Skip to main content
FASEB BioAdvances logoLink to FASEB BioAdvances
letter
. 2021 Mar 30;3(4):278–279. doi: 10.1096/fba.2021-00036

Ongoing selection for a uniquely human null allele of SIGLEC12 in world‐wide populations may protect against the risk of advanced carcinomas

Shoib S Siddiqui 1,2, Michael Vaill 1, Ajit Varki 1,
PMCID: PMC8019254  PMID: 33842853

The CD33‐related subset of Siglecs (Sialic Acid binding Immunoglobulin superfamily Lectins) are well‐known signaling receptors on immune cells, but Siglec‐XII is also expressed on epithelial cell surfaces. 1 , 2 A point mutation eliminating the canonical sialic acid‐binding function of Siglec‐XII is unique to humans 2 , 3 and fixed in all populations worldwide. We and others reported a further polymorphic frameshift mutation in the human SIGLEC12 gene that appears to be undergoing selection favoring a null and/or truncated allele in all human populations. 1 , 4 , 5 Individuals who have an ancestral SIGLEC12 allele with an intact open reading frame appear more prone to develop advanced carcinomas. 6 The likely mechanism involves aberrant signaling via recruitment of the SHP2 phosphatase to the cytosolic tail of the dysfunctional Siglec‐XII.

We appreciate the strongly supportive and positive comments by Voskarides 7 about our article published in this journal, 6 which suggested that human‐specific polymorphic pseudogenization of SIGLEC12 protects against advanced cancer progression. Voskarides appropriately emphasizes the relevance of George Williams' classic theory of “antagonistic pleiotropy”, 8 in which selection for an allele's beneficial effects in early life can have deleterious consequences in late life. 9 A 2018 meta‐analysis of 247 Genome‐Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identified an association between 1377 cancer‐associated genes in populations living in extremely cold environments and very high altitudes. 10 , 11 , 12 It is suggested that genetic variants that contributed to the survival of early humans living in these extreme environments are now associated with cancer incidence in contemporary populations, that is, the accumulation of deleterious mutations in tumor‐suppressor, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation genes. 7

In response to the interesting commentary which compares our discovery with previous examples of antagonistic pleiotropy, we should emphasize that our findings on Siglec‐XII are somewhat different from these instances. First, we report selection for the null alleles of SIGLEC12 in all human populations. Second, SIGLEC12 expression is not associated with the incidence or risk for carcinomas. Rather, the null state is associated with a decrease in advanced carcinomas commonly found in humans. 1 , 6 , 13 Third, unlike the genes discussed by Voskarides, many of which are extensively studied and fundamental to cancer biology, Siglec‐XII has received very little attention to date. Moreover, our studies represent the first implications of SIGLEC12 in human cancer, with currently unknown potential impact on cancer biology, prevention, and therapy.

Despite the above differences between our findings 6 and those of Voskarides, we believe his perspective gives some useful additional clues. First, the deleterious SIGLEC12 mutation is not fully studied and understood under stressful conditions. It might be that the status of SIGLEC12 in populations living in extreme vs non‐extreme conditions is different, following the trend shown for tumor‐suppressor and DNA repair genes. Our data also shows that unlike the other examples, Siglec‐XII seems to be a suitable prognostic marker. In a large cohort study of late‐stage colon cancer patients, we found that Siglec‐XII non‐expressors had a two fold higher survival than expressors. 6 Siglec‐XII also has the potential to be a therapeutic target, as we previously also showed that it undergoes rapid endocytosis upon binding a Siglec‐XII antibody, allowing selective delivery of a conjugated toxin. 1

In keeping with the conventional theory, Voskarides also emphasizes that it is very hard for natural selection to eliminate mutations that cause cancer after the end of reproductive age. With SIGLEC12, ongoing selection for the null state might be an example of a “less‐is‐more” evolutionary scenario, where losing expression of the full‐length protein is beneficial under current selective pressures. 6 , 14 , 15 It is also potentially an example of selection for prolonged post‐reproductive life span, a trait that is unique to humans among all land mammals. Indeed, it is consistent with the grandmother hypothesis, which posits that post‐reproductive individuals (predominantly grandmothers) can improve the survival of helpless younger kin. 16 , 17 , 18 In this regard, we have reported one example of a uniquely human allele of CD33 that protects against cognitive decline during the post‐reproductive lifespan of humans. 19 , 20 Overall, we believe that the scenario with Siglec‐XII is different from other cancer genes undergoing positive selection, but further studies are needed.

This work was supported by NIH Grant R01GM32373 to AV.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Mitra N, Banda K, Altheide TK, et al. SIGLEC12, a human‐specific segregating (pseudo)gene, encodes a signaling molecule expressed in prostate carcinomas. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:23003‐23011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Angata T, Varki NM, Varki A. A second uniquely human mutation affecting sialic acid biology. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:40282‐40287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yousef GM, Ordon MH, Foussias G, Diamandis EP. Molecular characterization, tissue expression, and mapping of a novel Siglec‐like gene (SLG2) with three splice variants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284:900‐910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Flores R, Zhang P, Wu W, et al. Siglec genes confer resistance to systemic lupus erythematosus in humans and mice. Cell Mol Immunol. 2019;16:154‐164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yngvadottir B, Xue Y, Searle S, et al. A genome‐wide survey of the prevalence and evolutionary forces acting on human nonsense SNPs. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:224‐234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Siddiqui SS, Vaill M, Do R, et al. Human‐specific polymorphic pseudogenization of SIGLEC12 protects against advanced cancer progression. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;3:69‐82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Voskarides K. broadening the spectrum of cancer genes under selection in human populations. BioAdvances. 2021;3:(4):275–277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Byars SG, Voskarides K. Antagonistic pleiotropy in human disease. J Mol Evol. 2020;88:12‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Byars SG, Voskarides K. Genes that improved fitness also cost modern humans: evidence for genes with antagonistic effects on longevity and disease. Evol Med Public Health. 2019;2019:4‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Voskarides K. Combination of 247 genome‐wide association studies reveals high cancer risk as a result of evolutionary adaptation. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:473‐485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhao Y, Ren JL, Wang MY, et al. Codon 104 variation of p53 gene provides adaptive apoptotic responses to extreme environments in mammals of the Tibet plateau. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:20639‐20644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ashur‐Fabian O, Avivi A, Trakhtenbrot L, et al. Evolution of p53 in hypoxia‐stressed Spalax mimics human tumor mutation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12236‐12241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Varki NM, Varki A. On the apparent rarity of epithelial cancers in captive chimpanzees. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Olson MV. When less is more: gene loss as an engine of evolutionary change. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:18‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Olson MV, Varki A. Sequencing the chimpanzee genome: insights into human evolution and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:20‐28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hawkes K. Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity. Am J Hum Biol. 2003;15:380‐400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hawkes K. Colloquium paper: how grandmother effects plus individual variation in frailty shape fertility and mortality: guidance from human‐chimpanzee comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(Suppl 2):8977‐8984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Hawkes K, Coxworth JE. Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity: a review of findings and future directions. Evol Anthropol. 2013;22:294‐302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Schwarz F, Springer SA, Altheide TK, Varki NM, Gagneux P, Varki A. Human‐specific derived alleles of CD33 and other genes protect against postreproductive cognitive decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:74‐79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Siddiqui SS, Springer SA, Verhagen A, et al. The Alzheimer's disease‐protective CD33 splice variant mediates adaptive loss of function via diversion to an intracellular pool. J Biol Chem. 2017;292:15312‐15320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from FASEB BioAdvances are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES