Abstract
Green synthesis of crystalline porous materials for energy-related applications is of great significance but very challenging. Here, we create a green strategy to fabricate a highly crystalline olefin-linked pyrazine-based covalent organic framework (COF) with high robustness and porosity under solvent-free conditions. The abundant nitrogen sites, high hydrophilicity, and well-defined one-dimensional nanochannels make the resulting COF an ideal platform to confine and stabilize the H3PO4 network in the pores through hydrogen-bonding interactions. The resulting material exhibits low activation energy (Ea) of 0.06 eV, and ultrahigh proton conductivity across a wide relative humidity (10–90 %) and temperature range (25–80 °C). A realistic proton exchange membrane fuel cell using the olefin-linked COF as the solid electrolyte achieve a maximum power of 135 mW cm−2 and a current density of 676 mA cm−2, which exceeds all reported COF materials.
Subject terms: Materials chemistry, Fuel cells, Metal-organic frameworks
Developing eco-friendly synthetic routes for fabricating robust covalent organic frameworks (COFs) remains a challenge. Herein, the authors created a green strategy to fabricate a highly crystalline olefin-linked COF which exhibited great promise application in proton exchange membrane fuel cell.
Introduction
The growing concerns of fossil fuel exhaustion and global environmental problems have prompted the exigent pursuit of alternative energy resources. The proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have been considered as an ideal candidate for sustainable energy with clean combustion products1. Proton exchange membranes (PEMs) are the core components in fuel cells, and their proton conductivity is critical to the performance of fuel cells. Thus, the development of membrane materials with high proton conductivity is a campaign in this field. In the past few decades, rational design and synthesis of organic polymers as proton-conducting materials have aroused great concern due to their good structure robustness and facile membrane fabrication2. Although the first report of Nafion (sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene-based fluoropolymer-copolymer) can be tracked back to as early as the late 1960s, the standard membranes for PEMFC are still dominated by Nafion and its derivatives3,4. However, some unsolved challenges such as high cost, high water/methanol permeability, and narrow working conditions of Nafion membranes hinder the commercialization of fuel cells5. Moreover, their low-ordered structures prevent precise structural design and understanding of the relationship between structures and properties6. Thus, developing alternative polymeric systems for PEMFC is in urgent demand.
Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are an emerging class of porous crystalline organic polymers built from the covalent linkage of geometrically predefined organic building blocks into extended two or three-dimensional (2D or 3D) networks7–10. Attributed to their well-defined structures, low densities, high surface areas, and facile functionality, COFs have been considered as highly designable and functionalized materials platforms with superior potential in diverse applications, such as gas adsorption and separation, catalysis, molecular sensing, and optoelectronics11–14. Notably, the uniform and tunable channels of 2D COFs are very helpful to enhance the proton mobility and the proton carrier loading capacity, which have been explored for proton-conducting applications15–21. The incorporation of small acidic molecules, including phytic acid22, phosphoric acid23–27, p-toluene sulfonic acid28, etc., into the channels of 2D COFs has been proved to one of the successful strategies to fabricate proton-conducting materials. However, most of the current COFs are constructed by reversible covalent bonds, such as boroxine, boronate ester, imine, and hydrazone, which usually exhibit inherent low stability especially in the acidic condition that seriously limits their practical applications toward fuel cells under harsh operating conditions.
Recently, olefin-linked 2D COFs synthesized via Knoevenagel condensation or Aldol condensation reaction have attracted continuous attention (Supplementary Table 1)29–32. The irreversibility of the C = C double bond linkages guarantee high chemical stability for olefin-linked COFs, but make it challenging to obtain highly crystalline materials. At present, all olefin-linked COFs were fabricated via the solvothermal synthesis in the presence of suitable organic solvents and special catalysts (Fig. 1). For instance, the Jiang group synthesized cyanovinylene linkage COFs in a mixture of mesitylene and dioxane with NaOH as a catalyst30. Zhang et al. reported a series of olefin-linked pyridine-based COFs in DMF solution with piperidine as a catalyst33. Yaghi34 and other groups35 successfully synthesized olefin-linked triazine-based COFs in a mixture of mesitylene, 1,4-dioxane, and acetonitrile, with trifluoroacetic acid as a catalyst, which exhibited high proton conductivity after doping H2SO4. All the reported synthesis required suitable organic solvent as synthesis mediums, which is often a time-consuming process and environmentally unfriendly. Meanwhile, the traditional solvothermal reaction was usually carried out at high temperature and pressure in a sealed pyrex tube, which hindered their scalable production. To overcome these challenges, solvent-free mechanohemical36 and ambient temperature ionothermal37 as simple and green synthetic routes38 have been developed to fabricate β-ketoenamine-linked or imine-linked COFs. Undoubtedly, developing facile and green synthetic routes for fabricating robust olefin-linked COFs is highly desirable, especially for industrial-scale production and applications.
Herein, we reported a green strategy to construct a olefin-linked NKCOF-10 (NKCOF = Nankai covalent organic framework) through benzoic-anhydride-catalyzed Aldol reaction between the activated methyl groups of 2,5-dimethylpyrazine (PZ) and 1,3,5-triformylbenzene (TFB) under solvent-free conditions. The resulting olefin-linked COF was of a layered honeycomb-like crystalline framework with a high surface area and exhibited exceptional stability toward harsh conditions, including strong acid/base. Moreover, we anchored the proton carriers, H3PO4, within the pores of NKCOF-10 through pyrazine functionalities to fabricate H3PO4@NKCOF-10, which exhibited ultrahigh proton conductivity and excellent performance as solid electrolyte membranes under real fuel cell-operating conditions.
Results
Design and synthesis of olefin-linked pyrazine-based COFs
In order to explore the green synthesis conditions for olefin-linked COFs, a model compound (2,5-distyrylpyrazine) was firstly synthesized via the condensation reaction of PZ with benzaldehyde catalyzed by benzoic anhydride39. The successful synthesis of the model compound was proved by 1H NMR and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Supplementary Figs. 1–3). Inspired by this reaction, the 2-connected linear monomer of PZ and 3-connected monomer of TFB with C3 symmetry was judiciously chosen to synthesize the target olefin-linked COF with hcb topology (Fig. 2a). A solvent-free reaction of PZ and TFB with benzoic anhydride as a catalyst under 200 °C for 5 days afforded a green-yellow monolith, which has not been observed in the COF field yet (Supplementary Fig. 4). This exciting result inspired us to use reaction containers with different shapes to control the shapes of the formed monoblock (e.g., cylinder, pellet). This discovery demonstrates great potential to fabricate continuous COF monoliths toward special applications. The formed samples were thoroughly washed with methanol to remove the benzoic anhydride and then dried at 80 °C to obtain the purified NKCOF-10. The crystalline structure of NKCOF-10 was examined by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns. As shown in Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 5, the existence of a narrow fwhm100 of 0.81° in the PXRD pattern indicated that NKCOF-10 had a high degree of crystallinity with long-range ordering in the frameworks. Pawley refinements was performed with the data from the PXRD pattern to yield unit cell parameters of a = b = 23.06 Å, c = 3.46 Å, α = β = 90°, γ = 120° with Rwp = 3.58% and Rp = 2.69%. Peaks at 4.4°, 7.65°, 9.02°, and 25.7° correspond to the (100), (110), (200), and (001) planes, respectively, which were in good agreement with the simulated AA-stacking model.
The chemical structure of NKCOF-10 was confirmed through FT-IR spectroscopy, solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy. In the FT-IR spectrum, NKCOF-10 showed a new characteristic absorbance at 1630 cm−1, confirming the formation of the C=C bonds in the as-prepared COF skeletons (Fig. 3a). The C–H stretching vibration peak of methyl (3000 cm−1) of the PZ monomer disappeared, and the C=O stretching vibration of the TFB monomer was attenuated in NKCOF-10, indicative of the polymerization. Moreover, the complete removal of benzoic anhydride via washing with methanol was verified in NKCOF-10 via FT-IR (Supplementary Fig. 6). Comparing the solid-state 13C NMR spectrum of NKCOF-10 with the liquid 13C NMR spectra of the model compound (2,5-distyrylpyrazine) revealed that these signals matched the corresponding carbon atoms. The two expected peaks at 125 and 136 ppm were assigned to the vinylene (C=C) carbons, which further supported the formation of olefin-linked COFs. In addition, the overlapping peaks from 126 to 133 ppm were assigned to phenyl carbons (Fig. 3b). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of NKCOF-10 revealed an interlayer distance of ~2.9 Å (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 7), which corresponds to the (001) facet.
The permanent porosity and surface area of NKCOF-10 were evaluated by N2 sorption measurement at 77 K (Fig. 3c). The adsorption isotherm curse showed a sharp rise in the low relative pressure range (P/P0 < 0.05), which can be described as a type I sorption isotherm, suggesting its microporous structure. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Langmuir surface areas of NKCOF-10 were calculated to be 811 and 1215 m2 g−1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 8). The pore size distribution was calculated by the nonlinear density functional theory (NLDFT) cylindrical pore model. The result displayed a prominent pore size distribution profile centered at 1.8 nm, consistent with the calculated pore size (1.9 nm) for the eclipsed AA layer stacking model. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed the high thermal stability of NKCOF-10, which showed no significant weight loss up to 400 °C (Supplementary Fig. 9). The chemical stability of NKCOF-10 was examined via treating with boiling water, sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 10 M), and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 12 M), respectively. The crystallinity and skeletal structures can be retained, as verified by FT-IR and PXRD (Supplementary Fig. 10). The high porosity and excellent chemical stability of NKCOF-10 provide a powerful guarantee for proton conductivity applications.
Solvent-free synthesis is usually carried out under mild operation conditons (e.g., ordinary pressure) that are desirable for the large-scale production of materials. Therefore, one-pot gram-scale synthesis of NKCOF-10 can be facilely achieved under the same reaction condition (Supplementary Figs. 11 and 12). Notably, NKCOF-10 of a cylinder shape (1.2 g, height of 0.8 cm, diameter of 2.0 cm) was obtained, which showed good crystallinity and high surface area (BET: 902 m2 g−1; Langmuir: 1307 m2 g−1).
Proton conductivity
High water adsorption capacity is essential to proton conductivity under humidity. Water vapor isotherm (Supplementary Fig. 13) revealed that NKCOF-10 adsorbed 635 cm3 g−1 water vapor at 90% RH and 298 K. The N atoms in pyrazine groups could serve as primary adsorption sites for water molecules since hydrogen bonding (O–H···N) between pyrazine groups and water molecules has been observed in previous studies40. Water contact angle measurement further confirmed the high hydrophilicity for NKCOF-10 (Supplementary Fig. 14). Thus, NKCOF-10 could possess intrinsic proton conductivity after adsorbing water, which was evaluated via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). Although negligible proton conductivity was observed for NKCOF-10 in anhydrous condition, the proton conductivity value increased dramatically under the humidity conditions and achieved 1.08 × 10−5 S cm−1 at 80 °C under 90% RH (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Table 2). These results indicated that water molecules played a crucial role in the proton conduction process, consistent with the literature results41,42.
Because heteroaromatic nitrogen atoms can act as protonation sites43, pyrazine groups in NKCOF-10 possess the potential to bind with proton carriers such as H3PO4. In order to further improve the proton conductivity, H3PO4 was successfully loaded into the channel of NKCOF-10 (termed as H3PO4@NKCOF-10) by the traditional immersing method. Notably, the COF powders exhibited a pronounced color change from greenish-yellow to red upon exposure to H3PO4 solutions (Fig. 4b), accompanied by a redshift of adsorption band in the solid-state Ultraviolet-visible spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 15)44–46. FT-IR spectroscopy further evidenced the protonation of the pyrazine (Supplementary Fig. 16). In the protonated structure, the typical absorption peaks of the pyrazine units shifted from 1479 to 1481 cm−1 (stretching mode), and from 1350 to 1360 cm−1 (breathing mode). The H3PO4 loading efficiency in H3PO4@NKCOF-10 was calculated to be ~31 wt% after weighing. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) mapping images demonstrated that H3PO4 was homogeneously distributed throughout the COF particles (Supplementary Fig. 17). The BET surface area of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 showed a dramatic decrease, which further confirmed the loading of H3PO4 molecules in the channel of the COF (Supplementary Fig. 18). Although the crystallinity of NKCOF-10 decreased due to the loading of amorphous guests (i.e., H3PO4) in the channels, the crystallinity can fully recover after washing with a saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution, water, and alcohol (Supplementary Fig. 19).
Next, we investigated the proton conductivity of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 from 298 to 353 K under 90% RH, and the Nyquist plots were shown in Fig. 4c. H3PO4@NKCOF-10 had a proton conductivity of 6.97 × 10−2 S cm−1 at 298 K, which is the highest value among all reported COFs under the same conditions (Supplementary Table 3). With the increase of temperature, the proton conductivity value continued to rise and reached up to 9.04 × 10−2 S cm−1 at 353 K (Supplementary Table 2), which was almost four orders of magnitude higher than the pristine NKCOF-10 without loading H3PO4. The activation energy (Ea) value of proton conduction for H3PO4@NKCOF-10 was 0.06 eV calculated from temperature-dependent Arrhenius plots (Fig. 4d). This value was much smaller than the pristine NKCOF-10 (Ea = 0.4 eV), Nafion film (0.22 eV), and all reported COFs (Supplementary Table 3)47, indicating the Grotthuss mechanism (Ea < 0.4 eV) rather than the vehicular-type mechanism (Ea > 0.4 eV)48. To further evident the critical role of water molecules in the proton transport mechanism, the humidity-dependent proton conductivity of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 was measured at 50 °C (Supplementary Fig. 20). The proton conductivity value drastically increased from 3.77 × 10−4 to 7.8 × 10−2 S cm−1 when RH raised from 10% to 90%. The water adsorption isotherms and hydrophobic angle measurements indicated high water uptake capacity and hydrophilicity property for H3PO4@NKCOF-10 (Supplementary Figs. 13 and 21). Thus, the adsorbed water molecules can assist the formation of hydrogen-bonding networks in the COF channels via P = O···H–O and O–H···N = C interactions in nanochannels, which supported a hydrogen-bond-mediated proton transport mechanism. In addition, the high proton conductivity of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 can be retained upon continuous run over 2 days (Supplementary Fig. 22), indicative of no leakage of H3PO4 and high conductivity stability. The content of H3PO4 was maintained after EIS measurements by TGA analysis (Supplementary Fig. 23), further confirming no leakage of H3PO4 during the EIS measurements.
The ultrahigh proton conductivity of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 can be comparable to traditional Nafion materials48, making it a promising candidate as solid-state electrolytes in PEMFCs. Fabrication of COF membranes with good mechanical properties is essential for practical application as fuel cell membranes49. Thus, we mixed a small amount of PTFE (3 wt%) into H3PO4@NKCOF-10 as a binder to fabricate a large-scale, self-standing membrane (Supplementary Figs. 24 and 25)50. The formed membrane was used as solid-state electrolytes for the construction of PEM fuel cells under H2/O2 operation conditions (Fig. 5a). The anode and cathode layers were fabricated using a commercial 40% Pt/C catalyst, and the Pt loading was maintained as 1 mg cm−1 on each electrode. As shown in Fig. 5b, the single-cell assembly exhibited an open circuit voltage (OCVs) of 0.87 V, indicating that the composite membrane could be in good contact with electrodes and no fuel gas leak in this system. Notably, H3PO4@NKCOF-10 shows a maximum power density of 135 mW cm−2 and a maximum current density of 676 mA cm−2 at 323 K, which are higher than the cell with Nafion membrane and the benchmark COF material (i.e., H3PO4@NKCOF-1)27. These results further suggested that H3PO4@NKCOF-10 was a promising, highly conductive material for PEMFC applications.
In conclusion, we developed a green synthesis strategy to synthesize a highly crystalline olefin-linked COF through a benzoic-anhydride-catalyzed Aldol reaction under solvent-free conditions. The formed COF (NKCOF-10) possessed a honeycomb-like layered framework with high surface areas and exhibited exceptional stability toward harsh conditions (e.g., strong acid and base). The nitrogen sites on the pore wall were exploited to confine and stabilize the H3PO4 within the 1D nanochannels that afforded both ultrahigh proton conductivity (9.04 × 10−2 S cm−1) and ultralow activation energy (0.06 eV). Noteworthily, the proton conductivity (6.97 × 10−2 S cm−1) at 298 K for H3PO4@NKCOF-10 was a new record for all reported COFs under the same conditions. Furthermore, a realistic proton exchange membrane fuel cell using H3PO4@NKCOF-10 as the solid electrolyte reached values up to 135 mW cm−2 and 676 mA cm−2 for maximum power and current density, respectively, the best performance for COF materials reported so far. Further studies to explore the generality of this green synthesis approach and apply the olefin-linked COFs for photoactuator and membrane separation application are ongoing in our group. We anticipate that this study will open up new possibilities for the green synthesis of advanced materials, especially COFs, and provide important guidance for the rational design and synthesis of polymeric materials for proton-exchange membrane fuel cell applications.
Methods
General
Unless otherwise stated, all materials were commercially available and used without further purification. All solvents were of analytical grade and used without further purification. PZ and TFB were purchased from HEOWNS. Benzoic anhydride was purchased from Alfa Aesar.
Characterization
Solid-state NMR experiments were performed on Varian Infinityplus 300 solid-state NMR spectrometer (300 MHz) using a 4 mm double resonance MAS probe. 13C NMR spectra were collected using the rotor frequency of 10 kHz with a contact time of 2 ms (ramp 100) and a pulse delay of 3 s. The cross polarization time was 1 ms 1H NMR spectra was recorded on Bruker AV400 instruments at 400 MHz. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield from internal tetramethylsilane. The surface areas of tested materials were determined using a Micromeritics ASAP-2046. Pore size distributions and pore volumes were derived from the adsorption branches of the isotherms using the NLDFT pore model for pillared clay with cylindrical pore geometry. PXRD patterns of all the materials were collected at ambient temperature on Rigaku dmax 2500 diffractometer using Cu Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation, with a scan speed of 1°/min, a step size of 0.02° in 2θ, and a 2θ range of 2–40°. The absorption of water vapor was screened using a Micromeritics ASAP-2020. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Nicolet iS 50 ATR-FTIR instrument. Ultraviolet–visible absorption spectra of solution samples are collected using an Agilent Cary 100 UV/Vis spectrophotometer with background correction. SEM images were taken with Hitachi JSM-7500F SEM. HRTEM images were characterized on a FEI Talos F200X G2 electron microscope. The electrochemical workstation, CompactStat, IVIUM Tech., was applied to measure the proton conductivity. Hydrophobic angle measurement was recorded using a SINDIN SDC-200.
Synthesis of NKCOF-10
In a typical synthesis, TFB (16.2 mg, 0.1 mmol), PZ (16.2 μL, 0.15 mmol), and benzoic anhydride (45 mg, 0.2 mmol) were weighed into a Pyrex tube. The tube was degassed by the freeze–pump–thaw technique three times and sealed under vacuum. Then the tube was transferred into an oven to heat at 200 °C for 5 days yielding a greenish brown solid. The greenish brown solid was collected then solvent exchanged with THF and methanol, and dried at 100 °C under vacuum for 12 h to afford NKCOF-10.
Bulky production of NKCOF-10
TFB (648 mg, 4.0 mmol), PZ (649 μL, 6.0 mmol), and benzoic anhydride (2714 mg, 12.0 mmol) were added into a 25 mL Pyrex tube. The tube was degassed by the freeze–pump–thaw technique three times and sealed under vacuum. Then the tube was treated at 200 °C for 5 days to finish the solvent-free condensation. The cylinder shape material was collected and washed with THF and methanol, and dried at 100 °C under vacuum for 12 h. The weight of purified NKCOF-10 was 1.2 g.
Synthesis of H3PO4@NKCOF-10
Dried NKCOF-10 powders sample (W1, mg) were soaked in 4 M H3PO4 for 24 h at room temperature. Centrifugation and removal of the solvent, and then dried at 120 °C for 10 h to obtain dry H3PO4@NKCOF-10, the weight (W2, mg). The amount of H3PO4 incorporated into COF was calculated by the following equation:
1 |
The measurement was repeated three times and the standard deviation was within ±2.0%.
Proton conductivity measurements
Proton conductivity of the COFs was measured by AC impedance using Ivium CompactStat potentiostat B31250 under controlled humidity and temperature. About 50 mg materials were pressed into circular pellets (13 mm in diameter, 200–400 μm in thickness) under a pressure of 30 MPa for 15 s. The rectangular pellets were placed between two-electrode cell connected with Ivium CompactStat potentiostat B31250 by a conductive wire. The temperature dependence of proton conductivity was tested by EIS with a tuned frequency range from 1 Hz to 1 MHz and an alternating potential of 100 mV in a humidity chamber maintained at 90% RH. The humidity dependence of proton conductivity was determined using different humidities controlled by saturated salt aqueous solutions in a constant temperature and humidity chamber. When changing temperature or humidity, the pellets were equilibrated for 2 h. Proton conductivity (σ, S cm−1) was calculated by the following equation:
2 |
where σ is the proton conductivity (S cm−1), L is the thickness of the pellet (cm), A is the area of the pellet (cm2), and R is the resistance (Ω) of the pellet corresponding to the real Z′ Nyquist plot. An equivalent circuit (shown below) is adopted to fit the data in Z-plot software.
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells
Fabrication of the anode and the cathode electrodes: Weighing 30 mg of Pt/C (containing 40% of Pt) and dispersing it into a mixture solvent of isopropanol (1 mL), water (150 μL), and Nafion (500 μL, 5 wt% in water) to form a uniform suspension. Then, coating the suspension onto a 12 cm2 (3 cm × 4 cm) carbon paper, dried in the oven. So the Pt-loading controlled was controlled as 1.0 mg cm−2. The MEA was prepared by sandwiching the H3PO4@NKCOF-10 membrane between the anode and cathode electrodes with maintaining an active area of 2 cm × 2 cm for the cathode electrodes (for O2 passage). Because the area of H3PO4@NKCOF-10 membrane was smaller than that of the air-flow passages of the test device, we used an active area of 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm for the anode electrodes (for H2 passage), with other regions kept airtight. The measurement was carried out using standard PEMFCs protocol in a 100% humid H2 and O2 environment where the gas flow was 50 mL/min to both the anode and cathode. The test was carried out without any back pressure. The measurement was operated at a cell temperature of 60 °C.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0907300), 111 projects (B12015), and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2019M660974). We also thank Professor Zhongyi Jiang’s team from Tianjin University for the assistance in evaluating the PEMFC performance. Dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Chemistry at Nankai University.
Author contributions
Z.Z. conceived and designed the project. Z.W., Y.Y., and Zf.Z. performed the experiments. P.Z., Y.Z., and J.L. helped with the structural characterization analysis. Y.C., and P.C. helped to analyze the results of proton conductivity tests. S.M. helped to simulate the structure of COFs. Z.Z. and Z.W. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all the authors.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, as well as the Supplementary Information file, or available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Dmitrii Perepichka and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Zhifang Wang, Yi Yang, Zhengfeng Zhao.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-22288-9.
References
- 1.Jacobson, M. Z., Colella, W. G. & Golden, D. M. Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Science308, 1901–1905 (2005). 10.1126/science.1109157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang, H. & Shen, P. K. Advances in the high performance polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. Chem. Soc. Rev.41, 2382–2394 (2012). 10.1039/c2cs15269j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Slade, R. C. T. & Varcoe, J. R. Investigations of conductivity in FEP-based radiation-grafted alkaline anion-exchange membranes. Solid State Ion.176, 585–597 (2005). 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.09.044 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Trigg, E. B. et al. Self-assembled highly ordered acid layers in precisely sulfonated polyethylene produce efficient proton transport. Nat. Mater.17, 725–731 (2018). 10.1038/s41563-018-0097-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nasef, M. M. Radiation-grafted membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: current trends and future directions. Chem. Rev.114, 12278–12329 (2014). 10.1021/cr4005499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meng, X., Wang, H.-N., Song, S.-Y. & Zhang, H.-J. Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials. Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 464–480 (2017). 10.1039/C6CS00528D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Côté, A. P. et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science310, 1166 (2005). 10.1126/science.1120411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li, X., Yadav, P. & Loh, K. P. Function-oriented synthesis of two-dimensional (2D) covalent organic frameworks-from 3D solids to 2D sheets. Chem. Soc. Rev.49, 4835–4866 (2020). 10.1039/D0CS00236D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ding, S.-Y. & Wang, W. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs): from design to applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.42, 548–568 (2013). 10.1039/C2CS35072F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Geng, K. et al. Covalent organic frameworks: design, synthesis, and functions. Chem. Rev.120, 8814–8933 (2020). 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00550 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu, X. et al. Recent advances in covalent organic frameworks (COFs) as a smart sensing material. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 5266–5302 (2019). 10.1039/C9CS00299E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li, J. et al. Bulk COFs and COF nanosheets for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev.49, 3565–3604 (2020). 10.1039/D0CS00017E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yusran, Y., Guan, X., Li, H., Fang, Q. & Qiu, S. Postsynthetic functionalization of covalent organic frameworks. Natl Sci. Rev.7, 170–190 (2019). 10.1093/nsr/nwz122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang, Z., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z. & Ma, S. Covalent organic frameworks for separation applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.49, 708–735 (2020). 10.1039/C9CS00827F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo, Z.-C., Shi, Z.-Q., Wang, X.-Y., Li, Z.-F. & Li, G. Proton conductive covalent organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev.422, 213465 (2020). 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213465 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou, B. et al. Simple tansformation of covalent organic frameworks to highly proton-conductive electrolytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces12, 8198–8205 (2020). 10.1021/acsami.9b19953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peng, Y. et al. Mechanoassisted synthesis of sulfonated covalent organic frameworks with high intrinsic proton conductivity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces8, 18505–18512 (2016). 10.1021/acsami.6b06189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Montoro, C. et al. Ionic conductivity and potential application for fuel cell of a modified imine-based covalent organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 10079–10086 (2017). 10.1021/jacs.7b05182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen, S. et al. Tuning proton dissociation energy in proton carrier doped 2D covalent organic frameworks for anhydrous proton conduction at elevated temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A8, 13702–13709 (2020). 10.1039/D0TA04488A [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xie, Z. et al. Stable 2D heteroporous covalent organic frameworks for efficient ionic conduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 15742–15746 (2019). 10.1002/anie.201909554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ranjeesh, K. C. et al. Imidazole-linked crystalline two-dimensional polymer with ultrahigh proton-conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 14950–14954 (2019). 10.1021/jacs.9b06080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chandra, S. et al. Interplaying intrinsic and extrinsic proton conductivities in covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Mater.28, 1489–1494 (2016). 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04947 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shinde, D. B. et al. A mechanochemically synthesized covalent organic framework as a proton-conducting solid electrolyte. J. Mater. Chem. A4, 2682–2690 (2016). 10.1039/C5TA10521H [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tao, S. et al. Confining H3PO4 network in covalent organic frameworks enables proton super flow. Nat. Commun.11, 1981 (2020). 10.1038/s41467-020-15918-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu, X. et al. Perfluoroalkyl-functionalized covalent organic frameworks with superhydrophobicity for anhydrous proton conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 14357–14364 (2020). 10.1021/jacs.0c06474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Meng, Z., Aykanat, A. & Mirica, K. A. Proton conduction in 2D aza-fused covalent organic frameworks. Chem. Mater.31, 819–825 (2019). 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03897 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang, Y. et al. Combined intrinsic and extrinsic proton conduction in robust covalent organic frameworks for hydrogen fuel cell applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.59, 3678–3684 (2020). 10.1002/anie.201913802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sasmal, H. S. et al. Superprotonic conductivity in flexible porous covalent organic framework membranes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.57, 10894–10898 (2018). 10.1002/anie.201804753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhuang, X. et al. A two-dimensional conjugated polymer framework with fully sp2-bonded carbon skeleton. Polym. Chem.7, 4176–4181 (2016). 10.1039/C6PY00561F [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jin, E. et al. Two-dimensional sp2 carbon-conjugated covalent organic frameworks. Science357, 673 (2017). 10.1126/science.aan0202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jadhav, T. et al. 2D poly(arylene vinylene) covalent organic frameworks via aldol condensation of trimethyltriazine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 13753–13757 (2019). 10.1002/anie.201906976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Acharjya, A., Pachfule, P., Roeser, J., Schmitt, F.-J. & Thomas, A. Vinylene-linked covalent organic frameworks by base-catalyzed aldol condensation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 14865–14870 (2019). 10.1002/anie.201905886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wei, S. et al. Semiconducting 2D triazine-cored covalent organic frameworks with unsubstituted olefin linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 14272–14279 (2019). 10.1021/jacs.9b06219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lyu, H., Diercks, C. S., Zhu, C. & Yaghi, O. M. Porous crystalline olefin-linked covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 6848–6852 (2019). 10.1021/jacs.9b02848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jadhav, T. et al. Transformation between 2D and 3D covalent organic frameworks via reversible [2+2] cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc.142, 8862–8870 (2020). 10.1021/jacs.0c01990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Biswal, B. P. et al. Mechanochemical synthesis of chemically stable isoreticular covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 5328–5331 (2013). 10.1021/ja4017842 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guan, X. et al. Fast, ambient temperature and pressure ionothermal synthesis of three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 4494–4498 (2018). 10.1021/jacs.8b01320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reinsch, H. “Green” synthesis of metal-organic frameworks, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.27, 4290–4299 (2016). 10.1002/ejic.201600286 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hogue, R. W. et al. Self-assembly of cyclohelicate [M3L3] triangles over [M4L4] squares, despite near-linear bis-terdentate L and octahedral M. Chem. Eur. J.23, 14193–14199 (2017). 10.1002/chem.201702153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vitoria, P. et al. Organic–inorganic hybrids based on four-electron reduced Keggin β-isomer phosphododecamolybdates and diazines. New J. Chem.27, 399–408 (2003). 10.1039/b207243b [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ramaswamy, P., Wong, N. E. & Shimizu, G. K. H. MOFs as proton conductors—challenges and opportunities. Chem. Soc. Rev.43, 5913–5932 (2014). 10.1039/C4CS00093E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xing, G., Yan, T., Das, S., Ben, T. & Qiu, S. Synthesis of crystalline porous organic salts with high proton conductivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.57, 5345–5349 (2018). 10.1002/anie.201800423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang, J.-R., Yang, Z.-H., Liu, C.-H. & Li, L.-L. Pyrazinediium bis(3-carboxy-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate) dihydrate. Acta Crystallogr.E64, o1289 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cui, F.-Z. et al. A gaseous hydrogen chloride chemosensor based on a 2D covalent organic framework. Chem. Commun.55, 4550–4553 (2019). 10.1039/C9CC01548E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ascherl, L. et al. Perylene-based covalent organic frameworks for acid vapor sensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc.141, 15693–15699 (2019). 10.1021/jacs.9b08079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kulkarni, R. et al. Real-time optical and electronic sensing with a β-amino enone linked, triazine-containing 2D covalent organic framework. Nat. Commun.10, 3228 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-11264-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wu, X., Wang, X., He, G. & Benziger, J. Differences in water sorption and proton conductivity between Nafion and SPEEK. J. Polym. Sci. Part B49, 1437–1445 (2011). 10.1002/polb.22326 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Agmon, N. The Grotthuss mechanism. Chem. Phys. Lett.244, 456–462 (1995). 10.1016/0009-2614(95)00905-J [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang, H. et al. Recent progress in covalent organic framework thin films: fabrications, applications and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev.48, 488–516 (2019). 10.1039/C8CS00376A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Feng, S., Zhong, Z., Wang, Y., Xing, W. & Drioli, E. Progress and perspectives in PTFE membrane: preparation, modification, and applications. J. Membr. Sci.549, 332–349 (2018). 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.12.032 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article, as well as the Supplementary Information file, or available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.