Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 2021 Jan 28;124(7):1187–1198. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01224-6

The use of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in clinical body imaging to probe cancer metabolism

Ramona Woitek 1,2,3,, Ferdia A Gallagher 1,3
PMCID: PMC8007617  PMID: 33504974

Abstract

Metabolic reprogramming is one of the hallmarks of cancer and includes the Warburg effect, which is exhibited by many tumours. This can be exploited by positron emission tomography (PET) as part of routine clinical cancer imaging. However, an emerging and alternative method to detect altered metabolism is carbon-13 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following injection of hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate. The technique increases the signal-to-noise ratio for the detection of hyperpolarised 13C-labelled metabolites by several orders of magnitude and facilitates the dynamic, noninvasive imaging of the exchange of 13C-pyruvate to 13C-lactate over time. The method has produced promising preclinical results in the area of oncology and is currently being explored in human imaging studies. The first translational studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the technique in patients with prostate, renal, breast and pancreatic cancer, as well as revealing a successful response to treatment in breast and prostate cancer patients at an earlier stage than multiparametric MRI. This review will focus on the strengths of the technique and its applications in the area of oncological body MRI including noninvasive characterisation of disease aggressiveness, mapping of tumour heterogeneity, and early response assessment. A comparison of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI with state-of-the-art multiparametric MRI is likely to reveal the unique additional information and applications offered by the technique.

Subject terms: Cancer imaging, Cancer metabolism

Background

Metabolic reprogramming is a significant hallmark of most cancers. The Warburg effect is an example of this, using aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation to produce ATP, and can be demonstrated visually in many cancer patients by the increased uptake of the glucose analogue [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose using positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) (Fig. 1).1,2 However, [18F]FDG-PET cannot distinguish the individual metabolites produced from the breakdown of glucose, or their cellular compartmentalisation, and provides no direct information on glycolytic flux or mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. In addition, the ionising radiation emitted during PET poses a small potential risk to patients, which is compounded by [18F]FDG-PET typically being performed in conjunction with computed tomography (CT) for localisation and quantification purposes as a hybrid imaging test: the effective dose of a combined PET/CT is ~11 mSv (range 8–24 mSv; ref. 3), which equates to approximately five times the average annual exposure from natural background radiation (~2.3 mSv; refs. 4,5). The increased risk of both cancer and heritable effects due to ionising radiation is ~5% per Sievert (Sv), which is equivalent to ~0.05% for a PET/CT.6 Another limitation of the technique is that [18F]FDG-PET demonstrates low sensitivity in a number of cases: in tumours with limited [18F]FDG uptake, such as prostate cancer;7 in tumours with adjacent high physiological [18F]FDG uptake, such as brain tumours surrounded by normal brain tissue; or in cancer of the prostate neighbouring the bladder.8,9 Furthermore, increased [18F]FDG uptake due to infection or inflammation limits the specificity of the technique but can also be seen as a result of immune infiltration in tumours responding to treatment, thus limiting the accuracy of the technique for early response assessment.10,11

Fig. 1. Glucose metabolism in cancer and its relevance for metabolic imaging.

Fig. 1

Cancer cells frequently demonstrate increased levels of glycolysis including conversion of glucose into pyruvate and subsequently into lactate (the Warburg effect). Consequently, increased import of glucose into tumour cells is maintained by increased expression of glucose transporters (GLUT). The intravenously injected positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose ([18F]FDG) is similarly taken up via the same transporter and also undergoes subsequent phosphorylation catalysed by hexokinase; this phosphorylation prevents its subsequent export from the cell. Hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate can be used to image metabolic alterations further down the glycolytic pathway. Monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs) mediate its uptake into cancer cells, where it undergoes reduction to [1-13C]lactate catalysed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), transamination to [1-13C]alanine by alanine-aminotransferase (ALT), or irreversible oxidative decarboxylation to acetyl Co-A, a reaction catalysed by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH). During the latter oxidation, the hyperpolarised 13C-label is transferred from the carboxyl (C1) position of pyruvate to 13CO2 and is detectable on spectroscopic imaging as bicarbonate (H13CO3). An alternative fate of [1-13C]pyruvate is carboxylation via pyruvate carboxylase (PC) to [1-13C]oxaloacetic acid, which can then be metabolised to [1-13C]malate. Any fumarate that is formed through the reverse fumarase reaction is symmetrical and therefore any subsequent forward exchange via fumarase results in the production of four-carbon intermediates with the 13C-labelling also present at C4 ([4-13C]malate and [4-13C]oxalacetic acid). The metabolites of this pathway have been detected using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in preclinical liver studies;110,111 increased conversion of pyruvate into oxaloacetic acid has been demonstrated in lung and breast cancer using non-imaging studies, which raises important applications for detecting this reaction more generally within tumours.112 However, none of these four-carbon intermediates have been detected in cancer using clinical hyperpolarised 13C-MRI. The 13C-label in the C1 position is shown as yellow circles and in the C4 position as red circles. For clarity, enzymatic cofactors and some of the additional substrates and products have been omitted. Other metabolic alterations relevant for cancer imaging are accumulation of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) due to mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) in the tricarboxylic acid cycle and accumulation of succinate due to succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficiency.

In contrast with PET, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a nonionising technique that is used for studying the structure and function of soft tissues, including tumours.12 Systems that integrate PET with MRI are increasingly being used for clinical body imaging in oncology to correlate metabolic findings with other functional and structural features. PET-MRI has applications in body regions where MRI is superior to CT for demonstrating soft-tissue contrast, such as in rectal, prostate, hepatobiliary and gynaecological cancers, as well as in brain tumours. Advances in attenuation correction and motion correction have helped to establish PET-MRI as a hybrid imaging technology in clinical oncology.13 Furthermore, preclinical data show that a differential response in pyruvate metabolism and [18F]FDG uptake might exist following treatment in some tumour models, suggesting that MRI and PET could have complementary roles that could be exploited in the setting of combined PET-MRI.14

One of the major strengths afforded by MRI is the ability to noninvasively detect and probe the levels of many tissue metabolites simultaneously and distinguish between them using MR spectroscopy (MRS): certain nuclei resonate in a magnetic field at a frequency that is determined by the local chemical environment. MRS using the proton resonance of hydrogen (1H) atoms can facilitate the noninvasive detection, identification and quantification of numerous biochemical compounds or metabolites, such as choline, lactate and many others. Some examples of the use of 1H-MRS for detecting phospholipid metabolism, glycolysis, cellular energetics and altered mitochondrial function in tumours are provided in Box 1. However, the use of 1H-MRS in routine clinical practice is largely limited to specific applications in neuroradiology and prostate cancer, in part due to in the requirements for specialist data acquisition and analysis methods, which are not widely available.32,33

Carbon-13 (13C), a nonradioactive form of carbon found at a natural abundance of 1.1%, can also be detected with MRS. As carbon forms the backbone of many endogenous metabolites, 13C-MRS offers the possibility of noninvasively detecting and probing many metabolic reactions in vivo. However, conventional 13C-MRS is limited by the spatial and temporal resolution that can be achieved, particularly in the clinical setting. In this review, we outline the role for hyperpolarised 13C-MRI, an emerging technique that increases the signal-to-noise ratio for the detection of hyperpolarised 13C-labelled metabolites by several orders of magnitude, focusing on its applications in the area of oncological body MRI including noninvasive characterisation of disease aggressiveness, mapping of tumour heterogeneity and early response assessment.

Box 1.

Tumours frequently display altered phospholipid metabolism, which can be detected using proton (1H) MRS in the form of a prominent signal from choline-containing compounds that are involved in phospholipid metabolism and therefore the cellular membranes that form during tumour proliferation.1517 In breast cancer, for example, high levels of choline-containing molecules involved in phospholipid metabolism result in an increased total choline (tCho) signal, which consists of signals from phosphocholine (PC), glycerophosphocholine (GPC) and free choline.18,19 An increased tCho signal can be observed in malignant breast lesions but not in benign lesions or in normal breast tissue, and has been shown to decrease during neoadjuvant treatment.2022

As a result of the shift towards increased glycolysis and lactate formation in cancers due to the Warburg effect, an elevated lactate signal on 1H-MRS is an indicator of advanced tumour grade and can distinguish cancer recurrence from treatment-related changes.23,24 However, in breast cancer, high levels of fat in the peritumoural mammary tissue make lactate detection using 1H-MRS extremely challenging and this has limited the application of the technique in routine patient care.25

1H-MRS has been shown to differentiate prostate adenocarcinoma from normal tissue using the higher (choline + creatine)/citrate ratio in cancer.26 Metabolites under the creatine peak (Cr) contribute to energy metabolism while citrate is found at high abundance in normal prostate tissue.27 However, despite this, 1H-MRS does not feature in the current Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS v 2.1), although its use in the future has not been precluded.28

The discoveries of metabolic mutations in some cancers, coupled with improvements in image/data acquisition, have allowed 1H-MRS to be applied to the specific detection of tumour-promoting metabolites or oncometabolites. In body imaging, this approach has been applied to the detection of the accumulation of intracellular succinate from succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient tumours including gastrointestinal stromal tumours, paragangliomas and phaeochromocytomas.29,30 Changes in succinate concentration over time have also been demonstrated in patients undergoing therapy.29,30 Moreover, 1H-MRS has been used to detect the accumulation of fumarate in patients with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma, who harbour mutations in the fumarate hydratase gene.31

Hyperpolarised MRI and pyruvate metabolism

Tumour metabolites, such as choline, lactate, succinate and fumarate, can be detected using 1H-MRS because they often give rise to discrete peaks that are present at high concentration, often in the millimolar range. However, metabolites that occur at low concentrations, or which generate overlapping resonance peaks on 1H-MRS, are more difficult to discriminate. By contrast, metabolite peaks detected using 13C-MRS are easier to separate as they are more widely dispersed. The sensitivity for detecting the many metabolic reactions that involve 13C can be significantly enhanced by the oral or intravenous administration of 13C-enriched compounds, and this approach has been applied to both preclinical and clinical research to interrogate a large range of metabolic pathways. Glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, as well as pathways intersecting with these two have been the most widely studied.34

Hyperpolarisation of 13C is an emerging method that increases the signal-to-noise ratio by greater than 104-fold over 13C signal acquired at thermal equilibrium (i.e. nonhyperpolarised).35 The technique of hyperpolarisation involves increasing the nuclear polarisation of a molecule, which consequently increases the available signal that can be acquired using MR. Although polarisation levels for 13C-pyruvate of as high as 70% have been reported using experimental systems, current clinical hyperpolarisers typically polarise molecules of biological interest, such as pyruvate, in the range of 20–30% in the liquid state, which equates to a 105-fold signal enhancement when 13C is imaged at 3 Tesla (T), compared with its thermodynamic polarisation at the same field strength.36,37

The hyperpolarisation process

Hyperpolarisation utilises the principles of dynamic nuclear polarisation (DNP) to polarise a frozen solution in the solid state with subsequent rapid dissolution while preserving polarisation during the transition into the liquid state for eventual injection into patients. The process is shown by the schematic in Fig. 2: at the beginning of the process, endogenous metabolites labelled with 13C are doped with a free radical (electron paramagnetic agent, EPA) to facilitate polarisation by providing unpaired electrons, placed in a magnetic field (typically 3.35–5 T) and cooled to ~1 K (−272 °C). Microwave irradiation at frequencies close to the resonant frequency of the electron spin over 1–2 h is then used to transfer spin polarisation from free electrons to the 13C nuclei in the solid state. Subsequently, the sample is rapidly dissolved using superheated water and the radical is removed for patient studies. After having passed suitability checks for use in patients (e.g. pyruvate concentration, pH, residual EPA concentration, and temperature), the solution containing the hyperpolarised 13C-labelled molecule is then injected intravenously as quickly as can be technically and safely achieved (usually within a minute) to minimise polarisation loss due to the relatively rapid decay of signal as a result of the short lifetime of the hyperpolarised signal (which decays exponentially with a time constant termed T1). Rapid quality checks, injection, and data acquisition are essential to allow insight into metabolic exchange rates and enzymatic activity, as only ~5% of the initial 13C signal remains at three T1s and <1% at five T1s.37

Fig. 2. Schematic of the hyperpolarisation process.

Fig. 2

A solution of 13C-labelled pyruvate is doped with a free radical (electrons show in blue) to facilitate hyperpolarisation, while placed in a magnetic field of around 3.35–5 T, cooled to ~1 K (–272 °C), and irradiated with microwaves. After rapid dissolution and successful quality checks (temperature, pH etc.), the solution can be injected intravenously.

Hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate as a probe

Hyperpolarised 13C is most often incorporated into pyruvate for preclinical and clinical imaging, as it is an endogenous molecule with a number of favourable biological, physical and chemical properties. Pyruvate is a breakdown product of glucose and can be used to probe several important cellular pathways, as it occupies a key position in cell metabolism at the branch point between reduction to lactate in the cytosol and intramitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the citric acid cycle. The low natural abundance of 13C (1.1%), the gyromagnetic ratio of 13C being a quarter that of 1H, and the low endogenous concentration of pyruvate in tissue all mean that detection of the natural abundance of 13C-pyruvate using 13C-MRI is not feasible in a clinical setting—hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate therefore offers a potential solution to this problem. Pyruvate labelled with 13C in the carboxyl position ([1-13C]pyruvate) is most frequently used in vivo for hyperpolarised 13C-MRI, as the time constant for loss of the hyperpolarised signal (T1) is long at clinical field strengths and enables metabolism to be studied over 1–2 min: the T1 of [1-13C]pyruvate is ~60 seconds ex vivo and ~25–30 seconds in vivo.38 Furthermore, low toxicity, rapid intracellular uptake and fast conversion into observable metabolites with a significant chemical shift difference, such as lactate, bicarbonate and alanine, make pyruvate an ideal molecule for clinical use.

Uses of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate

Hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate is injected into patients intravenously at a concentration of 250 mM, which produces an approximate intravascular concentration of ~1–2 mM and a tissue concentration of ~0.1 mM—similar to the physiological concentrations of endogenous pyruvate.39,40 Following transport to the tissue of interest, hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate undergoes rapid intracellular uptake mediated by monocarboxylate transporters (MCTs). Transmembrane transport has been identified in preclinical studies to be rate-limiting for the conversion of extracellular pyruvate into lactate, and the importance of MCT1 is supported by the first clinical studies using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in breast and prostate cancer.4143

The intracellular metabolic fate of pyruvate is outlined in Fig. 1: the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) catalyses the exchange of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate with existing endogenous intracellular lactate, and it is this reaction that will form the focus of this review. The underlying biological mechanisms that determine the detection of the hyperpolarised 13C-lactate signal vary between tumours, and the measured hyperpolarised lactate signal might depend on a variety of factors, including tissue perfusion, membrane transport of pyruvate (MCT1) and enzymatic activity (LDH), as well as the concentration of both the cofactor for the reaction (NADH) and the product, lactate. For example, if the pool of endogenous lactate increases, the hyperpolarised 13C-lactate signal will also increase due to increased 13C-label exchange between pyruvate and the elevated lactate pool, as has been demonstrated in many models in vitro.44

The amino acid alanine, also an end-product of glucose metabolism, is required for protein synthesis and amino acid transformations, and can also be detected following the injection of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate. Alanine-aminotransferase (ALT) catalyses the exchange of pyruvate and glutamate to alanine and α-ketoglutarate. Hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate has been shown to label the endogenous alanine pool in normal muscle, liver and kidney.4547 Although the endogenous concentration of alanine is lower in most tumours than in muscle, the formation of hyperpolarised 13C-alanine has been demonstrated in several preclinical models of cancer, including pancreatic and prostate cancer.48,49 Hyperpolarised 13C-alanine has also been detected in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).50

A third major reaction that can be detected following injection of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate is the irreversible formation of hyperpolarised 13C-carbon dioxide catalysed by the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), which controls pyruvate flux into the mitochondria. The 13C-carbon dioxide subsequently exchanges with 13C-bicarbonate through the action of the enzyme carbonic anhydrase (CA) and, given the greater abundance of bicarbonate compared with carbon dioxide at physiological pH, it is the detection of the former that is used to demonstrate significant PDH activity in vivo. While significant levels of hyperpolarised 13C-bicarbonate can be detected in the brain and the heart following injection of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate,51,52 very little PDH activity exists in most tumours due to a reduction in oxidative phosphorylation. However, bicarbonate formation has been demonstrated in some glycolytic glioblastoma models.53

Image acquisition and analysis of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI data

The acquisition techniques used for the first study of metabolic imaging using hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate in human cancer were mainly 1D and 2D dynamic MRI at a temporal resolution of 3 seconds using echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) to establish the time course of 13C-pyruvate delivery, and 3D EPSI single timepoint acquisitions in subsequent patients with a small field of view (FOV) of 8–10 cm covering the prostate.38 Initial oncological case reports used dynamic 13C chemical shift imaging (CSI) in a single slice every 10 seconds in a patient with breast cancer54 and every 20 seconds for renal cell cancer,55 while 1D dynamic MRI and 2D single timepoint CSI were acquired in a patient with pancreatic cancer.50 The first study investigating hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in different types of breast cancer and early response assessment in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) used IDEAL spiral CSI at a temporal resolution of 4 seconds for dynamic metabolic imaging.43,56 Spectral-spatial excitation is increasingly being used in clinical hyperpolarised 13C-MRI of the prostate and brain as it increases the signal-to-noise ratio for downstream metabolites that are less abundant than pyruvate, while preserving polarisation of the 13C-pyruvate, and can be combined with echo-planar or spiral k-space trajectories.5759

Although the analysis of hyperpolarised 13C-MRS or MRI data acquired at single time points can be accomplished by calculating the 13C-lactate-to-13C-pyruvate ratio, or by dividing 13C-lactate by the total signal from all 13C metabolites, this approach does not take advantage of the dynamic nature of the data generated in temporally resolved 13C studies. Dynamic hyperpolarised 13C-MRI confers the potential to provide absolute quantification of metabolic conversion, regardless of differences in bolus delivery or polarisation level, by using kinetic modelling to estimate a pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate constant (or kPL) or by using computationally simple approaches, such as the area-under-curve (AUC) ratio between 13C-lactate and 13C-pyruvate or 13C-lactate time-to-peak (TTP).6062 Although the majority of modelling approaches require the arterial input of pyruvate to be modelled using an arterial input function, and the time constant for the loss of the hyperpolarised metabolite signal (T1) to be predefined or fitted, an inputless kPL fitting method offers the advantage of not requiring this input function and fits only one or two additional variables, which simplifies the analysis. For example, the lactate magnetisation can be fitted (and optionally the T1 of lactate, T1L, which can also be approximated to that of pyruvate), with the measured pyruvate magnetisation being used as the input for the kinetic model at each timepoint.51,61,63 The inputless method, with its reduced number of fitted parameters, has been shown to be the most robust approach for data where the signal-to-noise is low or where there are different bolus characteristics using both simulated and real data of human prostate cancer, and is therefore very translatable to the real challenges of many clinical studies.61

Consistency in the technical acquisition of data at and between sites is key to the development of the field. Although the development of faster imaging methods that increase the signal-to-noise ratio is important for future clinical applications, these new methods will make comparison between data acquired over time difficult, as they will compare methods acquired over different developmental generations. Furthermore, injection rates can vary between institutions, adding further heterogeneity; indeed, consensus between sites regarding technical acquisition and analysis would be of great value to this field of research. Very few published examples of repeatability studies exist42 and more extensive repeatability and reproducibility research needs to be undertaken.

In conclusion, multicentre studies with homogeneous data acquisition protocols and analysis pipelines whose protocols include repeatability and reproducibility studies will be invaluable for the success of this emerging technique and should be a key priority for groups and centres focusing their research on hyperpolarised 13C-MRI.

Early-stage human data and implications for clinical translation from preclinical studies

The technique of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI has been applied to a range of preclinical cancer models over the past 15 years.14,49,59,6468 The evidence from these studies overwhelmingly indicates an increased exchange of the hyperpolarised 13C-label between the injected pyruvate and the endogenous lactate pool in most cancers that occurs secondary to increased glycolysis as a result of metabolic reprogramming.66 Indeed, several studies have shown positive correlations between increased lactate flux on 13C-MRI and tumour grade and progression in animal models, such as in mouse models of prostate cancer,48 in models of pancreatic preneoplasia/cancer,49 and in the early detection of Myc-driven liver tumours.66 Two clinical studies have shown that increased lactate labelling correlates with increased tumour Gleason grade in prostate cancer and with higher grade breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer.42,43

A second major potential clinical application of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI is the early detection of a successful response to chemotherapy: a reduction in lactate labelling following treatment has been demonstrated across a wide range of tumour models using both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Early metabolic changes seen using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI have been demonstrated between 16 and 48 h after treatment initiation in animal models of breast cancer, colon cancer and lymphoma14,44,67 and in patient-derived xenografts of renal cell cancer.68 In some models, the method has been shown to be more sensitive than [18F]FDG-PET to early-treatment-related changes.14,68 Preliminary evidence exists for a reduction in lactate labelling in conjunction with a successful response to treatment in human prostate cancer, following androgen ablation and chemotherapy and in breast cancer after a single cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.56,69

Although the majority of preclinical models have shown a reduction in lactate labelling following a successful response to treatment, the changes in 13C-label exchange between pyruvate and lactate might depend on the type of treatment and combination of drugs. For example, antiangiogenic drugs might produce paradoxical effects because of changes in the delivery of pyruvate and increased hypoxia, which will elevate lactate, and drugs that affect the availability of NAD(H) will have secondary effects on LDH, given that it is a cofactor for this enzyme.44,70 Although the preclinical results and early-stage human data appear promising, the use of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in routine clinical care and clinical trials will need to be assessed using larger patient studies. Below, we describe the current status of the field and outline the clinical applications in which hyperpolarised 13C-MRI has the potential to inform clinical decision making.

Potential clinical applications of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI

The discussion below focuses on the potential clinical applications of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in oncological body imaging, particularly in prostate, renal, breast and pancreatic cancer. The role of the technique in neurological and cardiological imaging has been reviewed elsewhere39,71 and so will not be discussed here.

Prostate cancer

Although the widespread use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has led to a decrease in cancer-related mortality, there is increasing concern about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant prostate cancer that has a low risk of progression during the natural lifetime of the patient.72 One of the main unmet clinical needs in localised prostate cancer therefore is the stratification of patients in order to receive the most appropriate form of management based on the assessment of tumour aggressiveness e.g. active surveillance (i.e. regular monitoring until treatment is required) or more interventional approaches, such as radical radiotherapy and prostatectomy alone or in combination with antiandrogen therapy and potentially chemotherapy.73

Several approaches currently exist in routine clinical practice for predicting prostate tumour aggressiveness. For example, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) plays an important role in ruling out high Gleason grade disease before treatment and in monitoring the disease by active surveillance.74,75 However, despite advances in conventional mpMRI, there is a need to improve both the sensitivity and specificity of the technique for tumour detection. The sensitivity and specificity can vary widely from 53% to 100% and 32% to 97%, respectively; specificity can be lower than 50% for indeterminate radiological lesions.7679 For example, a meta-analysis reported the specificity of mpMRI and prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS version 2) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer as 62%, when using a cut-off score of ≥4 on PI-RADS, and as low as 29% when using a PI-RADS score of ≥3 (with sensitivities of 90% and 96%, respectively).78 When reported on a per-lesion basis, sensitivities tended to be lower, and ranged between 75% and 85%.80,81 Therefore, new approaches are required to improve the accuracy of disease characterisation. Assessing tumour metabolism might increase the accuracy with which the disease is classified as clinically significant, and 1H-MRS has been used to study tumour metabolism as part of a multiparametric approach, with increased choline and decreased citrate detected in more aggressive tumours. However, 1H-MRS is rarely used clinically and its importance has been de-emphasised in the most up-to-date version of PI-RADS.82 The use of [18F]FDG-PET is limited for the assessment of prostate cancer due to low differential uptake in cancer compared with the normal gland, and the detection of any accumulation in the prostate is often contaminated by high levels of tracer in the adjacent urethra and bladder. In the case of biochemical recurrence (or elevated PSA levels after curative radical prostatectomy), imaging is used to detect and locate early recurrence with the aim of providing curative treatment. mpMRI and targeted PET tracers, such as 18F-fluciclovine and 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), are currently being investigated for their potential in detecting early recurrence.83

Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in patients with prostate cancer has several potential roles, including: improved patient stratification by using 13C-lactate labelling to assess aggressiveness; improving diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of disease progression in patients undergoing active surveillance; and locating disease in the case of biochemical recurrence.84,85

In the seminal first-in-human study of the technology, 31 patients with prostate cancer were successfully injected with hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate to assess the safety and feasibility of the method.38 The results confirmed the preclinical findings of an increased lactate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and an elevated apparent exchange rate constant for the enzyme LDH (kPL) in regions of confirmed prostate cancer, compared with the noncancerous normal gland. In addition, the study provided preliminary evidence that occult low-grade tumours that were not visible on conventional proton mpMRI could be detected by elevated 13C-lactate labelling, indicating potentially increased sensitivity also for the detection of recurrence when compared with conventional proton mpMRI. Granlund et al. reported in 2019 that increased lactate labelling correlates with increased tumour Gleason grade in prostate cancer, a finding that suggests a potential application of 13C-MRI for the prediction of disease progression in patients undergoing active surveillance.42 13C-MRI acquired following injection of hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate in twelve patients with prostate cancer demonstrated good repeatability, with no significant difference in the maximum lactate to total carbon signal (Lacmax) between injections at two time points. There was a significantly higher Lacmax in the tumours compared with the normal gland, and lesion detection was increased using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI compared with 1H-MRI.42

Furthermore, a separate report demonstrated the first clinical case of using the technique for response assessment in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer and a serum PSA level of 25.2 ng/ml (Fig. 3).69 After 6 weeks’ treatment with antiandrogen and chemotherapy, hyperpolarised 13C-MRI of the prostate revealed a demonstrable metabolic response, with a return of the lactate signal-to-noise ratio to normal levels; by contrast, tumour volume on T2-weighted images on MRI decreased only moderately and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) showed only a slight increase, indicating only a modest change in tumour cellularity using this approach. The positive treatment response was clinically confirmed 6 months later, when serum PSA levels had decreased and were no longer measurable.

Fig. 3. Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer.

Fig. 3

Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in a patient with metastatic prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy before and after 6 weeks of treatment initiation.69 Representative axial T2-weighted (T2W) anatomic image and corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) image, T2W image with an overlaid pyruvate-to-lactate metabolic exchange rate (kPL) image and corresponding hyperpolarised 13C spectral array are shown. The 52-year-old prostate cancer patient with extensive high-grade prostate cancer was imaged a before therapy and b 6 weeks after initiation of androgen ablation and chemotherapy. Before treatment, the region of prostate cancer can be clearly seen (red arrows) as a reduction in signal on the T2W and ADC images, and increased hyperpolarised lactate and associated kPL on hyperpolarised 13C-MRI. After initiation of androgen deprivation therapy there was a significant reduction in hyperpolarised lactate and kPL to normal levels, with the prostate volume and ADC showing only a modest response to treatment. Reprinted from European Urology, volume 72, Aggarwal, R., Vigneron, D. B. & Kurhanewicz, J., Hyperpolarized 1-[13C]-pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging detects an early metabolic response to androgen ablation therapy in prostate cancer, pages 1028–1029, Copyright (2017), with permission from Elsevier.

Renal cell carcinoma

The number of early-stage renal cancers that are being detected is increasing, partly due to the rise in the use of cross-sectional imaging such as CT and MRI.86 However, despite the early detection and subsequent treatment of these cancers, there has been no decrease in disease-specific mortality, which suggests that a relevant proportion of these patients might receive overtreatment. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) has many features that render it amenable to assessment with hyperpolarised 13C-MRI: it is highly glycolytic but well perfused, which is ideal for imaging using an intravenous metabolic contrast agent with a short signal lifetime; it is morphologically and genetically heterogeneous, thus providing a model of metabolic heterogeneity; there is increasing evidence that RCC is driven by metabolic dysregulation, and some renal tumours arise from mutations in mitochondrial enzymes, making it an ideal model to study novel tumour metabolism; and alternative methods to image metabolism, such as [18F]FDG-PET, are limited by contamination from renal excretion of the tracer. Furthermore, as RCC has a poor prognosis, both new treatments and imaging methods to monitor response are required.

Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI has the potential to improve treatment selection in patients with ccRCC by noninvasively predicting tumour aggressiveness. This hypothesis is supported by evidence from studies demonstrating that the expression of LDHA, which encodes a subunit of LDH, correlated positively with tumour grade and negatively with progression-free survival and overall survival.87 As hyperpolarised pyruvate and13C-MRI assesses a reaction catalysed by the enzyme LDH, the imaged lactate is likely to correlate with tumour grade and outcome as well. Noninvasive prediction of tumour aggressiveness and patient stratification using current state-of-the-art imaging techniques has poor accuracy, and invasive diagnostic approaches suffer from low sensitivity: biopsy samples have been shown to frequently undergrade RCCs due to the high degree of intratumoural heterogeneity, and up to eight biopsy samples are required to fully evaluate driver mutational status.88 Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI might therefore also provide a powerful tool to target tissue sampling and to provide a metabolic readout to be used in conjunction with the biopsied tissue to minimise undersampling and undergrading.

Preliminary case reports on the use of dynamic hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in ccRCC have shown promise.55,89 The results have demonstrated spatial variation in the lactate signal across these tumours, which corresponds to the ex vivo measurements of tissue lactate: for example, in multiple tumour biopsy samples obtained both intraoperatively and from the nephrectomy specimens of patients who had previously undergone hyperpolarised 13C-MRI of the tumour, the tissue lactate concentration measured using liquid-chromatography mass-spectrometry (LCMS) correlated significantly with the lactate signal-to-noise ratio using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI, both in intraoperative and post-nephrectomy samples, thus demonstrating biologic validity of the method for the first time in humans.55,89

Breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly gaining importance in the treatment of early breast cancer and is an important clinical area in which hyperpolarised 13C-MRI could be used as a tool for early response assessment, as well as having a potentially significant impact on clinical decision making. A 2018 meta-analysis has demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast-conservation rates without compromising on distant recurrence, breast cancer survival or overall survival (OS).90 Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS) and OS, especially in patients with HER2+ breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).91,92 An additional benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is that it allows any response to therapy to be assessed in vivo, while the tumour is still measurable: the clinical response assessment is currently largely based on monitoring the maximum tumour diameter using routine clinical radiological examinations.93

However, the prediction of successful response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still a significant clinical challenge. At present MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for the assessment of tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy,94 and several meta-analyses indicate pooled sensitivities for the identification of residual tumour after completion of preoperative therapy in patients, that range between 83% and 88% and pooled specificities of 54–83%.95,96 As in the case of mpMRI of the prostate, additional approaches are required to improve sensitivity and specificity. DWI MRI and [18F]FDG-PET have shown promise in predicting pCR at earlier time points during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Identifying nonresponders at this early timepoint would be highly desirable to allow their management to be changed (for example, to early surgery) in order to minimise the risk of metastases from chemoresistant cells and to reduce the side effects of prolonged but ineffective chemotherapy. It has been demonstrated that the addition of the ADC measured with DWI to standard functional tumour volume assessed on contrast-enhanced MRI showed improvement in the prediction of treatment response in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and TNBC, increasing the overall AUC from 0.76 to 0.81 at post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.97 When [18F]FDG-PET is performed in conjunction with MRI, the sensitivity and specificity have reached up to 100% and 71%, respectively, after only one cycle of chemotherapy.98 By contrast, 3ʹ-deoxy-3ʹ-[18F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET has been shown to only weakly predict pCR after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.99 Despite initial promising results for a role for 1H-MRS in monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in which an early decrease in tCho indicated a good response to therapy between 24 h after the initial dose and after 1–2 cycles,22,100 it has only shown limited predictive power for pCR or radiological response.32 1H-MRS is also technically challenging in the setting of a multicentre trial, partly due to long acquisition times and limited technical support on clinical scanners and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS).

New imaging methods are therefore required to predict the response to therapy sooner and more accurately, which would be desirable for clinical decision making. Such new methods are particularly important for combinational and targeted drug regimens used clinically, and also as companion biomarkers within clinical trials investigating novel targeted agents such as poly-ADP-ribosyl polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus, immune checkpoint inhibitors and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors.

Metabolic readouts could enable a very early assessment of successful response to therapy, given the downstream convergence of these pathways towards alterations in glycolytic reactions,101 making hyperpolarised 13C-MRI a promising tool to study metabolic changes in response to therapy. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that a decrease in label exchange between pyruvate and lactate can be detected in animal models of breast cancer as soon as 24 h after initiation of successful treatment67 and have provided evidence that hyperpolarised 13C-MRI might be more sensitive to very early-treatment-related metabolic changes than [18F]FDG-PET.14

A first clinical hyperpolarised 13C-MRI study in patients with early breast cancer demonstrated varying levels of lactate signal-to-noise ratio and lactate-to-pyruvate ratio across different tumour subtypes. Higher lactate signal-to-noise ratio was observed in the more aggressive and TNBC tumours, which makes these tumours potential candidates for early response assessment43 (Fig. 4). These more aggressive tumours are more likely to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy, thus supporting the potential use of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in this context. The metabolic intratumoural heterogeneity observed in TNBC using hyperpolarised 13C-MRI could make this approach a potential prognostic imaging biomarker, as several genomic studies have demonstrated that high levels of intratumoural heterogeneity are associated with poor prognosis, which might be due to a decreased immune response.102 The clinical hyperpolarised 13C-MRI study showed a significant correlation between the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio and the levels of MCT1, thus providing a biochemical mechanism for the variation in lactate labelling in breast cancer.43 Furthermore, the lactate-to-pyruvate ratio also correlated with tumour volume and the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α, suggesting that hypoxia might account for the increased lactate labelling in larger breast tumours.

Fig. 4. Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in a case of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Fig. 4

a Coronal T1 3D spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) MRI image. b Coronally reformatted DCE image at peak enhancement after intravenous injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. c Summed hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate and d summed hyperpolarised 13C-lactate images. The area of low 13C-pyruvate and 13C-lactate signals in the centre of the tumour are likely to correspond to an area with low enhancement on DCE. e LAC/PYR map showing intratumoural heterogeneity. The dominant intratumoural heterogeneity was concordant between the DCE-MRI and hyperpolarised 13C-MRI images and represents decreased delivery of both the gadolinium-based contrast agent and 13C-pyruvate to the centre of the tumour. f, g Dynamic hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate and 13C-lactate images acquired over 15 time points after intravenous injection of hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate (delay = 12 seconds; temporal resolution = 4 seconds). h Top: 13C metabolite spectrum from a coronal dynamic IDEAL spiral CSI slice covering the tumour summed over 15 time points; Bottom: The axial image from the equivalent DCE-MRI data was taken at the timepoint of maximum tumour enhancement. ppm parts per million, IC NST invasive cancer of no specific type. This Figure was reproduced from43 (10.1073/pnas.1913841117), licenced under CC-BY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

The first report of assessing treatment response with hyperpolarised 13C-MRI in a patient with TNBC showed that an early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be demonstrated as a 34% decrease in 13C-lactate labelling after a single treatment cycle, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and pharmacokinetic modelling did not clearly identify treatment response at this timepoint.56 Future larger studies are required to more fully assess the role of the technique in this context.

Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterised by high morbidity, with 5-year survival rates as low as 10%. More than 50% of patients are diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer and undergo palliative treatment while only 10–20% are diagnosed with early-stage disease that is suitable for potentially curative surgery.103 The pancreatic tumour niche is characterised by high interstitial pressure, dense fibrotic stroma, low tumour cellularity, and reduced vasculature.104,105 To overcome local nutrient sparsity, PDAC engages in metabolic crosstalk, with tumour cells deriving some of their nutrients from other intratumoural cell populations.106 For example, lactate might be secreted by hypoxic tumour cells and taken up by cancer cells in normoxic portions of the tumour to fuel proliferation.107

Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI has the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy when characterising lesions that are incidentally detected on imaging and could guide management in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a similar way to that described for breast cancer. In a preclinical study in murine models of pancreatic preneoplasia and invasive cancers, hyperpolarised 13C-MRI was been shown to detect preneoplasia based on an altered alanine-to-lactate ratio and was able to distinguish between invasive and noninvasive lesions based on this semiquantitative parameter.49 In a first clinical report of two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had undergone several cycles of chemotherapy, the pancreatic adenocarcinoma could still be distinguished from the adjacent normal tissue based on elevated lactate levels due to increased levels of glycolysis and elevated alanine levels (Fig. 5).50 The increase in the levels of alanine might be due to its secretion by exocrine stellate cells as a nutrient for adenocarcinoma cells in a hypoxic and nutrient-deprived tumour environment.108,109

Fig. 5. Hyperpolarised 13C-MRI on a patient with pancreatic cancer.

Fig. 5

Top row: anatomical axial slice showing the pancreatic tumour (white arrow) and the exocrine pancreas (purple arrow); the green region of interest outlines the whole pancreas. The ADC is greatly reduced in the tumour tissue. Bottom row: high [1‐13C]pyruvate, [1‐13C]lactate and [1‐13C]alanine signals were observed in the pancreatic tumour, with images acquired >30 sec after injection of hyperpolarised [1‐13C]pyruvate. The spectrum acquired in the area of the pancreatic cancer shows [1‐13C]pyruvate, [1‐13C]lactate and [1‐13C]alanine peaks. Reprinted from50 with permission from John Wiley & Sons.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Results from preclinical studies indicate that hyperpolarised 13C-MRI has a number of potential clinical applications: tumour characterisation based on their metabolic profile; noninvasive tumour grading; targeting of the most aggressive tumour regions in the presence of heterogeneity and assessment of treatment response sooner than is attainable using current state-of-the-art imaging methods. For hyperpolarised 13C-MRI to transition from a research tool to a robust and reliable clinical imaging method for probing cancer metabolism, technical and biological validation of the procedure is required. Quantitative and semiquantitative metrics of hyperpolarised 13C-pyruvate metabolism need to be correlated with invasive results from tissue analysis to understand the biological drivers for the imaging measurements. For example, comparing the hyperpolarised 13C-lactate signal to the endogenous lactate pool and the expression of MCTs or LDH will help to reveal the biochemical mechanisms involved in different tumour types: i.e. to determine whether membrane transport of the 13C-labelled pyruvate or enzyme mediated 13C-label exchange between pyruvate and lactate is the dominant factor in each case. Comparison of hyperpolarised 13C-MRI with state-of-the-art imaging for cancer detection will help to establish the added value of imaging metabolism over conventional anatomical and functional imaging methods. Repeatability and reproducibility studies are required to understand how variable the technique is and the magnitude of the change in tissue metabolism that is required for detection. Furthermore, harmonisation of acquisition and analysis methods will aid multicentre trials that are required to establish the clinical role of the technique.60,61

The field of clinical hyperpolarised 13C-MRI faces many challenges: the complexity of the clinical kits used for injectable hyperpolarised pyruvate solutions; the requirements for determining quality assurance for human use; optimising acquisition, analysis and quantification of dynamic metabolite measurements due to rapid signal decay; inherent low spatial resolution; as well as requirements for adequate repeatability and reproducibility. To accomplish full translation and integration into clinical cancer imaging, these challenges need to be overcome and hyperpolarised 13C-MRI needs to be integrated into clinical trials alongside state-of-the art imaging so that both, 13C-MRI and conventional imaging can be directly compared with clinical outcome measures such as response and survival. These trial designs will allow not only allow the clinical utility of the technique to be evaluated, but also the potential to affect treatment decisions and patient management. The next step will be to incorporate hyperpolarised 13C-MRI into treatment decision-making endpoints within these trials; positive results from such studies would allow full integration into clinical care.59 The area of cancer imaging where the evidence for this translation is most promising is the assessment of early response; however, the ideal timepoint for assessing these metabolic endpoints needs to be identified, such that it is early enough to provide clinical advantage over conventional imaging but late enough to reliably and specifically identify nonresponders. Future multicentre trials of the technology will address these important clinical questions.

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable

Author contributions

R.W. and F.A.G.: literature research, manuscript writing and review.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable

Data availability

Not applicable

Competing interests

F.A.G. holds a research agreement with GE Healthcare.

Funding information

The funding was provided by Cancer Research UK, the Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre (Grant C9685/A25177).

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wong, W. L., Sanghera, B., Cronin, B. Positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT). In: Nicholson T. (ed). Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, Second edition. (The Royal College of Radiologists, London, 2014).
  • 4.Shrimpton PC, Jansen JTM, Harrison JD. Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review. Br. J. Radiol. 2016;89:20150346. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/arsac-notes-for-guidance. (2020). [PubMed]
  • 6.International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37, 1–332 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Chetan MR, Barrett T, Gallagher FA. Clinical significance of prostate 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a five-year review. World J. Radiol. 2017;9:350–358. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i9.350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J. Nucl. Med. 1998;39:990–995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heiss WD, Raab P, Lanfermann H. Multimodality assessment of brain tumors and tumor recurrence. J. Nucl. Med. 2011;52:1585–1600. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.084210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J. Nucl. Med. 2001;42:1412–1417. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Bormans G, Balzarini J, Verhoef G, et al. [18F]FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy: Does [18F]FDG uptake correlate with the viable tumour cell fraction? Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2003;30:682–688. doi: 10.1007/s00259-003-1120-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gallagher FA. An introduction to functional and molecular imaging with MRI. Clin. Radiol. 2010;65:557–66.. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2010.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Broski SM, Goenka AH, Kemp BJ, Johnson GB. Clinical PET/MRI: 2018 update. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018;211:295–313. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hesketh RL, Wang J, Wright AJ, Lewis DY, Denton AE, Grenfell R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than PET for detecting treatment-induced cell death-dependent changes in glycolysis. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3557–3569. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gadian D. G. NMR and Its Application to Living Systems, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
  • 16.Mansour SM, Gomma MMM, Shafik PN. Proton MR spectroscopy and the detection of malignancy in ovarian masses. Br. J. Radiol. 2019;92:20190134. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bulik M, Jancalek R, Vanicek J, Skoch A, Mechl M. Potential of MR spectroscopy for assessment of glioma grading. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2013;115:146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.O’Flynn EAM, DeSouza NM. Functional magnetic resonance: biomarkers of response in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:204. doi: 10.1186/bcr2815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheng M, Bhujwalla ZM, Glunde K. Targeting phospholipid metabolism in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2016;6:266. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang X, Wang XJ, Song HS, Chen LH. 1H-MRS evaluation of breast lesions by using total choline signal-to-noise ratio as an indicator of malignancy: a meta-analysis. Med. Oncol. 2015;32:160. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0603-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baltzer PAT, Dietzel M. Breast lesions: diagnosis by using proton MR spectroscopy at 1.5 and 3.0 T-systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267:735–746. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meisamy S, Bolan PJ, Baker EH, Bliss RL, Gulbahce E, Everson LI, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of locally advanced breast cancer: predicting response with in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopy-a pilot study at 4 T. Radiology. 2004;233:424–431. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2332031285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Faghihi R, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Mosleh-Shirazi M-A, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Lotfi M, Jalli R, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and its clinical applications: a review. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2017;48:233–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crain ID, Elias PS, Chapple K, Scheck AC, Karis JP, Preul MC. Improving the utility of 1H-MRS for the differentiation of glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis. J. Neurooncol. 2017;133:97–105. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2407-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magnitsky S, Belka GK, Sterner C, Pickup S, Chodosh LA, Glickson JD. Lactate detection in inducible and orthotopic Her2/neu mammary gland tumours in mouse models. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:35–42. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fütterer JJ, Heijmink SWTPJ, Scheenen TWJ, Veltman J, Huisman HJ, Vos P, et al. Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 2006;241:449–458. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2412051866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Costello LC, Franklin RB, Narayan P. Citrate in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Prostate. 1999;38:237–245. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0045(19990215)38:3<237::aid-pros8>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:340–351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lussey-Lepoutre C, Bellucci A, Morin A, Buffet A, Amar L, Janin M, et al. In vivo detection of succinate by magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a hallmark of SDHx mutations in paraganglioma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:1120–1129. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Casey RT, McLean MA, Madhu B, Challis BG, Ten Hoopen R, Roberts T, et al. Translating in vivo metabolomic analysis of succinate dehydrogenase deficient tumours into clinical utility. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2:1–12. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Casey RT, McLean MA, Challis BG, McVeigh TP, Warren AY, Mendil L, et al. Fumarate metabolic signature for the detection of reed syndrome in humans. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:391–396. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bolan PJ, Kim E, Herman BA, Newstead GM, Rosen MA, Schnall MD, et al. MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2017;46:290–302. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Manias KA, Harris LM, Davies NP, Natarajan K, MacPherson L, Foster K, et al. Prospective multicentre evaluation and refinement of an analysis tool for magnetic resonance spectroscopy of childhood cerebellar tumours. Pediatr. Radiol. 2018;48:1630–1641. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4182-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sherry, A. D. & Malloy, C. R. in eMagRes pp 885–900 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2016).
  • 35.Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:10158–63.. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ardenkjær‐Larsen JH, Bowen S, Petersen JR, Rybalko O, Vinding MS, Ullisch M, et al. Cryogen‐free dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization polarizer operating at 3.35 T, 6.70 T, and 10.1 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:2184–2194. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keshari KR, Wilson DM. Chemistry and biochemistry of 13 C hyperpolarized magnetic resonance using dynamic nuclear polarization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:1627–1659. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60124b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nelson SJ, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Larson PEZ, Harzstark AL, Ferrone M, et al. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5:198ra108. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grist JT, Miller JJ, Zaccagna F, McLean MA, Riemer F, Matys T, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: a novel approach for probing cerebral metabolism in health and neurological disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:1137–1147. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20909045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moreno KX, Sabelhaus SM, Merritt ME, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. Competition of pyruvate with physiological substrates for oxidation by the heart: implications for studies with hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Am. J. Physiol. Hear Circ. Physiol. 2010;298:H1556. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00656.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Harris T, Eliyahu G, Frydman L, Degani H. Kinetics of hyperpolarized 13C1-pyruvate transport and metabolism in living human breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:18131–18136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909049106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Granlund KL, Tee SS, Vargas HA, Lyashchenko SK, Reznik E, Fine S, et al. Hyperpolarized MRI of human prostate cancer reveals increased lactate with tumor grade driven by monocarboxylate transporter 1. Cell Metab. 2020;31:105–114.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gallagher FA, Woitek R, McLean MA, Gill AB, Garcia RM, Provenzano E, et al. Imaging breast cancer using hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:2092–2098. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913841117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Day SE, Kettunen MI, Gallagher FA, Hu D-E, Lerche M, Wolber J, et al. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat. Med. 2007;13:1382–1387. doi: 10.1038/nm1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu S, Chen AP, Zierhut ML, Bok R, Yen YF, Schroeder MA, et al. In vivo carbon-13 dynamic MRS and MRSI of normal and fasted rat liver with hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2009;11:399–407. doi: 10.1007/s11307-009-0218-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Søgaard LV, Schilling F, Janich MA, Menzel MI, Ardenkjær-Larsen JH. In vivo measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients of hyperpolarized 13C-labeled metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2014;27:561–569. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schmidt R, Laustsen C, Dumez J, Kettunen M, Serrao E, Marco-Rius I, et al. In vivo single-shot 13C spectroscopic imaging of hyperpolarized metabolites by spatiotemporal encoding. J. Magn. Reson. 2014;240:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Zierhut ML, Zhang VY, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C lactate, pyruvate, and alanine: noninvasive biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and grading. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8607–8615. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Serrao EM, Kettunen MI, Rodrigues TB, Dzien P, Wright AJ, Gopinathan A, et al. MRI with hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate detects advanced pancreatic preneoplasia prior to invasive disease in a mouse model. Gut. 2016;65:465–475. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stødkilde‐Jørgensen H, Laustsen C, Hansen ESS, Schulte R, Ardenkjaer‐Larsen JH, Comment A, et al. Pilot study experiences with hyperpolarized [1‐ 13 C]pyruvate MRI in pancreatic cancer patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2020;51:961–963. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Grist JT, McLean MA, Riemer F, Schulte RF, Deen SS, Zaccagna F, et al. Quantifying normal human brain metabolism using hyperpolarized [1–13C]pyruvate and magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2019;189:171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cunningham CH, Lau JYC, Chen AP, Geraghty BJ, Perks WJ, Roifman I, et al. Hyperpolarized 13 C metabolic MRI of the human heartnovelty and significance. Circ. Res. 2016;119:1177–1182. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Park JM, Spielman DM, Josan S, Jang T, Mercahant M, Hurd RE, et al. Hyperpolarized (13)C-lactate to (13)C-bicarbonate ratio as a biomarker for monitoring the acute response of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:650–659. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Abeyakoon O, Latifoltojar A, Gong F, Papoutsaki M-V, Chowdhury R, Glaser M, et al. Hyperpolarised 13 C MRI: a new horizon for non-invasive diagnosis of aggressive breast cancer. BJR Case Rep. 2019;5:20190026. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20190026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tran M, Latifoltojar A, Neves JB, Papoutsaki M-V, Gong F, Comment A, et al. First-in-human in vivo non-invasive assessment of intra-tumoral metabolic heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma. BJR Case Rep. 2019;5:20190003. doi: 10.1259/bjrcr.20190003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Woitek R, McLean M, Gill AB, Grist JT, Provenzano E, Patterson AJ, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C-MRI of tumor metabolism demonstrates early metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Radiol. Imaging Cancer. 2020;2:e200017. doi: 10.1148/rycan.2020200017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gordon JW, Chen HY, Autry A, Park I, Van Criekinge M, Mammoli D, et al. Translation of Carbon-13 EPI for hyperpolarized MR molecular imaging of prostate and brain cancer patients. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:2702–2709. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chen HY, Larson PEZ, Gordon JW, Bok RA, Ferrone M, van Criekinge M, et al. Technique development of 3D dynamic CS-EPSI for hyperpolarized 13 C pyruvate MR molecular imaging of human prostate cancer. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;80:2062–2072. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Bankson JA, Brindle K, Cunningham CH, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: path to clinical translation in oncology. Neoplasia. 2019;21:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Daniels CJ, McLean MA, Schulte RF, Robb FJ, Gill AB, McGlashan N, et al. A comparison of quantitative methods for clinical imaging with hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:387–399. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Larson PEZ, Chen H-Y, Gordon JW, Korn N, Maidens J, Arcak M, et al. Investigation of analysis methods for hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate metabolic MRI in prostate cancer patients. NMR Biomed. 2018;31:e3997. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hill DK, Orton MR, Mariotti E, Boult JKR, Panek R, Jafar M, et al. Model free approach to kinetic analysis of real-time hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e71996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wiesinger F, Weidl E, Menzel MI, Janich MA, Khegai O, Glaser SJ, et al. IDEAL spiral CSI for dynamic metabolic MR imaging of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Magn. Reson. Med. 2012;68:8–16. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang ZJ, Ohliger MA, Larson PEZ, Gordon JW, Bok RA, Slater J, et al. Hyperpolarized 13C MRI: state of the art and future directions. Radiology. 2019;291:273–284. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gutte H, Hansen AE, Johannesen HH, Clemmensen AE, Ardenkjær-Larsen JH, Nielsen CH, et al. The use of dynamic nuclear polarization 13C-pyruvate MRS in cancer. Am. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015;5:548–560. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hu S, Balakrishnan A, Bok RA, Anderton B, Larson PEZ, Nelson SJ, et al. 13C-pyruvate imaging reveals alterations in glycolysis that precede c-Myc-induced tumor formation and regression. Cell Metab. 2011;14:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Witney TH, Kettunen MI, Hu D, Gallagher FA, Bohndiek SE, Napolitano R, et al. Detecting treatment response in a model of human breast adenocarcinoma using hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate and [1,4-13C2]fumarate. Br. J. Cancer. 2010;103:1400–1406. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Dong, Y., Eskandari, R., Ray, C., Granlund, K. L., Dos Santos-Cunha, L., Miloushev, V. Z. et al. Hyperpolarized MRI visualizes warburg effects and predicts treatment response to mTOR inhibitors in patient-derived ccRCC xenograft models. Cancer Res. 79, 242–250 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 69.Aggarwal R, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Hyperpolarized 1-[13C]-pyruvate magnetic resonance imaging detects an early metabolic response to androgen ablation therapy in prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2017;72:1028–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ravoori MK, Singh SP, Lee J, Bankson JA, Kundra V. In vivo assessment of ovarian tumor response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor pazopanib by using hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate MR spectroscopy and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in a mouse model. Radiology. 2017;285:830–838. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lewis AJM, Tyler DJ, Rider O. Clinical cardiovascular applications of hyperpolarized magnetic resonance. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2020;34:231–240. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06942-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TLJ, Zappa M, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2014;384:2027–35.. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. NG131. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng131/chapter/Recommendations. (2020).
  • 74.Patel KM, Gnanapragasam VJ. Novel concepts for risk stratification in prostate cancer. J. Clin. Urol. 2016;9:18–23. doi: 10.1177/2051415816673502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Barrett T, Haider MA. The emerging role of MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance and ongoing challenges. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017;208:131–139. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Barrett T, Riemer F, McLean MA, Kaggie J, Robb F, Tropp JS, et al. Quantification of total and intracellular sodium concentration in primary prostate cancer and adjacent normal prostate tissue with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Radiol. 2018;53:450–456. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.De Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014;202:343–351. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Woo S, Suh CH, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Diagnostic performance of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. 2017;72:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Turkbey B, Albert PS, Kurdziel K, Choyke PL. Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;192:1471–1480. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Greer MD, Lay N, Shih JH, Barrett T, Bittencourt LK, Borofsky S, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis prior to conventional interpretation of prostate mpMRI: an international multi-reader study. Eur. Radiol. 2018;28:4407–4417. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5374-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S, Bernardo M, Greer MD, Mertan FV, et al. What are we missing? False- negative cancers at multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate. Radiology. 2018;286:186–195. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017152877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cai W, Zhu D, Byanju S, Chen J, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in diagnosis of suspicious prostate cancer. Medicine. 2019;98:e14891. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Calais J, Ceci F, Eiber M, Hope TA, Hofman MS, Rischpler C, et al. 18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1286–1294. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30415-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hötker AM, Mazaheri Y, Zheng J, Moskowitz CS, Berkowitz J, Lantos JE, et al. Prostate Cancer: Assessing the effects of androgen-deprivation therapy using quantitative multi-parametric MRI. Eur. Radiol. 2015;25:2665. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3688-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim AY, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK. Diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate for changes from androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014;203:W645–W650. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Turner RM, Morgan TM, Jacobs BL, Jacobs BL. Epidemiology of the small renal mass and the treatment disconnect phenomenon. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2017;44:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Girgis H, Masui O, White NM, Scorilas A, Rotondo F, Seivwright A, et al. Lactate Dehydrogenase A is a potential prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mol. Cancer. 2014;13:101. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Horswell S, Chambers T, et al. Deterministic evolutionary trajectories influence primary tumor growth: TRACERx renal. Cell. 2018;173:595–610.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ursprung, S., Crispin-Ortuzar, M., Woitek, R., McLean, M. A., Priest, A. N., Gehrung, M. et al. Imaging of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in renal cell carcinoma with hyperpolarized carbon-13 MRI. in Presented at the World Molecular Imaging Congress in Montreal. (2019).
  • 90.Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) B. Barlow W, Bartlett J, Bergh J, Bergsten-Nordström E, Bliss J, et al. Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:27–39. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Esserman LJ, Berry DA, DeMichele A, Carey L, Davis SE, Buxton M, et al. Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL—CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:3242–3249. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.2779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, Sharma C, Greenup RA, Reynolds KL, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020;26:2838–2848. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chagpar AB, Middleton LP, Sahin AA, Dempsey P, Buzdar AU, Mirza AN, et al. Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. 2006;243:257–264. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000197714.14318.6f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Fowler AM, Mankoff DA, Joe BN. Imaging neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer. Radiology. 2017;285:358–375. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, Sardanelli F, Irwig L, Mamounas EP, et al. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:321–333. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sheikhbahaei S, Trahan TJ, Xiao J, Taghipour M, Mena E, Connolly RM, et al. FDG-PET/CT and MRI for evaluation of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Oncologist. 2016;21:931–939. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Li W, Newitt DC, Wilmes LJ, Jones EF, Arasu V, Gibbs J, et al. Additive value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2019;50:1742–1753. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cho N, Im SA, Cheon GJ, Park IA, Lee KH, Kim TY, et al. Integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI in breast cancer: early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2018;45:328–339. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3849-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kostakoglu L, Duan F, Idowu MO, Jolles PR, Bear HD, Muzi M, et al. A phase II study of 3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidine PET in the assessment of early response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from ACRIN 6688. J. Nucl. Med. 2015;56:1681–1689. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Baek H-M, Chen J-H, Nalcioglu O, Su M-Y. Proton MR spectroscopy for monitoring early treatment response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann. Oncol. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 2008;19:1022–1024. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McCann KE, Hurvitz SA, McAndrew N. Advances in targeted therapies for triple-negative breast cancer. Drugs. 2019;79:1217–1230. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01155-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.McDonald K-A, Kawaguchi T, Qi Q, Peng X, Asaoka M, Young J, et al. Tumor heterogeneity correlates with less immune response and worse survival in breast cancer patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019;26:2191–2199. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07338-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1605–1617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chu GC, Kimmelman AC, Hezel AF, DePinho RA. Stromal biology of pancreatic cancer. J. Cell Biochem. 2007;101:887–907. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Provenzano PP, Cuevas C, Chang AE, Goel VK, Von Hoff DD, Hingorani SR. Enzymatic targeting of the stroma ablates physical barriers to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:418–429. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ying H, Kimmelman AC, Lyssiotis CA, Hua S, Chu GC, Fletcher-Sananikone E, et al. Oncogenic Kras maintains pancreatic tumors through regulation of anabolic glucose metabolism. Cell. 2012;149:656–670. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Guillaumond F, Leca J, Olivares O, Lavaut M-N, Vidal N, Berthezene P, et al. Strengthened glycolysis under hypoxia supports tumor symbiosis and hexosamine biosynthesis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3919–3924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219555110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Biancur DE, Kimmelman AC. The plasticity of pancreatic cancer metabolism in tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2018;1870:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sousa CM, Biancur DE, Wang X, Halbrook CJ, Sherman MH, Zhang L, et al. Pancreatic stellate cells support tumour metabolism through autophagic alanine secretion. Nature. 2016;536:479–483. doi: 10.1038/nature19084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lee P, Leong W, Tan T, Lim M, Han W, Radda GK. In vivo hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveals increased pyruvate carboxylase flux in an insulin-resistant mouse model. Hepatology. 2013;57:515–524. doi: 10.1002/hep.26028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jin, E. S., Moreno, K. X., Wang, J.-X., Fidelino, L., Merritt, M. E., Sherry, A. D. et al. Metabolism of hyperpolarized [1-(13)C]pyruvate through alternate pathways in rat liver. NMR Biomed. 29, 466–474 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 112.Lao-On U, Attwood PV, Jitrapakdee S. Roles of pyruvate carboxylase in human diseases: from diabetes to cancers and infection. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 2018;96:237–247. doi: 10.1007/s00109-018-1622-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable


Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES