Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249591

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition after contusive spinal cord injury does not improve locomotor recovery

George Z Wei 1,2,3, Sujata Saraswat Ohri 3,4, Nicolas K Khattar 2,3,4, Adam W Listerman 3, Catherine H Doyle 3,4, Kariena R Andres 3, Saravanan S Karuppagounder 5,6, Rajiv R Ratan 5,6, Scott R Whittemore 2,3,4,7,*, Michal Hetman 1,2,3,4,7,*
Editor: Kimberly R Byrnes8
PMCID: PMC8021188  PMID: 33819286

Abstract

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating neurological condition that involves both primary and secondary tissue loss. Various cytotoxic events including hypoxia, hemorrhage and blood lysis, bioenergetic failure, oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and neuroinflammation contribute to secondary injury. The HIF prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD/EGLN) family of proteins are iron-dependent, oxygen-sensing enzymes that regulate the stability of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and also mediate oxidative stress caused by free iron liberated from the lysis of blood. PHD inhibition improves outcome after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) by reducing activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)-driven neuronal death. As the ATF4-CHOP (CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein) pathway plays a role in the pathogenesis of contusive SCI, we examined the effects of PHD inhibition in a mouse model of moderate T9 contusive SCI in which white matter damage is the primary driver of locomotor dysfunction. Pharmacological inhibition of PHDs using adaptaquin (AQ) moderately lowers acute induction of Atf4 and Chop mRNAs and prevents the acute decline of oligodendrocyte (OL) lineage mRNAs, but does not improve long-term recovery of hindlimb locomotion or increase chronic white matter sparing. Conditional genetic ablation of all three PHD isoenzymes in OLs did not affect Atf4, Chop or OL mRNAs expression levels, locomotor recovery, and white matter sparing after SCI. Hence, PHDs may not be suitable targets to improve outcomes in traumatic CNS pathologies that involve acute white matter injury.

Introduction

The pathophysiology of spinal cord injury (SCI) consists of a primary injury phase which occurs as the direct result of mechanical insult to the spinal cord and a secondary injury phase that involves multiple pathophysiological mechanisms including inflammation, vascular disruption, blood hemorrhage and ischemia. These mechanisms further exacerbate the initial injury and lead to greater functional loss [1, 2]. The proteostasis network includes all proteins with a role in protein synthesis, folding, disaggregation, or degradation [3]. Integral to proteostasis are the heat shock response (HSR), the endoplasmic reticulum stress response (ERSR), the integrated stress response (ISR), and the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathways which further attempt to restore cellular homeostasis and if unsuccessful initiate apoptosis and cell death. We and others have shown that the ERSR is activated acutely after SCI [49]. The ERSR initially promotes cell survival by reducing global protein synthesis and upregulating chaperones that assist in protein folding. However, excessive or sustained ER stress that cannot be resolved initiates cellular death and contributes to the secondary injury cascade [4, 5, 10, 11]. Interventions that target or alleviate the ERSR after SCI reduce oligodendrocyte (OL) death, protect white matter, and improve locomotor recovery [4, 68, 12].

The ERSR drives expression of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and its target and partner CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP/DDIT3). Upon activation of the ERSR, these transcription factors (TFs) drive a gene expression program that supports amino acid and protein synthesis in an attempt to restore ER homeostasis. However, if ER stress is unresolved, ATF4/CHOP-mediated gene expression becomes cytotoxic by causing ER protein overload, ER-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and ultimately apoptosis [13].

The HIF prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins PHD1/EGLN1, PHD2/EGLN2, and PHD3/EGLN3, encoded by the Egln1, Egln2, and Egln3 genes, are a class of metalloenzymes oxygen sensors that, under normoxic conditions, hydroxylate proline residues of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) to stimulate its proteasomal degradation [14]. Under hypoxic conditions, PHDs are inactive so that HIF-1α accumulates and activates adaptive genes that protect against hypoxia. However, pharmacological PHD inhibition using adaptaquin (AQ) or genetic deletion of the Egln1-3 genes protect neurons from oxidative death due to blood lysis-derived free iron and improves functional outcome after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) [15]. Those beneficial effects appear to be mediated by attenuation of the ATF4-driven cytotoxic gene expression program that is activated in neurons under oxidative stress [15]. PHD-mediated hydroxylation of several ATF4 proline residues is a likely mechanism that promotes cytotoxic activity of ATF4 [15].

Recent studies further demonstrate the protective role of pharmacological PHD inhibition by reducing ATF4-CHOP-mediated neuronal death and protecting against oxidative damage in models of neurodegeneration including Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease [1620], where neuronal loss is paramount. However, PHD inhibitors have not been evaluated for their therapeutic potential in protecting white matter against acute injuries such as thoracic contusive SCI where the ATF4 target gene Chop plays a major pathogenic role [4]. Furthermore, the role of PHDs in ATF4-CHOP activation after SCI is unknown. The current study was undertaken to determine the contributions of PHDs to ATF4-CHOP activation and white matter loss after SCI.

Materials and methods

Animals

All animal procedures were approved by the University of Louisville Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Institutional Biosafety Committee, in accordance with guidelines from the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council, 1996), and strictly adhered to NIH guidelines on use of experimental animals. AQ experiments were performed on wild type (WT) 8–10 week-old C57BL/6 female mice (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN) fed a standard ad libitum chow and housed under 12h dark/light cycle. Females are predominantly used in rodent SCI literature due to lower incidence of post-operative complications and, therefore, have better survival as compared to males [21]. Moreover, while sex-specific drug effects are possible, locomotor recovery in SCI rodents is not significantly affected by sex [2224]. Therefore, AQ studies were performed in females to reduce the animal number needed for adequately powered data. Plp-creERT2 (proteolipid protein) (Plp-cre-B6.Cg-Tg (Plp1-Cre/ERT) 3Pop/J; catalog #5975) and Egln1/2/3fl/fl (Egln2tm2Fong Egln1tm2Fong Egln3tm2Fong/J; Stock No: 028097) mice were acquired from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Those lines were crossed to generate experimental subjects (Egln1/2/3fl/fl:Plp-CreERT2), which, due to limited availability of animals with the desired genotype, included both males and females. Those mice were treated with tamoxifen to induce Egln1/2/3 knockout primarily in CNS myelinating OLs [2527] (see the Drug treatments paragraph for more details). Controls included male and female Egln1/2/3fl/fl:Plp-CreERT2 that were treated with vehicle and WT mice that were treated with tamoxifen. Importantly, PLP is expressed earlier than myelin basic protein (MBP) during development, beginning during embryonic life and at early developmental stages of OPC differentiation [25, 28], so in tamoxifen-induced Egln1/2/3fl/fl:Plp-CreERT2 mice, some OPC recombination may be expected as well. Sex unbalanced groups emerged in studies using Egln1/2/3fl/fl:Plp-CreERT2 mice due to limited availability of males of comparable age and peri- and/or post-operative loss of animals (see S1 Table for more details).

SCI

Prior to surgery, mice were anesthetized using an intraperitoneal injection of 0.4 mg/g body weight Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol in 0.02 ml of 1.25% 2-methyl-2-butanol in saline, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The back of the mice was shaved and disinfected using a 4% chlorohexidine solution. Lacri-Lube ophthalmic ointment (Allergen, Madison, NJ) was used to prevent drying of the eyes. A dorsal laminectomy was done at the T9 vertebrae and positioned under the Infinite Horizons (IH) Impactor as previously described [4, 29]. A moderate contusion injury (50 kdyn force/400–600 μm displacement) was delivered and mice were immediately placed onto a temperature-controlled 37°C heating pad until sternal time. Mice were administered buprenorphine twice daily for the following 2 days. Gentamycin (50 mg/kg; Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) was administered subcutaneously to reduce infection. Controls included sham animals that received T9 laminectomy only. All surgeries were performed without knowledge of a group assignment or genotype. For each study, surgeries for all groups were performed on the same day or two consecutive days with random sequence of animals from various groups/genotypes.

Drug treatments

Tamoxifen was dissolved in corn oil (Sigma, C8267) at 20 mg/mL and administered intraperitoneally (1 mg/day) beginning 21 days prior to SCI and continuing for 8 consecutive days as previously described [30]. Adaptaquin (AQ), obtained from Dr. Rajiv Ratan and Dr. Saravanan Karuppagounder (Burke Neurological Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University), was dissolved in a solution of 0.03% DMSO and olive oil. Fresh aliquots were prepared daily for treatment. AQ was administered by intraperitoneal injections (0.1 cc/injection 30 mg/kg) first, within 1 hour after SCI, and then, daily for either 3 days (the experiment to collect tissues at 3 days post injury; the last AQ injection administered 2h before euthanasia) or 7 days (the experiment to determine effects of AQ on locomotor recovery) of treatment. The AQ dosing was based on the previous ICH study which confirmed blood-brain barrier penetration and anti-ATF4 activity in the brain [15]. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR) was used to confirm the molecular integrity of AQ (S1 Fig).

Behavioral assessment

Animals were habituated to human interaction and handling twice a day for 5 consecutive days, 1 week prior to SCI/Sham. Baseline Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) locomotor scores were obtained prior to injury for every individual animal and weekly following SCI for 6 weeks [4, 31]. Raters were trained by Dr. Basso and colleagues at the Ohio State University and were blinded to the animal genotype and treatment groups. The order of animal analysis was random.

RNA extraction and analysis

Total RNA was extracted from spinal cord tissue at the injury epicenter (5 mm segment spanning the injury site) using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. RNA was quantified by ultraviolet spectroscopy (NanoDrop2000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). cDNA synthesis was performed with random hexamers using 500 ng of total RNA using the Invitrogen SuperScript IV VILO Master Mix I (Thermo Fisher) in a 20 μL reaction volume. All cDNAs were diluted 10x with water before using as a template for quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR). qPCR was performed using ViiA 7 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Briefly, diluted cDNAs were added to TaqMan universal PCR master mix or SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems) and run in triplicate. Primer sets are listed in S2 Table. For qPCR analysis of PHD family mRNAs, protocols and primers were used as previously described [32, 33]. RNA levels were quantified using the ΔΔCT method with Gapdh as a reference gene. Transcript levels were normalized to their respective levels in sham or vehicle controls and expressed as fold-changes.

White matter sparing (WMS)

WMS was evaluated as described previously [4, 34]. Six weeks post-SCI, mice were anesthetized with avertin, followed by thoracotomy and transcardial perfusion with ice-cold PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Spinal cords were dissected and submerged in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. They were then transferred to 30% sucrose for at least 7 days at 4°C, blocked in Tissue Freezing Media (Cat # 72592, Electron Microscopy Science, Hatfield, PA) and stored at -20°C. Spinal cords were serially cut (20 μm) in transverse sections spanning 5 mm rostral and caudal to the injury epicenter, and were stained for myelin using iron eriochrome cyanine (EC) with an alkali differentiator [35]. Images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville NY), and white matter was traced using Nikon Elements software. The epicenter of each injury was identified visually based on the section with the least amount of spared white matter. Data were normalized to spared white matter in corresponding non-injured sections. All imaging and analyses were performed blinded to ensure unbiased quantification.

ODD-luciferase assay

The biological activity of AQ used in animal studies was confirmed on cultured SH-SY5Y cells using the HIF-1α oxygen degradation domain (ODD)-luciferase reporter assay (S2 Fig) as previously described [15, 36].

Statistical analysis

All qPCR or image analysis data (WMS) were analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test (u-test, single sided). Repeated-measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc tests were used for analyzing BMS locomotor recovery data. A priori power calculations were performed for analysis of locomotor recovery. Power analysis based on BBB/BMS variance in published rodent SCI studies with standard deviations between 1.5–2.3 shows that the ability to detect a significant difference of 10% in BMS with at least 90% power in a sample size of 8/group. Hence, all locomotor recovery assessments were adequately powered. Data are reported as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 25 (IBM).

Results

At 3 days post-SCI, there were similar declines in neuron-specific enolase (Nse/Eno2) mRNA and increases in astrocyte-specific mRNAs (Gfap, Glul) in vehicle- and AQ-treated animals suggesting no effects of AQ on either cell type (Fig 1A). However, there were increased OL-specific transcripts (Olig2, Mbp), along with decreased mRNAs of Atf4, Chop, and the ATF4/CHOP target gene Trib3 in AQ-treated animals (Fig 1B). Moreover, Map2 mRNA, which is expressed mainly in neurons, but also detected in OLs [37], was increased. These results suggest reduced acute loss of OLs and attenuated activation of the ATF4-CHOP pathway. However, as expression of the ER stress-associated ATF4/CHOP targets Gadd34/Ppp1r15a and Slc7a11 was unaffected, the anti-ATF4 effects of AQ appear to be target gene-specific. Finally, AQ treatment did not modify ERSR-associated induction of Grp78 and Xbp1 mRNAs suggesting no general attenuation of the ERSR.

Fig 1. After SCI, AQ attenuates the acute loss of OL lineage mRNAs, moderately reduces acute ATF4 and CHOP activation, but does not improve chronic functional locomotor recovery.

Fig 1

(a) neural cell-specific and (b) ISR/ERSR and ATF4-regulated gene mRNA levels 72 hours-post SCI. Transcript levels (normalized to Gapdh) are expressed as fold change sham controls. Data in (a, b) are the mean ± SD (n = 8, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ns, p>0.05, u-test). (c) BMS analysis of hindlimb locomotion revealed no significant differences in hindlimb locomotor recovery between vehicle (Veh)- (n = 6) and AQ-treated 30 mg/kg (n = 7) mice (repeated measure two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of time after injury /F5,21 = 12.34; p<0.001/ but no significant effects of treatment /F1,59 = 0.03; p>0.05/ or the interaction between time after injury and treatment /F5,21 = 0.97, p>0.05/; see S3 Table for raw BMS data). (d) Representative images of the injury epicenter stained with EC to identify myelin (6 weeks post-SCI) (e) Quantitative analysis of EC-stained sections through the injury epicenter shows similar extent of spared white matter. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 4, p>0.05, u-test).

To determine the effects of AQ treatment on chronic locomotor recovery, mice received vehicle or 30 mg/kg AQ immediately after injury and then daily for 7 days. Hindlimb function was evaluated using the BMS for 6 weeks post-SCI. Comparison of BMS scores between vehicle- and AQ-treated mice revealed no significant differences (Fig 1C). Consistent with no AQ effects on locomotor recovery, a similar extent of white matter sparing was detected in AQ- and vehicle-treated groups (Fig 1D and 1E). These data show that despite transient improvement in OL survival acutely after contusive SCI, pharmacological inhibition of PHDs using AQ did not increase chronic white matter sparing or locomotor recovery.

To determine if the genetic deletion of the PHDs in OLs affects outcome after SCI, we used OL-specific Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice to conditionally remove all 3 PHD isoenzymes in OLs following treatment with tamoxifen. Fourteen days after the completion of tamoxifen or vehicle treatment, we confirmed that tamoxifen treatment resulted in lower Phd/Egln mRNA levels in uninjured spinal cords of Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (Fig 2A). Consistent downregulation of Phd/Egln transcripts ranged from 23 to 25% of control values. These findings suggest that (i) gene deletion efficiency was similar for each isoform and (ii) the deletion occurred in most PLP-positive, mature OLs as their estimated spinal cord content is 20–25% [3840] and at least the maximally expressed Phd2/Egln2 appears to be ubiquitously present in all spinal cord cells [41]. In addition, Phd/Egln mRNAs were downregulated by 25–32% in the OL-rich tissue of the optic nerve (Fig 2A), but not the OL-lacking liver of tamoxifen-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (S3 Fig). The OL-specific loss of Phd/Egln genes was biologically relevant as the established HIF target genes Vegf and Epo were upregulated, including 27% increase of Vegf or 37–39% increases of Vegf and Epo transcripts in the spinal cord or the optic nerve, respectively. Such upregulation is expected as a result of reduced negative regulation of HIF due to PHD deficiency [15, 42]. The lesser response in the spinal cord than the optic nerve is likely caused by high basal level spinal neuron expression of Epo and Vegf mRNAs [41] which can potentially dilute the OL induction of those genes after Phd/Egln deletion. Thus, our data suggest OL-specific knockout of PHD1/2/3 isoforms.

Fig 2. Effects of HIF-PHDs deletion in OL lineage cells after SCI.

Fig 2

(a) Tamoxifen (Tam)-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (n = 10, M:F = 4:6) show reduced Phd1/Egln1, Phd2/Egln2, and Phd3/Egln3 mRNAs in the spinal cord (controls received vehicle /Veh/, n = 9, M:F = 4:5). Similarly, Tamoxifen (Tam)-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (n = 4, M:F = 2:2) show reduced Phd1/Egln1, Phd2/Egln2, and Phd3/Egln3 in the optic nerve (controls received vehicle /Veh/, n = 3, M:F = 2:1). Confirming biological relevance of the OL-specific PHD1/2/3 deficiency, established HIF target genes including Vegf or Vegf and Epo were upregulated in OL-containing spinal cord and optic nerve, respectively. (b) At 72 h after injury, SCI-associated declines of neuronal- or OL mRNAs are unaffected by Tam-mediated OL-selective deletion of PHD1/2/3. (c) Likewise, Tam-mediated knockout of OL-PHD1/2/3 did not attenuate SCI-associated induction of ERSR transcripts including Atf4 and Chop. Transcript levels (normalized to Gapdh) are expressed as fold changes of Veh control (a) or sham Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl controls (b,c). Data (b,c) are the mean ± SD (n = 4, M:F = 2:2 *p<0.05; ns, p>0.05, u-test). (d) BMS analysis of hindlimb locomotion revealed no significant differences in recovery between Veh- (n = 8, M:F = 2:6), Tam-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (n = 12, M:F = 5:7), and Tam-treated WT C57BL/6 mice (n = 10, M:F = 4:6). When comparing Veh- and Tam-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice, repeated measure two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of time after injury (F5,56, = 11.89, p<0.001), but no significant effects of Tam treatment (F2,95 = 2.6, p>0.05), or the interaction between the time after injury and Tam treatment (F10,56 = 0.99, p>0.05); see S3 Table for raw BMS data.

At 72 h after SCI, tamoxifen- and vehicle-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice had similar neural cell mRNA levels, suggesting unaffected acute loss of neurons and OLs (Fig 2B). No effects on the expression of Atf4, Chop, Gadd34 or Grp78 mRNAs were observed (Fig 2C). Moreover, comparison of 6-week BMS scores for tamoxifen- and vehicle-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice revealed no significant differences in locomotor recovery (Fig 2D). Likewise, no differences in chronic hindlimb locomotor recovery were observed when tamoxifen-induced OL-PHD knockouts were compared to WT mice that received identical tamoxifen treatment (Fig 2D). Therefore, OL-selective deletion of HIF-PHD does not affect SCI-associated acute OL loss, ATF4-CHOP signaling or chronic locomotor recovery.

Discussion

Adaptaquin (AQ), a hydroxyquinoline-based inhibitor of PHDs, abrogates ATF4-CHOP-dependent neuronal death and improves functional outcomes in mouse models of ICH and Parkinson’s disease [15, 19]. While these studies implicate PHDs in ATF4-CHOP-mediated neuronal death, their involvement in OL death and white matter damage after SCI remains unknown. Acutely after SCI, the pro-apoptotic, ERSR-activated transcription factors ATF4 and CHOP are upregulated in neurons and OLs [48]. Our previous study showed improved behavioral outcome after thoracic contusive SCI in Chop-/- mice that was associated with increased WMS and attenuated acute loss of OLs [4]. Likewise, pharmacological interventions targeting proteostasis attenuated SCI-associated activation of ATF4-CHOP while improving functional recovery and WMS [7]. Therefore, we hypothesized that pharmacological and/or genetic suppression of ATF4-CHOP signaling after thoracic contusive SCI would similarly restore proteostasis and prevent chronic OL loss, leading to increased spared white matter and improved functional outcomes. However, AQ-mediated attenuation of acute OL loss and ATF4-CHOP signaling did not improve chronic locomotor recovery or WMS. Importantly, although AQ reduced Atf4, Chop, and Trib3 mRNA levels, there was no effect on three other ERSR transcripts, Gadd34, Grp78, and Xbp1 (Fig 1B). In previous studies, where increased acute OL/OPC mRNA levels were accompanied by increases in chronic locomotor recovery, there was reduced activation of not only Atf4 and Chop, but also other ERSR transcripts [4, 7, 12, 30, 43]. It is likely that AQ inhibits ATF4-CHOP signaling that is distinct from their involvement in the ERSR and therefore limits the effects of AQ’s effects on SCI outcome. Indeed, in the ICH model, AQ was proposed to inhibit the ATF4-mediated iron-dependent ferroptosis, but not the cytotoxic ER stress [15, 44]. Hence, our AQ studies suggest that although PHDs contribute to ATF4-CHOP signaling in the contused spinal cord, the cytotoxic ERSR is the dominant signaling pathway that drives chronic white matter damage and functional deficits [4, 9]. This interpretation is further supported by results from SCI mice with OL/OPC-specific PHD deletion (Fig 2). OLs are uniquely sensitive to injury-induced ERSR because of their high protein translation requirements [4, 4548]. However, no effects on thoracic contusive SCI-associated increases of ATF4 and CHOP signaling were observed in the OL-specific Phd/Egln1,2,3-/- mice. Likewise, acute OL loss and locomotor recovery were unaffected.

These observations are in contrast to those from various CNS injury models with primary effects on the grey matter [1620]. Those data suggest that PHD inhibition might improve functional outcomes in lumbar or cervical models of SCI, where neuronal death is paramount to loss of function [4951]. The differences in the effects of AQ on ICH and thoracic contusive SCI highlight the complexities of the proteostasis network [3]. Following CNS trauma, multiple proteostasis signaling pathways are differentially activated by distinct pathophysiological stimuli. Depending on the extent and duration of those stimuli, the various pro-homeostatic and pro-apoptotic signals differentially summate. Moreover, there are both overlapping and diverse aspects of the respective arms of proteostasis signaling [5255]. Unfortunately, there is currently no consensus on how best to globally target proteostasis effectors for treating CNS trauma. While it is likely to be therapeutically beneficial, it will have to be empirically determined for each type of injury.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. 1H NMR spectrum for the AQ batch used in the current SCI study.

1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 9.84 (s, 1H), 8.84 (dd, 1H), 8.2–8.4 (m, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H), 7.54 (dd, 1H), 7.3–7.5 (m, 6H), 6.8–6.9 (m, 2H), 6.4–6.5 (m, 2H) matches the spectra of AQ as previously described [56]. Data were recorded on a Varian Unity Inova 500 MHz and chemical shifts are reported in ppm using the solvent as an internal standard (DMSO-d6 at 2.5 ppm).

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Validation of biological activity for the AQ batch (AQ /KY/) used in the current SCI study.

SH-SY5Y ODD-Luc cells were treated with increasing concentrations of AQ (0.1 μM-10 μM) for 3 h. ODD-luciferase activity was determined by luminometry. AQ inhibits HIF prolyl hydroxylase activity and stabilize luciferase fused to the oxygen degradation domain (ODD).

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Effects of OL-specific HIF-PHDs deletion in the OL-lacking liver tissue.

Tamoxifen (Tam)-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (n = 4, M:F = 2:2) show no changes in Phd1/Egln1, Phd2/Egln2, Phd3/Egln3, Epo, and Vegf mRNAs (controls received vehicle /Veh/, n = 3, M:F = 2:1).

(TIF)

S1 Table. Experimental design.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. List of qPCR primers.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Raw BMS score data for individual mice.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Lukasz Slomnicki for discussions, Christine Yarberry for performing surgical procedures, Darlene A. Burke for help with statistical analyses, Johnny Morehouse and Jason Beare for BMS analyses and Molly Parsch for her excellent technical assistance.

Data Availability

All relevant analyzed data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by The NIH: NS108529 (NINDS), GM10350 (NIGMS), Norton Healthcare, the Commonwealth of Kentucky Research Challenge for Excellence Trust Fund (SRW, MH) and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (SRW, SSO, MH) and the Integrated Programs in Biomedical Sciences (GZW).

References

  • 1.O’Shea T.M., Burda J.E., and Sofroniew M.V., Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair. J Clin Invest, 2017. 127(9): p. 3259–3270. 10.1172/JCI90608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahuja C.S., et al., Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017. 3: p. 17018. 10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Labbadia J. and Morimoto R.I., The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Annu Rev Biochem, 2015. 84: p. 435–64. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohri S.S., et al., Attenuating the endoplasmic reticulum stress response improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Glia, 2011. 59(10): p. 1489–502. 10.1002/glia.21191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Penas C., et al., Spinal cord injury induces endoplasmic reticulum stress with different cell-type dependent response. J Neurochem, 2007. 102(4): p. 1242–55. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04671.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Valenzuela V., et al., Activation of the unfolded protein response enhances motor recovery after spinal cord injury. Cell Death Dis, 2012. 3: p. e272. 10.1038/cddis.2012.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohri S.S., Hetman M., and Whittemore S.R., Restoring endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis, 2013. 58: p. 29–37. 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.04.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ohri S.S., et al., Deletion of the pro-apoptotic endoplasmic reticulum stress response effector CHOP does not result in improved locomotor function after severe contusive spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2012. 29(3): p. 579–88. 10.1089/neu.2011.1940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ohri S.S., et al., Oligodendrocyte-specific deletion of XBP1 exacerbates the endoplasmic reticulum stress response and restricts locomotor recovery after thoracic spinal cord injury. Glia, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lin J.H., Walter P., and Yen T.S., Endoplasmic reticulum stress in disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Pathol, 2008. 3: p. 399–425. 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ohri S.S., et al., Inhibition of GADD34, the stress-inducible regulatory subunit of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response, does not enhance functional recovery after spinal cord injury. PLoS One, 2014. 9(11): p. e109703. 10.1371/journal.pone.0109703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Myers S.A., et al., Following spinal cord injury, PDE4B drives an acute, local inflammatory response and a chronic, systemic response exacerbated by gut dysbiosis and endotoxemia. Neurobiol Dis, 2019. 124: p. 353–363. 10.1016/j.nbd.2018.12.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Han J., et al., ER-stress-induced transcriptional regulation increases protein synthesis leading to cell death. Nat Cell Biol, 2013. 15(5): p. 481–90. 10.1038/ncb2738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fong G.H. and Takeda K., Role and regulation of prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins. Cell Death Differ, 2008. 15(4): p. 635–41. 10.1038/cdd.2008.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karuppagounder S.S., et al., Therapeutic targeting of oxygen-sensing prolyl hydroxylases abrogates ATF4-dependent neuronal death and improves outcomes after brain hemorrhage in several rodent models. Sci Transl Med, 2016. 8(328): p. 328ra29. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac6008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Niatsetskaya Z., et al., HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors prevent neuronal death induced by mitochondrial toxins: therapeutic implications for Huntington’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Antioxid Redox Signal, 2010. 12(4): p. 435–43. 10.1089/ars.2009.2800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li L., et al., Neuronal deficiency of HIF prolyl 4-hydroxylase 2 in mice improves ischemic stroke recovery in an HIF dependent manner. Neurobiol Dis, 2016. 91: p. 221–35. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Neitemeier S., et al., Inhibition of HIF-prolyl-4-hydroxylases prevents mitochondrial impairment and cell death in a model of neuronal oxytosis. Cell Death Dis, 2016. 7: p. e2214. 10.1038/cddis.2016.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aime P., et al., The drug adaptaquin blocks ATF4/CHOP-dependent pro-death Trib3 induction and protects in cellular and mouse models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis, 2020. 136: p. 104725. 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li K., et al., Sex differences in neonatal mouse brain injury after hypoxia-ischemia and adaptaquin treatment. J Neurochem, 2019. 150(6): p. 759–775. 10.1111/jnc.14790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stewart A.N., et al., Considerations for Studying Sex as a Biological Variable in Spinal Cord Injury. Front Neurol, 2020. 11: p. 802. 10.3389/fneur.2020.00802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luchetti S., et al., Comparison of immunopathology and locomotor recovery in C57BL/6, BUB/BnJ, and NOD-SCID mice after contusion spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2010. 27(2): p. 411–21. 10.1089/neu.2009.0930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fukutoku T., et al., Sex-Related Differences in Anxiety and Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury in Mice. J Neurotrauma, 2020. 37(21): p. 2235–2243. 10.1089/neu.2019.6929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walker C.L., et al., Functional and Histological Gender Comparison of Age-Matched Rats after Moderate Thoracic Contusive Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma, 2019. 36(12): p. 1974–1984. 10.1089/neu.2018.6233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wight P.A., et al., A myelin proteolipid protein-LacZ fusion protein is developmentally regulated and targeted to the myelin membrane in transgenic mice. J Cell Biol, 1993. 123(2): p. 443–54. 10.1083/jcb.123.2.443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fuss B., et al., Normal CNS myelination in transgenic mice overexpressing MHC class I H-2L(d) in oligodendrocytes. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2001. 18(2): p. 221–34. 10.1006/mcne.2001.1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Doerflinger N.H., Macklin W.B., and Popko B., Inducible site-specific recombination in myelinating cells. Genesis, 2003. 35(1): p. 63–72. 10.1002/gene.10154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mallon B.S., et al., Proteolipid promoter activity distinguishes two populations of NG2-positive cells throughout neonatal cortical development. J Neurosci, 2002. 22(3): p. 876–85. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00876.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Scheff S.W., et al., Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. J Neurotrauma, 2003. 20(2): p. 179–93. 10.1089/08977150360547099 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ohri S.S., et al., Blocking Autophagy in Oligodendrocytes Limits Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci, 2018. 38(26): p. 5900–5912. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0679-17.2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Basso D.M., et al., Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion detects differences in recovery after spinal cord injury in five common mouse strains. J Neurotrauma, 2006. 23(5): p. 635–59. 10.1089/neu.2006.23.635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tojo Y., et al., Hypoxia Signaling Cascade for Erythropoietin Production in Hepatocytes. Mol Cell Biol, 2015. 35(15): p. 2658–72. 10.1128/MCB.00161-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Takeda K., et al., Placental but not heart defects are associated with elevated hypoxia-inducible factor alpha levels in mice lacking prolyl hydroxylase domain protein 2. Mol Cell Biol, 2006. 26(22): p. 8336–46. 10.1128/MCB.00425-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Magnuson D.S., et al., Functional consequences of lumbar spinal cord contusion injuries in the adult rat. J Neurotrauma, 2005. 22(5): p. 529–43. 10.1089/neu.2005.22.529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stefanovic D., Stefanovic M., and Lalosevic D., Use of eriochrome cyanine R in routine histology and histopathology: is it time to say goodbye to hematoxylin? Biotech Histochem, 2015. 90(6): p. 461–9. 10.3109/10520295.2015.1057765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smirnova N.A., et al., Utilization of an in vivo reporter for high throughput identification of branched small molecule regulators of hypoxic adaptation. Chem Biol, 2010. 17(4): p. 380–91. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.LoPresti P., et al., Functional implications for the microtubule-associated protein tau: localization in oligodendrocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1995. 92(22): p. 10369–73. 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Valerio-Gomes B., et al., The Absolute Number of Oligodendrocytes in the Adult Mouse Brain. Front Neuroanat, 2018. 12: p. 90. 10.3389/fnana.2018.00090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dawson M.R., et al., NG2-expressing glial progenitor cells: an abundant and widespread population of cycling cells in the adult rat CNS. Mol Cell Neurosci, 2003. 24(2): p. 476–88. 10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00210-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sathyamurthy A., et al., Massively Parallel Single Nucleus Transcriptional Profiling Defines Spinal Cord Neurons and Their Activity during Behavior. Cell Rep, 2018. 22(8): p. 2216–2225. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lein E.S., et al., Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature, 2007. 445(7124): p. 168–76. 10.1038/nature05453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramakrishnan S., Anand V., and Roy S., Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in hypoxia and inflammation. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 2014. 9(2): p. 142–60. 10.1007/s11481-014-9531-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Saraswat Ohri S., et al., Acute Neural and Proteostasis Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels Predict Chronic Locomotor Recovery after Contusive Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma, 2020. 10.1089/neu.2020.7258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ratan R.R., The Chemical Biology of Ferroptosis in the Central Nervous System. Cell Chem Biol, 2020. 27(5): p. 479–498. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.D’Antonio M., Feltri M.L., and Wrabetz L., Myelin under stress. J Neurosci Res, 2009. 87(15): p. 3241–9. 10.1002/jnr.22066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lin W. and Popko B., Endoplasmic reticulum stress in disorders of myelinating cells. Nat Neurosci, 2009. 12(4): p. 379–85. 10.1038/nn.2273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pennuto M., et al., Ablation of the UPR-mediator CHOP restores motor function and reduces demyelination in Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1B mice. Neuron, 2008. 57(3): p. 393–405. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Southwood C.M., et al., The unfolded protein response modulates disease severity in Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. Neuron, 2002. 36(4): p. 585–96. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01045-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hadi B., et al., Lasting paraplegia caused by loss of lumbar spinal cord interneurons in rats: no direct correlation with motor neuron loss. J Neurosurg, 2000. 93(2 Suppl): p. 266–75. 10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Magnuson D.S., et al., Comparing deficits following excitotoxic and contusion injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spinal cord of the adult rat. Exp Neurol, 1999. 156(1): p. 191–204. 10.1006/exnr.1999.7016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nishida F., et al., Functional and histopathological changes induced by intraparenchymal injection of kainic acid in the rat cervical spinal cord. Neurotoxicology, 2015. 49: p. 68–78. 10.1016/j.neuro.2015.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Adamson B., et al., A Multiplexed Single-Cell CRISPR Screening Platform Enables Systematic Dissection of the Unfolded Protein Response. Cell, 2016. 167(7): p. 1867–1882 e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Shoulders M.D., et al., Stress-independent activation of XBP1s and/or ATF6 reveals three functionally diverse ER proteostasis environments. Cell Rep, 2013. 3(4): p. 1279–92. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.03.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lee A.H., Iwakoshi N.N., and Glimcher L.H., XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. Mol Cell Biol, 2003. 23(21): p. 7448–59. 10.1128/mcb.23.21.7448-7459.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pakos-Zebrucka K., et al., The integrated stress response. EMBO Rep, 2016. 17(10): p. 1374–1395. 10.15252/embr.201642195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Thinnes C.C., et al., Betti reaction enables efficient synthesis of 8-hydroxyquinoline inhibitors of 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases. Chem Commun (Camb), 2015. 51(84): p. 15458–61. 10.1039/c5cc06095h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Kimberly R Byrnes

7 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-28946

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition after contusive spinal cord injury does not improve locomotor recovery

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hetman,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The critiques below indicate the required changes.  The authors are encouraged to address the issue of knockdown of PDH, as reviewer 2 notes.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 21 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kimberly R. Byrnes, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The current studies by Wei et al. were designed to assess effects of prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition in a mouse model of moderate T9 contusive SCI. The authors reported that pharmacological inhibition of PHDs by adaptaquin moderately reduced Atf4 and Chop mRNAs expression levels and increased oligodendrocyte lineage mRNAs. However, the treatment did not affect locomotor function deficit and tissue damage induced by SCI. Furthermore, genetic deletion of all three PHD iso-enzymes in oligodendrocyte lineage did not affect Atf4, Chop or OL mRNA expression levels, or locomotor recovery after SCI. They concluded that PHDs may not be suitable targets to treatment SCI. Overall, this is the first study that demonstrates no effects of PHD inhibition in SCI model. In general, the manuscript is well written and the study is well designed. The authors provide appropriate and rigorous analysis and the conclusions are balanced with relevant literature. Methods are clear and descriptive of the procedures allowing reproduction of the experiments. Statistical analysis is properly applied by the authors. I have only few minor concerns:

1. Please justify using the literature the use of only female mice in the study for AQ experiments (Fig 1). More discussion is needed regarding the narrow focus of the study since males were not included in this study.

2. In the HIF-PHDs deletion study (Fig 2)---What is the rationale for using such different male/female ratio for each of the various tests?

3. For the statistical analysis, please specify if power analysis and exclusion of data were included in this research.

4. The authors should show individual data points where possible.

Reviewer #2: Wei et al. describe the effect of inhibiting the PHD family proteins on the outcomes of contusive SCI in the mouse model. They demonstrate that while pharmacological PHD inhibition moderately decreases levels of ER stress markers it has no effect on either histological or functional outcomes. Similarly, genetic oligodendrocyte-specific inhibition of Phd1-3 does not affect SCI outcomes.

In general, the manuscript is well written, the experiments are appropriately executed, analyzed and interpreted.

The only major issue is the extent of Phd1-3 knock out following tamoxifen treatment. While data in Fig 2a indicate that knock out of each of the genes significantly lowers its mRNA expression, the degree of this decrease is very small (10-15%). Statistically significant does not necessarily equal biologically relevant. Since these genes are expressed in other cell types, the authors should check expression in purified oligodendrocytes. It is also possible that expression would be lower at protein rather than mRNA level.

Minor issues:

• Please specify PHD family members in the introduction including their proper gene names (Egln1-3).

• AQ treatments were given for 3 days. Please provide better justification for timing - longer treatment (7-10 days) is often used for SCI.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 5;16(4):e0249591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249591.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


23 Feb 2021

Response to Reviewers

Re: Submission titled <Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition after contusive spinal cord injury does not improve locomotor recovery>

Rev #1:

1. Please justify using the literature the use of only female mice in the study for AQ experiments (Fig 1). More discussion is needed regarding the narrow focus of the study since males were not included in this study.

Response: Females are predominantly used in rodent SCI literature due to lower incidence of urinary tract infections and better survival as compared to males /PMID: 32849242/. Furthermore, there have been multiple studies that show that there is no significant sex difference in locomotor functional recovery after SCI /for instance see, PMID: 19831737 and 32486893/. Therefore, we have used females in AQ studies to minimize the animal number needed for adequate statistical power. Had there been any differences between AQ- and vehicle treated animals, a follow up study using males would have been added. We expanded the Animal paragraph of the Methods section justifying such an experimental design including citing the supporting literature.

2. In the HIF-PHDs deletion study (Fig 2)---What is the rationale for using such different male/female ratio for each of the various tests?

Response: To properly power experiments that involved quadruple transgenic Egln1/2/3fl/fl :Plp-CreERT2 mice (Fig. 2), we used both sexes. However, sex unbalanced groups emerged in our studies on Egln1/2/3fl/fl : Plp-CreERT2 mice due to limited availability of males of comparable age and their higher mortality due to complications after SCI (see #1, above). The aforementioned expansion of the Methods sections presents that rationale. We also added a Supplementary Table S2 that lists all the studies and provides detailed information about mortality.

3. For the statistical analysis, please specify if power analysis and exclusion of data were included in this research.

Response: Design of SCI studies to determine effects on locomotor outcome was based on a priori power analysis. We have revised the Methods section (the Statistical Analysis paragraph) to include the description of the underlying power analysis that guided the experimental design). In longitudinal assessments of locomotor recovery, we excluded all data obtained from animals that died or required euthanasia before completion of all assessments (S2 Table).

4. The authors should show individual data points where possible.

Response: Individual data points for Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 have been added.

Rev #2:

1. The only major issue is the extent of Phd1-3 knock out following tamoxifen treatment. While data in Fig 2a indicate that knock out of each of the genes significantly lowers its mRNA expression, the degree of this decrease is very small (10-15%). Statistically significant does not necessarily equal biologically relevant. Since these genes are expressed in other cell types, the authors should check expression in purified oligodendrocytes. It is also possible that expression would be lower at protein rather than mRNA level.

Response: We agree that ensuring high penetration of OL-specific PHD/EGLN deletion is essential for interpretation of our findings shown in Fig. 2. While analyzing PHD expression in purified OLs would be optimal, isolating mature OLs from adult mouse spinal cord is technically challenging (we have unsuccessfully tried that approach using the commercial Miltenyi reagents). Sufficient numbers of intact OLs cannot be isolated from adult mouse spinal cord as the dissociation procedures kill the majority of these cells. Another approach could be immunostaining. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain specific staining with any of the available anti-PHD antibodies. Therefore, for the current revision, we have expanded the qPCR validation of the gene deletions as follows:

- to ensure that Phd/Egln mRNA declines in the spinal cord tissue of tamoxifen-treated mice are consistent, we added additional animals increasing n to10 for the OL-KO group (tamoxifen treated) and to 9 for the WT group (vehicle treated). With those bigger groups, we observed consistent downregulation of spinal cord Phd /Egln transcripts. Moreover, the extent of downregulation was similar between various Phd/Egln isoforms (ranging from 23 to 25% controls). Hence, those findings suggest that (i) gene deletion efficiency was similar for each isoform, (ii) the deletion occurred in most PLP-positive, mature OLs as their estimated spinal cord content is 20-25% and as at least the maximally expressed Phd2/Egln2 appears to be ubiquitously present in all spinal cord cells (Allen Brain Atlas; OL content estimation is based on observations that the total C57Bl6 mouse CNS content of all OL linage cells (including OPCs and mature OLs) does not exceed 30% even in such white matter-rich areas as the brainstem /PMID: 30425626/ and that OPCs make 5-10% of all rodent CNS cells /PMID: 14572468/). Those new data are shown in the revised Fig. 2a. Furthermore, we show no changes in Phd1-3, Epo, and Vegf in the OL-lacking livers of tamoxifen-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (S3 Fig.).

- to further confirm that such mRNA declines represent OL-specific deletion of Phds/Eglns, we also analyzed Phd transcripts in the optic nerve which represents another CNS structure highly enriched for the white matter. Again, Phd/Egln mRNAs were reduced by 25-32% as expected for highly efficient, simultaneous deletion of all 3 genes in mature OLs. Those data are shown in the revised Fig. 2a.

-to ensure biological relevance of those deletions we also analyzed expression of Vegf and Epo which are positively regulated by HIF, the established downstream target of PHDs/EGLNs. In the OL-KO spinal cord, Vegf was up by 27%; in the OL-KO optic nerve, both Vegf and Epo were up by 38 and 39%, respectively. Hence, response of HIF target genes to OL-specific deletions of PHDs/EGLNs further supports efficient and biologically consequential KO of OL PHDs. Lesser response in the spinal cord than the optic nerve is expected as spinal cord neuron cell bodies contain most of spinal cord Epo and Vegf mRNAs under baseline conditions (Allen brain atlas). Hence, neuronal Epo/Vegf mRNAs likely dilute the OL induction of those genes in response to OL-specific deletion of Phds/Eglns.

2. Please specify PHD family members in the introduction including their proper gene names (Egln1-3).

Response: We have defined the PHD family members as PHD1/EGLN1, PHD2/EGLN2, and PHD3/EGLN3 in the introduction as requested.

3. AQ treatments were given for 3 days. Please provide better justification for timing - longer treatment (7-10 days) is often used for SCI.

Response: We performed 2 distinct studies using AQ. In the first study (to collect spinal cord tissue for mRNA analysis at dpi 3), AQ was administered for 3 days with the last administration 2 h before euthanasia and tissue collection. In the second study (to analyze AQ effects on locomotor recovery), the treatment was continued for 7 days. We revised the Methods sections to make that clear.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Wei_Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Kimberly R Byrnes

22 Mar 2021

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition after contusive spinal cord injury does not improve locomotor recovery

PONE-D-20-28946R1

Dear Dr. Hetman,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kimberly R. Byrnes, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I believe that all my concerns from my prior review have been adequately addressed and that all responses meet formatting specifications.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Kimberly R Byrnes

25 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-28946R1

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibition after contusive spinal cord injury does not improve locomotor recovery

Dear Dr. Hetman:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Kimberly R. Byrnes

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. 1H NMR spectrum for the AQ batch used in the current SCI study.

    1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 9.84 (s, 1H), 8.84 (dd, 1H), 8.2–8.4 (m, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H), 7.54 (dd, 1H), 7.3–7.5 (m, 6H), 6.8–6.9 (m, 2H), 6.4–6.5 (m, 2H) matches the spectra of AQ as previously described [56]. Data were recorded on a Varian Unity Inova 500 MHz and chemical shifts are reported in ppm using the solvent as an internal standard (DMSO-d6 at 2.5 ppm).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Validation of biological activity for the AQ batch (AQ /KY/) used in the current SCI study.

    SH-SY5Y ODD-Luc cells were treated with increasing concentrations of AQ (0.1 μM-10 μM) for 3 h. ODD-luciferase activity was determined by luminometry. AQ inhibits HIF prolyl hydroxylase activity and stabilize luciferase fused to the oxygen degradation domain (ODD).

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Effects of OL-specific HIF-PHDs deletion in the OL-lacking liver tissue.

    Tamoxifen (Tam)-treated Plp-creERT2+/+:Egln1/2/3fl/fl mice (n = 4, M:F = 2:2) show no changes in Phd1/Egln1, Phd2/Egln2, Phd3/Egln3, Epo, and Vegf mRNAs (controls received vehicle /Veh/, n = 3, M:F = 2:1).

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Experimental design.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. List of qPCR primers.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Raw BMS score data for individual mice.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Wei_Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant analyzed data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES