Abstract
Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a benign tumor that mainly occurs in the kidneys. Simultaneous involvement of the kidney and local regional lymph nodes is very rare and might be misdiagnosed as a metastasizing malignant cancer. In the present study, a 50-year-old woman was referred to our hospital after a routine health screening ultrasound. Sporadic multiple renal AML with lymph node involvement was suspected based on the clinical manifestations and radiologic features. Partial nephrectomy was performed and a para-inferior vena cava lymph node was removed. The pathologic results confirmed multiple AML with lymph node invasion. We also reviewed the English-language literature regarding renal AML with lymph node involvement. We found that middle-aged women were likely to develop this disease and that loin pain was the main presenting feature. Most patients had no history of tuberous sclerosis complex. Radical nephrectomy was the predominant treatment. No local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred in any patients after radical nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. In conclusion, renal AML with lymph node involvement is rare but can occur in both patients with tuberous sclerosis complex and those with multiple sporadic AML. Partial nephrectomy should be the first-line treatment, after which further treatment is not necessary.
Keywords: Angiomyolipoma, renal angiomyolipoma, lymph node involvement, partial nephrectomy, literature review, case report
Introduction
Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a benign tumor that primarily occurs in the kidneys and is composed of blood vessels, smooth muscle, and adipose tissue.1 Renal AML, also termed hamartoma, is the second most common benign tumor in the kidney and accounts for 3% of renal tumors.2 Classic renal AML is easily diagnosed based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging, and in almost all sporadic cases, renal AML presents as only one lesion.3 However, few cases of renal AML accompanied by regional lymph node involvement have been described. We herein present a case of multiple renal AML co-occurring with para-inferior vena cava (para-IVC) lymph node involvement and a comprehensive review of the literature. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article and accompanying images. The present study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University.
Case presentation
A 50-year-old woman presented with multiple right renal masses that had been incidentally detected on a health screening ultrasound. The patient was asymptomatic and had no hematuria or weight loss. Her medical history was unremarkable, and she had no signs of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Physical examination revealed no significant abnormalities. The results of routine laboratory tests, including kidney function and blood tests, were normal with the exception of microscopic hematuria. Unenhanced and enhanced CT scans revealed typical multiple renal AML in the middle pole of the right kidney measuring 4 cm in its greatest dimension. Enlargement of the para-IVC lymph node was also present (Figure 1). Open partial nephrectomy (PN) was performed, and the para-IVC lymph node (2 cm in its greatest dimension) was removed. The pathological diagnosis of the renal specimen was AML (Figure 2(a)), and the lymph node showed AML invasion (Figure 2(b)). The patient was followed up with a CT scan every 6 months, and the tumor had not recurred 12 months postoperatively.
Figure 1.
Non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (a) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (corticomedullary phase: b, nephrographic phase: c, excretory phase: d). Two heterogeneous enhanced tumors (red arrow) were present in the right kidney. A hilar lymph node was noted (blue arrow).
Figure 2.
Renal angiomyolipoma. (a) Most of the tumor consisted of smooth muscle, which was interspersed with thick-walled blood vessels and scattered adipose tissues. (b) The remaining components (glomeruli and renal tubules) were visible in the upper left corner (hematoxylin–eosin, 100).
Discussion
Renal AML occurs sporadically or accompanies TSC. Typically, renal AML shows a slow benign growth pattern and no signs of distant metastasis.2 However, renal AML with regional lymph node involvement might suggest potential metastatic characteristics of AML.
We searched English-language articles in the Medline database using the key words “kidney” or “renal,” “angiomyolipoma” or “hamartoma” and “lymph node.” Twenty-two papers were found. Based on the full text of the articles rather than only the abstracts, 16 papers and 25 cases were found to be relevant4–19 (Table 1). Busch et al.4 reported the first two cases of benign renal AML with regional lymph node involvement in 1976. The mean age of the patients in the 25 reported cases was 40 years and ranged from 9 to 73 years. Women were predominantly affected (female:male ratio of 20:5). Loin pain was the main presenting feature (56%). Most patients had no history of TSC; however, eight (32%) cases were associated with TSC. All 25 cases were benign AML rather than malignant epithelioid AML. No distant metastasis occurred in any patients. Radical nephrectomy (RN) was the main treatment, and PN was performed in only four (16%) patients.
Table 1.
Previously reported cases of renal angiomyolipoma with lymph node involvement.
| Case No. | Authors (year) | Age (years) | Sex | Side | Diameter | Symptoms | Treatment | TSC | Evidence of malignancy | Distant metastasis | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Busch et al. (1976)4 | 21 | Male | Right | 11 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | Unknown |
| 49 | Female | Right | Unknown | Asymptomatic | RN | No | No | No | Unknown | ||
| 2 | Chawla et al. (1983)5 | 28 | Female | Right | 12 cm | Pain | PN | Yes | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| 3 | Manabe et al. (1984)6 | 42 | Female | Left | 20 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 3 years |
| 4 | Sant et al. (1986)7 | 61 | Female | Left | 17 cm | Pain | RN | Yes | No | No | 9 years |
| 49 | Female | Left | 4 cm | Fatigue | RN | No | No | No | 3 years | ||
| 5 | Brecher et al. (1986)8 | 63 | Female | Right | 6.5 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 15 years |
| 6 | Manabe et al. (1987)9 | 37 | Female | Left | 9 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | Unknown |
| 7 | Taylor et al. (1989)10 | 9 | Female | Right | 10 cm, 3 cm | Pain | PN | Yes | No | No | 20 months |
| 15 | Male | Bilateral | Unknown | Unknown | RN | Yes | No | No | 2 years | ||
| 25 | Female | Right | Unknown | Unknown | RN | Yes | No | No | 8 years | ||
| 8 | Ansari et al. (1991)11 | 46 | Female | Left | 12 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 2 months |
| 9 | Ackerman et al. (1994)12 | 25 | Female | Unknown | Unknown | Asymptomatic | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| 10 | Maffezzini et al. (1995)13 | 42 | Male | Right | Unknown | Unknown | RN | Yes | No | No | 5 years |
| 26 | Female | Right | 15 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 4 years | ||
| 63 | Female | Right | 15 cm | Unknown | RN | No | No | No | 2 years | ||
| 52 | Male | Right | 2 cm | Unknown | PN | No | No | No | 2 years | ||
| 11 | Csanaky et al. (1995)14 | 38 | Female | Left | 10 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 2 years |
| 39 | Female | Left | 6 cm | Malaise | PN | Yes | No | No | 6 months | ||
| 73 | Female | Left | 4 cm, 2 cm, 2 cm | Asymptomatic | RN | Yes | No | No | 6 months | ||
| 12 | Türker Köksal et al. (2000)15 | 40 | Female | Right | 18 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 8 years |
| 13 | Göğüş et al. (2001)16 | 17 | Female | Left | 8 cm | Pain | RN | No | No | No | 6 months |
| 14 | Lin et al. (2003)17 | 37 | Female | Left | 7 cm | Pain | RN | No | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| 15 | Cui et al. (2011)23 | 47 | Male | Left | 28 cm | Pain | RN | No | Yes | No | 2 years |
| 16 | Kon-Nanjo et al. (2017)19 | 62 | Female | Left | 15 cm | Asymptomatic | RN | No | No | No | 10 years |
TSC, tuberous sclerosis complex; PN, partial nephrectomy; RN, radical nephrectomy.
Clinically, most cases of AML are sporadic, and 10% to 20% of cases present in association with TSC. Among the 25 published cases of AML with node involvement, 8 (32%) had a history of TSC. Most cases of sporadic AML are asymptomatic, whereas TSC-associated AML is often symptomatic. However, among the 17 published cases of AML with node involvement without TSC, only 2 (12%) were asymptomatic. Moreover, all 17 cases of AML with node involvement without TSC were solitary. Our report describes the first case of sporadic multiple renal AML with lymph node involvement.
Based on the benign nature of AML and the absence of local recurrence and distant metastasis in the present case, the involvement of a local regional lymph node was thought to be simply a multicentric growth instead of metastasis. Tan et al.20 analyzed the genomic instability of renal AML with regional lymph node involvement in 12 patients and found a potential lineage relationship between renal AML and involved local lymph nodes.
The biological assessment of renal AML is controversial. However, considering that epithelioid renal AML may present with malignant behavior, all patients described in previously published reports were followed up from 2 months to 15 years postoperatively, and no local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred although no further treatment was performed. However, only 16% of the patients in these published studies underwent PN; the others underwent RN. No patients developed local recurrence or distant metastasis, indicating that RN should be avoided when PN is feasible by any approach. Some atypical renal AMLs may be misdiagnosed as renal cancers; thus, biopsy of renal tumors is needed, particularly when small tumor-like lesions are incidentally detected. This may help to avoid unnecessary nephrectomy.21,22 Additionally, we may be able to hypothesize that PN is the standard treatment for small renal masses without preoperative renal mass biopsy, even with lymph node metastasis. Considering the benign behavior of renal AML with lymph node involvement, an unenhanced CT scan can be performed every 6 to 12 months.
Conclusion
Renal AML with lymph node involvement is rare and can occur in both patients with TSC and those with multiple sporadic AML. PN should be the first-line treatment, after which further treatment is not necessary.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
ORCID iD: Yanbo Wang https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-6421
References
- 1.Kingswood JC, Bissler JJ, Budde K, et al. Review of the tuberous sclerosis renal guidelines from the 2012 consensus conference: current data and future study. Nephron 2016; 134: 51–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Oostenbrugge TJ, Fütterer JJ, Mulders PFA. Diagnostic imaging for solid renal tumors: a pictorial review. Kidney Cancer 2018; 2: 79–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Razik A, Das CJ, Sharma S. Angiomyolipoma of the kidneys: current perspectives and challenges in diagnostic imaging and image-guided therapy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019; 48: 251–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Busch FM, Bark CJ, Clydine HR. Benign renal angiomyolipoma with regional lymph node involvement. J Urol 1976; 116: 715–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chawla K, Silber L, Alexander LL. Renal angiomyolipoma with retroperitoneal adenopathy. J Natl Med Assoc 1983; 75: 431–434. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Manabe T, Tasaka Y, Amano M, et al. Regional lymph node involvement in benign renal angiomyolipoma. Acta Pathol Jpn 1984; 34: 889–893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sant GR, Ucci AA, Jr, Meares EM., Jr. Multicentric angiomyolipoma: renal and lymph node involvement. Urology 1986; 28: 111–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brecher ME, Gill WB, Straus FH., 2nd . Angiomyolipoma with regional lymph node involvement and long-term follow-up study. Hum Pathol 1986; 17: 962–963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manabe T, Moriya T, Kimoto M. Benign renal angiomyolipoma with regional lymph node involvement. Report of a case showing enlargement five years after nephrectomy. Acta Pathol Jpn 1987; 37: 1853–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Taylor RS, Joseph DB, Kohaut EC, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma associated with lymph node involvement and renal cell carcinoma in patients with tuberous sclerosis. J Urol 1989; 141: 930–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ansari SJ, Stephenson RA, Mackay B. Angiomyolipoma of the kidney with lymph node involvement. Ultrastruct Pathol 1991; 15: 531–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ackerman TE, Levi CS, Lindsay DJ, et al. Angiomyolipoma with lymph node involvement. Can Assoc Radiol J 1994; 45: 52–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maffezzini M, Vlassopoulos G, Simonato A, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with extrarenal involvement–in vascular, lymph-node and perirenal tissue. Reports of four cases. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1995; 29: 327–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Csanaky G, Szereday Z, Magyarlaki T, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma: report of three cases with regional lymph node involvement and/or with renal cell carcinoma. Tumori 1995; 81: 469–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Türker Köksal I, Tunç M, Kiliçaslan I, et al. Lymph nodal involvement by renal angiomyolipoma. Int J Urol 2000; 7: 386–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Göğüş C, Safak M, Erekul S, et al. Angiomyolipoma of the kidney with lymph node involvement in a 17-year old female mimicking renal cell carcinoma: a case report. Int Urol Nephrol 2001; 33: 617–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin WY, Chuang CK, Ng KF, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with lymph node involvement: a case report and literature review. Chang Gung Med J 2003; 26: 607–610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu G, Yao D, Zhang S, et al. Minimal fat renal angiomyolipoma with lymph node involvement: a case report and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: E568–E571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kon-Nanjo K, Baba Y, Yoshio Y, et al. Renal angiomyolipoma with para-aortic lymph node involvement. Pathol Int 2017; 67: 273–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tan P, Xu H, Jiang Y, et al. Microsatellite analysis for differentiating the origin of renal angiomyolipoma and involved regional lymph node. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Silverman SG, Gan YU, Mortele KJ, et al. Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy. Radiology 2006; 1: 6–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 2007; 2: 379–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cui L, Hu XY, Gong SC, et al. A massive renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma with multiple metastatic lymph nodes. Clin Imaging 2011; 35: 320–323. [DOI] [PubMed]


