Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Apr 3;2(5):571–572. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.03.019

A public health antibody screening indicates a marked increase of SARS-CoV-2 exposure rate in children during the second wave

Markus Hippich 1,2, Philipp Sifft 1, Jose Zapardiel-Gonzalo 1, Merle M Böhmer 3,4, Vito Lampasona 5, Ezio Bonifacio 6,7,11,, Anette-Gabriele Ziegler 1,2,8,9,10,11,∗∗
PMCID: PMC8018829  PMID: 33842906

Main text

The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infections in preschool and school children is an important parameter for decisions regarding kindergarten and school openings and procedures. Evidence indicates that children have lower susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection than adults, but data in children from the general population are relatively few.1 We introduced a highly specific dual antibody testing strategy to monitor childhood SARS-CoV-2 antibody frequency in Bavaria, Germany through the Fr1da study.2 , 3 We reported a frequency of 0.87% during the first wave, which was 6-fold higher exposure than reported by PCR virus detection. Children tested in a multicenter, cross-sectional setting in southwest Germany recently reported a similar frequency during the first wave,4 and a previous study in Spain reported a frequency of <3% in children aged 1–9 years during the first wave.5 We have continued monitoring in Bavaria and have now tested 26,903 children aged 1–10 years from January 2020 to February 2021, including 22,183 children aged 1–5 years and 4,720 aged 6–10 years. Of those 15,523 were tested between January and August 2020 (first wave) and 11,380 between September 2020 and February 2021 (second wave). Kindergartens and day care centers re-opened in July 2020 and most remained open throughout the year until early December. Schools closed in March, re-opened from June to July and then September to mid-December with an alternation of face-to-face teaching and homeschooling relative to the SARS-CoV-2 regional incidence.

An increase in SARS-CoV-2 antibody frequency was observed in children during the second wave (446 of 11,380; 3.92%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.57%–4.29%) as compared with that observed during the first wave (106 of 15,523; 0.68%, 95% CI 0.56%–0.82%, p < 0.001). Antibody frequencies increased in pre-school children from October 2020 and in school children from November 2020 and continued to rise in both age groups through February 2021, reaching 5.6% (95% CI, 4.7%–6.7%) and 8.4% (95% CI, 6.4%–10.9%) in pre-school and school children, respectively (Figures S1A and S1B). Antibody frequencies in 2021 were around 8-fold higher than those observed at the end of the first wave and remained 3- to 4-fold higher than the cumulative reported virus positive PCR frequencies in both pre-school (p < 0.001) and school children (p < 0.001). The five regions that bordered Austria or the Czech Republic had higher antibody frequencies (4.4%) than the two regions without a border to other countries (2.5%, p < 0.001). Both border countries had reported a high prevalence of virus infections. Antibody-positive children who were followed longitudinally (n = 66; median follow-up: 93 days; IQR 74–115 days) had increased titers of SARS-CoV-2-RBD antibodies over time (median at first sample, versus last sample, RBD: 564.1 versus 854.6 units, p = 0.001) and 64 of 66 remained antibody positive. It is not expected that the increase is due to re-exposure, but rather the natural time course of antibody responses. Among the 446 children who were screened positive in the second wave, 413 (92.6%) completed questionnaires regarding symptoms. No symptoms were reported in a higher proportion of antibody-positive pre-school children (196 of 288; 68.0%) than antibody-positive school children (64 of 125; 51.2%; p = 0.001; Figure S1C).

Finally, the screening in the Fr1da study is done in the context of screening for pre-symptomatic type 1 diabetes defined by multiple islet autoantibodies.6 We observed multiple islet autoantibodies in 34 of 17,538 (0.19%, CI 0.13%–0.27%) children screened in 2019, 48 of 17,036 (0.28%, CI 0.21%–0.37%) screened in the first wave, and 26 of 12,281 (0.21%, CI 0.14%–0.31%) screened in the second wave. No cases of pre-symptomatic type 1 diabetes identified in the first and one case in the second wave also had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and there was no association between SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity and islet autoantibody positivity (p = 0.47).

General childhood population surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies has shown a marked increase of SARS-CoV-2 exposure during the second wave as compared with the first infection wave. This increase was likely caused by a combination of events, including a generally higher virus exposure during fall and winter, by school openings, and by the introduction of new, more infectious, virus variants. By February 2021, virus sequencing in a sample of positive cases in the region estimated the frequency of virus variants (in particular, B.1.1.7) to be 65% in pre-school-age and 70% in school-age children with positive PCR. Our findings clearly demonstrate that both pre-school and school children are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and that the cumulative frequency of infection in children is substantial and higher than that reported in virus PCR-based surveillance. Some of this discrepancy is likely to be due to asymptomatic cases in childhood. Adequate measures to contain spread of virus within kindergartens and schools is, therefore, likely to be necessary for controlling infection in the community.

Acknowledgments

We thank primary care pediatricians and general practitioners in Bavaria for participating in the Fr1da study. The Fr1da study is funded by the Life-Science-Stiftung (HMGU19.01), JDRF (3-SRA-2019-718-Q-R), and The Helmsley Charitable Trust (G-1911-03274, G-1911-03274). We are grateful to participating families and children and to members of the Fr1da study team. We also thank Marlon Scholz for technical assistance, Joanna Stock, Annika Kölln for logistical support, and Franziska Voss and Florian Haupt for data organization. The work was supported by grants from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ01KX1818) and by the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).

Author contributions

M.H. and P.S. measured SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. M.H. and J.Z.-G. performed statistical analysis. J.Z.-G. established the database. V.L. provided antigen for the tests. M.M.B. provided data on health authority reported virus-positive cases and incidence in Bavaria. E.B. oversaw all antibody measurements. A.-G.Z. and E.B. were responsible for study design and data analyses. E.B., and A.-G.Z. drafted the manuscript. M.H. was involved in the interpretation of the results and preparation of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing of interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2021.03.019.

Supplemental information

Figure S1. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 antibody and PCR positive incidence in children

(A) Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive children per month (bars) and the cumulative frequency of health authority reported virus-positive children by the end of each month (circles and lines) in Bavarian children aged 1 to 5 years (gray, n = 22,183 tested for antibodies) and 6 to 10 years (yellow, n = 4,720 tested for antibodies) from January 2020 to February 2021. Virus positive frequencies were based on reported monthly per 100,000 incidence figures. Error bars show the upper 95% confidence interval for the antibody prevalence. (B) Per quarter increase of SARS-CoV-2 antibody frequency stratified by age groups of 1-5 years (gray) and 6-10 years (yellow). (C) Number of questionnaire derived asymptomatic (dark gray) and symptomatic (light gray) cases among SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive children stratified by age groups and wave. In the first and second wave 71/96 (74.0%) and 413/446 (92.6%) of positive screened children completed questionnaires, respectively. Proportions of asymptomatic cases among the antibody-positive children with completed questionnaires were 59% (34 of 58) and 68% (196 of 288) in the first and second wave in the age group 1-5 years and 38% (5 of 13) and 51% (64 of 125) in the first and second wave in the age group 6-10 years, respectively.

mmc1.pdf (40.5KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Viner R.M., Mytton O.T., Bonell C., Melendez-Torres G.J., Ward J., Hudson L., Waddington C., Thomas J., Russell S., van der Klis F., et al. Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children and Adolescents Compared With Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175:143–156. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.4573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hippich M., Holthaus L., Assfalg R., Zapardiel-Gonzalo J., Kapfelsperger H., Heigermoser M., Haupt F., Ewald D.A., Welzhofer T.C., Marcus B.A., et al. A Public Health Antibody Screening Indicates a 6-Fold Higher SARS-CoV-2 Exposure Rate than Reported Cases in Children. Med (N Y) 2021;2:149–163.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2020.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Secchi M., Bazzigaluppi E., Brigatti C., Marzinotto I., Tresoldi C., Rovere-Querini P., Poli A., Castagna A., Scarlatti G., Zangrillo A., et al. COVID-19 survival associates with the immunoglobulin response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:6366–6378. doi: 10.1172/JCI142804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tönshoff B., Müller B., Elling R., Renk H., Meissner P., Hengel H., et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Their Parents in Southwest Germany. JAMA Pediatrics. 2021 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pollán M., Pérez-Gómez B., Pastor-Barriuso R., Oteo J., Hernán M.A., Pérez-Olmeda M., Sanmartín J.L., Fernández-García A., Cruz I., Fernández de Larrea N., et al. ENE-COVID Study Group Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study. Lancet. 2020;396:535–544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31483-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ziegler A.G., Kick K., Bonifacio E., Haupt F., Hippich M., Dunstheimer D., Lang M., Laub O., Warncke K., Lange K., et al. Fr1da Study Group Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany. JAMA. 2020;323:339–351. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 antibody and PCR positive incidence in children

(A) Frequency of SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positive children per month (bars) and the cumulative frequency of health authority reported virus-positive children by the end of each month (circles and lines) in Bavarian children aged 1 to 5 years (gray, n = 22,183 tested for antibodies) and 6 to 10 years (yellow, n = 4,720 tested for antibodies) from January 2020 to February 2021. Virus positive frequencies were based on reported monthly per 100,000 incidence figures. Error bars show the upper 95% confidence interval for the antibody prevalence. (B) Per quarter increase of SARS-CoV-2 antibody frequency stratified by age groups of 1-5 years (gray) and 6-10 years (yellow). (C) Number of questionnaire derived asymptomatic (dark gray) and symptomatic (light gray) cases among SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive children stratified by age groups and wave. In the first and second wave 71/96 (74.0%) and 413/446 (92.6%) of positive screened children completed questionnaires, respectively. Proportions of asymptomatic cases among the antibody-positive children with completed questionnaires were 59% (34 of 58) and 68% (196 of 288) in the first and second wave in the age group 1-5 years and 38% (5 of 13) and 51% (64 of 125) in the first and second wave in the age group 6-10 years, respectively.

mmc1.pdf (40.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Med (New York, N.y.) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES