Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2021 Mar 18;17(3):e1009462. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009462

Schistosome infection promotes osteoclast-mediated bone loss

Wei Li 1,2, Chuan Wei 2, Lei Xu 2, Beibei Yu 2, Ying Chen 2, Di Lu 2, Lina Zhang 2, Xian Song 2, Liyang Dong 2, Sha Zhou 2, Zhipeng Xu 2, Jifeng Zhu 2, Xiaojun Chen 2,*, Chuan Su 2,*
Editor: De’Broski R Herbert3
PMCID: PMC8009420  PMID: 33735306

Abstract

Infection with schistosome results in immunological changes that might influence the skeletal system by inducing immunological states affecting bone metabolism. We investigated the relationships between chronic schistosome infection and bone metabolism by using a mouse model of chronic schistosomiasis, affecting millions of humans worldwide. Results showed that schistosome infection resulted in aberrant osteoclast-mediated bone loss, which was accompanied with an increased level of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) Ligand (RANKL) and decreased level of osteoprotegerin (OPG). The blockade of RANKL by the anti-RANKL antibody could prevent bone loss in the context of schistosome infection. Meanwhile, both B cells and CD4+ T cells, particularly follicular helper T (Tfh) cell subset, were the important cellular sources of RANKL during schistosome infection. These results highlight the risk of bone loss in schistosome-infected patients and the potential benefit of coupling bone therapy with anti-schistosome treatment.

Author summary

Schistosomiasis remains an important public health problem in many countries in tropical and subtropical regions, which affects about 200 million people worldwide, with another 700 million considered at risk of infection. Although the primary cause of pathogenesis of schistosomiasis is the granulomatous inflammatory responses, schistosomiasis patients experience long-term hidden pathologies that remain poorly investigated. Here, we found that schistosome infection resulted in RANKL-associated bone loss. Furthermore, our results indicated that both B cells and CD4+ T cells, particularly Tfh cell subset, in the peripheral lymphoid tissues are likely to be the important contributors to bone loss through releasing soluble RANKL. In addition, Tfh cells played a sufficient but not necessary role in schistosome infection-induced bone loss. Our findings highlight the risk of bone loss in schistosome-infected patients and the potential benefit of coupling bone therapy with anti-schistosome treatment.

Introduction

Schistosomiasis is a chronic helminthic disease that affects more than 200 million people worldwide, with another 700 million considered at risk of infection tab [1,2]. Although the primary cause of pathogenesis of schistosomiasis is the granulomatous inflammatory responses in the liver and intestines [3,4], there is evidence that schistosomiasis patients experience long-term hidden pathologies that have remained poorly characterized. For instance, physical growth impairment in children is linked to parasitic infectious diseases, regardless of nutritional status [5,6]. Indeed, schistosome infection has been associated with growth inhibition in children, even with low parasitic burdens [7], indicating that schistosome infection may influence the skeletal system. Despite the importance of bone tissue in health and development, little is known about the underlying mechanisms of how schistosome infection disrupts bone homeostasis.

Schistosome infection elicits the robust multi-type immune responses beyond the Th2-type response [8], including B-cell response, regulatory T (Treg) cell response, Th17-cell response, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cell response [911]. Strikingly, substantial evidence support that schistosome-induced immunity has important impacts on the progression and outcome of multiple other diseases, such as type 1 diabetes and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis [1214]. Bone is a dynamic tissue that is constantly remodeled by bone-resorbing osteoclasts (OCs) and bone-forming osteoblasts (OBs) in a tightly regulated process [15]. The differentiation of OC precursors into OCs is under the influence of the key osteoclastogenic cytokine receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), which is moderated by osteoprotegerin (OPG), a RANKL’s physiological decoy receptor [16]. In fact, an increase in the ratio of RANKL to OPG accelerates the rate of osteoclastic bone resorption in various infectious diseases such as HIV infection and bacterial infection-induced periodontitis [17,18]. Many cell types are capable of producing RANKL, but T cells and B cells are recognized as predominant sources of RANKL in some infectious diseases [18,19]. Given the pivotal roles of T cells and B cells in orchestrating bone metabolism [20,21], it raises the possibility that schistosome infection might influence the skeletal system by altering the host’s immune responses, particularly T-cell and/or B-cell responses.

Here, we found that the increased RANKL was associated with schistosome infection-induced bone loss, and showed that both B cells and CD4+ T cells, particularly Tfh cell subset, were the important contributors to an increased level of RANKL during schistosome infection. Thus, schistosome infection leads to bone loss that reflects the immunological consequences of infection in the host, suggesting that patients with schistosomiasis should pay more attention to bone problems caused by schistosome infection.

Results

Schistosome infection results in bone loss in mice

First, we investigated whether schistosome infection had an impact on bone homeostasis. X-radiographic analysis of the femurs showed that mice in the chronic phase of the infection (since 11–13 weeks post-infection) had severe osteoporosis accompanied by a marked decrease in trabecular bone mineral density (Fig 1A). Micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis of distal femurs showed that schistosome-infected mice had significantly reduced trabecular bone volume and number (Fig 1B). Bone morphometric analysis of distal femurs by μCT showed that trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD, Fig 1C), bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), and connectivity density (Conn.D., Fig 1D), as well as cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar, Fig 1E) were significantly decreased in schistosome-infected mice. However, no significant difference in tissue volume or total cross-sectional area (TV or Tt.Ar) or trabecular space (Tb.Sp) was detected, while bone architecture was dramatically altered reflected by an elevated structure model index (SMI) in schistosome-infected mice (Fig 1D and 1E). Indeed, schistosome infection-induced bone loss was also observed in other mouse strains such as BALB/c and ICR (S1 Fig) and patients with schistosomiasis (S1 Table and S1 Text). These results demonstrated that schistosome infection leads to bone loss.

Fig 1. S. japonicum infection drove bone loss in mice.

Fig 1

Male C57BL/6 mice were infected with 12 cercariae of S. japonicum per mouse. (A) Mice were sacrificed at 3, 5, 8 or 13 weeks post-infection. Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal and S.japonicum-infected mice, and analyzed by X-ray. Representative of X-ray images of femurs; (B-E) Femurs from mice 13 weeks after infection and age-matched normal mice were analyzed by microcomputed tomography (μCT) scan. (B) Representative μCT images of distal femurs (top, longitudinal view; second, axial view of metaphyseal region; third, 3D view of metaphyseal region; bottom, axial 3D view of the cortical region); (C) Quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD); (D) Average quantifications of tissue volume (TV), bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), space (Tb.Sp.), the structure model index (SMI), and connectivity density (Conn.D.); (E) Average quantifications of cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). Data are representative of three independent experiments, and expressed as the mean ± SD of 6 mice from each group. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

Aberrant bone resorption causes bone loss in S.japonicum-infected mice

S.japonicum-infected mice displayed higher bone resorption compared to normal mice, as demonstrated by higher serum levels of the bone resorption marker CTx (C-terminal telopeptide of collagen; Fig 2A), comparable levels of the bone formation marker osteocalcin (Fig 2A), more osteoclasts, and larger osteoclast-covered surface (Fig 2B and 2C), as well as diminished trabecular structure (Fig 2D and 2E). These data suggested that S.japonicum-infected mice have reduced bone mass as a consequence of increased osteoclastic bone resorption.

Fig 2. Aberrant osteoclastogenesis resulted in bone loss in chronic S.japonicum-infected mice.

Fig 2

OCs and bone resorption in mice 13 weeks after schistosome infection. (A) C-terminal telopeptide (CTx) and osteocalcin were quantified in the serum of normal and S.japonicum-infected mice; (B) Histology and histomorphometry for OCs (purple) were performed in tibias. Representative TRAP-stained tibia sections are shown for normal and S.japonicum-infected mice at magnifications of 200×; (C) OC surface per bone surface area (Oc.S/BS) was calculated according to TRAP-stained tibia sections for normal and S.japonicum-infected mice; (D) H&E-stained tibias for normal and S.japonicum-infected mice at 50× magnification; (E) Trabecular areas were measured using Image-Pro Plus software. Values are given as mean ± SD of 6 mice from each group. Data are representative of three independent experiments. *, P<0.05; ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

The increased RANKL is associated with schistosome infection-induced bone loss in vivo

Our aforementioned results showed the increases in bone resorption and osteoclast-covered surface in S.japonicum-infected mice relative to normal mice (Fig 2A–2C). We next wondered whether the aberrant osteoclast generation was involved in the increased bone resorption during schistosome infection. Thus, we firstly analyzed the absolute number of OCPs (CD3-B220-NK1.1-CD11b-/lowCD115+CD117+ cells) [22] in bone marrow (BM) of normal and infected mice. Results in Fig 3A showed a comparable number of OCPs in normal and S.japonicum-infected mice. Next, we evaluated the levels of osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL in BM, and found a significant increase in RANKL level in S.japonicum-infected mice (Fig 3B). Furthermore, the percentages of RANKL+ cells were substantially increased in bone marrow (S2, S3A and S3B Figs), mesenteric lymph nodes (Fig 3C), and spleens (Fig 3D) during infection. Notably, these effects were also associated with lower OPG expression, resulting in a higher ratio of RANKL to OPG expression in BM (Fig 3B). X-radiographic analysis of the femurs showed an increased trabecular bone mineral density in S. japonicum-infected mice treated with anti-RANKL antibody, compared with that in isotype treated-infected mice (Fig 3E). Furthermore, μCT analysis showed that BV, BV/TV (Fig 3F and 3G), the trabecular and cortical BMD (S4A Fig), Tb.N (S4B Fig), Ct. Th, Cr.Ar, Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar (S4C Fig) were significantly increased in schistosome-infected mice treated with anti-RANKL blocking antibody, compared with those in isotype treated-infected mice. In addition, Tb. Th and Conn. D followed the same trend but they did not reach statistical significance (S4B Fig). In contrast, a significant decreased SMI was found in schistosome-infected mice treated with anti-RANKL antibody, while no demonstrable difference in Tb.Sp or Ct.Ar was detected (S4B and S4C Fig). Overall, these results indicated that RANKL blockade ameliorated schistosome infection-induced bone loss in mice.

Fig 3. RANKL blockade ameliorated schistosome infection-induced bone loss in mice.

Fig 3

(A-B) Mouse BMs from mice 8 weeks infected with S. japonicum and normal mice were harvested and the cells were surface stained with CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, B220-PerCP-Cy5.5, NK1.1-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD11b-FITC, CD115-PE, and CD117-APC and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the percentage and absolute number of OCPs in BM. Data are representative of three experiments with 6 mice in each group; (B) The concentrations of RANKL and OPG in the BM plasma (BMp) of normal mice and mice 8 weeks after infection were quantified by ELISA. Data are representative of three experiments with 6 mice in each group; (C,D) Mouse mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens from mice at 0, 3, 5, 8, or 13 weeks post-infection or age-matched normal mice were harvested and the cells were surface stained with RANKL-PE and analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the frequencies and absolute numbers of RANKL+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes (C) and spleens (D). Data are representative of three independent experiments with 6 mice in each group; (E) Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal and S.japonicum-infected mice treated with or without anti-RANKL blocking antibody, and analyzed by X-ray. Representative of X-ray images of femurs. (F) Representative μCT images of distal femurs (top, longitudinal view; second, axial view of metaphyseal region; third, 3D view of metaphyseal region; bottom, axial 3D view of the cortical region); (G) Quantitative assessment of tissue volume (TV), bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV) (n = 4–5, pool of two independent experiments). *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

Both B cells and CD4+ T cells contribute to the increased level of RANKL during schistosome infection

Given that CD4+ T cells and B cells are viewed as the predominant cellular sources of RANKL in some inflammatory conditions [18,19], we evaluated the distribution of RANKL+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens during infection. We found that both CD4+ T cells and B cells were shown to be major in vivo sources of RANKL during schistosome infection, and accounted for more than 90% of total RANKL+ cells (Fig 4A and 4B). We next analyzed the relative contribution of CD4+ T cells and B cells to the increased RANKL+ cells in schistosome-infected mice. Results showed that both CD4+ T cells and B cells were likely to be the major contributors to the increased RANKL+ cells during schistosome infection (Fig 4B–4J). A similar increased frequency of RANKL+ lymphocytes was observed in BM in schistosome-infected mice, most of which are constituted by T cells (S3C Fig). Our results, in conjunction with our observation that there was an evaluated level of osteoclastogenic cytokine RANKL in BM, suggest that CD4+ T cells are likely to be an important contributor to RANKL-mediated bone loss in schistosome-infected mice through releasing soluble RANKL.

Fig 4. CD4+ T cells contributed to the increased level of RANKL during schistosome infection.

Fig 4

Mouse mesenteric lymph nodes and spleens from mice at 0, 3, 5, 8, or 13 weeks post-infection or age-matched normal mice were harvested and the cells were surface stained with CD3- PerCP-Cy5.5, CD4-APC, CD19-FITC, and RANKL-PE, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the distribution of B cells (red), CD4+ T (blue), CD4- T (green), and the other cells (black) within total RANKL+ cells in infected and normal mice. Areas represent the means of percentages of B cells, CD4+ T, CD4- T, and the other cells within total RANKL+ cells. Gated to RANKL+ cells; (C-F) Flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the frequencies and absolute numbers of RANKL+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes (C-D) and spleens (E-F), Gated to CD3+ cells; The percentages of RANKL+ cells of CD4+ T cells in the graphs were calculated by RANKL+CD4+ / (RANKL+CD4+ + RANKL-CD4+) in the plots. (G-J) Flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the frequencies and absolute numbers of RANKL+ cells with CD19+ cells mesenteric lymph nodes (G-H) and spleens (I-J), Gated to total lymphocytes. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 6 mice in each group. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001.

Tfh cells are an important cellular source of RANKL during schistosome infection

CD4+ T cells can differentiate into several subsets including Th1, Th2, Th17, Tfh, and Treg cells in humans and mice during schistosome infection [9]. To investigate the exact cellular mechanisms responsible for schistosome infection-induced bone loss, we analyzed the distribution of RANKL+ CD4+ T cells in mice 8 and 13 weeks after infection, and found that Tfh cells were a major cellular source of RANKL during schistosome infection (Fig 5A and 5B). More importantly, the percentage of RANKL+ Tfh cells within CD4+ T cells had been increased by approximately 5-fold in mice since 8 weeks after infection (Fig 5C), suggesting that Tfh cells were an important contributor to the increased RANKL+ cells in vivo, and involved in osteoporosis-associated bone loss during schistosome infection.

Fig 5. Tfh cells were identified as a predominant cellular source of RANKL during schistosome infection.

Fig 5

Spleens (SP) and mesenteric lymph nodes (LN) were from wildtype (WT) or ICOSL knockout (KO) mice at 8 or 13 weeks post-infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry data plots and statistics show the distribution of Tfh (red), Treg (blue), Th1 (green), Th2 (purple), Th17 (black) and the other CD4+ T cells (orange) within total RANKL+ CD4+ T cells in mice 13 weeks after infection. Areas represent the means of percentages of Tfh, Treg, Th1, Th2, Th17, and the other CD4+ T cells within total RANKL+ CD4+ T cells in infected mice; (C) Flow cytometry data statistics show the frequencies of RANKL+ Tfh cells with CD4+ T cells in LN and SP of normal or infected mice; (D) Representative flow cytometry data plots show the percentages of Tfh cells within CD4+ T cells in SP and LN in WT or ICOSL KO mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum; (E) Flow cytometry data statistics show the frequencies of RANKL+ cells within CD4+ T cells in LN and SP in WT or ICOSL KO mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum; (F) Flow cytometry data statistics show the frequencies of RANKL+ cells in LN and SP in WT or ICOSL KO mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum; (G) Femurs were isolated from WT or ICOSL KO mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum, and analyzed by X-ray. Representative of X-ray images of femurs; (H) Representative μCT images of distal femurs from WT or ICOSL KO mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum (top, longitudinal view; second, axial view of metaphyseal region; third, 3D view of metaphyseal region; bottom, axial 3D view of the cortical region); (I) Quantitative assessment of tissue volume (TV), bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV). Data are representative of two independent experiments with 4 mice in each group. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

Next, we used ICOSL knockout (KO) mice as Tfh cell deficiency model (Fig 5D) [23,24] to address the exact contribution of Tfh cells in the induction of bone loss in S. japonicum-infected mice. As expected, Tfh cell deficiency led to a significantly reduced frequency of RANKL-producing cells in CD4+ T cells (Fig 5E), which nicely supported our previous observation that Tfh cells were a major subset of CD4+ T cells producing RANKL during schistosome infection. While the reduction of Tfh cells was only slightly decreased the percentages of total RANKL-producing cells in total lymphocytes (Fig 5F). Indeed, X-radiographic and μCT analysis of the femurs showed that Tfh cell deficiency alone was difficult to reverse schistosome infection-induced bone loss in vivo (Figs 5G–5I and S5), which may suggest a possible compensation from multiple sources of RANKL. Collectively, our results indicate that Tfh cells play an important role of contributor, which may be sufficient but not necessary, in schistosome infection-induced bone loss.

Discussion

The long-term hidden pathological consequences of schistosome infection are poorly defined. Schistosome infection could affect the outcome of many other diseases by altering their host’s immunological states [1214]. In particular, the possible relationship between growth stunting and schistosome infection in humans suggests that schistosome infection may has a negative effect on bone homeostasis [7]. However, there is limited knowledge on how schistosome infection affects bone homeostasis. Given that skeletal homeostasis is dynamically influenced by the immune system [20,21,25], it will be of interest to examine the role of schistosome-induced immune responses in bone metabolism in the host. In this study, we showed that the increased RANKL, mainly produced by T cells and B cells, was associated with schistosome-induced bone loss, suggesting that schistosome-infected patients are at higher risk for bone loss and potentially benefit from coupling bone therapy with anti-schistosome treatment.

Accumulating evidence has revealed that some infectious diseases caused by bacteria, viruses, or protozoan parasites, such as Staphylococcus aureus, human immunodeficiency virus, or plasmodium, can lead to aberrant bone remodeling that is commonly associated with bone diseases such as osteomyelitis, osteoporosis, or even pathologic fractures [18,2629]. Although some papers showed that S. japonicum or its products suppressed bone resorption in the context of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), actual schistosome infection exacerbated the severity of arthritis when established CIA mice were infected with schistosome [3032]. Interestingly, schistosome infection before CIA induction reduced the severity of CIA [31]. Here, we found that actual schistosome infection results in osteoclast-mediated bone loss in mice. Bone homeostasis is maintained by the dynamic balance between osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation [33]. Because no significant difference in the progress of osteoblast-mediated bone formation was observed between normal and infected mice, we reasoned that the osteoclast-mediated bone resorption was likely to be a major contributor to schistosome infection-induced bone loss. Although some studies indicated that IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, and IFN-γ produced by activated T cells in response to infection likely disrupts OC signaling, the RANK-RANKL signaling pathway is central in the differentiation of OCs [34,35]. A key finding of our study is that schistosome-induced bone loss is associated with the alterations in the RANKL/OPG ratio, and ameliorated by blocking the RANKL-RANK pathway. Indeed, the rates of osteoporosis in schistosomiasis patients were considerably higher than those in healthy controls in the non-endemic area. Thus, these results suggest that patients with schistosomiasis, affecting more than 200 million people worldwide [1,2], might potentially benefit from coupling bone therapy with anti-schistosome treatment.

In homeostatic conditions, osteocytes are major sources of RANKL production, contributing to bone remodeling as demonstrated by previous reports [36]. However, in pathological conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and HIV infection, other cells including T cells and B cells are likely to be major contributors to increased pathogenic RANKL production [37,38]. Schistosomes are parasitic trematodes living in the inferior mesenteric veins that induce marked B cell and CD4+ T cell responses in the peripheral lymphoid tissues such as the spleen and MLN [4]. Thus, it is reasonable to hypothesize that schistosome infection results in bone loss through triggering B cell and/or T cell responses in the spleen and MLN, which induce the release of the soluble RANKL and/or home to bone marrow. Although we can not rule out the effects of other cells on RANKL-mediated bone loss in this study, our results indicated that both B cells and CD4+ T cells in the MLN and spleen are likely to be important contributors to RANKL-associated bone loss through releasing soluble RANKL or homing into bone marrow, in which antigen-experienced T and B cells return to specialized niches for the formation of long-lived memory cells [21]. Consistent with this notion, we observed both elevated levels of soluble RANKL and increased frequencies of RANKL+ T cells in bone marrow in schistosome-infected mice. In addition, several previous published literatures also show that RANKL-producing T cells or B cells in the peripheral lymphoid tissues were the dominant drivers of osteoclast-associated bone loss under certain pathological conditions [18,3941].

Based on the phenotype, cytokine profiles, and functionality, CD4+ T cells are divided into distinctive subsets including type 1 helper T (Th1) cells, Th2 cells, Th17 cells, follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, and regulatory T (Treg) cells [42]. Recent in vitro experiments show that Th17 cells can secrete RANKL, and are viewed as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset [40]. Consistent with the published literature, our results showed that most Th17 cells produced RANKL in S.japonicum-infected mice. Accumulating evidence showed that IL-17 produced by Th17 cells has a role in promoting osteocytes to secrete RANKL [40]. Given that the number of Th17 cells was relatively low in schistosome-infected mice, it is plausible that IL-17-mediated RANKL production may not be a dominant contributor to increased RANKL in schistosome-infected mice. However, the exact contribution of IL-17 to RANKL production during schistosome infection remains to be further investigated. Unexpectedly, here we revealed that Tfh cells were a major in vivo source of RANKL. Although Tfh cells deficiency alone reduced significantly the frequency of RANKL-producing cells in CD4+ T cells, it only decreased slightly the percentages of total RANKL-producing cells in total lymphocytes, which suggests that Tfh cells were identified as a predominant subset of RANKL-producing CD4+ T cells, however, other RANKL-producing cells could serve a complementary role.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that the increased RANKL was correlated with the host’s osteoclast-mediated bone loss in the context of schistosome infection, and that both B cells and CD4+ T cells, particularly Tfh cells, a dominant subset of RANKL-producing CD4+ T cells, are involved in schistosome infection-induced bone loss in vivo. Thus, schistosome infection may be a substantial contributing factor to exacerbated bone loss by altering the host’s immune homeostasis. These results highlight the risk of bone loss in schistosomiasis patients and the potential benefit of coupling bone therapy with anti-schistosome treatment.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals (1988.11.1), and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Nanjing Medical University for the use of laboratory animals (Permit Number: IACUC-1601213).

Mice, infection and anti-RANKL blocking antibody treatments

Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J, BALB/c or ICR mice were purchased from the SLAC Laboratory (Shanghai, China). ICOSL-/- C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were infected percutaneously with 12 S. japonicum cercariae (Chinese mainland strain) obtained from infected Oncomelania hupensis snails purchased from the Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases (Wuxi, China). Three, five, eight, and thirteen weeks post-infection (a time point of chronic infection), experiments were performed. In certain experiments, mice 5 weeks after S. japonicum infection were administered intraperitoneally with 300 μg/mouse of anti-mouse RANKL blocking antibody (Clone IK22-5; BioXcell, West Lebanon, NH) or isotype control (Clone 2A3; BioXcell) three times per week for 8 weeks.

X-ray and μCT analysis

The femurs from normal and infected mice were analyzed by a MX-20 X-ray equipment (Faxitron, Tucson, AZ) or a Skyscan 1176 μCT scanner (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). For micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis, the femurs were removed and kept in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. The parameters of the scan in the 1176 μCT scanner are as follows: Scan duration (6–7 minutes), X-ray voltage (50 kV), X-ray current (455 μA), number of slices (329), Filter (0.5 mm aluminium), Image pixel size (17.76 μm), Camera pixel size (12.59μm), Rotation step (0.6), and Frame averaging (1). Two-dimensional images were used to generate three-dimensional renderings using the CT-Analyser (CTAn; Bruker Micro-CT Software). Both trabecular (metaphyseal) and cortical (metaphyseal-diaphyseal) were selected with reference to the growth plate. The trabecular region commenced about 0.3552 mm (20 image slices) from the growth plate level in the direction of the metaphysis, and extended from this position for a further 1.4208 mm (100 image slices). The cortical region commenced about 2.4864 mm (140 image slices) from the growth plate level in the direction of the metaphysis, and extended from this position for a further 0.5328 mm (170 image slices). According to the published guidelines for the assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using μCT [43], the following indices were calculated with the software which includes trabecular mineral density (BMD), tissue volume (TV), bone volume (BV), bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular space (Tb.Sp), structure model index (SMI, an indicator of the trabecular structures), and connectivity density (Conn.D.), and cortical mineral density (BMD), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), cortical bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar).

Immunohistochemical analysis

Bones were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and decalcified in 10% EDTA, and 5-μm-thick-paraffin-embedded sections were obtained and stained for TRAP and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All images were captured using an Axiovert 200M microscope (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany). Static histomorphometric parameters were measured in sections stained for TRAP using Image-Pro Plus software. The following primary parameters were determined in five fields of view (×200) in one section per mouse: OC surface area and bone surface area. The values obtained from these 5 fields were then averaged and used as the value for that particular animal. From the primary data, the OC surface per bone surface area (Oc.S/BS) was calculated.

Preparation of BM plasma

BM plasma (BMp) was prepared as described previously with some modifications [44]. Briefly, BMp was prepared by flushing femurs and tibias from one or four mice with 250μL RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% BSA and 10 mM Hepes for OPG or RANKL detection, respectively. Suspended cells were transferred into Eppendorf-type centrifuge tubes, and then cells and debris were removed by repeated (2×) centrifugation at 5,000 g for 10 min.

ELISA for CTx, osteocalcin, RANKL, and OPG

To quantify the levels of CTx, osteocalcin, RANKL, and OPG in serum or BMp, RATlaps ELISA kit (catalog number AC-06F1, Immunodiagnostic Systems, Fountain Hills, AZ), mouse osteocalcin ELISA kit (catalog number 60–1305, Immutopics, San Clemente, CA), mouse TRANCE/TNFSF11/RANK Ligand ELISA kit (catalog number DY462, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and mouse osteoprotegerin/TNFRSF11B immunoassay ELISA kit (catalog number MOP00, R&D Systems) with established protocols from the manufacturer were used, respectively. CTx, osteocalcin, RANKL, and OPG were measured in serum or BMp from mice, following an overnight fast.

Flow cytometry

Single-cell suspensions were prepared by spleens, mesenteric lymph nodes (LN), and BM in PBS containing 1% EDTA followed by red blood cell (RBC) lysis. For surface staining, 1× 106 cells per 100 μl were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with the following fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies: CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone 145-2C11; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), CD4-APC (clone RM4-5; eBioscience), CD4-FITC (clone RM4-5; eBioscience), CD19-FITC (clone MB19-1; eBioscience), CD25-PE-Cy7 (clone PC61.5; eBioscience), B220-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone RA3-6B2; eBioscience), NK1.1-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone PK136; eBioscience), CD11b-FITC (clone M1/70; eBioscience), CD115-PE (clone AFS98; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), and CD117-APC (clone 2B8; BioLegend), CXCR5-APC (clone 2G8; BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), PD-1-PE-Cy7 (clone J43; eBioscience), and RANKL-PE (clone IK22/5; eBioscience). After staining of surface markers, the cells were permeabilized with cold Fix/Perm Buffer, then followed by intracellular staining with IFN-γ-APC (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience), IL-4-APC (clone 11B11; eBioscience), IL-17-APC (clone eBio17B7; eBioscience), or Foxp3-APC (clone FJK-16s; eBioscience) for Th1, Th2, Th17, or Treg cells detection, respectively. The cells were then washed twice in wash buffer before analysis by FACSVerse cytometer (BD Biosciences). FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, USA) was used for the generation of figures and plots. All flow cytometry results were analyzed and plotted using Fluorescence Minus One controls (FMO).

Statistics

Data were analyzed by unpaired t-test for two-group comparison and ANOVA test for three or more-group comparison. Before analysis, the normality assumption was examined. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. To account for the type I error inflation due to multiple comparisons, we applied the Bonferroni correction. The analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0 software (IBM), and data are presented as mean ± SD.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. S. japonicum infection-induced bone loss in BALB/c or ICR mice.

Male BALB/c or ICR mice were infected with 12 cercariae of S. japonicum per mouse. Mice were sacrificed at 13 weeks post-infection. Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal or S.japonicum-infected mice, and analyzed by X-ray. Representative of X-ray images of femurs.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. RANKL was stained and plotted using Fluorescence Minus One controls.

Cells were isolated from the spleen of schistosome-infected mice. (A) Cells were stained with CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD4-APC, and RANKL-PE antibodies. Gated on CD3+ cells. RANKL+CD4+ T cells were analyzed and plotted using Fluorescence Minus One controls (FMO); (B) Cells were stained with CD19-FITC and RANKL-PE antibodies. RANKL+CD19+ B cells were analyzed and plotted using FMO.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. RANKL+ cells were increased in bone marrow in schistosome-infected mice.

Bone marrow from mice at 13 weeks post-infection or age-matched normal mice was harvested and the cells were surface stained with CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD19-FITC, and RANKL-PE antibodies. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry data plots (A) and statistics (B) show the frequencies of RANKL+ cells in the bone marrow. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 3 mice in each group. **, P<0.01; (C) Representative flow cytometry data plots show the distribution of CD19+ B cells, CD3+ T cells, and CD19-CD3- cells within total RANKL+ cells in bone marrow in infected and normal mice. Gated on RANKL+ cells. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 3 mice in each group.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. RANKL blockade ameliorated schistosome infection-induced bone loss in mice.

Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal and S.japonicum-infected mice treated with or without anti-RANKL antibody, and analyzed by microcomputed tomography (μCT) scan (n = 4–5, pool of two independent experiments). (A) Quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD); (B) Average quantifications of trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), space (Tb.Sp.), the structure model index (SMI), and connectivity density (Conn.D.); (C) Average quantifications of cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). n = 4–5, pool of two independent experiments. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Tfh cell deficiency alone failed to reverse schistosome infection-induced bone loss.

Femurs were isolated from wildtype (WT) or ICOSL knockout (KO) mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum, and analyzed by microcomputed tomography (μCT) scan. (A) Quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD); (B) Average quantifications of trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), space (Tb.Sp.), the structure model index (SMI), and connectivity density (Conn.D.); (C) Average quantifications of cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). Data are representative of two independent experiments with 4 mice in each group. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

(TIF)

S1 Table. The rates of bone loss and osteoporosis in schistosomiasis patients and healthy humans.

Schistosomiasis patients (n = 238) from a village in Chizhou City, Anhui province, China. The bone mineral density was detected in schistosomiasis patients by the heel ultrasound. The rates of osteoporosis from the healthy controls in Zhejiang province, a previous schistosomiasis endemic area but announced the elimination of this disease in 1992, were published in Chinese academic journal [45]. The rates of osteoporosis or bone loss between schistosomiasis patients and healthy humans were analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square Test.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Supporting text.

This file contains detailed materials and methods for S1 Table.

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank Wen Jiang (Nanjing Medical University) for language editing for the manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFA0507302) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871675 and No. 81430052) to CS, the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871676) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20190082) to XC, and the grant from Nanjing Medical University (No. NMUB2018323) to WL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.McManus DP, Dunne DW, Sacko M, Utzinger J, Vennervald BJ, et al. (2018) Schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4: 13. 10.1038/s41572-018-0013-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gryseels B, Polman K, Clerinx J, Kestens L (2006) Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 368: 1106–1118. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69440-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hams E, Aviello G, Fallon PG (2013) The schistosoma granuloma: friend or foe? Front Immunol 4: 89. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pearce EJ, MacDonald AS (2002) The immunobiology of schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 499–511. 10.1038/nri843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lewis CP, Lavy CB, Harrison WJ (2002) Delay in skeletal maturity in Malawian children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84: 732–734. 10.1302/0301-620x.84b5.12642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.LaBeaud AD, Nayakwadi Singer M, McKibben M, Mungai P, Muchiri EM, et al. (2015) Parasitism in Children Aged Three Years and Under: Relationship between Infection and Growth in Rural Coastal Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e0003721. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou H, Ohtsuka R, He Y, Yuan L, Yamauchi T, et al. (2005) Impact of parasitic infections and dietary intake on child growth in the schistosomiasis-endemic Dongting Lake Region, China. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72: 534–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Anthony RM, Rutitzky LI, Urban JF Jr., Stadecker MJ, Gause WC(2007) Protective immune mechanisms in helminth infection. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 975–987. 10.1038/nri2199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bouchery T, Kyle R, Ronchese F, Le Gros G (2014) The Differentiation of CD4(+) T-Helper Cell Subsets in the Context of Helminth Parasite Infection. Front Immunol 5: 487. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maizels RM, Pearce EJ, Artis D, Yazdanbakhsh M, Wynn TA (2009) Regulation of pathogenesis and immunity in helminth infections. J Exp Med 206: 2059–2066. 10.1084/jem.20091903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen X, Yang X, Li Y, Zhu J, Zhou S, et al. (2014) Follicular helper T cells promote liver pathology in mice during Schistosoma japonicum infection. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004097. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dunne DW, Cooke A (2005) A worm’s eye view of the immune system: consequences for evolution of human autoimmune disease. Nat Rev Immunol 5: 420–426. 10.1038/nri1601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cooke A, Tonks P, Jones FM, O’Shea H, Hutchings P, et al. (1999) Infection with Schistosoma mansoni prevents insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in non-obese diabetic mice. Parasite Immunol 21: 169–176. 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1999.00213.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.La Flamme AC, Ruddenklau K, Backstrom BT (2003) Schistosomiasis decreases central nervous system inflammation and alters the progression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Infect Immun 71: 4996–5004. 10.1128/iai.71.9.4996-5004.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Katagiri T, Takahashi N (2002) Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Dis 8: 147–159. 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.01829.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teitelbaum SL (2000) Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science 289: 1504–1508. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cochran DL (2008) Inflammation and bone loss in periodontal disease. J Periodontol 79: 1569–1576. 10.1902/jop.2008.080233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vikulina T, Fan X, Yamaguchi M, Roser-Page S, Zayzafoon M, et al. (2010) Alterations in the immuno-skeletal interface drive bone destruction in HIV-1 transgenic rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13848–13853. 10.1073/pnas.1003020107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kawai T, Matsuyama T, Hosokawa Y, Makihira S, Seki M, et al. (2006) B and T lymphocytes are the primary sources of RANKL in the bone resorptive lesion of periodontal disease. Am J Pathol 169: 987–998. 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takayanagi H (2007) Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems. Nat Rev Immunol 7: 292–304. 10.1038/nri2062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Walsh MC, Kim N, Kadono Y, Rho J, Lee SY, et al. (2006) Osteoimmunology: interplay between the immune system and bone metabolism. Annu Rev Immunol 24: 33–63. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.24.021605.090646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jacquin C, Gran DE, Lee SK, Lorenzo JA, Aguila HL (2006) Identification of multiple osteoclast precursor populations in murine bone marrow. J Bone Miner Res 21: 67–77. 10.1359/JBMR.051007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reinhardt RL, Liang HE, Locksley RM (2009) Cytokine-secreting follicular T cells shape the antibody repertoire. Nat Immunol 10: 385–393. 10.1038/ni.1715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Choi YS, Kageyama R, Eto D, Escobar TC, Johnston RJ, et al. (2011) ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity 34: 932–946. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Takayanagi H (2012) New developments in osteoimmunology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 8: 684–689. 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Marriott I (2004) Osteoblast responses to bacterial pathogens: a previously unappreciated role for bone-forming cells in host defense and disease progression. Immunol Res 30: 291–308. 10.1385/IR:30:3:291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Graves DT, Li J, Cochran DL (2011) Inflammation and uncoupling as mechanisms of periodontal bone loss. J Dent Res 90: 143–153. 10.1177/0022034510385236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Triant VA, Brown TT, Lee H, Grinspoon SK (2008) Fracture prevalence among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients in a large U.S. healthcare system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93: 3499–3504. 10.1210/jc.2008-0828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee MSJ, Maruyama K, Fujita Y, Konishi A, Lelliott PM, et al. (2017) Plasmodium products persist in the bone marrow and promote chronic bone loss. Sci Immunol 2. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aam8093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu F, Cheng W, Pappoe F, Hu X, Wen H, et al. (2016) Schistosoma japonicum cystatin attenuates murine collagen-induced arthritis. Parasitol Res 115: 3795–3806. 10.1007/s00436-016-5140-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Song X, Shen J, Wen H, Zhong Z, Luo Q, et al. (2011) Impact of Schistosoma japonicum infection on collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice: a murine model of human rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 6: e23453. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang X, Li L, Wang J, Dong L, Shu Y, et al. (2017) Inhibition of cytokine response to TLR stimulation and alleviation of collagen-induced arthritis in mice by Schistosoma japonicum peptide SJMHE1. J Cell Mol Med 21: 475–486. 10.1111/jcmm.12991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Feng X, McDonald JM (2011) Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol 6: 121–145. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011110-130203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tsukasaki M, Takayanagi H (2019) Osteoimmunology: evolving concepts in bone-immune interactions in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 19: 626–642. 10.1038/s41577-019-0178-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anandarajah AP (2009) Role of RANKL in bone diseases. Trends Endocrinol Metab 20: 88–94. 10.1016/j.tem.2008.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, Kurata K, Oh-Hora M, et al. (2011) Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med 17: 1231–1234. 10.1038/nm.2452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Okamoto K, Nakashima T, Shinohara M, Negishi-Koga T, Komatsu N, et al. (2017) Osteoimmunology: The Conceptual Framework Unifying the Immune and Skeletal Systems. Physiol Rev 97: 1295–1349. 10.1152/physrev.00036.2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Titanji K, Vunnava A, Sheth AN, Delille C, Lennox JL, et al. (2014) Dysregulated B cell expression of RANKL and OPG correlates with loss of bone mineral density in HIV infection. PLoS Pathog 10: e1004497. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li Y, Toraldo G, Li A, Yang X, Zhang H, et al. (2007) B cells and T cells are critical for the preservation of bone homeostasis and attainment of peak bone mass in vivo. Blood 109: 3839–3848. 10.1182/blood-2006-07-037994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sato K, Suematsu A, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi A, Morishita Y, et al. (2006) Th17 functions as an osteoclastogenic helper T cell subset that links T cell activation and bone destruction. J Exp Med 203: 2673–2682. 10.1084/jem.20061775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ranges GE, Sriram S, Cooper SM (1985) Prevention of type II collagen-induced arthritis by in vivo treatment with anti-L3T4. J Exp Med 162: 1105–1110. 10.1084/jem.162.3.1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhu J, Yamane H, Paul WE (2010) Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). Annu Rev Immunol 28: 445–489. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, et al. (2010) Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 25: 1468–1486. 10.1002/jbmr.141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ueda Y, Kondo M, Kelsoe G (2005) Inflammation and the reciprocal production of granulocytes and lymphocytes in bone marrow. J Exp Med 201: 1771–1780. 10.1084/jem.20041419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu W, Xu CL, Zhu ZQ, Wang W, Han SM, et al. (2006) Bone density of calcaneus of 2769 healthy persons in Zhejiang province. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 86: 891–895. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Edward J Pearce, De'Broski R Herbert

14 Jul 2020

Dear Dr. Su,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Schistosome Infection Promotes Osteoclast-mediated Bone Loss" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

De'Broski R Herbert

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Edward Pearce

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: This study investigates, the relationships between chronic schistosome infection and bone metabolism in a mouse model. The data suggest schistosome infection induces bone resorption, increased RANKL by follicular helper T cells and diminished OPG. While the studies and outcomes are very interesting, the data is somewhat preliminary and there are numerous concerns regarding the experimental design and its rigor, that need to be addressed.

Reviewer #2: Schistosomiasis appears to result in immunological changes that impact bone metabolism. To study this, these authors investigated the relationships between chronic schistosome infection and bone metabolism by using a mouse model of chronic schistosomiasis. Schistosome infection resulted in osteoclast-mediated bone loss, and assays demonstrated activation of NF-κB ligand and decreased level of a molecular, osteoprotegerin. The blockade of NF-κB ligand could prevent the bone loss, which was quite an intriguing result. Follicular helper T (Tfh) cells were identified as a predominant cellular source of NF-κB ligand during schistosome infection. These results might point the way to novel therapeutic interventions against bone loss in schistosome-infected patients.

In general, the paper is well written and the conclusions are supported by the data. Appropriate controls and statistical comparisons are provided. One comment is that on page 10 the authors note that many other infections can perturb bone metabolism and growth. This begs the obvious question that the authors should address: namely, how confident can they be that the perturbations are unique to schistosomiasis? Were experiments done with other pathogens to demonstrate that the perturbations in NF-κB ligand and the decreased level of osteoprotegerin were unique to Schistosomiasis or are these noted in other infections?

More comment on the precise scope of the skeletal abnormalities in humans would improve the discussion. Are the extensive abnormalities noted in mice also seen in humans? How big of a public health impact does Schistosomiasis have on human bone disease?

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: The therapeutic study where RANKL was ablated in the mice to ameliorate bone loss, is poorly explained and the data consists of a single panel of X-ray data. This is not quantitative data and the images are not informative. Full uCT and turnover markers are needed for this study. Irrespective, it’s unclear what this data means and the conclusions of this study are erroneous, and do not prove as claimed, that aberrant RANKL underlies the mechanism. Blocking RANKL would stall bone resorption irrespective of the mechanism by suppressing basal resorption. At the very least an uninfected control group treated with RANKL antibody needs to be performed for comparison. But even with that, interpretation would be difficult. A T cell conditional RANKL KO experiment would be the most convincing, however B cells also appear to make RANKL in this model (the authors dismiss this) and other source such as BMSC and osteocytes that are responsive to IL-17 from Th17, were not investigated as putative sources. The relevant sources of RANKL remain unclear at this time.

The reporting of methodology and required indices for uCT, does not correspond to the published guidelines (Bouxsein, M. L., et al. (2010). "Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography." Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 25(7): 1468-1486). The reported indices and methodology should be revised extensively per these guidelines.

Elevated SMI would not mask the lack of changes in Tb. Sp. as suggested. SMI is a mathematical extrapolation of bone architecture based on a structural model, while Tb. Sp. is an actual measurement. Why Tb. Tp. Does not change is perplexing given both Tb. N. and Tb. Th. Are significantly diminished.

How was cortical and trabecular BMD calculated by uCT? These is not a traditional uCT indices! TV.D (mg HA per cm3) is the recommended uCT parameter.

There are many required cortical indices that are missing and should to be presented, especially given the image seems to suggest significant decline in cortical bone mass.

Analysis of the axial skeleton should also be performed.

Figure 4 shows that both CD4 and CD19 lymphocytes make RANKL during infection, however the authors conclude that only T cells contribute to bone resorption. This is surprising. The data also needs to be normalized for total cell number as % is very misleading. The number of total B cells in the spleen and bone marrow is significantly higher than that of T cells, and hence even a small change in B cell RANKL may considerably outweigh a relatively larger increase in T cell RANKL. More detailed studies would be needed to ascertain the relevant sources of RANKL. Why were CD8 T cells excluded from the study, they are also known to make RANKL.

Th17 T cells are not only producers of RANKL, they are inducer of RANKL from other cells including osteoblast lineage cells, which were not examined.

Figure 5. A full uCT analysis of cortical and trabecular bone and bone turnover markers are needed to substantiate the conclusion that Tfh mediates the bone loss in infected mice. The changes in trabecular BMD (whatever that represents) are less than half of those shown for WT mice. Thus, a partial role for Tfh only may be indicated. That is responsible for the rest of the activity?

Throughout, the X ray images are not quantitative and are not convincing of an effect.

Reviewer #2: No issues.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: A lot of grammatical errors. Recommend a native English speaker review the manuscript, or Grammar software beyond Word should be utilized.

Please check spelling of “Infected” in Figure 2A.

It is suggested that anti-schistosomal drug treatment coupled with Denosumab may be beneficial in improving bone health. Any antiresorptive drug would likely be effective in improving bone mass. There does not seem to be a specific indication for use of Denosumab simply because RANKL is increased. As schistosome infection occurs largely in resource-limiting settings, Denosumab with its high cost would not seem to be a practical option compared to a bisphosphonate which would have similar effect. Furthermore, if schistosomes are eradicated pharmacologically as suggested, would this not alone prevent further bone loss? In which case Denosumab would likely no longer be necessary.

Page 11 line 17: however, no evidence shows that schistosomes or schistosome-derived antigens have demonstrable effect on osteocytes. The meaning or relevance of this statement is unclear.

Page 13, line 18: The contention that reference 42 documents RANKL expression by Tregs is not valid. In fact, this interesting study shows that a sub-set of Tregs may transdifferentiate into Th17 cells that secrete RANKL. The Tregs themselves are not generally considered a source of RANKL, and if anything, are anti-osteoclastogenic.

Immunohistochemical studies/ How was the osteoclast quantifications performed? No methodology is presented

Flow methods. No mention of FMO and isotype controls for gating.

Reviewer #2: No concerns.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Decision Letter 1

Edward J Pearce, De'Broski R Herbert

27 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Su,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Schistosome Infection Promotes Osteoclast-mediated Bone Loss" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Minor edits need to be made.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. 

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. 

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

De'Broski R Herbert

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Edward Pearce

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Minor edits need to be made.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed in part my concerns, and the manuscript is improved. However, there are still some relatively simple to fix issues that were not effectively addressed and need to be thought through more carefully and fixed. The interest and novelty of the study remains a strength.

Reviewer #3: I am satisfied with the modifications and responses and changes made by the authors in response to the reviewers' comments. They have addressed my concerns satisfactorily.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #3: None

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. The authors have failed to address the previous concerns regarding the role of B cell RANKL production in this model. B cells are still being dismissed based on the fact that a higher percentage of T cells (60%) express RANKL. This is an incorrect comparison because, as previously explained, the total number of B cells are dramatically higher than CD4 T cells, especially in the bone marrow where bone resorption occurs and where B cell subpopulations may represent up to 25% of the total cell population. By comparison CD4 T cells normally represent only 2-3% of total bone marrow. Similar, in spleen, B cells are 50% of total cells while CD4 represent only about 7%. Consequently, even if only half as many B cells are making RANKL (30% is reported here), because there are 5X as many B cells in total, their contribution may be very significant and outweigh that of T cells. Without further data as to the relative contributions of B and T cells, the authors need to stop claiming that T cells, and in particular CD4 T cells, are the major drivers of bone resorption and make allowance for a role of both T and B cells, and potentially a greater role of B cells given their relatively larger numbers.

2. The authors contend that a RANKL antibody control group is unnecessary based on some previous studies that did not use the appropriate controls. Most of the papers presented in proof, are very dated and/or published in low impact journals and/or were simply poorly reviewed. The important of complete controls, cannot be underemphasized. In this case it is not possible to conclude that increased RANKL is driving the events simply because depleting RANKL ablated the effect. Suppressing osteoclasts by any means (as previously explained) would reduce baseline resorption and prevent bone loss. This is not prima facia evidence of a cause-effect relationship, and consequently, the authors should not over-interpret the data and claim that this experiment proves RANKL involvement. While increased RANKL is likely, all that can be concluded from this experiment is that an anti-resorptive strategy may also prevent bone disease in human patients.

3. uCT Indices. I was not suggesting that you report all of the indices in the Guidelines, only that the authors use the recommended units and document the methodology as indicated. These guidelines were developed and adopted by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, so that different studies can be compared directly and parameters reported without confusion. For example, “bone volume over tissue volume (Tb. Vol/TV)” is neither the correct index nor notation. This should be bone volume fraction (BV/TV). Cortical bone volume as a fraction of total bone volume (Co. Vol/TV) Co. is also not the appropriate unit. This should be Cortical area fraction and is abbreviated as Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar. The guidelines state: “The minimal set of variables that should be reported for cortical regions includes total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), cortical bone area (Ct.Ar), cortical thickness (Ct.Th), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.A)”

4. The non-standard indices generated by your Brucker are very confusing and should be converted to common notation used in the Guidelines. There are many Skyscan users who report data in the expected format so it may necessary to request help from Brucker in converting the indices or units.

5. Furthermore, none of the machine settings are presented (e.g. integration time, tube voltage and current), number of slices and where they were measured. Please upgrade the methods to normal bone specifications.

6. Some new uCt has been added for the RANKL ablation experiment Figure 4G, and in 5I but trabecular BMD presented is again not the key index and BV/TV needs to be shown here instead. The data in the supplemental section for BV/TV looks quite good so no reason not to present this as the primary data. The BMDs presented is a dispensable index in uCT.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Decision Letter 2

Edward J Pearce, De'Broski R Herbert

9 Mar 2021

Dear Dr. Su,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Schistosome Infection Promotes Osteoclast-mediated Bone Loss' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

De'Broski R Herbert

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Edward Pearce

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

sufficiently improved manuscript

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Edward J Pearce, De'Broski R Herbert

16 Mar 2021

Dear Prof. Su,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Schistosome Infection Promotes Osteoclast-mediated Bone Loss," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. S. japonicum infection-induced bone loss in BALB/c or ICR mice.

    Male BALB/c or ICR mice were infected with 12 cercariae of S. japonicum per mouse. Mice were sacrificed at 13 weeks post-infection. Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal or S.japonicum-infected mice, and analyzed by X-ray. Representative of X-ray images of femurs.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. RANKL was stained and plotted using Fluorescence Minus One controls.

    Cells were isolated from the spleen of schistosome-infected mice. (A) Cells were stained with CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD4-APC, and RANKL-PE antibodies. Gated on CD3+ cells. RANKL+CD4+ T cells were analyzed and plotted using Fluorescence Minus One controls (FMO); (B) Cells were stained with CD19-FITC and RANKL-PE antibodies. RANKL+CD19+ B cells were analyzed and plotted using FMO.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. RANKL+ cells were increased in bone marrow in schistosome-infected mice.

    Bone marrow from mice at 13 weeks post-infection or age-matched normal mice was harvested and the cells were surface stained with CD3-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD19-FITC, and RANKL-PE antibodies. (A, B) Representative flow cytometry data plots (A) and statistics (B) show the frequencies of RANKL+ cells in the bone marrow. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 3 mice in each group. **, P<0.01; (C) Representative flow cytometry data plots show the distribution of CD19+ B cells, CD3+ T cells, and CD19-CD3- cells within total RANKL+ cells in bone marrow in infected and normal mice. Gated on RANKL+ cells. Data are representative of three independent experiments with 3 mice in each group.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. RANKL blockade ameliorated schistosome infection-induced bone loss in mice.

    Femurs were isolated from male age-matched normal and S.japonicum-infected mice treated with or without anti-RANKL antibody, and analyzed by microcomputed tomography (μCT) scan (n = 4–5, pool of two independent experiments). (A) Quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD); (B) Average quantifications of trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), space (Tb.Sp.), the structure model index (SMI), and connectivity density (Conn.D.); (C) Average quantifications of cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). n = 4–5, pool of two independent experiments. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Tfh cell deficiency alone failed to reverse schistosome infection-induced bone loss.

    Femurs were isolated from wildtype (WT) or ICOSL knockout (KO) mice infected with or without Schistosoma japonicum, and analyzed by microcomputed tomography (μCT) scan. (A) Quantitative assessment of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density (BMD); (B) Average quantifications of trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), number (Tb.N.), space (Tb.Sp.), the structure model index (SMI), and connectivity density (Conn.D.); (C) Average quantifications of cortical bone thickness (Ct.Th), total cross-sectional area (Tt.Ar), bone area (Ct.Ar), and cortical bone fraction (Ct.Ar/Tt.Ar). Data are representative of two independent experiments with 4 mice in each group. *, P<0.05, **, P<0.01, ***, P<0.001, NS indicating not significant.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. The rates of bone loss and osteoporosis in schistosomiasis patients and healthy humans.

    Schistosomiasis patients (n = 238) from a village in Chizhou City, Anhui province, China. The bone mineral density was detected in schistosomiasis patients by the heel ultrasound. The rates of osteoporosis from the healthy controls in Zhejiang province, a previous schistosomiasis endemic area but announced the elimination of this disease in 1992, were published in Chinese academic journal [45]. The rates of osteoporosis or bone loss between schistosomiasis patients and healthy humans were analyzed by Pearson Chi-Square Test.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Text. Supporting text.

    This file contains detailed materials and methods for S1 Table.

    (DOC)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES