Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jan 11;123(4):823–833. doi: 10.1002/jso.26377

Early postoperative outcomes among patients with delayed surgeries after preoperative positive test for SARS‐CoV‐2: A case‐control study from a single institution

Glauco Baiocchi 1,, Samuel Aguiar Jr 1, Joao P Duprat 1, Felipe J F Coimbra 1, Fabiana B Makdissi 1, José G Vartanian 1, Stenio de C Zequi 1, Jefferson L Gross 1, Suely A Nakagawa 1, Guilherme Yazbek 1, Thiago P Diniz 1, Bruna T Gonçalves 1, Charles E Zurstrassen 1, Heloisa G do A Campos 1, Eduardo H G Joaquim 2, Ivan A França e Silva 3, Luiz P Kowalski 1
PMCID: PMC8014861  PMID: 33428790

Abstract

Background

There are limited data on surgical complications for patients that have delayed surgery after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. We aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes of patients submitted to surgery after recovery from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

Methods

Asymptomatic patients that had surgery delayed after preoperative reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) for SARS‐CoV‐2 were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, type of surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists to patients with negative RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2.

Results

About 1253 patients underwent surgical procedures and were subjected to screening for SARS‐CoV‐2. Forty‐nine cases with a delayed surgery were included in the coronavirus disease (COVID) recovery (COVID‐rec) group and were matched to 98 patients included in the COVID negative (COVID‐neg) group. Overall, 22 (15%) patients had 30‐days postoperative complications, but there was no statistically difference between groups –16.3% for COVID‐rec and 14.3% for COVID‐neg, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 1.17:95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–3.0; p = .74). Moreover, we did not find difference regarding grades more than or equal to 3 complication rates – 8.2% for COVID‐rec and 6.1% for COVID‐neg (OR 1.36:95%CI 0.36‐5.0; p = .64). There were no pulmonary complications or SARS‐CoV‐2 related infection and no deaths within the 30‐days after surgery.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that patients with delayed elective surgeries due to asymptomatic preoperative positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test are not at higher risk of postoperative complications.

Keywords: SARS‐CoV‐2, surgical complications, surgical oncology

1. INTRODUCTION

The new coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) pandemic has been impairing the diagnosis and treatment of chronic diseases with major impact on public health, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. This could be justified by the concern among oncological patients after several reports pointed to the worst outcomes for SARS‐CoV‐2 disease during cancer treatment. 1 , 2 However, the delay in diagnosis and treatment of cancer has a negative impact on prognosis. Recently, a model for predicting the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on cancer screening and treatment in the United States estimated an increase of almost 10,000 excess deaths to the next decade, including just breast and colorectal cancer. 3

Moreover, recent data from COVIDSurg collaborative 4 reported a 30‐day mortality rate of 23.8% in a series of patients with perioperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, with overall pulmonary complication rates of 51.2%. In addition, a matched cohort study that included 41 cases with SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients reinforced a higher 30‐day mortality and complication rates for the SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients compared with controls. 5

In this setting, actions for protecting the access to health services have been proposed and are under practice during the pandemic. Despite the weakness of evidence, preoperative screening for SARS‐CoV‐19 has been proposed for elective cancer surgeries in Europe 6 and North America, 7 and also became a recommendation in Brazil since April 2020. 8 Therefore, we have implemented universal screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 with reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) nasopharyngeal swabs for all surgical procedures in our institution since late April 2020. Notably, we found a preoperative positivity rate of 7.6% among asymptomatic patients scheduled for elective surgeries. 9 These patients had their surgeries postponed, and the next raised question is about the safer strategy for re‐scheduling.

Although it has been suggested a significant increase in morbidity and mortality rates for perioperative SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients, it is not clear if these patients still have an increased risk of surgical complications in a delayed surgery after complete recovery from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Our aim was to evaluate the surgical morbidity and mortality among patients with delayed surgery due to asymptomatic positive SARS‐CoV‐2 at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center.

2. METHODS

2.1. Patients

Since April 22, 2020, all patients scheduled for surgical procedures at AC Camargo Cancer Center were subjected to preoperative RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2. The preoperative screening protocol included: (1) All patients with scheduled elective surgery were contacted for performing SARS‐CoV‐2 test, 2–3 days before surgical admission; (2) patients underwent epidemiological survey about flu symptoms or contact with infected relatives 5 days before surgery; (3) patients were tested with RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 from nasopharyngeal swabs; (4) before and after surgery, all patients were oriented to remain in social isolation; and (5) patients with positive results had the admission canceled, a new SARS‐CoV‐2 test was collected after 14 days, and the surgery was re‐scheduled only after a negative test. There were no additional costs for the patients with respect to screening and the study had the Institutional Review Board approval (#4.072.209).

From April 22 to July 2, 2020, a total of 1253 patients underwent surgical procedures at AC Camargo Cancer Center and were subjected to screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 by nasopharyngeal swabs. Eighty‐five (6.8%) tests were positive for SARS‐CoV‐2% and 17.6% (15/85) positive cases had emergency procedures. All elective surgeries with positive SARS‐CoV‐2 had admission canceled and surgery postponed (n = 70). Until the end of July 2, 49 cases have already been operated after a subsequent negative test and were included in the COVID recovery (COVID‐rec) group. Figure 1 depicts the patient's flow chart.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow‐chart of the 147 patients included in the study. COVID, coronavirus disease; SARS‐CoV‐2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Patients with delayed surgery due to SARS‐CoV‐2 positive (COVID‐rec) were matched in a 1:2 ratio to those with primary SARS‐CoV‐2 negative (COVID‐neg) that had the surgery performed according to the first schedule. Patients underwent the surgical procedures by the same surgical teams and during the same period of time. Moreover, patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 positive test were oriented for social distance and their symptoms development were followed. Oncological surgeries were considered as resections performed with curative intent and nononcological surgeries were those performed in patients without curative intent or related to the oncological management (e.g., ureteral catheter in a pelvic tumor recurrence or hysteroscopy in a patient previously treated for breast cancer).

For both groups we analyzed demographic and clinical variables such as: age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, 10 surgical procedure length, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital stay length, type of surgery (oncological surgeries or non‐oncological surgeries), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status. 11 Complications were recorded according to Clavien‐Dindo classification. 12

2.2. Statistical analysis

The patients in the COVID‐rec group (n = 49) were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age, type of surgery (oncological surgeries or non‐oncological surgeries) and ASA (1 and 2 vs. 3 and 4) to those in the COVID‐neg group (n = 98). We calculated the propensity score using a logistic regression model including type of surgery, ASA and age to balance these variables between the studied groups. A database was constructed using SPSS, version 20.0 for Mac (SPSS; Inc.). Descriptive statistics were described for both groups. The χ 2, Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the correlations between categorical variables and Mann–Whitney for continuous variables. Odds ratios (ORs) were assessed with logistic regression. For all tests, p < .05 was considered to be significant.

3. RESULTS

Forty‐nine cases had elective surgery delayed due to asymptomatic positive RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐rec) and 98 controls with preoperative negative RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐neg) were included in the study. The median time between the positive SARS‐CoV‐2 and definitive surgery was 25 days (range, 12–84). Interestingly, 3 (6.1%) cases had the second positive test, and only had a negative test after 20, 35, and 82 days.

Data on symptoms after positive RT‐PCR for SARS‐CoV‐2 were retrieved from 48 (98%) cases, and notably only 9 (22.9%) cases had symptoms related to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. All cases that developed symptoms had a mild presentation such as coryza, myalgia and anosmia, and any patient required hospital admission. Of the three cases with a second positive test, two developed symptoms but any of them had surgical complications.

There were no statistically differences between groups regarding age, body mass index, gender, performance status, surgical time length, and hospital stay length. For the COVID‐rec group, 25 (51%) cases had oncological surgeries and 24 (49%) nononcological surgeries. In addition, 2 (4.1%) cases of COVID‐rec groups had emergency surgeries due to complications during the delaying period. For COVID‐neg group, 6 (6.1%) cases with emergency surgeries were included (p = .71). Table 1 describes the surgical procedures.

Table 1.

Description of the 147 cases included in the study

Case SARS‐CoV‐2 status Age ASAa ECOGb Oncological surgery Surgical procedure Clavien–Dindoc
1 Positive 48 2 1 No Biliary drainage IIIb
2 Positive 68 3 0 Yes Pulmonary lobectomy MISd IIIa
3 Positive 76 2 0 Yes Skin resection IIIa
4 Positive 57 3 1 No Splenic embolization IIIa
5 Positive 57 2 0 Yes Cytoreductive surgery II
6 Positive 48 2 0 No Implantable venous catheter II
7 Positive 64 2 0 No Renal arteriography I
8 Positive 60 2 0 Yes Rectosigmoidectomy MIS I
9 Positive 62 2 1 No Implantable venous catheter None
10 Positive 19 2 0 No Hemangioma embolization None
11 Positive 49 2 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
12 Positive 60 2 0 No Implantable venous catheter None
13 Positive 51 2 0 Yes Brain tumor resection None
14 Positive 46 2 0 No Oophorectomy None
15 Positive 72 3 1 No Ureteral stent implant None
16 Positive 13 1 0 Yes Skin resection None
17 Positive 55 2 0 Yes Total hysterectomy None
18 Positive 26 1 0 No Hysteroscopy None
19 Positive 55 2 1 No Celiac plexus block None
20 Positive 34 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy None
21 Positive 62 2 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
22 Positive 69 3 0 No Implantable venous catheter None
23 Positive 31 1 0 Yes Transurethral bladder resection None
24 Positive 40 1 0 No Total hysterectomy None
25 Positive 38 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
26 Positive 56 2 0 No Skin resection None
27 Positive 58 2 0 Yes Total gastrectomy None
28 Positive 52 2 0 No Lymph node biopsy None
29 Positive 38 1 0 No Cervical conization None
30 Positive 52 2 0 No Implantable venous catheter None
31 Positive 38 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
32 Positive 68 2 0 No Total thyroidectomy None
33 Positive 59 2 0 Yes Radical prostatectomy MISd None
34 Positive 48 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
35 Positive 48 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
36 Positive 62 2 0 No Total hysterectomy None
37 Positive 28 1 0 Yes Radical orchiectomy None
38 Positive 51 2 0 Yes Partial penectomy None
39 Positive 46 1 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
40 Positive 53 1 0 Yes Radical prostatectomy MISd None
41 Positive 55 2 0 No Salpingectomy MISd None
42 Positive 45 1 0 Yes Skin resection None
43 Positive 35 1 0 No Cervical conization None
44 Positive 39 2 0 Yes Partial parotidectomy None
45 Positive 49 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy None
46 Positive 17 2 0 No Skin resection None
47 Positive 81 2 1 No Implantable venous catheter None
48 Positive 45 3 1 No Ureteral stent implant None
49 Positive 55 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
50 Negative 55 3 0 No Implantable venous catheter IVb
51 Negative 55 3 0 No Ileostomy closure IVa
52 Negative 48 2 0 Yes Total gastrectomy MISd IIIb
53 Negative 48 3 1 No Biliary drainage IIIa
54 Negative 52 2 0 No Total hysterectomy MISd IIIa
55 Negative 49 2 0 Yes Rectal amputation IIIa
56 Negative 69 2 1 No Ureteral stent implant II
57 Negative 51 3 1 Yes Simple mastectomy II
58 Negative 61 2 0 No Small bowel resection II
59 Negative 38 2 0 Yes Radical mastectomy II
60 Negative 46 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy II
61 Negative 60 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy II
62 Negative 59 2 1 Yes Pulmonary lobectomy MISd II
63 Negative 77 3 0 Yes Skin resection I
64 Negative 68 4 1 No Implantable venous catheter None
65 Negative 62 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
66 Negative 68 2 1 No Endoscopic gastrostomy None
67 Negative 68 3 0 Yes Maxillectomy None
68 Negative 53 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
69 Negative 66 2 0 No Tracheoplasty None
70 Negative 45 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
71 Negative 49 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
72 Negative 48 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
73 Negative 72 2 2 No Ureteral stent implant None
74 Negative 61 2 0 No Ureteral stent implant None
75 Negative 45 2 0 No Hysteroscopy None
76 Negative 39 2 0 No Craniotomy None
77 Negative 57 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
78 Negative 46 2 0 No Breast plastic None
79 Negative 55 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
80 Negative 55 3 1 No Bowel bleeding angiography None
81 Negative 16 2 0 No Ileostomy closure None
82 Negative 48 2 0 No Eye brachytherapy implant None
83 Negative 57 2 0 No Cystoscopy None
84 Negative 39 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy None
85 Negative 62 3 1 No Esophageal prosthesis None
86 Negative 46 2 0 No Hysteroscopy None
87 Negative 55 2 0 No Laryngeal biopsy None
88 Negative 45 2 0 No Hysteroscopy None
89 Negative 52 2 0 No Total hysterectomy MISd None
90 Negative 64 3 1 No Prostate endoscopic resection None
91 Negative 39 2 0 Yes Radical mastectomy None
92 Negative 57 3 1 No Choledocoplasty None
93 Negative 55 2 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
94 Negative 51 2 0 Yes Pulmonary resection MIS None
95 Negative 52 2 0 No Biliary drainage None
96 Negative 66 3 1 No Biliary drainage None
97 Negative 51 2 0 Yes Eye enucleation None
98 Negative 49 2 0 Yes Radical mastectomy None
99 Negative 40 2 0 No Total hysterectomy MISd None
100 Negative 38 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
101 Negative 45 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
102 Negative 24 1 0 Yes Partial parotidectomy None
103 Negative 38 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy None
104 Negative 58 2 0 Yes Liver resection None
105 Negative 39 1 0 No Anal fistulectomy None
106 Negative 25 2 0 No Oophoroplasty MISd None
107 Negative 81 4 0 No Eye brachytherapy implant None
108 Negative 45 1 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
109 Negative 64 2 0 Yes Paraortic lymphadenectomy None
110 Negative 59 3 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
111 Negative 52 2 0 No Partial thyroidectomy None
112 Negative 38 1 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
113 Negative 51 1 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
114 Negative 19 2 0 No Implantable venous catheter None
115 Negative 58 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
116 Negative 46 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
117 Negative 58 2 0 Yes Axillary lymphadenectomy None
118 Negative 34 1 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
119 Negative 48 2 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
120 Negative 40 2 0 No Paravertebral tumor biopsy None
121 Negative 57 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
122 Negative 53 1 0 Yes Radical prostatectomy MISd None
123 Negative 25 2 0 No Cervical conization None
124 Negative 20 1 0 No Anal fistulectomy None
125 Negative 62 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
126 Negative 31 1 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
127 Negative 55 2 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
128 Negative 26 2 0 No Cervical conization None
129 Negative 49 2 0 Yes Hysteroscopy None
130 Negative 35 2 0 No Hepatic angiography None
131 Negative 31 2 0 Yes Partial nephrectomy MIS None
132 Negative 68 2 0 Yes Radical prostatectomy MIS None
133 Negative 51 2 0 Yes Skin resection None
134 Negative 27 2 0 Yes Oropharyngeal biopsy None
135 Negative 72 2 2 No Eye brachytherapy implant None
136 Negative 16 2 0 No Biliary drainage None
137 Negative 24 1 0 No Skin resection None
138 Negative 55 2 0 Yes Simple mastectomy None
139 Negative 56 2 0 No Hysteroscopy None
140 Negative 34 1 0 Yes Total thyroidectomy None
141 Negative 48 2 0 Yes Radical mastectomy None
142 Negative 70 2 0 Yes Transurethral bladder resection None
143 Negative 75 2 0 Yes Radical nephrectomy MISd None
144 Negative 60 3 0 Yes Partial breast resection None
145 Negative 60 2 1 No Hysteroscopy None
146 Negative 60 3 1 No Transurethral bladder resection None
147 Negative 38 1 0 No Cervical conization None
a

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification. 10

b

ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.

c

Clavien–Dindo: Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. 11

d

MIS: Minimally Invasive Surgery.

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

Overall, 22 (15%) patients had 30‐days postoperative complications, but there was no statistically difference between groups – 16.3% for COVID‐rec and 14.3% for COVID‐neg, respectively (OR 1.17: 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–3.0; p = .74). Moreover, we did not find difference regarding Grades ≥ 3 complication rates – 8.2% for COVID‐rec and 6.1% for COVID‐neg (OR 1.36: 95%CI 0.36–5.0; p = .64). Yet, we had no pulmonary complications or SARS‐CoV‐2 related infection during the hospital stay length or during the 30‐days after surgery for both groups. Table 2 summarizes the clinical and demographic data between groups and Table 3 describes the surgical complications of Grades ≥ 3.

Table 2.

Clinical and demographic characteristics of the 147 patients submitted to surgical procedures from April 22 to July 2, 2020

Variable COVID‐nega group COVID‐recb group Total
n = 98 (%) n = 49 (%) p value 147 (%)
Age, mean; median (range) year 49.8; 51 (16–81) 50.1; 52 (13–81) .86 49.9; 51 (13–81)
Body mass index, mean; median (range) kg/m2 26.8; 25.9 (16.9–53.9) 27.6; 27.5 (18.8–43) .33 27.1; 26.6 (16.9–53.9)
Surgical time length, mean; median (range) (min) 119.0; 100 (10–670) 110.2; 79 (10–362) .54 116.1; 93 (10–670)
Hospital stay length, mean; median (range) (days) 3.48; 1.0 (0–62) 3.08; 1.0 (0–47) .28 3.35; 1.0 (0–62)
Gender Male 40 (40.8) 16 (33.3) .38 56 (38.4)
Female 58 (59.2) 32 (66.7) 90 (61.6)
ASAc 1 and 2 82 (83.7) 44 (89.8) .31 126 (85.7)
3 and 4 16 (16.3) 5 (10.2) 21 (14.3)
ECOGd 0 and 1 83 (84.7) 42 (85.7) .87 125 (85.0)
2 and 3 15 (15.3) 7 (14.3) 22 (15.0)
Surgical type Oncological 53 (54.1) 25 (51.0) .72 78 (53.1)
Nononcological 45 (45.9) 24 (49.0) 69 (46.9)
Surgical Department Gastrointestinal 17 (17.3) 10 (20.4) .73 27 (18.4)
Gynecology 16 (16.3) 10 (20.4) 26 (17.7)
Breast 21 (23.5) 5 (14.3) 26 (17.7)
Skin Cancer 14 (14.3) 5 (10.2) 19 (12.9)
Urology 12 (12.2) 7 (14.3) 19 (12.9)
Head and Neck 11 (11.2) 7 (14.3) 18 (12.2)
Otherse 8 (8.2) 4 (8.2) 12 (8.2)
Intensive care unit No 92 (93.9) 41 (85.4) .12 133 (91.1)
Yes 6 (6.1) 7 (14.6) 13 (8.9)
Morbidity (Clavien–Dindof) none 84 (85.7) 41 (83.7) .74 125 (85.0)
I 1 (1.0) 2 (4.1) 3 (2.0)
II 7 (7.1) 2 (4.1) 9 (6.1)
IIIa 3 (3.1) 3 (6.1) 6 (4.1)
IIIb 1 (1.0) 1 (2.0) 2 (1.4)
IVa 1 (1.0) 0 (0) 1 (0.7)
IVb 1 (1.0) 0 (0) 1 (0.7)
a

COVID‐neg: patients that had surgeries after a negative RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2.

b

COVID‐rec: asymptomatic patients that had surgeries delayed due to positive RT‐PCR test for SARS‐CoV‐2.

c

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification. 10

d

ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status.

e

Others: Vascular surgery, Intervention Radiology, Neurosurgery and Reconstructive Surgery.

f

Clavien–Dindo: Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. 11

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

Table 3.

Characteristics of the 10 patients with Clavien–Dindoa Grades III and IV submitted to surgical procedures from April 22 to July 2, 2020

Group Age (year) ASAb Oncological surgery Surgical procedure Clavien–Dindoa Complication type Treatment ICUc
COVID‐rec 57 3 No Splenic embolization IIIa Abdominal abscess Guide drainaged No
COVID‐rec 76 2 Yes Skin resection IIIa SSe infection Local suture No
COVID‐rec 68 3 Yes Pulmonary lobectomy IIIa Pleural effusion Pleural drainage No
COVID‐rec 61 2 No Biliary drainage IIIb Biliary leakage Re‐drainage No
COVID‐neg 49 2 Yes Rectal amputation IIIa Abdominal abscess Guide drainage No
COVID‐neg 52 2 No Hysterectomy IIIa Abdominal abscess Guide drainage No
COVID‐neg 48 3 No Biliary drainage IIIa SS bleeding Local suture No
COVID‐neg 48 2 Yes Total gastrectomy IIIb Small bowel obstruction Laparotomy No
COVID‐neg 55 3 No Ileostomy closure IVa Anastomotic leakage Laparotomy Yes
COVID‐neg 55 3 No Implantable venous catheter IVb Catheter infection Catheter removal Yes
a

Clavien–Dindo: Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications. 11

b

ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification. 10

c

ICU: Intensive Care Unit admission after complication.

d

Guided drainage: Image guided procedure.

e

SS: Surgical Site.

This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

For the COVID‐rec group, 18.2% of patients that developed symptoms after suspended surgery had any type of complications (Grades ≥ 1) compared with 16.2% for those who did not have any symptom (p = 1.0). Moreover, Grades ≥ 3 complications were found in COVID‐rec and COVID‐neg groups in 9.1% and 8.1% of cases, respectively (p = 1.0). Interestingly, delaying time length for surgery, analyzed as a continuous variable, was not related to a higher risk of complications (p = .18).

We found no deaths within the 30‐days after surgery. However, after a longer follow‐up, we observed five deaths. All deaths occurred after 45 days of follow‐up: three for the COVID‐rec group and two for the COVID‐neg. No death occurred directly after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. For the COVID‐rec group, one patient died after bone marrow transplant and catheter infection; one related to empyema after a pulmonary segmentectomy; and one related to hepatic progression of colon cancer after biliary drainage. For the two COVID‐neg group cases, one died due to congestive heart failure and one after ovarian cancer progression.

4. DISCUSSION

According to the World Health Organization, Brazil is the second country in the number of cases and deaths by COVID‐19 disease. 13 After considering the implications in delaying oncologic care, and the availability of ward and ICU beds, our institution opted to resume elective surgeries and implemented the strategy of universal preoperative testing. In our preliminary experience including 540 patients, the positivity rate was 7.6% among asymptomatic preoperative patients, allowing us to perform 84.1% of the surgeries electively scheduled. 9

Recently, the published data from the COVIDSurg collaborative 4 included 1115 patients with perioperative positive SARS‐CoV‐2 (835 with emergency surgeries and 280 with elective surgeries). SARS‐CoV‐2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26.1%) patients. The overall 30‐day mortality in this study was 23.8%, with all‐cause mortality rates of 18.9% in elective patients and 25.6% in emergency patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, 1.06–2.63; p = .026). Moreover, the mortality rates for minor and major surgeries were 16.3% and 26·9%, respectively (HR 1.52, 1.01–2.31; p = .047); for cancer surgery and benign cases of 27.6% and 22.1%, respectively (HR 1.55, 1.01–2.39; p = .046); and for ASA 3‐5 and 1‐2 were 32.2% and 12.1%, respectively (2.35, 1.57–3.53; p < .0001). Mortality in patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 occurred mainly in those who had postoperative pulmonary complications, which was about 50% of patients.

In addition, Doglietto et al. 5 reported a matched cohort study that included 41 cases with SARS‐CoV‐2 positive and compared with 82 negative cases. The 30‐day mortality (19.5% vs. 2.4%: OR 9.5; 95%CI 1.77–96.5) and any complication rates (85.3% vs. 53.6%: OR 4.98; 95%CI 1.81–16) were significantly higher for the SARS‐CoV‐2 positive cases. In contrast form our study, only seven cases of elective SARS‐CoV‐2 positive cases were included and only 13.4% (11/82) controls were treated during the same period of time.

Due to the devastating impact on morbidity and mortality in SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients submitted to surgical procedures even for minor procedures, consideration should be given for delaying nonemergency procedures and promoting alternative nonoperative treatments for surgery delay. Extrapolating the data from COVIDSurg Collaborative, 4 for the 272 elective cases, we estimate that up to 53 deaths could have been potentially avoided after applying a preoperative SARS‐CoV‐2 test and subsequent surgery delay.

Universal preoperative screening is now crucial, mainly in places with a high burden of SARS‐CoV‐2 positive cases. As stated, robust data suggest a highly unacceptable complication and mortality rates even for elective surgeries in SARS‐CoV‐2 positive patients, and these surgeries should be delayed. However, to date the only study that addressed the complication rates for patients that had delayed surgeries after a positive SARS‐CoV‐2 was recently published by COVIDSurg Collaborative. 14 They reported in a series of 112 patients that time from positive SARS‐CoV‐2 and surgery correlated to pulmonary complications and mortality. The authors found no pulmonary complications or deaths when the surgery was performed after 4 weeks of the positive test, suggesting that a 4‐week interval between the positive test and surgery may be a safe parameter.

As far as we know, we present the second series that evaluated this topic and we found no difference in complication rates between patients with previous positive SARS‐CoV‐2 compared with matched controls. Moreover, all cases were operated only after a negative SARS‐CoV‐2 test, and no case developed pulmonary disease or SARS‐CoV‐2 infection during the 30‐days after surgery. These findings suggest that it may be safe to postpone and operate patients after a negative control SARS‐CoV‐2 test. Notably, due to positive SARS‐CoV‐2, 2 elective surgeries were delayed and after oncological complications these cases had emergency procedures, however, with negative SARS‐CoV‐2 at this time and no deaths even after emergency procedures.

Our strategy was based on a negative control test, despite the interval between tests. The patients were planned to be re‐tested after 2 weeks from the first positive test and surgery were only performed after a negative test. Although our data suggest that this parameter is safe for re‐scheduling, we still need to determine if it is safe to operate after 3–4 weeks from the first positive test, even after a second (control) positive test or if a subsequent third test is necessary in an asymptomatic patient.

Although being an institution dedicated to cancer treatment, we expanded the analysis for nononcological surgeries and the COVID‐rec cases were matched for cases treated during the same period of time and by the same surgical teams. Despite the relatively low number of patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 positive with delayed surgeries, it is the first matched control study that evaluated this population, and our findings may contribute with valuable data for literature on this topic. However, we should point out the weaknesses of a retrospective single center study.

In conclusion, patients with delayed elective surgeries due to asymptomatic preoperative positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test are not at higher risk of postoperative complications after having a negative test before surgery. If ward and ICU beds are available, elective surgeries can be scheduled safely with preoperative screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 based on systematic RT‐PCR SARS‐CoV‐2 testing.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.

SYNOPSIS

Delayed elective surgeries due to asymptomatic preoperative positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test are not at higher risk of postoperative complications. Elective surgeries can be scheduled safely with preoperative screening with RT‐PCR SARS‐CoV‐2 testing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The study did not receive funding.

Baiocchi G, Aguiar S, Duprat JP, et al. Early postoperative outcomes among patients with delayed surgeries after preoperative positive test for SARS‐CoV‐2: A case‐control study from a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:823–833. 10.1002/jso.26377

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Miyashita H, Mikami T, Chopra N, et al. Do patients with cancer have a poorer prognosis of COVID‐19? An experience in New York City. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(8):1088‐1089. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Liang W, Guan W, Chen R, et al. Cancer patients in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(3):335‐337. 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30096-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sharpless NE. COVID‐19 and cancer. Science. 2020;368(6497):1290. 10.1126/science.abd3377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, Glasbey JC, et al. Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS‐CoV‐2 infection: an international cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396(10243):27‐38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31182-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Doglietto F, Vezzoli M, Gheza F, et al. Factors associated with surgical mortality and complications among patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) in Italy. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):691. 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bogani G, Signorelli M, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Surgical oncology at the time of COVID‐19 outbreak. J Surg Oncol. 2020;122(2):115‐116. 10.1002/jso.25975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lu AC, Schmiesing CA, Mahoney M, et al. COVID‐19 Preoperative assessment and testing: from surge to recovery. Ann Surg. 2020;272(3):e230‐e235. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pinheiro RN, Coimbra FJF, Costa‐Jr WLDA, et al. Surgical cancer care in the COVID‐19 era: front line views and consensus. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020:47. 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Aguiar S, Baiocchi G, Duprat JP, et al. Value of preoperative testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 for elective surgeries in a cancer center during the peak of pandemic in Brazil. J Surg Oncol. 2020;122:1293‐1295. 10.1002/jso.26146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status ‐ historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(3):373‐379. 10.1111/anae.14569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649‐655. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7165009 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P‐A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205‐213. 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) Dashboard . Situation by country, territory or area. https://covid19.who.int. Accessed August 20, 2020.
  • 14. COVIDSurg Collaborative . Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS CoV‐2 infection [published online ahead of print September 25, 2020]. Br J Surg. 2020. 10.1002/bjs.12050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES