Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2020 May 13;432(14):4023–4031. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.029

Membrane Lipid Requirements of the Lysine Transporter Lyp1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Joury S van ’t Klooster 1, Tan-Yun Cheng 2, Hendrik R Sikkema 1, Aike Jeucken 1, D Branch Moody 2,3, Bert Poolman 1
PMCID: PMC8005870  NIHMSID: NIHMS1681749  PMID: 32413406

Abstract

Membrane lipids act as solvents and functional cofactors for integral membrane proteins. The yeast plasma membrane is unusual in that it may have a high lipid order, which coincides with low passive permeability for small molecules and a slow lateral diffusion of proteins. Yet, membrane proteins whose functions require altered conformation must have flexibility within membranes. We have determined the molecular composition of yeast plasma membrane lipids located within a defined diameter of model proteins, including the APC-superfamily lysine transporter Lyp1. We now use the composition of lipids that naturally surround Lyp1 to guide testing of lipids that support the normal functioning of the transporter, when reconstituted in vesicles of defined lipid composition. We find that phosphatidylserine and ergosterol are essential for Lyp1 function, and the transport activity displays a sigmoidal relationship with the concentration of these lipids. Non-bilayer lipids stimulate transport activity, but different types are interchangeable. Remarkably, Lyp1 requires a relatively high fraction of lipids with one or more unsaturated acyl chains. The transport data and predictions of the periprotein lipidome of Lyp1 support a new model in which a narrow band of lipids immediately surrounding the transmembrane stalk of a model protein allows conformational changes in the protein.

Keywords: APC superfamily, membrane transport, yeast plasma membrane, amino acids, Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Introduction

In the fluid mosaic bilayer model [1], lipids are seen as solvent for integral membrane proteins like aqueous media are for soluble proteins. The length of the lipids should approximately match the hydrophobic region of the protein, and the polar head-groups of the lipids can interact with the hydrophilic regions of the membrane protein [2]. These parameters are referred to as hydrophobic–hydrophilic matching of proteins and lipids [3], which has been shown to affect the activity and or stability of membrane proteins [46]. The degree of saturation of acyl chains influences the packing of lipids and thus the fluidity of the bilayer. Additionally, sterols can increase the order of the acyl chains [7], which is accompanied by a decrease of the lateral diffusion of components in the membrane [8]. Sphingolipids typically have saturated long-chain fatty acids and preferentially interact with sterols, giving rise to so-called liquid-ordered membrane domains that are phase-separated from more fluid domains [9]. The hydrophilic heads of phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and -serine (PS) lipids form hydrogen bonds with polar amino acids, and salt-bridges can be formed between basic residues on the protein and the lipid phosphate [10].

In addition to specific bonding between lipids and proteins, the geometry of lipids can influence the structure and hence the activity of proteins through their impact on the physical properties of the membrane [11]. Lipids with a cylindrical shape, like phosphatidylcholine, PG, and PS, have a head-group cross-sectional area comparable to that of the acyl chains and spontaneously form bilayers. Lipids with a cone shape, like phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidic acid, have a head-group cross-sectional area that is smaller than that of the acyl chain area. These so-called non-bilayer lipids are capable of forming a hexagonal phase and induce substantial negative membrane curvature [12]. The different geometry of bilayer and non-bilayer types of lipids translate into differences in the lateral pressure profile of the membrane that in turn can modulate protein conformations [13]. The lateral pressure profile is also affected by the acyl chain length and degree of unsaturation, and charge of the head-groups [14].

The lipids directly surrounding the membrane protein are referred to as annular lipids. High-resolution X-ray [1517] and cryo-TEM structures [18] and electron spray–ionization mass spectrometry [1922] of membrane proteins have revealed non-annular “structural lipids” that specifically interact in between transmembrane α-helices or in hydrophobic pockets of transmembrane domains. Thus, lipid–protein interactions are likely crucial in the activity of the majority of membrane proteins but actual functional data to support this hypothesis is scarce. The picture that emerges from studies on four different bacterial transporters [2326] is that anionic lipids can fulfill specific roles in the activity or and regulation of transport activity, and that non-bilayer lipids stimulate transport. The role of lipids in the conformational dynamics of bacterial transporters has also been reported [2426]. However, we are not aware of systematic studies on the function of lipids in eukaryotic plasma membrane transporters, but the importance of the topic has been recognized [2730].

In a recent study [31], we have used styrene maleic acid lipid particles to extract proteins and lipids located within a defined diameter of the transmembrane stalk of proteins in the plasma membrane of yeast. Such “periprotein lipids” form in a stoichiometric excess of ~60:1 with the protein. They encompass more than the annular lipids and represent additional shell(s) of lipids surrounding the protein. We find that the Lyp1 periprotein lipidome is enriched in PS and depleted in ergosterol relative to the overall composition of the plasma membrane. The acyl chains of the periprotein lipids are mostly unsaturated, suggesting a more disordered state of the lipids surrounding the integral membranes proteins compared to the bulk of the plasma membrane. In the periprotein lipidome paper [31], we propose a model for the plasma membrane in which the disordered lipid environment provides the flexibility needed for transport proteins to perform their conformational changes associated with substrate translocation. Using these data and the availability of synthetic lipids in defined vesicles as starting point, we systematically analyzed the lipid dependence of transport of the eukaryotic amino acid proton-symporter Lyp1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Results and Discussion

Phospholipid dependence of Lyp1 function

We previously reconstituted Lyp1 in lipid vesicles composed of yeast total lipid extract [32], and we now incorporated the protein into vesicles with a defined lipid composition. The yeast sphingolipids and certain phospholipids with precisely matching head-group-acyl chain combinations identified in our periprotein lipidome analyses are not available, but we could design lipid mixtures that otherwise mimic periprotein lipids in yeast cells. To drive the import of lysine by Lyp1, we impose a membrane potential (ΔΨ) and pH gradient (ΔpH) by diluting the vesicles containing K-acetate into Na-phosphate plus valinomycin. The driving force is determined by the potassium and acetate gradient (Figure 1(a)). Typically, we use a ΔΨ and −ZΔpH of −81 mV each (Z = 58 mV), producing a proton motive force of −162 mV. We compared the lipid composition of the Lyp1 vesicles with the starting mixture for the reconstitution, using mass spectrometry, and did not find significant differences (Figure S1). This rules out enrichment or depletion of certain lipids during membrane reconstitution, including the possibility that co-purified protein lipids contribute significantly to the lipid pool. We used Lyp1-GFP rather than wild-type Lyp1, because the chimera proved more stable during protein purification and membrane reconstitution, and the fluorescent moiety allowed more accurate determination of the Lyp1 concentration. Importantly, the rates of transport of Lyp1-GFP and Lyp1 are similar (Figure S2), ruling out an effect of GFP on substrate transport. In addition, proton permeability measurements indicate that the transport rates are not skewed by large differences in proton leakage (Figure S3). Hence, the proton motive force is similar in vesicles of different lipid composition. Figure 1(b) shows the import of lysine over time, from which the slope estimates the initial rate of transport.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Generation of proton motive force and lysine transport progress curves. (a) Schematic showing the generation of a membrane potential (ΔΨ, red arrow) by a valinomycin-mediated potassium diffusion potential and pH gradient (ΔpH, green) via an acetate diffusion potential. Together the ΔΨ and ΔpH form the proton motive force (PMF = ΔΨ − ZΔpH, where Z equals 2.3RT/F and R and F are the gas and Faraday constant, respectively, and T is the absolute temperature. (b) Transport of lysine by Lyp1-GFP-containing proteoliposomes and data fitting. Lyp1 activity is obtained from the slopes of such lines and the rates of transport are converted into turnover numbers. (a) and (b) indicate two independent samples, i.e. two different lipid compositions

In initial experiments with ergosterol present, we observed that C34:1 (C18:1 plus C16:0 acyl chains) palmitoyl-oleoyl-sn-phosphatidylX (POPX; where X = choline, ethanolamine, glycerol, or serine; Figure 2(a) and (b)), support a much higher transport activity than the most commonly used C36:2 forms or when C32:0 dipalmitoyl-sn-phosphatidylX (DPPX; C32:0 = 2 C16:0 chains) lipids were used (Figure 2(c)). Hence, we started with a mixture of 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoserine (POPS), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol (POPG), 1palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanola-mine (POPE), and POPC (17.5 mol% each) plus 30 mol% ergosterol (Figure 2(d), #1) and used that to benchmark the activity of Lyp1 in vesicles against the effects of phospholipids and sterols. Figure 2(d) shows that increasing either POPS or POPE increases transport activity (#2 and #3), while reducing the fraction of these lipids decreases the activity (#5 and #6) relative to that in the benchmark mixture (#1). Increasing the fraction of POPG or lowering of POPC (#4) had no negative effect on transport. This suggests that the non-bilayer lipid POPE and the anionic lipid POPS are a minimal requirement for transport (#7).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Lyp1 activity as a function of lipid composition. (a) Geometric representation of lipids for the head-groups shown in (b). (b) Head-groups of phospholipids (and color coding) with the net charge of the lipids at pH 7. (c) Turnover number of Lyp1 in lipid mixtures with different acyl chains. (d) Turnover number of Lyp1 in different lipid mixtures with C34:1 (PO) acyl chains. The lipid composition (mol%) of each sample is visualized by pie graphs using the color coding of (b). The quantity of ergosterol was kept at 30 mol% in all mixtures. Data are based on three replicate experiments; the bars show the standard error of the fit.

The role of anionic lipids

PG and PS are both anionic lipids; therefore, it is not surprising that PG can partly substitute PS (Figure 2(d), #5). Yet, PG is the main anionic lipid found in bacteria, while PS is the predominant anionic lipid in eukaryotes. It is thus likely that Lyp1 has evolved to function optimally in membranes containing PS. Next, we simplified the lipid mixture by preparing vesicles composed of POPS and POPE plus ergosterol (Figure 2(d), #7) and stepwise reduced the quantity of PS. We found a sigmoidal relationship between Lyp1 activity and POPS concentration (Figure 3(a)), which is indicative of cooperativity and suggests that more than one molecule of POPS is needed for activation of Lyp1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Effect of anionic and non-bilayer lipids on Lyp1 activity in proteoliposomes. (a) Turnover number of Lyp1 as a function of POPS. (b) Turnover number of Lyp1 as a function of POPE (mol%). (c) Turnover number of Lyp1 in vesicles with POPE versus POPA. (d) Turnover number of Lyp1 as a function of DOPE, which was increased at the expense of POPE. The triangles at the top of each graph depict the gradual replacement of one lipid for another. Number of replicate experiments (n) = 3; the variation between replicates is ±20%, and therefore, the error bars are the standard error of the fit of n = 1. Sigmoidal curves were fitted using the equation: y=start+(endstart)xnkn+xn

The role of non-bilayer lipids

Many phospholipids have a cylindrical shape that allows bilayer formation with a single lipid species. The relatively small head-group of PE, as compared to the acyl chains, results in a cone-shaped geometry that does not allow bilayer formation from pure PE. PE and other non-bilayer lipids affect the lateral pressure profile and membrane curvature more drastically than bilayer forming lipids do [33]. We determined the PE dependence of Lyp1 by increasing the fraction of POPE at the expense of POPC (Figure 3(b)). Lyp1 transport activity increases 3-fold with increasing POPE and saturates at ~10 mol%. To determine whether the ethanolamine head-group or the geometric shape of the lipid is important, we substituted POPE for 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidic-acid (POPA) (Figure 3(c)), a non-bilayer forming conical phospholipid devoid of the head-group moiety in PE. POPA can fully substitute POPE in transporter activity, which suggests that PE is not essential but lipids with non-bilayer properties are important for Lyp1 function. Next, we titrated in DOPE at the expense of POPE to gradually increase the degree of acyl chain unsaturation (Figure 3(d)). We observe a 2-fold increase in Lyp1 activity with DOPE at 5 to 10 mol% and POPE at 30 to 25 mol%, but a further increase in dioleoyl at the expense of palmitoyl-oleoyl chains decreases the activity to zero. These experiments indicate that specific features of the acyl chains, which affect membrane fluidity, are as important as the geometric shape of non-bilayer lipids.

Ergosterol is essential for Lyp1 activity

Ergosterol is the major sterol of lower eukaryotes and present in the yeast plasma membrane at concentrations of ≈30 mol% [34]. We increased the fraction of ergosterol at the expense of POPC and observed an increase in activity up to 10 mol%. Without ergosterol, Lyp1 is not active and the activity drops above 25 mol% (Figure 4(a)). As with POPS, we find a sigmoidal dependence, but the apparent cooperativity is much lower. The predominant sterol of mammalian cells, cholesterol [35], supports less than 15% of Lyp1 activity as compared to ergosterol. Ergosterol differs from cholesterol in that it has two additional double bonds at positions C7–8 and C22– 23 and one extra methyl group at C24 (Figure 4(c), yellow ovals). To find out which of these is important for transport activity, we tested brassicasterol and dehydrocholesterol and an equal mixture of both (Figure 4(c)). However, the two sterols and the mixture thereof, which together represent the functional groups of ergosterol, cannot substitute for ergosterol itself (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Effect of sterols on Lyp1 activity. (a) Turnover number of Lyp1 as a function of the quantity of ergosterol in the vesicles. Arrow indicates the drop off activity from 25 to 30 mol% ergosterol. (b) Turnover number of Lyp1 as a function of the type of sterol. (c) Structures of sterols. ERG = ergosterol; CHO = cholesterol; BRA = brassicasterol; 7-DHC = 7-dehydrocholesterol. ERG and CHO parts are black and red, respectively. Structural dissimilarities between ERG and CHO are highlighted by yellow ovals. Number of biological experiments (n) = 3; the variation between replicates is ±20%, and therefore, the error bars are the standard error of the fit of n = 1.

Conclusion

Our periprotein lipidomics study [31] combined with published literature led to a new testable model of how proteins may function in a membrane of high lipid order [3639]. These biophysical properties coincide with the high tolerance of yeast for a low pH and high concentration of solvents, which allows the organism to survive in adverse environments [40,41].

We find that anionic lipids with saturated and unsaturated acyl chains, preferably POPS, and ergosterol are essential for Lyp1 functioning, and both lipid species stimulate transport cooperatively. This suggests that “allosteric” sites on the protein need to be occupied by specific lipids to enable transport. About 20 mol% PS and 5 mol% ergosterol are sufficient for optimal activity of Lyp1, which coincides with our periprotein lipidomic analysis (17– 20 mol% PS and 4–5 mol% ergosterol). This is distinct from that of the total plasma membrane where PS and ergosterol amount to 6 and 30 mol%, respectively, and this would reduce the apparent activity of Lyp1 severely. Hence, the periprotein lipidome provides an environment of specific lipids and sufficient local membrane fluidity for optimal functioning of Lyp1.

Methods

Cultivation of Pichia pastoris, protein expression, and plasma membrane isolation

The expression of Lyp1 in P. pastoris (SMD1163-Lyp1-TEV-GFP-his10) and its membrane isolation was described previously [32]. P. pastoris cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 7500g, for 15 min at 4 °C (Beckman centrifuge J-20-XP, Rotor JLA 9.1000, USA). Further steps were performed at 4 °C or on ice. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in 150 ml of cell resuspension buffer (20 mM Tris – HCl (pH 6.7), 1 mM EGTA, 0.6 M sorbitol, 10 μM pepstatin A (Apollo Scientific, UK), 10 μM E-64 (Apollo Scientific, UK) plus protease inhibitors (cOmplete Mini EDTA-free™, ROCHE, 1 tablet/75 ml)). Centrifugation was repeated, and the resulting cell pellet was resuspended to OD600 = 200 in cell resuspension buffer with 1 tablet cOmplete Mini EDTA-free™/10 ml. The resulting cell suspension was broken using a cell disrupter (Constant Cell Disruption Systems, USA) by three sequential passes operating at 39 Kpsi, after which 2 mM fresh PMSF was added. Unbroken cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 18,000 RCF for 30 min at 4 °C (Beckman centrifuge J-20-XP, Rotor JA16.250, DE). The supernatant was transferred to 45 TI rotor (Beckman, DE) tubes and membranes were pelleted by ultracentrifugation (Optima XE-90, Beckman, DE) at 186,000 RCF, 90 min at 4 °C. The resulting membrane pellet was resuspended to homogeneity at 400 mg/ml using a potter Elvehjem tissue grinder in 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 0.3 M Sucrose, 10 μM Pepstatin A, 10 μM E-64 (Apollo Scientific, UK), 2 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail (cOmplete Mini EDTA-free™, 1 tablet/10 ml). Aliquots of 2 ml were snap frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further use.

Liposome formation

Phospholipids were obtained from Avanti polar lipids Inc (Alabaster, AL, USA). Brassicasterol (CarboSynth, UK), 7-dehydrocholesterol (Sigma Aldrich, DE), cholesterol, and ergosterol (Sigma Aldrich, DE) were obtained from the indicated vendor. Lipids were dissolved in chloroform and mixed at desired ratios (mol%) to a total weight of 10 mg in a 5-ml glass round bottom flask. Chloroform was removed by evaporation at 40 °C and an applied pressure of 370 mBar, using a rotary vaporizer (rotavapor r-3-BUCHI). The resulting lipid film was resuspended in 1 ml of diethylether, and the previous step was repeated at atmospheric pressure until a dry film was visible. To remove any residual solvent, a pressure of 10 mBar was applied for 20 min. The obtained lipid film was hydrated in 1 ml of 50 mM NH4-acetate (pH 7.5) and 50 mM NaCl by shaking for 5 min and then transferred to a plastic tube compatible with sonication. The lipid suspension was homogenized by tip sonication with a Sonics Vibra Cell sonicator (Sonics & Materials Inc.) at amplitude of 70% for 2 min with 5-s pulses and 5-s pauses between each pulse. The sample was kept at 4 oC in ethanol:water:ice (25:25:50 v/v/v). The lipid suspension (1 ml aliquot at 10 mg of lipid/ml) was transferred to a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and thawed at 40 oC. This process was repeated four times and stored in liquid nitrogen until further use.

Proteoliposome preparation

Protein purification and membrane reconstitution was performed as described [32]. Briefly, n-dode-cylmaltoside was used to solubilize Lyp1-GFP. The protein was purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (using Nickel-Sepharose) and fluorescence size-exclusion chromatography (using a Superdex 200 increase 300/10 GL column attached to an Åkta 900 chromatography system (Amersham Bioscience, SE) with in-line Fluorescence detector (1260 Infinity, Agilent technologies, USA)). In parallel, liposomes were thawed at room temperature and subsequently homogenized by 11 extrusions through a 400-nm polycarbonate filter (Avestin Europe GMBH, Germany). Next, liposomes were destabilized using Triton X-100 and titrated to a point beyond the saturation point (Rsat) as described [42]; the final turbidity at 540 nm was at approximately 60% of Rsat. Purified Lyp1 was mixed with triton x-100-destabilized liposomes of the appropriate lipid composition at a protein-to-lipid ratio of 1:400 and incubated for 15 min under slow agitation at 4 °C. Bio-beads SM-200 (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA), 100 mg/0.4% Triton X-100 (final concentration of Triton X-100 after solubilization of the liposomes) were sequentially added at 15, 30, and 60 min. The final mixture was incubated overnight, after which a final batch of bio-beads was added and incubation continued for another 2 h. Protein containing liposomes (proteo-liposomes) were separated from the Bio-beads by filtration on a column followed by ultracentrifugation 444,000g at 4 °C for 35 min. Proteo-liposomes were suspended in 10 mM potassium-phosphate plus 100 mM potassium-acetate (pH 6.0), snap frozen, and stored in liquid nitrogen.

In vitro transport assays

Transport assays were performed and the formation of a proton gradient (ΔpH) and membrane potential (ΔΨ) was established as described [32]. Both ΔpH and ΔΨ were formed by diluting the proteo-liposomes (suspended in 10 mM potassium-phosphate plus 100 mM potassium-acetate (pH 6.0)) 25-fold into 110 mM sodium-phosphate (pH 6.0) plus 0.5 μM valinomycin. This results in maximal values of ZΔpH and ΔΨ of −83 mV as calculated according to the Nernst equation, yielding a proton motive force of −166 mV.

In vivo transport assays

Transport assays in S. cerevisiae By4742, expressing Lyp1-GFP or Lyp1 from the pFB021 vector, were performed as described [32], using the same concentrations of reagents and volumes.

Data analysis and transport rates

The data were analyzed in Origin (OriginLab, MA). The initial rates of transport were determined from the slope of progress curves (Figure 1(b)). The relative transport activity was determined by normalizing each vesicle preparation to the sample with a lipid composition POPC:POPE:POPS:POPG:Ergosterol in a ratio of 17.5:17.5:17.5:17.5:30 (mol%).

Lipid extraction and mass spectrometry

Lipid extraction from the proteo-liposomes was performed based on the Bligh and Dyer method [43]. The lower organic phase was separated from the upper aqueous phase and dried under a nitrogen stream. The extracted lipid residue was re-dissolved in the starting mobile phase A and 10 μl of the lipid extraction was injected on a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column (2.6-μm hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography 100 Å, 50 × 4.6 mm; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA). The mobile phases were (A) acetonitrile/acetone (9:1, v/v), 0.1% formic acid, and (B) acetonitrile/H2O (7:3, v/v), 10 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid. In a 6.5-min run, the solvent gradient changes as follows: 0–1 min, from 100% A to 50% A and B; 1–3min, stay 50% B; 3– 3.1 min, 100% B; 3.1–4 min, stay 100% B; 4–6.5 min from 100% B to 100% A. Flow rate was 1.0 ml/min. The column outlet of the LC system (Accela/Surveyor; Thermo) was connected to a heated electrospray ionization source of mass spectrometer (LTQ Orbitrap XL; Thermo) operated in negative mode. Capillary temperature was set to 350 °C, and the ionization voltage to 4.0 kV. High-resolution spectra were collected with the Orbitrap from m/z 350–1750 at resolution 60,000 (1.15 scans/s). After conversion to mzXML, data were analyzed using XCMS version 3.6.1 running under R version 3.6.1.

Supplementary Material

Figures S1-S3

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out within the BE-Basic R&D Program, which was granted a FES subsidy from the Dutch Ministry of Economic affairs, Agriculture and Innovation, and was supported by an ERC Advanced Grant (ABCVolume; No. 670578). The research was also funded by the National Institute of Health (R01 AR048632).

Abbreviations used:

PG

phosphatidylglycerol

PS

phosphatidylserine

PE

phosphatidylethanolamine

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.029.

References

  • 1.Singer SJ, Nicolson GL, The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes, Science 175 (4023) (1972) 720–731, 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Killian JA, Hydrophobic mismatch between proteins and lipids in membranes, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Rev. Biomembr. 1376 (1998) 401–416, 10.1016/S0304-4157(98)00017-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jensen MØ, Mouritsen OG, Lipids do influence protein function—the hydrophobic matching hypothesis revisited, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1666 (2004) 205–226, 10.1016/J.BBAMEM.2004.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mihailescu M, Krepkiy D, Milescu M, Gawrisch K, Swartz KJ, White S, Structural interactions of a voltage sensor toxin with lipid membranes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014) E5463–E5470, 10.1073/pnas.1415324111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grau B, Javanainen M, García-Murria MJ, Kulig W, Vattulainen I, Mingarro I, Martínez-Gil L, The role of hydrophobic matching on transmembrane helix packing in cells, Cell Stress. 1 (2017) 90–106, 10.15698/cst2017.11.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Srivastava SR, Zadafiya P, Mahalakshmi R, Hydrophobic mismatch modulates stability and plasticity of human mitochondrial VDAC2, Biophys. J. 115 (2018) 2386–2394, 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hung W-C, Lee M-T, Chung H, Sun Y-T, Chen H, Charron NE, Huang HW, Comparative study of the condensing effects of ergosterol and cholesterol, Biophys J. 110 (2016) 2026–2033, 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kahya N, Scherfeld D, Bacia K, Poolman B, Schwille P, Probing lipid mobility of raft-exhibiting model membranes by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 28109–28115, 10.1074/jbc.M302969200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simons K, Ikonen E, Functional rafts in cell membranes, Nature. 387 (1997) 569–572, 10.1038/42408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee AG, Lipid–protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1612 (2003) 1–40, 10.1016/S0005-2736(03)00056-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cullis PR, De Kruijff B, Lipid polymorphism and the functional roles of lipids in biological membranes, BBA Rev. Biomembr. 559 (1979) 399–420, 10.1016/0304-4157(79)90012-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cullis PR, De Kruijff B, The polymorphic phase behaviour of phosphatidylethanolamines of natural and synthetic origin. A 31P NMR study, BBA - Biomembr. 513 (1978) 31–42, 10.1016/0005-2736(78)90109-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cantor RS, Lipid composition and the lateral pressure profile in bilayers, Biophys. J. 76 (1999) 2625–2639, 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77415-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bagatolli LA, Ipsen JH, Simonsen AC, Mouritsen OG, An outlook on organization of lipids in membranes: Searching for a realistic connection with the organization of biological membranes, Prog. Lipid Res. 49 (2010) 378–389, 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Long SB, Tao X, Campbell EB, MacKinnon R, Atomic structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel in a lipid membrane-like environment, Nature. 450 (2007) 376–382, 10.1038/nature06265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Koshy C, Schweikhard ES, Gärtner RM, Perez C, Yildiz Ö, Ziegler C, Structural evidence for functional lipid interactions in the betaine transporter BetP, EMBO J. 32 (2013) 3096–3105, 10.1038/emboj.2013.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Penmatsa A, Wang KH, Gouaux E, X-ray structure of dopamine transporter elucidates antidepressant mechanism, Nature. 503 (2013) 85–90, 10.1038/nature12533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koshy C, Ziegler C, Structural insights into functional lipid– protein interactions in secondary transporters, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 1850 (2015) 476–487, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Laganowsky A, Reading E,Allison TM, Ulmschneider MB,Degiacomi MT, Baldwin AJ, Robinson CV, Membrane proteins bind lipids selectively to modulate their structure and function, Nature 510 (2014) 172–175, 10.1038/nature13419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bolla JR, Agasid MT, Mehmood S, Robinson CV, Membrane protein–lipid interactions probed using mass spectrometry, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88 (2019) 85–111, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bechara C, Nöll A, Morgner N, Degiacomi MT, Tampé R, Robinson CV, A subset of annular lipids is linked to the flippase activity of an ABC transporter, Nat. Chem. 7 (2015) 255–262, 10.1038/nchem.2172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gupta K, Donlan JAC, Hopper JTS, Uzdavinys P, Landreh M, Struwe WB, Drew D, Baldwin AJ, et al. , The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers, Nature. 541 (2017) 421–424, 10.1038/nature20820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Veld GI, Driessen AJM, Op den Kamp JAF, Konings WN, Hydrophobic membrane thickness and lipid– protein interactions of the leucine transport system of Lactococcus lactis, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1065 (1991) 203–212, 10.1016/0005-2736(91)90231-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Martens C, Stein RA, Masureel M, Roth A, Mishra S, Dawaliby R, Konijnenberg A, Sobott F, et al. , Lipids modulate the conformational dynamics of a secondary multidrug transporter, 23 (2016) 744–751, 10.1038/nsmb.3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martens C, Shekhar M, Borysik AJ, Lau AM, Reading E, Tajkhorshid E, Booth PJ, Politis A, Direct protein–lipid interactions shape the conformational landscape of secondary transporters, Nat Commun. 9 (2018) 4151, 10.1038/s41467-018-06704-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mirandela GD, Tamburrino G, Hoskisson PA, Zachariae U, Javelle A, The lipid environment determines the activity of the Escherichia coli ammonium transporter AmtB, FASEB J. 33 (2019) 1989–1999, 10.1096/fj.201800782R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alguel Y, Amillis S, Leung J, Lambrinidis G, Capaldi S, Scull NJ, Craven G, Iwata S, et al. , Structure of eukaryotic purine/H+ symporter UapA suggests a role for homodimerization in transport activity, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 1–9, 10.1038/ncomms11336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garaeva AA, Oostergetel GT, Gati C, Guskov A, Paulino C, Slotboom DJ, Cryo-EM structure of the human neutral amino acid transporter ASCT2, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25 (2018) 515–521, 10.1038/s41594-018-0076-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Marek M, Milles S, Schreiber G, Daleke DL, Dittmar G, Herrmann A, Müller P, Pomorski TG, The yeast plasma membrane ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter Aus1: purification, characterization, and the effect of lipids on its activity, J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011) 21835–21843, 10.1074/jbc.M111.244525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Laub KR, Marek M, Stanchev LD, Herrera SA, Kanashova T, Bourmaud A, Dittmar G, Pomorski TG, Purification and characterisation of the yeast plasma membrane ATP binding cassette transporter Pdr11p, PLoS One. 12 (2017), e0184236. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van ’t Klooster JS, Cheng T-Y, Sikkema HR, Jeucken A, Moody B, Poolman B, Periprotein lipidomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae provide a flexible environment for conformational changes of membrane proteins, Elife 9 (2020), e57003. 10.7554/eLife.57003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bianchi F, van Klooster JS, Ruiz SJ, Luck K, Pols T, Urbatsch IL, Poolman B, Asymmetry in inward- and outward-affinity constant of transport explain unidirectional lysine flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sci Rep-Uk. 6 (2016) 31443, 10.1038/srep31443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Den Brink-Van Der Laan E, Antoinette Killian J, De Kruijff B, Nonbilayer lipids affect peripheral and integral membrane proteins via changes in the lateral pressure profile, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1666 (2004) 275–288, 10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van der Rest ME, Kamminga a H., Nakano a, Anraku Y, Poolman B, Konings WN, The plasma membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: structure, function, and biogenesis, Microbiol. Rev. 59 (1995) 304–322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Volkman JK, Sterols and other triterpenoids: source specificity and evolution of biosynthetic pathways, Org Geochem. 36 (2005) 139–159, 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Greenberg ML, Axelrod D, Anomalously slow mobility of fluorescent lipid probes in the plasma membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Membr. Biol. 131 (1993) 115–127, 10.1007/BF02791320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Spira F, Mueller NS, Beck G, von Olshausen P, Beig J, Wedlich-Söldner R, Patchwork organization of the yeast plasma membrane into numerous coexisting domains, Nat Cell Biol. 14 (2012) 640, 10.1038/ncb2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bianchi F, Syga L, Moiset G, Spakman D, Schavemaker PE, Punter CM, Seinen A-B, van Oijen AM, et al. , Steric exclusion and protein conformation determine the localization of plasma membrane transporters, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 501, 10.1038/s41467-018-02864-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gabba M, Frallicciardi J, van ’t Klooster J, Henderson R, Syga L, Mans R, van Maris AJA, Poolman B, Weak acid permeation in synthetic lipid vesicles and across the yeast plasma membrane, Biophys. J. 118 (2020) 422–434, 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heard GM, Fleet GH, The effects of temperature and pH on the growth of yeast species during the fermentation of grape juice, J. Appl. Bacteriol. 65 (1988) 23–28, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb04312.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gray WD, Studies on the alcohol tolerance of yeasts, J. Bacteriol. 42 (1941) 561–574http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16560468. (Accessed 22 October 2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Geertsma ER, Nik Mahmood N. a B, Schuurman-Wolters GK, Poolman B, Membrane reconstitution of ABC transporters and assays of translocator function, Nat. Protoc. 3 (2008) 256–266, 10.1038/nprot.2007.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.BLIGH EG, DYER WJ, A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification, Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37 (1959) 911–917, 10.1139/o59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figures S1-S3

RESOURCES