Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a damage to the brain from an external force that results in temporary or permanent impairment in brain functions. Unfortunately, not many treatment options are available to TBI patients. Therefore, knowledge of the complex interplay between gut microbiome (GM) and brain health may shed novel insights as it is a rapidly expanding field of research around the world. Recent studies show that GM plays important roles in shaping neurogenerative processes such as blood-brain-barrier (BBB), myelination, neurogenesis, and microglial maturation. In addition, GM is also known to modulate many aspects of neurological behavior and cognition; however, not much is known about the role of GM in brain injuries. Since GM has been shown to improve cellular and molecular functions via mitigating TBI-induced pathologies such as BBB permeability, neuroinflammation, astroglia activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, herein we discuss how a dysbiotic gut environment, which in fact, contributes to central nervous system (CNS) disorders during brain injury and how to potentially ward off these harmful effects. We further opine that a better understanding of GM-brain (GMB) axis could help assist in designing better treatment and management strategies in future for the patients who are faced with limited options.
Keywords: 1-Carbon metabolism, Central nervous system, Ocular function, Retinal remodeling, Brain trauma
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs due to an external force causing skull damage which could invariably affect the brain [1]. The trauma leading to brain injury can be broadly categorized as an impact or a non-impact event depending upon whether the external object had a direct contact with the head (impact) or was it a non-impact force like the blast waves or a rapid acceleration, and deceleration (non-impact) with the head [2]. In the USA, frequency of TBI occurs every 15 s (roughly about 1.7 million new TBI cases/year) and costs more than US $77 billion/year [3]. In brief, TBI events are responsible for 50,000 deaths together with 80,000 individuals that are left with permanent disabilities each year [4–7]. It is believed that the frequency of brain injury is estimated to be higher than any other type of diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, AIDS, and breast carcinoma [3]. For example, motor-vehicle or traffic-related accidents constitute 17% cases while walking-falls are responsible for 35% of cases in USA [4–7]. As per one estimate 130,000 children in the age between 5 and 18 years suffered from sport-related concussions [8]. Besides, blast injury was the most common cause of TBI-related event that was observed among the military personnel [9]. In recent years, several experimental animal models have been developed to replicate human TBI pathophysiological aspects employing the pre-clinical settings [10] including fluid percussion, weight-drop injury, and controlled cortical impact (CCI). These animal models are routinely used in simulating TBI-related events in small animals with characteristics of mild or severe TBI. In fact, these models remain the workhorses for studying characteristic features of the primary, as well as secondary brain injuries in humans [11].
An acquired insult during TBI could potentially change various structural components of the brain resulting in temporary or even permanent brain impairment [12, 13]. Interestingly, GM and its role(s) in various system disorders has recently been the major focus area of research worldwide. For example, previous work reveals that GM plays important roles in neurogenerative processes such as formation of BBB, myelination, neurogenesis, and microglial maturation [14]. It has been shown that microbiome also modulates many aspects of our behavior since GM is involved in the modulation of cellular and molecular processes by balancing microbial eubiosis and dysbiosis condition and also involved in the progression of TBI-induced pathologies including BBB permeability, immune response to neuroinflammation, astroglial activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction (Fig. 1) [14]. Currently, efficacious treatments for TBI patients are acutely lacking [15–17]. Additionally, gut dysbiosis is known to exacerbate behavioral impairment as shown in studies that employed animal models of TBI and the spinal cord injury [18–21]. Furthermore, the dysbiotic milieu negatively affects the post stroke recovery [22–25]. Treatments for TBI and related disorders are severely limited, but recent research shows that microbiome transplants could mitigate CNS damage and functional impairments in spinal cord injury and stroke in animals [18]. In addition, probiotics were shown to reduce the rate of infections and time spent in intensive care units of hospitalized patients suffering from the brain trauma [18, 26, 27]. Thus, establishment of a protective, that is, eubiotic GM, is a promising therapeutic avenue since the brain injuries induce dysbiosis (Fig. 2). Reiner and colleagues 2014 reported that Novel CB2 Inverse Agonist SMM-189 reduce motor, visual, and emotional deficits after closed-head mild traumatic brain injury mouse model via mitigation of microglial inflammatory action [28]. ER stress was found to be increased early in juvenile rats exposed to TBI and that these rats developed tau oligomers over the course of 30 days and had significant short-term and spatial memory deficits following injury [29]. Treangen and colleagues suggested that acute bacterial dysbiosis within the gut microbiome was observed after TBI post-injury in mice [30]. The overall researched layout is represented in Fig. 2. However, post-TBI associated ocular and brain dysfunction via direct regulation of altered gut microbiome homeostasis is still needed to be demonstrated. This review discusses how GM alterations during post TBI contribute to CNS dysfunction and how to potentially target GM for therapeutic benefits in patients.
An Overview of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
TBI is defined as an alteration in brain functions that is provoked often by an external force. Unfortunately, it remains the main cause of injury-related death, disability, and mental disorders, thus representing a major public health issue globally [31–34]. In the year 2013 alone, a total of approximately 2.8 million TBI-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths were registered in the USA [35]. Unfortunately, it is also one of the most prevalent injury types in many industrialized countries [36]. Although there has been an overall decline in TBI mortality because of an improved treatment modality over the years; however, there is substantial increase in the number of individuals living with disabilities as a direct result of TBI [37–41]. At cellular levels, TBI pathophysiology is characterized by acute necrotic or delayed apoptotic neuronal death, cytokine and chemokine production, infiltration of peripheral immune cells, and activation of astrocytes and microglia that lead to a variety of brain, and visual problems [42–45]. The survivors often suffer from debilitating secondary injury conditions including cognitive deficits pertaining to their memory, attention, executive function, speed of information processing, and personality changes that are best characterized as dysexecutive syndromes involving social comportment, cognition, and motivated behavior and increased relative rates of psychiatric disorders, particularly depression and anxiety along with ocular dysfunction [15–17, 46, 47]. Despite past research accomplishments in TBI pathophysiology, much remains to be discovered regarding mechanistic understanding into the heterogeneous nature of brain injury-related neuropathologies, behavioral, and cognitive impairments. Again, as discussed earlier efficacious therapeutics for TBI-induced maladies are lacking [48–50]. Therefore, it is vital to consider novel treatment strategies to combat TBI-related disabilities, and in this context manipulation of GM by gut eubiotic therapeutic modalities could serve as means of captivating this expanding avenue, against the TBI-induced medical condition [51] (Figures 1 and 2).
Homocysteine, its Metabolism, and TBI Complications
Homocysteine (Hcy) is a sulfur containing non-proteinogenic amino acid derived from the essential amino acid methionine (Met) (Fig. 3). The catabolism of Met can be disrupted by factors like lifestyle, stress, aging, or genetic abnormalities leading to hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy). Dietary Met is first converted to S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), which is changed to S-adenosyl Hcy (SAH). Then SAH leads to the production of Hcy, which is further re-methylated back to Met wherein vitamin B12 serves as a co-factor, and the cycle continues [52]. Under the condition of either low cysteine or saturation of Hcy back to re-methylation, then Hcy can be further catabolized via the trans-sulfuration pathway into cysteine. In this rate-limiting step, Hcy is first converted to cystathionine with the help of cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) where vitamin B6 is an essential co-factor. Subsequently, cystathionine is converted to cysteine by cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE). Cysteine is then broken down to taurine, glutathione, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) (Ref-9 (Fig. 3). In its excess amount when it starts accumulating, Hcy is highly neurotoxic to astrocytes and neurons [53, 54]. Normally, it is continuously eliminated either via its re-methylation back to Met or via trans-sulfuration to cystathionine production. However, Hcy can accumulate under certain circumstances such as during folate deficiency, aging, occurrence of a mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, or under physical or emotional stress conditions [55–60]. When Hcy builds up (also known as HHcy), it invariably leads to BBB dysfunction and microvascular disorders [61]. It also increases NAD(P)H oxidase activity which in turn triggers microglia activation thus stimulating the secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules [61–64].
A recent study demonstrated that Met-treated HHcy in a TBI mouse model exhibited increased oxidative stress and BBB dysfunction. The phenotype promoted infiltration of inflammatory cells into the cortex as also emphasized here in Figs. 1 and 2 [63–65]. The study also suggested that HHcy was implicated in visual dysfunction. The previous study has clearly indicated that HHcy is a potent risk factor for retinal arteriosclerosis [51, 66], exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [67], and macular and optic atrophy due to retinal vascular occlusion or non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy [68] and glaucoma [69]. In fact, cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that there is a strong association between HHcy and exudative neovascular AMD [70]. Thus, HHcy appears to exacerbate TBI outcome suggesting that Hcy dysregulation may be a significant biological variable that could contribute to TBI pathophysiology and ocular disease conditions (Fig. 3). In addition, Zinno and colleagues suggested that dietary supplementation of dairy matrices containing natural folic acid could mitigate the plasma homocysteine (Hcy) and SAM levels and found to restore the fecal microbiota composition in the hyperhomocysteinemic (HHcy) mouse model (Fig. 3) [71]. However, the direct connection between HHcy, associated post-TBI outcomes such as neuroinflammation, BBB dysfunction, and cognitive deficits via modulation of gut microbiota homeostasis needs to be explored. Therefore, further research is warranted to understand the mechanism(s) of HHcy-associated multifactorial post-TBI linked outcomes.
Gut Microbiome Brain (GMB) Axis
The human intestine consists of more than 1000 types of microbes from at least 4000 different species [72–75]. Hence, alterations in their relative composition have been known to play definitive roles in the pathogenesis of many system disorders like diabetes, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, anxiety, and depression [76–83]. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in studying interactions between the brain, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and its microbiome and the bidirectional relationship between these systems [84] (Fig. 1). A deeper insight into the brain-gut crosstalk revealed the existence of a complex communication channel that not only ensures proper wellbeing of the gastrointestinal homeostasis but also likely to have multiple effects on the overall brain functioning such as higher cognitive function and motivation. The complexity of these interactions between the brain and gut is presumably through “gut-brain axis” ([85]. By realizing the importance of microbiome in modulating health, the gut-brain axis has been renamed as the GMB axis, which represents a complex network of communication between the gut, intestinal microbiome, and brain that seem to modulate immune system, gastro-intestinal tract, behavior, stress response, and CNS functions [15–17, 85–94] (Fig. 2). This bidirectional communication includes the enteric nervous system, autonomic nervous system, central nervous system, and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; however, the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis is considered as the core stress efferent axis [85, 95–97]. It was previously shown that GM regulates intestinal function and health but later accumulating evidence indicated that it could also influence the immune and nervous systems and vice versa [98].
Elderly individuals with lower diversity of microorganisms have strong connection with various system disorders [99]. Although quite a literature has already been published, it is still an evolving area of great significance where important links between diet, microbes, and cognition should be emphasized in detail as we make further progress. The influence of the microbiome on obesity and metabolic syndrome is also being increasingly recognized. It has been proven in the meantime that gut and brain do communicate with each other via several routes including the vagus nerve, immune system, enteric nervous system, and or by way of various microbial metabolic processes [100–102]. These microbiome-dependent processes have also been shown to include myelination, adult hippocampal neurogenesis, and microglia activation [103–105]. Reports show that animals featuring normal intestinal microbiome that are subject to no external influences develop inflammation in their brain [101, 102]. There are, in fact, already reports of the link between an intestinal dysbiosis and the non-infectious uveitis. Furthermore, the microbiome alteration with either germ-free rearing or treatment with oral metronidazole and ciprofloxacin resulted in reduced uveitis [106–110]. Another study showed that fecal microbial transplantation from Behcet’s disease patients into an autoimmune uveitis-prone mouse model worsened intraocular inflammation [111, 112].
Interestingly, obesity has been called a psychiatric disease and is highly linked with depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders [113–115]. Similarly, schizophrenia has been linked to intestinal inflammation and gastro-jejunal ulcers [115, 116]. Furthermore, deregulation in the GM that is associated with age-related decline in sensory, motor, and higher cognitive functions leads to age-related neurodegenerative disorders [117–121]. In recent years, researchers have proposed a potential role for pathogenic microbes, including those derived from gut in the development or exacerbation of Alzheimer’s disease [122–125]. There are many studies depicting alterations in the GM that are associated with neurological disorders, multiple sclerosis, and the Parkinson’s disease [126–133]. Similarly, unhealthy microbiome has been associated with the disruption of the ocular tissues, exacerbation of diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, uveitis, glaucoma, and Sjogren’s syndrome [134, 135]. On the other hand, Treangen and colleagues in 2018 suggested the overall impact of TBI on bacterial dysbiosis, and they went on to show that microbial changes occur 24 h after TBI in mice, indicating that CCI causes a rapid shift in relative abundance of many species including Lactobacillus gasseri, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Eubacterium ventriosum that are commonly seen in the human GM [30]. These results suggested that probiotics administration could be a therapeutic strategy for individuals with post-traumatic stress disorders such as TBI.
GMB-Axis in CNS Injuries
TBI-related pathophysiological effects have been increasingly studied that are directly associated with intestinal dysfunction and these effects represent an important consequence to the host because the GMB-axis supposedly ensures major bidirectional communication pathway between the brain and gastrointestinal tract incorporating both afferent and efferent signals which involve neuronal, hormonal, and immunologic cross-talk. Such bidirectional interactions can result in sequelae such as chronic fatigue of the gastrointestinal system including its disability to function properly [136–139] [140, 141] (Fig. 1). In the mouse model of brain, and spinal cord injury, CNS injury does upset the intestinal wall motility, and its permeability along with changes in the GM composition which ultimately led to gut dysbiosis [136, 137, 142–144].
Conversely, it is also reported that gut dysbiosis influences the traumatic CNS injury and its pathophysiology [145, 146]. In a traumatic spinal injury model, a study showed that gut microbiota composition was altered wherein there was a decrease in the population of Bacteroidetes but an increase in Firmicutes amount, and it was associated with an impairment in locomotor function [147]. Further, in a CCI rodent model of moderate TBI, gut microbiota composition (decrease in Firmicutes and increase in Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria) was altered following 2 h of injury along with increased post-injury lesion volume [148]. On the other hand, the study explains that gut eubiosis controlled reversible DNA methylation through activating DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase (PEMT) and that allows normal gene regulation. But the irreversible DNA methylation causes HHcy during dysbiosis condition and disrupts the normal gene regulation which could be responsible for cardiovascular metabolic syndrome (141) (Fig. 4). However, understanding the relationship between TBI-induced gut dysbiosis and altered gene regulation needs to be studied. Howard and colleagues suggested that severely injured patients with polytrauma established the relation between gut dysbiosis and post-injury in human patients. They have shown that 72 h of post-injury was associated with a decrease in Bacteroidales, Fusobacteriales, and Verrucomicrobiales but an increase in Clostridiales and Enterococcus populations [149]. These findings provide the complex relation between and multiple disease outcomes, revealing the notion that bacterial populations indeed influence the post-injury mediated neuro-pathophysiology and functional impairment via dysbiosis-dependent mechanisms [150–156].
Interplay of Transforming Growth Factor/Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling During TBI and Its Possible Link with the GM
Transforming growth factor (TGF) superfamily members are altered following TBI in the rodent species [157–163]. It has been reported that an increased TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 protein levels were described in human spinal cord injuries and BMP7 mRNA and protein levels in rat spinal cord injury [164–166]. Despite accumulated evidence, the precise role of this signaling system, and the interplay between the TGFβ, and BMP branches in the context of TBI pathophysiology are still not fully understood.
An early expression of BMP-6 in neurons of the hippocampus and cortex in normal adult rat brains that were subjected to TBI was demonstrated which was followed by pronounced expression in astroglia located to the lesion became obvious 48 h post-injury. The glia cells were found to be distributed around lesion, thus demarcating the injured tissue from the normal brain area. Further, double labeling by immunohistochemistry revealed that the major glial sources for BMP-6 were reactive astrocytes together with a few ED1(+) or W3/13(+) cells that also co-expressed BMP-6 protein. Subsequently, it was noticed that BMP-6 expression in neurons located to hippocampus and cortex of the lesioned hemisphere was upregulated 3 days post-injury suggesting that BMP-6 might be involved in astrogliosis following TBI [167]. Similarly, it was shown by others the distribution of TGF-β1 and BMP-6 in the brain of rats subjected to a mild and reversible ischemic damage produced by a 20-min occlusion of both carotid arteries without occlusion of the vertebral arteries. The researchers selected this model to study how the expression of trophic factor of the TGF-β superfamily changes in neurons that recover from a transient insult. Immunocytochemical analysis showed a loss of TGF-β1 in neurons of all hippocampal subfields immediately after the ischemic period, followed by a recovery of immunoreactivity in CA1 and CA3 neurons after reperfusion. BMP-6 immunoreactivity was also lost in most of the hippocampal neurons, but immunostaining became particularly intense in the interstitial space after both ischemia and reperfusion. An interstitial localization of BMP-6 was also observed in the cerebral cortex, particularly after reperfusion. Interestingly, mild ischemia also induced substantial changes in the expression of TGF-β1 and BMP-6 within the cerebellar cortex. In control animals, these factors appeared to be localized in granule cells and Purkinje cells, whereas the molecular layer was not immune-positive. Both TGF-β1 and BMP-6 were highly expressed in the interstitial spaces of the cerebellar cortex either 20 min after ischemia or 20 min after reperfusion. Taken together, these results suggest that a mild and reversible ischemia stimulates the release of BMP-6 from neurons into the interstitial space [168].
Disruption of TGF-β/BMP signaling cascade alters GM size, and its composition via ligand binding, and activation of heterodimer receptors, downstream Sma and Mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) homologs transcriptional regulators and co-activators [169]. The above signaling regulates intestinal immunity and also manages control of the intestinal bacterial proliferation that is important for the regulation of lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans since it is involved in the shaping of the GM [169–182]. In corroboration with previous findings, in the present review, we thus hypothesize that targeting TGF-β/BMP signaling cascade could prove as a milestone for effective future treatment strategy in the mouse model of TBI. In short, we believe that through modulation of GM via probiotics administration in the injured mouse model could counteract the downstream cellular and molecular events (neuronal death, inflammation, and BBB damage) of TGF-β/BMP signaling, and thereby it might be able to restore the brain and ocular damaging events (Fig. 5).
Gut Microbiome (GM) as Potential Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target for TBI
Understanding the gut microbiota composition and its alteration during dysbiosis may help in designing therapeutics having more efficacy and the relevant diagnostic tools for treating post-TBI complications and outcomes in affected TBI patients. Houlden and colleagues in 2016 found a positive correlation between the degree of gut dysbiosis and post-TBI injury in the “closed-head-impact” pre-clinical mouse model. In this regard, manipulation of the GM via microbiota transplants and pre- or probiotics consumption could, in fact, provide an exciting treatment against brain injuries (Fig. 2). As previous studies suggested that GM was substantially changed during the 24–72 h window period post-TBI injury; therefore, eubiotic therapeutic strategies could fundamentally shift the altered GM to a beneficial one and thus mitigate post TBI-associated secondary injury and the exaggerated damage response. [147–149].
As mentioned above, pre-clinical studies support the concept that microbiota transplants could be a valuable therapeutic tool to reduce brain lesion size and can help improve health outcomes in animal models such as shown in a mouse model of ischemic stroke to restore the microglial function [183, 184]. Probiotic and the microbial-derived metabolites and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) products like butyrate, propionate, and acetate may also help modulate mitochondrial homeostasis, and energy production [185]. Interestingly, along with dietary ketones, these metabolites work as the alternative energy sources for the injured brain towards improving mitochondrial bioenergetics in post-TBI and SCI injury models [186]. The gut microbiota-derived SCFA, especially the butyrate, acts as a potential histone deacetylation (HDAC) inhibitor, thereby offering a robust neuroprotection following post-TBI insults [187]. For example, probiotic Clostridium butyricum-derived butyric acid in fact did improve neurological deficits and attenuated neurodegeneration, BBB impairment, and reduced brain edema through the GMB axis in mouse model of weight-drop impact head injury and cerebral ischemia [188]. Also, VSL#3, is the mixture of eight friendly bacterial strains (4 strains of Lactobacillus viz. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subspecies bulgaricus, 3 strains of Bifidobacterium viz. Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium longum, and Bifidobacterium infantis, and 1 strain of Streptococcus viz. Streptococcus salivarius subspecies thermophilus. VSL#3 is considered as an advanced probiotic medical food [189]. It mainly improves gut microbial eubiosis and reduces intestinal barrier function, through improving tight junction protein (TJP) expression, and modulation of anti-inflammatory cytokine expression that is required for the physiological function of the host [190]. When VSL#3 was provided to the spinal cord injury, mouse model on the same day of injury was shown to improve the post-injury neuropathology. Furthermore, this probiotic improved the locomotor recovery and triggered an increase in the number of Treg cells, thus offering a protective immune environment [19].
In human preclinical trials, post-TBI injury patients when supplemented with Lactobacilli-rich probiotics within the first 48 h of hospital admission, and it was demonstrated that patients had a substantial decrease in their gastrointestinal dysfunction along with less incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, thus reducing the nosocomial infection rate [27, 191]. Till date we have not come across any study that has been shown to provide positive effects in cognition and behavioral outcomes following post-TBI injury events. Therefore, future study is warranted to understand the beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation for patients with TBI injury that could help reduce the mortality rate also.
Future Perspectives and Conclusion
The eubiotic gut is closely linked with good human health, and an imbalance of the GM either because of HHcy-led dysfunction of the 1-carbon metabolism or any other reason is associated with various system disorders (Figs. 1 and 2) [150, 153–156, 192–194]. Because of the importance of bi-directional relationship between the GM and TBI-associated pathophysiology, management of gut dysbiosis could serve as paradigm for a likely therapeutic target (Figs. 1 and 2). Probiotics consisting of butyrate-producing gut bacteria appear to be the most beneficial as a mode of eubiotic therapy that may enhance benefits of GMB axis and its health-promoting functions through anti-inflammatory and the positive mitochondrial energetic properties (Figs. 3 and 4). Advances in the next-generation sequencing, and bioinformatics tools have revealed an expansive and diverse microbial community that certainly offers a promising avenue for developing new class of therapeutics for a host of medical conditions, including TBI.
It is becoming clear that perturbations in the GM can contribute to neuro-physiological disorders. Thus, a further understanding of the role of GMB axis and its influence on brain and ocular function and its links with neurologic and neurodegenerative disorders will provide not only better treatment options but also superior managemental strategies in the coming future (Figure 5). Coordinated research efforts to understand the mechanism(s) involved in the dysbiosis could help us on how the connectivity between CNS injury, and microbiota regulates the diseases and their outcomes. Insights into these mechanisms could provide further options for early intervention for TBI in patients of all ages. Identification of therapeutic eubiotic microbes and their potential metabolites would offer promise for devising the effective treatment modalities for the patients. Furthermore, pathogenic mutations that cause genetically governed HHcy-related 1 carbon metabolic disorders and the attendant TBI severity and their relationships with intestinal dysbiotic flora remain to be investigated and thus warrant continued investigation.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank and acknowledge the help and support of other laboratory members.
Authors’ contributions
MS conceived the idea of collecting, assembling, and reviewing the literature for this manuscript before finalizing its submission. AKG helped putting the draft of the manuscript along with figure generation. JB, NT, and SCT assisted in developing the framework for the work, while RPH was responsible for language interpretation and sequence arrangement along with reference management for the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Funding
A part of this work was supported by NIH grants AR-71789, HL139047, and DK116591.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicting Interests
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Further, the authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Availability of Data and Material
Data and material pertaining to this manuscript shall be made available as per the journal’s guidelines.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Authors consent for the publication of the manuscript.
Footnotes
A part of this work was supported by NIH grants AR-71789, HL139047, and DK116591.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Nolan S. Traumatic brain injury: a review. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2005;28(2):188–194. doi: 10.1097/00002727-200504000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Summers CR, Ivins B, Schwab KA. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: an epidemiologic overview. Mount Sinai J Med N Y. 2009;76(2):105–110. doi: 10.1002/msj.20100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prins M, Greco T, Alexander D, Giza CC. The pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury at a glance. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(6):1307–1315. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.CDC grand rounds: reducing severe traumatic brain injury in the United States (2013) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(27):549–552 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Coronado VG, McGuire LC, Sarmiento K, Bell J, Lionbarger MR, Jones CD, Geller AI, Khoury N, Xu L. Trends in Traumatic Brain Injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995-2009. J Saf Res. 2012;43(4):299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pearson WS, Ovalle F, Jr, Faul M, Sasser SM. A review of traumatic brain injury trauma center visits meeting physiologic criteria from The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Field Triage Guidelines. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012;16(3):323–328. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2012.682701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Viano DC, Parenteau CS, Xu L, Faul M. Head injuries (TBI) to adults and children in motor vehicle crashes. Traffic Injury Prev. 2017;18(6):616–622. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1285023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen JS, Gioia G, Atabaki S, Teach SJ. Sports-related concussions in pediatrics. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009;21(3):288–293. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32832b1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mac Donald CL, Johnson AM, Wierzechowski L, Kassner E, Stewart T, Nelson EC, Werner NJ, Zonies D, Oh J, Fang R, Brody DL. Prospectively assessed clinical outcomes in concussive blast vs nonblast traumatic brain injury among evacuated US military personnel. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(8):994–1002. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bolouri H, Zetterberg H. Frontiers in Neuroengineering Animal Models for Concussion: Molecular and Cognitive Assessments—Relevance to Sport and Military Concussions. In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis © 2015 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Namjoshi DR, Good C, Cheng WH, Panenka W, Richards D, Cripton PA, Wellington CL. Towards clinical management of traumatic brain injury: a review of models and mechanisms from a biomechanical perspective. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(6):1325–1338. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Capizzi A, Woo J, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Traumatic brain injury: an overview of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and medical management. Med Clin N Am. 2020;104(2):213–238. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dixon KJ. Pathophysiology of Traumatic Brain Injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(2):215–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Y, Wang Z, Peng J, Gerner ST, Yin S, Jiang Y. Gut microbiota-brain interaction: An emerging immunotherapy for traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2021;337:113585. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fond G, Boukouaci W, Chevalier G, Regnault A, Eberl G, Hamdani N, Dickerson F, Macgregor A, Boyer L, Dargel A, Oliveira J, Tamouza R, Leboyer M. The "psychomicrobiotic": Targeting microbiota in major psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. Pathologie-biologie. 2015;63(1):35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pirbaglou M, Katz J, de Souza RJ, Stearns JC, Motamed M, Ritvo P. Probiotic supplementation can positively affect anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Res. 2016;36(9):889–898. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang H, Lee IS, Braun C, Enck P. Effect of Probiotics on Central Nervous System Functions in Animals and Humans: A Systematic Review. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(4):589–605. doi: 10.5056/jnm16018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rice MW, Pandya JD, Shear DA. Gut Microbiota as a Therapeutic Target to Ameliorate the Biochemical, Neuroanatomical, and Behavioral Effects of Traumatic Brain Injuries. Front Neurol. 2019;10:875. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kigerl KA, Hall JC, Wang L, Mo X, Yu Z, Popovich PG. Gut dysbiosis impairs recovery after spinal cord injury. J Exp Med. 2016;213(12):2603–2620. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jogia T, Ruitenberg MJ. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury and the Gut Microbiota: Current Insights and Future Challenges. Front Immunol. 2020;11:704. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhu S, Jiang Y, Xu K, Cui M, Ye W, Zhao G, Jin L, Chen X. The progress of gut microbiome research related to brain disorders. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-1705-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wen SW, Wong CHY. An unexplored brain-gut microbiota axis in stroke. Gut Microbes. 2017;8(6):601–606. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2017.1344809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tan BYQ, Paliwal PR, Sharma VK. Gut Microbiota and Stroke. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020;23(2):155–158. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_483_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Durgan DJ, Lee J, McCullough LD, Bryan RM., Jr Examining the Role of the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2270–2277. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.119.025140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prame Kumar K, Wong CH. Imbalance in the force: the dark side of the microbiota on stroke risk and progression. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2020;62:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yi LJ, Tian X, Shi B, Pi YP, Chen WQ. Early enteral nutrition supplemented with probiotics improved the clinical outcomes in severe head injury: Some promising findings from Chinese patients. Medicine. 2019;98(17):e15426. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000015426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tan M, Zhu JC, Du J, Zhang LM, Yin HH. Effects of probiotics on serum levels of Th1/Th2 cytokine and clinical outcomes in severe traumatic brain-injured patients: a prospective randomized pilot study. Crit Care (London, Engl) 2011;15(6):R290. doi: 10.1186/cc10579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Reiner A, Heldt SA, Presley CS, Guley NH, Elberger AJ, Deng Y, D'Surney L, Rogers JT, Ferrell J, Bu W, Del Mar N, Honig MG, Gurley SN, Moore BM., 2nd Motor, visual and emotional deficits in mice after closed-head mild traumatic brain injury are alleviated by the novel CB2 inverse agonist SMM-189. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;16(1):758–787. doi: 10.3390/ijms16010758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hylin MJ, Holden RC, Smith AC, Logsdon AF, Qaiser R, Lucke-Wold BP. Juvenile Traumatic Brain Injury Results in Cognitive Deficits Associated with Impaired Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Early Tauopathy. Dev Neurosci. 2018;40(2):175–188. doi: 10.1159/000488343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Treangen TJ, Wagner J, Burns MP, Villapol S. Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice Induces Acute Bacterial Dysbiosis Within the Fecal Microbiome. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2757. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Menon DK, Schwab K, Wright DW, Maas AI. Position statement: definition of traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(11):1637–1640. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Majdan M, Plancikova D, Brazinova A, Rusnak M, Nieboer D, Feigin V, Maas A. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1(2):e76–e83. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(16)30017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, Agrawal A, Adeleye AO et al (2018) Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 1–18. 10.3171/2017.10.Jns17352 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Dewan S, Schimmel S, Borlongan CV. Treating childhood traumatic brain injury with autologous stem cell therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18(5):515–524. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1439473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):1–16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341–353. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2007-22502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Selassie AW, Zaloshnja E, Langlois JA, Miller T, Jones P, Steiner C. Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(2):123–131. doi: 10.1097/01.Htr.0000314531.30401.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Langlois JA, Selassie AW. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23(6):394–400. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000341435.52004.ac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Badri S, Chen J, Barber J, Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Chesnut RM, Deem S, Yanez ND, Treggiari MM. Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(11):1800–1809. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2655-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Carney N, Chesnut RM, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(3):277–307. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199906000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chesnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14(2):176–188. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199904000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Helmy A, Carpenter KL, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ. The cytokine response to human traumatic brain injury: temporal profiles and evidence for cerebral parenchymal production. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31(2):658–670. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Burda JE, Bernstein AM, Sofroniew MV. Astrocyte roles in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2016;275 Pt 3(0 3):305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jassam YN, Izzy S, Whalen M, McGavern DB, El Khoury J. Neuroimmunology of Traumatic Brain Injury: Time for a Paradigm Shift. Neuron. 2017;95(6):1246–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jacobs SM, Van Stavern GP. Neuro-ophthalmic deficits after head trauma. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13(11):389. doi: 10.1007/s11910-013-0389-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ahmed S, Venigalla H, Mekala HM, Dar S, Hassan M, Ayub S. Traumatic Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatric Complications. Indian J Psychol Med. 2017;39(2):114–121. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.203129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Armstrong RA. Visual problems associated with traumatic brain injury. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101(6):716–726. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kline AE, Leary JB, Radabaugh HL, Cheng JP, Bondi CO. Combination therapies for neurobehavioral and cognitive recovery after experimental traumatic brain injury: Is more better? Prog Neurobiol. 2016;142:45–67. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pearn ML, Niesman IR, Egawa J, Sawada A, Almenar-Queralt A, Shah SB, Duckworth JL, Head BP. Pathophysiology Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Treatments and Potential Novel Therapeutics. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2017;37(4):571–585. doi: 10.1007/s10571-016-0400-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kochanek PM, Bramlett HM, Shear DA, Dixon CE, Mondello S, Dietrich WD, Hayes RL, Wang KK, Poloyac SM, Empey PE, Povlishock JT, Mountney A, Browning M, Deng-Bryant Y, Yan HQ, Jackson TC, Catania M, Glushakova O, Richieri SP, Tortella FC. Synthesis of Findings, Current Investigations, and Future Directions: Operation Brain Trauma Therapy. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(6):606–614. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kharrazian D. Traumatic Brain Injury and the Effect on the Brain-Gut Axis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2015;21(Suppl 3):28–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Behera J, Bala J, Nuru M, Tyagi SC, Tyagi N. Homocysteine as a Pathological Biomarker for Bone Disease. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(10):2704–2709. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Maltsev AV, Bystryak S, Galzitskaya OV. The role of β-amyloid peptide in neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2011;10(4):440–452. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goldsworthy MR, Vallence AM. The role of β-amyloid in alzheimer's disease-related neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2013;33(32):12910–12911. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2252-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Garcia A, Zanibbi K. Homocysteine and cognitive function in elderly people. CMAJ: Can Med Assoc J. 2004;171(8):897–904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mattson MP. Gene-diet interactions in brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(5 Pt 2):441–444. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_part_2-200309021-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mattson MP, Kruman II, Duan W. Folic acid and homocysteine in age-related disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2002;1(1):95–111. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tjiattas L, Ortiz DO, Dhivant S, Mitton K, Rogers E, Shea TB. Folate deficiency and homocysteine induce toxicity in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons via cytosolic calcium accumulation. Aging Cell. 2004;3(2):71–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nilsson K, Gustafson L, Hultberg B. Elevated plasma homocysteine concentration in elderly patients with mental illness is mainly related to the presence of vascular disease and not the diagnosis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24(3):162–168. doi: 10.1159/000105562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kade G, Antosiewicz S, Nowak Z, Wańkowicz Z. Albuminuria and hyperhomocysteinemia as cardiovascular risk factors in potentially healthy soldiers: A long-term observation. Med Sci Monitor. 2012;18(12):Cr771–Cr776. doi: 10.12659/msm.883638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kamath AF, Chauhan AK, Kisucka J, Dole VS, Loscalzo J, Handy DE, Wagner DD. Elevated levels of homocysteine compromise blood-brain barrier integrity in mice. Blood. 2006;107(2):591–593. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vegeto E, Bonincontro C, Pollio G, Sala A, Viappiani S, Nardi F, Brusadelli A, Viviani B, Ciana P, Maggi A. Estrogen prevents the lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in microglia. J Neurosci. 2001;21(6):1809–1818. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.21-06-01809.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zou CG, Zhao YS, Gao SY, Li SD, Cao XZ, Zhang M, Zhang KQ. Homocysteine promotes proliferation and activation of microglia. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(12):2069–2079. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Banks WA, Erickson MA. The blood-brain barrier and immune function and dysfunction. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Tchantchou F, Goodfellow M, Li F, Ramsue L, Miller C, Puche A, Fiskum G (2020) Hyperhomocysteinemia-Induced Oxidative Stress Exacerbates Cortical Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 10.1007/s10571-020-00866-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 66.Ghorbanihaghjo A, Javadzadeh A, Argani H, Nezami N, Rashtchizadeh N, Rafeey M, Rohbaninoubar M, Rahimi-Ardabili B. Lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, and retinal arteriosclerosis. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1692–1697. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Javadzadeh A, Ghorbanihaghjo A, Bahreini E, Rashtchizadeh N, Argani H, Alizadeh S. Plasma oxidized LDL and thiol-containing molecules in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 2010;16:2578–2584. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gerth C, Morel CF, Feigenbaum A, Levin AV. Ocular phenotype in patients with methylmalonic aciduria and homocystinuria, cobalamin C type. J AAPOS. 2008;12(6):591–596. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Micheal S, Qamar R, Akhtar F, Khan MI, Khan WA, Ahmed A. MTHFR gene C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and homocysteine levels in primary open angle and primary closed angle glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2009;15:2268–2278. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Axer-Siegel R, Bourla D, Ehrlich R, Dotan G, Benjamini Y, Gavendo S, Weinberger D, Sela BA. Association of neovascular age-related macular degeneration and hyperhomocysteinemia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(1):84–89. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00864-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zinno P, Motta V, Guantario B, Natella F, Roselli M, Bello C, Comitato R, Carminati D, Tidona F, Meucci A, Aiello P, Perozzi G, Virgili F, Trevisi P, Canali R, Devirgiliis C. Supplementation with dairy matrices impacts on homocysteine levels and gut microbiota composition of hyperhomocysteinemic mice. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(1):345–358. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01911-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ley RE, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine. Cell. 2006;124(4):837–848. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Atarashi K, Honda K. Microbiota in autoimmunity and tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol. 2011;23(6):761–768. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chervonsky AV. Intestinal commensals: influence on immune system and tolerance to pathogens. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(3):255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Paun A, Danska JS. Immuno-ecology: how the microbiome regulates tolerance and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;37:34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(34):13780–13785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706625104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bibbò S, Dore MP, Pes GM, Delitala G, Delitala AP. Is there a role for gut microbiota in type 1 diabetes pathogenesis? Ann Med. 2017;49(1):11–22. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2016.1222449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kasselman LJ, Vernice NA, DeLeon J, Reiss AB. The gut microbiome and elevated cardiovascular risk in obesity and autoimmunity. Atherosclerosis. 2018;271:203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sohail MU, Althani A, Anwar H, Rizzi R, Marei HE. Role of the Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiome in the Pathophysiology of Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:9631435. doi: 10.1155/2017/9631435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gavin PG, Mullaney JA, Loo D, Cao KL, Gottlieb PA, Hill MM, Zipris D, Hamilton-Williams EE. Intestinal Metaproteomics Reveals Host-Microbiota Interactions in Subjects at Risk for Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(10):2178–2186. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Beli E, Yan Y, Moldovan L, Vieira CP, Gao R, Duan Y, Prasad R, Bhatwadekar A, White FA, Townsend SD, Chan L, Ryan CN, Morton D, Moldovan EG, Chu FI, Oudit GY, Derendorf H, Adorini L, Wang XX, Evans-Molina C, Mirmira RG, Boulton ME, Yoder MC, Li Q, Levi M, Busik JV, Grant MB. Restructuring of the Gut Microbiome by Intermittent Fasting Prevents Retinopathy and Prolongs Survival in db/db Mice. Diabetes. 2018;67(9):1867–1879. doi: 10.2337/db18-0158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Duan Y, Prasad R, Feng D, Beli E, Li Calzi S, Longhini ALF, Lamendella R, Floyd JL, Dupont M, Noothi SK, Sreejit G, Athmanathan B, Wright J, Jensen AR, Oudit GY, Markel TA, Nagareddy PR, Obukhov AG, Grant MB. Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Restore Functional Integrity of the Gut Epithelial and Vascular Barriers in a Model of Diabetes and ACE2 Deficiency. Circ Res. 2019;125(11):969–988. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.119.315743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Brain-Gut-Microbiota Axis and Mental Health. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(8):920–926. doi: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13(10):701–712. doi: 10.1038/nrn3346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain-gut-enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6(5):306–314. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Collins SM, Surette M, Bercik P. The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(11):735–742. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Cowan CS, Callaghan BL, Richardson R. The effects of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. helveticus) on developmental trajectories of emotional learning in stressed infant rats. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(5):e823. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.De Palma G, Blennerhassett P, Lu J, Deng Y, Park AJ, Green W, Denou E, Silva MA, Santacruz A, Sanz Y, Surette MG, Verdu EF, Collins SM, Bercik P. Microbiota and host determinants of behavioural phenotype in maternally separated mice. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7735. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hyland NP, O'Mahony SM, O'Malley D, O'Mahony CM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Early-life stress selectively affects gastrointestinal but not behavioral responses in a genetic model of brain-gut axis dysfunction. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(1):105–113. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Khorjahani A, Peeri M, Azarbayjani MA. The Therapeutic Effect of Exercise on Anxiety and Bowel Oxidative Stress in the Maternal Separation Animal Model. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2020;11(1):69–78. doi: 10.32598/bcn.9.10.450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.O'Mahony SM, Hyland NP, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Maternal separation as a model of brain-gut axis dysfunction. Psychopharmacology. 2011;214(1):71–88. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ren TH, Wu J, Yew D, Ziea E, Lao L, Leung WK, Berman B, Hu PJ, Sung JJ. Effects of neonatal maternal separation on neurochemical and sensory response to colonic distension in a rat model of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2007;292(3):G849–G856. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00400.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rincel M, Darnaudéry M. Maternal separation in rodents: a journey from gut to brain and nutritional perspectives. Proc Nutr Soc. 2020;79(1):113–132. doi: 10.1017/s0029665119000958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Savignac HM, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Resistance to early-life stress in mice: effects of genetic background and stress duration. Front Behav Neurosci. 2011;5:13. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut-brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(8):453–466. doi: 10.1038/nrn3071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kudielka BM, Wüst S. Human models in acute and chronic stress: assessing determinants of individual hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and reactivity. Stress. 2010;13(1):1–14. doi: 10.3109/10253890902874913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Tsigos C, Chrousos GP. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(4):865–871. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00429-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ma Q, Xing C, Long W, Wang HY, Liu Q, Wang RF. Impact of microbiota on central nervous system and neurological diseases: the gut-brain axis. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1434-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Nagpal R, Mainali R, Ahmadi S, Wang S, Singh R, Kavanagh K, Kitzman DW, Kushugulova A, Marotta F, Yadav H. Gut microbiome and aging: Physiological and mechanistic insights. Nutr Healthy Aging. 2018;4(4):267–285. doi: 10.3233/nha-170030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut-brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(2):203–209. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Mohajeri MH, La Fata G, Steinert RE, Weber P. Relationship between the gut microbiome and brain function. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(7):481–496. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tengeler AC, Kozicz T, Kiliaan AJ. Relationship between diet, the gut microbiota, and brain function. Nutr Rev. 2018;76(8):603–617. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, Challis C, Schretter CE, Rocha S, Gradinaru V, Chesselet MF, Keshavarzian A, Shannon KM, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Wittung-Stafshede P, Knight R, Mazmanian SK. Gut Microbiota Regulate Motor Deficits and Neuroinflammation in a Model of Parkinson's Disease. Cell. 2016;167(6):1469–1480.e1412. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Sampson TR, Mazmanian SK. Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK. The Central Nervous System and the Gut Microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915–932. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Horai R, Zárate-Bladés CR, Dillenburg-Pilla P, Chen J, Kielczewski JL, Silver PB, Jittayasothorn Y, Chan CC, Yamane H, Honda K, Caspi RR. Microbiota-Dependent Activation of an Autoreactive T Cell Receptor Provokes Autoimmunity in an Immunologically Privileged Site. Immunity. 2015;43(2):343–353. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Nakamura YK, Metea C, Karstens L, Asquith M, Gruner H, Moscibrocki C, Lee I, Brislawn CJ, Jansson JK, Rosenbaum JT, Lin P. Gut Microbial Alterations Associated With Protection From Autoimmune Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(8):3747–3758. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Janowitz C, Nakamura YK, Metea C, Gligor A, Yu W, Karstens L, Rosenbaum JT, Asquith M, Lin P. Disruption of Intestinal Homeostasis and Intestinal Microbiota During Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(1):420–429. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Heissigerova J, Seidler Stangova P, Klimova A, Svozilkova P, Hrncir T, Stepankova R, Kverka M, Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Forrester JV. The Microbiota Determines Susceptibility to Experimental Autoimmune Uveoretinitis. J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:5065703. doi: 10.1155/2016/5065703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Klimova A, Seidler Stangova P, Svozilkova P, Forrester JV, Klaska I, Heissigerova J. The critical points in induction of experimental autoimmune uveitis. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech. 2016;160(1):140–142. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Huang X, Ye Z, Cao Q, Su G, Wang Q, Deng J, Zhou C, Kijlstra A, Yang P. Gut Microbiota Composition and Fecal Metabolic Phenotype in Patients With Acute Anterior Uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(3):1523–1531. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ye Z, Zhang N, Wu C, Zhang X, Wang Q, Huang X, Du L, Cao Q, Tang J, Zhou C, Hou S, He Y, Xu Q, Xiong X, Kijlstra A, Qin N, Yang P. A metagenomic study of the gut microbiome in Behcet's disease. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0520-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Aguilar-Valles A, Inoue W, Rummel C, Luheshi GN. Obesity, adipokines and neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology. 2015;96(Pt A):124–134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Byrne ML, O'Brien-Simpson NM, Mitchell SA, Allen NB. Adolescent-Onset Depression: Are Obesity and Inflammation Developmental Mechanisms or Outcomes? Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2015;46(6):839–850. doi: 10.1007/s10578-014-0524-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Severance EG, Alaedini A, Yang S, Halling M, Gressitt KL, Stallings CR, Origoni AE, Vaughan C, Khushalani S, Leweke FM, Dickerson FB, Yolken RH. Gastrointestinal inflammation and associated immune activation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;138(1):48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.02.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ozdemir V, Jamal MM, Osapay K, Jadus MR, Sandor Z, Hashemzadeh M, Szabo S. Cosegregation of gastrointestinal ulcers and schizophrenia in a large national inpatient discharge database: revisiting the "brain-gut axis" hypothesis in ulcer pathogenesis. J Investig Med. 2007;55(6):315–320. doi: 10.2310/6650.2007.00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, Nikkïla J, Monti D, Satokari R, Franceschi C, Brigidi P, De Vos W. Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One. 2010;5(5):e10667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, Marchesi JR, Falush D, Dinan T, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C, van Sinderen D, O'Connor M, Harnedy N, O'Connor K, Henry C, O'Mahony D, Fitzgerald AP, Shanahan F, Twomey C, Hill C, Ross RP, O'Toole PW. Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4586–4591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000097107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Salthouse TA. Decomposing age correlations on neuropsychological and cognitive variables. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(5):650–661. doi: 10.1017/s1355617709990385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Schaffer S, Asseburg H, Kuntz S, Muller WE, Eckert GP. Effects of polyphenols on brain ageing and Alzheimer's disease: focus on mitochondria. Mol Neurobiol. 2012;46(1):161–178. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8282-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Caracciolo B, Xu W, Collins S, Fratiglioni L. Cognitive decline, dietary factors and gut-brain interactions. Mech Ageing Dev. 2014;136-137:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2013.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Hill JM, Clement C, Pogue AI, Bhattacharjee S, Zhao Y, Lukiw WJ. Pathogenic microbes, the microbiome, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:127. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Zhao Y, Dua P, Lukiw WJ. Microbial Sources of Amyloid and Relevance to Amyloidogenesis and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) J Alzheim Dis Parkinsonism. 2015;5(1):177. doi: 10.4172/2161-0460.1000177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bhattacharjee S, Lukiw WJ. Alzheimer's disease and the microbiome. Front Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:153. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Ghaisas S, Maher J, Kanthasamy A. Gut microbiome in health and disease: Linking the microbiome-gut-brain axis and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of systemic and neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;158:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.de Theije CG, Wopereis H, Ramadan M, van Eijndthoven T, Lambert J, Knol J, Garssen J, Kraneveld AD, Oozeer R. Altered gut microbiota and activity in a murine model of autism spectrum disorders. Brain Behav Immun. 2014;37:197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Hsiao EY, McBride SW, Hsien S, Sharon G, Hyde ER, McCue T, Codelli JA, Chow J, Reisman SE, Petrosino JF, Patterson PH, Mazmanian SK. Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cell. 2013;155(7):1451–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Douglas-Escobar M, Elliott E, Neu J. Effect of intestinal microbial ecology on the developing brain. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(4):374–379. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Mulle JG, Sharp WG, Cubells JF. The gut microbiome: a new frontier in autism research. Curr Psychiatr Rep. 2013;15(2):337. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0337-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Macfabe DF (2012) Short-chain fatty acid fermentation products of the gut microbiome: implications in autism spectrum disorders. Microb Ecol Health Dis 23. 10.3402/mehd.v23i0.19260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 131.Fung TC, Olson CA, Hsiao EY. Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(2):145–155. doi: 10.1038/nn.4476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Scheperjans F, Aho V, Pereira PA, Koskinen K, Paulin L, Pekkonen E, Haapaniemi E, Kaakkola S, Eerola-Rautio J, Pohja M, Kinnunen E, Murros K, Auvinen P. Gut microbiota are related to Parkinson's disease and clinical phenotype. Mov Disord. 2015;30(3):350–358. doi: 10.1002/mds.26069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Keshavarzian A, Green SJ, Engen PA, Voigt RM, Naqib A, Forsyth CB, Mutlu E, Shannon KM. Colonic bacterial composition in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30(10):1351–1360. doi: 10.1002/mds.26307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Lin P. Importance of the intestinal microbiota in ocular inflammatory diseases: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;47(3):418–422. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Floyd JL, Grant MB. The Gut-Eye Axis: Lessons Learned from Murine Models. Ophthalmol Therapy. 2020;9(3):499–513. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00278-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Bansal V, Costantini T, Kroll L, Peterson C, Loomis W, Eliceiri B, Baird A, Wolf P, Coimbra R. Traumatic brain injury and intestinal dysfunction: uncovering the neuro-enteric axis. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(8):1353–1359. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hang CH, Shi JX, Li JS, Wu W, Yin HX. Alterations of intestinal mucosa structure and barrier function following traumatic brain injury in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9(12):2776–2781. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Rodríguez-Fandiño O, Hernández-Ruíz J, López-Vidal Y, Charúa L, Bandeh-Moghaddam H, Minzoni A, Guzmán C, Schmulson M. Intestinal recruiting and activation profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns stimulation in patients with IBS. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(11):872–e699. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Li H, Sun J, Du J, Wang F, Fang R, Yu C, Xiong J, Chen W, Lu Z, Liu J. Clostridium butyricum exerts a neuroprotective effect in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury via the gut-brain axis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(5):e13260. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Lu J, Goh SJ, Tng PY, Deng YY, Ling EA, Moochhala S. Systemic inflammatory response following acute traumatic brain injury. Front Biosci (Landm Ed) 2009;14:3795–3813. doi: 10.2741/3489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Wang HX, Wang YP. Gut Microbiota-brain Axis. Chin Med J. 2016;129(19):2373–2380. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.190667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Sundman MH, Chen NK, Subbian V, Chou YH. The bidirectional gut-brain-microbiota axis as a potential nexus between traumatic brain injury, inflammation, and disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;66:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Houlden A, Goldrick M, Brough D, Vizi ES, Lénárt N, Martinecz B, Roberts IS, Denes A. Brain injury induces specific changes in the caecal microbiota of mice via altered autonomic activity and mucoprotein production. Brain Behav Immun. 2016;57:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, Powers WR, Steliou K. Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. BioResearch Open Access. 2016;5(1):137–145. doi: 10.1089/biores.2016.0010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Winek K, Engel O, Koduah P, Heimesaat MM, Fischer A, Bereswill S, Dames C, Kershaw O, Gruber AD, Curato C, Oyama N, Meisel C, Meisel A, Dirnagl U. Depletion of Cultivatable Gut Microbiota by Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Pretreatment Worsens Outcome After Murine Stroke. Stroke. 2016;47(5):1354–1363. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.011800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Winek K, Meisel A, Dirnagl U. Gut microbiota impact on stroke outcome: Fad or fact? J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(5):891–898. doi: 10.1177/0271678x16636890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Kigerl KA, Mostacada K, Popovich PG. Gut Microbiota Are Disease-Modifying Factors After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2018;15(1):60–67. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0583-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Nicholson SE, Watts LT, Burmeister DM, Merrill D, Scroggins S, Zou Y, Lai Z, Grandhi R, Lewis AM, Newton LM, Eastridge BJ, Schwacha MG. Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury Alters the Gastrointestinal Microbiome in a Time-Dependent Manner. Shock (Augusta, Ga) 2019;52(2):240–248. doi: 10.1097/shk.0000000000001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Howard BM, Kornblith LZ, Christie SA, Conroy AS, Nelson MF, Campion EM, Callcut RA, Calfee CS, Lamere BJ, Fadrosh DW, Lynch S, Cohen MJ. Characterizing the gut microbiome in trauma: significant changes in microbial diversity occur early after severe injury. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017;2(1):e000108. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Stanisic D, Jovanovic M, George AK, Homme RP, Tyagi N, Tyagi SC, Singh M (2020) Gut microbiota and the periodontal disease: role of hyperhomocysteinemia. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 10.1139/cjpp-2020-0215 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 151.Rizowy GM, Poloni S, Colonetti K, Donis KC, Dobbler PT, Leistner-Segal S, Roesch LFW, Schwartz IVD. Is the gut microbiota dysbiotic in patients with classical homocystinuria? Biochimie. 2020;173:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Cristoni S, Rossi Bernardi L, Larini M, Natale G, Didomenico N, Varelli M, Conti M, Dorna I, Puccio G. Predicting and preventing intestinal dysbiosis on the basis of pharmacological gut microbiota metabolism. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrometr. 2019;33(14):1221–1225. doi: 10.1002/rcm.8461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Molnar J, Mallonee CJ, Stanisic D, Homme RP, George AK, Singh M, Tyagi SC. Hidradenitis Suppurativa and 1-Carbon Metabolism: Role of Gut Microbiome, Matrix Metalloproteinases, and Hyperhomocysteinemia. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1730. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.George AK, Singh M, Pushpakumar S, Homme RP, Hardin SJ, Tyagi SC. Dysbiotic 1-carbon metabolism in cardiac muscle remodeling. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(3):2590–2598. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Laha A, Majumder A, Singh M, Tyagi SC. Connecting homocysteine and obesity through pyroptosis, gut microbiome, epigenetics, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ, and zinc finger protein 407. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;96(10):971–976. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2018-0037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Tyagi SC, Stanisic D, Singh M (2020) Epigenetic memory: gene writer, eraser and homocysteine. Mol Cell Biochem. 10.1007/s11010-020-03895-4 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 157.Lindholm D, Castrén E, Kiefer R, Zafra F, Thoenen H. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in the rat brain: increase after injury and inhibition of astrocyte proliferation. J Cell Biol. 1992;117(2):395–400. doi: 10.1083/jcb.117.2.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Lewén A, Söderström S, Hillered L, Ebendal T. Expression of serine/threonine kinase receptors in traumatic brain injury. Neuroreport. 1997;8(2):475–479. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199701200-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Huang RQ, Cheng HL, Zhao XD, Dai W, Zhuang Z, Wu Y, Liu Y, Shi JX. Preliminary study on the effect of trauma-induced secondary cellular hypoxia in brain injury. Neurosci Lett. 2010;473(1):22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Komuta Y, Teng X, Yanagisawa H, Sango K, Kawamura K, Kawano H. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta receptors in meningeal fibroblasts of the injured mouse brain. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;30(1):101–111. doi: 10.1007/s10571-009-9435-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Schachtrup C, Ryu JK, Helmrick MJ, Vagena E, Galanakis DK, Degen JL, Margolis RU, Akassoglou K. Fibrinogen triggers astrocyte scar formation by promoting the availability of active TGF-beta after vascular damage. J Neurosci. 2010;30(17):5843–5854. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.0137-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Logan TT, Villapol S, Symes AJ. TGF-β superfamily gene expression and induction of the Runx1 transcription factor in adult neurogenic regions after brain injury. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Chen J, Van Gulden S, McGuire TL, Fleming AC, Oka C, Kessler JA, Peng CY. BMP-Responsive Protease HtrA1 Is Differentially Expressed in Astrocytes and Regulates Astrocytic Development and Injury Response. J Neurosci. 2018;38(15):3840–3857. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2031-17.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Buss A, Pech K, Kakulas BA, Martin D, Schoenen J, Noth J, Brook GA. TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2 expression after traumatic human spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(5):364–371. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Setoguchi T, Yone K, Matsuoka E, Takenouchi H, Nakashima K, Sakou T, Komiya S, Izumo S. Traumatic injury-induced BMP7 expression in the adult rat spinal cord. Brain Res. 2001;921(1-2):219–225. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)03123-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Hampton DW, Asher RA, Kondo T, Steeves JD, Ramer MS, Fawcett JW. A potential role for bone morphogenetic protein signalling in glial cell fate determination following adult central nervous system injury in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(11):3024–3035. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Zhang Z, Trautmann K, Artelt M, Burnet M, Schluesener HJ. Bone morphogenetic protein-6 is expressed early by activated astrocytes in lesions of rat traumatic brain injury. Neuroscience. 2006;138(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Martinez G, Carnazza ML, Di Giacomo C, Sorrenti V, Vanella A. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-6 and transforming growth factor-beta1 in the rat brain after a mild and reversible ischemic damage. Brain Res. 2001;894(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03140-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Gumienny TL, Savage-Dunn C (2013) TGF-β signaling in C. elegans. WormBook : the online review of C elegans biology. 1–34. 10.1895/wormbook.1.22.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 170.Dalfó D, Michaelson D, Hubbard EJ. Sensory regulation of the C. elegans germline through TGF-β-dependent signaling in the niche. Curr Biol. 2012;22(8):712–719. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Goszczynski B, Captan VV, Danielson AM, Lancaster BR, McGhee JD. A 44 bp intestine-specific hermaphrodite-specific enhancer from the C. elegans vit-2 vitellogenin gene is directly regulated by ELT-2, MAB-3, FKH-9 and DAF-16 and indirectly regulated by the germline, by daf-2/insulin signaling and by the TGF-β/Sma/Mab pathway. Dev Biol. 2016;413(1):112–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Wang J, Mohler WA, Savage-Dunn C. C-terminal mutants of C. elegans Smads reveal tissue-specific requirements for protein activation by TGF-beta signaling. Development (Camb, Engl) 2005;132(15):3505–3513. doi: 10.1242/dev.01930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Clark JF, Meade M, Ranepura G, Hall DH, Savage-Dunn C. Caenorhabditis elegans DBL-1/BMP Regulates Lipid Accumulation via Interaction with Insulin Signaling. G3 (Bethesda, Md) 2018;8(1):343–351. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Liang J, Yu L, Yin J, Savage-Dunn C. Transcriptional repressor and activator activities of SMA-9 contribute differentially to BMP-related signaling outputs. Dev Biol. 2007;305(2):714–725. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Madaan U, Yzeiraj E, Meade M, Clark JF, Rushlow CA, Savage-Dunn C. BMP Signaling Determines Body Size via Transcriptional Regulation of Collagen Genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2018;210(4):1355–1367. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Savage-Dunn C. Targets of TGF beta-related signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001;12(4):305–312. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(01)00015-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Savage-Dunn C (2005) TGF-beta signaling. WormBook : the online review of C elegans biology. 1–12. 10.1895/wormbook.1.22.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 178.Savage-Dunn C, Padgett RW (2017) The TGF-β Family in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 9(6). 10.1101/cshperspect.a022178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 179.Savage-Dunn C, Yu L, Gill K, Awan M, Fernando T. Non-stringent tissue-source requirements for BMP ligand expression in regulation of body size in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genet Res. 2011;93(6):427–432. doi: 10.1017/s0016672311000310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Mallo GV, Kurz CL, Couillault C, Pujol N, Granjeaud S, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ. Inducible antibacterial defense system in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2002;12(14):1209–1214. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00928-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Portal-Celhay C, Bradley ER, Blaser MJ. Control of intestinal bacterial proliferation in regulation of lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Berg M, Monnin D, Cho J, Nelson L, Crits-Christoph A, Shapira M. TGFβ/BMP immune signaling affects abundance and function of C. elegans gut commensals. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):604. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08379-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Singh V, Roth S, Llovera G, Sadler R, Garzetti D, Stecher B, Dichgans M, Liesz A. Microbiota Dysbiosis Controls the Neuroinflammatory Response after Stroke. J Neurosci. 2016;36(28):7428–7440. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.1114-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Erny D, Hrabě de Angelis AL, Jaitin D, Wieghofer P, Staszewski O, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Mahlakoiv T, Jakobshagen K, Buch T, Schwierzeck V, Utermöhlen O, Chun E, Garrett WS, McCoy KD, Diefenbach A, Staeheli P, Stecher B, Amit I, Prinz M. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(7):965–977. doi: 10.1038/nn.4030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Han B, Sivaramakrishnan P, Lin CJ, Neve IAA, He J, Tay LWR, Sowa JN, Sizovs A, Du G, Wang J, Herman C, Wang MC. Microbial Genetic Composition Tunes Host Longevity. Cell. 2017;169(7):1249–1262.e1213. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Cavaleri F, Bashar E. Potential Synergies of β-Hydroxybutyrate and Butyrate on the Modulation of Metabolism, Inflammation, Cognition, and General Health. J Nutr Metab. 2018;2018:7195760. doi: 10.1155/2018/7195760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Lu J, Frerich JM, Turtzo LC, Li S, Chiang J, Yang C, Wang X, Zhang C, Wu C, Sun Z, Niu G, Zhuang Z, Brady RO, Chen X. Histone deacetylase inhibitors are neuroprotective and preserve NGF-mediated cell survival following traumatic brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(26):10747–10752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308950110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Sun J, Wang F, Ling Z, Yu X, Chen W, Li H, Jin J, Pang M, Zhang H, Yu J, Liu J. Clostridium butyricum attenuates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetic mice via modulation of gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2016;1642:180–188. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Cheng FS, Pan D, Chang B, Jiang M, Sang LX. Probiotic mixture VSL#3: An overview of basic and clinical studies in chronic diseases. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(8):1361–1384. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Kumar M, Kissoon-Singh V, Coria AL, Moreau F, Chadee K. Probiotic mixture VSL#3 reduces colonic inflammation and improves intestinal barrier function in Muc2 mucin-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017;312(1):G34–g45. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00298.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Pavelescu D, Mirea L, Grintescu I. Could selected probiotics have beneficial effects on clinical outcome of severe traumatic brain injury patients? Crit Care. 2014;18(1):P472. doi: 10.1186/cc13662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.George AK, Majumder A, Ice H, Homme RP, Eyob W, Tyagi SC, Singh M. Genes and genetics in hyperhomocysteinemia and the "1-carbon metabolism": implications for retinal structure and eye functions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020;98(2):51–60. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Singh M, George AK, Eyob W, Homme RP, Stanisic D, Tyagi SC (2020) High methionine diet in skeletal muscle remodeling: Epigenetic mechanism of homocysteine mediated growth retardation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 10.1139/cjpp-2020-0093 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 194.Stanisic D, George AK, Smolenkova I, Tyagi SC, Singh M (2020) Hyperhomocysteinemia: an instigating factor for periodontal disease. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 10.1139/cjpp-2020-0224 [DOI] [PubMed]