patient's CH, including morphology of the thyroid gland (2/++0).
Not only thyroid dyshormonogenesis, but also familial occurrence of dysgenesis and central hypothyroidism should lead to further genetic testing (1/++0).
Any syndromic association should be studied genetically, not only to improve genetic counseling, but also to identify new candidate genes explaining the association (1/++0).
Further research is needed to better define patients or patient groups that will benefit most from these new diagnostic possibilities (2/++0).

5.3. Antenatal diagnostics, evaluation of fetal thyroid function, and management of fetal hypothyroidism

We recommend antenatal diagnosis in cases of goiter fortuitously discovered during systematic ultrasound examination of the fetus, in relation to thyroid dyshormonogenesis (1/+++); a familial recurrence of CH due to dyshormonogenesis (25% recurrence rate) (1/+++); and known defects of genes involved in thyroid function or development with potential germline transmission (1/++0).
Special issues should be considered for syndromic cases with potential mortality and possible germline mosaicism (as for NKX2-1 gene mutation/deletion and severe pulmonary dysfunction with possible transmission through germline mosaicism). In such circumstances, the discussion of the prenatal diagnosis should be open. The therapeutic management of affected fetuses should comply with the laws in force in the country concerned (1/++0). The familial recurrence of CH due to dysgenesis (2% of familial occurrences) requires further study to determine the feasibility and clinical relevance for antenatal detection.
For the evaluation of fetal thyroid volume, we recommend ultrasound scans at 20 to 22 gestational weeks to detect fetal thyroid hypertrophy and potential thyroid dysfunction in the fetus. Goiter or an absence of thyroid tissue can also be documented by this technique. Measurements should be made as a function of GA, and thyroid perimeter and diameter should be measured to document goiter (1/+++).
If a (large) fetal goiter is diagnosed, prenatal care should be provided in a specialized center of prenatal care (1/+++).
We recommend cordocentesis, rather than amniocentesis, as the reference method for assessing fetal thyroid function. Norms have been established as a function of GA. This examination should be carried out only if prenatal intervention is considered (1/+++).
In most cases, fetal thyroid function can be inferred from context and ultrasound criteria, and fetal blood sampling is, therefore, only exceptionally required (2/++0).
We strongly recommend fetal treatment by intra-amniotic T4 injections in a euthyroid pregnant woman with a large fetal goiter associated with hydramnios and/or tracheal occlusion; in a hypothyroid pregnant woman, we recommend to treat the woman (rather the fetus) with T4 (1/++0).
For goitrous nonimmune fetal hypothyroidism leading to hydramnios, we recommend intra-amniotic injections of LT4 to decrease the size of the fetal thyroid gland. The injections should be performed by multidisciplinary specialist teams (1/+++).
The expert panel proposes the use of 10 μg/kg estimated fetal weight per 15 days in the form of intra-amniotic injections. The risks to the fetus and the psychological burden on the parents should be factored into the risk–benefit evaluation (2/+00).

1. Neonatal Screening

1.1.
Benefits of CH screening
1.2.
Analytical methodology and effectiveness of CH screening strategies
1.3.
Postscreening strategies in special categories of neonates at risk of CH

1.1. Benefits of CH screening

Summary

Early detection and treatment of CH through neonatal screening prevent irreversible neurodevelopmental delay and optimize its developmental outcome (1/+++).
Screening for CH should be introduced worldwide (1/+++).

Evidence

Neonatal screening for CH has almost eliminated the profound negative effects of TH deficiency on growth and neurodevelopment (cretinism) in those countries where it has been established. Improved developmental outcomes were already reported a few years after the start of neonatal screening (3,4), and justified its economic costs by clearly outweighing the costs of providing health and educational care for individuals with neurodevelopmental damage due to CH (5).

Despite the benefits of neonatal screening, 70% of infants worldwide are born in areas that do not have access to neonatal screening (6). In addition, many of these infants are born in areas of endemic iodine deficiency, placing them at increased risk of TH deficiency.

1.2. Analytical methodology and effectiveness of CH screening strategies

Summary

The incidence of CH partly depends on the screening strategy; based on data from a number of screening programs, the incidence of primary CH lies between 1 in 3000 and 1 in 2000; the highest reported incidence of central CH is ∼1 in 16,000 (1/+++).
The initial priority of neonatal screening for CH should be the detection of all forms of primary CH—mild, moderate, and severe; the most sensitive test for detecting primary CH is measurement of TSH (1/+++).
When financial resources are available, we recommend adding measurement of total or fT4 to TSH, to screen for central CH (2/++0).

Evidence

Since the introduction of neonatal screening for CH in the late 1970s, using total T4 plus, or followed by TSH, gradually evolving into TSH only, its incidence and yield have also changed. An initial estimated incidence was revised from 1 in 7000 to ∼1 in 4000 soon after the introduction of screening in the United Kingdom (7), probably reflecting more accurate data with detection of CH cases who were previously undiagnosed. Since then, the CH incidence has increased to between 1 in 3000 and 1 in 2000.

This can be partly explained by the lowering of neonatal screening TSH cut-off values, resulting in the detection of newborns who would have been missed otherwise (false negatives) (8), but also in finding children with biochemically milder forms of CH (mostly with thyroid GIS) (9–11). However, the overall increase in the incidence of CH cannot be attributed solely to lower screening TSH cut-off values (12), and thus environmental, ethnic, and genetic factors should be considered, and all require further evaluation (13–18). For instance, the clinical expression of mutations in genes such as DUOX2/DUOXA2 varies widely between individuals and over time, with some patients requiring no treatment, and some having transient CH. In contrast, DUOX gene mutations can be associated with worsening of thyroid fucntions in the first weeks of life (16). However, justification for screening and detecting biochemically less severe eventually transient CH cases require assessment of neurodevelopmental sequelae, but this has been proved difficult (19). Long-term outcome studies of the effect of LT4 treatment on prevention of neurodevelopmental delay in these patients will also be required.

Neonatal screening programmes were originally designed to detect primary CH by total T4 plus, or followed by TSH measurement, and later by measurement of only TSH, with optimal timing of samples at least 48 hours after birth. However, also measuring T4 ± T4-binding globulin provides the potential to diagnose central CH. Although slightly >50% of neonates with central CH have moderate-to-severe CH, that is, a first diagnostic fT4 concentration of 5–10 pmol/L or lower, and central CH is likely to be associated with other pituitary abnormalities, this diagnosis is often delayed (20,21). Therefore, detection of central CH by neonatal screening has the potential to prevent the neurodevelopmental sequelae of TH deficiency and associated morbidities. The reported incidence of central CH detected through neonatal screening lies between 1 in 30,000 and 1 in 16,000, depending on the screening strategy (22–26). Although additional data on the true clinical benefits and false-positive rates are required, central CH is a potential candidate for neonatal screening.

Until 2019, only supportive therapy was available for patients with MCT8 deficiency. This changed when a clinical trial demonstrated that treatment with triiodothyroacetic acid (Triac) ameliorates key features of the peripheral thyrotoxicosis and might benefit brain development once treatment is commenced early in life (27). Therefore, early recognition of MCT8-affected children becomes of utmost importance through T4 and TSH neonatal screening eventhough the part of the fetal component of the disease that can be alleviated by Triac treatment remains to be determined.

Pitfalls in the newborn screening do exist and can be due to abnormal TH binding globulin, severe concomitant illnesses, as well as several drugs and autoantibodies (24,28).

1.3. Postscreening strategies in special categories of neonates at risk of CH

Summary

Some groups of children, such as preterm or low birthweight and sick babies, pass their initial screening test but are at high risk for later development of mild CH. For these groups, a postscreening strategy may be considered (1/+00).
In patients with Down's syndrome, we recommend measuring TSH at the end of the neonatal period (1/++0).
The initial screening in an affected twin may be normal; a strategy of a second screening should be considered. The nonaffected sibling of twins should be followed up for possible TSH elevation later in life (2/+00).
Clinical suspicion of hypothyroidism, despite normal TSH in TSH-based screening programs, should prompt further evaluation for primary (rare cases of false-negative neonatal screening results) and central CH, particularly in children with a family history of central CH (2/+00).

Evidence

Babies with primary CH who are born premature or with low birthweight, or who are sick in the neonatal period may not be able to generate an adequate TSH response in the first weeks of life. Therefore, in TSH-based neonatal screening programs, their screening result may be false negative (29,30). Maturation or recovery of the HPT axis with an increase in TSH occurs between the ages of 2 to 6 weeks of life, and many neonatal screening programs have revised recommendations for this group of infants (29,31). In preterm newborns, the TSH surge and the blood levels of T4 and T3 are lower than those in term neonates. The immature HPT axis in the extreme preterm neonates is characterized by (i) a markedly attenuated TSH surge, (ii) a T4 decrease instead of an increase, and (iii) a clearly lower and shorter T3 increase within the first 24 hours of life. Interestingly, the T3 surge is observed as early as 1 hour postnatally, while the T4 surge only appeared at 7 hours after birth in infants born 28 to 30 gestational weeks and 31 to 34 gestational weeks (32). This observation may be explained by three factors: decreased T3 metabolism in the placenta, increased outer ring deiodination of T4, and increased thyroidal T3 release in response to the TSH surge. However, because the T3 increase at 1 hour after birth was independent of the TSH surge, and T4 peak values were reached only at 7 hours after birth in more mature infants, an abrupt loss of placental D3 activity is the most probable physiologic explanation for the observed rapid T3 increase followed by a slightly delayed T4 increase. Transient hypothyroxinemia of the preterm neonate is a frequent finding, often aggravated by general illness of the preterm neonate and it is due to an immature HPT function. So far, LT4 therapy of preterm hypothyroxinemia remains controversial and large-scale randomized trials are necessary to provide more clarity on its potential impact or absence thereof. Even after diagnosis of CH in preterm infants, one needs to be aware of the high incidence of postnatal transient forms of CH, emphasizing the need of diagnostic re-evaluation beyond infancy. The Wolff–Chaikoff effect is only mature at the end of the third trimester. Premature neonates cannot protect themselves from excessive exposure to iodine overdose. Thus, the use of iodine-containing disinfectants is contraindicated in preterm babies, since exposure to topical iodine may cause transient neonatal hypo- or hyperthyroidism as summarized in a systematic review (33).

Although the concordance rate for CH in twins is low, twins are overrepresented in the CH population (34). Because of fetal blood mixing, the TSH concentration of an affected twin may be lower than expected and may escape detection in TSH-based screening (34,35). Therefore, a low threshold for repeat TSH measurement is suggested, or a second screening should be considered in same-sex twins. In addition, the nonaffected twin should be followed up for possible TSH elevation later in life (36).

Down's syndrome is associated with a 14 to 21 times higher than expected incidence of CH, and highly prevalent mild TSH elevation/subclinical hypothyroidism, especially in the first months to years of life (37–39). The probable cause of both phenomena is TD, probably related to the extra chromosome 21 and possibly to overexpression of the DYRK1A gene (40–43). Because many neonates with Down's syndrome have nonthyroidal illness due to (surgery for) cardiac or intestinal disease (44), TSH generation may be impaired resulting in a false-negative neonatal screening result (in TSH-based screening programs). Therefore, additional measurement of TSH and fT4 around the age of 3 to 4 weeks should be considered.

In babies born into families affected with primary or central CH, fT4 and TSH measurements are advised, even if TSH was normal in TSH-based screening programs. A delayed rise of TSH has been reported in newborns affected with defects in the DUOXs system (16). In central CH, TSH is usually normal, but can be lower than normal or mildly elevated; only fT4 will contribute to the diagnosis (25,45). In case of a known genetic cause, (even prenatal) genetic testing can prevent diagnostic delay.

Central CH should be considered in neonates with clinical manifestations of CH or congenital hypopituitarism, but a low, normal, or slightly elevated TSH concentration (25,45,46). In addition, we recommend endocrine testing in all neonates with a familial history of central CH, or signs or symptoms of congenital hypopituitarism, for example, micropenis with undescended testes, hypoglycemia, prolonged jaundice, or unexplained failure to thrive.

2. Diagnostics and Criteria for Treatment

2.1.
Biochemical criteria used in the decision to start treatment for CH
2.2.
Communication of abnormal neonatal screening and confimatory results
2.3.
Imaging techniques in CH
2.4.
Associated malformations and syndromes

2.1. Biochemical criteria used in the decision to start treatment for CH

Summary

A newborn with an abnormal neonatal screening result should be referred to an expert center (1/++0).
An abnormal screening result should be followed by confirmatory testing consisting of measurement of serum fT4 and TSH (1/++0).
If the serum fT4 concentration is below and TSH clearly above the age-specific reference interval, then LT4 treatment should be started immediately (1/+++).
If the serum TSH concentration is >20 mU/L at confirmatory testing (approximately in the second week of life), treatment should be started, even if fT4 is normal (arbitrary threshold, expert opinion) (2/+00).
If the serum TSH concentration 6–20 mU/L beyond the age of 21 days in a healthy neonate with an fT4 concentration within the age-specific reference interval, we suggest to either start LT4 treatment immediately and retest, off-treatment, at a later stage, or to withhold treatment but retest 1 to 2 weeks later and to re-evaluate the need for treatment (lack of evidence in favor or against treatment, this is an area of further investigation) (2/++0).
In countries or regions where thyroid function tests are not readily available, LT4 treatment should be started if filter paper TSH concentration is >40 mU/L (at the moment of neonatal screening; arbitrary threshold, expert opinion) (2/+00).
If the serum fT4 is low, and TSH is low, normal or slightly elevated, the diagnosis central CH should be considered (1/++0).
In neonates with central CH, we recommend to start LT4 treatment only after evidence of intact adrenal function; if coexistent central adrenal insufficiency cannot be ruled out, LT4 treatment must be preceded by glucocorticoid treatment to prevent possible induction of an adrenal crisis (2/+00).

Evidence

Early detection and prompt treatment of CH (within the first 2 weeks of life) are essential to optimize the neurocognitive outcome, linear growth, the onset and progression of puberty, pubertal growth, and final height of affected neonates (47). All newborns with an abnormal neonatal screening result must be referred to an expert center for immediate thyroid function testing (TSH and fT4) to confirm the diagnosis of CH.

Treatment is indicated if the serum TSH concentration is >20 mU/L or fT4 is below the age-specific reference interval (48). In the latter case, severe, moderate, and mild forms can be classified according to fT4 concentrations, <5, 5–10, and 10–15 pmol/L, respectively (1).

Whether neonates with mild hypothyroidism/hyperthyrotropinemia (i.e., diagnostic TSH concentrations between 6 and 20 mU/L, but a normal fT4 concentration) benefit from LT4 treatment is still unclear (49,50). Randomized controlled trials addressing this question have not been performed. The evolution of the TSH and fT4 concentrations and trend is instrumental in deciding whether to treat or not; the family history, thyroid imaging, and, if available, genetic analysis may be helpful in predicting the course of the thyroid function. In a large cohort study, Lain et al. found a worse neurocognitive outcome in children of school age with neonatal screening TSH concentrations between the 75th and 99.9th percentiles (51), while those with neonatal TSH values above the 99.9th percentile (12–14 mU/L) had better cognitive development, possibly due to LT4 treatment. In contrast, in a Belgian cohort of children, there was no relationship between mild neonatal TSH elevation and neurodevelopment at the preschool age (52–54).

In healthy neonates, it is generally suggested to evaluate thyroid function (TSH and fT4 measurement) every 1 to 2 weeks, and consider LT4 treatment when TSH is above, or fT4 is below the age-specific reference interval (48). Mild CH can be a permanent or transient condition. The family history, thyroid imaging, and genetic testing may be helpful to clarify the etiology and the need of (long-term) treatment (50).

In some coutries or regions, confirmatory thyroid function testing may not be readily available. In this scenario, LT4 treatment can be started when the neonatal screening TSH concentration is ≥40 mU/L, without awaiting the confirmatory thyroid function test result. Such a value is highly suggestive of moderate-to-severe primary CH (55).

Central hypothyroidism is characterized by a low serum fT4 on combination with a low, normal, or slightly elevated TSH concentration. Other causes of this fT4–TSH combination are nonthyroidal illness, premature birth (with a correlation between severity and GA/birthweight), and certain forms of reduced sensitivity to TH (25). Central CH can be isolated or part of multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) (56). In case of untreated adrenal insufficiency, LT4 treatment may cause an adrenal crisis. Therefore, LT4 treatment should be started only after a normal adrenal function test result or after glucocorticoid treatment has been started (45).

2.2. Communication of abnormal neonatal screening and confirmatory results

Summary

An abnormal neonatal screening result should be communicated by an experienced professional (e.g., member of pediatric endocrine team, pediatrician, or general physician) either by telephone or face to face, and supplemented with written information for the family (2/+00).
A confirmed CH diagnosis should be communicated face to face by a medical specialist (2/+00).

Evidence

In the organization of a (neonatal) screening program, both in industrialized and developing countries, communicating abnormal results is a key responsibility that should be carefully managed by trained personnel. Accurate prescreening information for families about the screening test and possible outcomes (e.g., false positives) improves participation and reduces possible parental anxiety. An abnormal neonatal screening result should be communicated quickly, but the way this should be done may differ, depending on biochemical severity and local circumstances (phone call directly to the family, web-based tool if available, etc.). The communication of a confirmed CH diagnosis should be carried out face to face by a medical specialist with sufficient knowledge of CH; in case of language or cultural differences, deployment of a translator or (cultural) mediator is recommended. Taking time and using simple language to explain the implications and management of the diagnosis, and the importance of early detection and adequate LT4 treatment are essential. Written materials can be helpful but should not replace this face-to-face discussion (57–59).

2.3. Imaging techniques in CH

Summary

In patients with a recent CH diagnosis, we strongly recommend starting LT4 treatment before conducting thyroid gland imaging studies (1/++0).
We recommend imaging of the thyroid gland using either radioisotope scanning (scintigraphy) with or without the perchlorate discharge test, or US, or both (1/++0).
X-ray of the knee may be performed to assess the severity of intrauterine hypothyroidism (2/+00).

Evidence

Although it does not change initial treatment, it is recommended to determine the etiology of CH at the time of diagnosis. However, this approach should never delay the start of treatment in newborns with CH. Early determination of the cause of CH provides the family with a precise diagnosis (including visual evidence) and, with that, strong arguments that their child has a congenital disorder necessitating lifelong daily treatment. Furthermore, an early accurate diagnosis—in most cases achievable by dual imaging—abolishes the need for further diagnostic testing and re-evaluation of the cause later on. Finally, (dual) imaging can give direction to genetic counseling and testing, providing information about the risk of recurrence and a possible early diagnosis in future siblings.

Thyroid US

US is an important diagnostic tool for determining the presence of the thyroid gland and, when present, its location, size, and echotexture. US, however, is less accurate than radionuclide scan for detection of an ectopic thyroid gland. It is a noninvasive nonirradiating cost-effective imaging technique, but highly observer dependent. Thyroid volume in newborns varies from 0.84 ± 0.38 to 1.62 ± 0.41 mL (60–62), without significant changes during the first 3 weeks of life (63). Thyroid size can be influenced by (long-term) TSH suppression during LT4 treatment. In that case, TSH should be measured at the time of the US so that thyroid size can be correctly interpreted. Thyroid US should be performed by an expert.

Thyroid scintigraphy

Scintigraphy is the most accurate diagnostic test for determining the etiology of CH, especially in case of TD. Technetium-99m (^99mTc) and iodine-123 (¹²³I) are both captured by sodium (Na)-iodide symporter (NIS) at the basal side of thyrocytes and are both suitable for imaging. ^99mTc is more widely available, less expensive, faster in use (image acquisition 15 minutes after administration), and has a shorter half-live than ¹²³I. ^99mTc is not organified, it is, therefore, difficult to provide quantification of the radionuclide uptake using ^99mTc. Images are of lower quality than with ¹²³I. The latter isotope needs later image acquisitions (at 2–3, and 24 hours), but provides more contrast and adds information about organification process, allowing perchlorate discharge testing when the thyroid is eutopic (64,65). Furthermore, it exposes infants to a lower dose of whole-body irradiation than ^99mTc (3–10 μCi/kg vs. 50–250 μCi/kg body weight) (66,67).

When the thyroid is present and normally located, and if sodium perchlorate is available, perchlorate discharge testing can be performed to study the iodine retention capacity of the thyroid gland. Sodium perchlorate is administred and thyroid activity is measured before and 1 hour afterward. The perchlorate discharge test is considered positive when discharge of ¹²³I is more than 10% of the administered dose. Together with serum thyroglobulin measurement, the perchlorate discharge test provides useful information for targeted genetic testing to diagnose the various forms of CH caused by dyshormonogenesis (1). One pitfall of scintigraphy is lack of isotope uptake despite the presence of thyroid tissue. This can be due to TSH suppression at the time of the scintigraphy (when performed beyond 5 to 7 days after the start of LT4 treatment), previous iodine exposure, maternal blocking TSH receptor antibodies, and mutations in genes affecting iodine uptake (NIS) or TSH receptor (TSHR) defects. In these cases, thyroid US should be performed to demonstrate the presence or absence of thyroid tissue. When treatment-related TSH suppression is the cause, and treatment cannot be interrupted, thyroid scintigraphy and perchlorate discharge testing can also be performed after recombinant human TSH administration (68).

Dual imaging

The combination of thyroid US and scintigraphy provides high-resolution anatomical (US) and functional (scintigraphy) information, allowing to distinguish between permanent and possible transient CH (64,67,69). Each technique compensates for limitations and pitfalls of the other. Dual imaging is particularly effective in confirming athyreosis (when scintigraphy shows absence of isotope uptake) and detecting thyroid ectopy (65,67).

X-ray of the knee

At birth, bone maturation is delayed in the majority of patients with severe CH and is considered a disease severity parameter. It has been shown to correlate with neurodevelopmental outcome (70), educational level (71), hearing impairment (72), and can be assessed by performing a X-ray of the knee (presence or absence of the femoral and tibial epiphyses). LT4 treatment normalizes bone maturation within the first year of life (70,73). Although disease severity can be derived from the first diagnostic fT4 and TSH concentrations, a knee X-ray can be performed as an additional parameter reflecting the severity of intrauterine hypothyroidism.

2.4. Associated malformations and syndromes

Summary

All neonates with CH should be examined carefully for dysmorphic features suggestive for syndromic CH, and for congenital malformations (particularly cardiac) (1/+++).

Evidence

Permanent CH can be isolated or syndromic. Careful clinical examination during the first days of life is, therefore, necessary to detect dysmorphic features suggestive of a syndrome. Syndromic CH is mostly caused by mutations in genes encoding transcription factors or involved in early thyroid development. The Bamforth–Lazarus syndrome (OMIM No. 241850) is characterized by TD (mainly athyreosis or severe hypoplasia), cleft palate, and spiky hair with or without bilateral choanal atresia or bifid epiglottis, and is due to biallelic mutations in the FOXE1 gene (74). Another example of syndromic CH that can be recognized during neonatal period or early infancy is the brain–lung–thyroid (BLT) syndrome (OMIM No. 610978) due to NKX2-1 haploinsufficiency, characterized by various types of CH, infant respiratory distress syndrome, and benign hereditary chorea (75,76). Other examples of syndromic CH are Alagille syndrome type 1 (OMIM No. 118450) with thyroid in situ, liver (bile duct hypoplasia), and cardiac malformations (77); Williams–Beuren (OMIM No. 194050) and DiGeorge syndromes (OMIM No. 188400) with a high prevalence of thyroid hypoplasia (50–70%) and subclinical hypothyroidism (25–30%) (78,79); and Kabuki (80) and Johanson–Blizzard syndromes (81) with a eutopic thyroid gland. Pendred syndrome due to mutations in the SLC26A4 gene (OMIM No. 274600), with or without goiter, should be considered in case of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Finally, the prevalence of congenital malformations, particularly cardiac defects, including septal defects, and renal abnormalities (82) is higher in individuals with CH than in the general population, with differences in prevalence between studies (83–89); indeed, the reported frequency of cardiac defects in CH is between 3% and 11%, compared with 0.5% to 0.8% in all live births. For Down's syndrome, see Section 1.3.

3. Treatment and Monitoring of CH

3.1.
Starting treatment for primary CH
3.2.
Monitoring treatment in primary CH
3.3.
Treatment and monitoring of central CH
3.4.
Diagnostic re-evaluation of thyroid function beyond the first 6 months of life
3.5.
Treatment and monitoring of pregnant women with CH

3.1. Starting treatment for primary CH

Summary

LT4 alone is recommended as the medication of choice for the treatment of CH (1/++0).
LT4 treatment should be started as soon as possible, not later than 2 weeks after birth or immediately after confirmatory (serum) thyroid function testing in neonates in whom CH is detected by a second routine screening test (1/++0).
The LT4 starting dose should be up to 15 μg/kg per day, taking into account the whole spectrum of CH, ranging from mild to severe (1/++0).
Infants with severe CH, defined by a very low pretreatment serum fT4 (<5 pmol/L) or total T4 concentration in combination with elevated TSH (above the normal range based on time since birth and GA), should be treated with the highest starting dose (10–15 μg/kg per day) (1/++0).
Infants with mild CH (fT4 > 10 pmol/L in combination with elevated TSH) should be treated with the lowest initial dose (∼10 μg/kg per day); in infants with pretreatment fT4 concentrations within the age-specific reference interval, an even lower starting dose may be considered (from 5 to 10 μg/kg) (1/++0).
LT4 should be administered orally, once a day (1/++0).
The evidence favoring brand versus generic LT4 is mixed, but based on personal experience/expert opinion, we recommend brand rather than generic (2/++0).

Evidence

There are no randomized clinical trials that support a specific treatment approach in CH with high-quality evidence. Since the first enthusiastic reports on the successful treatment of “sporadic cretinism” with thyroid extracts derived from animal thyroid glands, all further adaptations and improvements have been based on retrospective or prospective observational studies only. However, today a large series of such cohort studies is available that were undertaken to correlate final outcome to different treatment strategies. Initially somatic development in terms of growth and puberty was studied, but later on cognitive outcome—the most precious, but also vulnerable developmental outcome—became the focus of such studies. The highest level of evidence was gained by those studies that assessed the cognitive outcome (intelligence quotient [IQ]) in individuals with CH and unaffected sibling controls. Together, the available data allow for reliable conclusions and recommendations. One such conclusion is that one can expect a favorable outcome in most children with CH who were given the “right” treatment. In this respect, numerous outcome studies point to a strong impact of two (main) factors that influence cognitive outcome: the age at start of LT4 treatment and the LT4 starting dose.

Age at start of treatment and starting dose

Bearing in mind that these factors were not studied systematically, one can only deduce conclusions and recommendations from observational studies. Therefore, the recommendations on the optimal age at start of LT4 treatment and the optimal starting dose are deduced from reasonably powered studies that eventually demonstrated no difference in cognitive outcome between individuals with CH and unaffected siblings. So far only two such studies are available. Initially, two outcome studies in young adult CH patients and sibling controls showed an IQ gap of eight points. In these observational studies, treatment was started at an average age of 24 days and with average LT4 dose <10 μg/kg per day. The first study that reported no gap comparing 44 CH and 53 unaffected sibling controls with a median age at time of testing of 9 years was from New Zealand and published in 2013 (90). Patients were treated with LT4 from a mean age of 9 days with a starting dose between 10 and 15 μg/kg depending on CH severity. Neonates with athyreosis were treated with 15 μg/kg per day. TSH normalized within a median of 14 days after diagnosis. Power calculation predicted that the number of patients and siblings would be sufficient to detect a difference of 5.2 IQ point. There was no significant difference between the tested patients and siblings.

The second study reporting no gap comparing 76 CH patients and 40 sibling controls was from Berlin and was published in 2018 (91). The treatment approach resembled the New Zealand approach with a median age at diagnosis of 8 days, a mean LT4 starting dose of 13.5 μg/kg per day, and TSH normalizing within a median time of 15 days. In contrast to the New Zealand study, the mean ages of the patients and controls were 18.1 and 19.8 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall IQ (102.5 vs. 102.5), nor were there differences in other (cognitive) tests of attention, memory, fine motor skills, quality-of-life scores, and in anthropometric measurements. In addition, there was no negative effect of episodes of overtreatment in terms of a suppressed TSH. Even in the children with the highest number of episodes of TSH suppression, IQ and other outcome parameters did not differ.

Based on the evidence from four studies reporting sibling-controlled cognitive outcome data, one can deduce and conclude that a even a child with severe CH can reach a normal IQ that does not differ from unaffected siblings, if LT4 treatment is started before the age of 10 days and the starting dose is at least 10 μg/kg, with 15 μg/kg in the most severe forms. More precise values for the optimal age at start of LT4 treatment or the starting dose leading to such a favorable outcome cannot be given since this has not been systematically studied. However, in a meta-analysis included in the Berlin study comparing IQ differences between severe and mild CH cases with respect to the starting dose revealed that this difference can only be overcome with a starting dose of at least 10 μg/kg, but not lower than that.

Hormone preparations and administration

Since there are only a few studies on the effect of different hormone preparations or methods of administration available, recommendations are based on the results of the previously mentioned studies. Those studies that reported a normal cognitive outcome did either use crunched LT4 tablets dissolved in water or breast milk administered through a spoon, or liquid LT4 preparations (both administered orally). In none of the studies T3 was administered. Because the cognitive outcomes in these studies were favorable, it is recommended to use only LT4, administered as just described. The expert panel recognizes that crushing tablets is an off-label procedure, but that it has been done this way succesfullly for many years. Clinical experience suggests that the bioavailability of liquid LT4 preparations is higher than tablets, with a possible risk of overtreatment if tablet doses are used. The higher bioavailability may also have dosing consequences for changing medication from tablets to liquid, and the other way around. In addition, CH patients treated with liquid LT4 may need more frequent fT4 and TSH measurements, and dose adjustments during their first months of life (92,93). If intravenous treatment is necessary, the (starting) dose should be no more than 80% of the oral dose; subsequently, the dose should be adjusted guided by fT4 and TSH measurements. It should be stressed that only pharmaceutically produced medication should be prescribed. This applies to both tablets and liquid LT4 preparations. Brand rather than generic LT4 tablets should be used, particularly in severe CH and in infants (94). The expert panel is against the use of compounded solutions or suspensions. Finally, parents should be provided with written instructions about LT4 treatment.

3.2. Monitoring treatment in primary CH

Summary

We recommend measurement of serum fT4 and TSH concentrations before, or at least 4 hours after the last (daily) LT4 administration (1/++0).
We recommend evaluation of fT4 and TSH according to age-specific reference intervals (1/++0).
The first treatment goal in neonates with primary CH is to rapidly increase the circulating amount of thyroid hormone, reflected by normalization of serum TSH; therafter, TSH should be kept within the reference interval.
If TSH is in the age-specific reference interval, fT4 concentrations above the upper limit of the reference interval can be accepted and recommend maintaining the same LT4 dose (1/++0).
Any reduction of the LT4 dose should not be based on a single higher than normal fT4 concentration, unless TSH is suppressed (i.e., below the lower limit of the reference interval) or there are signs of overtreatment (e.g., jitteriness or tachycardia) (1/++0).
The first clinical and biochemical follow-up evaluation should take place 1 to 2 weeks after the start of LT4 treatment (1 week at the latest in case of a starting dose close to 15 μg/kg per day or an even higher dose) (1/+00).
Subsequent (clinical and biochemical) evaluation should take place every 2 weeks until complete normalization of serum TSH is achieved; therafter, the evaluation frequency can be lowered to once every 1 to 3 months until the age of 12 months (1/+00).
Between the ages of 12 months and 3 years, the evaluation frequency can be lowered to every 2 to 4 months; thereafter, evaluations should be carried out every 3 to 6 months until growth is completed (1/+00).
If abnormal fT4 or TSH values are found, or if compliance is questioned, the evaluation frequency should be increased (2/+00).
After a change of LT4 dose or formulation, an extra evaluation should be carried out after 4 to 6 weeks (2/+00).
Adequate treatment throughout childhood is essential, and long-term under- or overtreatment, that is, TSH concentrations above or below the reference interval, should be avoided (1/++0).
In contrast to adults, in neonates, infants and children LT4 can be administered together with food (but with avoidance of soy protein and vegetable fiber); more important, LT4 should be administered at the same time every day, also in relation to food intake. This approach can improve compliance, and ensures as consistent as possible LT4 absorption and as good as possible LT4 dose titration (2/+00).
In case of an unexpected need for LT4 dose increase, reduced absorption or increased metabolization of T4 by other disease (e.g., gastrointestinal), food, or medication should be considered (2/+00); noncompliance may be the most frequent cause, especially in teenagers and adolescents.

Evidence

Shortly after the start of LT4 treatment

Repeated measurement of serum fT4 and TSH, and clinical assessment (especially for signs of overtreatment when using the highest starting dose) are the backbone of monitoring LT4 treatment in patients with primary CH (95–97). TSH normalizes slower than fT4. Therefore, the first treatment goal is as rapid as possible normalization of fT4. Since fT4 reflects the unbound biologically active form of T4, measurement of fT4 is preferred to total T4 (98). The second treatment goal is normalization of TSH within 4 weeks. Consequently, fT4 (or total T4) should guide dosing until TSH reaches the age-specific reference interval (99). Rapid normalization of TSH and keeping fT4 in the upper half of the age-specific reference interval have been shown to optimize the neurodevelopmental outcome (90,100–102).

Follow-up after the first weeks of LT4 treatment

There is no evidence for a one optimal follow-up scheme. Recent studies focusing on optimization of biochemical thyroid function testing suggest the importance of frequent laboratory monitoring and dose adjustment during the first year of life. Findings in these studies were that (i) patients with severe CH (athyreosis and dysgenesis vs. dyshormonogenesis, with high TSH values at diagnosis) need more dose adjustments during the first year of life (103,104); (ii) the highest doses within the recommended range of 10–15 μg/kg per day resulted in more dose adjustments because of hyperthyroxinemia (105–107); and (iii) monthly thyroid function testing led to frequent dose adjustments during the first year of life (75% at 0–6 months of age, and 36% at 7–12 months of age) (97). However, in none of these studies neurodevelopmental outcome data were available, the most important long-term treatment goal in CH. With this in mind, the follow-up schemes that were chosen in the studies that reported normal IQ outcomes can be used as recommendation. In the New Zealand and the Berlin studies, treatment effectiveness in terms of normalization of serum parameters was tested weekly after the start of treatment until they normalized (90,91). Thereafter, in New Zealand, blood tests were done monthly during the first year and bimonthly during the second year, and every 3 months in the Berlin study. Obviously, follow-up schemes have to be personalized according to parents' capabilities and compliance.

The main biochemical target parameter in primary CH is TSH. The Berlin study reported on all obtained serum parameters during the first 2 years of life in all treated children. This revealed that when TSH was within the reference interval, T4 was often elevated but T3 was normal. Noteworthy, also in adult patients with severe acquired hypothyroidism, a higher serum fT4 is necessary to reach normal TSH concentrations. This may be due to lack of thyroidal production of T3 that needs to be compensated by a higher fT4 concentration.

Data on the effects of clearly increased serum (f)T4 concentrations are scarce. In two studies, long-term follow-up after periods of overtreatment during the first 2 years of life suggested a decreased IQ at the age of 11 years, and an increased rate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (108,109). Earlier studies suggested adverse effects on attention span (110). However, Aleksander et al. showed no IQ differences between patients and siblings despite comparable periods of overtreatment (91). As long as there is no evidence for a possible negative effect of periods of overtreatment, dose reduction in case of an elevated fT4 should only be done after a second fT4 measurement, unless TSH is suppressed. Besides overtreatment, “resetting” of the hypothalamus–pituitary–thyroid feedback axis after intrauterine hypothyroidism has been proposed as a possible mechanism, especially in patients younger than 12 months (24,111). Persistence of such mild hypothalamus–pituitary resistance has been reported in adult CH patients compared with patients with acquired hypothyroidism (112).

In summary, there is no definitive evidence for one optimal follow-up scheme based on studies with cognitive outcome as the main parameter. However, a normal cognitive outcome has been achieved with monthly and bimonthly, and with 3-monthly controls during the first 2 to 3 years of life, after TSH normalization in the first weeks after diagnosis. Furthermore, patients with the most severe forms of CH and the highest range of the recommended LT4 starting dose are at an increased risk for frequent dose adjustments in the first year of life because of elevated fT4 levels. Since the long-term neurological consequences of hyperthyroxinemia/periods of overtreatment are still not clarified, the follow-up frequency should be individualized with more controls in case of suboptimal fT4 or TSH values. After dose adjustment, a next control is recommended 4 to 6 weeks later (113). Finally, adolescence and the period of transition to adult care are critical periods. Individualized follow-up schemes should be drawn up to assure normal growth and puberty in the adolescent, and fertility in the young adult (114).

Adverse effects of LT4

Adverse effects of long-term LT4 treatment are rare or absent if adequately prescribed. Cases of pseudotumor cerebri or craniosynostosis have been described (115,116). However, relative macrocrania at the age of 18 months, but without any case of craniosynostosis, was reported in a cohort of 45 CH patients with documented fT4 concentrations above the reference interval during their first 6 to 9 months of life (117). In one cohort of young adults with CH, cardiovascular abnormalities were reported (impaired diastolic dysfunction and exercise capacity, and increased intima media thickness, IMT); however, the clinical relevance of these findings remains unknown. Moreover, in a large nationwide study, standardized mortality ratio in patients with CH was not increased for diseases of the circulatory system (87).

Cardiac insufficiency

LT4 has clear positive ino- and chronotropic effects on the heart. In newly diagnosed CH in newborns with congenital heart disease and impending heart failure, we therefore recommend to apply a lower LT4 starting dose—approximately 50% of the recommended dose—and to increase it guided by serum fT4 and TSH measurement, and the infant's clinical condition.

Impaired bioavailability by diseases, drugs, or food

LT4 is mainly absorbed in the proximal small intestine. Undiagnosed or untreated celiac disease will reduce LT4 absorption. Children with short bowel syndrome will also have reduced absorption (118). Recently, rectal administration of LT4 was been shown to be effective in a child with this condition (119). Increased type 3 deiodinase activity in large hemangiomas can cause increased metabolic clearance of administered LT4 and, with that, necessitate a higher LT4 dose (120–122). Bioavailability of LT4 can also be reduced by concomitant use of other medication. For example, proton pump inhibitors, calcium or iron, will decrease absorption, while antiepileptic medication (phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine) and rifampicin will increase its metabolic clearance. Interactions need to be considered and can sometimes be overcome by avoiding concomitant ingestion (123,124).

While in adults the recommended LT4 intake moment is 30–60 minutes before intake of food (125,126), such a recommendation is difficult to realize in infants (123). Pragmatically, LT4 should be administered at a fixed time with an equal interval to food intake every day to have a constant as possible LT4 absorption and, with that, as good as possible LT4 dose titration. Soy containing food products have been repeatedly shown to inhibit LT4 absorption in children with CH (127,128).

3.3. Treatment and monitoring of central CH

In severe forms of central CH (fT4 < 5 pmol/L), we also recommend to start LT4 treatment as soon as possible after birth at doses like in primary CH (at least 10 μg/kg per day, see Section 3.1), to bring fT4 rapidly within the normal range (1/++0).
In milder forms of central CH, we suggest starting treatment at a lower LT4 dose (5–10 μg/kg per day) to reduce the risk of overtreatment (1/++0).
In newborns with central CH, we recommend monitoring treatment by measuring fT4 and TSH according to the same schedule as for primary CH; serum fT4 should be kept above the mean/median value of the age-specific reference interval; if TSH is low before treatment, subsequent TSH determinations can be omitted (1/+00).
When under- or overtreatment is suspected in a patient with central CH, then TSH or fT3 or T3 can be measured (1/+00).
When fT4 is around the lower limit of the reference interval, then undertreatment should be considered, particularly if TSH >1.0 mU/L (1/+00).
When serum fT4 is around or above the upper limit of the reference interval, then overtreatment should be considered (assuming that LT4 has not been administered just before blood withdrawal), particularly if associated with clinical signs of thyrotoxicosis, or a high (f)T3 concentration (1/+00).

Evidence

Just like primary CH, treatment of central CH consists of daily administration of LT4 (orally; tablets or liquid dosage form). The biggest differences between the treatment of primary and central CH are in the monitoring of treatment—with serum fT4 (instead of TSH) being the most important parameter—and in the LT4 starting dose. Important to realize is that in central CH, a low TSH concentration does not point to overtreatment.

The (biochemical) LT4 treatment aim is bringing and keeping the fT4 concentration in the upper half of the age-specific fT4 reference interval. Although randomized clinical trials testing this approach in children are lacking, studies in adults give some support (129,130).

Central CH can be a severe condition (fT4 at diagnosis <5 pmol/L), but most cases can be classified as mild to moderate (fT4 at diagnosis 5–15 pmol/L) (20,131). Although studies investigating the optimal starting dose in central CH are lacking, clinical experience has taught that an LT4 starting dose of 10–15 μg/kg in mild-to-moderate cases quickly results in supraphysiological fT4 concentrations. So, with exception of severe cases, a lower starting dose that is 5–10 μg/kg is advisable.

With regard to the treatment monitoring frequency, the schedule for primary CH should be followed.

3.4. Diagnostic re-evaluation of thyroid function beyond the first 6 months of life

Summary

When no definitive diagnosis of permanent CH was made in the first weeks or months of life, then re-evaluation of the HPT axis after the age of 2 to 3 years is indicated, particularly in children with a GIS, and in those with presumed isolated central CH (1/++0).
For a precise diagnosis, LT4 treatment should be phased out over a 4 to 6 weeks period or just stopped, and full re-evaluation should be carried out after 4 weeks, consisting of (at least) fT4 and TSH measurement.
If primary hypothyroidism is confirmed (TSH ≥10 mU/L), consider thyroid imaging and, if possible, genetic testing; if central CH is likely (fT4 below the lower limit of the reference interval in combination with a low normal of only mildly elevated TSH), consider evaluating the other anterior pituitary functions and genetic testing.
If TSH is above the upper limit of the reference interval but <10 mU/L (primary CH) or fT4 just above the lower limit of the reference interval (central CH), then continue withdrawal and retest in another 3 to 4 weeks (1/++0).
If a child with no permanent CH diagnosis and a GIS requires an LT4 dose <3 μg/kg per day at the age of 6 months, then re-evaluation can be done already at that time (1/++0).
We recommend avoiding iodine as an antiseptic during peri- and neonatal period, as it can cause transient CH (1/++0).

Evidence

In recent years, the prevalence of transient CH has steadily increased. In a number of studies, factors have been identified that increase the likelihood of transient disease, such as sex (more often in boys) (132,133), low birthweight (134,135), neonatal morbidity requiring intensive care (135), race/ethnicity (more often in nonwhite patients) (14), and less severe CH at diagnosis (assessed by screening TSH, or diagnostic TSH or fT4) (8,132,133,136–141). In contrast, factors such as prematurity (11,142,143), other congenital abnormalities (141), a family history of thyroid disease (142), abnormal thyroid morphology (thyroid hypoplasia at diagnosis) (142), TSH elevation >10 mU/L after the age of 1 year (when infants outgrow the LT4 dose), and a higher LT4 dose requirement at 1 to 3 years of age are associated with permanent CH (with conflicting results between studies for the factor dose requirement) (132,133,136–140,143–147). Recent studies have shown that early treatment withdrawal to assess the necessity of further treatment can be considered and done from the age of 6 months onward, particularly in patients with a GIS, a negative first-degree family history of CH, or in those requiring a low LT4 dose. Saba et al. (148) investigated 92 patients with CH and a GIS and found 49 of them (54%) to have transient CH. In this study, the optimal LT4 dose cut-off values for predicting transient CH at the ages of 6 and 12 months were 3.2 and 2.5 μg/kg per day, respectively, with a sensitivity of 71% at both time points, and a specificity of 79% and 78% at the ages of 6 and 12 months, respectively (with values below these thresholds considered predictive of transient CH). In the study by Oron et al. (149), 17 out of 84 patients with a GIS (20%) turned out to have transient CH. The optimal LT4 dose cut-off values at the age of 6 months were 2.2 μg/kg per day, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 57%. Both studies highlight the need for careful clinical and biological monitoring to identify children who do not require long-term treatment.

Medication that interferes with thyroid function, in particular iodine and iodomimetics, may result in transient but profound hypothyroidism (150). The use of iodine as a skin antiseptic, such as povidone–iodine (PVP-1), is therefore not recommended in obstetrics and neonatology, since it reaches the fetal or neonatal thyroid gland easily, causing transient hypothyroidism (through skin and placenta in mothers, and skin in neonates) (29,151,152). This may be more profound in premature born babies, as escape from the Wolff Chaikoff effect does not mature until term. Mothers should be asked about consumption of iodine-rich nutritional food or supplements, which can also induce transient CH (153).

3.5. Treatment and monitoring of pregnant women with CH

Summary

In women with CH who are planning pregnancy, we strongly recommend optimization of LT4 treatment; in addition, these women should be counseled regarding the higher need for LT4 during pregnancy (1/++0).
fT4 (or total T4) and TSH levels should be monitored every 4 to 6 weeks during pregnancy, aiming at TSH concentrations in accordance with current guidelines on treatment of hypothyroidism during pregnancy, that is, <2.5 mU/L throughout gestation in patients treated with LT4 (1/+00).
In pregnant women with central CH, the LT4 doses should be increased aiming at an fT4 concentration above the mean/median value of the trimester-specific reference interval (1/+00).
After delivery, we recommend lowering the LT4 dose to preconception dose; additional thyroid function testing should be performed at ∼6 weeks postpartum (1/++0).
All pregnant women should ingest ∼250 μg iodine per day (1/++0).

Evidence

Optimal management of pregnant women with CH requires knowledge and understanding of the normal physiological changes. In early pregnancy, before and during the development of the functioning fetal thyroid gland, the fetus depends on TH supply by the mother, requiring an optimal iodine status. Indeed, since the fetal thyroid gland is not functionally matured before weeks 18–20 of pregnancy, the fetus largely depends on the supply of maternal T4 during the early stages of intrauterine brain development, making fT4 the most important hormone for the fetus. During the second half of pregnancy, fetal thyroid hormones are both from maternal and fetal origin. Overt and subclinical maternal hypothyroidism have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes as well as with neurodevelopmental deficits in the offspring, particularly if the dysfunction occurs early in pregnancy. With respect to adverse pregnancy outcomes, maternal CH is associated with an increased risk of gestational hypertension, emergency cesarean section, induced labor for vaginal delivery, and preterm delivery (154,155). TSH ≥10 mU/L during the first 3 to 6 months of pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery and fetal macrosomia. These associations were not found in women with satisfactory control of hypothyroidism, that is, TSH <10 mU/L. Yet, these women did have a higher risk of induced labor for vaginal delivery (154). Children born to mothers with CH were found to have a higher risk of poor motor coordination, but not of other developmental domains such as mobility, communication, and motor and language skills. However, children born to mothers with TSH ≥10 mU/L were more likely to have low motor or communication skills scores. Yet, it remains unclear whether these adverse effects modify subsequent neurodevelopment (156,157). During pregnancy, TH requirement increases and most LT4-treated women require a dose increase up to 30%. Women with athyreosis, the most severe form of CH, require the highest doses and treatment should aim to keep TSH concentrations <2.5 mU/L throughout pregnancy (154,155,158). Therefore, careful monitoring of LT4 treatment of pregnant women with hypothyroidism is extremely important.

4. Outcomes of Neonatal Screening and Early Treatment

4.1.
Neurodevelopmental outcomes
4.2.
Development of goiter in thyroid dyshormonogenesis
4.3.
Growth, puberty, and fertility
4.4.
Bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health
4.5.
Patient and professional education, and health-related quality of life
4.6.
Transition to adult care

4.1. Neurodevelopmental outcomes

Summary

Psychomotor development and school progression should be periodically evaluated in all children with CH; speech delay, attention and memory problems, and behavioral problems are reasons for additional evaluation (1/++0).
In the small proportion of children with CH who do display significant psychomotor developmental delay and syndromic CH with brain abnormalities, it is crucial to rule out other causes of intellectual impairment than CH (1/+00).
Not just neonatal but also repeated hearing tests should be carried out before school age and, if required, during further follow-up (2/++0).

Evidence

In the vast majority of early and adequately treated children with CH, neurodevelopmental and school outcomes level are normal (90,91,159–161), and intellectual disability—defined as an IQ <70—has virtually disappeared (162). In the past, patients with severe CH treated with a low initial LT4 dose had lower IQ scores (although within normal range), and subtle neurological deficits in cognitive and motor development (163,164) when compared with control populations, including healthy siblings (164,165). In the past two decades, early treatment with a high initial LT4 (≥10 μg/kg per day) and improvement in the management of CH patients has resulted in better cognitive and motor developmental outcomes, comparable with those of sibling controls (90,91).

However, despite early and adequate treatment, patients with severe CH may still have subtle cognitive and motor deficits, and lower educational attainment (161,166–168). These deficits may reflect prenatal brain damage due to TH insufficiency in utero, not completely reverted by postnatal treatment. Even though transplacental supply of maternal T4 may protect the fetal brain from severe neurological impairment, it may not be sufficient to protect from severe fetal hypothyroidism (168). Children with CH may also display reduced hippocampal volume (169) and abnormal cortical morphology among brain regions (thinning or thickening) (170), which may explain subtle and specific deficits in memory, language, sensorimotor, and visuospatial function (169,170). In addition, early episodes of both under- and overtreatment may be associated with permanent behavioral problems in a limited number of preadolescent children with CH (109). Overtreatment during the first months of life (with the exception of fT4 above the normal range with not supressed TSH and/or without signs or symptoms of hyperthyroidism), a critical period for brain development, may be associated with attention deficit at the school age (109,171,172), and lower IQ scores (108,173,174). Finally, other factors such as socioeducational status (71) and poor adherence to the treatment (71,167,174) may also negatively affect cognitive outcome and educational attainement. Therefore, psychomotor development and school progression should be periodically evaluated in all children with CH. In case of doubt, evaluation by a specialized team is indicated at specific ages (12, 18, 24, and 36 months, 5, 8, and 14 years) to monitor progression of specific developmental skills (58). Speech delay, attention and memory problems, and behavioral problems are reasons for additional evaluation. In the small proportion of children with CH who do display significant delay in psychomotor development, it is necessary to rule out other causes of intellectual impairment than CH. Undiagnosed hearing impairment can adversely impair speech development, school performance, and quality of life (71,72,175). TH plays a role in cochlear and auditory function development (71,176,177). Despite early and adequate LT4 treatment, mild and subclinical hearing impairment has been reported in ∼20% to 25% of adolescents with CH. The risk of hearing loss was higher than in healthy controls (3%), and closely associated with the severity of CH (72,178). Young adults with CH reported hearing impairment more frequently (9.5%) than the general population (2.5%) (71). Hearing loss was mostly bilateral, mild to moderate, of the sensorineural type, concerned high or very high frequencies, and in some cases required hearing aids. Even after exclusion of patients with Pendred syndrome, the risk of developing a hearing impairment seems to be more than three times higher in CH subjects than in the general population (72). Not just neonatal, but also repeated hearing tests should be carried out before school age and, if required, during follow-up.

4.2. Development of goiter in thyroid dyshormonogenesis

Summary

Children and adolescents with primary CH due to dyshomonogenesis may develop goiter and nodules; in these cases, serum TSH should be carefully targeted in the lower part of normal range, and periodical ultrasound investigation is recommended to monitor thyroid volume (2/++0).
Since a few cases of thyroid cancer have been reported, fine needle aspiration biopsy for cytology should be performed in case of suspicious nodules on ultrasound investigation (1/+00).

Evidence

Children and adolescents with primary CH due to dyshormonogenesis (mainly TPO gene, but also SLC5A5/NIS, SLC26A4/PDS, DUOX, and TG gene mutations) may have an increased risk of developing goiter and thyroid nodules, and may even have an increased risk of malignancy. However, to date only a few cases of thyroid cancer (either papillary or follicular) have been reported in patients with long-standing CH. In some cases, goiter was already present and thyroid nodules (isolated or multiple) developed despite apparently adequate LT4 treatment. In other cases, poor compliance to treatment, with persistently high TSH levels during adolescence, was the probable cause (179–182). Therefore, TSH should be targeted in the lower part of normal range during treatment of dyshormogenic CH. Despite the rare occurrence of thyroid carcinoma in CH patients, we recommend periodical neck US—for example, every 2 to 3 years—in children and adolescents with goitrous CH due to dyshormonogenesis (including NIS gene mutations), to identify nodules that may require fine needle aspiration biopsy to rule out thyroid carcinoma.

4.3. Growth, puberty, and fertility

Summary

Adequately treated children with nonsyndromic CH have normal growth and puberty, and their fertility does not differ from individuals who do not have CH (1/+++).

Evidence

Early and adequately treated children with nonsyndromic CH have normal growth and pubertal development (183–187). Adult height is normal and comparable with siblings, with no effects of severity of CH at diagnosis, CH etiology, or LT4 starting dose (47,183–185); moreover, in the majority of children, adult height is above the target height in both sexes (47,183,184). Onset of puberty occurs at the normal age in the vast majority of CH patients and progresses normally in both sexes (47,183,114). The same applies to age at menarche and menstrual cycles (114,183). In adults, fertility is generally normal (188). However, women with CH may have an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In addition, their offspring is at risk for poorer motor coordination (see also Section 3.5) (154,156).

4.4. Bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health

Summary

Adequately treated children with nonsyndromic CH also have normal bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health (1/++0).

Evidence

Thyroid hormones play an important role in skeletal growth and bone mineral homeostasis. At birth, skeletal maturation is delayed in the majority of CH patients with severe hypothyroidism (70); however, within the first months of life, LT4 treatment rapidly normalizes bone maturation (71). Since thyroid hormones have major effects on bone remodeling, LT4 overtreatment may increase bone turnover with higher bone resorption than formation, resulting in progressive bone loss (189). Yet, long-term studies in children and young adults with CH have shown normal bone mineral density (190–193), suggesting that early started and adequate LT4 treatment is not harmful to bone health. Given the importance of sufficient calcium intake, patients with CH, in addition to adequate LT4 treatment, should consume 800 to 1200 mg calcium daily; if dietary calcium intake is low, supplements should be added (1,190).

Body mass index and composition are generally normal in children and adult with CH (90,91,187), and comparable with that of the general population. However, earlier adiposity rebound (194–196) and increased risks of being overweight or obese have been reported in up to 37% of young adults with CH (47,71,114). Therefore, lifestyle interventions, including diet and physical exercise, should be encouraged to avoid metabolic abnormalities (1).

In addition to an increased risk of congenital heart disease (86–88), neonates with untreated CH may have increased aortic intimal-media thickness (IMT), serum cholesterol levels (197), and impaired cardiac function (198,199) reversed by early LT4 treatment (200).

Young adults with CH have normal blood pressure, glucose, and lipid metabolism, and carotid IMT (90,200). However, repeated episodes of inadequate treatment may place them at risk of subtle cardiovascular dysfunction such as low exercise capacity, impaired diastolic function, increased IMT, and mild endothelial dysfunction (201). Whether these subtle abnormalities result in impaired quality of life or in an increased risk of cardiovascular disease needs to be further clarified. Anyway, good adherence to treatment in adolescents and young adults with CH is mandatory for optimal metabolic and cardiovascular health.

4.5. Patient and professional education, adherence, and health-related quality of life

Summary

Medical education about CH should be improved at all levels, with regular updates (1/+++).
Education of parents, starting at the time of the diagnosis, and later on of the patient, is essential not only throughout childhood, but also during transition to adult care and in women during pregnancy (1/+++).
Since adherence to treatment may influence the outcomes, it should be promoted throughout life (1/++0).

Evidence

It is very clear, and it should not have to be stated here, that medical professionals should have basic knowledge about CH. The education of parents, starting at diagnosis and updated regularly, and of CH patients throughout childhood is mandatory. Good understanding of CH is essential to manage parental anxiety attitude, and to promote treatment adherence throughout life. Both are important conditions to assure optimal outcomes in CH. Adequate education of patients is also important to improve self-esteem and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and to assure treatment adherence particularly during adolescence and pregnancy. The perception of the impact of CH on behavior varies with age and differs between children and their parents (202). Most (71,203,204), but not all (202,205), studies suggest that children and young adults with CH have an increased risk for lower HRQoL. Young adults with CH do not report problems concerning autonomy and sexual functioning. However, compared with the general population, they experience lower HRQoL with respect to cognitive and social functioning, daily activities, aggressiveness, and self-worth (204), which was already present in childhood (203). Moreover, young adults with CH are more likely to report associated chronic diseases, hearing impairment, visual problems, and overweight than their peers. Fewer attain the highest socioeconomic category and full-time employment, and more are still living with their parents. CH severity at diagnosis, long-term treatment adequacy, and the presence of other chronic health conditions seem to be the main determinants of educational achievement and HRQoL scores. Yet, despite these subtle disadvantages, most patients well integrated into society (71).

4.6. Transition to adult care

Summary

When patients are transferred from pediatric to adult care, the main aims are continuity of care and, with that, optimal clinical outcomes and quality of life, and to increase understanding of CH and promote self-management (1/+++).

Evidence

The period of transition from pediatric to adult care can be challenging since it is associated with an increased risk of poor treatment compliance and inadequate follow-up that may have repercussions, in terms of increased morbidity, and poor educational and social outcomes (206,207). Family structure and parental involvement are important for preventing and tackling this problem. Finally, given the female preponderance in all thyroid diseases and the finding that (subclinical) hypothyroidism may be associated with subfertility and adverse pregnancy and offspring outcomes, improvement and maintenance of disease control in young women are crucial (154,156).

5. Genetics of CH, Genetic Counseling, and Antenatal Management

5.1.
Criteria for genetic counseling
5.2.
Genetics of CH
5.3.
Antenatal diagnostics, evaluation of fetal thyroid function, and management of fetal hypothyroidism

5.1. Criteria for genetic counseling

Summary

Genetic counseling should be targeted rather than general (to all CH patients), and done by an experienced professional (2/++0).
Counseling should include explaining inheritance and the risk of recurrence of the patient's primary or central form of CH, based on the CH subtype, the family history, and, if known, the (genetic) cause (1/++0).
Parents with a child, or families with a member with CH, should have access to information about the two major forms of primary CH—TD and dyshormonogenesis—and, if included in the neonatal screening, about central CH (1/+++).

Evidence

Genetic counseling is highly recommended for patients and families with one or more affected member(s) with CH. Precise criteria were already established for the CH consensus guideline published in 2014 (1). Table 1 describes proposed criteria for genetic counseling.

Table 1.

Situations in Which Genetic Counseling Should Be Proposed

I. Pregnant women

Positive family history for nonsyndromic CH

Dyshormonogenesis (previously affected child) (1/+++)

Dysgenesis (at least one member of the family) (2/++0)

Positive family history of syndromic CH with:

Neurological disorders, including unexplained intellectual impairment

Deafness

Congenital heart disease, surfactant deficiency syndrome

Cleft palate

Kidney malformations

Any sign of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (GNAS mutation) (1/++0)

Unexplained abnormality of T4, T3, or TSH levels in family members (mild forms of CH) (2/++0)

II. Infant or child with CH (2/++0)

Subject with

Deafness

Neurological signs (hypotonia, choreoathetosis, intellectual disability)

Lung disorders (surfactant deficiency syndrome, interstitial lung disease)

Congenital heart disease

Cleft palate

Kidney malformations

Any sign of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (GNAS mutation)

Family history

Consanguinity

Kidney malformations

Deafness

Specific malformations (as already listed)

Unexplained intellectual impairment despite adequate treatment of CH in family members

Any sign of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (GNAS mutation)

Open in a new tab

CH, congenital hypothyroidism; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; TSH, thyrotropin.

Detailed phenotypic description of the index patient's CH form is essential and should include the presence or absence of associated malformations (syndromic vs. isolated CH), guiding genetic counseling and, if possible and necessary, genetic testing. Patients and family members should be informed about the inheritance and the risk of recurrence, and the presence of associated disorders in case of syndromic CH.

Accurate genotyping/genetic testing of patients with CH by mutation analysis of candidate genes can or may (i) explain the disease; (ii) predict the risk of CH and extrathyroidal defects in family members (to be performed in all cases of syndromic primary CH, and in central CH); (iii) identify carriers of NKX2-1 gene mutations who are at risk of life-threatening respiratory disease (208); (iv) enable “personalized” LT4 treatment to prevent goiter formation, which may occur in CH due to TPO or TG gene mutations if TSH concentrations are not carefully kept in the lower part of the reference interval; and (v) identify patients with mild TSH resistance in whom long-term LT4 treatment may be nonbeneficial (50).

5.2. Genetics of CH

Summary

If genetic testing is performed, its aim should be improving diagnosis, treatment, or prognosis (1/++0).
Before doing so, possibilities and limits of genetic testing should be discussed with parents or families (1/++0).
When available, genetic testing should be performed by means of new techniques, such as CGH array, NGS of gene panels (targeted NGS), or WES (1/++0).
Preferably, genetic testing or studies should be preceded by careful phenotypic description of the patient's CH, including morphology of the thyroid gland (2/++0).
Not only thyroid dyshormonogenesis, but also familial occurrence of dysgenesis and central hypothyroidism should lead to further genetic testing (1/++0).
Any syndromic association should be studied genetically, not only to improve genetic counseling, but also to identify new candidate genes explaining the association (1/++0).
Further research is needed to better define patients or patient groups that will benefit most from these new diagnostic possibilities (2/++0).

Evidence

Primary CH

TD due to thyroid maldevelopment is the most frequent cause of permanent primary CH, explaining ∼65% of cases (12,209). In contrast to TD with conditions such as athyreosis or thyroid ectopy, the other 35% is best described as GIS of which <50% is due to inherited defects of TH synthesis (dyshormonogenesis). TD is considered a sporadic disease. However, the familial component cannot be ignored, suggesting a genetic predisposition and a probably complex inheritance mode (210,211). In only 5% of TD cases, a genetic cause is identified with mutations in TSHR (212), or in genes encoding transcription factors involved in thyroid development (TTF1/NKX2.1, PAX8, FOXE1, NKX2-5, and GLIS3) (213,214). During the past years, novel and faster genetic and molecular tests, and the availability of large well-phenotyped cohorts of patients have led to the discovery of new genetic causes of CH. Heterozygous mutations in the JAG1 gene, responsible for Alagille syndrome and encoding the jagged protein in the Notch pathway, have been identified in TD patients (mainly with orthotopic thyroid hypoplasia) (77,215). By WES in familial TD cases, Carré et al. found borealin (encoded by BOREALIN), a major component of chromosomal passenger complex, to be also involved in thyrocyte migration and adhesion, explaining cases of thyroid ectopy (216). Mutations or deletion in the NTN1 gene have been found in patients with TD. Netrin is part of a family of laminin-related proteins, involved in cell migration and possibly in the development of pharyngeal vessels (217). Finally, mutations in the TUBB1 (tubulin, beta 1 class VI) gene have recently been identified in patients from three families with TD (mostly ectopy) and abnormal platelet physiology (basal activation and exaggerated platelet aggregation) (218). Functional studies in knockout mice validated the role of Tubb1 in thyroid development, function, and disease.

With respect to the cause of the mild nonautoimmune subclinical hypothyroidism in neonates and infants with Down's syndrome, new insights were provided by a study in Dyrk1A (+/++) mice, showing abnormal thyroid development and function (42). How overexpression of this gene causes thyroid abnormalities remains to be elucidated. Another more frequent form of syndromic CH is BLT syndrome due to NKX2-1 haploinsufficiency. Extensive genetic analysis of a large group of affected patients revealed novel variants, expanding BLT syndrome phenotype (219). Table 2 summarizes genes associated with TD.

Table 2.

Genes Associated with Thyroid Dysgenesis or Syndromic Primary Congenital Hypothyroidism

Gene (OMIM)	Protein role	Typical thyroid phenotype	Mode of inheritance	Associated conditions
NKX2-1 (600635)	NF	Variable	AD	Respiratory distress, choreoathetosis, variable expressivity
FOXE1 (602617)	NF	Athyreosis, severe hypoplasia	AR	Cleft palate, choanal atresia, and spiky hair
PAX8 (167415)	NF	Variable	AD	Urogenital tract defects (horseshoe kidney, renal agenesis, ureter, and testes anomalies), variable expressivity
NKX2–5 (600584)	NF	Thyroid in situ, variable hypothyroidism	Unclear	Congenital heart malformations
GLIS3 (610192)	NF	Variable	AR	Neonatal diabetes, polycystic kidneys, and cholestasis
JAG1 (601920)	Jagged 1: Notch receptor ligand	Variable orthotopic hypoplasia	AD	Heart malformations, variable expressivity
TBX1 (602054)	NF	Thyroid in situ	AD	Di George syndrome with congenital heart malformations, variable expressivity
NTN1 (601614)	Laminin-related secreted protein	Thyroid ectopy	unknown	Arthrogryposis
CDCA8 (609977)	Cell division cycle associated protein 8 or Borealin: component of the chromosomal passenger complex	Thyroid ectopy, hemiagenesis, thyroid asymmetry	Variable (AD, AR)	None in sporadic cases
TUBB1 (612901)	Member of the β-tubulin protein family	Thyroid dysgenesis	AD	Formation of macroplatelets and hyperaggregation of platelets

Open in a new tab

AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; NF, nuclear factor; OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Men (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/).

In contrast to TD, thyroid dyshormonogenesis is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern and, except for Pendred syndrome, CH is isolated in most cases. Genes involved in TH synthesis are SLC5A5 (NIS), SLC26A4 (PDS), TPO, TG, DUOX2, DUOXA2, and IYD (DEHAL1). These seven genes encode proteins for the various steps in this process. The use of modern genetic techniques, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms arrays and NGS (WES/whole genome sequencing), has provided new insights into the genetics of CH. First, NGS has identified new genes and/or extended the assumed thyroid phenotype, resulting from mutations in genes responsible for TH synthesis, causing dyshormonogenesis. For instance, biallelic mutations in SLC26A7 cause goitrous CH (220,221). SLC26A7 is a member of the same transporter family as SLC26A4 (pendrin), an anion exchanger with affinity for iodide and chloride (among others). However, in contrast to pendrin, SLC26A7 does not mediate cellular iodide efflux and affected individuals have normal hearing (220,221). Mutations in SLC26A4/PDS (222), TPO (222a) and DUOX2 (223) have been unexpectedly found in patients with nongoitrous CH and thyroid hypoplasia, narrowing the gap between TD and dyshormonogenesis. Recently, DUOX2 mutations have also been reported in patients with thyroid ectopy; however, further studies are needed to confirm and explain this striking finding (224). Moreover, the first CH patients with both DUOX1 and DUOX2 mutations have been reported, suggesting that CH can have a digenic cause (225). DUOX2 mutations have also been found in patients with early-onset inflammatory bowel disease, suggesting an extrathyroidal role for DUOX2 (226,227). Table 3 gives genes implicated in thyroid dyshormonogenesis. Also, recently, NGS studies in cohorts of CH patients screened for mutations in sets of CH genes revealed that a significant proportion of these patients has multiple variations in more than one thyroid-specific gene (89,228,229). Strikingly, these variations were found in genes encoding both thyroid transcription factors and proteins involved in TH synthesis, independently of the thyroid phenotype. These variations in more than one gene (oligogenicity) should, therefore, be considered as a plausible hypothesis for the genetic aetiology of CH (89). These novel data may also provide an explanation for the sporadic presentation of CH and observed complex modes of inheritance. In such context, JAG1 may act as a gene modifier in a multifactorial architecture of CH (215).

Table 3.

Genes Associated with Thyroid Dyshormonogenesis

Gene (OMIM)	Protein role	Typical thyroid phenotype	Mode of inheritance	Associated conditions
TSHR (603372)	G-protein coupled receptor	Complete or partial TSH resistance: apparent athyreosis → thyroid in situ and severe → mild hypothyroidism	AD, AR
GNAS (139320)	Alpha subunit of the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)	Partial TSH resistance, mild hypothyroidism	Maternal inheritance, parental imprinting of gene locus	PseudoHypo Parathyroidism (multiple hormone resistances)
SLC5A5 (601843)	Sodium iodide symporter	Absent or low iodide uptake at scintiscan, variable hypothyroidism, and goiter	AR
SLC26A4/PDS (605646)	Pendrin: anion transporter	Partial iodide organification defect, mild-to-moderate hypothyroidism, goiter, high serum Tg	AR	Pendred syndrome: sensorineural deafness with enlarged vestibular aqueduct, predisposition to alkalosis
DUOX1/DUOX2 (606758/606759)	Dual oxydases: peroxide generating system	Partial or complete iodide organification defect, goiter, transient or permanent hypothyroidism of variable severity, high serum Tg	AD, AR
DUOXA2 (612772)	Dual oxydase associated protein: a endoplasmic reticulum chaperone protein	Partial or complete iodide organification defect, goiter, transient or permanent hypothyroidism of variable severity, high serum Tg	AR
TPO (606765)	Thyroid peroxidase: iodide organification and thyronine coupling	Complete iodide organification defect, severe hypothyroidism, goiter, high serum Tg	AR
TG (188450)	Tg: glycoprotein precursor to the thyroid hormones	High iodide uptake, variable hypothyroidism, congenital or rapidly growing goiter, low serum Tg	AR
IYD/DEHAL (612025)	Dehalogenase providing iodide salvage in thyroid	Conserved iodide uptake, negative perchlorate discharge test, goiter, variable hypothyroidism, high serum Tg and MIT/DIT concentrations in serum and urine	AR or AD with incomplete penetrance
SLC26A7 (608479)	Anion transporter	Goiter, variable hypothyroidism, conserved iodide uptake, partial defect at perchlorate discharge, high serum Tg	AR

Open in a new tab

AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; MIT/DIT, monoiodotyrosine/diiodotyrosine; Tg, thyroglobulin.

Central CH

Thanks to NGS, the number of probable genetic causes of isolated central CH and central CH within the framework of MPHD has increased (Table 4). Isolated central CH due to biallelic TSHβ gene mutations is associated with severe hypothyroidism and characterized by the typical manifestations of CH (hypotonia, jaundice, umbilical hernia, macroglossia, etc.). If left untreated, these patients develop cretinism comparable with patients with severe primary CH (230–232). Therefore, central CH must be ruled out in all infants with signs or symptoms of CH and a low, normal, or only slightly elevated TSH concentration.

Table 4.

Genes Associated with Central Congenital Hypothyroidism and Related Phenotypes

Gene (OMIM)	Protein function	Thyroid phenotype	Mode of inheritance	Associated conditions
Isolated central CH
TSHβ (188540)	Hormone subunit	Neonatal onset with low TSH	AR	High αGSU and normal PRL serum levels, pituitary hyperplasia reversible on LT4
TRHR (188545)	GPCR	Normal TSH and low PRL serum levels, blunted TSH/PRL responses to TRH	AR	Male index cases with growth retardation and overweight during childhood; one female proband with prolonged neonatal jaundice
TBL1X (300196)	NF	Mild isolated central CH in males with normal TSH serum levels and normal response to TRH stimulation test	X-linked	Hearing defects
IRS4 (300904)	NF	Mild isolated central CH in males with normal TSH serum levels, blunted TSH response to TRH	X-linked
Multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies
IGSF1 (300137)	Plasma membrane protein of unknown function	Normal TSH serum levels and blunted response to TRH test; males are preferentially affected	X-linked	Low PRL levels, variable GH deficiency, possible transient mild hypocortisolism and metabolic syndrome; late adrenarche and delayed rise of testosterone in males, dissociated from testicular growth ending in postpubertal macrorchidism
PROP1 (601538)	NF	Variable age of onset	AR	GH, PRL LH/FSH deficiencies and delayed ACTH defects, small to large pituitary volume
POU1F1 (173110)	NF	Variable age of onset	AR, AD	GH and PRL deficiency, prominent forehead, midface hypoplasia, depressed nose
HESX1 (601802)	NF	Central CH	AR, AD	Hypopituitarism associated with septo-optic dysplasia
SOX3 (313430)	NF	Central CH	X-linked	Anterior–pituitary hypoplasia with ectopic posterior pituitary, persistent craniopharyngeal canal and learning difficulties
OTX2 (600037)	NF	Central CH	AD	Anterior pituitary hypoplasia with ectopic posterior pituitary and ocular defects (ano-/micro-ophthalmia/retinal dystrophy)
LHX3 (600577)	NF	Central CH	AR	Hypopituitarism with variable ACTH defect, small to large pituitary, short and rigid cervical spine, and variable hearing defect
LHX4 (602146)	NF	Central CH	AR, AD	Variable hypopituitarism, anterior pituitary hypoplasia with ectopic posterior pituitary, Arnold–Chiari syndrome, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum
LEPR (601007)	Cytokine receptor	Central CH	AR	Hyperphagia, obesity, and combined with central hypogonadism
SOX2 (184429)	NF	Central CH	AD	Variable hypopituitarism, pituitary hypoplasia, microphthalmia, variable learning difficulties
Genetic defects variably associated with central CH
PROKR2 (607123)	GPCR	Variable TSH defects	AR, AD	Variable hypopituitarism associated with septo-optic dysplasia or pituitary stalk interruption syndrome
NFKB2 (164012)	NF	Variable TSH defects	AD	Deficient anterior pituitary with variable immune deficiency syndrome associated with ACTH deficiency and variable GH defects
CHD7 (608892)	ATP-dependent helicase	Variable TSH defects	AD	CHARGE syndrome with ectopic posterior pituitary and variable LH/FSH and GH defects
FGFR1 (136350)	Receptor tyrosine kinase	Variable TSH defects	AD	KS and nCHH, variable association with defects of other pituitary hormones including TSH, septo-optic dysplasia, and ectopic posterior pituitary
FGF8 (600483)	GF	Variable TSH defects	AR	KS and nCHH, variable associations with defects of other pituitary hormones including TSH, holoprosencephaly, and corpus callosum agenesia
FOXA2 (600288)	NF	TSH defects	AD	Hypopituitarism with craniofacial and endoderm-derived organ abnormalities and hyperinsulinism

Open in a new tab

αGSU, alpha glycoprotein subunit; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; CHARGE, Coloboma, Heart anomaly, choanal Atresia, Retardation, Genital and Ear anomalies); FSH, follicle-stimulatinng hormone; GF, growth factor; GH, growth hormone; GPCR, G-protein coupled receptor; KS, Kallman syndrome; LH, luteinizing hormone; LT4, levothyroxine; nCHH, normosmic congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism; NF, nuclear factor; PRL, prolactin; TRH, thyrotropin releasing hormone.

To date, defective thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) action due to biallelic mutations in the TRHR gene has been described in only a few families (45). Although prolonged neonatal jaundice was reported in one female, even complete TRH resistance does not cause severe neonatal hypothyroidism. The diagnosis in three of the four probands with biallelic TRHR mutations was made during childhood because of delayed growth accompanied by lethargy and fatigue or by overweight. However, complete TRH resistance diagnosed by genetic testing has been diagnosed in a pregnant woman (233). Immunoglobulin superfamily member 1 gene (IGSF1) mutations are the molecular cause of a recently described X-linked syndrome, including mild-to-moderate central CH. In this syndrome, central CH is associated with abnormal testicular growth leading to adult macro-orchidism (+2.0 standard deviation score), a tendency toward pubertal delay, low prolactin, and, rarely, reversible growth hormone deficiency (234,235). Some female carriers can also manifest central CH. Recent data indicate IGSF1 as the most frequently implicated gene in congenital central CH (235).

Mutations in the TBL1X gene are the second most frequent cause of X-linked central CH. TBL1X, transducin-like protein 1, is an essential subunit of the nuclear receptor corepressor-silencing mediator for retinoid and TH receptor complex, the major TH receptor CoR involved in T3-regulated gene expression. In addition to central CH, many patients exhibit hearing loss (236). Finally, mutations in IRS4 are another cause of X-linked mild central CH. Since IRS4 is involved in leptin signaling, the cause of the central CH may be disrupted leptin signaling (237). Central CH is more frequently part of MPHD and can be associated with one or more other pituitary hormone deficiences. In addition, a certain percentage of affected patients has morphological abnormalities of the pituitary gland or hypothalamus, or other neurological defects (25,45). Table 4 presents genes implicated in central hypothyroidism.

5.3. Antenatal diagnostics, evaluation of fetal thyroid function, and management of fetal hypothyroidism

Summary

We recommend antenatal diagnosis in cases of goiter fortuitously discovered during systematic ultrasound examination of the fetus, in relation to thyroid dyshormonogenesis (1/+++); a familial recurrence of CH due to dyshormonogenesis (25% recurrence rate) (1/+++); and known defects of genes involved in thyroid function or development with potential germline transmission (1/++0). Special issues should be considered for syndromic cases with potential mortality and possible germline mosaicism (as for NKX2-1 gene mutation/deletion and severe pulmonary dysfunction with possible transmission through germline mosaicism). In such circumstances, the discussion of the prenatal diagnosis should be open. The therapeutic management of affected fetuses should comply with the laws in force in the country concerned (1/++0). The familial recurrence of CH due to dysgenesis (2% of familial occurrences) requires further study to determine the feasibility and clinical relevance for antenatal detection.
For the evaluation of fetal thyroid volume, we recommend ultrasound scans at 20 to 22 weeks gestation to detect fetal thyroid hypertrophy and potential thyroid dysfunction in the fetus. Goiter or an absence of thyroid tissue can also be documented by this technique. Measurements should be made as a function of GA, and thyroid perimeter and diameter should be measured to document goiter (1/+++).
If a (large) fetal goiter is diagnosed, prenatal care should be provided in a specialized center of prenatal care (1/+++).
We recommend cordocentesis, rather than amniocentesis, as the reference method for assessing fetal thyroid function. Norms have been established as a function of GA. This examination should be carried out only if prenatal intervention is considered (1/+++).
In most cases, fetal thyroid function can be inferred from context and ultrasound criteria, and fetal blood sampling is, therefore, only exceptionally required (2/++0).
We strongly recommend fetal treatment by intra-amniotic LT4 injections in a euthyroid pregnant woman with a large fetal goiter associated with hydramnios and/or tracheal occlusion; in a hypothyroid pregnant woman, we recommend to treat the woman (rather the fetus) with LT4 (1/++0).
For goitrous nonimmune fetal hypothyroidism leading to hydramnios, we recommend intra-amniotic injections of LT4 to decrease the size of the fetal thyroid gland. The injections should be performed by multidisciplinary specialist teams (1/+++).
The expert panel proposes the use of 10 μg/kg estimated fetal weight per 15 days in the form of intra-amniotic injections. The risks to the fetus and the psychological burden on the parents should be factored into the risk–benefit evaluation (2/+00).

Evidence

Antenatal diagnostics is advised in case of fortuitously discovered fetal goiter during fetal US examination in an anti-TSHR antibodies negative mother, an earlier child with primary CH due to dyshormonogenesis (and a 25% risk of recurrence), and in an earlier child with (severe) syndromic CH. How to evaluate fetal thyroid function and to manage (nonautoimmune) fetal hypothyroidism have been described in the 2014 CH concensus guidelines (1). In short, fetal thyroid size can be assessed by US at 20 to 22 weeks, and at 32 weeks gestation. When thyroid measurement values based on diameter or perimeter are above the 95th percentile (238), the mother and fetus should be referred to a specialized center for prenatal care. If prenatal intervention is considered, cordocentesis can be performed to assess fetal thyroid function. Conditions that may be a reason for fetal treatment are a large fetal goiter with progressive hydramnios, and risk of premature delivery or concerns about tracheal occlusion. If fetal treatment is considered in a euthyroid pregnant woman, one way is to administer intra-amniotic LT4 injections in a dosage of 10 μg/kg estimated fetal weight per 15 days. Studies have confirmed the feasibility and safety of intra-amniotic LT4 injection and strongly suggest that this treatment is effective for decreasing goiter size. However, none of the many LT4 regimens used ensures euthyroidism at birth. It is, therefore, not possible to formulate guidelines from current data. These further diagnostics and intervention should only be done by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized center of prenatal care after a careful benefit–risk evaluation. Determination of the indications and optimal modes of prenatal treatment for nonimmune fetal goitrous hypothyroidism will require larger well-designed studies that would be best conducted through international cooperation between multidisciplinary medical teams. Alternative ways of treating the fetus by administering drugs to the mother should also be investigated. In a hypothyroid pregnant woman, the preferred approach is to treat the woman with (rather than the fetus) with LT4. Finally, adequate iodine intake should be ensured for all pregnant women (250 μg/day).

Conclusions

This update of the consensus guidelines on CH recommends worldwide neonatal screening and appropriate diagnostics—including genetics—to assess the cause of both primary and central hypothyroidism. The expert panel recommends the immediate start of correctly dosed LT4 treatment, and frequent follow-up including laboratory testing and dose adjustments to keep TH levels in their target ranges, timely assessments of the need to continue treatment, attention for neurodevelopmental and neurosensory functions and, if necessary, consulting other health professionals, and education of the child and family about CH. Harmonization of diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up will optimize patient outcomes. Lastly, all individuals with CH are entitled to a well-planned transition of care from pediatrics to adult medicine. This consensus guidelines update should be used to further optimize detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of children with all forms of CH in the light of the most recent evidence. It should be helpful in convincing health authorities of the benefits of neonatal screening for CH. Despite ∼50 years of neonatal screening for CH, some important questions remain, such as the genetic etiology of TD, the assumed harm of subclinical CH, that is, a normal fT4 in combination with an elevated TSH, and the cause of the gradually increased incidence of CH with GIS. Further epidemiological and experimental studies are needed to understand the increased incidence of this condition.

Author Disclosure Statement

Part of the scientific study performed by A.S. and M.P. in relation to congenital hypothyroidism was financed by grants from EDF, Sandoz SAS Merck Serono France, and nonprofit Princess Grace Foundation of Monaco as well as by French public nonprofit funding agency Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01916018, P110120 – IDRCB 2012-A00797-36). A.S. was supported by the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology Research Fellowship Grant and Alexander S. Onassis Foundation. The financing bodies were not involved in reviewing the content of this article. The remaining authors of the article have no conflicts of interest to declare related to the guideline content.

Funding Information

One of the two face-to-face meetings necessary to achieve this study was supported by a grant from the ENDO-ERN.

References

1. Léger J, Olivieri A, Donaldson M, Torresani T, Krude H, van Vliet G, Polak M, Butler G; ESPE-PES-SLEP-JSPE-APEG-APPES-ISPAE; Congenital Hypothyroidism Consensus Conference Group. 2014. European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology consensus guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:363–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Swiglo BA, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ, Kunz R, Vigersky RA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM. 2008. Case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:666–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Hulse JA 1984. Outcome for congenital hypothyroidism. Arch Dis Child 59:23–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Alm J, Larsson A, Zetterstrom R. 1981. Congenital hypothyroidism in Sweden. Psychomotor development in patients detected by clinical signs and symptoms. Acta Paediatr Scand 70:907–912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Geelhoed EA, Lewis B, Hounsome D, O'Leary P. 2005. Economic evaluation of neonatal screening for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. J Paediatr Child Health 41:575–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Ford G, LaFranchi SH. 2014. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: a worldwide view of strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:175–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Barnes ND 1985. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: the first decade. Arch Dis Child 60:587–592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Langham S, Hindmarsh P, Krywawych S, Peters C. 2013. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: comparison of borderline screening cut-off points and the effect on the number of children treated with levothyroxine. Eur Thyroid J 2:180–186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Olivieri A, Fazzini C, Medda E; Italian Study Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism. 2015. Multiple factors influencing the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Horm Res Paediatr 83:86–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Mitchell ML, Hsu HW, Sahai I; Massachusetts Pediatric Endocrine Work Group. 2011. The increased incidence of congenital hypothyroidism: fact or fancy? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 75:806–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Corbetta C, Weber G, Cortinovis F, Calebiro D, Passoni A, Vigone MC, Beck-Peccoz P, Chiumello G, Persani L. 2009. A 7-year experience with low blood TSH cutoff levels for neonatal screening reveals an unsuspected frequency of congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 71:739–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Barry Y, Bonaldi C, Goulet V, Coutant R, Léger J, Paty AC, Delmas D, Cheillan D, Roussey M. 2016. Increased incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in France from 1982 to 2012: a nationwide multicenter analysis. Ann Epidemiol 26:100–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Albert BB, Cutfield WS, Webster D, Carll J, Derraik JG, Jefferies C, Gunn AJ, Hofman PL. 2012. Etiology of increasing incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in New Zealand from 1993–2010. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:3155–3160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Peters C, Brooke I, Heales S, Ifederu A, Langham S, Hindmarsh P, Cole TJ. 2016. Defining the newborn blood spot screening reference interval for TSH: impact of ethnicity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3445–3449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Persani L, Rurale G, de Filippis T, Galazzi E, Muzza M, Fugazzola L. 2018. Genetics and management of congenital hypothyroidism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 32:387–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Peters C, Nicholas AK, Schoenmakers E, Lyons G, Langham S, Serra EG, Sebire NJ, Muzza M, Fugazzola L, Schoenmakers N. 2019. DUOX2/DUOXA2 mutations frequently cause congenital hypothyroidism which evades detection on UK newborn screening. Thyroid 29:790–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Knowles RL, Oerton J, Cheetham T, Butler G, Cavanagh C, Tetlow L, Dezateux C. 2018. Newborn screening for primary congenital hypothyroidism: estimating test performance at different TSH thresholds. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:3720–3728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Dufort G, Larrivée-Vanier S, Eugène D, De Deken X, Seebauer B, Heinimann K, Lévesque S, Gravel S, Szinnai G, Van Vliet G, Deladoëy J. 2019. Wide spectrum of DUOX2 deficiency: from life-threatening compressive goiter in infancy to lifelong euthyroidism. Thyroid 29:1018–1022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Lain S, Trumpff C, Grosse SD, Olivieri A, Guy Van Vliet G. 2017. Are lower TSH cutoffs in neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism warranted? Eur J Endocrinol 177:D1–D12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van Trotsenburg AS, Verkerk PH. 2015. The severity of congenital hypothyroidism of central origin should not be underestimated. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:297–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Nebesio TD, McKenna MP, Nabhan ZM, Eugster EA. 2010. Newborn screening results in children with central hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 156:990–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Braslavsky D, Méndez MV, Prieto L, Keselman A, Enacan R, Gruñeiro-Papendieck L, Jullien N, Savenau A, Reynaud R, Brue T, Bergadá I, Chiesa A. 2017. Pilot neonatal screening program for central congenital hypothyroidism: evidence of significant detection. Horm Res Paediatr 88:274–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Adachi M, Soneda A, Asakura Y, Muroya K, Yamagami Y, Hirahara F. 2012. Mass screening of newborns for congenital hypothyroidism of central origin by free thyroxine measurement of blood samples on filter paper. Eur J Endocrinol 166:829–838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Kempers MJ, Lanting CI, van Heijst AF, van Trotsenburg AS, Wiedijk BM, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism based on thyroxine, thyrotropin, and thyroxine-binding globulin measurement: potentials and pitfalls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3370–3376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Persani L, Brabant G, Dattani M, Bonomi M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Fliers E, Gruters A, Maiter D, Schoenmakers N, van Trotsenburg ASP. 2018. European Thyroid Association (ETA) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of central hypothyroidism. Eur Thyroid J 7:225–237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Lanting CI, van Tijn DA, Loeber JG, Vulsma T, de Vijlder JJ, Verkerk PH. 2005. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of the thyroxine/thyroxine-binding globulin ratio to detect congenital hypothyroidism of thyroidal and central origin in a neonatal screening program. Pediatrics 116:168–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Groeneweg S, Peeters RP, Moran C, Stoupa A, Auriol F, Tonduti D, Dica A, Paone L, Rozenkova K, Malikova J, van der Walt A, de Coo IFM, McGowan A, Lyons G, Aarsen FK, Barca D, van Beynum IM, van der Knoop MM, Jansen J, Manshande M, Lunsing RJ, Nowak S, den Uil CA, Zillikens MC, Visser FE, Vrijmoeth P, de Wit MCY, Wolf NI, Zandstra A, Ambegaonkar G, Singh Y, de Rijke YB, Medici M, Bertini ES, Depoorter S, Lebl J, Cappa M, De Meirleir L, Krude H, Craiu D, Zibordi F, Oliver Petit I, Polak M, Chatterjee K, Visser TJ, Visser WE. 2019. Effectiveness and safety of the tri-iodothyronine analogue Triac in children and adults with MCT8 deficiency: an international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7:695–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Zung A, Bier Palmon R, Golan A, Troitzky M, Eventov-Friedman S, Marom R, Keidar R, Kats N, Almashanu S, Flidel-Rimon O. 2017. Risk factors for the development of delayed TSH elevation in neonatal intensive care unit newborns. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:3050–3055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. McGrath N, Hawkes CP, Mayne P, Murphy NP. 2019. Optimal timing of repeat newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in preterm infants to detect delayed thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation. J Pediatr 205:77–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Cavarzere P, Camilot M, Popa FI, Lauriola S, Teofoli F, Gaudino R, Vincenzi M, Antoniazzi F. 2016. Congenital hypothyroidism with delayed TSH elevation in low-birth-weight infants: incidence, diagnosis and management. Eur J Endocrinol 175:395–402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. LaFranchi SH 2014. Screening preterm infants for congenital hypothyroidism: better the second time around. J Pediatr 164:1259–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Murphy N, Hume R, van Toor H, Matthews TG, Ogston SA, Wu SY, Visser TJ, Williams FL. 2004. The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in preterm infants: changes in the first 24 hours of postnatal life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2824–2833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Aitken J, Willimas FLR. 2014. A systematic review of thyroid dysfunction in preterm neonates exposed to topical iodine. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 99:21–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Olivieri A, Medda E, De Angelis S, Valensise H, De Felice M, Fazzini C, Cascino I, Cordeddu V, Sorcini M, Stazi MA; Study Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism. 2007. High risk of congenital hypothyroidism in multiple pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3141–3147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Perry R, Heinrichs C, Bourdoux P, Khoury K, Szöts F, Dussault JH, Vassart G, Van Vliet G. 2002. Discordance of monozygotic twins for thyroid dysgenesis: implications for screening and for molecular pathophysiology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4072–4077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Medda E, Vigone MC, Cassio A, Calaciura F, Costa P, Weber G, de Filippis T, Gelmini G, Di Frenna M, Caiulo S, Ortolano R, Rotondi D, Bartolucci M, Gelsomino R, De Angelis S, Gabbianelli M, Persani L, Olivieri A. 2019. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism: what can we learn from discordant twins? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:5765–5779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Fort P, Lifshitz F, Bellisario R, Davis J, Lanes R, Pugliese M, Richman R, Post EM, David R. 1984. Abnormalities of thyroid function in infants with Down syndrome. J Pediatr 104:545–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Sharav T, Collins RM Jr, Baab PJ. 1988. Growth studies in infants and children with Down's syndrome and elevated levels of thyrotropin. Am J Dis Child 142:1302–1306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Purdy IB, Singh N, Brown WL, Vangala S, Devaskar UP. 2014. Revisiting early hypothyroidism screening in infants with Down syndrome. J Perinatol 34:936–940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. van Trotsenburg AS, Vulsma T, van Santen HM, Cheung W, de Vijlder JJ. 2003. Lower neonatal screening thyroxine concentrations in down syndrome newborns. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1512–1515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. van Trotsenburg AS, Kempers MJ, Endert E, Tijssen JG, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Trisomy 21 causes persistent congenital hypothyroidism presumably of thyroidal origin. Thyroid 16:671–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Kariyawasam D, Rachdi L, Carré A, Martin M, Houlier M, Janel N, Delabar JM, Scharfmann R, Polak M. 2015. DYRK1A BAC transgenic mouse: a new model of thyroid dysgenesis in Down syndrome. Endocrinology 156:1171–1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, Witteveen ME, Marchal JP, Klouwer FCC, Ikelaar NA, Smets AMJB, van Rijn RR, Endert E, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg ASP. 2017. Early thyroxine treatment in Down syndrome and thyroid function later in life. Eur J Endocrinol 176:505–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. van Trotsenburg AS, Heymans HS, Tijssen JG, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Comorbidity, hospitalization, and medication use and their influence on mental and motor development of young infants with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 118:1633–1639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Persani L, Cangiano B, Bonomi M. 2019. The diagnosis and management of central hypothyroidism in 2018. Endocr Connect 8:44–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van Trotsenburg ASP, Verkerk PH. 2018. TSH and FT4 Concentrations in congenital central hypothyroidism and mild congenital thyroidal hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1342–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Delvecchio M, Vigone MC, Wasniewska M, Weber G, Lapolla R, Popolo PP, Tronconi GM, Di Mase R, De Luca F, Cavallo L, Salerno M, Faienza MF. 2015. Final height in Italian patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: a 20-year observational study. Ital J Pediatr 41:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Wassner AJ 2018. Congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Perinatol 45:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Wassner AJ 2017. Pediatric hypothyrodism. Paediatr Drugs 19:291–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Vigone MC, Capalbo D, Weber G, Salerno M. 2018. Mild hypothyroidism in childhood: who, when, and how should be treated? J Endocr Soc 2:1024–1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Lain SJ, Bentley JP, Wiley V, Roberts CL, Jack M, Wilcken B, Nassar N. 2016. Association between borderline neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations and educational and developmental outcomes: a population-based record-linkage study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:756–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Trumpff C, de Schepper J, Vanderfauillie J, Vercruysse N, Van Oyen H, Moreno-Reyes R, Tafforeau J, Vanderpas J, Vandevijvere S. 2015. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration at birth in Belgian neonates and cognitive development at preschool age. Nutrients 7:9018–9032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Trumpff C, de Schepper J, Vanderfauillie J, Vercruysse N, Van Oyen H, Moreno-Reyes R, Tafforeau J, Vandevijvere S. 2016. Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration and psychomotor development at preschool age. Arch Dis Child 101: 1100–1106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Cherella CE, Wasser AJ. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism: insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2017:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Leung AKC, Leung AAC. 2019. Evaluation and management of the child with hypothyroidism. World J Pediatr 15:124–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. van Tijn D, de Vijder JJM, Verbeeten B, Verkerk P, Vulsma T. 2005. Neonatal detection of congenital hypothyroidism of central origin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3350–3359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Salm N, Yetter E, Tluczek A. 2012. Informing parents about positive newborn screen results: parents' recommendations. J Child Health Care 16:367–381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Cassio A, Corbetta C, Antonozzi I, Calaciura F, Caruso U, Cesaretti G, Gastaldi R, Medda E, Mosca F, Pasquini E, Salerno MC, Stoppioni V, Tonacchera M, Weber G, Olivieri A; Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology; Italian Society for the Study of Metabolic Diseases and Neonatal Screening; Italian National Institute of Health; Italian National Coordinating Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism; Italian Thyroid Association; Italian Society of Pediatrics; Italian Society of Neonatology; Italian Society of Endrocrinology; Associazione Medici Endocrinologi. 2013. The Italian screening program for primary congenital hypothyroidism: actions to improve screening, diagnosis, follow-up, and surveillance. J Endocrinol Invest 36:195–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Hettiarachchi M, Amarasena S. 2014. Indicators of newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in Sri Lanka: program challenges and way forward. BMC Health Serv Res 14:385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Supakul N, Delaney LR, Siddiqui AR, Jennings SG, Eugster EA, Karmazyn B. 2012. Ultrasound for primary imaging of congenital hypothyroidism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:360–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Chanoine JP, Toppet V, Lagasse R, Spehl M, Delange F. 1991. Determination of thyroid volume by ultrasound from the neonatal period to late adolescence. Eur J Pediatr 150:395–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Perry RJ, Hollman AS, Wood AM, Donaldson MD. 2002. Ultrasound of the thyroid gland in the newborn: normative data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 87:F209–F211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Freire R, Monte O, Tomimori EK, Catarino RM, Sterza T, Rocha T, Pereira KCC, Mattos HS Jr., Fagundes LB, Liberato MM, Dos Santos LWR, Pereira A, Cintra T, Hegner C, Lube D, Murad M. 2015. Sonographic evaluation of the thyroid size in neonates. J Clin Ultrasound 43:224–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Clerc J 2014. Imaging the thyroid in children. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:203–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Keller-Petrot I, Leger J, Sergent-Alaoui A, de Labriolle-Vaylet C. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism: role of nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 47:135–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Graber E, Regelmann MO, Annunziato R, Machac J, Rapaport R. 2015. The role of (1)(2)(3)I imaging in the evaluation of infants with mild congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 83:94–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Goldis M, Waldman L, Marginean O, Rosenberg HK, Rapaport R. 2016. Thyroid imaging in infants. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 45:255–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Fugazzola L, Persani L, Vannucchi G, Carletto M, Mannavola D, Vigone MC, Cortinovis F, Beccaria L, Longari V, Weber G, Beck-Peccoz P. 2007. Thyroid scintigraphy and perchlorate test after recombinant human TSH: a new tool for the differential diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism during infancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1498–1503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. De Silva A, Jong I, McLean G, Bergman P, Rodda C, Brown J, Nandurkar D. 2014. The role of scintigraphy and ultrasound in the imaging of neonatal hypothyroidism: 5-year retrospective review of single-centre experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 58:422–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Wasniewska M, De Luca F, Cassio A, Oggiaro N, Gianino P, Delvecchio M, Aiazzi R, Stoppioni V, Lombardo F, Messina MF, Valenzise M, Arrigo T. 2003. In congenital hypothyroidism bone maturation at birth may be a predictive factor of psychomotor development during the first Year of life irrespective of other variables related to treatment. Eur J Endocrinol 149:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Léger J, Ecosse E, Roussey M, Lanoë JL, Larroque B. 2011. Subtle health impairment and socioeducational attainment in young adult patients with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1771–1782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72. Lichtenberger-Geslin L, Dos Santos S, Hassani Y, Ecosse E, Van Den Abbeele T, Léger J. 2013. Factors associated with hearing impairment in patients with congenital hypothyroidism treated since the neonatal period: a national population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3644–3652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Salerno M, Militerni R, Bravaccio C, Micillo M, Capalbo D, Di MS, Tenore A. 2002. Effect of different starting doses of levothyroxine on growth and intellectual outcome at four years of age in congenital hypothyroidism. Thyroid 12:45–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Bamforth JS, Hughes IA, Lazarus JH, Weaver CM, Harper PS. 1989. Congenital hypothyroidism, spiky hair, and cleft palate. J Med Genet 26:49–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Devriendt K, Vanhole C, Matthijs G, de Zegher F. 1998. Deletion of thyroid transcription factor-1 gene in an infant with neonatal thyroid dysfunction and respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 338:1317–1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Krude H, Schutz B, Biebermann H, von Moers A, Schnabel D, Neitzel H, Tonnies H, Weise D, Lafferty A, Schwarz S, DeFelice M, von Deimling A, van Landeghem F, DiLauro R, Gruters A. 2002. Choreoathetosis, hypothyroidism, and pulmonary alterations due to human NKX2-1 haploinsufficiency. J Clin Invest 109:475–480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77. de Filippis T, Marelli F, Nebbia G, Porazzi P, Corbetta S, Fugazzola L, Gastaldi R, Vigone MC, Biffanti R, Frizziero D, Mandara L, Prontera P, Salerno M, Maghnie M, Tiso N, Radetti G, Weber G, Persani L. 2016. JAG1 loss-of-function variations as a novel predisposing event in the pathogenesis of congenital thyroid defects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:861–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Levy-Shraga Y, Gothelf D, Pinchevski-Kadir S, Katz U, Modan-Moses D. 2018. Endocrine manifestations in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Acta Paediatr 107:678–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Shugar AL, Shapiro JM, Cytrynbaum C, Hedges S, Weksberg R, Fishman L. 2015. An increased prevalence of thyroid disease in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 167:1560–1564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Kawame H, Hannibal MC, Hudgins L, Pagon RA. 1999. Phenotypic spectrum and management issues in Kabuki syndrome. J Pediatr 134:480–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Zenker M, Mayerle J, Lerch MM, Tagariello A, Zerres K, Durie PR, Beier M, Hulskamp G, Guzman C, Rehder H, Beemer FA, Hamel B, Vanlieferinghen P, Gershoni-Baruch R, Vieira MW, Dumic M, Auslender R, Gil-da-Silva-Lopes VL, Steinlicht S, Rauh M, Shalev SA, Thiel C, Ekici AB, Winterpacht A, Kwon YT, Varshavsky A, Reis A. 2005. Deficiency of UBR1, a ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway, causes pancreatic dysfunction, malformations and mental retardation (Johanson-Blizzard syndrome). Nat Genet 37:1345–1350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82. Kumar J, Gordillo R, Kaskel FJ, Druschel CM, Woroniecki RP. 2009. Increased prevalence of renal and urinary tract anomalies in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 154:263–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Roberts HE, Moore CA, Fernhoff PM, Brown AL, Khoury MJ. 1997. Population study of congenital hypothyroidism and associated birth defects, Atlanta, 1979–1992. Am J Med Genet 71:29–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Devos H, Rodd C, Gagne N, Laframboise R, Van Vliet G. 1999. A search for the possible molecular mechanisms of thyroid dysgenesis: sex ratios and associated malformations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2502–2506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Castanet M, Polak M, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Lyonnet S, Czernichow P, Léger J, AFDPHE (Association Française pour le Dépistage et la Prévention des Handicaps de l'Enfant) 2001. Nineteen years of national screening for congenital hypothyroidism: familial cases with thyroid dysgenesis suggest the involvement of genetic factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2009–2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Olivieri A, Stazi MA, Mastroiacovo P, Fazzini C, Medda E, Spagnolo A, De Angelis S, Grandolfo ME, Taruscio D, Cordeddu V, Sorcini M; Study group for congenital hypothyroidism. 2002. A population-based study on the frequency of additional congenital malformations in infants with congenital hypothyroidism: data from the Italian Registry for Congenital Hypothyroidism (1991–1998). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:557–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Azar-Kolakez A, Ecosse E, Dos Santos S, Leger J. 2013. All-cause and disease-specific mortality and morbidity in patients with congenital hypothyroidism treated since the neonatal period: a national population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:785–793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88. Bas VN, Ozgelen S, Cetinkaya S, Aycan Z. 2014. Diseases accompanying congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 27:485–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. de Filippis T, Gelmini G, Paraboschi E, Vigone MC, Di Frenna M, Marelli F, Bonomi M, Cassio A, Larizza D, Moro M, Radetti G, Salerno M, Ardissino D, Weber G, Gentilini D, Guizzardi F, Duga S, Persani L. 2017. A frequent oligogenic involvement in congenital hypothyroidism. Hum Mol Genet 26:2507–2514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Albert BB, Heather N, Derraik JG, Cutfield WS, Wouldes T, Tregurtha S, Mathai S, Webster D, Jefferies C, Gunn AJ, Hofman PL. 2013. Neurodevelopmental and body composition outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism treated with high-dose initial replacement and close monitoring. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3663–3670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Aleksander PE, Brückner-Spieler M, Stoehr AM, Lankes E, Kühnen P, Schnabel D, Ernert A, Stäblein W, Craig ME, Blankenstein O, Grüters A, Krude H. 2018. Mean high-dose l-thyroxine treatment is efficient and safe to achieve a normal IQ in young adult patients with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1459–1469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92. Cassio A, Monti S, Rizzello A, Bettocchi I, Baronio F, D'Addabbo G, Bal MO, Balsamo A. 2013. Comparison between liquid and tablet formulations of levothyroxine in the initial treatment of congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 162:1264–1269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93. Peroni E, Vigone MC, Mora S, Bassi LA, Pozzi C, Passoni A, Weber G. 2014. Congenital hypothyroidism treatment in infants: a comparative study between liquid and tablet formulations of levothyroxine. Horm Res Paediatr 81:50–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Carswell JM, Gordon JH, Popovsky E, Hale A, Brown RS. 2013. Generic and brand-name L-thyroxine are not bioequivalent for children with severe congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:610–617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Vogiatzi MG, Kirkland JL. 1997. Frequency and necessity of thyroid function tests in neonates and infants with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 100:E6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Mathai S, Cutfield WS, Gunn AJ, Webster D, Jefferies C, Robinson E, Hofman P. 2008. A novel therapeutic paradigm to treat congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 69:142–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Balhara B, Misra M, Levitsky LL. 2001. Clinical monitoring guidelines for congenital hypothyroidism: laboratory outcome data in the first year of life. J Pediatr 158:532–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Baloch Z, Carayon P, Conte-Delvox B, Demers LM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Henry JF, LiVosli VA, Niccoli-Sire P, John R, Ruf J, Smyth PP, Spencer CA, Stockigt JR, Guidelines Committee, National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. 2003. Laboratory medicine practice guidelines. Laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Thyroid 13:3–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. Bakker B, Kempers MJE, De Vijlder JJM, Van Tijn DA, Wiedijk BM, Van Bruggen M, Vulsma T. 2002. Dynamics of the plasma concentrations of TSH, FT4 and T3 following thyroxine supplementation in congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol 57:529–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Selva KA, Mandel SH, Rien L, Sesser D, Miyahira R, Skeels M, Nelson JC, Lafranchi SH. 2002. Initial treatment dose of L-thyroxine in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 141:786–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Selva KA, Harper A, Downs A, Blasco PA, Lafranchi SH. 2005. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital hypothyroidism: comparison of initial T4 dose and time to reach target T4 and TSH. J Pediatr 147:775–780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Heyerdahl S, Oerbeck B. 2003. Congenital hypothyroidism: developmental outcome in relation to levothyroxine treatment variables. Thyroid 13:1029–1038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103. Hanukoglu A, Perlman K, Shamis I, Brnjac L, Rovet J, Daneman D. 2001. Relationship of etiology to treatment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:186–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104. Zdraveska N, Anastasovska V, Kocova M. 2016. Frequency of thyroid status monitoring in the first year of life and predictors for more frequent monitoring in infants with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 29:795–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105. Tuhan H, Abaci A, Cicek G, Anik A, Catli G, Demir K, Bober E. 2016. Levothyroxine replacement in primary congenital hypothyroidism: the higher the initial dose then higher the rate of overtreatment. J Pediatr Endocrinol metab 29:133–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106. Schoelwer MJ, Tu W, Zhou J, Eugster EA. 2017. Targeted levothyroxine therapy for treatment of congenital hypothyroidism. Endocrine Pract 23:1067–1071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107. Craven M, Frank GFR. 2018. Does initial dosing of levothyroxine in infants with congenital hypothyroidism lead to frequent dose adjustments secondary to iatrogenic hyperthyroidism on follow-up? J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 31:597–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108. Bongers-Schokking JJ, Resing WCM, de Rijke YB, de Ridder MAJ, de Muinck Keizer-Schraman SMPF. 2013. Cognitive development in congenital hypothyroidism: is overtreatment a greater threat than undertreatment? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:4499–4506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109. Bongers-Schokking JJ, Resing WCM, Oostdijk W, de Rijke YB, de Muinck Keizer-Schraman SMPF. 2018. Relation between early over- and undertreatment and behavioural problems in preadolescent children with congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 90:247–956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110. Rovet JF, Alvarez M. 1996. Thyroid hormone and attention in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9:63–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111. Fisher DA, Schoen EJ, LaFranchi S, Mandel SH, Nelson JC, Carlton EL, Goshi JH. 2000. The hypothalamic-pituitary negative feedback control axis in children with treated congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2722–2727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112. Bagattini B, Cosmo CD, Montanelli L, Piaggi P, Ciampi M, Agretti P, Marco GD, Vitti P, Tonacchera M. 2014. The different requirement of L-T4 therapy in congenital athyreosis compared with adult-acquired hypothyroidism suggests a persisting thyroid hormone resistance at the hypothalamic-pituitary level. Eur J Endocrinol 171:615–621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113. American Academy of Pediatrics, Rose SR; Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Brown RS: Public health Committee, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, Foley T, Kaplowitz PB, Kaye CL, Sundararjan S, Varma SK. 2006. Update on newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 117:2290–2303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114. Léger J 2015. A clinical update of long-term outcome in young adults. Eur J Endocrinol 172:67–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115. Strickler C, Pilon AF. 2007. Presumed levothyroxine-induced pseudotumor cerebri in a pediatric patient treated for congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Ophthalmol 1:545–549 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116. Penfold JL, Simpson DA. 1975. Premature craniosynostosis—a complication of thyroid replacement therapy. J Pediatr 86:360–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117. Dubuis JM, Glorieux J, Richer F, Deal CL, Dussault JH, Van Vliet G. 1996. Outcome of severe congenital hypothyroidism: closing the developmental gap with early high dose levothyroxine treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:222–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118. Stone E, Leiter LA, Lambert JR, Silverberg JD, Jeejeebhoy KN, Burrow GN. 1984. L-thyroxine absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59:139–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119. Ybarra ML, Dos Santos TJ, Pinheiro CTC, Dichtchekenian V, Damiani D. 2018. Rectal levothyroxine for the treatment of hypothyroidism: a case study. Pediatrics 142:e20173317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120. Huang SA, Tu HM, Harney JW, Venihaki M, Butte AJ, Kozakewich HP, Fishman SJ, Larsen PR. 2000. Severe hypothyroidism caused by type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase in infantile hemangiomas. N Engl J Med 343:185–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121. Bessho K, Etani Y, Ichimori H, Miyoshi Y, Namba N, Yoneda A, Ooue T, Chihara T, Morii E, Aoki T, Murakami M, Mushiake S, Ozono K. 2010. Increased type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase activity in a regrown hepatic hemangioma with consumptive hypothyrodism. Eur J Pediatr 169:215–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122. Peters C, Langham S, Mullis PE, Dattani MT. 2010. Use of combined liothyronine and thyroxine therapy for consumptive hypothyroidism associated with hepatic haemangiomas in infancy. Horm Res Paediatr 74:149–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123. Zeitler P, Solberg P. 2010. Pharmacy and therapeutics committee of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. J Pediatr 157:13–1420547262 [Google Scholar]
124. Colucchi P, Yue CS, Ducharme M, Benvenga S. 2013. A review of the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Eur Endocrinol 9:40–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125. Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM, American Thyroid Association Task Force on thyroid hormone replacement. 2014. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid 24:1670–1651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. 2017. Hypothyroidism. Lancet 390:1550–1562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127. Chorazy PA, Himelhoch S, Hopwood NJ, Gregor NG, Postellon DC. 1995. Persistent hypothyroidism in an infant receiving a soy formula: case report and review of the literature. Pediatrics 96:148–150 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128. Jabbar MA, Larrea J, Shaw RA. 1997. Abnormal thyroid function tests in infants with congenital hypothyroidism: the influence of soy-based formula. J Am Coll Nutr 16:280–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129. Slawik M, Klawitter B, Meiser E, Schories M, Zwermann O, Borm K, Peper M, Lubrich B, Hug MJ, Nauck M, Olschewski M, Beuschlein F, Reincke M. 2007. Thyroid hormone replacement for central hypothyroidism: a randomized controlled trial comparing two doses of thyroxine (T4) with a combination of T4 and triiodothyronine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4115–4122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130. Koulouri O, Auldin MA, Agarwal R, Kieffer V, Robertson C, Falconer Smith J, Levy MJ, Howlett TA. 2011. Diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism in TSH deficiency compared to primary thyroid disease: pituitary patients are at risk of under-replacement with levothyroxine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 74:744–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131. Peters C, van Trotsenburg ASP, Schoenmakers N. 2018. DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: congenital hypothyroidism: update and perspectives. Eur J Endocrinol 179: 297–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132. Oren A, Wang MK, Brnjac L, Mahmud FH, Palmert MR. 2013. Mild neonatal hyperthyrotrophinaemia: 10-year experience suggests the condition is increasingly common but often transient. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 79:832–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133. Kara C, Gunindi F, Can Yilmaz G, Aydin M. 2016. Transient congenital hypothyroidism in Turkey: an analysis on frequency and natural course. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 8:170–179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134. Jung JM, Jin HY, Chung ML. 2016. Feasibility of an early discontinuation of thyroid hormone treatment in very-low-birth-weight infants at risk for transient or permanent congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 85:131–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135. Korzeniewski SJ, Grigorescu V, Kleyn M, Young WI, Birbeck G, Todem D, Romero R, Paneth N. 2013. Transient hypothyroidism at 3-year follow-up among cases of congenital hypothyroidism detected by newborn screening. J Pediatr 162:177–182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136. Ford GA, Denniston S, Sesser D, Skeels MR, LaFranchi SH. 2016. Transient versus permanent congenital hypothyroidism after the age of 3 years in infants detected on the first versus second newborn screening test in Oregon, USA. Horm Res Paediatr 86:169–177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137. Kang MJ, Chung HR, Oh YJ, Shim YS, Yang S, Hwang IT. 2017. Three-year follow-up of children with abnormal newborn screening results for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Neonatol 58:442–448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138. Park IS, Yoon JS, So CH, Lee HS, Hwang JS. 2017. Predictors of transient congenital hypothyroidism in children with eutopic thyroid gland. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 22:115–118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139. Zdraveska N, Zdravkovska M, Anastasovska V, Sukarova-Angelovska E, Kocova M. 2018. Diagnostic reevaluation of congenital hypothyroidism in Macedonia: predictors for transient or permanent hypothyroidism. Endocr Connect 7:278–285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140. Fu C, Luo S, Li Y, Li Q, Hu X, Li M, Zhang Y, Su J, Hu X, Chen Y, Wang J, Xie B, Luo J, Fan X, Chen S, Shen Y. 2017. The incidence of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in Guangxi, China and the predictors of permanent and transient CH. Endocr Connect 6:926–934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141. Razavi Z, Mohammadi L. 2017. Permanent and transient congenital hypothyroidism in Hamadan West Province of Iran. Int J Endocrinol Metab 14:e38256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142. Rabbiosi S, Vigone MC, Cortinovis F, Zamproni I, Fugazzola L, Persani L, Corbetta C, Chiumello G, Weber G. 2013. Congenital hypothyroidism with eutopic thyroid gland: analysis of clinical and biochemical features at diagnosis and after re-evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:1395–1402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143. Olivieri A, Fazzini C, Medda E. 2015. Multiple factors influencing the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Horm Res Paediatr 83: 86–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144. Zung A, Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Barkan S, Hanukoglu A, Hershkovitz E, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Bistritzer T, Zadik Z. 2010. Neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia: population characteristics, diagnosis, management and outcome after cessation of therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72:264–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145. Unuvar T, Demir K, Abaci A, Buyukgebiz A, Bober E. 2013. The role of initial clinical and laboratory findings in infants with hyperthyrotropinemia to predict transient or permanent hypothyroidism. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 5:170–173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146. Messina MF, Aversa T, Salzano G, Zirilli G, Sferlazzas C, De Luca F, Lombardo F. 2015. Early discrimination between transient and permanent congenital hypothyroidism in children with eutopic gland. Horm Res Paediatr 84:159–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
147. Eugster EA, LeMay D, Zerin JM, Pescovitz OH. 2004. Definitive diagnosis in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 144:643–647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148. Saba C, Guilmin-Crepon S, Zenaty D, Martinerie L, Paulsen A, Simon D, Storey C, Dos Santos S, Haignere J, Mohamed D, Carel JC, Léger J. 2018. Early determinants of thyroid function outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism and a normally located thyroid gland: a regional cohort study. Thyroid 28:959–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149. Oron T, Lazar L, Ben-Yishai S, Tenenbaum A, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Meyerovitch J, Phillip M, Lebenthal Y. 2018. Permanent vs transient congenital hypothyroidism: assessment of predictive variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:4428–4436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150. Valizadeh M, Moezzi F, Khavassi Z, Movahedinia M, Mazloomzadeh S, Mehran L. 2017. Influence of topical iodine-containing antiseptics used during delivery on recall rate of congenital hypothyroidism screening program. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 30:973–978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
151. Chanoine JP, Boulvain M, Bourdoux P, Pardou A, Van Thi HV, Ermans AM, Delange F. 1988. Increased recall rate at screening for congenital hypothyroidism in breast fed infants born to iodine overloaded mothers. Arch Dis Child 63:1207–1210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152. Thaker VV, Galler MF, Marshall AC, Almodovar MC, Hsu HW, Addis CJ, Feldman HA, Brown RS, Levine BS. 2017. Hypothyroidism in infants with congenital heart disease exposed to excess iodine. J Endocr Soc 1:1067–1078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153. Connelly KJ, Boston BA, Pearce EN, Sesser D, Snyder D, Braverman LE, Pino S, LaFranchi SH. 2012. Congenital hypothyroidism caused by excess prenatal maternal iodine ingestion. J Pediatr 161:760–762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154. Léger J, dos Santos S, Larroque B, Ecosse E. 2015. Pregnancy outcomes and relationship to treatment adequacy in women treated early for congenital hypothyroidism: a longitudinal population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:860–869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155. Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, Grobman WA, Laurberg P, Lazarus JH, Mandel SJ, Peeters RP, Sullivan S. 2017. 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid 27:315–389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
156. Léger J, Forhan A, Dos Santos S, Larroque B, Ecosse E, Charles MA, Heude B. 2018. Developmental milestones at one year for the offspring of mothers with congenital hypothyroidism: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol 178:471–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
157. Korevaar TIM, Muetzel R, Medici M, Chaker L, Jaddoe VWV, de Rijke YB, Steegers EAP, Visser TJ, White T, Tiemeier H, Peeters RP. 2016. Association of maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy with offspring IQ and brain morphology in childhood: a population-based prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:35–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
158. Alexander EK, Marqusee E, Lawrence J, Jarolim P, Fischer GA, Larsen PR. 2014. Timing and magnitude of increases in levothyroxine requirements during pregnancy in women with hypothyroidism. N Engl J Med 351:241–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
159. Simoneau-Roy J, Marti S, Deal C, Huot C, Robaey P, Van Vliet G. 2004. Cognition and behavior at school entry in children with congenital hypothyroidism treated early with high-dose levothyroxine. J Pediatr 144:747–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
160. Bongers-Schokking JJ, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM. 2005. Influence of timing and dose of thyroid hormone replacement on mental, psychomotor, and behavioral development in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 147:768–774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
161. Grosse SD, Van Vliet G. 2011. Prevention of intellectual disability through screening for congenital hypothyroidism: how much and at what level? Arch Dis Child 96:374–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
162. Kempers MJ, van der Sluijs Veer L, Nijhuis-van der Sanden RW, Lanting CI, Kooistra L, Wiedijk BM, Last BF, de Vijlder JJ, Grootenhuis MA, Vulsma T. 2007. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism in the Netherlands: cognitive and motor outcome at 10 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:919–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
163. Rovet JF, Ehrlich R. 2000. Psychoeducational outcome in children with early-treated congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 105:515–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
164. Rovet JF 2005. Children with congenital hypothyroidism and their siblings: do they really differ? Pediatrics 115:52–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
165. Oerbeck B, Sundet K, Kase BF, Heyerdahl S. 2003. Congenital hypothyroidism: influence of disease severity and L-thyroxine treatment on intellectual, motor, and school-associated outcomes in young adults. Pediatrics 112:923–930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
166. Dimitropoulos A, Molinari L, Etter K, Torresani T, Lang-Muritano M, Jenni OG, Largo RH, Latal B. 2009. Children with congenital hypothyroidism: long-term intellectual outcome after early high-dose treatment. Pediatr Res 65:242–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
167. Hauri-Hohl A, Dusoczky N, Dimitropoulos A, Leuchter RH, Molinari L, Caflisch J, Jenni OG, Latal B. 2011. Impaired neuromotor outcome in school-age children with congenital hypothyroidism receiving early high-dose substitution treatment. Pediatr Res 70:614–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
168. Vulsma T, Gons MH, de Vijlder JJ. 1989. Maternal-fetal transfer of thyroxine in congenital hypothyroidism due to a total organification defect or thyroid agenesis. N Engl J Med 321:13–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
169. Wheeler SM, Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. 2011. Hippocampal size and memory functioning in children and adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E1427–E1434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
170. Clairman H, Skocic J, Lischinsky JE, Rovet J. 2015. Do children with congenital hypothyroidism exhibit abnormal cortical morphology? Pediatr Res 78:286–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
171. García Morales L, Arnao R, Sánchez R, Íñiguez D, González A. 2017. Sustained attention in school-age children with congenital hypothyroidism: influence of episodes of overtreatment in the first three years of life. Neurologia 485:30299–30302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
172. Alvarez M, Iglesias Fernández C, Rodríguez Sánchez A, Dulín Lñiguez E, Rodríguez Arnao MD. 2010. Episodes of overtreatment during the first six months in children with congenital hypothyroidism and their relationships with sustained attention and inhibitory control at school age. Horm Res Paediatr 74:114–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
173. Tillotson SL, Fuggle PW, Smith I, Ades AE, Grant DB. 1994. Relation between biochemical severity and intelligence in early treated congenital hypothyroidism: a threshold effect. BMJ 1309:440–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
174. Salerno M, Militerni R, Di Maio S, Bravaccio C, Gasparini N, Tenore A. 1999. Intellectual outcome at 12 years of age in congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 14:105–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
175. Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. 1998. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 19:339–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
176. François M, Bonfils P, Leger J, Czernichow P, Narcy P. 1994. Role of congenital hypothyroidism in hearing loss in children. J Pediatr 124:444–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
177. Rovet J, Walker W, Bliss B, Buchanan L, Ehrlich R. 1996. Long-term sequelae of hearing impairment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 128:776–783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
178. Bruno R, Aversa T, Catena M, Valenzise M, Lombardo F, De Luca F, Wasniewska M. 2015. Even in the era of congenital hypothyroidism screening mild and subclinical sensorineural hearing loss remains a relatively common complication of severe congenital hypothyroidism. Hear Res 327:43–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
179. Agretti P, Bagattini B, De Marco G, Di Cosmo C, Dionigi G, Vitti P, Tonacchera M. 2016. Papillary thyroid cancer in a patient with congenital goitrous hypothyroidism due to a novel deletion in NIS gene. Endocrine 54:256–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
180. Zhu H, Peng YG, Ma SG, Liu H. 2015. TPO gene mutations associated with thyroid carcinoma: case report and literature review. Cancer Biomark 15:909–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
181. Niedziela M 2006. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in children. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:427–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
182. Şıklar Z, Berberoğlu M, Yağmurlu A, Hacıhamdioğlu B, Savaş Erdeve S, Fitöz S, Kır M, Öçal G. 2012. Synchronous occurrence of papillary carcinoma in the thyroid gland and thyroglossal duct in an adolescent with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 4:30–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
183. Salerno M, Micillo M, Di Maio S, Capalbo D, Ferri P, Lettiero T, Tenore A. 2001. Longitudinal growth, sexual maturation and final height in patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Eur J Endocrinol 145:377–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
184. Delvecchio M, Salerno M, Acquafredda A, Zecchino C, Fico F, Manca F, Faienza MF, Cavallo L. 2006. Factors predicting final height in early treated congenital hypothyroid patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 65:693–697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
185. Soliman AT, Azzam S, Elawwa A, Saleem W, Sabt A. 2012. Linear growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of children with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: a controlled study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16:565–568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
186. Dalili S, Rezvani SM, Dalili H, Mohtasham Amiri Z, Mohammadi H, Abrisham Kesh S, Novin MH, Medghalchi A, Gholamnezhad H. 2014. Congenital hypothyroidism: etiology and growth-development outcome. Acta Med Iran 52:752–756 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
187. Uyttendaele M, Lambert S, Tenoutasse S, Boros E, Ziereisen F, Van Vliet G, Heinrichs C, Brachet C. 2016. Congenital hypothyroidism: long-term experience with early and high levothyroxine dosage. Horm Res Paediatr 85:188–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
188. Hassani Y, Larroque B, Dos Santos S, Ecosse E, Bouyer J, Léger J. 2012. Fecundity in young adults treated early for congenital hypothyroidism is related to the initial severity of the disease: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1897–1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
189. Williams GR, Bassett JHD. 2018. Thyroid diseases and bone health. J Endocrinol Invest 41:99–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
190. Leger J, Ruiz JC, Guibourdenche J, Kindermans C, Garabedian M, Czernichow P. 1997. Bone mineral density and metabolism in children with congenital hypothyroidism after prolonged L-thyroxine therapy. Acta Paediatr 86:704–710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
191. Salerno M, Lettiero T, Esposito-del Puente A, Esposito V, Capalbo D, Crapinelli A, Padula S, del Puente A. 2004. Effect of longterm L-thyroxine treatment on bone mineral density in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 151:689–694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
192. Kempers MJ, Vulsma T, Wiedijk BM, de Vijlder JJ, van Eck-Smit BL, Verberne HJ. 2006. The effect of life-long thyroxine treatment and physical activity on bone mineral density in young adult women with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19:1405–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
193. Karakaş NM, Tulgar Kınık S, Özdemir B, Muratoğlu Şahin N, Tekindal MA, Haberal A. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism and bone remodeling cycle. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 9:106–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
194. Wong SC, Ng SM, Didi M. 2004. Children with congenital hypothyroidism are at risk of adult obesity due to early adiposity rebound. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61:441–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
195. Livadas S, Magiakou MA, Mengreli C, Girginoudis P, Galani C, Smyrnaki P, Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Xekouki P, Chrousos GP, Dacou-Voutetakis C. 2007. Obesity and attenuated adiposity rebound in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Normalization of BMI values in adolescents. Horm Metab Res 39:524–528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
196. Chen SY1, Lin SJ, Lin SH, Chou YY. 2013. Early adiposity rebound and obesity in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Neonatol 54:107–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
197. Akin MA, Sarici D, Yikilmaz A, Akin L, Gunes T, Ozturk MA, Kurtoglu S. 2013. Aortic intima-media thickness in newborns with congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 80:267–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
198. Öner T, Özdemir R, Doksöz Ö, Yozgat Y, Karadeniz C, Demirpençe S, Yılmazer MM, Büyükinan M, Meşe T, Tavlı V. 2015. Cardiac function in newborns with congenital hypothyroidism: association with thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 7:307–311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
199. Arslan A, Baş VN, Uytun S, Poyrazoğlu HG. 2017. Effects of L-thyroxine treatment on heart functions in infants with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 30:557–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
200. Salerno M, Oliviero U, Lettiero T, Guardasole V, Mattiacci DM, Saldamarco L, Capalbo D, Lucariello A, Saccà L, Cittadini A. 2008. Long-term cardiovascular effects of levothyroxine therapy in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2486–2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
201. Oliviero U, Cittadini A, Bosso G, Cerbone M, Valvano A, Capalbo D, Apuzzi V, Clabrese F, Lettiero T, Salerno M. 2010. Effects of long-term L-thyroxine treatment on endothelial function and arterial distensibility in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 162:289–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
202. Bisacchi N, Bal MO, Nardi L, Bettocchi I, d'Addabbo G, Conti V, Monti S, D'Alberton F, Cicognanni A, Cassio A. 2011. Psychological and behavioural aspects in children and adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening: comparison between parents' and children's perceptions. Eur J Endocrinol 164:269–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
203. van der Sluijs Veer L, Kempers MJE, Stam HM, Last BF, Vulsma T, Grootenhuis MA. 2012. Health-related quality of life and self-worth in 10-year old children with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 6:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
204. van der Sluijs Veer L, Kempers MJ, Last BF, Vulsma T, Grootenhuis MA. 2008. Quality of life, developmental milestones, and self-esteem of young adults with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2654–2661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
205. Sato H, Nakamura N, Harada S, Kakee N, Sasaki N. 2009. Quality of life of young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Int 51:126–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
206. Rachas A, Lefeuvre D, Meyer L, Faye A, Mahlaoui N, de La Rochebrochard E, Warszawski J, Durieux P. 2016. Evaluating continuity during transfer to adult care: a systematic review. Pediatrics 138:e20160256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
207. Rachas A, Tuppin P, Meyer L, Falissard B, Faye A, Mahlaoui N, de La Rochebrochard E, Frank M, Durieux P, Warszawski J. 2018. Excess mortality and hospitalizations in transitional-age youths with a long-term disease: a national population-based cohort study. PLoS One 13:e0193729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
208. Carré A, Szinnai G, Castanet M, Sura-Trueba S, Tron E, Broutin-L'Hermite I, Barat P, Goizet C, Lacombe D, Moutard ML, Raybaud C, Raynaud-Ravni C, Romana S, Ythier H, Léger J, Polak M. 2009. Five new TTF1/NKX2.1 mutations in brain-lung-thyroid syndrome: rescue by PAX8 synergism in one case. Hum Mol Genet 18:2266–2276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
209. Deladoey J, Ruel J, Giguere Y, Van Vliet G. 2011. Is the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism really increasing? A 20-year retrospective population-based study in Quebec. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2422–2429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
210. Szinnai G 2014. Clinical genetics of congenital hypothyroidism. Endocr Dev 26:60–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
211. Abu-Khudir R, Larrivee-Vanier S, Wasserman JD, Deladoey J. 2017. Disorders of thyroid morphogenesis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 31:143–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
212. Schoenmakers N, Chatterjee VK. 2015. Thyroid gland: TSHR mutations and subclinical congenital hypothyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:258–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
213. Stoupa A, Kariyawasam D, Carré A, Polak M. 2016. Update of thyroid developmental genes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 45:243–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
214. Fernandez LP, Lopez-Marquez A, Santisteban P. 2015. Thyroid transcription factors in development, differentiation and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:29–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
215. Marelli F, Persani L. 2018. Role of Jagged1-Notch pathway in thyroid development. J Endocrinol Invest 41:75–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
216. Carré A, Stoupa A, Kariyawasam D, Gueriouz M, Ramond C, Monus T, Leger J, Gaujoux S, Sebag F, Glaser N, Zenaty D, Nitschke P, Bole-Feysot C, Hubert L, Lyonnet S, Scharfmann R, Munnich A, Besmond C, Taylor W, Polak M. 2017. Mutations in BOREALIN cause thyroid dysgenesis. Hum Mol Genet 26:599–610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
217. Opitz R, Hitz MP, Vandernoot I, Trubiroha A, Abu-Khudir R, Samuels M, Desilets V, Costagliola S, Andelfinger G, Deladoey J. 2015. Functional zebrafish studies based on human genotyping point to netrin-1 as a link between aberrant cardiovascular development and thyroid dysgenesis. Endocrinology 156:377–388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
218. Stoupa A, Adam F, Kariyawasam D, Strassel C, Gawade S, Szinnai G, Kauskot A, Lasne D, Janke C, Natarajan K, Schmitt A, Bole-Feysot C, Nitschke P, Leger J, Jabot-Hanin F, Tores F, Michel A, Munnich A, Besmond C, Scharfmann R, Lanza F, Borgel D, Polak M, Carré A. 2018. TUBB1 mutations cause thyroid dysgenesis associated with abnormal platelet physiology. EMBO Mol Med 10:e9569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
219. Thorwarth A, Schnittert-Hubener S, Schrumpf P, Muller I, Jyrch S, Dame C, Biebermann H, Kleinau G, Katchanov J, Schuelke M, Ebert G, Steininger A, Bonnemann C, Brockmann K, Christen HJ, Crock P, deZegher F, Griese M, Hewitt J, Ivarsson S, Hubner C, Kapelari K, Plecko B, Rating D, Stoeva I, Ropers HH, Gruters A, Ullmann R, Krude H. 2014. Comprehensive genotyping and clinical characterisation reveal 27 novel NKX2-1 mutations and expand the phenotypic spectrum. J Med Genet 51:375–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
220. Zou M, Alzahrani AS, Al-Odaib A, Alqahtani MA, Babiker O, Al-Rijjal RA, BinEssa HA, Kattan WE, Al-Enezi AF, Al Qarni A, Al-Faham MSA, Baitei EY, Alsagheir A, Meyer BF, Shi Y. 2018. Molecular analysis of congenital hypothyroidism in Saudi Arabia: SLC26A7 mutation is a novel defect in thyroid dyshormonogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1889–1898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
221. Cangul H, Liao XH, Schoenmakers E, Kero J, Barone S, Srichomkwun P, Iwayama H, Serra EG, Saglam H, Eren E, Tarim O, Nicholas AK, Zvetkova I, Anderson CA, Frankl FEK, Boelaert K, Ojaniemi M, Jääskeläinen J, Patyra K, Löf C, Williams ED; UK10K Consortium, Soleimani M, Barrett T, Maher ER, Chatterjee VK, Refetoff S, Schoenmakers N. 2018. Homozygous loss-of-function muttaions in SLC26A7 cause goitrous congenital hypothyroidism. JCI Insight 3:e99631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
222. Kuhnen P, Turan S, Frohler S, Guran T, Abali S, Biebermann H, Bereket A, Gruters A, Chen W, Krude H. 2014. Identification of PENDRIN (SLC26A4) mutations in patients with congenital hypothyroidism and “apparent” thyroid dysgenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E169–E176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
222a. Stoupa A, Chaabane R, Guériouz M, Raynaud-Ravni C, Nitschke P, Bole-Feysot C, Mnif M, Ammar Keskes L, Hachicha M, Belguith N, Polak M, Carré A. 2018. Thyroid hypoplasia in congenital hypothyroidism associated with thyroid peroxidase mutations. Thyroid 28:941–944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
223. Srichomkwun P, Takamatsu J, Nickerson DA, Bamshad MJ, Chong JX, Refetoff S. 2017. DUOX2 Gene mutation manifesting as resistance to thyrotropin phenotype. Thyroid 27:129–131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
224. Kizys MML, Louzada RA, Mitne-Neto M, Jara JR, Furuzawa GK, de Carvalho DP, Dias-da-Silva MR, Nesi-Franca S, Dupuy C, Maciel RMB. 2017. DUOX2 mutations are associated with congenital hypothyroidism with ectopic thyroid gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:4060–4071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
225. Aycan Z, Cangul H, Muzza M, Bas VN, Fugazzola L, Chatterjee VK, Persani L, Schoenmakers N. 2017. Digenic DUOX1 and DUOX2 mutations in cases with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:3085–3090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
226. Parlato M, Charbit-Henrion F, Hayes P, Tiberti A, Aloi M, Cucchiara S, Begue B, Bras M, Pouliet A, Rakotobe S, Ruemmele F, Knaus UG, Cerf-Bensussan Ndisease. 2017. First identification of biallelic inherited DUOX2 inactivating mutations as a cause of very early onset inflammatory bowel. Gastroenterology 153:609.e3–611.e3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
227. Muzza M, Rabbiosi S, Vigone MC, Zamproni I, Cirello V, Maffini MA, Maruca K, Schoenmakers N, Beccaria L, Gallo F, Park SM, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L, Weber G, Fugazzola L. 2014. The clinical and molecular characterization of patients with dyshormonogenic congenital hypothyroidism reveals specific diagnostic clues for DUOX2 defects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:544–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
228. Lof C, Patyra K, Kuulasmaa T, Vangipurapu J, Undeutsch H, Jaeschke H, Pajunen T, Kero A, Krude H, Biebermann H, Kleinau G, Kuhnen P, Rantakari K, Miettinen P, Kirjavainen T, Pursiheimo JP, Mustila T, Jaaskelainen J, Ojaniemi M, Toppari J, Ignatius J, Laakso M, Kero J. 2016. Detection of novel gene variants associated with congenital hypothyroidism in a finnish patient cohort. Thyroid 26:1215–1224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
229. Nicholas AK, Serra EG, Cangul H, Alyaarubi S, Ullah I, Schoenmakers E, Deeb A, Habeb AM, Almaghamsi M, Peters C, Nathwani N, Aycan Z, Saglam H, Bober E, Dattani M, Shenoy S, Murray PG, Babiker A, Willemsen R, Thankamony A, Lyons G, Irwin R, Padidela R, Tharian K, Davies JH, Puthi V, Park SM, Massoud AF, Gregory JW, Albanese A, Pease-Gevers E, Martin H, Brugger K, Maher ER, Chatterjee VK, Anderson CA, Schoenmakers N. 2016. Comprehensive screening of eight known causative genes in congenital hypothyroidism with gland-in-situ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4521–4531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
230. Miyai K, Azukizawa M, Kumahara Y. 1971. Familial isolated thyrotropin deficiency with cretinism. N Engl J Med 285:1043–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
231. Bonomi M, Proverbio MC, Weber G, Chiumello G, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L. 2001. Hyperplastic pituitary gland, high serum glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit and variable circulating thyrotropin (TSH) levels as hallmark of central hypothyroidism duet o mutations of the TSH beta gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1600–1604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
232. Ramos HE, Labedan I, Carré A, Castanet M, Guemas I, Tron E, Madhi F, Delacourt C, Maciel RM, Polak M. 2010. New cases of isolatedcongenital central hypothyroidism due to homozygous thyrotropin beta gene mutations: a pitfall to neonatal screening. Thyroid 20:639–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
233. Bonomi M, Busnelli M, Beck-Peccoz P, Costanzo D, Antonica F, Dolci C, Pilotta A, Buzi F, Persani L. 2009. A family with complete resistance to thyrotropin-releasing hormone. N Engl J Med 360:731–734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
234. Sun Y, Bak B, Schoenmakers N, van Trotsenburg AS, Oostdijk W, Voshol P, Cambridge E, White JK, le Tissier P, Gharavy SN, Martinez-Barbera JP, Stokvis-Brantsma WH, Vulsma T, Kempers MJ, Persani L, Campi I, Bonomi M, Beck-Peccoz P, Zhu H, Davis TM, Hokken-Koelega AC, Del Blanco DG, Rangasami JJ, Ruivenkamp CA, Laros JF, Kriek M, Kant SG, Bosch CA, Biermasz NR, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Corssmit EP, Hovens GC, Pereira AM, den Dunnen JT, Wade MG, Breuning MH, Hennekam RC, Chatterjee K, Dattani MT, Wit JM, Bernard DJ. 2012. Loss-of-function mutations in IGSF1 cause an X-linked syndrome of central hypothyroidism and testicular enlargement. Nat Genet 44:1375–1381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
235. Joustra SD, Heinen CA, Schoenmakers N, Bonomi M, Ballieux BE, Turgeon MO, Bernard DJ, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg AS, Losekoot M, Persani L, Wit JM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Oostdijk W: IGSF1 Clinical Care Group. 2016. IGSF1 deficiency: lessons from an extensive case series and recommendations for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:1627–1636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
236. Heinen CA, Losekoot M, Sun Y, Watson PJ, Fairall L, Joustra SD, Zwaveling-Soonawala N, Oostdijk W, van den Akker EL, Alders M, Santen GW, van Rijn RR, Dreschler WA, Surovtseva OV, Biermasz NR, Hennekam RC, Wit JM, Schwabe JW, Boelen A, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg AS. 2016. Mutations in TBL1X are associated with central hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4564–4573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
237. Heinen CA, de Vries EM, Alders M, Bikker H, Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van den Akker ELT, Bakker B, Hoorweg-Nijman G, Roelfsema F, Hennekam RC, Boelen A, van Trotsenburg ASP, Fliers E. 2018. Mutations in IRS4 are associated with central hypothyroidism. J Med Genet 55:693–700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
238. Ranzini AC, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Kung M, Limbachia A, Vintzileos AM. 2001. Ultrasonography of the fetal thyroid: nomograms based on biparietal diameter and gestational age. J Ultrasound Med 20:613–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B1] 1. Léger J, Olivieri A, Donaldson M, Torresani T, Krude H, van Vliet G, Polak M, Butler G; ESPE-PES-SLEP-JSPE-APEG-APPES-ISPAE; Congenital Hypothyroidism Consensus Conference Group. 2014. European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology consensus guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and management of congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:363–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B2] 2. Swiglo BA, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ, Kunz R, Vigersky RA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM. 2008. Case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:666–673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B3] 3. Hulse JA 1984. Outcome for congenital hypothyroidism. Arch Dis Child 59:23–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B4] 4. Alm J, Larsson A, Zetterstrom R. 1981. Congenital hypothyroidism in Sweden. Psychomotor development in patients detected by clinical signs and symptoms. Acta Paediatr Scand 70:907–912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B5] 5. Geelhoed EA, Lewis B, Hounsome D, O'Leary P. 2005. Economic evaluation of neonatal screening for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism. J Paediatr Child Health 41:575–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B6] 6. Ford G, LaFranchi SH. 2014. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: a worldwide view of strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:175–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B7] 7. Barnes ND 1985. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: the first decade. Arch Dis Child 60:587–592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B8] 8. Langham S, Hindmarsh P, Krywawych S, Peters C. 2013. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism: comparison of borderline screening cut-off points and the effect on the number of children treated with levothyroxine. Eur Thyroid J 2:180–186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B9] 9. Olivieri A, Fazzini C, Medda E; Italian Study Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism. 2015. Multiple factors influencing the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Horm Res Paediatr 83:86–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B10] 10. Mitchell ML, Hsu HW, Sahai I; Massachusetts Pediatric Endocrine Work Group. 2011. The increased incidence of congenital hypothyroidism: fact or fancy? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 75:806–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B11] 11. Corbetta C, Weber G, Cortinovis F, Calebiro D, Passoni A, Vigone MC, Beck-Peccoz P, Chiumello G, Persani L. 2009. A 7-year experience with low blood TSH cutoff levels for neonatal screening reveals an unsuspected frequency of congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 71:739–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B12] 12. Barry Y, Bonaldi C, Goulet V, Coutant R, Léger J, Paty AC, Delmas D, Cheillan D, Roussey M. 2016. Increased incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in France from 1982 to 2012: a nationwide multicenter analysis. Ann Epidemiol 26:100–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B13] 13. Albert BB, Cutfield WS, Webster D, Carll J, Derraik JG, Jefferies C, Gunn AJ, Hofman PL. 2012. Etiology of increasing incidence of congenital hypothyroidism in New Zealand from 1993–2010. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:3155–3160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B14] 14. Peters C, Brooke I, Heales S, Ifederu A, Langham S, Hindmarsh P, Cole TJ. 2016. Defining the newborn blood spot screening reference interval for TSH: impact of ethnicity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3445–3449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B15] 15. Persani L, Rurale G, de Filippis T, Galazzi E, Muzza M, Fugazzola L. 2018. Genetics and management of congenital hypothyroidism. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 32:387–396 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B16] 16. Peters C, Nicholas AK, Schoenmakers E, Lyons G, Langham S, Serra EG, Sebire NJ, Muzza M, Fugazzola L, Schoenmakers N. 2019. DUOX2/DUOXA2 mutations frequently cause congenital hypothyroidism which evades detection on UK newborn screening. Thyroid 29:790–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B17] 17. Knowles RL, Oerton J, Cheetham T, Butler G, Cavanagh C, Tetlow L, Dezateux C. 2018. Newborn screening for primary congenital hypothyroidism: estimating test performance at different TSH thresholds. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:3720–3728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B18] 18. Dufort G, Larrivée-Vanier S, Eugène D, De Deken X, Seebauer B, Heinimann K, Lévesque S, Gravel S, Szinnai G, Van Vliet G, Deladoëy J. 2019. Wide spectrum of DUOX2 deficiency: from life-threatening compressive goiter in infancy to lifelong euthyroidism. Thyroid 29:1018–1022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B19] 19. Lain S, Trumpff C, Grosse SD, Olivieri A, Guy Van Vliet G. 2017. Are lower TSH cutoffs in neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism warranted? Eur J Endocrinol 177:D1–D12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B20] 20. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van Trotsenburg AS, Verkerk PH. 2015. The severity of congenital hypothyroidism of central origin should not be underestimated. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:297–300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B21] 21. Nebesio TD, McKenna MP, Nabhan ZM, Eugster EA. 2010. Newborn screening results in children with central hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 156:990–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B22] 22. Braslavsky D, Méndez MV, Prieto L, Keselman A, Enacan R, Gruñeiro-Papendieck L, Jullien N, Savenau A, Reynaud R, Brue T, Bergadá I, Chiesa A. 2017. Pilot neonatal screening program for central congenital hypothyroidism: evidence of significant detection. Horm Res Paediatr 88:274–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B23] 23. Adachi M, Soneda A, Asakura Y, Muroya K, Yamagami Y, Hirahara F. 2012. Mass screening of newborns for congenital hypothyroidism of central origin by free thyroxine measurement of blood samples on filter paper. Eur J Endocrinol 166:829–838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B24] 24. Kempers MJ, Lanting CI, van Heijst AF, van Trotsenburg AS, Wiedijk BM, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism based on thyroxine, thyrotropin, and thyroxine-binding globulin measurement: potentials and pitfalls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:3370–3376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B25] 25. Persani L, Brabant G, Dattani M, Bonomi M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Fliers E, Gruters A, Maiter D, Schoenmakers N, van Trotsenburg ASP. 2018. European Thyroid Association (ETA) Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of central hypothyroidism. Eur Thyroid J 7:225–237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B26] 26. Lanting CI, van Tijn DA, Loeber JG, Vulsma T, de Vijlder JJ, Verkerk PH. 2005. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the use of the thyroxine/thyroxine-binding globulin ratio to detect congenital hypothyroidism of thyroidal and central origin in a neonatal screening program. Pediatrics 116:168–173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B27] 27. Groeneweg S, Peeters RP, Moran C, Stoupa A, Auriol F, Tonduti D, Dica A, Paone L, Rozenkova K, Malikova J, van der Walt A, de Coo IFM, McGowan A, Lyons G, Aarsen FK, Barca D, van Beynum IM, van der Knoop MM, Jansen J, Manshande M, Lunsing RJ, Nowak S, den Uil CA, Zillikens MC, Visser FE, Vrijmoeth P, de Wit MCY, Wolf NI, Zandstra A, Ambegaonkar G, Singh Y, de Rijke YB, Medici M, Bertini ES, Depoorter S, Lebl J, Cappa M, De Meirleir L, Krude H, Craiu D, Zibordi F, Oliver Petit I, Polak M, Chatterjee K, Visser TJ, Visser WE. 2019. Effectiveness and safety of the tri-iodothyronine analogue Triac in children and adults with MCT8 deficiency: an international, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7:695–706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B28] 28. Zung A, Bier Palmon R, Golan A, Troitzky M, Eventov-Friedman S, Marom R, Keidar R, Kats N, Almashanu S, Flidel-Rimon O. 2017. Risk factors for the development of delayed TSH elevation in neonatal intensive care unit newborns. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:3050–3055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B29] 29. McGrath N, Hawkes CP, Mayne P, Murphy NP. 2019. Optimal timing of repeat newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in preterm infants to detect delayed thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation. J Pediatr 205:77–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B30] 30. Cavarzere P, Camilot M, Popa FI, Lauriola S, Teofoli F, Gaudino R, Vincenzi M, Antoniazzi F. 2016. Congenital hypothyroidism with delayed TSH elevation in low-birth-weight infants: incidence, diagnosis and management. Eur J Endocrinol 175:395–402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B31] 31. LaFranchi SH 2014. Screening preterm infants for congenital hypothyroidism: better the second time around. J Pediatr 164:1259–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B32] 32. Murphy N, Hume R, van Toor H, Matthews TG, Ogston SA, Wu SY, Visser TJ, Williams FL. 2004. The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis in preterm infants: changes in the first 24 hours of postnatal life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2824–2833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B33] 33. Aitken J, Willimas FLR. 2014. A systematic review of thyroid dysfunction in preterm neonates exposed to topical iodine. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 99:21–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B34] 34. Olivieri A, Medda E, De Angelis S, Valensise H, De Felice M, Fazzini C, Cascino I, Cordeddu V, Sorcini M, Stazi MA; Study Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism. 2007. High risk of congenital hypothyroidism in multiple pregnancies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:3141–3147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B35] 35. Perry R, Heinrichs C, Bourdoux P, Khoury K, Szöts F, Dussault JH, Vassart G, Van Vliet G. 2002. Discordance of monozygotic twins for thyroid dysgenesis: implications for screening and for molecular pathophysiology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4072–4077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B36] 36. Medda E, Vigone MC, Cassio A, Calaciura F, Costa P, Weber G, de Filippis T, Gelmini G, Di Frenna M, Caiulo S, Ortolano R, Rotondi D, Bartolucci M, Gelsomino R, De Angelis S, Gabbianelli M, Persani L, Olivieri A. 2019. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism: what can we learn from discordant twins? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:5765–5779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B37] 37. Fort P, Lifshitz F, Bellisario R, Davis J, Lanes R, Pugliese M, Richman R, Post EM, David R. 1984. Abnormalities of thyroid function in infants with Down syndrome. J Pediatr 104:545–549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B38] 38. Sharav T, Collins RM Jr, Baab PJ. 1988. Growth studies in infants and children with Down's syndrome and elevated levels of thyrotropin. Am J Dis Child 142:1302–1306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B39] 39. Purdy IB, Singh N, Brown WL, Vangala S, Devaskar UP. 2014. Revisiting early hypothyroidism screening in infants with Down syndrome. J Perinatol 34:936–940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B40] 40. van Trotsenburg AS, Vulsma T, van Santen HM, Cheung W, de Vijlder JJ. 2003. Lower neonatal screening thyroxine concentrations in down syndrome newborns. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1512–1515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B41] 41. van Trotsenburg AS, Kempers MJ, Endert E, Tijssen JG, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Trisomy 21 causes persistent congenital hypothyroidism presumably of thyroidal origin. Thyroid 16:671–680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B42] 42. Kariyawasam D, Rachdi L, Carré A, Martin M, Houlier M, Janel N, Delabar JM, Scharfmann R, Polak M. 2015. DYRK1A BAC transgenic mouse: a new model of thyroid dysgenesis in Down syndrome. Endocrinology 156:1171–1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B43] 43. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, Witteveen ME, Marchal JP, Klouwer FCC, Ikelaar NA, Smets AMJB, van Rijn RR, Endert E, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg ASP. 2017. Early thyroxine treatment in Down syndrome and thyroid function later in life. Eur J Endocrinol 176:505–513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B44] 44. van Trotsenburg AS, Heymans HS, Tijssen JG, de Vijlder JJ, Vulsma T. 2006. Comorbidity, hospitalization, and medication use and their influence on mental and motor development of young infants with Down syndrome. Pediatrics 118:1633–1639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B45] 45. Persani L, Cangiano B, Bonomi M. 2019. The diagnosis and management of central hypothyroidism in 2018. Endocr Connect 8:44–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B46] 46. Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van Trotsenburg ASP, Verkerk PH. 2018. TSH and FT4 Concentrations in congenital central hypothyroidism and mild congenital thyroidal hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1342–1348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B47] 47. Delvecchio M, Vigone MC, Wasniewska M, Weber G, Lapolla R, Popolo PP, Tronconi GM, Di Mase R, De Luca F, Cavallo L, Salerno M, Faienza MF. 2015. Final height in Italian patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: a 20-year observational study. Ital J Pediatr 41:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B48] 48. Wassner AJ 2018. Congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Perinatol 45:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B49] 49. Wassner AJ 2017. Pediatric hypothyrodism. Paediatr Drugs 19:291–301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B50] 50. Vigone MC, Capalbo D, Weber G, Salerno M. 2018. Mild hypothyroidism in childhood: who, when, and how should be treated? J Endocr Soc 2:1024–1039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B51] 51. Lain SJ, Bentley JP, Wiley V, Roberts CL, Jack M, Wilcken B, Nassar N. 2016. Association between borderline neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentrations and educational and developmental outcomes: a population-based record-linkage study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:756–765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B52] 52. Trumpff C, de Schepper J, Vanderfauillie J, Vercruysse N, Van Oyen H, Moreno-Reyes R, Tafforeau J, Vanderpas J, Vandevijvere S. 2015. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration at birth in Belgian neonates and cognitive development at preschool age. Nutrients 7:9018–9032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B53] 53. Trumpff C, de Schepper J, Vanderfauillie J, Vercruysse N, Van Oyen H, Moreno-Reyes R, Tafforeau J, Vandevijvere S. 2016. Neonatal thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration and psychomotor development at preschool age. Arch Dis Child 101: 1100–1106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B54] 54. Cherella CE, Wasser AJ. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism: insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2017:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B55] 55. Leung AKC, Leung AAC. 2019. Evaluation and management of the child with hypothyroidism. World J Pediatr 15:124–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B56] 56. van Tijn D, de Vijder JJM, Verbeeten B, Verkerk P, Vulsma T. 2005. Neonatal detection of congenital hypothyroidism of central origin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3350–3359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B57] 57. Salm N, Yetter E, Tluczek A. 2012. Informing parents about positive newborn screen results: parents' recommendations. J Child Health Care 16:367–381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B58] 58. Cassio A, Corbetta C, Antonozzi I, Calaciura F, Caruso U, Cesaretti G, Gastaldi R, Medda E, Mosca F, Pasquini E, Salerno MC, Stoppioni V, Tonacchera M, Weber G, Olivieri A; Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology; Italian Society for the Study of Metabolic Diseases and Neonatal Screening; Italian National Institute of Health; Italian National Coordinating Group for Congenital Hypothyroidism; Italian Thyroid Association; Italian Society of Pediatrics; Italian Society of Neonatology; Italian Society of Endrocrinology; Associazione Medici Endocrinologi. 2013. The Italian screening program for primary congenital hypothyroidism: actions to improve screening, diagnosis, follow-up, and surveillance. J Endocrinol Invest 36:195–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B59] 59. Hettiarachchi M, Amarasena S. 2014. Indicators of newborn screening for congenital hypothyroidism in Sri Lanka: program challenges and way forward. BMC Health Serv Res 14:385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B60] 60. Supakul N, Delaney LR, Siddiqui AR, Jennings SG, Eugster EA, Karmazyn B. 2012. Ultrasound for primary imaging of congenital hypothyroidism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:360–366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B61] 61. Chanoine JP, Toppet V, Lagasse R, Spehl M, Delange F. 1991. Determination of thyroid volume by ultrasound from the neonatal period to late adolescence. Eur J Pediatr 150:395–399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B62] 62. Perry RJ, Hollman AS, Wood AM, Donaldson MD. 2002. Ultrasound of the thyroid gland in the newborn: normative data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 87:F209–F211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B63] 63. Freire R, Monte O, Tomimori EK, Catarino RM, Sterza T, Rocha T, Pereira KCC, Mattos HS Jr., Fagundes LB, Liberato MM, Dos Santos LWR, Pereira A, Cintra T, Hegner C, Lube D, Murad M. 2015. Sonographic evaluation of the thyroid size in neonates. J Clin Ultrasound 43:224–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B64] 64. Clerc J 2014. Imaging the thyroid in children. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 28:203–220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B65] 65. Keller-Petrot I, Leger J, Sergent-Alaoui A, de Labriolle-Vaylet C. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism: role of nuclear medicine. Semin Nucl Med 47:135–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B66] 66. Graber E, Regelmann MO, Annunziato R, Machac J, Rapaport R. 2015. The role of (1)(2)(3)I imaging in the evaluation of infants with mild congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 83:94–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B67] 67. Goldis M, Waldman L, Marginean O, Rosenberg HK, Rapaport R. 2016. Thyroid imaging in infants. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 45:255–266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B68] 68. Fugazzola L, Persani L, Vannucchi G, Carletto M, Mannavola D, Vigone MC, Cortinovis F, Beccaria L, Longari V, Weber G, Beck-Peccoz P. 2007. Thyroid scintigraphy and perchlorate test after recombinant human TSH: a new tool for the differential diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism during infancy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:1498–1503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B69] 69. De Silva A, Jong I, McLean G, Bergman P, Rodda C, Brown J, Nandurkar D. 2014. The role of scintigraphy and ultrasound in the imaging of neonatal hypothyroidism: 5-year retrospective review of single-centre experience. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 58:422–430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B70] 70. Wasniewska M, De Luca F, Cassio A, Oggiaro N, Gianino P, Delvecchio M, Aiazzi R, Stoppioni V, Lombardo F, Messina MF, Valenzise M, Arrigo T. 2003. In congenital hypothyroidism bone maturation at birth may be a predictive factor of psychomotor development during the first Year of life irrespective of other variables related to treatment. Eur J Endocrinol 149:1–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B71] 71. Léger J, Ecosse E, Roussey M, Lanoë JL, Larroque B. 2011. Subtle health impairment and socioeducational attainment in young adult patients with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1771–1782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B72] 72. Lichtenberger-Geslin L, Dos Santos S, Hassani Y, Ecosse E, Van Den Abbeele T, Léger J. 2013. Factors associated with hearing impairment in patients with congenital hypothyroidism treated since the neonatal period: a national population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3644–3652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B73] 73. Salerno M, Militerni R, Bravaccio C, Micillo M, Capalbo D, Di MS, Tenore A. 2002. Effect of different starting doses of levothyroxine on growth and intellectual outcome at four years of age in congenital hypothyroidism. Thyroid 12:45–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B74] 74. Bamforth JS, Hughes IA, Lazarus JH, Weaver CM, Harper PS. 1989. Congenital hypothyroidism, spiky hair, and cleft palate. J Med Genet 26:49–51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B75] 75. Devriendt K, Vanhole C, Matthijs G, de Zegher F. 1998. Deletion of thyroid transcription factor-1 gene in an infant with neonatal thyroid dysfunction and respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 338:1317–1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B76] 76. Krude H, Schutz B, Biebermann H, von Moers A, Schnabel D, Neitzel H, Tonnies H, Weise D, Lafferty A, Schwarz S, DeFelice M, von Deimling A, van Landeghem F, DiLauro R, Gruters A. 2002. Choreoathetosis, hypothyroidism, and pulmonary alterations due to human NKX2-1 haploinsufficiency. J Clin Invest 109:475–480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B77] 77. de Filippis T, Marelli F, Nebbia G, Porazzi P, Corbetta S, Fugazzola L, Gastaldi R, Vigone MC, Biffanti R, Frizziero D, Mandara L, Prontera P, Salerno M, Maghnie M, Tiso N, Radetti G, Weber G, Persani L. 2016. JAG1 loss-of-function variations as a novel predisposing event in the pathogenesis of congenital thyroid defects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:861–870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B78] 78. Levy-Shraga Y, Gothelf D, Pinchevski-Kadir S, Katz U, Modan-Moses D. 2018. Endocrine manifestations in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Acta Paediatr 107:678–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B79] 79. Shugar AL, Shapiro JM, Cytrynbaum C, Hedges S, Weksberg R, Fishman L. 2015. An increased prevalence of thyroid disease in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 167:1560–1564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B80] 80. Kawame H, Hannibal MC, Hudgins L, Pagon RA. 1999. Phenotypic spectrum and management issues in Kabuki syndrome. J Pediatr 134:480–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B81] 81. Zenker M, Mayerle J, Lerch MM, Tagariello A, Zerres K, Durie PR, Beier M, Hulskamp G, Guzman C, Rehder H, Beemer FA, Hamel B, Vanlieferinghen P, Gershoni-Baruch R, Vieira MW, Dumic M, Auslender R, Gil-da-Silva-Lopes VL, Steinlicht S, Rauh M, Shalev SA, Thiel C, Ekici AB, Winterpacht A, Kwon YT, Varshavsky A, Reis A. 2005. Deficiency of UBR1, a ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway, causes pancreatic dysfunction, malformations and mental retardation (Johanson-Blizzard syndrome). Nat Genet 37:1345–1350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B82] 82. Kumar J, Gordillo R, Kaskel FJ, Druschel CM, Woroniecki RP. 2009. Increased prevalence of renal and urinary tract anomalies in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 154:263–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B83] 83. Roberts HE, Moore CA, Fernhoff PM, Brown AL, Khoury MJ. 1997. Population study of congenital hypothyroidism and associated birth defects, Atlanta, 1979–1992. Am J Med Genet 71:29–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B84] 84. Devos H, Rodd C, Gagne N, Laframboise R, Van Vliet G. 1999. A search for the possible molecular mechanisms of thyroid dysgenesis: sex ratios and associated malformations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:2502–2506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B85] 85. Castanet M, Polak M, Bonaïti-Pellié C, Lyonnet S, Czernichow P, Léger J, AFDPHE (Association Française pour le Dépistage et la Prévention des Handicaps de l'Enfant) 2001. Nineteen years of national screening for congenital hypothyroidism: familial cases with thyroid dysgenesis suggest the involvement of genetic factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:2009–2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B86] 86. Olivieri A, Stazi MA, Mastroiacovo P, Fazzini C, Medda E, Spagnolo A, De Angelis S, Grandolfo ME, Taruscio D, Cordeddu V, Sorcini M; Study group for congenital hypothyroidism. 2002. A population-based study on the frequency of additional congenital malformations in infants with congenital hypothyroidism: data from the Italian Registry for Congenital Hypothyroidism (1991–1998). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:557–562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B87] 87. Azar-Kolakez A, Ecosse E, Dos Santos S, Leger J. 2013. All-cause and disease-specific mortality and morbidity in patients with congenital hypothyroidism treated since the neonatal period: a national population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:785–793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B88] 88. Bas VN, Ozgelen S, Cetinkaya S, Aycan Z. 2014. Diseases accompanying congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 27:485–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B89] 89. de Filippis T, Gelmini G, Paraboschi E, Vigone MC, Di Frenna M, Marelli F, Bonomi M, Cassio A, Larizza D, Moro M, Radetti G, Salerno M, Ardissino D, Weber G, Gentilini D, Guizzardi F, Duga S, Persani L. 2017. A frequent oligogenic involvement in congenital hypothyroidism. Hum Mol Genet 26:2507–2514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B90] 90. Albert BB, Heather N, Derraik JG, Cutfield WS, Wouldes T, Tregurtha S, Mathai S, Webster D, Jefferies C, Gunn AJ, Hofman PL. 2013. Neurodevelopmental and body composition outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism treated with high-dose initial replacement and close monitoring. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3663–3670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B91] 91. Aleksander PE, Brückner-Spieler M, Stoehr AM, Lankes E, Kühnen P, Schnabel D, Ernert A, Stäblein W, Craig ME, Blankenstein O, Grüters A, Krude H. 2018. Mean high-dose l-thyroxine treatment is efficient and safe to achieve a normal IQ in young adult patients with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1459–1469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B92] 92. Cassio A, Monti S, Rizzello A, Bettocchi I, Baronio F, D'Addabbo G, Bal MO, Balsamo A. 2013. Comparison between liquid and tablet formulations of levothyroxine in the initial treatment of congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 162:1264–1269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B93] 93. Peroni E, Vigone MC, Mora S, Bassi LA, Pozzi C, Passoni A, Weber G. 2014. Congenital hypothyroidism treatment in infants: a comparative study between liquid and tablet formulations of levothyroxine. Horm Res Paediatr 81:50–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B94] 94. Carswell JM, Gordon JH, Popovsky E, Hale A, Brown RS. 2013. Generic and brand-name L-thyroxine are not bioequivalent for children with severe congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:610–617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B95] 95. Vogiatzi MG, Kirkland JL. 1997. Frequency and necessity of thyroid function tests in neonates and infants with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 100:E6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B96] 96. Mathai S, Cutfield WS, Gunn AJ, Webster D, Jefferies C, Robinson E, Hofman P. 2008. A novel therapeutic paradigm to treat congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 69:142–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B97] 97. Balhara B, Misra M, Levitsky LL. 2001. Clinical monitoring guidelines for congenital hypothyroidism: laboratory outcome data in the first year of life. J Pediatr 158:532–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B98] 98. Baloch Z, Carayon P, Conte-Delvox B, Demers LM, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Henry JF, LiVosli VA, Niccoli-Sire P, John R, Ruf J, Smyth PP, Spencer CA, Stockigt JR, Guidelines Committee, National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry. 2003. Laboratory medicine practice guidelines. Laboratory support for the diagnosis and monitoring of thyroid disease. Thyroid 13:3–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B99] 99. Bakker B, Kempers MJE, De Vijlder JJM, Van Tijn DA, Wiedijk BM, Van Bruggen M, Vulsma T. 2002. Dynamics of the plasma concentrations of TSH, FT4 and T3 following thyroxine supplementation in congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Endocrinol 57:529–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B100] 100. Selva KA, Mandel SH, Rien L, Sesser D, Miyahira R, Skeels M, Nelson JC, Lafranchi SH. 2002. Initial treatment dose of L-thyroxine in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 141:786–792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B101] 101. Selva KA, Harper A, Downs A, Blasco PA, Lafranchi SH. 2005. Neurodevelopmental outcomes in congenital hypothyroidism: comparison of initial T4 dose and time to reach target T4 and TSH. J Pediatr 147:775–780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B102] 102. Heyerdahl S, Oerbeck B. 2003. Congenital hypothyroidism: developmental outcome in relation to levothyroxine treatment variables. Thyroid 13:1029–1038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B103] 103. Hanukoglu A, Perlman K, Shamis I, Brnjac L, Rovet J, Daneman D. 2001. Relationship of etiology to treatment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:186–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B104] 104. Zdraveska N, Anastasovska V, Kocova M. 2016. Frequency of thyroid status monitoring in the first year of life and predictors for more frequent monitoring in infants with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 29:795–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B105] 105. Tuhan H, Abaci A, Cicek G, Anik A, Catli G, Demir K, Bober E. 2016. Levothyroxine replacement in primary congenital hypothyroidism: the higher the initial dose then higher the rate of overtreatment. J Pediatr Endocrinol metab 29:133–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B106] 106. Schoelwer MJ, Tu W, Zhou J, Eugster EA. 2017. Targeted levothyroxine therapy for treatment of congenital hypothyroidism. Endocrine Pract 23:1067–1071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B107] 107. Craven M, Frank GFR. 2018. Does initial dosing of levothyroxine in infants with congenital hypothyroidism lead to frequent dose adjustments secondary to iatrogenic hyperthyroidism on follow-up? J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 31:597–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B108] 108. Bongers-Schokking JJ, Resing WCM, de Rijke YB, de Ridder MAJ, de Muinck Keizer-Schraman SMPF. 2013. Cognitive development in congenital hypothyroidism: is overtreatment a greater threat than undertreatment? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:4499–4506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B109] 109. Bongers-Schokking JJ, Resing WCM, Oostdijk W, de Rijke YB, de Muinck Keizer-Schraman SMPF. 2018. Relation between early over- and undertreatment and behavioural problems in preadolescent children with congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 90:247–956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B110] 110. Rovet JF, Alvarez M. 1996. Thyroid hormone and attention in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 9:63–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B111] 111. Fisher DA, Schoen EJ, LaFranchi S, Mandel SH, Nelson JC, Carlton EL, Goshi JH. 2000. The hypothalamic-pituitary negative feedback control axis in children with treated congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2722–2727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B112] 112. Bagattini B, Cosmo CD, Montanelli L, Piaggi P, Ciampi M, Agretti P, Marco GD, Vitti P, Tonacchera M. 2014. The different requirement of L-T4 therapy in congenital athyreosis compared with adult-acquired hypothyroidism suggests a persisting thyroid hormone resistance at the hypothalamic-pituitary level. Eur J Endocrinol 171:615–621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B113] 113. American Academy of Pediatrics, Rose SR; Section on Endocrinology and Committee on Genetics, American Thyroid Association, Brown RS: Public health Committee, Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society, Foley T, Kaplowitz PB, Kaye CL, Sundararjan S, Varma SK. 2006. Update on newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 117:2290–2303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B114] 114. Léger J 2015. A clinical update of long-term outcome in young adults. Eur J Endocrinol 172:67–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B115] 115. Strickler C, Pilon AF. 2007. Presumed levothyroxine-induced pseudotumor cerebri in a pediatric patient treated for congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Ophthalmol 1:545–549 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B116] 116. Penfold JL, Simpson DA. 1975. Premature craniosynostosis—a complication of thyroid replacement therapy. J Pediatr 86:360–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B117] 117. Dubuis JM, Glorieux J, Richer F, Deal CL, Dussault JH, Van Vliet G. 1996. Outcome of severe congenital hypothyroidism: closing the developmental gap with early high dose levothyroxine treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:222–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B118] 118. Stone E, Leiter LA, Lambert JR, Silverberg JD, Jeejeebhoy KN, Burrow GN. 1984. L-thyroxine absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 59:139–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B119] 119. Ybarra ML, Dos Santos TJ, Pinheiro CTC, Dichtchekenian V, Damiani D. 2018. Rectal levothyroxine for the treatment of hypothyroidism: a case study. Pediatrics 142:e20173317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B120] 120. Huang SA, Tu HM, Harney JW, Venihaki M, Butte AJ, Kozakewich HP, Fishman SJ, Larsen PR. 2000. Severe hypothyroidism caused by type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase in infantile hemangiomas. N Engl J Med 343:185–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B121] 121. Bessho K, Etani Y, Ichimori H, Miyoshi Y, Namba N, Yoneda A, Ooue T, Chihara T, Morii E, Aoki T, Murakami M, Mushiake S, Ozono K. 2010. Increased type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase activity in a regrown hepatic hemangioma with consumptive hypothyrodism. Eur J Pediatr 169:215–221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B122] 122. Peters C, Langham S, Mullis PE, Dattani MT. 2010. Use of combined liothyronine and thyroxine therapy for consumptive hypothyroidism associated with hepatic haemangiomas in infancy. Horm Res Paediatr 74:149–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B123] 123. Zeitler P, Solberg P. 2010. Pharmacy and therapeutics committee of the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. J Pediatr 157:13–1420547262 [Google Scholar]

[B124] 124. Colucchi P, Yue CS, Ducharme M, Benvenga S. 2013. A review of the pharmacokinetics of levothyroxine for the treatment of hypothyroidism. Eur Endocrinol 9:40–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B125] 125. Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, Burman KD, Cappola AR, Celi FS, Cooper DS, Kim BW, Peeters RP, Rosenthal MS, Sawka AM, American Thyroid Association Task Force on thyroid hormone replacement. 2014. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid 24:1670–1651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B126] 126. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. 2017. Hypothyroidism. Lancet 390:1550–1562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B127] 127. Chorazy PA, Himelhoch S, Hopwood NJ, Gregor NG, Postellon DC. 1995. Persistent hypothyroidism in an infant receiving a soy formula: case report and review of the literature. Pediatrics 96:148–150 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B128] 128. Jabbar MA, Larrea J, Shaw RA. 1997. Abnormal thyroid function tests in infants with congenital hypothyroidism: the influence of soy-based formula. J Am Coll Nutr 16:280–282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B129] 129. Slawik M, Klawitter B, Meiser E, Schories M, Zwermann O, Borm K, Peper M, Lubrich B, Hug MJ, Nauck M, Olschewski M, Beuschlein F, Reincke M. 2007. Thyroid hormone replacement for central hypothyroidism: a randomized controlled trial comparing two doses of thyroxine (T4) with a combination of T4 and triiodothyronine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:4115–4122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B130] 130. Koulouri O, Auldin MA, Agarwal R, Kieffer V, Robertson C, Falconer Smith J, Levy MJ, Howlett TA. 2011. Diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism in TSH deficiency compared to primary thyroid disease: pituitary patients are at risk of under-replacement with levothyroxine. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 74:744–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B131] 131. Peters C, van Trotsenburg ASP, Schoenmakers N. 2018. DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: congenital hypothyroidism: update and perspectives. Eur J Endocrinol 179: 297–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B132] 132. Oren A, Wang MK, Brnjac L, Mahmud FH, Palmert MR. 2013. Mild neonatal hyperthyrotrophinaemia: 10-year experience suggests the condition is increasingly common but often transient. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 79:832–837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B133] 133. Kara C, Gunindi F, Can Yilmaz G, Aydin M. 2016. Transient congenital hypothyroidism in Turkey: an analysis on frequency and natural course. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 8:170–179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B134] 134. Jung JM, Jin HY, Chung ML. 2016. Feasibility of an early discontinuation of thyroid hormone treatment in very-low-birth-weight infants at risk for transient or permanent congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 85:131–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B135] 135. Korzeniewski SJ, Grigorescu V, Kleyn M, Young WI, Birbeck G, Todem D, Romero R, Paneth N. 2013. Transient hypothyroidism at 3-year follow-up among cases of congenital hypothyroidism detected by newborn screening. J Pediatr 162:177–182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B136] 136. Ford GA, Denniston S, Sesser D, Skeels MR, LaFranchi SH. 2016. Transient versus permanent congenital hypothyroidism after the age of 3 years in infants detected on the first versus second newborn screening test in Oregon, USA. Horm Res Paediatr 86:169–177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B137] 137. Kang MJ, Chung HR, Oh YJ, Shim YS, Yang S, Hwang IT. 2017. Three-year follow-up of children with abnormal newborn screening results for congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Neonatol 58:442–448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B138] 138. Park IS, Yoon JS, So CH, Lee HS, Hwang JS. 2017. Predictors of transient congenital hypothyroidism in children with eutopic thyroid gland. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 22:115–118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B139] 139. Zdraveska N, Zdravkovska M, Anastasovska V, Sukarova-Angelovska E, Kocova M. 2018. Diagnostic reevaluation of congenital hypothyroidism in Macedonia: predictors for transient or permanent hypothyroidism. Endocr Connect 7:278–285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B140] 140. Fu C, Luo S, Li Y, Li Q, Hu X, Li M, Zhang Y, Su J, Hu X, Chen Y, Wang J, Xie B, Luo J, Fan X, Chen S, Shen Y. 2017. The incidence of congenital hypothyroidism (CH) in Guangxi, China and the predictors of permanent and transient CH. Endocr Connect 6:926–934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B141] 141. Razavi Z, Mohammadi L. 2017. Permanent and transient congenital hypothyroidism in Hamadan West Province of Iran. Int J Endocrinol Metab 14:e38256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B142] 142. Rabbiosi S, Vigone MC, Cortinovis F, Zamproni I, Fugazzola L, Persani L, Corbetta C, Chiumello G, Weber G. 2013. Congenital hypothyroidism with eutopic thyroid gland: analysis of clinical and biochemical features at diagnosis and after re-evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:1395–1402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B143] 143. Olivieri A, Fazzini C, Medda E. 2015. Multiple factors influencing the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Horm Res Paediatr 83: 86–93 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B144] 144. Zung A, Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Barkan S, Hanukoglu A, Hershkovitz E, Pinhas-Hamiel O, Bistritzer T, Zadik Z. 2010. Neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia: population characteristics, diagnosis, management and outcome after cessation of therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 72:264–271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B145] 145. Unuvar T, Demir K, Abaci A, Buyukgebiz A, Bober E. 2013. The role of initial clinical and laboratory findings in infants with hyperthyrotropinemia to predict transient or permanent hypothyroidism. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 5:170–173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B146] 146. Messina MF, Aversa T, Salzano G, Zirilli G, Sferlazzas C, De Luca F, Lombardo F. 2015. Early discrimination between transient and permanent congenital hypothyroidism in children with eutopic gland. Horm Res Paediatr 84:159–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B147] 147. Eugster EA, LeMay D, Zerin JM, Pescovitz OH. 2004. Definitive diagnosis in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 144:643–647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B148] 148. Saba C, Guilmin-Crepon S, Zenaty D, Martinerie L, Paulsen A, Simon D, Storey C, Dos Santos S, Haignere J, Mohamed D, Carel JC, Léger J. 2018. Early determinants of thyroid function outcomes in children with congenital hypothyroidism and a normally located thyroid gland: a regional cohort study. Thyroid 28:959–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B149] 149. Oron T, Lazar L, Ben-Yishai S, Tenenbaum A, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Meyerovitch J, Phillip M, Lebenthal Y. 2018. Permanent vs transient congenital hypothyroidism: assessment of predictive variables. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:4428–4436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B150] 150. Valizadeh M, Moezzi F, Khavassi Z, Movahedinia M, Mazloomzadeh S, Mehran L. 2017. Influence of topical iodine-containing antiseptics used during delivery on recall rate of congenital hypothyroidism screening program. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 30:973–978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B151] 151. Chanoine JP, Boulvain M, Bourdoux P, Pardou A, Van Thi HV, Ermans AM, Delange F. 1988. Increased recall rate at screening for congenital hypothyroidism in breast fed infants born to iodine overloaded mothers. Arch Dis Child 63:1207–1210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B152] 152. Thaker VV, Galler MF, Marshall AC, Almodovar MC, Hsu HW, Addis CJ, Feldman HA, Brown RS, Levine BS. 2017. Hypothyroidism in infants with congenital heart disease exposed to excess iodine. J Endocr Soc 1:1067–1078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B153] 153. Connelly KJ, Boston BA, Pearce EN, Sesser D, Snyder D, Braverman LE, Pino S, LaFranchi SH. 2012. Congenital hypothyroidism caused by excess prenatal maternal iodine ingestion. J Pediatr 161:760–762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B154] 154. Léger J, dos Santos S, Larroque B, Ecosse E. 2015. Pregnancy outcomes and relationship to treatment adequacy in women treated early for congenital hypothyroidism: a longitudinal population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:860–869 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B155] 155. Alexander EK, Pearce EN, Brent GA, Brown RS, Chen H, Dosiou C, Grobman WA, Laurberg P, Lazarus JH, Mandel SJ, Peeters RP, Sullivan S. 2017. 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum. Thyroid 27:315–389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B156] 156. Léger J, Forhan A, Dos Santos S, Larroque B, Ecosse E, Charles MA, Heude B. 2018. Developmental milestones at one year for the offspring of mothers with congenital hypothyroidism: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol 178:471–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B157] 157. Korevaar TIM, Muetzel R, Medici M, Chaker L, Jaddoe VWV, de Rijke YB, Steegers EAP, Visser TJ, White T, Tiemeier H, Peeters RP. 2016. Association of maternal thyroid function during early pregnancy with offspring IQ and brain morphology in childhood: a population-based prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:35–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B158] 158. Alexander EK, Marqusee E, Lawrence J, Jarolim P, Fischer GA, Larsen PR. 2014. Timing and magnitude of increases in levothyroxine requirements during pregnancy in women with hypothyroidism. N Engl J Med 351:241–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B159] 159. Simoneau-Roy J, Marti S, Deal C, Huot C, Robaey P, Van Vliet G. 2004. Cognition and behavior at school entry in children with congenital hypothyroidism treated early with high-dose levothyroxine. J Pediatr 144:747–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B160] 160. Bongers-Schokking JJ, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM. 2005. Influence of timing and dose of thyroid hormone replacement on mental, psychomotor, and behavioral development in children with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 147:768–774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B161] 161. Grosse SD, Van Vliet G. 2011. Prevention of intellectual disability through screening for congenital hypothyroidism: how much and at what level? Arch Dis Child 96:374–379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B162] 162. Kempers MJ, van der Sluijs Veer L, Nijhuis-van der Sanden RW, Lanting CI, Kooistra L, Wiedijk BM, Last BF, de Vijlder JJ, Grootenhuis MA, Vulsma T. 2007. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism in the Netherlands: cognitive and motor outcome at 10 years of age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:919–924 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B163] 163. Rovet JF, Ehrlich R. 2000. Psychoeducational outcome in children with early-treated congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatrics 105:515–522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B164] 164. Rovet JF 2005. Children with congenital hypothyroidism and their siblings: do they really differ? Pediatrics 115:52–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B165] 165. Oerbeck B, Sundet K, Kase BF, Heyerdahl S. 2003. Congenital hypothyroidism: influence of disease severity and L-thyroxine treatment on intellectual, motor, and school-associated outcomes in young adults. Pediatrics 112:923–930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B166] 166. Dimitropoulos A, Molinari L, Etter K, Torresani T, Lang-Muritano M, Jenni OG, Largo RH, Latal B. 2009. Children with congenital hypothyroidism: long-term intellectual outcome after early high-dose treatment. Pediatr Res 65:242–248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B167] 167. Hauri-Hohl A, Dusoczky N, Dimitropoulos A, Leuchter RH, Molinari L, Caflisch J, Jenni OG, Latal B. 2011. Impaired neuromotor outcome in school-age children with congenital hypothyroidism receiving early high-dose substitution treatment. Pediatr Res 70:614–618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B168] 168. Vulsma T, Gons MH, de Vijlder JJ. 1989. Maternal-fetal transfer of thyroxine in congenital hypothyroidism due to a total organification defect or thyroid agenesis. N Engl J Med 321:13–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B169] 169. Wheeler SM, Willoughby KA, McAndrews MP, Rovet JF. 2011. Hippocampal size and memory functioning in children and adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E1427–E1434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B170] 170. Clairman H, Skocic J, Lischinsky JE, Rovet J. 2015. Do children with congenital hypothyroidism exhibit abnormal cortical morphology? Pediatr Res 78:286–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B171] 171. García Morales L, Arnao R, Sánchez R, Íñiguez D, González A. 2017. Sustained attention in school-age children with congenital hypothyroidism: influence of episodes of overtreatment in the first three years of life. Neurologia 485:30299–30302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B172] 172. Alvarez M, Iglesias Fernández C, Rodríguez Sánchez A, Dulín Lñiguez E, Rodríguez Arnao MD. 2010. Episodes of overtreatment during the first six months in children with congenital hypothyroidism and their relationships with sustained attention and inhibitory control at school age. Horm Res Paediatr 74:114–120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B173] 173. Tillotson SL, Fuggle PW, Smith I, Ades AE, Grant DB. 1994. Relation between biochemical severity and intelligence in early treated congenital hypothyroidism: a threshold effect. BMJ 1309:440–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B174] 174. Salerno M, Militerni R, Di Maio S, Bravaccio C, Gasparini N, Tenore A. 1999. Intellectual outcome at 12 years of age in congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 14:105–110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B175] 175. Bess FH, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker RA. 1998. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear 19:339–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B176] 176. François M, Bonfils P, Leger J, Czernichow P, Narcy P. 1994. Role of congenital hypothyroidism in hearing loss in children. J Pediatr 124:444–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B177] 177. Rovet J, Walker W, Bliss B, Buchanan L, Ehrlich R. 1996. Long-term sequelae of hearing impairment in congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr 128:776–783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B178] 178. Bruno R, Aversa T, Catena M, Valenzise M, Lombardo F, De Luca F, Wasniewska M. 2015. Even in the era of congenital hypothyroidism screening mild and subclinical sensorineural hearing loss remains a relatively common complication of severe congenital hypothyroidism. Hear Res 327:43–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B179] 179. Agretti P, Bagattini B, De Marco G, Di Cosmo C, Dionigi G, Vitti P, Tonacchera M. 2016. Papillary thyroid cancer in a patient with congenital goitrous hypothyroidism due to a novel deletion in NIS gene. Endocrine 54:256–258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B180] 180. Zhu H, Peng YG, Ma SG, Liu H. 2015. TPO gene mutations associated with thyroid carcinoma: case report and literature review. Cancer Biomark 15:909–913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B181] 181. Niedziela M 2006. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in children. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:427–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B182] 182. Şıklar Z, Berberoğlu M, Yağmurlu A, Hacıhamdioğlu B, Savaş Erdeve S, Fitöz S, Kır M, Öçal G. 2012. Synchronous occurrence of papillary carcinoma in the thyroid gland and thyroglossal duct in an adolescent with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 4:30–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B183] 183. Salerno M, Micillo M, Di Maio S, Capalbo D, Ferri P, Lettiero T, Tenore A. 2001. Longitudinal growth, sexual maturation and final height in patients with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. Eur J Endocrinol 145:377–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B184] 184. Delvecchio M, Salerno M, Acquafredda A, Zecchino C, Fico F, Manca F, Faienza MF, Cavallo L. 2006. Factors predicting final height in early treated congenital hypothyroid patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 65:693–697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B185] 185. Soliman AT, Azzam S, Elawwa A, Saleem W, Sabt A. 2012. Linear growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of children with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: a controlled study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 16:565–568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B186] 186. Dalili S, Rezvani SM, Dalili H, Mohtasham Amiri Z, Mohammadi H, Abrisham Kesh S, Novin MH, Medghalchi A, Gholamnezhad H. 2014. Congenital hypothyroidism: etiology and growth-development outcome. Acta Med Iran 52:752–756 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B187] 187. Uyttendaele M, Lambert S, Tenoutasse S, Boros E, Ziereisen F, Van Vliet G, Heinrichs C, Brachet C. 2016. Congenital hypothyroidism: long-term experience with early and high levothyroxine dosage. Horm Res Paediatr 85:188–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B188] 188. Hassani Y, Larroque B, Dos Santos S, Ecosse E, Bouyer J, Léger J. 2012. Fecundity in young adults treated early for congenital hypothyroidism is related to the initial severity of the disease: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1897–1904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B189] 189. Williams GR, Bassett JHD. 2018. Thyroid diseases and bone health. J Endocrinol Invest 41:99–109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B190] 190. Leger J, Ruiz JC, Guibourdenche J, Kindermans C, Garabedian M, Czernichow P. 1997. Bone mineral density and metabolism in children with congenital hypothyroidism after prolonged L-thyroxine therapy. Acta Paediatr 86:704–710 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B191] 191. Salerno M, Lettiero T, Esposito-del Puente A, Esposito V, Capalbo D, Crapinelli A, Padula S, del Puente A. 2004. Effect of longterm L-thyroxine treatment on bone mineral density in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 151:689–694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B192] 192. Kempers MJ, Vulsma T, Wiedijk BM, de Vijlder JJ, van Eck-Smit BL, Verberne HJ. 2006. The effect of life-long thyroxine treatment and physical activity on bone mineral density in young adult women with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19:1405–1412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B193] 193. Karakaş NM, Tulgar Kınık S, Özdemir B, Muratoğlu Şahin N, Tekindal MA, Haberal A. 2017. Congenital hypothyroidism and bone remodeling cycle. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 9:106–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B194] 194. Wong SC, Ng SM, Didi M. 2004. Children with congenital hypothyroidism are at risk of adult obesity due to early adiposity rebound. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 61:441–446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B195] 195. Livadas S, Magiakou MA, Mengreli C, Girginoudis P, Galani C, Smyrnaki P, Kanaka-Gantenbein C, Xekouki P, Chrousos GP, Dacou-Voutetakis C. 2007. Obesity and attenuated adiposity rebound in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Normalization of BMI values in adolescents. Horm Metab Res 39:524–528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B196] 196. Chen SY1, Lin SJ, Lin SH, Chou YY. 2013. Early adiposity rebound and obesity in children with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Neonatol 54:107–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B197] 197. Akin MA, Sarici D, Yikilmaz A, Akin L, Gunes T, Ozturk MA, Kurtoglu S. 2013. Aortic intima-media thickness in newborns with congenital hypothyroidism. Horm Res Paediatr 80:267–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B198] 198. Öner T, Özdemir R, Doksöz Ö, Yozgat Y, Karadeniz C, Demirpençe S, Yılmazer MM, Büyükinan M, Meşe T, Tavlı V. 2015. Cardiac function in newborns with congenital hypothyroidism: association with thyroid-stimulating hormone levels. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 7:307–311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B199] 199. Arslan A, Baş VN, Uytun S, Poyrazoğlu HG. 2017. Effects of L-thyroxine treatment on heart functions in infants with congenital hypothyroidism. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 30:557–560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B200] 200. Salerno M, Oliviero U, Lettiero T, Guardasole V, Mattiacci DM, Saldamarco L, Capalbo D, Lucariello A, Saccà L, Cittadini A. 2008. Long-term cardiovascular effects of levothyroxine therapy in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2486–2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B201] 201. Oliviero U, Cittadini A, Bosso G, Cerbone M, Valvano A, Capalbo D, Apuzzi V, Clabrese F, Lettiero T, Salerno M. 2010. Effects of long-term L-thyroxine treatment on endothelial function and arterial distensibility in young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol 162:289–294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B202] 202. Bisacchi N, Bal MO, Nardi L, Bettocchi I, d'Addabbo G, Conti V, Monti S, D'Alberton F, Cicognanni A, Cassio A. 2011. Psychological and behavioural aspects in children and adolescents with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening: comparison between parents' and children's perceptions. Eur J Endocrinol 164:269–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B203] 203. van der Sluijs Veer L, Kempers MJE, Stam HM, Last BF, Vulsma T, Grootenhuis MA. 2012. Health-related quality of life and self-worth in 10-year old children with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 6:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B204] 204. van der Sluijs Veer L, Kempers MJ, Last BF, Vulsma T, Grootenhuis MA. 2008. Quality of life, developmental milestones, and self-esteem of young adults with congenital hypothyroidism diagnosed by neonatal screening. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:2654–2661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B205] 205. Sato H, Nakamura N, Harada S, Kakee N, Sasaki N. 2009. Quality of life of young adults with congenital hypothyroidism. Pediatr Int 51:126–131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B206] 206. Rachas A, Lefeuvre D, Meyer L, Faye A, Mahlaoui N, de La Rochebrochard E, Warszawski J, Durieux P. 2016. Evaluating continuity during transfer to adult care: a systematic review. Pediatrics 138:e20160256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B207] 207. Rachas A, Tuppin P, Meyer L, Falissard B, Faye A, Mahlaoui N, de La Rochebrochard E, Frank M, Durieux P, Warszawski J. 2018. Excess mortality and hospitalizations in transitional-age youths with a long-term disease: a national population-based cohort study. PLoS One 13:e0193729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B208] 208. Carré A, Szinnai G, Castanet M, Sura-Trueba S, Tron E, Broutin-L'Hermite I, Barat P, Goizet C, Lacombe D, Moutard ML, Raybaud C, Raynaud-Ravni C, Romana S, Ythier H, Léger J, Polak M. 2009. Five new TTF1/NKX2.1 mutations in brain-lung-thyroid syndrome: rescue by PAX8 synergism in one case. Hum Mol Genet 18:2266–2276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B209] 209. Deladoey J, Ruel J, Giguere Y, Van Vliet G. 2011. Is the incidence of congenital hypothyroidism really increasing? A 20-year retrospective population-based study in Quebec. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2422–2429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B210] 210. Szinnai G 2014. Clinical genetics of congenital hypothyroidism. Endocr Dev 26:60–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B211] 211. Abu-Khudir R, Larrivee-Vanier S, Wasserman JD, Deladoey J. 2017. Disorders of thyroid morphogenesis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 31:143–159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B212] 212. Schoenmakers N, Chatterjee VK. 2015. Thyroid gland: TSHR mutations and subclinical congenital hypothyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:258–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B213] 213. Stoupa A, Kariyawasam D, Carré A, Polak M. 2016. Update of thyroid developmental genes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 45:243–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B214] 214. Fernandez LP, Lopez-Marquez A, Santisteban P. 2015. Thyroid transcription factors in development, differentiation and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:29–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B215] 215. Marelli F, Persani L. 2018. Role of Jagged1-Notch pathway in thyroid development. J Endocrinol Invest 41:75–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B216] 216. Carré A, Stoupa A, Kariyawasam D, Gueriouz M, Ramond C, Monus T, Leger J, Gaujoux S, Sebag F, Glaser N, Zenaty D, Nitschke P, Bole-Feysot C, Hubert L, Lyonnet S, Scharfmann R, Munnich A, Besmond C, Taylor W, Polak M. 2017. Mutations in BOREALIN cause thyroid dysgenesis. Hum Mol Genet 26:599–610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B217] 217. Opitz R, Hitz MP, Vandernoot I, Trubiroha A, Abu-Khudir R, Samuels M, Desilets V, Costagliola S, Andelfinger G, Deladoey J. 2015. Functional zebrafish studies based on human genotyping point to netrin-1 as a link between aberrant cardiovascular development and thyroid dysgenesis. Endocrinology 156:377–388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B218] 218. Stoupa A, Adam F, Kariyawasam D, Strassel C, Gawade S, Szinnai G, Kauskot A, Lasne D, Janke C, Natarajan K, Schmitt A, Bole-Feysot C, Nitschke P, Leger J, Jabot-Hanin F, Tores F, Michel A, Munnich A, Besmond C, Scharfmann R, Lanza F, Borgel D, Polak M, Carré A. 2018. TUBB1 mutations cause thyroid dysgenesis associated with abnormal platelet physiology. EMBO Mol Med 10:e9569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B219] 219. Thorwarth A, Schnittert-Hubener S, Schrumpf P, Muller I, Jyrch S, Dame C, Biebermann H, Kleinau G, Katchanov J, Schuelke M, Ebert G, Steininger A, Bonnemann C, Brockmann K, Christen HJ, Crock P, deZegher F, Griese M, Hewitt J, Ivarsson S, Hubner C, Kapelari K, Plecko B, Rating D, Stoeva I, Ropers HH, Gruters A, Ullmann R, Krude H. 2014. Comprehensive genotyping and clinical characterisation reveal 27 novel NKX2-1 mutations and expand the phenotypic spectrum. J Med Genet 51:375–387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B220] 220. Zou M, Alzahrani AS, Al-Odaib A, Alqahtani MA, Babiker O, Al-Rijjal RA, BinEssa HA, Kattan WE, Al-Enezi AF, Al Qarni A, Al-Faham MSA, Baitei EY, Alsagheir A, Meyer BF, Shi Y. 2018. Molecular analysis of congenital hypothyroidism in Saudi Arabia: SLC26A7 mutation is a novel defect in thyroid dyshormonogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1889–1898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B221] 221. Cangul H, Liao XH, Schoenmakers E, Kero J, Barone S, Srichomkwun P, Iwayama H, Serra EG, Saglam H, Eren E, Tarim O, Nicholas AK, Zvetkova I, Anderson CA, Frankl FEK, Boelaert K, Ojaniemi M, Jääskeläinen J, Patyra K, Löf C, Williams ED; UK10K Consortium, Soleimani M, Barrett T, Maher ER, Chatterjee VK, Refetoff S, Schoenmakers N. 2018. Homozygous loss-of-function muttaions in SLC26A7 cause goitrous congenital hypothyroidism. JCI Insight 3:e99631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B222] 222. Kuhnen P, Turan S, Frohler S, Guran T, Abali S, Biebermann H, Bereket A, Gruters A, Chen W, Krude H. 2014. Identification of PENDRIN (SLC26A4) mutations in patients with congenital hypothyroidism and “apparent” thyroid dysgenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E169–E176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B239] 222a. Stoupa A, Chaabane R, Guériouz M, Raynaud-Ravni C, Nitschke P, Bole-Feysot C, Mnif M, Ammar Keskes L, Hachicha M, Belguith N, Polak M, Carré A. 2018. Thyroid hypoplasia in congenital hypothyroidism associated with thyroid peroxidase mutations. Thyroid 28:941–944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B223] 223. Srichomkwun P, Takamatsu J, Nickerson DA, Bamshad MJ, Chong JX, Refetoff S. 2017. DUOX2 Gene mutation manifesting as resistance to thyrotropin phenotype. Thyroid 27:129–131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B224] 224. Kizys MML, Louzada RA, Mitne-Neto M, Jara JR, Furuzawa GK, de Carvalho DP, Dias-da-Silva MR, Nesi-Franca S, Dupuy C, Maciel RMB. 2017. DUOX2 mutations are associated with congenital hypothyroidism with ectopic thyroid gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:4060–4071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B225] 225. Aycan Z, Cangul H, Muzza M, Bas VN, Fugazzola L, Chatterjee VK, Persani L, Schoenmakers N. 2017. Digenic DUOX1 and DUOX2 mutations in cases with congenital hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:3085–3090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B226] 226. Parlato M, Charbit-Henrion F, Hayes P, Tiberti A, Aloi M, Cucchiara S, Begue B, Bras M, Pouliet A, Rakotobe S, Ruemmele F, Knaus UG, Cerf-Bensussan Ndisease. 2017. First identification of biallelic inherited DUOX2 inactivating mutations as a cause of very early onset inflammatory bowel. Gastroenterology 153:609.e3–611.e3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B227] 227. Muzza M, Rabbiosi S, Vigone MC, Zamproni I, Cirello V, Maffini MA, Maruca K, Schoenmakers N, Beccaria L, Gallo F, Park SM, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L, Weber G, Fugazzola L. 2014. The clinical and molecular characterization of patients with dyshormonogenic congenital hypothyroidism reveals specific diagnostic clues for DUOX2 defects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:544–553 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B228] 228. Lof C, Patyra K, Kuulasmaa T, Vangipurapu J, Undeutsch H, Jaeschke H, Pajunen T, Kero A, Krude H, Biebermann H, Kleinau G, Kuhnen P, Rantakari K, Miettinen P, Kirjavainen T, Pursiheimo JP, Mustila T, Jaaskelainen J, Ojaniemi M, Toppari J, Ignatius J, Laakso M, Kero J. 2016. Detection of novel gene variants associated with congenital hypothyroidism in a finnish patient cohort. Thyroid 26:1215–1224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B229] 229. Nicholas AK, Serra EG, Cangul H, Alyaarubi S, Ullah I, Schoenmakers E, Deeb A, Habeb AM, Almaghamsi M, Peters C, Nathwani N, Aycan Z, Saglam H, Bober E, Dattani M, Shenoy S, Murray PG, Babiker A, Willemsen R, Thankamony A, Lyons G, Irwin R, Padidela R, Tharian K, Davies JH, Puthi V, Park SM, Massoud AF, Gregory JW, Albanese A, Pease-Gevers E, Martin H, Brugger K, Maher ER, Chatterjee VK, Anderson CA, Schoenmakers N. 2016. Comprehensive screening of eight known causative genes in congenital hypothyroidism with gland-in-situ. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4521–4531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B230] 230. Miyai K, Azukizawa M, Kumahara Y. 1971. Familial isolated thyrotropin deficiency with cretinism. N Engl J Med 285:1043–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B231] 231. Bonomi M, Proverbio MC, Weber G, Chiumello G, Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L. 2001. Hyperplastic pituitary gland, high serum glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit and variable circulating thyrotropin (TSH) levels as hallmark of central hypothyroidism duet o mutations of the TSH beta gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1600–1604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B232] 232. Ramos HE, Labedan I, Carré A, Castanet M, Guemas I, Tron E, Madhi F, Delacourt C, Maciel RM, Polak M. 2010. New cases of isolatedcongenital central hypothyroidism due to homozygous thyrotropin beta gene mutations: a pitfall to neonatal screening. Thyroid 20:639–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B233] 233. Bonomi M, Busnelli M, Beck-Peccoz P, Costanzo D, Antonica F, Dolci C, Pilotta A, Buzi F, Persani L. 2009. A family with complete resistance to thyrotropin-releasing hormone. N Engl J Med 360:731–734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B234] 234. Sun Y, Bak B, Schoenmakers N, van Trotsenburg AS, Oostdijk W, Voshol P, Cambridge E, White JK, le Tissier P, Gharavy SN, Martinez-Barbera JP, Stokvis-Brantsma WH, Vulsma T, Kempers MJ, Persani L, Campi I, Bonomi M, Beck-Peccoz P, Zhu H, Davis TM, Hokken-Koelega AC, Del Blanco DG, Rangasami JJ, Ruivenkamp CA, Laros JF, Kriek M, Kant SG, Bosch CA, Biermasz NR, Appelman-Dijkstra NM, Corssmit EP, Hovens GC, Pereira AM, den Dunnen JT, Wade MG, Breuning MH, Hennekam RC, Chatterjee K, Dattani MT, Wit JM, Bernard DJ. 2012. Loss-of-function mutations in IGSF1 cause an X-linked syndrome of central hypothyroidism and testicular enlargement. Nat Genet 44:1375–1381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B235] 235. Joustra SD, Heinen CA, Schoenmakers N, Bonomi M, Ballieux BE, Turgeon MO, Bernard DJ, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg AS, Losekoot M, Persani L, Wit JM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Oostdijk W: IGSF1 Clinical Care Group. 2016. IGSF1 deficiency: lessons from an extensive case series and recommendations for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:1627–1636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B236] 236. Heinen CA, Losekoot M, Sun Y, Watson PJ, Fairall L, Joustra SD, Zwaveling-Soonawala N, Oostdijk W, van den Akker EL, Alders M, Santen GW, van Rijn RR, Dreschler WA, Surovtseva OV, Biermasz NR, Hennekam RC, Wit JM, Schwabe JW, Boelen A, Fliers E, van Trotsenburg AS. 2016. Mutations in TBL1X are associated with central hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4564–4573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B237] 237. Heinen CA, de Vries EM, Alders M, Bikker H, Zwaveling-Soonawala N, van den Akker ELT, Bakker B, Hoorweg-Nijman G, Roelfsema F, Hennekam RC, Boelen A, van Trotsenburg ASP, Fliers E. 2018. Mutations in IRS4 are associated with central hypothyroidism. J Med Genet 55:693–700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[B238] 238. Ranzini AC, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, Kung M, Limbachia A, Vintzileos AM. 2001. Ultrasonography of the fetal thyroid: nomograms based on biparietal diameter and gestational age. J Ultrasound Med 20:613–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Congenital Hypothyroidism: A 2020–2021 Consensus Guidelines Update—An ENDO-European Reference Network Initiative Endorsed by the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and the European Society for Endocrinology

Paul van Trotsenburg

Athanasia Stoupa

Juliane Léger

Tilman Rohrer

Catherine Peters

Laura Fugazzola

Alessandra Cassio

Claudine Heinrichs

Veronique Beauloye

Joachim Pohlenz

Patrice Rodien

Regis Coutant

Gabor Szinnai

Philip Murray

Beate Bartés

Dominique Luton

Mariacarolina Salerno

Luisa de Sanctis

Mariacristina Vigone

Heiko Krude

Luca Persani

Michel Polak

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Summary of the CH consensus guidelines update

1. Neonatal screening

1.1. The benefits of CH screening

1.2. Analytical methodology and effectiveness of CH screening strategies

1.3. Postscreening strategies in special categories of neonates at risk of CH

2. Diagnostics and criteria for treatment

2.1. Biochemical criteria used in the decision to start treatment for CH

2.2. Communication of abnormal screening and confirmatory results

2.3. Imaging techniques in CH

2.4. Associated malformations and syndromes

3. Treatment and monitoring of CH

3.1. Starting treatment for primary CH

3.2. Monitoring treatment in primary CH

3.3. Treatment and monitoring of central CH

3.4. Diagnostic re-evaluation of thyroid function beyond the first 6 months of life

3.5. Treatment and monitoring of pregnant women with CH

4. Outcomes of neonatal screening and early treatment

4.1. Neurodevelopmental outcomes

4.2. Development of goiter in thyroid dyshormonogenesis

4.3. Growth, puberty, and fertility

4.4. Bone, metabolic, and cardiovascular health

4.5. Patient and professional education, and health-related quality of life

4.6. Transition to adult care

5. Genetics of CH, genetic counseling, and antenatal management

5.1. Criteria for genetic counseling

5.2. Genetics of CH

5.3. Antenatal diagnostics, evaluation of fetal thyroid function, and management of fetal hypothyroidism

1. Neonatal Screening

1.1. Benefits of CH screening

Summary

Evidence

1.2. Analytical methodology and effectiveness of CH screening strategies

Summary

Evidence

1.3. Postscreening strategies in special categories of neonates at risk of CH

Summary

Evidence

2. Diagnostics and Criteria for Treatment

2.1. Biochemical criteria used in the decision to start treatment for CH

Summary

Evidence

2.2. Communication of abnormal neonatal screening and confirmatory results

Summary

Evidence

2.3. Imaging techniques in CH

Summary

Evidence

Thyroid US

Thyroid scintigraphy

Dual imaging

X-ray of the knee

2.4. Associated malformations and syndromes

Summary