Abstract
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a cryptogenic vascular disorder in the intracranial arteries. RING protein 213 (RNF213) is the susceptibility gene for MMD, and encodes a RING domain and a Walker motif. Herein, we identified UBC13 (UBE2N) as an E2 ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme for RNF213 E3 ubiquitin ligase by yeast two‐hybrid screening with a fragment containing RNF213 RING domain as bait, and the immunocomplex of RNF213‐UBC13 was detected in vivo. Analysis of the ubiquitin chain on RNF213 by monitoring autoubiquitination showed that RNF213 was autoubiquitinated in a K63 chain fashion, but not in a K48 chain fashion. Finally, this RNF213 ubiquitination in a UBC13‐dependent manner was required for cell mobility and invasion activity for HUVEC cells in UBC13 knock‐down and ubiquitination‐dead RNF213 mutant expressing experiments. These findings demonstrated that RNF213 is a K63‐linked E3 ubiquitin ligase, and UBC13 is responsible for RNF213 dependent ubiquitination. The RNF213‐UBC13 axis may be associated with angiogenic activity and MMD.
Keywords: angiogenic activity, lysine‐linked ubiquitination, Moyamoya disease, RNF213
Abbreviations
- 3‐AT
3‐amino‐1, 2, 4‐triazole
- AAA
ATPases Associated with diverse cellular Activities
- AAVS1
Adeno‐associated virus integration site 1
- CHX
cycloheximide
- CRISPR‐Cas9
clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat‐CRISPR‐associated proteins 9
- DMEM
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium
- EC
endothelial cells
- GFP
green fluorescence protein
- HA
hemagglutinin
- His
Histidine
- HUVEC
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
- K48
Lysine 48
- K63
Lysine 63
- Leu
Leucine
- Lys
Lysine
- MMD
Moyamoya disease
- NP‐40
Nonidet P‐40
- PBS
phosphate‐buffered saline
- PMSF
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride
- RING
Really Interesting New Gene
- RNF213
RING protein 213
- RPMI
Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium
- SD
Synthetic Dropout
- tetR
Tet Repressor protein
- Trp
Tryptophan
- UBC13
Ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme 13
- Wt
wild‐type
1. INTRODUCTION
Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a disorder caused by internal dysfunctions in the internal carotid artery and branches in the Willis’ circle. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 A couple of mechanisms, including inflammation, upregulation of various angiogenic factors, and abnormalities of endothelial progenitor cells, are thought to cause MMD. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9
In our previous study, we identified RNF213/Mysterin as a causative gene for MMD. RNF213 encodes a huge protein that possesses two functional domains: two pairs of Walker motifs and a RING domain. 10 , 11 The p.R4810K variant (rs112735431) of the RNF213 gene was a founder polymorphism related to MMD in East Asia. 1 , 10 , 12 A couple of rare RNF213 variants have been identified and reported in MMD patients in ethnically diverse populations. 6 , 12 , 13
The knockdown of Rnf213 gene expression in zebrafish caused irregular wall formation in the trunk arteries and abnormal sprouting vessels. 10 Although the HUVEC cells expressing the RNF213 R4810K mutant showed defects in tube formation and decreased wound healing activities, which influenced angiogenic activity in endothelial cells, RNF213 knockdown HUVEC cells using siRNAs showed no distinct changes in angiogenic activity. 10 , 14 , 15 , 16 These phenomena indicated that the RNF213 R4810K variant might dominant‐negatively play a role in MMD endothelial cells. 12
Posttranslational protein modifications by mono‐ or polyubiquitin are involved in diverse cellular signaling pathways and are tightly regulated to ensure cellular processes. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Ubiquitin molecules are conjugated at the ε‐amino group of lysyl residues of target proteins through isopeptide bonds. This process occurs by three types of enzymatic activities, namely ubiquitin‐activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin‐protein ligases (E3). An initial step catalyzed by E1 activates the C‐terminus of ubiquitin for subsequent reactions. An intermediate step catalyzed by E2 transfers the activated ubiquitin from E1 to the E2 enzyme. E3 ligases facilitate the final attachment steps of ubiquitin to target proteins. Individual E2 enzymes dictate specific biological functions of ubiquitin because the E2‐E3 interaction determines the last substrates of ubiquitin covalently bound by the E2 enzyme. 17 , 21 , 22 The ε‐amino group of seven lysyl residues of ubiquitin (Lys6, Lys11, Lys27, Lys29, Lys33, Lys48, and Lys63) can also be attached to ubiquitin through an isopeptide bond. The nature of a ubiquitin‐ubiquitin isopeptide bond appears to determine the subsequent fate of ubiquitinated proteins. 18 , 19 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 Lys48 (K48)‐linked polyubiquitination implies recognizing the conjugated protein by proteasome molecules and subsequent proteolytic degradation of the target proteins. On the contrary, Lys63 (K63)‐linked polyubiquitination appears to be involved in critical cellular processes, such as DNA repair, regulation of the I‐kappaB kinase/NF‐kappaB cascade, or T cell receptor signaling pathway. However, it does not appear to imply proteolytic degradation. 19 , 21 , 26 The UBC13‐Mms2 E2 heterodimer can build the K63‐linked ubiquitin chains selectively. 27 , 28
RING domain‐dependent homo‐ or heterodimerization has been reported. 9 , 19 , 20 The heterodimer formation between the RING domain of MDM2 and MDMX1 activates the ubiquitination activity, 20 , 29 , 30 , 31 as does BRCA1 with BARD1 22 , 32 , 33 and Ring1b with Bmi1. 34 Zinc centers of the RING domain of MDM2 are required for E3 ligase activity, and the five C‐terminal residues of the domain are essential for both dimer formation and E3 activity. 20 , 29 , 30 , 31 The α‐helical flanking region outside the RING domain of BRCA1 is responsible for dimerization with BARD1, 22 , 32 , 33 and heterodimerization activates the ubiquitination activity. Some RING‐type E3 ligases form dimers through RING domains or oligomers through a distinct RING domain. Prp19 E3 ligase has been shown to oligomerize with multiple RING dimers as a tetramer. 35
To address MMD and the candidate RNF213 functions, we identified UBC13 (UBE2N) as the binding partner of RNF213 protein in yeast two‐hybrid screening using E2 enzyme‐specific libraries. 30 , 36 This interaction was also observed by co‐immunoprecipitation using HeLa cells extract. By testing the possibility of ubiquitination on RNF213, K63‐linked polyubiquitination was detected, but not K48. The K63‐linked polyubiquitination was suppressed in Ubc13 knockdown HeLa cells. The RNF213 mutant, which showed a weak interaction with UBC13 in yeast two‐hybrid assay, was not ubiquitinated.
Moreover, the RING domain of RNF213 protein formed a homodimer, and this dimer formation appeared to be required for the ubiquitination. The interaction with UBC13 and the homodimer formation of RNF213 protein were necessary for autoubiquitination and angiogenic, motility, and invasion activities in HUVEC cells. These findings indicate that the homodimer RNF213 protein might have E3 ligase activity in a specific manner of K63‐linked ubiquitination with UBC13 as an E2 enzyme in endothelial cells.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Directed yeast two‐hybrid screens
All procedures and materials were as in previous papers. 22 , 30 , 36 A DNA fragment corresponding to a 3951‐4107 amino acid of RNF213 was amplified with the following primers: 5'‐ GGGCCATGGCCGGCAGCGGGAGCCTGGCCC‐3', 5' ‐CCCGTCGACCTATTAGCATGCTTTTCAATGGCT‐3'. The resulting PCR products were cloned into pGBKT7 (Takara Bio USA, Mountain View, CA) using NcoI and SalI sites. The I3999A mutation was introduced with a PCR‐based site‐directed mutagenesis system using Pfu Turbo (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). E2 enzymes used in Figure S2(A)‐(D) were amplified with each specific primer (Table 1) using total RNA from HCT116 cells and cloned into pENTR‐D‐Topo (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cloned E2 genes were transferred into pAct2‐gtwy (Addgene #11346) using LR Clonase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The bait plasmid and pGBKT7 were transformed into the yeast strain AH109 (Takara Bio USA) on selection media (SD –Trp). Good‐growing colonies were selected and transformed with the prey plasmids and pAct2‐gtwy and selected on selection media (SD –Trp/–Leu). Three independent colonies were mixed and suspended in water, and the mixture was spotted onto selection media (SD –Trp/–Leu) and incubated at 30°C for 24 h and replicated on selection media (SD –Trp/–Leu) and (SD –Trp/–Leu/–His plus 1 and 5 mM 3‐amino‐1, 2, 4‐triazole (3‐AT; Merk, Darmstadt, Germany)), and incubated for 3 days.
TABLE 1.
Primer list
| Fw | Rv | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RNF213_B | GGG CCA TGG CCA TTC AGC CGT GCT CC | RNF213_A | CCC GTC GAC AGT TAA ACA GTA GGG GC |
| RNF213_C | GGG CCA TGG CCA GCC GCG TCC CCG AG | RNF213_D | GGG GTC GAC CTG AAT CCC AAA CCT GC |
| RNF213_Y2H_F3924A | GTGGAGTCGGATTGCCTCCACCGCACTC | RNF213_Y2H_F3924A | CTCCACGAAGAGTGCGGTGGAGGCAATCCG |
| RNF213_Y2H_H3932A | CTCTTCGTGGAGGCCGTGCTCCTAGGAA | RNF213_Y2H_H3932A | CTCTCGGTTCCTAGGAGCACGGCCTCCAC |
| RNF213_Y2H_H3951A | CTGGTGACCGAGGCCGTCTTCTTACTAGAC | RNF213_Y2H_H3951A | GACACTTGTCTAGTAAGAAGACGGCCTCGGT |
| RNF213_Y2H_F3971A | ACGCACGGGCCTGCTGAGGCCGTGATGCG | RNF213_Y2H_F3971A | GAGAGTGCGCATCACGGCCTCAGCAGGCCC |
| RNF213_Y2H_F3992A | GACCCTCAGCAGGGCTGGGATTCAGCCGTG | RNF213_Y2H_F3992A | GGAGCACGGCTGAATCCCAGCCCTGCTGAG |
| RNF213_Y2H_P4040A | TTAACTGCCTTGGCAGACGAATTCTCTCCA | RNF213_Y2H_P4040A | AAACAGCTGGAGAGAATTCGTCTGCCAAGG |
| RNF213_Y2H_F4043A | CTTGCCAGACGAAGCCTCTCCAGCTG | RNF213_Y2H_F4043A | GGAAACAGCTGGAGAGGCTTCGTCTG |
| RNF213_Y2H_F3953A | GACCGAGCACGTCGCCTTACTAGACAA | RNF213_Y2H_F3953A | GAAGACACTTGTCTAGTAAGGCGACGTGCT |
| RNF213_Y2H_F3929A | CCACCGCACTCGCCGTGGAGCACGTG | RNF213_Y2H_F3929A | CTAGGAGCACGTGCTCCACGGCGAGTGCG |
| RNF213_Y2H_N3962D | GTCTTCGAGAGGACTCTGACGTGAAG | RNF213_Y2H_N3962D | CGTGCGTCTTCACGTCAGAGTCCTCTCGA |
| RNF213_Y2H_D4013 N | CTGTCTGCCCTGCAACCACGTGCACTGC | RNF213_Y2H_D4013 N | GCAGGCAGTGCACGTGGTTGCAGGGCAG |
| UBE2B_F | caccATGTCGACCCCGGCCCGG | UBE2B_R | TTATGAATCATTCCAGCTTTG |
| Ube2C_F | caccATGGCTTCCCAAAACCGC | Ube2C_R | TCAGGGCTCCTGGCTGGTGAC |
| UbE2D1_F | caccATGGCGCTGAAGAGGATT | UbE2D1_R | TTACATTGCATATTTCTGAGT |
| UbE2D2_F | caccATGGCTCTGAAGAGAATC | UbE2D2_R | TTACATCGCATACTTCTGAGT |
| UBE2D3_F | caccATGGCGCTGAAACGGATT | UBE2D3_R | TCACATGGCATACTTCTGAGT |
| UBE2E1_F | C ACCATGTCGGATGACGATTCG | UBE2E1_R | TTATGTAGCGTATCTCTTGGT |
| UbE2E2_F | C ACCATGTCCACTGAGGCACAA | UbE2E2_R | CTATGTGGCGTACCGCTTGGT |
| UbE2E3_F | C ACCATGTCCAGTGATAGGCAA | UbE2E3 _R | TTATGTTGCGTATCTCTTGGT |
| UBE2F_F | caccATGCTAACGCTAGCAAGT | UBE2F_R | TCATCTGGCATAACGTTTGAT |
| UBE2G1_F | caccATGACGGAGCTGCAGTCG | UBE2G1_R | TCACTCAAAAGCAGTCTCTTG |
| UBE2H_F | caccATGTCATCTCCCAGTCCG | UBE2H_R | CTACAACTCCATATCCTGGGC |
| Ube2I_F | caccATGTCGGGGATCGCCCTC | Ube2I_R | TTATGAGGGCGCAAACTTCTT |
| Ube2K_F | caccATGGCCAACATCGCGGTG | Ube2K_R | TCAGTTACTCAGAAGCAATTC |
| UBE2L3_F | caccATGGCGGCCAGCAGGAGG | UBE2L3_R | TTAGTCCACAGGTCGCTTTTC |
| UbE2L6_F | caccATGATGGCGAGCATGCGA | UbE2L6_R | TTAGGAGGGCCGGTCCACTCC |
| UBE2M_F | caccATGATCAAGCTGTTCTCG | UBE2M_R | CTATTTCAGGCAGCGCTCAAA |
| Ube2N_F | caccATGGCCGGGCTGCCCCGC | Ube2N_R | TTAAATATTATTCATGGCATA |
| Ube2q2_F | caccATGTCCGTGTCAGGGCTC | Ube2q2_R | TTAGCCATCTTCCTTTGGAGG |
| UBE2R1_F | CACCATGGCTCGGCCGCTAGTGCCC | UBE2R1_R | TCAGGACTCCTCCGTGCCAGAGTC |
| UBE2S_F | C ACCATGAACTCCAACGTGGAGAAC | UBE2S_R | CTACAGCCGCCGCAGCGCCCG |
| UBE2T_F | caccATGCAGAGAGCTTCACGT | UBE2T_R | CTAAACATCAGGATGAAATTT |
| UBE2U_F | caccATGCACGGCAGAGCTTAC | UBE2U_R | TCATTTTAAATTCCATTCTTT |
| Ube2v1_F | caccATGCCAGGAGAGGTTCAA | Ube2v1_R | TTAATTGCTGTAACACTGTCC |
| UBE2V2_F | caccATGGCGGTCTCCACAGGA | UBE2V2_R | TTAATTGTTGTATGTTTGTCC |
| Ube2v3_F | caccATGAAGGAAGACTTGAAC | Ube2v3_R | TTAATTGCTGTAACACTGTCC |
| UBE2W_F | caccATGGCGTCAATGCAGACC | UBE2W_R | TCAACAAGTATCATCATGATA |
| Ube2z_F | caccATGGCGGAGAGTCCGACT | Ube2z_R | CTAAACCCTCAGGCTCCCATG |
| Ft1_F | caccATGAACCCTTTCTGGAGC | Ft1_R | TTAAGTCGCCACTGTTTTCTC |
| TSG101_F | caccATGGCGGTGTCGGAGAGC | TSG101_R | TCAGTAGAGGTCACTGAGACC |
2.2. Cell culture and plasmid transfection, and siRNA transfection
HeLa cells were grown under standard conditions in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, and streptomycin. U2OS cells were grown under standard conditions in RPMI media supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin and streptomycin. U2OS AAVS1‐tetR cells were generated in the AAVS1 locus using the CRISPR‐Cas9 system using pZDonor‐AAVS1 Puromycin plasmid (Merk) containing tet repressor (tetR) and puromycin resistant gene cassette between AAVS1 exons. Stable cells expressing RNF213 protein were the selected antibiotic, and protein expression was confirmed by western blotting.
HUVEC cells were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (lot # 883826) medium 200 supplemented with low serum growth supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for plasmid transfection. Lipofectamine RNAi Max (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for siRNA treatment. siRNA duplexes to repress RNF213 (sc‐94184, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), control (sc‐37007, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Ubc13 (sc‐43551, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMax (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were seeded into 6‐well plates, and after 6 or 12 h, the 1.5 × 105 of cells were re‐plated into 6‐well plates, and then, analyzed 30–60 h after transfection.
2.3. Immunoprecipitation and western blotting
Harvested cells were washed once with PBS (pH 7.2) without calcium and magnesium and lysed in NP‐40 lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 250 mM NaCl, 1% NP‐40, 5 mM β‐glycerophosphate, 1 mM PMSF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM dithiothreitol and protease inhibitor cocktail (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Cell lysates were incubated at 4°C for 20 min and centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 15 min. For immunoprecipitation of EGFP‐tagged proteins, the supernatants were incubated with anti‐GFP antibody conjugated to agarose beads (MBL, Nagoya, Japan) for 4 h at 4°C. The immunoprecipitates were washed once with NP‐40 lysis buffer, twice with NP‐40 lysis buffer without NaCl, and subjected to western blotting. Antibodies against RNF213 14 or GFP (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) were used at a concentration of 0.5 µg/ml. The antibody against β‐Actin (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemistry, Osaka, Japan) was used at the recommended dilution. For immunoprecipitation of the RNF213 protein, the supernatants were incubated with anti‐RNF213 antibody at 4°C. After 4 h, the precleaned beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were added and incubated for 4 h at 4°C. The immunoprecipitates were washed once with NP‐40 lysis buffer, twice with NP‐40 lysis buffer without NaCl, and subjected to western blotting. For immunoprecipitation of RNF213 protein to observed ubiquitinated RNF213 protein, solubilized cell lysates by SDS‐sample buffer were incubated with anti‐TurboGFP (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) antibody at room temperature. After 4 h, the precleaned beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were added and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. The immunoprecipitates were washed three times with SDS‐sample buffer without dye and subjected to western blot. Other antibodies, anti‐TurboGFP, anti‐UBC13 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti‐Flag (Nacalai Tesque), anti‐HA (Covance, Denver, CO), anti‐K63‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin (Cell Signaling Technology), and anti‐K48‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) were used at a concentration of 1 μg/ml.
2.4. Assessment of angiogenic activity
Endothelial tube formation was assessed as described previously 37 , 38 HUVEC cells (10,000 cells/well) were seeded onto Geltrex Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Matrix‐coated (Thermo Fisher Scientific) μ‐Slide Angiogenesis (ibid, Martinsried, Germany). Cells were incubated for 18 h at 37°C, and digital images of the tubes were captured at the indicated time points. For quantification, the tube area, total tube length, and the number of tube branches were calculated using ImageJ software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). Three independent tube formation assays were conducted.
Migration assays were performed as previously described. 39 HUVECs or U2OS cells were grown to over‐confluence in Culture‐Inserts 2 Well (ibid), and then, incubated overnight. After removing the insert to create a wound, the medium was added, and the wound was allowed to narrow for healing for 18 h. Digital images were obtained every 2 h, and the area of re‐endothelialization was calculated using Image J software.
2.5. Invasion assay
The cell culture inserts in the invasion chamber plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with Geltrex hESC‐qualified Ready‐To‐Use Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer's manual. HUVEC cells (10,000 cells/insert) were seeded onto each insert and incubated for 48 h at 37ºC. After two days, the media was aspirated from the inside of the insert. The interior of the inserts was gently wiped with cotton‐tipped swabs to remove noninvasive cells. The inserts were transferred to a fresh well plate and fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde solution and stained with crystal violet (1% crystal violet in 2% ethanol). The stained inserts were washed with tap water several times. The inserts were air‐dried, and digital images of invaded cells were captured. 40 For U2OS cells, the cell culture inserts in the invasion chamber plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated with collagen type I (Nippi, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer's manual. The cells (10,000 cells/insert) were seeded onto each insert and incubated for 48 h at 37ºC.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Structure of the RNF213 RING domain
RNF213 gene was initially characterized as a susceptibility gene and encoded a 591 kDa protein that possesses two Walker motifs and a RING domain. 10 , 11 Sequence alignment of the RING domain of RNF213 orthologs indicated that the RING domains of RNF213 belonged to RING‐HC subclass C3HC4‐type (Figure S1(A)). 36 , 41 Amino acids with bulky side chains in the RING domain were relatively conserved in RNF213 orthologs and E3 ligase with C3HC4‐type RING like BRCA1. In our previous work, ectopic‐expressed RNF213 in HEK293 cells was efficiently ubiquitinated, but not the RING mutant. 10 These data indicate that RNF213 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and may interact with specific E2 enzymes to ubiquitinate the target protein and/or itself.
3.2. Identification of E2 enzymes bound to the RNF213 RING domain
Functional and selective E2‐E3 interactions are required for the efficient ubiquitination of the target protein. A growing number of reports show that the E2‐E3 selective interaction can achieve specific mono‐ and/ or polyubiquitination. 17 , 21 , 25 , 30 , 33 , 41 To understand RNF213 cellular functions and MMD, we used the fragment containing the RING domain (3951‐4107 amino acid region of RNF213) of RNF213 as bait in a directed yeast two‐hybrid screen with 23 human E2 enzymes as prey [Figure S2(A)‐(D)]. The 23 plasmids cloned E2 enzymes were transformed with RNF213 RING in pGBKT7 or empty vector (pGBKT7), respectively, and these yeast clones grew on selective media [SD –Tryptophan (Trp)/ –Leucine (Leu)]. Good‐growing independent colonies were replicated onto another selective media [SD –Trp/–Leu and –Histidine (His) plus 1 or 5 mM 3‐AT (3‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole)]. Two E2 enzymes, UBE2N (UBC13) and UBE2U, introduced into yeast with RNF213 RING could grow on the selective media (SD –Trp/–Leu/–His +1 mM 3‐AT) well, although the other E2 enzymes and the empty vector introduced into yeast with RNF213 RING or empty vector could not grow anymore [Figure S2(A)‐(D)]. These data indicated that UBE2N (UBC13) and UBE2U are good candidates for specific E2 enzymes interacting with RNF213 E3 ligase.
3.3. The specificity of interaction between two E2 enzymes and RNF213
Structural and functional analysis showed that several mutations in the RING domain disrupt the E2‐E3 interaction and result in the loss of E3 ligase activity 22 , 30 , 32 , 34 ). To confirm the specific E2‐E3 interaction, Isoleucine at the 3999 amino acid position in the RNF213 RING domain [Figure S1(A),(B)], corresponding to the BRCA1 RING mutant, 29 , 30 , 34 , 41 , 42 , 43 was changed into Alanine. This mutant in the two‐hybrid assay with UBE2 N (UBC13) reduced the growth on selective media, but not with UBE2U. [Figure 1(A),(B)] This result indicated that UBE2 N (UBC13) could specifically interact with the RNF213 RING domain, and UBE2U may interact with RNF213 in a RING‐independent manner.
FIGURE 1.

RNF213 can bind to UBC13 E2 enzymes. (A) Confirmation of principle E2 enzyme screening. (B) Each positive (UBE2N and UBE2U) transformants with wt of RNF213 RING fragment or I3999A mutant or empty vector as bait were streaked on SD media (–Trp/– Leu)(left), and replica plated on selective media (–Trp/–Leu/–His +1 mM 3‐AT)(right). (B) UBC13 binding to RNF213 protein. The cell extracts were prepared for immunoprecipitation with anti‐RNF213 antibody or normal rabbit IgG, followed by western blotting with anti‐UBC13 antibody. The expression level of each protein was monitored by western blotting with anti‐RNF213 and UBC13 antibodies. (C) RNF213 binding to UBC13 protein. GFP, GFP‐tagged UBC13 was overexpressed in HeLa cells, and the expression level of each protein was monitored by western blotting with anti‐GFP antibody for GFP‐tagged proteins, with anti‐RNF213 antibody for loading controls. The cell extracts overexpressed in each protein were prepared for immunoprecipitation with anti‐GFP antibody‐conjugated beads, followed by western blotting with anti‐RNF213 and GFP antibodies. (D) RNF213‐RNF213 homo‐dimer formation. Yeast two‐hybrid assay was performed with the RNF213 RING fragment as bait and prey plasmids. Each positive (wt of RNF213 RING fragment and empty vector) transformant with wt of RNF213 RING fragment or empty vector as bait were spotted onto SD media (–Trp/– Leu) (left), and replica plated on selective media (–Trp/–Leu/–His +1 mM 3‐AT)(right). (E) Mutation scanning assay for RNF213‐RNF213 homo‐dimer formation. Yeast two‐hybrid assay was performed with the RNF213 RING fragment as bait and the mutated fragment prey plasmids. Each positive (wt of RNF213 RING fragment and empty vector) transformant with wt of RNF213 RING fragment or each mutated fragment or empty vector as prey were spotted onto SD media (–Trp/– Leu) in the three stepwise diluted conditions (left), and replica plated on selective media (–Trp/–Leu/–His +1 mM 3‐AT) (right)
3.4. RNF213‐UBC13 interaction in HeLa cells
To further confirm RNF213‐UBC13 interaction in vitro, undenatured cell extracts from HeLa cells were subjected to co‐immunoprecipitation assay with anti‐RNF213 antibody. UBC13 was detected in the immune complex of RNF213 but not in the control rabbit IgG [Figure 1(C)]. Moreover, undenatured cell extracts from Rnf213 or Ubc13‐knockdown cells and EGFP‐tagged UBC13 expressed cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation. The level of UBC13 protein decreased in the RNF213 immune complex using Rnf213‐ or Ubc13‐knockdown cell extract compared with control siRNA‐transfected cells (Figure S3(G)). Furthermore, using undenatured cell extracts from EGFP‐UBC13 expressing HeLa cells, RNF213 was detected in the EGFP‐UBC13 complex, but not in the EGFP complex [Figure 1(D)]. Using undenatured cell extract from 3xFlag‐tagged RNF213 expressing HeLa cells, UBC13 was detected reciprocally in the anti‐Flag IgG immune complex but not in the control rabbit IgG [Figure S3(H)]. These results indicated that RNF213 could form the complex with UBC13 in vivo and in vitro.
3.5. RNF213 can form a homo‐dimer in vitro
Many E3 ubiquitin ligases can form homo‐ and heterodimers for ubiquitination activities. 9 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 28 , 32 , 34 To address the homo‐dimer formation of RNF213 protein, yeast two‐hybrid assay using RING fragment of RNF213 as bait and prey plasmids was performed under the same conditions as the E2 enzyme screen condition [Figure 1(E)]. The yeast clone with the RING fragment of RNF213 could grow with the RING fragment as prey on SD media (–Trp/–Leu/–His +1 mM 3‐AT), but not with the empty vector as prey. To determine the region responsible for the homo‐dimer formation of RNF213 protein, yeast two‐hybrid assay was performed using a series of deletion mutants of RNF213 [Figure S2(E),(F)]. The yeast cells with RNF213 RING fragment containing 97 amino acids (3939–4036 amino acid of RNF213) could only grow on selective media, but not with RNF213 RING fragment containing 95 amino acids (3902–3996 amino acid of RNF213), 63 amino acids (3996–4058 amino acid of RNF213), or 41 amino acids (3996–4036 amino acid of RNF213). The mutation scanning experiment using two‐hybrid assay with the RING fragment of RNF213 showed that D4013N amino acid substitution remarkably reduced the cell growth on selective media [Figure 1(F)]. These results indicated that RNF213 protein could form a homo‐dimer through the RING domain, and amino acids between the third and fourth Zn2+ coordinating residues of the RING domain were responsible for dimer formation.
3.6. Stability of RNF213 protein in vivo
K11, K27, K29, K33, and K48‐linked polyubiquitinations are recognized by the proteasome and subsequently lead to degradation, but not K63‐linked autoubiquitination. 18 , 21 , 23 To test the stability of RNF213 protein, RNF213 protein level was monitored using soluble extracts from cycloheximide (CHX)‐treated HeLa cells. The protein levels of RNF213 was not affected by CHX treatment for 4 h [Figure S3(A)]. Furthermore, the protein level of RNF213 was also monitored using the soluble extract from MG132 proteasome inhibitor‐treated HeLa cells. The RNF213 protein level also did not change after the treatment [Figure S3(B)]. These data indicated that RNF213 is a stable protein and may not be ubiquitinated through K11, K27, K29, K33, and K48‐linked ubiquitination.
3.7. K63‐linked ubiquitination of RNF213 dependent on UBC13
Yeast‐two‐hybrid analysis indicated that RNF213 might ubiquitinate the substrates through the K63‐linked polyubiquitin chain. The RNF213 was a stable protein and was not affected by proteasome pathway. Moreover, using denatured total cell lysate, slow‐migrating smear bands reacted with anti‐RNF213 antibody, and the reactivity was dependent on the amount of cell lysate [Figure S3(D)]. These observations suggested that these slow‐migrating smear bands corresponded to RNF213 protein, and RNF213 might be ubiquitinated through K63 ubiquitin. To test this possibility, immunoprecipitation assay using denatured total cell lysate was performed with K48‐ and K63‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibodies and subjected to western blotting with anti‐RNF213 antibody. Reciprocally, immunoprecipitation assay with anti‐RNF213 antibody was performed and subjected to western blotting with K48‐ and K63‐specific polyubiquitin antibodies under similar conditions [Figure S3(I)]. The immunoprecipitates by K63‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibody could react with anti‐RNF213 antibody, compared with K48‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibody and normal IgG [Figure 2(A)]. It might not be easy to separate the modified from unmodified bands of RNF213 protein because the protein is a high molecular weight protein (over 500 kDa). The highest reactivity band of RNF213 might be ubiquitinated in addition to the slow migrating bands because the immunoprecipitates were pull down by the polyubiquitin antibody. However, p53 protein, which is well known as ubiquitinated through the K48‐linked ubiquitin chain, was detected efficiently in the K48‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibody. Using USP2 deubiquitinase to remove the linked‐ubiquitin chain of RNF213 protein, the slow migrated smearing K63‐specific bands in immunoprecipitates with anti‐RNF213 antibody was dramatically reduced [Figure S3(E)]. The incomplete deconjugation of the modification bands might be due to using denatured protein or the accessibility to the substrate of USP2 enzyme. The optimization will be required to understand the ubiquitination pattern. To confirm the K63‐linked ubiquitination of RNF213, denatured extracts from Ubc13‐siRNA‐treated HeLa cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti‐RNF213 antibody. Treatment of HeLa cells with Ubc13 siRNA reduced the level of UBC13 by up to 10% of the control level [Figure 2(B)]. The K63‐linked ubiquitin chain band intensity from Ubc13 siRNA treated cells was lower than that from the control siRNA treatment (slow migration bands/RNF213 band ratio; control siRNA: Ubc13 siRNA = 1: 0.16) [Figure 2(B)].
FIGURE 2.

RNF213 protein has K63‐linked ubiquitination activity. (A) RNF213 was ubiquitinated through K63‐linked polyubiquitin. The cell lysates were prepared for immunoprecipitation with anti‐K63‐ or K48‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibodies or normal rabbit IgG, followed by western blotting with anti‐RNF213 antibody. The time for Long exposure was ten times longer than that for short exposure. The bottom panel showed the blotting with anti‐p53 antibody (DO‐1) using the same blotting membrane. (B) K63‐linked polyubiquitination of RNF213 was dependent on UBC13. The cell lysates from siRNA‐treated cells were prepared for immunoprecipitation with anti‐RNF213 antibody, followed by western blotting with anti‐K63‐linkage‐specific polyubiquitin antibodies. The expression and immunoprecipitant levels of each protein were monitored by western blotting with the anti‐RNF213 and anti‐UBC13 antibodies for UBC13 knockdown efficiency, with anti‐β‐Actin antibody for loading controls. (C) The ubiquitination of RNF213. The cell lysates from TurboGFP, TurboGFP‐ tagged wild‐type, or I3999A or D4013N overexpressing cells with HA‐tagged ubiquitin were prepared for immunoprecipitation with anti‐TurboGFP antibody, followed by western blotting with anti‐HA antibody (right). CBB staining showed the immunoprecipitants with anti‐TurboGFP antibody (left), and the immunoprecipitants were normalized by western blotting with anti‐RNF213 antibody
Furthermore, in vitro auto‐ubiquitination assay using purified Myc‐tagged RNF213 protein was performed to test RNF213 autoubiquitination. The ubiquitination signal of Myc‐tagged RNF213 protein was detected in the presence of His‐tagged UBC13 and GST‐fusion UBE2V1 proteins as E2 conjugating enzymes, but not in the absence of the E2 enzymes or ATP/magnesium [Figure S3(F)]. These results indicated that this ubiquitination was dependent on UBC13‐UBE2V1, and RNF213 might be autoubiquitinated through K63 of ubiquitin.
3.8. RING mutations of RNF213 abolished the ubiquitination activity of RNF213 protein
The substitutions of an amino acid (I3999A and D4013N) within the RING domain of RNF213 protein reduced the UBC13 interaction and homo‐dimer formation, respectively. Isoleucine's position at the 3999 amino acid is responsible for ubiquitination and autoubiquitination corresponding to the BRCA1 RING mutant [Figure S1(A),(B)]. 19 , 30 , 41 , 42 , 44 These mutants tagged with TurboGFP protein were ectopically expressed with HA‐tagged ubiquitin in U2OS cells. The total cell extracts were used for immunoprecipitation with anti‐TurboGFP antibody, and the immunoprecipitants were subjected to western blotting with anti‐HA antibody to detect RNF213 ubiquitination [Figure 2(C)]. The immunoprecipitant from the TurboGFP‐tagged mutants (I3999A and D4013N) did not react with anti‐HA antibody similar to that from negative control TurboGFP. However, the TurboGFP‐tagged wild‐type (wt) immunoprecipitant reacted with anti‐HA antibody [Figure 2(C) right]. These amino acids might be essential for catalyzing the ubiquitination of substrates of RNF213. These results indicated that the disruption of the binding with UBC13 and the homo‐dimer formation, abolished the ubiquitination.
3.9. Ubiquitination activity was responsible for the angiogenic activity of endothelial cells
To address the responsibility of ubiquitination activity of the RNF213 protein, Ubc13 or Rnf213 siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells were subjected to a tube formation assay on a matrix, and the time‐dependent tube formation was monitored at 4, 6, 8, and 10 h from the start of the test for 18 h [Figure 3(A),(B)]. Ubc13 and Rnf213 siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells showed reduced tube network formation compared with the control siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells (ctrl) between 2 and 8 h from the assay start point [Figure 3(A)]. Image analysis using ImageJ software showed that network mesh and total master segments length decreased compared with the control experiment between 2 and 8 h. On the contrary, total isolated branches length and the number of extremities increased in Ubc13 or Rnf213 siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells between 2 and 6 h [Figure 3(B)]. Flag‐tagged RNF213 wt, ubiquitination‐defective I3999A, and D4013N mutants were ectopically expressed in HUVEC cells [Figure S4(A),(B)] and subjected to a tube formation assay on a matrix. Ubiquitination defective I3999A and D4013N mutants expressing HUVEC cells showed reduced mesh network formation and increased branch length and number between 2 and 4 h from the assay start point, compared with the wild‐type Flag‐tagged RNF213 protein‐expressing HUVEC cells.
FIGURE 3.

The time course of tube formation activity by UBC13‐RNF213 axis in HUVECs. (A) Tube formation assays for siRNA‐treated HUVECs. The siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells were seeded onto the matrix, and digital images were captured at the indicated times. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (B) Analysis of tube formation assays. The tube areas per field of the digital image were analyzed using ImageJ software (n = 3; *p < 0.05, by Student's t‐test). Similar results were obtained for the total tube length and number of branches
Furthermore, a wound healing assay was performed using siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells, Flag‐tagged RNF213 wt, ubiquitination‐defective I3999A, and D4013N mutants expressing HUVEC cells. The Ubc13 or Rnf213 siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells showed lower healing activity than control siRNA‐treated HUVEC cells [Figure 4(A)(B)]. The rate of tube formation in Ubc13 and RNF213 siRNA‐treated cells was similar to each other. The ubiquitination‐defect mutants also showed lower wound healing activity than the wild‐type RNF213 expressing HUVEC cells [Figure 4(C),(D)]. These results indicated that RNF213 dependent K63‐linked ubiquitination might influence angiogenic activity in HUVEC cells. The RNF213‐UBC13K63‐linked ubiquitination axis may influence angiogenic activity. Although MMD shows endothelial cell‐specific defects, these RNF213 dependent ubiquitination effects were studied using U2OS cells (Human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cells) by wound healing assay [Figure 4(E),(F)]. Surprisingly, ubiquitination defect mutants expressing U2OS cells showed increased migration activity compared with a wild‐type of RNF213 or control U2OS cells [Figure 4(E),(F)]. These findings indicated that RNF213 dependent K63‐linked ubiquitination might play different roles between endothelial cells and epithelial cells.
FIGURE 4.

The cell migration activities of UBC13‐RNF213 axis. Migration assays for HUVEC cells after treatment with siRNAs. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (A) Analysis of migration assays for HUVEC cells. The open wound areas were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3; *p < 0.05, by Student's t‐test compared with control siRNA‐treated cells). (B) Migration assays for HUVEC cells overexpressing Flag, wt, I3999A, or D4013N mutants of RNF213 protein. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (C) Analysis of migration assays for HUVEC cells. The open wound areas were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). (D) Migration assays for U2OS cells overexpressing TurboGFP, wt, I3999A, or D4013 N mutants of TurboGFP‐tagged RNF213 proteins. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (E) Analysis of migration assays for U2OS cells. The open wound areas were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3)
3.10. The ubiquitination activity of RNF213 protein inhibited the invasion activity of endothelial cells
An invasion assay using a matrix‐coated two‐phase culture dish was performed with Flag‐tagged RNF213 wt and mutants expressing HUVEC cells. Flag‐tagged mutated RNF213 expressing HUVEC cells could invade efficiently through the matrix‐coated membrane, but not the Flag tag only, and Flag‐tagged wild‐type RNF213 [Figure 5(A),(B)]. These results indicated that the ubiquitination activity of RNF213 protein was required for the movement of endothelial cells but inhibited the invasion activity of HUVEC cells.
FIGURE 5.

The cell invasion activities of UBC13‐RNF213 axis. (A) Invasion assays for HUVEC cells overexpressing Flag, wt, I3999A, or R4810K mutants of RNF213 protein. The invaded cells were stained with dye and digital images were captured. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (B) Analysis of invasion assays for HUVEC cells. The invaded cells were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3; *p < 0.05, by Student's t‐test compared with Flag overexpressing cells). (C) Invasion assays for U2OS cells overexpressing TurboGFP, wt, I3999A, or R4810K mutants of TurboGFP‐ tagged RNF213 proteins. The invaded cells were stained with dye and digital images were captured. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (D) Analysis of invasion assays for U2OS cells. The invaded cells were quantified using ImageJ software. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3)
Furthermore, invasion assay using a matrix‐coated chamber showed that the number of invaded cells through the matrix was reduced by expression of the ubiquitination‐defect I3999A mutant compared with control cells, despite the increasing number of invaded cells in wild‐type RNF213 expressing U2OS cells. These results showed that the I3999A mutant had lower invasion activity than control or wild‐type RNF213 expressing U2OS cells [Figure 5(C),(D)]. These findings indicated that RNF213 dependent K63‐linked ubiquitination might play different roles between endothelial cells and epithelial cells, and ubiquitination activity of RNF213 protein might regulate both migration and invasion activity.
4. DISCUSSION
RNF213 is a large protein that encodes AAA+ATPase (Walker domain) and the RING domain. Our previous work demonstrated that the AAA+domain possessed ATP hydrolysis activity in vitro, and ectopically expressed RNF213 protein efficiently ubiquitinated itself, but not RING deleted RNF213. 10 Two functional domains of RNF213 may contribute to its physiological functions. In this study, RNF213 interacted with UBC13 (UBE2N) and UBE2U in yeast two‐hybrid assay, and UBC13 could bind to RNF213 in the manner of RING structure, but not UBE2U. The UBC13‐RNF213 interaction may contribute to the selective ubiquitination of the target protein. UBC13 forms heterodimers with other E2 enzymes, UBE2V1 (Uev1A) and UBE2V2 (Mms2), and catalyzes the synthesis of polyubiquitin chains that are linked through K63 of ubiquitin. 26 , 27 , 28 , 44 The UBC13‐UBE2V1 heterodimer forms a complex with TRAF2 and TRAF6 and mediates NF‐κB activation through K63‐linked polyubiquitination. 19 , 26 The UBC13‐UBE2V2 heterodimer forms a complex with E3 protein ligase involving DNA repair and DNA break processing. 27 , 28 , 43 , 44 The two E2 enzyme variants seem to regulate UBC13‐E3 ligase and mediate polyubiquitination through K63 of ubiquitin. 18 , 21 , 43 , 44 In this two‐hybrid screen, interactions between RNF213 and these UBE2V variants were not observed. Moreover, these variants were not detected in the RNF213 immunocomplex with anti‐RNF213 antibody (data not shown). However, in vitro ubiquitination assay using recombinant proteins, RNF213 protein was ubiquitinated in the presence of UBC13‐UBE2V1 E2 complex. RNF213 protein may bind weakly with these variants or not have an interacting surface with the variants. These indicated that UBE2V1 might be a candidate for E2 enzyme collaborating with UBC13 and RNF213 proteins. Further investigations are required. Studies of the homo‐dimer formation through the RING domain of RNF213 and binding with E2 suggested that the asymmetrical RNF213 structure might be necessary for the interaction between RNF213 and the variants. The heterodimer formation with other E3 ligases might facilitate the interaction between RNF213 and UBC13‐UBE2V E2 enzymes. The conserved bulky hydrophobic residues were involved in the interaction between the RING domain and E2 as c‐Cbl, MDM2, and BRCA1. 20 , 30 , 32 , 45 Isoleucine at the 3999 amino acid position was also conserved among RNF213 ortholog and RING protein. Mutation of these residues could reduce RING‐E2 interaction and lead to decreased ubiquitination activity. This mutation was located between the first and second Zn2+‐coordinating residues and appeared to lose Zn2+ chelating and RING structure. Further studies are required for RNF213‐mediated selective E2 binding and ubiquitination activity.
RNF213 protein has two AAA + walker motifs and forms an oligomer, and this hydrolysis activity changes its oligomeric state. 46 These motifs are located at the N‐terminus of RNF213. Like Prp protein, N‐terminal walker motifs may involve a higher‐order oligomer that has multiple dimerized RING domains. 9 , 35 The relationship between oligomerization and RING‐mediated dimerization needs to be clarified.
UBC13 can facilitate ubiquitination through K63 ubiquitination and is involved in several signal transduction pathways, unlike K48 linked ubiquitination. RNF213 can interact with UBC13 in vivo, in vitro, and is autoubiquitinated through K63 well but not K48 in a UBC13‐dependent manner. RNF213‐UBC13 ubiquitin ligase activity may involve known or unknown signal transduction pathways through K63‐linked ubiquitination. In in vivo studies, Ubc13 knock‐down cells and ubiquitination‐deficient mutant expressing cells showed slow tube formation or slow healing in the endothelial cells. Deubiquitinase of the K63‐linked ubiquitin chain has been reported to play a critical role in angiogenesis. 47 The balance between deubiquitinase and RNF213 may be essential for angiogenesis. Ubiquitination linked via the N‐terminal methionine and K63 facilitates innate immune signaling initiated by pattern recognition receptors such as toll‐like receptors and nucleotide‐oligomerization domain‐like receptors, and cytokine receptors such as tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR‐1). 26 , 48 The ligands for receptors might be substrates for K63‐linked polyubiquitination by RNF213. Indeed, TNFR‐1 controls endothelial inflammatory responses and angiogenic activities. 49 , 50
Matsuoka et al. 51 reported that ATR phosphorylates RNF213 under UV treatment. Indeed, the UBC13‐RNF8 or RNF168 ubiquitin ligase complex can facilitate the ubiquitination chain on PCNA and histone H2AX, which are critical molecules in DNA metabolism. 28 , 43 , 44 , 52 RNF213 collaborating with UBC13 may be involved in DNA replication, DNA repair pathway, and DNA metabolism under control by ATR kinase. 14 , 15
Many motor proteins that encode AAA + domain and Walker motifs, utilize ATP to move along microtubules. 53 , 54 , 55 For example, Dynein motor protein complex, which is a large multi‐subunit protein complex and poses 6 AAA + domains in the large subunit, moves on microtubules with ATP hydrolysis. 53 In our previous report, the Walker motif of RNF213 could hydrolyze ATP efficiently in vitro. 10 , 16 RNF213 protein is a novel AAA + ATPase, forms oligomers, and this hydrolysis activity changes its oligomeric state. 46 RNF213 encoded two AAA + ATPase modules. The one module regulates the assembly of RNF213 oligomers, while the second one regulates the disassembly of RNF213 oligomers. These modules consist of Walker A and Walker B motifs to hydrolyze ATP. The pR4810K variant of RNF213 forms oligomers like the wild‐type, although the variant exhibits lower ATPase activity in vitro. 46 These indicate that this variant does not appear to affect ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis. Previous reports indicated that the R4810K variant affected tube formation and migration activities. 14 , 16 In this report, the R4810K variant exhibited higher invasion activity than the wild‐type RNF213 in HUVEC cells. Conversely, the ubiquitination defect mutant exhibited more aggressive invasion activity of HUVEC cells, despite the lower migration activity. The relationship between ATPase activity and migration and invasion activity should be investigated further. The AAA + domain of RNF213 may contribute to cell motility by coordinating with K63‐linked ubiquitination activity. K63‐linked ubiquitination is reported to be required for cell migration. 26 , 49 , 56 , 57 , 58 RNF213 has been reported to surround lipid droplets in fibroblast cells. 59 RNF213 may play a role in the transportation of cellular lipid droplets. The transport of K63‐linked ubiquitinated proteins may contribute to cell motility and invasion.
New blood vessels’ growth consists of five steps: tip cell selection, sprout formation, tip cell migration, stalk cell proliferation, and vascular stabilization. 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 A specialized EC, termed the tip cell, exists at the distal end of each sprout. Tip cells have motility, invasion, and high polarization with elongated filopodial protrusions and navigate endothelial sprouts. 61 , 62 During angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs)/Notch signaling pathway regulate the tip‐stalk cell selection and shuffling. 63 Tumor necrosis factor α(TNF‐α) induces the tip cell phenotype. 60 , 64 The expression of the tip cell markers platelet‐derived growth factor BB (PDGF‐BB) and VEGFR2 guides angiogenic sprouting. 65 A couple of studies have reported that inflammatory cytokines, IFN‐γ, TNF‐α, and INF‐β activate transcription of RNF213. 16 , 66 The upregulation of RNF213 transcription by these cytokines in tip cells might activate cell motility and invasion, and in this process, K63‐linked ubiquitination might be upregulated dependent on RNF213.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflict of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
T. Habu and K.H. Harada designed the research and analyzed data; T. Habu performed the research and wrote the paper.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Supporting information
Fig S1‐S4
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan to T.H.
Contributor Information
Toshiyuki Habu, Email: habu@mukogawa-u.ac.jp.
Kouji H. Harada, Email: kharada-hes@umin.ac.jp
REFERENCES
- 1. Suzuki J, Takaku A. Cerebrovascular moyamoya disease: disease showing abnormal net‐like vessels in base of brain. Arch Neurol. 1969;20:288‐299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Suzuki J. Cerebrovascular "Moyamoya" disease. Arch Neurol. 1969;20(3):288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Nerve TK. Hypoplasia of bilateral internal carotid arteries; 1957.
- 4. Kudo T. Spontaneous occlusion of the circle of Willis. A disease apparently confined to Japanese. Neurology. 1968;18:485‐496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wittko‐Schneider IM, Schneider FT, Plate KH. Cerebral angiogenesis during development: who is conducting the orchestra? Methods Mol Biol (Clifton N.J.). 2014;1135:3‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bower RS, Mallory GW, Nwojo M, Kudva YC, Flemming KD, Meyer FB. Moyamoya disease in a primarily white, midwestern US population: increased prevalence of autoimmune disease. Stroke. 2013;44:1997‐1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yoshimoto T, Houkin K, Takahashi A, Abe H. Angiogenic factors in moyamoya disease. Stroke. 1996;27:2160‐2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Houkin K, Ito M, Sugiyama T, et al. Review of past research and current concepts on the etiology of moyamoya disease. Neurol Med Chir. 2012;52:267‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yudina Z, Roa A, Johnson R, et al. RING dimerization links higher‐order assembly of TRIM5α to synthesis of K63‐linked polyubiquitin. Cell Rep. 2015;12:788‐797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liu W, Morito D, Takashima S, et al. Identification of RNF213 as a susceptibility gene for moyamoya disease and its possible role in vascular development. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kamada F, Aoki Y, Narisawa A, et al. A genome‐wide association study identifies RNF213 as the first Moyamoya disease gene. J Hum Genet. 2011;56:34‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Koizumi A, Kobayashi H, Hitomi T, Harada KH, Habu T, Youssefian S. A new horizon of moyamoya disease and associated health risks explored through RNF213. Environ Health Prev Med. 2016;21:55‐70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kobayashi H, Brozman M, Kyselová K, et al. RNF213 rare variants in Slovakian and Czech moyamoya disease patients. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hitomi T, Habu T, Kobayashi H, et al. The moyamoya disease susceptibility variant RNF213 R4810K (rs112735431) induces genomic instability by mitotic abnormality. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2013;439:419‐426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hitomi T, Habu T, Kobayashi H, et al. Downregulation of Securin by the variant RNF213 R4810K (rs112735431, G>A) reduces angiogenic activity of induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived vascular endothelial cells from moyamoya patients. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2013;438:13‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kobayashi H, Matsuda Y, Hitomi T, et al. Biochemical and functional characterization of RNF213 (Mysterin) R4810K, a susceptibility mutation of moyamoya disease, in angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pickart CM, Raasi S. Controlled synthesis of polyubiquitin chains. Methods Enzymol. 2005;399:21‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Chen ZJ, Sun LJ. Nonproteolytic functions of ubiquitin in cell signaling. Mol Cell. 2009;33:275‐286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yin Q, Lin S‐CC, Lamothe B, et al. E2 interaction and dimerization in the crystal structure of TRAF6. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:658‐666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Linke K, Mace PD, Smith CA, Vaux DL, Silke J, Day CL. Structure of the MDM2/MDMX RING domain heterodimer reveals dimerization is required for their ubiquitylation in trans. Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:841‐848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hochstrasser M. Ubiquitin signalling: what’s in a chain? Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:571‐572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Winkler G, Timmers H. Structure‐based approaches to create new E2–E3 enzyme pairs. Methods Enzymol. 2005;399:355‐366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin‐proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J. 1998;17:7151‐7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hochstrasser M. Evolution and function of ubiquitin‐like protein‐conjugation systems. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:E153‐E157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin‐proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:679‐690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jiang X, Chen ZJ. The role of ubiquitylation in immune defence and pathogen evasion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Eddins MJ, Carlile CM, Gomez KM, Pickart CM, Wolberger C. Mms2–Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage‐specific polyubiquitin chain formation. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13:915‐920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hodge CD, Ismail IH, Edwards RA, et al. RNF8 E3 ubiquitin ligase stimulates Ubc13 E2 conjugating activity that is essential for DNA Double Strand Break Signaling and BRCA1 tumor suppressor recruitment. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:9396‐9410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wu‐Baer F, Lagrazon K, Yuan W, Baer R. The BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer assembles polyubiquitin chains through an unconventional linkage involving lysine residue K6 of ubiquitin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:34743‐34746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Christensen DE, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE. E2–BRCA1 RING interactions dictate synthesis of mono‐ or specific polyubiquitin chain linkages. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:nsmb1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Buchwald G, van der Stoop P, Weichenrieder O, Perrakis A, van Lohuizen M, Sixma TK. Structure and E3‐ligase activity of the Ring‐Ring complex of polycomb proteins Bmi1 and Ring1b. EMBO J. 2006;25:2465‐2474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Fang S, Jensen JP, Ludwig RL, Vousden KH, Weissman AM. Mdm2 is a RING finger‐dependent ubiquitin protein ligase for itself and p53. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:8945‐8951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Poyurovsky MV, Priest C, Kentsis A, et al. The Mdm2 RING domain C‐terminus is required for supramolecular assembly and ubiquitin ligase activity. EMBO J. 2007;26:90‐101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hashizume R, Fukuda M, Maeda I, et al. The RING heterodimer BRCA1‐BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by a breast cancer‐derived mutation. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14537‐14540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kooi CW, Ohi MD, Rosenberg JA, et al. The Prp19 U‐box crystal structure suggests a common dimeric architecture for a class of oligomeric E3 ubiquitin ligases. Biochemistry. 2006;45:121‐130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Christensen DE, Klevit RE. Dynamic interactions of proteins in complex networks: identifying the complete set of interacting E2s for functional investigation of E3‐dependent protein ubiquitination. FEBS J. 2009;276:5381‐5389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Huuskes BM, DeBuque RJ, Kerr PG, Samuel CS, Ricardo SD. The use of live cell imaging and automated image analysis to assist with determining optimal parameters for angiogenic assay in vitro. Front Cell Develop Biol. 2019;7:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sone M, Itoh H, Yamahara K, et al. Pathway for differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to vascular cell components and their potential for vascular regeneration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:2127‐2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Potente M, Ghaeni L, Baldessari D, et al. SIRT1 controls endothelial angiogenic functions during vascular growth. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2644‐2658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chen Y. Tumor cell invasion assay. Bio‐Protocol. 2012;Bio‐101:e101. 10.21769/BioProtoc.101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Metzger MB, Pruneda JN, Klevit RE, Weissman AM. RING‐type E3 ligases: master manipulators of E2 ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes and ubiquitination. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) ‐ Molecular Cell Research. 2014;1843(1):47‐60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Mallery DL, Vandenberg CJ, Hiom K. Activation of the E3 ligase function of the BRCA1/BARD1 complex by polyubiquitin chains. EMBO J. 2002;21:6755‐6762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Andersen PL, Zhou H, Pastushok L, et al. Distinct regulation of Ubc13 functions by the two ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme variants Mms2 and Uev1A. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:745‐755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lok GT, Sy SM, Dong S‐SS, et al. Differential regulation of RNF8‐mediated Lys48‐ and Lys63‐based poly‐ubiquitylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:196‐205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Joazeiro C, Wing S, Huang H, Leverson J, Hunter T, Liu Y. The tyrosine kinase negative regulator c‐Cbl as a RING‐type, E2‐dependent ubiquitin‐protein ligase. Science (New York, N.Y). 1999;286:309‐312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Morito D, Nishikawa K, Hoseki J, et al. Moyamoya disease‐associated protein mysterin/RNF213 is a novel AAA+ ATPase, which dynamically changes its oligomeric state. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Miskinyte S, Butler MG, Hervé D, et al. Loss of BRCC3 deubiquitinating enzyme leads to abnormal angiogenesis and is associated with syndromic moyamoya. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:718‐728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fiil BK, Gyrd‐Hansen M. Met1‐linked ubiquitination in immune signalling. FEBS J. 2014;281:4337‐4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wang Y, Li J, Huang Y, et al. Tripartite motif–containing 28 bridges endothelial inflammation and angiogenic activity by retaining expression of TNFR‐1 and ‐2 and VEGFR2 in endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2017;31:2026‐2036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Pan S, An P, Zhang R, He X, Yin G, Min W. Etk/Bmx as a tumor necrosis factor receptor type 2‐specific kinase: role in endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7512‐7523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2007;316:1160‐1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Shao G, Lilli DR, Patterson‐Fortin J, Coleman KA, Morrissey DE, Greenberg RA. The Rap80‐BRCC36 de‐ubiquitinating enzyme complex antagonizes RNF8‐Ubc13‐dependent ubiquitination events at DNA double strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3166‐3171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Holzbaur EL, Vallee RB. DYNEINS: molecular structure and cellular function. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1994;10:339‐372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. White S, Lauring B. AAA+ ATPases: achieving diversity of function with conserved machinery. Traffic. 2007;8:1657‐1667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Lupas AN, Martin J. AAA proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2002;12:746‐753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Choi K‐SS, Choi H‐JJ, Lee J‐KK, et al. The endothelial E3 ligase HECW2 promotes endothelial cell junctions by increasing AMOTL1 protein stability via K63‐linked ubiquitination. Cell Sign. 2016;28:1642‐1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Ray DM, Rogers BA, Sunman JA, Akiyama SK, Olden K, Roberts JD. Lysine 63‐linked ubiquitination is important for arachidonic acid‐induced cellular adhesion and migration. Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;88:947‐956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tan P, Ye Y, He L, et al. TRIM59 promotes breast cancer motility by suppressing p62‐selective autophagic degradation of PDCD10. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e3000051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Sugihara M, Morito D, Ainuki S, et al. The AAA+ ATPase/ubiquitin ligase mysterin stabilizes cytoplasmic lipid droplets. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:jcb.201712120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Carmeliet P, Smet F, Loges S, Mazzone M. Branching morphogenesis and antiangiogenesis candidates: tip cells lead the way. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Smet F, Segura I, Bock K, Hohensinner PJ, Carmeliet P. Mechanisms of vessel branching. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009;29:639‐649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tung JJ, Tattersall IW, Kitajewski J. Tips, stalks, tubes: notch‐mediated cell fate determination and mechanisms of tubulogenesis during angiogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Chen W, Xia P, Wang H, et al. The endothelial tip‐stalk cell selection and shuffling during angiogenesis. J Cell Commun Sign. 2019;13(3):291‐301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sainson RC, Johnston DA, Chu HC, et al. TNF primes endothelial cells for angiogenic sprouting by inducing a tip cell phenotype. Blood. 2008;111:4997‐5007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zecchin A, Pattarini L, Gutierrez MI, et al. Reversible acetylation regulates vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 activity. J Mol Cell Biol. 2014;6:116‐127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Ohkubo K, Sakai Y, Inoue H, et al. Moyamoya disease susceptibility gene RNF213 links inflammatory and angiogenic signals in endothelial cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig S1‐S4
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
