Abbreviations
- ACE2
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2
- BLCA
Bladder carcinoma
- BRCA
Breast invasive carcinoma
- CESC
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma
- COAD
Colon adenocarcinoma
- COVID‐19
Coronavirus disease 2019
- COVID‐19‐SNP
COVID‐19 susceptibility SNP
- CRC
Colorectal cancer
- CTSL
Cathepsin L
- ESCA
Esophageal carcinoma
- FDR
False discovery rate
- FYCO1
FYVE and coiled‐coil domain autophagy adaptor 1
- GWAS
Genome‐wide association study
- HGI
COVID‐19 host genetics initiative
- HNSC
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
- KIRC
Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma
- KIRP
Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma
- LAML
Acute myeloid leukemia
- LGG
Brain lower‐grade glioma
- LIHC
Liver hepatocellular carcinoma
- LUAD
Lung adenocarcinoma
- LUSC
Lung squamous cell carcinoma
- NS3BP
NS3 binding protein
- PAAD
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- PCPG
Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
- PRAD
Prostate adenocarcinoma
- RCC
Renal cell carcinoma
- RPLP2
Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P2
- SARC
Sarcoma
- SARS‐CoV‐2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- SKCM
Skin cutaneous melanoma
- SNP
Single nucleotide polymorphism
- STAD
Stomach adenocarcinoma
- TALDO1
Transaldolase 1
- TCGA
The cancer genome atlas
- TGCT
Testicular germ cell tumors
- THCA
Thyroid carcinoma
- THYM
Thymoma
- TMPRSS2
Transmembrane serine protease 2
- UCEC
Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma
Dear editor,
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is an emerging disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection [1, 2]. It has spread rapidly across the world and caused a global health emergency. As of 10 February 2021, COVID‐19 has caused 2,333,446 deaths worldwide. The majority of COVID‐19 deaths had comorbidities including cancer [1, 2]. Notably, a recent study suggested that cancer was the only independent risk factor for death of COVID‐19 patients among common comorbidities [3]. Moreover, cancer patients are more susceptible to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection than noncancer individuals due to their specific immunosuppressive state [3]. Despite the links between COVID‐19 and cancer, the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms underlying these links remain unclear. Thus far, only genetic and epigenetic variants within three COVID‐19 receptors, angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), and cathepsin L (CTSL), have been investigated in cancers [4]. However, the majority of COVID‐19‐related genetic and epigenetic variants still remain uninvestigated. Here, we performed a systematic genetic‐epigenetic analysis to explore the mechanisms underlying the links between COVID‐19 and cancer.
To decipher the potential mechanisms, we first identified COVID‐19‐susceptible single nucleotide polymorphisms (COVID‐19‐SNPs) and then assessed genetic‐epigenetic links between COVID‐19 and cancer using COVID‐19‐SNPs and (1) CpG methylation or (2) gene transcription/translation data (Figure 1 a). To identify COVID‐19‐SNPs, we selected SNPs from two genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) of COVID‐19 and then filtered SNPs having a P value threshold of 1.0 × 10–5. There were 265 and 184 COVID‐19‐SNPs identified from the two GWAS studies, respectively (Figure 1 b). Since the two GWAS studies were performed in large sample sizes (both n > 3,000), we merged the two sets of SNPs and ultimately identified 426 COVID‐19‐SNPs (Supplementary Table S1 ). The detailed data analysis process for this study is described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
FIGURE 1.

The association study of coronavirus disease 2019‐susceptible single nucleotide polymorphisms (COVID‐19‐SNPs) and CpG methylation levels in cancers. (a) The pipeline of the two association studies for exploring the potential mechanisms. These studies investigated the associations of COVID‐19‐SNPs with (1) CpG methylation levels and (2) transcription/translation levels in cancers. mQTL‐CpG, methylation quantitative trait loci corresponding CpG. eQTL‐gene, expression quantitative trait loci corresponding gene. (b) Identification of COVID‐19‐SNPs from two Genome‐Wide Association Studies (GWAS). The Ellinghaus dataset includes significant SNPs (P < 1.0 × 10–5) found from the COVID‐19 GWAS study based on Spanish and Italian cohorts. The COVID‐19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI) dataset includes significant SNPs (P < 1.0 × 10–5) found from the COVID‐19 GWAS meta‐analysis by the COVID‐19 Host Genetics Initiative. (c) A heatmap of associations between COVID‐19‐SNPs and CpG methylation across 23 types of cancer, colored by the effect size. Non‐significant associations were colored in white. Since different COVID‐19‐SNPs may associate with the same CpG site, we only showed the best‐associated COVID‐19‐SNP for each CpG. (d) Boxplots summarizing methylation differences of each CpG between tumor and normal tissues. BRCA, Breast invasive carcinoma. ESCA, Esophageal carcinoma. HNSC, Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. KIRC, Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. KIRP, Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma. LUSC, Lung squamous cell carcinoma. UCEC, Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma. (e) The positive correlation between COVID‐19‐SNP risk alleles and cancer pathogenesis could be mediated by CpG methylation, underlying a potential mechanism of the links between COVID‐19 and cancer.
To investigate the molecular dependencies between COVID‐19 and cancer using COVID‐19‐SNPs and methylation data, we first investigated interplays between COVID‐19‐SNPs and CpGs in various cancers. Across 23 cancer types in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), eight CpGs associated with COVID‐19‐SNPs were identified as methylation quantitative trait loci corresponding CpGs (mQTL‐CpGs) in 17 types of cancer with a threshold of false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 and |r| ≥ 0.3 (Figure 1 c, Supplementary Table S2 ). Amongst them, three mQTL‐CpGs (cg21620969, cg18089519, and cg01741372) were positively correlated with COVID‐19‐SNP risk alleles in multiple cancers, whereas the remaining mQTL‐CpGs were negatively correlated. Subsequently, we identified methylation changes in mQTL‐CpGs between tumor and normal tissues. To obtain mQTL‐CpGs that are more likely to capture marked cancer pathogenesis and to be devoid of mQTL‐CpGs that show environmentally induced variability, we selected mQTL‐CpGs with significant methylation changes greater than 10% in tumors versus normal tissues, since environmentally induced methylation changes rarely surpass 10%. Based on this approach, we yielded three mQTL‐CpGs: cg01741372 in breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), esophageal carcinoma (ESCA), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC); cg16320329 in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC); and cg18089519 in KIRC (Figure 1 d, Supplementary Table S3 ). cg01741372 and cg18089519 had higher methylation levels while cg16320329 had lower methylation levels in tumors versus normal tissues. Collectively, based on the directions of correlations demonstrated above, the positive correlation between COVID‐19‐SNP risk alleles and multiple cancer pathogenesis might be mediated by CpG methylation (Figure 1 e).
Interestingly, all three identified mQTL‐CpGs showed significant methylation changes between tumor and normal tissues in the major subtypes (i.e. KIRC and KIRP) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is the most common (85%) malignant kidney tumor. This might suggest a potential mechanism underlying the links of COVID‐19 and RCC observed in a previous epidemiological study [5]. The three mQTL‐CpGs were separately located in gene body regions of NS3 binding protein (NS3BP), FYVE and coiled‐coil domain autophagy adaptor 1 (FYCO1), and transaldolase 1 (TALDO1) (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4 ). NS3BP and TALDO1 are associated with chronic kidney disease, which is a risk factor for both RCC incidence and COVID‐19 mortality [6]. Additionally, TALDO1 encodes a rate‐limiting enzyme involved in the pentose phosphate pathway and shows increased levels in SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected cells [7]. The pentose phosphate pathway contributes to various biological processes, including the ribonucleotide supplying for SARS‐CoV‐2 replication and carcinogenesis [7]. FYCO1 encodes a Rab7 adapter protein involved in autophagy, which is linked to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and tumor development [8]. Specifically, autophagy substantially controls immune responses by regulating the production of cytokines and the functions of immune cells [8]. The immune system demonstrates complex interactions with kidney tumors, and its dysfunction can make it harder to fight the coronavirus infection [1, 2]. Collectively, methylation changes in these genes might be associated with specific biological functions and suggested as a mediator linking COVID‐19 and RCC.
To explore the molecular dependencies between COVID‐19 and cancer using COVID‐19‐SNPs and gene transcription/translation data, we initially identified genes correlated with COVID‐19‐SNPs in transcription levels (Figure 1 a). Through a database analysis, 13 genes were identified (FDR < 0.05; Supplementary Figure S1a , Supplementary Table S5 ). Next, we tested their differential levels at both transcription and translation between tumor and normal tissues to ensure transcriptional changes leading to translational changes. Amongst the 13 candidate genes, ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P2 (RPLP2) showed significantly higher expression levels in tumor tissues of KIRC and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (FDR < 0.05; Supplementary Figure S1b and c , Supplementary Table S6 ). Given that RPLP2 transcription levels in KIRC and LUAD could be elevated by the COVID‐19‐SNP risk allele, the positive correlation between COVID‐19‐SNP risk alleles and the pathogenesis of KIRC and LUAD could also likely be mediated by gene transcription/translation besides CpG methylation (Supplementary Figure S1d ).
LUAD is the most frequent cancer type among these COVID‐19 patients with malignancies. Furthermore, lung cancer patients had a higher incidence of COVID‐19 and a greater risk of mortality from COVID‐19 compared to the general population [1]. Here we demonstrated the elevated transcription and translation levels of RPLP2 in LUADs, which is consistent with a previous study (Supplementary Table S4 ) [9]. RPLP2 is related to the poor overall survival of LUAD patients [9]. Moreover, RPLP2 encodes a ribosomal protein involved in ribosome biogenesis, which can influence innate immune responses to virus infection and shows a hyperactive state in COVID‐19 patients [10]. Collectively, it could be reasonable to suggest a mediation role of RPLP2 expression in linking COVID‐19 and LUAD.
We conclude that methylation or transcription/translation levels of four genes served as the molecular dependencies underlying the positive links between COVID‐19 and multiple cancers, especially RCC and LUAD. These findings were based on association studies on a large dataset from TCGA, and further biological experiments are still needed to confirm the proposed mechanisms.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
Not applicable.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Not applicable.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ZD and HY conceived and designed the experiments. ZD and HY performed the experiments and analyzed the data. HY and ZD wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL
All data generated or analyzed during this study were acquired from these databases: The COVID‐19 HGI (https://www.covid19hg.org/results/), COVID‐19 GWAS Results (https://grasp.nhlbi.nih.gov/Covid19GWASResults.aspx), TCGA (https://tcga‐data.nci.nih.gov), Pancan‐meQTL (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/Pancan‐meQTL/), UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) and PancanQTL (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/PancanQTL/).
Supporting information
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to sincerely thank Professor Michael S. Kobor for all the knowledge and moral support.
REFERENCES
- 1. Addeo A, Friedlaender A. Cancer and COVID‐19: Unmasking their ties. Cancer Treat Rev. W.B. Saunders Ltd; 2020;88:102041. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2020.102041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gosain R, Abdou Y, Singh A, Rana N, Puzanov I, Ernstoff MS. COVID‐19 and Cancer: a Comprehensive Review. Curr Oncol Rep. Springer. 2020;22(5):53. 10.1007/s11912-020-00934-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Meng Y, Meng Y, Lu W, Lu W, Guo E, Guo E, et al. Cancer history is an independent risk factor for mortality in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients: A propensity score‐matched analysis. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:75. 10.1186/s13045-020-00907-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Katopodis P, Anikin V, Randeva H, Spandidos D, Chatha K, Kyrou I, et al. Pan‑cancer analysis of transmembrane protease serine 2 and cathepsin L that mediate cellular SARS‑CoV‑2 infection leading to COVID‐19. Int J Oncol. 2020;57(2):533–9. 10.3892/ijo.2020.5071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tsimafeyeu I, Alekseeva G, Berkut M, Nosov A, Myslevtsev I, Andrianov A, et al. COVID‐19 in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Russian Federation. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020;S1558‐7673(20):30167–1. 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, Bacon S, Bates C, Morton CE, et al. Factors associated with COVID‐19‐related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584:430‐436. 10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bojkova D, Costa R, Bechtel M, Ciesek S, Michaelis M, Cinatl J. Targeting pentose phosphate pathway for SARS‐CoV‐2 therapy. bioRxiv. 2020; 10.1101/2020.08.19.257022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jiang GM, Tan Y, Wang H, Peng L, Chen HT, Meng XJ, et al. The relationship between autophagy and the immune system and its applications for tumor immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:17. 10.1186/s12943-019-0944-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yang M, Sun Y, Sun J, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Yao G, et al. Differentially expressed and survival‐related proteins of lung adenocarcinoma with bone metastasis. Cancer Med. 2018;7(4):1081–92. 10.1002/cam4.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zhou Z, Ren L, Zhang L, Zhong J, Xiao Y, Jia Z, et al. Heightened Innate Immune Responses in the Respiratory Tract of COVID‐19 Patients. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27(6):883–890.e2. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study were acquired from these databases: The COVID‐19 HGI (https://www.covid19hg.org/results/), COVID‐19 GWAS Results (https://grasp.nhlbi.nih.gov/Covid19GWASResults.aspx), TCGA (https://tcga‐data.nci.nih.gov), Pancan‐meQTL (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/Pancan‐meQTL/), UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) and PancanQTL (http://bioinfo.life.hust.edu.cn/PancanQTL/).
