Abstract
With the increasing demand for antimicrobial agents and the spread of antibiotic resistance in pathogens, the exploitation of plant oils to partly replace antibiotic emerges as an important source of fine chemicals, functional food utility and pharmaceutical industries. This work introduces a novel catalytic method of plant oils hydroxylation by Fe(III) citrate monohydrate (Fe3+-cit.)/Na2S2O8 catalyst. Methyl (9Z,12Z)-octadecadienoate (ML) was selected as an example of vegetable oils hydroxylation to its hydroxy-conjugated derivatives (CHML) in the presence of a new complex of Fe(II)-species. Methyl 9,12-di-hydroxyoctadecanoate 1, methyl-9-hydroxyoctadecanoate 2 and methyl (10E,12E)-octadecanoate 3 mixtures is produced under optimized condition with oxygen balloon. The specific hydroxylation activity was lower in the case of using Na2S2O8 alone as a catalyst. A chemical reaction has shown the main process converted of plantoils hydroxylation and (+ 16 Da) of OH- attached at the methyl linoleate (ML-OH). HPLC and MALDI-ToF-mass spectrometry were employed for determining the obtained products. It was found that adding oxidizing agents (Na2S2O8) to Fe3+ in the MeCN mixture with H2O would generate the new complex of Fe(II)-species, which improves the C-H activation. Hence, the present study demonstrated a new functional method for better usage of vegetable oils.Producing conjugated hydroxy-fatty acids/esters with better antipathogenic properties. CHML used in food industry, It has a potential pathway to food safety and packaging process with good advantages, fundamental to microbial resistance. Lastly, our findings showed that biological monitoring of CHML-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) inhibited growth of various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in vitro study. The produced CHML profiles were comparable to the corresponding to previousstudies and showed improved the inhibition efficiency over the respective kanamycin derivatives.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13065-021-00748-z.
Keywords: Hydroxy-fatty acids/esters, Functional method, Catalyst, Anti-pathogens, Growth-inhibition
Introduction
Diverse functions of vegetable oils have attracted their attention for fossil feedstock and industrial applications as renewable biomass to partly replace the fossil resources [1–6]. The hydroxylated plant oils have a potential usage for industrial applications, especially in food industries, due to their lower energy consumption, lesser processing steps. Plants oil conjugates have been used as additives in food, for example; butter, margarine, cooking oils and salad oils, as well as fatty acids supplemental food, biodiesel, paints, greases, and lubricants. However, there have been continued shifts from food to industrial consumption [7–12]. In our previous studies, we reported that the transformation process of fatty acid is based on the reaction of isomerization and/or oxidation to corresponding keto-fatty acids/esters isomers with Pd(II)/Lewis acid catalyst [13, 14]. However, the hydroxy fatty acids containing one or more than one hydroxyl (–OH) groups are remarkable owing to their essential chemical and physical properties. These compounds have diverse industrial and marketing applications, including in food-, cosmetic- and pharmaceutical products [15]. Hydroxy fatty acids also possess suitable applications for paintings, plastics, nylon and carbon source of medicine due to their therapeutic activities [15–18]. For example, 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid has strong antifungal activities, and it can also be used as an anticancer agent.[19]. Furthermore, hydroxy-methyl linoleate was produced from plant resources by microbial catalyst and hydroxylation of oleic acid with Selenium dioxide-tert-Butyl-hydro peroxide under harsh condition in 72 h [20]. Chang and co-workers reported that the Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PR3) had been used as a catalyst for the transformation of unsaturated fatty acids hydroxylation to the corresponding hydroxy fatty acids [21]. Numerous papers have also introduced hydroxy fatty acids from their resources, the production of di-and tri-hydroxy fatty acids (DOD and TOD) combined with low yield in harsh conditions at several days [22–24].
Recently, Tuan et al. reported that castor oil is converted to multi hydroxy-fatty acid by enzyme catalyst [25, 26]. However, the dihydroxy fatty acids were successfully component within no endpoint, and rather harsh reaction conditions, such as high temperature or time of transformation reaction and stoichiometric problems. In previous studies, hydroxy fatty acid such as 7,10-dihydroxy-8-E-octadecenoic acid (DOD)was emphatically produced after several days by enzyme catalyst [21–24, 27].
Besides, Persulfate ion S2O82− has a much higher radical quantum yield than other oxidant ligands expected of the O3. It is also an attractive alternative specialized oxidizing agent in chemistry, which has the ability to oxidize the other substance, such as oxidizing the contaminants in groundwater [28–30]. The activation of sodium persulfate was known by adding the iron Fe (III) as donor of electrons, and the oxidizing target compounds produce a new complex with radicals. However, the reaction mechanism is not well understood [31–33]. In the present study, the iron (III) citrate is significantly activated Na2S2O8 and, it promotes the hydroxylation of methyl linoleate to the corresponding hydroxy-conjugates under simple conditions. Characterization of the hydroxylation system is achieved by using HPLC, MADI-ToF MS, and NMR spectrums. Herein, we propose this a novel catalytic method for preparing the conjugated hydroxyl compounds of plant oils for superior emulsifying, anti pathogens and anti-oxidative agents. The anti pathogenic assays are investigated by using conjugated hydroxy-Linoleic acid methyl ester, especially with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of CHML. This novel strategy designed for an extension food safety and offer potential ways to replace petroleum oil for packaging processes and technologies with very good economical accounts.
Experimental
Chemical materials
All reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and arranged in the laboratory store. (9Z,12Z)-Octadecadienoic acid methyl ester (ML) and ferric chloride (FeCl3)were purchased from (Aladdin Ltd., Shanghai, China). Iron (III) citrate monohydrate (FeC6H5O7·H2O) was purchased from (Nanjing chemical reagent Co. LTD). Iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), iron sulfate [Fe2(SO4)3] and ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O) were purchased from (Nanjing Chemlin Chemical Co., Ltd.).Iron (II) phthalocyanine (FePC) was purchased from (Aladdin Ltd., Shanghai, China). The sodium cyanoborohydride (NaCNBH3), sodium metavanadate (NaO3V) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) were purchased from (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC). Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3·5H2O) and sodium peroxydisulfate (Na2S2O8) were supplied by (Nanjing Lattice, China). Scandium (III) trifluoromethanesulfonate Sc(OTf)3was purchased from (Accela Chembio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), acetonitrile (CH3CN), tetrahydrofuran(THF), toluene, methanol (MeOH) and dichloromethane (DCM)were all bought from (Sino pharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Methanol used for HPLC purchased from Merck (Nanjing, China).All the media were purchased from Hai Bo Ltd. (Shandong, China). Regular halo test assays were performed for this purpose. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was performed on an AV400 MHz instrument (Bruker, Beijing, China). Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF–MS) is A Bruker Autoflex Speed mass spectrometer (equipped with a 1000 Hz Smart beam-II laser). High-performance liquids chromatography (HPLC–UV) analysis was carried out in the LCMS 8040 system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan), all chromatograms were made by Lab-Solutions software. The HPLC analyses equipment with an ultraviolet detector (UV) set at 254 nm.
General Procedures for catalytic hydroxylation of methyl linoleate (ML) to its derivatives by FeC6H5O7·H2O/Na2S2O8 catalyst
In a typical procedure, FeC6H5O7·H2O (0.05 mmol) 13.1 mg, Na2S2O8 (6 Equiv.) 59.5 mg were dissolved with 5 mL of MeCN/H2O (4:1, v/v) in a glass tube, and then Methyl linoleate 1 M (316.6 µL) was added to the above solution. The reaction mixture was magnetically stirred at 80 °C in an oil bath under anO2 balloon for 24 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and un-reacted materials were washed with cold hexane and filtrated by ethyl acetate and methanol (9:1 v/v). After that, a mixture of solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude product was subjected to column chromatography in the eluent solvent as a mixture of petroleum ether/ethyl acetate/methanol (8:1:1, v/v/v), affording the (CHML) products in 88.7 ± 3.3% yield. Controlling the experiments by using FeC6H5O7·H2O or Na2S2O8 as the catalyst was carried out in parallel.
General procedures for detection of methyl linoleate (ML) and its conjugated hydroxy-methyl linoleate (CHML)
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy(NMR)
Methyl-9,12-di-hydroxyoctadecanoate 1, methyl-9-hydroxyoctadecanoate 2 and methyl-(10E, 12E) octadecanoate 3 were isolated as mixture (CHML) product, which characterized as well as reported by Kuo et al., Tuan et al., and Kim et al.[15, 17, 22–25]
The 1H NMR was recorded in CDCl3, 1H NMR 400 MHz revealed a peak of carbons that contain hydroxyl groups at 4.19 ppm, while the alpha protons of the carbons nearest to carbonyl groups have a peak at 2.25–2.39 ppm. All methylene groups (CH2) appear from 1.81 to 1.26 ppm, and the terminal methyl group has a peak at 0.95 ppm, whereas the ester methyl has a peak at 3.67 ppm. Two tertiary protons appeared at (4.16–3.59 ppm, OH-CH-CH2) of carbons that contain hydroxyl groups. All methylene groups (CH2) appear from 1.81 to 1.26 ppm and the methyl group has a peak at 0.95 ppm. In the case of carboxylic group, the protons methyl ester group (O-CH3) disappeared.
HPLC–UV profiling of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate (CHML)
Reaction products were identified by LC–MS (Agilent) on a Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan, consisting of an LC-30AD pump with COSMOSIL column 5C18- MS-II 4.6 ID × 250 mm, at room temperature. The flow rate was adjusted to 0.5 mL/min; water (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B) were used as mobile phases (solvent B). The separation of the conjugated hydroxyl methyl linoleate (CHML) was achieved with the ratio of the elution 75% of solvent B.[34–36]
MALDI-ToF mass spectrometric analysis in identification of CHML
Prepared samples were diluted 20-fold with deionized water, then analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF–MS). A Bruker Autoflex Speed mass spectrometer, it was used for analysing the samples using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid as matrix mass spectra, using Bruker Flex analysis software version 3.3 and were annotated manually.
Bio-activation and detection of CHML
Several commonly occurring food-borne pathogens including, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 15313, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 50013 and E. coli O157 CICC 21530 were used for testing the antipathogenic activity of the conjugates of hydroxymethyl linoleate samples, all the bacterial samples recovered from the − 80 °C stock through two times of culturing at 37 °C for 18 h. S. aureus was incubated in the Baird-Parkermedium, S.typhimurium was incubatedon Xylose Lysine Desoxycholate medium, L. monocytogenes was incubated on PALCAM medium and the E. coli incubated in Violet Red Bile medium. All the media were obtained from HaiBo Ltd. (Shandong, China). Regular halo test assays were prepared similar to the literature protocol [37]. Unlike a single pure compound, the conjugates of hydroxymethyl linoleate CHML samples are a mixture of hydroxy- octadecanoic methyl esters, and after the purification, the yield of the sample may, therefore, vary for each preparation. In order to measure the amount of the conjugated hydroxy octadecanoic methyl ester which, used the assays more correctly, the sample amount (40 nmol/mL) was calculated based on the HPLC peak areas using a commercial octadecane as standard (10 nmol/mL) as an internal standard for comparison.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicates. The data was given as average with standard error.
Results and discussion
To explore the activated sodium persulfate-promoted plant oils hydroxylation with Fe (III) citrate catalyst, we first focused on commercially available (9Z, 12Z)-octadecannoic methyl ester as a substrate, using simple Fe (III) citrate monohydrate (Fe3+-cit.) with sodium persulfate (Na-pers) as a catalyst, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The chemical reaction was carried out in acetonitrile mixture with water at 80 °C in presence of oxygen balloon, offering 95.3 ± 3.2% neither of the CHML mixture product, while neither Fe (III) C6H7O8 nor of sodium persulfate alone is inactive for methyl linoleate hydroxylation. It can be rationalized by the solubility and fact that there is no extra oxidizing source in the reaction mixture to facilitate the formation of the Fe (III)(citrate)-Na moiety. In this case, may not be realized (S2O8)2− to initialize the [9, 11]-hydrogen shift mechanism, while the Fe(III)/Fe(II) catalytic cycle for the [9, 12]-hydrogen shifts [38].
Table 1.
The hydroxylation of methyl linoleate (ML) in presence of the iron catalyst with different sulfate metal ions
Entry | Catalyst | Ligands | Conv.% | Yield of CHLM% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | FeCl3 | Na2S2O8 | 52.2 | N.D |
2 | FeCl3·6H2O | Na2S2O8 | 67.3 | 18.6 ± 1.4 |
3 | FeCl2·4H2O | Na2S2O8 | 45.5 | 21.3 ± 5.4 |
4 | Fe2(SO4)3 | Na2S2O8 | 58.1 | 13.5 ± 4.6 |
5 | FePc | Na2S2O8 | > 90 | N.D |
6a | Fe3+-cit·H2O | Na2S2O8 | 100 | 95.3 ± 3.2(88.7 ± 3.3) |
7 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | Na2S2O3·5H2O | 87.9 | 81.7 ± 3.5 |
8 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | NaO3V | 82.0 | 14.2 ± 4.2 |
9b | Fe3+-cit·H2O | Na2SeO3 | 100 | 18.3 ± 5.2 |
10 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | NaCNBH3 | 100 | 21.3 ± 2.1 |
11c | Fe3+cit· H2O | Na2S2O8 | 100 | 33.4 ± 2.5 |
12d | Fe3+-cit·H2O | Na2S2O8 | 97.2 ± 1.3 | 73.2 ± 5.2 |
13 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | – | 19.7 ± 2.1 | 11.5 ± 1.5 |
14 | – | Na2S2O8 | 100 | 38.2 ± 4.1 |
15 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | Sc(OTf)3 | 54 | N.D |
16 | Fe3+-cit·H2O | H2O2 | 80.2 ± 5.5 | 59.4 ± 5.2 |
Condition: in mixture solvent MeCN/H2O (v/v, 4 mL/1 mL), the 1.0 mmol (316.6 µL), of methyl linoleate was added to the solution containing Fe(III) citrate -monohydrate 0.05 mmol and Na2S2O8 (6 equiv.). Reaction mixture was stirred 24 h at 80 °C under O2 balloon. Yield determined by HPLC with internal standard
aIsolated and, determined yield by 1H NMR analysis with internal standard, N.D. = Not detected
bReaction at 50 °C
cReaction under Argon
dReaction under air
Although sodium-persulfate is a strong oxidizing agent, however, if it’s used alone as catalyst, the hydroxylation yield is offered 38.6 ± 4.4% of CHML and carboxylic acid was generated through hydrolysis of the ester.
In control experiment (entry 13), using Fe(III) C6H7O8 lone as a catalyst offering yield 11.5 ± 1.5% of CHML products from (9Z,12Z)-octadecadienoic acid methyl ester (ML) hydroxylation. Adding Na-metal ions would be greatly promote Fe(III)-catalyzed (9Z,12Z)-octadecadienoic acid methyl ester (ML) hydroxylation, and the improvement of hydroxylation system by highly oxidizing strength-dependent on added metal ions. Using FeCl3 or FePc as catalysts with the Na2S2O8 does not generate any improvement for methyl linoleate hydroxylation (Table 1, entry 5). However, adding iron-metal ions such as FeCl3·6H2O, FeCl2·4H2O or Fe2(SO4)3 substantially promote the catalytic activity of hydroxylation, providing 18.6 ± 1.4%, 21.3 ± 5.4% and 13.5 ± 4.6% of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML with a good selectivity entry 4. In particular, adding Na2S2O3·5H2O and/orNa2S2O8 can offer 81.7 ± 3.5%entry7and 95.3 ± 3.2% CHML entry 6respectively in 24 h. The results compared with other sodium metal ions such as NaO3V, Na2SeO3, NaCNBH3, and the offered yield of 14.2 ± 4.2% entry 8, 18.3 ± 5.2%entry 9 and 21.3 ± 2.1%entry 10respectively were achieved under current conditions. Na2S2O8 is a redox active and widely used as stoichiometric oxidant or co-catalyst in versatile Fe(II)-catalyzed oxidative C-H activations [39–42]. There were several reports of catalytic transformation of vegetable oil to its conjugates by organometallic catalyst in acetonitrile [43–46]. While a Fe-based catalyst of hydroxylation of the unsaturated plants oil was not reported [47, 48]. In Table 1 entries 11 and 12, the Fe(III)/Na2S2O8 catalyst system in MeCN/H2O solution just offered 33.4 ± 2.5% under argon and 73 ± 5.2% in the absences of oxygen balloon.
Adding the Na2S2O8 to the mixture reaction sharply accelerated vegetable oils hydroxylation by donor oxygen or accepting of electrons in present water as a nucleophilic attack, it’s best catalytic efficiency for the hydroxylation even better than hydrogen peroxide H2O2 and the (Sc)3+as Lewis acid, Table 1, entries 15, 16 [49–52]. In our case, the produced CHML as a mixture of hydroxy fatty acids from ML was carried out in 24 h with Fe3+-cit./Na2S2O8 catalyst as given in a scheme 1
Scheme1.
The major products identified by MALDI ToF mass spectroscopy analysis of methyl linoleate hydroxylation with the Fe(III) citrate/Na2S2O8 catalyst
In 1H NMR characterizations of ML substrate and its conjugated (CHML) products, the chemical shift observed at 2.7 ppm of the methylene protons between the two C = C bonds (CH=CH–CH2–CH=CH) in ML, it is shown in Fig. 1e. The chemical shifts of vinylic-hydrogens of the unconjugated methyl linoleate ester appeared at 2.7 and 5.3 ppm in 4 has depicted in Fig. 1d.
Fig. 1.
1H NMR spectra of methyl linoleate substrate and its conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate; purified hydroxy methyl linoleate (a). Conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate (CHML) mixture (b) and, saturated ester (c), unconjugated methyl linoleate isomer 4 h (d), and then Methyl linoleate (ML substrate) (e)
Disappearance of the chemical shifts at 2.7 and 5.3 ppm as in saturated ester (Fig. 1c) and, in the case of the new chemical shift was appeared at 3.5–4.2 ppm corresponding to the hydrogens of carbons that contain hydroxyl groups, indicated the hydroxylation product mixture as depicted in Fig. 1b. The isolated product of hydroxy methyl linoleate and its shown in Fig. 1a.The chemical shift for conjugated vinylic hydrogens methyl linoleate disappeared at the peaks at 5.2–5.4, 2.7 and 2.09 ppm, simultaneously, thus excluding the formation of the CHML products. In the case of using Na2S2O8 alone as a catalyst which provided 100% conversion and 38.2 ± 4.1% yield as mixture of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate, although the 1H NMR spectrum of the isolated products indicated the disappearance of protons of the methyl ester group at 3.6 ppm, thus showing the formation of the linoleic acid as a main product Fig. S1.
The new chemical shift around 3.5–4.2 ppm, simultaneously, disappearance the peaks of vinylic hydrogens and methylene protons at 2.7 and 5.2–5.4 ppm respectively, it’s suggested the hydroxylation reaction occurring on this system [53–55]. Clearly, the roles of addition Na2S2O8 in ML hydroxylation are distinctly different between the presence and absence of the water to the acetonitrile as co-solvent due to increasing the polarity of solvent, the other is to promote Fe3+cit-catalyzed hydroxylation of methyl linoleate, addition Na2S2O8 effectively improved the catalytic hydroxylation of methyl linoleate to the desired products under the simple conditions with atmospheric air at 80 °C. In the control experiment, using Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8 as catalyst without water, offered 100% conversion of methyl linoleate. However, CHML products 21.9 ± 4.1% yield were detected in HPLC analysis. The isolated of the main product was identified as saturated ester by 1H NMR analysis in Fig. 1c,and Additional file 1: Figures S2, S3, S4, S5 are illustrated the details NMR-spectrum as in supplementary information. The hydrolysis does not happen under current hydroxylation conditions, and 13C NMR showed only one carbonyl group as depicted in Figure S6.
Table 2 shows the result of the divers of solvents employed for improving Methyl (9Z, 12Z)-octadecadienoate (ML) hydroxylation, THF, MeOH, DMSO, and DMF are a poor solvent for this catalysis system. Despite the fact that they got mixed with water are not better than acetonitrile. Adding the water to the reaction mixture significantly supported the catalytic efficiency and Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8-catalyzed methyl linoleate hydroxylation was found with excellent catalytic activity. At the same time, using the acetonitrile alone as a solvent and it is providing only 21.9 ± 4.1% (entry 2) yield of CHML mixture with methyl linoleate isomer. In addition, methanol is a good example ofthe resource of protons donor, which used as a solvent, and the result was also a poor solvent for catalytic ML hydroxylation. Increasing of water ratio in mixture solvent (MeCN/H2O) to 2:1 and (1/1, v/v) just obtained 64.3 ± 4.2% (entry 4) and 48.7 ± 2.4% (entry 5) yield of CHML respectively. Increasing of nucleophilic attacks by mixing MeCN/water (4:1, v/v) ratio of solvent and, the hydroxylation provided a better efficiency. The reaction mixture of ML hydroxylation was stirred in the presence of Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8 catalyst for 24 h.
Table 2.
Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8 catalyzed methyl linoleate hydroxylation to a mixture of conjugated hydroxy-octadecanoate methyl ester in different solvents
Entry | Solvent (v/v) | Conv.% | Yield of CHLM% |
---|---|---|---|
1a | MeCN/H2O (4/1) | 100 | 95.3 ± 3.2(88.7 ± 3.3) |
2 | MeCN alone | 100 | 21.9 ± 4.1 |
3 | H2O alone | 98.2 ± 1.8 | 24.8 ± 2.5 |
4 | MeCN/H2O (2/1) | 93.7 ± 3.4 | 64.3 ± 4.2 |
5 | MeCN/H2O (1/1) | > 99 | 48.7 ± 2.4 |
6 | THF/ H2O | 45.6 | ND |
7 | MeOH | 60.4 | ND |
8 | DMSO | 45.5 | ND |
9 | DMF | 69.7 | ND |
Condition: In mixture solvent MeCN/H2O (v/v, 4 mL/1 mL), the (1.0 mmol) 316.6 µL, of methyl linoleate was added to the solution containing Fe(III) citrate -monohydrate 0.05 mmol (13.1 mg) and Na2S2O8 (6 equiv.). Reaction mixture was stirred 24 h at 80 °C under O2 balloon. Yield determined by HPLC with internal standard
aIsolated and, determined yield by 1H NMR analysis with internal standard, N.D. = Not detected
The ML conversion was determined by HPLC, which obviously used to separate, identify, and quantify each component in a reaction mixture, as shown in Fig. 2. In spite of adding the water to the reaction solution as co-solvent significantly enhanced ML hydroxylation, the results we found that mono and di hydroxyl octadecanoic methyl ester possess peaks around 27.3 and 28.07 mints respectively. While the negative controls, using Fe(III) alone as catalyst and its offered 19.7 ± 2.1% conversion as shown in Fig. 2 at 27.34 mints. HPLC-separation shows the 100% conversion of methyl linoleate to its conjugated -hydroxy methyl linoleate (CHML), as seen in the red line. The black line shows the peak of the substrate (ML) at rotation time at 26.01 mints. Using the Na2S2O8 as catalyst alone, the peak of the mixture products at 27.34 mints was absorbed on yellowish line with low peaks of CHML ≈38.6 ± 4.4% yield, due to the de-esterification. The grey line shows the products of CHML as a mixture with an excellent yield 95.3 ± 3.2% (Table 2 entry 1).The conversion of ML is calculated at fantail time, [A(ML)i and A(ML)f] the area of ML chromatographic peaks respectively at the initial (zero)and in fantail time.[10]A (St) is the external standard as show following:
Fig. 2.
HPLC analysis shows the controlling experiments of ML hydroxylation
where the yields of products (CHML) were calculated at fantail time of reactions, as shown below:
Alternatively, but the blue line in Fig. 2 showed the lower result of ML-hydroxylation mixture, due to increasing water ratio (2:1, v/v), and that might be caused for hydrolysis of methyl ester. Additional file 1: Figure S3 shows the mixture of products of methyl linoleate hydroxylation 95.3 ± 3.2% yield and, it is worth mentioning that the products mixture of hydroxy-methyl linoleate (CHML) which was further evidenced by MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Reading the results of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML from Additional file 1: Figure S7, almost no unreacted substrate ML could be detected, and a new mass peaks with an m/z value of 294.39 [(9E, 11E)-CML, confirmed by 1H NMR analysis] [13]. M 330.32, 338.33, and 354.28 were observed, which matches the calculated molecular mass of CHML isomers (294.39 Da for [M]+). The product was further verified by detection of a hydroxyl fragment (16.2 Da) by MALDI-ToF MS/MS as shown in Additional file 1: Figure S7.
Furthermore, the kinetics of catalyst system obviously determined with UV.vis spectra showed that using the iron alone as catalyst has not band appeared up to 300 nm on beginning reaction’s time, and the band changes to ≈300 nm with adding the Sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8) to Fe3+-cit·H2O, as we see in blue line at Fig. 3a.
Fig. 3.
The UV–Vis kinetics of Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8 in 5 mL of MeCN/H2O (4:1, v/v) at room temperature
Adding Na2S2O8 to the MeCN/H2O solution of Fe(III) citrate at room temperature to order the reaction-kinetic. The absorbance obviously change below 300 nm by adding Na2S2O8 also implicated the formation of new Fe(II) species as well as in acetonitrile alone as blue line in Fig. 3b.The reaction between 2–6 h like in the green-line in Fig. 3b, it can be compared with the characterization results of Fe3+-complex which has been studied and published [37, 41].
In particular, adding methyl linoleate to this new species in acetonitrile can immediately trigger the absorbance band maximum around 300 nm, as depicted in Fig. 3b.
Moreover, the formation of the new complex as a stable species having a characteristic absorbance band at ∼ 300 nm, and the original blue color of the intimidated (Fe2+-(S2O8)2− species which, changes to a pale green of the new species, the new complex formed might be responsible for ML hydroxylation during the time from 12 to 24 h. Adding H2O to the reaction mixture facilitate the formation of the Fe(II)-species, formally Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle was involved in the catalytic cycle (Scheme 2a).
Scheme 2.
Proposed mechanism for hydroxylation of methyl linoleate to its conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate by the Fe(III)/Na2S2O8 catalyst
In this catalytic system of internal double bond hydroxylation, it contributed to oxidative/reductive-hydroxylation following [1, 3]-hydrogen shift mechanism, and may not be realized (S2O8)2− moieties to initialize the [9,11]-hydrogen shift mechanism (Scheme 2b), Fe(II)-species coordinated to C=C bond either from the 9-position or the 12-position, the F(III)/S2O82− species next activates the methylene protons which have the chemical shift around 300 nm [13, 38].
Altogether, the conversion was calculated as the consumption of ML and determined by HPLC relative to the initial ML was added, and CHML products are confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS), using HPLC with octadecane as an internal standard. The isolated products were determined by 1H NMR relative to the initial ML added with toluene as an internal standard. The selectivity of the total CML was obtained by dividing the average total yield of products (CHML) by the average ML conversion (Scheme 2).
Growth inhibitions of pathogens by CHML
The results we found in this study may suggest a new method for producing the antimicrobial agents and the spread of antibiotic resistance in pathogens. Methyl linoleate used such a good example on large scale, and the conjugated of its hydroxylation-products can be used as a natural preservative ingredient in pharmaceutical and/or food chemistry. The result of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was tested with the four pathogens; all were more susceptible to hydroxy-methyl linoleate (CHML) than to kanamycin, it is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Growth inhibition activity of the mixture of hydroxy- methyl linoleate against: a S. aureus, b E. coli, c Salmonella typhimurium, and d Listeria monocytogenes
The original samples concentrations with highest MIC (10 µg/mL) were chosen and compared with kanamycin for the subsequent anti-pathogens activity assay. For the growth inhibition assays no effects from ML (substrate) with DMSO components; similarly, the water showed no activity. Whereas the original samples of CHML were tested and showed a large zone with S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenesas depicted in Fig. 4a, d). However, the samples were diluted 10, 100, 1000 times of concentration and dose generate clear zone, and CHML employed with kanamycin as a good comparable, and CHML led to a strong inhibition of growth. The CHML was performed and purified with excellent yield 261.2 mg, 88.7 ± 3.3% of CHML mixture. Four tested strains were selected and used 10 µg/mL of CHML for bacterial inhibition growth in each sample.
The inhibitory potential of methyl linoleate hydroxylated is comparable to the standard clinical dose of kanamycin of 50 mg/mL. In the cases of E. coli and S. typhimurium simples, the vegetable oils hydroxylated (CHML) showed only moderate growth inhibition as depicted in Fig. 4b, c. Accordingly, this novel functional method was successfully producing the anti-pathogens with an excellent performance.
In this study, hydroxylation of the unsaturated plant oils was investigated by metal catalysts for the first time. Taking advantage of the availability of large amounts of methyl linoleate with a catalyst in our laboratory, we were able to prepare the CHML on large scale, which enables their subsequent use as in antimicrobial assays.
Conclusions
The hydroxylation of plant oils exhibited the significant role of Na2S2O8 in promoting the Fe(III)-catalyzed methyl linoleate hydroxylation. Adding Na2S2O8 oxidizing to simple iron (III) citrate tri-basic monohydrate as a catalyst can sharply promote its hydroxylation efficiency, even much better than the classic H2O2 as oxidant legend [11], which highlights the peroxide properties. Persulfate –S2O82−, also has a high redox potential which, mixing the iron Fe3+/Fe2+ with persulfate, readily facilitated the generation of new Fe2+-species [38, 39, 42]. Noticeably, the hydroxylation was conducted under atmospheric air (oxygen balloon). While previously reported an olefins and or unsaturated fatty acids hydroxylation were generally conducted under harsh conditions, all unlikely Fe3+-cit/Na2S2O8 catalyst system demonstrated here.
In addition, these results suggested a new opportunity for improvement the application of vegetable oils methyl ester derivatives in medicals system and food industry. Particularly, it relates to hydroxylated plant oils of superior antibiotic properties. The inhibition growth of different microorganisms with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was investigated by using CHML; the mechanism of growth inhibition mostly attributed to the antioxidative properties of CHML contains hydroxy groups. The conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate (CHML) as mixture demonstrated a remarkable growth inhibiting gram-positive vs gram-negative bacteria as well as in vitro. Using high performance and analysis, MALDI-ToF mass spectroscopy was employed for determining the CHML. This novel method is suitable for hydroxylating vegetable oils in food industry uses, environment-friendly and future sustainable technology, maintaining the quality of food products, economized field operations, increased the rate and efficiency. Based on these results, we provide recommendations for potential ways in food safety.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra for conjugated hydroxymethyl linoleate (CHML) and MALID-ToF spectrometry. Figure S1. The quantification products by 1H NMR Spectrum; Linoleic acid obtained as main product of ML hydroxylation with (Na2S2O8) alone as catalyst. Figure S2. 1H NMR spectrum of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate (isolated product 1). Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML (Reaction Mixture). Figure S4. 1H NMR Spectrum of Saturated Ester. Figure S5. 1H NMR spectrum of original methyl linoleate. Figure S6. 13C NMR spectrum of isolated product in CDCl3 (after removal of the solvent MeCN/H2O). Figure S7. MALDITOF–mass spectroscopy employed for determining the mixture of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML after reaction time 24 h.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the 1H, 13C NMR and MALDIToF-MS analysis was performed in the Analytical and Testing Center of Nanjing Agricultural University.
Abbreviations
- Fe3+-cit.
Iron citrate monohydrate
- CHML
Conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate
- ML
Methyl linoleate
- HPLC
High performance liquid chromatography
- MALDI-TOF
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Authors' contributions
AMS, BY, YZ and YMY were the main author of the work, performed syntheses, and biological test of growth inhibitions of pathogens by CHML and experiment, MMN, MU, JAB, SZ assisted with manuscript writing and figures. LL was the corresponding author. All authors read and approved this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by China-1000 Talent Foundation No. 080-804108 (Ahmed M.) and, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 31871754 (Liu Li).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Although, all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
All the authors listed in this article are declared that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ahmed M. Senan, Email: ahmedmsenan@njau.edu.cn
Binru Yin, Email: 2017208020@njau.edu.cn.
Yaoyao Zhang, Email: szhang71@uthsc.edu.
Mustapha M. Nasiru, Email: 2018208036@njau.edu.cn
Yong‐Mei Lyu, Email: 2016208021@njau.edu.cn.
Muhammad Umair, Email: umair_uaf@hotmail.com.
Javaid A. Bhat, Email: javid.akhter69@gmail.com
Sicheng Zhang, Email: szhang71@uthsc.edu.
Li Liu, Email: lichen.liu@njau.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Murray RE, Bantchev GB, Dunn RO, et al. Thioether-functionalized vegetable oils: metal-absorbing biobased ligands. ACS Sust Chem Eng. 2013;1:562–565. doi: 10.1021/sc300164y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rafiq M, Lv YZ, Zhou Y, et al. Use of vegetable oils as transformer oils—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;52:308–324. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wiedmaier-Czerny N, Schroth D, Topman-Rakover S, et al. Detailed analysis of the fatty acid composition of six plant-pathogenic bacteria. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2021;1162:122454. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rubin D, Laposata M. Cellular interactions between n-6 and n-3 fatty acids: a mass analysis of fatty acid elongation/desaturation, distribution among complex lipids, and conversion to eicosanoids. J Lipid Res. 1992;33:1431–1440. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)41397-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wahyudi WING, Widodo A, Wijayanti W. Improving vegetable oil properties by transforming fatty acid chain length in jatropha oil and coconut oil blends. Energies. 2018 doi: 10.3390/en11020394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ashraf I, Zubair M, Rizwan K, et al. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of essential oils from different parts of Daphne mucronata Royle. Chem Cent J. 2018;12:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s13065-018-0495-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dijkstra AJ (2016) Palm oil. In: Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldrá F (eds) Encyclopedia of food and health. Academic Press, pp 199–204. ISBN 9780123849533. 10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00514-6
- 8.Lima GES, Nunes EV, Dantas RC, et al. Systematic investigation of the oxidative polymerization of linseed oil catalyzed by Co(II), Mn(II), and Fe(II) complexes with chelating nitrogen ligands. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2015;117:229–234. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201400091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oroz-Guinea I, Zorn K, Bornscheuer UT. Enhancement of lipase CAL-A selectivity by protein engineering for the hydrolysis of erucic acid from crambe oil. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2020;122:1–6. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.201900115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raclot T, Holm C, Langin D. Fatty acid specificity of hormone-sensitive lipase: Implication in the selective hydrolysis of triacylglycerols. J Lipid Res. 2001;42:2049–2057. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)31534-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen J, De Liedekerke BM, Gyurik L, et al. Highly efficient epoxidation of vegetable oils catalyzed by a manganese complex with hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid. Green Chem. 2019;21:2436–2447. doi: 10.1039/c8gc03857k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rios L, Echeverri D, Cardeño F. Hydroxylation of vegetable oils using acidic resins as catalysts. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;43:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Senan AM, Zhang S, Qin S, et al. Transformation of methyl linoleate to its conjugated derivatives with simple Pd(OAc)2/Lewis acid catalyst. JAOCS. 2017;94:1481–1489. doi: 10.1007/s11746-017-3052-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Senan AM, Zhang S, Zeng M, et al. Transformation of unsaturated fatty acids/esters to corresponding keto fatty acids/esters by aerobic oxidation with Pd(II)/Lewis Acid Catalyst. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:6912–6918. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim KR, Oh DK. Production of hydroxy fatty acids by microbial fatty acid-hydroxylation enzymes. New York: Elsevier; 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lligadas G, Ronda JC, Galià M, et al. Quantitation in the analysis of transesterified soybean oil by capillary gas chromatography 1. Soil Sediment Contamination. 2018;10:875–879. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lligadas G, Ronda JC, Galià M, Cádiz V. Renewable polymeric materials from vegetable oils: a perspective. Mater Today. 2013;16:337–343. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nagai T, Shimizu Y, Shirahata T, et al. Oral adjuvant activity for nasal influenza vaccines caused by combination of two trihydroxy fatty acid stereoisomers from the tuber of Pinellia ternata. Int Immunopharmacol. 2010;10:655–661. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moreno JJ. New aspects of the role of hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids in cell growth and cancer development. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;77:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Knothea G, Weisleder D, Bagby MO, Peterson RE (1993) Hydroxy fatty acids through hydroxylation of oleic acid with selenium dioxidelter L. Butylhydroperoxide1 54:401–404
- 21.Chang IA, Kim IH, Kang SC, et al. Production of 7, 10-dihydroxy-8(E)-octadecenoic acid from triolein via lipase induction by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PR3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:301–306. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0662-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Suh MJ, Baek KY, Kim BS, et al. Production of 7,10-dihydroxy-8(E)-octadecenoic acid from olive oil by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PR3. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:1721–1727. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-3040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kuo TM, Manthey LK, Hou CT. Fatty acid bioconversions by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PR3. JAOCS. 1998;75:875–879. doi: 10.1007/s11746-998-0240-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Levinson WE, Tsung MK, Kurtzman CP. Lipase-catalyzed production of novel hydroxylated fatty amides in organic solvent. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2005;37:126–130. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tran TK, Kumar P, Kim HR, et al. Microbial conversion of vegetable oil to hydroxy fatty acid and its application to bio-based polyurethane synthesis. Polymers. 2018 doi: 10.3390/polym10080927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tran TK, Kumar P, Kim HR, et al. Bio-Based Polyurethanes from Microbially Converted Castor Oil. JAOCS. 2019;96:715–726. doi: 10.1002/aocs.12223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Suh MJ, Baek KY, Kim BS, et al. Microbial conversion of vegetable oil to hydroxy fatty acid and its application to bio-based polyurethane synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;75:301–306. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-3040-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wols BA, Hofman-Caris CHM. Review of photochemical reaction constants of organic micropollutants required for UV advanced oxidation processes in water. Water Res. 2012;46:2815–2827. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He X, De La Cruz AA, Dionysiou DD. Destruction of cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin by hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals using UV-254 nm activation of hydrogen peroxide, persulfate and peroxymonosulfate. J Photochem Photobiol, A. 2013;251:160–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2012.09.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang KC, Couttenye RA, Hoag GE. Kinetics of heat-assisted persulfate oxidation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) Soil Sediment Contamination. 2002;11:447–448. doi: 10.1080/20025891107708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Crimi ML, Taylor J. Experimental evaluation of catalyzed hydrogen peroxide and sodium persulfate for destruction of BTEX contaminants. Soil Sediment Contamination. 2007;16:29–45. doi: 10.1080/15320380601077792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Block P a, Brown R a, Robinson D (2004) Novel activation technologies for sodium persulfate. Situ Monterey 25:2A–05
- 33.Wang J, Wang S. Activation of persulfate (PS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and application for the degradation of emerging contaminants. Chem Eng J. 2018;334:1502–1517. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Carvalho MS, Mendonça MA, Pinho DMM, et al. Chromatographic analyses of fatty acid methyl esters by HPLC-UV and GC-FID. J Braz Chem Soc. 2012;23:763–769. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50532012000400023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Freedman B, Butterfield RO, Pryde EH. Fast capillary chromatography. Spectra-Phys J Amer Oil Chem Soc. 1986;63:1375. doi: 10.1007/BF02679606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Freedman B, Kwolek WF, Pryde EH. Quantitation in the analysis of transesterified soybean oil by capillary gas chromatography 1. J Am Oil Chem Society. 1986;63:1370–1375. doi: 10.1007/BF02679605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang WL, Wang W, Du YM, et al. Comparison of anti-pathogenic activities of the human and bovine milk N-glycome: Fucosylation is a key factor. Food Chem. 2017;235:167–174. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hammerer L, Winkler CK, Kroutil W. Regioselective biocatalytic hydroxylation of fatty acids by cytochrome P450s. Catal Lett. 2018;148:787–812. doi: 10.1007/s10562-017-2273-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Konoike T, Araki Y, Kanda Y. A novel allylic hydroxylation of sterically hindered olefins by Fe-porphyrin-catalyzed mCPBA oxidation. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:6971–6974. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01437-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Senan AM, Qin S, Zhang S, et al. Nonredox metal-ion-accelerated olefin isomerization by palladium(II) catalysts: density functional theory (DFT) calculations supporting the experimental data. ACS Catal. 2016;6:4144–4148. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b01061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Battistuzzi G, Bellei M, Bortolotti CA, Sola M. Redox properties of heme peroxidases. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;500:21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Adam FI, Bounds PL, Kissner R, Koppenol WH. Redox properties and activity of iron-citrate complexes: Evidence for redox cycling. Chem Res Toxicol. 2015;28:604–614. doi: 10.1021/tx500377b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Monaco I, Arena F, Biffi S, et al. Synthesis of lipophilic core-shell Fe3O4@SiO2@Au nanoparticles and polymeric entrapment into nanomicelles: a novel nanosystem for in vivo active targeting and magnetic resonance-photoacoustic dual imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2017;28:1382–1390. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu G, Ren G, Zhao L, Cheng L, Wang C, Sun B. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of bifidocin A against Listeria monocytogenes. Food Control. 2017;73:854–861. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jiang D, Chen FX, Zhou H, Lu YY, Tan H, Yu SJ, Yuan J, Liu H, Meng W, Jin ZB. Bioenergetic crosstalk between mesenchymal stem cells and various ocular cells through the intercellular trafficking of mitochondria. Theranostics. 2020;10(16):7260–7272. doi: 10.7150/thno.46332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pan D, Xia XX, Zhou H, Jin SQ, Lu YY, Liu H, Gao ML, Jin ZB. COCO enhances the efficiency of photoreceptor precursor differentiation in early human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal organoids. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-01883-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhu S, Wang X, Zheng Z, Zhao XE, Bai Y, Liu H. Synchronous measuring of triptolide changes in rat brain and blood and its application to a comparative pharmacokinetic study in normal and Alzheimer’s disease rats. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;185:113263. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhu S, Zheng Z, Peng H, Sun J, Zhao XE, Liu H. Quadruplex stable isotope derivatization strategy for the determination of panaxadiol and panaxatriol in foodstuffs and medicinal materials using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatography A. 2020;1616:460794. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jiang Q, Jin S, Jiang Y, Liao M, Feng R, Zhang L, Liu G, Hao J. Alzheimer’s disease variants with the genome-wide significance are significantly enriched in immune pathways and active in immune cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(1):594–600. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9670-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zou Q, Xing P, Wei L, Liu B. Gene2vec: gene subsequence embedding for prediction of mammalian-methyladenosine sites from mRNA. RNA. 2019;25(2):205–218. doi: 10.1261/rna.069112.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Xiang W, Chang J, Qu R, Albasher G, Wang Z, Zhou D, Sun C. Transformation of bromophenols by aqueous chlorination and exploration of main reaction mechanisms. Chemosphere. 2021;265:129112. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang YC, Huang K, Lai X, Shi Z, Liu JB, Qiu G. Radical bromination-induced ipso cyclization–ortho cyclization sequence of N-hydroxylethyl-N-arylpropiolamides. Organic Biomol Chem. 2021;19(9):1940–1944. doi: 10.1039/D1OB00010A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qi Y, Wei J, Qu R, Al-Basher G, Pan X, Dar AA, Shad A, Zhou D, Wang Z. Mixed oxidation of aqueous nonylphenol and triclosan by thermally activated persulfate: reaction kinetics and formation of co-oligomerization products. Chem Eng J. 2021;403:126396. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang H, Guan W, Zhang L, Guan X, Wang S. Degradation of an organic dye by bisulfite catalytically activated with iron manganese oxides: the role of superoxide radicals. ACS Omega. 2020;5(29):18007–18012. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhang H, Sun M, Song L, Guo J, Zhang L. Fate of NaClO and membrane foulants during in-situ cleaning of membrane bioreactors: combined effect on thermodynamic properties of sludge. Biochem Eng J. 2019;147:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra for conjugated hydroxymethyl linoleate (CHML) and MALID-ToF spectrometry. Figure S1. The quantification products by 1H NMR Spectrum; Linoleic acid obtained as main product of ML hydroxylation with (Na2S2O8) alone as catalyst. Figure S2. 1H NMR spectrum of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate (isolated product 1). Figure S3. 1H NMR spectrum of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML (Reaction Mixture). Figure S4. 1H NMR Spectrum of Saturated Ester. Figure S5. 1H NMR spectrum of original methyl linoleate. Figure S6. 13C NMR spectrum of isolated product in CDCl3 (after removal of the solvent MeCN/H2O). Figure S7. MALDITOF–mass spectroscopy employed for determining the mixture of conjugated hydroxy methyl linoleate CHML after reaction time 24 h.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Although, all data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.