Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2021 Mar 26;6(3):1216–1218. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2021.1903350

Complete mitochondrial genome and the phylogenetic position of the Burmese narrow-headed softshell turtle Chitra vandijki (Testudines: Trionychidae)

Chen Chen 1, Hong Xiaoyou 1, Li Wei 1, Yu Lingyun 1, Chen Haigang 1, Zhu Xinping 1,✉
PMCID: PMC8008941  PMID: 33829088

Abstract

Narrow-headed softshell turtles constitute a group of critically endangered freshwater turtles that belong to the family Trionychidae. Here, we determine the complete mitogenome of the Burmese narrow-headed softshell turtle Chitra vandijki. The length of the mitochondrial genome was 16,614 bp, composed of 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, two rRNA genes, and twelve noncoding regions. The phylogenetic analysis strongly indicated that C. vandijki is closely related to C. indica. The mitochondrial genome will contribute to the genetic research and conservation of C. vandijki in the future.

Keywords: Mitochondrial genome, conservation, Chitra vandijki, softshell turtle

The Burmese narrow-headed softshell turtle Chitra vandijki McCord and Pritchard (2002), named Peter-Paul van Dijk, is the largest Chitra species (McCord and Pritchard 2002). C. vandijki experienced allopatric speciation around the Ayeyarwaddy River basin of Myanmar throughout evolution. This gives the species unique cephalic and neck patterns compared to the other three congeners (McCord and Pritchard 2002). In recent years, due to overexploitation and expansion of the international turtle trade, declining population has seriously threatened the persistence of C. vandijki. The situation has highlighted the need for protective actions. The IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group (TFTSG) categorized the species as critically endangered in 2011.

Mitogenomic information is considered a valuable molecular tool in species identification and phylogenetic conservation research. For this reason, we determined the complete mitochondrial genome of C. vandijki and analyzed it by comparing it with that of other Trionychidae turtles to confirm the phylogenetic relationship between them.

An umbilical cord tissue sample was carefully taken from a hatchling turtle bred from two captive C. vandijki individuals at Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China (22°0′N, 100°47′E) in October 2019. The tissue sample was stored in 95% ethanol solution and deposited in our laboratory specimen bank (Dr. Chen, chenchen3729@outlook.com) under voucher number PRFRI_CVAND_20191001.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the ethanol-preserved specimen using a MicroElute Genomic DNA kit (Omega, USA), and a 350-bp DNA library was constructed. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq Xten platform (Illumina, USA), and a dataset of 38,530,879 raw reads generated. After trimming adapters and quality filtering, the clean data were assembled using SPAdes software (Bankevich et al. 2012). The mitochondrial genome was annotated through the use of MITOS (http://mitos.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/ index.py) (Bernt et al. 2013), NCBI ORF finder, and tRNA-scan SE (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE/) (Lowe and Eddy 1997). After manual examination to ensure its correct assembly, the complete annotated C. vandijki mitogenome was submitted to GenBank under accession number MT683848.

All 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs) in 27 turtles were chosen (Supplementary Table S2) to investigate the phylogenetic position of C. vandijki, with Mauremys reevesii (NC_006082) and Mauremys mutica (NC_009330) as the outgroups. Each of the 13 PCG sequences was individually aligned with MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2005) by default settings, and ambiguous characters were removed via GBlocks (Castresana 2000). Then, 13 PCG sequences were concatenated in BioEdit (Hall 1999). Next, the optimal partitioning scheme and substitution model were determined by using PartitionFinder (Lanfear et al. 2016). Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed by IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) via the maximum likelihood (ML) method in partition mode (Supplementary Table S3). Node support was calculated with 5000 bootstrap replications.

The total mitochondrial genome of C. vandijki was 16,614 bp in length with 40.41% CG content and consisted of 13 PCGs, two rRNA genes, 22 tRNA genes, and 12 noncoding regions. Twelve C. vandijki PCGs initiated with ATG start codons, and one initiated with GTG (cox1). Nine C. vandijki PCG stop codons were complete, including seven terminated by TAA, one ended with AGA (nad6), and one ended with AGG (cox1). The remaining four vandijki PCG stop codons were incomplete, ending with T– (nad2, cox3, nad3, and nad4). Similar to other Trionychidae turtles, the C. vandijki 12S rRNA genes (970 bp) and 16S rRNA genes (1595 bp) were distributed between tRNAPhe(UUC) and tRNAVal(GUA), and between tRNAVal(GUA) and tRNALeu (UUA), respectively. The two long noncoding regions were OL (29 bp) and the control region (1115 bp), whereas the lengths of the other ten regions were small, ranging from 1 to 11 bp with a total length of 40 bp (Supplementary Table S1).

The ML phylogenetic tree best supported that C. vandijki belonged to Trionychinae and was closely related to Chitra indica with 100% bootstrap support (Figure 1). This result is consistent with that of Engstrom et al. (2002) and McCord and Pritchard (2002), which was based on the likelihood and parsimony analysis of the ND4 gene. Our mitochondrial genome sequence data provide a new source of useful information for the genetic research and conservation of C. vandijki.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree showing the phylogenetic relationship of 27 turtles based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences of all 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes (PCGs), with the Mauremys reevesii (NC_006082) and the Mauremys mutica (NC_009330) as outgroups. GenBank accession numbers of each sequence were next to the species name, and the numbers at each node represented the bootstrap support values (%) based on 5000 replicates. The Chitra vandijki was in bold red font.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Xishuangbanna Indigenous Fish Breeding Research Center for supporting the sample acquisition and Huitong Biotechnology Co. for the Illumina sequencing.

Funding Statement

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD0900201], the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2016A030310010], the National Freshwater Genetic Resource Center [NFGR-2020] and the Guangdong Agricultural Research System [2019KJ150].

Disclosure statement

The authors report no potential conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession no. MT683848. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA706680, SUB9182104, and SAMN18140118 respectively.

References

  1. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF.. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17(4):540–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Engstrom TN, Shaffer HB, McCord WP.. 2002. Phylogenetic diversity of endangered and critically endangered southeast Asian softshell turtles (Trionychidae: Chitra). Biol Conserv. 104(2):173–179. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hall TA. 1999. BIOEDIT: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98. [Google Scholar]
  6. Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T.. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(2):511–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B.. 2016. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol E. 34:772–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lowe TM, Eddy SR.. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25(5):955–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McCord WP, Pritchard PC.. 2002. A review of the softshell turtles of the genus Chitra, with the description of new taxa from Myanmar and Indonesia (Java). Hamadryad. 27:11–56. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Haeseler AV, Minh BQ.. 2015. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32(1):268–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession no. MT683848. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA706680, SUB9182104, and SAMN18140118 respectively.

Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES